All Episodes
Previous Next
Dec. 1, 2017 - Radio Renaissance - Jared Taylor
53:28
Arrest Donald Trump!
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome, ladies and gentlemen, to another edition of Radio Renaissance.
I'm Jared Taylor with our usual guest in the studio, Paul Kersey, with his unlimited insights and his broad and deep understanding of all the factors that influence race, immigration, and the national question in the United States.
As usual, it's been a busy week.
I should probably stop saying, as usual, it's been a busy week because it's always a busy week when you pay attention to what's going on in the United States and around the world and how this affects our interests as white people.
Of course, the big news today is the fact that the killer of Kate Steinle, Garcia Zarate, has been acquitted of involuntary manslaughter, of murder, and apparently he was guilty only of possessing a weapon as a felon.
Now just to give you a little bit of background on Garcia Zarate, in case you had forgotten, at the time that he shot Kate Steinle, this was in the fall of 2016, in the summer of 2016.
It's actually 2015. Was it 2015?
It was 2015. If I could go back real quick here and give a 40,000 foot view.
Donald Trump has just announced his candidacy for president.
He then makes a comment about illegals and Mexican rapists, Mr. Taylor.
Macy's and a number of other companies that he's contracted with immediately drop him.
Then this happens.
It was serendipitous, the timing.
Donald Trump shot to the top of the polls because he was the first candidate.
He actually went out there and tweeted at Rubio, who was one of the leading candidates.
He tweeted at Bush.
Why aren't you talking about Kate Steinle?
Well, the point is that Garcia Zarate, he'd been homeless at the time of the shooting,
and he had multiple felony convictions, and he had just been set free from jail just a
few months before the shooting.
But the fact is, the federal immigration authorities had insisted that he be turned over to them because he had already been deported from the country five times.
Correct. Correct. And the San Francisco people says, no, no, no.
We're a sanctuary city. We're not going to give you this guy.
So that is what made this killing so spectacular and really helped Donald Trump.
He's saying, look, we need to build a wall.
We need to keep these people out. Here's a prime example.
So, yes. Now, so finally, all these years later, the jury reaches the conclusion that he is not guilty even of involuntary manslaughter.
The only thing that he's guilty of is as a felon possessing a firearm.
Now, theoretically, he'd get three years for that.
But, you know, as a general rule, I do not like to second-guess jurors.
A criminal trial is a very, very complicated and exhaustive thing.
They go into the evidence in a very detailed way.
These jurors, who by the way have refused to speak to the press, so we don't know what they think, they were deliberating for days.
Six or seven days it sounds like they were deliberating.
And apparently they decided that this guy was not responsible somehow for her death, or at least not in any criminal way.
There is agreement that he fired the weapon, but the bullet that hit Kate Steinle ricocheted off of a concrete wall or a pier or something, and it traveled another 80 feet before it killed her.
Now, just what the deal is, it seems to me that as the district attorney said...
He did fire the weapon, and it was reckless endangerment to have brought a weapon of that kind into a crowded area and fire it, no matter what his intentions were.
So it is difficult for me to understand how the jury could not have found him guilty of some kind of criminal offense in the killing of Kate Steinle.
What's your sense of this? Well, to put that into perspective, that 80 feet is important, because you're right.
Juries do see a lot of the information that we don't.
If you were on Twitter last night or today, the reaction from the right has been...
It's been awesome, actually, to see people so passionate about this story.
But as Mr.
Taylor said, step back.
They got to see information that, obviously, most people aren't going to ever look at.
They're not going to think about. Put that into perspective.
80 feet, if you've shot, that's almost one-third the length of a football field.
A football field is 300 feet, 100 yards.
That is not exactly the type of distance that you're going to be trying to shoot someone with a pistol.
Even trained police at 80 feet, I mean, my gosh.
You're going to have a very hard time actually having much success at 80 feet.
So that is important. That point you brought up, it is very important to think about.
And also, we don't know how our traveler Ford hit the concrete surface.
You know, he could have been 100 feet away from her, 200 feet away from her.
We don't know. And I think it is absolutely, probably beyond a doubt that he did not intend to kill her.
But it seems to me that what he did was exceedingly dangerous, firing a weapon under those circumstances.
Yeah, again, the question that we're about to get into is how did he get this stolen weapon?
To me, again, the real culprit behind this is the US government and the city of San Francisco.
This guy was supported five times.
It's not about the fact that, A, in this case, it might have been involuntary manslaughter.
It's the fact that our government allowed this guy, this illegal alien from Mexico.
But see, that is what people should be angry about rather than the jury verdict.
Correct. I mean, it is annoying, but hence, when Donald Trump says he calls it a disgraceful verdict, no wonder the people of our country are so angry with illegal immigration.
No. Not relevant.
Maybe it was a disgraceful verdict, but people should be angry about illegal immigration for a whole host of other reasons.
This whole question of this jury verdict is separate from the fact that this guy shouldn't have been here in the first place.
Now, apparently, they say they're going to deport him.
Well, about time.
Now, as far as I'm concerned, they should deport him now.
I don't care if he serves.
I don't care if he's guilty. I don't want him to be whining and dining at our expense for the next 20 years if he's guilty of first-degree manslaughter or whatever it is.
