Derrick Hamilton, a wrongfully convicted "jailhouse lawyer" exonerated after 30 years—including two 25-year sentences tied to NYPD’s Louis Scarcella—exposes systemic racism in arrests (Black people 3.5x more likely for marijuana) and sentencing (crack vs. powder disparities). His persistence, despite SHU isolation and judicial incompetence (e.g., a dementia-afflicted judge), freed others like Bruce Bryant but left cases like Nelson Cruz unresolved. The 2022 Shin v. Ramirez Supreme Court ruling blocked even proven innocence claims, while flawed forensics—like bite marks and fingerprint errors—keep innocents imprisoned. Reform hinges on grassroots pressure, not tribalism or corporate prison profits, proving justice demands action over apathy. [Automatically generated summary]
So this is Derek Hamilton, who has been regarded by the New Yorker as the most prolific jailhouse lawyer that ever lived.
He is...
He's single-handedly responsible for freeing probably over a hundred people, including himself.
He spent three decades in jail for murders that he didn't commit.
He was framed by one of the most horrific Corrupt cops in the city of New York's history, sown by the name of Scarcella.
But more than that, he's become known as one of the biggest and most effective criminal justice reform advocates in the country.
And I'll tell you, get into it a little bit more later, but...
Derek is not a miracle.
He's a force of fucking nature.
And I'll tell you a little bit about how we met and how we got involved together.
So, probably about nine years ago, Jay-Z wanted to get into boxing.
And Roc Nation started a promotional company to promote boxers.
And Andre Ward was one of them.
So we were on the opposite sides of the negotiating table, and it might be less or more than nine years ago.
It was right on the heels of the Eric Garner murder when he was putting a chokehold on Staten Island.
And Jay-Z was coming to sign the contract, and I was there with Jay Prince.
And we started talking about, like, what the fuck is wrong with this country.
And figured out that we had, like, a common bond in that regard.
So fast forward to a few years later, we...
I find out through working with Roc Nation on just criminal justice reform initiatives that Jay-Z has this...
Foundation that flies under the radar that is just remarkable.
It's called the Sean Carter Foundation.
He and his mother started it.
And they take inner-city youth, mostly from Brooklyn, really the five boroughs, and help give them an opportunity to go to college.
But they start when they're in high school.
They take them on a bus tour.
They help them with the application process.
And they literally change the trajectory of these people's lives.
So I had this idea that I would have five of their scholars, we would do a scholarship program, come work on social justice cases with me.
And Jay-Z's mom loved it.
He loved it.
Rock Nation.
There's someone named Donya Diaz who runs their philanthropy arm and she's on the board of the Sean Carter Foundation.
We made it a reality.
It took a couple of years.
So this summer, I had five college students that were coming to work with me on innocence cases.
And I said, you know, I need somebody that can really connect with these people.
Because I have sympathy for the way they grew up, for the conditions that they were born into, for the opportunities that they didn't have.
But I can't empathize because I'm white.
It's just as simple as that.
So I thought of Derek, and I had met Derek about five years ago.
after he had been out for only six years.
And Derek was the first person on my mind that can mentor these students.
And I asked him if he would join me in helping mentor them through this seven week program working with me on a case.
And over the past seven weeks, we're this close to freeing this man named Bruce Bryant, who they worked on together.
They worked on his case together.
And to watch Derek and to know his story, I knew right away that he'd be able to connect with them, but I did not know his power.
So when he picks up the phone and calls a district attorney of Queens, they take his call right away.
He calls the head of a conviction integrity unit that's involved in re-reviewing cases.
He's got such deep respect, and people in high places have such admiration for him because of what he was able to overcome in not only helping himself, but helping free others.
He had a settlement with the city.
And the state.
And instead of taking that settlement and resting on his laurels and doing whatever, which would have been understandable, he's dedicated his life to helping get people out of jail.
And not only that, to helping reform the criminal justice system.
But these are words like reform the criminal justice system.
We kick around.
This man is a human tornado of violence.
Of action that instead of leaving destruction in its wake, leaves hope.
And instead of, you know, devastation, leaves opportunity.
I mean, so maybe tornado was the wrong analogy, but I've just never witnessed anything like it.
So I'm on the verge of starting this new criminal justice reform center.
Which we're not at liberty to announce that is being funded by someone that I've talked about quite a bit on this show.
And they were asking me to find a deputy director, you know, a lawyer.
And I said...
I looked at resumes.
I interviewed people and I said, I found him.
I found my lawyer.
He may not have a law degree, but he knows more about criminal procedure.
He's more respected.
He's the best strategic thinker I've ever encountered.
And he knows human beings better than anyone.
And Derek's going to be my...
I'm the executive director.
Derek is going to be my deputy director.
And I mean, I'll let him tell his story.
But when you hear what he's been through and what he's overcome and what he has done since, he's not a force.
Words aren't adequate to describe who this man is and what he's overcome and what he's been through.
I was trying to suck an ounce of his mental energy on the ride over here from Houston.
Just trying to understand how he summons the strength, because I'm trying to use it and apply it in my own life.
So it's just, I'm not going to cry yet.
I usually wait till hour two, but it's just amazing to me the way the universe aligned for us to come together and for him to be next to me today and for your listeners and you to hear his story is just an honor.
Well, thanks for having me, and Josh, thanks for the accolades.
I was a 17-year-old kid running around Brooklyn at a time when Brooklyn was terrible, and I was a product of my environment.
I was doing little robberies and, you know, little stump stuff that adolescents do.
And I got on the radar of the police department.
They used to search me all the time, pat me down, you know, throw me up on the car.
Regular stuff that happened in that community.
One day, a man was killed about 5 a.m. by some older guys in the neighborhood.
The police had an identification of their car.
They called the guy in and he somehow told them he rented me the car and that I was the one that bought the car back and told him that I had committed the crime and that I had shot the guy by accident.
And that was my first real experience with the criminal justice system because it was a murder.
I'm like, murder?
You know, I did a couple of robberies.
I did some petty stuff, but murder?
That's not me.
So, you know, what was amazing to me is, number one, nobody would have gave me their car at 17 years old.
Any cop would have known that this guy wouldn't have gave me his car.
But they arrested me, and they charged me with murder.
And I was convicted by a jury because they admitted grand jury testimony of a witness who came before the court and said, I've never seen this guy at all.
The police made me lie in the grand jury and say that I've seen this guy.
I'm not testifying.
I refuse to testify.
I'm not going to get up there and purge myself.
The judge told the prosecutor that day that they were dismissing the case, that if they don't get another witness, this case is going out of here.
The judge's name was Lombardo back then.
This was 1983. I went back to Rikers Island that day.
We came back the next day, and the judge said that he thought about this all night, and he felt that the only person would benefit from this witness not testifying would be me.
Therefore, he was going to allow the prosecutor to admit their grand jury testimony as evidence-in-chief at my trial, and I would forfeit my right to confront the witness and let the jury hear the truth that she never saw the crime.
So that was my first real experience.
I was a young knucklehead.
The lawyer that I had at the time, Candace Kurtz, said, look, young man, get your head out your ass, and you better read these cases, and you better see what's going on like they railroad you.
She took the stand and told the judge what the witness told her, and I was convicted.
I was sentenced to 25 years of life, and it was at that moment that I know that I had to study law, that I had to really dig deep in the books, and I did it.
New York State, thank God, had A law library.
They had all the books in the world.
All you had to do was apply yourself.
And I spent the next five and six years working on my case.
In 1987, the appellate division in that case found that the judge had no evidence whatsoever that me or anybody acting on my behalf had threatened this witness, did anything improper.
And that the judge was right.
There was no evidence that can prove that.
So they reversed the conviction, and I was able to get out of prison after six and a half years.
Unbeknownst to me, there was a rogue cop by the name of Louis Garcella.
Who felt that I didn't do enough time for this conviction.
He didn't like the appellate division decision.
Eight months later, I was in New Haven, Connecticut at a unisex salon that I had on at the time.
He came in that store and arrested me, told me I was going back to Brooklyn for a murder.
And I'm like, a murder?
Like, this can't be true.
Like, again?
How many times has this happened?
I went to New York.
I was processed.
About a year later, I went to trial.
I was convicted.
They brought a witness in by the name of Jew Smith, who said that she was present at the murder when her boyfriend was killed, that I was a gunman, had a gun in my hand, and I shot this individual several times with this gun.
But her original statement to the police said she wasn't there, that she never saw this crime.
She was around the corner at a store.
When she came back, her boyfriend was dead.
The jury never heard that statement.
But in any event, the ballistics evidence proved that this guy was shot with two different guns, that he wasn't shot in the building where she said he was shot at, but he was shot outside in the street.
Despite this evidence, I was convicted.
After I was convicted was when I learned that she had first told the cops at the crime scene.
She never saw the crime, but she had told it to a different detective.
So I made a pro se motion to set aside the verdict.
And in the motion, I argued that this detective that never came in that she gave the statement to could prove my innocence.
And the judge ordered a hearing for a year.
He said, I can't give this guy a day in jail.
Let alone 15 years, which was the minimum.
I want this witness to come back.
The prosecutor said, I'm not calling her.
And the judge said, if you don't call her back, this case is going to a new trial, right?
They called her back.
And she admitted that she never saw the crime, that the detective Lewis Garcella told her what happened and told her that if she didn't get up here and say that I committed the crime, she was going to jail.
She was on parole.
Her boyfriend was a felon that just got out.
She had kids.
They said, you're going to jail.
She said, what was I supposed to do?
Here's the system telling me this, that if I don't come in and say this, I'm going to jail.
And I came in and said it.
The judge ruled a year later that, again, he felt that I was, he said there was a common thread of string that I manipulated this evidence.
Again, I called the detective.
The detective came in and said exactly what the witness said, that she told him she didn't see the crime, that she was beat up and took to the precinct and told she was going to jail.
And had that jury heard that, there'd have been different results.
At the trial, they told the jury that her first statement was the most important statement in this case, and that when the police arrived on the scene, she didn't hesitate.
She said, Derek Hamilton, somebody I know my entire life committed the crime, which wasn't true.
In fact, she said the truth, which she didn't see the crime, that she was somewhere else.
I was sentenced to 25 years of life.
I filed numerous post-conviction motions after post-conviction motions.
Every time the judge gave me a hearing, every time he said he can throw the case out, every time he said he was troubled by this conviction, the prosecutor would come in and tell him I'm a bad guy, that this is not somebody you want to release, that, you know, they put imagined harms and make a judge think that I was the most terrible person in the world.
