All Episodes
Previous Next
Aug. 14, 2017 - Radio Renaissance - Jared Taylor
46:08
Google Goes Berserk; So Does Charlottesville
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome, ladies and gentlemen, to another edition of Radio Renaissance with our stalwart and standby guest, the inimitable Paul Kersey of SPPDL. Welcome, Paul.
We've got another exciting week to talk about, haven't we?
We've got an amazing, unbelievable week to talk about, but I'd like to say thank you to all of those individuals out there.
Fans of AR, fans of SBPDL, and fans of this podcast who called for the return of it.
Not just occasionally, but weekly.
Very excited to be here and moving forward to bring you guys some fantastic commentary.
That's what we're hoping to do every week.
Now, of course, the big scandal this week was about James Damore, the Googler.
Can you set the scene for us here, Mr.
Kersey? I'll set the scene as best as I can, the TLDR version of what's happened to James.
Basically, in an internal conversation within the company, Damore, who, as you noted right before we came on, who has a PhD from Harvard, Unbelievably intelligent guy who's actually doing work that has nothing to do with his doctorate.
In an interview with Stefan Molyneux, he basically said he won a coding contest that Google had sponsored.
And it was a logic-type game.
And he's just a brilliant guy.
And he's the kind of guy that, when you have a lot of these type of individuals, not only do they build...
Communities people are envious of, they build companies with massive market capitalization, like a Google.
And we both know that Google has been under the gun for lacking diversity within its employees.
I don't remember the exact numbers, but Wired Magazine did a story where something...
I want to say like 1.6% of Google's programmers or actual people who produce stuff instead of just being a body, that they're black or Hispanic.
It's almost all Asians and whites.
And Damore is a guy who, with his doctorate, with his intelligence, could probably do anything he wants in life.
But he won this contest, and he's there in Palo Alto doing work for Google.
And he was forced to go to a diversity seminar.
And what he told Stefan Molyneux is one of the funniest things I've ever heard.
He had to go to China, and he had 12 hours.
So on this flight to China, when most people would be watching an in-flight movie or getting some rest, James writes a manifesto.
And it...
And this manifesto basically challenges a lot of the ideas put forth in these diversity seminar.
We won't bore you with the details because I'm sure most of you have read this well-documented, well-sourced essay denouncing the ideas of the day that diversity is the ultimate goal, that egalitarianism must guide all decisions in life, and that we should always...
A term that I came up with was regression to the black mean must be the ultimate goal.
And I think that's what we're seeing in Silicon Valley.
Well, but no, let's not put the emphasis on the racial aspect of this.
He mentions that only in passing.
He does. Mostly what he's talking about is all of the lamentations about the fact that there are not enough lady programmers, not enough lady executives.
And of course, where he commits the egregious and unforgivable taboo is to suggest that although, yes, there is considerable overlap in abilities between the sexes, it might just be that for biological reasons, temperamental reasons, that maybe women are not as good at coding and women are more people-oriented rather than object-oriented.
They're a little less sharp-elbowed when it comes to the scrum and people trying to get to the top.
And so you cannot attribute this lack of representation of females strictly and exclusively, as Google invariably does, to male chauvinist discrimination.
That's all he's saying, basically.
That's his argument. And he cites a number of quite authoritative sources on the fact that men and women are simply different.
You're exactly right about that aspect of the...
Of this actually very well-documented paper that James put together.
I mean, again, you see just how his suggestion, you see how smart this guy is.
He put together a logic and reason-based argument against what is considered the highest moral value of the day.
And that is a devotion to egalitarianism.
In this case, the tenet of equality between the sexes.
Almost an extra equality between the sexes.
If we go back, though, to when the Obama administration declared war on Google, when they basically looked in, this is what started a lot of it.
And it did start with the lack of female programmers.
And also, as we know, because Jesse Jackson and professional black activists have found a new revenue source in attacking and being consultants as to try and help Facebook and Google and Twitter.
Reddit, all these companies that were just about or have already done their IPO and they're seeing just massive valuations, but they have a lack of minority and female employees.
And somehow this is an evil, even though these companies have market capitalizations and valuations that Mr.