I'd just rather he was gone so long as we can keep him gone and let the Mexicans worry about him.
Last week, Mr. Taylor, a federal judge put the kibosh on Trump's sanctuary city.
And again, this is case study number one in what you have to say.
This is an American citizen who was killed by our sanctuary city policies.
It's not that, you know, yes, the circumstances, the gun may have gone off accidentally.
The point is, had the United States government done its fundamental duty to protect the citizens, at the end of the day, what is the state's job?
It's to have the monopoly on violence and protect their own citizens.
That's the number one simple function.
And the federal government was trying to do that.
Bingo. And it is the city of San Francisco that prevented it.
That is the lesson here.
Not necessarily, and maybe I'm making too big a deal of this, not that the jury came up with a verdict that baffles us.
That is a side question.
This was Obama's federal government, by the way.
Right. We're talking about 2015.
That this is going on where they're trying to get this guy in the city of San Francisco, this sanctuary city, protects Protects this five-time deported illegal alien.
So, go figure.
Maybe the city of San Francisco, the people of San Francisco may have something to say about this.
In any case, another, I'm not going to talk about this long because I haven't had a chance to go over it, but the independent review of what happened in Charlottesville at the time of the Unite the Right rally, you and I have discussed this several times, has just come out.
It's 200 pages. It's put together by the independent study by Hunton and Williams, which is a well-respected law firm founded in Richmond back in 1901, if I'm not mistaken.
It's a very well-respected law firm.
The city of Charlottesville commissioned them to do this.
And to the credit of the city and the law firm, the city asked somebody to look at them independently.
They got an independent view that makes the city of Charlotte look very bad.
And one of the phrases, I mean, I just skimmed the thing immediately, but...
The review talks about a horrible misalignment of police resources that led to chaos.
I think it's very good.
And one thing that definitely comes through in this is that as everyone who was at the rally seems to agree, when the police decided that this was an illegal assembly and dispersed the crowd, they basically pushed the Unite the Right demonstrators into the arms of the Antifa counter-protesters.
The worst, most stupid thing possible.
And I am delighted to see that this law firm has taken a very, very clear position on that.
I've spoken to people who were in attendance at the Unite the Right event.
And actually, as it was happening, I was talking to people as they were being pushed out into this protected army of Antifa that the police were just...
Forcing them to go out of the park, out of Lee Park.
And I'm looking forward to someone like Hunter Wallace sinking his teeth into this study.
Or hopefully Gregory Hood will take a look at it for American Renaissance and do some analysis.
Because he just wrote that brilliant piece about jurisprudence and Anglo-Saxon law no longer protecting Caucasians in America for AR. Which I encourage everyone listening to this, read it.
You know, another thing that I picked up from this report, just in my superficial skim of it, where that guy drove the car and killed Heather Heyer.
Apparently, they had one policewoman at that crucial street corner.
She phoned in and said that she was afraid for her life.
And rather than send reinforcements out there, they said, okay, you're relieved.
You can go away. Now, these individuals, these are the Antifa we're talking about.
No. No, no.
There was a policewoman at the intersection where the car was driven.
Okay. And she was there trying to control traffic, make sure nothing bad happened.
She called in to her superior saying that she, as a police officer, was afraid for her life.
And her police superior said, okay, in that case, you can leave.
I guess my question to you is, was this before the car incident?
Before the car incident, yes.
Okay, so the Unite the Right people had largely left the city at this point.
So my point is that she was worried about the Antifa people who didn't have a permit even to be doing what they were doing, who had taken over the streets...
That's my understanding. But this really needs to be looked into in great detail.
But that really jumped off the page to me.
In any case, we'll see.
I'm delighted to see that these lawyers appear to have done their job.
Now, one thing they do say is there appears to have been no explicit stand-down order.
They looked for one.
They couldn't find one that said, you guys do nothing.
But that was, in effect, what happened.
And whether there was an order or not, these lawyers are very strong about blaming the police.
Good stuff. Maybe there is a glimmer of justice possible in the world.
Well, the question that we've talked about many times, and I think it needs to be addressed, is there is a chain of command in every city.
And the fact that this law firm went in and independently looked for that smoking gun evidence, which still might exist.
I don't think that...
Judicial Watch has bigger fish to fry right now, but could you imagine if they actually...
Went in to try and find any redacted information.
Anyways. Well, they looked pretty hard.
And this looks like a very promising...
Excellent. Then, of course, there's the story of poor Tony Hovater.
I don't know if I'm pronouncing his name correctly.
He is one of the founders of the Traditionalist Workers' Party.
He lives in Ohio. And there was a long New York Times profile by him, by Richard Fawcett.
He's a veteran reporter. And although the Fawcett describes him as the bigot he surely is, to quote Fawcett, the article got all sorts of criticism.
I had a friend who is a normal, apolitical guy who said, Why are people so upset about this article?
What is the reason why everyone's making a big deal about it?
I don't get it. And I just said, oh, what article?
I'm not sure what you're talking about.
Oh, that's because in our society...
You can't portray anyone who is a white advocate or who puts the ideas of white identity as being something worth protecting and discussing in an adult manner.