And he would deny the motion every single time.
You know, I filed numerous motions, numerous post convictions.
I did everything you could imagine to prove my innocence, but to no avail.
I began going to parole board around 2009. It was a very traumatic experience for me because at that time, the parole board wanted me to admit guilt, and I wasn't going to do that.
I'm not going to come in and say I killed somebody I didn't kill.
I'm not doing that.
I don't care what you say.
And I had to challenge them and fight them for two years.
And then my family went out and protest, and we got a Daily News article put out that said that I would be free if the court would just basically give me justice.
If they just give this guy a fair shot, he'd be home.
So it changed the mentality of the parole board.
They look at all of my evidence, and they said, you know, based on the evidence that you presented here, we believe in your innocence.
Like, this evidence speaks for itself.
Even the judge said you was innocent.
I don't know what you're doing here all these years.
And they released me.
And at that point, I began a crusade.
Because when I was in prison, there were several guys.
We built something called an actual innocence team.
Guys who I was working in the law library.
So I would read a guy's case and check him out.
So what I had to do was...
Get families together.
Get people to come together and bring their families and say, look, let's send these people to City Hall.
Let them know there's a lot of us in here.
It's not just me.
There's white, there's black, there's a bunch of us in here that got the same issue.
That they're procedurally barring us.
They're not looking at our case.
They're just kicking it into the garbage.
We don't want to hear it.
Get out of here.
Right?
Because they can.
They have the power.
So when we start bringing attention to these cases, it changed the whole dynamic.
So when I got out, I joined that group, Family and Friends of the Raw Women's Convictions.
We had a PR guy by the name of Lonnie Suri who was helping us keep it together.
And we just began blasting the prosecutors.
We began protesting outside their offices and getting rid of them.
The first one we was able to get rid of was Charles Hines in Brooklyn, the prosecutor that sent me to prison.
We was able to remove him and put a progressive prosecutor in that agreed that he would look at these convictions if he was elected.
So he got in and in two years he has honorated 22 people.
And he found that there was a systemic racist problem in Brooklyn that was convicting the wrong people.
Fortunately for me, the New York Times reporter called me in, I believe it was 2012, and they said, why are people afraid of the police?
And I just thought, are you kidding me?
Why are they afraid of the police?
And I told them names of guys that I knew that was in prison that this cop set up.
And a lawyer had contacted me and said that he was working on a case which this cop framed, another guy, by the name of David Ranter.
And he said, in two weeks, there's going to be an article in New York Times that exposed this cop.
And I told the New York Times reporter that.
And I said, look, in two weeks, if it comes out, you come back to me and I take you to these guys.
And she came back, Frances Robins, she came back and I took her to these guys.
She got the prosecutor to agree to look at 50 of these cops' cases.
50 of them.
And, you know, 20 was exonerated so far, those guys.
And I was exonerated in 2015. In 2014, for the first time in New York history, the appellate division's second department ruled in my case that a free-standing actual innocence claim can be recognized under post-conviction motion.
And they said that anybody that's innocent, the courts could no longer procedurally bar you.
They got to reach the merits of your contentions.
They just can't say, well, you should have raised this before, or your lawyer failed to do this before, or you should have did—you got to reach the merits of it.
Get to the bottom line.
Is this guy innocent or not?
And when they gave me that opinion, it kind of like, in itself, exonerated me, because the prosecutor now had to hear my witnesses.
I had alibis.
I had police officers who said, look, this guy was in New Haven, Connecticut, not Brooklyn when this murder happened.
We know because we've seen him there.
We was at a party with him.
I had hotel receipts.
I had many witnesses that could verify where I was at on the day in the town of Newcastle was murdered.
The course was just throwing evidence in the garbage.
We, in fact, proved who committed the crime.
The real murderer was present when the cops arrived.
He was on parole for manslaughter.
They took his name down but never even investigated who he was.
So we had a lot of evidence.
We had a witness who was there who identified who was there, identified why the guy was shot.
There was a 911 caller that said three male blacks fleeing in the red car.
He admitted they was in the red car.
So it was just overwhelming evidence of my innocence.
But courts was just throwing it in the garbage because the prosecutor lied to them and said he's a bad guy.
So my experience has taught me that, you know, there's a lot of innocent people.
I was in prison, man.
Look, one thing about prison that I tell people, they say, hey, everybody says they're innocent.
That's not true, right?
They may tell a lawyer that, but they're not going to tell a guy in the neighborhood with them that.
I know you're guilty.
You know, I was with you.
I know what you did.
You told me.
Everybody tells me.
You from the same neighborhoods.
So it's a small minority of people that's in the law library every single day.
If you go to the yard, God's working out in the weight pile, right?
They're playing basketball.
But the innocent God is in that law library every single day trying to find a way out.
And that was me.
Every single day.
And I studied every book in there.
I taught law classes.
And I became very good at it.
I mean, I was surprised.
I mean, I know I'm in the college, right?
When the lawyer gave me the first two cases and I read them, I was surprised how well I knew the cases.
I was surprised how I comprehended them.
And it was because of that that I kept going.
And I found this civilian who liked me.
He was working in the law library.
And the first test I got was a 44. And he said, look, man, I'm not going to waste my time.
It just shows you, you know, he's been written about a lot.
Scarcella, there have been scores of articles out there about him because he was exposed.
And this is not an indictment of all police that are amazing cops.
But a couple of bad eggs that let the power get to their head, a couple of rogue cops, they don't just destroy a life.
They destroy, you know, it's a ripple.
One, you know, if you, like, Derek and I were at Sing Sing visiting one of our clients, this guy Bruce Bryant, and, you know, it's the brothers, the sisters, the family, and then you start to multiply that out and the ripple effect of how it affects these families.
There's been 20 exonerations.
There's been 22, actually, but there's been 20, 22 exonerations connected to this one cop.
It only takes, you know, some rogue cops and people to look the other way.
And, I mean, look at this beautiful man.
How articulate and bright.
And he's prolific in what he does.
And he snatched his life from him.
We were talking last night about how this is like a second chance to live for him.
Some of the best years of his life, he'll never get back.
You're never the same.
But he's easily the exception to the rule because he's out there and a force of nature and working toward helping to solve this problem.
But Scarcella, we were just asked the same question on the way here.
Because, let's show you how small the world can get.
I haven't talked to Paulie Malignaggi in years.
And he said to me something interesting.
Called me the other day to check up, how you doing?
You know, what's been going on?
He said, you know, I've been following the work you're doing.
And for those that don't know, Paulie was a world champion fighter that liked to talk a lot that I managed years ago.
But he's a good soul.
He's got a good heart.
And he said, you know, there's this case you got to look into for me.
How is there no law that, first of all, eliminates the statute of limitations when someone puts someone in jail for the rest of their fucking life and also treats something like that as organized crime?
Here's the thing that people have to start to understand and get through their heads and believe it.
We have to be careful about who we put in power.
This is not, are you a Democrat?
Are you a Republican?
Are you this?
We have to be careful because Power is worse than any drug.
I'm now convinced of that.
Fame, power, any form of it.
And if you don't start paying attention to the people that we are putting in positions of power, it is human nature that this will keep happening.
As the mammals that we are, we're hardwired to abuse power.
And you ask a great question.
Which is, how do we not suspend the statute of limitations?
It takes people that are willing to do the right thing.
I have been excoriated about, oh, you went on Rogan and said that Kamala Harris was this, but then you voted for her.
No, I fucking didn't.
I call it like I see it.
I'm not a Democrat.
I'm not a Republican.
We have to be careful about who we put into power.
And once you start putting people in power that will do just the right thing, not the popular thing, but the right thing, laws like that can get changed.
They can get change.
And, you know, you have said it before, and you're right.
Until we can get out of this tribal mentality of either us, them, those, we're going to keep on seeing this happen.
This is a hypothetical, because the guy signed a letter, along with a bunch of other state and district attorneys, saying if you pass an abortion law...
I don't think it's a good use of our resources to prosecute people that might be the victims of rape, you know, who are doctors who are trying to help the victims of rape.
I think it clogs up the system and they have their rationale for it.
But there had never been a case brought before him yet.
Now, why did Ron DeSantis do that, in my opinion?
He did that because he knows abortion is a hot-button issue.
And if he goes down there and removes this guy, he becomes a hero for it.
We are not going to prosecute according to state law.
We're going to prosecute according to this county ordinance.
If Ron DeSantis gave a shit about state attorneys not prosecuting crimes, don't you think he would have been right there and said, what the fuck is this?
You're not prosecuting according to state law?
You're not fit to be a state attorney.
I'm pulling you out of office.
That's the first thing he would have done.
He didn't do that.
They actually created a way to circumvent state law and did it.
Abortion is politically popular, so he knows he's going to make himself...
So whether you're a quote-unquote Republican, a Democrat, a Libertarian, if you don't look at that fact and say...
There's something really wrong there.
Something wrong.
I don't care about anything else involving this man.
That in and of itself smacks of fascism.
When you go grab an elected official by the scruff of their neck and yank them out of an elected position, that doesn't horrify you?
I mean, but when it comes to weed, you know, it's illegal in the state of Florida.
You sort of did an end around here to get around the law.
But I'm going to leave that state attorney alone.
There's no answer to that.
I have met this man before.
He threw a tissy fit over the fact that I was wearing a mask at the height of the pandemic because my son has type 1 diabetes, and it wasn't known yet whether I could get it, pass it to him, and...
Instead of meeting with me, turned his back on me and walked out.
He cancels clemency routinely in Florida.
That should bother people.
That people like Derek, who just want a hearing, just hear me.
You cancel the fucking clemency?
You cancel the entire hearing so people's cases can't get heard.
And until people are willing to sort of step away and say, you know what?
I don't like what this individual does.
I'm not going to vote for him.
I'm not going to vote that person into power.
There are judges that get elected in the state of Florida, some that have ruined the lives of my clients.
You know, and they continually get elected because we vote along party lines instead of using our minds.
And, you know, Derek and I were talking about it on the way here.
Like, what is it that prevents people from saying, you know what, I'm going to do something.
Instead of talk about it on Instagram or post about it or bitch about it at a cocktail party, what prevents people from saying, you know what?
Maybe I'll run for office.
Or maybe I will write a letter.
Or maybe I will go protest.
And maybe I will take up this cause.
I don't know what it is.
It's something stops in people.
And they say that's just something for other people.
If you want to make change happen and be about the change, you can do it.
