All Episodes
Previous Next
Jan. 15, 2018 - Radio Renaissance - Jared Taylor
50:00
Send Them Home
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome, ladies and gentlemen, to another edition of Radio Renaissance.
I'm considering introducing our podcast slightly differently from the usual.
I've been learning from the people who introduce various programs on television, and even NPR, and it's always this, and they put in a pause, this is NPR.
So, ladies and gentlemen, this is Radio Renaissance.
Doesn't that make it sound like we're so much more important?
I would say you have a phenomenal voice for an NPR.
Maybe in a different society you would have been an amazing All Things Considered host because we are about to consider all the things that the polite press doesn't want to allow for everyone to have public consumption of.
Yes, maybe we should call this All Things Suppressed.
That's great.
Although some of these things have been sneaking into the news, thanks to our president.
We're not going to touch on this for very long, but tell us your reaction to what our president has recently said.
We don't even know if this is actually what he said.
Let's get that out.
It's alleged because one of the Democratic senators, Dick Durbin, I believe, from Illinois, came out and said, hey, President Trump called these countries shitholes.
Shitholes.
Awful!
Awful!
And the reaction by the press, which exists to act as public relations for these third world countries and to promote the idea that mass immigration from these third world countries is inevitable and that any opposition is, you know, white racism, white supremacy, blah, blah, blah, whatever you want to say.
The reaction by the left to Donald Trump's alleged statements has, in my opinion, Bandy, highlight the high watermark of Trump's presidency thus far.
Because you're actually seeing normal conservatives, normal Republicans coming to President Trump's defense and saying, you know what?
He just said what we're all thinking.
I saw an email, I got an email because I subscribed to one of the top Direct mail gurus.
And his email, it said President Trump, the subject line, President Trump just said what we all have been thinking.
Now that subject line would have been unthinkable prior to a President Trump arriving.
But here we are at a point now where conservatives, normal people who exist to fundraise off of whatever Republicans are doing in Washington, They are now coming to the defense of our president.
And these comments.
You know, I have a number of thoughts about this.
And one is that because he's the president of the United States, and because he says what he thinks, I keep hoping that someday he will just toss off some remark like, well, what's wrong with white people wanting to remain the majority?
Or, what's wrong with white people wanting to live in a white neighborhood?
Or, he might even say, well, you can't expect the same number of blacks as Asians to be in the advanced placement classes.
They're just not as smart.
I can imagine him saying something like that.
And it would produce exactly the same kind of thing.
A lot of people would end up saying, well, the fact is, the president's right.
The president's right.
I think that would be a possibility.
The other thing that occurs to me is, You probably don't remember this, but years ago, when Henry Kissinger was Secretary of State, he described Bangladesh as a basket case.
Now, this was mildly criticized, but because Henry Kissinger was considered, well, he was a Republican, the leftist media was not really crazy about him, but he didn't get anything like the criticism.
I wonder what would have happened if Donald Trump, I don't think he probably knows much about Henry Kissinger and what he's said in the past, but if he'd said basket case instead of shithole.
In any case, we're just not supposed to point out the obvious.
But, as you have pointed out, Mr. Kersey, the great thing about this is to put on the table, frankly there for everyone to see, a fact that we all know in our bones but we don't dare say.
He's done us a great service in that respect.
Now, frankly, you know my habits and you know my sensibilities.
I would prefer that he had said basket case, for example.
I don't care for that kind of vulgarity, but I agree with you.
He's done us a huge service.
Well, just one quick anecdote.
Right now, the past week, you've had people researching Haiti.
You've had people researching nations in Africa.
And, of course, they're finding out pretty quickly, like we discussed last week, that Wakanda isn't real.
Port-au-Prince is real.
And I have to point out an article that Don Derbyshire noted.
It was an NPR piece, Mr. Taylor.
It was written in 2017 and it talked about the sewage infrastructure problems in Haiti.
Now, when the earthquake ravaged Haiti in 2010, Steve Saylor did an amazing piece where he talked about how Over a thousand different charity organizations, humanitarian organizations, are pumping in billions of dollars to keep Haiti afloat in some capacity.
And yet all this money, none of it is going to actually create a centralized sewage system in Port-au-Prince.
So in 2012, as Derbyshire noted, there was a rainstorm.
Three feet of sewage, of actual excrement, poured into the streets and seven people drowned.
Now, Mr. Taylor, one of the things that I love to do is I love to read about the Romans.
And we know this, that aqueducts built 2,000, 2,200 years ago.
They are still producing water for public consumption.
Think about this.
The oldest black republic in the world that was created on the back of an actual white genocide in San Domingo.
If you haven't checked it out, read Lothar Stoddard's The French Revolution in San Domingo.
Do you guys sell that at the AR store?
No, we don't sell it anymore.
We used to at one time.
Amazing book.
Read it.
Because guess what?
That is the actual foundation of the Haitian nation.
Again, the Roman Republic, aqueducts still produce clean water that you can consume.
