All Episodes
Previous Next
May 11, 2018 - Radio Renaissance - Jared Taylor
59:21
National Black Mama’s Bail Out
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome, ladies and gentlemen, to Renaissance Radio.
I'm Jared Taylor with American Renaissance, and with me in the studio is our regular guest, Paul Kersey.
This Sunday is going to be Mother's Day, so we'd like to start this podcast with a heartwarming story on this particular observance.
And let me just read the first paragraph from what appears to be a news release.
The National Bailout Collective launched in May 2017 with a campaign to post-bail for black mothers who would otherwise be separated from their children on Mother's Day.
The effort raised enough funds to free about 100 women who were in jail awaiting trial and sparked a year-round movement with fundraising drives for Father's Day, Juneteenth, and Pride.
Those are, of course, special black celebrations.
In all, the group's efforts helped more than 200 black people return home to their families while they await trial, effectively giving them away out of a system that disproportionately impacts African Americans.
Now, this year, the collective launched its second year of national Black Mamas bailout campaign, and it appears that 21 cities are going to participate.
Yes.
I suppose this just speaks for itself, but do you have any commentary on this?
You know, Mother's Day is a wonderful event.
First off, I wish all of our listeners and all readers of Miracle Renaissance a very happy Mother's Day.
All the mothers out there who carry both the burden and that wonderful joy of being responsible for the next generation of our people.
So happy, happiest Mother's Day and I encourage all of the males listening, call your grandmother, call your mother, take care of your wife and take care of your daughters because one day they too will be mothers and they will carry on that flame that we try and, you know, That we try and kindle and turn into a blazing conflagration every day on this radio podcast and also on AmeriCorps Descente, www.amerin.com.
Yes, they are the key to our survival.
Without them, we are nothing.
All it would take is a few men.
But mothers are irreplaceable.
Absolutely irreplaceable.
And I agree with you.
Happy Mother's Day to all of the mothers who are listening and to all of you who have mothers.
Be nice to them.
And going back to the story there's not much to say except maybe a laugh and maybe this is one of those sort of It's almost embarrassing to read.
Yes, it is.
It's almost embarrassing to read.
And this effectively gives them a way out of a system that disproportionately impacts African-Americans.
Well, again, the assumption here is it disproportionately impacts them out of reasons of just pure prejudice and racism.
It takes into consideration nothing about the way people behave.
But interestingly enough, they call it So straightforwardly, National Black Mamas Bailout.
Boy, oh boy.
It's a recognition of something that is happening in America, but the reasons for it are completely skewed in their minds.
It is a sad thing, but it is also something you have to sort of laugh about to keep from crying.
In any case, Happy Mother's Day to all those mothers who are going to be bailed out.
I think they'll have a happier Mother's Day with their children, let us hope.
Moving on to a somewhat related story.
This was a Los Angeles Times article about a increase in sexually transmitted diseases.
These are diseases one used to call venereal diseases.
I don't know why they've now STDs rather than VD.
Maybe VD just began to have kind of a bad stigma and so people thought it would be politer to use STD rather than VD.
In any case, There's been a steady increase, especially the last couple of years.
And in Los Angeles, they have just launched a Center for Health Equity.
Now, this has to do with making sure that black people and Hispanic people don't get diseases at any higher rates than white people.
And the fact that Asians get many of them at lower rates is of no concern to them.
Irrelevant.
Yes.
But the LA County, the syphilis rate among African-American women is six times higher than that of white women and three times higher than that of Latina women.
This is of great concern to the Center for Health Equity.
Now, the person who runs it, the director, her name is Heather Northover.
I can't think of a whiter name than Heather Northover.
I could be mistaken, but I would bet you... There are a few out there I can think of, but it really fits with what you're trying to do because, you know, you and I have joked about this in the past.
Peter Brimlow wanted to have that last chapter of Alien Nation, the fictional story of the last white family trying to escape.
Los Angeles County and Heather Northover, who's dedicated her entire life now, it seems,
to trying to fight venereal diseases among non-whites.
She might be that last white person trying to escape.
She might be.
Now, in any case, a reading from the Los Angeles Times, Northover said that officials need to evaluate
what's called structural or systemic racism because she thinks that racism is part of the explanation
as to why black women have such high rates of venereal disease.
And she says systemic racism, that's the way housing or education policies may negatively impact people and their health.
She goes on to point out that studies show that people with HIV who have low levels of literacy were less likely to follow their treatment, and that poorer Americans more likely to engage in risky sexual behavior, including the risk of STDs.
Now, what Heather is saying here is something that everybody knows.
Dim people, or educated people, or poor people.
In any case, people who have disorganized lives are less likely to think about the future, less likely to follow directions, and probably more likely to have risky sex.
But she is blaming this, of course, on racism.
She's blaming it on whites.
She's blaming higher rates of promiscuity among non-whites on white people.
That's right.
Again, it's one of these things.
Just today, it came out that the NAACP wants to mandate implicit bias testing.
I didn't get a chance to read the whole story, but it seems like within all companies, whether it's private, public, they're demanding this.
They're taking They're taking Michelle Alexander's thesis and the new Jim Crow which touches on the whole disproportionately impacting African-Americans being in the judicial system.
Well now you're taking this to its absurdity with the STD problem where, again, this has to be blamed on White people.
That's right.
Every difference.
Every difference.
Well, this is just one more in this great litany.
