Noland Arbaugh, a quadriplegic Neuralink participant, details his 64-thread brain implant—designed for imagined movements—after a swimming accident dislocated his C4/C5 vertebrae. Early trials revealed unexpected brain pulses (3mm/beat) and software fixes for signal loss, with potential future applications like thought-based typing or spinal cord bypasses via animal-tested pathways. While Rogan speculates BCIs could eliminate lying or expose political corruption within decades, Arbaugh focuses on immediate benefits: restoring mobility for others despite his own atrophy risks. His year-long study, one of three early human trials, hints at rapid progress but faces FDA hurdles; future versions may integrate with phones or robots. Arbaugh’s shift from self-pity to advocacy—via platforms like Modded Quad—underscores how tech could redefine disability, though ethical misuse looms as an inevitable challenge. [Automatically generated summary]
They'd probably just do movies with AI and probably really quickly.
You could probably take a really great novel like The Great Gatsby, run it through an AI video creator, and it would just make you the most amazing version of The Great Gatsby.
But if we're talking about historical moments in human beings and in technology, the implementation of Neuralink on the first human patient, that's you.
Yeah, I mean, I keep thinking about it like, you know, BCI have been around for a while.
What is BCI? Brain-Computer Interface.
So, like, just implants that they've done in people, different ways that they've given people the ability to control electronic devices.
They've been able to control computers and stuff.
There are a couple things out there.
The Utah Ray Synchron came out with something where basically they go through the artery in the neck and they kind of thread something up into the brain.
It expands in a vein up there, in an artery up there, and then they can control the brain through that.
So BCIs have been around for a while, a few decades at least, I think since like the 90s.
So I always say that we're standing on the shoulders of giants sort of thing, but I know Neuralink just has, it's in a league of its own, and I know that, you know, with Elon's name attached to it, it's going to blow up way more.
But I think this is the beginning.
I think everyone else that, you know, comes after this basically is going to be pulled up by the progress Neuralink's making.
And the fact that they are trying to open source basically all of it, I think the whole field is just going to grow exponentially at this point.
MRI scans reveal what we see in dreams Japanese researchers unveiled dreams visuals with 60% accuracy using innovative MRI scans at pivotal Kyoto studies showcasing a breakthrough in sleep science Wow Wild stuff.
I think if the simulation is real, it seems ridiculous now.
Less so than it seemed five years ago, but I think five years from now it'll seem likely.
I think it's all interconnected in some very bizarre way.
I think we're slowly building toward that connection with all of this technology and all of these new innovations and all of a greater understanding of quantum physics and space and all these.
As they build on all this stuff, I think it's going to become more and more likely that this whole thing is somehow or another real, but not real at the same time.
That's one of the things I'm really excited about with Neuralink is how much we're going to learn just about the brain from this.
Like the amount of data that they're collecting.
I mean, little things like the fact that all the stuff with the thread pullout going on with my brain, one of the reasons that they think it happened is because...
Well, I don't know.
Have you heard about the thread pullout and stuff?
So basically, there are 64 threads implanted in my brain with 16 electrodes on them each.
And over the...
Course of a month, we saw a lot of the threads start retracting from my brain.
So the threads that the robot implanted were retracted.
And so we were getting less signals from a lot of them.
And they can't see that on brain scans or anything.
So the threads are so small, not even the size of a human hair, that in order to get a scan of them, you'd have to use such a big machine that it would probably just fry my brain.
So they can't just go in and look at them.
So a lot of the data that we have that shows that they were moving or coming out of the brain was literally just whether or not the electrodes on the threads were sending signals anymore if they were picking up neuron spikes.
So a lot of the threads were getting pulled out and that led to, you know, some decline performance for a while.
They kind of fixed that in a way.
But some of the reason that that happened, at least we think, is because the brain moves more than they thought it would, which is something that was so bizarre to me when I first heard that.
I was like, you guys don't know how much the brain moves?
This feels like that should have been something that was solved ages ago.
I mean, I get like, what happens with me is if my heart rate's higher, I'll get like headaches and stuff.
So, like, I have a lot of weird things with my body, with being a quadriplegic, where, like, I can tell, like, if I have really high blood pressure, my head just gets, like, really, really...
Like, I get really bad headaches and stuff.
But, yeah, so...
My brain moves more than we thought it did, which blew my mind.
Once we get more people in the study, then we'll really know if for some reason my brain just moves a lot more than it should.
I imagine that we'll see something around the same and then we will be able to determine like a range like you're talking about.
If it's, you know, a range of one millimeter to say five millimeters or if it's pretty consistent around three millimeters, I'm not sure.
Implant has a Bluetooth connection to the computer.
And then through that, Neuralink has created an app that they have uploaded to the computer.