Well, obviously, the problem is, in Haiti, you just don't have stone to build aqueducts with.
That's the problem.
Come on, really.
You're being unfair to the Haitians.
But, yes, the earthquake.
And this leads us to this whole business of temporary protected status.
The people who are in the news about TPS as it's called, temporary protective status, it's El Salvador.
Now, I'd like to talk just a little bit about the background of this whole TPS system.
It's really fairly recent.
It was started only in 1990.
Bush Sr.
set this up.
And what happens is, if there is some sort of certifiable disaster in some foreign country, then at the present time, the Secretary of Homeland Security has the right to designate everyone here in this country from that place, give them temporary protective status.
They don't even have to be citizens of that country.
They don't even have to be here legally.
If they habitually live, well, if they're stateless, but they habitually live in Haiti, for example, then they get TBS.
And ordinarily, it's supposed to last only 6 to 18 months.
And then after that designation, you can't come in, even if in the case of a disaster, for example.
Okay, we get an earthquake in Haiti.
2010, they get TPS.
Well, what about people who, a couple of months later, are trying to come out from under the rubble?
You know, they don't get in.
It's all very arbitrary.
In any case, for El Salvador, they got TPS because in 2001, there were two earthquakes.
That's 17, 18 years ago, for heaven's sake.
And they are still here because Bush Jr., acting just like his papa, Bush Sr., decided to allow more than 200,000 Salvadorans, who happened to be here in the United States at that time, legally or illegally, doesn't make any difference, to remain.
Well, believe it or not, they have become the parents of how many U.S.
citizens?
192,000.
They have become the parents of, yeah, again, they've almost increased their population 50%.
Yes, yes.
Well, no, they've practically, yes.
No, he allowed 200,000 to stay and now they're 192,000.
They've doubled their population.
Yeah, exactly.
They've doubled their population.
100%.
You're right.
Forgive my math.
People are saying, oh no, no, this is horrible, this is horrible.
But the reasons they are saying it's horrible is not because of the earthquake.
They point out the fact that it's a violent place.
Okay, it may be a violent place.
It's a poor place.
All right, maybe it is a poor place.
But they were let here because of this earthquake, presumably.
But no, we've got to let them here presumably forever.
Temporary.
Temporary when it comes to third world people living in the United States means permanent.
One of the more shockingly honest leftists, Sally Cohn on CNN, she actually tweeted out a couple days ago, before Trump's shithole comments, You know, started the fire that continues to smolder and consume everything.
Sally Cohn tweeted out exactly what you just said.
How can we let these El Salvadorans, how can we make them go back to a country that's war-torn, violent, you know, a third-world country, basically a shithole.
Well, exactly.
And, you know, for lack of a better term, for, again, I want to go back and say something real quick about TPS, because it all ties together.
Donald Trump, once again, he has Branded the third world now.
This, as you noted, it is a vulgarity.
It's very jingoistic.
But you know what?
It's very descriptive.
I was thinking about Scott Adams, the creator of Dilbert and his book on persuasion.
And this technique again, Trump just kind of stumbles into it.
He may not even use this word, but now the word has come to It's so ironic.
a tremendous adjective in describing the conditions that individual Haitians collectively have created.
Or other third world countries, El Salvadorans.
And it's just, to me, that is the magic of what's happening.
And you know, it's so ironic.
When all of these bleeding hearts tell us we should not be sending these folks back,
they give us all of these reasons.
This country doesn't work.
It's violent.
There is sewage in the streets.
There is corruption.
Nothing works.
There's no democracy.
It's a dictatorship.
Well, doesn't that mean it is, in fact, exactly as Donald Trump describes it?
Even better when we see these people in our country and they monopolize all of the various misery indexes that exist, and all the problems are then blamed on systemic racism and implicit bias.
So somehow we'd see it again.
If only evil white people weren't still around in control of things, they would create this utopia.
It's like, well, look where they came from.
The same conditions there are being replicated here.
That's right.
That's right.
It seems to be there's an uncanny predictability about that, isn't there?
The fact is, there are approximately 400,000 people from 10 different countries living in the United States under TPS.
Now, let's examine these countries and see if President Trump's designation might apply to them.
One is El Salvador, and they're here because of an earthquake.
Well, we were just talking about that, the earthquake in 2001.
Then Haiti, which we needn't say much more about, an earthquake in 2010.
Then Honduras and Nicaragua, both from Hurricane Mitch in 1998.
20 years.
Yes.
When will it end?
When will it end?
Temporary protective status goes on for 20 years.
Nepal, an earthquake in 2015.
And then we get to Somalia, Sudan, South Sudan, Syria, and Yemen.
All because of alleged civil war.
But I think every single one of these countries is one in which Americans certainly would not want to live.
Never, never, never.
That's the last place they'd want to go.
And I am tempted to believe that most Americans, in their bones, recognize that Donald Trump's description of these is spot on.
Now, it's interesting to me the number of countries that have been removed from TPS.
