All Episodes
Previous Next
Jan. 10, 2019 - Radio Renaissance - Jared Taylor
59:57
‘Impeach the Mother****er’
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome, ladies and gentlemen, to today's edition of Radio Renaissance.
I'm Jared Taylor with American Renaissance, and with me is my indispensable partner in this undertaking, Paul Kersey.
Always glad to have you with us and always appreciate your insights and observations.
Greetings to all those out there in podcast land.
And we want to remind you once again, please encourage your friends, your family, acquaintances to subscribe to the American Renaissance podcast channel on YouTube.
You could even encourage your enemies to subscribe.
All you have to do is say, hey, head over to YouTube and type in Amren Podcast.
You'll see all the podcasts.
It's incredible archive.
It is a joy to go through and listen to the fantastic conversations we've had over the years, and we look forward to have many more.
Indeed we do.
And I suppose top on this week's agenda is the primetime Oval Office speech that President Trump delivered to the nation on the subject of the wall.
The speech, I think, was pretty much unobjectionable, eight or nine minutes long.
You can read it yourself and find out what he had to say, maybe just four or five minutes.
To me, what was remarkable about it was really the reaction to it.
And it just shows once again how crazed, how utterly unhinged the opposition to Donald Trump is these days.
Jill Abramson, The former executive of the New York Times who, surprisingly enough, recently was criticizing the Times for covering Donald Trump in a biased way.
Oddly enough, she has enough journalistic integrity to recognize that her former employer is basically writing editorials that masquerade as news stories.
But she herself was swallowed up by the hostility and described Donald Trump's first Oval Office speech as, quote, a litany of lies.
Then she went on to say that it was so insignificant, so awful, that the networks should not have granted Donald Trump the honor of breaking into their primetime broadcasting to let him speak.
Then Vox went on to call the Oval Office address, quote, an insult to the nation's intelligence.
And CNN said that the whole speech was sprinkled with falsehoods, sprinkled with falsehoods.
As I say, you wonder what sort of thing they could think up to yell in frustration if he had recited Mary Had a Little Lamb.
They'd think of something.
There's nothing that that guy can open his mouth and say without producing just a torrent of hysteria.
Nancy Pelosi said the president was, quote, full of misinformation and even malice.
Now this is once again one of the left's favorite tactics is going into people's motives.
What motivated him?
Not any kind of patriotic interest in securing the border, but malice.
You know, Joe Scarborough of the Morning Show on MSNBC said the same things that Vox said.
It was full of lies.
Of course, he never addressed what those lies were.
He just said, oh, it was full of lies.
And Jimmy Kimmel, who hosts one of the big Tonight Shows, Jimmy Kimmel Live on ABC, he just simply said, hey, Trump held a primetime address to, quote, warn us about completely made up things, end quote.
Now, Mr. Taylor, what I would have done if I were Mr. Trump, I would have addressed the nation for about a minute or two, stated why this was important, and then I would have had two or three of the angel mothers, the angel parents, who could have just said, I'd like now to give my time over to, this is Officer Singh's brother.
He was just killed by an illegal alien.
I'd like him to tell you why this is important.
Now, of course, though, I'd like to point out that A wall wouldn't have kept the illegal aliens who are already in the country out, those who are committing crimes.
And that is the big disconnect, Mr. Taylor, that I see with what President Trump is doing.
The symbol of the wall is fantastic.
It's amazing.
It's wonderful.
It has to go up or else there is no opportunity for him to win re-election in 2020.
He has to get this wall built.
But what do you do with the 30 plus million illegals already in the country?
Well now, don't leave yourself open to be accused of making up facts.
We don't know how many there are.
In fact, one of the left's biggest talking points these days is it's not even the 11 or the 13 million figure anymore.
It's declining.
That's what they all insist.
Of course, whenever there's any doubt about something, they stretch the facts their way.
Unquestionably.
Wasn't it your alma mater that came out with a study saying that it was closer to 22 to 25 million?
That's right, but not even Yale can be trusted if it produces hate facts, which it occasionally, even in this day of political correctness, sometimes does.
Now, another fellow who was mighty excited by Trump's speech was my old buddy and debating sparring partner Jorge Ramos.
He was offered an op-ed opportunity in the New York Times.
I, needless to say, was not.
And I think it's worth quoting from what he said.
He wrote that George H. W. Bush, Bill Clinton, and George W. Bush built fences and walls along the southern border, and even Barack Obama maintained the resulting system.
However, the difference is that Mr. Trump's wall is a symbol of hate and racism.
I mean, you can have 600 miles of wall that are legitimate barrier, but if he adds one more mile, that is a symbol of hate and racism.
He goes on to write, The wall has become a metaphor to Mr. Trump and his
millions of supporters.
It represents a divide between us and them, a physical demarcation for those who refuse to accept that
in just a few decades, a majority of the country will be people of color.
He, of course, has to make it a matter of race.
Now, I have never ever seen Mr. Trump and very few of his supporters ever talking about
the racial mix of the immigrants.
He just wants them to come legally.
He's said over and over he wants big, beautiful doors in the wall.
Let them come.
But no, no.
The other side always has to make it about race with the full understanding that no one will ever point out that he's making a racial-boosting argument for his people by turning it into race.
They can boost their racial interests.
We cannot.
Then he goes on to say, the Trump's wall is a symbol for those who want to make America white again.
Well, I wish it were.
I wish it were.
But alas, it is not.
But the way they are constantly dragging race into this is a fascinating thing.
Then he goes on to say, every country has a right to protect its borders.
Well, Jorge, thanks for that.
