All Episodes
Jan. 24, 2021 - Radio Renaissance - Jared Taylor
08:17
Lefty Media Suddenly Against Immigration
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Hello, I'm Jared Taylor with American Renaissance.
Everyone has heard that there has been so much non-white immigration to the United States that by 2040 or so, whites will be a minority.
A French demographer says whites will be a minority in France by 2060.
Whites are being replaced.
But you better not complain.
Just type the words"The Great Replacement" into a search engine and you'll find out just how hateful you are if you don't want to become a minority.
If you use the words"The Great Replacement" in the title of a YouTube video, as we did, YouTube will unilaterally tack on a link to explain to you that it's a white nationalist right-wing conspiracy theory.
But in just the last few days, there may have been a media change of heart about replacement.
It has to do with Jammu and Kashmir, the only Muslim-majority state in Hindu India.
When India became independent in 1947, Article 35A of the Constitution said outsiders could not permanently settle in Kashmir or buy land there.
That was to protect Kashmir's unique identity.
Well, India is now being run by Hindu nationalists, and on August 5th, they revoked.
Article 35a, which means Hindus can move in and buy land.
Well, isn't this wonderful?
Those benighted Muslims will now learn the joys of diversity.
And surely not letting Hindus buy property in part of their own country was like redlining and segregation.
Well, astonishingly, the media don't see it that way.
The Associated Press warned that, for many, India's decision is a breach of trust and an attack on Kashmir's identity.
A Vox article said that the decision on Kashmir has sparked fears of ethnic cleansing, that Hindus will flock to the region and push out the Muslims once and for all.
Ethnic cleansing?
Isn't that a hate-filled conspiracy theory?
Even the New York Times worries about Kashmir's identity.
Human rights activists said that the moves to change Kashmir's status were only the first steps in a broader plan to erode Kashmir's core rights and seed the area with non-Kashmiris, altering the demographics and eventually destroying its character.
The human rights group American Renaissance has been warning for decades that immigration is changing the character of the United States.
The Washington Post sounds just like American Renaissance.
It reported that analysts say the change could bring about a profound transformation of Kashmir's population that would exacerbate unrest there.
Farouk Abdullah represents Jammu and Kashmir in the Indian Parliament.
He says his party will not allow any changes in the demography of the state and any attempt to Dalut, Jammu, and Kashmir's unique identity will be resisted.
Can you imagine an American politician talking like that?
Well, actually they do, but not about the United States.
Ever since Israel was established in 1947, every president has recognized its right to remain Jewish.
President Bill Clinton tried to make peace in the Middle East, but as he wrote on page 633 of his autobiography, no Israeli leader would ever let in so many Palestinians that the Jewish character of the state could be threatened.
Israelis refused to be replaced.
What about the U.S.?
In 2009, Mr. Clinton told a group of American Arabs that by 2050, the U.S. will no longer have a majority people with European heritage.
And in an interdependent world, that is a very positive thing.
Well, why is replacement good for us, but bad for Israel?
In 2015, Barack Obama told the Atlantic magazine that there's a direct line between supporting the right of the Jewish people to have a homeland and to feel safe and free of discrimination and persecution and the right of African Americans to vote and have equal protection under the law.
These things are indivisible in my mind.
Mr. Obama sees no difference between rights for blacks and the Jewish right to a homeland.
But why, if whites want homelands, are they haters?
Donald Trump wants Israel to stay Jewish, too.
He was delighted when a Jewish settlement in what used to be the Syrian Golan Heights was named Trump Heights.
Just last year, the Knesset declared Israel to be the nation-state of the Jewish people and that the fulfillment of the right of national self-determination in the state of Israel is unique to the Jewish people.
Our rulers don't find this xenophobic or hateful at all.
At this very moment, the largest ever congressional delegation is visiting Israel to show bipartisan support.
That's 41 Democrats and 31 Republicans, nearly 15% of the entire Congress.
If France declared itself the exclusive homeland of the French, there would be bipartisan support for sanctions.
Well, we support other ethnostates.
The Dalai Lama warns that so many Chinese are swarming into Tibet that his country is, in his words, fast becoming a Chinese colony.
He adds, this will further reduce the Tibetans into an insignificant minority in their own country.
He wants to protect our unique culture and identity.
Well, mysteriously.
Every U.S. president, from Bush to Elder to Barack Obama, has invited this vicious xenophobe more than once to the White House and showered him with praise.
And then there's Xinjiang Province in China.
It's ethnically and religiously different from the rest of the country, and the Uyghur people who live there like it that way.
Well, the Chinese government, the Han people, wanted to be Chinese and encourage...
Mass migration.
The leftist British paper The Guardian, which loves mass migration to the West, sympathizes with the Uyghurs.
It denounces unmistakable colonial practices, such as the transfer of Han Chinese to the region.
The Nation magazine is furious about increasing Han migration, which exacerbates the local population's sense of being overwhelmed by the Chinese.
The U.S. Council on Foreign Relations reports that riots broke out as mostly Uyghur demonstrators protested against state-incentivized Han Chinese migration in the region and widespread economic and cultural discrimination.
In the eyes of Beijing, all Uyghurs could potentially be terrorists or terrorist sympathizers.
Isn't that what the left calls whites who don't want to be replaced?
Potential terrorists?
I detect a pattern.
It's okay for non-white people to resist replacement.
No one says the Japanese or the Moroccans or the Bolivians are Nazis because they don't want diversity.
And it's very okay for Israelis not to want to be replaced.
But Europeans?
Every one of our countries, from New Zealand to Canada, is supposed to be up for grabs.
As Esquire recently explained, if you don't want to be replaced, you're a white nationalist.
And a white nationalist adheres to a violent ideology, whether or not that person has yet to shoot up a Walmart.
Potential terrorists, just like the Wieners.
But the reaction to what happened in Kashmir is a ray of hope.
Export Selection