And through that app, I can interface with the computer.
What it does is all of the electrodes on the threads are sending neuron spikes, neuron signals.
Through my, so it's all implanted in my motor cortex, through my intentions.
So say if I want to try to, you know, move my hand left, right, up, down, I can't really move it.
I have like a little bit of movement in my hand, but I can't really move it.
But the neurons are still firing.
That intention is still there.
So like those signals are being sent.
There's just a cutoff in my spinal cord.
So obviously it's not getting down.
But it's still going on in my brain.
And those electrodes are picking up those signals.
And there's an algorithm, like machine learning, going on in the background that is taking those intentions.
And over time, it is learning what I'm trying to do.
And that translates to cursor control.
Oh, shit.
Yeah.
So if I want to try to move the cursor to the left, I move my hand to the left.
But that's not necessarily what I would need to do.
If I wanted to move the cursor to the left, I could kick my foot or I could do any sort of like motor action to train it to learn that's what I want it to do to go left.
So there will be like a visual on the screen that says like move your hand to the left and then they will train that left movement to left on the cursor control.
But that visual could be anything.
It could be like do a little jig and that'll move it to the left.
Like anything that it can do, anything you can do, I mean it can learn and you can map that to anything.
We're working on what works well at this point, so a lot of it is my right hand stuff.
We have mapped a lot of things to individual fingers, hand movements in general, but we've done left hand stuff, we've done foot kick stuff, and it doesn't look like the signals are as good, but that also might be just due to the fact that some of the threads are pulled out.
So when they fix that issue with the next people, then those things would be much, much better.
And if that's the case, then you could theoretically do multiple things at once.
It's not just, you know, you map, say, my right hand to the cursor control, then you map my fingers and my other hand and my toes to, like, key control.
So I could be moving the cursor and typing at the same time with my toes or something.
So you're thinking in your mind or you're trying to get your hands to make the signs of sign language and then the computer interprets that as the language and types it out.
So you were saying that you're one of the first people to do this and there's going to be more people in the trial and that maybe they'll learn, like, the things that are going wrong with yours.
It was something that, you know, when the thread retraction had happened, I was obviously pretty broken up about it.
I thought that...
So, like, when they told me, I didn't have very good control of the cursor anymore.
It was really hard for me to get the cursor to go where I wanted it to go.
I thought my time in the trial was coming to an end.
And that's really hard.
It's something hard to come to terms with.
Because they had just shown me this whole new world.
Like, all these new capabilities that I had.
And they had introduced so many things.
Like, before that point, I had played video games for, you know, 10 hours without needing any sort of help.
And it was hard to...
You know, internalize that it could all be coming to an end.
I know that it will at some point because I'll be out of the study and I won't be able to use it anymore.
So my first thought was, can you guys go in and fix it?
Like go in, take it out, put in a new one.
And they basically said, we're not at that point yet.
We're going to see if we can fix it.
We're going to see if we can do things on the software side to fix it, which they ended up doing.
It works better than it did before now.
Even with fewer threads.
So I'm glad we didn't because they learned a lot.
If we would have just gone in and taken it out and put in a new one, they wouldn't have learned anything that they had learned over the last three months.
They could go in and do it.
They're not going to.
I don't think that they need to.
But at some point, I know that the whole point of Neuralink is to be upgradable.
So at some point, they're going to go in, hopefully, and take it out and give me a better one.
You can do things in other countries that you're not allowed to do in America because of regulations.
But what they're able to do down there is they're going right into discs and they're alleviating people's disc problems where they're actually making the discs grow larger and heal people with back injuries.
And I know I've read things about spinal cord injuries and improvements, but I would love to connect you with them.
And they, you know, they're the experts on this.
They'd be able to tell you, like, what the state of the art in terms of, like, the research shows that stem cells can and can't do.
Basically, they do something similar to what a lot of the stem cell research is.
A lot of the stem cell stuff is implant stem cells above and below the level of injury, and those stem cells will migrate basically and create a bridge.
Some of them have even talked about injecting right into the level of injury.
So, with the Neuralink, the plan is to implant one in the brain, and then implant one below the level of injury, and then the Neuralinks will just talk right to each other.
All the brain signals that it's picking up in the brain, wherever it's implanted, motor cortex, in this point, in this scenario, would go straight to the other one, and it would send it right through your body like it should.
They have one in a pig, you can watch the video of it, where basically they have an implant in the pig's brain and an implant in the pig's spinal cord, I think in the thoracic section of the spinal cord.
And they have been moving the pig's, like, legs on its own.
The pig's not paralyzed or anything, but basically they, like, tell the pig, come to this section of, you know, they, like, grid off the floor, and they put food in a section of the grid, and they're like, if you're okay with us testing on you, pig, come over here, basically.