Well, you just can't portray them as in the slightest bit normal.
They're not human. They're inhuman.
That was the worst part of it.
In fact, the article at the very end, Fawcett writes this sentence.
He's talking about this guy with his fiancée, who's now his wife, astonishing that this insect could actually have a fiancée.
In any case, he says, they spoke about their future, about moving to a bigger place, about their honeymoon, about having kids.
That's how the story ends.
And apparently, the Times got so much pressure for not just portraying them as the worst possible monsters.
And the Times officially responded, whatever our goal, a lot of readers found the story offensive, with many seizing on the idea that we were normalizing neo-Nazi views and behavior.
And here somebody wrote, How to Normalize Nazis 101.
I'm both shocked and disgusted by this article.
Attempting to normalize white supremacist groups should never have been printed.
Well, to me, though, one of the most interesting comments they got was from a senior reporter at Mother Jones, and a guy who's won the National Magazine Award.
He tweeted, and this is very good, People mad about this article.
Want to believe that Nazis are monsters we cannot relate to.
White supremacists are normal-ass white people.
And it's been that way in America since 1776.
We will continue to be in trouble till we understand that.
I thought that was very interesting.
You know, it's fascinating, the reactions by the so-called blue checkmark Twitter brigade attacking the New York Times and the ombudsman of the New York Times for failing to put either a disclaimer or for just spiking the story as opposed to even running it.
You know, it made me think that these individuals believe that someone like Tony should only be spoken to when...
A leftist is protected by a hazmat suit because they're going to have some sort of virus they can spread.
They need to have gloves on or some sort of protective mask on.
Right, right. Well, as Fawcett himself wrote in a kind of apology, he says, Why did this man, intelligent, socially adroit, and raised middle class, gravitate towards the furthest extremes of American political discourse?
He says Hovater was very open with him, candid, often shockingly so, but it seems as though his worldview was largely formed by the same recombinant stuff that influences our mainstream politics.
In other words, He could not find some kind of repulsive, tragic, or disgusting immorality in the heart of this man.
And that's why this story was no good.
The story would have been fine if he could have been accurately described as snarling, or hateful, or jackbooted, or sig-heiling and goose-stepping.
That would have been okay, but the fact that Tony Hovater turns out to be a pretty ordinary guy.
That is what set off the readers, don't you think?
Yeah, you know, when this story broke, it reminded me of one from Memphis in 2016 when the Dallas shooting happened.
The Memphis Commercial Appeal published a story on their front page, Five White Cops Killed by Black Nationalists.
That was their headline on the front page.
The next day, the editor of the paper wrote an apology saying, we shouldn't have done this.
We are a majority black city.
We can't portray the news as such.
I was thinking about that when this whole story broke because we live in a world where journalists are automatically approaching people like us.
We are an anthema. We are beyond the reproach.
We cannot have our views disseminate because when we are able to, in an environment where freedom of speech actually exists, We make a lot of sense.
Exactly. And that's what so frightens these people about this article about Tony.
He is a normal guy who his life, he has encountered ideas, people, this state-coerced integration that has been at the heart of the civil rights post-1965 experiment in America, and he realizes it's not working.
That's right. The same recombinant stuff, as Fossett says.
He's just talking, he has noticed various factors in American society, things that are happening to us in our daily lives, and he has reached certain conclusions.
Certain conclusions that you and I would find entirely rational.
And these people are convinced that in order to draw these conclusions, we must be somehow insane.
They talk about us as spewing hatred.
Well, I guess he found that Tony Hovater was not spewing hatred, not obviously unhinged.
And that is the part they just simply can't deal with.
One of the reactions we've seen to our next topic, Donald Trump's tweets regarding Europe, one of the things that a lot of people have attacked him for, are you mentally unhinged?
How can you do this? And that so tragically accentuates the reaction to Tony and this New York Times piece.
How in the current year, how in 2017, how in our progressive society where we have all these wonderful advancements in the way that we think and the way that Collectively, we're supposed to believe in this rainbow utopia.
How can someone with such wonderful things all around in the showcase that this...
This egalitarian utopia is going to work.
How can you still have these views?
How can you be someone that you'd actually want to have dinner with?
It proves, really, how literally bigoted they are.
How closed their minds are.
They can accept disagreement on certain topics, but not this one.
Because, in their minds, the iron curtain has fallen.
BAM! And they cannot see through it.
This is a testimony to the utter bigoted closed-mindedness of the major media to have had, first of all, a story like this with this reaction and then the reaction to the reaction.
Anyway, the same thing, of course, as you point out, is happening in Britain.
As probably all of our readers know, Donald Trump retweeted a tweet that included three short videos.
One was someone who was reported to be a Muslim migrant attacking a Dutch boy on crutches, really this defenseless guy, and then someone smashing a statue of the Virgin Mary while making pro-Muslim declarations, and then a man being pushed off a roof in Egypt.
Now, as you know, this has really created an enormous furor in Britain.
I hadn't realized this until you walked in, but Donald Trump had been expecting to pay a state visit, but apparently, after all these calls that he'd be kept out of Britain, they've canceled.
Think about this world tour.