But not, says he, a wall that represents hate, discrimination, and fear.
He just invalidates the previous statement he made.
This is the type of... He's lecturing.
George Ramos.
You say Jorge.
He's a white guy.
He's championing this Reconquista that's transpiring before our eyes.
California already has been colonized, basically.
We're seeing it with Arizona.
We're going to talk about other states with a fertility rate for Hispanics.
This is called a sneak peek of what we're going to talk about in a few minutes here.
But there are a lot of southern states now where Hispanic fertility is far greater than actually white and African-American fertility.
It's shocking what's happening across the country.
The hour is late and the symbol of the wall is so important.
That's why the elite are so Well, you know, perhaps I disagree with you on the wall.
If he does his best and is simply unable to get congressional funding, and if the private funding that this fellow, the triple amputee, the Air Force guy, Doesn't quite reach the $1 billion that he had in mind.
By the way, all of you out there, if you wish to contribute to that, we certainly encourage you to do so.
But if private funding doesn't come through either, if he does a good faith effort to get that wall built, but does not, I do not think that that will necessarily weaken him fatally in the elections.
What would His big opponent is going to be, well, his big problem is going to be who the other side brings on.
And he will still be a vastly superior choice to whoever the Democrats run against him.
I honestly don't think that despite the fact of having made that a campaign promise, well, maybe you could make it a campaign promise again and say, and this time I'm going to deliver.
But who knows?
It's simply the fact that it's Donald Trump against a Democrat.
That's going to be what matters, not necessarily whether this wall is built.
But good old Jorge, Jorge Ramos, he's a cheerleader for his tribe.
We're not allowed to be cheerleaders for ours.
And I would just note in passing that he has said elsewhere that we have a responsibility in the United States to absorb the caravanners who are congregating on our southern border.
Now, he would not be saying that if the caravaners were white South Africans fleeing racial oppression.
I fear not.
I fear not.
They speak his language, they sing his songs, they dance to his tunes, so they're his people and we should absorb them.
But just another caravan update.
I like to mention the caravan in passing because it sort of disappears from headlines, which it should not do.
But the fact that the Trump administration has changed the way we process these asylum seekers.
They meter in just a few dozen a day, which I think is an excellent way to do it.
And so the others are sitting on the other side of the Mexican border.
And lately, the coyotes who bring people up to the border have been chartering commercial buses.
They've been bringing up to all sorts of different places, not just Tijuana, which has already got a bad reputation for not wanting them, understandably enough.
And so they are in Reynosa and elsewhere.
And what's happening here is that they, too, are being metered in very slowly.
And some of them are saying, eh, to heck with this.
I'm not going to wait.
I'm going to pay a smuggler to get me across.
Here is someone by the name of Maximo Rene Arana Nunez, a Guatemalan, who showed up in Reynosa.
And he's trying to get across.
He says, I'm scared to go to the border crossing because they will deport me.
Well, they sure will.
He says, I'm stuck here until my family in the United States can save enough money to pay for a smuggler.
And he reports having been quoted a price of $7,000.
As usual, these are not poor down and out, scratching a living out of the unyielding earth that we like to imagine.
His family is probably going to scrape together whatever it takes.
But this price has been going up because of all of these people who are wanting to get in, and because of increased border security, supply and demand.
And as you noted, Maximo is waiting until his family in the United States, presumably they're here illegally, And they're going to scrounge together money that's not going to go into the United States economy, but it's going to be sent over to him by a wire transfer without being taxed, which is simply all President Trump has to do.
Tax remittances and voila.
Yes, we plan to do a study for the American Renaissance website on this whole question of the billions and billions of dollars That gets sent out of the country by people who are here, often illegally, who certainly are not saving their money and putting it into health care, for example.
They don't pay insurance.
Hispanics are the least likely to have health insurance, which means they show up at the emergency room and we get to treat them.
But they're shipping out $500, $600, $700 a month.
that they are saving by sleeping 10 to a bedroom and we never see that money but they are going to no doubt scrape the money together and send it to their dear relative Maximo so he can pay a smuggler to get him across the border.
Quick anecdote for you there was a CNN article in January of 2018 that made the rounds on conservative websites that talked about how much money Mexicans were sending back to Or Guatemalans, or Hondurans.
It was a shocking amount, in the tens of billions.
And that was just a study that they did from, I want to say, August 2017 to December 2017.
Just a shocking amount.
Well, that story went viral, and CNN pulled it from their website.
You can still find it when you access one of the internet archives, the Wayback Machine.
But they actually pulled this story.
So when you went there, it would have the 404 error, this page is not found.
Because it's such a powerful story that shows this is where, and this is how, President Trump's wall can be built without American taxpayers spending $1.
That's right.
If you just put a, I don't know, maybe a 3% tax over a few years' time, all of this money going outside of our country, a little of it could be filtered back as it crosses the border and used for this very useful purpose.
And I don't know what the legalities would involve.
I don't know if you could do that by executive orders.
Perhaps not.
But he used to have a majority in Congress, but he'd wasted his opportunity of doing what could have been a real way to make foreigners pay for that wall.
But more update on the caravan.
It appears that when these caravanners are waiting to cross on the border, because they're being let in in small numbers, some of these places that they're staying have become incubators for disease.
As a result, border authorities are referring 50 people a day, just 50 people a day, for urgent medical care.
Their conditions include parasites, blood infections, abscesses, tuberculosis, pneumonia, and, of course, the inevitable smattering of pregnant women who need to give birth.
Now, among these 50, many of them are, the majority of them, in fact, are children, with 28% of them under the age of 5.
