Gregory Hood — "Nationalists Without a Nation." (2022)
|
Time
Text
Our next speaker, Gregory Hood, is our star writer at American Renaissance.
He has spent his entire adult life in conservative and nationalist politics.
He tells me he lives for the cause, he loves his job, but occasionally I have to tell him that he can't end every single article with a rousing, impassioned call for our magnificent people to rise for eternal victory.
Age may have tempered some of Gregory Hood's views, but certainly not his enthusiasm, and I'm sure it never will.
Hood.
A magnificent call for our people to rise and win eternal victory.
I mean, that's more or less where I'm going anyway.
I was thinking about how racism has no longer become the real go-to term for the left over the last few years.
I think this is one of the cases where The word truly has lost its meaning.
In fact, I think it was just this year where the Anti-Defamation League, who was one of these groups that apparently has appointed itself in charge of what Americans can see and read and hear, they had three different definitions of racist.
And every time they defined the word, somebody attacked them for saying, well, no, because now you're implying that non-whites can be racist and we can't have that.
No, you can't say that white people are uniquely guilty, because then that gets into all these questions of who's considered white and who isn't.
And finally, I think what they came up with was any time you treat a group more favorably because of who they are, in which case I think white people are probably the only non-racist people on the planet.
Instead, we get the term white nationalist.
And I have a lot of questions about what this term means because I see it applied to people like Donald Trump, who couldn't even bring himself to oppose affirmative action or anti-white discrimination.
And yet he's a white nationalist.
They say this about the Republican Party.
The Republican Party has done nothing to stop the left-wing agenda on a host of issues over 50 years.
Just this morning, I was looking through, and I have very dire economic news.
Chuck Schumer tells us that we have a worker shortage.
No, you laugh, but we do.
We have a worker shortage, and the reason we have a worker shortage is because we have a population that's not reproducing at the same rate that it used to.
Those are his words.
So, therefore, we need to have amnesty and a, quote, gateway to citizenship for, and this is a quote, The 11 million people, or however many there are in the country.
I like the same government that'll jump down your throat if you forget to notarize the expense you did once, just has no idea how many millions of people are in the country.
I expect they do know, but just don't care.
And it certainly raises questions about a system that they call white nationalists, when, as far as I can tell, the main thing that it exists to do is replace the existing population.
I'm hard-pressed to think of what else my tax dollars fund.
I mean, as far as infrastructure or protecting the border or any of the basic services that we come to expect, that's been declining for a long time.
And it seems to me that this country thrives not because of the government, but in spite of it, anytime anything good happens.
But nonetheless, we live under this reign of propaganda and this term white nationalism.
And it's very interesting what you have to believe to believe in what is now being called our democracy.
You have to believe it.
You have to believe that there is absolutely no relationship between the media and the number of young adults identifying as trans doubling between 2017 and 2020.
You have to believe that.
It has no effect on minors whatsoever.
If you believe that, you're a bad person.
But you also have to believe.
That if voters are not prevented from seeing misinformation or disinformation as determined by somebody, they'll vote the wrong way.
It'll be the end of our democracy.
So you can't trust adults to make political decisions, but you also can't take away their right to vote.
A five-year-old knows what's going on, but a 19-year-old who...
Decides to buy a gun, say, does not know what's going on.
For example, there's a lawsuit being filed against some gun companies by people who are accusing them of marketing a certain demographic.
And they said something along the lines of how they're targeting the impulsive natures of adolescent males and post-adolescent males.
I felt somewhat targeted.
I guess, like, oh, that's what racism feels like.
But if you believe that, if that's a legal doctrine, well, we can no longer be held accountable for any of our consuming decisions either.
Because we're too stupid to make up our own minds.
We're all directed by marketing campaigns.
And certain experts are to determine how everything goes.
It really begs the question, why do we bother having votes in the first place if these guys are going to make all the decisions for us?
We live in a country now where Potentially a child expressing some sexual view which would have been regarded as bizarre or insane even a decade ago.
That could cost you your kids.
We live in a country right now where any interaction you have with a non-white person or anybody else for that matter or race becomes evolved could become national news and could literally become a federal case.
That's a sword hanging over every single person.
We live in a country now where law enforcement is highly selective and tends to be determined on the political interests being served.
For example, somebody who was involved in throwing a Molotov cocktail into an NYPD car during the 2020 riots only got 15 months from the Biden Justice Department.
