All Episodes
Feb. 19, 2019 - The Joe Rogan Experience
02:27:09
Joe Rogan Experience #1248 - Bill Ottman
Participants
Main voices
b
bill ottman
01:03:19
j
joe rogan
01:15:59
Appearances
j
jamie vernon
02:13
| Copy link to current segment

Speaker Time Text
joe rogan
Five, four, three, two, one.
Legit.
Hello, Bill.
bill ottman
Hey, man.
joe rogan
What's going on?
bill ottman
Here.
joe rogan
You are here.
bill ottman
Yes.
joe rogan
With a book.
You got a book of shit.
bill ottman
I got a book.
joe rogan
You come prepared.
bill ottman
I mean, yeah, I'm trying to write.
I'm trying to get back into handwriting.
joe rogan
For people who don't know, Bill is the CEO and co-founder of Minds.com, and we've been going back and forth through email, and you got hoaxed by some dude who said he was Joey Diaz.
bill ottman
It did happen.
joe rogan
He really believed.
You're like, Joey's been on my network, and I'm like...
bill ottman
He was messaging me in Joey's voice, basically cloning it.
There's weird people out there, man.
joe rogan
Well, that's not hard to do.
You watch enough Joey.
bill ottman
Basically just cloning his tweets.
joe rogan
Cocksucker.
Every Monday morning or so, there's a tweet about someone needs to suck your dick.
They need to suck your dick.
You need to let them know.
That's on the regular.
What's the notes, man?
bill ottman
Just some ramblings from this morning.
joe rogan
Yeah?
bill ottman
Yeah.
joe rogan
Important stuff.
bill ottman
It's actually the first thing that I've written in this notebook.
I've not been doing handwriting much at all in the last years, probably.
Mostly digital.
Which is not good, because I actually majored in English.
joe rogan
Yeah, you definitely lose your ability to write words.
It's funny, I tried writing in, for whatever reason, I write mostly in all caps, because I mostly just write notes, but I tried writing with lowercase letters, and then I tried writing in cursive, and my cursive is like, it's almost like I have to relearn it.
bill ottman
Yeah, I was finding just trailing off at the end of certain words, but I blend it all together.
unidentified
You what?
bill ottman
I blend it all together with capital and lowercase.
joe rogan
Oh, why do you do that?
bill ottman
I mean, well, just as a normal person would, proper grammar.
joe rogan
I thought you were just mixing them up randomly.
bill ottman
No, no.
joe rogan
Okay.
bill ottman
So I did write my college thesis in all lowercase.
unidentified
Why?
bill ottman
Typed.
joe rogan
We protesting?
bill ottman
Yeah, kind of.
It was stupid.
joe rogan
It's like a cool move, right?
I'm not going to use any uppercase.
Who cares, man?
bill ottman
There's weird postmodern theory about capitalization.
unidentified
Oh, really?
bill ottman
And that's kind of what I was talking about.
I got a little bit indoctrinated at UVM. Really?
Yeah.
Yeah.
This one class was called Critical Theory.
joe rogan
Which one is UVM? Vermont.
Vermont.
Oh, Vermont is like super social justice-y, right?
bill ottman
And paved with good intentions.
joe rogan
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
They have great ice cream up there, too.
Nice folks.
bill ottman
But this one class was called Critical Theory, and we had to watch Buffy the Vampire Slayer.
And apply, like, Marxist theory to it to show how, like, it's the rise up of the lower class.
It's like you're forced to write these papers in, like, a certain way.
joe rogan
Yeah?
bill ottman
Yeah.
joe rogan
What are they trying to prove?
bill ottman
Class division.
joe rogan
Class division?
bill ottman
Yeah.
joe rogan
In Buffy the Vampire Slayer?
bill ottman
It's there.
There's, like, books and books written about Buffy the Vampire Slayer.
unidentified
What?
bill ottman
Marxism.
Yeah.
joe rogan
Come on.
bill ottman
Not kidding.
joe rogan
Really?
unidentified
Yep.
joe rogan
What do they have to say?
bill ottman
I don't remember.
unidentified
I don't even want to go into it.
joe rogan
It's amazing.
I mean, I'm sure you're aware of James Lindsay and Peter Boghossian and what is it?
The other woman's name?
Yes.
Helen?
Shit.
I didn't meet her, unfortunately.
The Grieving Studies hoaxes.
They submitted a bunch of fake studies to these journals and not only got reviewed, but got lauded and praised for their academic scholarship.
unidentified
Yeah.
bill ottman
Yeah, I think that stemmed from this guy Sokol who first trolled a lot of the postmodern journals.
And he was the first.
And so it's called a Sokol hoax to do that kind of trolling.
joe rogan
It's hard to figure out who's who, right?
It's hard to figure out what's the hoax.
bill ottman
I got tricked by that.
There's this one thing called the postmodernism generator online.
It's a computer that writes articles.
That puts all of this fancy language together.
And someone sent it to me, and I showed it to my teacher, and I was like, oh, this is saying something pretty interesting.
But it was nothing.
joe rogan
What do you make of all this hoaxing?