Apparently, this is something the United States government is capable of doing, believe it or not.
Temporary is sometimes actually temporary.
Yeah, you look at this list and you go from Kuwait, Lebanon in the early 1990s for a couple years, Bosnia, Rwanda.
Again, just a couple years.
Bosnia had a longer duration from 1992 to 2001.
But Sierra Leone, Kosovo, Angolia, Gwana, Liberia, of course, obviously the entire nation.
If you actually had a liberal... Again, this goes back to the idea of what I've said over and over again about Hillary and what she could have done with TPS.
They could basically use anything as an excuse for the quality of life found in these countries to say, we can't allow children to be in this type of environment.
We've got to bring them over immediately.
With a place like Liberia, a liberal could probably argue Regrettably succinctly, due to the way our court systems are, that we need to bring everyone back over here.
They can't be there because the dirt there is somehow, by osmosis, creating this bellicose smoke to engulf everything.
In some cases it's quite interesting.
For Guinea, Liberia, and Sierra Leone.
They all went on and off at exactly the same time because of that outbreak of Ebola.
That's right.
That's what gave them TPS.
And you know, it's fascinating.
You can imagine somebody here illegally, and it looks as though the cops are maybe closing in.
Uh-oh!
Uh-oh!
Bam!
An earthquake in your homeland.
Hooray!
Housana!
In a way, these people should be thanking their lucky stars that something terrible happens back home, and they get to stay in the United States.
I mean, that may be a crude way of putting it.
But it's not.
It's quite accurate.
And then Rwanda-Burundi, that of course was during the machete attacks on each other that killed nearly a million people.
This is something I often bring up when people describe white people as particularly violent.
You know, look at panzer divisions.
Well, what if the Rwandans and the Burundis had had panzer divisions, you know?
They managed to kill nearly a million of each other with hand-to-hand combat with machetes, you know.
What if they'd had stuka dive bombers?
But anyway.
So, yes, it is gratifying to know that temporary protective status can be lifted.
And it's happened, I guess, about 10 times here.
And so there is good precedent for Donald Trump deciding that, well, after maybe 20 years, we should lift TPS on some of these Haitians, these El Salvadorans.
But an interesting thing, I think, about what's happening with the El Salvadorans is the Canadian reaction.
I'm sure you remember back when Donald Trump was talking about banning citizens from these Muslim countries.
A year ago, Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, oh boy, he sent out an unambiguous tweet.
He says, to those fleeing persecution, terror, and war, Canadians will welcome you regardless of your faith.
Diversity is our strength.
Boy, you couldn't put it on the line any more clearly than that, could you?
I don't know.
White males across the country are experiencing state-sponsored persecution in a lot of ways, as we saw with James Damore's lawsuit that he just put against Google.
I mean, it was shocking.
Maybe we can talk about that later in a subsequent podcast.
All of that, by the way, I want to point out.
Back in 2017, if we want to do a quick year in review, the James Damore situation was so important and then that was derailed by what?
Charlottesville.
It happened a week after and then everything with James Damore was just instantly forgotten and then you think about what just happened with the Twitter situation that you're facing and what James O'Keefe just dropped, the big bomb.
Oh yeah, it's quite fascinating.
Maybe we can get to that next week but, you know, it's fascinating because You know, Justin Trudeau sent out this tweet that basically said, hey, you know what?
If America doesn't want you, come to the Great White and North.
Please, come on up here.
We want you.
Yes.
And then, of course, last November.
That's when Donald Trump announced that TPS was going to end.
It didn't end, but it was going to end sometime in 2019.
Well, the Haitians, and I'm rather impressed by their resourcefulness, they decided to move out already before they were kicked out.
You gotta hand it to them, they're thinking ahead.
And of course, they started streaming across the border to Canada.
And at one point, at one crossing point, they were showing up 250 a day, some of them practically frozen to death because they weren't used to the winter conditions, and it looks as though the Canadians were not keen on this.
They had to set up these special tents, And they decided that maybe diversity wasn't their strength after all.
And so now, now that El Salvadorans look as though they might be deciding to think ahead and move out, the Canadian government has embarked on an information campaign explicitly to discourage them.
I find this fascinating.
Where's Justin Trudeau when we need him?
No, Justin, again, sometimes it takes dramatic examples to shake people of their apathy.
I think there's going to be exciting things going on in Canada in the next election.
I think that there's a lot of bad news, of course, with the draconian speech laws, but what you just said about Haitians, 250 a day crossing, that is a lot of people.
That's a thousand people in four days.
Yeah.
Crossing.
And that's just in one crossing.
Just one crossing in upstate New York.
Is there a list?
Are Haitians on a list serve somewhere where they're getting a directive, this top-down order that says, hey, you know, because again, most Americans don't even know what TPS is.
So you have Haitians living all across the country.
How are they being coordinated from a supply side?
situation to say, you know, we need to, you need to leave the country because this TPS is going away.
You need to go to Canada.