If blacks are less likely to be employed, if they're more likely to be in jail, if they are more likely to fail their school tests, it's all our fault.
So the next step here is not just black illegitimacy rates, which are somehow all our fault, but now it's venereal disease rates.
So it's just yet another exercise in imagination, in creative thinking, to blame us somehow for all of this.
But the point that she's making is all of these things that are associated with getting of a neurodisease.
Lack of education, poor planning, poverty, all of these things she's blaming on racism.
And it's just like the one about National Bailout Day for National Black Mamas Bailout Day.
It is the criminal justice system that, in an unfair way, accounts for black ladies needing this more than any other race.
But let's just take a look at what racism accounts for in the United States.
If we're talking about chlamydia, black men have it at 6.8 times the white man rate, and black women have it at 5.4 times the rate for white women.
And as you listen to these numbers, perhaps those of you who are thinking of straying outside your usual dating territory, You might bear this in mind.
If you see that cute American Indian girl, you might realize that American Indians have chlamydia at 3.8 times the white rate.
Hispanics at twice the rate.
Asians at 60% the white rate.
And we find this pattern repeated in all of the venereal disease that we find listed here.
And it's important that the numbers Mr. Taylor just read, those come from the Center for Disease Control in Atlanta.
That's from the 2016 study.
I'm looking forward to the 2017 study coming out within the next couple months.
They release it every year to much fanfare and gnashing of teeth primarily because of the disproportionate Primarily because, let's face it, black and Hispanic men and women are largely, incubators sounds a little harsh, but they're the individuals who are primarily keeping these diseases alive.
I'm afraid that is the case.
And when it comes to gonorrhea, blacks, male and female put together, have this disease at 9.6 times, that's nearly 10 times the white rate.
American Indians 4.4 times, Hispanics 1.8, and Asians again, At about half the white rate.
When it comes to syphilis, blacks at 5.2 times the white rate.
Black men are 7.6 times the white men rate.
American Indians 2.5, Hispanics 2.2 times, and Asians at 0.5.
Once again, at half the rate.
So we have this completely consistent pattern.
Blacks are the worst, American Indians come in next, or they're sort of neck and neck with Hispanics, and then white people, and then Asians.
And I find it fascinating, as always, that racism is blamed for the higher rates for certain non-whites, and people just sort of ignore the fact that Asians have lower rates than whites.
You know, Los Angeles County, they're the ones who are launching this Center for Health Equity.
Now, the numbers in that county were interesting, but these are the national numbers.
And you think about when you look at cities like, let's just say, southern cities here.
Memphis, New Orleans, Atlanta, Birmingham, Washington, D.C.
These rates are just so shocking that in some of these places, it's obviously exceedingly rare for an Asian or a white person to even have these rates.
In larger urban areas, that's where you're going to have commingling of interracial couplings.
And it's just fascinating when you actually look at this, Dan, and you start to think about what this actually means moving forward for the future.
Again, we're running out of white people to blame, and you just wonder at what point 10, 20 years down the road When more and more states look like California, can they keep blaming, Mr. Taylor, systemic racism and implicit bias?
Oh, they will keep blaming it long after we're dead, long after we're gone.
Look what goes on in South Africa.
Everything that goes on there now, despite the fact that blacks are running it, is a legacy of apartheid.
So, if we're gone, it'll still be the legacy of white racism, even if there are no white racists around, no white people at all around, is my suspicion.
Let me pose a question to you real quick.
Yes.
I wasn't that old when the Truth and Reconciliation Commission was launched in South Africa.
What do you think, obviously that's what the left would like to have happen in America, when they take control of The executive branch, the judiciary, and the legislative branch for good, which we're heading on that path, unfortunately.
What would that look like in this country, in your thoughts?
Well, don't forget the Truth and Reconciliation.
That project was one that got people to admit that they had engaged in criminal acts and then forgave them.
That was the purpose.
Now, in the United States, an equivalent would be get white people to admit that they engaged in racism and then condemn them.
I think that would be more likely.
The whole idea of Eric Holder's National Conversation on Race, that of course was not to establish guiltlessness or work through some procedure whereby we'd be forgiven.
It was to establish some procedure whereby we would be accused, confessed, and condemned.
I think that's very much the idea.
But to return to this question about venereal disease, I think it is pretty obvious.
First of all, blacks engage in first intercourse, as I recall, about a year younger on average than whites.
So, they start earlier.
They have more sexual partners.
They are less likely to use some kind of protection.
So, inevitably, their STD rates are going to be higher than that of whites.
And then you find the same process for the different races.
It all meets a certain pattern, with Asians being oldest when they have first intercourse, fewer partners, and who knows?
I've never seen any data on this, but it may very well be the case that they're more likely to use protection.
But to then blame this on racism, this is the aspect of this that I find quite fantastic.
And Heather Northover is probably going to go to her grave beating her breast and thinking we white people are to blame for all of this.
But to move on to our next article, it had to do with the National Urban League and other civil rights groups complaining About the percentage of blacks in the combined workforces of Google, Facebook and Twitter.
Now, altogether those companies have 41,000 employees.
If you had not already taken a peek at this figure and know the answer, what would you have guessed was the percentage of blacks among those 41,000 people?
Well the problem is you and I aren't normal people.
We actually look at this all the time and I'm always fascinated.
I remember a couple years ago there was a cover story on Ebony where they had these amazing pie charts and they even included Apple, they included IBM, Microsoft, not just these social media companies.
