Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Aug. 2, 2018 - Radio Renaissance - Jared Taylor

58:46

‘White Men are Bullshit’

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Hello, ladies and gentlemen, welcome to another edition of Radio Renaissance.
	I'm Jared Taylor with American Renaissance.
	And with me on the line from his hideout is Paul Kersey with his usual brilliance and insight.
	And just like every other week, There are so many events to talk about, we just don't know where to begin or stop.
	That's the problem.
	But I think we will begin with something that has just showed up lately.
	And that is the story of Sarah Jung.
	Just yesterday, Sarah Jong, who was born in South Korea, grew up in North Carolina and California, and is a naturalized US citizen, was appointed to the New York Times editorial board.
	That is a very prestigious position.
	She has also been appointed to be the lead writer for technology.
	Now, she is a graduate of UC Berkeley and of Harvard Law School.
	She was a Pointer Fellow in Journalism at Yale in 2016.
	And in 2017, just last year, she was named by Ford Magazine as 30 under 30.
	In other words, one of the top 30 under 30 journalists in the entire United States.
	And just this year, she turned 30 years old.
	Well, Very shortly after this appointment, in fact just a few hours after this prestigious appointment, a few people have been discovering what she has been tweeting over the years.
	And let me read some of the choicer ones that have come to light.
	Dumb-ass fucking white people marking up the internet with their opinions like dogs pissing on fire hydrants.
	White men are bullshit.
	White people have stopped breeding.
	You'll all go extinct soon.
	This was my plan all along.
	It must be so boring to be white.
	Are white people genetically predisposed to burn faster in the sun, thus logically being only fit to live underground like groveling goblins?
	You neglected my favorite one.
	Yes.
	Quote, white men are bullshit.
	Unquote.
	You know, you read these tweets and you think about what's happened over the past month in regards to Twitter.
	We saw the brouhaha over the seemingly supportive of pedophile tweets by the director of Guardians of the Galaxy, James Gunn.
	That were from about seven, eight years ago.
	He was subsequently removed from that franchise.
	He was set to direct Guardians of the Galaxy 3.
	You know, Twitter is a fascinating, fascinating medium.
	You, of course, are banned from that website.
	Certainly for nothing like this, you know?
	White people to stop breeding good riddance?
	Dumb-ass fucking white people?
	And Jared, of course, is just quoting these tweets.
	This is not language.
	This is not part of his normal lexicon from what I understand.
	No, these tweets, I mean, Twitter is fascinating because the people who discovered these tweets and decided to go to war, they're people who Twitter actually wants to remove from the discourse.
	These are people who would have normally been stranded on Gab and been locked on that medium where basically there's no other journalists or celebrities to interact with.
	That's why Twitter is so important, to be able to instantaneously interact with any of these people and then they might be having lunch, they might be between takes on the set, and then they'll get irritated when somebody tweets at them something that they've never encountered before in their life.
	That's why I love Twitter.
	Because you never know who you're going to properly offend with a truth that they despise with all of their being.
	And then you read these tweets and you realize this person has been spoon-fed an anti-white diet for the past 15 years.
	And you know what?
	She's gorged herself on it.
	She's...
	She's, uh, you know, she's corpulent on anti-white hate.
	Well, you know, I just don't understand this.
	This is a woman who has benefited from certainly the best institutions in the United States.
	Harvard Law School.
	Berkeley.
	She was a fellow at Yale.
	I cannot imagine that white people have mistreated her in any possible way.
	Probably, people have just been lovely to her.
	Oh, they've been over backwards to help her to be on that 30 for 30 list and to attain what she has achieved thus far in her life.
	That's right.
	She's written for all of these prestigious magazines and newspapers and now she's at age 30 on the editorial board of the New York Times.
	I just don't understand this all-consuming resentment for a country that could not have treated her, I suspect, more generously.
	Now the question of course is, what's the New York Times going to do?
	There are a lot of people out there who think the New York Times is not going to care.
	I remember seeing, I just saw a tweet that had been reproduced someplace saying, don't worry, this was the stuff at the top of her resume when they sent it into the New York Times.
	And I personally agree with that.
	Before we started this podcast, we were on the phone talking and I said, I actually think that this is the type of stuff that's going to get her a 10% raise and probably get her a book deal with the Harvard Press.
	I think that you underestimate the level of anti-white venom that flows through the veins of the elite.
	This is precisely why she has risen.
	This is the type of They're not sociopaths at this point.
	They truly believe this.
	They're actually probably good people.
	Well then, then perhaps we should have a bet of some kind.
	I think she will be fired.
	I think she'll be fired within the next few days.
	Maybe even within the next few hours.
	But maybe I'm naive.
	We'll come up with a bet offline, but I'll take that bet.
	That's a good one.
	But it's funny you bring that up about people, what happens, because unlike some of the baseball players recently, the white baseball players, I'm thinking of Trey Turner, I'm thinking of Atlanta Braves starter Sean Newcomb, who almost pitched a perfect game the other day and then had to answer questions about his so-called racist and homophobic tweets that had been dug up from years prior.
	And the Associated Press Tried to put out this idea that there's this toxic culture in baseball that starts in high school where these baseball players, these white baseball players, are engaging in homophobic, misogynistic, racist talk and they put it on Twitter.
	And this of course is one of the reasons why black participation is so low.
	Of course no one ever asks if the same type of mentality where blacks are posting stuff on Twitter is one of the reasons why White participation in basketball and AAU games is so low in high school levels.
	You know, obviously, that type of diversity doesn't... That's good diversity when a league is almost all black.
	But when a league is 60% white, like the Major League Baseball is, well, that's a horse of a different color.
	It's obviously a racist color.
	And, you know, Mr. Taylor, reading these tweets that Trey Turner did, I don't know if you knew what happened.
	He had to go and face the media, and he was holding back Tears, as he apologized, as he apologized, fighting back Niagara Falls coming out of his eyes, all because these tweets were discovered, whereas you noted, and other people have said, this new member of the New York Times editorial board, I think she's actually going to be commended by her peers.
