Hello, I'm Jared Taylor with American Renaissance.
Donald Trump's victory shocked the Democrats.
And it might even shock them into doing something wonderful.
It looks like they're going to choose Keith Ellison to run their party.
I can't imagine a better chairman of the Democratic National Committee.
I really hope he gets the job.
As you recall, Mr. Ellison was the first Muslim to serve in Congress when he was elected ten years ago.
And being a Muslim is a great qualification for running the Democratic Party.
But being black is better.
As Simone Sanders, Bernie Sanders' campaign press secretary, has explained, we don't need white people leading the Democratic Party right now.
Well, actually, they don't have white people leading the party now anyway.
The three top jobs at the DNC are chairman, treasurer, and secretary.
The acting chair is Donna Brazile.
Not a Muslim, but certainly black.
The secretary is none other than Stephanie Rawlings-Blake, mayor of Baltimore, who gave rioters space to riot and indicted and destroyed the lives of six innocent police officers.
Now the treasurer is still a white man, Andrew Tobias, but they could replace him.
Al Sharpton likes money.
I think he'd make a great treasurer.
Keith Ellison, as chairman, though, will do a tremendous job reinforcing the identity of the Democrats as the party for minorities, for everybody but white people.
And that means it will reinforce the identity of the Republicans as the party for white people.
Voting patterns are already divided by race.
Naming a black man to run the party will formalize the division.
It will drive yet more whites out of the party.
It will be the best thing for white consciousness since the Baltimore riots.
And Mr. Ellison has another qualification for the job that is even more important than being black and Muslim combined.
He used to think just like me.
He understood that blacks and whites are better off living apart.
Back in 1990...
When he was a law student, he wrote a column for the school paper to explain the advantages of setting up a separate nation just for blacks.
This is what he wrote.
Blacks would employ themselves, teach their own children the truth, and control their own neighborhoods.
Black-white interaction would be voluntary instead of compelled.
No more busing.
No more affirmative action.
And best of all, No more white guilt.
White people could righteously say they have settled their debt with blacks.
And think of it.
Whites could reclaim their cities without dispossessing anyone.
Oh, say it, brother!
If he were writing that column today, he could even add, no more race riots, no more Black Lives Matter, no more whining about how many blacks won Oscars, etc., etc., etc.
Of course.
Mr. Ellison now says it was all youthful exuberance.
He never really meant it.
And since he's black, he can walk away from a column that would keep a white guy out of office forever.
And he probably doesn't really want separation anymore.
He probably now realizes that if blacks were on their own entirely, they'd end up with another Liberian.
But he's still my man.
He would be an inspiring symbol.
of the psychological, political, and eventually physical separation of the races.