All Episodes
Previous Next
March 23, 2018 - Radio Renaissance - Jared Taylor
55:29
White Refugees
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome, ladies and gentlemen, to another edition of Radio Renaissance.
I am your intrepid stand-in host, Henry Wolfe.
Mr. Taylor is not with us today, and I'm here with the inimitable Paul Kersey.
We have a show of force for you all today.
Let's go ahead and just jump into it on the South Africa question.
As many of you have likely heard, there's some very strong statements coming out of Australia, the land down under on the South Africa question.
We've got the Home Affairs Minister Peter Dutton has made some strong comments about possibly allowing fast-track refugee status for South African farmers.
He says that they face, quote, horrific circumstances and needed help from, quote, from a quote,
civilized country, which was, you know, of course, not taken well from from the South
African diplomats.
They criticized him and said, you know, nobody's being murdered in South Africa.
This should be kept in diplomatic channels and so on.
But this is now being strongly considered.
People have been pushing Trump to do this and Coulter and others on Twitter have been
encouraging Trump to consider allowing Afrikaner farmers, South African farmers in general,
to come to the United States as as true refugees.
They are the kind of people that we want.
I think that that was a wonderful way to frame what we're about to start talking about, because
you and I were you and I are part of the post-apartheid generation.
We we didn't know we didn't really read about any of what transpired before Mandela was
let out of prison.
We grew up in a world where the Rainbow Nation, the Truth and Reconciliation Commission, had come about and they had gone to try and bring everyone to some sort of conclusion and finality to this, in their words, this sorrowful chapter.
Right.
And of course, as we've discussed many times, the movie Invictus, it depicts why the South Africans, why the white South Africans gave up their country so they could play international rugby.
I mean, again, at the end of the day, it is our love of professional and collegiate sports.
Regardless of where you are and your devotion to be able to play, then the sense of national pride, you gave up your country.
And 24 years later, you know, these people are on the verge of being Removed from their land that they've owned for generations and generations and generations Some maybe even dating back to what the 1600s some of these farms.
Yeah.
Yeah, there's no question and things are really reaching a fever pitch there Malema who's the head of the Marxist EFF?
Opposition party he's been just absolutely blatant in his anti white attitudes I mean it couldn't be any more apparent to anyone that Watching what's on his mind.
He claims, of course, that white farmers aren't being targeted.
They aren't being killed.
He says, quote, we don't know violence.
We know negotiations.
He says, he continues, quote, and we are very robust in our engagement.
Sometimes a racist country like Australia says the white farmers are being killed in South Africa.
We are not killing them.
Now Australia says Malema, EFF, want to kill white farmers.
They must come to Australia.
Well, this is what Malema says in response to those claims.
Quote, if they want to go, they must go.
They must leave the keys to their tractors because we want to work the land.
They must leave the keys to their houses because we want to stay in those houses.
They must leave everything they did not come here with in South Africa and go to Australia.
And just hearing him describe some of this stuff about the taking over the houses and the tractors and stuff brings to mind Africa Adio.
Which I'm sure you've seen the excellent documentary of decolonialization and basically this Italian film crew was there and they filmed some of the before and after shots.
Mr. Taylor and I spoke about this last week and again I encourage everyone to go out there.
It's probably available on Amazon.
I own a copy and it's worth watching once, twice, three times.
You and I both have a great affinity to Arnold Schwarzenegger.
We used to.
We used to.
I should take that back.
The old Arnold was pretty awesome.
The real Arnold.
The non-cucked Arnold.
In his autobiography, he writes about when the great South African weightlifter Reg Park invited him to his home.
I believe it was in Cape Town.
It's either Cape Town or it is... Johannesburg.
I think it was Cape Town.
I'm pretty sure it's Cape Town.
And he just talked about what a beautiful spread they had.
He was just blown away by the big pool.
You know, there's a great picture of them both in the pool lounging around and you're just looking at this unbelievable landscape of what South Africa looked like under white rule.
And when you read these history books, this is history you and I didn't grow up with.
We don't know what that was like.
What we know is this world. We know a world where this gentleman, Malema,
is going to be the president of South Africa at some point in the not too distant future.
Well, he certainly seems to be calling the shots. And he's such a strong opposition leader
that the ruling party is having to take into account his rhetoric and the things he's saying.
He's doing rallies all across the country. And if I may read something from for you real
quick and for our listeners.
We've talked about the great book by Paul Thoreau.
It's called The Last Train to Zona Verde.
It is one of the more important books you can read.
There's a great review that is on American Renaissance, actually.
Just want to say, go read that and then go buy the book and you're going to realize that the review doesn't do the book justice.
How amazing this book that it slipped through.
Because at the beginning of the book, the author, Paul Theroux, he writes about Malema and how Bono, the U2 singer, actually appeared with him and sang the song, Shoot the Boar.
And he compared this to Irish rebel ballads to this South African song.
