Hello, I'm Jared Taylor with American Renaissance.
Are you a white man who thinks Brett Kavanaugh is getting a raw deal?
Well then, according to Associate Professor Carol Christine Fair of Georgetown University, you deserve a miserable death.
Here's what she said about the Republican senators investigating the sex assault charges against Judge Kavanaugh.
Look at this chorus of entitled white men justifying a serial rapist's arrogated entitlement.
All of them deserve miserable deaths, while feminists laugh as they take their last gasps.
Bonus! We castrate their corpses and feed them to swine?
Yes! Georgetown backed her, saying, The views of faculty members expressed in their private capacities are their own.
Lucky for her, she was talking about white senators and not, say, Hispanic rapists.
Did Brett Kavanaugh get drunk and grope a girl?
I don't know.
But for a lot of people, that's apparently not the real problem.
The real problem is he's white.
Bryce Covert at the Huffington Post has an article called What Kavanaugh's Ugly Entitlement Can Teach Other White Men.
She says what's ugly is that Judge Kavanaugh, quote, feels he is entitled to this seat.
In her view, he thinks, and I quote, such power, such prestige is the birthright of a white man.
Jonathan Capehart of the Washington Post was singing the same tune in an article called, Hell hath no fury like an entitled white man denied.
All of this is part of what Mr. Capehart calls the, quote, When Judge Kavanaugh got upset at accusations, including gang rape, that he swears are false,
Paul Krugman of the New York Times wrote that he has joined the Angry White Male Caucus.
Mr. Krugman wrote that, quote, White male rage isn't restricted to blue-collar guys in diners.
Hatred can go along with a high income and all too often does.
Uh-oh.
Here comes the left's favorite word: Hatred.
The judge is an angry white male hater.
I wonder if Mr. Krugman thinks Professor Feed Them to the Swine of Georgetown is a hater.
Rex Hupke of the Chicago Tribune accuses Brett Kavanaugh of having told little white male privilege lies to the committee.
Not lies, white male privilege lies.
Ann Brannigan wrote in The Root that, quote, America is a patriarchy built on white supremacy and that Judge Kavanaugh's testimony was, quote, a perfect distillation of whiteness and maleness.
Professor Marcy Hamilton at the University of Pennsylvania wrote an article for the New York Daily News called, Brett Kavanaugh's indignation was the sound of privileged white male entitlement.
Professor Hamid DeBashi of Columbia University wrote about Kavanaugh and white boys club politics in the U.S. He blasted white boy denial and raging white power.
The Sacramento Bee editorial board And of course,
Twitter is full of talk about privileged white boy, white male privilege, angry white male, white entitlement, often laced with the now apparently obligatory obscenities.
These people are obsessed with race.
And some of them seem pretty clearly guilty of what we're always being accused of, hatred.
Brett Kavanaugh's guilt or innocence seems less important to these people than an opportunity to vent their contempt for white men and yell about white male privilege.
But if he were anything but a white man, it would be unthinkable to pound him so viciously.
It's open season on white men, and only white men, year round.
They're the only people you can attack in the most bloodthirsty way because of their race and sex, and then complain about white male privilege.
Can't these people see the irony?
We used to believe in due process and the rule of law for all people, privileged or not.
That's why justice is supposed to be blind.
We aren't supposed to"believe the women" or believe the men for that matter.
We're supposed to believe the evidence.
For Brett Kavanaugh's critics, evidence doesn't seem to matter.
All they need is to take one look at him to know he's guilty.