All Episodes
Previous Next
Jan. 22, 2018 - Radio Renaissance - Jared Taylor
51:36
A Legal Perimeter Around California
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Ladies and gentlemen, welcome to another edition of Radio Renaissance.
And we have in the studio our usual indispensable guest, Paul Kersey.
Good to see you, Brother Kersey.
Same to you.
Yeah, I'd like to start with a story out of Yale University.
This is a significant piece of research, unlike the usual bumf that emerges from that hotbed of liberal idiocy.
Apparently, a postdoc associate and lecturer named Mohamed Fazel Zarandi has done a very serious investigation into the number of illegal immigrants in the country.
And with a name like that, my guess is he's probably not trying to nudge the numbers down.
He's probably got a pretty serious look at this thing.
And his conclusion is that instead of just going on the basis of survey data or census data, which is obviously a completely cuckoo way to try to figure out how many illegal immigrants are in the country, He has done inflows, outflows, a logical attempt to understand what's happening, and what he gets is a lower bound.
This is his lower realistic bound for illegal immigrants in the country is $17 million.
That's a full 50% higher than the most frequently quoted figure of $11.3 million.
And he says the most realistic figure for illegal immigrants in the country is 22.8 million.
That's twice the number that people are frequently bandying about.
We've seen a lot of people in the outer orbits of conservative ink.
I guess I talk about Ann Coulter, Pat Buchanan.
They've actually suggested the number might be as high as 30 million.
I've seen some of Ann Coulter's work most recently in Adios America.
This study, which was released this week, it hasn't garnered much attention because of all the news about what's going on with the government shutdown, the battle with DACA, but this story is It illustrates the importance of truly understanding the utter failure of our government in doing its most important function, and that is protecting the actual citizens who are paying the taxes, as opposed to importing a new class of people who, as we've seen in states like California, which we're going to talk about, are basically the demographic army for the new electorate that's being built up.
And this is scary.
Steve Saylor, who has just been doing such... He used that word, indispensable, to describe me.
I would say that that word needs to go to someone like Steve Saylor, whose work on the Affordable Family Formation and any other time in American history, that would have been the basis of a right-wing non-profit to help promote and promulgate his ideas.
Well, Steve Saylor noted in one of his blog posts that I read that, you know, in the Bible, it talked, you know, the Bible actually mentions many times that there are synthesis undertaken and that's important to
actually understand from a governmental practice who's in your country and this
study it blows a hole in all the accepted norms of who of the number of infiltrators the
number of invaders Well, the aspect of this that I find particularly shocking is that the U.S.
government itself has been making no realistic attempt to count the number.
Bingo!
That's right.
You have to count on private investigators, in effect.
This is a study carried out by the Yale School of Management, and that's the only way to get to the bottom of this.
Now, another aspect of this is that it seems to me that the liberals and the pro-immigrant people, they are of two minds about this.
They want the illegals counted because that goes into representation in Congress.
It goes into the amount of money that's doled out to particular areas on the basis of population.
On the other hand, it makes them nervous to realize and to have this information publicized that our way of controlling our borders is so poor.
So they're really of two minds about this.
On the one hand, they want to say, okay, now we know these people are here.
This is more reason for us to have bigger programs, the kind of programs they love.
On the other hand, this is a recognition that we cannot control our borders.
Our borders are much less well controlled than anybody ever talked about.
And it's also Terrifying to think about what this means for Trump and for Republicans, because it really shows the importance of deportation.
If we only thought that it was $11 million, then you can say, okay, this will be it.
This will be the last amnesty.
Because again, Trump during the election, again, You and I are meeting here today.
It's the one year anniversary of his inauguration and the Trump that we saw before the election, he was talking about deportation, the Trump deportation force, which of course we see beautifully.
Implemented in a place like Israel, where they're paying people $9,000, bounty hunters, to go after illegal aliens.
Gosh, I wish we could have those great policies that they're enacting there.
That's what enabled Trump to be elected.
Now one year on, there's still some very positive things going on, but Donald Trump needs to be sat down by Stephen Miller, by Michael Anton, by other people within his administration.
And they really need to take a hard look at this, because if it is 100% greater, which I would say that based on these numbers, he says that the standard parameter values generate an estimate of 22.8, You know, could it be even higher?
I think, you know, yeah, 22.8 million.
Could it be closer to that 30 million number?
It could be, it could be.
But again, again, see, others, you know, the pro-immigrant folks will then turn right around and say, it is impossible.
It was impossible to talk about deporting 11 million people.
It's even more impossible to talk about deporting almost three times that number.
But my argument has always been, if we are tough about deportations, if there are a couple of well-publicized news stories of people being sent across the border and people realize that they have a choice, go when you have organized your life or go when the federal government nabs you.
They are going to organize their lives and go.
It's called self-deportation.
Yes, Mr. Mitt Romney was right about that.
The numbers to me are, maybe it's a larger problem than we thought, but the numbers are something we can deal with so long as we have the right attitude.