How is this type of communication going on?
I think if you have TPS, the government knows about you.
You have to register for TPS.
Okay.
So Uncle Sam knows who's got TPS.
And so the word gets out.
I think they're, I don't know this for sure, but I suspect they're notified individually.
Look, by next year, you got to clear out boys.
And then of course, you know, people get on Facebook and they start twittering around and the word gets out.
Now, I do, I think your point is a valid one.
How are 250 a day showing up this one border crossing?
That's pretty coordinated.
Boy, you wouldn't expect people from a, let's call it a dung heap, to operate in such a coordinated way.
But, yep, and there's something about showing up en masse like that that calls attention to your point.
Yes, yes.
But, so, This time, this time, apparently the Canadians have rethought their open arms policy and they have sent a special envoy to California who speaks Spanish and he's going to be on the lecture tour and he's going to try to persuade El Salvadorans to think twice about it because if they do not have a valid, valid claim to get refugee status in Canada, they are going to be sent not just back to the United States but to guess where?
El Salvador.
So, I'm delighted to see that after an encounter with Haitians, it seems that the Canadians, despite their high talk, have come to some sensible conclusions about El Salvadorans.
Mr. Taylor, a lot of people on our side thought that on day one of the Trump presidency, you were going to be able to undo so much of the damage from the past that had been implemented in a pragmatic way by our enemies.
And by our enemies, I do point out to the Bush family that has done so much damage publicly and explicitly to the nation.
It takes a lot of time to unwind the Gordian Knot of what has happened.
Donald Trump just couldn't pull an Alexander with a sword pulled out that he got in Saudi Arabia and just say, It's over.
It takes a lot of time to unwind the damage that's been done in the courts because we've seen how the courts are going to use Trump's tweets as an example of why they should put a stop on his executive actions.
And this is, of course, a segue into what we're about to talk about with administrative power on a very important subject with the Attorney General.
But I just want to point out that we have to start thinking Long term.
Mr. Taylor and I have talked about this on other podcasts of the Austrians and where they are now in the situation with the government versus when they took power kind of unexpectedly back in the late 1990s early 2000s and the opposition.
It was 2000.
In the year 2000.
Every FPO for the first time was in a government.
But it took them, in the late 90s, they were running, they were building the coalition, they were doing the stuff on the ground.
This stuff doesn't just happen all spontaneously, and I really encourage our people to stop being so black-pilled.
Stop being so down on what's happening.
You've got to understand that things don't just turn around overnight.
They don't turn around in a month.
They don't turn around in six months.
And yet, you know, you were talking about this idea that somehow Donald Trump was going to just cut the Gordian Knot.
I never had that illusion.
I've just been in this business for too long.
And it is dismaying to me to see that the effect that he had had simply by being elected on border crossings, for example, they went way, way down because the people south of the border had gotten the message, oop, they got a new guy.
It's a new ballgame.
We better not even try.
But now they're discovering, oh, they're talking about amnesty.
He's being nice to the so-called dreamers.
DACA might be voted by Congress rather than just by Executive Fiat.
So they're streaming in again.
This is something that you have to take a consistent position on.
But as far as consistent positions are concerned, at least we have Jeff Sessions.
Yes, we do!
And Jeff Sessions has done something that I think this is an excellent example of the power of the executive.
What you can do simply by By enforcing the law and by issuing orders to people in the executive branch to do as they're supposed to do.
And this has to do with a seemingly obscure procedure called administrative closure in the case of immigration judges and their rulings.
The way it works is this.
Administrative closure is a way simply to drop a case.
You don't come to a final decision, but you drop a case if somebody is illegally in the United States, but there is some other pending legal issue, or the government just decides it's too much of a bother.
And these would ordinarily be people who might have, they're here illegally, but they have children who were born in the United States, and therefore citizens.
This terrible birthright citizenship has got to go.
I wish that Donald Trump would do something about that.
It's a way of temporary amnesty through the back door.
These immigration judges under Obama, they administratively closed 180,000 cases in four years.
You know, here, you stay, you stay, you stay, you know, get out of jail free.
And this sort of backdoor amnesty became something they could practically count on.
Now, this doesn't mean that it is an amnesty.
The United States government can decide that they're going to pursue deportation after all.
All it means is we're not doing it now.
And the great thing about it is that the Trump administration, under instructions, I mean the people who are in the administrative system who are doing these immigration judge cases, they are reopening thousands of these closed cases.
And again, it's this question of parents of U.S.
citizen children.
The Obama administration said, of course they can stay.
It doesn't make any difference how illegal they are.
They can stay.
And according to news reports, Jeff Sessions could open as many as 350,000 of these cases that were closed.
He is saying to the judges, look, cut this stuff out.
These people are here illegally.
And it makes no difference whether or not they are not priorities.
We know where they are.
We know who they are.
They've been in front.
They've been before you.
They deserve to be deported.
Deport them.
Do your job.
You know, 180,000 cases that Obama closed in four years.