You've been hoaxed twice then, that you've just admitted in the first minute of the show.
bill ottman
I mean, I think that you sort of have to have the right to...
joe rogan
To hoax?
bill ottman
To hoax.
To be wrong.
To mess up.
joe rogan
Well, that's not messing up.
That's deceiving people.
True.
But you kind of have the right to do that, too.
You kind of have the right to troll.
bill ottman
Yeah, you don't have the right to impersonate, but I have the right to get trolled and be wrong.
joe rogan
Well, you don't have the right to impersonate.
Like you can't have a verified account and pretend you're Joey Diaz.
bill ottman
Oh, no, of course not.
joe rogan
But harmless trolling like that guy did to you?
Isn't that kind of like part of freedom?
bill ottman
Yeah.
Like taking down disinfo from social networks because it's wrong.
That doesn't make sense.
It also depends on the intent.
It doesn't make sense?
joe rogan
I mean, Like if someone is purposely...
Okay, let's say that you find some Chinese bot that's purposely disseminating incorrect and negative information about maybe a potential presidential candidate.
Let's pick one.
Tulsi Gabbard.
They're disseminating fake news about her.
You know for sure that it's fake.
You know for sure...
I don't know how you know, but you know for sure who the source of it is.
You don't think that should be taken down?
bill ottman
I think that if it's illegal, it should be taken down.
joe rogan
If it's illegal?
bill ottman
Yeah.
joe rogan
Okay.
But if it's just lies?
bill ottman
Then that could be illegal.
I'm not a lawyer.
So I'm trying to position the network or just like advocate for other networks to take more of a neutral stance.
There's this cool thing.
It's called the Manila Principles, which the Electronic Frontier Foundation wrote with a bunch of other internet freedom groups, which is talking about how digital intermediaries shouldn't be making these subjective decisions about what's getting taken down and should require a court order.
Now, with a DNS provider or something less content-focused...
joe rogan
Explain DNS to people who don't know what you're talking about.
bill ottman
A domain name, yeah.
joe rogan
Explain what that is.
bill ottman
It's like where you buy a domain.
But for a social network, we're hosting tons of content.
So it's harder for us because we see illegal content and we should proactively take some of it down if we know it's illegal.
But at the same time, it's just slippery.
joe rogan
Well, I follow quite a few people who have...
I don't want to say they have hoax accounts, but they have parody accounts.
And, you know, a lot of people read into it wrong and think they're being honest and argue with them.
Like, there's this progressive dad guy on Instagram.
You ever follow him?
jamie vernon
I know exactly what you're talking about.
joe rogan
He's hilarious.
jamie vernon
The one I follow too, that's pretty funny.
joe rogan
I follow quite a few of them.
There was a guy who was the wrong skin guy who was saying he was born in the wrong color skin, that he's transracial, and he would make these ridiculous arguments about it.
And Elwick, what was his name?
Apparently he's a comic from the show.
jamie vernon
I was just thinking, I don't know the moment they had to do it, but let's say four years ago, a lot of those troll accounts had to sort of say, we're not this person.
For instance, the main one I follow is now it's known as not Bill Walton.
He tweets funny sports jokes all night long, like what's on TV, as though he's Bill Walton, like in Bill Walton's voice.
But at some point, he had to put in the name, like this is not Bill Walton, but still has quite a few followers, and he still gets the jokes out.
bill ottman
That's funny Well, what's your stance on people who make accounts of your stuff, put it out there?
joe rogan
Well, I have a lot of them.
There's a ton of them.
Some of them actually do good stuff.
They make little clips, and they put those clips online, and it's good for people to enjoy the show.
They get a little one-minute snippet of things.
And then some of them will pretend to be me and contact people and try to book them on the show, which is really weird.
Yeah, I've had that.
But, you know, I mean, who is that?
Is that a 16-year-old kid in Indiana?
I mean, who is that?
It's odd.
But it's overall, like, get past my own personal feelings because it's about me.
It's interesting.
This strange new ground that we're covering.
We've been discussing this ad nauseum on the podcast lately that essentially we've been dealing with 20 years of this.
And in those 20 years, it's changed radically.
What it is, it's become something completely different.
It's become something that changes public opinion on things overnight.
It's become something where you can distribute information from person to person about some huge international news event.
You can get all of your information from Twitter, whether it's what happened in Venezuela or anywhere there's something in the world.
People are turning to social media almost before they're turned anywhere.
When I hear about something, I almost always, before I even Google it, I almost always go to Twitter and check Twitter and see what's going on.
bill ottman
DuckDuckGo it.
joe rogan
DuckDuckGo?
bill ottman
Have you heard of that one?
joe rogan
No, what's that?
bill ottman
It's like a privacy-focused search engine.
It's pretty much the only privacy alternative to Google.
It's like this idea that we say, oh, just Google it.
unidentified
Right.
bill ottman
Our whole process has been to like purge proprietary surveillance tools from our company.
And I've been trying to do it myself, like getting off Facebook, getting off Twitter, getting off Instagram.
It's just like they're so abusive to everybody.
