Josh Waitzkin, chess prodigy turned martial arts and ocean sports master, explores how elite performers—from Marcelo Garcia’s lightning-fast jiu-jitsu transitions to Eddie Bravo’s rubber guard—exploit shared principles like energy flow and spatial awareness, transcending rigid disciplines. His near-death experience in Wim Hof training and AI’s AlphaZero dominance reveal existential risks of stagnation and manipulation, urging a "beginner’s mind" to adapt. Coaching the Boston Celtics’ Joe Mazzullo and his own students, he emphasizes fluid, individualized methods over static biases, linking personal growth to arts like foiling, where extreme sensitivity mirrors life’s evolving dangers. Grounded intuition, not social media, becomes the antidote to AI-driven chaos. [Automatically generated summary]
You know, I get excited when interesting people do jujitsu because I think to the outsider, to a lot of people that are, you know, they haven't been exposed to what it's like to train and what it's like to be around high-level jujitsu people,
they don't know that vibe.
They don't know what it's like.
They don't know the beauty of jujitsu.
I feel like...
Jiu-jitsu is beautiful for people who practice it.
You see Marcel is a great example, your coach.
You know, Marcelo is probably one of the most beautiful guys to watch.
Because he just takes advantage of these scrambles in this, like, really beautiful way.
Like, fast and slippery.
And when the opponents react, he reacts in the other way.
It's all just technique and flow.
It's like, ah!
Like, the first time I ever saw him, I saw him live in 2003 in Abu Dhabi.
So I was doing Chinese martial arts for a bunch of years before that, competing everywhere.
Then I started cross-training with John in, I think, 2001, 2002.
And then early 2005, moved back to New York.
Started training with Marco Santos in his school in New York, and I was training with Jucao, and Alcine Brites.
Jucao is an amazing old school, Bracey Baja, like, you know, amazing fighter.
And I was also cross-training with Lucas Lepre at the time.
And I was just ready to...
And then I met Marcelo, and he had moved from New York to Florida, and I was traveling to Florida to train with Marcelo a bunch, and I wanted to be pushed all in.
And Marcel and I had gotten really close, and then I just said to him, hey, man, you want to come back to New York and open a school together?
And he really loved New York, and we'd gotten very close at this point.
Well, you're maximizing time spent in the in-between.
I mean, I think in the martial arts, people are so focused on position when they're learning position, position, position, but the in-between is where the real virtuosity happens, don't you?
So in stand-up fighting, that would be like footwork and angles.
It would be similar to that because the most important thing about – Any kind of combat sport in terms of striking sports is to be in a better position, to land a shot.
And be in a better position to defend.
So if you're fighting southpaw to orthodox, you always want to make sure that if you're southpaw, your foot is on the outside of your opponent's leg.
That way your opponent has to kind of cross over, try to hit you, but you're in a position to hit them on the blind side.
And the best ever at that is Vasily Lomachenko.
Because Lomachenko, when he was young, his father made him stop boxing for two years and just study Ukrainian dance.
It's all about movement and position with this guy.
It's all about when you punch, he's going to make you react this way, and then he's going to go that way, and then he's going to spin sideways and he'll be behind you.
So this is Lomachenko.
The way he moves is so different.
It's almost like...
It's almost like he's got just a radar for where their punches are coming from and knows exactly where to put his feet at all times.
No matter what they do, he knows what they're going to do.
But when you watch his footwork, it's the most extraordinary thing because his ability to give you all sorts of different reads, like, incredible.
I mean, he won a world title.
I think it is fourth pro fight.
Unbelievable amateur record.
But it's just the movement.
He's never right in front of you.
He's always off to the side.
He's always moving around.
He jumps in and out.
And it's with perfect precision.
A lot of times when guys do a lot of footwork and movement, there's points in that.
Transition where they're off balance, where they can't really throw a punch, or their footwork is out of position, or they're leaning too far over on this side.
He's never off balance.
He's never out of position.
He's always slide to slide, pop, pop, slide to slide, pop, pop.
And you never know where the fuck he is.
He's a magician.
It's fascinating to watch him fight.
And very few people have tried to incorporate that.
Like, you see some of his movement.
It's just the way he's able to fool the best fighters in the world and just have a level of movement that they just don't really understand what to do with.
They get baffled by it.
Because everything is coming from different angles.
It's never I'm charging straight forward at you trying to destroy you.
One way I relate to the transitional training is through frames.
It's like a process of building more frames.
We have position, we have position, and for some people there'll be no space in between, but if you spend your time playing in the transitional space between, you build up frames, like an illusionist.
I remember you spoke to Darren Brown back in the day.
Like, you know, great illusionists, magicians, mind control guys, they have the ability to see in frames that we don't have the ability to see, and so it seems like magic, it seems like illusion.
It's like if you think about you're engaging with an illusionist who has done something, has spent hundreds of hours in a certain specific routine, and you're seeing it for the first time.
They just have immense knowledge where you have none.
They have more frames, and they can play in frames.
Well, that's where Eddie Bravo had a pretty significant contribution to jiu-jitsu because he was so creative in some of his attacks and some of the things that he...
Developed, particularly off his back.
The rubber guard variations, they were so systematic.
If you got good at it, it was surprising to anybody who didn't understand what you were doing because they didn't know these positions well.
There's this kid named Jeremiah Vance, who's one of Eddie's best guard players, and there's a highlight reel of his submissions off of his back, his rubber guard submissions.
And if you don't...
Have a person that you train with.
If you train at a traditional school and you don't understand these positions, you don't know how good someone can be at it, there's times where you don't think you're vulnerable where you're incredibly vulnerable.
The difference between a really good guard player in MMA, like Paul Craig, for example, he submitted some of the best two world champions off of his back in the light heavyweight division.
Jamal Hill and the current champion, Ankulayev.
Ankulayev's only defeat is to Paul Craig.
Because he's just wicked off of his back.
So everybody feels comfortable.
In MMA, there's only a couple guys like Oliveira.
You've got to really watch your P's and Q's.
There's a few guys that are just wicked off of their back.
But no one's like Paul Craig.
And so if you're just used to fighting regular guys off of their back, and you get in guard, and you get a little cocky, you extend an arm to try to land a punch, and then all of a sudden his legs are wrapped around your fucking neck.
And you're like, oh, Jesus.
How did this happen so quick?
Because he's just got that...
Technique is just so tightened up.
It just locks it up so fast.
It's fascinating to watch the difference between a really good guard player and someone who's just a regular MMA fighter who knows how to do a triangle but really doesn't have the elaborate setups.
They were all tooth and claw at each other back then.
I didn't know that...
I knew Carlson's from, I think the show was Extreme Fighting, the John Peretti show.
So John Peretti, who worked for the UFC, then branched off and had another thing called Extreme Fighting.
And that's where Conan Silvera came from and a bunch of elite UFC fighters.
Mario Sperry fought his first fights over there.
So it was like a really good competitive organization.
That was, like, right up there with the UFC back in the day.
And so I had Carlson Gracie's name was on that all the time, and they showed some training footage of them training.
So I found out about that place, and that was right when Vitor Belfort was emerging.
So Vitor was 19, so I was training at the same gym as Vitor.
It was incredible.
Just watching him train, you know, he was a freak.
Like, just an athletic freak at 19. He was so fast.
Just so fast.
And so and with his hands and everybody knew he was a black belt under Carlson Gracie So everybody expected just jujitsu and this guy comes out with little MMA gloves on and just starts tuning people up on the feet You know like whoa a black belt who can do that like where's this coming from like this is a totally new thing So that was the first fight that I attended.
It put him in the spotlight as the chess teacher in the country and the world.
So he rolled with it really well.
I was just sensitive to all of...
All these mean-spirited things that happened between us in the film that never happened in life.
And years later, those things did happen to me.
And actually, during those years, when it came out, they were happening to me then.
What was interesting is I had some really destructive coaches during that time.
And I didn't put that on Bruce.
But also what happened with the movie is that I loved chess so deeply.
It was my first form of self-expression.
And up until the film came out, it was just sort of this pre-conscious, innocent form of play, of battle, It was my jujitsu mats.
I fucking loved it.
And then the movie is what pulled me into self-consciousness for the first time.
I started thinking about, instead of losing myself in thought, I started thinking about how I looked to groupies, to cameras, to the rest.
And so I moved from self-expression to self-consciousness to being locked up.
And then, you know, and I didn't ask for it.
I didn't decide I want to have a movie.
This thing was done.
And it was ultimately...
I'm grateful for it.
From my perspective now, the existential crisis that happened was awesome for me.
It forced me to become more complicated as a human and integrate a sense of consciousness into my relationship to something.
So my perspective on it now is that it was a beautiful journey.
It made me grapple with a lot of shit.
I didn't become reliant on a flower garden in order to have a deep relationship to an art.
But at the time, I was very conflicted about it.
And then when I graduated high school, I took off and left the U.S. for a couple of years, lived in Slovenia with my girlfriend at the time to get away from the spotlight, get away from the media, get away from all the shit that was connected to the movie.
And that was when I started studying East Asian philosophy and meditating and started reading Jack Kerouac and existentialist literature and trying to figure myself out, figure the world out, figure out how I related to these things in some empty space.
What's a tremendous burden to place upon a young person to...