Donald Trump's, the first year of his presidency is coming to an end.
He's had successful trips to Saudi Arabia, to Israel, to Japan, to China.
He's been all around the world.
He's been open arms.
The people, the dignitaries, the ambassadors, just wonderful tours.
And yet, our special relationship with our cousins across the pond.
The reaction, the vitriol by the so-called conservative Prime Minister Theresa May.
Trump's tweet to her was amazing when he said, hey, you guys, you have bigger things to worry about than my tweets, like radical Islam.
Think about all the concrete barriers you're building in London, on all the bridges, all across the nation, basically, to try and protect the citizens from the consequences of the folly.
You know, apparently, they were as upset by the source of these videos as the videos themselves.
What is it, Britain First? It's something by a young woman by the name of Franzen, I believe?
Correct. And they think that she's just this horrible fascist.
She, as far as I can tell, just has two main points.
She wants Britain to remain white, and she wants the country to be recognized as a Christian country.
She's committed, well, they've been arresting her for hate speech by saying unkind things about Muslims.
But that appears to be the main, that's as much the problem as anything else, that Donald Trump is, they think, promoting this wicked woman.
There's a term that CNN is trying to establish.
They put the balloon up to try and maybe do a little bit of A-B testing when it comes to this female who sent out this tweet that Donald Trump retweeted.
They're calling her a convicted racist when they show pictures of her on TV. It's underneath.
It says convicted racist. You can see the screenshot.
And you realize she's convicted of Islamophobia over there in England because they have such draconian hate laws now.
But that's how they're using this term.
Convicted racist. As if this is something...
Having these views is on par with being a...
A pedophile or a criminal or someone alleged murderer.
A convicted racist.
I mean, think about if that term comes to America, how it's going to be applied.
This is... Oh, yes.
I can easily imagine it.
What astonishes me, though, is the number of MPs who've suggested that simply by retweeting that tweet that the President of the United States has committed a crime.
Who is this? An MP, a member of Parliament, Ian Murray.
He says he thinks these tweets constitute a crime.
And Chris Bryant, another member of Parliament, the Labour Party, he's demanding that Donald Trump be arrested, if he ever sits foot in Britain, for retweeting these three videos.
This just goes to show you the astonishing depths to which they have sunk in terms of any kind of acceptance of contrary ideas.
And then, of course, there's the Lord Mayor, Sadiq Khan.
He's the one who wanted the state visit.
Well, it wasn't really a state visit, but sort of a working visit.
And it was canceled.
Well, as you were pointing out just earlier, he, when he was a private lawyer, one of the highlights of his career was trying to defend lifting the travel ban on Louis Farrakhan.
Louis Farrakhan was asked to stay out of Britain.
Well, he said, Sadiq Khan, when he was a private practice, he said, Louis Farrakhan is, quote, the leader of a vast section of the black community.
And he denied that he was anti-Semitic or preached a message of racial hatred or antagonism.
Of course, you know their theories about Yakub, right?
I mean, I'm just laughing at all this because it's so, as someone of Albion's seed, it is so disturbing to think that the United Kingdom has degenerated to the point where their members of parliament, conservative members of parliament, are actually advocating that not only should Trump be arrested if he goes to the United Kingdom, but that his Twitter should be suspended.
I mean, these are the type of hate laws, these are the type of reactions that would have been implemented day one of a Hillary Clinton presidency.
Negative things to say about Trump, but the mere fact that he's retweeting Britain first.
It's not like somebody...
Think about this. He's in the White House, and somebody says, hey, what are you going to retweet?
What are you doing, Mr.
President? Oh, I'm looking at these videos from Britain first.
I'm not sure what this is, but look at these images of the Virgin Mary statue being desecrated.
or, wow, these Muslims are throwing people off the roofs in Egypt, or this white kid just got attacked.
I saw the Netherlands actually put out a story, the Netherlands consulate on Twitter, where they said,
hey, hey, Mr. Trump, you need to take this down.
This guy was actually born in the Netherlands, this Muslim who attacked this white kid.
Well, I think they're denying that he's even a Muslim.
But the fact that he's born in the Netherlands, what difference does that make?
It's irrelevant.
Yes, if he's a Muslim, of whatever he's doing, In any case, the fact that he was born in the Netherlands, if he is a Muslim.
Now, there's some other source that's saying he's not even a Muslim, but we don't know.
He hasn't been identified. But be all that as it may.
It may have been a little hasty on Donald Trump's part to retweet that, but to say that this is a crime for which he should be arrested if he sets foot in the United Kingdom.
Astonishing stuff. I actually got to say, I love the fact, Mr.
Taylor, that he's retweeting this type of stuff because this has been leading the news for three days.
It makes people think about, well, wait a second, why is the media and why are government officials, elected officials, trying to censor these type of videos?
What kind of conclusions will we come to about this grand experiment of...
The Islamization of Europe or the continued mass migration refugee resettlement of Muslims in the United States.
But going back to what you were saying about our friend Louis Farrakhan, of course, they do still, to this day, preach that blacks are superior to whites.
And this was the This was the man that the current mayor of London was advocating to come to the UK. Louis Farrakhan, that's right.