If you actually...
This guy is a...
The best example of the power of one and how the power of one can sort of light a fire under the power of others.
I'm inspired by him.
I feel like there's not enough time in the day to get things done.
And you start to see the fruits of your labor when you get the wind at your back and you start making change happen.
And I just think people feel like, well, politicians, that's for someone else.
Or being a leader, that's for someone else.
A lot of it is just sort of getting out there and making it happen or else we're just going to be in this It's amazing when some people get their back up against the wall, they become like a different person.
You literally changed the course of your education.
You learned law.
That is so inspiring to me that someone who gets put in a terrible situation instead of woe is me and complaining, you went out and you changed the course of the history of your life.
You really did.
You did it yourself.
That's so incredible.
I mean, I've heard similar stories of people becoming jailhouse lawyers, but I'm always inspired by that, and I'm always inspired by the human spirit that someone can, despite the odds, despite the way it feels, despite the inclination to lean towards despair, that you figured it out, man.
Well, you know, for me, one of the most telling things, I could never understand how, you know, I'll give you an example.
In Rikers Island, you wake up 5 o'clock in the morning, You go to court.
So from 5 a.m.
to probably 10 o'clock at night, you're in the bullpen.
You're stressed out, and guys fighting each other, cutting each other.
It's a zoo house, right?
And I was to be cursing these guys out because you're tough with each other, but when you go before the judge, you're a pussy.
Excuse the vernacular.
I just couldn't understand that.
Like, the most important thing in your life, you don't stand up and fight.
And I know that didn't want to be me.
I wanted to be the smartest guy in that courtroom.
If they was going to railroad me, I was going to have objection.
I was going to say, Your Honor, may I address the court and I was going to state the law and why what you was doing was wrong.
So I thanks Candace Curse, that attorney that gave me the advice.
Study law, man.
You got to fight for your life.
Nobody's going to fight for it for you.
And I grew up a fighter.
I grew up in Bevis-Stuyvesant, Brooklyn.
And I couldn't fight physically, so I know I had to arm myself mentally with enough intelligence to be able to take on a judge, to take on a prosecutor, to take on my defense attorney if they was wrong.
And that was my thing.
When I went in that courtroom, I wanted to make sure, even though you was railroading me, that wreck it, and that's what got me out of prison, the wreck it.
All of my objections got me out.
The judge had to admit that.
That there was evidence to prove I'm innocent because I wouldn't let them have it in any way.
I wasn't leaving that courtroom with him making a record like I was guilty.
Whenever the prosecutor said that I shot somebody and killed them, I objected.
I called them on the phone.
I wrote letters.
I used to call the Judge Chambers and act like I was somebody in the mayor's office and say, why are you doing this to me?
They would be like, yeah, tell your client, don't call me no more.
But to me, the most important thing I had was my life.
And if I didn't stand up and fight for it, nobody else would.
Nobody else could.
Nobody else knew I was innocent.
And they always believed that you're guilty because the prosecutor, lawyers, judges, a lot of them in the same, Democratic Party in New York City, they're all amongst party lines, they all hang out together.
They're friends.
I was the only outsider in that.
And I knew for a fact that if I didn't stand up and throw punches back the only way that I could, through the law, that I would have stayed in prison the rest of my life.
So, I mean, the criminal justice system is broken.
We've got to fix it, as you said, even to waive the statute of limitations to hold people accountable, to hold prosecutors accountable, to change the level of amendment.
I mean, everybody, look, if you can go after Donald Trump, Right?
Then you can go after prosecutors and cops.
You can't tell me that you can go after Trump today for things that you said he did as a president, but you can let Scarcella get away, you can let the prosecutors get away, and you want me to say that that's okay?
It's just incredible to me that they would be willing, just because they want to keep this guy as a snitch, that they will go out and convict an innocent person.
How does a person get so jaded That they're willing and don't care about putting innocent people behind bars.
I mean, is their idea that everybody's guilty of something, so it's okay?
Like, what's the mindset that allows a cop to do something like that?
Judges on based on how fast the case moved to the system.
So if you're going to pat me on my back as a cop and say, good job done, and there's nobody investigating to see whether or not you did a great job, prosecutors are supposed to investigate any case that cops bring before them.
They're rhetorical, but they're the same questions that I hear from people that hear these stories.
And it's almost like your defense mechanism as a human being doesn't want to let you believe that that could be.
Because you're taught as a kid, cops are here to serve and protect you.
Prosecutors are here to get the bad guys.
What's woven in here and that we're not really, we're addressing it without addressing it, is that the racism that runs rampant in our system is a very big part of this.
A lot of white cops, whether subconsciously or consciously, think the black guy or the brown guy, the Latin guy did it.
There is a huge, that's one, you know, it's a messy stew.
There's one part of it, a large part of it, I'm sure, is what you just said.
It's you do not see the human cost that a prosecution of a human being leaves in its wake.
And these prosecutors get accolades for convictions, and it is a game.
It's about wins and losses.
For cops, it's about arrests.
And yes, it taps into something primal that, you know, winning is good, losing is bad.
And it's a messy stew.
And I used to think that sometimes cops were out to frame people.
I don't think it's always that.
I think that they think that their hunch is better than evidence and they make the ends justify the means.
But you can't ignore any one of these factors.
Look...
You and I had a discussion, not on the podcast, about Brittany Griner, right?
And, you know, I think we all agree as human beings that she, it's insane.
It's not, the word doesn't give it justice.
It's horrific.
It's, you know, every adjective that you can pull, it's a nightmare for her.
And you asked me a question that I think you asked it, you articulated on the podcast and you and I were texting about it, which is that, you know, this happens here.
And yes, she's getting attention because she's in Russia.
It's a political thing.
It's in vogue.
And I want her to get out, of course, more than anyone.
But there are way worse situations here in this country.
I sent you some of these cases.
So I went down a bit of a rabbit hole.
And I said, you know, there's got to be some...
There has to be someone that has studied the disparity between the sentences that black men and women get for marijuana possession or marijuana convictions versus white people.
And Derek found a study that I have with me.
And when I read it, I kept on saying, this is unbelievable.
It was commissioned by the ACLU from 2010 to 2018. And they examined this from every angle.
They took the crystal ball and they turned it around, and then they turned it over, and then they looked at the inside of it.
They looked at it from every angle, okay?
Did the decriminalization of marijuana reduce the number of arrests overall?
Yes, slightly.
did it reduce the number, the ratio of arrests when you look at black people that are arrested for marijuana possession as opposed to white people?
And the resounding answer is no.
If you are a black person in this country and you are caught possessing marijuana, you are three and a half times more likely to A, get arrested and B, get a disproportionate sentence.
And if anybody is interested in the report, it's called the ACLU Research Report, A Tale of Two Countries.
Racially targeted arrests in the era of marijuana reform.
It will blow your fucking mind.
It is, it went, they went down to a level of granularity that you would expect from a rigorous research study.
They said, okay, well, do white people possess weed more than black people?
Or do black people?
Because if you would think that if black folks possessed more marijuana, they would get arrested at a higher rate.
The answer is no.
White people do.
You know, and you cannot look at these statistics and not be outraged and say, okay, we have a problem here in this country.
Our criminal justicism is infected by racism.
It doesn't just stay in one segment of society.
They looked at the arrest rate, right?
The black-white ratio in table six of this report from 2010 to 2018. The arrest per 100,000 may go down, but black people get arrested in this country for marijuana possession in the same scenario, 3.6 times more than white people.
They broke it down state by state.
I brought it because I wanted to leave it with you, and they went down to states with the highest black arrest rates for marijuana possession.
States with the largest increases in racial disparities.
I mean, a lot of this shit is happening in the South.
It's happening to black people.
They're being brutalized by our criminal justice system.
And unless people are willing to wake up to that fact, I mean, we're in 2022. Yes.
Marijuana is legal in many states, decriminalized in many others.
And so getting back to DeSantis, I'm not beating up on him.
If you really cared about removing a state attorney and you want to, you know, do something right, you know, decriminalize it in the entire state.
How many people, you know, well, imagine this.
This is who this guy is.
And I'm just calling it like I see him.
I've met him.
I've met with him.
He is the jerk at work.
You know, everybody has that person that is just an asshole at work and is always telling on people and causing a fucking problem and looking to be difficult.
That's who this guy is.
He has a bad temperament.
He doesn't have patience.
I was there meeting with him as a favor from one of his biggest donors.
He had no patience with me.
And why was I there?
I was there because I wanted him to simply give me a clemency hearing.
I wasn't asking for anything.
I wasn't saying, please...
Commute the sentence of this innocent man, James Daly, who I know is innocent.
I was just there to say, just hold the hearing and let me show you, as Derek said, the merits.
Let me just show you the merits of the case.
The only person that would meet with me on the clemency board and hear me out is a woman that's running for governor in Florida named Nikki Fried.
She's the fucking commissioner of agriculture.
She didn't need to meet with me.
She met with me for three and a half hours with her general counsel, with other members of her clemency team.
I'm supporting her because I'm, you know, something that I'm interested in, she paid attention to.
And she said, there's a problem here.
We have to hear people out.
This is before she had intentions to run for governor.
And now, you know, she's neck and neck with Charlie Crist in Florida.
If people want to make change happen, you know, take a look at her.
She's an interesting alternative.
She was a public defender.
I think she then became a prosecutor.
She gets it from all angles.
She's a commissioner of agriculture and she's not a politician.
The thing that bothers me is that when you look at racial disparities In marijuana possession arrests, you know, what's happening in the South in this country, Pickens County, Georgia, the arrest rate for black people caught possessing marijuana, you're 97 times more likely to get arrested if you're black possessing marijuana.
The face that you just made is what happened in my fucking heart when I read it.
You know, in Illinois, people wonder that, you know, like it's like a popular thing for white people to say is like when they're in social circles where they don't think anyone's listening, fucking black people are killing each other in Chicago, right?
Well, you know, in Tazewell County, Illinois, you're 43 times more likely to be arrested if you're black and caught with weed than if you're white.
I mean, we have a broken system.
And if people aren't willing to step up and recognize that, this report confirmed what I already thought and knew.
But if people aren't willing to recognize and say, okay, well, how do we go about fixing it?
You know, the legislatures pass laws that are made by people.
And are conjured up by people.
They get in a room and they sit there with a pen and paper and they come up with a law.
And then we try to get them passed.
You're absolutely right.
There should be no statute of limitations for a cop like Luis Scarcella who has fucking ruined the lives of a generation of people.