Taylor, they dwarf the GDPs of most Of most countries that are part of the Great, you know, not just the Great Eight, but, you know, the European Union.
It's insane when you think about the value of what Facebook or Google or an Apple.
They must be doing something wrong.
Well, what Damore is worried about is that with this obsession to get equal outcomes, and he mentions race in passing, but mostly he's talking about equal outcomes by sex.
Yeah. He's worried that the company is going to go barking up the wrong tree.
They're going to go down a blind alley and that they will change the nature of the company and it won't do as well as it has been.
He's genuinely worried about that.
Now, when I read his 10-page document, it had been described as a screed over and over and over in all the headlines and all the papers, all the stories written about this.
I was very pleasantly surprised at how carefully argued, how moderately expressed, how ultimately sensible it all was.
And you referenced this session on diversity that he had attended.
He had noted that unlike practically all meetings at Google, they'd turn the microphones off for this.
In the interest of transparency, ordinarily they record all the participants at meetings of this kind.
But he said, because they were explicitly suggesting ways to break the law, to discriminate in favor of women and non-whites, they turned the mics off.
And this, too, he found deeply disturbing.
Of course, when people talk about how they want absolute equal outcome for the sexes, 50-50, 50-50, I always like to ask them, well...
In an America without sexual discrimination, do you expect 50% of the muggers and the murderers to be women?
Do you really expect that?
Do you really expect 50% of the people who apply for and get patents to be women?
Right now it's about two or three, at most five percent.
Do you really think that by nature men and women are identical and interchangeable in that respect?
Because if they concede even one point About men and women being different, aside from this minor technicality of their genitalia, then they have to be prepared to concede that maybe we cannot expect equal outcomes.
On that point, it's such an important point to make because we have to remember, all of these tech companies, it's not just Google that is doing this to try and find ways to skillfully maneuver around the law to discriminate against whites and Asians.
A couple years ago, when all of this eye of Sauron, whatever you want to call it, when everyone started to say, hey, wait a second.
Why are all these whites and Asians taking these great jobs at Facebook and Apple and Google?
We've got to find a way to get more minority representation or female representation.
Google spent something like $240 plus million to try and...
$265 million on the effort to try and increase the number of blacks within the company.
I know we're talking about females, but it's important to understand this is all part of
the same war against merit.
And that's what you have to call it.
I mean, again, if you're just looking to promote the interest of either a gender, a sexual
persuasion, or race, you are waging war on merit.
You have a background in writing for tech magazines a long time ago and a lifetime that probably seems like an eon ago.
But all these tech magazines, I read them.
I like to read Wired. I like to read Fast Company because they are so influenced by that social justice warrior mindset.
It's frightening because they consider it somehow a sacrilege that these companies...
Don't have more female and minority representation.
And this somehow is damaging to the image and the brand of the company, even though the image and the brand of the company only exists because of the proliferation of whites and Asians within the current employee structure.
The other aspect of it, of course, that's astonishing, is that if these were bastions of discrimination, why is it that Asians are so fantastically overrepresented?
They're supposed to be these old dinosaur Stone Age white men who can't look past their own cronyism, and yet how come they hire all these Asians?
And every single tech company in Silicon Valley is the same.
They have absolutely the same pattern.
Are we supposed to believe that they really are?
All of these crackerjack programmers who are black, who are women, who are, I don't know, one-legged lesbian Africans, who they're just spurning because of this mindless discrimination?
This stuff is just so pathetically crazy.
You know, just this morning, I was driving in the car and I was listening to C-SPAN. And C-SPAN had a whole panel that had been put together on increasing women in the work of cybersecurity.
Cybersecurity needs more women in order to be effective.
And I thought to myself, wait a minute.
When is the last time we've ever heard of some lady hacker who has gotten into Citibank or gotten into MasterCard or gotten into the Defense Department?
Every one of these people that you ever hear about is a man.
Now, is that due to some sort of incorrect socialization?
Gee, the idea that we need more women in cybersecurity, where does this even come from?
Except from just this utterly blinded, blinkered view that you have to have equal outcomes, otherwise it's just pure prejudice.
Top-down egalitarianism, and to really...
