All Episodes
Previous Next
Nov. 21, 2019 - Radio Renaissance - Jared Taylor
59:34
The Attack on Asian-Americans
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Ladies and gentlemen, boys and girls, whoever you are, wherever you are, welcome to Radio Renaissance.
I'm Jared Taylor with American Renaissance, and with me is, of course, as usual, the indispensable PK.
And once again, I'd like to invite you in these uncertain times, let us know how to reach you should it become necessary to do so.
If you can come to the amaran.com page and go to the contact us tab please give us your email address and we will send you our newsletter and we'll be able to reach you should the time come and there's an alternative way to reach us.
Yeah well good afternoon Good morning, good afternoon, good evening, wherever you are listening to us across the world, you can shoot an email over to me.
BecauseWeLiveHere at ProtonMail.com.
Once again, that's BecauseWeLiveHere, all one word, at ProtonMail.com.
And Mr. Taylor, I know Thanksgiving is coming up, I wanted to throw something out there to our listeners.
I encourage all of you to go see, with your family, Midway.
I've been trying to get Mr. Taylor to go see the movie.
It's about the fortuitous naval battle in 1942 that changed the course of the Asian theater, or the Pacific theater, and it is a phenomenal movie.
It's one that you'll want to share with your grandchildren, your children, especially as we enter an age where a lot of the World War II veterans are dying.
In fact, one of the saddest parts of the movie is at the very end, during the postscript, they note that all members of the Doolittle Raid have passed on since 2018.
They had a yearly gathering to remember what they did and that bombastic attack on Tokyo and what that did to change morale.
And it was so sad to see that all members of the Doolittle Raid have now passed on.
Well, it's been quite a few years since the Doolittle Raid.
But yes, it is a pity those great men have gone to their maker.
When it comes to Midway, I like to pose a little question to my friends.
Namely, what is a major airport in the United States that's named after an incident in American history in which white people killed 3,000 persons of color?
Very few people can get that right.
I know the answer and we've already given the answer away.
That's right.
It's the Battle of Midway.
It's the Battle of Midway.
And you know the other airport in the Chicago area?
O'Hare.
It's named for Butch O'Hare.
He was a naval aviator in the Pacific as well.
And so you can ask the question, what's another major airport in the United States named after a white man whose sole claim to fame is having killed persons of color?
Did he fly in the Battle of Midway?
No, it was before that.
I believe it was Carl C. Yes, Battle of Midway, Mr. Kersey is urging me to go see it in the theater.
I should probably do so.
I rarely get out of the house and almost never go to the cinema, but it sounds like a worthy cause.
And I understand it is full of white people.
It's not one of these re-engineered situations in which Maid Marian out of Robin Hood is a black lady.
No, no.
Everybody who's white is supposed to be white.
Wait a minute.
Why do you say that?
Because right now there's a movie out in theaters, Harriet Tubman, and when this was first pitched, I'm not sure if you heard this, one of the Hollywood executives said this would be a great role for Julia Roberts.
Oh goodness gracious.
I'm not making this up!
Well, but you know, that's if they can have black people play white people, why not white people play black people?
Sacrilegious.
Well, turnabout's fair play.
Well, but speaking about turnabout, there's a lot of turnabout these days.
I thought some of the most interesting news out of the Wall Street Journal this week was an article November 18th called, The Attack on Asian Americans.
And this article pointed out, first of all, that when it comes to racial preferences, otherwise known as affirmative action, that's one of the real euphemisms of our time, When asked directly whether race or ethnicity should be a major factor, a minor factor, or not a factor at all in college admissions, 73% of Americans say not a factor.
73%!
That's a good number.
And not only did 78% of whites take that position, but so did 65% of Hispanics.
58% of Asian Americans and 62% of blacks.
That's pretty solid.
Those are good solid majorities.
And 63% of Democrats say race should be not a factor at all in college admissions.
So there is a real public head of steam against the idea of racial preferences, certainly in college admissions.
Well, You would never know that from talking to the chattering classes and to the political classes.
And what this article in the Wall Street Journal points out, that Asian Americans, they're really leading the charge against affirmative action in any kind of significant way.
They were behind killing a law that would have overturned a 20-year-old ban on racial preferences that was passed in the state of Washington.
They successfully rallied to force the law onto a ballot.
And then, as a ballot measure, they led the charge to defeat it.
And this is really quite an achievement, given that the pro-racial preferences side had more money, they had the support of the political establishment, and the Asian-American former governor, Gary Lauck.
He was behind it too.
But Asians have really been foursquare behind this idea of going on merit rather than racial preferences.
And the Wall Street Journal goes on to point out that five years ago, When California considered a law that would have reversed its own ban on racial preferences—that, too, was a ballot initiative, by the way—there was a backlash by Asians, and they forced three Asian-American Democrats who had voted yes in the state Senate to switch sides.
In other words, people listen to their constituents.
If the constituents yell loudly enough, they will do that.
And this doomed the measure.
And of course, in New York City, where Bill de Blasio and all the other kookies are trying to change the entrance requirements for all the fancy schools, who is leading the charge to maintain a meritocracy?
Asian Americans.
Now, What's the reaction been to this?
And I think the Wall Street Journal has done a good job of collecting the kind of resentment that Asians are now facing from other non-whites.
They quote a comedian by the name of Hassan Minhaj.
He closed out his 2018 Netflix special by calling the Asian-Americans who were suing Harvard Harvard, of course, has been discriminating against Asians and against whites.
And, of course, Asians mounted this lawsuit.
They failed on the assumption that, no, no, no, we're not discriminating against Asians or whites.
We're discriminating in favor of, in any case, in favor of blacks or Hispanics.
One of these just mind-boggling legal decisions that are just beyond the grasp of mere mortals like me and Mr. Kersey.
