All Episodes
Previous Next
Aug. 24, 2016 - Radio Renaissance - Jared Taylor
37:09
Trump and the Campaign of Hate
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome to another edition of Radio Renaissance.
We have with us today the legendary Paul Gerze of Stuff Black People Don't Like.
He is always full of really remarkable commentary on the passing scene.
And today I thought we would talk about the astonishing media hatred that we are seeing for the Republican candidate Donald Trump.
Never in my lifetime have I seen the press go after a single human being the way the press has gone after Donald Trump.
I was alive and living in the United States at the height of the Nixon impeachment controversy, and I thought that was ferocious.
But that is a pale imitation of what is happening with Donald Trump today.
And so, Paul Kersey, in your view, what motivates this ferocious antagonism, this outright hatred that we see in the press for Donald Trump?
Well, you know, Jared, I do want to ask, you know, I wasn't alive at the time period you're talking about.
I've read about what was going on with Goldwater.
You know, in your heart, you know he's right.
You know, in your head, you know he's nuts.
It might have been the vice versa of that.
But it's interesting because Trump in a lot of ways has used the media and the
new media, social media, to his advantage to basically showcase that the
media is irrelevant and intimidating your average white American voter into
distancing themselves from Trump. I mean let's face it, decades after decades of
indoctrination and more importantly decades upon decades of mass immigration
which has turned California permanently blue.
It's on the verge of turning Georgia blue.
They didn't get to a point, Jared, where they could have the dispossession of whites, to quote Wilmot Robertson's phenomenal tome.
Trump came along and changed all that with just a couple speeches.
And the media thought they were going to be able to celebrate 2040, 2050, whatever that infamous date is in the future when whites are a minority and there's a plurality of races.
And they thought they were going to get to that without white people noticing what was happening and then being able to publicly discuss this.
And Trump's changed everything.
And that is why they are, Jared, so upset.
Because, you know...
Just take a look at what we've seen with the George Soros emails, leaked emails that have come out, and you realize they thought they could get away with it.
Soros said, let's frame Pamela Geller and these anti-Islamic individuals as the most evil people in the world, and they were successful at doing that.
But Trump came along and has literally changed the paradigm as we know it.
Well, I have two reactions to that.
First of all, given the new media that you referenced, given the fact that Donald Trump can reach his fans by the million directly and completely bypass the media, that is an added incentive for the media to be a little bit more fair-minded.
After all, when they had an absolute monopoly on how people presented themselves to the United States or to the world, then if they misrepresented you, you had very little recourse.
But now, if they misrepresent Donald Trump, or if they show absolute, uncompromising bias against him, then he can reach people directly.
So the bias is even more clear, clearer than it could have ever been before, before the age of new media.
The other point that I would make also is that much as we may approve of Donald Trump's message, and much as people like you and I may see in what he is saying a kind of message that runs counter to this story we've been told about how wonderful America is going to be when whites are reduced to a minority, He himself has never actually denounced that prospect.
He has never taken what is genuinely a racialist view.
And so, in both of those respects, I think on the one hand, the media should be more respectful of a presidential candidate, especially when he can go over their heads and talk to people directly.
And at the same time, he has not given them the reason or really a clear reason to attack them on the grounds that you've just described.
You know, that's an interesting point.
And what I would say is that personnel is policy.
It's one of the things that a certain nonprofit in Washington, D.C. teaches.
And look who Mr.
Trump has giving his warm-up speeches.
Stephen Miller, who in a, I believe it was a Washington Post or a New Yorker profile of him, he noted that the whole reason he got involved was because he saw California undergo the demographic shift and then, of course, what happened at Duke.
And then look what he just did with Steve Bannon, naming him basically the man in charge of his campaign, which Paul Manafort resigned only a day later after Steve Bannon, who, let's be honest, what he's done with Breitbart is, in a lot of ways, he has...
He's challenged a lot of the sites that you and I, you know, he's basically putting the stories AR used to highlight as the main way to get traffic to Breitbart.