And the pig will go in there, and then they will take control of the pig's leg, and they will, like, start playing around with it, like, making the pig.
Yeah, so this right here.
So all those movements right there, the pig's leg are them.
That is the ultimate fear of human beings becoming cyborgs, is that we're going to be subject to all the problems that our computers and our phones have with malware and spyware.
I mean, people ask me all the time if this thing can be hacked, and short answer is yes.
But at this point, at least, hacking this wouldn't really do much.
You might be able to see some of the brain signals, you might be able to see some of the data that Neuralink's collecting, and then you might be able to control my cursor on my screen and make me look at weird stuff, but that's about it.
I guess you could go in and, like, look through my, like, messages, emails, something like that.
But I'd also have to be, like, connected already.
So if I'm not connected to my computer or anything, you can't get in there on your own.
So it would have to be a time when I am on it and you are able to hack it.
You know, along that line, it's something I've thought a lot about with, like, doing interviews and stuff is, like, some of the people that I've done interviews with, I'm like, are they going to try to attack me to get to, like, Elon Musk or something?
Are they going to say things about me or, like, you know, try to do, like, a getcha on me, gotcha sort of thing?
And everyone that I've talked to about that, they're just like, they would have to be the scum of the earth to try to do that to you.
Well, see, here's the thing about interviewing that a lot of people don't know.
When you're used to talking to people...
Like, I talk to a lot of people.
I'm used to talking to people if I just meet them.
This is me if I was at a store buying food.
This is me everywhere.
I can be me.
But it's because I'm used to it.
But a lot of people, when they sit down, They know they're gonna be on camera, they've never been on camera before, and they get very nervous.
And that's why I like to talk to people before the show, just kinda hang out a little, get you chilled out, I'm just a person, you're just a person, we're gonna just talk.
It's gonna be easy, man.
I'm your friend, we're gonna have a good time.
Some people don't want to do that.
They want to do the opposite.
So they want to sit there with a clipboard, and they want to look at you in a condescending way, and it's like a little bit of a power move.
And what they're trying to do is make salacious content.
That's all they're trying to do.
That's their job.
Their job is different than a person who just wants to have a conversation and ask questions, which is my job.
Their job is to make something dramatic happen that's going to be shared on TikTok.
If you work for a tire store, you're trying to sell tires.
That's their business.
You need new tires.
Do I really?
Their business is talking shit and making things...
It's a bad format.
Most of those media interviews are bad formats because it's a very limited amount of time and you have to have a clip that fits in between commercials.
And also, they're not free.
They have executives and there's too many people that get in there and just...
The person talking to you should just be talking to you and they should have an understanding of what you do and how it happened and what this is all about, what this means for future people.
You know, it shouldn't be like going after Elon Musk.
Everyone's so goddamn political right now.
It's so weird.
Even making apolitical people political.
So to connect you to that, it's just so stupid.
What you are is, like I said, I think if there's a movie about the future, one of the very first people that has used This kind of technology, and we're learning that these people are getting better at it, and now with the use of AI, I mean, who knows what's going to be possible with you just in a few years.
Like, how much it's going to be able to help people.
How much it's going to be able to help people like me, at the beginning at least.
Like, I know a lot of this is, like, down the road stuff.
Like, you know, what it's going to do to normal people who get this.
They're going to be able to be hacked or controlled or something.
But for me, I think about it like...
How many people who are paralyzed don't have to be paralyzed anymore?
How many people with disabilities, ALS or Alzheimer's or any of these who are blind, how many people are going to be able to live their lives again?
And that's my goal at the beginning.
I know that I feel like people are going to look at me and say, like, I really need to be more concerned about a lot of the things coming down the road.
And it's something that I'm trying to think more about because at some point people are going to ask and I don't have good answers for it because all I'm thinking about is, you know, like I want to help people and I feel like this is going to help people and that's what I'm focused on.
Well, it's just once this stuff goes live, it's going to be really weird.
It's going to be really weird.
But along the way, we're going to solve a lot of the problems.
Look, I've had three knee surgeries, two ACL reconstructions.
If I lived 100 years ago, I'd be a cripple.
Just how it is.
My knees would be destroyed.
I wouldn't be able to walk good.
And now I can do anything.
That's just medical technology and understanding of the human body.
Implementation of this kind of device that can allow you to move your body and can, as you were saying earlier, you can bring back eyesight to some people.
This is something that they really are hopeful for.
They did a talk about it a while ago on a show and tell.
They basically show how...
Like, how the Neuralink works in my brain would be very, very similar.
You would just take...
You would, like, activate certain parts of the brain or behind the eye, the part of the brain, the part of the eye that...
Dictate sight and stuff.