And it's like there's brilliant people who work there.
I mean Instagram is such a well-designed app.
joe rogan
Are you kidding me?
bill ottman
Beautiful.
joe rogan
So what do you think is abusive about it, particularly?
Let's start with Twitter.
bill ottman
They're all the same.
joe rogan
Do you think they're all the same because they're all gigantic businesses?
bill ottman
Yeah.
And they're all the same because none of them share their source code.
And they all spy on everybody.
And they don't show you what is happening behind the scenes.
They don't show you what the code's doing.
So like in that note I wrote to you the other day, it's like, I compare it to like food transparency.
You know, 50 years ago, nobody thought about that.
And then 20 years ago, everyone's like, I want to know what's in my food.
But why wouldn't you want to know what's in your apps?
I mean, it's super sketchy what they're doing.
joe rogan
But how so?
What superscription?
bill ottman
We don't know.
But we know that they're spying on everyone and tracking you everywhere you go.
They're targeting things at you based on physical location, browser, history.
Even when you're not on those websites, they're following you around where you're going on the internet.
joe rogan
Right.
And so some people accept that for this free search engine with free email and things along those lines.
They accept the fact that a certain percentage of what they're doing is not going to be private.
Or at least...
Their searches are not going to be private.
Like, say if you search, like, you're thinking about buying a Jeep, and you search Jeeps, you look at, you know, 2019 Jeep, and then all of a sudden all your Google ads are about Jeeps.
unidentified
Right.
joe rogan
They're like, we know.
We know you're thinking about a Jeep, Bill.
bill ottman
And I don't think that that makes people want to spend more time on Google and Facebook.
joe rogan
What do you think it does?
Do you think it freaks them out?
bill ottman
I think that we're just numb to it, and so we accept it.
unidentified
Yeah.
joe rogan
I think it's more than that.
bill ottman
Yeah, and so there's all different layers of like what we use with your browsers, your apps, your operating system, your food, your, you know, government, your energy, like all of this technology.
It has code that's associated with it.
And when you open up your computer, when you sign into a browser, when you open up an app, you are empowering that app.
That's how the apps of the world become huge, monstrous corporations, is because we all use them every day.
So if you switch from Mac OS to GNU Linux or Debian or Ubuntu, if you use Brave or Firefox, if you DuckDuckGo is actually proprietary, which is annoying, but they are very privacy-focused.
And then there's apps.
There's Mines.
There's other open-source, decentralized social networks out there that we can potentially federate with.
There's really cool, new, interesting protocols like DAT and IPFS that are more torrent-style back-end.
So there's actually no servers available.
In a giant warehouse like Facebook and Google, it's fully peer-to-peer.
And we're trying to balance it because it's not like decentralization equals good and centralization equals bad.
But in order to get a sweet app like Instagram-style, you need servers to process video.
And so the tech is still sort of immature in the fully peer-to-peer Bitcoin-style environment.
But we're definitely getting there.
And I just think it's important for people to use things that are transparent to them and respecting our freedom.
joe rogan
Yeah, I think one of the problems with these giant companies is that once they become big, you kind of use them as a default, and it's very difficult to get people to communicate with you off of them.
It's hard to say, hey man, I'm launching this new social media app.
I would imagine you could speak to this.
I'm launching this new social media app, and I want you to join it.
People are like, but I'm already on fucking Facebook.
I'm already on Google.
I'm already on Instagram.
I don't want to do that, man.
Too much.
Too much extra.
bill ottman
And we make it a million times harder for ourselves because we're not scooping into people's contacts.
And, you know, taking all their information.
joe rogan
That you're not.
bill ottman
We're not.
No.
joe rogan
Okay.
bill ottman
So, like, when you give your address book to an app.
joe rogan
Who does that?
bill ottman
Most apps.
joe rogan
You've got to be an asshole.
bill ottman
No, but when you say, oh, I want to find my friends who are on this app, and you share your contacts.
joe rogan
Well, you're not supposed to do that.
bill ottman
You're not supposed to do that, yeah.
But most people do.
And, you know, your friends didn't give you permission to give Facebook their phone number.
joe rogan
Do you do that?
jamie vernon
I probably used to, like, seven, eight years ago, but I don't do it anymore.
joe rogan
I always say the same thing when it pops up.
Get the fuck out of here.
That's always what I say.
Would you like to share your contacts?
Get the fuck out of here.
No, you can't have my contacts, you asshole.
I know what you're doing.
Facebook is a weird one, man.
It's such a sneaky one.
Facebook and all the congressional hearings and the inner workings of it all.
The fact that it profits off of outrage, so it wants people to argue.
The AI, the computer learning, specifically wants people to have contentious debates about things because that keeps their eyes focused on the website.
And if your eyes are focused on Facebook, then those Facebook ads are very valuable.
It's really fascinating, Matt.
bill ottman
I think the outrage is unavoidable on any network.
It's more, you know, are you going to take down?
They're taking down outrage.
joe rogan
Some, yeah, sure.
bill ottman
And it just seems so inconsistent and subjective how they're applying.