And that's who is his campaign.
And then, you know, in a couple days, Hillary Clinton is going to give a speech trying to denounce Donald Trump by highlighting his connections to what is commonly called the alt-right.
And you are right about the media.
You are right that the media should be objective.
You know, the New York Times basically came out a couple days ago.
I think you referenced this piece in a really phenomenal piece that you wrote on August 12th called Trump and the Atmosphere of Hate.
The New York Times came out and said, you know, Trump is testing the norms of objectivity in journalism.
It was by Jim Rutenberg, published on August 7th.
You know, the point is about, you know, journalism though at this point is corporate journalism really doesn't need to make It doesn't need to be objective because look at the decline in newspaper subscriptions.
The Atlanta Journal Constitution has dropped, I think, 50% since 2012.
The Memphis Commercial Appeal has dropped 65% in terms of subscriptions.
The Birmingham News is only published Monday Wednesday and Friday and Sunday now.
So, you know, their subscription rates are dying, but guess what?
Most of these papers are still connected to Gannett, and Gannett's a publicly traded company that they're able to write off their losses, and they don't care.
I mean, the beautiful thing, Jared, is that you could go on Facebook Live now every day and you could do a newscast based on the AR-10 stories that you guys publish.
And you could get a huge audience that could, after a year, even though you won't have any commercials, that type of revenue, you would have an audience that could rival The audiences that, you know, your local Washington, D.C. affiliates, ABC, CBS, NBC Nightly News, that they get. So, I mean, everything is changing, and it's a beautiful, beautiful thing.
Yes, although something you said struck me, that the media do not have to be objective anymore.
That's an interesting idea.
They certainly are ceasing to be objective, certainly when it comes to Donald Trump.
And it seems to me you're almost suggesting that the role of media today, unlike the old Walter Cronkite days when Uncle Walt could be counted on, or at least Americans thought he could be counted on, to tell it as it is.
That's the way it is.
And if Uncle Walt said so, then that's the way it was.
Are you suggesting really that people no longer even expect that?
That they want to have their own opinions fulfilled, that they don't expect objectivity, that they are more likely to tune in to people who slant the news in a way that makes them feel better, or that fulfills their, sort of goes along with their own biases?
If you've never been to a Trump rally and experienced the feeling of that visceral hate that the entire room, it's palpable, when Trump turns around and says, look at the media behind you.
They're the most evil people that exist.
And the whole crowd turns around and hisses and boos like it's a professional wrestling match and the heel has just done something to the...
To the babyface wrestler pulled out a foreign object or something.
Of course, that's exactly what I'm suggesting.
There's a reason why, you know, just a couple days ago, Matt Drudge highlighted a really powerful editorial from the New York Post, American Journalism is Collapsing Before Our Eyes by Michael Goodwin.
And he wrote, if I could quote it real quick, it said, And, you know, to end quote, and I think it's important to read this piece by Mr.
Goodwin at the New York Post because really he's right.
We are watching the, you know, the collapse of American journalism into just intense subjectivity.
And they're really showcasing that, you know, go back years ago, Jared, to when Pat Buchanan's contract was renewed at CNBC. The head of MSNBC said, the conversation Pat Buchanan wants to have, it can't happen.
I can't remember the exact words he said, but it was beyond the narrative or something like that.
We weren't supposed to have that conversation.
We know Trump has smashed through that glass ceiling that they put there for Pat Buchanan, and what is most...
Surprising, I think, to even you and to people who've been involved in this for a while is how many Americans believe that Trump is representing their ideals.
Remember a couple years ago when people were saying, oh, don't donate even though he's...
Just look how scared those gatekeepers are at this point.
It's a beautiful thing. Oh, they're certainly terrified, and their terror, I agree with you, is indeed a beautiful thing.
Yes, it was Pat Buchanan's book, The End of America, wasn't that the one that finally was just too much for MSNBC? And as you say, they in effect said, these ideas should not even be discussed on the media.
Here's this best-selling author with a best-selling book saying things that resonate with millions of Americans.