But that Viking guy who was in the Capitol on January 6th got, I believe it was, 41 months, if not more.
It's very hard to argue that the former act was less violent than the latter act.
But that's the situation that we're in.
And the biggest thing that I think everybody in this room has to sense at some level is that there's a weird spiritual sickness at the heart of our society right now.
And everybody senses it.
The majority of people, the vast majority of people, said that the country was going in the wrong direction.
As they walked out of the polls in the midterms.
And nonetheless, they voted for the same government, by and large.
And I think the reason is because people see the problem.
They know something is wrong, but they don't think they're allowed to speak against it, and they don't feel justified in taking action to live any other way.
We've been tamed, essentially.
You know, de Tocqueville wrote in Democracy on America, he was writing about the way democracy can spread government.
And what it does is it doesn't openly tyrannicize you, but it compresses, it enervates, it extinguishes, it suffocates people.
Those were his words.
And eventually what you end up with is a group of productive and tepid animals, of which the government is the shepherd.
I would say that holds true today, but instead of government, I would substitute media.
For when I say, what does the system consist of chiefly?
It is the media which has the power to shape opinions.
And ultimately to shape the outcomes for individual people.
10-15 years ago, if you started something on the internet, there was something akin to a marketplace of ideas.
In politics, we saw this in 2015 and 2016.
They're never going to let that happen again.
There's not actually a market of ideas.
Power determines what ideas you are allowed to see.
And this means that every time you see somebody on YouTube, Or anytime you see somebody on Facebook or Instagram or any of these other major platforms, somebody somewhere decided, these people are allowed to be here.
These people, in some sense, are part of our product.
And so even when some guy calls himself a socialist or something, but he's sponsored by YouTube, that's not a socialist.
That's not even a political commentator.
That's just a product.
And I don't spend my life terribly concerned about the opinions of inanimate objects.
We are living in a country now where the next leader of the Democratic Party is likely to be Hakeem Jeffries.
If that last name rings a bell, it's because his uncle was the poet who defined non-white people as sun people and white people as ice people.
So I'm not sure the new Democratic leader who last year, a couple years ago at least, said, end mass incarceration now, tweeted this, but then also tweeted, lock up Kyle Rittenhouse and throw away the key.
I'm guessing that the new Democratic leader doesn't like ICE people very much.
And we may be in for some hard times, but we have to ask ourselves, how is that different than normal?
It was under the Trump administration that the Department of Homeland Security started working with big tech, saying which people are to lose their platforms.
None of this is new.
And the DHS has testified before Congress that they do work with big tech to suppress certain disinformation, and they do target certain people.
But none of this was pioneered by Biden.
None of this was something that was indicative of the liberal takeover in 2020.
This is something that probably would be happening in any event, even if Trump had stayed in office.
There's never been a point in my entire life where somebody in office has done something that actually made things better for the country.
Now, I might just be one random guy saying that, but I don't think I am.
And I mean not a single thing.
Every single time somebody is in power, everything good that they said they would do falls away.
And instead they do a number of destructive things and again and again and again.
The difference between right-wing conspiracy theorist and accurate pundit about everything seems to be about two years.
Once we're acknowledged that we're in a system there, it doesn't really represent us and can't represent us.
And it's fundamentally the product of a media class that hates us.
And a political class does not want us to compete.
That does lead us to, I don't know, a certain liberation.
That's how I felt about the midterms.
Because to me, it was the decisive signal that you can no longer compete electorally for the entire country.
There were a lot of people saying if the Republicans changed certain voting requirements or ballot laws, that would save the day.
Well, you need power to do that, and they don't do it.
And as others have noted, even if Republicans had won every single House seat and every single Senate seat that was open, they still wouldn't have done it.
Fundamentally, they don't want to even win.
We'll have Steve King tonight, and I can tell you about when Steve King was expelled from the party.
Party leadership deliberately misread the story, accusing him of saying things that he didn't say in a context that was completely irrelevant.
But the Republican Party leadership chose to believe the good faith of the New York Times instead of a member of their own caucus who had been out there representing grassroots conservatives for decades.
All that stuff fell away with one journalist's phone call.
I, for one, am...
I'm happy that we don't even need to think about these people anymore.
Because ultimately, right now, aside from certain state and local locations, they're completely irrelevant.
And my response to Trump or DeSantis or anybody else is, who cares?