So, we have a situation in which not only people are bringing families, and this has been an astonishing thing.
In December, in December, at the U.S.
border, the southern border, ICE, well the Border Patrol, caught 60,000 people, of whom 22,000 were children.
This is a huge record.
Now, why are they doing this?
Well, it's very clear.
You remember the poor boy who died on Christmas Eve?
Well, the boy's mother back in Guatemala explained to the Reuters news agency that they had heard that if they brought a child, The father would get quickly released into the United States, whereas he might not if he came up alone.
So, he could very well have been sick before he left.
But so now, of these 22,000 children who have been taken into custody in the month of December, now every single child in Customs and Border Patrol custody gets a new medical checkup sometimes more every week because we have to be sure that
none of them die.
As America's infrastructure crumbles, 22,000 children, Guatemalans, Hondurans,
whatever you want to say, Mexicans, whoever can get here, OTMs, it doesn't
They are the ones who are the beneficiaries of tax dollars that should be going to our children's future.
And it's infuriating when you think about this.
And I've got a question for you.
Do you think that in this new country, say 30, 40, 50 years from now,
that these areas where migrants are crossing, that they're gonna become tourist sites?
You know, Ellis Island is a tourist location, largely because that's where new immigrants are arriving,
and the late 19th century, early 20th century, you know, obviously the Statue of Liberty was there,
so that's the reason why people like to go there now, but Ellis Island, you still have displays
where you can see the way that people were quarantined.
if they had diseases.
Because at that point, whatever the equivalent of the Border Patrol was in the 19th, 20th century, they checked everyone.
And they would say, hey, I'm sorry, you've got a communicable disease.
You're not welcome in this country.
Yes.
Do you think that these are going to be tourist sites?
That's a good question.
You mean there will be sections of the Rio Grande that will be memorialized as they're like the underground railroad?
This is where the gringos failed to secure their country, which is why we now lord over it.
Yes, could be.
I do understand that some years ago There was a theme park in Mexico.
Now, it may have ceased operations because I haven't heard of it for some time, but it was, enjoy the excitement of crossing the border without having to do so.
And they would tramp in the dark, and there would be shots of, oh, here comes La Migra, and they'd run, and there might even be gunshots.
Yes, you pay, you paid an admission fee, it's like Disney World or something, and you pretend that you're crossing the border and flouting the Norte Americanos and sneaking into their country.
So, who knows how they'd memorialize that.
Yeah, but even if there are not memorials, I'm sure that this would very much get the Underground Railroad treatment.
That they are fleeing the chains and slavery that the North American imperialists have imposed upon them by their neoliberal trade policies and made life intolerable in their homelands, and so they are coming to get their just desserts, their just rewards.
Yes, I can easily imagine that.
But just one last thing about the border.
You know, the Mexican government has... I have to give them credit for what they've been up to.
They have agreed to keep these OTMs, these other-than-Mexicans, on their side of the border, while we check them out for whether or not they have sustainable asylum claims, which, of course, 85% of them do not.
And at the same time, now, the Mexican government, understandably, is getting tired of this.
And they have just announced that they're going to put guards at 370 illegal crossing points along the country's southern border with Guatemala, which happens to be the Usumacinta River.
This is one in many places.
It's pretty narrow, depending on the season.
You know, just you can paddle across in an inner tube.
But Interior Secretary Olga Sanchez-Codero says that in addition to guarding these points, they're going to beef up enforcement agencies at 12 formal points of entry on the border.
So they are doing the obvious thing.
If they have agreed to hold these people who are not even their citizens, in many cases they have to feed them, house them, clothe them, medicate them, they're doing the logical thing.
They're going to make sure fewer of them come.
So hats off to this new Mexican administration.
One of the things I've been fascinated with is that one of these leftist groups that we've talked about before that has helped this so-called humanitarian crisis and the caravan by, you know, food and transportation, Why they haven't tried to get a large group of Venezuelans to flee the socialist Venezuela and to make their march up here?
Because you'd think that they could use PR tactics and marketing to cast it as these individuals were harmed by socialism.
They really want to be in a capitalist society.
They'd be so successful to make it to America.
You can't let them rot and continue to lose weight when all the grocery stores are empty in this socialist regime.
I'm kind of surprised that hasn't happened yet.
Well, you have quite an imagination.
That would be something to throw in the face of all of us.
I would be a tremendous leftist.
I think Hood and I were one time talking about that.
Our enemies don't really have the imaginations that we do.
We do.
Yes, well good for you.
That would be something to throw in the face of these democratic socialists of America.
Here are people who are coming from your idea of how to run a country.
Exactly.
And look what wonderful times they have.
The Koch Foundation, the Koch brothers, would love to find a way to use their network to help the poor downtrodden.
Well, that's a good point.
You know, they're looking for cheap labor anyway.
I bet these desperate people are probably happy to work for 75 cents an hour.
Bring them on, bring them on, and then point them out as to just how bad socialism is.
Well, you know, you should send your resume to the Koch Foundation.
No, thank you.
No, you don't think that'd be fun?
No, I don't think so.
But let's finish up with a border here.
With your and my good friend, Anna Navarro.
She is, of course, an alleged Republican strategist.
She voted for Hillary out of her intense dislike for Donald Trump.
She's Nicaraguan-born, by the way.
I just love it when people are born anywhere in the world and then show up here and try to run our political campaigns and tell us how to run our country.
You'd think they'd have a little bit of gratitude and humility, but no, sir.
Well, she was in the news because she was on a... this is a CNN program, isn't it?
The Cuomo Primetime.