I mean, even just yesterday, I think some journalists got banned from Facebook.
joe rogan
Yeah, you aware of the story?
unidentified
Yeah.
joe rogan
I'm going to send this to you, Jamie, because it's a really crazy one.
bill ottman
Because they wanted her to show who her funding sources were, and I didn't even know that there was an area where you could show that.
So it's almost like they're making this up as they go along.
unidentified
Yeah.
joe rogan
Yeah, Kyle Kalinske sent me this today.
I'm going to send this to you right now, Jamie.
Let me hang on one second.
Hold on.
I'm very quiet.
Unfortunately, this is an audio show.
bill ottman
This is live air.
joe rogan
Yes.
bill ottman
Not dead air.
joe rogan
There you go.
Okay, buddy.
I just sent it to you.
Okay.
Facebook suspended in the now tweets page.
At the behest of CNN and the U.S. government-funded think tanks, it says we had almost 4 million subscribers, did not violate Facebook rules, were given no warning, and Facebook isn't responding to us.
So yeah, what actually started this off?
bill ottman
I mean, who knows?
They don't communicate with anyone.
They've been banning legit accounts for years.
You cannot even send a Minds.com link through Facebook Messenger right now.
It's blocked.
joe rogan
What?
bill ottman
Yeah.
unidentified
What?
bill ottman
If you post in the news feed, it says, careful, this could be an unsecure website.
jamie vernon
Oh.
I clicked on a link from TMZ yesterday and got the same thing on Twitter.
Twitter said this might be malicious, there's spam, there could be...
joe rogan
From mines?
jamie vernon
No, it's from a TMZ link.
It was clicking, like this story is on TMZ. Here, do you want to see the rest of the story?
joe rogan
So they're trying to keep you from going to TMZ? Yeah, I don't know why.
jamie vernon
It was the first time I've ever seen that.
bill ottman
It's probably caught up in some algorithm.
I sent an actual written letter to Facebook about it.
Obviously, they don't get back.
There's no human activity.
joe rogan
A written letter?
You wrote it with a piece of paper?
bill ottman
No, no.
That would have been cool.
I signed it with ink.
joe rogan
Really?
bill ottman
Yeah, no.
Because our lawyer said that actually proves that you sent them something, some sort of diligence.
But there's just no recourse.
unidentified
Right.
bill ottman
They're lost.
joe rogan
So, explain.
So, if someone is trying to say on Facebook Messenger, hey, you should go check out Minds.com, it won't let you post that link?
bill ottman
Nope.
joe rogan
And what is their excuse?
They don't tell you?
bill ottman
No, they don't tell you.
joe rogan
So, is it because you're a competing social media network?
bill ottman
I don't know.
I don't want to get into...
I don't know.
joe rogan
You don't know.
bill ottman
I'm not going to say that.
But you just know that it does.
Yeah.
joe rogan
Yeah.
You don't know why it does, but you know it does.
bill ottman
And they're calling us unsecure, and I'm pretty sure that Facebook got hacked.
You know, they compromise everybody's data.
Like, you want to talk about unsecure, there's no more unsecure site that exists.
joe rogan
It is kind of funny, right?
I mean, after those hearings and after all the Russia stuff...
Yeah, it is kind of funny calling somebody else insecure.
bill ottman
Yeah, they're insecure.
Mark Zuckerberg is very insecure.
joe rogan
Well, he's also stupid rich.
He seems like he's too rich, like he fucked up.
Like he's there sipping water like a robot, trying to figure out what the fuck he's doing with his life.
bill ottman
I think that they're scared because they know they've betrayed everybody, and so it's hard to get them to speak.
You know, it's interesting with Dorsey here, because I give him credit for speaking, but But the fact is that he's not answering the questions.
joe rogan
Well, he's bringing somebody else in to answer the questions in the next go-round.
And so that should be very interesting.
bill ottman
And you think he actually didn't know the answer to those questions?
joe rogan
I think he probably doesn't know all the specifics because he's a CEO of not one but two different corporations.
He's busy as shit.
And also rich as fuck.
bill ottman
True, but I think that when we look at the policy that exists on these networks, he is in control of the policy to a large degree.
There's a board, there's a decision-making process, but he has a large voice.
joe rogan
Okay, I don't know how large his voice is.
I assume that's probably true, but one of the things we did detail on the last podcast with Tim Pool was how he wasn't the CEO for quite a long time.
jamie vernon
Yeah, he got fired and then rehired at some point.
unidentified
Yeah.
joe rogan
Yeah, so obviously there's some contention, there's some issues, and there's a lot of money involved in these things, and I think that plays a giant part in how they decide to make decisions.
bill ottman
But do you think that an advertiser, in reality, doesn't, like, say you're an advertiser and you want to advertise your computer.
joe rogan
Okay.
bill ottman
And there's a video on YouTube that is about something controversial.
Does it actually make sense for that advertiser to not show their product on that controversial video?
Don't they want to sell computers?
joe rogan
Well, it depends.
I mean, if the controversial videos are about how Jews are evil, and you have this video about Jews being evil, and then you're like, buy Razer computers!