And Paul Thoreau, to his credit, he's a white liberal, he's a true liberal to the sense that he sees
this type of rhetoric as terrifying for fairness and equality, the world that he actually believes
can be constructed, which goes against every law of nature because egalitarianism is a revolt against nature,
as the great Murray Rothbard said.
And it's important to realize how long this battle has been playing out in South Africa.
This guy rising to power, Malema, and scaring really everyone else older than him, the older generations who Obviously, the endgame is always going to be taking white-owned land.
That was obviously the endgame, but it's this type of rhetoric and how younger generations are gravitating toward his bellicose calls for, we need retribution, we need revenge now.
And I think it's important when you read, because one of the things that this great Last Train to Zona Verde talks about, and this is something that we're about to talk about, it talks about the Malthusian nightmare that is appearing in the continent of Africa.
Not just in South Africa, not just in a place like the former Rhodesia where, you know, they're begging white farmers to come back to help feed people, but the entire continent is a Malthusian nightmare that we, in our lifetime, are going to watch become the greatest humanitarian crisis In recorded human history and known human history.
We will touch on that.
Yes, we should finish by the Malema comments by noting some of his other choice quotes in the past couple of days.
He said, you know, we want Africa back.
Africa belongs to our people.
He said that his party was, quote, cutting the throat of whiteness.
And he's tweeted at a white mayor.
who his party is trying to depose from power through some technicalities.
The white mayor had tweeted something about it. And then Malema replied on Twitter and said,
ha ha ha, you are going white man. I've got no sympathy for whiteness. It feels so good
for a black child to determine the future of a white one.
I mean, again, we were told that there was going to be this lovely rainbow nation.
Rainbow Nation.
I mean, you think back, what was the movie in 2012?
And the movie 2012, this really just terrible, over-the-top CGI film.
The movie ends with the entire world being destroyed, but they show up in, what is it, the Cape of Good Hope?
They show up in South Africa to try and restart the world over, and these ships that survived this cataclysmic event.
And guess what?
South Africa, in the real world, the one that you and I live in, where we are It's so hard to even fathom what's going on there and the type of environment that white people have to create to be able to even exist.
The greatest cataclysm has already happened, and that is the mandate of democracy, which is nothing more than a racial headcount where whites have been completely dispossessed to a point where We see glimpses of what's going to happen in the United States and in Europe and in our indigenous homeland of Europe and then of course in a place where our ancestors colonized what is the United States, Canada.
South Africa is our future.
We're headed there.
There's nothing else to say.
There's no other path.
There is no There is no peace, is the best way to put it.
We're headed there because they're headed here.
And that comes to the Malthusian situation we were talking about.
One of the opponents of the proposition in Australia to bring in fast-tracked South African refugees is a MP from the Nationalist Party named Andrew Broad.
And his objection to it is he says he says that the black South African farmers certainly have not proven themselves in matters of farming.
He says, quote, they need the skill set of the white South African farmers if they're going to have any chance of feeding the population.
If we take away the farmers from South Africa.
We robbed them of the capacity to farm that ground and ultimately feed the population.
So there are people, at least we're thinking in terms of the Zimbabwe effect, which is about to happen on South Africa as they begin confiscating these farms.
And contra Mr. Malema, they're not going to be working that land.
They're going to be doing what the people in Africa did and driving the tractors and just digging up the land and Just totally not caring for the soil.
I mean, they don't care about farming.
They'll sell the land for a quick profit.
The time horizon is very, very near.
The idea of having productive property is much less important than just having something they can sell off, probably back to a white, which is what happened in many cases in Zimbabwe.
Correct.
But yeah, this Australian MP has the right idea.
What's going to happen is a massive food shortage if even Australia provides the carrot of fast-track refugee status.
So what he's in effect saying is we need to trap these people in there.
They need to be forced to continue to endure the savagery that they're enduring.
And make no mistake, they are dealing with high levels of savagery.
I've got the stats here according to the the civil rights group Afroforum based in South Africa.
It's a South African civil rights or Afrikaner civil rights group.
In 2018 so far, there have been 109 attacks on farms, white-owned farms, and more than 15 murders.
And last year, you know, you can imagine those numbers were much, much higher.
We're only in March so far.
And so this is the reality.
And these are not just murders.
It's not just like they're coming in and picking people off.
It's meant to terrorize.
It is terrorism.
I mean, what it is is they'll come in and for hours torture these people with all sorts of instruments.
And they're trying to get whites to just voluntarily flee.
And then you've got people like this Australian MP who are saying we shouldn't even allow them to flee.
We shouldn't give them a place of refuge from this, these attacks, because the rest of South Africa is just going to collapse and not be able to feed itself.
You know, you have to understand, and this is one of the departures, I think, that Mr. Taylor and I have regarding liberals' reactions in the United States to what's going on in South Africa.
You've seen a lot on Twitter.