And she was debating a fellow named Steve Cortes, who was doing a pretty good job, actually, of talking about how A lot of these illegal immigrants are criminals.
And refuting this idea that the crime rates of illegals are so much less than natives.
Nah, nah, nah.
It ain't as simple as that.
No, it's not.
No, it certainly isn't as simple.
He's talking about crime.
Well, as soon as he starts talking about the crime that illegals and other immigrants are committing, Ana Navarro starts filing her nails.
Filing her nails!
Really, in the middle of an interview.
She whips out a nail file and starts filing her nails.
She had this prop ready to go.
She was rolling her eyes the entire time.
It was very disrespectful.
It was one of those triple screenshots where you have the interviewer in the middle and neither of the two participants in this conversation were in the same location as the host of the show, as you noted.
It was Cuomo's show on CNN.
And you see the You see Steve talking.
And you're right, he did a great job.
And you see Anna, she's rolling her eyes.
And then when she brings out this prop.
So she went into this interview knowing she was going to do this.
This was a premeditated filing of her nails after it was brought up that Americans were being killed by illegal aliens.
This is going to become one of the more powerful memes you'll see.
And I do strongly urge all of our listeners here on this great American Renaissance podcast Renaissance Radio, as I believe you've branded it, to seek out this video, but then also to see the image and the memes that are being created.
This is galling.
This is shocking that we're going to be lectured at by this Nicaraguan-born, quote, Republican strategist, end quote, whose entire goal is aligned with that of George Ramos, or Jorge Ramos, if you want to call him that.
They want to swamp America because these people are more American than you or I, Mr. Taylor.
Yes they are, yes they are.
And I think, you know, it's in this context that we should probably bring up Pierce Corcoran.
Pierce Corcoran is a fellow, a Tennessean, and he was just driving down the road, and this is on December 29th, and a fellow by the name of Franco Cambrani Francisco Eduardo Age 44, who has been illegally in the country for 14 years, swerved into incoming traffic and ran headlong into Pierce Corcoran's car and killed him.
Now, Franco has survived.
And I thought it was quite interesting that his mother wrote a public notice about him.
And I think it's worth quoting some of the excerpts here.
She writes, Pierce Corcoran was only 22 years old when he was killed by an illegal immigrant in a car crash.
We as parents taught all three of our children to be responsible for their actions.
We discussed with them their need to maintain their vehicles and always have their license, registration, and insurance up to date.
Now everyone is well aware that the 44-year-old man involved in our 22-year-old's death did not practice the same responsibility and has not done so for 14 years.
14 years of illegal residence in the United States.
She goes on to say he will most likely face little jail time.
He believes he should remain in our country illegally.
Not only that, but we provide his counsel to fight for his rights.
Then she goes on to say, for God's sake, out of respect for the men and women who fought and fight to make this country such a desirable place to live, do the right thing and come here legally and become a responsible citizen.
Now, I think it's interesting that she's putting this in such explicit legal, illegal terms.
You do have to thank President Donald Trump for having made this the prominent subject that it is.
In other times, under Hillary Clinton, if this had happened, she would probably not think in those terms.
No, she wouldn't.
But here she has.
Now, she's also been very careful to say It's not about where this man came from.
It's the fact that he takes no personal responsibility for his actions.
And the title of her plea was pleading for change, not discrimination.
Well, the thing is, though, she is pleading for discrimination.
We are discriminating against legal and illegal citizens.
And this is why, going back to what I brought up at the very beginning of our conversation, and you noted it's fake news.
We have no idea how many legal aliens there are.
The wall is important, but the wall being built would not have stopped Pierce Corrin from being this 22-year-old white kid who's just prepared for his life.
He's getting ready to go out and enjoy life and start work, start a family, etc, etc.
That's gone now.
And if the wall had been built, it wouldn't have stopped this murder from happening.
Without deportations.
The other side even argues, and perhaps even plausibly, With the wall up, that might have been a reason for him to stay in the country, because he couldn't get home.
And once he got home, he'd have a hard time getting back.
But of course, yes, we need to keep them out to begin with, and the Trump wall is certainly the place to start.
But this is the kind of story which induces Ana Navarro to file her nails, roll her eyes, and act as though this is not her problem.
Bend over, Whitey.
It's already over.
Jorge Romes, you've read his pieces.
This is our country now.
Pierce-Corinne is nothing more than collateral damage and the browning of America.
And that's why it's so important that Republicans start to talk about not just the wall, but deportations.
Yes, yes, we've got to get them out.
Oh, I just forgot to mention that when Ana Navarro was debating Steve Cortez, she referred to our president as President Loco.
I thought that was a charming way to refer to the chief executive.
But yep, she's filing her nails while Mr. and Mrs. Corcoran are burying their 22-year-old.
I have no problem with a Spanish, with People like Anna and Ramos and Hispanics calling him President Loco because that means he's doing something that for us is very sane.
Oh, as we have said many times, the battle lines get clearer and clearer and clearer every day.
And this makes more and more white people wake up every day.
I tell you, we just got a communication today, this very day, from a guy who's been an academic for 33 years.
And he has finally seen the light.
He says, this is just not the country that I want to leave to my children and grandchildren.
We need to do something about it.
Here's a guy, I mean in academia too, those guys really get it full force.
But yes, this is happening all around the country every day.
Those who listen to the Renaissance Radio podcast and read American Renaissance know that we are the corrective lens to white people's racial myopia.
That's a good way of putting it.
Yes, we are the antidote to suicide.
We choose life, not death.
Health, not sickness.
Yes, forward motion rather than retrograde motion.