That's 45,000 per year.
Think about what that does to the legal system.
Everyone's all upset because Sessions wants to enforce federal law over states with marijuana.
No one wants to point out, but having that on the books, a marijuana charge, that actually saves courts a lot of time, judges a lot of time, because you can plea down these black criminals to a marijuana charge and get them in jail.
Well, without that, you've actually got to go to trial in a lot of cases.
It's very hard to get a lot of these criminals who are arrested to plea down for a couple of years.
This is the unspoken truth of the drug war that we have been able to get.
Crime has gone down in a lot of ways in a lot of cities.
We've seen those maps.
But I'm looking at this and I think about what the ICE director just came out and said, Mr. Taylor.
In any other time period in American history, this would be so axiomatic.
We'd look at each other and say, I can't believe you just had to say that.
We all know it just as we can breathe.
He said, those Harvard illegals in sanctuary said he should be arrested.
I thought that was one of the also another amazing moment because it's like, you know.
In our society, that's a revolutionary act in a lot of ways.
Something so simple, obviously it's true.
If illegal alien invaders are being protected by executives of the state of California or cities across the country, yes, they should be arrested.
They are aiding and abetting.
That's a fundamental principle of law.
If you are consciously assisting or protecting a lawbreaker, you have broken the law yourself.
Yes, it's lovely to see these things being explicitly articulated, and it's about time.
And they're being gobbled up by the consumer, by the Americans who voted for Trump.
People are seeing these stories, they're sharing them on social media.
They're like, why is this even being said?
Go do it!
Go arrest!
And I believe that we are seeing a groundswell to a moment.
You saw the raid this past week on the 7-Eleven stores.
You're beginning to see a loosening of the apparatus that has been created over the past year.
The legal maneuverings, the order has been given.
You know, in Star Wars Episode 3, I know you won't get this reference, but when the Emperor decided to execute Order 66 to take out the last remnants of the Jedi, I almost feel like we're at a moment where President Trump is saying, alright, you know what?
I want you to execute my primary directive and that is let's go arrest Jerry Brown.
He declared the state of California a sanctuary state.
I know that might be fantastical to think, but that is the type of moment that keeps us from a constitutional crisis and seeing something really, really bad happen in the year 2018.
I'm afraid I don't have the faith in Donald Trump that you have in that respect.
Well, I have the faith in Steve Miller, who has President Trump's ear and who we know is the main person fighting and advocating for the actual American people.
Versus the inundating of the American people by a mass amnesty, which is what the Gang of Six, which is what the Democrats, which is what the mainstream corporate legacy media so aghast at President Trump's shithole comments, they are trying to submerge America in those same conditions found in these other countries.
Because it is some sort of, I don't know, perverse revenge against white people for setting up a country that up until 1965 was Again, it was an implicit ethnostate.
Well, it was explicitly majority white.
It was explicitly majority white, but it still wasn't in the founding documents.
If you go back and look at that first act of Congress, it's quite clear.
We've talked about it.
The Naturalization Act of 1790.
Naturalization Act of 1795.
But again, it was never implicit.
Explicit.
Well, I guess you're right.
It should have been in the Constitution, but well, that's watered long, long under the bridge.
But again...
If Donald Trump, and I never expected him to be a consistent and determined thinker along these lines, if he really did think in terms of the demographic future of the United States, rather than just sort of shooting from the hip and talking about dung-heap countries, You know, I just have a hard time saying these words over the air.
But if he, instead of just flying off the handle every now and then, thought consistently about what must be done.
And I'm sure you're right.
Steve Miller does.
And I hope that Miller maintains the President's ear throughout his presidency, whether it lasts one term or two.
But there is so much more that he could do.
Of course, it's hopeless to be weeping about it, and I'm delighted that Jeff Sessions is doing the kind of thing he can do.
But again, this stuff about administrative closure, and then there's another thing they can do.
These immigration judges can issue a continuance.
That just means, okay, come back in a year.
It's a continuance.
And Jeff Sessions says, hey, do your jobs.
You've got to come to a conclusion.
And all this is great.
It shows the importance of this administrative power.
And I agree with the point that you were making earlier.
Every time the president says or does something that just sets the cat among the pigeons and the media starts screeching, it draws a line.
On which side do you stand?
And I think more and more Americans are recognizing, well, gosh, I stand on the side that Donald Trump is standing on.
This stuff forces us to deal with these questions.
And that's why, as I say, I wish he would talk about IQ.
Anyway.
Here's the thing.
Here's the thing.
is probably our greatest ally because he has competent people who are running these other organizations.
All this stuff about Jeff Sessions. So Trump can say whatever he wants to, but the machinations are going on
behind the scenes.
Who would have imagined that this E-Verify situation this week, that would have been a big story in any other week of
his presidency, that he's doing this inhumane raid on 7-Eleven stores. How
dare you do this? But that was overshadowed.
Mr. Kersey, his eroticism is not his greatest gift.
