Josh Szeps and Joe Rogan debate Australia’s Omicron surge—cases skyrocketing from 1,200 to 60,000–100,000 daily in NSW despite 95%+ vaccination rates—while dismissing Indigenous vaccine conspiracy claims as misinformation. Szeps defends mask mandates against Omicron skepticism, citing viral dose reduction, but criticizes overregulation and institutional distrust fueled by media bias (e.g., Pfizer’s influence) and suppressed stories like Hunter Biden’s laptop. They link societal fractures—Portland riots, inner-city neglect—to unchecked social media algorithms and economic inequality, questioning whether psychedelics or AI could transcend primate instincts like greed. Ultimately, the episode blends pandemic policy, political corruption, and existential musings on human evolution and rationality. [Automatically generated summary]
We can talk about all the numbers and stuff, but this whole theory that Australia has become a prison colony and there were definite excesses over the past couple of years in the way that some Australian states dealt with it.
But since the 1st of November, when the biggest state, New South Wales, where Sydney is, where I'm from, basically was like, Alright, we're open.
We're letting people come in from abroad.
We're not going to have quarantine anymore.
You're allowed to do whatever you want.
We're not going to have any restrictions and stuff.
I was looking at the numbers this morning just before I came here.
There were like 1,200 new cases a day in November, and now there are between 60,000 to 100,000 cases a day in a state of...
8 million people, so it's about- 100,000 cases a day.
Yeah, so it's about the equivalent of, if I adjusted it for the US population, it's about 800,000 to 1.3 million a day in the US, which is about, I think, what it is.
The way the epidemiologist put it is, like, if it's half as bad, but ten times as many people get it, then you've still got five times as many people in hospital.
I mean, part of the hassle of it is that it doesn't – I mean, for most of us, if you're not very old and you're not very fat and you don't have a comorbidity, then the hassle of this whole thing that's going on at the moment with Omicron is all the, do I have to isolate – Am I going to be able to cross a border?
I mean, I've been traveling for the past month from Australia.
I was released from our prison aisle as soon as we could go.
I honestly feel so warm towards you, and it's so nice to be with you.
I did this show six times when you were in LA, between 2014 and probably 2017, so I was living in New York and working on HuffPost Live, and went to Australia, had twins.
Nightmare of like babies and work and then the pandemic hits and like, you know, kind of a good time to not be able to leave the country because how much fun travel can you do when you've got two screaming babies next to you anyway?
But as soon as the borders opened and the state government was like, you're not going to have to spend two weeks in a quarantine hotel when you come back into the country anymore, we left.
I'll backtrack and I can give some context to this in a sec, but just to finish my thought about jumping across borders.
I was in Europe and I sent my partner Sean and our kids to his parents in New England to see the grandparents because the grandparents haven't seen them in two years.
It's the big pandemic reunion.
And I was like...
I've got to do a little bit more work in Sydney.
So you take the kids by yourself.
Thank you, Sean.
I'll go to Europe and meet up with some old mates and some family in Europe.
And this is like in September, October, so sort of pre-Omicron.
I'm booking nine-hour train rides from France to Switzerland.
I'm hitting up my mate in Rome.
We're going to go to Sicily.
We're going to do all this stuff.
And then Omicron just starts coming, and I've spent the past four weeks, I feel like Indiana Jones with a burning bridge, and I'm running And the bridge is just falling apart.
It's like the borders are clanging close behind me.
Well, true, but I mean, it's also a pain in the ass, because it used to be three days before, and then Biden was like, we've got to really crack down on this and make it one day before.
I mean, the weird thing about Australia has been...
What people don't understand when they think, what the hell is going on in Australia, when they look at those videos of people being locked up in detention centres for two weeks just for being a close contact or something.
And this is not to say that there hasn't been some overreach.
There has, especially since it's sort of a state-by-state thing in Australia.
So, you know, there are some states that...
Have gone really hard, and other states have been a bit more loosey-goosey about it.
And the borders of the states have been closed.
You haven't been able to go for long periods of time when there's been a big outbreak in Sydney or a big outbreak in Melbourne.
All the neighbouring states just go, putting up a police blockade, and that's it.
Just keep it there.
So Western Australia, where Perth is, has had essentially no community transmission of coronavirus the entire time.
And on February 5th, they're going to open up and let it in.
Like, if you'd want to go to Western Australia from even another Australian state...
Like, imagine California had just been completely closed off from the rest of...
Or, like, maybe Alaska is a better example.
Imagine Alaska had just said, all right, no one is coming into Alaska in March of 2020, and there's no COVID, and that's it.
And then, like, you're just going with normal life.
In Western Australia...
No masks, no school closures, no social distancing.
Up until recently, all this is changing a bit with Omicron.
And so they've been like, well, why would we let it in?
Why would we have all of the disruptions to our lives that the rest of the world has had to endure if we can just go to the beach and go out to restaurants and live normally?
And they've had an attitude, and that was the attitude of the whole country up until basically four months ago.
You couldn't come into the country unless you spent two weeks in managed quarantine.
And the idea was not, as some alt-right troublemakers here in the States try to put it, that the country was just going to turn into North Korea and remain a hermit kingdom forever.
The point was, get everyone as vaccinated as possible.
Get all the ICU beds that you can.
Get your ducks in a row.
We know that we have a fight on our hands coming.
And to be frank, because Australia managed to eliminate coronavirus in March, April 2020, essentially eliminate community spread of it, there's a whole bunch of fat, old and sick people in Australia who, to be blunt, were...
would be dead in America and are, or the UK or Italy, Because those are the people who were kind of lost in the first cull in New York and Northern Italy and London and places like that.
Oh, you mean in normal times or in COVID? COVID times.
COVID times, I mean, everything is screwy everywhere, isn't it, with the supply chain stuff, and it's hard to get things around.
I mean, I kind of feel like if you could give...
It's like the rest of the world had the luxury of not being able to control coronavirus, and it's almost like a survivor's curse, or like a victor's curse, where the countries that have been able to successfully keep it out...
So, South Korea, Japan, Taiwan, Hong Kong, New Zealand, Australia are broadly like the basket of countries that have taken what you might call a zero COVID approach, where for the first year or year and a half of the pandemic, they were like, we're going to have massive contact tracing of everybody who tests positive, we're going to close the border and make sure that the virus doesn't come in, and we're going to stamp out every instance of community transmission, because once it runs away, then you can't get control over it anymore.
And we'll willingly bring it in when we're ready to do so, instead of allowing it to just come in and go.
New Zealand and Western Australia are jurisdictions where Like, if you've never had it, and you've got no experience of it, what politician would have the guts to go, all right, my little cloistered population of people who've never been exposed to this pathogen, let's just bring it in voluntarily and manage how we do that.
That's the conundrum that they face, and that's the conundrum that New South Wales, my state in Australia, on November 1st was just like, well, okay, now or never.
We're as vast as we're going to be, we're as prepared as we're ever going to be, we understand the treatments now, we're not going to go through what New York and Northern Italy did, What is it like over there in terms of the recognition and the discussion of vaccine injuries?
I've been thinking about this, like, and what is suppression and what is just the sort of habit of the media elite to find certain sources credible and certain sources non-credible.
So, like...
We've given 9 billion doses of this, of the vaccine so far, right?
Well, yeah, people aren't dropping dead from the vaccine in those 5 billion double doses.
But that doesn't mean that there aren't side effects.
And so, I mean, I've tried to do a good job of not- Some people are dropping dead, right?
Yeah, just not as many as you would if you infected all those people with COVID. Well, it depends on who the people are.
Like, if you're talking about the young soccer players that are dropping dead, I don't think they would have died from COVID. So, I mean, I think the – well, again, it's a numbers game, isn't it?
I mean, you only need a one in, even if there's only a one in 100,000 chance or a one in a million chance that someone with a particular risk profile is going to die of COVID, then you're right that the balance becomes different when you're talking about, let's say a 15-year-old male's risk of COVID and a 15-year-old male's risk of some side effect from the vaccine than if you're talking about an 82-year-old Right.
Michael's impression that what we should have done early on is protect the vulnerable and concentrate on protecting the vulnerable and not mandate it for everybody, particularly for people that may have like for young boys in particular, there's an adverse risk associated with the vaccine.
It's like a two to four fold increase in the instances of myocarditis.
You know that there's an increased risk of myocarditis among that age cohort from getting COVID as well, which exceeds the risk of myocarditis from the vaccine.
I don't think it's true that there's an increased risk of myocarditis from people catching COVID that are young versus increased risk of myocarditis from the vaccine.
I was looking at when they were vaccinating me as well.
I was like, now I'm just getting nervous.
No, I mean, look, there's a risk profile to everything, and as a broadcaster, because I work for the public broadcaster there, so I'm like sort of the...
I suppose the big bad media elite, like lamestream media person, who other people might criticize as being part of a group of people who haven't necessarily covered themselves in glory in being as open as you might want them to be about all of the...
Well, yeah, I think people have a chip on their shoulder about the way that the mainstream media has dealt with issues of...
There are a lot of people like me who work in the mainstream media, and so many of my colleagues at the ABC, who are genuinely committed to the truth and to trying to...
And I will absolutely – I know that there's no long-term gain in trying to cover things up or trying to bullshit people.
I've always felt for you as a better platform anyway because it's unrestricted and you can – Be wild.
You can say whatever you really feel.
And you have very strong opinions.
And when you have very strong opinions and you work for a gigantic corporation, those very strong opinions could harm advertiser revenue or fuck with some narrative that you can get.
Because if you give people an enormous amount of power to control whether people come and go, whether they can work or not, what schools they can go to, what stores they can shop in, they exert that power.
The kind of people that run for office enjoy power.
They're fucking weirdos.
They're not normal people and they're not healthy.
It's not a healthy job.
unidentified
To want to tell people, you're just going to have to get used to COVID. Just going to have to get used to your vaccines.
From the VAERS reports, when they report this stuff, it's like the amount of people that report, the under-reporting, depending upon who you ask and what it is, it's either 1%, like Harvard did a study on the VAERS report about vaccine injuries.
And I think they were talking at the time about the HPV vaccine.