You would activate certain things in order to display what's going on around the world to someone, to the back of someone's eye, to their retina, whatever it is.
I don't know much about it.
But they have done it.
Oh, they did it with monkeys, actually.
Yeah.
So there's a video of them lighting up parts of a screen.
And they have like basically an eye tracker in the monkey.
And so the monkey will look to different parts of the screen and like wherever they've lit up on the brain basically.
So whatever is going, whatever implant they have in the brain, they will like light up somewhere on the brain and then they'll light it up on the screen and the monkey will look there.
And then at some point they stop lighting it up on the screen and they're just lighting it up in the monkey's brain and the monkey still looks there.
Wow.
Yeah, so they know that they can do these sorts of things.
Yeah, it's amazing.
I know that there are other companies that have done something similar to this too, like helping people with their eyesight.
I know one of them went under, which was...
It was just a wild story.
Basically about a company who had implanted things in people, and the company went under, and then the people in the study were like, well, what do we do now?
And they didn't know if they were just going to continue.
They have to, like you said, learn something from the monkeys, from the animals that they're testing on.
So some of them they will, you know, let live longer.
Some of them they'll implant something in and then sacrifice almost immediately to see because they have to know what it's doing short term, medium term, long term.
So basically all animals and all animal testing get sacrificed at some point.
I don't know how true that is because obviously a lot of them, once they're done with the study that they're in, they let go live if it wasn't too invasive.
If they don't need to study any part of them, they would need to be killed for.
If you're going to study the brain, then there's really no other way.
You've got to get it now.
And then there was the whole, like, report that came out about all the terrible things that Neuralink was doing to monkeys.
I've talked to the people.
I got to meet them, the people who were working directly with the monkeys.
Those monkeys have the best animal facility in the world.
Someone like came in and built it.
Like basically they're going around now.
That person is going around and changing how other like labs treat their monkeys like for the better.
So they're going there like revolutionizing the world of like animal testing basically.
So Neuralink treats their animals better than anywhere else.
And then the report that came out and said like all these terrible things that were happening with animals.
It's skewed because all the things that they brought up were just it was all of the bad.
Like basically anything bad that happens to the monkey has to be, or any of the animals, has to be reported and gets reported in this like, you know, XYZ format of this is what's going on with the monkey, this is what happens, this is what we think happened, we had to kill the monkey, yes or no.
But none of the other things get reported at all.
None of the time between.
Like if it's five years that the monkey's alive and one bad thing happens, then there's a report about that one bad thing happening to the monkey.
And you compile all that and you're like, look at all these terrible things that are going on with the monkeys.
There's a video of a guy sitting on the ground, cross-legged, and a monkey hops on his shoulder, and then the guy's thinking it's cute and smiley, and then the monkey just decides to take a massive chunk of his scalp off.
Just bites down on his head and just takes a football-sized chunk of scalp off this dude's head.
It's horrible.
Just decided for no reason, unprovoked, you know, monkey lives in a rough neighborhood.
He had a hard life.
He had a hard life.
He's not out there just, you know, picking fruit.
This is it.
So this dude is just sitting here with his monkey, is like sitting on his lap, and he's like talking to the monkey.
I think when we're looking at these kind of scientific experiments on animals, a lot of people are going to have a problem with.
But I wonder with new technology if that's even going to be necessary anymore.
In the future, particularly with the leaps that are going to be made with AI, I wonder if they're going to be able to just be able to map out a study You know, like, understand the interactions between human beings and these devices and be able to map out the possibilities and probabilities without having to do that.
Yeah, I have a feeling they're gonna be able to replace parts with artificial parts too, like the eyeball itself.
I was just thinking about that the other day, like how complex, like look how small these little cameras are on phones, little tiny ass cameras, but one of these can do a 100x zoom, you know, and one of these is 200 megapixels, this little tiny thin thing.
Like, what's to say that they wouldn't be able to come up with something that works way better than the human eye?
I was saying, like, through your teeth, but, I mean, that is how they do it.
A team of specialists at the University of Miami Miller School of Medicine announced Wednesday that they're the first surgeons in the United States to restore a person's sight by using a tooth.
The procedure is formally called Modified Osteo-Odonto-Keratop...
Karen K. Thornton, 60, went blind nine years ago from a rare disorder called Steven Johnson Syndrome.
The disorder left the surface of her eyes so severely scarred she was legally blind, but doctors determined that the inside of her eyes were still functional enough that she might one day see with the help This is a patient where the surface of the eye was totally damaged, no wetness, no tears.
Dr. Victor L. Perez, the ophthalmologist at the Bascom Palmer Eye Institute at the University of Miami, who operated on Thornton.
So we kind of recreate the environment of the mouth in the eye.