Consistency would be his greatest gift.
And that's what I would love, but I just don't think we're going to get that from Donald Trump.
But at least he's erotic in a good way.
He veers sometimes very dramatically in our direction, and for that we must be grateful.
But if his consistency was his greatest gift, let me play devil's advocate for you,
the media would be alert at all times.
And you wouldn't have the profound impact of Don Lemon coming out and saying, Mr. Trump, you're a racist.
These videos are incredible, because you're talking about a line in the sand.
Sometimes it's better to have someone who, again, one of the stories I read about the Norway comment,
he had had a conference the day before with the Norwegian president.
Prime minister.
Prime minister.
Forgive me, the prime minister.
And then the next day, it's almost as if we've known this about him.
It's the last person to make an argument sticks with him.
That's the way his mind works and he brings this up.
It's why I still think, going back to what you just said about a comment about IQ or a comment about crime.
Let's say that Heather McDonald is in a room in the Oval Office and she's talking about crime in the country and she points out, in the next couple weeks, she's giving a presentation about New York crime and she points out that 98% of homicides and 98% of non-fatal shooting suspects are black or brown people in New York.
Donald Trump then gives a press conference or tweets out something along those lines.
Boom!
There's your moment.
That is the beauty of having a mouthpiece who basically is the You really want to defend him no matter what.
No, I don't want to defend him no matter what.
Because I do have a lot of problems with him.
But again, Jeff Sessions is doing great work.
He's got people who are in place who have clear, concise orders.
It's kind of like when everyone got upset about Kobosh.
Voter fraud panel being disbanded.
If you actually read the story, it's even better because now it's going to the DHS.
And the DHS can just say, hey, you give us this information.
With a panel, it was, hey, please comply with us.
It's like, no, we're not going to.
With the DHS, it's like, you will.
There's stuff going on that we as just law-abiding citizens, we're trying to do our best to live, to breathe, to exist in this tyrannical nation that, again, All of the forces except for the executive power of the country are aligned against us still.
We saw this with the reaction to Trump's comments.
But the line in the sand moment was there.
Serendipitously, the conservative movement has now been forced to defend President Trump.
Because they're raking in a lot of money right now from donations.
This is a fact.
And they're all saying, Do you agree with President Trump if you do send us a couple bucks?
And they're making money off of this!
So, I just want to say that, again, I've said it before in this podcast, again, guys, this is one of those moments where you've got to jump on if you have any influence on social media.
Keep pointing out, why is Haiti a dung heap?
Why are these third world countries that exist With complete non-white control.
I believe in Haiti's initial constitution it said that white males couldn't be citizens.
Same thing in Liberia's constitution.
All these countries are explicitly run for the benefit of non-whites and yet it takes massive foreign aid largely from white countries to to prop them up so they can exist. And
as we know, Mr. Trump in this meeting just calmly pointed out, why don't
we want European?
Why don't we want European immigrants? And Henry Wolff, to his credit, a few years ago,
he noted that President Trump said the same thing at a CPAC.
I've got a lot of friends from Europe, Mr. Trump said at CPAC, who want to come here, but they can't.
Why is it?
That's not fair.
And again, these type of moments, when they happen, you have to jump on them and you have to give example after example, anecdote after anecdote, picture after picture of what these places look like.
And guess what?
Why is it that there's a correlation between the way these look and places like Detroit, Baltimore, Camden, Newark, There's eerie semblance when you take a look.
You're committing the crime of pattern recognition.
But this brings me to another interesting story.
And this was Mayor de Blasio in his investigation of insensitive statues and memorials in New York City.
This also was one of the fruits of Charlottesville.
Yes.
After the business of trying to preserve the Robert E. Lee statue, He launched a five-month initiative.
He was going to review, quote, all symbols of hate on city property.
And apparently, he tracked down four, four potentially offensive memorials.
And one of them, this is quite astonishing, this was a sidewalk record, just a little plaque in the sidewalk.
Apparently, there was a parade for a General Philippe Pétain.
A ticker tape parade down probably Fifth Avenue, Broadway in Manhattan.
Now, it was fascinating to me, the New York Times described Pétain as a French Nazi collaborator, as if The city of New York invited a Nazi collaborator to come and gave him a ticker-tick parade.
This was after the First World War.
He had been one of the great French leaders, and so he was recognized.
But now he's simply dismissed as a Nazi collaborator for what he did years afterwards.
It's just astonishing.
But that's going to stay put.
It's not going to be removed.
And apparently a statue of Christopher Columbus.
That, too, will stay put.
And a statue of Theodore Roosevelt.
Now, we'll talk about this a little bit later, but all three of those are going to be supplemented with a little explanation about how bad these people were.
An asterisk.
Yes, there's going to be an asterisk, and it's going to explain just how bad they were.
Now, one guy though, who is going to be moved, he is apparently in Central Park,
and he's going to be moved to Greenwood Cemetery in Brooklyn.
Now that sounds like banishment to me.