Take their life, which is essentially anonymous, you know, to the general public, you know, known in the chess world, obviously, but in the general public, anonymous, and then all of a sudden, a movie star.
And not a movie star in the sense that you're on the screen, but it's about you, which is probably even weirder.
So you have these false expectations or false narratives of...
How your life played out and who the people...
Everywhere you run into people, they have a version of you that they've seen that's not real.
That I could win without getting my ass kicked first.
I had to grapple with my demons.
The year from then to winning my first Nationals the next year was when I really developed a love for chess and I had to work very hard and I didn't associate winning the Nationals with talent or a smooth trip or all the bullshit that people can connect when they're...
Call the prodigy from the outside.
It's not a term I ever related to myself at all.
But, like, when these labels are put on from the outside and if you win too fast, too young, you can just develop this relationship to, this brittle relationship to success and to training and to everything, right?
You don't realize that getting your ass kicked is a huge part of the journey.
Circumstances, coaching, there's a lot of different factors.
But if you're a real prodigy, and there are people out there that are just extraordinary from the beginning, I find that if success comes too quickly, you don't develop the metal.
To really push through boundaries and reach new levels because the only way you get there is through you have to I think oftentimes training becomes It becomes regimented.
It becomes something you do.
You see incremental growth and improvement.
You get confidence.
But then when you compete, if you get your ass kicked, then you have to kind of reassess everything.
Like, okay, was I working at 10 or was I working at 8?
Was I studying tape or was I fucking off and calling girls?
You know, was I paying attention to my training routine and my recovery or was I just training and partying?
I was giving a simultaneous chess exhibition for a charity in my 20s somewhere, and this guy introduced his son, and he said his son hadn't lost a chess game in two years.
And he was so proud.
And it's just like I knew it was a...
Fucking train wreck.
I mean, the kid obviously just was only choosing people to play who he could beat.
Wouldn't compete up in tournaments.
Would only play down.
And he was the only kid who didn't want to play against me in the simul.
And so his life was protecting this perfect thing, right?
People who don't lose.
So in my chess life, the interesting thing that happened to my psychology is that I was the top-rated player for my age in the country from a young age.
But I always played up.
I always played against adults, except for nationals and worlds I played up.
And all of my rivals were targeting me because I was the top seed in youth events.
But they're coaches and they were much stronger players than me.
They were adult, international masters, grandmasters, and they could see all my weaknesses, psychological, technical, everything.
And so if I ever made a mistake, the weakness was exploited until I took it on.
And so I developed from a really young age this relationship to training, which was...
If I didn't take on my weakness, I got my ass kicked and I felt pain.
And so not taking on my weakness became outside of my conceptual scheme.
So from age eight, I just – and it can be a blind spot.
Like today in life, like a criticism of me that certain loved ones would have is that I'm just – I'm always – I love training.
I love pushing my limits as a way of life in whatever I'm doing.
If it was chess, if it was fighting, now it's foiling, surfing and then foiling in the biggest waves I can find.
But it's a big part of my foundation in that was being 8 years old and being targeted 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, my whole life.
And it wasn't until recently that I realized that it was actually outside of my conceptual scheme not to take on.
Because it was just connected to pain from such a young age as a competitor.
There's no luck in chess.
There's no fucking luck in chess.
If you're playing chess, if you have an opening repertoire that's massive and you go into a game and there's one little place that there's a weakness and you don't want your opponent to go, he always fucking finds it.
You don't know why.
You never make a move and hope he doesn't see it.
Or let's hit this trap and it's not the best move, but maybe he'll fall into it.
But if it's kind of driving you – for me, I think it's healthier for me to recognize that pattern in myself and then roll with it as opposed to just not even see like that it's – That it's there.
Like if I'm cooking a turkey, I have to cook a world-class turkey.
I have a friend, Jim Detmer, who says to me, Josh, what you have to do is cook a terrible turkey.
Just cook an average turkey.
Don't crush it.
In other words, like don't – It's an interesting thing when you become present to the fact that you have this youthful story running through everything you do.
And you can choose to live that way.
But it's good for it to be a choice as opposed to just driving you.
It's always good for it to be a choice because sometimes life will...
You know, there's a curve that you have to take and you have to put something aside for a bit or maybe forever and you have to be able to transition to something else.
And you see a lot of that with martial arts people.
You know, most of us at a certain point in time realize that injuries are not just inevitable, but at a certain point in time you go, maybe I should stop doing this.
Because training, no matter what you do, training is all about...
You using your body as a weapon and someone using their body as a weapon, whether it's martial arts like stand-up fighting or whether it's jiu-jitsu, it's the same thing.
You're trying to isolate joints, you're trying to cut off blood, and you're resisting all these things, and all the weak points get exposed.
Shoulders, knees, ankles, back, neck.
All those things get exposed.
And if you're a meathead, like I have been in the past, you train through injuries, and they get chronic, and then you get to a certain point where you're like, "What am I doing?"
And if you can't transition to something else, if you can't find something else to do with your time, then you're a cripple.
Then, you know, then you're getting your 10th surgery on your back, and you're still trying to train.
And everybody's like, look at Bob.
He's crazy.
He's got all his discs fused, but he's still training.
Like, maybe Bob shouldn't be training.
Like, maybe Bob's going to break something else now.
Like, maybe it's time to move on to something else.
And if you don't have this ability to constantly take on new projects and be excited by different things, you're going to have a shallow life.
Life has so many challenges and so many fascinating things to dive into.
For you now, it's foiling.
For a while, jiu-jitsu, chess, anything like that, you'll find something else like that.
When it comes to college basketball and March mania, one thing is for sure, nothing's for sure.
Upsets.
Buzzer beaters, Cinderella's advancing, top seeds going home early.
It's all going to happen.
Bet the unexpected every upset every day with DraftKings Sportsbook.
With live betting, exclusive content, promos, and parlays, DraftKings is the ultimate college basketball destination for March.
First time?
Here's something special just for you.
New DraftKings customers bet $5 to get $200 in bonus bets instantly.
Bet the unexpected with DraftKings Sportsbook.
Download the DraftKings Sportsbook app and use the code ROGAN.
That's code ROGAN for new customers to get $200 in bonus bets when you bet just $5.
Only on DraftKings, the crown is yours.
unidentified
Gambling problem?
Call 1-800-GAMBLER.
In New York, call 877-8-HOPE-N-Y or text HOPE-N-Y-467-369.
In Connecticut, help is available for problem gambling.
Call 888-789-7777 or visit ccpg.org.
Please play responsibly.
On behalf of Boothill Casino and Resort in Kansas, 21 and over, agent eligibility varies by jurisdiction.
Void in Ontario, new customers only.
Bonus bets expire 168 hours after issuance.
For additional terms and responsible gaming resources, see dkng.co slash audio.
Jiu-jitsu was the art I had to move on from, not on my own terms.
Because I ruptured my L405 disc, trained on it like a crazy person for a couple of years, and then the doctors looked at that and they were just like, if you keep on doing this, you're not going to be able to walk, you're not going to be able to play ball.
And I was so madly in love and all in with Marcelo and having that, like, I was at that part of the learning process, which is where I get good at the learning process, which is, like, toward the higher levels of something.
I couldn't lift up my child for the first three, four months of his life.
Then I had this strange period where I couldn't, I couldn't, standing and walking was the toughest.
But then I had this period, like if I had gone to the corner store to get milk, like three, four months later, I'd have to bike to the corner store and come back.
And I can't explain this, but I had a period where I couldn't walk, but I could ski.
Because of the angle.
So Marcel and I were going.
To the mountains out around New York, just bombing down.
I remember I was back in the early 2000s studying Eddie's game, studying the rubber guard, studying all the Twister stuff, just trying to wrap my head around it.
It's so nasty and you just, you don't know what the fuck you're doing.
How am I getting out of this?
I mean, he just hits this over and over and over on people.
And so many times when people go for an omoplata, people say, okay, worst case scenario, I might roll out of this and wind up on my back in side control.
But not with him.
This is like, you're really close to checkmate from the moment the omoplata is set up from a position where you're defending.
So you're defending correctly from the omoplata, and that winds up setting up this choke.
And when you see his style, the problem with his style...
In my opinion, it's so jiu-jitsu heavy that he's vulnerable when he's fighting world-class strikers.
Like, Ilya Taporia smashed him.
And it was a horrible, horrible knockout.
It's because Ilya's a legit Brazilian jiu-jitsu black belt, but also, like, way more technical on the feet.
And when you're fighting a guy who's just...
Any one mistake you make...
In striking, it is a concussion.
Any one mistake, boom!
A big hand's coming, a knee's coming, a kick's coming.
It's like something's coming if you make mistakes.
It's just like being a blue belt rolling with a high-level black belt.
It's the same thing.
It's like you're just way too vulnerable.
So his jiu-jitsu is off the charts, but his stand-up is not at the level of his jiu-jitsu.
And that's just a real problem today.
You can kind of be a specialist if you're a striker.
A striker, like, there's a few guys that can pull it off if they're really strong and they have good takedown defense, like Pereira is the best example, right?
Two-division world champion kickboxer comes over, dominates, becomes a two-division UFC champion as a striker because every fight starts standing up.
But if you don't know how to strike, every fight starts standing up.