And I would like to just add that those stats just don't apply to marijuana.
If you go to the Almanac, those stats apply to all crimes around the board, that black people are being arrested.
In some instances, when you look at the Almanac, white people are being arrested more but convicted less.
Of the same crimes.
So it's just systemic.
It's systemic racism.
As you said, it's tribal, right?
People tend to go with their tribe more than others, right?
And then if you're poor, that plays another role.
Whether you're white or black, right?
If you're poor, you can't get the money to defend yourself.
So you're relying on who?
A public defender or somebody who a judge has to sign off on their They're money to get paid, right?
So you're still stuck.
I had an 18B lawyer, which is a county lawyer one time, come to me on a motion that I made, pro se, and say, the judge told me that he's going to deny your motion no matter what we do.
She was scared to death.
He was signing her voucher.
She was scared.
What did I do?
Went right in the court and said it.
Judge, this lawyer just told me that you're going to deny the motion no matter what we do.
And she says, I never said that, Judge.
And I says, well, she's a liar.
And that's the reason why I don't want her on my case.
I'm asking that she be removed.
There's a conflict.
But she was so afraid.
She was so scared that this judge had already told her what the disposition is.
And there's also racial disparity that's clearly written in the law when it comes to the difference between the way they recognize crack cocaine versus regular cocaine.
But if you talk to an actual person who understands the effects of the drug, like Dr. Carl Hart, he will tell you it is exactly the same drug.
It's the same drug, but the conviction, what you get if you get convicted for crack cocaine, like you would probably know this better than I, it's far greater sentence, far more likely to be convicted, far greater sentence, and it directly impacts impoverished communities.
I said, if I was a black man in this country, I don't know how he holds it together.
But I was, you know, what ends up always blowing me away is what I think you touched on earlier.
Because it's like, how do you find a silver lining?
I don't think there's any silver lining to a life that has been damaged the way Derek's life has been damaged.
And as tough as he is, somewhere under there, he hurts in a way that we'll never understand.
But I was watching these students.
We got five college students who would never have got this opportunity Just wouldn't have got this opportunity to sit there if they weren't part of Jay Z's scholarship and his mom Gloria Carter was just a wonderful woman and this woman Donya Diaz and said let's see what happens when we give people an opportunity and I watched five college juniors that are going into their senior year of college some of them shy and timid some of them who were in intimidated
by the notion that they would be working on a legal case Start to realize, like, this guy Bruce Bryant, and if people that are interested should go to Free Bruce Bryant, there's a clemency petition for him.
I can't talk too much about his innocence case, but he has been called by the press the poster child for clemency in New York.
There's stunning evidence of his innocence.
They quickly got to the main facts of the case and were able to start solving it.
These are college juniors.
And they said, you know, who brings—he was accused of being a shooter and a murder— Right.
And they started to find inconsistencies in the testimony of people that claimed they saw him, didn't see him.
And, you know, really, it was like a stunning reminder to me that if we just give people the opportunity, Derek was forced into the opportunity.
I told him I did a day in jail.
I was a fucking puddle.
I was a mess.
And I don't know how he was able to summon the strength to survive, let alone have the discipline to plug.
He was telling me about when he was in the hole about how there was a guy in the cell next to him.
It was a fascinating analogy he gave me.
He said it's like social media.
It's that there's some voice in the darkness that you'll never meet them, you'll never see them, but they can criticize you and get under your skin and call you names and say nasty shit about you.
Looking for a reaction.
And they sometimes get it.
And that emboldens them more.
He said it was the same thing when I was in the hole.
You'd have someone next to me yelling terrible shit.
I'm gonna fuck your wife.
I'm gonna do this to your daughter.
You know.
And taunting you.
And being able to distinguish between anger and And the recognition or the realization, I'll never be able to confront this person.
It's just a voice out there that is sick in the head, obviously, and is trying to get a reaction out of me.
And Derek was telling me how it forced him into patience.
And it forced him to be able to develop the skill at drowning out the background noise.
Because to me, it must be annoying because I'm always asking him questions like, how did you do it?
It's the same thing you were getting at.
How do you summon the strength to be able to overcome?
And if people like him can overcome, people that were born into the worst circumstances, born into a poor background, a system built against him, you know, if we just start changing that paradigm...
Don't we want everyone around us to succeed and have the same chance that we have?
It's hard to not sound corny about it, but I always tell people that...
I've heard criticisms of you, Joe, before, and I say to people, you have no fucking clue who this man is.
You know how rare it is to come across a human being that wants other people to do well?
We're almost hardwired to want to tear each other down because of our insecurities.
You genuinely want to see people do well.
And it's like, I was telling Derek that about you.
It's like, he genuinely wants to see people do well.
And it comes from the heart.
And, you know, if he's not an inspiring example of what we can all aspire to and overcome and doesn't open some eyes to say, you know, if I just give someone a chance, they can do it.
They think that wanting someone to do well and somehow or another takes away from you, but it doesn't.
It boosts you.
It helps you.
The more people do well, the better you'll do.
But that's a competitor's understanding of the nature of the circle that you surround yourself in.
You should always be around people that are killing it, because then you want to kill it.
You should always be around people that are kind and people that are generous because you know that feeling you get when you go, God damn, what a fucking great guy.
The person that only wants to be the man and wants everything for themselves and wants to be selfish and cut everybody down, that's a lonely, sad fucking person.
That's a terrible place to be.
It's terrible for yourself.
It's a selfish thing to be kind.
It's a selfish thing to be generous.
It's great for you.
It's great for everyone else too though.
It's like there's a selfishness in it because I genuinely love the feeling when I can help people.
I genuinely love the feeling of whether it's helping people express themselves on a podcast or elevate a comedian's career or just help someone out that I know needs some help.
You know, one of the things we know, and I'm going to say we, and I'm talking about it as black people, right?
We believe that the system was designed the way that it is.
That it didn't happen by happenstance, right?
So when you know that, you work to change the system.
I work to change the system so that my kids will get a better opportunity, their kids will get a better opportunity, and that we can together gel as human beings.
If I don't do the work, what good is to be criticizing it, right?
If I be angry and upset and grab a gun and become some animal, that doesn't help the society.
It doesn't help the criminal justice system.
So, again, I had to really, really think about it.
Let me tell you, I'm the first person to tell you that I had fantasies of killing the cop.
I had fantasies of killing the prosecutor.
I went and spoke to mental health people and said, listen, I can't sleep at night.
All I think about is killing these guys when I get out of here.
You know what the social worker told me?
I looked at your record.
And it's what guys like you do.
And this is why till today, I got a trauma about speaking to mental health people.
Because this is somebody I went to to say, Lord, I can't sleep at night.
I have fantasies about killing Scarcella.
You think I didn't?
Fantasies.
I had a whole list of people that I was going to kill.
But it was a program that I went to when I was in prison called Challenge to Change.
I went to the program solely for the purpose to see if they can change that in my mind.
And they did.
And you know how they did it?
They had me put the people that I love, my kids, up on the board.
They said, put down the people that you love up there and think about how it would affect them.
What would happen?
You already did these many years.
And I had a daughter that's 30 years old now.
And I was telling her for 21 years I was coming home.
Every year I'm thinking I'm coming home.
I'm following these motions.
They're great motions.
It's impossible for the judge to deny it, right?
And at some point she said, you's a liar.
You've been telling me for 21 years you're coming home.
Yeah, well, I think one big step is I always thank you, and I don't think that there should be a limit to my gratitude.
Being on this podcast is the best example because I don't think we would have got the two exonerations in Kansas without the attention, and I think we need to keep the drumbeat going.
So I'm forever and continually grateful to you for giving me a platform.
But I think that in addition to that, more people need to understand that they can help make the change happen.
So, again, we can't announce the name.
We have been sworn to secrecy.
But Derek and I are on the precipice of starting a very major legal justice center at a major law school together, where I'll be the executive director and he'll be the deputy director.
And it was funded by someone who had this experience where they were wrongfully accused of a crime and had the resources to fight it and has now funded it.
And we need, you know, donations always help because the more resources you have, the more attorneys you can hire.
But it needs the public awareness and then it needs to keep the drumbeat of pressure going because we know that works.
Derek mentioned The Daily News article that got the parole board's attention.
Getting these stories out there work.
There are guys that we have talked about, and we might as well do it because we're here, okay?
And we're here to try to get the word out.
There are stories of cases that are out there now.
You said this can't be true, and then I sent you the Joe Schilling case, right?
Where Joe Schilling is serving life in prison.
After being convicted of having an ounce and a half of weed and had his appeal denied.
And you wrote to me, is this true?
And then I sent you the opinion.
And, you know, Joe Schilling is like...
An example, this happened in Mississippi.
This is what happens to black men in the South.
And Joe Schilling is an example of a case where if enough people write to the clemency board, write to the governor, somebody will pay attention at some point.
And here's a guy where they look at, you know, things that he has done in the past, and they say, well, it wasn't just this marijuana conviction.
He was also involved in an armed robbery, right?
Well, he wasn't involved in an armed robbery.
When you say involved, you picture, stick him up!
Here's a gun or a knife.
You know, there are different levels of involvement, and people make mistakes.
So you don't use those past mistakes as a way to shoehorn them in To throwing their life away, right?
If you really want to do something to change the rate of deaths in this country, the rate of violence in this country, and you really are not a hypocrite, you'll ban alcohol.
Because alcohol causes a lot more accidental deaths because of drunk driving.
There's not a lot of people that are sitting there smoking weed, getting in their car, and blowing up another car in a family.
The biggest victims of marijuana smoking are fucking potato chips and chocolate.
I mean, it's like, what the fuck are we talking about here?
So here you're throwing away a life.
And saying, oh, well, this is because of what you did before.
Joe Schilling's case should be advertised.
There should be letters flowing in by the hundreds of thousands.
So the bottleneck is, I think, and maybe I sound a little bit arrogant in saying this, but you'll correct me and be my reality check, both of you.
The bottleneck is not having the fucking balls to To stand up and say, I am going to speak truth to power.
And I'm going to tell you, this is not okay.
And I've had my life threatened.
I have had my families threatened, because I will speak truth to power.
And I look, I wear it like a badge of honor.
And you know, Derek told these students, because they said, well, what if we get emotional?
He said, this business is not for the faint of heart.
You can get emotional, and you can be sympathetic, but it just takes more caring and more doing.