But it doesn't come from nihilism.
It comes from knowing that I no longer have a country, and neither do any of you.
And whatever solutions we talk about, If people call them unrealistic or utopian, all I would say is they're a lot more grounded and rooted in practicality than thinking we're going to vote our way out of this.
Thank you.
More than that, I believe whites are stateless people not just in the United States of America but across the world, even in our historic homelands of Europe.
Our people will be a minority within a very short span of time.
This is being done globally.
It is being done deliberately.
Now, you can have all sorts of views about who or why, and I think there are probably multiple things going on and multiple groups who are pushing this, and don't ever excuse the sheer stupidity of short-term capitalists who are not looking any farther than the first quarter.
Obviously, as Lenin said, the capitalists will sell the rope with which we will hang them.
And I do feel a little discouraged in that we have to save these people along with ourselves.
But then again, maybe we don't need to.
Then again, maybe we should stop, as several people have pointed out, stop trying to defend a regime that everybody in here, as far as I can tell, already sees as something foreign to them.
What today is America?
Its founders are mocked and ridiculed at their own homes, if you go to Mount Vernon, Montpelier, Monticello.
Its icons have been torn down.
The Constitution was written by a bunch of white nationalists, which is probably true.
The Declaration of Independence, we're going to use that one phrase and define our national identity by it, but we're going to leave out all the parts about the merciless Indian savages and all the rights that we're supposed to have.
All that goes away.
Jefferson himself goes away.
Essentially, every symbol of the old historic American nation goes away, even Columbus or settling the West, which would imply that the world would be better off had whites never come to this continent.
And yet, these people come to us and demand our loyalty because they say,"We're America.
We're representing the United States." You don't get to do that.
You don't get to claim something that you were never a part of.
You don't get to renounce that which you never possessed.
And ultimately, the host should not concern itself with the thoughts of the parasite.
Yeah. Thank you.
Thank you.
I don't think it's just about the United States.
I think it's happening in Europe, and I think that the solution has to be worldwide.
And for a very long time, people have said, well, what is to be done?
What is to be done?
How do we organize?
I talked a little bit about that last year.
You've heard some suggestions on this this morning.
Frankly, I see a lot of people doing it.
Tribes, networks, self-organization.
But all of that is meaningless without a utopian goal.
A goal that has to serve as our Sorelian political myth.
That will inspire us to action in the here and now.
That will ground our entire struggle.
And so when people say, what do we want?
We can say, we want this.
I believe that right now we live in a world of empires and blocks.
I don't think the nation-state, with the exception of particularly large ones, which essentially are empires, not nation-states, but I don't think the nation-state by itself can survive long-term.
I don't think it can buck The current leadership of the West.
And a country like Hungary or some of the other Eastern European countries, it's my belief they're on the same track as us, but they're just behind.
Now, I hope to be proven wrong.
And I also hope that those Eastern European countries join together in some way so they're not just dominated by the EU.
But that's not my place.
What is my place is, as an American, I can say we really don't have these We see ourselves fundamentally as white.
And while America usually, when it comes to European nationalist movements, the American role is usually to screw everything up and stick our nose where we don't belong.
And also, of course, our government is funding the opposition to people like Viktor Orban and was doing so even under the Trump administration.
The one thing that we have going for us here is because we see ourselves as whites, we can actually put forward That pan-European message, that civilizational message, that idea that if we're going to survive as a culture and as a people, literally survive, we're going to have to bind together.
And it's not...
I don't mean this in terms of a vague feeling of unity.
I don't mean this in terms of a vague alliance.
I don't mean a community of belief.
I mean, quite literally, In one civilization state that is set up explicitly to defend the continuity of Western civilization, to further the upward development of our people, and to ensure the next generation of scientific,
intellectual, and artistic accomplishments.
and most of all, to ensure the physical survival of the only race that could build Western civilization and maintain it.
Yeah! Yeah!
What do I want?
That's what I want.
I was white before I was American.
So were all of you.
And being part of the West means being part, truly, of the locality, of the community.
But we've always thought of ourselves as part of a civilization before we started thinking of ourselves as nation-states.
The current era of Western division Which, of course, were the most tragic manifestations, were the First and Second World Wars, or what I would consider to be the Great Western Civil Wars.
These identities made sense for a long time, and it's going to be hard to give them up in a way.