	I just don't think that they are prepared to memorialize the double standard quite to that extent.
	In their heart of hearts, they may think this, but they simply cannot be seen as taking such a ferocious stance against these baseball players.
	As you say, things they did years ago when they were in high school or college, some of them.
	And pretty mild stuff.
	There's even a worse story from two years ago.
	A baseball player named Steve Clevenger.
	He was a journeyman catcher for the Seattle Mariners at the time.
	He tweeted some things about Some of the riots that were happening.
	I think it was in Baltimore.
	Something was happening in Baltimore, I believe.
	And he was suspended for the rest of the year by the Mariners.
	And his career as a Major League Baseball player was effectively over.
	He's not played Major League Baseball since.
	And you think about the double standards there.
	There's a guy who, you know, a couple of tweets under 140 characters.
	His life passion to play in Major League Baseball was taken from him.
	Well, we will see.
	Sarah Jong, I'm sure her career is not over.
	This will not end her career.
	I just don't think that the times can, as I say, be so, so clear and so obvious about such a ferocious anti-white bias.
	They just can't afford it.
	I can see her at some point being promoted to the ombudsman of Facebook to decide as the arbiter of what is and what isn't fake news.
	I mean, look at it this way.
	I've heard stories now, Mr. Taylor, that Alex Jones is InfoWars.
	If you share InfoWars stories on a page that you own, Say American Renaissance still had a page and you guys shared a story from InfoWars.
	You would then get a message from FactChecker that said, this is fake news.
	We are now going to use our algorithm to ensure that you don't get as many eyeballs see your material as before.
	And that's the type of role that I think Acera could have an army of you.
	I mean, here's the scary thing.
	You said this is an individual 30 for 30.
	She's but a microcosm of the true macro of the enormity of anti-white hate that exists nationwide that has been bred and is going to every second, not just the New York Times editorial board, the Gannett editorial board, USA Today is a governing company.
	Think about Cox Communications.
	They own the Atlanta Journal-Constitution.
	Why is it that Netflix, Mr. Taylor, is working with the Obamas now to do a show?
	I mean, again, we're not seeing any... Well, what the Obamas do is certainly not, you know, white men are bullshit, you know, and you're not breeding, you're going to disappear, hooray!
	He doesn't talk that way.
	Having read Michelle Obama's dissertation, I'm sure she and old Barry... Barry Serato have had that conversation before.
	I can't help thinking that, you know, I've known a lot of Asian Americans and I think she's...
	I think she's unusual.
	I think she's unusual.
	I hope so.
	We'll see.
	We'll just have to see.
	But speaking of the sins of the white man, and exclusively the sins of the white man, let's jump to the story about Austin, Texas.
	Austin, Texas just recently released a 25-page report.
	I haven't had the time to dig through it, but I'm sure it's just fascinating reading.
	Identifying sites named for Confederates and slave owners.
	25 pages!
	Boy, oh boy!
	And of course, they want to rename these things.
	Anything that says Beauregard, anything that says Lee, anything that says Jackson.
	Gotta get rid of that.
	But, just as an afterthought, they pointed out that the name of the city itself Austin, named for Stephen F. Austin, who was basically the George Washington of Texas.
	Yeah.
	He's really the father of Texas independence.
	He said some now unfashionable things about slaves.
	He wanted Texas to be a slave state.
	He thought that slavery and cotton were going to be the economic backbone of Texas.
	And he said that if slaves were freed, they would become, quote, vagabonds, a nuisance, and a menace.
	Now, that doesn't sound nearly as mean-spirited as what Sarah Jong has been up to about white people.
	But in any case, this means that there is a real movement on now to perhaps change the name of the city.
	Now, so far, nobody in a leadership position in Austin's city government has come out publicly to say that we've got to change the name.
	But there's a Stephen F. Austin University in East Texas.
	There's an Austin Elementary School in the Panhandle.
	And one in the Rio Grande Valley, and another in the Permian Basin.
	They're these Austin elementary schools, and so they're going to have to worry about whether or not they can continue living in a city named after a guy who supported slavery.
	Yeah, this story, when it hit, it was so shocking because you think, wow, they really are going to go to such levels to erase and remove anyone, regardless of what they did, even if they said a minor thing.
	I mean, think about the story of of Stephen Foster that we've talked about on prior podcasts.
	You can go back and you can think of the gentleman who did, was it the Dred Scott Act who had the statue in?
	Yes, Taney.
	Judge Taney, yes.
	His statue had to come down.
	You basically start to realize that They are going to dismantle white American history brick by brick, city by city at this point.
	I mean, you know, Austin, let's keep Austin weird.
	I think that's one of the sayings that they have on bumper stickers.
	Hey, let's keep Austin, Austin.
	I mean, this is this is insanity.
	And I think, again, this is one of those steps that had this report come out maybe 10 years later when Texas was, you know, a blue state, which it's headed that way, guys.
	The only reason Texas is a red state still is because whites vote 85% for Republicans, just as they do in Georgia.
	I think in Virginia, whites only vote for the Republican Party.
	What, like 65%?
	Is it even as high as that?
	I was reading an article recently and it pointed out that Georgia's demographics are actually worse than Virginia's, Mr. Taylor.
	But because whites vote as a block, so almost monochromatically, that's why they're able to dominate, even though they're about to be a racial plurality.
	In Texas, you think, again, Austin, Texas.
	It's got to be renamed.
	Well, who do you rename it for?
	Do you rename it after Santa Ana?
	I mean, that's the whole reason.
	Someone that I greatly respect, Mr. Taylor, one time said, don't care about the Alamo.
	The Alamo was a victory for Mexicans.
	You should always remember San Jacinto.
	That was our victory.
	Yes, that was our victory.
	And you know, there is a huge memorial there, a big arch.
	You can go up inside the arch and tour the battlefield.
	It's amazing.
	It's amazing.
	It's a wonderful place.
	And but you think about at some point you wonder when Texans are going to say, oh gosh, what?