Come on!
bill ottman
Right, but do you think that people actually...
I can understand not wanting to support certain types of content.
And maybe advertisers feel like they're supporting that content by advertising next to it.
But I also don't think that people, when they're watching a controversial video on the internet, say, oh my gosh, you know, this advertiser is completely out of line for being next to this controversial thing.
I don't think that's a healthy direction to move.
joe rogan
Well, okay.
That's one way to look at it.
Another way to look at it is if you are a giant company that sells things.
Let's say you're Toyota and you're selling Tundras.
You don't want your Tundras to be associated in any way with something that you might think is negative.
It's their prerogative.
They're paying for advertising.
They can kind of decide.
This is one of the things that's leading YouTube in specific.
And I've had...
I've had a ton of conversations about this.
It's leading them specifically to try to demonetize things that could be considered distasteful or insensitive or controversial.
And it's very frustrating to content creators.
When you talk to them, they're essentially saying that they need to do better and that their tools are very blunt.
That they don't really have the correct computer learning tools to figure out what is offensive and why.
And then there's a human review system, which is very weird.
And we've run into that many times.
We'll have a podcast with, say, Tom Papa, who's an uncontroversial, fantastic stand-up comedian, and it's demonetized.
And then we're like, why?
What happened?
And then we go, what the fuck can we talk about?
We didn't talk about anything crazy.
bill ottman
And it's really damaging for brands when it gets demonetized right away because it's that initial time period that generates the most revenue.
So when you have to go back and do it...
I mean, so I agree with that.
So we built a tool that's like a peer-to-peer advertising tool.
So there's two options.
So you earn...
Crypto for your contributions.
And then...
joe rogan
Which cryptos do you support?
bill ottman
We have an Ethereum-based token.
But we're going to support all of them.
joe rogan
So what is an Ethereum-based token?
bill ottman
So it's an ERC-20 token.
joe rogan
What does that mean?
bill ottman
It means that we basically reward people for all of their activities.
unidentified
Okay.
joe rogan
So like, say, if Jamie's posted on Mines and people love his posts, he gets rewarded in some...
bill ottman
Yeah.
joe rogan
How much?
How much you get?
bill ottman
Well...
joe rogan
Can I go buy a house?
bill ottman
One token will give you a thousand impressions.
unidentified
Oh.
bill ottman
So we're not focused on like, oh, you're going to make money from this.
That's not what we're saying.
joe rogan
One token will give you a thousand impressions or you get a thousand impressions from, you get a token from one thousand impressions.
bill ottman
When you use a token to advertise on Mines, you get a thousand impressions when you boost your posts with it.
joe rogan
So wait a minute, if you use the crypto, you use a token, you guarantee views?
unidentified
Yeah.
joe rogan
That's weird, isn't it?
Why?
Well, you're guaranteeing people see something?
bill ottman
Well, we...
When you boost it, it gets fed to people's news feed chronologically.
joe rogan
Right, I see.
bill ottman
So, there's just a backlog.
joe rogan
So, sort of like when Instagram has those sponsored posts.
bill ottman
Except we're not spying on people when we send them.
joe rogan
Instagram spies on people, too?
bill ottman
Oh, my...
joe rogan
I don't know, man.
I'm stupid.
Help me out.
unidentified
It's...
bill ottman
Yes, they do.
And the thing is, we just don't know.
So this is where free and open source software is just essential.
Like, the big networks, there's no excuse for them not to be sharing their software.
joe rogan
Right.
bill ottman
It's like, when you're a public forum on that scale...
The community just has a right to know what the algorithms are doing.
joe rogan
So you think that they're not sharing their software because their software is encoded and designed to spy on you and extract information and sell that information?
bill ottman
Partially.
joe rogan
Like when Jamie gives up your contacts.
When he signs up for an app and he says, yes, you can get access to all my contacts.
bill ottman
There's a lot of reason and they don't want people to compete with them.
Like anyone could actually take all of our code and make their own social network and compete with us.
They could set up on their own servers.
And we encourage that.
That's what the Fediverse is called.
joe rogan
That's what Elon Musk does with Tesla.
All of his electric patents for electric cars.
bill ottman
I think that he opened up the patents.
I don't think he open sourced all the code of the car.
But he's definitely moving in the right direction.
He wants to build the market.
joe rogan
Yes, and he also wants to save the world.
I mean, he legitimately has this, and he also has a shitload of money.
He's got enough money.
I think that's a big factor with those guys.
bill ottman
But don't you think that it's almost like...
It's going to help.
Whatever network does that, is more transparent, stops spying on people, is more community-run and evolved.
Wouldn't that be the network that you would think humanity would want to stick with in the long term?
Wouldn't that be a good move of that?
joe rogan
Yes and no.
For the average person, what are they losing when they get on Facebook or Google?
What's bad?
bill ottman
Well now their likes are going down.
Everybody's likes are going down and that makes everyone very sad.
joe rogan
What do you mean?
bill ottman
Well the algorithms, you're only reaching 5% of your own followers organically on Facebook now.