So the more people that can write to clemency boards, the more people that can say, I'm not going to vote in a tribal way, the more people that say, you know what, I can do better as a leader by running for office.
Do it!
We all feel like it's for someone else, you know, but like this happened to you, right?
Did you ever think you would reach this many people?
And I watched her evolve to the point where when I finally got married to my wife, the fact that she was Christian and that a judge married us in a non-denominational ceremony that was more human than it was religious, it wasn't even an issue.
So if we're willing to break from what's expected of us and the norm...
You know, and I had a dad, my dad recently passed, you know, that he was a complicated dude, but, you know, like, we...
Draw off of things that happen to us.
I remember in college, I was home for Thanksgiving, and my mom sent my dad off to Home Depot to get light bulbs because the light bulbs in the living room burned out.
And he comes back from Home Depot with these two young black guys that were selling these keyboards with a flip-up screen that could connect to the internet at the time.
It was like, he felt bad for them because he's like, these guys were out here in the fucking Florida heat in November.
And he's like, they had nowhere to go for Thanksgiving.
And it was like, my mom was like, what the fuck are you doing?
You just take home two strangers?
And he's like, they need food for Thanksgiving.
They need to be here.
It's human compassion.
This is part of who we are as human beings.
And it was like, it was nuts.
It was like a fucking Seinfeld episode.
But I was like, wow, this fucking guy.
Who does that?
I mean, what he does after is he goes and drives him home and comes back two hours later blazing high and he's like, I smoke something called the cryptos with them.
So time-barred means it's the same thing as the statute of limitations.
So you have to raise claims of newly discovered evidence within a certain period of time in most states, okay?
And in most federal jurisdictions.
And if you don't If you are in possession or should have been in possession of this newly discovered evidence and you don't file it in a timely manner and raise it, it's deemed waived.
So what the opinion was basically saying was that we cannot let innocence or the fact that someone may be innocent trump these procedural hurdles.
So in other words, rules exist for a reason.
And if we don't follow those rules, just because somebody might be innocent and just because there's compelling evidence of their innocence does not mean that we are going to let that get in the way of these procedural rules.
And, you know, you got to look at 28 U.S.C. 2254 is the habeas corpus statue in the feds if you're a state prisoner coming to the feds asking for relief.
And they've been watering that down for years, basically saying that states should be the one to decide these things, that you shouldn't be able to come to the federal court to get relief.
And let's just explain for the listeners what habeas corpus relief is.
Habeas corpus means, I think the Latin translation is possession of the body.
Okay?
So that is your last ditch effort to try to get relief from a federal court saying that you are possessing my body.
In a way that violates my rights.
You have my corpus, right?
So when you raise a habeas or a habe, it's often referred to, petition, you're basically throwing everything against the wall and saying, please look at the merits of the case.
I may be time barred.
I may have violated a procedural deadline.
But if you just look at the evidence, I'm innocent.
And what the Supreme Court decision says is your innocence is not part of this equation.
No, and I just want to say that Clarence Thomas actually wrote the decision.
Kavanaugh was a part of it.
But what they basically...
Was ruling on this case.
The Ninth Circuit had reversed the case and they had gave a hearing on ineffective assistive counsel claim.
And they found that the lawyer was ineffective because he didn't present the evidence of innocence.
And so what they did was reverse it and said innocence doesn't matter.
Now in the feds they got something called a gateway claim.
Right?
So your innocence alone, they're saying, is not a freestanding actual innocence claim.
You have to have some other constitutional violation.
In that case, the lawyers chose ineffective assistance of counsel because they said this evidence always was available.
Always was available.
That the lawyer should have got it and presented it.
The courts reversed it and said, no, we don't care about his innocence, and you should stop holding hearings on ineffective assistance of counsel claims, whether it relates to innocence or not.
A remarkable young woman, white woman, that taught a lot of people in Beffitt Hills Correctional Facility in New York how to get out and run organizations.
She has all kinds of degrees, PhD, kind of like Bruce Bryant, but a female version of it.
She got life from New Hampshire.
New Hampshire sent her to New York to do her time.
She's been in New York prisons over 30 years.
She can't get clemency and she see New York prisoners walking out every day that don't have her credentials.
Because she's in New York.
The New York governor doesn't have control of her.
New Hampshire's like DeSantis, the governor there.
The student becomes assessed and kills her husband.
And she swears she never told him to do it, but despite if she did or not, she'd been in prison over 30-some years.
Remarkable young lady, has every degree you can think of.
Runs the prison.
The superintendent gave her letters saying that she should get out of clemency.
Why isn't she out?
Like, it's things like this that keep me up at night because, look, when you have redeemed yourself, whether you're guilty or not, when you can serve society best by being out and running programs and helping people, I think you should be here.
But the environments that you're describing and the environments that everybody that I've ever talked to that's been incarcerated describe are nothing like that.
Yeah, they have something called qualified immunity.
And qualified immunity means that in most situations, they're not going to be held accountable.
And you've asked this question before, and it is probably the most important question to ask.
Because the way that we deter people from engaging in this type of behavior, I mean, the reason why people don't, you know, think twice about whether it's cheating on their taxes, selling cocaine, whatever is...
The fear of going to jail is a real fear.
It should be a real fear.
Derek and I were talking about it.
We were talking about different prisons in the state of New York.
It's an awful fucking place.
Who the fuck wants to be in jail?
It depresses us when we have to go.
It's awful.
If prosecutors know that they're not going to be prosecuted or subject to prosecution themselves, you know, it makes it a lot more difficult for accountability to follow.
And, you know, how do we change qualified immunity?
We get new people in the fucking legislature.
I'm not on some crusade against Ron DeSantis.
I'm not.
The reason why I always come back to him is because he very well could be...
Who the fuck knows what's going to happen with Donald Trump?
He very well could be the next choice for president.
He's very popular.
Here's a guy that vetoed a bill for contraception.
It was a bipartisan bill.
You can't get Democrats and Republicans in Florida to agree on the fucking weather.
So he vetoes a bill that would increase...
Contraception.
It would have provided $2 million to low-income women to gain IUDs, more access to contraception.
So you would think that the president of the Senate, who's a Republican, and championed this bill, I thought that would solve a lot of abortion issues, probably eliminate thousands of abortions.
And then he goes on and he blames himself for not convincing DeSantis.
His reasoning behind it is that he received a letter from, I think, the Catholic bishops.
And the Catholic bishops told him that if you—these IUDs prevent— They prevent a fetus from grabbing onto the uterine wall and that that was a form of abortion in and of itself.
So now he's become a doctor and he's against contraception.
So you're now invading the...
Personal decisions of a woman of how she wants to go about contraception, whether you are stymieing semen from entering a woman by putting a fucking raincoat on your dick, or you are putting a device in a woman to prevent sperm from getting into the uterine wall.
I think it's called the Florida Conference of Catholic Bishops.
That's who he got a letter from.
And they object to the use of long-acting contraception, particularly these what they call hormonal IUDs.
And they say that they can prevent an embryo from implanting into a woman's uterus.
So they deem them...
They're called abortifacients.
So, you know, it's like we have to have the...
I guess the the ability to step outside of this tribal primal box and say, you know what, I don't care if you're a Democrat, Republican, Libertarian and say, I'm not going for that shit, just like I'm not going for somebody that fought To keep DNA testing from seeing the light of day.
Why?
Why would Kamala Harris do that?
And you want to know something?
The campaign, you know, wanted to...
You know, I caught a lot of shit.
I think there was a senator that was promoting a clip of me being critical of her.
And one, they wanted me to, you know- Walk it back.
Yeah, would you reconsider and walk it back?
And I said, why can't?
Yeah, we had a conversation.
And she won't walk anything back.
She won't say anything.
I mean, why can't you just say, look, I was trying to serve my community.
I realized with the benefit of hindsight that it's an $11 test, the DNA test.
Why not give access?
A lot of politicians, they're afraid of the political cost of admitting a mistake.
I'm so turned off by it, I almost want to run for office.
I was asked, would you ever run for governor of New York?
I said, I don't want my family ravaged and people looking into my past and making a mockery of me.
I understand why people don't want to run for office.
But at the same time, it kind of makes you feel like if the people that are in power are wielding power in a way that is so dangerous and so harmful to people, sometimes I think about it.
I also don't want to give up my privacy and I also don't want people judging me on every time I make, you know, a decision that they disagree with.
And, you know, I'm conflicted about it.
I almost, I'm like encouraging people to get involved in a way that I even wouldn't get involved.
And, you know, then you end up, you know, serving many masters.
Yeah, it's a dirty business.
And I just don't know, you know, this is like, it's a pretty simple equation to me when it comes to how problematic racism is in our criminal justice system.
I don't get why people don't understand this equation, the following equation.
You take an entire race of people, steal them from their homeland, Enslave them, savage them, brutalize them.
Tell them they're free.
They're really not free.
Build a system in which, in our lifetime, your parents, my parents, could not urinate in the same bathroom as people of color.
And then an entire system is built upon, you know, making, you know, why don't you pick your, we've talked about this before, pick yourself up by your bootstraps, I'm tired of the excuses, all that.
Because there's a cycle of, you know, a family unit being broken, an entire civilization of people that have been stolen and brutalized in this country.
And it just feels like the criminal justice system is going to be problematic because people are wielding power, you know, and abusing it in the first place.
And then you throw, you know, the racial injustice into it, and it complicates it even more because we're just not willing as a society to say...
You know, like I hear from friends of mine, look at the Jews.
Like, you know, make sure that you are explaining that you were there in your individual capacity because they don't want...
People are so afraid of cancel culture.
They're afraid that you will be painted in a certain way because of who you associate with or who you speak to or who you try to sit across a table from.
It's like, let me say this.
I'll say it publicly.
This guy, Joe Rogan, is like a brother.
You know, we don't even know each other.
It's weird because our families don't know each other and we've talked about it.
You know, like when I see him get dragged through the mud in the media, I've shed tears.
Because he's a rare person.
He roots for me and wants to see me do good.
And we know each other in a way that is like...
It's weird because it's at a distance, but I feel like a closeness to him like a brotherhood, right?
And that's because I understand the guy's heart.
So I'm not going to be, you know, told what to do or censored or told what to think or what to say.
Because, you know, I don't think that that...
Derek, I honestly don't think it's strength.
I think that it's more out of anger and being pissed off that people think in a way that represents a herd mentality, right?
And it's like I feel it sometimes with you where sometimes people will judge him.
They see a black man with a gold tooth who's big and has been in prison for 30 years and they make assumptions.