In any case, he said these people are the worst kind of American.
Now, I love it when a guy like Hassan Minhaj, he is a Muslim from Uttar Pradesh, India, shows up in our country and tells us, no, you're a good American, you're a bad American.
And then, Edward Blum, he is the guy who is behind the lawsuit against Harvard.
He runs something called Students for Fair Admissions.
And what the American Civil Liberties Union's ACLU says about him is he, quote, pits people of color against one another.
And what this tells us is really something very interesting.
The ACLU, and just like this guy Hasan Minhaj, are saying all non-whites need to stick together in the real fight which is against whitey.
Yes.
That is what all of this means.
As soon as any person of color breaks ranks, they say, well wait a minute, this isn't fair.
Now they're not saying it's not fair against whites, they're saying it's unfair against us.
But apparently all non-whites got to stick together because whitey must be made to pay.
Now, one of the non-whites, playwright Young Gene Lee, She wrote an op-ed in the New York Times calling the Harvard lawsuit, quote, a cynical manipulation that urges Asian Americans to sell out other people of color.
Same thing.
Can't you all got to stick together against evil whitey?
Well, I looked into this lady, Young Jean Lee.
She was born in Korea, so she's yet another person who has come over to this country.
Well, she's written a lot of plays, and one of them is called Straight White Men.
Now, let's imagine how it treats straight white men.
According to Wikipedia, the plot is, during the Christmas holidays, three brothers return to their family home in the Midwestern United States to keep their widowed father, Ed, company.
Sounds like a good wholesome... Sounds like a Hallmark Christmas movie.
Well, of course, all four are wasps.
Well, how does the New Yorker describe this?
The New Yorker review called it a play about asshole culture.
Straight white men.
I mean, obviously, that's going to be asshole culture.
I didn't realize that the New Yorker used language of that kind.
No.
But I guess it does.
And it says, the audience, quote, gets to give a thumbs down on straight white men.
So they get to play along while they're watching?
Oh, the audience gets to think, oh, gosh, these people are just so repulsive.
And they can think, oh, we're so superior.
You know, here you have this Asian immigrant writing a play about the people who built the country.
And I'm sure it's one string of insults after another.
But if you had a white playwright who was writing a play about Asian characters, even if it were complimentary, they'd say, no, no, no, no.
Cultural appropriation.
Cultural appropriation.
You don't have the qualifications to write about Asians.
But here, I mean, you know, you must wonder, do they ever think to themselves, What an amazing country!
I come here to a country built by these straight white men, and I came, of course, because they built a better country than my ancestors did, but I get to come here and make a living and become famous putting plays on Broadway, no less, that just make fun of them and insult them right, left, and center.
Like you said, that insult and denigrate the very people who What's funny and what's astonishing to me is that Netflix or one of these other streaming services hasn't tried to option this play yet to broadcast on their streaming devices or Hollywood hasn't come calling and said you know what can you turn this into a an ABC sitcom?
Well, you know, the New Yorker, the New Yorker said that there was a whole lot of potential here to insult straight white men, but she didn't do it with the kind of no-holds-barred enthusiasm that she's shown on other subjects.
The New Yorker was disappointed.
Don't pull punches!
Yes, the New Yorker was disappointed that she didn't blast straight white men even more viciously.
So I guess if she'd done a really good job, then she'd get an option.
But here, See, the incredible thing is not that people who are different from us should decide that they wish to hate us or make fun of us.
The astonishing thing is that people who are like us let this happen and go to plays and applaud this kind of thing.
That's really the incredible thing.
But there are many astonishing things about the United States and I believe you had a few astonishing stories to tell us yourself.
Well, we've got to start with Jussie Smollett because this is a shot, so to speak, for the chaser.
So, Jussie's back in the news.
He's suing Chicago for malicious prosecution.
So Chicago, the police are still trying to get him to pay $130,000 in cost to cover the time
the police spent investigating the supposed hate crime that took place during the, what was it,
the winter, the, the, just last winter. Yeah, it was during the vortex, one of the coldest days
Again, quick recap, he claimed that two white guys wearing MAGA hats recognized him from Empire and attacked him, put a rope around his neck.
Turns out that he paid two Nigerian bodybuilding brothers to participate in it.
There's video of him walking around with a rope on his neck, having a time of his life relaxing.
It's all a hoax.
The media ran with it because it was an opportunity.
Let's go back to that play about straight white men.
It was an opportunity to denigrate all straight white men and Donald Trump supporters nationwide.
It backfired in a Tom Woovian fashion.
This whole story was just shocking and it's still going on.
You know, we know that all these celebrities came on board and they tweeted out support.
A lot of the Democratic candidates for president tweeted out support for Smollett.
Well, here's what's happening.
In court documents filed this week, Smollett has called this action against him Malicious.
Now, his lawyers have said that his record has been wiped clean, of course.
We know this.
Well, that's right.
He got this pardon.
He got the inside job pardon.
And, of course, Kim Foxx, the prosecutor, who's up for re-election, she said, you know, we made some mistakes, but we're going to learn from them.
And there's still an investigation going on into what actually took place within her offices.
But here's what's going on right now.
He's accused the city, now this is Smollett and his lawyer, the city police and others of causing, quote, Substantial economic damages as well as reputational harm, humiliation, mental anguish, and extreme emotional distress, end quote.
And says he's now seeking compensation.
Simply because the city wants him to pay back the money that they spent on this wild goose chase investigation.
Bingo.
Well, I think we have an expression for that.
Is it chutzpah by any chance?
I think maybe so.
I think it would be.
Well, speaking of!
Yes, speaking of yet more chutzpah!
So, I want everybody listening to this podcast To get ready to pause, because I want you to watch a video.
No, don't pause.
You can watch it later.