Of course, this reminds me, in terms of attitude, When Donald Trump was first elected, all of the arrivals just plummeted.
People thought, oh, it's all over.
America has finally come to its senses.
We're not welcome after all.
But now, oh, there's talk of DACA.
There's talk of amnesty.
So they're coming back again.
It's a question of the psychological climate you build within the country.
And if the psychological climate is right, we don't have to charter airplanes or hire Greyhound buses.
They will go.
They will go.
Build a wall and they will go.
Anyway.
But again, to me, this is an interesting transition to our next story, which is about California's new sanctuary law.
California is essentially saying, illegal immigrants are great.
We want them to stay.
In effect, they're saying, the more the merrier.
And if the federal government is going to try to get them out of our state, we're going to dig on our heels and make it impossible, or as hard as possible for the federal government to do this.
And this is all based on the Immigrant Worker Protection Act, which was signed by Governor Jerry Brown and took effect January 1st, on New Year's Day today.
Now, it was authored by a San Francisco Democratic Assemblyman by the name of David Chu.
That's a good Irish name, right?
In any case.
What this means is that, well, it all applies to employers in California.
And it is a new law that means that employers cannot voluntarily cooperate with the federal enforcement people.
And if we look sort of one by one at some of the provisions of David Chu's new law, it says it requires employers to ask immigration agents for a warrant.
before granting access to a work site.
That means the feds come up and say, you know, we'd kind of like to poke around, see if you've got any illegal immigrants.
There is no legal obligation for an employer to say, not to say, go right ahead, take a look.
But this new law says you have got to bar them access.
Got to bar them access.
This is extraordinary.
Which is one of the reasons we've seen a lot of the news before the government shutdown was about rumors of a massive surge by ICE, by Immigration Customs Enforcement, that they were going to be going into Oakland, San Francisco, and there were a lot of people.
The Attorney General came out and said, hey, if you participate, you're violating this law that we've set up, which somehow, in their mind, supersedes federal law.
As you said before we got started, you used an amazing term that I think We need to maybe even explore, and hopefully one of the great writers of American Renaissance, I'm looking at you Gregory Hood, will consider adopting, and that's this legal perimeter that California is trying to set up to protect itself.
Before we started this podcast... To protect itself?
It's not protecting itself, it's protecting illegal immigrants.
Exactly, and that's what I mean, that's what I mean.
Before you and I started this podcast today, we quickly looked up the numbers from the 2016 election.
It's fascinating when you look at that Clinton got about 8.3, 8.4 million votes, 61% of the electorate.
Trump still got 4.4 million votes.
That's 32%.
That might be the second most number of votes in the entire country after Texas.
If you actually think about that, just because California is so large.
I mean, I know for a fact that in Alabama, because we've talked about this before, he only got 1.5 million just because of the size of the state.
That's a lot of people who still voted for Donald Trump.
If you look at the map of California, it's stunning some of the counties.
There aren't that many counties in California, as in some states, where there's just, you know, like Georgia, I know, for instance, has over 100 counties, and the size of California, there aren't that many counties.
They're large swaths of land.
And as you know, in the upper portion of the state, some of these counties went 80% for Trump.
It's stunning when you look at that.
Well, see, the point, I believe, the conclusion we can draw from this is that there are plenty of employers who don't want illegals working for them, who are going to be happy for the feds to be enforcing the law.
Now, the state of California says, if you cooperate, if you say, yes, ICE, you may look around, This is one of the things that they are forbidden to do.
The punishments for this are $2,000 and up to $5,000 for a first violation, and up to $10,000 for succeeding violations.
And they will probably count those violations in a very broad way.
You let three ICE agents in, it's probably three violations.
I don't know.
They love to count these things.
But that's one thing you can't do.
And they say prevents employers from voluntarily sharing confidential employee information without a subpoena.
Again, if you are an employer and you think that this guy, this guy looks like an illegal to me, you cannot voluntarily share that information.
It's against the law.
The state says you are not allowed to do that.
And then, of course, if there is going to be a federal audit, the law says that they can't stop the feds if they've got a subpoena, if they've got a court order, then the employee's got to notify all its employees, here it's coming!
Now, what do you think the purpose of that is?
I figure the purpose is they can clear out.
Yeah, exactly.
It's giving them a chance, you know, la lo, la lo, because here come these nasty migra types.
This is 21st century nullification and an attempt to protect illegal immigrants that the people of California back in the 1990s voted to deny state rights with Prop 187.
I mean, again, this is so fascinating because over a 20 year time period, you've seen the government of California reconstituted and restructured to do everything to benefit illegal immigrants and do everything to deny representation to actual Californians.
And as you noted before we started, you're seeing an exodus of right-leaning conservative Californians to Idaho, to Arizona, To Colorado, to Texas.
I've read plenty of stories about that.
To cheaper areas because of the gross expense that this endless supply of cheap labor, what it's doing to the housing market and just to the overall standard of living.
This is going to be in the next couple months.