And they're starting to change the chronological feed on Instagram too.
And they know that this causes depression and they're still doing it because they know that they think they're better at showing you what you want to see than you are.
And they want to make money from it.
joe rogan
What do you mean by they know that this causes depression?
bill ottman
They've done studies about mental health in relation to...
Actually, Facebook got exposed like five years ago for doing a secret study on...
On like a few million users where they were injecting both positive and negative content into the newsfeed and they proved that they could affect people's moods.
This was with Princeton.
There's a huge backlash and they're like, oh sorry.
Whoops.
joe rogan
Right, but this isn't injecting negative or positive content.
This is just moving these images or these posts around so that less people see them?
bill ottman
There's two different topics there.
The basic newsfeed on Facebook is now a mysterious conglomeration of thousands of variables, which we don't know.
But additionally, like a few years ago, they were exposed for having been experimenting with people's brains.
joe rogan
That's right.
I remember that now.
I remember that now.
That's right.
Yeah, I remember thinking, like, wow, that's kind of creepy.
They're experimenting on the people that are on their site, and they're not telling these people they're experimenting on them.
Yeah.
But, I mean, if they're trying to make it better...
Do you think that's a factor?
How does it cause depression if your images or your posts are not being seen by as many people?
bill ottman
Have you talked to kids posting on social media and their reactions to how many likes they're getting?
They get very, very concerned.
joe rogan
Well, that seems like more of a problem with that.
bill ottman
It is on both sides.
Being addicted to likes as some sort of a...
joe rogan
It's a weird dopamine hit, right?
bill ottman
It's not healthy.
We need to learn to not care about that.
But...
I think that the core purpose of a social network is to subscribe to someone and see their stuff.
And when people subscribe to you, they see your stuff.
So when you spend years building up a following on social media, and say you earn 100,000 followers or something, and then suddenly the network says, nah, your friends can't see that anymore.
That's not cool.
And even Twitter's default newsfeed is no longer chronological.
You have to click it to go chronological, and then it defaults back to their weird algorithm thing.
So we're saying, look, 100% organic, chronological, raw, forever as default.
And then if you want to curate algorithms or have recommended stuff come in as an alternative, fine.
But that is the core purpose of social media, is to connect with people that follow you and the other way around.
joe rogan
What do you think the purpose is?
Why do you think Facebook would decide to have things not in chronological order and only be seen by 5% of your followers?
What would be the benefit in that for them?
bill ottman
Revenue.
joe rogan
Revenue, how so?
How does that generate revenue?
bill ottman
They just know that they can keep you on the app better.
joe rogan
If you get less likes?
bill ottman
No.
joe rogan
If your stuff is seen by less people?
It doesn't make sense.
bill ottman
That's a good point.
It sort of works both ways.
I think that they think they know the people that you're going to react to the most.
So as a consumer, when you're getting that content, you know, the algorithms are showing you what you typically like.
Have you noticed that?
joe rogan
I'm really not paying much attention, but I believe you.
bill ottman
So, yeah, for creators, it's hurting creators.
People who post are getting hurt.
People who are sitting there just scrolling, they're the ones who are really getting, you know, addicted.
More so with the algorithms.
joe rogan
So how are the people that are posting getting hurt?
They're getting hurt because their stuff is being seen by less people?
bill ottman
Yeah.
joe rogan
Because it's not chronological and it's not organic because it's curated.
But aren't they doing it because they think it's going to be a better and an experience that's more conducive to your likes?
bill ottman
That's what they say.
joe rogan
What do you think they're doing it for then?
bill ottman
They're doing it because they...
Have studied, through looking at the data, how to keep people on the app more.
joe rogan
Right, and that way is to give them...
Like, say if I Google or if I look at muscle cars on Instagram.
Now, if I go to my search, it's all muscle car stuff.
So that's what it is.
They say, oh, he likes that.
So we're just going to give him a lot of that.
bill ottman
And I think that's okay as an alternative feed.
Or to put that somewhere...
I just think the core feed always needs to stay pure.
Because otherwise you're just...
Down the slippery slope again.
I understand.
They're injecting things into your head that you didn't ask for.
joe rogan
Right, and they're doing it because they want to keep you around.
Yeah, that makes sense.
How many different companies are subscribing to that?
It seems like all the big ones we're saying are curating and moving things around and all the big ones have an algorithm that's designed to keep you on board, right?
bill ottman
And that's okay to pursue.
I think there's really cool things you can do with AI and machine learning and algorithms that...
Is really beneficial.
But it's just taking away people's reach when they have worked years and years to achieve it, it's not okay.
joe rogan
Do you think that this is this marriage between something that is this social media network that's designed to allow people to communicate with each other and then commerce, like this business, like how do we maximize this business?
How do we get more profit out of this business?
How do we get these people to engage more?
And then they start monkeying with the code and screwing with what you see and what you don't see.
You think that's what's happening?
bill ottman
Yeah.
But in the short term, it's probably working.
But in the long term, they're betraying everybody's trust.
It has to be more of a consent-based system.
So, you know, at least give people – well, it should be opt-out by default.