So the beginning of the fight is always something you're not good at and if you're getting tagged at the very beginning of the fight and now you're in desperation mode and all this person has to do it's an enormous space they're fighting in the octagon and the cage of the octagon Actually makes it easier to get up if someone takes you down.
So there's a lot of elements that wouldn't even exist if you had a flat surface with no walls.
So it's easier to defend.
It's easier to move around because it's an enormous surface.
So you're now chasing this person and you might have already gotten a concussion.
You might have already been rocked.
So you're already like a little out of it and now you're like desperado mode.
It's just a bad place to be.
You have to have world-class striking to compete at a world-class level in MMA at this point.
And Ryan is one of those guys that's a specialist.
And, you know, he tapped a lot.
I mean, he tapped BJ Penn in like 10 seconds.
He's tapped a lot of guys.
When he gets a hold of you, you're in this complex web of transitions and techniques that if you're just a regular MMA fighter who trains jiu-jitsu three times a week, you're not going to know what he's doing.
And it was so interesting watching him and Marcelo.
Because Ryan had a huge amount of humility relative to Marcelo.
And he wanted to train with him.
And Marcelo was so curious about Ryan's game.
But Marcelo never studied anyone's game.
A core principle of Marcelo is if you study my game, you enter my game, and no one will be better at my game than me.
And so in competition, the guys would be studying tape of everybody.
He would never study one's tape, never study one's fights, but he'd watch them the fight before they went against him.
And he'd pick up on some kind of elemental read.
He's what I call a low-rep learner.
His ability to learn from a single repetition is just unbelievable.
And it was really interesting watching him and Ryan because Ryan just came and visited me in my home a month ago.
And we were talking about how formative those training experiences with Marcelo were.
And it was like one way that Ryan described it is that he had this like layers of traps seven steps in.
But Marcelo had this deep understanding upstream of that.
And it was like watching Marcelo put himself like right next to the fire.
Like, right next to Ryan's game, he wanted to learn the edges of Ryan's game but never enter it.
And his ability to play right at the threshold of all of Ryan's traps, which he could pull almost everyone else into, in just pure grappling, right?
But not just...
His ability to learn, it felt like a cat putting its paw right up against the edge of a fire and just, like, learning about what heat was and deconstructing it, but then not ever getting into the heat.
You know, and you watch Ryan roll to anyone else, he can just pull them into the fire, into the spider web.
I tended to do weightlifting that was consistent with the movement patterns of the arts that I was training in.
So I would do a lot of biking, lower body strength, and then I would do...
I think if I did it now, I would do much more weightlifting.
But when I was rolling usually twice a week, six days a week, and I would do cardio work in addition and then some resistance work, but I didn't...
I wasn't, like, I'm doing a lot of work with the Boston Celtics now, and I'm seeing how they're, for the last few years, and I see how they're a brilliant their sports science team and their physical trainers are.
And, like, I don't think that I was, when I was training jiu-jitsu, I was at the level of, for example, the Boston Celtics in the resistance training that I was doing to supplement it.
And Marcello didn't do weight training.
That was part of it.
When I was training with him, we were, like, I was just...
It just came out, first generation, and I was just like thousands of miles biking, one-wheeling all over New York.
But it was at the early one, if you push past the pushback, it had this pushback thing, which would slow you down, but you could push past it and go faster.
But if you push past the final pushback, it just bottomed out.
Wham!
And he's went 23, 24 miles.
It's a whack, right?
unidentified
Over taxi cabs, under taxi cabs, through taxi cabs, everything.
Like chess, Chinese martial arts, jiu-jitsu, surfing, foiling.
To me, the fascinating thing when you get toward the pinnacle of an art is that you start to experience, at least from my perspective, that the apexes of these arts are much closer to one another than...
lower down in the mountain of the same art.
So people who are virtuosos in various fields are often speaking a much more similar language than people who are at lower levels of the same art than their training.
And like when I think
chess, I related to chess through core principles and those principles manifest in the martial arts.
I remember I had this, when I wrote my first book, or my second book, The Art of Learning,
It was about my experience of crossing over my level from chess into the Chinese martial arts.
And I had this really interesting experience where I was giving a simultaneous chess exhibition, playing 40 games at once in a charity for Duchenne muscular dystrophy.
But at that point, I'd been training martial arts for two years.
I was in the transition away from chess during that period.
And I had this realization that I was winning these chess games, playing 40 games at once, but I was not playing chess.
I was feeling flow, riding space left behind.
I was riding the energetic wave of the game like I would if we were flowing on the mats.
But I was making chess moves.
And I realized that these arts had become fundamentally connected.
And then...
That became like an area of interest and of exploration.
I started making what I was doing unconsciously more and more conscious.
And now when I relate to chess, I don't move chess pieces anymore, but chess is manifest in everything that I do, as is jujitsu.
And as is in the ocean arts, I'm manifesting these other arts, the core principles I've experienced through them all the time.
And that's one of the things that I've been puzzled by.
For many years is why chess is so fucking hard.
Like, chess has no luck.
The best chess players in the world are so brilliant at what they do.
I listened to your episode with Magnus Carlsen.
He was great.
Yeah, it was cool.
Like, someone like Magnus, he's so fucking good at what he does.
Such a virtuoso.
But if you look at, like, the top 100 or top 1,000 chess players, they're tremendously strong.
But when they try to translate their ability to other fields, they often can't.
And it's surprising.
And I've tried to figure out why for a lot of years, because you'd think, like, if you're able to just be so excellent at something that's super hard, you could take on something that's relatively easier and become very good at it.
And I think that the reason that people often can't cross level over from one thing to the other is that they learn it in a localized language.
So you can learn chess in a way which is very specific to chess, like principles that are just chess principles.
Or you can learn chess in a language which connects to all of life.
And that won't slow down.
It might accelerate your chess learning.
And if children are taught games like chess or gymnastics or music or whatever else, so they're learning about that art very deeply.
They're touching quality.
They're pushing their limits.
They're living a life of training, as I know you value very much.
But they're doing so in a language which connects to the rest of life.
Then they're studying thematic interconnectedness while they're studying chess or jiu-jitsu or anything else.
And then they're just learning the language of excellence.
And it's interesting because if you watch chess players, chess teachers teaching students, many of them don't do this.
They teach it within like the confines of the chess board, like a prison.
And if you learn chess that way, then it's like you're living on an island and the ocean around you is like prison walls, right?
But if you study chess in a way that...
If you're learning how each chess principle connects to every other art you could ever study, then this web of interconnectedness is forming in your mind.
Then when you take on something else, you're able to cross the level over really naturally.
In many ways, that's a big part of my life's work, is the study of that interconnectedness.
Do you think that, well, it had to be a huge factor for you that you were sort of forced to re-evaluate?
The way you interface with life when you became famous because of the film at 15 so Childhood chess player become very well recognized then all sudden this movie and now you have to kind of like grapple with things and as you said these challenges make you more complex person and then your ability to sort of push Chess aside and try other things.
Do you think that's because of It has to be a factor in this desire to explore other things because you're kind of thrust into this thing where your thing is now changed.
Your thing is now not just flowing and learning and getting better and doing battle with chess.
Now it's image and groupies and this bizarre thing that you're living up to and you don't like it and you want to escape it.
And so you have to reevaluate.
Forced re-evaluation from a young age, at 15 years old, this key developmental period as a young man, sort of opens you up to the possibilities of all sorts of different ways of living life and all sorts of different things to do with life.
Yeah, a language I use for this is the passage from the pre-conscious to the post-conscious competitor or artist.
Up until 15, I would relate to myself as the pre-conscious competitor.
I loved chess.
It was free-flowing.
I loved the battle.
I loved the competition.
I loved the ass-kicking and the kicking ass.
I just loved the fucking battle of the thing.
And then I fell in love for the first time when I was 15. The movie came out after that.
And I started studying existentialist literature.
I started reflecting on the absurdity of it all.
I started to become present to the fact that these were just 64 squares and 32 pieces.
Like I was spending my life studying this fucking box, wooden box.
Like the construct, the absurdity of being stuck in that construct became clear to me.
And then I was becoming more and more self-conscious about how what I was doing was perceived by others.
And I got lost in all of that.
Some people don't run into that for a long time.
There are some chess players that just become insanely strong without ever reflecting on the absurdity of the fact that they're just playing chess.
And that's a great liberation.
The moment you become aware of the fact that you're immortal, that you can get your ass kicked, that your arm can break, that you can die, that what you're doing is absurd, you get locked up by that knowledge.
And there's so many different forms that can take.
Or the moment you, for example, Boston Celtics, you're hungering to win a world championship and then you win the NBA finals.
Suddenly everything changes.
Your relationship, your motivation changes.
All the reasons you're doing it are no longer valid in some ways because now you've accomplished the thing you always dreamed of and you have to discover.
It's true in any form of competition or art in my experience is that there comes a moment where someone's consciousness becomes more complicated and they can't just return to the innocence they had before because you can't do that.
You can't put it back in the box.
It's out.
So then you have to work through.
That journey, which is a lot of what I did from, like, my late teenage years, leaving and studying philosophy and then moving into other fields and started relating to art in a way that was integrating that self-awareness, integrating that sense of mortality.
It's like when I...