What?
I don't get that.
Whoa!
Finally, Perez and his team implanted the modified tooth which had a hole drilled through the center to support a prosthetic lens.
We used that tooth as a platform to put the optical cylinder into the eye, explained Perez.
Perez said doctors often use less risky and less invasive techniques to replace corneas, but the damage from Thornton's Steven Johnson syndrome ruled those out.
Whoa!
Using a tooth might sound strange, but it also offers an advantage because doctors used Thornton's own cheek and tooth tissue.
She faces less risk that her immune system will attack the tooth and reject the transplant.
Patients getting a coordinate transplant from a deceased donor, on the other hand, face chances that their immune system will reject the new tissue.
Yeah, for some reason I thought they were using that tooth to like, I don't know, use it as a replacement for like her vision in some way, but it's literally just a placeholder for like, you know, different things like the tissue and different places to like, like they said, hold that lens and stuff.
And with you, do you have the – like, if they start doing the range of motion studies or the – being able to recreate motion or restore motion, are you going to be available for those studies?
You would have to do it with someone who already has the implant in their brain.
So I don't know if it'll be a separate Neuralink that they would need, like a different one specifically for...
Like the two implants interacting together.
I don't see why that would be the case.
Just like the same thing with people who they're going to have to test to see if the surgery to replace a Neuralink is safe at some point.
They're going to have to go through a whole thing.
So they're going to have to do it on people who already have it in.
So I imagine that sort of study might be something I would be involved in if they're planning on implanting one in someone's spinal cord and then seeing how they interact and seeing if it works.
I don't see why I couldn't be in that, but we'll see.
So like this study is to prove whether or not it's safe and if it works, basically.
I think once that's proven, then they're going to get into a lot more of what it's actually capable of.
And then once it's released to the public, I think people are going to rush to get it, honestly.
At least a group of people who have been following it at the very least.
Because once we know that it's safe, then that's one of the big things that people are going to like, once that's lifted, once you're like, okay, it's safe.
Now we can go through and start talking about being able to communicate with people and being able to, you know, possibly download information or have it be available to you.
using AI and stuff like that.
I'm not sure if that's going to happen.
I don't see why it's not possible at the very least.
And then I know Neuralink's talking about opening up a clinic in Austin, basically where you would go in and get a surgery and walk out.
So it's not like...
My surgery was, I don't want to say not invasive because obviously they did brain surgery, but they were expecting it to be something like three to six hours, and my surgery took under two hours.
It went super, super fast.
There were no complications at all.
It was not like obviously invasive in the brain, but there was no damage done really.
So, and this was the very first time.
So once they get this even better, even more tuned in, then I imagine people go into this clinic and go in and come out in a few hours with an Erlink and then they can chat with other friends online or something else.
Again, I'm not here to talk about like the ethical ramifications of that or like how How it's fun to think about, like the things that might go wrong or could go wrong.
And it's probably something that people much smarter than me should think about whether or not it should be done.
But I think there are so many things that you could do with it.
And if someone does figure out a way to connect human beings to some form of wireless internet or wireless data or some completely new thing, instead of thinking as the internet as we know it, being these devices that go to websites, it might be a completely different invention that uses a completely different type of technology to sync All the information and all the minds in the world together.
It might not be as dopey as going to a website.
Going to a website is probably an archaic way to do it.
Well, they're able to scour the internet for every artist's work and then sort of take pieces of that and create art.
And these artists are like, hey, you know, that took me fucking forever to paint that.
And you just stole it and did a version of it in 13 seconds.
Weird.
And that's just one problem.
Another problem is deep fakes and songs.
They made a Drake song that became a hit and Drake had nothing to do with it.
It's not that far away from it being out of the barn where you're not going to be able to ever stop You're going to be able to do whatever you want in terms of creating videos, audios, and it'll look indistinguishable from a real video, real audio.
They're already going to take this podcast and translate it into different languages without me being able to speak them just through AI. Yeah.
It's something that I was actually just talking with my buddy about the other day.
I think it's going to be something similar to...
You know how we get emails from Nigerian princes, and we're like, yeah, grandma, don't open that.
Don't send them money.
It's not real.
I think it's going to be something that people are able to do, like the next generations, where they look at something online and they're like, oh yeah, that's AI. Oh yeah, that's fake.
I don't think they're going to be able to stop it.
I think we're just going to get into a real weird blurry place.
I think the one thing that might help, and this sounds crazy, but I think ultimately what technology does It makes things more accessible.
It gets you more information.
It connects people more.
With translation, it's connecting people from different cultures and different countries more.
I think ultimately what it's going to do is it's going to be some sort of a mind interface.
I don't think it's going to be as simple as language.
I think it's going to be a next-level mind interface.