And MSNBC says, no, this is just not fit dialogue for the United States of America.
Extraordinary. But, no, I think you are absolutely right to point out the importance of this New York Post piece.
In fact, it's an interesting coincidence.
I had it up on my computer screen earlier, and I'm looking at it now myself.
To me, when the New York Post, which doesn't necessarily support Donald Trump either, but when they run an article like this that American journalism is collapsing before our eyes, that's an extraordinary condemnation of their own media.
And I couldn't agree with you more that the American media is behaving in a spectacularly shameless way by all piling up in an utterly partisan way to try to sink the Trump candidacy.
Now you and I would like to think that especially in a day of alternative media, in direct media, in Donald Trump being able Tweet to millions of followers that this open bias is going to discredit the media even further.
And I think to a large extent it will.
But at the same time, there are many more or less middle-of-the-road Americans who, if they get this constant bombardment that Donald Trump is a fascist, Donald Trump is a racist, he's a bigot, he's a, and this is my favorite accusation, he's a threat to democracy.
This is going to have some kind of effect.
I think that on the one hand, just the obvious, over-the-top, crazy fanaticism of the media is going to discredit itself to some degree, but at the same time, I fear that it will have enough of an effect To influence who knows how many people, but perhaps that swing vote that could move the election one way or the other.
That's a profound point.
I mean, what's most shocking is how...
Well, it's not shocking.
You know, go back to Trump's magnificent address at the GOP when he was nominated, when he accepted that.
It was amazing how the media all used that word, dark.
There's a great meme out there where it shows all little Twitter accounts for the main newspapers across the country and also the top leftist sites like Salon, Huffington Post, the soon-to-be-shut-down Gawker, R.I.P. Gawker.
No, I'm kidding. I'm glad Hulk Hogan leg dropped you with Peter Thiel into oblivion.
But, you know, you're right about most Americans not even paying attention to this stuff.
I mean, that's the one thing that we can't pull, is how many Americans have just completely tuned this out?
You know, I've been to one Trump rally, and I walked around and I asked people why they were there.
This was well before the first primary even happened.
It was in November of 2015.
And everyone that I talked to, I said, hey, you know, is this your first Trump rally?
I'm sorry, is this your first rally?
Your first political rally you've ever been to?
And they said, yeah, you know, I drove 90 miles to be here.
I drove 60 miles to be here because I'm so excited about what he's saying.
And I think conversely to your point that, you know, are people just tuning this out?
Well, I think a lot of people are tuning in.
And I think it's a lot more than we want to give credit for.
We still haven't seen that one really great article yet that, that, that, It shows the immense crowd Trump is getting.
I think you actually went to a rally that kind of was a spur of the moment rally in Virginia that was announced the day before and they had to turn thousands of people away.
Is that right?
Yes, that's exactly right.
I had no idea.
I got there about an hour and a half early.
I thought I'd have no trouble getting in.
But I went there as a journalist, and so I interviewed some of the demonstrators.
And by the time I got past the demonstrators, I spent about a half an hour with them.
And it was an hour before the doors were supposed to be open on this rally that had had 24-hour notice.
People only found out about it the day before.
And I thought, my gosh, this is a huge line!
And as it turned out, all of these white people, and practically everyone was white, all of these white people sat there cheerfully in 94 degree weather, sweltering away, probably knowing that they had no chance of getting in, because this was in a gymnasium of a high school.
And about 45 minutes after standing in line, 15 minutes before the doors opened officially, a cop on a motorcycle comes by with a little loudspeaker saying, sorry, that's it, you all got to go home.
And you can imagine the kind of reaction that a crowd waiting to get into a rap concert might have had.
But here all of these nice, well-behaved white people very cheerfully walked back to their cars.
But no, it was a huge disappointment.
Now, to me, I had a very perplexing experience during that wait.
I had plenty of time to interview these people who were standing in line.
And I would invariably ask them, well, why do you support Trump?