But I also wanted to promote a great piece by our staff writer, Gregory Hood.
It's called the Affirmative Action Congress, and I'm just going to touch on a few highlights here, but I think he picked up something that is remarkable about this new Congress.
It's got more women than ever before, more non-whites than ever before.
And the whole leftist press, and perhaps it is redundant to call it the leftist press.
It's oxymoron.
Yes.
The press is just whooping with joy about this.
And emblematic of this was a cover of the New Yorker magazine.
It's a drawing that portrays some of these newly elected lady non-white members of Congress.
They're in color.
And they're walking through a door, and the room into which they're walking is filled with line drawings of white men.
They are just pure black and white.
They are utterly colorless.
But these ladies of color, they are lovingly there in full color, and the Huffington Post call this portrayal of the changing face of Congress brilliant.
And it was not just a New Yorker that caught this notion of vibrant people of color displacing old men.
It was a common theme.
In fact, Vox, you know, we're sort of picking on Vox, but Vox makes itself a very tempting target, doesn't it?
I'd say so.
Two authors by the name of Li Zhu and someone named Kainaz Amaria.
I love it when you see these articles by these people whose names you can practically, unpronounceable names, telling us what's going on.
But they wrote, on the Democrat side of the aisle, this was talking about the swearing-in ceremony.
On the Democrat side of the aisle, a historically diverse class of women and people of color were clad in bright outfits as they were sworn in.
While on the Republican side, a relatively homogeneous group of mostly white men wore nearly identical dark suits.
Yes, this nice contrast.
Now, then good old Jill Abramson, we're bringing her up again.
She was writing for something called Gulf News and she says, The rainbow!
She's talking about the rainbow of colors, of bright dresses, of kente cloth, of turbans.
Sorry, not turbans.
Hijabs.
I guess we don't have any Sikhs yet in Congress, but that day will come.
That rainbow was only visible on the left side of the dais, the Democrat side.
On the right, where the Republicans sat, there was still the usual set of suits worn by mainly older white men.
We can tell whose side she's on, but I think this is the best.
Someone who writes in the name of J.E.F.
for The Economist.
That seems like a rather laconic byline to me.
She says, there was on one side of the chamber a sea of white men in suits.
On the other, a wide array of hues, colors, and styles.
It was multicultural America on one side, a rather dour country club on the other.
I guess which side she's on.
Well, I mean, again, it's The Economist and so this is what they've cheerleaded for decades as being open border and just for this hyper capitalism that has birthed this But, you know, The Economist, I used to subscribe to The Economist.
I see.
I subscribed for a long time, maybe for as long as 20 years.
I finally just became disgusted at their open, open, open borders, essentially anti-Western civilization stance, their utter unwillingness to even consider any kind of alternative.
And I'm generally a free market capitalist, but in this respect, they do not simply take this kind of population replacement as an extension of simple free markets.
They are cheerleading this movement.
They think it's great.
The fewer whites around, the better.
It has become a kind of ideological aspect to them that has nothing to do with the free flow of capital, They just want to see us done in.
And as you and I are well aware, and the listeners of this show, and the readers of American Renaissance, this non-white wave that is, you know, washing across all of the country brings with it not free market capitalist ideas, but socialism.
Exactly, exactly.
High taxation on both the individual and the corporate side.
So it's one of the paradoxes of the economists Cheerleading this open borders non-white immigration into our country.
That's right.
But continuing with Greg Hood's story, one of the newly minted members of Congress that he focused on was Rashida Tlaib.
The first Palestinian ever to take the oath and become a member of Congress.
A few hours after she was officially sworn in, she attended an event that was co-hosted by something called the New American Leaders Fund.
The name says it all, doesn't it?
Not too many white people involved.
No, the New American Leaders Fund.
It is an organization dedicated to, quote, a more diverse leadership.
And what they do in this little organization, which was founded by somebody called Sayu Bhojwani, yet another Mayflower name.
Wasn't there a Bhojwani that signed the Declaration of Independence?
Oh, several Bhojwanis.
Bhojwanis pair and feast.
She was New York City's first Commissioner of Immigrant Affairs, by the way, so she was the pioneering officeholder in that respect.
In any case, she says she explains her organization, the New American Leaders.
We work with the best and brightest from the African, Arab, Asian Pacific Islander, Latino, and Caribbean American communities to transform them into effective candidates and the inspiring leaders their communities need.
Their communities being the key word.
Their communities.
Now, do we note an absence here?
Yes, yes.
You can be African, Arab, Asian, Pacific Islander, Latino, Caribbean, American, but that's where they draw the line.
Now, this is something that's funded by the Ford Foundation, and it'd be very interesting to know just if there are any legal problems with funding something that's so explicitly racially
oriented and so discriminatory and who they make their programs available.
But we'll see.
This is the new America we're looking for. But now to get to the part of
our program that is not as family-friendly as we'd like, when Rashida
Tlaib attended this, I think it was called the New America Swearing-In or
something like that.
They got all of these colorful, delightful, vibrant people together and they had a party.
And when Rashida Tlaib was at this event, co-hosted by the New American leaders, she announced that her plan was to, quote, impeach the motherfucker.
The motherfucker, of course, being the President of the United States.
So, it's remarkable to me how quickly these new-fangled immigrants pick up the vulgar vernacular.
Who of this freshman incoming class of the house, who's your favorite?
Is it Ms.
Tlaib, or is it the Somali in Minnesota?
Is it everyone's favorite punching bag?
Alexandria.
You know, I don't have a favorite yet.
I'm going to give them a chance to flap their wings a little bit, show their stuff, see what their true colors are.