Through a technology akin to Neuralink or maybe future versions of Neuralink, I think we're going to be able to know what someone's actually thinking.
I think you're not going to be able to lie anymore is what I'm saying.
I don't think lying is going to be possible 100 years from now.
Which would be a really good thing.
And if you're a person right now that lives your life without lying, you know this.
This is way better.
As a person who used to lie and doesn't lie ever now, I'll tell you right now, it's great.
I love it.
It's a good thing to not lie.
And if you live your life in this manner where there cannot be deception, how much more would we get done?
How much more would we understand each other in relationships?
And if you're bullshitting, you'll understand that you're bullshitting by the way another person sees your thoughts, and then you'll be forced to handle those and go, you know what?
I'm trying to put this off on other people, and it's really me.
I'm the problem.
You'll be able to see it.
Everyone will see reality instead of these sort of manufactured narratives that people have with this very selective view of memory and their thoughts of the past.
And, you know, my boss did me wrong.
No, you were a fuck up.
You showed up late every day.
Like, you know, they fucking hated me.
No, you were super insecure and real shitty around people.
We'll be able to solve a lot of our social issues that seem insurmountable because of poor communication and the lack of honesty, a lack of real honest conversations instead of just people trying to win arguments.
We're going to have to have actual understanding of all the different processes that are in play, whether it's environment or resources or...
You know, inter-country conflicts, whatever the fuck is going on, we're going to have to have a real understanding of it without politicians bullshitting us as to why we're going to do something that won't exist anymore.
That would be wild.
They would be the ones that would resist it the most.
They're like, we have this dangerous mind-reading technology, like if fucking Nancy Pelosi would have a press conference.
Because China will do it, Russia will do it, everyone will do it.
Someone's gonna do it.
All these eggheads out there that are willing to push that button, they're not gonna listen to the government.
Shut the fuck up.
The government is just a bunch of people.
The super nerds out there are the ones who are really in charge of this stuff, because even we're seeing this with technology and some of these hearings on AI, the people that are asking the questions don't know what the fuck is going on.
You know, and I'm sure you saw that with some of the Facebook hearings and some of the other hearings.
The people that are actually asking about the technology, how much time do you have to get into the understanding of this?
How much time between worrying about water rights in your district and this and that and all these other problems that you have as a politician?
How much time are you actually spending trying to figure out how social media works?
They're not going to be the people that control AI, and they're not going to be the people that are going to be able to figure out how to stop mind-reading technology.
I think when mind-reading technology comes, it's going to come so fast that it's going to be just like all these other things, like the Internet.
It came so fast they couldn't control it.
Because if you looked at the Internet, if you looked at...
What the internet has done for like a distrust in mainstream media, distrust in politicians, exposing corruption, all the different things that we know about now that are a fact that just 20 years ago you would have thought been crazy conspiracy talk.
If they knew that that was going to happen and make life so much more difficult for them, they would have regulated the internet from the jump.
They would have stopped, stepped in, took over like China did.
Took over like North Korea did, and you would get their version of the internet forever, and that's it, and there's no growth, and they'll silence dissidents.
And that's how they would have done it if they had ever known that it was going to be what it is now.
I think that's exactly what's going to happen with mind-reading software and mind-reading technology.
I think it's going to happen.
They're going to be...
Oh, Jesus Christ!
I don't think...
And also...
Look, they're just human beings too.
They're gonna want that.
If they find out there's a technology that allows you to communicate with people in a completely new way and it's much more fulfilling and we understand each other much better and we really do realize that we are all one.
Imagine we can communicate with this technology and it ends war overnight.
It makes war literally impossible.
You realize that these people that you're about to bomb are you, and that we're all the same thing.
We're all one consciousness experiencing itself through different bodies and different lives and different experiences and different genes and different parts of the world, but we're all genuinely the same thing.
Yeah, I know of one story where there was a hunter just walking around and it got like dark over him or something and he looked up and there was just like a ship over him and he looked through his scope and he looked right into some like mantis people.
Dun dun dun.
Yeah, and I'm not okay with that.
Like that's the one alien story I think I'll stay far away from and hope it's something else.
Well, you gotta think that Insects have some kind of bizarre intelligence because if you've ever seen leafcutter ant colonies when they pour the cement in them and you realize how sophisticated they are, like, how did you guys do this?
How do you figure this out?
They have channels where the air can pass through so they can ferment leaves.
So they have like a fermentation factory inside their ant colony.
And the colony is huge!
It's so big!
And you're like, you little tiny fuckers built a city underground right here.
There's got to be some sort of...
Of intelligence.
Now, if ants evolved to the point where they develop that kind of intelligence, who's to say that in a different environment, where ants have more accesses to food, more access to resources, and more competition, that they don't evolve to the point where that intelligence, it keeps getting scaled up And they get to like a human.