The editor of The Economist for Africa, yeah, I can't think of his name, but he's been apolectic.
He's been shocked that this The idea of Australia taking in these refugees would even be floated, never mind the fact that Australia has taken in a large number of white South Africans over the years.
What's the number?
So 500,000 South Africans have left in the past 30 years, and 200,000 of them went to Australia.
So there's a great history of South Africans fleeing and settling in Australia, you were saying.
Well, and my point is, you know, a lot of liberals I'm sorry to say to people who have this notion that, oh, there are people who don't believe this type of revenge is going to come, that this isn't rooted in their ideology.
If you look at the reaction of a lot of white liberals in the United States of America to this idea being floated of offering refuge in Australia to white South Africans who face genocide, There's no bones about it.
They face genocide.
White liberals, a lot of them have said things, well, they deserve it, based on what happened in the past.
They deserve it for their ancestors' actions.
And the best way to juxtapose what's going on with their response to quite literally genocide in South Africa for whites and what they face is the whiteness studies that's going on all across the country.
They're gaining more and more popularity.
I just read the college fix about a conference being cancelled because every speaker was a white woman and that wasn't diverse enough or something.
intellectual foundation for the type of situation where income inequality can only be overcome by confiscating land or property or assets of white people in the United States to make amends for past transgressions as we're seeing with the same language that is so hopeful in the eyes of so many economically Displaced Africans who, in the words of Malema, they see a savior.
That's the only hope they have because they have no skills.
They have nothing to offer in return for some sort of financial compensation.
They just don't have the time horizon.
They don't understand the need to cultivate something.
We're publishing an article tomorrow about the demographic situation in Africa and Europe.
And really what it means for global trends in migration in the years to come.
And one of the very interesting points is made about this lake, Lake Chad, which is in Central Africa.
And 30 million Africans depend on that lake for their water needs.
And in 1960, it covered 25,000 square kilometers.
And today, it's only one-tenth of that size.
And it continues to shrink, and that's because of massive overuse.
And there are all these conflicts breaking out between farmers and pastoralists over who's going to get to use the water.
And so, the lake is probably going to disappear.
And what's going to happen with these 30 million people?
You know, they're gonna have no water because they didn't have the time horizon back in 1960 to think in terms of conservation.
And likewise today in South Africa, I mean, people like Malema just instantly think if they get what they want, which is this land, that somehow that's going to translate to prosperity in the future, and it's not.
Yeah, I was just thinking about something.
These are some startling statistics.
In 1967, South Africa, an Afrikaner who grew up on a farm, didn't have shoes, he became the first person to do a successful heart transplant surgery.
1967, South Africa.
First one in world history.
South Africa, first one in world history. In 1979, South Africa became a nuclear power.
They, of course, thankfully dismantled them, which I'm becoming a firm proponent of nuclear
disarmament as America becomes majority non-white, thinking about what could happen if we allow
a majority non-white hostile to whatever might be rising in Eastern Europe and Russia and
other places whatever ends up happening.
From a future time orientation standpoint, perhaps we should become like the white South Africans.
Maybe there's a lot to learn there about why they did decide to do that.
Because think about it.
If this situation arises where there is some type of civil war or something terrifying breaks out in South Africa, if the actual state had the ability to just drop nukes on wherever the whites are located primarily, You know again, these are terrifying situations, but this is type of stuff that they were thinking about I mean here's the thing that
For younger people like myself and Mr. Wolf, they had conversations in the late 1980s and early 1990s about what to do with the nukes in South Africa.
And then they finally just dismantled them.
They just dismantled them.
And I was reading a story about how basically the entire Air Force and the attack helicopters of the South African military, they're all grounded because they don't have any money for, they don't There's some new plane project that I just saw a picture and headline about that's stillborn as well.
There's some big research project that they had going there and it's probably because a certain percentage of the firm has to be owned by non-whites and a certain percentage of management and engineers and all this stuff and then you're just You're not able to get things done.
You end up with an FIU bridge situation.
Yeah, the Black Economic Empowerment, or BEE, which is mandated by the state in every capacity, whether it's private or public employment, that is the prototype for what you're going to see in Western Europe, and increasingly the United States, as one of the topics we're about to start talking about here in a few minutes.
Income inequality and the obvious reality that genetics plays into.
Income inequality and why it persists.
Just before we move on, I just wanted to make a general point, which is that, you know, our movement is generally characterized and it's the movement for raising white racial consciousness.
It's generally been characterized in the past couple of years by trolling, by irony, by using humor to kind of poke fun at the other side.
And there's a lot to poke fun at.
Um, but we should remember the, our brothers in South Africa, we should remember that the situation these farmers are facing, it's not statistics.
You know, we can talk about the 109 attacks.
We could talk about the 15 murders.