But I don't think we need to.
Instead, we sublimate it to something greater.
The fact is, when we think of some of the great men, for us it might be George Washington, for the French it might be Napoleon Bonaparte, for the British it might be Wellington or Lord Nelson.
I mean, unfortunately, what made them great is usually they were good at killing other white men.
And that's who most of our heroes were.
That's who the people who were the founders of this country, that's who the wars were fought against.
But identities change.
And just as I think all the different German states ultimately united to form Germany under Bismarck, I think there's a new change in identity taking place now.
Because right now, I would argue...
That your racial identity is more determinative of how you are going to be treated, how you think about the world, and ultimately what political symbols inspire your loyalty.
Your race is more important than your passport because your passport no longer has any real connection to your identity anymore beyond a simply legal sense.
If we're living in a society where the Senate majority leader can say the biggest problem is, We have a worker shortage and all we've got to do is just import in people to take the place of the people who don't want to work for a pittance.
What kind of a country is that?
At best, it's a marketplace.
Not even like a good marketplace.
One of those horrible Chinese marketplaces where they put nets around the buildings because people are jumping out trying to commit suicide.
One of those kinds of marketplaces.
And I joke about this, but there's real emotional harm too.
White identity is not something that we're just making up.
It's not even something we particularly wanted.
It gets pushed on you.
Ultimately, my ideas about race or what I think the biological existence is or what its consequences are, ultimately none of that matters.
I'm just some guy.
But the people with power, race matters a lot to them.
It matters a lot to them if you're white.
And you can think of yourself however you want to.
It doesn't make a difference.
To those who matter, you are white.
And this is not something you get to renounce.
Why? Because if you renounced it, they would lose that hold of power over you.
I am convinced that so many of the people, young white kids, who are broken by today's society and embrace either a crazy sexual subculture or just outright self-hatred, I am convinced that is because they have been brought up in what is essentially a terrible nationwide system of child abuse that tells them That they are born of a poisoned bloodline,
that they can't take any pride in their ancestors, but they are personally responsible for the failings of other people whom they have never met.
We are being lectured on the sins of our ancestors by people who don't take responsibility for the behavior of their own children.
But of course, how low class do you even talk about children?
Implicit also in Chuck Schumer's statement was the idea that there's something sick and wrong about the idea of reproducing at a healthy rate.
Or the idea that our country is something more than just random people who are inside it.
That being part of a community defined by blood and ethnicity means something.
We live in a society that is deeply hostile to family, and I think this is at the quiet desperation of a lot of whites right now.
When you have both parents having to work, and nobody can stay home with the kids.
And you're in hawk to a bank and the mortgage rates keep going up, but as the mortgage rates are going up, inflation is going up too, and now you can't make the payments anymore, and you can't live in the city because crime is going up, but they keep re-electing the Democrats anyway, and so you keep moving farther and farther out,
which means you've got to drive to work, but now gas prices keep going up.
These kinds of small-scale disasters that just roll through ordinary people's lives, this is the real tragedy of modern life.
It's not in the lurid tales of a black-on-white murder or something like that.
Yeah, we see those.
But the things that really get to me are all these people that I see driving around utterly broken, utterly without purpose, utterly unhappy.
And they were made that way for a reason.
Because broken people support the system.
And the more broken they are, the more they support the system.
You can see some of this in the midterm voting.
Healthy. Independent, strong, capable.
These types of people are not wanted in America today.
They're not reliable voters.
And they're not reliable voters for a system that I think may be unique in history in that it breaks people down to the worst version of themselves by design.
I think every other ruling class in history had some interest in his people being able to do certain things.
But our government wants us to be dependents.
It wants us to be victims.
And strangely enough, it also wants us at each other's throats.
I remember very distinctly on September 11th, in the days afterward, how we were not to show the videos of what had happened that day because we didn't want to get anybody angry.
And I remember this, and then I pick up the paper, and I think three different film companies are doing a movie story on Emmett Till.
Now, unless you're...
We also saw the big thing a couple years ago where they talked about the so-called Tulsa massacre and announced some big search for bodies.
So far, the last story I checked, they haven't found a single one that they could tie to the event.
Now, even if all these things were true, if you were trying to have a country where people just got along, why would you go into the racial wounds of the country and rip it open?
Why would you do that unless you were deliberately trying to get people hurt?
And to be...