I have a feeling that in the future everyone's going to be some sort of a cyborg and everyone else is going to be artificial.
developed just with computers.
Just like computers, technology, whatever form of chips, and they'll put together things that are more intelligent than us, can communicate with us, can work with us, but that's going to be one of those things.
It's not going to be one of us, and that'll be a different life form that exists alongside with us.
But I don't think there'll be very many people like me.
No chip.
No nothing.
Just a person.
Like, what is that moron doing?
You're running around with no chip?
You know, I think in the future it's going to be everyone's going to have something that enhances them.
We already do with our phones, you know?
It's going to be something beyond that, where it's going to be so compelling that everyone's going to want to do it.
One thing that I found with the Neuralink is something that kind of blew my mind, too, is that when I'm attempting to do stuff sometimes, or I'm thinking it to, like, move in a certain place, Sometimes it's so good that it's moving before I even, like, think it to move.
It's almost like, if you think about moving your hand, the signal is basically already being sent before you move your hand.
Like, your mind is saying, okay, he's about to move his hand basically, so the signal needs to be sent all the way down and back up in order for you to move your hand.
So the speed that all that happens, and it's almost a little preemptive, I saw that with the Neuralink, where it was moving the cursor before I was actually moving my hand.
So with video games, stuff like that, you just need to think for it to move somewhere, and it is that accurate, and it's quicker than you can even think.
So there's no way it's going to, like, no one else is going to be able to keep up with it.
Yeah, because there's tactics and strategy, especially if you're doing one-on-one deathmatch, where you have to know when the health is spawning and when the weapons are spawning, how to control a map.
Yeah, but if the brain is already interpreting your, like, motor cortex, the movement of your motor cortex, then you can just think, move this, and it'll move it in VR as well.
Yeah, I've always thought if, you know, you just give me an Optimus robot, I'll have it get one of those, like, baby chest carriers or something like that.
And they can just carry me around like that, and it'd be great.
I'm pretty sure some of the people who have left Neuralink have gone and either started their own little companies or have gone to other companies that are doing something similar.
I think Neuralink's advancements now are going to pull everyone else up.
I think Neuralink will be at the lead for quite a while, but I don't see why companies that haven't been able to achieve what Neuralink is achieving now won't be able to do it in a year or two time.
Especially, like I said, because Neuralink is making everything so open source and there's people like me out there who are just talking about it like willy-nilly.
I don't see why other companies won't find some way to catch up over time.
I think with them leading the way and the fact that it's been implemented and it's been successful and the fact that they're already improving upon the software and being able to correct issues with it.
What is their timeline?
Like in terms of next being able to use something that allows people to move that couldn't move, restore sight.
Do they have like a timeline where they think all the time?
I keep saying that it's all going to happen in my lifetime for sure.
I keep saying that it's going to happen in the next 10 years, 20 years where quadriplegics like me, paralyzed people won't have to be paralyzed anymore.
I have this vision of someone being paralyzed, going into the hospital, getting the Neuralink and walking out like a day or two later, which I think is totally possible.
I think it's going to happen a lot sooner than later, especially how fast all this is moving.
And the fact that this is like successful now, I think it'll...
I don't know that it would help me per se, even though I said it's in my lifetime.
about being paralyzed and quadriplegic is my body is just deteriorated so much that even if they did give me something to like make me able to move again my body's just so jacked up at this point that I'm not sure it would really help that much I could probably build it back up to a certain point but even people who have recovered or have been part of studies where they get some movement back Their bodies just don't work the same.
Well, that's also one of the legitimate uses for steroids.
One of the legitimate uses for steroids is that people with muscle-wasting disease and people who have severely atrophied and that it allows them to build up tissue better.
Kind of already one, especially if you're playing you quake.
I can't wait to see that.
That'd be sick.
That'd be sick.
With the future of this stuff, it's going to eventually get to a point where it's probably, like, in the beginning, it's probably going to be very difficult to acquire, right?
Like, very expensive.
But it's probably in the future going to be much more accessible, right?
Yeah.
If they complete your trial, they find it satisfactory, they have a way to do it, when will the average person who is a quadriplegic be able to start being able to use some of this technology?
They called me for the first, like, so I applied like September, late September, September like 19th or something around that day.
A month later, end of October, I had finished all my testing and interviews and then I didn't find out they had chosen me until maybe the end of November, early December.
going to be one of the first, like three people that they were doing for the first part of the study.
So they didn't tell me I was going to be the first.
They just said, we selected you as one of the candidates, basically.
And so that was really, really cool.
And then it was sort of a back and forth.
Do I want to be the first?
Do I want to wait until I have someone else?