I would say probably Off the top of my head, I would say 2.8 to 3% max.
Isn't that fascinating?
Because it was Henry Wolfe who first called this story to my attention.
He walked out of his office and he said, what do you guess the figure is?
And I said, 3%.
And he said, nope, 1.8.
And this includes everybody.
This includes marketing.
This includes, who knows, the people who cook the meals for good grief.
This includes janitors.
This includes salespeople.
This includes the developers, the tech.
This includes management, which is a great... This includes also the made-up positions of chief diversity officer.
Yes, all of those.
And 1.8% are black.
These are the people, of course, who are deplatforming us, who are considering us beyond the pale, unclubbable, we're not even to be heard of, and yet they think that they live in a world of complete racial equality and that blacks are just as capable?
I mean, if we say that they're not, that's something they don't want to hear.
And yet, they're turning in a performance at 1.8%, which I think reflects absolute reality.
I don't think they're the least bit prejudiced against blacks.
They're beating the bushes for black people to hire, and yet they can only manage 1.8%.
It just is yet another example of this topsy-turvy world we live in.
We are, in fact, providing the explanation for why, try as they might, they can't get over 1.8%.
But they still don't want to hear from us.
Well, not just that.
For the past five years...
to accelerate what you just said to really go about and just put the exclamation point to really just say these companies Amazon, IBM, Microsoft, Facebook, Google, Twitter, any of the tech companies, any of the tech companies in Silicon Valley, They are doing everything they can, bending over backwards, to go out and recruit and create incentives in the form of bonuses, in the form of stock options, in the form of, we want to get the top minority, the top non-white, minority is the wrong word because a lot of these companies have a large Asian workforce.
Huge Asian workforce.
I hate that term, non-Asian minority.
It's black or brown people, Hispanics and Africans in America.
They will do everything they can to lay the carpet out and recruit them.
Once they get the job, If their profile is up on LinkedIn, they're going to have recruiters for the other companies beating down their doors offering, hey, we'll give you 20% more and we'll give you all sorts of bonuses, structure worked in, and we'll pay for your relocation.
We'll do whatever we can.
If you have any talent and you are a black individual, The first thing you should do is find a way to get your resume out to Silicon Valley companies because they will hire you sight unseen as long as your color is noticed.
No, I think that's the case.
And that's why the Urban League wants to get in on the gravy train, on the racial gravy train, because Jesse Jackson tried to do this and guess what?
The tech companies basically ignored him.
That's right.
He had gone around to, I think, Anheuser-Busch was one of the places that he went and marched around, and he said, look, we're going to stop buying your beer.
He would go to various places, and he would just threaten to boycott a shakedown, and they'd pony up.
But yeah, he was out in Silicon Valley, whooping and hollering, and the tech companies apologized, but they never gave him money.
No, they didn't.
I guess they realized that black people are going to buy those smartphones anyway.
Well, that's one of the points the Associated Press article makes, is that Africans in America are some of the largest users of these smartphones, but yet they're not, they have virtually, they're superfluous when it comes to the development of this tech.
And going back to Jesse Jackson, there's a fun story that we have to bring up real quick, just because it was last year, or last month was the anniversary of, 50th anniversary I guess, of the MLK assassination.
The night before MLK was shot, he was actually giving the speech, I've been the mountaintop speech, and he says, hey Jesse, what's that one bread company?
Because Jesse Jackson and Martin Luther King were trying to shake down Coca-Cola, and I believe it was Wonder Bread, to try and get more black distributors.
And they were threatening a massive boycott of Coca-Cola at the time, even though Coca-Cola has long been a company.
That was SJW, long before that term was ever even invented.
And of course, at that same time, Martin Luther King was planning the Poor People's Campaign, which obviously showed up at Cape Canaveral on July 16th, led by Ralph Abernathy, his number two.
Where they showed up in a mule cart to protest the launch of, well, the Saturn V rocket to the moon, and probably the sorriest moment in human history.
But anyways, it's this type of stuff that if some of our listeners out there in tech, maybe you guys work for these companies, tell you what, we asked last week for you guys to send in questions, and a lot of you sent some great questions in.
Send us some of your, send us some of the, Some of the more over-the-top memos you guys might get when it comes to minority recruitment.
We'd love to see that.
Yes.
I would like to know specifics about the efforts that these tech companies are making.
I know that Intel, for example, they had promised to set aside, it was something like $10 million over the next couple of years to increase their non-white workforce.
At least, again, it's really blacks, Hispanics, American Indians, Eskimos, if you can find them.
And I'd be very curious to see how they plan to spend that money.
If anybody has any specifics about that, it'd be fascinating to know.
Yeah, so fire over.
Or if you see any great studies on this, we'd love to see it because this is a very important conversation point, especially with a lot that That Mr. Taylor and American Renaissance are going through with their deplatforming of Twitter and other social media accounts.
It's not going to stop.
It's only going to get worse, this digital lynching that's going on.
Yes.
If you were to take their assumptions about across-the-board equality and then say to Twitter, look, you guys only have X percent.
You guys are obviously prejudiced and racist.
And you're accusing me of saying things that are beyond the pale?
Anyway, so it's all part of this deliberate blindness that our country has assumed.
Really hard to understand.
Now, I think while we're at it, we ought to look at a different study.
This is one that was put out by the Yerkes National Primate Research Center and the Living Lynx Center in Emory University.
And it had to do with a sense of fairness among non-human primates.