And they said it was 1% of the adverse events were reported by the VAERS system.
And I know people that have tried to report things in the VAERS system.
I don't trust American epidemiological data very much, but the fact that it's a global pandemic and that there are lots of wonky geniuses in Germany and South Korea and stuff doing a lot of this research as well, I think that in general I sort of trust the consensus of most of the people who are smarter than me about it.
That's the data that I've heard about it.
But I mean, it's interesting.
It's going to be super interesting to see what happens.
He thinks that Omicron being so mild that it's essentially going to give people immunity.
It's going to go through the population.
And it doesn't come with it a lot of the issues that the other COVID variants have come with, like the lack of smell and lack of taste, even though a lot of people are testing positive for both at the same time.
I don't want you to get away with saying that it's too mild, though, because I just spent New Year's up in Vermont with a nurse who works in North Carolina, I think, and she was like, I've seen this movie run before, and she was so overworked.
Yeah, it was like Groundhog Day.
She was like, it's like Delta all over again.
The hospital is filling up again.
There are all these people.
It's almost all unvaccinated people.
She's run off her feet.
No one can get any time off.
It does cause a huge amount of complications.
It's not the same as it was in the past, but when you give...
A whole bunch of people who haven't previously gotten it, or even if they have, but it's a while ago, a new respiratory illness, like, shit happens, you know?
Yeah, I wouldn't be surprised if it's neck and neck, since there was a lot of Delta here anyway, so you're going to have a lot of endemic infection from people who have Delta.
But because Omicron is so infectious, it's crowding out all the Delta, at least in Australia and a lot of countries.
The weird thing is, in all this whole, like, you know, Australia has become an authoritarian fascist dictatorship kind of rhetoric that I've seen pouring out of the States.
So when you close the border and you keep the virus out, then the consequence is not that life gets more oppressive.
The consequence is that you're able to maintain this little fantasy land of continuing life as normal.
So there have been these...
We had kind of brutalising overreaches of some state police enacting local laws.
I interviewed this woman on my radio show in December.
So in South Australia, which is one of the states, they were continuing to insist that if you are a close contact of a...
I don't think they do this anymore, but they were continuing to insist that if you're a close contact of someone who has COVID, then you have to isolate for a week, right?
Right.
And if you can't isolate for a week by yourself, then they might just force you to go into one of these quarantine hotels that were initially set up for people coming in from abroad.
That was a whole part of the system, like people coming in from abroad, two weeks in a hotel, or you might have seen images of these concentration camps in Australia, like these dum-dums like Tim Pool will go like, it's a concentration camp, when there's this large facility which was originally just sort of bungalows for workers who worked in the mining industry or something that got repurposed into...
I mean, it's like, you know, rules everywhere are silly once you start trying to enforce them and trying to What do you guys do in terms of early treatment if someone catches COVID over there?
Because as a person who wasn't vaccinated and got early treatment and got over COVID very quickly, I was like, this narrative that the only way to beat COVID is to be vaccinated is nonsense.
I think the idea of getting everybody vaccinated is a way of avoiding what you were alluding to earlier, which is like, can't we just protect the really vulnerable people?
I mean, they have like, you know, one or two cases in managed quarantine facilities, like one might escape, and then they go and crash tackle a guy and put him in a hotel.
So what happened was there are these communities out in Catherine, which is this really remote part of the Northern Territory.
If people think of the Northern Territory...
Think like Crocodile Dundee, like really, really, really, really seriously remote.
Like you just mentioned that Australia is the same size as the contiguous United States and has the population of, you know, not even the population of California.
So everyone's huddled on essentially that 80% of the population lives on the East Coast and then a bit on the West Coast and then you've got Tasmania and everything in between is like...
You can fly over it for four hours, and it's just red desert with nothing there.
And there are indigenous communities who live out there, and they'll often live – there'll be 50 people who all live in the same sort of area.
There are grandparents sleeping with kids.
It's not a situation in which anyone can realistically isolate.
They don't have air conditioning.
They often have comorbidities.
Their life expectancy is low.
It's a really, really tricky situation.
And since the start of the pandemic, health experts have been like, shit, what happens when it gets into those communities?
I mean, that's going to be like dropping a match on a tinderbox.
It's just going to explode.
It's going to be horrible.
They're hundreds and hundreds of miles from the nearest healthcare.
Yeah.
What are you going to do?
So they enlisted the assistance of the local Indigenous leaders to be like, okay, if there's an outbreak, then what do you want to do?
The local leaders were like, we'll send them to Howard Springs.
I mean, put them in the air-conditioned bungalows where you can't cross the line outside.
And they actually spend their two weeks in quarantine so that these people, these Indigenous communities don't get ravaged by coronavirus.
They're also fairly vaccine hesitant.
So there's been a lot of Attempts to get vaccination rates up among Indigenous Australians, but it's slower.
There are a couple of people in the Northern Territory who claim to be like Indigenous leaders.
I don't know if you saw the video of like...
That woman?
Well, there was a woman and then there was like a bloke with some other Indigenous-looking people around him with like a flag behind them who were all like saying this went viral.
I think Marjit Noah's retweeted it in the UK. And he was like, you know, Amnesty needs to look into this.
They're crash-tackling us and vaccinating us on the ground.
They're forcibly vaccinating us.
It's like a denial of human rights.
And I saw that and I was like, oh my God, how have I not...
How have I failed as a journalist in Australia to understand that this is happening?
So, this guy is one of those guys who, he believes that Australia is actually owned by the Vatican, and that therefore all police officers are employees who don't have to be obeyed.
So if people go to this article, this explains everything, right?
Outback Australian Information Wars.
Matthew Blackwell, who wrote that, is an actual journalist in the Northern Territory who has contacts in the Indigenous community there.
And they say, we don't know this guy.
He doesn't speak on behalf of us.
We are supportive of the Northern Territory government isolating people in this way at Howard Springs.
Now, we can have a whole conversation about whether or not It's appropriate for, like, what do you do with the, like, three teenagers, three indigenous teenagers broke out of Howard Springs, which isn't hard.
You just sort of walk out and climb a small fence.
And you might say, wasn't that an infringement of their human rights?
And one of the things, I wanted to compliment all of the indigenous people for, because of all the horrific bad shit that's, it's not even a thing of the past, and it's just more subtle and institutionalized now, but the indigenous people here as a whole have been so...
So, you know, there's this whole alt-right ecosystem of Americans who are suddenly very exercised about Australians' rights, who, as you can hear, like, go over and are like, oh, what's going on?
He's like, oh, it's all part of the new world order and all this sort of stuff.
He's entitled to his opinion.
You know, I've got no beef with him.
But he's not a representative of the Indigenous communities there.
The Indigenous communities themselves are, like, working hand-in-hand with the Northern Territory government.
It's to some extent, I suppose, an infringement of an individual's human rights if you're incarcerating them essentially for two weeks because they're a close contact of a COVID case.
The alternative is that that individual infects the entire community against the wishes of the community and against the wishes of the community leader when they're hundreds of miles from...
So there was like a 17-year-old who broke out of Howard Springs and was like, I'm not having a go at this.
This is rubbish.
I don't need to stay here.
So...
Not every single human being does, but if you're looking at it as a public health thing, a short-term public health thing to get through an emergency when the virus is just spreading in a very, very vulnerable community, then those community leaders have agreed to that.
It wouldn't be a permanent thing.
And for me, my concern is what I've been agitating for and what's made it a lot harder is the conversation here in the States from people like Tim Pool and people like that who is sort of like...
If you had a buddy who you thought was a bit too strict with their kid or something, you just sort of wanted to change his behaviour in a certain way, and you were like, I think I can do this.
I think I know how to talk to this person.
I think the best solution is a collaboration with them.
And then another buddy of yours goes, no, you have to say that your buddy is a child abuser, and until you admit that he's a child abuser, I'm not even going to have a conversation about this because your buddy is a child abuser.
Let's insist.
You'd be like, hang on, hang on, hang on, hang on.
This is what it feels like when Americans come and try to save the conversation that Australians are having with each other about these policies.
So it's become a lot harder for people like me to go, "Let's look at the human rights trade-offs.
Let's look at the health trade-offs.
Let's try to assess what's reasonable and what's not reasonable," when you've got all this chatter coming from some of these alt-right people who are saying, literally, Jamie, do you have the- Tim Pool's not alt-right.
You're using that pejorative to dismiss what they're saying.
They might get really into these conspiracies and you look at it on paper without the whole breadth of knowledge from the community and you find out that these people are being relocated and you do see those, whatever you want to call them, camps, communities where the people have to stay on their porch.
It's concerning to someone who lives in America.
You would understand how you would think of Australia as being this wild, free place.
The difference is that there are some people, and I sort of give Marjorie a pass on this because I know him well enough to sort of think that he must just be sort of...
Not doing enough fact-checking, but there are some other people, like Tim, who I feel like I and people like Claire Lehman at Quillette, who's the editor of Quillette, have done a lot of work pointing out the facts, and then it doesn't go anywhere.
It's like, unless you call them concentration camps and accept that Australia is on a path to become a fascist authoritarian dictatorship, there's nothing to even talk about.
Before I forget this, this is what the myocarditis thing was that I was confusing to.
Peter McCullough, Dr. Peter McCullough was saying that there's instances that they're recognizing as myocarditis that are very different with the virus versus with the vaccine.
And that the instances of the vaccine because they thought initially that the spike protein was going to be limited to the injection site but yet it's going to various tissue in the body including the heart and causing a completely different kind of inflammation.
The type of myocarditis concerned him far more from the vaccine, particularly in regards to young people, versus what you would get from the virus itself, which is a normal inflammation of the tissue around the heart.
Or what did he say?
Did he say fluids around the heart?
He was talking about a normal level of inflammation.
I mean, the point of all this, I suppose, is that at a population level, when you're talking about public health, I mean, I think the goal for me and the goal for a lot of people is like, can we just get some semblance of normal life?
Yeah, I mean, and it's like, you know, I can fully understand the attitude of people in Western Australia or New Zealand who are like, well, I mean, we've kept it out and we've been living essentially normal lives.