No, there are several good candidates here.
You do wonder when this individual we're talking about, the one who took John Conyers' seat, I think these last names, these surnames are so crazy.
Tlaib.
Correct.
You have to wonder when she's going to say something anti-Semitic that is going to upset the Jewish Democrats.
And this coalition of the fringes begins to fray.
She's already been accused of anti-Semitism.
She has been, but she's yet to go on a tangent on the floor of the House.
During the speech.
That is going to be the moment where you realize the cracks are there.
There's no going back.
Oh, there are very, very serious cracks here.
It's this idea that somehow all the non-whites, all the people of color, are going to join hands and gang up against whitey and then they're going to live happily ever after.
Ain't going to work that way.
It may be possible to reduce whitey to minority, but that is not going to bring the kingdom of heaven on earth, much as they may hope it might.
Which brings us to California, where whites already are a minority, and probably the last white governor has just been inaugurated.
Gavin Newsom, everyone's favorite punching bag from San Francisco, who keeps failing upwards.
Yes, well, he seems to be living a charmed life.
As you say, it's a little surprising that they've got a genuine honky.
A male honky!
Who has three, you know, Nordic children.
Yes, he does not appear to be too light in the loafers.
He has a nice wife and sure enough children.
Yep, yep.
But just a few quotations from his inaugural speech I think are worth reading.
He says, we have the resources to ensure a decent standard of living for all.
It's not a question of whether we can do this, but whether we will.
I mean, the democratic socialists are gaining in numbers, aren't they?
Oh, yes, they are.
Yes, they are.
They're going to find ways.
I mean, this is, I mean, I love Margaret Thatcher's description of socialism.
Eventually, you run out of other people's money.
But Gavin Newsom is part of this increasingly popular idea that it is important for government to tax the productive to subsidize the lives and the further proliferation of the unproductive.
That's essentially what he's saying.
And you know the tech sector in California which has helped When you think about how much these, you know, the market capitalization and the valuations of these companies that are based in Silicon Valley, in San Francisco, in Los Angeles, you have to wonder what's going to happen if they're going to have some of their lobbyists say, no, wait a second, because all these companies, they fund lavishly the Democratic Party.
We talked about this.
We talked about how, what was Apple?
Wasn't it something like The employees who gave to the Democratic Party versus the Republicans.
I can't remember the number, but it was some... A hundred to one?
It was far greater than that.
Same thing with Google, same thing with Facebook, same thing with all these corporations.
Apple, again, these... Netflix, these, you know, massive, massive market caps, and yet they're the ones who are funding these Democratic Socialists, who at the end of the day, they're going to come back With their forks and their knives, they're sharpened.
Hey, now it's time for you guys to pay the piper.
That's right, that's right.
If somebody's going to be milked, they are the prime cows.
But continuing with Gavin Newsom's inauguration speech, he managed to quote an African proverb He says, if you want to go fast, go alone.
If you want to go far, go together.
So we're all going to hold hands.
African proverb.
And he also quoted Cesar Chavez.
I find it charming who he chose to quote.
Telling him.
Yes.
Cesar Chavez apparently said, you cannot uneducate the person who has learned to read.
Now, okay, all right, Cesar, but these are not what I would call immortal words, but Gavin Newsom chose to quote them.
And then, this is another quotation, another person he quoted.
I didn't find him quoting George Washington.
I didn't find him quoting any of, not Thomas Edison.
That great California governor, Ronald Reagan, was left on the cutting room floor as well.
The only people he quoted were African Proverbs, Cesar Chavez, and then, A young dreamer from Los Angeles who unbosomed the following heartwarming line.
She said, I wasn't born in California, but California was born in me.
I'm sure that got a huge round of applause.
Of course, he finished it off with, Governor Newsom said, quote, California is and should be a, quote, house that provides shelter to all who need it and sanctuary to all who seek it.
I guess he's an anti-federalist now?
What's going on here?
What is this?
Incoming democratic socialist state rights?
You know, I think it was just last time we ran through a series of killings that resulted from sanctuary policy in California.
Correct.
They get out of jail, they go on a shooting rampage because the local sheriffs are barred from turning people over for ICE.
ICE is just itching to get their fingers on these people and deport them.
But no, no, he hasn't learned a thing.
California is going to provide shelter to all who need it and a sanctuary to all who seek it.
It does sound like he wants to start his own immigration policy.
And I guess his theory is he can let them all in.
It's going to be extremely expensive and it's going to be a lot of fun to watch because as California goes, so goes the country.
We already have seen New York also kind of go in that same way as basically saying we're going to be a beacon of hope as this dark cloud haunts Washington D.C.
and the federal government.
We will do what's necessary.
This was Governor Cuomo during his second inauguration address.
He did it Ellis Island, by the way.
Wasn't he saying that it's going to make no difference what your legal status is, where you're from, we're going to make sure you get first-rate medical treatment if you live in New York.
Well, again, you've got New York, you have California, so people all across the country are watching and they're going to start seeing a mass exodus.
You thought white flight from California was bad before.
Obviously, these goofy white people who are fleeing California are going to bring their politics, regrettably, to places like Texas, and Colorado, and Arizona, and Idaho.
That's the strange thing about white people, you know?
They escape from the worst of California, and then they find themselves in a place like Utah, or some of them end up in Northern California, Placer County, which is still, I think, 85-90% white.
And then look around and say, gosh, we missed the diversity.
And what is it where they were fleeing?
Oh, they were fleeing the traffic.
They're fleeing the pollution.
Well, they don't miss the diversity because they keep their politics.