And what they did was they took these brown capuchin monkeys and they would train them to do disagreeable tasks in return for a reward.
And they would either give them a cucumber, which is not bad for a monkey, or grapes, which just makes them whinny with delight.
Grapes are just wonderful.
And the researchers found out that if one monkey did the same disagreeable task as another monkey, but he got only a cucumber and the other monkey got grapes.
In other words, they did the same work, but one monkey got the better reward.
The one that got shafted got angry.
And this was something they tested a whole lot of different ways just to make sure that it wasn't simply the availability of grapes.
You could wave grapes around at them and if neither of them got it, it made no difference.
If both got the same reward, then they felt happy.
But especially if one monkey worked harder and then got the same reward or worse reward.
So it is clear that monkeys have a sense of fairness.
And so this is an evolved trait in monkeys, and this raises the question to what extent this is an evolved trait in human beings.
And once we think about it in terms of something that has evolved due to environmental or even social pressure, because culture has had a strong effect on reproductive success in the last 5,000 years, the last 1,000 years.
And so this raises the question again of group differences in this evolved sense of fairness or another way of thinking about it is empathy.
Fairness and empathy are linked traits and I don't think we need to go into any great detail about specifics of this but I would be astonished if there are not substantial group differences in average levels of a sense of fairness and a sense of empathy among human groups.
It's undoubtedly true.
Obviously, you're not going to see any psychologist or anyone try and do this study in the United States.
Perhaps China will be the leader in this type of academic endeavor.
This kind of study, you could put together, I think, any number of interesting structures, interesting test protocols to get into this.
And I think you would find real differences.
You know, the only datum that I have is from a guy who ran a recycling truck in Louisville, Kentucky, when I lived in that city.
And he said it was almost a waste of time to drive through certain black neighborhoods because nobody bothered to recycle.
He said they would drop off the tubs.
Here's for your newspaper.
Here's for your tin cans.
Here's for your glass.
He said you might as well have thrown them into the Grand Canyon for all he was ever going to see them again.
It was only in the white neighborhoods that people put out their stuff and he'd pick it up.
But he said he had to drive through all these other areas anyway because that was on his route and he had to do it.
He said it was practically a complete waste of time.
Now, where's the racism explanation for this?
What is the racism that is causing these black people not to want to recycle?
Environmental racism.
I don't know.
There you go.
I knew you'd have the answer.
The power lines are above ground in the neighborhoods that are predominantly black, whereas the neighborhoods in Louisville where whites live, the power lines are underground.
That's actual legitimate structural racism in place.
Well, the rest of our stories are outside of the United States here.
We've got a big dose of, well, a couple of British stories here.
One that I think is particularly interesting and that is What they call the Gangs Matrix.
This is a gang-related database that's compiled by Scotland Yard and they share it around with other agencies and local councils and what they have done is get a list of people that they think are most likely to be involved in gang activity and some of them violent.
Now, they include in their criteria an actual history of violent crime, but also entries on social media and information from bodies, including local councils, to give them some sense of who is likely to be involved in gang activity.
They all put this together with a particular algorithm and come up with a risk assessment and a list of names.
Now, on this gangs matrix, they have 3,806 people.
1,500 of them appear to be affiliated with gangs, but no risk of violence for now.
But they're people that, you know, the police want to keep an eye on.
So, the rest of them are real potential threats.
Now, believe it or not, and I know, Mr. Kersey, you'll find this very hard to believe, but the figures from July of 2016 showed that 87% of the people on the list were visible minorities, as they call them, and 78% were black.
78%!
Well, Amnesty International, the UK version of it, whose director Kate Allen pointed out That this is a racially discriminatory thing, that they ought to just junk the whole database entirely.
Junk it entirely.
Once again, we were talking about big data, I think, on our last conversation.
The big data show you something that reflects patterns of reality.
But as soon as people acknowledge these patterns and take any activity based on this knowledge, then you're going to find somebody like Kate Allen of Amnesty International screaming about it.
You're implementing technology to make life better for everyone, not just white people.
But somebody like Kate Allen of Amnesty International believes that this accumulation, this aggregation of disparate data points is going to showcase the fact that, once again, the racists were right.
I mean, I've been pouring over data to try and figure out what percentage of knife crime in London is actually committed by white Britons.
And it's stunning to actually, because you can only find pieces of data from various years.
You can find people complaining about, you know, oh, we can't have stop and frisk over knives
because it's only gonna be blacks, blah, blah, blah.
But there's no real definitive number.
But here in this piece, you're beginning to get the picture once again.
You've got this awesome, awesome database put together, you know, the Gangs Matrix.
What a cool name.
What a cool name.
And you find out that when it actually had.
Sounds like a best-seller movie, doesn't it?
Yeah, it sounds like it.
Matrix 4.
But what's so cool about this data is that, once again, even though the state, even though the media, really doesn't want that number to slip out of what percentage of white Britons is actually committing the knife crime, it's in a study like this.
Because, again, it's important to note with this that Embassy International was allowed a peek at this database.
They were allowed a glimpse of it.
And again, once again, When all the numbers are crunched together, when it all comes out, all you get to see is that white criminals are left out.
That's right.
Well, it's prejudice, of course, on the part of the computer, no doubt.
The computer is prejudiced, you know, so it processed this in a most racist and bigoted way.
But, see, Kate Allen, she is conceding something that's very important.
And that was recently reported, namely, that the murder rate in London is now neck-and-neck for this year with a murder in New York City.