We are going to see a moment, I do believe, that where Donald Trump and ICE actually do try to arrest some people.
They do do a raid.
Well, yes, and the question is how the federal government will react to impositions of fines against people who cooperate with the federal government.
This is an extraordinary state of affairs.
As you say, it is a modern-day version of nullification.
Now, nullification has a bad reputation these days because it was Southerners who were nullifying federal law.
But now that California is doing it, I think nullification, they probably won't use the word because that's got too many implications back to the slavery era.
But they will say California is standing up for human rights, for human dignity, and it will be fascinating to see whether Jeff Sessions has got the backbone to really put the screws on these people.
Well, it's fascinating whether or not Jeff Beauregard Sessions When you actually think about where we are right now with Donald Trump, again, this would never have been possible.
Hillary would have loved all of this.
This would have been the model for every state, the legal perimeter that California is erecting.
That would have gone to all the states to protect illegal aliens from federal intrusion because the federal government would not be as emboldened to actually implement the rule of law.
That's all this is.
Again, Gregory Hood has mentioned this.
How insane that we live in a world where simply enacting the rule of law and law and order is seen as a violation of human rights.
Enforcing the law.
Enforcing the law is a scandal.
It is a crime against humanity to enforce the law.
Yes, we live in astonishing times.
And yes, I do appreciate the fact that it's Donald Trump rather than Hillary Clinton, even though I do not quite share your enthusiasm for this guy.
I guess I just do have this snobbish view that I would prefer a man with a certain amount of dignity in the White House.
Well, I'll put it this way.
If Kate Steinle's ghost one night is the last person that Donald Trump sees before he goes to sleep, and then he wakes up and says, you know what?
I want to go arrest one of the mayors of these sanctuary cities, the entire world changes overnight.
Because at that point, the world media then Really will go overboard.
Not just the American media, but the world media will go overboard.
I don't think that's going to happen.
I do not think even Donald Trump has got the guts to send in federal agents to arrest a sitting American mayor or state rep.
We'll see.
I mean, that would be very, very exciting.
Oh, I'd be glued to my screen.
The world changes though.
That's all I'm saying.
And it's, it's, it's, you know, hey, If an apparition shows up and he thinks it's Kate Steinle, that's all I'm saying.
He does something.
It would be great.
But on the question of these illegals and sanctuary cities and how this has changed the country, this leads us from California all the way to the city of Franklin, Indiana.
It's a small place, only about 24,000 people.
It's 95% white.
And you found this story, this guy, this Republican city councilor, Joseph Alt.
And he got in trouble, didn't he?
He got in a lot of trouble.
He also serves as a sheriff's deputy.
And, of course, he's no longer in that role.
They're actually investigating him because he dared share a meme on Facebook
Which read and I quote We bring people from shithole countries because shithole
Democrats need shithole votes so they can turn America into a shithole
Do you agree and quote I?
I do apologize for the use of colorful language, but that was of course what Donald Trump said, and the Donald Trump effect has trickled down to a guy in Joseph Alt, a city councilman in this virtually all-white city in Indiana, named after Ben Franklin.
And guess what?
It erupted into a furor.
He was basically Forced to apologize.
He wasn't forced to, he willingly apologized.
He groveled and he resigned his seat on the city council.
There's an internal investigation going on within the government and within his position as the sheriff's deputy.
The sheriff was actually quoted in the story, I believe it was on I believe I read this on Fox 59, the Indianapolis Fox affiliate, where they talked about the sheriff's deputy was quoted, or the sheriff was actually quoted as saying, yeah, we're doing an investigation of this guy.
This guy has been a sheriff's deputy for 20 years, 20 years, and one tweet, he may be out the door.
One Facebook message, yeah.
Yes, sorry, one Facebook message, and he could be out the door.
I tried to find an image of what actually it was because I'm sure it was a picture of, you know, as you've seen these, they're everywhere, of the, you know, the Haitian beach and just the trash strewn all over this beach and just how, you know, But it doesn't need a picture.
We all know what he's talking about, and we all understand.
It's this determination of the entire ruling class and much of the so-called middle class to pretend otherwise.
But we all know what's going on.
We absolutely know why Donald Trump used that word, and we all know that it was perhaps a vulgarism, but it depicts a certain reality.
We're all supposed to pretend otherwise.
American Renaissance has been around about 8 years longer than he served as a sheriff's deputy.
1990, if 20 years would be 1998.
What is it psychologically, Mr. Taylor, that compels a white person to capitulate so quickly?
To surrender to this orgy of political correctness and the knifes that are out for him.
Because we are herd animals.
We are people of the tribe.
We have this deep, deep longing to be approved by our fellows.
Human beings are just not very good at being lone wolves.
We just don't have that in us.
What this guy doesn't realize is that he has resigned.
He has apologized.
It makes no difference.
He should have stayed on, made them force him out.
He should have explained this is exactly what's happening.
All of these people coming in from failed countries will give the Democrats more vote.
And all these people coming in from failed countries will turn our country into a failed country as well.
