Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

Dec. 15, 2022 - Radio Renaissance - Jared Taylor

59:35

Real Scholarship Leaves the Universities

Jared Taylor and his co-host discuss a renegade archaeologist’s eye-opening report. The hosts also discuss idiocy at UVA, America First Legal, Great White Shark Privilege, the Third-World tidal wave, and French double-talk on immigration.

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Ladies and gentlemen, welcome to Radio Renaissance.
	I'm your host, Jared Taylor with American Renaissance, and with me is my irreplaceable, inimitable, and incandescent co-host, none other than Paul Kersey.
	Mr. Kersey, how are you today?
	And before you answer, let me remind you that I know you are brimming with Christmas wishes for our listeners, but we will have yet another podcast before December 25th.
	Well, I was going to not do that, but thanks for sticking with me.
	I will be irascible though, so I won't be a grinch.
	But no, we're very excited to once again have the opportunity to communicate with all of our listeners as we near the end of 2022.
	Yes, indeed.
	Yes, indeed.
	It's been quite a year of ups and downs.
	And next year will be likewise a year of ups and downs, but let's hope more ups than downs.
	And our commenters were thrilled, Mr. Kersey, at the idea that we would run off to Haiti.
	Well, thrilled is perhaps not the right word.
	One commenter says, I would love to go and make a podcast with you all in modern-day Wakanda.
	Another says, Mr. Kersey was begging for a trip to Haiti.
	I'm compelled to doubt his sanity.
	Please tell him I would gladly buy him a ticket, but it would have to be one way.
	Oh no!
	Oh no!
	And then here's another one.
	This is really quite interesting.
	I live in the Dominican Republic.
	I'm responding to your podcast.
	The part about the differences between Haitians and Dominicans is something that hits home.
	I've been a huge fan of Jared Taylor and Paul Kersey and would love to show you people my country and be your tour guide.
	I've never been to Haiti, and honestly, I would discourage you from going there from what I've always been told.
	It's dangerous.
	Could be, but you're a tough guy.
	You could be my bodyguard.
	You know, in some ways it was a joke, but I have always had conversations.
	We've always discussed wanting to go see Port-au-Prince with other people as well.
	Why not?
	There's that great mountain palace fortress that is all in ruins now.
	I think it'd be a great place to go.
	Here's another comment.
	Radio Renaissance of December 6th reported on the U.S.
	Navy's new practice of increasing recruitment by lowering standards to an IQ of about 80.
	In the Vietnam War, Defense Secretary Robert McNamara lowered IQ requirements to 80.
	The result was what's called McNamara's morons.
	These soldiers have been described at Wikipedia and they got themselves into all sorts of trouble.
	They were useless in combat, got themselves shot up.
	Now, says our listener, the Navy has lowered the requirements to McNamara's moron level to find people to run vessels that run under the water, powered by a nuclear reactor, and carry nuclear weapons.
	That's reassuring.
	Here is yet another comment we were just commented to within an inch of our lives this week.
	On your last podcast, it was of great interest to me to hear about Shark Week being racist.
	I'm a licensed merchant marine captain and in the 70s and 80s I tagged sharks for NOAA.
	That's the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration if I've got it right.
	I guess the problem is that the great white shark got more publicity than the brown shark or the dusky shark.
	I'm sure that's the problem.
	The great white, I mean, that's just inherently white supremacist.
	Now, I looked up the dusky shark.
	I'd never heard of the dusky shark.
	It is an ocean predator that can reach up to 400 pounds and it is found in coastal waters worldwide.
	The brown shark, it is one of the biggest coastal sharks and is closely related to the dusky shark.
	Found in tropical to temperate waters worldwide.
	So, Mr. Kersey, they sound like pretty sporty sharks, these dusky and brown sharks.
	Maybe it's true.
	They just don't get no respect, and the white shark has white privilege.
	I wonder if our listener has ever heard of the octoroon shark.
	Hmm.
	Well, I certainly haven't.
	Okay.
	But yet another comment.
	A story ...was called to our attention by a listener who is very familiar with patterns of criminal behavior.
	The story has to do with police in Warner Robins, Georgia, who report that an armed and masked intruder entered an American Philly and Wings restaurant last week, demanded money for an employee before jumping over the counter and pistol whipping the worker.
	The employee eventually managed to pull out his own legally owned pistol, Fired at the attacker three times, striking him twice, whereupon the attacker died of his wounds.
	Now, our listener points out that although there is no mention whatsoever of race, in his experience, and as I say, he's very familiar with patterns of criminal behavior, this business of counter-jumping in the first place is very African American, and so is pistol flipping.
	And if you get a combination Then the chances are just about zero that it could be any other than an African American perp.
	Now, the police go on to warn that robbery and personal larceny tend to increase in December, rising 20 percent as the end of the year approaches.
	I didn't know that.
	And a police spokesman says theft in general does tend to increase around the holidays.
	Now, I suppose these nice people just need emergency funds for their Christmas list.
	And Christmas is expensive when you have 12 children by five different women.
	Now, Mr. Kersey, I believe you have a very important story for us about America First Legal.
	I was quite intrigued by this exercise by Stephen Miller.
	Yeah, this is one of those really good stories that I think we could all say, hey, this is what you call a white pill.
	Yes.
	This is from the Washington Post, which, Mr. Taylor, I'm sure you were as sad as I am to find out that they're going to have to lay off a significant amount of their staff today.
	They had an all-hands meeting for the employees of the Washington Post, Jeff Bezos' Democracy Dies in Darkness paper.
	They've lost 500,000 subscribers.
	So, anyways.
	I weep bitter tears.
	Yes.
	We will be weeping no tears over this story, how a Trump-allied group fighting anti-white bigotry beats Biden in court.