A very powerful example of this was I drowned in a pool.
I guess, like, nine, ten years ago, I was...
Doing hypoxic breath work, Wim Hof training in a pool.
My last memory is of just tingles and bliss and then waking up.
And so if I hadn't been pulled out, there would have been no flash, no seeing my life pass before my eyes, no...
Tunnel on the other side.
Nothing.
You know what's really fucking wild, though, is that many years later, I was doing this...
This guy, Brandon Powell, is a brilliant guy who's a top Wim Hof trainer and a trainer of trainers of his guys, and I was doing some retreats with teams of mine, and we were doing some Wim Hof work, and he had this methodology of kind of accelerated hypoxic work where...
That he said, I'm not sure if it's true, but he said, release DMT in your body, inhibited the DMT inhibitors in your body.
And I did these journeys with him twice, through pure breath work, no psychedelics.
And I experienced, these two times, months apart, I experienced one time, I experienced the center of my consciousness as my busted disc.
And I experienced the world through the electrical connections emerging from my L4-L5.
It's very strange.
And the other one...
Was the only memory I have of that, and I'm not sure if this is accurate or some kind of illusion, but I saw the drowning experience from above, the whole thing.
I watched the 20 minutes that I was on the bottom of the pool and then up in 25 minutes and then on the pool deck, and I saw the whole thing from above.
And most people who die from shallow water blackout are highly trained Navy SEALs because they're very good at inhibiting the urge to breathe, but you can get too good at it.
The surf community is quite scarce in some ways because you can only surf in specific kinds of waves.
And if you're trying to make one turn, you might not see that section again for two years.
You can't replicate conditions in the ocean.
Foiling you can because you can pump a foil, you can drive it down, let it float back up and drive it down.
Or you can whip yourself behind a jet ski into a certain kind of wave.
So if I want to work on a certain turn, I can get 40, 50 reps in a given day while surfing pre-wave pool.
You couldn't at all.
So most great surfers are brilliant low rep learners.
Because by necessity in the ocean, you don't get tons of reps.
So in my observation, the greatest competitive surfers in the world are excellent at learning from one or two reps like Marcelo Garcia is on the mats.
I'm not naturally a great low rep learner.
I'm a higher rep learner.
Foiling is...
One could say it's...
It's more technically complex than surfing because everything that surfing is, but also you have a foil which has lift dynamics and a tail, and you can change the foil shape, the tail shape.
If you change the angle of attack on your tail by a quarter degree, it changes the whole feel of everything.
It's super technical.
And so in many ways, one could argue that it's harder.
Not that it's harder.
Any of these arts are infinitely deep.
Because you can refine anything forever.
But it's more technical shit to deal with, but it's more trainable because you can replicate conditions like you now can in wave pools.
Wave pools for surfers now, you can hit the same section 30, 40 times.
So I do think it's incredible.
But the interesting thing is that most surfers of this generation aren't – they don't train.
In the same way that chess players do or jujitsu fighters do because it's a low rep art that you can't replicate conditions in.
So surfers aren't – most surfers aren't constructed psychologically in a way that they will take advantage of wave pools the way a jujitsu guy would.
And it's very interesting to me that – so surfers crossing over to foiling is very interesting because they – a lot of surfers – some surfers do it and they just – they're all in and they want to take it on.
A lot of the best surfers in the world are crossing over.
But it's a different lifestyle.
The ones who cross over are the ones who can embrace the high rep training life.
So my life's work is in learning, and I think a lot about unlearning because so much of what high-level learning is is being unblocked, which is...
Getting rid of the blocks, the egoic blocks, the false constructs we have, the fucking bullshit we put on everything we do, trying to control the situation, we should just embrace the lack of control.
Children don't have to unlearn that.
They haven't learned it in the first place.
So they're unblocked.
Like, my little boy Charlie learning how to surf was so beautiful to watch.
He just, like, he grew up in the ocean.
He grew up in the jungle and ocean, and he just, from a young age, was swimming and tumbling, and we made a game of tumbling.
And then when he first got on the surfboard, It was, like, it wasn't, we didn't make it technical.
It wasn't like he should, telling him what to do, it was like he could be right foot forward or left foot forward.
It wasn't, we didn't impose things on him.
He just, like, danced on the board and would find his way, and he started doing things that were very technical that he would just create.
It was pure playfulness.
Well, if you watch people come to a surf, like a surf break, who are like New Yorkers who travel down for five days, and they've got all this gear.
The gear is amazing they've got, like.
Gloves and booties and knee guards and, like, everything is covered.
White faces.
Everything is just, like, not a part of their body is designed to touch the ocean.
They're trying to keep the ocean away.
And they're, like, they want to be super controlling about everything they learn.
They're, like, everything is so regimented in their minds.
But they're trying to control their relationship with the ocean.
But the way to learn on the ocean is to not control it, to embrace it, to listen to it, to observe it, to feel it, to, like, let it envelop you.
Right?
Well, kids will just play.
They're not afraid of failing.
They'll just...
Like, the moment a kid becomes afraid of looking bad, like, you see that wash over kids when they're, like, 9, 10, 11, 12, different ages, and they become, oh, they don't want to fall.
They don't want to look bad.
And then that's when they get locked up.
The freedom of...
I mean, to me, a lot of what, like, the beacon is, as adults, is being the post-conscious...
Discovering the post-conscious freedom as a learner.
Like, how can we learn without the egoic blocks?
Right?
without having to look good.
So if you're crossing over, like if you're a world-class striker and you're getting on the jiu-jitsu mats and you're getting your ass kicked, or if you're a great jiu-jitsu fighter and you get onto an MMA gym and suddenly the guys can just beat the shit out of you, like having, or a great surfer switching over to foiling, right?
Or a great chess player moving into the martial arts.
So you're a fucking, or if you're like training in some esoteric, you know, Chinese martial art, like I was, and then you're moving into the jiu-jitsu mats and you might have some ego, but you're just tapping out to everybody all the time, right?
And like having the freedom to learn without egoic blocks is...
And I actually think that culturally, this is one of the most important things that we need to cultivate because we're living in a world now where the pace of technological disruption is accelerating so fast.
I know you've done a bunch of explorations on this with Tristan Harris and others in terms of what AI is bringing to society.
It's been a big focus of mine for many, many years.
And it's an area where I'm working.
I think that...
We are going to be living in a world where AI is better at everything than we are, right?
So if you think about it in the context of chess, I grew up in the world where chess was crossing over into the computer realm.
So computers are first – like I began playing chess in the pre-computer era, computer chess era.
Then computers entered, and I initially was very resistant and romantic to it.
And I remember at 19, I started – I was developing ChessMaster, this computer chess program, and I developed this academy of mine for the next 10 years that followed teaching the human side of chess through computers.
But when they first approached me, I didn't want to do it because I felt like it was going to disrupt.
It was going to kill the beauty of human chess, the art of chess, which is so much about imperfection.
But chess players, when I grew up, had to sit...
In the unknowing, in tolerance of cognitive dissonance, I might study a chess position and go three months without knowing what the solution is, right?
So our psychologies had to be constructed so that we could sit in cognitive and emotional dissonance for long, long periods of time, days, weeks, months, sometimes years.
Now chess players can click on a button and they've got a supercomputer right by their side.
We'll tell them the answer instantly.
It's interesting to think about how different that is psychologically and the different kinds of people that that draws in.
What happened then is that you had Deep Blue entered the game, like supercomputers, and then you had the movement of AI entering into chess.
And we had AlphaGo and then AlphaZero, which came out of DeepMind.
So Demis Hassabis was the developer of DeepMind.
He was a childhood chess friend of mine.
So Demis and I, from age 11 on, were good friends, and we had dialogue about the birth of DeepMind, which was this AI company he began.
And then he developed AlphaGo and AlphaZero.
And to give a feel for what AlphaZero did in chess...
Alpha Zero was able to, without being taught anything about humans playing chess, no education of the history of human chess playing, within three hours of experimentation was stronger than any human or computer in history.
So imagine your life's work.
I was a pretty good chess player.
Someone like Magnus Carlsen is a much, much stronger chess player.
He's a world champion.
Gary Kasparov, Anatoly Karpov, Bobby Fischer.
Think about people who are world champions.
Alpha Zero, within three hours of experimentation, without being taught anything, was stronger than them.
So the strongest AI engine in the world today is rated 3,700 ELO.
So to give a sense for what that means, when I was nine years old, my rating was like 1,900 or so.
Magnus Carlsen, the strongest human players in the world now, are rated somewhere about 2,800, 2,850-ish ELO.
The strongest AI is 3,700 ELO.
So just like the absurdity of the fact, the gap between like a strong nine-year-old and the human world champion is the same ELO gap as between the world champion and the strongest AI.
It gets so hard for us to really wrap our heads around what that means.
That means that everything, like chess players had a front row seat to that happening early.
When I listened to some of your dialogues with these guys, and I could feel you and them trying to grapple with like how to communicate what it means to To have these insanely powerful intelligences in the world.
And I think that, like, if you can imagine, like, an art like chess having millennia of development, people studying it like you train jiu-jitsu, right?
So imagine people training 10 hours a day for 30, 40 years, being the greatest human in the world at it.
And then something can come in and within three hours of experimentation be much stronger than them.