	You want to start reading them in our cities?
	I mean, you always hear all these elated things about Texans and how hardcore they are.
	Texans and the people of Austin are an entirely different category.
	That's true.
	I remember back when W was running against John Kerry.
	And W. Bush wins.
	And a professor at the University of Texas at Austin was actually quoted as saying, I can't believe that guy won.
	I don't know a single person who voted for him.
	That's the kind of bubble they live in.
	That's what Austin is like.
	I haven't been for years, but apparently it's just as liberal as the day is long.
	And you have people there who simply don't know and cannot imagine someone voting for George W. Bush.
	Not only is it liberalism day is long, the affluency now is driving out the few pockets of African-Americans in the city of Austin, blacks, because the price of real estate is so great.
	You're seeing, if you saw a picture of the skyline of Austin 10 years ago to today, you wouldn't recognize the city.
	It looks like one of those cities you see being built by the Saudi oil money or by the United Arab Emirates.
	It's shocking the transformation of Austin, but at the same time, it's also becoming increasingly white.
	And of course, that is something that the white liberals, they can't stand.
	Oh, they're terribly ashamed of that, I'm sure.
	Gentrification under their very... They're probably more ashamed of that, Mr. Taylor, than they are of the name Austin.
	I'm sure.
	But did you know that on the Statehouse grounds, there is a beautiful Confederate monument?
	I am aware.
	I've been to Austin and I did seek that out when I was in Austin.
	It is a beautiful memorial.
	And as you enter the Statehouse building, there are all the flags under which Texas flew.
	And the national flag of the Confederacy is one of them.
	It's right there in the marble as you go in.
	Now, I just don't know how long that stuff is going to last, but we will see.
	Once they start changing the name of Austin, anything's up.
	Oh, and once they change the name, it's all gone.
	I mean, when you lose, that's the slippery slope.
	If you give them an inch, they take every aspect of your history and they reimagine it to contort to whatever weird nuance they have concocted for the present.
	And were you aware that Faneuil Hall, Faneuil Hall is named for a guy who traded slaves.
	Faneuil Hall in Boston.
	This is known as the Cradle of Liberty.
	This is since the 1740s.
	You had the rebellious colonists, and then you had abolitionists and suffragettes.
	You had people like John Adams, Susan B. Anthony, Frederick Douglass all declaiming, making their points in Faneuil Hall.
	But Peter Faneuil, who gave the money to have this hall built, was one of the richest merchants in 17th century New England.
	He was a slave owner and a slave trader.
	Gotta go!
	In fact, now the idea is that they must rename Faneuil Hall for Crispus Attucks.
	Now, remind me, was he the first person killed?
	Was he killed at the... That's right.
	At the time of the Boston Massacre.
	Correct.
	And he just happened to be there.
	That's what I thought.
	He wasn't really taking part of it, but he was the first who actually got shot.
	So he's considered the first casualty of the American Revolution, a black man, not nearly given the credit he deserved.
	They want to call it Crispus Attucks Hall.
	And it's not as though there are not precedents for this kind of renaming.
	Apparently, there was a street outside Fenway Park, the baseball stadium.
	Probably the most historic baseball stadium left in America besides that.
	Maybe Wrigley Field in Chicago.
	Yeah, yeah.
	I've actually been to a game in Fenway Park.
	I find that hard to believe.
	Well, it was a miracle.
	Never to be He repeated.
	In any case, there was a street called Tom Yawkey Street.
	Now, he was a Red Sox owner and a great booster of the team, but... And the city.
	Yes, that's true.
	But later on, it was discovered that he did not have a black player on his roster until 12 whole years after Jackie Robinson signed on with the Dodgers.
	Unfortunately, that date Jackie Robinson first integrated baseball is seared into our minds because that's supposed to be one of the great hallowed days in our history now.
	It was 1947, I believe, when Jackie Robinson first played.
	So that means I think baseball was actually integrated before the armed forces.
	Was the Armed Forces integrated in 1948?
	It wasn't until 1959 that the Negro Leagues came to Boston.
	There's actually a great book about this.
	There was apparently The Curse of the Bambino, which is why the Boston Red Sox never won a World Series.
	And this liberal white author argues, no, no, no.
	It's because of the racism of the Boston Red Sox owner that kept that he wouldn't have a fully integrated team.
	He'd only have a few token black players.
	And of course when the Red Sox won the World Series in 2004, it was a team of almost all white players with a couple Dominican Republican players who don't consider themselves black.
	Right.
	Or they'd punch you in the nose if you said they were black.
	It's very true.
	But when they renamed Tom Yawkey Street, I was astonished to discover that they didn't call it Jackie Robinson Street.
	They didn't call it Nelson Mandela Street.
	They changed it back to its original name, which was Jersey Street.
	How traditional!
	How remarkable!
	I find this quite astonishing.
	But you know, all the whole Boston area has just been sick about this stuff.
	Just two years ago, Harvard Law School, they They completely revamped their official seal because it was related to the family crest of the people who had first endowed the law school.
	But they were slave owners.
	They were slave owners.
	Can't have anything, anything even remotely symbolically connected to that as part of Harvard.
	So who knows what's going to happen to Austin?
	Who knows what's going to happen to Faneuil Hall?
	But the March of White Obliteration goes on.
	And this was, in effect, the point of a long Vox article about what changing demographics mean for the United States.
	Yeah, by Ezra Klein.
	It's a must-read.
	Hopefully we can find a way to put a link.
	I think it actually was linked on American Renaissance a couple days ago, and if not, it needs to be, because this is a really revealing article that shows that the white leftists, they understand what this backlash is going to be.
	They understand What the early stirrings of this backlash, which culminated in Donald Trump's victory in 2016, what that means and what it's going to translate to.
	Yes.
	Now, they go through a lot of statistics about how by 2030, immigration will overtake new births as the dominant driver of population growth.
	And of course, 15 years after that, America will become a majority-minority country.
	Whites will be a minority.