Punctuate your point. If there is this untapped female programmer out there, you'd think that there would be a company that would just start up and say, hey, we're going to throw a lot of stock options at you.
We want you here. We're going to build a company around your talents.
Do you have any friends? You probably have a network of female programmers or Or people writing code, people doing CSS, people who are cutting edge when it comes to all the latest technology.
You guys are probably all meeting because obviously Google and Facebook and these other tech companies, they aren't hiring you because they're discriminating.
So where are they? Let's get them all into our company and let's exploit your talents that are being discriminated against by these monoliths like Google and Facebook because we need you.
And guess what?
If we have you working for our company, we're going to get amazing profiles written of us by USA Today.
NPR is going to come profiling us for being 80% female.
70% of our employees not only are female, but they're also a minority.
Non-Asian or minority.
And we'll get just wonderful profiles.
We'll have all sorts of federal government grants because of our MBDA status, minority business status.
And, I mean, goodness gracious.
I make the larger argument to the larger point about where, theoretically, women are paid only 70 cents on the dollar for doing the same work as men.
If this were true, how come some guy who calculates his sums with pretty sharp pencils hasn't fired all his male employees and replaced them with women at maybe let's offer them 75 cents on the dollar?
Why not? Wouldn't they all come flocking 80 cents on the dollar and make boom time profits?
Why hasn't anybody ever thought of this, Mr.
Kersey? Well, you look at it that way.
What is the largest cost that a business has?
It's labor. And if all things are equal, if a female employee, like you just said, is producing the same amount of work but is making, like you said, 70 cents on the dollar, it would make perfect sense for a smart team to say, hey, you know what?
Instead of outsourcing, let's just fire all the men.
Replace them with these cheap women.
It makes perfect sense.
But you know, I guess capitalists are just so stupid.
They are so benighted that they just don't do something as obvious as that.
Now, there is a profession, by the way, and it's not the oldest profession, in which women get paid vastly more than men for exactly the same work.
Do you know what that would be?
I'm not even going to guess.
What is it? Models.
The top female models out-earn the top male models by a hundred, five hundred in some cases.
Ever heard of a top male model?
No. They're a dime a dozen.
Well, Derek Zoolander. No.
The movie. But top female models, they rake it in.
You know, a lot of them, they refuse to get out of bed for under a quarter of a million a day or something.
They just make huge sums of money.
Just to accentuate your point of how much they make...
Gisele, Tom Brady's wife, I think made double what he did one year.
And he's one of the top paid athletes in the country.
And here she is, this white Brazilian goddess.
And it's just...
Whatever happened to equal pay for equal work, huh?
He's a model, too. Okay.
Anyway. Well, something else is coming up, I guess, today.
By the time this airs, unfortunately, it's probably not going to air until Monday.
And by then, the Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville would have taken place.
Now, this is in a good cause, I think, and that is to prevent taking down the statue of Robert E. Lee, which sits in what used to be Lee Park in Charlottesville.
Emancipation Park now. Now, Emancipation Park, yes, yes.
And I think one can object to perhaps some of the things that are going to be said on that occasion and the manner in which they're said, but the idea of protecting the heritage of our past is an extremely, extremely important one.
And I salute the people who are down there doing that.
One thing I would like to point out is that it seems that the more the Civil War and slavery disappear into the past, the more furious people get about it.
And I think it's worth pointing out that, first of all, Robert E. Lee, he opposed secession.
Robert E. Lee was opposed to slavery.
And Robert E. Lee, as you know, was offered the command of the Union armies because he was such a well-regarded officer.
His service in the Mexican-American War was sterling, and he turned it down when Virginia seceded, and he said, I cannot draw my sword against my native state.
And that's why he served the Confederacy rather than the Union.
Furthermore, I think it was in 1924 when that statue was put up.
At that time, There were still many Union veterans who had fought Robert E. Lee.
Did they oppose honoring him?
Not at all. He was widely recognized as just one of the finest, most honorable, most noble men in American history, really, certainly on both sides of that war.
But now the further we get, any taint of the Confederacy, which of course is conflated with slavery start to finish, Anything of that kind is reason to just throw people into the rubbish heap.
We just saw a story.
I don't remember what city it was, but there's a middle school or elementary school that has the name Lynch in it.