And I won't even tell you, it's happened since we've been associated with each other.
It's part of what happens when you get a lot of attention.
There's no getting around it.
I appreciate it.
I appreciate what you are and who you are and what you're capable of doing and the love that you have for these people and the way that you put yourself out there.
It's very, very rare.
And that's why you and I are brothers.
Because I know you.
I know your heart.
I know what you're doing, you know, and Some people they just they think again, it goes along tribal lines and it's also the fear of Repercussions a feel fear of criticism they read too much.
They're paying attention to too many idiots on social media They're paying attention to too much nonsense the greater good of what you're doing outweighs everything by a gigantic margin and And the fact that they can't see that, it just shows that even on the right side of important issues, you're gonna have people that are cowards.
They don't like when someone displays character and a point of focus that's beyond what they're capable of.
It intimidates them, it bothers them, and they try to find weakness in it and they try to critique it and criticize it and shut it down.
And it's just a lack of understanding of just the true character of human beings and how important it is to have someone like yourself that dedicates a massive amount of their life to trying to help innocent people get out of jail, which should be the focus of our entire culture.
Our entire culture should be, let's, first of all, make sure that no one is ever convicted of something that they're unjustly accused of.
No one.
Ever.
And if they are, we need to get them out.
Before we need to convict people of crimes, we need to get people out that are innocent.
That's more important than anything.
It's more important than anything.
If we have a culture that not only allows people to be imprisoned but creates law and signs decisions that keep people in prison that they know are innocent, we have a terrible system.
That should be number one, because these are innocent people.
We're supposed to be protecting innocent people.
Those people, that should be our primary concern, and that's your primary concern, and that's an incredibly noble and brave and honorable and loving perspective.
And for people to not see that and try to connect it with nonsense, And try to just get you upset or just criticize you or try to tear you down.
I mean, maybe I don't give myself enough flowers, and I'm not looking for flowers.
I just feel like, you know, I'm not looking for anything but the feeling of, you know, I just know, I've said it before, that the feeling of restoring another human being, and when you walk someone out, there's just like...
You know, I've done plenty of drugs in my life, and I've tried it all, and there's just nothing that can match it.
There just isn't.
And it's like almost the feeling that you were describing of when you, like, surround yourself with good people and see them succeeding and you get a thrill off of it.
This is the ultimate thrill.
I remember one time where Emanuel Stewart, who trained Lennox Lewis and Tommy Hearns and so many other champions from the Cronk Gym, I mean, I was like a baby at the time, now that I think about it.
All right, so Walter Swift served, I think, close to 40 years.
And I was with Barry Sheck at dinner, one of the founders of the Innocence Project, and he was telling me about this case in Detroit.
And it was a rape case, and this black guy was accused of it, and they had stunning evidence of his innocence, and he's like, if I could just get the DA to pay attention.
You know anyone in Detroit?
I said, I know Emanuel Stewart.
And I remember even as I flung the name out there, I was like, he's a boxing trainer.
I gotta also imagine that that hard work that you did when you were in prison fortified your character and changed you as a person because you knew that you could do that now.
You knew you could become this incredibly knowledgeable lawyer now.
And it fortifies you further, strengthens you further.
It's very admirable and it's very inspirational.
And for a lot of people listening to this that maybe have pity on themselves for nonsense, they're listening to your case right now and they're going, holy shit, what am I talking about?
Yeah, and you know, if you Google Derek Hamilton, it's like, I remember the dean of the law school where the center is being launched, and it's killing both of us if we can't.
We'll come back.
Hopefully, you'll have us back again, and we'll announce the launch.
I told her, I said, you know, there's this guy that got out and she said, you're going to have an exoneree be the deputy director of this big legal center?
And she called me and she said, I want to meet him.
So much has been written about Derek and how prolific he was.
And to be honest with you, I want to be around him as much as I can because I draw strength and knowledge and wisdom.
And I watch him navigate a room.
And whether it's street folks, people in education and higher education or on Wall Street, whatever it is...
He can navigate any room.
And he can do it with, what do the Ivy Leaguers say, with aplomb.
He knows what the fuck he's doing and how to say it.
And that is a skill set in and of itself, to be able to read a room and to know what is appropriate and what isn't.
A lot of guys that get out.
Have a real difficult time socially.
We have friends in common that are exonerees that they struggle to get things done because they're inappropriate sometimes.
They haven't been around women forever.
They haven't been around people forever.
And I just know we're on to...
We're going to free a lot of people.
And the clemency arm of our legal justice center, you know, you mentioned it earlier.
You've got to make a decision as a human being.
What do you believe in terms of the ability to forgive and give a second chance?
Are we all better than the worst thing we've done?
If you take a real look at yourself in the mirror, And I'll take a look at myself in the mirror and say, I hope I'm better than the worst things I've done.
And if the worst things I've done define me...
Then I should be, you know, condemned.
We're all fallible.
We've all made horrible mistakes that we wish other people didn't know about.
And if prison is really about rehabilitation, clemency should be a real option.
We still incarcerate at a rate that is six times what South Africa incarcerated during apartheid.
That says terrible things about who we are as a culture.
Are we trying to rehabilitate and send people back into society to be productive members of society?
Or do we want to lock people up and throw away the key and forget them?
And to stop that business dead in its tracks, you're going to have a lot of people out of work, and they have a vested interest in continuing that industry.
Well, I mean, you talk about private or state rent, but private more so allows, you know, I mean, look, you get a private prison, it's not going to be regulated on the same way that state prisons are supposed to be regulated.
So the minimum standards go out the door, right?
Because it's strictly for profit, right?
There's no rehabilitative characters in it whatsoever.
But I think they both kind of marry each other because whether it's state-ran or private-ran, the deprivations are the same.
It's all about a dollar, right?
So whether you're in a state-ran prison, you're going to work for $0.14 an hour, right?
You're going to be in the industry because the industry might pay $1 a day or $2 a day.
So if you go to industry where you make lockers or you make furniture, right?
They say, okay, we give you two hours a day.
Commissary is going to cost you money.
So you're just doing it to eat.
You're doing it to survive, right?
And then the 14 cents a day you get, it's not like the stakes paying it.
They're getting it from the interest of all of the money that your family sent in.
So they're taking interest from that money and they're paying you.
So it's all about a dollar, whether it's private or whether it's state rent.
It's industries in the prison that make money for corporations.
And the corporations get rich.
So it's about a dollar.
It's about whether it's private or state.
You can get a bid on a comb.
If you're a prison owner, you say, okay, I'm going to bid combs.
I'm going to pay 25 cents per comb.
If they're giving you $1,500 a day for an inmate, why would you want to let them go anywhere?
You're going to give them a ticket.
You're going to say, look, I have guards tell me, you know, you got a parole date.
You better be careful.
Because you may lose that any second, right?
Because you know, it's job security.
If I write this guy up and say he punched me in the face, who's going to disbelieve him?
Cuomo, when he ran for governor of New York, one of the first things he said in his stated address is that New York got to stop using prisons as an industry.
That we got to find another way to make some money.
He admitted it outright that New York was doing it.
So I think that the private, whether it's private or whether it's state-run, the goals are the same.
It's an industry.
It's a money-making machine.
And nobody want to give it up.
Nobody want to give it up.
I used to tell correction officers to get them mad.
This is an overpaid babysitting job.
I said I grew up, I never heard anybody say they want to be a correction officer.
I'm not disrespecting you.
It's a fallback job.
You know?
Everybody got to make a living.
But it's just, it's about money.
It's about money.
And nobody want to give it up.
I mean, it's modern day slavery.
Who else going to do those jobs?
Who else going to make license plates?
Tell me where you know that there's any industry out here in society making license plates.
What goes back to the history when slavery was first absolved, abolished rather, one of the first things they did was go out and arrest people and force them to work for slave labor in prison.
They didn't give them, there wasn't some sort of comprehensive plan to rehabilitate them and introduce them, and no reparations and no nothing, no punishment for the people that did it to them, and no assistance to those people.
And so they would just arrest them.
And that was the beginning of our prison industrial complex in this country.
If you look at all the communities that were damaged by redline laws, all the communities that were apart, that's the number one problem in this country.
Is that these people that grow up in this, the idea, this is where I have the biggest problem with this whole bullshit about pull yourself up by your bootstraps.
You have people that are growing up in a neighborhood that you couldn't comprehend, filled with violence and crime and gangs, and to tell that person that they just have to be accountable when they have no examples around them.
We imitate our atmosphere.
You surround yourself with good people, more likely you're going to become a good person.
You have a much better chance.
You surround yourself with people that are criminals, that becomes the norm for you.
It becomes natural.
And if we don't concentrate on that, we spend $40 billion to Ukraine.
We spend billions of dollars for all sorts of military programs that many of us don't agree with, interventionist foreign policy that many people don't agree with, and there's a countless coffer that pays for that shit.
So I don't know where he went, but think about this.
Imagine this, okay?
And this is like, you know, Joe raised this with me before and it makes so much sense because you think about a guy like Jeff Bezos Or Elon Musk or any of these guys that are...
Elon Musk seems to me to be one of the most forward-thinking, progressive, dynamic, creative human beings I've ever laid eyes on or listened to.
And if anyone could reimagine a society...
There's a case in Alabama.
People should look up this case.
Willie Simmons.
Willie Simmons is serving a 40-year sentence for stealing nine fucking dollars.
That's not made up.
Go look it up.
Look at the Breonna Taylor case.
Just imagine this for a minute.
Imagine you walk into your fucking office and you think that someone is in your office and shouldn't be.
You shoot at them five fucking times.
Could you imagine going to your boss and saying, I want to raise...
In Louisville, they increased the budget for police and the way they did it was to cut it out from libraries.
In response to that.
So in other words, increase the budget for police for what?
For training?
For what exactly is it going to?
So we need to reimagine how we think about...
This is why it was...
It's so eye-opening for me to work with the Sean Carter Foundation and Jay-Z's mom and with these students because I was watching these students that I know were born into circumstances that I was not born into.
And they just didn't have the same opportunities that I had.
And to watch them flourish and they doubted themselves quite a bit.
And this man, Derek, would tell them, you can do this.
I don't want to hear any bullshit that you can't.
I don't care that you're not a law student, you're not a lawyer.
You're just solving a puzzle.
And they never said, these are, what, 20, 21-year-old kids?
And when you watch human potential flourish, oh boy, is that an uplifting thing.
And it is like...