And Donald Trump, we don't want you here just because you dare showcase the consequences of Islamic immigration to Europe.
But yeah, the fact that Louis Farrakhan says that the whites are a race of devils created by the evil black scientist Jakub.
I think this is supposed to have taken place on the Isle of Patmos, by the way.
In any case, that's still official ideology of the Nation of Islam.
But that's okay. That's okay.
This is a message of brotherly love.
And Sadiq Khan tried very hard to get him into the country.
I don't think the British government at that time relented.
He was kept out. But, well, too bad for Louis Farrakhan.
But on the subject of these various anti-white statements, which I think we could say that Louis Farrakhan has been guilty of occasionally, this guy, Rudy Martinez, He's a student at Texas State University.
On Tuesday of this week, he wrote a column called, Your DNA is an Abomination.
And he's talking about white people, of course.
And then he went on to say, Whiteness will be over because we want it to be.
And when it dies, there will be millions of cultural zombies aimlessly wandering across a vastly changed landscape.
That's you and me, by the way.
I'm not even sure what that means.
You know, I think what that means is he's not talking about killing us all, I don't think.
He's talking about sort of deconstructing whiteness, taking white privilege away, taking white supremacy away.
And once our notions about being white are taken away, we'll be turned into zombies.
We'll be wandering around this wonderful state of happiness and euphoria.
White people will just not know what to make of life once their whiteness has been taken away.
See, I'd almost argue most white people are already in that state.
That's right. What's on Netflix tonight?
Can you give me another glass of Pinot Grigio?
They are zombies because they haven't realized what being white is about, not because they're reveling in their whiteness.
Exactly right. But then he says, he goes on to say, white death will mean liberation for all.
Whiteness is a construct used to perpetuate a system of racist power, and white people are, quote, an aberration.
But this is the punchline, seems to me.
Until then... Until we are wandering around like zombies.
Until then, remember this.
I hate you because you shouldn't exist.
That's you and me, Mr.
Kersey. You and me. We shouldn't exist, so he hates us.
This is Mr. Martinez. I suspect that if he's not a first-generation immigrant, he's descended from people who immigrated to this country that our ancestors built, but we shouldn't exist.
You know, I actually knew someone who was murdered in Atlanta back in 2012.
Three white girls were shot by a black security guard who had attended college, I believe in West Georgia.
I don't remember the actual college.
But his mother was a big-time lawyer in the state of Georgia.
And it came out during the trial that Brittany Watts, she died.
Three girls were shot, one of them died.
The reason that he shot these three girls was because in college, he had learned about white privilege.
And he wanted to do something about it.
Yes, I remember that case.
Yes, and so when you're looking at stuff like this, you're wondering what this is doing to people's minds.
People are impressionable, and when you hear this, that white privilege is keeping people of color down.
There's nothing else you can use to delineate why people of color are failing to reach the same levels as white people, except...
Racism by white people and systemic oppression and persecution.
So, logically, what are you going to do about it?
You're going to do what Rudy did and write this type of article.
Yes. It is the logical consequence.
For years, ever since I wrote Paved with Good Intentions, back in 1990, I guess it was.
Gee, it's a long time ago.
As I pointed out, we are doing the best possible job of trying to teach black people, and now Hispanics, and why not Asians, to hate us.
Because we are their cause of everything that ever goes wrong for them.
And it's not surprising that we get stuff like this.
Oh, but this was really quite rich.
The Texas State University, the editor-in-chief of the paper, her name is Denise Cervantes, sounds like another Hispanic, just like Rudy Martinez.
She printed an apology and she said, we acknowledge that the column could have been clearer in its message and that it has caused hurt.
Could have been clearer. Well, Mr.
Kersey, I think it's pretty clear.
I hate you because you shouldn't exist.
Yes. It's like, well, dude, I'm not sure what you mean there.
It's kind of ambiguous. What do you say?
Can we be friends?
Is this a muffled insult?
Anyway, it was perfectly clear.
But here's yet more stuff.
A guy named Assad Haider.
He writes for these lefty websites called Jacobin and Viewpoint.
And he's written a book, Mistaken Identity, Race and Class in the Age of Trump.
Well, he's a Middle Easterner of some kind, but he writes such good English.
I read an article that he wrote for Jacob.
It's such good English. I suspect that he grew up here.
In any case, he wrote this article for Viewpoint.
He's talking about white people, too.
He says, Difficult as it is for people of color, including me, to come to terms with, we are not about to get rid of white people.
The country is full of them.
They are an intrinsically reactionary force.
The relevant question is how to subdue this force.
I mean, you know, I don't think we can say that we're not going to issue an apology and say his message could have been clearer.
His message is pretty clear, too.
We are a force that must be subdued.
We'd love to get rid of you.
We can't quite figure out how.
The country is full of you people, but we're going to subdue you one way or another.
Basically, how do you create a docile population?
One of the things you see online, memes now, is this concept of the fact that testosterone levels are dropping in Western men.
Sperm count is dropping.
So obviously something's working to create a docile population, whether it's soy, who knows?
I'm not going to speculate on to the scientific reasons it is, but the mere fact, Mr.