And there's a huge controversy about that.
So they've had to name the school now for the gentleman's name who gave.
It can't just be called Lynch Middle School or Lynch Elementary School.
It's got to be Patrick Lynch now.
Because I think he gave the land for these schools back in maybe the late 19th, early 20th century.
The story I heard was out in the West Coast, either Seattle, that area, Oregon or Washington.
And it was Lynch Meadows or something like that.
And the idea, it was named after a guy, but this particular lynch person had nothing to do with lynching.
But just the fact that that word appears in the name of the school makes it anathema.
How long until Lynchburg, Virginia has to change its name not only for being the home of an evil Christian
organization like Liberty University but also because how dare you have Lynchburg and honor your
town with what obviously is the third or fourth most evil idea that the white man ever brought to the United States
and that of course is the concept of lynching.
That's right. Despite the fact that lynching was rough frontier justice that was meted out not just against blacks, there are cases of blacks lynching whites who had committed crimes against blacks.
Of the approximately 4,500 documented cases of lynching, about 1,500 of them are of white people.
Most people don't even realize that.
That's right. It's unquestionably the case that there was more lynch law carried out against blacks than whites, certainly proportionally speaking, and in terms of absolutes.
But this was a form of rough justice, and it grew up in areas where the reach of the law was tentative.
It started out in the West, as I understand it.
But in any case, just the word itself, as you point out, if that name appears in a school, makes no difference.
It has nothing to do with lynching.
Nope. Got to turn that on.
And the study you're referencing is the Tuskegee study that was commissioned, I think, back in maybe the late 1990s, early 2000s.
It's just a powerful study because it completely destroys this myth that we're forced, that
children from the moment they wake up now, when they're able to compartmentalize and
sort of retain knowledge, lynching evil white people, doing something horrifying to a noble,
saintly black individual who never did anything wrong except for look at a white woman in
the wrong way in the case of Emmett Till.
And the Confederacy.
Thoroughly evil.
Southerners, thoroughly evil.
And if Lee's got to go, then why not George Washington?
George Washington was a slaveholder.
Seven of the first nine presidents were slaveholders.
And it seems to me we've got to rename the Capitol.
And of course we've got to repaint the White House.
My gosh, isn't that obviously a symbol of white supremacy?
The president living in a White House?
We've got to change all of this stuff.
Another thing I point out, Yankees should be part of this movement to protect Robert E. Lee, because whether you came to the United States before the Civil War, no matter which side you fought on, or if you came much later, which is the case of probably most white people living today, You're still equally wicked.
You are still equally a beneficiary of unearned white privilege.
It's against every last one of us.
This is a start really on the white past of the United States.
The fact that white people built this country.
Well, you know...
We already see a precedent for what's going to happen in the renaming of states and cities.
King County, Washington, which is home to Seattle, I think it was back in the late 90s, there was a big brouhaha over the fact that it had been named for someone, I believe, who may have owned slaves that the county was named for.
So therefore, a Black City Council member of Washington.
Only 6% black Seattle.
Yeah, Seattle, Washington is about 70% actually Caucasian at this point.
Only 6% black.
There was a fight and they successfully renamed the county for Martin Luther King.
So on the buses, when you go visit Seattle, on the buses, King County is no longer named for a white man.
It's been retconned and it honors Martin Luther King.
I don't know if there's any evidence to suggest he ever visited Washington.
He probably never heard of King County.
Well, he probably never visited Washington.
Obviously, I doubt he ever visited Oregon because in their state constitution, it once barred blacks from even going to the state.
But we know what's going to happen if nothing changes.
And I think that...
If We Do Nothing is a wonderful title and a wonderful idea that needs to resonate with everyone listening to this.
And that needs to constantly be in the back of your mind by the actions you do and by the way that you dedicate what resources you have to help out in this cause.
Because if we do nothing, it's only going to continue to get worse and worse and worse.
Statues will come down.
Cities will be renamed. And the past, our past, will be erased.
That's right. There's just no question about it.
And of course, there's a different process having to do with the present.
And I was just thinking about this because this is now exactly the one-year anniversary of the murder of Katrina Vetrano.