You can watch it later.
Okay, now perhaps for this one.
For this one you need to.
Alright.
Go to YouTube and type in Miles Garrett Mason Rudolph.
Now last week during a Steelers-Browns game, the game is about to end, Mason Rudolph is the quarterback.
He's a white quarterback for the Pittsburgh Steelers.
And as the play is over, he's brought to the ground by Miles Garrett, who's part of the defense for the Cleveland Browns.
And they get into a little tussle.
Now, when you watch this, you're going to see what happens.
Mason Rudolph is upset that the play is over.
He's trying to get up there.
They're kind of getting in a fight.
Garrett rips Rudolph's helmet off and then hits him over the head with it.
Maliciously.
Shockingly.
Violently.
It is legitimate assault.
On live television, the sportscasters who were calling it were just aghast because, again, the play is over, the game's about to end, and then they see this just massive scrum taking place.
And then when you actually watch the replay, which I'm encouraging you to do now, you see a black player assault a white player with his own helmet.
Now, what ended up happening is Miles Garrett, the black player who attacked Mason Rudolph, the white player, he was suspended indefinitely for the rest of the season.
Who knows how long the suspension could take place.
As he deserved to be.
Exactly.
Now, Rudolph was also fined for his part in the little scrum, about $35,000, I believe.
Because, again, if you watch it, It was unnecessary on both their parts.
However, it's what happened after they were broken apart and the helmet was ripped off and then Rudolph was attacked.
That's why Garrett was suspended.
Well, get this.
Jussie Smollett, this mindset now creeps in too.
He would be.
He would be.
In fact, I'm sure he's smiling just reading about this.
So, during an appeal hearing on Wednesday, November 21st, Cleveland Browns defensive end Miles Garrett, he alleged that Rudolph directed a racial slur at him just prior to the brawl, which took place on Thursday Night Football.
The Pittsburgh Steelers quarterback, Rudolph, of course, denies this because this is the first time we're hearing about it.
This is days later.
This is a week, this is a full week later.
And he finally remembers, that's why he put his foot down.
Exactly.
Again, when all else fails, just claim A. He called me the N-word and then, oh my gosh, then the assumption of guilt falls immediately on the white person.
How dare, you know, we've got to look into this guy's tweets.
Yes.
Bert Lawton, who is a Steelers spokesman, said, and this is great, quote, Mason vehemently denies the report of being accused of using a racial slur during the incident Thursday night in Cleveland.
He will not discuss this accusation any further, and his focus remains on preparation for Sunday's game against the Cincinnati Bengals.
And Rudolph would go on and tell reporters he said nothing To provoke Garrett or escalate the situation.
I mean, look at the video.
Again, it just looks like the play is over.
The Steelers lost the game 21-7.
It was unnecessary to even do this play.
They should have just taken a knee to the game.
There's no way you can score 14 points in 10 seconds.
I'm sorry, when you're on your own 5-yard line.
When you watch this video, again, it is a clear-cut case of a black NFL player Taking off a helmet.
I've never seen this before.
I watch a lot of football.
And just smashing the guy over the head.
It's barbaric.
And again, he tries to then claim that it was all because of this mysterious N-word use.
Is anyone rallying to his side and saying, yes, yes, yes.
This must have happened.
This was righteous rage, not unprovoked aggression.
No, but Rudolph's attorney put out an even better statement.
Timothy Younger said, according to ESPN's appeal, Myles Garrett falsely asserted that Mason Rudolph uttered a racial slur toward him prior to swinging a helmet at Mason's uncovered head in a desperate attempt to mitigate his suspension.
This is a lie.
This false allegation was never asserted by Garrett in the aftermath of the game, never suggested prior to the hearing, and conspicuously absent.
In the apology published by the Browns and adopted by Garrett, the malicious use of this wild and unfounded allegation is an assault on Mason's integrity, which is far worse than the physical assault witnessed on Thursday.
This is reckless and shameful.
We will have no further comment."
Mr. Taylor, I think they actually should.
I think they should sue.
This is shocking that he would make this.
And you say, hey listen, there are mics all over the game.
Individual players are picked by NFL Films and by, I think that Amazon and, I'm not sure, maybe Fox have a partnership where they actually air the Thursday Night Game.
They've got mics everywhere.
You can hear what fans in the third row in the upper deck are saying in some cases.
It's shocking.
It's shocking.
So what I'm saying is, if this turns out to be an attempt to Obfuscate the situation and make it seem like, hey, you know what?
Yeah, this white guy, he called me an n-word.
Of course I was justified in attacking him, right?
Well, let's hope that his suspension is extended on account of this.
Let this be a lesson unto them.
But I find it gratifying that this isn't getting any kind of traction at all.
Well, real quick, if you recall, earlier this year there was a review on the amrin.com website of Clay Travis's book, Republicans Buy Sneakers Too.
He's an insanely popular sports journalist, and he actually came out and did this amazing tweetstorm where he said, Mason Rudolph has to sue.
This is a clear-cut case of a black athlete trying to deflect a barbaric act.
As Rudolph's attorney said, he's attacking and impugning his integrity here.
Because when you get accused of being a racist, we know that's the worst thing in the country to be.
Well, we'll see what happens.
Well, from football all the way to the City Council of Charlottesville.
Nice segue.
Not that big a jump, actually, unfortunately.
Charlottesville has gone the other way.
They have voted to remove a statue of Lewis and Clark and Sacagawea that was in a prominent place in the city.
And the councilors discussed this statue after having invited Descendants of Sacagawea.
They came all the way from Idaho.
And Rose Ann Abramson, who is this said descendant, she said that she's seen nearly every depiction of her ancestor all over the country.
I guess she spent a lot of time snooping around these things.
She says the statue in Charlottesville was the worst we have ever seen.