I think part of the whole thing about Australia is also that we've been out of sync with where America's and the rest of the world has been at because...
We got rid of it.
There were 500 plus cases a day in March of 2020. We locked down through a lot of contact tracing and testing at it.
It was doubling every 3.4 days initially.
So you would have gone 500, 1,000, 2,000, 4,000, 8,000, 16,000, then you're off to the races.
Brought it right, right down.
Everyone's basically living a normal life during that first wave period between like, you know, April, May, June of 2020.
Aussies are like, sweet, we closed the borders, we suppressed the virus, we're able to essentially live normally, we're not wearing masks and we're not doing all that sort of stuff by essentially June of 2020.
You don't think that is concerning when you see that kind of shit where people get arrested and thrown to the ground because they don't have a mask on?
Some of those videos that you see are also like, when you actually ask the cops about it, they were like, actually, we were arresting somebody for, like, that was a person being arrested for a crime.
Look, if you've got a respiratory virus that attaches itself to aerosol particles, to liquid particles, then it makes sense to me that anything that can trap the little bits of liquid that I'm spitting out onto this microphone right now is probably going to reduce the chance that I'm going to give it to you.
In fact, he probably feels a little bit quietly judged by the fact that I've lost weight now, because now he's like, oh man, he's started taking up tennis lessons.
He's like, oh man, I've got to get fit now as well.
I mean, you're breathing out of the sides of those things, man.
I just don't know what the fuck those things actually stop.
I mean, I think you could probably make some kind of an argument that less of it could get on you, but if you're in a position where someone's breathing near you and they're wearing a mask, I think you're getting a fucking full load in the face.
Look at this.
I mean, come on, man.
What the fuck is that doing?
It's not stopping shit.
And he explains in this, the size of the microns of the particles of COVID are far smaller than what you get from the big particles.
It's sort of like climate science or something, like...
Like, if a lot of people who really know about this say that a mask is going to reduce the number of microscopic water particles that are coming out of my face that have COVID attached to it, then I'll probably just wear a mask.
Because there's so much political shit attached to it, too.
It's like you can't say that it doesn't work.
I mean, she's said cloth masks don't work.
I've talked to other doctors that said none of these fucking masks work.
This is what my doctor said.
Can you breathe?
With the mask on?
I go, yes.
He goes, then it's not working.
He goes, the particles of COVID are so fucking small that if they're in the air in a room, he goes, it's one of the best things about outdoor transmission.
A buddy of mine who lives in California, he was standing six feet away from a woman who was picking up her kid at the daycare where he was waiting to pick his kid up, and he's not masked.
I mean, I think if we just cleaved off all of the left-wing assholes and all of the right-wing assholes, then the rest of us would probably just find a sensible accommodation.
Like, if I'm on a plane, if I'm in an airport, I'm going to wear a mask anyway because I think it's courteous because I don't know if there are people around.
I don't know if I'm carrying the virus, and I don't know if there are people around who are immune-suppressed or who are super fat or super unhealthy who it might do damage to.
It's not a huge—it's no skin off my nose, really.
But if I'm outside, I'm not going to put it on at the playground with my kids.
I'm not going to put it on when I'm jogging along the beach.
I think it's one of those things where there's normal, natural human patterns of behavior dependent upon all the various factors that are in the community.
And I think if you're in a community that's enlightened...
That has a lightened attitude and they're more relaxed, you're going to get more people that sort of adopt that.
And if there's more tense people, then you're going to get more people that are on the edge.
And when you get these polar opposite viewpoints, like QAnon versus BlueAnon.
I don't know how they work in Australia, but the fact that sitting members of Congress have information about deals that are going to affect positively or negatively these companies and trade...
This one...
It's Warren Buffet saying, no one can say when a stock will go up or down, and then Nancy Pelosi said, that's cute.
This is part of what motivated Trump and it's part of what motivated Obama before him.
This keenness among the electorate to just give us someone who's not in that group of people, of lobbyists and insiders and people who go to the same golf courses and go to the same parties.
Yeah, exactly.
And they give each other little inside tips.
The whole thing feels like...
And I think this is also part of what's made the pandemic really difficult, is this erosion of faith in institutions, in the news media, and it's not unjustifiable, in political systems, in bureaucracies and stuff like that, leaves everybody just spinning around like you've just had your head walloped in a Warner Brothers cartoon, you've got little Tweety Birds floating around your head going, what am I supposed to grab onto here?
I mean, I think his whole life has been about this weird sort of game of influence and power, but now he's out of it.
He's so out of it that it's like there's a real justification for impeachment, I think, that if the Republicans take power, And they have this ability to highlight all the areas where he seems to be...
When they were talking about that with Trump, I was like, man, you open this door, it's just going to be every single president from now on is either going to get impeached or withdrawn under the 25th Amendment.
Every party is just going to be like, all right, you're out.
He doesn't own a hotel that he gets foreign heads of state and their delegations to all stay in so that he can make a personal profit out of it when they're on government business.
But he does have a son that he sent overseas, and his son made a lot of money for no reason whatsoever, and his son wrote down that the big guy gets a cut, and then they had a story about his laptop, and there was an active move to suppress it.
I mean, that's, to me, the whole new thing to be afraid of.
Like, I... I'm sad that we've lost so much faith in conventional media because I do think that there are – like, anyone who's worked in a newsroom, in a formal newsroom, in a big old legacy institutional media outlet like the New York Times or the New Yorker or the Atlantic or the BBC or something like that – It knows that you bring in a story, an editor will be on your back about how can you verify it, how many sources do you have.
Sometimes you need to have three sources, you certainly need to have two sources.
This doesn't mean that there isn't a subtle ideological capture where these institutions are all looking at things from the same perspective.
You only have to look at the New York Times over the past few years to be like, every time I open it up, I'm like...
Seriously?
Are we going to read another story about how skiing is racist because there aren't enough black skiers?
That was a recent example that I saw.
I'm sure it's a very worthy point to make, but can we occasionally have something that isn't just from your one hobby horse of everything has to be filtered through an identity lens at the moment?
But I think that's different from some of the new media outlets, which are just...
Intentionally kind of coming at things with a particular angle.
They don't have the fact-checking.
They don't have the resources.
They're just like...
They're sort of just A-B testing whatever's going to work.
And they're throwing stuff out.
They're clickbaiting.
And then, you know, whatever viral video of something going crazy in Australia happens to get attention, they provide more and more and more of that.
You're sensitive to this criticism of the authoritarian state that you live in that has supported you coming over to America to spread your propaganda.
You know that in Australia, I'm regarded as a critic of that.
I wrote a whole piece in Sydney's biggest newspaper in December saying, can we please have a national conversation about balancing...
Oh, that's right.
So the anecdote I was going to tell you about this woman who I spoke to in December on my radio show.
I forgot to finish it.
She's...
This will hopefully burnish my credentials as a critic of Australian authoritarianism enough for you.
So she's in Melbourne.
She's her and her husband, and they've got like a five-year-old kid and like a three-month-old.
And she decides to fly to Adelaide, the capital of South Australia, to see her family.
So they fly in, they get off the plane, she gets a text message from the South Australian Health Department saying, actually, one person on your plane just tested positive, so you need to isolate for a week.
And she calls them and she goes, well, can I just leave the state?
And they're like, yeah, that's all right, according to her.
So she books the next flight out from Adelaide to go back to Melbourne, gets to the airport, they start boarding the flight, and some armed police officers come up to her and her family and kids, and they're like, are you so-and-so?
She goes, yeah.
They take her to a room at the airport for an hour and a half.
They take her in a convoy to a quarantine hotel.
They all test negative.
They're all vaccinated.
They've just been on a plane with one person who tested positive.
And six days later, she's still in the hotel with her kids.
No windows.
They're being fed.
And the authorities aren't giving them proper information about what the hell is going on.
She finally kicks up enough of a stink and she's like, please just let us go back to Melbourne.
Just let us go back to the other state.
So they go, all right.
And they take a police car to escort her that drives behind her car for 300 kilometers, 200 miles, all the way to the border of the state.
And then once she crosses the border, the police car just turns around.
Dear Tim, I live in a concentration camp and I'm a government stooge, an apologist for the inevitable Australian authoritarianism that you were so prescient in predicting.
He was saying that with Americans, it's like if you're landing a beach, if you imagine D-Day or Normandy or something like that, and you're trying to make friends with someone, then with Americans, it's super, super easy.
The boat comes up on this beautiful shore, and Americans are all warm and welcoming, and you walk, and you walk, and you walk with them, and you walk, and you walk, and you walk, and you walk.
And you walk and you walk and you never quite get behind the niceness, he felt.
But with Brits and with Aussies, it's like coming in a tempestuous sea and you crash into these rocks.
It's quite hard, especially with Brits, more than Aussies.
You crash into the rocks and there's a huge cliff face and you have to claw your way up to get into their good graces and you've got blood coming out from under your fingernails.
But then you emerge on top and there's this huge vista, this vast expanse of friendship.
That's his analogy between the difference between Oh, interesting.
That's interesting to see it from a perspective of someone coming from the UK. I have a good buddy of mine who grew up in England, and he's been over here, I think, for about 10 years.
And the big factor for him, he said, is that in England, people kind of want you to fail.
That's his position.
He's like, they don't celebrate success over there.
He goes, it's really interesting.
He's like, they outwardly sort of dismiss any chances that you have.
I think there'd be a lot of sort of, well, yeah, no, I mean, you know, so-and-so did try that a few years ago, and that didn't really work, so, you know, here are the impediments, here are the reasons why it might not work, here are all the impediments, here are the things that you should be thinking about.
Like, it's just much more, we don't really do that sort of thing here, so maybe, and I think that's true in the UK as well, like...
It's just, it's harder to get people excited about stuff, because Americans still have this kind of, almost like, naive little, oh shucks, this is great!
Well, that's one of the weird things where people who are rich, who are politicians, who really kind of enact laws that suppress...
In some ways, the ability for a lot of people to escape from middle class and do better.
But meanwhile, those people celebrate these people and celebrate even the ethics that these people espouse because they think somehow or another one day they're going to make it and they want those protections.