Now, unlike Michael Brown, unlike Trayvon Martin, Katrina Vetrano is a name that is hardly known by Americans.
But last year, she went for a jog.
She was this very, very, very pretty Italian-American girl, really quite gorgeous.
She went for a jog and never came back.
She lived in Howard Beach, and she was attacked, raped, and murdered by a black guy.
Now, this guy made it very clear that he raped her because he was angry about white people, and he raped and murdered her for explicitly racial reasons.
Interestingly enough, the fact that he was black, she was white, this has not been made a big deal at all, at all, at all in the media.
That has not stopped a professional anti-racist such as Sean King.
He's one of these light-skinned black guys.
I'm writing a piece in the Daily News, I believe it was the New York Post, saying, Our paper and our city must demand justice for Carina Vetrano without slipping into racism.
Now, the point is, everyone has been bending over backwards, not even to mention race at all, much less slip into so-called racism.
But he was annoyed that the guy who killed Carina Vetrano, a fellow named Lewis, Louis Chanel, he has been described as a thug and a brute and even a demon.
Now, a guy who attacks, rapes, and kills an utterly unoffending, innocent woman, no matter of what race, I don't think it's wrong to call that person a thug or a brute or a demon.
Even her mother has used terms like that.
But that, of course, is unconscious racism.
So we must not use words of that kind when we talk about this Lewis Channel guy who has committed this crime.
I don't want to deviate from what we're talking about for too long, but recall the story of the white Vanderbilt student who was raped by three blacks and a white football player in Vanderbilt in Nashville, one of the top schools in the South.
He actually said, one of the black players who participated in the rape and then urinated on the white girl, he actually said this was for slavery.
This was done out of racial hatred.
And obviously we can't do polls with all the black criminals in jail who have committed violence or sexual assaults on white people.
But I would imagine if you polled...
If you were to do this within federal and local police jails, sales, and whatnot, you would find a shocking amount of Justification for the crimes based upon hatred of white people.
I think there's no question about that.
Occasionally this does come out.
It becomes a small item in a news story.
While he was raping her, he said he told her that this was payback for slavery or something like that.
Or I remember one case in which a black guy had killed a white woman and his black girlfriend asked whether it was really necessary to kill her under the circumstances.
And he says, eh, she's bound to have been a racist.
So, that justifies killing her.
But in a way, we could almost expect even more of this given the general tenor of society today.
After all, blacks are constantly being told how wicked we are.
And if we are half as bad as society suggests, don't we all deserve to be murdered and raped?
I would think so.
James Damore, the gentleman we talked about at the beginning, just for broaching subjects that run against the narrative of intense egalitarianism as the highest moral virtue of our society.
He gets death threats.
And these are serious. I mean, there are people who literally believe because he spoke out and wrote this paper and is still defending it, Death is the only solution to stop these ideas from finding a captive audience or just being deplatformed because we shouldn't allow these ideas to be at the marketplace.
And that, Mr. Taylor, goes to the whole Unite the Right event, which has seen a lot of trouble even being able to get their First Amendment rights to be upheld.
Yes, this is the rally in Charlottesville to save the Lee statue.
That's right. First of all, the City Council said, yes, you can meet in Lee Park, now Emancipation Park.
Then they said, no, no, you can't.
You have to meet way off in someplace else.
Then the ACLU, God bless them, came to the defense of the United Kingdom.
As they should. Yes, as they should.
Every now and then they do something on principle.
It's shocking. It's startling when they do.
So we will see what the consequences are.
And there is a school of thought that says that if cities are made to pay a tremendous price in terms of added security, in terms of enormous amount of City Council and government time devoted to worrying about this thing, that they will be less likely to take down Confederate monuments.
I'm not sure I agree with that or not.
What is your view? Do you think that punishing them this way makes this sort of less likely, or do you think perversely makes it more likely?
Oh, it makes it more likely.
Look, to just talk about the whole concept of deplatforming, look at all the people who are losing their ability to monetize their videos right now.
Yeah.
Yeah. Anything close to being construed as conservatism is going to lose its ability to be either searched on places like Google and then the SEO when you're searching and you have stuff pop up.