She says the statue shows Sacagawea cowering and recoiling.
She says this horrible object should be put in a place where it can become, quote, an object of discussion of America's intolerant past.
Now, the fact is, There is Meriwether Lewis and there's William Clarke.
One is standing on a rock higher than the other.
One is a little bit lower.
Sacagawea is sitting on the rock.
And all of them are looking off in the distance.
And the way this was described by the sculptor Charles Keck, and this went up a hundred years ago this year.
He said, and according to a 1919 Natural History magazine, which I will quote, the statue's title is, Their First View of the Pacific.
And the artist represented Sacagawea bending forward intent on the vast expanse of ocean.
And as you can imagine, Sacagawea had probably never seen anything like that in her life.
No, no.
And Lewis and Clark probably had, but they'd never seen the Pacific.
And here they're looking at this enormous expanse of blue water.
Well, that is not acceptable because she is sitting down.
She's clearly in a lower state than Lewis and Clark.
Now, Dustina Abramson, she says, and this is Roseanne's daughter, this is yet another descendant, another generation of Sacagawea descendants.
She concedes that Lewis and Clark were good men, but they should be depicted in a new statue standing alongside Sacagawea as equals.
Now that's the only way, apparently, that they can be depicted as equals of Sacagawea.
If Sacagawea had never even been in there, that'd be okay.
Yeah, I gotta interrupt real quick.
Yes, please do.
I'm surprised she actually used that word, because you would think that they would want Sacagawea on top, pointing, on top of the mountain.
As the two white guys are kind of cowering.
That's right.
She led the way.
Exactly.
Maybe in fact she has them on her back and she's carrying them the whole way.
Yes.
And have it maybe be some animatronic instead of a statue.
She concedes that they can be equals.
But that's the only way that Sakaji Hoeya may be depicted.
Wow.
Yes, well that's what her descendant says.
Now, this is even better, the mayor of Charlottesville, I bet you don't know her name.
I know that she's a black female, I do not know her name.
Her name is Nikuya, that's spelled N-I-K-U-Y-A, Walker.
And she says, it would be a challenge for me to keep Lewis and Clark in the statue because, I mean, you've got to just have Sacagawea, because of the historical mistreatment of African Americans throughout the country's history.
What?
Okay.
Yes, we're all just goggling in amazement at this.
So every episode of American History has to be looked through the lens of how it impacted African Americans throughout history.
That's right.
Were there any blacks on the Lewis and Clark expedition?
There was a black, a guy named York.
That's right!
I did know that.
He, in fact, aside from Lewis and Clark and Sacagawea, there were 40 white men on it, but the only one that we know about is the black guy, York, because he's black.
A little bit of affirmative action, I'd say.
But yeah, the idea that you can't have white people in the statue because of the mistreatment of African Americans throughout the country's history.
Well, that just goes to show you that Mayor Nekuya Walker sees everything in terms of the mistreatment of black people in American history.
So basically, I guess that just counts out all white people.
All white.
I mean, I just don't see who would qualify.
I wonder if any white liberals there are listening to this and they're thinking, you know what, everything we're doing to systematically dismantle this white supremacist structure, you know, We've unpacked our invisible knapsack of privilege.
We're doing everything possible, and yet we're not going to have our names even on this wall of tolerance.
So, if you're going to memorialize this expedition, you should have only Sacagawea and York.
That's the logical conclusion.
Lewis and Clark, who cares about them?
Those other white guys?
Irrelevant.
Now, you know the mayor, Mayor Nikaya, I looked into her a little bit.
She has three children and no husband.
She used to live in low-income housing.
Okay.
And Wikipedia says this about her.
Walker's leadership style is fundamentally disruptive and her goal is to enact sweeping changes that she believes are necessary to correct the inequities in the city.
Isn't this incredible?
Her leadership style is fundamentally disruptive.
Isn't that exactly what you want running your city?
But you know, I looked further into this little story.
This is not the first time that the Sacagawea statue, we'll have to call it that from now on, not the Lewis and Clark statue, the Sacagawea statue got people in trouble because 10 years ago, for the very same reason, the fact that she's not the same stature and leading and pointing the way, They put a plaque at the base of the statue explaining who Sakajawea was.
And the plaque was composed, the text was composed by this same Abramson woman, Roseanne Abramson.
She's been there 10 years ago.
And she came along with her mother.
Who was described as the great granddaughter of a powerful Shoshone medicine woman.
And so, Roseanne Abramson's mother, I assume that she is now a ghost, but why she wasn't there this time, she performed a smudging ceremony on the plaque by burning sage.
And she said, to quote her words from the time 10 years ago, this is so people will respect it, so it will always have positive energy.
So the plaque, the plaque, there's a plaque under the statue only about Sakajawea.
Oh yeah, she's all that matters.
Yes, she's all that matters.
Now, it seems to me that if they got taken down a statue, you'd think that they would move the plaque, but now that it's got all this Indian mumbo-jumbo magic with all this positive energy, they'll probably be struck dead if they uproot the plaque.
What do you think?
I would not want to be anywhere in the vicinity of that city at all if that statue comes down.
Oh, that plaque is going to curse you if you touch that thing.
It's got all that smudging power built into it.
Well, tell me.
Now, we all remember the conniptions that Starbucks went through back when one of their misguided store managers called the cops on blacks who refused to pay, refused to go, and wanted to use the restroom.
So there have been consequences of some of their shenanigans.
Yeah, this was in early 2017 in Philadelphia.
A couple black guys were in the restaurant, they weren't buying anything, they were loitering,
it was filmed, it turned out to be a massive brouhaha.
You recall, Starbucks actually shut down their store one day.
All their stores.
All their stores.
Yes.
All their stores nationwide to have a...