We could talk about All the murders that have happened since the end of apartheid, but those are just statistics We should remember that the situation that these people face is extremely dire I think whites in South Africa are 9% of the population and it's dwindling every day because people are either fleeing or they're being murdered and We need to remember that there there is a serious aspect to all this which is
That, you know, there are people who have grudges against whites, who resent whites, who resent the success that whites have had, the societies that they've built, and they don't have the time horizon to realize they need to keep whites around to maintain that stuff.
They think that if they take it over somehow, magically, they'll be just the same as the white people.
They're wrong, but you're not going to convince them they're wrong.
And we should remember that the situation is very dire there.
We'll have a South African speaker at the conference this year, Simone Roche of the Soylanders group.
We're very happy about that.
So please do what you can to help the Afrikaner people.
If you can find a good South African charity, please consider contributing.
Definitely spread the word, because the more awareness that gets brought to the subject, the more chance there is that something like these proposals in Australia will actually go through.
and we'll actually be able to provide these people uh refugee status and they truly are refugees.
I'm sure at some point this twitter account will be uh censored and and um you know kicked off but I encourage everyone listening to follow at will e m p e t once again that's at W-I-L-L-E-M-P-E-T.
This is a guy named Willem Petzer and he's a South African and every day he's publishing these just horrific obituaries for the people who have been killed and there's one in particular that just it was so sad to read because it was You know, these, these oxygenarians, uh, Richard and Jemima Lemmer.
That's actually her name.
And they were 84 and 81.
And, uh, they were, they were, you know, one of them was burned with a clothes iron to the point where, where she died, she was tortured.
And you read this stuff and you think about, you know, any of the horror fiction you've read or any of just the way that, you know, throughout the, the cruelty of, of, you know, the cruelty that, that happened during the, During the religious wars and European history in our history and then you think about the savagery and just the the when you have a population that has been told every day that the faults and the and the the failures in their life are all predicated because of a white supremacist structure and the lingering residue of that white supremacist structure that still creates structural inequalities and you know an implicit bias
In South Africa, which is what this Malema guy is doing to raise this army.
This otherwise ungovernable army.
It's only held together by increasingly hostile rhetoric toward whites.
To the point where now we say, hey, leave your keys.
We'll take over your house.
Just go.
Do you want to die?
Just go.
Come on.
Mr. Wolf is right.
I mean, a lot of what's happened since 2015 with the rise of the so-called alt-right and the trolling culture, we do lose touch with the demonic world that exists in what was once a first world nation that had nuclear, that had nukes.
It's so hard to believe.
And if we weren't, if we weren't capable of understanding racial realities that help us make sense of a world that otherwise wouldn't make sense.
We wouldn't understand what's going on in South Africa and be able to accurately say, this is our future if we do nothing.
And that's why Mr. Taylor's book, If We Do Nothing, is so appropriately named.
Because everything that's happening in these former places that whites once ruled and then acquiesced and gave up, It's going to happen in countries where we still are the
majority.
Well, you have to you have to realize that the international right now we have the entire
international system is looking at South Africa. And so there's a lot holding people like Malema
back from acting as they would actually wish to.
There's a lot of opprobrium, which is brought on them by international media.
There's, uh, diplomatic forces that can bear down on South Africa.
They really need foreign investment and things like that.
So South Africa is still very dependent on global approval and the global system.
If whites in America or Europe, for instance, ever got down to 9% of the population, there would be no such international order protecting them.
And that's an important difference to realize, too.
You know, people talk about, oh, well, you know, white South Africans are at 9% of the population and they're still not getting it.
You know, some of them are still liberal and stuff like that.
Well, they're also, they don't really have their backs up against the wall.
I mean, people realize that if there was just outright slaughter, if the army just started moving in and just slaughtering people, that there would be an international intervention.
And so it has to be this kind of slow thing.
So you can't really look at the Look at the Africana people and say that, well, OK, whites will never wake up.
I think that in America and Europe, it's more likely that we'll realize that this is kind of the last redoubt, that there's no country that's going to give us refugee status, for instance.
I mean, maybe China or something, but, you know, you can't count on that.
So it's important to pay attention to what's happening there as Certainly some sort of eventuality, and certainly to realize the undercurrents of resentment that are there are pervasive throughout the Western world, and that, you know, when people are given power, electorally or otherwise, they will act on those resentments.
Which brings us to our next topic, which is the voting trends in the United States and the demographic trends in the United States.
We have a Pew analysis that just came out two days ago, which is based on 10,000 interviews of registered voters in 2017.
of registered voters in 2017.
And the results are fairly stark, fairly grim.
It's not what you would hope for.
If you're a Republican or you think that our salvation lies in the Republican Party, or that they'll at least help us maintain a white majority for a little while longer, anything like that.
Pew found that half of white voters, only half, 51% of white voters identify with the GOP or lean Republican, while 43% identify as Democrats.
Or lean Democratic.
And you might say, well, that's not so bad.