Per capita, yeah.
Well, and they're almost exactly the same size, actually.
That's true, you're right.
So, it's really, you're comparing pretty much apples and apples here.
Apparently, in the last few days, New York City has pulled ahead, but only slightly.
You know, it's funny, I've got to interject because I just read this story.
Baltimore, which has a population of about 610,000 people, they just celebrated their 100th murder of the year.
So, if you were to actually I mean, per capita, take those numbers to where New York is and actually do the math.
I mean, it just blows the mind, the murder rate in this 70% black city.
But back to what you were saying about London.
Yes, yes.
Interestingly enough, at one point, I think it was in April, so far there had been 47 murders in London, 31 committed by knives.
So, apparently the Londoners are just as good with their knives as the New Yorkers are with their guns.
The question, of course, now, some gun rights people would say, well, look, obviously guns are not the problem.
That it's just the murderous people who are the problem.
And to an extent, they're right.
But I would be curious to know, if there were as many guns floating around in London as there are in New York City, perhaps the number would be higher.
Who knows?
But the race of people perpetrating these murders, I think, would not change at all.
What you'd have is an overwhelmingly non-white murdering population.
And we have to give credit where credit is due to President Trump.
He goes and speaks to the NRA convention down in Dallas and what does he do?
He talks about gun control in the context of how the people in England and specifically London are having debates about knife control.
And it's little moments like that where it causes When these news stories start percolating through the news, and you're a normal American who's never really thought about this stuff, they get a chance to sit back and think.
And that light bulb, for some of them it's going to go off, for others it might be too late.
But once again, President Trump, as only he can, as he did with the Swedish migrant problem when it came to violent crime in Sweden, as it has in so many other cases, He let slip a very important truth.
Yes, he did.
Yes, he did.
And it's fascinating to me.
The British Interior Ministry, they are taking advice on various new laws that would further restrict dangerous weapons, including banning online stores from delivering knives to residential addresses.
Can you...
It's hard to take this seriously.
They are going to make it impossible to order a knife online, as if you couldn't just walk into a hardware store and buy one.
This is just astonishing.
They are considering measures as absurd as this, but Kate Allen of Amnesty International says actually putting a database together on the people who like to use these knives, that's racist.
Well it's actually a greater crime.
Actually having the database is in her eyes a greater crime No, don't put thoughts in her mind.
She may not have said that, but she is so upset.
And of course, we can be absolutely sure that if this database had not been overwhelmingly black, she would think it's a great idea, a wonderful way to fight crime.
I'm absolutely certain of that.
And here I am putting thoughts in her mind.
Well, I was about to say, you and I both know that reality has a well-known racial bias.
That's right.
You know, Palantir, I believe that's a company that Teal owns.
Why am I blanking on his first name?
Peter Teal?
Peter Teal.
Yeah, and Palantir is a company that is right now consulting with a lot of police departments throughout the United States to implement this big data technology that New Orleans is doing.
And of course, the big push in our country is the ACLU and other organizations are upset because it also is Presenting the same data.
That's right.
It's racial discriminatory to have all this data available.
And I believe this is going to be one of the moments within the coming decade that is really going to help advance our cause on a worldwide scale.
It just was announced that the Swedish government is going to start cataloging race of suspects again for the first time in decades.
Oh, I didn't see that.
What a shock.
I think that the rise of the popular, whatever you want to call it, this awakening that's taking place in the Western world, Our leadership, the managerial elite, as Burnham and San Francis called them, they're realizing that they have to begin to acquiesce somewhat on these data points, especially in Sweden.
If a country is cucked, Sweden will do that.
I'm actually surprised England even has this database.
Knowing how awful Cuck Island is.
It's probably confidential, shared only with certain police authorities, and I wonder how Amnesty International got a hold of it.
They have this information, they just don't make it available.
But to return to President Donald Trump, in that same NRA speech, he didn't speak about gun control law only in the UK, he talked about it in France too.
And he said, think of the Bataclan.
If there had been just one guy with a gun sitting in those cafes, he'd have blazed away and the story would have been completely different.
Well, did you realize the French are, their knickers are in a ferocious twist about this?
Everybody in France is united in saying this is an insult to France.
I don't understand why they take this so seriously.
In fact, I have consulted with some of my French friends about this.
They're just shaking their heads in bewilderment too.
But all of France has risen up in absolute righteous indignation at the idea that France has bad gun control laws.
I should clarify for anyone listening who might not have caught what Mr. Taylor just said there.
He said knickers.
He said, as in trousers.
It came off, I was a little shocked.
You said it so fast, but I just want to clarify.
You thought I might have said another word?
I don't think anyone has ever heard that epithet come out, but I did just want to point out, because obviously social media censors exist.
All right.
So, but no, you're right.
I mean, this is...
When Trump lets this stuff slip, it shows how deep the rot goes in these countries, and how steadfast they are in clinging to these illusions.
Yes.
I mean, how can you deny?
I mean, you can say that there may be other implications to allowing Parisians to walk around armed, but how can you deny the fact that if someone in that Bataclan where, what is it, 100 people were killed, another 200 wounded, something like that.
If there had been some return fire, there could have been a different outcome.
I mean, how can you dispute that?
But they're not even talking about the facts.
They're just reacting in this typically liberal, purely emotional way.
But back to Britain.
My mother country from years and years and centuries ago, they have come up with some sentencing guidelines for hate crimes.