	Now, they also point out that the Hispanic and Asian populations are expected to roughly double by then, the mixed-race population to triple.
	Meanwhile, the non-Hispanic white population is the only one that's going to fall.
	It will fall from about $199 million to $179 million.
	A loss of $20 million between 2020 and 2060.
	We are the only ones who are going bye-bye.
	Now, this was something that quite surprised me.
	The modal age, that is the most common age for white Americans, is 58.
	For Asians, it is 29.
	That's the most common age of Asians is 29.
	For African Americans, blacks, it's 27.
	And for Hispanics, it's 11.
	There are more 11-year-old Hispanics than 12 or 13 or 80 year old, there are more 11 year olds than any other age.
	Which is why the data that NumbersUSA puts out that shows it's the immigration that is driving the population growth.
	It's one of the primary reasons why commute times are so terrible because white people continue to try and find new subdivisions, new cities to live in to protect their children from black crime.
	And guess what?
	Inevitably those new subdivisions, those new houses, those new communities are erected by illegal alien laborers.
	So it's it's it's a sad situation that these numbers are I'd say they're depressing but you know what this is something that we've known was coming this demographic change is it's it's as if 30 or 40 years ago the Hubble telescope, well I don't think the Hubble telescope went up until the mid 80s, but it captured some sort of asteroid that we knew was going to hit.
	And NASA and the best scientific minds had to devise a way to make sure that this didn't hit us in 50 years.
	And unfortunately there's only a few minds, people listening to this, who actually even care about the demographic transformation, what it's going to mean to not just America, But to white Americans and also, you know, the quality of life for everybody is going to fall.
	I mean, even if you're an environmentalist.
	We've mentioned this before and someone sent me a very nice email and they said, thank you for bringing that up.
	The environmental impact of the immigration change.
	Oh yeah.
	And just racial demographics.
	You think about even when America was a 90% white, 10% black country.
	Whites abandoning cities all across the country and creating suburbs out of the wilderness and what that did to the environment.
	Now you factor in A doubling of the, a double and a tripling, I'm sorry, a doubling of the Hispanic and Asian population.
	What that's going to do to the environment and to, and to, you know, water usage and like the electrical grid.
	It is terrifying when you think about all the prospects and ramifications of this racial change.
	Oh, I know.
	Just population change, as you point out.
	For years, I've been marveling at the idea that we're supposed to be fighting crime, and yet we import people who commit high rates of crime.
	We're supposed to be fighting illiteracy.
	And bad schooling, and we import people who can't even read their own languages.
	We're supposed to be fighting disease, but we import people with strange diseases that we eradicated long ago.
	And we're supposed to be fighting pollution, and yet we import more and more people who, by coming here, the only reason they're coming here is that they expect to consume more than they did when they were back where they were.
	Here's a question for you, and it's slightly switching gears, but I think it's very interesting because Ron Innes has done some studies that show the Hispanic crime rate in America is just a little higher than whites.
	It's not something to be worried about, but he points out the black crime rate is, you know, catastrophically high.
	We've just started seeing stories about how horrible the murder rate is down in Mexico this year.
	It's actually stunning.
	President Trump just actually this morning tweeted about the high number of homicides.
	I think there was something like 30,000 homicides in Mexico last year and this year is unbelievably violent.
	Have you thought much about why this is?
	Why, you know, are the numbers Skewed in the country for the Hispanic crime rate?
	Well, there's several things going on here.
	The study that Ron Anz did about Hispanic crime was a very interesting one, but he was mostly looking at circumstantial evidence, so to speak, because there are no national crime statistics that separate whites and Hispanics out in a useful way.
	Where you do find that is in city statistics, for example, state statistics.
	And when you are able to separate them out, for most violent crimes, there is a distinctly higher Hispanic rate of committing these than white.
	But it's not nearly, the differentials aren't nearly as great as when you're talking about whites and blacks.
	And of course, Asians are almost invariably lower.
	Although curiously enough, in New York City, Asians commit a violent crime at a higher rate than whites.
	I think it's probably because they've got some sort of Chinese gangs or something.
	There's some strange anomalies.
	If all you look is at a county or a city, but if you're looking at something like a state like California, California's got pretty good statistics.
	And at every age, at every age, Hispanics are committing violent crimes at a higher rate than whites.
	From, you know, it goes from 20 to 50 percent, something like that.
	As Ann Coulter pointed out in her book Audios America, making a point that I wish had occurred to me years ago, if we had an immigration policy that works, we wouldn't have a single immigrant that commits crimes.
	The fact that any immigrants commit any kind of crimes shows that we are letting through all sorts of bad apples that shouldn't be allowed.
	And we're just talking about legal immigrants, correct?
	We're not even talking about illegal immigrants.
	It's almost, you know, over and over we are told that legal immigrants do not commit crime at a higher rate than natives.
	Nobody really knows.
	It's a very, very slippery thing to get your hands on.
	But again, even if they did, well, of course the native rate is elevated by black crime rates.
	If you're comparing it to whites, I'm sure legal immigrants probably commit all sorts of crimes at higher rates than whites, but nobody in any local jail or any kind of sentencing situation is making the statistics available.
	It's a very hard number to come up with in any kind of reasonable and reliable way.
	But all of this stuff that Vox was talking about in this review, they did say also that America's foreign-born population is projected to rise from 14% today to 17% by 2060 And that would be above the record of 15 percent, which was set in 1890.
	1890 is when, so far, the largest percentage of immigrants of the population was foreign-born.
	And, of course, they were overwhelmingly white.
	Now, of course, they're overwhelmingly non-white.
	And in 2060, I have no reason to suspect they won't be 90 to 95 percent non-white as well.
	Well, they already are 90 to 95 percent non-white at this point.
	And more sobering of that number, I mean, as recently as 1970, Only five years after the horrendous 1965 Immigration Act completely changed everything, the foreign-born population of America was under 5%.
	We were a actual nation.
	Yes, there were warts.
	Yes, there were problems.