Sensitivity training.
Sensitivity training, where white people were basically told, hey guys, guess what?
Everything that's bad happening to people of color out there...
It's not just Lewis and Clark's fault, but it's your fault as well.
That's right.
And there's no Indian positive energy we're going to give you.
So go make those coffees and do whatever it takes to make people happy.
Well, guess what?
Guess what?
Well, but no.
Wasn't the punchline the fact that they were going to make their restrooms open to anybody who wanted to use them.
You don't have to pay.
You don't have to be a customer.
Just march in.
You don't have to have bathed.
You don't have to have shaved.
You can be anybody at all.
March in and use the restroom.
You can loiter.
You can just come in.
You can relax.
You can do drugs.
You can bring your syringes in.
We're not going to stop you.
We're not going to dare.
Because that would be racist.
It would be racist.
Again, if it's a homeless person, regardless of color, you're engaging in some sort of prejudicial thinking.
Well, guess what happens?
There's a study done that shows.
The study was done by academics from the business schools at the University of Texas at Dallas and Boston College.
Joint study.
Well, get this.
Monthly visits to Starbucks dropped 6.8% compared with other nearby coffee shops after the open bathroom policy was put in place in May of 2018.
The study conducted in collaboration with the data company Safegraph examined aggregate and anonymous cell phone location data for more than 10 million devices between January 2017 and October 2018.
It covers 10,800 US Starbucks locations and measures them against other cafes and restaurants nearby.
And those other cafes and restaurants, they don't have that same open door, open bathroom policy that Starbucks has instituted.
So, the 43-page report states, quote, the decline in visits to Starbucks is large and significant.
With the free bathroom access, the researchers looked at the proximity of a given Starbucks store to a homeless shelter and found that customer traffic declined at almost double the rate at stores closest to homeless shelters versus those farthest away.
By just pure coincidence, I'm sure.
Exactly.
The researchers also found fewer sightings The researchers also found fewer citations for public urination in nearby Starbucks locations as a result.
Well, that's a public service!
Well, unless you're in San Francisco, where the new DA is basically instituting policy where, hey, you know what?
Soliciting for sex?
Public urination, sleeping in tents, it's all fair game.
It's all just fine.
And to finish it off, customer traffic wasn't the only thing that was hurt.
The average income of Starbucks customers has dropped compared with the average income of other nearby coffee shops thanks to fewer visits from its Wealthier clientele.
Well, well, well.
You know, I don't mean to toot our own horns too loudly, but this is precisely what we predicted.
You'd be shocked at the amount of predictions of things that we've stated have come to pass.
Well, I will have to poke you on a prediction that appears to be failing, but that'll be later on in the program.
That was a tease, by the way.
Yes, that was a tease.
I love that softball up tune you knocked out of the park.
Yes, yes, yes.
Now, we're moving on to a few ladies that we wish to speak about, one of whom is Elizabeth Warren and her plan to fight white supremacy, white nationalism.
Now, she's been tweeting about this because she's come up with a huge program to combat white nationalist crime, as she calls it.
She points out, the FBI has recorded 7,000 hate crimes last year, and there are likely hundreds of thousands more that go unreported or uncategorized.
How does she know?
Hundreds of thousands!
Now, she goes on to say the current administration has chosen to ignore the threat posed by white nationalists and violent extremists.
Donald Trump has cozied up to white nationalists, even hiring some into his White House.
So, these hundreds of thousands of unreported hate crimes?
She wants to shift the investigation of hate crimes, every one of them, to the FBI.
Now, if there really are hundreds of thousands the FBI is going to be investigating, they're not going to have time to do anything else.
Also, she wants tougher penalties for individuals who commit hate crimes, and as she says, regardless of their race, ethnicity, or supposed ideology.
We'll see about that.
We'll see just how consistent she is.
She also wants the Pentagon to tighten up its background check.
So that there are no white nationalists within the ranks.
She also wants an interagency task force to combat white nationalist crime.
That would be DOJ, DHS, Departments of Education, HHS.
All of them are going to get together and focus on early intervention and countering violent narratives before they can take root.
Now that sounds like censorship to me.
But HHS and the Department of Education, they're already part of this interagency task force to combat white nationalism.
And then, this strikes me as quite fascinating, she wants to research the public health effects of white nationalist violence.
Now, I think there's very little white nationalist violence, as we all know, but she wants the Centers of Disease Control and Prevention to research the public health impacts in communities targeted by white nationalists and identify evidence-based interventions to strengthen these communities.
This is just a worldwide program she's got here.
And then, I find this very interesting.
She would want to make the conviction of a misdemeanor hate crime.
Now, misdemeanor hate crime is something like writing graffiti on a wall that's considered to be anti-semitic or racist or homophobic or whatever, or defacing a gravestone.
I mean, these are very nasty things to do.
I agree.
But those are misdemeanor.
If you are guilty of a misdemeanor hate crime, Then, you would never be allowed to buy a gun for the rest of your life.
Well, look, the whole gun control concept is nothing more than trying to disarm white people.
There's no end.
There's no way to go around that.
I want to throw something out there real quick.
Are you finished with all the ugliness?
There's a little bit more.
I hate to say this.
The fact is, there is no misdemeanor hate crime at the federal level.
All of theirs are felonies.
And in fact there are 20 states that don't have misdemeanor hate crimes and four states don't have hate crimes at all.
So there are 24 states to which this would not apply.
But there is a Disarm Hate Act proposed in both the House and the Senate that would do exactly the same thing.
It would insist that any misdemeanor hate crime result in a perpetual bar on the right to own a firearm.
This is extraordinary.
Now, ordinarily, you have to be a murderer, or you have to be a wife abuser.
Yeah, it's pretty doggone serious if you're not allowed to own a firearm.