A modern progressive, you have to believe, you have to believe that unless journalists curate online information, people will vote the wrong way.
And if people hear the arguments of people like Jared Taylor, whites are going to be moved to violence once they go find him on one of these marginal platforms that we've pushed them to.
But you also have to believe, you must believe, that the Doctrine of grievance and hatred that those in power preach to black Americans every day, saying that the reason they are in the situation they're in is because of white racism.
You have to believe that doesn't lead to violence.
You have to believe that despite being just 13 or 14 percent of the population, the latest stats I saw show they committed the majority of the murders in this country.
Now, if you're not willing to confront that, Or if you believe that there's no cultural movement pushing that kind of violence, I don't know what to tell you.
Because at this point, I see anti-white hatred as the governing ideology of every Western government.
So that means we're not just stateless.
We're explicitly under occupation.
And we are being treated as a conquered enemy.
Do you know why?
Because we are one.
All right.
Many young whites don't know who they are.
They speak about going to find themselves.
They may seek extreme experiences in order to test themselves or figure out who they really are.
And certainly we've seen a lot of this with how things once taken for granted like sex are now apparently malleable and can change at your whim.
Just on the thoughts of your head, you can determine what gender you are.
Oddly enough, though, it doesn't seem to work that way for race, apparently when it comes to divvying up affirmative action programs.
But whites do have an identity as whites.
It's just an entirely negative one.
But the question has already been answered.
There's no way you get through modern America or anywhere in the West as a white person without having a white identity.
The only question is whether it's going to be positive or negative.
And what we need to do...
And what is being done, I'm happy to say, is explicitly say that what is the West now is not the West.
It is a kind of anti-civilization.
It is an occupation.
And they themselves have renounced every symbol of national loyalty or civilizational unity they could appeal to for our loyalty.
They don't have it anymore.
They lack the mandate of heaven, as the Chinese would say.
What we stand for is strength instead of weakness, of intelligence instead of stupidity, of the actual science instead of the science being used as an excuse to restrict people's freedoms and say things that just aren't true.
Like, for example, asserting, I'll say this as a journalist would say it, repeatedly asserting, without evidence, that racial egalitarianism exists.
It does not exist.
It is a mistake at best and a lie at worst to keep saying that the reason races perform differently as different groups in American society is because of white racism.
It's because of biological differences and the different cultures they engender.
That's the answer.
And if you're not willing to say that, you're not going to make any progress.
Nobody except the elites.
Certainly not.
Most of the blacks themselves.
Nobody is actually benefiting from these lies.
And this is what gets me angry.
It's not that we have an elite.
Every society has an elite.
How could there not be an elite?
But an elite that derives its power from the degradation of the people they rule.
I think that's pretty new.
And we have to put ourselves up as a counter-elite.
And the way we have to do this is by arguing for the inverse of the values being preached now.
Because we have to set an example that whites can aspire to.
And we say, look, you actually don't have to believe the testimony of people who get paid more if you believe what they said.
That's not a credible moral agent.
You don't actually have to believe or even listen to the people who say that they hate you.
Give you reasons about why they hate you.
You actually don't owe them any of your attention or money.
And it's pretty silly to think that we're all behaving this way because we're afraid of a word.
We're being held captive, a word that the ADL can't even define anymore.
We're being held victim by our virtues.
We're still keeping this thing, this thing, this failed experiment, which has sadly become the United States, We're still keeping this thing going.
But within five to ten years, if you look at people who are coming through college now, they're either with us or they're completely on the other side.
And as they say, the woke are more correct than the center because they're fundamentally right to say that the United States of America was created by de facto white nationalists.
That's a true statement.
The woke would say that, but...
Once you have that point, how do you then keep using the symbols of the traditional American nation?
How do you not tear down the statues of all the Founding Fathers?
And how do you then appeal to the people who still think these people are heroes?
People like us.
That moment is coming for every single Western country, save a few in the East where migration isn't getting quite as hard.
It's not that there's going to be a white minority in and of itself.
Yes, we would talk about that.
That would be an issue.
But that's not even the real thing.
The real thing is that this process is happening because it hurts white populations.
As Tony Blair's advisor said when they talked about migration in the United Kingdom, we're going to rub the right's nose in diversity.
That was how they put it.
And you see it with some of the people who lobby for immigration reform now.
It's because they know that this will actually hurt the people they don't like.