And the decision is that if a person who is a perpetrator found guilty of a hate crime, and this person is in, quote, a position of authority, then the penalty would be greater.
The Sentencing Council for England and Wales has drafted this change for offences that include stirring up hatred against people on grounds of race, religion, or sexual orientation, and the judge will be able to increase the punishments for people who are, and this is I'm reading from the way it's described, in a position of trust, authority, or influence, and who abuses this position to stir up hatred.
Now, they're thinking of someone like a politician or some sort of prominent personality.
I suppose if you're a soccer star or I suppose if you're a movie star.
And if you do some sort of tweet that the authorities don't like, your punishment could be greater than some unknown person.
And you can go to prison for up to seven years.
As is noted, having a high number of followers on social media, whether it's Twitter, whether it's Facebook, that's a factor in this arbitrary nature of trying to determine what or trying to adjudicate what a hate crime is.
Well, see?
They're trying to make it not arbitrary.
Well, exactly.
But the point is, they're going to go after somebody like a Paul Joseph Watson.
Exactly.
Paul Joseph Watson has had an enormous impact on a lot of people out there.
You know, here's a guy who Twelve years ago he was writing a book on 9-11 and he was more interested in why Building 7 fell down than why England was on the cusp of having a non-white majority in London.
And now that's the only thing that this guy is really talking about are very important demographic issues from a very clever manner.
But you get a guy like him...
front of a court and you say hey you're going to jail you silence anyone else out there that he influenced and
England and you you know
you basically encourage the
Complete abandonment of these ideas on Cuck Island and there are so few people there in England who are even
Trying to do anything at this point. I mean it really is depressing reading these stories of what comes from England
well the idea that you are going to
tailor the punishment to the prominence of the person Now, I'm not sure there's any precedent for this.
Well, let's think about it.
If you are a rock and roll star, or if you're a movie star, and you, I don't know, commit a murder, or if you are guilty of a mugging, Do you go to jail for longer?
No, you don't.
You're probably going to go to jail for a less period of time because you're going to get probation.
But here, what they're saying is, a person who is in a position, they're probably saying, okay, he's prominent, he's got people that he's influencing, he should know better.
Or, if he is misbehaving and saying things that are bad, more people are going to hear about it and be poisoned just like that.
I can't think of a precedent for this, for having more intense punishment for someone who is in a position of leadership.
I am not going to defend the guy who made these comments, but there's an interesting parallel in the United States when you have someone like this rapper Kanye West, who is now being accused by a lot of the top psychiatrists who have positions of authority and power in the media.
Dr. Phil, who has a show, he came out and questioned, does he have a mental illness for doing this?
In the United States it's different, where anybody who deviates, and I think Kanye West is a buffoon.
I think this whole episode is farcical.
Just review for the three listeners who are unaware of what the Kanye West story is about.
Obviously there's this conservative organization called Turning Point USA, a guy named Charlie Kirk runs it.
He has this minority outreach individual named Candace Owens.
She's a black female and it turns out that Kanye West, who is one of the more notable people on the planet, regrettably.
That's true.
He has a massive Twitter following.
A lot of people base their identity and their lives on his every word.
He came out and said some positive things about Candace Owens and about President Trump and you know he didn't I didn't say anything that he said that was objectionable.
It's just he basically said that, hey, you know, I'm going to put on a MAGA hat, a Make America Great Again hat.
And the response to that from the corporate media and the psychiatrists that they promote, again, does Kanye West have a mental illness?
Exactly.
In other words, he's saying things that black people are not supposed to say.
That black people would say only if they are mentally deranged.
So yes, we have our own versions of this kind of thing, but even if he had not been a very, very influential black person, if that had happened sort of in a private circumstance and none of us found out about it, it's entirely possible that a nobody black person who started saying those things His family members might say, ah, maybe he's got a mental illness.
No, but again, this idea of punishing someone more for exactly the same activity, exactly the same crime, because he is more influential.
I think that's without precedent.
I can't think of another example of that.
And to me, this is yet another example of the kind of extraordinary, creative, imaginative thinking that people go into when it comes to this absurd stuff about race.
The state will do everything they can to perpetuate their own power.
That is one of the first laws of power.
Once you accumulate power or are appointed to a position of power, you will do everything possible to protect that power from any threat.
And guess what?
There is no greater threat to the established order of the Western world than racial reality.
They certainly act that way.
Nothing seems to scare them more.
Nothing.
Nothing.
I'd say it's sort of a close race between us and ISIS at its height.
In any case, Britain is an extraordinary place.
I had never heard of this.
There's apparently a little used law that criminalizes gross offense.
And I'm sure you heard about this YouTuber.
He goes by the name of Count Dankula.
And he had trained his girlfriend's pug to lift his right front paw in a provocative way whenever this Count Dankula said, Sieg Heil, or gash the Jews.
And he was sentenced under this gross offense law.
Apparently, it wasn't inciting racial hatred.
I would have thought they could have found some way to work that into inciting racial hatred, but they didn't.
Gross offense.
And he's sentenced to pay 800 pounds.
So this is the kind of thing that is going on in Britain now.
In our culture of hero worship, if you have someone come along, an actor, or a sports ball star, or a famous news personality, and they come out and they say, we made a mistake.
Why do we keep celebrating Dunkirk?
Why do we keep celebrating?
Why do we keep celebrating any of our history when we allowed this to happen?
You know, Peter Brimlow likes to say people should be hanged for what's happened to England.