	Of course, we lived under the tyranny of the Kerner Commission for three years after that, because that came out in 1907, which blamed whites for all the problems of the black community.
	But you know what?
	Then we decided, To bring all these other people over and just exacerbate those problems even more.
	And of course, Whitey was to blame for every failure.
	Of course.
	But you know, another aspect of this Vox article that was very interesting is that in this long account of the transformation of the United States, it did point out that we are moving towards block voting.
	That whites vote for Republicans, non-whites vote for Democrats.
	And increasingly, there's this sense of whites who are saying, well, hold on.
	We don't like what's going on here.
	We don't like it at all.
	And they anticipate a certain amount of real tension.
	It's unusual when you see articles like this, when people say they're going to be problems.
	They acknowledge they're going to be a problem.
	Then there was a sentence here that I thought was interesting.
	To say American politics is in for turbulence, which they admit is going to be turbulence, is not to say we are in for dissolution.
	You know, I think Ezra Klein, the writer of this piece, admitted that we needed to kind of lie about these numbers a little bit to white Americans.
	Because that line right there, it's insanity.
	Because at the end, he also talks about how politicians Now of course, that just makes no sense because Barack Obama, I guess after he won re-election, even before then with the Trayvon Martin stuff, the things that he did to antagonize not just police, but to basically put the bullseye in the back of white Americans nationwide, siding with black criminal time and time again.
	Well, it's hard to imagine what type of world these people live in when they continue to put Barack Obama on a pedestal.
	And as if he was this America's Nelson Mandela type figure.
	And of course that's going to lead us to our next topic a few minutes from now.
	But again here, he's saying politicians able to articulate a vision of this future that is inclusive, inspiring, and non-threatening.
	How many of them are there going to be?
	Is that even possible?
	I keep bringing this up and I'm working on a very long piece for AR about the upcoming Kempf Abrams election in Georgia.
	And it's already.
	The only one who's actually got an inspiring, inclusive message is the Republican, Kemp.
	Honestly, he's like, we need to deport illegal aliens.
	I care about the black unemployment rate.
	He's basically talking like Donald Trump.
	Donald Trump continues to talk about the Hispanic unemployment rate, the black unemployment rate, pointing out that his policies are working.
	Brian Kemp is using the same language.
	He's just attacking illegal aliens.
	Abrams, the highly indebted black candidate who's obviously a proponent of... I wouldn't say she's a black power candidate, but she's very excited about these racial changes.
	She's making this a prominent...
	point of her campaign that I represent the New Georgia.
	Screw everyone else.
	Screw these white voters down in Valdosta or Columbus or the suburbs of Atlanta.
	All you white women, how dare you vote for Donald Trump back in 2016?
	You have a chance to prove yourself that you were wrong and vote for me to get a person of color in the governor's mansion in Atlanta.
	That's right.
	No, you're absolutely right.
	It's only whites Who are talking about inclusion.
	Bingo!
	That's it.
	All the rest of them.
	And that ain't gonna last forever.
	And the good thing is, it didn't last in the 2016 election.
	All the goobers.
	The governor of Ohio, John Kasich.
	You had Jeb Bush.
	Even Rand Paul said some dumb things.
	Think about what Rand Paul did.
	An outreach office in Detroit.
	That's right.
	I mean, how many of these black power candidates, how many... This socialist Cortez, has she set up any outreach campaign in the whitest suburbs all across the country?
	Is she trying to say, hey, this is going to work for you guys?
	You're talking about Alexandria Cortez.
	Alexandria Cortez.
	Yes.
	She's doing a countrywide tour right now trying to get this...
	Democratic socialist mindset started and kick-started.
	Of course, all the Democrats, even Barack Obama, has pushed back because they realize it's too soon.
	It's too soon.
	But they're not going to outreach to whites.
	They don't think it'd give too... They do not care about the white vote at all.
	When she says, when she says, it's our turn now.
	Yes.
	I don't think she's talking about white liberals.
	She's talking about white dispossession, which Wilmot Robertson, I don't even think he saw the depths of which these people were ready to go.
	Yeah.
	But yes, the future, the writing is so clearly on the wall.
	But when he says also that to say American politics is in for turbulence, it's not to say we're in for dissolution.
	Well, I vote for dissolution.
	Separation.
	Separation.
	This kind of turbulence.
	Does he really think?
	You know what this reminds me of?
	When he says, you know, we're going to have this sort of rocky spell, but then we're going to get some Obama type who's going to join us all together.
	We're going to be happy and overcome all our divisions.
	It's just like Robert Putnam's study about just how awful diversity is.
	He hated the data.
	He tried to sift the data in every possible way to conclude that, no, something else must mean that Los Angeles is a worse place to live than North Dakota.
	It can't be diversity that makes it a horrible place to live.
	But all he was left with was diversity.
	And then he says, but there's no reason to think that in the future, diversity will be a wonderful strength.
	I mean, that's just like this Edward Cline article.
	Things are rocky now, but, you know, if you catch this tornado, lasso it in the right way, you could just go anywhere.
	Where do they get this?
	This Pollyanna-ish nonsense?
	But I guess that's what they have to say, have to conclude.
	They can't just say, well, we made a mistake.
	Well, I think that they live in the power corridors of Washington, D.C.
	or New York City, and they're trying to figure out a way to get rid of They're non-white, undesirable population in a very creative manner by saying, hey, you're going to be blessed by having this.
	You know, it's just like in Chicago.
	The black population of Chicago is dropping precipitously.
	It's dropping radically.
	And at the same time, they're lamenting this.
	They're quite, you know, the people who own all the property are quite excited because property values are going to start rising everywhere throughout the city.
	So it's about getting rid of your undesirable population and white liberals have a unique way of doing that.
	See, we have this constant disagreement.
	I don't think they deliberately and viciously want us to disappear, but they are trying to point out that there may be, you know, it may be tough for you white guys as you become a minority, but in the end it'll be just so much better.
	Having read Gregory Hood's tremendous review of the movie The First Purge, which is available right now on American Renaissance website, I think it's one of the Yeah, I say this a lot because I think he tops himself almost every time he writes something, but this is a review you should read.