They want to save money on taxes and become rich.
They almost have this attitude like eventually I'm going to be in a position where this is important.
He's a moral psychologist, I guess, at NYU. And he came out to Australia and New Zealand just before the pandemic.
And I was like the moderator on his events and sort of interviewed him at these live events.
And he's like...
Really putting out the call saying, this stuff not only is bad for you in terms of constantly forcing your brain to expect novelty and innovation and to train you to essentially judge yourself in comparison to other people, to judge your output on the basis of how many likes and comments and shares you get, to sort of derange the way that you interact with other human beings, to make you less capable of having human interactions and more capable of winning points and scoring, you know,
slam dunks in this weird artificial universe that is Instagram slam dunks in this weird artificial universe that is Instagram and Twitter and Facebook.
But for young people in particular, is his point, it's having really bad effects.
I mean, he looks at like, he charts the introduction of social media and the rise of like self-harm, hospitalizations for self-harm, especially among adolescent girls.
I mean, he just thinks that the social media companies have to be forced to at least Not let kids on.
At the very least it should be like cigarettes and booze where they make a genuine attempt to keep people under the age of 16 or 18. It's interesting because there are some things that for those kids are...
The way China is handling it is so different than America.
China's version of TikTok...
It celebrates academic achievements, athletic achievements, it's all science projects, all these different fascinating things, and they lock it out at 10 p.m.
At 10 p.m., no one's on it.
Those kids are not allowed to get on it, because they're trying to encourage achievement.
They're trying to encourage...
China has a program to try to make men more manly.
Like this open program where they're trying to make men more masculine.
They're doing all these things with like this idea of engineering a society of more accomplished, more successful people.
The difference is interesting, because I don't think we should engineer the way our society interacts with each other.
But if you look at the way China's doing it, like, they're doing it clearly with this idea that they want to stimulate young minds, and they want to promote this idea that doing things that you are, you know, like, you're going to become more accomplished, you're going to become more athletic, these are what they're trying to encourage.
I'm a little bit reticent about holing anything up that the Chinese Communist Party does as being a great idea.
And if we're worried about things like the New York Post article about Joe Biden's son's laptop being suppressed by Twitter, just wait till you get along.
And all of the people who were being suppressed on conventional social media outlets, like just wait till you get a load of what a bureaucracy would do if they had control over what the algorithms show you as well.
Like, I mean, the other thing that Haidt says is maybe you try to force them to make the algorithms, like, not constantly addictive.
I mean, I think what people don't necessarily always think about when you're using these platforms is that they're not blank open spaces into which your friends and the people you're following are commenting and then it's just kind of, you know, filtering down in a neutral way.
It's obviously being...
Rejigged at the back end to maximize the time that you're spending on the site.
All the algorithm wants to do is to keep you there for one second longer so that they can maximize the time that you're spending on the platform.
John Hite's like, could you change that algorithm so that it's more fulfilling stuff instead of more addictive stuff?
And I'm like, I don't know how you would legislate that.
Well, that's probably good, but if there was no algorithm whatsoever...
You know, the argument would be that, well, there's probably a lot of things that you would be introduced to that you would enjoy that you're going to miss if there's no algorithm at all.
I mean, as you say, once AR, and whenever you talk about haptic feedback suits and stuff like that, my mind just goes to once porn gets mastered in that world, there's going to be a large percentage of the population that's just in the basement.
Well, there's a woman, I talk about her in my act, there's a woman from 1970 who was allergic to pain medication, and they rigged this system where they drilled holes in her head and put wires into her brain and gave her an electrical device, and when she felt discomfort, she could hit a button.
And the button would send a charge into her brain.
I'll read you what they wrote about her because it's so crazy that you wonder how long before something like that is in a phone or how long before some ability to do something.
At its most frequent, the patient self-stimulated throughout the day, neglecting her personal hygiene and family commitments.
A chronic ulceration developed on the tip of the finger used to adjust the amplitude dial, and she frequently tampered with the device in an effort to increase the stimulation amplitude.
At times, she implored her family to limit her access to the stimulator, each time demanding its return after a short hiatus.
Yeah, so they gave her the ability to self-stimulate in a way.
See, the patient clocked up 1,500 doses in a three-hour period.
So this is possible with humans, and it's not far off.
Once they start doing things like Neuralink, and they start tapping into the receptors of the mind, or neurons, or...
Just the stimulation aspect of the human body, like whatever they can do externally or internally, once there's a device that allows you to achieve a sensation that's unachievable without it, we're going to have a real fucking problem because people can't stop looking at their Instagram likes.
Well, I think it'll happen the same way phones happen, where it's too late by the time we realize, and then it'll be so addictive, and then it'll also be so profitable.
Because, like, with these algorithms, like what Jonathan Haidt is saying is very logical, that there really should be some sort of regulation on these algorithms.
And this is also with Tristan Harris and The Social Dilemma, which is an amazing documentary that really sounds off the alarm on these things.
These are minor in comparison to something that can actually change the physiological state of your fucking brain.
I mean what's interesting is that like the war on drugs like justifies itself as being something that's against...
Harm, like physical harm, right?
We don't want people to hurt themselves.
We don't want people to derange their lives through addiction and whatever.
And yet it's become expanded to include any sort of tinkering with your consciousness, right?
Even things that we know are not particularly harmful, you know, MDMA and psilocybin and things like that.
In clinical settings, we know how to administer these in ways that are very...
Very low risk.
And yet that's still illegal because there's, again, a kind of puritanical objection to the whole enterprise of trying to screw around with how your brain works.
So my question is, why isn't Instagram sort of included in that?
In fact, throughout the pandemic, like you mentioned, I lost weight.
Well, I gained weight, then I lost weight.
Let me tell you, that has an impact on your mood.
That's a tiny orgasmatron in your head when you've just worked out.
You know that.
There are all kinds of things that we can do in our lives which moderate our moods, which impact on the way that our consciousness is perceiving the world and so on.
Yeah, but the kind of stimulation that you get from a phone is actually ultimately very profitable.
Because first of all, they sell phones.
Everybody wants to buy the new phone.
When the new phone comes out, Instagram is very profitable.
All these social media, I mean Facebook, how much have they profited off the data of those untold billions of people that are on it?
It's stunning.
If they really do develop a Facebook coin, if they trick regulators into allowing them to have a crypto coin, we've got a real fucking problem on our hands.
Because then Facebook becomes essentially a nation.
They're going to have a coin that people are going to use if it becomes a predominant crypto coin.
If it becomes a really big deal that people buy and exchange goods and then maybe even homes and cars and things like that with crypto that's from Facebook.
And then Facebook, they have currency.
And so not only do they generate untold billions of dollars a year, like how much money does Facebook make a year?
What do you make of the whole, like, Axie Infinity and all these...
There's, like...
There are Filipino kids whose job it is...
I say kids.
They're 15-year-olds.
Who's, like, many of them, whose job it is to play...
Like, crypto video games with, like, rich Western – well, richer Western teenagers who, like, exchange – the playing of the game generates some of the coins.
So, like, Axie Infinity and these kinds of virtual games.
I'm not aware of these.
It's like this whole other universe, right?
So, along with the rise of NFTs and shit like that.
I've got an episode of my podcast.
My podcast is Uncomfortable Conversations, by the way.
If people want to check it out, Uncomfortable Conversations with Josh Sepps.
One of the episodes was with this investment banker who is a bit of an expert on Bitcoin and crypto.
So at the moment, just think about the fact that we're at the precipice at the beginning of the second decade, the third decade of the 21st century or whatever, at the beginning of this whole evolution.
It's almost like being at the beginning of the Industrial Revolution, but it's a technological revolution.
And all of these little things are popping up.
We haven't even heard of them yet.
What is a train?
You know, it's like being 200 years ago or something.
What's this?
What's this thing you're doing?
An internal combustion engine or something?
And all these little experiments in this stuff.
A printing press.
Yeah, exactly.
How is that going to change the world?
Yeah, smash cut to 80 years of war and bloodshed after the printing press, right, in Europe.
It's going to be incredibly tumultuous.
And as soon as a Zuckerberg...
Gets his eyes set on, oh, okay, well, hang on.
If that kind of money is being spent on this tiny little nothing game, how do I fold that into the metaverse, provide goods and services in my virtual territory that enable people to get some kind of perceived value from them?
And then all of a sudden you're actually trading, conversing, living, aspiring, acquiring in this virtual world.
And every time you're buying something, someone's getting a cut Right?
Maybe Rupert Murdoch, but I mean, I think you'd have to say Zuckerberg is the most powerful person in the world, because he can...
What he does to the algorithm, what direction he chooses to take that company in, with billions and billions of users, it doesn't have to be a big thing.
It's just like all these tiny little tweaks.
It's like a sailboat in the ocean that you just tack it a little bit that way.
So like the YouTube recommendation bar that you were talking about, we've all seen these experiments.
I hope we've all seen them online of where people start searching about dieting and then it goes more and more extreme suggestions about dieting and you end up with pro-anorexia videos being delivered to 14-year-old girls because each step of the way it's just slightly more interesting and slightly more clicky to get slightly more extreme.
Yeah, or like, you know, you start inquiring about 9-11 and you end up with a 9-11 truth video.
It rarely goes in the other direction.
It's rarely like, here's a very reasonable, moderate, like, centrist, mildly boring thing that you're probably not going to click on, which may be the truth.
Most things that are true are mildly boring in comparison to their more extreme...
The thing about these places, whether it's YouTube or Facebook or Twitter, it's like there's no real – once it's already been established and then it gets moving and then it becomes an enormous part of our culture.
It becomes an enormous way where people exchange information.
There's no precedent.
It's not like we have decades of this to look back on and go, well, remember back in the 30s?
You know, people got it wrong, but now social media is more adapted.
No, it's so new.
That the consequences of it all haven't been—they really haven't been vetted out yet.
I mean, like when you look at like the political and cultural swings from right to left as we sort of go back and forth and like one party, one side of politics gains power and the other loses.
The sort of the gentle pendulum that has always happened, I worry, is turning into like a pirate ship at a fair where it just goes more and more and more and more and more and more and more.