At least a majority of whites, uh, you know, support Republicans.
And that's, you know, an eight point gap.
But then you realize that whites aren't 90% of the population anymore.
No.
There's something like 67% of the voting population.
And that is... And that drops every, every, every, every voting year.
You're right.
It's dwindling every day.
And also the percent of whites who are identifying with the Republican Party seems to be going down.
Um, among college-educated whites in particular, uh, there was, where there used to be an even split where two years ago there was a 47-47 split between how they either identified or leaned.
Now it's shifted five points to where 53% either identify of white college-educated people, either identify or lean Democratic versus just 42%, um, Republican or lean Republican.
That's again a five-point swing from just two years ago.
Republicans are still holding a solid foothold among less educated, or what did Trump call them, the poorly educated people who he loves.
They've done well.
Those who have some college experience identify with Republicans at 55%.
Those with no college identify or lean Republican at 58%.
But the trends are unmistakable.
If you look at the blacks that identify with the GOP or the Hispanics that identify with the GOP, those trends have either stayed the same or are going down slightly.
You've got, let's see, the trend black from 2006 to 2017.
So, from over the course of a decade, up until last year, blacks went from 11% identifying with the GOP to just 8%.
And Hispanics dropped from 29% to 28%.
I don't know what the margin of error was in this study.
That would be interesting to know.
10,000 voters is pretty good.
Yeah, this is still a... because again, I'm not someone who believes, and I don't believe you are, and I hope that a lot of our listeners, or people who are just listening to this podcast for the first time, of course I would say please go back and listen to the entire archive.
They're fantastic.
Mr. Wolf does a tremendous job sitting in for Mr. Taylor, but a wonderful archive to go through.
Sam Francis put it best.
The Republican Party must be smashed if there is ever to be hope for a white identitarian movement to arise.
Now obviously, there's not going to be a third party, but what that means is that we have to have the Republican Party betray Those people who are still clinging to some hope that the Republicans are the American Party.
Lesser-educated whites, perhaps whites who live in the suburbs, who have a college degree, maybe a master's, who are barely identifying with the Republican Party at, what, 53%?
It's unclear what else they could do to betray those people.
I mean, do you see the spending bill?
The omnibus spending bill today just got proposed.
It's got record military spending, so everyone in Northern Virginia is going to be happy.
All the defense contractors are going to be happy.
Even though we're not fighting any wars, we've got record defense spending.
Well, except our lingering adventures in the Middle East.
And I guess in Africa.
16 years in Afghanistan for what?
I know, but apart from that, there's no funding for the wall.
They claim that there's like $1.6 billion, but that's for fence maintenance.
Nonsense.
I think Trump's gonna veto it.
I think there's gonna be a major pushback against it.
We'll see.
He tweeted big support of it.
He didn't.
And, you know, and then I just saw another headline.
Republicans are now trying to push for their next big push is like bigger tax cuts or like, you know, making these tax cuts permanent.
Like that's all they can think about is pleasing the military industrial complex, their big business donors, corporate America, all the people who could not give Two cents for middle America, the people who actually pushed Trump over the edge.
And, you know, these people continue to identify as Republican probably only because the Democratic Party and liberals in general have reached such a fever pitch with their anti-white rhetoric that they just can't see themselves going the other way.
What you do see is a massive increase in identification as independents.
And so part of what you're... and that's actually coming from both sides.
A lot of Democrats are identifying with the Bernie movement and so on.
But this rise in independence is very interesting.
But people are fleeing the Republican Party.
They're becoming discouraged.
And I don't see a lot of evidence that they're going to be able to muster a lot of enthusiasm in the midterms.
No, not at all.
Not at all.
It's funny.
At a time where Donald Trump is Beginning to co-op the language of the so-called swamp.
He said he was gonna go drain you see Fox News the Fox News Channel basically go the other way and They've decided to completely reinvent their their their their key marquee lineup Hannity Laura Ingram and Tucker Carlson and It is, it is Trumpian during the campaign type-esque language.
Every day, all the time.
It's funny because they outflank him to the right.
Exactly, that's my point.
They actually end up holding his feet to the fire.
It's not even like they're... Hannity is usually the mouthpiece of whoever the Republican is in power, and to an extent he's been that.
But he's also held Trump on some matters, but certainly Tucker.
And Laura Ingram, very strong in terms of holding him to his campaign promises.
Tucker's show has taken the best elements of a website like Breitbart when it was in the lead up to the election, and it's taken the best elements of the trolling culture on social media and merged them into this beautiful marriage that has produced This glorious offspring of what we all hope Donald Trump would actually be saying in the White House.
Which is not going to happen, unfortunately.
But that doesn't matter because the ratings that you're seeing, people want this.
People remember what Trump talked about in the campaigns.
And you know what?
If Donald Trump doesn't want to be the flag bearer, the standard bearer for what he helped for what he spoke on the campaign trail.