	America First Legal was founded last year by Stephen Miller, who is credited as the architect of Trump's immigrant family separation policy.
	The deal in early 2021 was hailed by advocates for black farmers as the most significant piece of legislation Act of 1964, about $4 billion in President Biden's massive pandemic stimulus package to rectify decades of discrimination.
	This discrimination, by the way, we published a debunking article on that years ago.
	This idea that black farmers have been suffering discrimination at the hands of the American bureaucracy is utter and complete nonsense.
	But that's the story that we're supposed to believe.
	I beg your pardon, please.
	Well, and this has just been an absolute outrageous payday for so many blacks.
	It started with this guy named Pigford.
	The Pigford case and everything that has come since from the Department of Agriculture is just an outrage.
	I beg your pardon.
	I leapt in without invitation.
	You're always invited.
	Minority farmers began investing in machinery and other improvements, anticipating tens of thousands of dollars in government aid.
	But today, the landmark deal on behalf of historically disadvantaged farmers is dead, successfully challenged in court by a fledgling conservative organization.
	That's kind of a nasty adjective.
	I don't think they're fledgling.
	That argued the program racially discriminated against white farmers.
	And by the way, white was capitalized in that sentence.
	America First Legal, headed by Stephen Miller.
	He's the architect of President Donald Trump's crackdown on illegal immigrants.
	He's also from California. While AFL lacks the name recognition and financial heft of many
	conservative counterparts, it's racked up notable court victories over the Biden administration,
	which leaves you to wonder what a lot of these conservative law firms are, you know,
	legal groups are actually doing to fight on behalf of their donors. That's my opinion, of course.
	Casting itself as quotes.
	That's an excellent question.
	And it just goes to show you that they've been doing essentially nothing.
	Here are these golden opportunities to step in and actually ask for equal treatment for whites.
	And all of these multimillion dollar funded, tens of million dollar funded beltway organizations are sitting on their hands.
	Yeah, you have to just look at what the Heritage Foundation has in their endowment and the money they're sitting on.
	I mean, what exactly have they advocated for except for, to quote the great Gregory Hood, tax cuts for our enemies.
	Casting itself as, quote, the long-awaited answer to the ACLU, AFL has weaponized the grievance politics embodied by Trump's Make America Great Again movement through dozens of federal lawsuits challenging efforts to remedy racial disparities, support LGBTQ students, and expand the pool of early voters.
	AFL-backed suits helped doom a $29 billion program that prioritized struggling female and minority-owned restaurants last year.
	And last week, a council created by the Department of Education that conservative parent groups viewed as partisan.
	AFL has won in part by consistently filing lawsuits in a conservative-friendly judicial district in Texas.
	It's called SMART.
	Well, it's called jurisdiction shopping, and the left does it all the time.
	Yes, they do.
	And taking advantage of a larger federal court system revamped by Trump's predominantly conservative nominees.
	There's a lot to unpack there.
	say Trump's predominantly white conservative nominees, but oh well.
	The group's success is alarming.
	Civil rights advocates who fear Miller has figured out how to harness the courts to protect
	America's declining white majority and unravel government policies intended to right historical
	wrongs against marginalized communities.
	So in that sense, there's a lot to unpack there.
	There's a lot to unpack in this article, Mr. Taylor.
	Again it's admitting the great replacement is happening and then simultaneously admitting,
	wow, there are a lot of policies that are going to help out non-whites exclusively at
	the expense of white people in a country where you're not supposed to have a government that
	prioritizes or favors one race over another.
	Go ahead.
	Well, of course, every time they say that these are Making up for some kind of past misbehavior on the part of whites.
	What they're doing is they are actually officially singling out whites for negative treatment.
	They're talking about making up for past injustices.
	This is perpetrating very vivid present injustices, no matter what they say.
	Yeah, especially when you consider just the amount of venom and vitriol that Young white students have to face in public school at this point, their entire K-12 education.
	And then when they get to college, grad school, it's even more in your face and more alarming as to righting historical wrongs by just a racial grievance industry that really knows no depth to where it can go.
	But that's why they're so afraid of what Miller's doing, because he's fighting back effectively.
	Quote, many of these lawsuits are centered on making sure that white people remain in control and continue to benefit from underprivileges and on maintaining the systemic discriminatory policies that have harmed black people and other people of color for generations.
	Yeah, I'm going to interrupt you one last time, but that's the way they characterize any demand that the race be treated equally.
	I think that sentence is worth reading again.
	Yes, please.
	So this is a quote, ladies and gentlemen, from David Hinojosa, an attorney with the Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights Under Law.
	This is his quote.
	Here we go.
	Quote, many of these lawsuits are centered on making sure that white people remain in control and continue to benefit from unearned privileges and on maintaining the systemic discriminatory policies that have harmed black people and other people of color for generations.
	To argue that white men are being pushed to the back of the line is unfounded and ridiculous.
	Excuse me.
	What they're being asked to do is share a place in line with other people who do not look like them.
	End quote.
	Unpack it, Mr. Taylor.
	The door is wide open for you to enter.
	You know, it hardly needs unpacking at all.
	If you say the races have to be treated equally, then white people are accused of wanting to maintain unearned privilege, of supporting white supremacy, of supporting discrimination against others.
	They've turned logic, morality, and even the English language entirely on its head.
	But they're good at that.
	Yeah, well, wanting to be colorblind and actually have fairness.
	Again, that's wanting to maintain systemic discriminatory policies.
	SDP in their eyes.
	So, wow.
	Okay, I guess we know that the proverbial MLK dream, it's just you're perpetuating systemic discriminatory policies that will haunt blacks and other POC.
	Better go blow up his statue.
	Hey.