And that the algorithms are kind of dragging us back and forth so that instead of going from like, you know, Clinton to Romney or something, you're going from Trump to Obama and, you know, Obama to Trump and then like what's next and – Yeah.
That all of that is feeding into that.
And once we're all hooked up to our VR and AR and we're all exchanging like Axie Infinity tokens with each other and getting off on our orgasmatron porn plugged directly into our brains, how does that affect our actual ability to collaborate with each other on the big problems that actually exist in the real world?
It's like the Myanmar thing where there was like a whole genocide, right?
And like people talk about how, you know, there needs to be more internal regulation at Facebook of hate speech and stuff like that, which is, of course, a double-edged sword because you don't want...
Hate speech or misinformation to get defined so broadly that anyone with a dissident opinion like you is suddenly banned from the platform or something just because you don't agree with Fauci about something or whatever.
I was at a thing with a woman that I am very good friends with who was a large executive at one of the big tech companies.
She invites us.
We go.
We're hanging out.
And it's me and my wife.
And there's a woman there from Facebook.
And so she starts talking about how difficult it's been to regulate Facebook and this and that.
I go, there was a case, I go, where I saw a man had a playlist on his page and his YouTube page, just a random guy.
And he received a community guidelines strike because he put up a video of Douglas Murray and Sam Harris having a conversation.
I go, why would he do that?
She goes, it was hate speech.
And I go, the way you said that, so confidently, my wife grabs my knee, she squeezes my knee, she sees the fucking look in my eyes, and I'm like, what are you talking about?
How can you say that so confidently that it was hate speech?
Tell me about the contents of the conversation.
She's fucking digging her nails in my leg.
I go, tell me about the content of that conversation.
Why would you say that's...
I go, you're talking about two public intellectuals.
It's like hate speech has gone from intentionally vilifying people and trying to encourage other people to be physically violent against minorities to raising any questions that might contradict the enforced narrative that people want you to believe.
Sort of literally pro-genocidal activity that's going on, especially on WhatsApp.
A lot of people don't realize that in developing countries, often...
WhatsApp and Facebook Messenger and these things will be used to disseminate to thousands of people in a single text.
They've changed this now, to their credit, about the number of times that you can retweet something and the number of people who you can group chat it to.
Because, like, there would be military dictatorships in the developing world that would just spray out inflammatory rhetoric against, I mean, I'm thinking specifically of Burma here, Myanmar, where they'd spray out inflammatory rhetoric against religious minorities, for example, accusing them of having done all sorts of terrible things.
And that would get passed on and passed on and passed on and passed on.
All of a sudden you've got people effectively being lynched and running out of their homes and they're becoming refugees.
And in terms of moderating this content, here in the States, Facebook proudly points to its army of content moderators of over like 100,000 people that keep saying to, you know, whenever Zuckerberg has to testify at Congress, he's like, we employ so many people to check it and blah, blah, blah.
Well, how many Burmese speakers are in there?
They've got like...
I can't remember what it was, but it's four or 14, certainly not more than 40, to cover a country of many, many tens of millions of people.
So all over the world, there are these countries.
And Zuckerberg made a deal with a lot of countries where he said, I'm going to give you free internet as long as Facebook is the portal through which all of your citizens get to the internet.
So there are countries where people think that Facebook is the internet.
They don't even know that there's a World Wide Web outside of Facebook.
Well, when you're a creative person and you're trying to construct a creative life, now I sound like I'm kind of talking to the young people out there, but maybe I am a little bit.
One of the exciting things is you do find yourself going in all these.
Weird, crazy directions that you never would have expected.
And that's part of the kind of beautiful tap dance of doing your own thing and of creating a life that isn't just getting a job.
Like my grandfather...
He learned to make shoes when he was, like, 15 during the Depression in New Zealand.
And his buddy, you know, had a dad who worked at a shoe factory, so they trained him.
Like, left school in 10th grade, went to the shoe factory at the age of 16, walked out of that shoe factory at the age of 65, and that was his job.
And it comes back to what you were saying earlier about inequality and the elites that make that harder for people.
Like I do worry that a lot of the craziness that we've seen over the past couple of years that I think is partly due to the pandemic in terms of like riots and what's been going on in Portland and the extreme sort of clashes between alt-right and like Black Lives Matter and like the intensity of the culture wars is partly because we're all trapped inside spending too much time on Twitter.
The true inequality in America is the inner cities.
If you look at the disparity between the amount of violence and crime and drug use and gang violence that's in whether it's South Side of Chicago or Baltimore or Detroit or Compton, pick a spot where it's historically been riddled with crime and drug use and And just sadness and despair.
They don't fix those spots.
They'll fucking spend billions of dollars to go to Afghanistan and fix this or Iraq and fix that.
These Halliburton no-bid contracts that they got when they blew up Iraq.
Like, imagine if Halliburton got contracts, no-bid contracts to fix Baltimore.
It's so frustrating because let's take this plan of yours to halibutonize the redevelopment of inner cities.
And if you tried to propose that, it wouldn't just...
I mean, both sides would object.
The right would object because the right would be like, why are we spending all this money on these people in the first place?
They should be able to swim their way up the salmon ladder without help.
And then the left would have a whole bunch of vested interests, and they'd be like, well, we know the way of doing things here.
We've been working for many years in these communities of need, and it's very important to allow the people who choose to be homeless to—oh, they're not homeless anymore.
They're like, you know, whatever the euphemism is.
It's very important for them to allow themselves to be self-expressed in the way that they want to be self-expressed.
I think Americans are unaware, and I was unaware when I lived here.
I went to New Orleans...
A few years after Katrina, I had a buddy who was living down there and I was like, you know, I kind of want to go to the parts that were badly hit and that haven't been redeveloped yet.
He was like, you don't want to go there.
And I was like, no, I mean, I got my rental car.
I'm Australian.
unidentified
Come on.
Hey, let's go and see what the poor people are up to, shall we?
And he's like, so I went on a drive by myself, and you're talking about Thailand, people being happy.
You go to India, they have nothing, but they all are sort of the same level of nothing, so they can be happy, and they can still have community, and they can have a sense of a functioning society, even without very much.
Here, no functioning society, no nothing.
I mean, just empty houses, boarded up.
Like, a dude running from one house to another when he hears my car coming down the street.
No cars.
A few cars with, like, the tires pulled off and, like, you know, up on bricks.
You know, just smashed windows everywhere.
Like, it was like a post-apocalyptic thing.
Nightmare, but still people, like shadows in the windows and stuff like that.
And I drove through, pulled out, and I literally pulled the car over to the side of the road and I burst into tears.
There has to be a way to do something for the people who are living there that is better than what they've got right now.
How on earth?
What a complete indictment of whatever system we've got that Zuckerberg's out there with his little figuring out how to turn Axie Infinity into Facebook coins that we're all going to spend in the metaverse at the same time as that exists.
And then whatever chaos comes as a result of weather systems being disrupted due to climate change is only going to hit those kinds of neighbourhoods the worst anyway.
So if you do care about that, then care about all of it.
And the neighborhoods, if you stopped and thought about just the sheer amount of despair that comes out of these places and crime and the violence and all that stuff, if people saw it, if they really knew about it and they looked at it as like a problem that we have in America, In terms of, like, you know, we have a pollution problem, we have this problem, we have this problem, too.
He's a blogger and he basically takes big huge ideas like the sort of stuff that we're talking about and puts them into stick figure cartoons and writes little blogs about them to super super super super almost hilariously oversimplify them.
But I'm hoping that, you know, obviously things vary, but according to epidemiologists, most things that follow along these lines that we're seeing in this pandemic, this is actually Omicron's a normal progression.
So the theory that I was just talking to him about that we mentioned you about was like whether or not there's a...
So why isn't there any evidence of alien civilizations, right?
So one explanation is that there's like a great filter, which whenever civilizations get sophisticated enough to be able to reach out and communicate with other civilizations, they either blow themselves up, And like, you know, there's no opportunity to actually evolve beyond a certain point because you get too clever for your own good and you blow yourself up with nukes or you destroy the planet or something like that.
Or maybe the great filter is behind us and there's a whole ton of life out there in the solar system, in the galaxy, in the universe, but none of it actually gets to be conscious and self-aware and build civilizations because there's some impediment to becoming as sophisticated as our brains are that we don't even know about, that we've already...
Overcome, like some point in human evolution.
And the third point was like, maybe there are lots of civilizations out there, but there's one super predator civilization that as soon as another civilization gets too big for its boots, just comes and extinguishes all of the rival civilizations.
And the ones that haven't been extinguished have to stay quiet, almost like there's a...
Like you're in the dark woods and you know that there's a monster out there, so you don't light a fire because you don't want the monster to know where you are.
So nobody's broadcasting the fact that alien civilizations actually do exist.
They're just staying quiet because they don't want to communicate to the predator civilization that they actually exist and get wiped out.
What if the idea of travel through space and visiting other planets, other physical planets is archaic and that what they do develop is some sort of hyper metaverse and that everything becomes more Internal with these quasi-dimensions,
with these new ways of achieving stimulation and also like a symbiotic relationship with electronics where people stop being biological and they start being some sort of weird cyborg-type creature.
I mean, this is like...
The archetypal alien, this little guy right here, right?
You know, one of the things that people believe is that that's what human beings are destined to probably look like in the future.
If you think about what we used to be, if we used to be these beastly, muscular primates, and we have slowly but surely become these doughy things with Big brains.
But I think those scenarios of like, if you look at where we're going, I mean, clearly, there's some sort of a push for us to travel to other planets and interstellar exploration.
Surely, there's some...
I mean, Elon's at the forefront of that.
But really, the big push of this country, of this population of human beings, though, is technological innovation.
Like, if you looked at us objectively from afar, if you were some sort of a being and you didn't understand what we were, what's going on over there?
Oh, there's this one dominant species that makes things.
We're the only ones that make things.
There's a few examples of bees that make beehives, and there's leafcutter ants in my property that are making some weird little structure.
But the real makers of things is the humans.
And if you look, well, what is their goal?
Well, their goal is to make the best shit possible constantly every year.
And they even have a built-in problem with...