And invariably, it was something like, well, he's going to make America great again by bringing jobs back, or he's got an economic plan, or he's a guy with a real business record, unlike these politicians.
He can make the country run properly.
And I would say things like, well, what about his views on Muslims, keeping Muslims out?
Are there any other groups that you might want to keep out?
Oh, no, no, no, people are people.
And I said, well, I would ask variants of this question, clearly opening the door to a non-PC reply as to why they like Donald Trump.
And I would ask them questions like, well, what do you think of this prediction that white people are going to become a minority?
And a couple of answers were to the effect that, well, if they adopt our values, then they're going to find that this is a wonderful country, these new non-whites coming in, as long as they adopt our values, it'll just be great.
I couldn't get a single, really radioactive kind of reply out of anybody.
And yet, There they were, standing in line, in sweltering weather, to see this man that the media has denounced as a fascist and a racist.
I wished I'd had more of an opportunity to talk at length with these people, whether or not because I had a microphone in my hand, they were playing it safe, Whether or not they are just so suspicious of the world around them that they dare not publicly or on the record express a dissident view, I don't know. But to me, there was a real contradiction there.
Their obvious interest, their obvious willingness to sacrifice at a moment's notice and stand in line to see the great Donald Trump, and yet their unwillingness to say anything but give the most banal reasons for supporting him.
Well, they'd probably be the same people who would start that, you know, I'm just unbelievably edifying build the wall chant that comes up whenever mr.
Trump speaks and you know to me the most important moment of this entire episode of Trump running for the Republican nomination for president It was during his speech at the RNC when it was spontaneous.
He didn't even say those three words and this group of individuals who for years have supported McCain and they've supported Romney and they supported Bush for two terms, and they supported, go back to 1996, Bob Dole, and they supported George W. Bush's father.
They started chanting, build the wall, all those delegates.
And to me, that was just one of those moments where, you know what, those people outside, had they been in there, I guarantee you they would have been some of the loudest people chanting.
Most people, most of our people are still so afraid of I'm explicitly stating what they implicitly know.
And the world is going to shake, Jared, to its core when that changes.
And it's happening before our eyes.
And it's just...
I think that you know it goes back to that MSNBC We you've got it you have to go back and look at when Pat
Buchanan was told why he was no longer allowed a platform Because the tea party movement had just been co-opted by
Glenn Beck You know the one event that I wish I had gone to was that
weird rally Glenn Beck held when the tea party was beginning
to become a huge Phenomenon and Glenn Beck you know was at Fox News remember
what he said at Fox News. He got him a lot of trouble Yes
Barack Obama is a racist.
He doesn't like white people. Remember that statement?
It was a very weird moment, but Glenn Beck's ratings started to go up.
And he held this weird prayer rally.
That's what it became. And that's when the Tea Party kind of was delayed Trumpism.
And look at a guy at Fox News like Sean Hannity.
His ratings have been falling for years.
He wrapped himself in the Trump flag and his ratings are now rivaling that of Bill O'Reilly.
He's one of, if not the most important person in Fox News now because he is having these discussions that MSNBC said, hey, we can't have these anymore.
It's outside the bounds.
You know, going back to what's coming real quick in a couple days, Jared, that is you're probably going to be mentioned by Hillary Clinton.
You are going to be mentioned in a speech by the Democratic nominee for president when she tries to associate you, just as the mainstream media try to do.
With Jared Loeffner a couple years ago when they tried to claim that weird episode.
I'm sure you recall that with great disdain.
But have you thought about what's going to happen when you are mentioned by Hillary in the speech Thursday?
Well, let's get to that in just a moment.
This is an intriguing prospect.
But back to your analysis of the people that I interviewed.
I like the idea that you have, and I think you're probably right.
These people who gave these very sane, very safe, very non-controversial replies as to why they support Donald Trump.
They are probably, as you say, the very people who would chant Build the Wall with a real fervor, with a real gleam in their eyes.
I hope that's the case.