	Oh, I didn't say that.
	No.
	I could probably be arrested.
	Yeah, because he's advocating for, you know, systemic discriminatory policies.
	His, you know, gosh, they should, just like they just exhumed the last Confederate memorial in Richmond and even dug up the guy's body.
	Was it A.P.
	Hill who they just got rid of?
	Yes.
	Yes.
	That's what happened to MLK's statue there in D.C.
	In an interview, Miller said AFL is filling a void in the conservative legal movement by challenging what he termed Quote, a hyper-racialization of American political and corporate life, end quote.
	Programs seeking to remedy past injustices and boost historically disadvantaged groups are punishing people based on their skin color, he said.
	Quote, I believe that the equity agenda represents one of the single greatest threats to the survival of our constitutional system.
	End quote, Miller said.
	The group's mission was fueled by more than $6.3 million in donations last year.
	Gosh, just imagine what, if they were able to double their budget, what they could actually achieve in terms of not only scaring the left and these civil rights organizations, but in actually stopping and rendering impotent a lot of these just obviously anti-white agendas and programs.
	I mean, that's basically what we're up against.
	It's actually kind of shocking, Mr. Taylor, that Elon Musk hasn't seen some of the things they're doing and said, hey, I'd be happy to chip in some money, knowing that his Tesla was, I think they were sued for some ridiculous amount in California because some janitor got called an N-word by another black employee, if memory serves correct.
	That's right.
	That created a hostile work environment that was worth compensation in the millions of dollars.
	Yeah.
	So just to finish up the story, and I encourage all of our listeners to go and read this Washington Post story.
	In the lead up to the midterm election, AFL also bankrolled a multi-million dollar ad campaign That included inflammatory radio and TV spots demanding an end to anti-white bigotry and accusing the White House businesses and universities of discriminating against white people.
	Again, you and I have stated, I believe this is the most effective and the most white killing ad in my lifetime.
	Now, I've only been on this earth for about three decades, but again, that's telling you something that this ad really scared the left.
	As soon as you point out reality, that's being inflammatory.
	And I've always said Stephen Miller was the best white man in the entire administration.
	I don't know, maybe he would share honors with Jeff Sessions, but certainly in the White House, he was the staunchest and the best.
	Well, moving on, I've got a few things to say about University of Virginia, I suppose, because it's just right down the road from where I live.
	It is, of course, the flagship University campus in the Virginia state system, and it happens to have a statue of Homer on the lawn.
	I wasn't aware of that.
	Mr. Taylor, if I could, just at University of Virginia, I think you may have said West Virginia.
	Oh, did I say West Virginia?
	Oh, heavens.
	Nope, nope, nope.
	Well, there go the marbles.
	Three at a time.
	Yes, University of Virginia, UVA.
	Well, in October, an unidentified man hung a noose in what police say was a hate crime.
	The police released a photo from the video showing a white man in a dark jacket walking away from the area.
	Well, the young Democratic Socialist of America chapter at UVA protested racism and white supremacy, of course.
	And Democratic Socialist chair and UVA student Ella Tinch, one of our African-Americanist, She says you can't increase surveillance and policing of students to address the problem of white supremacy when these systems are the result of white supremacy in the first place.
	So nothing apparently can be done.
	One black UVA student organizer said, for black men and black women here on this campus and in this country, our life is always threatened.
	There's always a noose around our neck.
	Well, in that case, why bother to notice?
	Why make a big deal about another one?
	But then a representative from the Charlottesville Beyond Policing Community Organization predicted the UVA will call for increased police presence on campus, which will harm black people and those who have been historically underrepresented and under-resourced.
	Now, that's a new expression to me.
	Under-resourced.
	Now they're under-resourced.
	But apparently there's nothing you can do.
	If you step up police presence, they'll just go running around shooting black people anyway, so no harm can possibly be done.
	Well, needless to say, needless to say, the police opened an investigation immediately, working with local and FBI agents to identify a suspect and bring charges.
	I just love it when the FBI gets called in for a piece of rope found someplace.
	They've got nothing better to do, those guys.
	Well, for months, they got no leads.
	Until one, until finally, an Albemarle County man, that's the county where UVA is located, a fellow by the name of Shane Daniels, essentially turned himself in.
	He left a Christian cross, a sealed envelope, and inside the envelope, a letter contending that the statue in which Homer is sitting next to a naked boy, glorifies pedophilia.
	And the letter had nothing to do with any kind of racial or religious references.
	So, it had absolutely nothing to do with black people.
	This guy is against pedophilia, and he thought the statue was promoting pedophilia, because there's Homer, Homer the blind poet, with a little naked boy next to him.
	And the president of the university, after this guy was captured, he wrote to say, we are grateful To so many people who assisted with this investigation.
	Well, the investigation turned up with nothing until this guy essentially turned himself in.
	Now, the question I have is, do blacks or the administrators ever feel ridiculous about saying all of these awful things about white people, about how they live with nooses around their necks all the time, and it had nothing to do with them?
	I feel sure they never feel ridiculous.
	And that reminds you, we talked about this story also back in August, Rocks had been thrown through a window at the Black Cultural Center, causing much anguish, much indignation among the African-American community.
	And the university police department, a month later, announced it had a suspect.
	And the college fix was on top of this.
	This is really a pretty good website.
	They, I mean, there's so much nonsense on campus to write about that they have just an absolute embarrassment of riches for material.
	But they repeatedly went to the media relations office, the campus police department, asked for some kind of report on what the race of this suspect was.
	Because when they don't announce it immediately, you sort of always know.
	And the FICS also called the communication department months later, left voicemail, went to the Office of African American Affairs, local NAACP, Everybody knew, but everybody said nothing.