They're then able to say, hey, guess what?
Our politics work here.
And you know what?
You don't have the inclusion diversity.
Because white people, I do believe this, white people can make anything work.
I'm not talking about the Soviet Union or stuff, but there's a reason why the happiest people on the planet are in the Scandinavian countries.
And these white people, these whites who are fleeing California, they go to white areas.
They're not seeking diversity.
They know.
Implicitly, they know, but they're going to hold on to... But I've seen so many interviewers saying, yes, we're glad we moved, but we just don't have the diversity that we used to.
They will actually say... I wonder to what extent they genuinely miss it or they feel obliged.
They're mouthing the platitudes.
I think it's a form of virtue sickness.
They're quite happy to have cashed out before Prop 13 is overturned in California, which is something that Governor Newsom has said.
It's on the table.
Well, that's right.
Now, the state house can overrule this stuff.
Prop 13 is merely a law.
It's merely a reflection of the people's will, but the people's representatives can just give the people's will the back of the hand.
And as you noted, I believe that the state legislator in California is 60% Hispanic?
I can't remember the figure, but it's something close to that.
Now, and for those who are not aware, Proposition 13 was voted back in, gee, back in the, I'm trying to think, maybe 1980s.
It's been on the books for a long time, but it limits property taxes.
I think it limited property taxes to 1% of that.
Significant, yeah.
And not above that.
But now that the tax and spend folks are really itching to get their fingers on that money.
So, yes, move out while you can.
Now, this is a story that you call to my attention, a rather sobering one, about fertility in the United States.
And it's been well known, the United States as a whole has been below replacement fertility since 1971.
And whites have been below replacement fertility for even longer than that.
Now, in some respects, lowering fertility is not necessarily a bad thing.
The fertility rate for teenagers, the birth rate has fallen by 55% since 2007,
and by 70% since the most recent peak in 1991.
So I don't mind when teenagers stop giving birth.
But the consequence is that it's not just teenagers.
Last, in 2017, that's the last year for a course for which you have complete data,
There were 3,853,000 births in the United States.
That sounds like a lot, but it's down 2% from 2016 and it's the lowest in 30 years.
So not only is the rate is declining to the point that it outstrips the increasing population, which is remarkable.
Now, the only population group The only group of women whose birth rates are improving is women in their 40s.
Now, obviously, there's only a very, very small number of them, but they are desperately trying to pop out a baby while they still can.
All of these poor, career-oriented, feminist-oriented white women who are trying to at least get one before the curtain drops on their fertility.
Take the pink hat off your head, protesting President Trump, and they decided to put a pink or blue cap on their little baby.
I guess they have.
But congratulations to them.
They're going to have children after all.
And I thought it was significant that, of course, there is not a single state In the United States, in which in 2017, the fertility rate for white women went up, went down in every single state.
And of course, it is below replacement in every state, the lowest fertility for white women.
And this is really rather obvious when you think about it.
It's in the District of Columbia.
White women living in the District of Columbia have barely more than one child per woman, total lifetime fertility.
I mean, at that rate, every generation gets cut in half.
That's a sure ticket to extinction in no time at all.
But then the lowest after that are the New England states, Delaware, Maryland, all Under 1.6 and in some cases down as low as 1.3.
Those are the places where white people are not having many children.
Now, the highest fertility rates for whites in 2017, although they're still not at replacement level, one would be Utah.
Utah is 63% Mormon.
And Mormons are really one of the few white groups that still have a substantial number of children.
And if you count just Mormons, I believe they are replacing themselves.
And then also South Dakota has got a surprisingly high fertility rate for whites.
But still not at replacement level, as you noted.
Exactly, exactly.
And no one is entirely sure why South Dakota has had this relative boom in white babies, but with fracking, shale oil, and all these things, there's been an economic boom there.
Now, as for black women, they had a fertility rate above replacement level in 12 states, as opposed to zero for white women.
And I was surprised to hear this at first, that the state with the highest fertility rate for black women is Maine.
But there's an explanation.
There is a logical explanation for that.
And as you know, it's probably Somalis who have flooded into places like Portland and Lewiston, Maine.
Gosh, I think it was Lewiston, Maine.
There was a recent speech given where someone brought up Lewiston, Maine.
That's right.
Somebody just noted it in passing as one of those places that... Oh, it was Tucker Carlson and Tucker Carlson's famed discussion on economics and the decline of mortality in the United States and what was going on.
And he just shockingly brought up Lewiston, Maine for some reason.
Yes, I wonder how he could possibly have done that.
Of course, those of us who pay attention to these things knew exactly what he was talking about.
Hooray for Tucker Carlson for mentioning this.
But so, yes, Maine is where blacks have the highest fertility rate.
The number is four per women.
Four per women!
You know, they get themselves on welfare, and of course you know the old story about the Somalis.
They sent search parties out all across the country, and they found the place with the most generous welfare, and they all flocked there.
And now they're having four children per woman.
And in general, it's interesting.
Blacks have the highest fertility rates in the northern Midwest, And then the lowest in the southern Midwest.
Interesting.
And more or less average rates in the south where the large number of blacks are to be found.
Now in the case of Hispanics, this is another surprise to me.
Alabama had the highest fertility rate for Hispanics in 2017.
They had just over three per Hispanic woman.
So the Hispanic population is definitely growing in Alabama.
And apparently they remain high in this sort of high two to three range in Georgia and North Carolina as well.
Well there's a lot of farms, a lot of agriculture in the great state of Alabama and Georgia and North Carolina and regrettably as cheap labor comes in, guess what happens?