On Facebook you're seeing people be suspended for days for really minor infractions against the politically correct climate.
I believe that I believe strongly that a demonstration as honorable and as necessary as the Unite the Right event is only going to inspire more city councils to quickly remove things as fast as they can with this little fanfare.
Because A, they don't want to see a mass mobilization and a loss of revenue and having the Chamber of Commerce come down on them.
We're seeing basically Charlottesville shut down this weekend.
A lot of lost revenue.
The whole idea of even having these monuments up, even for people like Thomas Jefferson or George Washington, it's not just Confederates.
All this stuff is going to have to go because it stands as a reminder of what America once was.
It's implicitly, and in many cases, explicitly white-only country.
And this stuff has to go if we're going to fit the narrative.
And city councils have a vested interest in trying to attract global investment from companies.
And even though a city like New Orleans...
The Confederate statues stood in some cases since the late 1890s.
That never stopped outside investment from coming into New Orleans.
But we're somehow supposed to believe that it's going to do it today.
Whatever. Yes.
No, these things are absolutely astonishing.
If we could go one more point about this, unite the right.
Yes. Airbnb is another one of these companies that has popped up and has become a huge resource for people who want to get around hotels and want to stay in a cheaper opportunity in someone's home.
And we've seen Airbnb, they were sued actually because there were some people who were part of Airbnb who discriminated against Well, now we're seeing with the Unite the Right event, we're seeing Airbnb cancel reservations.
A friend of mine is going to the event and he shared with me that two Airbnb reservations have been canceled because they believed...
He was associated with the UTR event, and this violated the terms of service because you can't have racism or something.
Well, this, though, this is an interesting case.
I've heard about these folks whose Airbnb reservations were canceled and whose accounts were completely eliminated.
First of all, I don't understand how Airbnb would have known why they were looking to come to Charlottesville.
There must have been something about that that gave the game away.
I don't know. There are people who are claiming that you should be able to sue Airbnb about that, but that's not the case.
I think you would lose a suit for that reason, because what the anti-discrimination laws, they prohibit discrimination for certain reasons.
Race, sex, national origin, religion, etc.
They don't prohibit political views.
If Airbnb wanted to, they could, I think, perfectly legally, eliminate all the accounts of someone that voted for Donald Trump.
They could completely eliminate every left-handed person if they had some sort of ferocious prejudice against left-handed people.
That is not forbidden by the law.
And I think the law should not forbid that sort of thing.
On the other hand, across the board, all of these huge companies that have become almost like public utilities now, they're so dominant.
All of these companies are in the hands of people who hate us, who are completely opposed to everything that we stand for.
And what one does about that, I tend to be sort of a free market guy.
I tend to be one who says, okay, if you don't want to do business with people you don't want to do business with, God bless you.
But none of them wants to do business with us.
It's a very difficult thing.
I tend to be the opposite spectrum in a homogenous country.
Yes, the free market will allow ideas and whatnot.
There's no barrier of entry.
But when you read... When you read Fast Company and Wired, these tech magazines that are dictating policy, you understand that they don't want us to even have access to the internet, Mr.
Taylor. They would be perfectly happy to shut us up.
I think that is clearly their motivation.
And they're finding ways to do it that don't tap.
Technically look like censorship, but it boils down to that.
You know the stuff about sort of shadow banning, where you may have 50,000 followers on Twitter, but all of a sudden you find out that it looks like only maybe 10,000 of your followers are getting your tweets.
Or you may have 100,000 subscribers to your YouTube channel, but you put up a new YouTube video, and you get messages from people, wait, wait, I never heard about that.
This stuff is very, very difficult to prove.
Just think if you put a lot of money into building up your Facebook page and then you find out that they've changed the algorithm so that if, say you've spent $10,000 to $20,000 building up a Facebook page with a lot of likes, your engagement rates are virtually zero now because they've created a way so that you're...
Stories won't even show up on the news feed.
Which, and if you're listening to this, the news feed on Facebook is when you log in
and that's when you see what your friends are up to because it's building its algorithm
based on people you engage with.
And if you're engaging with certain pages more, you're gonna see that content.
It's gonna be more prevalent.