	Well, it of course turned out, finally, in December, months later, the police report identified, and now I have to pronounce this word, Mr. Kersey, you tried last time, now it's my problem, now it's my turn to butcher it, but as I say, I'm going to give it a real proper halal butchering, Zaynab bint Abdudal Hadijakian, okay, and bint Abdudal Doggone.
	Bintabdu Harijakian.
	I think that's pretty close.
	It's hyphenated.
	She is the person.
	And there's a photograph of her.
	She does wear a headscarf and she is very melanin enhanced.
	And this had nothing whatsoever to do with anything.
	It was not a white person, but apparently this person had a grudge against the director of the center, Michael Mason, for reasons that have not been disclosed.
	Now, as I say, of course, they immediately released the race of the guy who put the Homer thing, put the statue, put the noose on the Homer statue.
	And then one final little thing.
	Back in 2020, this is not something I believe I recall our reporting on, Mr. Kersey, but you who remember everything may be in a position to correct me.
	They opened a new expanded multicultural center.
	And this expanded space built by the university is a place to embrace and support diversity.
	Had been open for only four days when an irate black student hopped up and blasted her white classmates for taking advantage of the school's center.
	And she says, and this was caught on video, excuse me, if y'all don't know, this is a multicultural student center and there are just too many white people in here and this is a space for people of color.
	So just be cognizant of the space that you're taking up because it does make some of us POCs uncomfortable when we see too many white people in here.
	There's the whole university for y'all and there are very few spaces for us.
	So keep that in mind, said she.
	Well, At this point, the university officials released a statement by UVA President Jim Ryan.
	Of course, there were no repercussions for this lady who wanted to kick out all the white people.
	a great and good place.
	These centers are open to all members of the university community.
	Of course, there were no repercussions for this lady who wanted to kick out all the white
	people.
	And then finally, to wrap up this perhaps excessively long commentary on the sins of
	UVA, just last November 13, Christopher Darnell Jones, another African-American student and
	a former member of the Virginia football team.
	He is he's facing counts of second degree murder after he shot and killed three members of the football team and wounded two others.
	He was reported the university's threat assessment in the fall of this year for possession of a gun.
	He was involved in prior criminal incidents outside of Charlottesville in February 2021 involving concealed weapons.
	All of his victims were black.
	But, this apparently, there was no harrumphing about hate crimes.
	I guess there's nothing to worry about about hate here because it was black people, and black people don't hate anyone ever.
	In the meantime, I thought it was interesting that the three dead students have been awarded posthumous degrees.
	I'm not, you know, I don't know why they offered that.
	I think Trayvon Martin, didn't he get a posthumous degree too?
	He looks good in that resume.
	Yes, I guess it does, you know, when you show up at the pearly gates.
	I don't know.
	I guess it's just one way to kiss their dead feet.
	Now, here's another story that I thought was really quite significant and interesting from a British author writing about the situation in Britain of the discipline of archaeology.
	For many of us, anonymity has allowed us to pursue our passion for scholarly research in a way that is simply impossible within the censorious confines of modern academia.
	And so, in these hidden places on the internet, professional geneticists, bioarchaeologists, and physical anthropologists have created a network of counter-research.
	Detailed and rigorous work is conducted away from prying eyes.
	Many, like myself, are junior researchers or PhD dropouts, people with one foot in the door, but who recognize how precarious academic jobs are.
	Most humanities disciplines veer to the left, but archaeology is the outlier.
	Instead, it is now in the middle of an upheaval, one that will have deeply troubling consequences.
	In the past, he writes, it was possible to argue that changes in the material record in Britain, that is to say objects and artifacts, pottery, metal tools, craft objects, clothing, reflected some kind of passive or diffuse spread of technologies and fashions.
	But that's no longer the case.
	In other words, there was some sort of really, I don't know, stylish kind of clothing that just worked its way across the world because it was just so obviously stylish.
	Now, he says, that that is clearly nonsense.
	In 2018, a paper proved this was fundamentally wrong.
	In fact, nearly 90% of the population of Britain was replaced in a short period, corresponding to the movement of the Bell Beaker people into Britain and the subsequent disappearance of its previous Neolithic inhabitants.
	In other words, these stylish clothes and these tricky tools don't just come by themselves.
	They come because the conquerors brought them.
	We know this because careful genetic work shows the new arrivals were different people of different DNA.
	For years, the very idea of an invasion of Germanic peoples had been downplayed.
	The idea that ancient peoples organized themselves along ethnic and tribal lines is taboo.
	You can't dare say it happened.
	Obvious statements of common sense, such as the existence of patriarchy, are constantly challenged.
	In other words, the people in the past were just as wishy-washy and namby-pamby as we were.
	Added to this is the ever-present fear that studies and results are being used by the wrong people.
	In a 2019 journal called Genetics, Archaeology, and the Far Right, an Unholy Trinity, Suzanne Hackenbeck expressed grave concern that recent genetics works on the early Bronze Age invasions of the Indo-European steppe people are needlessly giving oxygen to dangerous ideas.
	Namely, that young men from one ethnic group might have migrated from the Pontic Caspian grasslands
	and violently subdued their neighbors, passing on their paternal DNA
	at the expense of the native males.
	What an idea, Mr. Kersey.
	What an idea.
	We just can't believe that.
	Crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentation of their women.
	Yes, as you rape their wives and their daughters.
	Didn't Genghis Khan say something?
	There was no greater joy than slaughtering your enemies and taking by force their wives and daughters.
	Yeah, the line that I just did was from Conan the Barbarian, John Milius's magnum opus.
	Well, it's a very old idea.
	In any case, This guy goes on to say, well, she says, we are being offered an appealingly simple narrative of a past shaped by virile young men going out to conquer.