If Tucker wants to take it, and of course he's doing a far better job being an evangel and evangelizing the Trumpian masses, if you will, to an extent that I don't even think Donald Trump would even be able to do as Commander-in-Chief.
No, he is galvanizing people.
He had an excellent segment about demographic change and how Hazleton, Pennsylvania had gone from being a majority white community to majority Hispanic in the span of just a few years.
And how people never voted for that, how elites insulate themselves from these sorts of trends.
And, you know, of course everyone referred to him as a white nationalist and all these things, but you don't even have to be a white nationalist to recognize that having your community transformed from one where everyone speaks English to one where everyone speaks Spanish is, you know, a pretty radical thing.
and a pretty just bewildering thing.
I mean, you wake up one day and you think you're at home and the next you're in Mexico.
The Washington Post likes to lecture Americans for their nativist views and for helping elect Donald Trump,
but a lot of the times now you're seeing the Washington Post run articles about Montgomery County,
about Fairfax County, about all these counties that surround the empire on the Potomac.
The super zips, as Charles Murray put it.
Correct, and just the vast enclaves of not just illegals, but the MS-13 menace that exists there.
And to me, that is one of the great accomplishments of Donald Trump as president.
You know, you think about what he's actually done that is forcing the conversation to at least start within the elite journals, within the elite newspapers, within the elite intellectual magazines, where the decision makers are forced to actually read and have to entertain the ideas that you and I have been reading about for decades, for more than a decade.
And I think about what just happened with President Trump putting out this idea that we should Execute drug dealers as a way, you know, punishment must be unusual or else it serves no purpose.
The great Robert Heinlein said in Starship Troopers.
That's right.
If you have a deterrent called the death penalty for drug dealers, that's a pretty cool thing.
And guess what happened, Mr. Mr. Wolf?
The Washington Post published a story where they lamented that if this actually became policy, it would impact people of color disproportionately.
Implying what?
Implying what?
Yes, the Washington Post and elite media's reporting on things is really quite shocking.
I think Ann Coulter tweeted that and said something like, Nor'easter, you know, dumps 15 inches of snow, non-whites affected most.
That's, I think, a takeoff of a Sobran quip where he said something like, asteroid to hit earth, you know, non-whites affected most.
Of course, statistically that would be true.
But there's also an interesting story in the New York Times this week, which was reporting on a big research project led by this guy Raj Shetty, who is out of Stanford.
And then there were people out of Harvard and a couple of researchers from the Census Bureau who teamed up with him.
And these guys gained access to very Rare data.
Data that most Americans are not allowed to see, most researchers and scholars are not allowed to see.
The IRS gave them the 1040 data from tens of millions of people.
It was redacted or whatever, but they gave them the income data, and then they managed to get an inside look at Census Bureau data, which is supposed to be totally off Off balance to this sort of research, according to privacy laws and things, but somehow they managed to coordinate these things together to find what is actually some pretty interesting, what are some pretty interesting data.
And of course, the New York Times drew all the wrong conclusions and everyone else who's looked at it draws all the wrong conclusions.
And I think that's actually exemplified by the title of the New York Times piece.
And this was definitely the biggest story of the day in terms of what got passed around on social media and so on and caused a lot of reverberation.
Well, the original title of it, well, all right, the original title of it was Sons of Rich Black Families Fair No Better Than Sons of Working Class Whites.
Pretty bold.
When I saw it, I was like, wow, that's pretty bold.
That is a pretty strong thing to claim.
Very jugalistic.
And it's actually true that that that is proven in the data.
Well, they, I guess, took some heat or maybe thought better of it or whatever, and realized that they had to highlight something else in the title.
So they changed the title.
The title that's up there now is Extensive Data Shows Punishing Reach of Racism for Black Boys.
So of course they have to jump to the conclusion that what causes downward mobility among black is racism even though that's not not demonstrated at all in uh in the piece in the research they're just assuming that racism and discrimination have to be have to be to blame for it but uh the piece is really good i definitely recommend that people uh go and take a look at it it's got some very interesting graphics where you can you can watch these dots going across the screen and it shows basically they're zeroing in on blacks and whites
who are raised in top 1% households and then it shows how their kids well it shows how those those blacks and whites fare relative to their parents so it shows them dropping dropping down for the most part because anyone who's in the top 1% they're going to regress toward the mean for their group.
And, you know, for blacks that's much lower than for whites.
So, you know, the black dots are going way down and the whites, you know, mostly stay up toward the top.
And so, you know, this is showing the downward mobility of even the wealthiest blacks.
There was an amazing story in the Journal of Blacks in Higher Education a couple years ago where it showed the SAT scores.
That's what this reminded me of.
Yeah, do you remember that?
I believe that the only group of Blacks by their income for their children.
I think blacks who scored over 200,000, whose family had an income of $200,000 more per year.
Only that group of people had a higher, was it SAT score?
