Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

March 10, 2022 - Radio Renaissance - Jared Taylor

09:57

‘Unconditional War’ on Racism

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Hello, I'm Jared Taylor with American Renaissance.
	The Internet is doing its very best to make my videos impossible to find.
	So, if you like this video, please send the link to some of your friends.
	Last month, 34 members of Congress introduced a bill called Declaring Unconditional War on Racism and Invidious Discrimination and Providing for the Establishment of a Cabinet-Level Department of Reconciliation.
	charged with eliminating racism and invidious discrimination.
	Everyone has heard of racism, but what's invidious discrimination?
	It's a legal term that means treating a class of persons unequally in a manner that is malicious, hostile, or damaging.
	The classes are the usual.
	Race, religion, sexual orientation, etc.
	And this bill...
	It would establish a brand new cabinet-level department called the Department of Reconciliation to wage this unconditional war against discrimination.
	It would have a budget of at least 10% of the defense budget, which is now $730 billion.
	The Department of Reconciliation would therefore have at least $73 billion to spend every year.
	That's three times NASA's budget, and twice as much as the entire State Department.
	The Secretary of Reconciliation would set a comprehensive national strategy to eliminate discrimination.
	What prompted this bill?
	As the preamble explains, In other words,
	rioters know best.
	What is unconditional war on racism?
	I suppose it means to require unconditional surrender, which is a surrender in which no guarantees are given to the surrendering party.
	It is often demanded with the threat of complete destruction, extermination, or annihilation.
	The Prophet Muhammad, peace be upon him, liked unconditional surrenders.
	In 627, his men besieged the Banu Kiraiza, a tribe of Jews living in northern Arabia.
	This is a Muslim depiction of them accepting unconditional surrender.
	The bottom part of the illustration suggests what happened next.
	In the top row are the men, bareheaded, with their hands tied together.
	Every one of them, some 600 to 900, were beheaded.
	Below them are the women and children.
	Muhammad's men kept them as slaves.
	In 1836, Santa Anna offered unconditional surrender to the defenders of the animal.
	He was as good as his word.
	His soldiers killed every Texan and, for good measure, shot and bayoneted their bodies.
	It appears that this war on racism is to be a war of extermination.
	Needless to stay, sponsors of the bill are exclusively Democrat.
	It was introduced by Al Green of Texas.
	At a 2019 hearing with the CEOs of major banks, he asked them why they were all white men, and asked the boss of JPMorgan Chase whether his bank had made money from slavery.
	Of the 33 co-sponsors, 22 are black, including the usual hotheads, such as Maxine Waters, Ilan Omar, Bobby Rush, and Benny Thompson.
	Another sponsor is Hank Johnson, who is said to be a Buddhist.
	During a hearing in 2011, he worried about the effects of a troop buildup on Guam.
	My fear is that the whole island will become so overly populated that it will tip over and capsize.
	We don't anticipate that.
	In a 2014 poll of congressional aides, he was voted both the most clueless and the worst speaker.
	Maxine Waters, also a sponsor, is distinguished in other ways.
	I think that Jeff Sessions is very dangerous.
	I think he's a racist.
	This is a bunch of scumbags.
	That's what they are.
	There are four Hispanic co-sponsors and one Palestinian, Rashida Tlaib.
	Bless her heart.
	Five white people are among these 34 sponsors.
	The bill never mentions anti-racism swami Ibram X. Kendi, but I think he inspired this bill.
	Mr. Kendi says Americans should pass an anti-racist amendment to the U.S. Constitution that enshrines two guiding anti-racist principles.
	Racial inequity is evidence of racist policy, and the different racial groups are...
	Equals. Because blacks are just as smart and hardworking as whites, if whites are doing better, it can only be because of racism.
	As he told the New York Times in 2018, when I see racial disparities, I see racism.
	And the way to get rid of these disparities is simple.
	Discriminate against whites.
	In a June 2020 interview, he explained that racial discrimination The defining question is whether the discrimination is creating equity or inequity.
	If discrimination is creating equity, then it is anti-racist.
	Discrimination is therefore fine if it's against white people.
	Mr. Kendi also wants a new cabinet-level department, but his would be called the Department of Anti-Racism.
	It would be staffed with people who think just like him.
	And they would have the power to veto any law or regulation passed at any level of government in the entire United States if it doesn't fight racism.
	It would be vastly more powerful than the Supreme Court.
	In fact, you could get rid of the Supreme Court.
	This would be a dictatorship for the sole purpose of making blacks equal to whites.
	As anyone who has studied race differences knows, that's impossible.
	So it would be a tyranny and would eventually drive all white people out.
	To those who criticize his plans for a racial dictatorship, Mr. Kendi replies, I know.
	You want the freedom, the civil liberty, to be racist, to enslave, to segregate, to exploit, to exclude.
	Right. All we want to do is bring back slavery.
	The billionaire founder of Twitter, Jack Dorsey, thinks this dangerous nut is wonderful.
	Jack Dorsey donates $10 million to Ibram X. Kendi's Center on Anti-Racism.
	Mr. Kendi's book, How to Be an Anti-Racist, has sold more than 2 million copies.
	And he has his eye on your children with a hot new board book called Anti-Racist Baby.
	But back to this declaration of unconditional war, which has been referred to the Judiciary Committee.
	Will there be hearings?
	If there were even a glimmer of sanity in Congress, experts would testify on race and IQ.
	But there's no chance of that.
	I'll be keeping an eye on this bill.
	In the meantime, how about this?
	Supporters say they have the votes in the House to pass a reparations bill.
	The first version of this bill was introduced 30 years ago, and now it could conceivably pass.
	As recently as 2008, during his first campaign for president, Barack Obama said he opposed reparations, but he was just putting on a show.
	In an interview last year, Obama said that reparations are justified, but the politics of white resistance and resentment made the issue a non-starter during his presidency.
	California Governor Gavin Newsom has already signed a bill to study and recommend reparations for California's blacks.
	Move there quickly, black folks!
	If it took the country 30 years to get serious about reparations, Mr. Kendi's racial dictatorship might take how many years?
	10? 15?
	Some blacks would get the ball rolling by tearing up the Constitution.
	Just last week, MSNBC legal commentator claims the U.S. Constitution is kind of trash.
	That's because the framers were white slaveholders and didn't consult anyone who looks like him.
	Eli Mistal went to Harvard College and Harvard Law School, where he was no doubt viciously oppressed, so he knows best.
	Once you throw out the Constitution, there need be no obstacle.
	to punishing and exploiting whites any way you like.
	Twenty or even ten years ago, a declaration of unconditional war on racism would be ridiculed as much as the now fashionable idea of declaring racism a public health crisis.
	The real point is this: there are people who want to reduce whites to a kind of peonage, and there are more of them all the time.
	We cannot compromise with these people.
	They have to go their way, and we have to go ours.
	And the sooner we start thinking about that, the better.

▲