If he had stood his ground, He would be worldwide news.
Now he's just a footnote.
He's another white guy who made some sort of verbal error, apologized, and got smashed down anyway.
If he had stuck to his guns and he'd explained why, it would have been a hugely important story.
Not just sticking to his guns, but by resigning the way that he did, and apologizing.
He ceded all moral authority to those who are saying, you can't say this.
That's right.
We're the arbiters of what you can and can't say or think.
He's admitting that he was wrong, despite the fact that he knows he's right.
It is this kind of autodafé, this kind of Soviet show trial, in which these Soviets, these old Bolsheviks, confess to crimes that were absolutely preposterous.
He's doing the same things.
I was wrong.
He knows that he's not wrong.
But, you know, further, about Franklin, I looked at a few photographs of the place.
It has a sort of idyllic, small-town look.
The city hall is this quaint little building, nice little streets.
And I think it's not a coincidence that a bunch of Japanese industrial companies have moved in.
This is in the last decade or two.
What you've got there is Toyota, Toyota Tsusho.
It's part of the Toyota Group to make auto parts, textiles and machinery.
NSK, the number one Japanese ball bearing company.
KYB, which stands for Kayaba Manufacturing.
They have a whole range of industrial products they make.
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, climate control.
They make these big compressors and HVAC equipment.
These are great jobs.
The city of Franklin has been booming in population.
Because the Japanese, they're not stupid.
They know that an area that's 95% white is going to have good, solid workers, no problem with unions.
In fact, they got in trouble for that.
The auto companies, you know, they were looking around where they're going to locate in the United States.
Well, was it pure coincidence they found all these of Tennessee, Alabama, yes, yes, Ohio, these areas that were overwhelming the sort of rural and white.
And there were some internal memos that came out saying, you know, well, we know why we're going there.
I think actually just this past week Toyota announced they're going to build a huge new facility 4,000 jobs in North Alabama right past Huntsville and a lot of people were worried that they were going to lose that had Roy Moore been elected because of the negative connotations.
This was some speculation that was done by By a number of people, actually.
And who cares about that aspect?
But you're right.
These car companies, these foreign car manufacturers, and then all of the ancillary companies that go into building.
That's one of the things that isn't reported a lot of the times.
Whenever a car company Builds all the distributors, all the suppliers, all the vendors.
They then build as close as they can to keep their costs down.
Most people don't realize that an automobile manufacturer, they're sort of an assembly shop for the most part.
They may make some very complicated, they might make the engines, but you know the panels, the electronic equipment, the brake cylinders, shock absorbers, ignition, all that stuff comes from outside.
And so you get all these other companies that come around, and these are ancillary companies, but there's some of them doing other things as well.
Kayaba and Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, they're not related to the automobile industry, but in any case, This is probably a great place to live, a great place to get a good, well-paid industrial job, and a guy who has probably served his city with distinction and dedication for more than 20 years.
He's probably out on his ear for having said something that we all know is true.
All because some Bolshevik on Facebook got mad and reported him to the media.
So the lesson is, on your personal Facebook page, do not share things that you might be worried that one of your neighbors is going to go report to.
The thought police.
The Komizar.
And they'll come after you because the media wants to entrap white people who put out a message, even if it's as inane as this.
I mean, again, President Trump.
Always just take the lead from President Trump.
He didn't apologize.
No.
He didn't grovel.
He didn't say... Well, he denied he said it.
That was sort of a disappointment.
He said he used harsh terms.
Well, who knows?
But no, he did not grovel.
Good for him.
Yes.
But he is setting a good example in that respect.
And I wish, I wish this fellow, this fellow Joseph Alt had taken a leaf from Donald Trump's book.
But now, interestingly enough, here is a black guy who apparently is not groveling.
Jimmy Edwards.
He is a former judge and he is the director of public safety for the city of St.
Louis.
Public safety, that involves the jails, the fire department, several other divisions.
It's a big important job.
He definitely oversees a number of the organizations that keep and maintain safety within the city of St.
Louis.
St.
Louis is, real quick, a 49% black, 43% white city.
They do have a white mayor.
percent black, 43 percent white city. They do have a white mayor, she's a female.
They just put it, they just, they've got a new black police chief and it's of
course been in the news for the past couple years because of Ferguson, the
St.
Louis is one of those towns in the Midwest losing population.
There's been a lot of talks about mergering the city and the county, St.
Louis County.
That's happened a lot of places.
But what's fascinating about Jimmy Edwards is he's been, he was a judge for a long time and he dealt with, I read a story about him in the St.
Louis Post Dispatch where he became disillusioned because he just saw an
endless parade of black criminals who were there because they were being charged with murder, with rape, with murder,
with shootings. Just day in, day out. That's got to be just mind-numbing. So he's
at this MLK Day event and he remarks about how in 2017 almost every
homicide, and when I say almost every homicide, I mean all but one homicide was
committed by a black suspect. This is a city where again 49% black, 43%
white, and the anomaly is there was one white suspect or one non-black
suspect and he basically said that black people, we need to get serious
about having a discussion about black-on-black crime which is a dilemma
for us.