That tells us we really don't need to take their arguments seriously when they say that immigration is good for us.
Because, frankly, within about five minutes, I can convince them that they don't believe that.
And very quickly, their real beliefs come out.
Thank you.
When white people are surrounded in a climate of hatred like this, it's not just enough to present a certain political goal.
We also have to give them something to define themselves by.
And what I would say to whites is that you are part of a bloodline that is chosen, and that is sacred.
It's the only thing in this world that can't be bought, that isn't just a product.
But it doesn't make you better.
What it really does is it lays an obligation upon you.
And we're no better than the lowest form of life on this planet if we don't step up to that obligation.
That obligation is to be constantly looking toward the horizon, constantly building something better, constantly working toward the upward development of our people and its greatest cultural expressions.
And ultimately, it's toward achieving a political unity.
among all whites, and a civilization that will ensure the West's survival and the survival of the creating people.
Thank you.
Thank you.
You don't need to find who you are.
You are who you are.
You need to become who you are, and that means being the best version of yourself that you can possibly be.
But who you are is unchosen.
And it's not something you can reinvent.
What matters is what's in your blood.
And what matters is having a connection with the traditions that our civilization gave rise to.
And that I believe which alone hold the potential for human progress.
So remember, you're not just fighting for yourself.
You really are fighting for all of humanity.
And that may be unfair to have that kind of a burden, but...
That's what it is to be white.
Thank you.
I want to thank everybody for coming today, and I just want to end by saying this homeland, this empire, this republic, whatever you want to call it, I'm not saying how we get there.
I'm not saying necessarily the midway steps.
It might be one single state that takes up this kind of banner and forges something.
The way Bismarck did with the different German states.
It might be taking back America and switching things by some miracle.
I'm not going to say that.
But I will say this.
We are citizens of this unknown ideal.
That is what we are working toward every day.
And every small step that we make has to be into the service of something that is greater than us, that will last after us, and that is above us.
Thank you very much.
Thank you.
So, with the present situation, I think that there's two variables.
There's first, how do we liberate ourselves from the current system, which is sort of like a bear trap that's caught our leg and we're bleeding out the longer that we're involved in this and our people are being indoctrinated to hate themselves and so forth.
And then, if we're able to liberate ourselves from the system, what we would build next?
Right now, there's a golden opportunity, I think, where a lot of people, a lot of white people, are losing faith in the system.
A lot of it's due to Donald Trump and his rhetoric about the rigged elections, which actually are rigged, and even if we won the elections, things would still turn out against white people.
But let's say that there was a split in the country.
If it was led by Donald Trump and his MAGA movement, which is very concerned about getting the highest African-American vote ever, the highest Hispanic vote ever, we're going to have a lot of these base non-whites that are part of the coalition and maybe this MAGA movement,
which was really bought into the whole culture of the civil rights movement, which was a revolution against our founders, against the white nationalists who built this country.
So should we be carving out a place within that MAGA coalition, or should we be building the groundwork for something else which is explicitly for white people?
What do you think?
Well, I think the real-world things people are doing to build explicitly white communities and businesses, that's the most important thing.
So I would say that's way more important than trying to, I don't know, win a place in the MAGA movement.
It doesn't work that way with American politics because the campaigns are so personal.
It would be one thing if you had a permanent Republican Party staff or you were trying to infiltrate a party in Europe.
I've seen that kind of stuff work.
But with America, even if you take over the party organization, say, you just get wiped out next time when whatever campaign, whatever personality comes in and replaces all your guys.
I mean, showing up to events and maybe looking for converts, yeah, I mean, I favor engaging with pretty much everyone, but, I mean, it's 2022, and I feel like Trump won once in 2016,
and he's been losing ever since.
That gives me no joy to say that, but I think that's a fact.
And so, he'll be a wrecking ball against the system, maybe.
But I don't have any illusions that he's going to save us.
So if the system does fall, what are we as white advocates supposed to do?
Talk to me after a moment.
When you use a German example, a large part of Herger and the other German ideologues that were reacting to Napoleon, they were trying to create this greater Germany, this all-encompassing thing for the German folk that you want for the white race.
How are you going to prevent the neoliberals?
These sort of capitalist class, which I think is part of the enemy.
I mean, the spiritual stuff is important, but the material as well.