	Oh, we can't have that.
	And another historian by the name of Wolf Liebeschutz and archaeologist Sebastian Brather.
	And he says, this is to pick just two of a whole host of people.
	They firmly insisted that archaeology must not and cannot be used to trace migrations or identify different ethnic groups in prehistory.
	And at a stroke, this line of reasoning essentially abolishes several centuries of work.
	But this is precisely the point.
	By depriving archaeology of the ability to point to when and where different groups emerged and moved, there can be no rest to the nationalist mill.
	And I thought this is a great line here.
	Queer Vikings, transgender skeletons, female warriors.
	Not a week goes by without some new claim that today's morality has always been the norm.
	You know, ordinary people understand that this is just so cuckoo, but these so-called professionals are trying to make us believe stuff that is obviously insane.
	And he also writes about the infamous Cheddar Man fiasco.
	Do you remember that?
	That this Mesolithic hunter-gatherer was identified by geneticists.
	I think he was seven or eight thousand years old.
	They got his DNA out and they concluded he had black skin.
	Do you remember that?
	I barely do, yeah.
	Oh, the lefties were so happy, and they had these artist's conceptions of this guy.
	He had more or less Caucasian features, but with this cold black skin.
	Oh, that's right, that's right, that's right.
	Yes.
	Well, the fact that he had a black skin, this was supposed to be deduced from the genes, but this claim was quietly retracted afterwards.
	But it was weaponized for supporters of mass immigration to make the rhetorical claim that Britain has always been a nation of immigrants.
	And now, he says, a young man entering full-time research interested in warfare, conflict, the origins of different peoples, how borders and boundaries have changed over time, narratives of conquest or expansion, such a person would find himself stymied at every turn, regarded with great suspicion, And that is why anonymous internet accounts and blogs are the only places where archaeologists are free to roam across different disciplines, connecting the dots between mortuary archaeology, languages, and religions in a way modern scholars simply cannot.
	I think, now I've taken time to read a lot of this material, but I think it's very important.
	What this guy is essentially saying, real scholarship doesn't take place in universities anymore.
	Those plays are so stifled and muffled and blinded that people with good common sense ideas or people simply who want to follow what the evidence tells you have no place.
	I think that's really a significant statement about all sorts of social science, especially anything to do or could conceivably have to do with race.
	Well, there's a great essay I'd like to encourage all of our listeners to go check out by Greg Hood.
	About that Netflix series that's being attacked, the Graham Hancock series, because it dares bring up some unfortunate truths that the left doesn't like that much.
	Well, to me, this is even more significant because doesn't that, if I'm thinking of the Gregory Hood article that you are, it has to do with some of the myths about Atlantis and otherwise.
	It's about ancient civilizations.
	I can't remember the title of Fingertips of the Gods or something.
	I actually read that book back in college and was mesmerized by it.
	I thought it was quite good.
	We're in 2022.
	But again, any time, I mean, the left is, the left, again, it's, they can, I mean, again,
	if Shark Week is racist, Mr. Taylor, where exactly are we?
	I mean, I mean, we're in 2022.
	We're in the current year.
	Any abvocation is considered racist if it disproportionately is liked or populated by
	white people.
	It's that simple.
	That's all you need to know.
	That's the Cliff Notes of 2022.
	Well, tell me, you had proposed what strikes me as an extremely important story about this immigration tidal wave coming across the southern border.
	Yeah, Daily Mail article.
	And I do apologize, part of the headline got knocked off.
	I'm not sure why, but Astonishingly, it's about to get easier to enter the U.S., and said Todd Binsman, future generations will never forget the moment the hurricane hits.
	Excuse me, I had to take a sip of water before we get started here.
	Now, this appeared in the Daily Mail.
	This is a newspaper, an online resource that you and I have constantly stated is perhaps the best newspaper in the country, in the world.
	It's out of England.
	They're constantly doing Great things when it comes to race, when it comes to this type of subject matter that American papers just don't cover.
	Exactly.
	So Todd Binsman, he's the author of, quote, Overrun, How Joe Biden Unleashed the Greatest Border Crisis in U.S.
	History, end quote.
	So every record in the annals of mass migration lay shattered after nearly two years of President Joe Biden's negligent stewardship of the American southern border.
	Yet unimaginably, in about a week's time, it's going to get catastrophically worse.
	Total known illegal border crossings stand at a record-breaking 4.4 million.
	4.4 million.
	I'm going to say that one more time.
	4.4 million.
	Since President Biden's inauguration, with another 1.5 estimated gotaways, believed to have slipped into the country undetected.
	I mean, is that the population of It's more the population of pretty much every state, right?
	Well, there's several states with far fewer people than that.
	Exactly.
	Yes.
	It's like the population of Wyoming, Alaska, Montana, Idaho.
	Yeah, just anyways, unbelievable numbers.
	Interior deportations are at the lowest number ever, and the percentage of global nationalities crossing is at the highest percentage ever.
	Still this pandemonium of 7,000 to 9,000 illegal crossers caught every single day.
	200,000 plus every single month for two straight years.
	Mr. Taylor, dear listener, it's just a Category 3 hurricane on the mass migration scale.
	A Category 5 is barreling down on the United States, a Hurricane Katrina, with the scheduled December 21st lifting of Title 42, the one last real impediment to a next level crisis far beyond not just the American experience, but that of every nation in the developed world.
	Think about that for a second.
	Except the East Asian ones.
	I'd say the Japanese are developed, the Koreans are developed, the Taiwanese are developed.
	They're not facing this.
	Only white people put up with this.
	Correct.
	If U.S.
	intelligence estimates ought to be believed, a previously unthinkable storm is gathering just off America's borders, portending a potentially permanent transformative impact on the country, i.e.