And it's on our shoulders.
It's not caused by outside, by the magic dirt that white people somehow have that we don't have access to.
We need to get serious as a people about black-on-black violence.
It comes down, the buck stops with us.
Exactly, that we are responsible.
We are responsible when our people kill our people, which seems like an elementary observation.
But of course, in these days, this is a revolutionary observation.
And the sky fell on this poor guy and Blake Strode, He is the executive director of something called Arch City Defenders.
This is a non-profit civil rights law firm.
I'd never heard of such a thing, but apparently you can be a 501c3, raise money, and you hire these lawyers to defend people who probably are indefensible, but you do it anyway.
And he really unloaded, representing the voices of all these outraged people, suggesting that blacks should never be blamed for what black people do.
And I think he had this great quote.
He says, it's misleading to suggest that black people are in some sense are the cause of their own dilemmas.
Now, this is a breathtakingly concise statement of the official American view.
Black people are never to blame.
Everything that's ever gone wrong for black people, historically, today, tomorrow, in the future, for the next 500 years, is not their responsibility.
It's our responsibility.
Well, that is a summation, an excellent summation, of the Kerner Commission.
That's the thesis of the Kerner Commission, that we still live under the horror of that of that ill-conceived report that has dominated American intellectual life and social policy for going on, I guess that came in 67, so we're talking about going on 50 years now.
Oh, it goes back further than that.
American Dilemma.
I know.
In fact, it goes back even further.
It was W.E.B.
Du Bois.
That's the guy, really, who invented this idea that it's not black people's fault.
He wrote these treatises on the American Negro.
Until his time, it was pretty much taken for granted that black people are different from white people, and they build different kinds of societies, and you just get different outcomes for black people because they're black.
But no, he's the one who started pushing the ball very hard in another direction.
Gunnar Myrdal took over.
The Kerner Commission, as you say, that was one step on the way.
And now, it's everywhere.
But again, this is a crystal clear thesis of the mindset of so many people when it comes to every...
Anything that can be measured and any metric you can create for social capital and for quality of life, again, this comes down to why is there a disparity between whites and blacks?
Of course, no one cares about Asians or no one really cares about Mexicans even.
It's always white-black.
Our social elite, the elite in America, still look at things in a white and black perspective.
You're not quite right about Mexicans.
To the extent that Mexicans don't do as well as whites, they are still all part of the analysis.
Even if they just showed up last generation, or yesterday.
So long as they're not doing as well as whites, we are doing something wrong.
But you're right.
Blacks are the test case.
Blacks are sort of the symbol of the wickedness of white people.
But what's fascinating about this quote is that it's interchangeable.
If you remove blacks, if you remove the noun there, you can pop in Illegals.
You can pop in Mexicans, you can pop in, you can even go so far as just any of the coalition of the fringes that are uniting to agitate for greater rights and the erosion of rights of the majority of just simply equal representation before the law.
That's why I found this story so great.
Another little anecdote that I've just got to bring up because it just showcases how St.
Louis, which is in the middle of the country, they're getting ready to change Mr. Taylor The name of the Gateway Park.
I don't know if you know this.
It's actually named the Jefferson Park.
It's named for Thomas Jefferson because he was obviously the Louisiana Purchase, one of the great Americans.
That was the gateway to exploring.
Exactly.
In my opinion, that is one of the great monuments in America because it is a monument to Manifest Destiny.
Well, let me guess what they might change it to.
Emancipation?
Diversity?
Nelson Mandela?
They just want to remove Jefferson and they want to make it just a gateway park.
Oh, they want to take Jefferson's name on it.
They want to take Jefferson's name on it.
And I've been meaning to look and see if there's articles about how You know, Manifest Destiny was about the expulsion of the native indigenous peoples.
I haven't had a chance to dig into it too deeply.
But again, this is one of those things that, you know, Thomas Jefferson, this is the middle of the country, the symbolic.
This is this is fascinating.
Just having his name on the park.
It's shameful.
They want to get rid of it, and I need to do some more research.
So if anyone in St.
Louis is listening, you know, Countments, if you're listening, you're one of my favorite bloggers out there, if you could, in the comments section, look into this for us.
Maybe you've talked about it in your blog, but somebody out there, give us the details on this.
But the anecdote that I want to pull out, back in 2008 at this MLK Day event that the black director of public safety got in so much trouble for, Mr. Taylor, Francis Slay, a white Democrat, the mayor, he was mayor for a long time.
He was actually booed out of the building because he had just fired the first black fire chief.
And he goes to this event of, you know, conciliatory and praise for the great colorblind Martin Luther King, and blacks boo him out of the building.
He never set foot again during his entire time as mayor at this MLK Day event.
Talk about a just a spineless son of a gun in this white mayor.
I mean, Well, I don't know.
I think when white people do not go to these MLK Day things, and they don't go to these black caucus events, that takes a certain amount of spine.