It is not only uplifting, it fills you with the type of hope that propels you forward and says, well, I have to do more, right?
You know, Jay-Z sits in the background, and so does his mom, and he has this pretty remarkable impact on society and culture that he does not really seek attention for.
Right.
And, you know, Roc Nation and Danya Diaz and these folks at Roc Nation that empower these They're not out there looking for a story about it.
But they trusted me and put confidence in me to basically take their children.
They call them their babies, right?
Because they know them since they're in high school.
And it was a moment of awakening for me this summer to see children that otherwise didn't have the confidence or didn't even know the potential in themselves realize that potential.
And they're not going to all go on to be lawyers.
You know, one of them is a dancer, one of them is a drama major, and one of them wants to help the incarcerated through dance and healing in that regard, right?
That's why I like hanging around you because it just needs more encouragement for people to like realize their own potential.
You know, some other human being can do it.
You can do it.
You know, I marvel at everything.
I marvel at the lights I see.
I marvel at the person that made this table.
You realize what you're good at.
You know, and then you get out there and do it instead of figuring out reasons why you can't.
You can make this kind of change happen.
And that starts with like, if someone makes a stupid joke that's a racist joke that you don't think is going to propel the conversation forward, here's why that's harmful and won't advance the ball.
You know, and call them out on it.
If you see a law that you don't like or you think is stupid, you have the power to change it.
I mean, we talk about $100 million that Van got, but it doesn't take $100 million to help somebody that's innocent get out of prison.
You know, it doesn't.
It just takes action.
It takes work.
It takes dedication.
Last two years, we got three people out.
One lawyer.
It didn't take...
You know, a bunch pro bono.
You got to dedicate yourself to the cause.
Just yesterday in Jersey, family and friends of the room were convicted, protesting against Jersey because of so many innocent people and they're incarcerated.
Bad lawyering.
Terrible.
Jersey's terrible.
But you have to take action.
While I'm here, the organization is up there working, right?
They up there working, saying, free these guys in Jersey.
Family and friends.
You have to take action.
Right?
And there's more people that, you know, I was told something in Louisiana.
They got an organization called Vote There, all incarcerated, forming incarcerated people.
And what they do, and we should actually link with them, they do is they get involved in elections.
And that's how they got to New Orleans, Governor, and different people up there.
And one of the things the guy said to me up there, I'll never forget.
He says, our motto is that if it's 10 of us, and each of us bring one person, that's 20. And then each one person, bring one person that's 30 and 40 and 50. This is what we believe in.
Don't take a bunch of us.
We just take enough of us.
And that makes the difference.
I mean, if everybody brings somebody in, right, the numbers multiply.
These listeners are hearing us.
And they know that, to me, this is a real, real situation because we're all Americans.
At the end of the day, no matter how you want to say it, no matter how you want to believe it, we all are Americans.
We all believe in this system where we dislike what it does or not.
We're all a fabric of our environment.
So we all should hold our government accountable.
One of the things that kept me going was the Magna Carta.
I learned that in 1215 it was bold English barons that held King John at gunpoint and made him sign the Magna Carta.
You didn't give it to them, they made them give it to them.
And when people talk about, you know, I speak to people, they talk about What happened at the Capitol, right?
And what I teach people, the Second Amendment, if you read it, right, it says when the government becomes tyrant, the people can get a militia to revolt.
Well, will you agree with them, people, or not?
If they believe that the election was stolen, right, they had a right to revolt.
You don't have to believe that.
Read the Second Amendment.
This is why the right to bear arms existed.
I studied it, right?
And this is why you have three branches of government.
When there was a debate, when the Constitution was being put into effect, there was a great debate on what type of government we're going to have, right?
They knew that the government was corrupt, so they put all these checks and balances in place, right, so that we wouldn't be abused by the government.
Right?
So when we see government abuse as our responsibility, it's our obligation to stand up and do something about it.
If not, then you're a victim.
I don't want to be a victim.
I believe in fighting back.
So I believe that the call to action is that every American, every person that's on this shore should stand up and change something in your lifetime.
Change something to make it a better place.
And I just believe that from the core of my being.
And when you talk about the government being involved, I mean, what about the people that were involved in January 6th that were agent provocateurs that were encouraging people to go into the Capitol?
There's people that are on record that they 100% got that they know most likely were federal agents that did this that have faced no criminal consequences whatsoever.
They were actively encouraging people They know who these people are.
Is your point, Joe, that you should be going after, if you're going to go after the people that actually were revved up to do it, you should actually go after the people that revved them up?
It was 100%, not just entrapment, but they built the whole organization around him.
They built this case around getting this guy to plant this bomb and ignite this bomb that doesn't even work.
It's not even really a bomb.
And then they arrested him.
I mean, what is that?
Is that protecting or serving?
What is that?
What the fuck is that?
And I think that speaks to what we were talking about earlier, that part of the problem is that this is a game.
These guys are trying to convict people.
And if you can arrest someone who was a religious extremist that wanted to blow up a bomb, and they wanted to become a martyr, and they wanted to do this because they felt like this was a righteous thing to do, because they were convinced by people, What the fuck kind of a government is this?
Yeah, I never really looked at it that way because a lot of the people that were involved in January 6th end up becoming fall guys, fall men and women.
But, you know, look, what kind of government is this?
You either believe it or you don't.
Is there a reason why there is a separation of powers?
Do we believe that fundamentally, that the executive branch should do their job and the judiciary should do theirs?
And what's going to happen with this guy, Andrew Warren, who was the state attorney that was removed, what's going to happen is he's going to appeal this.
He's going to launch a fight.
Okay?
And the Senate, this is where the lines start to get blurred and we have to start thinking, what are we doing?
Do we believe in the dream of America?
The Senate in Florida is controlled by Republicans.
The law in Florida says if the Senate affirms the suspension, he's suspended.
It's a kangaroo court.
He's getting suspended.
They're going to affirm it.
That's going to happen.
So, you know, if you are a Democrat, Republican, libertarian, if you just believe in America, you should not get behind somebody that is willing to go move an elected official from office.
And I think that people are afraid of the consequences of abandoning who they think other people should think they support.
You know, I have a cousin.
Whose children have no fucking earthly idea why they stand for what they stand for.
But their parents are right-wing Republicans, so they think they should do that.
I have another cousin whose kids, and they're actually sisters.
Our kids are growing up in a quote-unquote progressive household, and they think that they should be everything that's on the left.
We are influenced by the people that rear us, right?
And I feel like what I'm trying to encourage my kids to do is we don't raise them—and I'm not saying this is the right way.
Maybe I'm fucking totally off on this— We don't raise them as Catholic, Buddhist, Jewish.
We raise them as human beings.
We try to teach them a little bit about everything and say, you make the decision.
My daughter talks to me about God.
Do you believe in God, Dad?
I say, I don't even know what that means.
I just don't.
I would rather be honest with you.
Is it a man with a white beard that sits in the sky?
Is it a feeling that you get?
I don't know.
And I don't know how you reinvent human beings, you know, other than what I know about what might change human beings.
And the only thing that I think that changes them is having the ability to let your guard down and say, maybe everything that I thought I knew is not true.
And maybe everything that I was taught by the people I held up as heroes, as idols, You know, we all have that moment where we stop viewing our parents as superheroes and as human beings.
Well, I would say in Brooklyn, what we did with a voter block, we was able to remove the bad prosecutor and put one in that had the values and ideas of the people of Brooklyn.
Right?
So I do agree with you that, you know, when you talk about locally, right, we can create voters' blocks.
People talk about the Jews.
They vote in one block, most of them.
They're Orthodox, right?
They vote in one block, most of them, right, when you talk about Orthodox Jews.
So I believe that we can change the system by organizing people.
John Scarpa has the ballistics expert on the stand, and he says, you found two shell casings.
And he says, yes.
And were you able to identify common characteristics in those shell casings such that you were able to determine whether or not they came from the same gun?
And he said, to a degree of scientific certainty, the markings on those shell casings lead me to believe that they came from the same gun.
And he came up with all the reasons why the striage...
And he's saying that upon ejection, that marks are left on the shell casings, that...
If the shell casings have the same common identifying characteristics, you can say to a degree of scientific certainty that they were ejected from the same gun.
Now the logic is that those fragments came from those two shell casings.
Because no other shell casings were found.
And he says, to his credit, a detective Hopkins.
Those bullet fragments could have come from another gun.
Could have come.
Okay?
So the prosecutor says to him, so how many guns maximum would you say were used in this crime?
He said at least two.
The prosecutor then, within the same two pages of transcripts, says, if I take a gun and shoot it into that file cabinet in front of this jury and you find two shell casings and two bullet fragments...
How many guns will you say were used in my shooting the file cabinet?
And without missing a beat, the ballistics expert says, two.
Listen, you know, bite mark evidence was born out of the Salem witch trials, and a judge just accepted it.
Bite mark evidence, odontology, is basically out of the criminal justice system now because it has been outed as a junk science.
But for decades and decades and decades, they could claim, it's pretty handy that I have a skull with some teeth here.
They would claim that you could make an indentation in someone's skin and match it up to the ridges in this tooth.
Okay?
And there was a guy by the name of West that would testify case after case after case that you could look at the indentation in the skin and you could match it up to teeth marks.
And it was proven to be such junk science that they set him up and they gave him the teeth impressions of a detective.
And they asked him if the detective's teeth, they told him that it was from the suspect, and he said it's a perfect match because he was told it was a suspect.
So odontology has basically worked its way out of the criminal justice system.
So there was a case of a guy who They claimed was biting young children and killing them and sacrificing them and that he was a witch.
And it was in the 1600s of Salem Witch Trials.
And they paraded him around.
They pried his mouth open.
They put a stick in his teeth and they said to the jury, look, see that ridge?
You see that slope in his tooth?
That is what left the indentation in this child's skin.
Now, it was later proven that this man didn't commit these crimes.
He was hung in a public hanging.
If you want to listen to Wrongful Conviction Junk Science Season 1, I'd do the first episode on this.
They ended up finding out that this man was not only innocent, he was in jail in another town when these crimes were committed.
It's the first case of a wrongful conviction and compensation because the Commonwealth of Massachusetts ended up compensating his family for executing him for a crime he didn't commit.
And that was the first known case of teeth marks, bite marks being used.
Since then, it's been outed as a junk science, but it's one of the few junk sciences that has been outed.
In 2009, the National Academy of Sciences did a study on forensic sciences, and the only one that they could find was even remotely credible was DNA. So everything that we knew about forensic science should have been turned on its head.