Because being the first, a lot more risk, obviously, and I have the worst version of the Neuralink that's ever going to be in anyone.
It's only going to get better.
So I was like, maybe I'll let someone else get the first, and then I get a better version in the second or third one.
But ultimately, being the first is cool.
It's something that I just decided to do.
I was like, this is the best way I can help, too.
If anything goes wrong, I'd rather it go wrong to me than passing it up and having someone else struggle.
If, God forbid, anything bad happened to someone, I would rather it happen to me, and I would rather not have passed up and watched it happen to someone else.
So I decided to do it.
And I was like, yeah, just let me know if I'm going to be the first or not.
Obviously I wanted to at that point.
And then about a month later they called and they were like, we're going to do your surgery.
You're going to be the first person.
I think in December they had told me that it could be me and they said that we might end up having you be the first and it could happen as early as like mid-December.
And that kind of stressed me out because I was a little worried that something bad would happen and I would have ruined Christmas for my family forever.
I was like, if this is right around Christmas and something bad happens, like Christmas is going to be ruined forever.
Luckily, they waited like an extra month and a half, but it was cool.
Like, I kept pretty level expectations through the whole thing.
I didn't know what was going to come of it.
I didn't know if I was going to end up doing media or anything.
It was something that I had talked to my parents about, but it wasn't something that I really wanted to do, per se.
I wasn't wanting to, like, get famous or anything from this.
There are a couple things that I did want to do, and ultimately, that's why I decided to do media.
No, I would say being paralyzed made me just rethink a lot of things in my life, a lot of my perspective.
I mean, one thing about being paralyzed is there's, especially being a quadriplegic, you just have a lot of time to think.
I thought through everything I'd ever done, all the mistakes I ever made, why I was who I was, where I was.
I realized a lot of things about myself.
I realized, you know, that I wasn't the person who I thought I was.
I always built myself up a certain way and then going back through all of my interactions with everyone all the mistakes I made I realized I'm painting a much prettier picture of myself in my head than who I like actually was then a lot of the interactions I had with people you know actions speak louder than words and if I was thinking I was this great person and treating people like absolute you know dog crap basically like then maybe I'm not as good of a guy as I thought I was
I realized that I wasn't as good of a son as I thought I was I wasn't as good of a boyfriend as I thought I was and I wasn't as good of a friend like so So, I found the reasons why I was doing these things, and I thought about it for probably a few years, just lying in my bed, staring at walls for, you know, eight, ten hours a day just thinking.
And eventually I came to this conclusion that partly through my, like, faith, my interactions with God, partly just because I wanted to be better, I wanted to be a better person, I realized that there were things that I could do to help, and this seemed like my best chance, honestly.
People keep saying a lot of weird things about me like, you know, you're like an Apollo astronaut.
I don't see myself that way.
I know that people keep saying you're the first, you're like a pioneer.
I don't see myself that way at all.
I just think anyone in my position would have done it.
I think that I guess it took a bit of bravery.
I don't think...
I just...
I don't see myself that way.
I just think that I did it so...
To show people...
I did it because I knew that I could.
I did it because I knew that I was capable of going through it.
I did, you know, became a quadriplegic and I made it out the other side.
Like, I feel good about my life.
I feel...
Like, I manage that pretty well.
I'm a pretty chill guy, so I feel like I rolled with the punches pretty well.
And I thought the same thing with Neuralink.
And so, like, I never thought of myself, like, trailblazing or anything, but it's just cool to be a part of, and I'm really happy that Neuralink chose me.
And I'm looking forward to having some, like, cyborg buddies in the future.
You know, if they could develop an eye just like artificial intelligence can make images like pretty fucking close, maybe they can make an eyeball that just really does kind of like talk to you a little bit.
Just because in order to even interact with the computer, it has to be uploaded with that app.
And so that's why putting it on a phone or something, you would just upload the app onto it.
Any sort of other devices, there's ways to connect to them.
So, like for me, even with the Switch, it's through my computer still, but then you run like a cord from my computer through like a converter box and then into the Switch.
So it's all through the computer right now.
I don't think it's going to be that way forever.
I think it's going to be much easier to connect to other devices in the future.
Especially if Neuralink takes off like I think it will, then companies will start just uploading the software onto it, downloading the software onto it, so that way you can...
It's going to be one of those things where it's Alexa compatible.
I think when he said that they might ban Apple devices because they're going to use open AI, I was like, what is going on?
I get real nervous when someone way fucking smarter than me gets nervous.
When he's saying that if AI... Basically what he's saying is, I think, to paraphrase, he's saying that Apple wasn't smart enough to create their own artificial intelligence, but they're smart enough to keep artificial intelligence from running rampant through their operating system.