And there is no other misdemeanor that you can commit that makes you ineligible to own a firearm.
Well, as we see the expansion of red flag laws, you know, again, it simply will be, hey, you know what?
I think that guy said something Racists in the past.
We got to get his guns.
It's really that simple.
Now, see what I'd like to know is how about hate crime hoaxes?
If you commit a hate crime hoax, does that mean you're gonna be disarmed too?
Somehow, I guess not.
No, you know, it's funny listening to all that nonsense, you know, about the mental health effects.
You know, Mr. Taylor, this past weekend in Philadelphia, a bunch of black leaders got together and, get this, they started something called hashtag man up PHL and This black guy named Stanley Crawford stood up and admitted that the gun violence in Philadelphia is, quote, we as black men in the community are doing the shooting and we are getting shot.
It's up to us.
It is our responsibility to do whatever it is we can to stop this, end quote.
I thought that was amazing.
Yes, remarkable.
It's refreshing because you can look at the statistics in a city like Philadelphia, which is one of those that is seeing an uptick in non-fatal shootings and homicides.
Homicides.
Murder.
And to have this type of gathering where they will admit, you know what?
We know.
We know who's shooting.
We know who's doing the shooting.
It's us.
And then you hear this stuff where, you know, it's scary what Elizabeth Warren is proposing.
Yes, it is.
Because this is, where did we think all of this whiteness studies, abolishing whiteness was going to go?
Where did we think it was headed?
Well, to second-class citizenship.
And this is a perfect example of it.
Now, she's saying, doesn't make any difference what race you are.
We're going to do this to all these hate crime perpetrators.
I bet Elizabeth Warren does not know that blacks on a per capita basis are twice as likely to commit hate crimes as whites.
This is one of those little-known statistics.
The New York Times will never tell you.
And she's probably unaware of that.
Now, I've always thought, if the whole idea of interracial crime is this horrible thing, and hate crimes, whatever they are, it seems to me, if you're really serious about this, you should prosecute every crime, violent crime, that crosses racial lines.
Give that an extra penalty.
Wouldn't that make sense?
It's all that makes sense.
Yes.
I mean, if, you know, if some poor black woman is gang raped by white men, I mean, it's very unusual.
In fact, I can't think of a single case.
But if that were to happen, it doesn't make any difference if a racial slur is used.
Would that not traumatize her against white men?
Of course it would.
And think of it the other way around.
So every crime of violence that crosses racial lines, that should get an added penalty.
Of course, the libs will never ever do that.
Do you recall the story, I think it was out of Louisville, where the black judge got mad at the white girl because she had been attacked by a black criminal or black robber?
It was a home invasion.
Yeah, a home invasion.
She was traumatized by this and the black judge excoriated her and he was more upset about the fact that
this little white girl had it was impacted it she said that she was afraid of
black men correct and the black judge was all up in arms about this the home
invasion became secondary compared to this revelation that this man said
Good grief.
Anyway, but now we have, that's Elizabeth Warren for you, and well, we'll see.
I was talking to a guy who is a pretty savvy political operative, and he says that if Donald Trump runs against Elizabeth Warren, he could probably win.
But if he runs against Bernie Sanders, he might lose.
We'll see.
But Elizabeth Warren could be our presidentess one of these days.
It's not out of the question.
I wonder if she would be allowed back into the whole Sacagawea Indian mindset with that.
Well, she seems to be forgiven about this, you know?
That's been completely forgotten.
It's been, you know, forgiven, forgotten.
But now, somebody who's not been forgiven and forgotten is a former Mayor of Baltimore, Catherine Pugh.
Now, perhaps she has pronounced P-U-G-H.
Her name is spelled P-U-G-H.
I apologize to our listeners.
I don't know whether it's pronounced Pugh, Pugh, Pugh?
It's Pugh.
Or what?
It's Pugh.
It is Pugh.
Okay, Pugh.
Well, thank you.
Thank you.
Well, last March it was revealed that the University of Maryland Medical System paid Mayor Pew half a million dollars for 100,000 copies of her children's book called Healthy Holly.
We talked about this on this very podcast.
Now, why did University of Maryland Medical System pony out that kind of cash?
Well, it's because Mayor Pew sat on the board of this organization, and she was the mayor, and she had a lot to do with ladling out contracts, so it was useful for the Maryland Medical System, University of Maryland Medical System, to have Pew on their good side.
The word came out in March.
And in April, Mayor Pugh went into seclusion.
She took a leave of absence from her mayoral duties, claiming that she suffered from poor health because of a bout of pneumonia.
Well, the pneumonia must have been awfully bad because the next month in May, she resigned.
She did.
As the scandal just began to swirl and grow.
And it further turned out that Kaiser Permanente had paid her $114,000 for nearly 20,000 copies of this book.
$40,000 for nearly 20,000 copies of this book and she oversaw the Baltimore spending board
At a time when the city awarded a 48 million dollar contract to Kaiser
She made a healthy amount of money from Healthy Holly, if I can use the word.
Yes, she did.
And oddly enough, nobody seems to be able to find a copy of this book.
It was supposed to be distributed to all of these grade schools and put in all the libraries.
Nobody can track down copies.
I'd love to read it.
I would love to read a copy.
Yes, Healthy Holly.
Yes, I'm sure you'd be a much more health-savvy guy after you read Healthy Holly.
So uh yes now the uh well she's come to an increasingly sticky end because she's now facing an 11 count federal indictment for wire fraud and tax evasion in connection with the sale of these books.
Now what's curious to me is all the scandal seems to be falling on the head of Catherine Pugh It appears to me that Kaiser Permanente and the University of Maryland Medical Systems, somebody in those organizations... They signed off on it.
They signed off on it!
Those are the people... I mean, she accepted the bribe, but boy, those people sure are doing the bribery.