These people were eating bread that had gone through, the wheat had gone through a late frost, and it develops a fungus called ergot, and ergot is psychedelic.
So these people were all tripping balls, eating bad wheat and all the other products that they made with the wheat bread and all these different things, and they were getting ergot poisoning, so they were all tripping.
There's some dispute about this, but there's no dispute about whether or not there was a late frost.
There's some dispute about the way they cooked the bread and whether or not ergot would still be available.
But there's no dispute that there was a late frost when they do core samples of the earth and they find out during that time period that this matches up to what is established science on you know on this and they have found residue of ergot and they know that in similar situations when people have consumed ergot they have these horrific unexpected psychedelic consequences.
Yeah, I mean, in doing the research for this wrongful conviction junk science, I went back to the—and this was a couple of years ago when we first met, many years ago, I guess three, four years ago.
I was doing the research into the origin stories of all these junk sciences, and I was just blown away that nobody said, wait a second— Why are we accepting this?
And the way things become legal precedent in our system is, you know, it's scary.
Because if one judge accepts it, then other people start citing it.
And if other people start saying, well, there is precedent here, then it just becomes ingrained in the system.
And it's happened with everything from fingerprints to blood spatter to bite mark impressions to tread marks.
Right?
And, you know, if you look at the origin story of each of these so-called forensic sciences, you would think that you were listening to some tale of like a religion that was cooked up.
I mean, you know, blood spatter evidence was born in the basement of some fucking crackpot in upstate New York that was taking college age girls and having them dip their hair into the blood of cadaver dogs and fling it around the room.
And they would make these assumptions about the direction in which a certain weapon was wielded.
I mean, that's still used today.
Now, is there some blood spatter evidence that is useful?
Yes.
You can tell the difference between projected blood that's spattered on a wall or a transfer stain or blood that has been dropped from, you know, dripping from a wound.
All of these, like, shit, horse shit forensic scientists infect a lot of the cases we work on, glyphosate.
Clemente Aguirre's case, we've talked about it on this.
I can't talk too much about it, because if you could believe it, the state of Florida is doubling down.
He's been exonerated.
He's now suing them for federal civil rights violations, failure to investigate.
I have to try the case in December where I'm trying to get him compensated.
And I have found out in the case that they re-reviewed.
I mean, talk about fingerprints.
They re-reviewed the forensic services unit of the Seminole County Sheriff's Office and found out that this latent print examiner had wrongfully claimed in numerous cases that she could match a print to a suspect.
The Florida Department of Law Enforcement and an independent agency deemed that she had made mistakes to the point where she couldn't be relied upon.
And you think that when you hear from a fingerprint expert, what do jurors know?
They know what they're being educated about.
And if a judge lets it in, why would they question that?
A certified latent print examiner.
Well, I don't know.
Might you question them if you found out, as I found out during Clemente's case, during discovery, something I didn't even know when I exonerated him, that the detective in the case was going down to the lab and saying, this is the suspect.
Did you match the prints yet?
You know, we're human, and we get influenced by people, and that shouldn't be happening.
It creates confirmation bias.
And, you know, I didn't even know it at the time.
And you end up finding out that there's no training manual, there are no training standards, there are no standard operating procedures, there's no one doing administrative review on their work.
You would think if we're going to be so quick to accuse someone of a crime and take their freedom away, We want to make damn sure we're getting it right.
I think it speaks to what we were talking about earlier that people, when you set up this thing, whether it's with cops or with prosecutors, where a conviction is good for their career and good for their record, that's a point.
They want to score that point.
They want to win.
When you take away that point, they want to go to a review.
And that's what's happening in Clemente's case, I'm sure.
And they think they're going to be able to connive their way and weasel their way through it.
Even if they look at what you've said just on this podcast, where you reviewed it and brought me to tears, there's astounding evidence that he's innocent.
I'm happy to do it because it's a labor of love for me.
The guy that's trying the case with me is a guy named David Rudolph who has a bit of a cult following because he was the lawyer and then Netflix hit The Staircase where the guy Peterson was accused of pushing his wife down the stairs.
And he's just a tremendous civil rights lawyer who's seen it all.
And not only does it not look like an animal, but there are claw mark impressions and a beak impression in the same exact spot that an owl would do it.
And people say, come on, an owl?
Yeah.
It happens all the fucking time.
Why would a guy push his wife down the stairs for what fucking reason?
He said if he pushed her down the stairs, and that's where the murder took place, the so-called murder, how the fuck was she bleeding when they were out by the pool, walking in toward the pool?
And if you read the article in, I believe it's in Texas Monthly, that she wrote, she won a very prestigious award for investigative journalist of the year for this story about Paul Skalnik.
And then you tell me how you don't give James Daly a clemency hearing.
This guy claims that James Daly walked by his cell, a known informant, and said, hey, by the way, hey, you informant that are in isolation, hey, by the way, I killed this girl.
What do you think about that?
You read that story.
A call to action for your listeners would be go read the story that Pamela Koloff, C-O-L-O-F-F, wrote about Paul Skownick.
And watch the 2020. And if you're not enraged that this guy put somebody on death row on his word alone with no physical evidence, I don't know what else will inspire you to get involved.
There's a feeling of helplessness that I get, and I'm sure a lot of people also get listening to this, that there's so many cases.
There's so many cases and for every Clemente, for every case like Derek, for every case that you get out, there's countless more that are still being locked up.
It's a terrible feeling.
It's a terrible feeling to know that there's people out there that didn't do anything wrong, or at least didn't do the crime that they've been accused of, and they're gonna be locked in jail for the rest of their life.
And that this is the system that we rely on.
And this is when you call the police, when you, you know, you see someone getting tried and convicted, and you sleep well knowing that, oh good, they got the good guy, they got the bad guy, they got the right person, that it's not right.
Well, listen, Another call to action would be, if you get called to jury duty, this notion that there is a presumption of innocence only exists if you breathe life into it.
Do not believe the headline when you hear so-and-so committed the crime.
Someone was arrested.
Believe they're innocent.
Actually start there.
The question that I get the most traction from is I ask people during jury selection, You know, I just picked a jury in a case that is not so sensational but for the media.
It was one of the so-called Varsity Blues cases, alright?
unidentified
You've heard of these cases where the parents were accused of...
Well, this guy was accused in Boston of putting $180,000 in a brown paper bag and giving it to the tennis coach so that his daughter could get in, fake a shoulder injury, and not be on the tennis team.
Now, you have the tide of a tidal wave of media.
Lori Loughlin was accused of it.
You know, a bunch of famous people.
And those cases were all about their kids never played sports.
It was all like phony pictures.
And this guy's daughter actually played tennis.
She played at a prep school.
He had gone to school and played college tennis with the tennis coach of Georgetown.
They went to college together.
Now this guy's the coach of Georgetown.
They go out.
They are at an alumni event.
And he says, my daughter's actually a pretty good tennis player.
She tries her ass off.
Georgetown is a private school.
It's a private business.
one of their criteria for getting people into the school is to look at their aptitude for philanthropy.
Are they from a wealthy family?
They have every right to run their business how they want to.
They're not a public school.
So they had a memo, an internal memo that said that the coaches could get gratuities. - Yes.
The tennis coach made something like $50,000 a year.
The basketball coach made millions of dollars a year.
Here's somebody whose freedom is on the line, and I am forced to rush.
Can I ask a question?
Please let me ask.
The judge won't let me ask a single fucking question.
So finally, she asks them, how many of you read about the Varsity Blues or the college admissions scandal cases?
And 87 of the 92 jurors, I'm not making the numbers up, raised their hands.
And she said, do you have anything, any follow-up?
I said, yeah, I want to know what they read.
Go ahead, ask.
We're finishing today, though, this race to finish.
So my first question was, please tell me what you read.
All right, well, I read that, like, the woman from Full House brought, I said, okay.
Given that my client was charged with essentially the same thing, isn't it fair to say that he's probably starting off a little bit behind?
You think he probably did something.
Right after telling the judge they could be fair and impartial, she would turn it over to me.
And I would say, don't you think they could tell me what you read?
How did it make you feel?
And the very first perspective juror said, it made me feel like they're all a pack of criminals.
Who bribes their way in?
And she told me this story about how she tried out for her college volleyball team.
And she said, I had to work my ass off to get there.
And I said, isn't it fair then to say that this might not be the case for you?
She said, you know, now that you put it like that, I'm not quite sure that I could be fair.
This happened nine times in a row.
The judge was pissed at me.
I didn't care.
Because I'm showing that...
If you ask someone, can you be fair and impartial, 99 times out of 100 in a room full of strangers, they'll say yes.
No one wants to view themselves as unfair, especially in a room full of strangers.
They don't want to be viewed by others as unfair.
I'm giving you one little piece of the criminal.
And I was hailed in the legal community as some sort of hero for getting individual jury selection.
The guy got acquitted.
And it was the only Varsity Blues case where there was an acquittal.
I give Roy Black the credit for getting him acquitted.
All I did was my job.
I just helped get a jury that was the fairest possible.
But give that some thought as a closing thought.
You are charged with a crime in federal court in this country 999 times out of 1000. That jury will be picked in one day and the lawyers won't get to ask a single question.
Why?
Because federal judges just said, you know what?
That's the way we're going to do it.
There's no law.
There's no statute that says that.
And a lot of lawyers don't want to stand up to the judge and say, you're violating my client's right to a Sixth Amendment right to a fair and impartial jury.
Part of a fair trial subsumed within that right.
How do you get a fair trial if we don't know whether the jurors are fair?
If you don't know what their occupation is, if you don't know what their spouse's occupation, all these things that inform decision-making.
So I think it's also incumbent on lawyers to be able to not worry about pissing off judges so much and be more interested in protecting your client's rights and standing up for their rights.
The conviction rate should not be 99% in federal court, if we really have the presumption of innocence.
Derek, you are an admirable and inspirational person.
And I really appreciate you being here.
And I really appreciate your story.
And I think it means a lot to people.
I think...
What you've done is incredible, and the impact, just the millions of people that are going to listen to us talk here, it's going to have a profound impact on people.
No, I'm not here on behalf of the Innocence Project.
I think that what really needs, because I'm branching out on my own, I think that if you contact me on Instagram, dubin.josh, we can give you the details on our criminal justice reform organization, but a great place to start would be the Midwest Innocence Project.
The Midwest Innocence Project, the executive director is someone by the name of Tricia Bushnell.