And imagine that's going to be in fucking everything.
Because we will fight tooth and nail to maintain our conceptual schemes.
That's one of our strongest drivers of all humans.
Right?
And so I think we're moving into a world now where you're going to have 37, 3800 ELO rated everything.
Kicking our ass at everything.
So we have to become like children, to go back to your question, in my opinion, and how we relate to learning.
Right?
We can't.
Decision making.
Right?
Like when we think about...
Like social media.
Imagine a 3,800 ELO rated network.
Imagine a million networked 3,800 ELO rated super intelligences utilizing everything that they can gather about you on social media to manipulate you to do whatever it wants or whoever is controlling it wants.
My feeling about it is that, I mean, there are places where it's going to be incredibly, it's going to be beautiful.
Like, just how computer chess raised the level of human chess game, chess players, right?
And now AI chess has made chess players Much, much stronger.
And part of it is because great chess players are partially great because they have had, they're excellent at knowing where not to look.
Right?
Great chess players don't actually look at more, they look at less, but they look in the most potent directions.
And what's fascinating is that AI entering the picture has forced really strong chess players to unlearn where they've been correct to learn not to look.
So in other words, areas where they were well-trained not to look because humans couldn't play those positions.
AI can now play those positions.
And actually, those are the right positions to play.
They're the objectively correct positions to play.
But now humans studying with an AI can be much better at playing those positions.
Right?
And so, like, for example, I'm working on this fascinating project called Lila Science, which is focused on combining cutting-edge science, the best scientists in the world, and cutting-edge AI to try to...
Have huge breakthroughs in material science and life sciences.
And now, that can only be done, in my opinion, with just best, best, best-in-class safety practices.
And in my view, that involves having a higher-level AI running safety than you have running the actual science.
Wild, that you don't create things that get out there that could be terribly destructive.
I think that the part of the AI race that's happening is that people are driven by ego and there's like a game theory of a race going on.
And when you have a race, everyone's just running as fast as they can, but if they slow down to think about what's safe, they might fall behind in the race.
And I believe ethically if we're in the AI scene at all...
Then we must be developing safety practices that are making it responsible.
And the consequences of losing the race are grave.
It's akin to the consequences of losing the Manhattan Project, of not coming to the bomb the first, not being the first to implement a bomb.
Which is really crazy to think.
But I think it's that on steroids.
I think it's the Manhattan Project on steroids.
Because I think it has the...
If used in the wrong way, it has the possibility of completely imprisoning society.
All you'd have to do is lock down resources, food, power, electricity, everything.
And you put society at a complete halt.
If you can figure out a way to completely disable grids...
Every car has a computer in it now.
Most cars are connected to Wi-Fi.
Most new ones have at least an option to connect it.
There's a way that someone can connect to your car.
And this is crazy.
In phones, everyone's reliant completely on your phone.
There's AI in your phone now.
Who knows what could happen if that got hijacked?
You know, there's a guy named Robert Epstein who spent a lot of time analyzing what the impact of...
Curated searches can do to presidential elections, to public opinion on things, and that when you're getting a search where you're using Google or some of these search engines, you're getting curated search results.
If you look for specific political opinions, political positions, you will get a Curated result that is oftentimes skewed in whatever ideology, towards whatever ideology the people that programmed it are,
you know, they're aligned with.
So if you Google something about Donald Trump, you will have as many negative responses they could possibly throw to the front of the line.
It will take you page after page after page to find what you're looking for, but you'll be confronted immediately with negative stuff.
Now, if you're a person that's in the middle, And maybe a person that's undecided in an electoral process, in an electoral race, you can be swayed in a significant manner.
And he estimates it's as high as 30 to 50 percent of the people that are on the fence that are sort of undecided voters can be swayed by search result engines, which is kind of crazy.
And that's just an algorithm.
That's just something that they've – this is not like a purposeful changing of narratives in order to implement whatever strategy they think would be the best for them financially.
Whether it's a central bank digital currency or a social credit score system or something where they could completely control behavior and have your behavior locked up to your bank account, locked up to your ability to make a living, your ability to travel.
That's spooky stuff because that's all AI. And if AI can be –
You know, when I hear people say things like that 80-90% positive, I feel like they're jumping to the destination without thinking about the journey to it.
Because the journey to it is going to involve...
so much disruption, so much pain, so much chaos.
And I think what you just said about grids and everything is true.
I mean, you think about about how many people had the ability to disrupt in that way 15 years ago.
A handful of countries.
Right. Right now, it's going to be hundreds of thousands or millions of individuals who just have access to super code super coders.
Right. Right.
And so how could it be 80 to 90 percent positive when
is just going to be limitless humans who have the ability to disrupt armed with
3,800 ELO rated coders that can do anything you want.
So it only takes one terribly destructive act or a handful of them to overcome all the positive.
I don't believe that that 80-90% thing is right.
I think that there are areas like science where we could easily create materials that could...
We could have a massively positive impact on the climate.
We could have life science breakthroughs that eliminate cancer, eliminate diseases, make the human lifespan hundreds of years.
I think those things could happen, which is great.
I also think that we could have been manipulated into doing increasingly destructive things.
And we could have horrific things happen like the grid.
You know, there's a guy who was very brilliant in the espionage world years ago who said to me, he said to me, you know, He's someone who would know.
And he said, you know, Josh, what you don't realize is a strong AI, and this was years ago, armed with the information that the social media companies have about you, could convince 99% of Americans to move to Alaska or Antarctica or anywhere within two weeks easily.
There's one thing I kind of disagreed with you on this talk.
You were saying that you just don't think that humans are going to do anything about it until we're forced to.
But I don't know, man.
I think that what if we just wake the fuck up and take ourselves off of this thing that can be used to steer us anywhere other humans or AI wants to steer us?
You have to change the whole way they interface with life.
And that's a big ask.
It's not as simple as, logically, social media is bad for you, I'll stay off.
The small dopamine hit that you get from opening up reels, just scrolling through and seeing people get knocked out and car accidents and big boobs, that is, for whatever reason, much more compelling than the idea of...
Possessing autonomy.
The idea of having the ability to completely remove yourself from the thing that everyone's addicted to, which is likes and engagement and outrage.
The algorithm showing you things over and over again that outrage you.
It's so compelling to people and we're so averse to being bored that at any time when nothing's going on, you pick up your phone, you start scrolling.
At any time, you just get nonsense just fed into your head at any time.
Once it's attached to quantum computing, it literally would be a god.
Yeah.
We're about to experience the most bizarre transition that I think any human civilization has ever experienced.
It's electricity times a billion.
You know, computers times a billion.
It's something completely different.
And we're going to adapt to it.
We're going to have to.
We're going to have to figure it out.
It's just what will that be like?
What will life be like when we adapt to it?
That's when things are going to get strange.
I think the 80% to 90% improvement of life experience, I think what he's talking about, quality of life experience, I think what he's talking about is...
It'll make allocation of resources much more efficient.
It'll be much easier to get water and health services to third-world countries.
It'll be much easier to keep power on in places.
It'll be much easier for people to get sanitation, medicine, things along those lines.
And then starving, poverty, nutrition, all those things could probably be worked out in a far more efficient and a far more effective way.
Then the problem is control.
That's the problem.
The problem is human beings.
Every single government, every single leadership position, everything involves control.
The CEO controls the company.
The president controls the country.
There's Congress.
There's senators.
Control, control, control.
Everything is control and then financial benefit from that control.
That's where it gets scary.
Because whoever is actually programming this thing, as we've seen with Google's AI disaster, when they programmed their AI to show you images of Nazis and it showed you multicultural, multi-ethnic, you know, multi-racial Nazis.
Like, instead of actual, like, what is it?
No, Nazis with fucking dueling scars on their face.
Hard-looking, scary German dudes.
That's Nazis.
These are not Nazis.
This is a fever dream.
This is some nuttiness that you've put your DEI nonsense into an artificial version of what the past is.
That's crazy.
You can't do that.
Because if you start doing that with everything else, then we have a distorted version of reality itself by the most potent intelligence that we currently have at our disposal.
I think that we're going to have thrillingly exciting discoveries being made.
We're going to have problems solved that we are, as humans, unable to solve.
And so there will be amazing technological innovations that are going to make things much more convenient.
I think there will be huge life science breakthroughs.
I think there will be huge material science breakthroughs.
I think there will be wild competition for who controls it and I completely agree with you about that.
And I think that as that unfolds, it's going to be really messy.
I think that there's going to be like unbelievable amounts of jobs are going to be lost and people are going to not have jobs.
So what the fuck are they going to do, right?
So this is part of what I'm describing.
People need to train at the ability to recreate themselves.
Right?
Like how some people can move from one to another and others can't.
I think we have to train at the art of rediscovery.
Right?
So I think we're going to be tested as a species in our ability to recreate our identities and to live in a state of dynamic flux, of embracing new paradigms.
Paradigms are going to be shifting all the fucking time.
The pace of change is going to be radically accelerating for the rest of our lives.
The rest of our lives.
Right?
So if that pace of change is accelerating...
Then we need to have the ability to recreate ourselves as things shift.
We all know that you can't be solving the problem that was important in a fight a minute ago.
It's a different fucking problem than we have right now.
Or in a chess game an hour ago, or ten minutes ago, or one minute ago.