	Accelerating the Great Replacement and bearing a last-minute unlikely appeal by the Biden administration to delay the elimination of Title 42, America's forecast to take a direct hit, capsizing not just the Superdome but the entire country.
	Up for court-ordered demolition this month is Title 42, the pandemic control statute that, since March of 2020, has allowed U.S.
	Border Patrol to quickly expel most crossers back to Mexico.
	And more importantly in doing so, deny them access to a highly defraudable asylum system.
	This failed asylum system hamstrings deportation and mainlines illegal immigrants straight into America pretty much forever because they just don't show up for their hearings for the low, low cost of a tale of woe that need never be proven.
	And Todd Binsman writes, don't take my word for it.
	I have to be honest about the asylum laws and processing.
	Former Obama DHS Secretary Jeh Johnson recently told Face the Nation, it takes six years right now to process an asylum claim once someone has entered into this country.
	One of the problems is that the bar to qualify initially is relatively low, Jeh Johnson continued.
	Something like 70% of migrants qualify who seek it and ultimate qualification for asylum And the ultimate qualification for asylum, excuse me, is the percentage there is about 20% and there's six years in between.
	Let me repeat what Johnson's remarks emphasize.
	Binsman writes, 70% of migrants seeking asylum are allowed into America.
	Only 20% are eventually granted asylum.
	Migrants know this, and so we've got to develop a system where we can get, where we can more expeditiously deal with these claims.
	Jay Johnson concluded, I know my friends on the left won't be too happy to hear that.
	Well, we know that There aren't any friends on the left toward us, by the way.
	U.S.
	asylum is at the root of this crisis because the simple act of claiming asylum at the border allows largely ineligible economic migrants to forestall mandatory detention and deportation and a backlog line of years long.
	It also enables those who immediately abandon their claims or eventually lose their asylum cases to simply disappear into a increasingly unrecognizable country.
	Well, one of the first things you said, the numbers of illegal entrants are at an overwhelmingly record figures, whereas the interior deportations are lower than ever.
	That's crushing us from both sides here.
	We let them all in and we don't get rid of them.
	Yep, that's exactly right.
	Didn't they have further figures about 1,000 people crossing in one town in one day?
	This is a gruesome article.
	Yes, it's gruesome.
	That's the right word for it.
	I'm going to quickly take a look at the article here to find that.
	Yeah, possibly the largest illegal migrant group in history.
	More than 1,000 from Cuba, Venezuela, and Nicaragua waded across a river into El Paso, Texas.
	Just this past Sunday night, I've seen the video.
	It's available on YouTube.
	It's available on Elon Musk's Twitter.
	He actually commented on it and said this is terrible.
	Oh, good.
	So, on Twitter, and he said this is just shocking to see.
	And, you know, as he's basically declaring his war on wokeness as the greatest threat to not just colonizing Mars, but the future of civilization, I would argue, and I hope that all of our listeners will on Twitter tell Mr. Musk, Title 42 and this coming cataclysmic that Binsman writes about, this is going to keep us from ever getting, well, SpaceX to even work, let alone get to Mars, if we don't have a country that can properly have science and not diversity, equity and inclusion as the highest goal.
	Well, I mean, eventually there won't even be clean running water or electricity.
	I remember in 1994, at the very first American Renaissance Conference, predicting, what's the next city that's going to have undrinkable drinking water?
	Well, Flint, Michigan showed up.
	This is the future.
	Things are just going to cease working when you replace a first world population with a third world population.
	And as we joked about in 2022, again, there were a lot of stories that were just, they were just mind blowing.
	But you mentioned that story in the episode where we talked about Jackson, Mississippi, not even having running water.
	So that's where we are.
	Yep.
	Well, France is going through something similar, and this article really points out some of the terrible contradictions, some of the terrible internal psychological obstacles that white nations face.
	It says, French President Emmanuel Macron is set to make a second attempt at increasing expulsions of illegal immigrants under fierce pressure from far-right opponents.
	He's got a new draft immigration law.
	He says, we want people who work, not people who rob.
	Well, OK, Emmanuel, that's a good start.
	But Prime Minister Elizabeth Borne, that's his lady prime minister, opened debate in the National Assembly by saying the law would allow France to say who we want and who we don't.
	Now, then she says zero immigration is neither desirable nor possible.
	Well, hold on, hold on.
	I think it's desirable.
	But if you say zero immigration is not possible, you're admitting that you can't control your borders.
	She says zero immigration is no more realistic than unregulated immigration.
	Well, wait a minute.
	Unregulated immigration is completely realistic.
	It's happening throughout the West.
	Interior Minister Gerald Darmanin And Emmanuel Macron have linked immigration to delinquency in recent weeks.
	Well, did they finally wake up to this?
	Both of them saying that about half of petty crime committed in Paris is by foreigners.
	How about major crime, boys?
	Macron pitched the new legislation as a means to address the historic rise of the far-right National Rally.
	That is Marine Le Pen's party, which in June became the biggest opposition party in Parliament.
	Now, wait a minute.
	Isn't this something you do because you really need to do it because it's worth doing?
	Or is it because the national rally is stealing your voters?
	I mean, good grief.
	He says, we need a policy that is firm and humane in line with our values.
	It's the best antidote to the extremes that feed off anxieties.
	In other words, he's talking about Marine Le Pen.
	He's not doing it for the good of the country.
	He's doing it because Marine Le Pen is breathing down his throat.
	This sounds like something that could be written about the United States.
	France currently expels about 10% of illegals who have been ordered to leave the country, and the rate has never been higher than 20%.
	So they go through all the trouble of exhausting the appeals, and they say, you gotta go, and then nine of them get to stay.
	That's France for you.