	I think that makes it quite clear what the entertainment elite have in store.
	Well, that movie was made by a black director, I believe.
	It's a practically all-black cast.
	That is an expression of black anti-white vitriol.
	I think more and more white people are just going to begin to wonder, well, wait a minute, wait a minute.
	Is this really the country that we thought we were developing and building?
	But, there are certainly people who seem to think that we're headed in the right direction by letting in everybody.
	This is a story that you pointed out to me.
	The union that represents the employees of ICE, they are threatening to sue the mayor of Portland, Oregon.
	And the reason is, There was an occupation of the ICE facility in Portland, not an occupation, but people camped out right in front of them for a period that lasted for nearly 40 days.
	They're constantly demonstrating in front of the ICE facility, camped out there, harassing people that go in and out to the point where people who work for ICE thought they might be in danger.
	But what the mayor of Portland, Mr. Wheeler, He said he's not going to tell them to go away.
	In fact, he ordered the police not to cooperate.
	These people may be trespassing, they may be harassing employees, but he ordered them not to cooperate with ICE.
	This is an absolutely extraordinary state of affairs.
	And it was only when ICE threatened to sue to get normal police protection from these people who were loitering, who were catcalling, protesting, only then Did he say that, well, okay, maybe you guys better go.
	And then they dispersed without any arrests.
	You know this type of this type of mindset with these in these extreme left cities that again a lot of the politics are fueled by this this anti-white animus we saw this in Charlottesville we see this in places like Berkeley we see this in Portland which is why I think there's gonna be another rally a free speech rally and it might be in Portland this week and or Seattle one of these cities I don't know why people keep doing this if you fight back you're going to be arrested the police you know I I have no problem with police.
	A lot of people say, oh, you know, police, blah, blah, blah, pigs.
	It's like, no, police are only going to answer to who's in power.
	There's a chain of command.
	And you know what?
	If we were in power, police, all they want to do is get home to their families, to kiss their wife, to play with their kids, to get their pension.
	You know, they're hardworking people, but they answer to those in power.
	And in Portland, they answer to an authority that has decided that illegal immigrants and their rights are far more important than the rights of actual average citizens or protecting As the union's attorney in this notice that he sent saying we're gonna have to sue you he says your policy that is to say the mayor's policy of telling the police
	Don't protect ice, basically.
	He says, your policies create a zone of terror and lawlessness.
	Imagine, you've got to run the gauntlet.
	Who knows, one of these guys might take a poke at you.
	This is just crazy.
	For nearly 40 days, they're camped out, occupying the area all around the ice facility.
	Extraordinary.
	It just goes to show you the extraordinary division you have between people who live in this liberal, cuckoo, never-never land.
	And of course, Portland is one of the whitest cities in the country.
	Big cities.
	Yeah, whitest big cities.
	Yes.
	It's one of these places.
	It's just so typical.
	White people who don't have diversity think they're going to just thrive on it.
	It's going to be so wonderful.
	And it's only after it's too late that they realize what diversity is really all about.
	Portland and Seattle are beautiful cities, obviously, and San Francisco too, but they all have their problems and it's the ideology.
	It's this idea that an insufficient amount of black and brown people somehow makes their cities illegitimate in the eyes of the coastal elites on the East Coast.
	Of course, on the East Coast, our major cities are virtually unlivable for whites unless you live in a place like New York City where there's a Veritable army patrolling, and I'm talking about the New York City Police Department, which has, I don't know, last time I checked it had well over 40,000 members of the police force.
	A shocking amount to keep the city somewhat safe and going on.
	But you talk about the eastern seaboard from Baltimore to Camden to Philadelphia.
	These are largely no-go areas.
	Occupied territory.
	Yeah.
	But moving on to a lovely human interest story.
	This showed up in the Washington Post, I believe.
	It talks about a 51-year-old mother of five who was going under a false name because she didn't want to be identified, an illegal immigrant from Mexico who is suffering from type 2 diabetes and suffers from what's called end-stage renal disease.
	That means she has left her type 2 diabetes, which is acquired in adulthood, usually because you don't eat properly and you are fat, And according to the photograph, I can't help observing that she is very considerably overweight.
	In any case, your kidneys break down and she needs dialysis.
	Ordinarily, if you're in end-stage renal disease, you get dialysis three times a week.
	Well, because she has no private medical insurance and because she's an illegal alien, she can't go on traditional Medicare or Medicaid.
	And so, she benefits from something called the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act, which was passed in 1986, according to which, anybody who shows up with a life-threatening, and by the way, the last moments of pregnancy are considered life-threatening.
	Correct.
	If you show up in the last moments of labor, or if you have a medical emergency that's potentially life-threatening, then Every hospital in the country has got to take you in and treat you and stabilize you, whether you are here legally, whether you can pay, and if you can't pay, they do it on the public dole.
	That's, of course, taking the Hippocratic Oath to its logical conclusion.
	Well, then they should be importing by 747 load.
	Bring them in.
	They're going to.
	We're not far away from that.
	So, because she can't get regular treatment and she has to wait until she is in a life-threatened state, she gets her dialysis once only every seven days.
	And, because patients like her are considerably sicker by the time they come in, they require more time and care and treatment.
	And her annual treatment, at the taxpayer's expense, is about $285,000.
	$285,000. $285,000 that you and I are paying to keep this lady alive. Now, if she were not an
	illegal, I suppose she could just be any ordinary foreigner.
	Doesn't have to be a U.S.
	citizen.
	She could then go on Medicaid and the treatment, because it's more regular, even if it's more frequent, three times a week, she could be treated for $77,000 a year.
	So this, no, I beg your pardon, this is from the Los Angeles Times, this story.
	And the Los Angeles Times wants us to wring our hands over how unfair this is to this poor illegal immigrant with type 2 adult-onset diabetes and Just think, just think how much money we could save if we treated her like a citizen or like a legal immigrant.