What is materialism?
Well, it's a silly notion.
You're going to live this empty life where you're just chasing objects, but what are you doing with this instinct of materialism?
You're fueling innovation.
You're fueling because you're constantly working to try to earn the money so you can get these new things, and these new things are always superior to the old things.
and they keep getting better and better and the acceleration of that superior like arc is exponential like if you look at the this is another point that tim i'm just giving tim a shout out to give him credit for the shout out to tim that i've been noodling on for the past uh you know yesterday and today on pluv it a lot of time just sitting on a plane looking out the window going man where are all the aliens and
And so the other thing he talks about is like if the history of human civilization was an 800-page book, so say 160,000 years that we've been like homo sapiens sapiens with like the kinds of civilizations that, well, even pre-civilizations, right?
Nomadic peoples and so on.
Yes.
right, or 200 years, 200 times 800, yeah, 160,000.
Like, you can open that book to almost any page, and the same shit's going on.
- Yes. - Right?
Like, all the way up until the-- Like, yeah, basically people are wandering around with pretty primitive tools.
A few of them sort of figure out how to use fire.
A few of them figure out, like, how to use metals and stuff like that.
A few of them figure out how to ride horses and domesticate animals.
But it's basically the same shit for, like, 790 pages of the 800-page book of our species.
And then just towards the end, it's like...
The page before the very end, like, the United States gets settled, Australia gets settled, the Industrial Revolution happens.
And then, like, on the final page, if each page is 250 years of an 800-page book, you know, it's the last half of the page.
Nuclear weapons, you know, going into space, landing on the moon, the evolution of the internet, vehicles, cars, climate change, like, all of this.
And it's like the final few lines, like Facebook and all this shit, Axie Infinity and little coins and your VR and your orgasmatron and everything is like the final two lines of an 800-page book.
So, you know, sometimes people will say to me, oh, you know, people always think that they're living through amazing times, Josh.
You know, you think you're living through an incredible time.
But I'm sure people were saying that in like the 1820s.
I'm sure everyone was like, oh, my God, things are changing so fast.
And I'm like, no, I'm going to call bullshit on that.
If an alien who knew nothing about anything took that 800-page book, they'd be like, page 233 is roughly the same as page 722. But they'd get to the end and they'd be like, holy shit, what's going to happen next?
So like, even if they don't come, like, I'm not talking about like, why haven't aliens come and visited us like in Independence Day?
I just mean like when we train our telescopes on the sky.
Why isn't there any evidence of little flickering radio waves coming from somewhere?
But a possible explanation is the one that you say, which is we're looking for the wrong things.
We've only been emitting radio waves for a century, and we might be just about to end that and go into some virtual reality metaverse or something, and maybe we'll meet them all there.
Maybe we'll unlock some door of the Zuckerberg multiverse and be like, oh, here are a whole bunch of pre-existing civilizations of aliens who already exist on this platform.
Well, also, if you think about the various planets that we know exist just in our solar system and the conditions that exist on these planets, there's not a lot of them that can support life.
Like, they believe that Mars at one point in time had liquid water and they had an atmosphere and they probably hit with some sort of an asteroid that wiped out everything.
But other than that, you've got Europa that has frozen water on the outside.
My point was, the solar system that we exist in is very unusual.
And, you know, we obviously have a planet that exists in this Goldilocks range.
But we also have an extremely large asteroid belt.
And it's indicative of the initial impact between Earth 1 and Earth 2. You know, Earth 1 was a planet that got hit by another planet.
Right.
And that's what created the moon, and they believe that also created the asteroid belt.
And if there's a solar system out there that didn't have that sort of event, so didn't have to worry about these intermittent cataclysms, where, you know, that's one of the things that Randall Carlson and Graham Hancock have done some great research on, is that Indication that at least one time that we know of, while civilization existed, it was probably almost wiped out.
And it's somewhere in the Younger Dryas Impact Theory.
The point is if there's a planet out there that doesn't have that issue and like let's imagine because I don't know what the reality is when it comes to like ancient Egypt or Mesopotamia or I mean these incredible structures that these people built where unfortunately because the burning of the library of Alexandria we don't have the real records of how they did it or how they accomplished it or who they were.
Or even really how long ago they really made it.
We know that some of them, they've done carbon dating on some of the stuff, and they know it's at least 2500 BC, but there's some indications that some of it might be far, far older than that.
So let's imagine that there was some sort of a civilization 10,000 years ago, 20,000 years ago, that was very advanced.
And was allowed to advance without any interruption, without nuclear war, without solar flares, without asteroid impacts or supervolcanoes.
Maybe they lived in a much more stable climate, and they got to a place where they're a million years more advanced than us.
A million years.
Imagine what the fuck we're going to be in a million years.
Like, if you think about what a scientist is, it's someone who wants to observe but sometimes protect.
You know, like, we protect endangered species.
Activists get together and they say, hey, you know, there's only a few of these birds left.
We have to do whatever we can to preserve them.
If they have that same mentality about the human race, I think they would have a pretty standoffish attitude and just sort of wait for us to figure it out.
Especially if they look at the acceleration of our innovation and this exponential acceleration of technology.
I can't remember if it was like Michio Kaku or Neil deGrasse Tyson or one of those like great science guys who was saying like maybe any civilization that would be advanced enough to be able to reach out to us or to be noticed by us would also have to be the kind of civilization that would not be a predatory colonizing civilization.
Right.
Species, because in that case it would have devoured itself with internal squabbles.
You basically have to reach a certain level of spiritual and psychological wisdom and self-awareness and compassion in order to sustain yourself over the course of, you know, so far we've had a couple of hundred years since the Industrial Revolution and it's only been a century, less than a century, that we've had nukes.
I think one day we're going to recognize that one of the things that holds back progress is our primate bodies.
And that the symbiotic relationship we have with technology is going to enable us to bypass emotions.
Because emotions and hormones and our need to breed through traditional intercourse, I think we're going to look at that and go, this is the result or this thing that we have, these primate instincts, these animal instincts.
This is the cause of all of our suffering.
This is the cause of all of our territorial behavior.
This is the cause of jealousy and hate and greed and racism and tribal identity.
And all this stuff is all related to these animal emotions.
If we could get past that and if we could breed through some sort of genetic manipulation, if we could have a body that doesn't exist riding on these natural animal hormones, but rather you know uses photosynthesis like a fucking plan we Would you still be human?
No.
We're not going to be human, just like we used to be a monkey, and now we're not a monkey, right?
And now we're something else, and we're going to be something new a million years from now.
I mean, it is fascinating what the phenomenology of that would be, like the big fancy term of what the actual experience of feeling like that thing would be, in the sense that we like to think of ourselves as being brains which are having an experience inside this shell that does what we want it to do.
And again, this is another Jonathan Haidt thing, like he has the analogy of the rider on the elephant, right?
We're all riding around on an elephant, and the elephant is our kind of passions and our unreason and our instincts and the things that motivate us.
in a sort of brutish evolutionary primate way.
And we ride on the elephant thinking that we're in total control of the elephant because our rational brains like to perceive ourselves that way.
But in actual fact, we're often making post hoc rationalizations about where the elephant goes.
So like the elephant takes us and we're like, oh yeah, yeah, go over there, elephant.
And you know like those tests of like...
When you startle someone, you see a bear or you see a snake or something like that, you think you see it and then your heart starts racing and your body goes into fight or flight.
But when the scientists actually study you, your body is in the fight or flight and then you're reacting to it.
So your body is actually physiologically reacting even before the psychological impression of the thing lands in your consciousness.
So if you extract all of that, as you're saying, and you become just like a kind of a perfect...
you know, brain in a vat sustained by photosynthesis or whatever, without the feeling of the pounding heart, without the feeling of the adrenaline coursing through your brains, without the feeling of the messiness and the arousal and the sexuality and like, what then are you?
Like, what does that even feel like?
Is it, do you even feel fear or success or pride or anything?
If you are, if you are detached, if you are disentangled from all the kind of messy neurology of your physical body.
Is it important to feel loved and lust and is it are those things like human?
It's certainly human right, but if if what we can achieve without that is superior like imagine the feeling of being on MDMA where you love everyone and What if you could get a little bit of that and maintain it?
We end war.
We end it instantaneously for the entire population.
So that's step one.
So whatever it is, it's a wearable device, it's maybe a headset, it's Neuralink, it's one thing.
And one of the first things they do is ramp up your dopamine and your serotonin to the point where you are incapable of violence and everybody just wants love and everybody really does think of everyone as being one.
We are all one race and we try and we like instantaneously have this desire to go to that neighborhood in New Orleans and rebuild it.
We instantaneously want everyone to be on the same page and everyone to feel the same way.
Because we are all one.
So instead of looking at people as your competition, looking at people like you're going to have to stomp on the lower class in order to, you know, so you can have a yacht.
We're not going to think that way at all anymore because we're never going to be able to feel free with this idea of one person dominating other people.
And even Mark Zuckerberg is going to be stuck like, oh my God, what have I done?
Like I have to undo everything.
I have to, you know, The YouTube people will drop the algorithm and everything is going to realize that what we really are is a gigantic superorganism that has to be together with each other.
This idea of independence is so preposterous because the worst thing they could ever do to you when you're in jail is put you in solitary confinement.
We need each other.
We are literally useless without each other.
And we never would have achieved a fraction of what this species has achieved if it wasn't for everyone working together, even with the horrible things like the Manhattan Project.
It required so many scientists to work on it simultaneously.
I mean, I think a lot of who I am is not just that I've got a lot of discipline and I have a lot of drive, but also that I've not had too many obstacles in my way in terms of something life-changing that can stop me in my tracks.
Well, I think we're at a moment where we're not respecting dissenters enough.
And there's one part of the culture that reveres any dissenter and anyone who sort of sticks it to the man and who questions authority.
And then there's another part of the culture that is very pro-authority and that is very...
Like, you're not supposed to question things.
And there isn't a lot of...
There's not a lot in the playful centre, which is where I like to live.
Like, you know, let's try this, let's try that.
I think it's good to ask questions.
I think it's good to...
You know, I don't want to be so cynical towards the establishment and towards elites...