And with a page like AR or some of these other, even just conservative pages,
they're seeing massive traffic drop because Facebook has basically said,
this is, whether it's fake news or not, it's just, we're gonna create ways
to sanitize people's experience and make it more...
That egalitarian friendly and sterile when it comes to ideas that you or I would be interested in actually having.
Because we can't have...
The debates are over, Mr.
Taylor. Their side has won so significantly that they believe to even entertain some of the concepts that even a guy like James Damore brought up leads you down the slippery slope to...
I don't know, Auschwitz?
That might be too far to say, but I'm being serious.
When the left believes that if you dare broach...
The concept of inequality between either sexes or even if you go a little bit further and you go to race.
Obviously, what's the next step?
That's right. And that's why you saw Mr.
Trump so frequently cited as the second coming of Hitler during the campaign and still to this day because if we're going to start deporting illegals, well, what happens next?
Fill in the blank. Right, right.
Before we move on to another topic, I wanted to get back to Karina Vetrano.
And the reason is, I just wanted to contrast the utter and total silence that official America has met her crime with.
Remember the story about this guy, Timothy Kaufman?
He was a guy from Baltimore, I believe, who drove up to Manhattan and he whipped out a sword and he killed an elderly black guy.
This was really quite a horrible thing, but that got all sorts of attention.
Mayor Bill de Blasio, Governor Andrew Cuomo, the Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance, they all talked about this as murder as an act of terror.
And Bill de Blasio, who as far as I know has not said one word about Carina Vetrano, he actually criticized Donald Trump and Sean Spicer for not coming out and denouncing this crime.
And he says this, Call him a racist, call him a terrorist, period.
He says, this was a horrible incident and exceedingly rare.
We can't remember another situation exactly like this in recent history in New York City.
Sorry, Bill.
There are plenty of situations like this.
And the fact is, they mostly and almost exclusively involve black people killing and attacking white people.
That's exactly right.
Yes, for him to talk that way.
And in a way, he's almost making my point.
In other words, he's saying the idea of a white person killing a black person for explicitly racial reasons, it's super rare.
Let's talk about it. Let's call it terrorism.
But we don't even think about it when the races are reversed.
It simply comes down to white people aren't allowed to have interests of their own because if white people start to unite, we all know what that leads to, is the idea of the left.
and we've already definitively, the 20th century was about slamming the door shut on access
that white people have to identity politics.
That is the fitting lesson because I think I made this point to you before, I was born
well after this, but the Kerner Commission made quite clear that black dysfunction, black
criminality was all the fault of white racism.
That's right.
That goes all the way back to American Dilemma.
All the way back to Gunnar Murdoch.
Yes, that has been the law laid down.
The book is closed.
And to me, it's fascinating the extent to which that kind of blinkered egalitarian thinking has moved out of the area of race to sex.
Where all of us, most of us, well, all of us have mothers.
Many of us have sisters.
We live on an intimate basis with people of the opposite sex in a way that most of us do not, with people of different races.
And yet, we're still supposed to pretend that the sexes are equivalent.
This is, I mean, really, the idea of racial egalitarianism is something you could perhaps conceive of if all you knew about black people was what you read about in Time magazine.
Yeah. But we have direct experience with women.
But we're supposed to believe that they're going to make wonderful hired killers in the special forces?
Now, the one area, of course, where people don't make that silly assumption is in professional sports.
Now, winning a football game is important, for heaven's sake.
But gee, having special forces who are the best of the best, eh, no, no, no, we can sort
of jigger the rules a little bit to get some lady SEAL involved.
Not only is winning football so important, giving up all your traditions in the pursuit
of a winning football team is important if we look at the case of Ole Miss.
Ole Miss where they've given up the ability to have Confederate flags, to have Dixie,
to even have Colonel Reb as their mascot.
Get this Mr. Taylor, Ole Miss just got put on probation because of a lot of boosters
who were giving money to players.
And one of these boosters just came out Tuesday in a deposition.
He claimed that he was really good friends with one of the black players he was giving money to.
And the black player said, just some stocky white guy, I don't even know his name.
So he was giving this guy a lot of money under the table and this black player, the only
reason he was a student at Ole Miss was because of his ability to play football.