And fine, give me messages to opt-in so that you can show me certain things.
But this whole forcing people into surveillance, it just has to stop.
It's super scary.
joe rogan
How's it super scary to you?
bill ottman
It's just too much power.
joe rogan
Yeah.
It's too much power for something that's supposed to be silly, right?
Like, what was Facebook supposed to be?
It was supposed to be some silly thing that you just can communicate with friends.
bill ottman
It was, but from the beginning, none of these networks have ever really been about the people of the networks.
It's always been closed source since the inception.
But then look at open networks out there.
You have Wikipedia.
Totally open source, community run.
Granted, they have their issues with moderation, fine.
But it's a top 10 website in the world.
It's totally open source.
Creative Commons content, incredible human achievement.
Bitcoin, open source money.
WordPress even is an open source CMS system that is like powering 25% of the internet.
So why wouldn't that happen with social media?
It should.
I mean, this is where everyone's hanging out.
So we should all sort of collectively even own it.
We did an equity crowdfunding round.
So like thousands of members of our community actually own the site.
joe rogan
Now, how many people are on Mines?
bill ottman
We have like a million and a half registered, like quarter million active.
We're small.
But the weird thing is that Even though we're a fraction of the size, especially smaller creators who come get better reach on minds than they do on Facebook and Twitter because we have this reward and incentive system sort of like gamified where you earn reach and you earn more of a voice for contributing.
So like you could have an account on Twitter for 10 years and post thousands and thousands of tweets and you never hit that viral nerve and you just never really get much exposure.
So we're trying to help people be heard.
And so you'll find a small creator who on other networks has no followers, have thousands and thousands of followers on Minds.
joe rogan
And what do you think you would like to do with Minds in the future that you haven't been able to do yet?
bill ottman
Engineer the control out of ourselves so that we aren't even in a position to really take people's stuff down or What if someone posts your house and your information, where your kids go to school?
I think that on the central servers, obviously, yes, we're always going to moderate.
And if it's legal, it can stay.
If it's not illegal, it can't.
But a decentralized social network is definitely where we have to go.
Because, and yeah, okay, it's scary.
And you know, you've talked about this, like, things are getting more transparent.
This is sort of like the inevitable evolution of technology.
I mean, how many hours a day do you stream?
A couple?
You know, 25 years ago, would you have thought you'd be sharing, you know, 20% of your life live streaming to, you know, millions of people?
Like, our lives are becoming more transparent just inevitably.
It's just pulling us.
joe rogan
Yeah, I agree.
bill ottman
So, you know, Bitcoin, crypto, DAT, torrent-type architecture, that is just where we're going.
Because it's more resilient.
It's less censorship prone.
There's just benefits of it.
I think that we can balance it too.
Like maybe when you post, you have a decision.
Do you want to be able to delete this at any point?
Alright, fine.
Then you can post to the central server.
Do you want this to get unleashed?
Yeah, it's scary because, you know, there's scary stuff on the internet.
It's already like that.
But, you know, getting into censorship more, does censorship even solve the problem?
Or does it make it worse?
joe rogan
What problem?
bill ottman
The problem of crazy content, illegal content.
joe rogan
How could it make it worse?
bill ottman
Well, I mean, it seems like it can often amplify radicalization.
joe rogan
It definitely can, right?
bill ottman
Yeah.
joe rogan
And it definitely, when you censor people, it just makes them aware that there's a plot against them too, right?
A lot of conservatives on Twitter are finding that.
Sam Harris actually just sent me an article.
It was detailing the bias against conservatives on Twitter that they've actually done, you know, like some real studying it, and it's pretty demonstrable.
Demonstrable?
bill ottman
It affects both the left and the right.
Demonstrable?
joe rogan
Yeah, the way I'm saying it wrong.
But it affects the left and the right for sure.
bill ottman
That's what Kyle was saying.
I watched that video that he did.
It's anti-establishment that seems to be getting targeted.
And so, you know, Abby's been censored on Facebook.
Abby Martin.
And yeah, this person today.
I mean, most of the stuff coming out of RT is progressive, which is weird.
And who knows what kind of...
Games are getting played behind the scenes with the rush.
I mean, who knows?
But the point is, they have a right to be there.
And I mean, look at this is not YouTube's fault.
But remember the YouTube shooter?
I mean, she thought she was getting censored on YouTube.
And she went and brought a gun to the YouTube headquarters.
Like, people get pissed when they get censored.
It affects you.
joe rogan
Right, but in her case, you're talking about a crazy person that wasn't really being censored.
bill ottman
Oh, of course, but there's crazy people out there.
joe rogan
Yeah.
No, she wasn't being censored.
bill ottman
Well, she was getting censored just like everybody else is getting soft-censored on these networks.
joe rogan
Well, she just thought she wasn't getting promoted the way she wanted to.
I don't think anybody was actively doing anything to her.
bill ottman
No, I'm not saying that.
joe rogan
Her stuff was terrible.
bill ottman
I'm saying that the soft censorship of the algorithms, people getting demonetized, this has an impact on psychology.