No, it wasn't.
They still scored worse than basically whites whose family income was like under $30,000.
Yeah, I was trying to find it.
The children of parents, black parents whose families, you know, made $200,000 have lower SAT scores than whites from the poorest echelon.
I mean, you can't explain that.
Well, that's one of those great charts that the Ann Coulter-approved Battle Beagle on Twitter would love to tweet out, because it's one of those just eye-popping... The Journal of Blacks in Higher Education, we're not talking about some run-of-the-mill publication.
This is a well-respected, peer-reviewed publication, and this is one that I think Steve Saylor has written about this many times.
Do you guys know what this means?
I don't know that they do.
Interesting.
So this data, the whole crux of it was that if you look at boys versus girls, there is this downward mobility.
So in other words, if we zero in on people in the top 1%, people whose family incomes is in the top 1%, and we look at those children when they grow up, how much do they earn?
If you look at boys, what they found is that the boys will earn significantly less than their parents.
But black boys will.
But white boys, not so much.
White boys kind of stay up.
Well, when you look at girls, the regression, again, when you're isolating it to the top 1%, people raised in top 1% households, the regression is about the same.
The regression toward the mean is about the same for black girls and white girls.
And so what the New York Times concludes is that there's this kind of unique racism that affects black boys that, you know, black girls definitely experience racism.
You know, they're sure to point that out, but black boys experience it differently.
And, uh, you know, they talk about the, they don't mention the school to prison pipeline, but they'd say it occurs even in preschools when, when black kids are getting suspended and, and so on.
And of course there's no, they, they pretend that black boys have no, Agency that there's simply victims of the system that the system is just out to get them because of some stereotypical Stereotyped reputation that they have which has no basis in fact and of course we all know that it's simply because black boys are more likely to act out and the things that make some of the same things that lead them to be
Uh, good athletes, you know, being athletically capable, maybe higher testosterone, at least when they're younger, um, and so on.
And as well as a short time horizon, greater impulsiveness, and these sorts of things are just a recipe for high crime.
And we know that they commit crimes, uh, at higher rates than whites.
And that's, there's, as we've demonstrated in our color of crime report, which hopefully our listeners are familiar with, um, that's not due to discrimination.
That's not due to discrimination from the justice system, that is due to the crimes that they commit.
Ben and Jerry, the ice cream maker, who hopefully everybody listening to this boycotts and avoids, like, the plague, because A, it's horrible for you, but B, the ideology that they adhere to is also horrible.
They tweeted out a stat recently about the incarceration rate for plaques, and a lot
of people pointed out, hey, well, maybe that's because they commit crime at that rate.
Right.
How is this so hard to understand?
It goes back to the Washington Post headline.
Donald Trump's policy on executing drug dealers will disproportionately impact people of color.
Well, are you admitting that the majority of drug dealers are people of color?
You know, at a time when we know, because begrudgingly it is coming out that the opioid
epidemic is overwhelmingly impacting whites at a level that would equal their representation
in the country back in the 1960s when the country was 90% white.
Have you seen some of these studies?
Yeah.
It's almost as hard to believe as what's going on in South Africa.
I mean, what's happening in this world is the nightmarish consequences of egalitarianism running unchecked and all the policies cascading to this world that has completely transformed what once was a pretty great place for all races.
And I don't want to sound squishy here and saccharine, but I'm going to say that because we've seen studies that show blacks in South Africa now view apartheid South Africa with far more approval than they do post-apartheid South Africa.
And I think if you were to talk to a lot of older blacks who lived in a place like Memphis when, say, the city had demographics that were closer to half white, half black, as opposed to now where it's 63% black, you know, 28% white, they would look back and they'd say, We actually had grocery stores we could go to.
Instead now, Kroger's leaving, and we have a food desert.
You know, you're talking about the desertification of Africa?
Yeah.
Guess what happens in the United States when a community goes majority black?
You have a food desert that's created.
Yep.
Well, to bring it back to the New York Times statistics, Steve Saylor, of course, has done the yeoman's work on this one.
As usual.
You know, no one can explain the sex difference, why black men, when they grow up, regress so much in their income, even if they're raised in wealthy households, and why black women track it about the same regression as whites.
And so he says, uh, glibly, he just says, well, black guys screw up their lives too much.
And that's, that's basically, that's basically it.
And that's actually demonstrated in the data presented by Raj Chetty and this team.
They found that black men who are raised in the top 1%, which is millionaires here, they're as likely to be incarcerated as white men raised in households earning about $36,000.
Well these researchers act like they're perplexed about why this gap exists and they say, you know, black men must be subject to racism.
Well look, your own data shows that even wealthy blacks are as likely to be incarcerated as poor blacks.
So what does that tell you?
And they're also likely to be subject to more school discipline because they act out more.
And then they can't get into good colleges.
And so you end up with statistics where black women are getting, you know, 25% of black women have college bachelor's degrees versus 17% of black men.