I mean, I don't know what motivated him.
But I'm, you know, without even knowing the facts, I have no doubt that he fired this guy because this guy was no good.
If the guy was good, he would have kept him.
Yeah.
That goes practically without saying.
But to me, this is a sign of just the typical across-the-board black solidarity.
He fired one of our guys.
Makes no difference if he was on the tape.
Makes no difference if he was drunk in the office all day.
Who knows what the circumstances were?
He was one of our guys, and we're gonna boot this guy out of the building.
That's what that story means to me.
Exactly.
But, you know, it is this idea that it's misleading to suggest that black people are in any sense the cause of their own dilemmas.
That leads to our next story.
And that is what apparently is a budding back-to-Africa movement.
Here in the United States, there was an interesting article this week in Al Jazeera about that, about black Americans who have decided that America is so hopelessly racist that they are fighting so many built-in headwinds in this white supremacist society that they're going to Africa.
And I was very surprised to read, according to this, that there are an estimated 3,000 to 5,000 black Africans, I'm sorry, black Americans living in Accra alone, in just that one city, 3,000 to 5,000 of them.
And apparently, a woman, a former African-American, who is now apparently an African-African, named Mohamida el-Muhajir, she has even done a video documentary called Blacksit.
In other words, blacks are exiting.
I think this is a sentiment that we should encourage.
Well, I like her quote.
She said that she moved to Accra because, despite her education, she was a digital marketer from New York City.
Obviously, she was probably paid in excess of $100,000 due to both her race and a STEM field.
They'd be dying to have someone of her racial hue within the company.
But she says that she moved because, despite her education and experience, She was always made to feel like a second-class citizen.
Moving was an opportunity to fulfill her potential and avoid being targeted by racial violence.
What?
You know, I saw a photograph of her.
She's this very nice-looking black woman.
The idea that she could somehow be targeted for racial violence is just preposterous.
But this is part of the mindset of this guy, Blake Strode, of the Arch City Defenders.
That there is this just impenetrable wall of racism that even the most qualified and most hardworking blacks have to face.
And then this to me was the great quote from her.
She says when talking about living in a crop, you might not have electricity, but you won't get killed by the police either.
Yeah, it was a day from dysentery.
Wow.
Now, this apparently is what she genuinely believes.
That this nice-looking young black woman is at risk of being killed by the police just at the drop of a hat.
Anytime.
It's just breathtaking.
But you see, to me, and I've really worn this idea out, and I probably shouldn't be repeating it over and over, but this is an example of how blacks and whites see the world so differently, but she is taking the logical next step.
If America really is the way she believes it to be, then by all means, go live with people like yourself.
This is where she thinks she's going to be comfortable, and perhaps she is.
I say, God bless her.
Well, you're right.
From a logical standpoint, this is the only way to cocoon yourself from the ubiquitous white police officers who are out there ready to take out the next Tamir Rice or Eric Garner.
Obviously, this is a great step and from an insanity standpoint, insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different result.
They realized, hey, we just got to be away from white people and we can create our own society.
Hey, if it doesn't have electricity, if we don't have enough medical doctors to treat certain diseases and some sort of outbreak, you know, breaks out and takes out of our people, guess what?
We still don't live around white people.
We were in control of our own, you know, present, which means that obviously our destiny is without evil white people.
So this is a step that obviously the Nation of Islam is incapable of taking because You know, that would mean that they'd have to, again, you've pointed this out many times, this is something that they instinctively know that without white people
It's not going to work out.
It's not going to work out.
But these people, I wish this well.
In fact, if there was a GoFundMe campaign, I'd probably throw in a few bucks for Blacksit.
So just like I'd throw in a few bucks if someone would be smart enough to create a GoFundMe campaign for the wall.
I think that would be a smart thing.
Because then you'd see the mass appeal of this.
And I think it would be funny, Mr. Taylor.
I know that it won't happen because GoFundMe would shut it down quickly.
But if there was a Blacksit GoFundMe campaign.
Could you imagine if within a couple days, you know, $10,000 becomes $100,000 becomes $1,000,000, the news story that that would create for our friends in the media to really showcase how evil and racist white people, irredeemably racist white people are in America for helping fund Black Sunday.
Well, apparently it's okay for the Israelis to offer blacks to go back to Africa and pay them money to do so, but if white people to do that, oh my gosh, the sky would fall and the sky would feel like bricks when it fell.
But yes, I thought it was interesting, just last week we had a few more racial hate crime hoaxes revealed.
University of Maryland.
Racially charged graffiti, including a swastika, was found in a men's bathroom.
This was last fall.
Well, the authorities have been beavering and beavering and beavering.
They spent months, who knows how many man hours, who knows how many thousands of dollars, and they finally decided the perp was Terrell DeMonte Alexander, an 18-year-old former university employee who is black.
And then, just last October, at the same, same location, University of Maryland, the police arrested Ronald Alford, a 52-year-old black former employee, for spray painting a swastika on campus.
This is a process that never seems to end.