Taylor, that somebody is writing and being paid to write such a message and that university students like Rudy Martinez are so quick to say that, hey, they hate us.
They don't want us to exist. Where are all these ideas coming from?
Who's going out there and is the Pied Piper for this type of stuff?
Who is going out there and is Also being compensated, being paid handsomely to come in and give lectures on the necessity of making sure that treason to whiteness is loyalty to humanity and that white privilege must end at all costs.
Well, one of those of course is Tim Wise.
Tim Wise, our great admirer from years and years ago.
Yeah, just when he was writing about Roy Moore and the election, it's coming up later in just a few days now.
December, was it 10th?
I want to say it's going to be two Tuesdays from now.
He says, if white people elect Ray Moore in Alabama, no decent human being should ever spend another dime in that state unless it is with a black-owned business or the Birmingham Civil Rights Museum.
If Moore wins, here's the punchline, It's time to destroy white Alabama like we should have 150 years ago.
He went on, Mr.
Taylor, to say that I should have clarified, I meant economically destroy them.
So he tried to equivocate.
The point is, saying that you should only do business with black-owned businesses, that made me think of the great anecdote from 2015, when we were supposed to celebrate 50 years of the Selma march, the Selma to Montgomery march, when Jesse Jackson was sitting in Selma, and he was quoted as trying to, he said, How can we figure out a way to pass a law that keeps white businesses from leaving majority black cities?
And you're sitting there and you read this stuff from Tim Wise and it's like, dude, Tim, there wasn't even a movie theater in operation in 80% Black Selma.
The city had to go in and buy a movie theater, convince them to come in here and run it as a non-profit so they could actually...
Debut Selma in the city.
That's the economic consequences of blackness.
Right. Well, you know, I think when he talked about destroying white Alabama, he might have meant it more literally than now he's letting on.
Because I well remember, after the midterm elections of 2010, the Republicans made huge gains.
They regained a majority in the House of Representatives.
And in an open letter to white American conservatives, Tim Wise looked forward to the day when we would be outnumbered by other races, and then he wrote this...
He says, we just have to be patient and wait for your hearts to stop beating.
That's white American conservatives.
And stop they will.
And for some of you, real damn soon, truth be told.
Do you hear it? The sound of your empire dying?
Your nation, as you knew it, ending permanently?
Because I do.
And the sound of your demise is beautiful.
Now, later on, after people commented on it, he took that down.
That is no longer on his website, but he wrote those very words.
And of course, he would be welcome in Britain, I'm sure.
No one would suggest that his tweets are illegal.
No one would suggest he be arrested if he set foot.
But no, the sound of your and my demise, that's beautiful in Tim Wise's ears.
I believe the British government would not only pay for his trip, they would compensate him quite lucratively to give a lecture to members of parliament about the necessity and the need to end white privilege in England and to ensure that the transformation of St.
Paul's Cathedral into being a grand mosque went swimmingly.
Yeah, for all I know, he has made a lecture tour of Britain.
I know that even at the time of the 2010 midterm elections, I looked him up a bit.
He'd already spoken at least 600 universities.
He's probably racked up another several hundred since then.
I think he charges about $5,000 a throw to give lectures at universities to tell white students just how awful they are and how they deserve to die.
But, you know, that's the kind of country we live in these days.
And, oh yes, here's another great con job.
You'd call this attention to...
Why don't you tell us about this NFL hustle that's going on?
Well, it's been fascinating watching the NFL's trajectory this year.
Ratings are down tremendously, tremendously.
Attendance, you look at some of these images of the games, it looks like a preseason game, as if no one is even interested in going to the games.
Just massive, empty...
Seats and just low attendance.
Well, the NFL is 70% black and the players union has a lot of control when they go and they negotiate with the owners and collective bargaining.
A couple years ago, they actually were threatening a strike, Mr.
Taylor. And Ray Lewis famously said he was worried that if a strike happened, what would happen to the city of Baltimore?
that they'd be shooting each other continuously if this didn't happen.
We've got to make sure that we have entertainment to make sure they don't
shoot each other. Is that right? If there were no football, the residents of
Baltimore would be shooting each other. Yeah, of course as we know Baltimore just passed
319 murders. The exact number was last year, so I don't think football is
actually the reason why they're shooting one another. But my point being about
the NFL, it's a 70% black league.
Blacks control the player union.
A lot of people speculate this is one of the reasons why you see some discrimination against white players.
Because of this entrenched notion of this idea that blacks are better athletes, blah, blah, blah.
Whatever you want to say. But the players union representative is a black lawyer.
A lot of people believe he's going to be the next commissioner.
I can't think of his name right now.
But... The owners have been very worried, Mr.
Taylor, about the ratings drop, the revenue drop, what this means for the positioning of the NFL the next time they go to negotiate for these billion-dollar contracts with the networks.
Well, they're concerned about not getting in the money.
Exactly. So, how can they...
Come to an agreement, Mr.
Taylor, with the players to stop a lot of this on-the-field headaches when it comes to the National Anthem.
What can we do? How can we get you guys to stop doing this?
So they've been meeting off and on with players.
I believe one of the main players who's been doing this is Anquan Bolden.