And if someone in that country who was on the verge of death
were to come out and say that, you know, could you — at some point, they're going to not only have to have
the fear of imprisonment.
Because someone's going to become a martyr.
Within the next few years in England, if this actually passes, there will be someone who will become a martyr.
Just as Count Dinkula became a martyr.
And he became a worldwide martyr for free speech.
Somebody will actually be persecuted, prosecuted, and potentially put in jail over this.
Well, you know, years ago, John Tyndall, the founder of the British National Party, BNP, he did go to prison.
That's right.
And there are others, I believe, who have also... And there was somebody else who went into prison with him at the same time.
They have not shirked from actually sending people to prison.
And didn't they just recently give people at least suspended sentences for this kind of activity?
Well, the two members of the... I can't remember...
Britain.
Was it Britain first?
Britain first.
I believe they did serve time in jail.
They might actually be in jail as we're speaking.
That's right.
The Brits are perfectly prepared to throw you in jail just for saying things.
At some point it's going to come to a confiscating of wealth.
Imagine if some actor or a member of the House of Lords came out and said, this is not the England my ancestors Slamming his fist down on a table and saying something like that.
Could you imagine then the idea of confiscating their wealth, their land, their title?
I mean, that is where the Western world, especially in the UK, is headed.
It could be.
It could be.
But moving from Britain to Sweden, this may sound like a kind of a technical story.
And in a way it is.
But just this last week, Sweden's center-right moderate party, has said that it's willing to bring the Sweden Democrats into a cross-party agreement on immigration.
Now why is this important?
It's important because the Sweden Democrats are a staunchly immigration control party.
They've been in Parliament since 2010 when they won 5.7% of the vote.
when they won 5.7% of the vote. Now they have about 13% of the vote in the 2014
elections but like all healthy parties all across Europe they've been held at
Nobody will talk to them.
Nobody will cooperate with them.
And here, the moderate party, that's its name, the moderates, they're the number two party in the country.
And they're saying, look, if we're going to have an agreement on immigration, we need to talk to these guys.
This is, I think, a very, very important first step.
There is some confusion now as to whether or not these talks are actually going to take place.
But the fact that the number two party has said, we cannot keep these people in the deep freeze forever.
There are certain reasons for it, though.
One is that the Sweden Democrats, they could win maybe 20% this time, as opposed to the 13% they've already got.
Also, there was a recent debate of party heads, the top three parties.
And at the present time, Sweden Democrats, they're the number three party in this multi-party system.
That's a substantial group.
And they act as though they're not, the rest of the parties act as though they're not even there.
But there were television debates and Jimmy Atkinson, was found by viewers to have performed the best in this multi-party debate and in particular he came out top on migration and law and order.
No surprise.
So, to me, there's a particular lesson here.
And that is, you can go into electoral politics and progress is slow.
And people will shun you.
People will put you, people will ostracize you.
But if you persist, and if you present your case in a reasonable way to the public, which is the way the Sweden Democrats have done, you can make progress to the point where everybody else has to take you seriously.
This is the kind of political breakthrough that is difficult to imagine here in the United States because we have this absurd two-party system.
But I think it would even be possible in the United States if people really started at the local level.
In any case, that's why I think this is an important story.
These guys have been doing the right thing, working hard, presenting an attractive message, attractive candidates, and they're now getting to the point where they are being consulted on immigration policy.
It's not a sprint, guys.
It's a marathon.
Every waking hour, our enemies have a complete monopoly of the academia, the media, entertainment, and pop culture.
Our people are inundated 24-7, 365.
And yet, if we just look at the big picture and We get the right people on the bus and we realize it doesn't matter where the destination is as long as you have people who can work together and who can have a consistent coherent message because you cannot, you know, people will listen but when you start to use words, I hate to use something like trigger, you know, trigger warning stuff but there are certain words that people have a built-up wall that goes up when they start to hear this type of stuff and
The lessons that we're learning from Austria, from Germany, from Hungary, from Poland, and now from a country as seemingly lost as Sweden.
If there is hope for Sweden, there is hope.
Yes, I should have made that point.
Sweden is further down the road to perdition and oblivion than just about any European country.
I would argue they're worse off than Afrikaners.
Because at least the Afrikaners have a sense that they have a right to exist.
Well, I think the Swedes are coming back.
I agree, I agree.
And you know, there's a kind of a wild card in here.
The elections are coming up in September of this year, and the Swedes are already worried that the Sweden Democrats are going to be in a kingmaker position.
But there's a kind of a wild card here in that there is a brand new party, Alternative for Sweden.
Now, this was established in March of this year and founded by former members of the Sweden Democrats youth movement who were expelled for being too radical.
The good guys.
They want to repatriate immigrants.
They want to restrict welfare to Swedish citizens.
And they are rock-hard Euroskeptics.
But we'll see what happens.
I'm sorry to see this split.
And I must confess, I know nothing about the internal politics of this.
But there's going to be yet another.
And this is clearly modeled on the alternative for Germany.
Very solid folks.
Now, I watched their launch video.
And it is a really quite beautiful, inspiring video.
It's quite short.
You can find it on YouTube.
The launch video for The Alternative to Sweden.
And beautiful music, beautiful scenes of Sweden.
I must say, there's not a single non-white face in the whole thing.
Not one.
But I just want to read you just a few of the lines from it.
It says, you can vote for the same old politicians who never listen to the people and who are destroying your country, or you can choose an alternative to the politicians, an alternative for Sweden.