As a society, we need to be solving the problems that are and that are coming, not the ones that were ten years ago that we're emotionally addicted to.
But humans don't fucking do that.
We tend to cling to our ideas.
The decisions we've made.
Then we try to justify our ideas.
We cling to our identities.
I mean, I think that this question of identity is a really important one, whether it relates to a belief system, a decision you've made.
Like this idea of humans fighting tooth and nail to maintain our conceptual schemes.
You think about someone who has what one might frame as a fear of success.
That's a term people use, fear of success.
The way I understand fear of success is that...
Why do people undermine themselves when they are close to something that they want, right, to a breakthrough that they yearn?
I think the reason is because if their conceptual scheme, if their identity is in not being the person who wins the big game, right, or who succeeds, it is more terrifying to succeed than it is to give up that old identity.
That's a core driver of human psychology.
Right?
In competition, that's a lot of what we do, right?
We plant identities in people, tells in people, little egoic addictions in people.
And then we exploit the mind being stuck there because it's not dynamic.
It can't keep on moving.
Right?
Like Robert Persig, my favorite, the most important philosopher in my life, Robert Persig wrote Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance.
So what do you think happens with all these people that lose their jobs?
Because most people believe that some form of universal basic income, people that study this, believe that some form of universal basic income...
Is inevitable and necessary.
I worry about that psychologically because I worry about people being dependent upon checks from the state and not having agency and not having a personal sense of worth.
People identify with what they do.
If someone's a great mechanic and they have a great relationship with the people that bring their cars to them and they enjoy being able to fix things and help people, they identify with this.
This is a part of who they are.
They're a person who fixes cars and works on cars.
If that's gone and now all of a sudden they just have a check, who are they?
There's going to be people that take advantage of it in a very positive way.
If there's like a real living wage that you get from the government, where you really don't have to worry about your housing anymore, you don't have to worry about your food.
I think that would be, if you were an ambitious person, that would be amazing.
So then you could dedicate yourself entirely to what you love.
Whatever that thing is, and just really dive into that and let that become your focus in life.
And we're accustomed to believing that survival itself is the primary driving force.
Food and shelter is the primary driving force for this intelligent species of human beings.
But part of me says, why?
Why is that?
Why does that have to be your driving force?
If we have unlimited resources, which assumingly will...
Assumingly we will with AI, if it's implemented correctly.
We have unlimited resources in terms of your ability to never worry about being hungry, never worry about shelter.
You would hope that what people would do then is pursue their dreams.
But some people don't have fucking dreams.
Some people, they've gone too far down this journey of life with a rigid mindset and a very limited perspective.
And now they're forced to change.
And many will change, but many will not.
And that's where it gets weird.
Because then you have a whole entire class of society, an enormous swath of human beings that are addicted to TikTok, that now get checks, have no hobbies or interests, live off garbage food, and they're lost.
And they're being told...
Probably they're being manipulated, that someone's responsible for this, that these people need to be taken down and shut down.
Well, I think that, like, in dialogue that I've had over the past 10 years or so with people who are AI optimists, there's this jump to the utopian future.
Right?
Land of abundance.
No more resource scarcity.
Everything is beautiful.
People have the ability to study art and poetry and opera.
They don't need to work anymore.
They don't need to be grinding anymore.
They can think about philosophy, etc.
That's the argument.
Let's just assume that that would be a positive end.
I'm not so sure.
I think that we have some other energies flowing through us that we won't want to express.
But let's just say that that would be great.
The problem is getting there.
So in chess, there's this interesting dynamic between strategy and tactics all the time.
We need to liberate ourselves to be strategic and to think ahead.
Think about what would be the ideal place to go, but then we also have to get the tactics right, the math right to get there.
We can't just hang our queen or hang our bishop or hang our rook on the path to our strategic dream.
We need to integrate execution with strategic dreaming.
Because often if we're thinking too much tactically, we can't see the long-term plan we want.
To utilize, right?
Like the end result we want to move toward.
And so when I think about this path of AI, I think there's going to be so much disruption along the way to that place of resource abundance and utopia.
Even if that was a positive place, I think it's going to be a really messy path to get there.
But for us to navigate the path, the question to me now is what should we be doing as individuals, as a species, in order to allow us to navigate that path?
Any kind of training, anything where you're learning something.
But again, it comes to this comfort thing.
You and I have very similar paths in life in that we've sought things that many people find uncomfortable and difficult.
And I think there's great value in uncomfortable and difficult things and in the beginner's mindset and the learner's mindset because there's just – you learn more about everything by learning about something.
And I've lived my life like that and so have you.
And there's many people out there that resonate.
these ideas and they also live their life like that and they get excited but there's many people that don't and those are the people that I really worry about.
The people that just want a good job where there's nothing wrong with that.
There's nothing wrong with wanting a good job and being able to take care of your family and having a place where you enjoy working and being able to go there every day.
And when that's taken away from people and they have to kind of restructure the entire way they interface with reality and then there's this bizarre thing
Connection with the government now where the government is now your provider.
It's not just for the people, by the people.
You know, representative of the people.
It's now your provider, which is a very strange relationship to have.
And, you know, we see it in welfare states and, you know, which I think social safety nets are very important.
I think if we're going to be a compassionate society, we need to be able to take care of people that aren't doing well because a lot of life is about fortune.
And sometimes people run into horribly unfortunate situations and there's massive potential in those people.
And those people can realize that potential if they're helped.
And I think that's real, too.
But I do think there's a certain psychological aspect to having the state take care of all your food and money and resources and housing, that all of a sudden, who are you?
And what do you do to give yourself meaning if you're not the type of person that seeks out difficult things and you're 45 or 47 years old or whatever you are, and this is happening to you?
And you feel lost.
Like, there's going to be a lot of people like that.
And throughout history, terrible times have been very cruel to people who weren't prepared.
And, you know, I worry about it almost like an intellectual famine.
You know, like a psychological famine.
That people will be deprived of the thing that they have rested their hat upon.
Their identity, who they are, what it means, their sense of purpose, that it will be pulled away from them.
That scares the shit out of me.
Especially when I know how many people get addicted to drugs and how many people get addicted to all sorts of weird lifestyle choices to provide them with some dopamine or some rush or just something that makes them feel like they're alive.
There's something so powerful about being grounded in And a path to being grounded is being immersed in an art, like for example, like jiu-jitsu or chess, where if you're on the jiu-jitsu mats and you overextend your arm and you get armbarred,
you're not going to say, that's not my fault.
That was his fault.
Then you just don't fucking get better and you get armbarred again.
You only get better by taking your shit on.
Or if you're a chess player and you make a mistake and you lose, you...
People who say that's not my fault, they're irrelevant very, very quickly.
They just get blazed by.
They're just like everyone else's race has passed and they're not in the race anymore.
And if you think about a community, for example, of fighters, let's think about jiu-jitsu as a vision.
One of the things that separates people as they get deeper into an art is whether they want to take themselves on as a way of life.
Whether they're hungry to have their weaknesses revealed, right?
You think about a school where somebody...
I always found it interesting to watch people when they're four or five rounds into sparring.
Do they look for the blue belt to rest with or do they look for the 240-pound fucking bruiser to beat the shit out of them or the high-level brown belt to exploit them or the black belt to kick their ass, right?
Who do they look for?
Who does the up-and-coming purple belt look for when the young competitor...
Is he looking for the egoic rest or the place to be exposed?
Like the people who hunger for exposure to get better, right?
It's like seeking accountability as a way of life.
I think there's something really powerful to do that with decision making, right?
Because we're making decisions and we're making decisions in a higher and higher stakes world.
And if we train at the art of decision making in something that's grounded in reality.
Like, for example, the chess rating system is just a fucking thing.
It's objective.
There's no bullshit to it.
But I hear people, like, I know people who play chess online and then they're like, yeah, this is my rating, but I'm actually much stronger than that because of this and this.
It's like, no, you're not.
You just haven't taken your shit on.
Right?
Like, you're not stronger than your rating.
Your rating is how strong you are as a chess player.
But there's something about, there's something so beautiful about an accurate feedback loop.
And that can be with a coach.
Training with you could be on the – just getting tapped out, getting your ass kicked, getting hit, losing, whatever it is.
I think that there's something so powerful about people cultivating some way of life where they're grounded in some kind of feedback loop in their training life.
That there's no bullshit involved.
They learn to accept accountability as a way of life.
They seek feedback loops.
I think that we can do this in decision-making.
My view is that we're going to be making decisions as a species in an increasingly complex world where there is a superintelligence.
So we need to track our decisions and we need to see objectively when they are good and when they're bad.
Just how you can studying tape as a basketball team or as a jiu-jitsu fighter or whatever.
We need to create game tape in our decision-making.
We have to stop deluding ourselves about the fact that we're actually better than everything shows we are.
Like if you make a decision, write down what the decision is and write down why you made the decision and then look back on it in a week or two or three and create like a spreadsheet, a log or whatever the fuck you want to use of all of your decisions and why you made them and look back on them.
And then if the reasons for making the decision no longer are valid, but you're holding to the decision, which is what everyone does, then don't do that.
Well, at my school with Marcelo, we had a huge group of fighters, jiu-jitsu fighters.
And so I've been in dialogue with people who are at the...