We'll see. Because you're right, we have been so browbeaten, we have been so intimidated, That many people hide the things they say, and so long as there's not somebody with a microphone who's asked them their name, then they'll let it all hang out.
Now, this question as to what Hillary's going to do, I guess that's Thursday, day after tomorrow, this big speech she presumably is going to give in an attempt to hang the alt-right around Donald Trump's neck.
It's difficult for me to imagine, frankly, that my name is going to be mentioned by Hillary Clinton.
Maybe she'll mention American Renaissance.
We'll see. But as others have pointed out, she can't simply blame this entire phenomenon On anonymous Twitter handles.
She's got to hang at least some real name onto this phenomenon, so we'll see.
But it is true that there has been a kind of, well, there's certainly been a kind of feeding effect for us that Donald Trump has had.
The media who absolutely hate him have of course used our support for him as a way of saying, well look at these loathsome insect racists.
Look at Jared Taylor.
He supports Donald Trump.
Well Donald Trump too must be a loathsome insect racist.
This simple-minded nonsense that they go for, the kind of the equivalent of which they would never attack Hillary with.
But, no, we'll see.
I plan to, to the extent possible, follow her speech live, and I'm thinking perhaps I should clear the decks and see if the media are going to inquire as to what the loathsome insect Jared Taylor actually thinks, if she does mention me by name.
At least at this point, Due to some of the work of the mainstream media that's generally very hostile to us, American Renaissance and my name are certainly associated with this concept of the alt-right.
So perhaps even if she doesn't mention me or American Renaissance by name, there will be a press that's interested in what I, as an ostensible spokesman for the alt-right, have to say about it.
So it'll be very interesting.
I plan to be in town, Mr.
Kersey. Let's put it that way. No, I think this is a very big moment because they have to do something big.
You know, they've been trying...
One of the people I've become a very big fan of his writing is Scott Adams.
He's the creator of Dilbert, the comic strip, and his writing on the art of persuasion that's been used.
You know, he's basically said that Trump is a master of persuasion skills and just extraordinary
when it comes to, you know, the whole crooked Hillary.
Look what he did with lying Ted, creating these, creating these ideas that spill over
and then have real resonance with, with individuals and collectively become the way that we view
the individual that he's targeting.
And, you know, he, he, he came out and publicly endorsed Hillary for his own safety because,
you know, he said that, you know, the media is trying, the media and Hillary are trying
to pair Trump with Hitler.
and she's doing it quite well.
And as we've noted in prior personal calls between each other, we've noted that if you keep doing this, isn't there a moral justification?
I mean, how many people have done that philosophical experiment where would you go back in time and kill baby Hitler?
And it is frightening, the way that the left, I'm not talking about the media here, but the media is aiding this.
And Thursday's speech is going to be Hillary's big opportunity to really try and throw a heaping bucket of You know, water on Trump to try and see what sticks in terms of Jared Taylor, Peter Brimlow, Richard Spencer.
You can even say that, you know, Breitbart was the one that published the piece by Miley Yenopopoulos.
I don't know if I pronounced the surname correctly.
And remember, it talked about some ideas that...
Frankly, AR doesn't want to talk about.
It was a very risky piece, and that's the type of person I think they're going to go after.
Because Bannon has published some very risky pieces that I dare say you would never publish.
I'm not trying to be funny.
I'm simply stating a fact.
Well, we'll see if she will accuse him of being a fascist.
I understand that Hillary Clinton has said that Donald Trump is an existential threat to American democracy.
In other words, if he is elected, then American democracy could glimmer away.
This is extraordinary. Extraordinary.
This is just extraordinary.
And I don't know, I've lost count of the number of journalists who have told us that Donald Trump is a fascist.
Donald Trump is a threat to democracy.
This is now routine.
And as you point out, this notion of killing baby Hitler.
Last October, the New York Times Magazine asked its online readers if, were it possible to travel back in time, would they kill baby Hitler?
No fewer than 42% said that they would.
28% weren't sure.
They might just do it themselves.
That adds up to 70% would either do it or they'd think about it.