I become essentially credulous.
We all know the type of conspiracy theorist who is so anti the mainstream narrative that it's a kind of credulity in itself.
It's like they just believe anything because it's not what the mainstream believes.
But nor do I want to have to live in a world where you get social credits for saying the right thing and doing the right thing and reciting what the authorities want you to say or what the opinion page of the New York Times wants you to say.
I think you're right.
We're at a fork, and page 801 is going to be written by us.
I think the last time I was on the show, I was talking about my nana had just died in New Zealand, my grandmother.
She lived to the eve of her 100th birthday.
And I was going to Greece after her funeral to visit a buddy of mine who lives in Athens.
And I'm wandering around the foothills of the Agora where democracy was born, near the birthplace of ancient Greece.
And I'm like, wow, 4,000 years ago, Western democracy was born on this site with people just wandering around for the first time, asking each other what they thought about things.
Instead of an authority from on high telling people what to do, people are like, Hey, maybe we can all figure it out for ourselves.
And that germ of an idea has then spread and changed the world and been the birthplace of civilization, the cradle of Western, blah, blah, blah.
And through his research, they've opened up a field of study at Harvard that are looking into this.
And what they found is physical evidence of psychedelic drug use in ancient Greece.
And that they found these vats of wine, these vessels that contained ergot and a bunch of different psychedelic compounds that resemble LSD and psilocybin.
And that this idea of wine, like we think of wine like a great Cabernet from Napa, right?
It's like, oh, it's a 19, you know, but it's really good.
What they were doing was mixing, first of all, most of their wine was very low fermentation alcohol.
Like it didn't, they weren't able to develop the kind of alcohol, like when we think of beer, when we think of like strong Canadian beer or something like that, it's like 9% alcohol.
And they basically developed fermentation so that they didn't have spoil.
It killed the bacteria.
So the alcohol killed the bacteria so they were able to prevent what they would call traveler's disease from drinking bad water.
Well, they would add a bunch of stuff to their wine.
Different flavors and different spices and they would also add psychedelic drugs to their wine.
Now because of the fact that Roman emperors came along and they put a kibosh in this stuff, they had to start traveling to different lands and they brought these Rituals and the way they practiced these psychedelic rituals, they brought them to Spain and to Italy and they found evidence of this all over Europe where they had to travel to avoid persecution.
But the root of democracy, the root of the enlightenment, the root of all of the foundations of modern society probably came out of drugs.
And Brian has done an amazing job of a thorough research of that.
See if you can pull up the cover of that book so you can see it.
Yes, and well, yeah, the burning bush being, at the university in Jerusalem, they believe that that was an acacia tree, and that the acacia tree is rich in dimethyltryptamine, and that the whole idea of the burning bush being a message from God, like, we're looking at this in a literal sense, and it was probably they smoked this tree, and they saw visions, and they saw God, and God told them, like, I want you to live your life by these commandments.
And if you've had psychedelic experiences, I know you have, there's moments where you have them where you start thinking, oh, we're supposed to do this.
We're supposed to treat each other with love.
We're supposed to look at each other as if we are one.
Michael Pollan writes about this, which is, you know, part of my sort of scientific interest in this experimentation as well.
I haven't done it since I was in my teens, but then it was like what Pollan, the New York Times bestselling journalist, calls the noetic.
Truth, meaning a kind of a truth that is only accessible because you really, really deeply know it.
So it's almost like a spiritual understanding or something.
And a lot of the research that's going on into psychedelics and MDMA and end-of-life care and in these clinical studies and stuff like that, I mean, even in treating addiction, it's showing incredible promise in getting people to quit smoking and stuff like that because people have these epiphanies, have these in a properly managed setting with a proper therapist and stuff like that.
They're able to attain these levels of insights that supersede anything that you can know through your rational mind.
It lets you know what is causing you to have this self-destructive behavior too because – So many people, they have, whether it was alcohol or drug addiction or whatever, they have these psychedelic moments where they allow themselves to see themselves objectively, completely free of the confines of the ego and they can see all the pitfalls.
Of these personality traits they've developed and all these patterns of behavior that they've fallen into, like a tightly carved groove and they just can't seem to get out of it.
It's like you've been skiing down a slope and there's all those grooves and you have this experience and all of a sudden there's just like a fresh dusting of snow.
And for me it comes down to the biggest question of all.
which is how is it that we're self-aware at all?
I mean, why is it that we live in a cosmos in which all of these stars are spewing out?
I mean, the universe is mostly hydrogen.
These stars are these gigantic nuclear reactors.
They spew out these little impurities, and these impurities, like carbon and things, are the things that we are made of.
So these kind of little bits that get created in stars aggregate together on this planet and form themselves together in such a way that not only are we capable of making all these tools and doing all these incredible things and going to the moon and building a metaverse, but we're able to have an experience of what it's like to be doing that thing.
Which the psychedelic or MDMA or whatever these new clinical trials are doing seems to unlock the ability to, as you say, transcend the ego and just elevate you to a level of pure consciousness and connectedness with...
ineffable somethingness of self-awareness.
Why is there any self-awareness at all?
Why is there a thing that it's like to be me?
There doesn't have to be.
I could be doing all of these things that I'm doing right now without having any lights on inside.
You can imagine a sophisticated robot doing all of these things, talking like I'm talking, doing all the things that I'm doing.
There's no need for me to actually have an experience of being alive.
Yet I do, you do, presumably chimps do, presumably dogs do.
There's this whole network of life which is suffused with self-awareness and consciousness that comes out of stars.
What the hell's going on, Joe?
When I was in my teens, I was a very, very hardcore atheist.
I was very much on the Richard Dawkins...
Sam Harris bandwagon.
And now I'm still not a religious person in terms of believing in books that were written thousands of years ago as being the sole source of truth about the world.
But I do sort of sit back in my kind of, I'm a 15-year-old, you know, smoking a reefer, lying on my back, gazing at the stars type moments and go like, what?
Build yourself up to the point where you can take a real heroic dose.
And then all these cocky thoughts you have of what you absolutely know exists out there in the world and in the universe and in reality itself, it's going to go away.
You don't know.
And I'm not saying that...
I'm not a religious person, and I think that I'm...
And I'm more of a person who is open to the possibility of there being an infinite number of variables that we don't even have the ability to perceive.
Because that's one of the things that I've experienced through psychedelic trips is that, like, The first time you do a really strong psychedelic, you go, how the fuck is that?
That's what's weird about these compounds when you think about the burning bush and what you were just saying about ancient Greece and stuff.
Maybe the great filter that I was talking about with regard to alien civilizations, like why are we rare?
Why is it rare that a civilization as sophisticated as ours Since we don't seem to see evidence of it in any nearby galaxies, even though there are 100 billion stars.
Maybe the filter is that we needed these compounds.
Maybe we needed these compounds to unlock something in our primate brain and go, whoa, look at the stars.
I mean, it very well could be what caused us to become people in the first place in that it's sort of like a, you know, a signpost on the road guiding us into a direction of whatever the fuck we're going to become.
Stop looking at your little, like, leaf-cutting, like, stop making the little tools that the chimps make to, like, dig the ants out of the thing and, like, turn your eyes to the stars and, like, think about where you actually are and look at miracles.
But if you wanted to be really, if you wanted to be, you know, look at it I'm not completely objective, like looking at outside of what benefits or does not benefit the human race.
Maybe you would think that it's probably better that they made this stuff illegal and then they demonized it and made it very hard to get because that forced people to really accelerate this technological race.
That forced people to accelerate like in not letting them become aware of the futile nature of materialism.
They pursued it to the nth degree to the point where they have spectacular technological capabilities, but also this existential crisis and then also this real concern about thermonuclear warfare with these rivals.
And then, slowly but surely, psychedelics get reintroduced into society while we have...
Well, that's why I say maybe, because it also does make people more creative, right?
I think you're absolutely right that there's a certain kind of mainstream, kind of middle American, like Willie Loman, Death of a Salesman, like work, work, work, work, work.
Like, you know, I'm going to be the hardest working.
This is a kind of, almost reminds me of like Peter Thiel or someone like that, or a Wall Street person who's like, I'm just going to work harder than everybody and work longer and be better than everybody else.
There's definitely that.
But then there's this other kind of creativity that Jobs has or maybe even Elon Musk has or like where it's just a weird universe that they've got going on in their head, which is not necessarily like I'm going to go from A to B in the most materialistic, closed-minded way.
It's like I'm going to dance with the fairies like on this incredible lily pad of existence and I'm going to take it wherever I want it to go.
And when you see that become successful – That is inspiring.
I mean, when you see what Apple's created and when you see what Elon's up to, you're like, I'm in the presence of something truly unusual, truly incredible, that may be enhanced by psychedelic compounds.
Maybe enhanced by it, but then the other thing is, think of those things that you're talking about, specifically like Apple.
Through the use of that technology, that accelerated the whole smartphone revolution.
And that also changed the way people exchange information.
And through that, accelerated our understanding of these things.
Like Brian Murrow-Rescue's book and his ideas, like who knows how much of that was affected by the use of social media, reading things online about...
You know, Terence McKenna's work and all these various people that have researched psychedelic drugs throughout the years and written all these different things about ancient Greece.
And he had to take a big chance to try to put that all out in a book.
Fortunately, he did and then came on this podcast.
Then the podcast broadcasted to millions of people.
Harvard hears a signal.
They changed a course of study.
So you can study this concept of psychedelic drugs influencing ancient Greece and what ancient Greece has contributed to the entire civilization of the world.
All this happens through the invention of Steve Jobs and technology.
Podcasts literally were invented for an iPod.
That was the first from Adam Curry.
That's literally where it started.
It's all crazy how it all piles onto each other.
What Elon's doing is fucking sending people into space.
He's in the middle of this thing where he's not just making electric cars.
This is what Pollan is talking about when he's talking about noetic truth, right?
I mean, until you do it, you don't know what you don't know.
Penn is a brilliant guy.
You can't just say, like, my rational brain has concluded that the conclusion to this whole experiment is that it is just an artifact of consciousness and it has nothing to teach us.
It was James Randi who had the Million Dollar Challenge.