He's a guy named Dr. J. Marion Sims.
And this guy, interestingly enough, I looked him up a little bit.
He is an antebellum doctor from South Carolina.
And he developed a very interesting surgical procedure to correct something that was very frequent in his time after childbirth.
Apparently, if there had been a long and difficult labor, what women very frequently ended up with is called vesicovaginal fistula.
Which means that there's some sort of communication between the bladder and the vagina, and people who suffer from this drip urine all the time.
Now apparently this is still a common problem in the third world, but it has been cured almost completely in advanced countries thanks to Dr. Sims.
So, there have been memorials erected to him in South Carolina, Alabama, and Central Park in New York City, where in 1855, I mean, he was no Southern chauvinist, he opened the first hospital exclusively for women.
He's been called the father of gynecology, and he invented this procedure that has made life much, much better for many, many millions of women.
But, But, he is now under a cloud, under a very dark cloud, because some of his original experimental procedures, trying to figure out how to make this work, were on slave women.
And they did not give consent, and instead of experimenting on white people or on, I don't know, maybe you could have used pigs or cows or something, he experimented on slaves.
And that is an unforgivable sin.
So, he is being banned.
Now, one other aspect of this is the campaign that is going to be put on by the Department of Cultural Affairs in New York City, which will dedicate $10 million.
Over the next four years to create new works of art, new works of public art, to honor underrepresented communities.
I wonder just who they have in mind.
Who do you think they're going to be erecting?
Well, I know one that they're really thinking of seriously, but who do you think they're going to be erecting these things to?
Probably the guy whose daughter just died of a heart attack.
Eric Garner is probably going to get some sort of statue in memory of his life.
Could be.
I bet there will be a plaque in the sidewalk.
This is where Eric Garner was choked to death.
Which is not what happened.
Choked to death by white police officers.
No, they're going to put up some big memorial probably in Central Park to Native Americans.
I guess the ones who sold the land to the Dutch.
Now that's one they're going to do.
Well, they're going to have to tear down some of my favorite images that I've seen.
The pictures are of the white workers up on the steel beams of the Chrysler Tower, or what was once known as the Chrysler Building, and then the Empire State Building.
Where they're just hanging out, having lunch.
If you're going to tear down true symbols of hate on city property, remember there was immigration restriction going on because of men like Stoddard and Grant who helped convince the Congress in 1924 to pass the Immigration Act that stopped a lot of the non-Northern European immigration and those buildings were erected in the 1930s.
Very quickly, I might add, those need to come down because those are true symbols of hate.
Yeah, the most famous photographs are Rockefeller Center, in any case.
Well, I don't think they're going to take them down.
I know, I speak hyperbolically.
Of course, now, the Ford Foundation apparently has earmarked $250,000 to support further review of controversial artwork on city property, which reminds me, in the Brooklyn City Hall, At one point, they had all of these portraits of the city fathers going back to... and some group of blacks decided that these were all racist white people.
They just took them all down, replaced them with black people.
A lovely mosaic of the people who really founded the country.
Yes, yes, of course.
So, poor Mr. Sims, he's going to be relegated to Greenwood Cemetery.
I mean, what more eloquent way of saying, this guy just deserves to be forgotten about.
Put him in a cemetery.
Here's a doctor.
He's saving people.
He's doing good to people.
Put him in a cemetery.
I think that's highly symbolic.
Now, the other aspect of it is, I wonder what's going to come after the asterisk, after Teddy Roosevelt's name.
What are they going to say?
Apparently he is offensive.
He actually is.
He is a very offensive guy for a lot of great things that he did.
He's sort of like Lindbergh.
Lindbergh wrote those famous essays on aviation.
and White People for Readers Digest.
There is scholarship that Theodore Roosevelt wrote about, quite explicitly about, about white people
and our expansion across the planet, across the earth, really sort of the beginning stages of the concept of Albion's
seed, bringing civilization, and how great that is.
There's...
He wrote some things, some rude things about blacks, for example.
Correct.
There's no question about that.
But I would be curious to know if there's anything he, in fact, did.
It's not as though he implemented segregation.
No.
Or supported it.
No.
Really, what you would find is that he said things such as, it'd be better if blacks had not been brought here, that kind of thing.
But he never did anything to try to send them away.
No, he didn't.
So, I'll be curious to know.
Instead, he invited a good man, Booker T. Washington, to the White House to have some conversation, which is what people routinely cite.
I still believe, obviously we can't go back in time, but had Booker T.' 's vision of integration been implemented as opposed to Du Bois grabbing that flaming sword from the Southerners and taking it to our throats and white Americans' throats,
We'd be a lot better off as a nation and with race relations.
But unfortunately, alas, that's not the case.
Of course you know.
If they're looking... Sorry, Mr. Wolf.
If they are looking for monuments to racists, they should take a look at Grant's tomb.
Ulysses S. Grant said some rude things about blacks, too.
And it would not be very difficult to dig up dirt on him.