How do you prevent them from doing what Bismarck did, which is aligning himself with the aristocracy, in this case the current ruling class, from taking a part of the existing order and creating a so-called Kaiserreich or German Empire, but not something that encompasses the entire people,
in this case the entire civilization from North America, Europe, Australasia, etc.?
Yeah. Good questions.
First off, I want to note that this is a Sorellian ideal, just like Sorell himself talked about, the class struggle is the foundational myth for Marxists.
So this is the highest aspiration that we go for.
It's not necessarily something like, we're going to get tomorrow.
I mean, unless we get it tomorrow.
You never know.
I think that...
The question of what we are to do with the neoliberals is a very good one because I think they are the biggest enemy.
I'm not terribly concerned about Antifa.
I'm concerned about Amazon.
I'm trying to think of a single company.
I said, well, there's too many companies to list.
Think of one company on our side.
I couldn't think of a single one.
So, I mean, essentially all of corporate America at this point.
And I think the only way you can prevent it is you actually have to say, as a foundational text and ideal of the state, that it exists for white racial preservation.
And without that...
I mean, this is one of conquest laws, right?
Everything that is not explicitly right-wing becomes left-wing over time.
And I think the founders, we can justly claim the founders for ourselves, but I think we would have been saved a lot of trouble if Jefferson hadn't written, all men are created equal.
And for better or worse, ideas get taken to the logical conclusion.
On our side, we do have the MyPillow guy.
He's in their shoes.
You said that you could convince these politicians in five minutes that diversity is not good for them, and they don't believe that.
They only support it because it hurts whites.
How would you convince them that diversity is not good for them or get them to admit that?
Politicians? Or you said elites or...
Well, you're not...
The thing with politicians is that their agreement or disagreement means...
Very little in most cases.
I mean, all you can really do is shape the environment in which they're running for election.
I think directly lobbying them to change their mind is a waste of time.
The way you would lobby them is to say, I and the group of 3,000 voters that are behind me will not vote for you unless you do X. When it comes to politicians, you always appeal to interest, not to belief.
Because, you know, if they're good politicians, their job is to change their beliefs to meet public opinion.
So, I agree with you that national elections, you know, House, Senate, etc., are a dead end, but my question was about local elections, because in the 2022 midterms, I read Moms for Liberty, which is a group lobbying for school board elections,
had some great successes, like South Carolina.
Got a superintendent who, in the first session of the school board, banned critical race theory, took several other right-wing measures to take our schools back.
So do you think that would be a worthwhile effort to get our guys into local elections, you know, school boards, city councils, etc.?
Yeah, my intent with proposing this ideal in a strange way is actually to bring it down to manageable proportions, not to claim some expansionist thing.
What I'm suggesting, essentially, is that people need to start working with these kinds of movements at the local level, and if necessary, relocating to places where this can be done.
So, yes, I mean, that is what they need to be doing, but we need to be thinking along the lines of how all these different groups and tribes and networks that are springing up without any central direction, which is the way to do it, how can we keep them going and someday get them to act in a common cause for a riddle?
I think everything that you're saying is correct, and people need to move to be able to do it.
I would say to the gentleman, he's right, he is doing a lot that's good, but I'd also say there is such a thing called the greater truth.
And the greater truth is that even though there are great people of all colors, I don't think anybody here denies that.
What we're looking at now is what Teddy Roosevelt warned us about, is a group of squabbling masses.
And we can ask ourselves, why is it that we can't get anything done?
Is it because there's 37 different nationalities or different races or different sexual ideas going on in our country?
What is the common denominator?
And I guess I would like to say to this group today, I think that if we can't talk about what feminism has done to our country as far as creating an idiocracy, really a schizophrenic society, a politically incorrect society,
it's a little bit like us all being on the Titanic and we just keep on playing in the band but not doing any good.
I think one of the most interesting statistics, just real quick, about the...
Midterm elections was how the overwhelming number of unmarried women voted for the left.
Married women did not.
And this brings up something I wanted to mention during my talk.
If we take as a presumption that people who are married are at least happy enough to stay married, whatever jokes they might tell about it or something else, and then we look at the depression rate among single women, As measured by antidepressant use,
alcoholism, all these other indicators, you basically come to the awareness that the Democratic Party has an interest in broken families and unhappy people.
Because the more of those people you have, the more they're going to be dependent on government, take advantage of an ideology that rewards them, and wield power through the state.
So that's why I'm suggesting we actually have to have a radical different...