The psychic rewards that blacks get for exaggerating the notion that they live in this thing that they appear to believe they live in, but for which there's no evidence.
This idea that there are these impenetrable barriers, there's this unmitigated hostility towards them everywhere in American society, and because it's really not there, they have to concoct it.
I encourage everyone to listen.
If you haven't seen it, go to amrin.com and look at the hate crime hoax map that Jared Taylor's fantastic staff put together.
One thing that would be so illuminating to find out if it could be done is to quantify the amount of hours and then what that actually equaled in terms of pay.
and money that's been spent investigating these stories.
I think it was Kansas State or one of the Midwestern schools where they actually stated how many man hours the police actually allocated and spent and funded to investigate these crimes.
I think it was something left on a car or something.
I don't remember the exact details, but that's not the point.
The point is if you could actually look at the records, because again, police or that that's a public service you could actually
probably do a FOIA request and find out how many man hours were spent on an
investigation for these hate crime hoaxes and you could quantify the number it
would be it would be shocking and it would definitely pay for a significant form
of blacksit let's put it that way if these people want to create like you
said this this psychic force field to protect themselves by
I hesitate to use that term.
As you know, I'm a bit of a softie on that score.
Do they really hate us?
which all they do is it's a manifestation of their hatred for the
majority people, for whites. You know I don't know if it's so much hatred I
hesitate to use that term as you know I'm a bit of a softie on that score. Do
they really hate us? I think really they are trying to build an
atmosphere in which they are the perpetual victims and this is all part
And they don't have enough actual cases of white people behaving in the way they really sort of secretly deep down believe we all behave, so they have to concoct them.
What's significant to me about what happened in Toronto is sort of the usual story here.
A Muslim girl claims that a white man cut off her hijab with a pair of scissors and yelled insulting things at her.
It turns out it was all baloney.
She is 11 years old, 11 years old.
By the time they are 11, these non-whites, this person is probably an immigrant.
They have already picked up on how all the psychic rewards you get
if you can claim that you're a victim of vicious white people.
This is just extraordinary to me.
And the same psychological thought processes are at work in Canada as here.
An immigrant, fresh off the boat, pretty much instantly figures out, wow, if I can be a victim, an absolute direct face-to-face victim of a vicious white person, boy, they're a reward.
The media promoted this to the heavens before the investigation was even commenced, and they found out, of course, like you said, all a lie.
All done for, you point out, the rewards, the adulation.
Justin Trudeau, the Prime Minister of Canada, tweeted this out, that this is somehow This is all, you know, again, it all comes down to all white people somehow being responsible for this act before it is exposed as a hoax.
And of course when it's exposed as a hoax, all of the Muslims, since she's Muslims in this case, all Muslims are not responsible.
It's just an individual act and we need to actually investigate why she would do this because obviously she was driven to cut her own hijab and report this because Some form of discrimination she's feeling.
It still is white people's fault.
Of course.
It still is white people's fault.
Of course.
But think how gratifying it must have been for this 11-year-old girl to have the Prime Minister of Canada taking up her cause, tweeting about how horrible this is.
It worked.
It worked like a charm for a while.
But then the truth finally came out.
Well, Mr. Kersey, I think I'd like to close with a foreign story.
This has to do with the Italian elections coming up in March.
Now, as you know, this fellow by the name of Attilio Fontana, he is a prominent politician with the right-wing Northern League, the Lega Nord.
He was talking about the need to stop immigration, large-scale immigration.
And he has said, this is the quotation, we have to decide if our ethnicity, if our white race, if our society continues to exist, or if it will be canceled out.
He put it in really straightforward, refreshingly straightforward terms.
There's no synonyms involved there.
There's no attempt to mask the language.
It is straightforward.
That's right.
We are on the verge of being demographically eclipsed by this endless, never-ending parade of migrants who are crossing the Mediterranean who are being rescued.
I believe that That Brussels, that the EU is concerned because 600,000 migrants and refugees have been rescued in the past four years.
A large number of those are being placed within Italy.
I think I read on Voice of Europe, I'd like to give kudos to that fantastic site.
They do tremendous work.
They had an article that Zero Hedge picked up, that Drudge put on his site for a while, Italians are going to be a minority in their own country because of this of this of this just unrelenting wave of migrants that again you've pointed this out many times and you say you're a softie but you've stated the way to end this is for the Italian Navy to just sink one of those ships just one just one ship is sunk and then hey you know what all the Italians have to do is then weather
One or two weeks of just hatred from the world media, but then guess what?
It ends and then the endless parade of migrants ends as well.
That's right.
Ideally, all it would require is a convincing and persuasive statement that this is our policy henceforth.
I mean, that was like the election of Donald Trump.
He didn't have to deport people.
He didn't have to build a wall.
People stopped coming.
The appearance of resolve is often all that's required.
Say that one more time.
Well, the appearance of resolve is sometimes all that's required.
You know what's fascinating is our friend He has apologized, but his numbers have gone up, what I've read.