And I'm a little bit surprised that they haven't got him under the microscope, too.
No, he also gave that infamous Civil War executive order, if you recall what I'm talking about, that I'm sure some people might not be too kind of, as well.
To keep certain merchants out of the... Correct.
No need to go any further.
No, we might as well be explicit about it.
He said no Jew peddlers, no Jewish merchants to be around the Union armies.
Again, this goes back to the fact that any monument to a white person, again, somebody who has had such a phenomenal impact on the health of women across the world, like this Dr. Sims, they have to go because they ascribe to the moors of the time period.
Or they dare to experiment upon slaves, something like that.
I mean, it is such And, you know, I hate to say something so trivial and so banal, but if you do take this approach, then there's practically nobody from the American past of before maybe 1950 who will come through unscathed.
Virtually nobody.
And obviously Madison, Monroe, Washington, all these slave-holding presidents, Good grief!
Jackson, they've all got to go.
And I think that those campaigns will only gain steam.
But anyway, that's such an obvious thing that I shouldn't be repeating it.
Correct.
But let's see, just last couple things.
I did want to touch on Viktor Orban.
Just this last week, he gave an interview to Bild, which is Germany's largest circulation newspaper.
And I just love the things he says.
One of the things he was talking about was immigration, of course.
And this is a quote.
We don't see these people, he's talking about the migrants, as Muslim refugees.
We see them as Muslim invaders.
Here is a guy who has not forgotten 732, the Battle of Tours.
He has not forgotten 1683, the Siege of Vienna.
He has not forgotten about the Siege of Malta.
This is a guy who knows his history and who knows what happens when these people show up in large numbers.
He goes on to say, We believe that a large number of Muslims inevitably leads to parallel societies because Christian and Muslim societies will never unite.
Multiculturalism is only an illusion.
It's just so refreshing to see a head of state speaking so clearly and so explicitly.
You know, I'll waffle here and say something that confirms what you said, and that is that consistency confirms commitment.
Here's a guy who has, since he's become the Opposition face that has, I think, in a lot of ways inspired the people of Poland as well, the Czechs who are about to elect an explicit anti-immigrant president, and of course with what's going on in Austria, and of course with what's going on with the AFP in Germany and all these other parties.
There's hope, because you know what?
We have someone to look to.
And these are probably his best comments that he's given thus far.
This is beyond explicit.
This is confirming his consistency to the protection of his people, which is exactly what the state and what the executive branch of any government and our form of democracy or republic, whatever you want to call it, that permeates the Western world, that is what they're charged to do.
To protect their people.
And this guy is This is one of those moments in history that the line has been drawn in the sand quite clearly in Europe.
And the Western European elite who entered Brussels, they've made their bed.
And you know what?
They're going to have to lay in it because you've got a guy like Orban who is putting up that flag.
And I just wonder all along, I know we're running long here, we've got a couple more things to say, but I wonder at what point the Hungarians, the Poles, when they can just have that meeting with the Russians and they can just let bygones be bygones.
That's the one thing that could change the trajectory of all of this forever,
is if these Eastern European countries stop looking to the West
and they look to the Westerners who are East, who are in Moscow and St. Petersburg,
and they realize that there's a better way.
If they can just...
See, I want them to stay in the European Union.
Because while they're in the European Union, they are officially part of the West.
And if they stay, now they may leave if they are forced to do things they don't want to do.
But at this point, I think the European Union would have a very, very hard time expelling Hungary, for example, because Poland would probably go.
The Czechs, the Slovaks might very well go.
That would be a terrible, terrible precedent for them.
A guy like Viktor Orban, who, and yes, I'm glad you recognize his consistency and the value of that.
A guy like Viktor Orban is a permanent thorn in their side, and every time he points out what happens in the West, and people read that and say, yeah, yeah, that's true.
They don't have to guard a Christmas market in Poland or Hungary.
They don't have to do that at all, because there's no one there who would attack such a place.
All of this is immensely valuable.
I think he's doing the Lord's work, as my Christian brethren would sometimes say.
He's really a wonderful guy.
And one of the other things that he said to The Build Reporter, the German guy, the journalist who was interviewing, Interviewing him said, well look, Germany has accepted hundreds of thousands of refugees and migrants, while Hungary has accepted none.
This is unfair.
And Orban responds, the difference is, you wanted them.
We didn't.
Consistency confirms commitment.
This is just a beautiful thing that is inspiring.
He's inspiring patriots across Europe and across the Western world.
In Australia and places all across the Western world and that's all you can say is that their heroes are rising and flags are being placed firmly in the ground establishing that we're not going to allow what you elite in Brussels who have already acquiesced to surrendering your lands That's right.
We have a few white people, some in high places and many of us in low places, who are standing up for our rights as a people.
And the more we stand up with the greater vigor and the more persuasively we can speak, I think we have started a movement that cannot be stopped.
Bingo!
That's exactly it.
That's exactly it.
▲
Export Selection