Now, to the extent that the media are convinced that Donald Trump is essentially a baby Hitler, isn't all of this accusation of fascism, of threat to democracy, etc., etc., the world's going to end, he's the equivalent of a giant meteor striking the earth, isn't this, in effect, an invitation to kill Donald Trump?
Well, Jared, look at the violence that happens routinely at his events.
He had to cancel a speech in Minneapolis because, my gosh, the police lost control from the anarchists this past Friday night.
I guess it was about August, what, August 19th?
And how many times...
The other day on CNN, Corey Lewandowski, who was his campaign manager at the time, he was on CNN and he pointed out the violence that happens in Chicago.
And he noted, which is an event that everyone seems to have forgotten about, was that obvious trap.
Trump wanted to go and speak at, was it the University of Chicago?
Where the leftists came in and they basically were beating up Trump supporters inside the building.
They had to cancel it because the Secret Service and And Trump's own security team and the police, they all came together and realized we can't guarantee Trump's safety.
And I remember watching the livestream on Drudge that Friday night that that happened and thinking, holy cow, this is how bad the country is.
And that was well before he had the nomination locked up.
Look what happened in San Jose when that infamous video of the white guy running away and then the black immigrant chases his dad, chases him down and throws him on the ground.
It kind of Kind of basically, you know, the visual of that hilarious meme, you know, diversity is chasing the last white person down and it's happening.
And yeah, you know, it's, it's, I've only been to one Trump rally that was in an area that is, I guess you would call it a whiteopia.
I wanted to go to a Trump rally on Maybe when he has one in New Jersey or Pennsylvania, maybe he has one in Philadelphia, I'd go to that because that would be a hostile area.
It is frightening because I think the media is realizing that Donald Trump...
I want to go back to that Pat Buchanan quote because I just pulled it up.
Phil Griffin, he was the...
The president of MSNBC. I don't know if he still is.
But here's exactly what he said, Jared.
He said, and I quote, the ideas he put forth aren't really appropriate for national dialogue, much less the dialogue in NBC, end quote.
And I'm referring to Pat Buchanan's ideas, you know, from his book, Suicide of a Superpower, Will America Survive to 2025?
And you know what's funny, Jared, is no one's really looking at that title.
Survive to 2025.
Well, Pat, why would you say that?
You know, you wrote the book and...
In 2012, that's only 13 years later.
Now, I'm not saying that Pat has the power of prophecy, but, you know, that's pretty shocking that we're here at a point now when Donald Trump has come along and kicked the door down to force this conversation that even he, I don't think, wants to have.
But the media is realizing that he is one person who...
You know, by choice of his words when he talked about rapists from Mexico or when he talked about a moratorium on Muslim immigration, he was one person, Jared, who stood up.
And you know what? Look how many other people stood up.
And said, I support that, Donald.
I support that. And I think the media began to realize, holy cow, if these Americans, if actual Americans that we're trying to dispossess ever figure out how many people would stand together, their way of life is over.
This managerial elite that's trying to bring about globalism, like we just saw with the European Union president who said, you know, borders are the most evil thing that's ever been invented, the worst invention.
You know what? If they knew how many people were willing to stand, it just took Donald to say these things.
And you know, it's like you said, he's never said anything implicitly.
Explicitly, yeah. Explicitly.
I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I was reading something.
He's never said anything explicitly.
But you know what? For some reason he is.
He's scratching a muscle.
That hasn't been exercised in a long, long time for most people.
And you know what? There's been a little atrophy, but you'd be surprised how quickly that begins to swell.
Oh, for years it's been my belief that natural, healthy, racial feelings of solidarity would spring back to life among whites practically overnight if we ended this non-stop media campaign trying to suppress it.
And to me, one of the most fascinating things about the current media campaign trying to suppress Donald Trump is the way they are couching it.
For example, another New Yorker writer, his name is George Saunders.
He hates Donald Trump.
He went to Donald Trump rallies and he did not refute any of the things that Donald Trump said or the people at the rally said.