	But because she's illegal, can only be taken in when her life is threatened.
	It costs $285,000 a year rather than $70,000 a year.
	And she's one of 6,500 illegal aliens who are living in our country with an end-stage disease.
	That's right.
	End-stage renal disease.
	So think about that number for the year.
	$285,000 for one person.
	Now do the quick math.
	Add another times 6,500 people.
	That's right.
	That is one little cost of having just one illegal alien, but allowing this to exacerbate and grow and augment.
	I mean, again, it's why are these people in the country?
	That's right.
	And this is a person who, in fact, according to the article, feels grateful because she knows that if she were back in Mexico, her home country, she wouldn't be getting any treatment and she'd probably be dead.
	So she's happy to be here, even though her treatment is rather more traumatic than it would be if she was getting this dialysis three times a week.
	Of course, her being here is one of the primary reasons that the American experiment is Declining and on the verge of extinction.
	Yes.
	Being extinguished.
	You know, it's too bad.
	It sounds heartless, but this woman crossed the border illegally and there is no reason why she could not be sent right back to Mexico tomorrow.
	She's an illegal immigrant.
	Now, if everybody says, oh my gosh, she'll die.
	Whose fault is that?
	Why don't we shame the Mexicans if that's so horrible?
	Tell the Mexicans to take care of her.
	If the Mexicans think that this is important, maybe she can take up private donations.
	It's not our fault.
	It's not our fault.
	If we think we are responsible for everybody in the world with end-stage renal disease, there is absolutely no end to it.
	And unfortunately, I'm afraid that people like Kamala Harris and Ms.
	Cortez and the Potential first black governor of Georgia, Ms.
	Abrams, who of course is close to $80,000 in debt and she has no problem with that.
	Well, I thought it was more like $200,000.
	I think it is.
	Yeah, you're right.
	I get it.
	Yeah, because you have to factor in.
	I think, yeah, a credit card debt, back taxes she owes.
	It makes her more in tune with the people, I think was the word she used in a Daily Caller piece I read.
	This is what they want.
	I mean, this is, you know, the border didn't cross them.
	I can't remember the words they used, but we live in an era where People like this... Altruism, in my opinion, is the ultimate horror trope.
	We think about horror movies and the terrifying things that scare us.
	Altruism, to me, is the most...
	Horrifying aspect of the white psyche because there's no shortage of people.
	White people are going to read this and they're going to say, we need to open up our checkbooks.
	We need to go and we need to go grab people's 401ks and their retirement plans to help pay for it.
	Because that's unearned privilege.
	We need to help these people out.
	That's right.
	All these white people benefiting from unfair advantages and effectively exploiting non-whites, whether they know it or not, they should pay.
	But funny you should mention Kamala Harris.
	She, she's the senator from California, And you know, the more I think about it, you may be right.
	She sure could be the Democratic nominee.
	She's certainly got what looks like, well, it's hard to tell now, but she's certainly in the lead, or one of the people who are leading.
	And then a senator named Tom Carper of Delaware.
	They are among the ones who objected the most strenuously to the proposal that a citizenship question be added to the 2020 census.
	They said, quote, this would depress participation of immigrants and U.S.
	citizens in mixed-status households who fear how government will use the information.
	Now, I never understood that.
	They're not asking, are you legal or illegal?
	Just, are you a citizen or not?
	Why is that such a threat?
	And of course, if you aren't a citizen, what's going to stop you, or what penalty is going to be if you just say, yeah, I'm a citizen?
	Well, of course, you could say that.
	You could certainly lie.
	But why this is, in the slightest sense, a threat, I don't know.
	But they think that anything that will inconvenience a non-citizen, or perhaps an illegal immigrant, has got to be stopped.
	Well, these two same Democrats, Who are so up in arms about asking about citizenship, are proposing a different question to be added onto the Census of 2020.
	And they've introduced what they call the Census Equality Act.
	And this would ask all Americans about their sexual orientation and gender identity.
	So, my first reaction would be to say, well, yes, I'm actually, I identify as a woman, and I'm a lesbian woman.
	Why not?
	Well, you're a black lesbian woman, I'm sure.
	Well, gosh, yes, while we're at it, you know, why not let our imaginations run wild?
	And I'm a dwarf, and deaf and dumb.
	But any case, now, the way, the reason they say this is, That they apparently believe that undercounting of LGBTQ, which is apparently the the new fashionable designation for these people, is quote, it results in an inadequate distribution of resources and social services including Medicaid, Section 8 housing vouchers, and Supplemental Nutritional Assistance Program.
	Now, How on earth does whether or not the homosexual population
	is 2%, 3%, 4%, 5%, 1%?
	How that affects the distribution of Section 8 housing or SNAP benefits beats the heck out of me.
	I suppose they simply want an opportunity to be able to say, well, homosexuality is vastly more common than you bigoted
	Christians think, and they're just as normal as you and me.
	But any case, that's their proposal of a census question that is apparently not intrusive.
	I mean, at what age are they going to start asking that question?
	Are they going to ask 12-year-olds?
	Kindergarten.
	Yeah, kindergarten.
	There you go.
	What is your sexual orientation, little Lucy?
	But, well, there's Kamala Harris for you, and I'm sure she's going to get a lot of support from certain sectors of the population on account of this.
	But moving along to a couple of foreign stories here.
	This was really an infuriating thing.
	There is a new political party called Alternative for Sweden.
	It's obviously modeled on the Alternative for Deutschland in Germany that's had such remarkable success lately.
	This is an offshoot of the Sweden Democrats.
	The Sweden Democrats are a pretty good, pretty staunch party in terms of trying to keep Sweden Swedish.
	But the Alternative for Sweden thinks they aren't staunch enough.
	And so they have a YouTube channel, just like everybody else does, but their YouTube channel has been shut down.
	YouTube said no.
	And apparently what kicked this off was a YouTube video that came along with the text that says, News anchors should be able to speak fluent Swedish.
	Now this is typical Sweden, of course.