He was the frontrunner, but now he's the clear frontrunner for this position.
Yes, he's running for the president of Lombardy.
That is one of the northernmost provinces of Italy, right next to Switzerland.
These are, you know, I get in trouble talking about some of the distinctions between Northern Italians and Southern Italians.
They are all our good European brothers.
Don't get upset, you Sicilians.
But these people are, you know, they're basically Swiss.
In any case, he has, he's, as you say, his standing in the polls has not fallen at all.
But he did apologize.
He said, He said it was an unfortunate expression.
He says, I think, what he meant to say is, I think that this uncontrolled immigration risks causing serious problems for our country in the future.
That is what I wanted to say.
But he's not backing down.
He's not stepping out of the race.
I wish again that he had not said, no, I wish he'd not apologized.
He should have said, this is exactly what's happening, exactly what's happening.
But all these people like Franz Timmermans, he's the vice president of the European Commission.
This guy, this guy has been a huge immigration booster from the year dot.
His reaction was, we must protect the values that we share as Europeans.
We're all equal, regardless of race or religion.
I think the danger for Europe does not come from other countries or other religions, but from the fear that too often inspires the exclusion of others.
Why do white people end up with these utterly suicidal ideas?
Apparently, the values we share as Europeans are to forget that we're Europeans.
If you don't exclude the others, you are overwhelmed by the others.
You're subsumed.
I mean, that's one of the great messages of Lovecraft's The Shadows over Innsmouth and all of his great horror stories.
And I think his fiction, if you read them now, it really gives you an example of someone who was writing ahead of its time.
One of your great friends, the late Dr. Sam Francis, was such a big fan of Lovecraft.
And I think about... These are Lovecraftian ideas when you think about what Timmermans is advocating versus what Fontana... You know, again, it's that quote you just had.
And I think that's...
That's a profound statement, this appearance of resolve.
Again, he didn't just have the appearance of resolve, which he is maintaining by his saying, you know, it was an unfortunate expression, but he stood by the uncontrolled immigration saying that.
But his statement, it was an emphatic, explicit statement of resolve, which is Again, it's going to take that in every European country.
You can't backtrack.
You have to just stand by it.
That's why I wanted to juxtapose Joseph Alt's story, our friend from Franklin, Indiana, where he just... Again, you're at a moment where the President of the United States has given, for the first time in decades, white people were forced to confront the reality of these, quote, shithole countries, unquote.
Why are they that way?
They're not that way because of colonialism.
They're not that way because of white people raping the natural resources.
These countries are shitholes.
Pardon the expression.
I'm just using what the president said.
These countries are that way because of the people who live there.
And naturally, if they come to our country in large numbers, areas that used to be replete and overwhelming with social capital, beautiful places that the Japanese would want to invest And build their factories.
Exactly.
Those disappear.
And then you have Gary, Indiana.
Then you have Selma, Alabama.
You have these places that the infrastructure is still in place, but they have degraded.
They have regressed to the mean of the race that encompasses them.
And if whites are gone, guess what?
It's going to regress to what I call regressing to the Negro mean.
Well, more and more, I think white people all around the world are understanding this.
More and more.
And people will occasionally blurt out the truth.
And I think that it is good that the leader of the Lega Nord, Matteo Salvini, His popularity is rising all the time, too.
These March elections in Italy are going to be something to really keep an eye on.
Yes, they are.
I think they could be as significant as the Austrian elections.
We could get something very, very important as a result.
He is rising.
And the Five Star Movement.
Those people are very anti-Europe.
They're not quite so hard on immigration control, but they're really on the right side of the fence on that, too.
Now, he defended his pal, Attilio Fontana, and he says, we are under attack.
Our culture, society, traditions, and the way of life are at risk, but Then he goes on to say, and this is too bad, the color of one's skin has nothing to do with it, but the risk is very real.
Centuries of history risk disappearing if Islamization, which up until now has been underestimated, gains the upper hand.
In effect, what he's saying is, if these people weren't Muslims, if they were Catholic, if they were black Catholics from the Central African Republic, that'd be okay.
At some point these people have to take the Fontana position and say Islam is a problem.
Yes, but Islam isn't the only problem.
Islam is a secondary manifestation of the problem.
The problem is these people are not us.
Civic nationalism is a social construct and at some point white people are going to have to Accept that, or they will be submerged by the other.
It really is that simple.
It's that simple.
It's that simple.
And as I say, I'm delighted to see that Mr. Fontini's ranking in the polls has not dropped.
Let us hope that he becomes the president of Lombardi.
And let's hope that he goes on to express himself as clearly and as explicitly as possible.
Don't be a Joseph Alt.
Always stand and never, ever give moral authority back to our enemies.
That's right.
It's that simple.
When you are right, stick to your guns.
And, Mr. Alt, if you're listening, if you're possibly listening, you will regret to the end of your life, I suspect, having capitulated the other side.
You were right.
You should have stood your ground.
Well, thanks very much, and we'll see you next time.
▲
Export Selection