	Yeah, unfortunately, the numbers, unfortunately, Or I should say, fortunately for France, Mr. Taylor, it's not cataclysmic numbers like 4 to 6 million people like we have.
	20% of 400,000 is a lot less than 20% of 4 to 6 million that we have.
	I bet in terms of the size of the national population, they are facing a tidal wave that is probably pretty similar to ours.
	But you could be correct.
	We'd have to look at the numbers in detail to see.
	But the country's legal appeals process, procedural delays, and a lack of resources are seen as reasons for this low expulsion rate, which Interior Minister Darmanin has pledged to increase.
	The new draft legislation would reduce the number of appeals possible for failed asylum seekers from 12 to 3.
	They can go through 12 appeals.
	This is staggering.
	Yes.
	I mean, it sounds like you could have grandchildren by the time you get through all these 12 appeals.
	Like many European countries, France struggles to persuade the nations in North and West Africa to readmit their citizens once they're subject to an expulsion order.
	This too is crazy.
	There is a very easy way to force them to do that.
	You can say, look, None of your people are coming here.
	We're granting no visas.
	We're stopping any kind of travel, with visa or without, from your country unless you take these swine back.
	But, oh no, no, they won't take them back, so they've got to stay.
	You know, the British have this problem too.
	Oh, the Ethiopians won't take them back, the Somalis won't take them back, so this rapist murderer's got to stay.
	Now, French far-right leader, as they call her, far-right leader, Marine Le Pen, who got 41% in the second round of April's presidential election, She often accuses the government of submerging France with foreigners.
	In her third bid for the presidency, she proposed changing the Constitution via referendum to set strict immigration targets and ensure that French people get priority over foreigners for all state services.
	Imagine that.
	France for the French.
	Then she says, and this is very realistic, I don't expect anything from this new law.
	They will talk to us again about balancing firmness and humanity.
	We've heard that for decades.
	Nothing will change.
	Immigration in our country is out of control.
	And, she notes, France has passed 29 different laws on immigration since 1980.
	I wonder how many we have.
	I bet the number's not nearly as high.
	Now, of course, there was that gruesome murder of a 12-year-old schoolgirl in Paris in October.
	Whose body parts were severed for some, I don't know, it seemed like some sort of ritualistic purpose.
	This caused a major political scandal after it emerged that her killer was an Algerian woman who had been ordered to leave the country.
	She was one of those 9 out of 10 who, despite an order to get lost, stuck around so she could kill little 12-year-old schoolgirls.
	The new law would remove safeguards for foreigners who arrived in France as children, making it easier to expel them if they are convicted I had a feeling that was it.
	is a measure designed to tackle teenage delinquency.
	And there'll be measures, on the other hand, to offer work permits to foreign workers
	with skills required in particular sectors of the economy.
	And guess which is the sector of the economy in which they're most badly needed?
	Mr. Kersey, I'll answer that question.
	It's those employed illegally in the restaurant sector.
	Those are the ones where- I had a feeling that was it.
	Yep, you know the answer to that stuff.
	Yep.
	Cheap labor, yeah.
	That's right.
	A lot of labor needed at Michelin star rated restaurants with some Michelin star shops, right?
	Indeed.
	And they don't have to speak French and they don't have to have any kind of religion
	that is compatible with the West.
	But boy, if they're willing to wash dishes and bust tables, boy, do we need them.
	Now, this is also part of it, too.
	People from 15 different charities and some left-wing MPs demonstrated in front of the National Assembly to denounce what they termed the hostile attitude of the government to migration.
	In other words, if you actually expel people who are deemed expellable, if you actually try to persuade the countries of origin to take them back, You are hostile and you have to be denounced.
	These are people, just like that Hinojosa guy that you quoted in that article from CIS, they basically seem to think, come one, come all, makes no difference, makes no difference.
	Yes, our countries are up for grabs.
	Yeah, they are, they are, and that's what these stories that help our listeners all across the Western world, and even our listener in the Dominican Republic who wanted us to, who warned us about going to Haiti.
	You guys, this is, we are seeing so many changes before our eyes, and You know, in the lifetime of a lot of our listeners, it's unbelievable, the apocalyptic changes that have already taken place.
	And, you know, I went to Paris back in 1999, and I was in London that same year.
	There were different places.
	I mean, I believe now in London, white Britons are a considerable minority, correct?
	Aren't they under 40?
	That's correct.
	And there are no statistics.
	I believe that the French don't allow statistics for cities, correct, on race?
	There are no official statistics because, theoretically, all Frenchmen are French.
	That's not supposed to make a bit of a difference.
	But back to this French situation, the polls say that 8 in 10 French people think Macron's government has failed to control immigration.
	Well, of course, they're right.
	And polls have repeatedly shown this year that 7 in 10 think there are too many foreigners in France.
	So, when the people themselves have an opportunity to talk, they don't want any more of these people.
	There are already too many.
	Seven in ten.
	And that probably includes some of the non-whites who are already here.
	I wonder what just the white French would say about that.
	So here you have that.
	No, this is this is what this is what our rulers call our democracy.
	Our democracy is when a small number of elite people who think they know better get to decide for us and the people themselves what we think.
	Ooh, that doesn't make a bit of difference.
	But a couple of short little pieces here and on the subject of everything is racist.
	Marta Schaeffer.
	She's a California English teacher who teaches her students that grammar is white supremacy.
	Her goal is, in her words, to undermine that BS.
	She uses social media posts on TikTok to sell to an even wider audience the idea that proper grammar and syntax is entrenched white supremacy.
	She says she teaches rules that we actually use to communicate instead of the made-up rules that white supremacy created.
	I didn't realize that grammar—I mean, I guess if there were no non-whites, would it still be white supremacist?