	They've got some immigrant Who is being hyped as some news anchor who speaks heavily accented Swedish.
	This grates on the ears of a few native Swedes and they say, look, if you're going to be a news anchor, for heaven's sake, speak proper Swedish.
	They're not saying you can't be a non-white.
	They're just saying speak proper Swedish.
	YouTube completely booted their channel, violating YouTube's community guidelines.
	And I thought the statement by the Alternative for Sweden was really poignant in a way.
	They said that foreign private companies With a monopoly, have the ability to dictate which opinions and which political parties are able to reach out to the general public is one of the greatest threats to the freedom of expression today.
	It's the primary threat to freedom of expression today.
	You, of course, have suffered under that with your Facebook page being kicked off years ago, which I don't think you guys have ever really talked about.
	It just kind of was taken away.
	That's right.
	But with your censorship and silencing on Twitter, both your personal account and, of course, the highly entertaining American Renaissance account, both were great accounts, but Again, the tech left decided, nope, this guy can't have a platform.
	It's got to go.
	And for me, it's particularly striking when you have these folks who are under the thumb of a foreign company, as they say, a foreign private company, decides what the people of Sweden are allowed to see and hear.
	It's just remarkable.
	But we've suffered from YouTube, too.
	How many of your YouTube videos have actually been quarantined?
	At this point, it's about four, I think.
	And there have been a couple that were completely pulled down.
	So they've got two different levels of punishment.
	One is completely jerk it from YouTube.
	The other is to quarantine it so it doesn't come up as a recommendation.
	And a few other things.
	Now, one thing that they could do if they wanted to, rather than completely pull our channel, is make it such that our videos are not recommended.
	You know, when you look at a YouTube video, YouTube recommends... And the thumbnails.
	Yes, the thumbnails.
	That would be a very heavy blow because a lot of people come to us because they have a recommended YouTube and they learn about us and they start looking more at our stuff and they come to us.
	I've read that guy Colin Flaherty wrote the book White Girl Bleed a Lot.
	He has had his YouTube channel yanked, I believe, five separate times, about to back up a massive number of subscribers.
	And then he was finally unceremoniously dumped and said, hey, thank you for your time here, but you're not allowed to use our platform.
	And I've heard through the grapevine that he's actually considering doing some sort of legal action against YouTube, against Alphabet, as you did against Twitter, which I think this is what you have to do.
	I think you do.
	I think you do.
	I can't remember what the figure was, but he was selling advertising on his YouTube videos, and he was making an enormous amount of money.
	Maybe this is inside information, but it was a considerable amount of money.
	Per month?
	Yes, per month.
	Bam!
	Gone.
	Well, that demonetization, that's happened to a lot of right-wing insights.
	It was amazing that he was even able to monetize his channel for as long as he did.
	But I guess it has to be our last story here because we're running out of time.
	We can save it for next week.
	Those stories aren't going anywhere.
	In fact, I think we're going to be able to probably talk a little more about that story from South Africa.
	Well, maybe so.
	All right, we'll save it.
	I guess we need to take a poke at the Spanish foreign minister around.
	Joseph Borrell.
	As you know, Italy is taking a strong stand.
	They say no more.
	No more of these illegal immigrants.
	And so Sweden, now that it's under a new socialist government, has been welcoming them in.
	Spain.
	Yes.
	It's okay.
	You got Sweden on the mind.
	No, Spain.
	We're talking about their neighbor, Spain.
	That's right.
	The Spanish foreign minister.
	And he says, people talk about mass immigration, mass migration.
	No, you're trivializing the word mass.
	Only 21,000 so far, and we can take a whole lot more.
	But then, this is the line, this is the line that really stands out.
	He says, Europe's demographic evolution shows that unless we want to gradually turn into an aging continent, we need new blood, and it doesn't look like this new blood is coming from our capacity to procreate.
	So there you go.
	If we are not going to have babies, we will have other people have babies for us.
	Spain will turn right very quickly.
	Again, it takes dramatic examples, sadly, to shake white people from their apathy.
	And again, looking at what's going on in Hungary, where the birth rate's rising.
	In Russia, Putin has put a lot of mechanisms in place that reward Russians having children.
	The same could be done in the United States very quickly, if you had the right government.
	And you know what?
	That number of the average, or the average, yeah, what was it?
	The average white person is 58 years old in this country.
	That number could be dramatically lowered in a course of five simple years if you had a way for the government to step in and incentivize white people having children.
	And you know, this is not something that I can prove, but my suspicion is that there would be a whole lot more white babies if, when white parents went down to see what their schools looked like, it turned out that their own child who's already in grade school is not the only white child.
	Think about how many white families their entire existence is predicated upon ensuring that their white child enters and is introduced to a world where, hey, they're not the only white child.
	Unless they're masochistic and they want their white child to be introduced into that type of environment.
	Yeah, and today we were expecting to answer some very interesting listener questions, but we're going to have to save them for another time as well.
	But we do look forward to your questions, and the fact that we did not get around to them today should not discourage you.
	We will.
	Maybe one of these days we'll start one of these.
	Let's do it next week.
	So if you listeners have questions, please send them to us.
	I get some great questions.
	I forward them over.
	Jared and I talk about them along with Henry to see via email which ones we should use.
	Send your questions, comments to sbpdl1 at gmail.com.
	Once again that's sbpdl1 at gmail.com.
	Or you can send them to the contact us page at amran.com.
	And one final thought I want to thank everyone over the past month or two that have sent in their respective university colleges data on the diversity center
	that they create and the money that they allocate to diversity and multiculturalism on campus. I've started to
	put together studies based on conferences that we're going to be releasing
	around the start of college football season, kind of have a little fun with it so we can break it down by
	conference, the ACC, the SEC, the Big Ten, the Pac-12, that type of stuff.
	And it's a pretty exhaustive study.
	It's been fun to do.
	But if you want to help out, if you want to send me your college's information on how much they spend on their diversity center and on So, for Jared Taylor, this has been Paul Kersey.
	Our time is up.

▲