It all smells very, very bad to me.
But, so, she resigned.
Now, interestingly enough, before her, Her predecessor, Stephanie Rawlings Blake.
Oh, yes.
Remember Stephanie?
Well, Stephanie was the lady who, during the 2015 riots, said that she tried to keep the peace, but, and I'm quoting word for word, We also gave those who wished to destroy space to do that as well.
We couldn't, can't make the black kids angry.
Isn't that the Colin Ferguson view of things?
Don't make the black kids angry.
Don't make the black kids angry.
And that of course is a quote from the Kansas City black mayor when there was a number of black That's right, that's right.
And then during a subsequent press conference after she had been criticized for this, she said, no, no, no, I didn't mean that.
She says, too many people have spent generations building up this city for it to be destroyed by thugs.
Well, saying that did not get her back in the good graces of the right people because she was then accused of using the word thug.
That's right.
Which is the equivalent of the n-word.
Can't say that these black people burning down their own cities are thugs.
No, you can't.
And so she apologized for that and she was so disgraced she decided not to run.
Despite the fact, this is important, in 2014 Vanity Fair included Mayor Stephanie Rawlings-Blake on its list of the 10 best-dressed mayors in America.
It's an incredible list to be a part of.
Quite the achievement.
That did not save her career.
And then if you go yet one step further, one generation previous in this succession of black ladies who are running Baltimore, before that Sheila Dixon left office in 2010 after a criminal trial and a jury verdict of guilty and part of a plea deal for stealing money that was meant for needy families.
Needy black families.
Needy black families.
She had to resign and she got probation.
So it's been a sort of a bad series of black lady mayors.
Now they have a black gentleman mayor.
We'll see what sort of end he comes to, but his three predecessors have come to rather sticky ends.
Now, continuing, continuing, and this is where I get to poke you, Kamala Harris.
I remember, I remember being a little bit surprised that you were predicting, you were predicting with what seemed like considerable confidence to me that she would be the Democratic nominee.
And, you know, I thought, well, you know, Mr. Kersey's a pretty savvy guy.
He's probably on to something.
He may be right.
But what I have since discovered that the Sacramento Bee, her hometown paper in effect, says she ought to drop out of the 2020 presidential race.
She's pulling pretty low.
Come right out and said so.
They say she's doing terribly at the polls, her campaign staff are heading for the door, blaming each other for how bad it's gone.
What is Kamala's explanation for her low poll results?
It's what she calls the donkey in the room.
Now that's an interesting turn of phrase.
She basically tried to do what Miles Garrett did with Mason Rudolph.
That's right, that's right.
She's now saying the reason she's polling so poorly is American voters are racist and sexist.
Well, not even the Sacramento Bee is falling for this.
They point out that in her 2016 bid for the U.S.
Senate, 60% of California voters voted for her.
They also elected her twice as the State Attorney General, and in 2010, for the State Attorney General race, she beat a white man!
And then they're saying now, even in California, she's running a distant fourth, a distant fourth, barely ahead of this unknown mayor of South Bend, Indiana.
Now the Sacramento Bee says, did California voters suddenly start hating black people and women?
No.
They say they voted overwhelmingly for Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama.
So, hats off to Sacramento Bee.
Call it out.
They're in a position to say, come on, Kamala, don't give us this baloney.
And more importantly, she's attacking her own party.
I don't think there are too many Republicans voting or being polled a Democratic Polls across the country.
That's exactly right.
That's exactly right.
But you know, it's like this black football player.
It's just like Juicy Smollett.
When push comes to shove, when things don't go their way, all they can think of is racism.
Well, it works.
Sexism.
Time and time again, it actually works.
There are so few people in America, in any part of public life, who have a backbone, who will stand up and say, whoa, wait a second.
What are you accusing?
What are you saying?
How dare you, you know, to pull that finger?
Who is that governor of, you know, to basically pull a Jan Brewer?
You remember that great photo of Barack Obama when she gets off the plane and Jan Brewer points that finger in Barack Obama's face?
You have no idea what they're talking about, but it's that type of mindset that That animated and motivated Mason Rudolph's lawyer and the Sacramento Bee editorial section writers to state, hey, hold the racism trolley here.
Yes.
Back it off.
I guess it has happened so often, even liberals, and I'm quite sure that the editorial board of the Sacramento Bee would disagree with every word you and I have ever uttered in our entire lives, but even they are getting sick and tired of this.
It's like that scene at Animal House.
I'm sure you've seen it during the hazing where they're paddling one of I think Kevin
Bacon's character and he says, thank you, sir.
May I have another?
That's how they believe that white people have been conditioned.
And you know what?
I think it's obvious that across the country that mind manipulation is beginning to evaporate.
It sure seems to be.
And now I will finish up with just one more black lady story.
Oh, one more?
One more, one more.
I just can't get enough of black ladies this time around.
After three mayors and a potential candidate for the President of the United States, We have a potential candidate for Vice President of the United States.
This is just a brief little blurb about Stacey Abrams, one of our favorite politicians who almost became governor of Georgia.
Two years too soon.
Yeah, yeah, she could make it next time.
Now, apparently, everywhere she goes, she's being asked, well, would you be willing to be vice president?
And apparently, she is prepared to be vice president, and someone asked her, even for Joe Biden?
Even for this old white geezer?
And she says, absolutely.
I am a Democrat, and I would be honored to help the Democrat ticket win and to serve.
Now, I find this all curious because she's been asked, well, has anybody approached you?
No.
No one's approached her.
No one.
But she's prepared to serve no matter who the Democrat is, even, even Sleepy Joe.
Doesn't Stacey Abrams understand that Democrats are the real racists?
How can she be a proud Democrat?
Doesn't she get it?