And Randi, who just died, God bless his soul, he collaborated with Johnny Carson to put Uri Geller on the spot.
He had an appearance on The Tonight Show.
And Carson was an old magic kid.
When Carson was in his teens, he loved doing card tricks and stuff.
So he was also one of these kinds of guys.
So was Houdini, by the way, like a debunker of stuff.
Like it's the people who know how to trick people that are the best.
Oh yeah, here it is.
So Geller thinks that he's coming on the show just for a nice chat, but Johnny Carson surprises him with all of these things that he didn't know he was going to have to do, all of these things that he claims to be able to do.
Carson collaborated with Randy behind the scenes.
Randy wasn't on the show, but he was like the coach, essentially, behind the scenes.
You can find videos of some of that stuff.
It's fascinating.
And Yuri Geller, if you go to the end of the segment, Jamie, you can see how sort of embarrassed he is and how kind of awkward and apologetic he is.
Because Johnny's just like, you know, I don't want to put you on the spot, but this is stuff you say you can do.
Well, for example, you asked us before the show and this afternoon for one of our staff members to draw on a couple of cards and seal them in an envelope, which we have done.
Yes.
Well, let me tell you again.
This didn't bend much, and right now here I'm stuck.
I don't feel for it more, so I don't want to be stuck either on an envelope.
I'd rather tell you that many people are skeptical about these things.
They see something happening and then they want to see it closer and closer.
There have been many people running and saying that they can duplicate what I do.
Well, I can only say that if I'm on stage and people see me from far, they can always say that there is some sort of a sleight of hand trickery here.
But I've been working with science quite a lot.
And by doing what you see here under controlled conditions, because this is not a controlled condition...
What do you mean?
Well, this is not a controlled condition.
What I mean is, for instance, in experiments, it's covered with bell jars, and there are cameras running, and many scientists looking at every point, although you're trying to do the same, but this is really not a controlled condition.
But Randi was behind the way that Carson was going to set up those tests.
He's like, well, if Geller claims that he can bend a spoon...
A real spoon.
A real spoon, yeah.
If he claims that he can tell which salt shaker has water in it without seeing it just by moving his hand over a covered batch of salt shakers, then actually do it properly.
Let's do it this way.
This is the way that I would trick you if I were doing it as a magician, so let's make sure that he can't do it that way.
When someone does something like that with a spoon and they know how to do it, the people that know how to do it and they watch someone fuck with someone, I've had Banachuk on the podcast before.
We had me and my friend Duncan Trussell, we did a television show where he contacted people from the audience and knew things about their family and did all that kind of crazy shit.
And he goes, listen to me right now.
I am not psychic.
This is not real.
These are tricks.
I can't tell you how I do it, but I'm telling you right now, this is all bullshit.
He could foresee how a society that became obsessed with trivialities and with little squabbles and with consumer culture and with celebrities and stuff like that would be led blindly into unproductive dead ends, basically.
And his concern was that all these little things that you think you're dabbling in, sure, they might just be a bit of fun to you.
But if we're going to have the ability as a civilization to come together and to speak to each other on the same page about reality, about facts, about the things that we're actually grappling with, whether you think that's climate or whether you think that's the pandemic, whether you think that's going to space or whether you think that's evolving into the next phase of human civilization due to psychedelics or artificial intelligence or virtual reality or whatever,
whatever, we're not going to be able to have like robust conversations that yield resilient solutions to anything if we're all off in our little quagmires of unreason, like with our tarot cards and our like jerking each other off to some strange, you know, pseudoscience.
Like it's not without costs.
That basically there is a cost to being a culture that does not respect reason, that does not respect rationality, that we have to be as rational and reasonable as we can be in order to converse on the same platform and find solutions to big problems.
And so every time I hear about like, you know, psychics and this and that, for me, it's more than just like, oh, it's a little bit of fun.
It's like, no, just make shit make sense.
Make shit make sense.
That's like a basic obligation of a rational human being.
Require that the things that you do make some sense that would be articulable to somebody else, to someone who's more skeptical like me.
I think that there's too many pathways to nonsense.
And it's so easy to get locked up in flat earth theory or get taken away.
And you should be able to if you're an intelligent person, right?
If you want to Google that there are trolls and goblins living in New Zealand and you really want to watch these videos, like, what the fuck is going on?
It should be okay for fun.
Sure.
For some people, it's not silly.
It's not escapism.
It's not watching hoarders.
If you're not a hoarder and you watch hoarders, it should be like, whoa, this is crazy.
But it shouldn't change your whole life.
Some people, they find escapism in these really preposterous thought processes and they embrace that and give up on everything else.
I mean, that's why I'm not a religious person either, because a religious person is trying to tell me that they know what happens after we die when we all know that nobody knows that.
You must have been at the dinner table last night.
My kids wanted to talk about simulation theory.
They apparently had heard about simulation theory at school.
And last night became a conversation about whether or not life is a simulation.
I said, I do not know because you wake up every morning and you assume that you have been alive for a long time.
You assume it.
I go, so if that assumption's correct and I really just go to sleep and I really just wake up, I can tell you that I lived in a time where there were no computers.
So I don't think simulation theory is happening right now.
And you're not even scared to go on to general anaesthetic, which is even more intense than sleep.
Joe, I heard this anecdote in this book that I was reading.
Do you know a Neil Seth?
Is that a person who's been on this show?
He must have been on...
Yeah, can you Google that?
Jamie A-N-I-L. Seth, I just want to make sure I'm not getting the wrong person.
He must have been on Sam's show.
He's a consciousness researcher, a Brit, and I read him reading his audio book after hearing him on some podcast about consciousness.
And he tells the story of the most famous legendary amnesiac case, like the most extreme form of amnesia that happened to anybody that people in his field study to try to understand the nature of what it's like to be a person.
It was this like Austrian music conductor or something in like the 1970s.
And his wife has written a book about this, who had some traumatic brain injury and then basically became like the guy out of Memento, where he would wake up every day.
like, I don't know, 30 seconds, 60 seconds, something like that, a whole new person, right?
And so his short-term memory was so erased, his memory was completely gone, so he's like...
And he has these notebooks that would be like, this is the real me now.
This is me.
This is me.
Scribble out, scribble out, scribble out.
No, no, no, no, no.
No, this is me.
This is me now, and I am in my real me.
And scribble out, scribble out, scribble out.
Forget all that has been written.
This is me.
I'm like, oh my god.
So he's just...
He is pure consciousness being reinstantiated over and over again with none of the...
The fabric that has connected together his sense of being a human being who exists over time.
But his book's called Being Conscious or something like that.
It's a great read or listen if you're interested in that.
But I mean, it raises all those questions about like, yeah, you wake up in the morning, you have a memory of yesterday.
How do you know that you're not actually like the composer who can't remember anything, but you just have an artifact of a memory that is the Joe Rogan who's existed prior to right now?
How do you know that you're the same person who came into this studio and started having a conversation with me?
But the scene where the woman robot leaves him in that room when you realize she doesn't really have emotion and she doesn't really care.
And she leaves him in that room.
I'm like, this...
The concept of artificial intelligence and the concept of creating an intelligence that mirrors ours, that's the scariest aspect of it, is that we would be...
I'm attracted to that robot.
When I watch that show, that movie, I'm like, God, she's so hot.
If I was around her, I'd probably be confused.
I'd be like, why do I need my girlfriend to be biological?
I mean, that's one of the many things that are genius about that movie, which is the Oscar Isaac character has a line in there, which is like, this isn't about the Turing test, trying to get a robot to convince you that it's not a robot.
The whole point here is that you can see it's a robot.
You can see that she's not real.
So there's no subterfuge.
It's almost like James Randi or like Yuri Geller or something like that, right?
I mean, this is kind of what you were talking about, about like, what if our brains were detached from our physical body so we didn't have all of the hormones and the arousal and everything that comes with a physical human body?
You know, I mean, if you were being trapped, if you woke up as like, you know, Joe Rogan wakes up in the morning and you don't know, you know, what has happened in the past, you're like our Austrian conductor and you've got amnesia or something, or, you know, all of your memory about what has happened in your life is actually an artifact of Oscar Isaac's character who's embedded this in your artificial system, then you might just think, well, I don't want to be a prisoner.
Well, that's a real question too in terms of like if we do create artificial life or artificial intelligence or even we separate our emotions from everything else.
If they create something artificial, you would assume that if you're going to create an artificial person, they would try to program emotions into it.
But that might be the bottleneck.
They might realize like, oh, this is where the problems lie.
Like we're trying to make these things behave like we are when in fact we could use some improvement.
What I think is interesting about the space that's sort of opening up that people like Sam Harris are creating is like this new secular version of that ancient Buddhist wisdom.
I mean, you play a role in this as well, in kind of fostering an ability for people to think about themselves as somewhat detached from their animal emotions, from their instincts, from what's driving us as physiological primates.
And just to sort of notice the thoughts...
A kind of a psychedelic mindfulness and detachment where you're not going to stop yourself from being a human.
You're not going to stop yourself from being subject to all of the whims of being a physical embodied evolved primate.
But you can just like take one step back so that you're not activated by them.
I was on the subway in New York and I saw these two young girls and they were in an argument.
They were like, I mean, they were like...
Really at it.
They were just angry, so angry, so everything that one of them said would activate the other.
It was one of those situations where the whole subway car shifts down to the other end of the car because they're all like, I don't want to be part of this.
And I was looking at them thinking, you're just...
It's all reactive.
It's all just being triggered.
You are not even there, really.
You're just a monkey with another monkey attacking me, and you're like, input, response, input, response.
It's almost like a doctor comes up with a thing and taps your knee, and your leg goes, boop!
It's like, you know, you call her a bitch.
She goes, yeah, well, you're a slut.
It's just back and forth and back and forth like that.
The pathways of those behaviors are really just the remnants of barbaric pasts, the barbaric genetics that we have, where we had to have that sort of response because this primate was coming to try to take your food or take your mate or take your baby or whatever, and you had to like...
I was going to have an open-topped car and streamers and everything, and now it's just going to be throwing rotten tomatoes and turds at me when I get off the plane.