	It's hard to—I can't figure it out.
	These rules are—they've been around a long time.
	In any case, she advocates academic essays written in African-American vernacular English, known as AAVE.
	But Mr. Kersey, whatever happened to Ebonics?
	We don't hear about that anymore.
	We don't hear much about Ebonics, or Kwanzaa for that matter.
	Happy Kwanzaa, listeners!
	That's good.
	You know, you're right.
	Kwanzaa was really the thing, and I bet the U.S.
	is going to put out another postage stamp, but Kwanzaa really has faded away, hasn't it?
	That's a very good point, along with Ebonics.
	I guess they're off in the same grave.
	And then, you know, the New York Times, it was on strike last Thursday.
	And News Guild Chief Susan DiCarava, and despite that sort of classy sounding Italian name, she is an African Americanist.
	She's the chief of the News Guild.
	She says Times employees, the employee reviews, discriminate against black people because, as it turns out, they don't get evaluations that are as high as white people.
	So that's ifso facto discrimination.
	And she says, They are weighted against employees of color.
	She says no black employee at the New York Times has ever received the highest rating possible.
	So that that's just obvious discrimination, right?
	Now, to me, the idea that I bet the people who evaluate the black workers, the New York Times are absolutely terrified and they probably give them All sorts of inflated ratings for fear of being accused of racism, but that's the problem at the New York Times, so they're going out on strike.
	Now, here's a bit of good news.
	A county board in Virginia, this is Matthews County, is moving ahead with plans to deed the public land under a Confederate statue on the historic courthouse green to a private preservation group.
	And that would prevent the statue from being taken down in the future if there's a change in the law and the government in some sense, either city or local, says it's got to go down.
	And so what they're trying to do is to carve out a 21 foot by 22 foot plot of public land under the statue to make it available to a private group that would love and cherish and protect the statue.
	Now the NAACP is screeching, of course, and in a way I don't blame them because that was the ruse that was used in Memphis to take down the statue of Nathan Bedford Forrest.
	As required, there was a Tennessee state law that forbade publicly owned statues from coming down.
	In this case, the Virginia people are anticipating a day when the government would say publicly owned statues can come down.
	So at least they're thinking way ahead and they're going to say, oh, it's going to be privately owned and so it can stay up.
	In the case of Memphis, they jiggered the deal so it was privately owned and it was taken down.
	They sold the land, this central, very valuable land in the middle of Memphis to some black group for $3,000 or some nominal price.
	Now it's private.
	Now we can take down Nathan Bedford Forrest.
	So these dodges can go both ways.
	And now I know, Mr. Kersey, That you haven't been paying much attention to... Oh my gosh, our time is nearly up.
	Wow, we got so many more stories to do.
	We flew through this one.
	Golly, yes.
	Well, I pay attention to the World Cup because it is such an interesting expression of different kinds of nationalism.
	And after Morocco's victory over Portugal in the World Cup, 20,000 people in the Champs-Élysées in Paris.
	They were throwing bricks and bottles and shooting fireworks at the police.
	These are Moroccans, of course.
	France has got a large number of Moroccans.
	And they were celebrating the victory over Portugal, which is really a pretty high-powered, one of the favorites, to win.
	A thousand police were mobilized.
	And by evening, several main roads leading into Paris had to be closed because there was such chaos.
	And in the French city of Lille, police were attacked by Moroccan fans.
	They rolled trash bins into police lines, threw things at them.
	Police responded with stun grenades and tear gas.
	In Avignon, there's a video of Moroccan fans looting a truck, and it's unclear if any arrests were made.
	In Roubaix, Moroccan fans jumped on top of police vehicles and danced on their roofs while officers tried to drive through the crowd.
	And the same thing has happened, of course, in Belgium, the Netherlands and Spain.
	When the Moroccans win, they run wild.
	But the French are now very worried because the French national team is set to play Morocco.
	That's going to be, well, that's today, December 14th, isn't it?
	I don't know if that game has already been played yet.
	Maybe you can look it up while we talk.
	Oh, that game has been played.
	It has been played.
	France beat Morocco 2-0, and I think you'd actually have to ask yourself if you watched the game which team was actually the African nation.
	Yes, yes.
	These European teams, it's just pathetic.
	But as one, let's see, there is a fellow who studies discrimination against the Arab populations.
	He's talking about the fact that Morocco took down three colonial European nations in 10 days.
	That was Spain and Portugal.
	And what was the other?
	I don't follow it close enough to remember.
	I'm sure we have listeners who know.
	But they were remarkable.
	They did a remarkably good job.
	But whenever this happens, their people living in Europe are celebrating.
	Now, my question for you would be, let's imagine that the U.S.
	is beaten by Mexico in a World Cup game.
	Do you think Mexicans in the U.S.
	would riot?
	Maybe in L.A.
	in one or two neighborhoods for 10 seconds, they might shoot some fireworks off.
	But no, I don't think they would, actually.
	That's a good question.
	It would be interesting to see.
	It would be interesting to see if they would.
	But golly, we are out of time.
	And Mr. Kersey, you had a number of great stories for us.
	I'm sorry we won't get to them.
	We'll hope to get to them next time.
	But in the meantime, as usual, we very much appreciate hearing from our listeners.
	That means you out there in listener land, and please tell us things you'd like us to cover, observations about our stories, any time we made a mistake of some kind, and please send them to either amren.com, A-M-R-E-N.com, the Contact Us tab, and they'll come straight to me, or you can send them to... All one word, because we live here, at protonmail.com.
	Once again, Because we live here at Protonmail.com.
	And again, Mr. Kersey, I apologize for not getting around to some of your excellent stories.
	We will try to tack them on if we can next time.

▲