Hasn't she been paying attention to Turning Point USA?
Doesn't she realize it's time for Blexit?
Get off the plantation!
Come on, Stacy.
She hasn't got the message.
She just hasn't got the message.
But I guess, you know, she's manipulated by the media.
That's your cue.
Well, speaking of the media...
We've got to talk about a story that I think showcases how dishonest the corporate media is.
So it turns out that a story with the wrong official narrative was scrubbed by mainstream media outlets.
After reporting on detained migrant children, the AFP and Reuters has scrubbed the story when they could blame it on Trump.
But it turns out that it was Obama back in 2015 when the United Nations revealed it happened on Obama's watch.
So what am I talking about?
The media is in full self-censorship mode.
They're basically not retracting it.
They're not changing it to make it go from, we apologize, this wasn't Donald J. Trump, it was Barack Hussein Obama, whose administration was engaging in this detaining of 100,000 illegal immigrants.
Of course, they're calling them migrant children.
We're going to use the correct term.
They're illegal immigrants.
The thought manipulation of the public is on full display.
Rather than issue a correction, AFP and Reuters, as mentioned, has instead opted to delete the story, stating, as I mentioned, 100,000 illegal aliens, they call them migrant children, were detained in U.S.
border facilities.
This decision to delete comes after the United Nations clarified the number is years old, predating the Donald Trump administration.
Oh, dear.
Well, that sounds typical.
If the story, if the truth doesn't suit their worldview, then we'll just suppress the truth.
We won't make a correction.
I'm afraid we see this all too often.
All too often.
Well, let's see.
We're getting short on time here.
I believe you had a Sweden story for us.
I've got a Sweden story.
Let's move overseas.
We've also got that great new story about refugees.
Do you want to end on that?
Let's end on knife crime in London.
Okay.
Tell us about Sweden.
Okay, let's talk about Sweden real quick.
So, there is this left-wing journalist.
She's a 64-year-old, Lena Malin, who vehemently Vehemently.
I was thinking about the refugee story and I was trying to figure out a way to segue in.
She was a mass proponent, supporter of mass immigration in the nation.
She's changed her tune all of a sudden, admitting that when it came to Sweden's crime-ridden no-go zones, quote, everyone knew it would end in disaster.
Lena Malin has now acknowledged that Sweden's attempt to integrate huge numbers of migrants from Africa and the Middle East has failed.
Quote, all parties, with the possible exception of the left party and the Sweden Democrats, Wow.
That is strong talk.
affected the reality on this point should be ashamed. She accuses politicians
of having quote largely neglected the development in some of our suburbs to
fight the fact that everyone knew it would end in disaster.
Wow that is strong talk I wonder if everyone really knew. I you know I think
there are we've talked about a number of the European Union bureaucrats over the
years who've had their own daughters murdered, mauled, raped by refugees and
they still remain committed to the Great Replacement.
It is extraordinary.
See, I find it hard to believe that people move forward year after year, day after day, saying things that they genuinely do not believe.
No, that's right.
I think, in their heart of hearts, they thought this was going to work.
But now, now that they have taken these strong positions that are leading their country to this kind of disaster, will they have the courage to change course?
That's the big question.
And I think it's admirable.
It's remarkable that a woman like this is stating the case as clearly as that.
And I hope there are more of them.
But speaking of the course of disaster, We had a little story, just a little story, out of London which speaks volume and it has to do with the fact that knife crime in the City of London increased by 43% over the last year.
And during the same period in England, there was a record high of 43,000 knife crimes across the country.
Now, it is true that they have disarmed many of the criminals.
There is still gun crime.
There are illegal guns in the country.
And gun crime is monopolized by West Indian blacks.
But in any case, because knives are easy to get a hold of, they are all over the place.
I think we had, on one of our podcasts, we talked about this process known as bagging.
Do you remember that?
I do.
Gosh, I shouldn't even have brought it up.
It's so disgusting.
The idea is to stab someone so deeply in the rectum that his lower bowel is permanently damaged and he has to wear a colostomy bag for the rest of his life.
What a gruesome, horrible thing.
This is done deliberately and it happens often enough so it's got a name for it.
But what's the solution?
What's the solution to all this knife crime?
Well, the solution is to distribute bleed control kits to all the bars in the City of London.
Hundreds of these things are going to be distributed at a cost of tens of thousands of pounds.
Now, what's in these things?
They contain tourniquets, trauma bandages, adhesive chest seals, I guess you know if you're stabbed in the chest, and foil blankets to keep them warm.
Geez.
Yes, and bar staff will be trained in their use so that the victims of violent crime, if you get stabbed, will not bleed out and die before an ambulance can reach them.
The Chief Superintendent of the City of London told Sky News that this decision was a no-brainer.
It's a war zone.
The bars in London have to be equipped like field medics.
Good grief.
You know, again, there's a reason why Baltimore and St.
Louis are cities where Air Force trauma surgeons go to prepare for the war zone, because they are war zones.
And now London, post White London is now a place where this type of lifestyle is permitted and has led to this individuality.
And we have an article on our website that describes the fact that there's a certain pattern to knife crime.
And it is a pattern that fits certain patterns that we see in the United States.
Violence is not evenly distributed among different demographic groups.
Now, to the point where You might wonder, should they be distributing these bleed control kits to every American ghetto household?
I mean, it might be a useful thing.
Because, you know, when you're shot, you might bleed out, too.
In any case, our time has come to an end.
Our time has come to an end, but let me do one quick Paul Harvey.
It's a great news story.
Mr. Taylor, how many refugees do you think were resettled in the United States in October of 2019?
Well, I cheated.
You told me.
Zero!
Thank you, President Trump.
So, for Jared Taylor, this has been Paul Kersey.
Our podcast time is up.
▲
Export Selection