Like the pinnacles of different fields my whole life.
And one thing is that I love working with people who want to take themselves on.
So it begins with them being all in on the process.
I'm not great at motivating people to take their shit on.
I love to begin once we're taking our shit on.
And then it's individualized.
I get to know someone's pattern just 99% listening, observing.
A lot of what I try to do is understand the entanglement of their brilliance and their eccentricity or their genius and their dysfunction.
I think so quickly people try to come in.
If you come in with some kind of formula for how things will be done, you're going to be slicing away the brilliance of individuals, right?
Like all of our most brilliant creations are interwoven with the dysfunctional parts of our mind.
Everyone wants to normalize people.
In the realm of like trainers or coaches of different fields, I think it's mostly bullshit because it's mostly armchair professors who don't understand what it actually means to be playing on that razor's edge of peak performance where you have to make a decision which is taking a risk that's right on the edge of something catastrophic but that's the thread-the-needle solution.
And so when I start working with someone, I try to get to know them very, very deeply.
Their patterns of success, their patterns of failure, where they're...
Genius and their dysfunction are entangled.
I often go into what I call a cave process, which is trying to understand what their self-expression is, like going into the cave with them metaphorically, trying to understand what their self-expression would be liberated from reactivity and inertia.
So not reacting away from what they did before and not being subject to the inertia of what they did before, but just blue-skying what the ideal solution is.
What the most pure self-expression for them would be.
Yeah. And not their approach, the individual and the patterns of their approach.
Not that we would do things the way they did before, but I have a lot of humility.
I don't think that I know the way.
I don't think there is a way.
I think we all have our own way we need to discover.
Coaches who have been most damaging to me, for example, when I was in that same period, when I was 15, 16 years old, I had a coach –
Who was part of the Russian school of chess who essentially had me move away from my self-expression, move away from my style.
My style of chess play at that point my whole life had been creative, attacking, improvisational.
I love to create chaos and find hidden harmonies in chaos.
I love to battle.
He urged me to...
Stop playing that way.
Stop studying that style of play.
Play, like, these cold-blooded prophylactic chess players, like Petrosyan or Karpov.
I played much more in the style, not the strength, but the style of, like, Garry Kasparov or Mikhail Tal or Bobby Fischer, like players who were aggressive, who had a lot of, like, red blood flowing through their body.
Like, I was hot-blooded.
And he urged me to play in the opposite style from what was natural to me.
But there's also the movement of a young competitor away from their self-expression, a love from their love for the game, a love from their passion.
There's this brilliant man named Yuri Razovayev, who was on the other pillar of the Russian school of chess, who said this amazing thing to me.
He said to me, Josh, you can learn Karpov through Kasparov.
And I didn't understand what he meant for many, many years after that.
And it was a little too late in my chest life to take that in.
Why was it late in your career to take that in?
Well, good question.
It's just when he said it to me, like I was in my early 20s and I'd lost my love for chess.
It had gotten static, stale.
Good challenge.
It probably wasn't late, but I couldn't hear it.
I would have had to go into the cave, go away, go through an existential crisis and come back to chess, but there were a lot of things that were moving me away from chess at that point, in addition to that.
I didn't want to be trapped inside of the confines of 64 squares anymore.
I felt like a lion in a cage.
So it was like, if I had known him when I was 14, 15, it would have been a different arc for me in the chess life.
But maybe it would have been much worse for my life.
If I had known him when I was 15, I might have fucking played chess for the rest of my life, and I'm so grateful I didn't.
Isn't it interesting when life takes you on these, or you go on your own journey, and you realize that decisions that you've made that have turned you in one way, like, those are critical decisions if you think of the life that you're living now,
is this optimal?
If this is optimal, then yes, it's good that you moved away from chess.
But if you had gotten that coaching when you were younger and it reignited your love of chess, then it would be good for the life that you currently have.
Because you would say, well, as a person who's just so in love with chess, I'm so grateful that I ran into this person when I was 11 years old and they sent me in this correct path.
In many ways by this alienating experience that I just described and then also the dynamics of the movie and everything.
But I played chess for eight years after the movie.
So my results were very good.
But I was moving into this internal – I was in an existential crisis.
But every catastrophic injury or heartbreaking loss or losing a world championship when you're a millimeter from winning the finals, all of those losses that were so – Heartbreaking to me.
Every big loss, I'm grateful for now.
And led to the biggest wins and led to the biggest insights and transitions.
And my life today, like the crises that I had in many ways have armed me to help people express themselves in their arts, right?
And a lot of the reads that I made as a competitor, to go back to your question, like I invert now.
So the way I would read chess players, find where their minds were stuck, find where their bias patterns were, find where their energy was stuck, find where they were static.
Now, then I would exploit them.
Same thing you do in the fight game.
You find where someone's pattern is static and exploit it.
Then what I do in training people is I have a very good nose for those because I spent my life as a competitor sniffing them out, feeling my way to them, but then I work on liberating them, releasing the obstruction.
So a lot of what I do today...
In my work with brilliant performers is work on unleashing what I used to exploit.
Like, I don't go in thinking, like, this is the way you fucking should do it.
I don't believe that I know what they should do.
And I believe that any coach who thinks that they know what someone else should do without listening to the self-expression of that person very, very deeply is just wrong and they should not be, they reject that coach.
But the amazing thing is you find the hitch, but then you see, oh, that hitch is interwoven with your biggest...
I sent you that thing I wrote about Marcelo, right?
And there was this incredible moment that I had with Marcelo.
Such an emotional moment.
I describe him as this great lower-up learner.
And he's someone...
Who uniquely in my life, I've never seen anyone better at learning from one experience, big or large, right?
And then there was this moment, we were sitting, I guess it was six years ago, we were sitting just talking about life and our journey and everything, and he started weeping.
And he said to me, you know, Josh, I never forget my pain.
And he said, you know, Marcelo had a real tragedy.
He lost a baby.
Marcelo and Tachi, his wife, they lost, they had twins, and they lost their baby Joey.
Olivia and Joey were born premature, and Joey died.
It was a terrible tragedy.
It was just devastating for, I mean, just beyond belief, devastating.
And like the loss of his son, the loss of his mother, the loss of his father.
Every moment someone looked at him a certain way.
Every moment somebody, like, raised their voice at him and it triggered him into, like, a fight place.
Every time he'd been submitted.
Every time he'd been swept.
I realize as he was saying this, like, all of his pain is with him every moment.
And as he described this to me, it was this incredibly emotional scene where he was just weeping in his exploration, in his, like, just brother to brother talking to me about, like, he walks around with...
Every wound he's experienced in life, present, all the fucking time.
And so we think of this brilliant low-rep learner, the guy who has a superhuman ability to learn from one experience.
And it's a superpower, but also it ravages him all the fucking time.
I'll never forget this chess coach, Mark Deveretsky, he said to me this unbelievably hubristic thing when I was 15, 16 years old.
He said to me, if he had had Bobby Fischer as a student, as a seven-year-old, he could have made Fischer a much, much stronger chess player without any of the craziness.
Well, there's also a problem in when someone becomes very good at doing something and they have a very specific way, they've become very good at doing something.
They assume that this is the way and that this is the way for everyone and that they can impose their way on other people.
And what led them to become great in the first place is also that hubris that makes them think they could take Bobby Fischer and make him even better.
Because most teachers teach the way they learned, which will alienate 70 or 80% of their students by definition.
Great coaches for a large group need to be able to teach different ways for different kinds of learners, different modalities of learners.
Are they visual?
Are they somatic?
Are they auditory?
What makes them tick?
And you have to know, if you're teaching a chess class, I started teaching a group of kids chess when I was in my...
I taught them from kindergarten through fifth grade, and we ended up winning in New York.
It was a beautiful journey with kids at PS116.
And from moving the pieces to winning city, state, and national championships.
And it was so interesting, because I'd be like, teaching eight, ten kids at once, and I would be teaching...
It was like giving a simultaneous exhibition.
Each one had their own language.
And I was so involved with this theme that it was exhausting.
Because I was teaching 10 chess lessons at the same time to 10 kids.
And I remember I had this moment, this heartbreaking moment, where I had this one student named Ivan, who I...
Just charismatic, intense.
We had a very close relationship.
I loved the kid.
And at the national championship, I was giving him this pep talk.
And I was just, like, firing him up and speaking to him in the way he needed to be spoken to.
And then he was, like, he ran off, like, stoked, fired up to go kick some ass.
And then this other kid who was on the team, this beautiful, sensitive boy, came over, and I looked at him with the same energy that I'd just been speaking to Ivan, and I brought it to him.
And I was, like, 15 seconds into speaking to him, and I looked at his eyes, and I realized, like, this was a disaster.
That's what's fascinating about you is that you've gone from being this hyper-competitor to teaching people or coaching people to find the very best version of themselves and how to acquire that.
That's very rare that someone who gets really good at something...
Also becomes really good at showing people how they can get better at things.
Well, I took on this interesting challenge when I broke my back.
Because I was already doing this, but I was training people.
But when I broke my back, I remember I said, okay, during this healing process, after the year and a half to two years of denial and training through it, when I stopped, I tried to take on training people with the same passion and love that I had for training myself.
I wanted to see if I could love it as much.
And I never got there.