He's a black player. All black representatives they're meeting with, that the owners are.
Well, what we learned this week, and this just blew my mind, the owners have agreed to give close to $100 million No, don't exaggerate.
$89 million. $89 million.
All right, $89 million over seven years to projects dealing with criminal justice reform,
law enforcement, community relations, and education, all to explicit black charities.
The United Negro Fund is going to get the largest amount.
And then there's another fund, I can't remember what it was, but then there's an unspecified
nonprofit that will be created, obviously, by the players.
They'll have a lot of say in as to where this goes.
And when you're thinking about this, once again, the owners have capitulated entirely
on this situation because there's no clause in this deal to stop them from continuing
to kneel during the games, during the national anthem.
But more importantly, they're basically acquiescing to this idea that black people are being targeted
by cops.
Like, why would, is no one going to push back and say, what are you talking about guys?
Where is the evidence that Colin Kaepernick has stated was the justification for taking
a knee to begin with in 2016, that black bodies are being harmed by police?
Where is this idea?
Well, where's the evidence?
And that is, of course, the initial question when they started taking the knee and saying
that this was against injustice.
Well, hold on. Where's the injustice?
That was the obvious question that the League was incapable of asking.
But I share your astonishment.
In this deal whereby they're going to kick in $89 million without an agreement from the black players that they will stop taking a knee.
Because, as you were explaining earlier, that's what's putting off a lot of white fans.
They do not want to see black players showing such disrespect to the national anthem.
And so the money's going away.
They want to know what to do about it.
If I were the black players, I'd say, okay...
Because this agreement doesn't say we have to stop taking a knee.
I'd say, okay, $89 million is a good start.
We will stop taking a knee if you kick in another $189 million.
What's the stop of doing that?
There's no cap on this.
This is an astonishing agreement.
They want some sort of quid pro quo.
They've got the quid but no pro.
No quo, sorry.
And as the commentary about ESPN, ESPN was saying players came to the table in a rare position of power because many fans have cited the protest as the main reason they've tuned out the NFL. They're not giving up their power here.
They're maintaining all their power, getting an $89 million.
I'd consider that a down payment if I were them.
In reality, the players in this position should have no power because the owners are the ones who made the agreements with the networks.
And again, that is the largest source of revenue.
That's ballooned these franchise...
I think the Dallas Cowboys are...
Fortune magazine said they're worth something like $2.8 billion when Jerry Jones bought them for...
Don't quote me on this, but I believe he bought the Dallas Cowboys in the late 80s for under $100 billion.
When you think about the maturation of that investment, it's like, oh my gosh, that's like...
Pretty good return. Exactly.
The greatest return on investment, imaginably.
You have a lot of people being like, oh, hey, Bitcoin's up just past $10,000.
Well, hey, imagine buying a franchise for under $100 million and then seeing it worth today $2.8, $2.9, $3 billion.
My point is this. The owners can look at these players and say, guys, it's your actions on the field that are causing us to see ratings decline, to see advertisers step away.
It's not our actions. We helped...
We, using your, using labor like you are giving us in this year and labor from players in past years, we were able to build up a reputation, an organizational reputation of our league to a point where we're the most lucrative, Entertainment industry on the planet, professional football. You guys, starting in 2016 by siding with Colin Kaepernick, are now jeopardizing that.
How dare you try and dictate to us the terms of our surrender?
Now, of course, the owners are fearful of any sort of...
Boycott by blacks of what can happen on corporate sponsors.
I really feel that...
You know, look, most of the players, most of the fans are white.
Correct. They're the ones that they need to worry about.
Correct. I don't think that this is...
On the one hand, it is very much a financial decision.
But it's a financial decision that is colored top to bottom by a fear of offending blacks.
Yes, that's exactly right. That's what it ultimately boils down to.
The blacks are offending the white fans.
So they're not going to say, okay, black players, straighten up.
They're going to say, what can we do to bribe the black players to stop offending the white fans?
It's an astonishing capitulation.
And the whole question, as you point out, of the justification of taking a knee, all this alleged injustice and racism by the police, not even considered.
Yeah. It's very expensive to go to an NFL game.
From a disposable income standpoint, I don't believe that NFL accepts EBT for EBT cards as a currency to get tickets.
Probably not yet. Knowing that the black community doesn't have exactly the greatest purchasing power and knowing that outreach to Hispanics and Asians for the NFL has not gone exceedingly well.
The NFL is at a point where if you start to lose...
The white share of the fan base, you're in some significant trouble from a rating standpoint and an attendance standpoint.
But the rating standpoint is far more important, Mr.
Taylor, because that is the greatest source of revenue that has propelled these franchises to be worth billions of dollars.
And this situation is not going anywhere.
If white fans continue to tune out the NFL, at some point the question has to become from owners who have...
Long-term thinking into how are we going to negotiate if we can't give a product that consumers actually want.
At the bottom line, at the end of the day, the owners don't see race.
They see green, and that's money.
And if they're negatively impacted by this, they're going to have to put a foot down.
The question will be to what extent white fans are capable of seeing this bribe for what it is, this disgusting shakedown by the black players for what it is.