So this helps explain it as well.
It's like black men can't go to college because, you know, either they don't want to or they can't get in.
or they've got this criminal background that precludes them from doing so.
Yeah.
So black women are going, so they're better able to hold on to the gains that their parents had.
Yeah. And furthermore, they're big beneficiaries of affirmative action.
That also seems to be something The New York Times hasn't considered, which is that companies are starving for blacks
because they have to present this diversity data.
They have to show that they're doing affirmative action, and black women are a lot more manageable than black men.
Not just corporations, but the Public sector, too.
Oh, yeah.
Big time.
Public sector.
Big time public sector jobs.
And also another thing that The Times doesn't mention, which, you know, another good explanation that maybe isn't racism, but they're not going to consider it, is that black women are less likely to be married than white women, and therefore they have to earn more as individuals.
So it was looking at individual income.
Well, black women have to provide usually for an entire household.
They're a lot more likely to have to do that than white women, especially white women with college degrees.
And, you know, so they have to earn more because they have to support their families.
So it's just the New York Times just can't consider any of these.
They'll just go ahead and accuse, say that racism is to blame in the title.
This would be a vocation that neither you nor I would probably ever consider.
But one of the one of the places you see so many of the overeducated black women making unbelievable, unbelievable income and as school administrators.
It is stunning the amount of money that a school administrator, whether you go from principal to up the hierarchy within the county system, whether it's superintendent.
I mean, when you read about all these great inflation scandals that have happened over the past 10 years.
In D.C.
or in Atlanta with the test score.
Yeah, Atlanta, Prince George's County, Washington, D.C.
is going through one right now where they're actually going back and looking at everything.
Atlanta's, of course, is the most Egregious one.
But at the same time that the Atlanta public school fiasco happened, there were investigations in Philadelphia and Dallas and all these public school systems.
But you know what?
There are so many positions for administrators and these public entities, they want to hire people of color.
And you would think that guidance counselors and stuff would be pushing people to these type of jobs, especially
people of color.
And that's one of the reasons why I also think you see that higher income for black females, because they do take these type of jobs.
I mean, Mr. Wolf, these women are making, as school administrators in a place like Prince George's County or in Baltimore County, They're making over $200,000 a year.
Oh, I'm sure.
It's just absurd.
But yeah, the New York Times, as usual, is just blinded to any explanation that doesn't include blaming it on whites.
You know, it couldn't possibly be the fact that blacks shouldn't, you know, commit crimes.
And that was Steve Saylor's point.
He's like, well, if you want to really fix it, maybe you should tell blacks to just commit crimes.
Bringing this full circle, when this type of stuff happens, When these type of stories happen, they get on Black Twitter.
It's like the story of the Austin bombing.
Initially, there were a couple people of color who were killed, and the story came out on all the Black news sites, and then proliferated on Black Twitter.
The bombers are racist.
Right.
The bombers are racist.
Right.
The bombers are racist.
Repeat it again ad nauseum.
And then as soon as the whites got, were victimized as well, it became just no interest.
But on the day that the alleged bomber blew himself up, The Root, TheRoot.com, which is a black news website that has mega corporate funding, they put out an article on their Twitter and obviously throughout all social media on their website that said, what if the bomber is a racist?
Basically, it was still insinuated and still feeding this anti-white hysteria that obviously garners their websites a lot of traffic.
And that's why a story like this, as it was originally presented, Sons of rich black families fare no better than sons of working class whites.
That type of racial resentment toward white and white society, and white people in general, that is ginned up.
Go back to what we were talking about with South Africa, and the language that Malema is using.
It's not hard to realize where things are headed.
When every aspect of American culture is aligned against whiteness.
Yep.
And I think more and more people are coming to terms with that and starting to realize that, hey, this is, uh, what's going on here?
You know, this is my country that I grew up in.
I'm a pretty, I'm a good person.
I didn't do anything wrong.
Why am I by default hated?
And more and more people will come to see our way of viewing the world and hopefully be able to take some action before we're not able to take any action.
Speaking of taking action, we're about to wrap up this phenomenal podcast.
Hope you all enjoyed it.
The American Renaissance Conference is coming up in less than a month.
Tell us, is there still some room available to be able to sign up to go?
Well, there are no rooms in the inn.
It's like, this is like Bethlehem.
There are still seats available at the conference, so people cannot stay at Montgomery Bell anymore.
We've got all those rooms booked, but there are still some seats available at the conference.
We almost will certainly sell out, and we'll probably sell out within the next, I would think, one or two weeks, so definitely register if you plan on coming.
There are plenty of hotels in the nearby area, about 15-20 minutes drive from the conference facility, so please definitely do Join us at next month's conference.
Paul Kersey, thank you as always for joining me, and we look forward to talking to our listeners next week.
Mr. Wolf, our time is up.
▲
Export Selection