On 9th September, you have a choice.
Now the journey begins to take your country back.
And once again, the young people in this party, I've seen photographs of meetings, they're just like the people that you would see in something like Identity Europa or an American Renaissance conference.
Young, sharp, clearly on the ball, committed people.
It's very, very encouraging.
So these elections are going to be something to keep an eye on.
And I love that word, journey, to take your country back.
Folks, nothing's going to happen overnight, nothing's going to happen next week, nothing's going to happen in a fortnight.
It is a journey, it is an odyssey, and yet it's one that nobody else is going to undertake if we don't.
Persistence, dedication, and a willingness to dig in right until the end, that is what it's going to take.
And just as the Sweden Democrats, they first got into the parliament in 2010, that's eight years ago, but they were campaigning and campaigning long before that.
They never broke through that four or five percent barrier to get in.
Persistence pays off.
Now, we have less time left than I was hoping to deal with some of the questions from our listeners.
Why don't we go ahead and address these questions next week to start off with, and we'll encourage other listeners to send in more questions.
Well, but let's talk about one of them here.
Okay.
One that I would like to read out, actually, because I have some observations to make about this question.
This listener says, Given current trends, every white Western country is going to become majority non-white sometime within the next century or less.
I believe this is largely inevitable, says this question.
Assuming this, how would you suggest someone prepare?
How do you prepare for a world where America and other Western countries are majority non-white?
He says, I have four young children.
This scares the heck out of me.
Do you go someplace?
What would you do?
Now, I first take issue with this.
I believe this is largely inevitable.
I don't think it's inevitable in a lot of European countries.
It's not inevitable.
It's certainly not going to happen in Eastern Europe.
I don't think it's going to happen.
And I believe that some of the Western European countries can wake up in time.
I really do believe that.
As you know, I was in four European countries just during the month of April, and I was really, really encouraged by the kind of sharp people who were working hard on that.
But, see, to me the question is more relevant to the United States.
We're Americans.
Do we run away?
Do we stand and fight?
And I think the question here is, how do we preserve at least enclaves of majority whiteness?
This is something I've been talking about for a long time, really.
How do we establish areas in which we are the unquestioned majority?
I think that's something that we can do.
As far as other things, you know, they're the obvious.
You know, some people are survivalists.
You know, they want their mountain redoubt.
That's one thing that people talk about.
To me, what is much more important is just a community where we can be a majority, where we run the city government.
Start small.
Start small.
There are excellent examples of this that Orthodox Jews have put together.
In Monsey, New York, and New Square, New York, every single house that goes up for sale ended up being bought by an Orthodox Jew.
And they have a community now that's 100% theirs.
They run the town.
Everyone there is an Orthodox Jew.
They can be sure that their culture will survive.
I think that is the kind of thing that we can be moving towards.
There's no reason we couldn't do that if we start small.
You know, to your point, obviously there's going to be enormous pressure if word gets out from the national media.
It would become the cause.
It would become the vocal point for days, weeks, perhaps months of articles with media coming down and interviewing anybody who dared move to that city.
And they'd try to expose and try to keep businesses from opening.
You know, putting pressure on franchises not to move there if that happened.
Well, I think that is probably inevitable.
But legally, what can you do?
One thing that I could perhaps imagine is that, say, if you manage to take over a city council, Then the county, if it had the power, could disincorporate the town and make it subject, make it an unincorporated part of the county or something like that.
It's hard to know.
It's very hard to know.
But it seems to me you could probably find a place that had its own little school district.
And then, if you get the school district and you get enough people running for school superintendent or school board, then you could get the right people there.
And if there is a state law that says you have to spend X number of hours talking about Martin Luther King, well, we have things to say about Martin Luther King.
We could comply.
We could do everything that the law required, so long as you're stuck within the law.
And if a black person or Hispanic wanted to buy a house, you couldn't say no.
But they wouldn't.
They wouldn't want to.
The main thing I would say, this guy's got four young kids who said this question, and you pointed out that there are a lot of people out there who want to go off in the woods and play Rambo and prep and all that nonsense.
You know what you do?
Every day you act and you do what you can to Advance our interest, but at the same time, invest and put money aside.
Let it get compound interest.
Invest in the stock market.
Invest so that, you know what?
If we don't win, you can get the hell out of the United States to a country that does win.
Protect your family first.
I guess that's my point.
Mr. Financial, you need to protect your family first.
And yes, you do.
From a morality standpoint, that is what matters first and foremost, is insulating your family from the horrors of this state-mandated diversity we all live in.
Yes, you certainly have to do that.
Family first.
And any way you can prepare your children To have a healthy consciousness and not be sucked into this multi-culti, multi-racial morass that is always a terrible danger for people who are not homeschooled, for example.
And that's the importance of having a community so that you're not the only lonely person who understands.
Well, here's an example real quick.
It was just announced the Mormon Church is Breaking from the Boy Scouts.
They are no longer going to be affiliated with the Boy Scouts that has done everything that they could to acclimate to this new world order when it comes to homosexuals, females in their midst.
That's the important point, Mr. T, I'd like to make is that community starts and, you know, If the Mormons can do it, we can.
That's it, in a nutshell.
So hey, real quick, if you have some questions for us, please send them to sbpdl1 at gmail.com or you can go to amren.com.
Yes, just the message us, the contact us page.
And we will see you all next week.
Hey, our time's up.
▲
Export Selection