I hope this $89 million is huge news, and I hope that means even if the black players keep their feet during the national anthem, if this were big enough news, I think the viewership would decline even more anyway, if white people had any sense about it at all.
This notion that black players have held up the management and made them hand over money to all these explicitly black causes so that they can stand up.
And they might not even stand up.
This is just incredible.
I'll do my part in trying to get a few people to turn off.
Very good. Very good.
I never turned on. Anyway, well, I guess we should close with this Pew Research Report about Europe and Muslims.
You know, Pew does remarkable work.
I think those guys, you know, and although it's very, very difficult to get precise numbers on the Muslim populations in any of these countries, because in France, for example, which has the largest number of Muslims, They officially do not take census information.
But Pew has done a very good job of trying to figure out where these people have come from.
I really tend to trust them.
I think they're all liberals at heart, but they seem to be loyal to the data.
And, you know, anybody who's loyal to the data, I'm a fan of.
So long as they give me the data, I can interpret it, they can interpret it, but it's the data that matter.
And they're pretty doggone good, if you ask me.
But they have counted up the number of Muslims in Europe, and now they're 25.8 million in Europe.
And they're defining Europe as the European Union, 28 countries in the Union.
And that's about 5% of Europe's population.
Now, the fact is the non-Muslim population of Europe is declining.
It's declining because the non-Muslims, mostly white people, are not having enough children.
Correct. The average non-Muslim, and I think we can take this to mean white, is having, average woman is having 1.6 children a year below, sorry, in a lifetime.
1.6 children in a lifetime, well below replacement rate, while the Muslims are having 2.6.
Above replacement rate.
So even if immigration stopped tomorrow, tomorrow, there would be a steady increase in Muslims, not only because they're having more children, but also because they tend to be much younger.
Let's see. I think the average age of Muslims is about 15 years younger than the average age of non-Muslims.
And we have various projections here.
If the number of refugees continues at the rate it has been recently, you could have, very soon, end up with about 14, by 2050, that's in what, 37 years?
33 years. You could end up with a 14% population, triple the number of Muslims who are there now.
You know, when you look at these numbers, the one thing that startled me is that 1 in 10 non-Muslim Europeans, obviously white people in Europe, are age 75 and older, which is only true of 1% of the Muslims in Europe.
Now there are 25.8 million Muslims, so you do the math of what that actually means.
Unbelievable, unprecedented population growth is going to continue unless you actually start to see some of these parties rise and enact the policies to protect.
But the point is... They're already there.
They're already there.
And the state is helping sponsor the birth rate of these Muslims.
And do these Europeans believe that as they age and become septuagenarians and octogenarians, that these Muslims are going to take jobs wiping them when they're in nursing homes and taking care of them?
Yes. See, that is the prospect that we face.
In the United States, I was thinking of exactly the same thing.
As these non-Muslim white people get old and go into nursing homes, they're going to be looked after by these young Muslims.
Young Muslims who probably have the same feeling about them as Rudy Martinez of Texas State University has about us.
We are really building up living hell for our aging populations.
But I don't know quite how to put a silver lining on this other than to say that fortunately there are some countries who are saying no mas.
As you know, the Eastern European countries, they will be, I think they will increasingly become models for what we could be and what we will hope to be when we regain our sanity.
Those who are refusing to take Muslims, I think in the EU now, let's see, I was looking at the figures for what percentages of various Countries are Muslim.
France is the highest because they made the mistake back in the 19th century of colonizing all these North African Muslim countries.
So they've got Tunisians, they've got Moroccans, they've got Algerians, more than they could ever hope to want.
It's 9% Muslim.
Now that's the highest. But now when you get to Poland, less than one-tenth of a percent Muslim.
Slovakia, one-tenth of a percent.
Now Hungary's got 0.4%.
They're coming in, but they're saying no more.
Now, interestingly enough, and I was unaware of this, Cyprus, because it's separated into the Greek part and the Turkish part, their Muslim population is 25%.
And of course, any Cypriot, because of free movement within the European Union, they can go to any place.
But of course, Cyprus is a small country.
But in any case, a quarter of Cyprus is a small country.
One in four people, correct. I mean, again, Europeans, since Islam burst on the scene in the 7th century, Europeans have had an interesting relationship with Islam.
And I believe that we are entering a time period in our history and not just areas where
Europeans have colonized like the United States but also in the homeland of Europe.
We will have the opportunity once again to come to a conclusion.
Do we want to survive as a distinct people or not?
And this time I think if we are to survive, I don't know if we'll ever actually have that
problem again, but if we do nothing, we won't even be able to think of ourselves as a distinct
That's right. That's right.
If we do nothing, as Guillaume Fay has said, he said this about 15 years ago, he said, if the generation now in their 20s and 30s does nothing, we will cease to exist.
It's up to them. So, let us hope that our listeners, some in their 20s and 30s, will do something.
And in the meantime, we will wish you a happy beginning of December.
And this is leading into what is now known as the holiday season.
But I will call it the Christmas season just to show you how politically incorrect I am.
Our president did it last night, so why not?
Oh, did he? Very good. All right.
Well, and we'll look forward to seeing you again, Mr.
Kersey, a week from now. Hey, thank you all.
▲
Export Selection