You've got government welfare that will help take care of these families.
This is the thing, with whites you have to have both the mother and the father work to take care of the children because you don't really have affordable family formation anymore.
You don't have You know, whites don't live in an area where there are a lot of their family members that they can lean on to help out, whereas in these Hispanic areas that are in these colonized areas of Georgia, Alabama, North Carolina, that's what we have to start calling them.
These areas are being colonized.
Now, I know you don't like that phrase because we live here.
The reason why I say it is because everyone in America post-1965, hey, they're just visiting.
We live here and you know they can go back and they have to go back or else we don't have a future.
It really is that simple but this was a depressing article that was on that's probably still on Drudge today's January 10th.
This was prominently placed on the Drudge Report so you know that a lot of people were reading this and there were a lot of people Probably your friend Jorge Ramos and Ana Navarro were excited when they saw this story.
They probably were.
No fewer than 29 states, Hispanics are successfully doing more than just reproduce themselves.
But we must not end the program without talking about Jasmine Barnes.
I think everybody who's listening to us probably knows what happened there.
This was the seven-year-old child who was the victim of a drive-by shooting.
Somebody pulled up in the car in which she was riding with her sisters and her mother
and blazed away, and poor Jasmine, only seven years old, died.
Now, what made this a matter of importance and not a matter of just routine police blotter
was the fact that it was said that the killer was a blue-eyed, skinny, white man in a red pickup truck.
So this set off a frenzy of hate crime allegations, blanket coverage, over a dozen stories in the New York Times,
and civil rights activist Sean King, who works very actively with Black Lives Matter
as an accommodator for the Young Turks, he offered a $100,000 reward for anybody who could track down this white guy.
And in fact, Houston launched its biggest manhunt in history.
There was actually a story, Mr. Taylor, that NASA was asked to help out and do whatever they could to enhance this so-called the red truck that was driven by this skinny blue-eyed white man.
Of course there is the police sketch that was done of this rather handsome white suspect that of course turned out to have been entirely made up.
Well, see, I just can't decide about this.
They claimed that he was so close they got such a good look at him that they could tell he had blue eyes.
Now, I see people every day and I couldn't tell you what color their eyes were, but I guess these were very, very observant people while the guns were blazing away and they're speeding away.
In any case, they pinned it on this white guy.
And now, interestingly enough, and I don't know the details about this, but Sean King, indefatigable Sean King, who claimed that he vetted over 1,000 tips on this and was working day and night to find the killer of this seven-year-old girl, I wonder what motivated him.
He doesn't seem to care about seven-year-old girls who are killed or paralyzed by just the usual black-on-black gangland banging away.
No, he didn't care about that.
Ooh, if you can find a white man and claim racism, boy, he really threw himself into that.
And he apparently got a hold of a mugshot of a fellow by the name of Robert Cantrell, who had been picked up a day or two after the December 30 killing of Jasmine Barnes.
He'd been picked up for purse snatching or something.
And somehow or another, he convinced himself that this was the white man with the blue eyes.
And he ran the mugshot and he said, and I quote in a tweet, we've had 20 people call or email us and say he is a racist violent asshole and always has been.
Tell me everything you know.
You know it's funny when I first saw this story emerge on say January 1st and 2nd of 2019, this the shooting of Yes, yes, it's terrible.
And God rest her soul, as I tweeted out the day this became obvious, this story was never
about her.
This was a vehicle to attack all white people as a proxy by using this suspect, this white
suspect as the avatar for white supremacy which is rising in the age of Trump.
This is something that the Young Turks, where Sean King appears a lot.
They were pushing this meme that this is indicative of this evil racial climate that Trump has created.
And of course the Young Turks have deleted all the videos they did about Jasmine Barnes' murder where they tried to blame not just one white suspect but all white people as having Something to do with this murder.
But again, it was two black gangbangers.
One guy who actually had a pretty big rap sheet.
He had a weapons charge in Louisiana.
I mean, this really was just a black-on-black crime that shows black lives don't matter.
Because it has been completely dropped.
There were 12 stories, as Mr. Taylor said, in the New York Times, all with the headline, White Male Suspect, somehow in the headline or in the lead open paragraph.
Once the story came, it was completely dropped.
They just said suspect arrested or suspects arrested.
That's right.
Case closed.
Move along, Whitey.
Move along, everyone.
We were on the verge of having, you know, a lynch mob set up because the night before... Oh, good.
Well, no, I just wanted to point out that this fellow, Robert Cantrell, who was fingered as the possible or likely suspect by Sean King, his family's been getting threatening messages all the time.
On Facebook, his niece says, just read off one of the messages, says, someone is going to rape, torture, and murder the women and children in your family.
Death threats, despite the fact That the word's out.
He had nothing whatsoever to do with it.
Now, you will not find anything about this in the New York Times, so long as we still thought there was a white man who had been shooting black people.
Wow, that's big news.
But now that we find a completely innocent, completely exculpated white man getting death threats, huh, that's of no interest whatsoever.
He needs to file suit against Sean King.
He needs to file suit against Sean King.
Sean King needs to be removed from Twitter.
Someone such as yourself Who's been removed from Twitter, who's never tried to do something like this.
Sean King is able to do this, and I believe there are pictures of Sean King and the CEO of Twitter, Jack Dorsey.
But no apologies from Sean King.
So, of course, we make no apologies either for our position, and I believe our time is up.
And so we look forward to visiting with our listeners next time, and we'll have other wonderful stories to tell, and a few that didn't make it this time, but For Jared Taylor, this has been Paul Kersey.
Our podcast time is up.
▲
Export Selection