He was getting money because this guy lives vicariously, this white booster lives vicariously
through how the Ole Miss football team performs on fall Saturdays.
That's what his life is all based around.
Even if it means the tearing down of every tradition his ancestors ever valued who may
have gone to that school, this black player said simply, I don't know his name, some stocky
white guy, some fat white guy.
So this white guy had no connection with the university at all, just privately out of his own pocket?
He's dumping loads of money on this guy?
He was a booster. Colleges throughout the country The NCAA considers, for some reason, college athletic programs a non-profit.
So your donations as an alumni of, say, LSU or an alumni of Notre Dame, if you give money to the athletic department, you can write that off on your taxes.
So all these boosters are doing this underneath...
We're giving money at the University of Mississippi to players underneath the table to try and convince...
Black high school athletes to come to the school and play.
So Ole Miss is now on probation for a number of years.
They had to vacate all their wins.
So, you know, you get rid of the Confederate flag.
You get rid of Colonel Reb.
You get rid of playing Dixie.
But you get a football team that goes 5-7, 6-6.
But you at least have a couple of, you know, three or four star black recruits to get excited about and say, Hey, I know this guy.
I give this money under the table.
And then the black player says...
I don't know his name. He's just some stocky white guy.
It was a fitting end to when you think about how so many people, so many good people out there, conservative white people, Instead of spending money on good causes, they could be going to actually help out their people, their ancestors, their posterity. They're putting all their money into these college football programs.
And that reaction from that black player, I don't know.
He claims we're friends.
He's just some stocky white guy.
I don't even know his name.
I wonder if anyone will learn his lesson on account of that.
Probably not. People are so mesmerized by athletics.
This to me is something I've just never understood, this absolute fascination.
I know that you follow sports in a way that I never have, but the idea of professional sports to me is really almost revolting.
I probably shouldn't say that publicly, but anyway, there's something else that is even more revolting.
And let's move on to the last story we're going to cover, and that has to do with yet another Sex Grooming Scandal from the UK. This time, it's from Newcastle.
And you know, when you think about the fact that these scandals came out in Rotherham, in Rochdale, and now Newcastle, and they come out years later, You wonder, there must be many, many cases like this that never get reported.
You hear over and over that people didn't want to talk about this for fear of the fact that since all the perps are non-white and all of the victims are young white women, that this is something we just don't dare talk about.
And I think one of them, as it turns out, in this case, in Newcastle, they've gone on trial and they actually convicted 17, 16 men and one woman, oddly enough.
She was helping arrange for all of this.
They are technically speaking UK citizens, British citizens, but they're Bangladeshis, Pakistanis, Indians, Iraqis, Iranians, Turks, not a single European, by the way.
And I think one guy's comment really sums it up to me.
And he's quoted in the papers as saying, White women are good for only one thing, for people like me to fuck and use as trash.
End quote. End quote.
That sums it up.
That sums it up.
Well, thank you, whoever you are, for laying it on the line like that.
This is probably the kinds of stuff that's going through the heads of every last one of them.
They probably say it openly, but the press is too cowardly to print this kind of thing.
It's probably what's going through the minds of the Africans we saw on that boat, that terrifying video in Spain where the people are out on the beach and all of a sudden this boat pulls up like an invasion and all of a sudden you see scores of people jump out and start running to freedom as if they've come to the land of Of milk and honey and, well, let's face it, white women.
White women. That's right.
That's right. You're talking about, this is sort of a brief cell phone video.
These people are vacationing on the beach and all of a sudden, here this whole boatload of Africans pulls up and they're sprinting for the shore.
That's just the way Europe is these days, you know.
The elite in Europe exists to pave the way for the proliferation of non-Europeans, all courtesy of the current Europeans' redistributed taxes.
That's right. That's simple.
Well, yes, we are building up our own funeral pyre, as some famous man once said.
Anyway, well, I think this comes to the end, that we come to the end of our episode here.
Thank you so much for coming into the studio.
And we'll look forward to seeing you next week.
Always a pleasure to have you here.
I look forward to hearing from all your fantastic listeners.
And more importantly, just in conclusion, thank you for having me.
And courage, guys.
That's what it takes. That's right.
▲
Export Selection