He just sort of peed on them from a great, great height.
You know, the sort of disdain that they have for these redneck white people who don't live on the East Coast or the West Coast and actually think Donald Trump is a great man.
In any case, he said, and this is the way he concluded this long article of contempt for Donald Trump, he said, I've never before imagined America as fragile, as an experiment that could, within my very lifetime, fail, but I imagine it that way now.
He's saying the American experiment, now I hate the idea of my country being an experiment, but let's set that aside, it's a different subject, that the American experiment will fail if Donald Trump is elected.
My gosh!
That's another version of the he's a threat to democracy view, but in effect, it is the most profound contempt for the people of America, for the democratic process.
After all, Donald Trump, he eliminated, what, 16 other competitors to become the Republican nominee?
Isn't that the way democracy is supposed to work?
Wasn't he the people's choice?
If he is the people's choice to be president, can't we say that is democracy?
But for this guy to say, if the guy I don't want for president is elected, then the American experiment has failed.
Great Scott! These people are living in a completely different world.
I would say to him, to the extent that our country is an experiment, and since about the 1950s, I would say it has embarked on this horrible egalitarian experiment, from that point of view, the experiment has already clearly failed.
And Donald Trump is one of the rare guys who could salvage it right at the cliff's edge.
But to say that if people vote the way I don't want them to, America has failed.
Wow! This is a profound commentary on just how blinkered their view is.
But I think it's very widespread.
No, that epitomizes that elite view.
You know, again, with that gentleman who wrote that, if he were to have been in that car of the person who did the filming of going through 83% Black Detroit and showed Detroit at night that Matt Drudge leaked to, And it caused a lot of people to talk about, wow, is this America? To me, that is the epitome of what you talked about, that 1950s American experiment.
Back in 1950, Detroit was 85% white.
It was a fine city.
It was thriving.
It was the Paris of the West.
And the experiment has brought it down to a point where whites have vacated the city.
They've given up all positions of power within the city.
Yeah, you've got a white mayor, but you've got a completely black bureaucracy.
The point being is the simply I mean there's your there's the version of the American experiment that failed and it's the it's the attempt to force at the point of bayonet integration and you know that that that author would of course be horrified if you dared say well there's your American experiment that failed friend and of course by the same way he would never be caught dead in Detroit he'd have He'd send out an intern to go cover Detroit and blame white people for the failure.
That's exactly right.
The hypocrisy of this is just so incredible.
I'm reminded virtually every day of Joe Sobrun's brilliant observation that in their mating and migratory habits, liberals are indistinguishable from members of the Ku Klux Klan.
Yes. Look at where they live.
Look at who they mate with.
Look at who goes to their dinner parties.
This is just utterly contemptible.
Well, of course, the one thing that's wrong with that quote from Joe Sober is that virtually every member of the so-called organization you just referred to is, of course, on the payroll of the federal government.
So, you know.
Yes, I'm afraid there's a lot of that too.
But anyway, well, I really appreciate your coming on today to talk about these things.
And once again, I would like to recommend to all of our listeners, not only amran.com, of course, but stuff.com.
Black People Don't Like.
It's a brilliant blog by the brilliant and unparalleled Paul Kersey.
I think you really do bring a gimlet eye to what's going on racially and culturally in the United States in a way that very, very few other people have the capacity to do.
Jared, if I've seen farther, it's because I stand on the shoulders of giants like yourself.
And can we go in and announce what's going to be coming every week now?
Or do you want to save that for next week?
Maybe we'll save that for next week.
Excellent. We'll come up with some appropriate introduction to it.
I like it. Also, we will, and I'm sure our listeners will stay tuned to what's going to happen on Thursday.
The big Hillary speech on those demons, those old devilish, racist, Nazi fascists on the alt-right.
And we'll see just how far she goes and what happens as a consequence.
But in any case, thanks so much for being on.
Always a pleasure to have you.
The pleasure is all mine.
And remember, Jared, you're part of that...
▲
Export Selection