And then I got into the, you know, that's part of what moved me into discovering the ocean arts and being all in on training.
So a big part of my relationship with training other people is training myself as a way of life.
Like I'm always, like I'm living at my limit in the arena myself.
The moment I think a coach like leaves the arena where they're putting their own ego on the line all the time or their life on the line or whatever the fuck they're putting on the line, then they become static and they start to think they know the answer.
It's like the fat, you know, martial arts instructor who's...
Many years past training and is smoking a cigarette on the sideline telling people what to do and no longer is like actually dynamic.
The moment our egos get protected, right?
So my relationship to training is something that I live all the time.
I think also becoming a dad was a big part of it.
Like the nurturing.
And a lot of what I've done is invert what I used to do to break people.
Now I invert to heal them or unleash them.
Being a father is about the most humbling thing I've ever...
I thought I had ideas about education until I became a dad and then I realized I didn't know anything and I had to start over.
Yeah, and also the wound pattern.
I think understanding people's wound patterns is very important.
A lot of my wound pattern is in loving something very, very deeply, being alienated from it, and then finding...
A post-conscious relationship to it and a self-expression within it.
And I think that helping people with that journey is really important.
And also, I love engaging with all-un-motherfuckers.
I just love, like, whether, you know, my current projects are, like, cutting-edge science and AI.
Just brilliant scientists.
It's incredibly interesting.
And, like, being deeply involved with the Boston Celtics, like, just...
The very top of the NBA world and my relationship with Joe Mazzullo, the head coach, and kind of coaching the coach is a modality that I've been playing in for a long time.
Helping the leader of an organization express themselves as the coach of their people is a big part of what I do and a couple other interesting investing and tech projects.
It allows me to play in fascinating realms and then studying the interconnectedness.
I mean, a big part of my passion is thematic interconnectedness.
Like, how is what's happening with the Boston Celtics the same as what's happening in this cutting-edge science program?
The same as what's happening in this wildly interesting tech investing program, right?
And how do those principles, those interconnecting fibers, relate to culture more broadly and relate to me and what I'm doing every day on the water, boiling?
You know, one of my favorite cadences of Musashi is in so many chapters of Book of Five Rings, how he comes back and says, Like, essentially, these words are empty.
You can have no bullshit in your mind, so you must be balanced.
And his approach was, you must be an artist, you must be a poet, you must be a warrior, you must be in tune with all of your feelings and all of your senses and everything about you and to do everything correctly.
But there's something so beautiful about the truth-telling nature of living.
You know when you're in a jiu-jitsu team and you watch someone who doesn't think they're competing for a while, but then suddenly they're competing next week?
How the repertoire compresses.
Like all the fat.
Just flies off.
Right?
There's something so beautiful about that process and the cadence.
And like, if we live putting ourselves in the flame, then we're not going to be bullshitting ourselves all the time because there's this truth-telling modality.
So the question is, how can we, as many of us as possible, live in some form that's true to us where there's this grounded, truth-telling, accurate feedback loop in what we're doing?
Yeah, it's so hard for people to recognize when that's happening as well.
Because, you know, once people get success, then the fear of losing that success overwhelms them.
And then sometimes it's easier to control a person who's been successful because they don't want to let this go.
They don't want to go back.
They want to move forward.
So what do I have to do to make sure that I'm...
I mean, you see this in Hollywood.
It's a big thing in Hollywood.
People panic when they start doing well, and then they align themselves with other people doing well, and then it kind of changes the way they think and the way they behave because everything is dependent upon you being chosen for things.
So your whole life is like wondering what your social status is and how you advance that and, hey, what do I have to say?
What should I tweet today to make sure everybody knows I'm on the right side?
If you're a football team and you have a 14-point lead in the fourth quarter or an 8-point lead in the fourth quarter, and you stop Doing the dominant things that got you the lead, but you start protecting the lead.
So your defensive back, sit back.
You start allowing 8 or 10 or 12-yard completions.
It is now you're protecting the lead versus dominating the opponent.
But then you let the opponent feel their strength, feel their greatness.
They're not dominating anymore.
A moment a fighter stops feeling dominated and starts to tap into their greatness, then your fucking opponent's a beast again.
So many people I've observed who are great surfers, they want to learn to foil because foiling opens up so much.
You can foil all the time in different conditions and sloppy conditions and ocean, big wave, small wave.
It's so abundant.
And they can see how epic it is.
But then they try once.
And they get their ass kicked.
It doesn't matter how good a surfer you are.
I'm not talking about e-foil.
I'm talking about wave-foiling and high-performance gear.
You're going to have two, three months of ass-kicking as part of it.
It doesn't matter how good you are as a surfer.
But now you have to look like a beginner again.
You have to go from being the coolest guy in the lineup, if you're socialized, to being the quote-unquote kook, being the guy who's just getting his ass kicked, who's falling all the time.
And they don't want to do that.
So their ego of the excellent surfer prevents them from learning this art they want to learn because they're unwilling to look bad for a while in front of the people who they're used to looking good with.
So the foilers are people who – it's a very interesting microculture inside of surfing is that foilers have been people who learned how to foil because they were willing to get their ass kicked and look bad.
That's one of my favorite things to watch is people that are just absolutely engrossed in what they're doing and are fascinated by it and in love with it and on the journey.
It's very addictive.
It's very inspirational.
It gives you something.
It's like there's something out of watching people and learning from people that are really, really passionate about something that's so contagious.
Maybe it's because I'm at this moment of life where I'm at and I'm integrating everything I've learned from different arts and bringing it into this one and this one's manifesting all of it.
But in terms of the day-to-day experience of it, oh yeah, man, I'm a lunatic.
I was surfing and it was like 5 a.m. and I was flying back to New York that day.
So I went out for like a just...
Pre-sunrise, right at sunrise surf, and I was on this glassy, like, head-high wave, and this gnarled log came up in front of me, this piece of fucking wood.
And I saw it, and I hit it and jumped off.
It just emerged right in front of me.
I didn't know how I didn't see it.
I thought it was a big tree.
And when I hit the water, my brain was still thinking log, but it was so interesting.
My skin lit up, goosebumps, and I just realized, like, red alert, like, prehistoric danger.
Jumped back on my board, and this 10, 11-foot croc came swimming just a few feet away from me.
It was so interesting.
I spent my life...
Since I was six years old, I've been freediving, spearfishing with a Hawaiian sling, bow and arrow underwater, deep-water diving.
I spent tens of thousands of sharks, but this was so different.
Sharks, I mean, there's a lot of people that believe that sharks are attacking people because the people are where the sharks are and they don't want the people there.
I think they are the waste management of the ocean and of the ground.
I mean, they are there to make sure that anything that slips, anything that gets too close, anything that fucks up and doesn't pay attention to the ripples in the water, that's a meal.
They clean up.
They're the cleaning crew.
They make sure that there's no weakness in the system.
And they devour.
And they live forever.
That's the crazy thing.
It's like the ones that they spotted in the early journeys when they were talking about, like there's talks of 40 foot plus crocodiles, probably were real.
Because crocodiles don't die of old age.
They don't have like a 20 year lifespan.
They just keep growing.
And if a crocodile lived before people had guns and, you know, they weren't on the menu, and you've got to imagine, they could live hundreds of years, hundreds of years eating deer and wildebeest and anything that fucked up, antelopes, anything that fucked up,
anything they can get a hold of, and they just keep growing.
They could be enormous, enormous, enormous super predator dinosaurs that live amongst people.
I have a friend of mine who's a professional hunter, Jim Shockey.
And he was flown to Africa because this particular village was being targeted by crocodiles.
So they hired hunters to hunt these crocodiles.
And while he was there, he said everyone you would meet had a chunk taken out of them.
People were missing hands.
Some people were missing feet.
And while he was there, one of the women in the village got taken.
And they would set up these posts in the water so that the crocodiles couldn't get through to this one area where they would gather water and wash clothes and do things.
The crocodiles had figured this out.
So they went onto the shore and then they would go into the water where the posts are and wait for them.
I want to make one other point, which is that I think that when we talk about training as decision makers, It doesn't matter how good you are at something.
It matters that you're on the road.
You're on the journey.
So let's just say people started to play chess.
It doesn't matter how strong a chess player you are or if you're good or if you suck.
It doesn't matter.
It's a journey, right?
If you're putting yourself in any arena that's objective and you're trying your hardest and you have a feedback loop, like the mats, like the jiu-jitsu mats, whatever they are for you, and you Look at the quality of your decisions and you jot down why and you are willing to change your mind and you take on that training as a way of life.
Then you're on the road to being grounded in a way that we're not today.
And I think that being grounded in reality, in something, like feeling the earth beneath our feet, in our process.
Is a big part of how we're going to be able to navigate a world where everything is being deconstructed all the time by a superior intelligence.
Because we're going to need to recreate ourselves.
But we have to have...
You know how when you're deep into an art...
Think about you with your knowledge of MMA.
You have this intuition about where the truth is.
You have a sense for where it is.
We need to cultivate that sense in an increasingly chaotic world.
And I do feel that being involved in some kind of truth-telling arena...
Whatever it is, is a hugely important practice.
And then taking on the art of training as a way of life is...
I feel like it's one of our...
And that combined with getting the fuck off social media.