Right.
joe rogan
I see what you're saying.
bill ottman
I'm not saying they were deliberately targeting her.
It's horrible what happened.
joe rogan
So what you're saying is that these algorithms that they use in order to maximize their revenue and give people things that they like but actually takes away from things being posted chronologically, keeps certain things from being seen by as many people, so it keeps them from being as viral, so it keeps the whole thing from being organic.
bill ottman
Yeah.
joe rogan
Yeah.
Makes sense.
Yeah, it gets to that point where we're realizing that all of these things, all these social media things, are really recent.
We've only had them for a few years, and we don't necessarily know what the rules should or shouldn't be.
So it's good.
I mean, it's one of the reasons why I wanted to have you on.
I wanted to find out where these upstarts or these new people that are coming into the game, like mine's, like where you're coming into the game from and what is your position on what's wrong with the current state of affairs.
bill ottman
Yeah, and look, there is messed up stuff on social media.
We'll get pigeonholed into being like, oh, you support all of this crazy stuff.
First of all, most of the users online are artists, musicians, filmmakers, activists, journalists, just trying to get their content out there.
There's a very tiny minority of actually crazy content.
joe rogan
When you say crazy content, what do you mean?
Alt-right?
bill ottman
I'm not even going to make decisions on what is and isn't crazy.
That's not my place, but it's been proven that censorship is not the answer.
Look at the history of prohibition.
You have digital content, it's substances, it's anything.
People want They want the ability to make the decision for themselves.
joe rogan
They certainly do.
And then the argument on the other side is when people are distributing, and I'm going to use the big air quotes, hate speech.
That's when it gets slippery to me because who's to decide what's hate speech and what's not hate speech?
I mean, I've seen people make some ridiculous fucking statements about all sorts of people that are inaccurate.
And they do that in order to categorize them and pigeonhole them in an easily definable and dismissable characterization.
You know, you just decide, hey, that Bill Ottman guy, that guy's a this.
Oh, he's a radical that, and he believes in this, so fuck him.
And they're like, okay, fuck him, sweep more.
And then cancel culture comes in, like, we're going to cancel Bill Ottman.
We're not listening to him anymore.
You know, he lied to us about his source, or whatever the fuck you're doing.
bill ottman
Have you heard of Daryl Davis?
joe rogan
No, I have not.
Unless I forgot.
bill ottman
Daryl Davis is your boy.
joe rogan
He's my boy?
bill ottman
I haven't met him, but he's my boy.
I want him to be my boy.
So he is a black man who befriended hundreds of members of the KKK. And he got them all to leave.
He got them to leave the KKK? 200 members left.
Wow.
After he was like, yeah, I'm just going to talk to you.
unidentified
Really?
joe rogan
Did you ever see the W. Kamau Bell's show when he visited with those white supremacists?
bill ottman
Not that specific one.
joe rogan
No, it's really good because he's such a nice guy.
He's so easy to get along with that they let the guard down around him.
You get to see these people kind of confused that they like this guy.
bill ottman
That's why I think initiating human contact via the social networks, that's really important.
joe rogan
But, to play devil's advocate, it's one of the worst ways for people to express themselves in a way where you consider other human beings' experiences and feelings and the way they're going to receive what you're saying because there's no social cues, you're not interacting with them, you're not looking at them in the eyes.
It's one of the weirder forms of communication between human beings and one that I would argue we have not really necessarily successfully navigated it yet.
bill ottman
I agree.
I was actually saying that I think we should use social media more to get people to get together in real life.
joe rogan
Do you know who Megan Phelps is?
bill ottman
No.
joe rogan
She was with the Westboro Baptist Church.
You know, the famous one that protests those soldiers' funerals and anything gay.
They're like ruthlessly, viciously fundamental Christians.
They do a lot of protesting at funerals and do a lot of stuff to try to get...
She was with them for the longest time and then got on Twitter.
And through communicating on Twitter, and when you meet her, you would never believe it in a million years that she was ever this fundamentalist and that she was ever some mean person sending hateful messages to people because their son was gay or whatever it was.
Now, she's completely cured of it.
She has no contact with the church anymore.
She's married.
She has a kid.
She's completely outside of it.
She does a podcast now and gives TED Talks and speaks about radicalization and about how she was kind of indoctrinated and grew up in this family.
And her grandfather, Fred Phelps, was this, you know, it's like, it's a fucking mean guy.
Like a really mean, he's the God Hates Fags guy.
You know, they would have those signs that they would hold up at soldiers' funerals.
I mean, it's like really inflammatory stuff.
But through Twitter, through her communicating with people on Twitter, specifically her now husband, like, he cured her, like, just with rational discourse and communication, and she was open to it.
bill ottman
Yeah, people will change.
joe rogan
Yeah, they will change, yeah.
bill ottman
And so that's why banning them, I mean, I saw in a recent podcast, you've been talking about redemption.
joe rogan
Yeah.
bill ottman
So, but I'm curious, do you think people, what is, how does that look like?
joe rogan
Well, look, in the case of, like, Megan Phelps, that's a real thing, right?
She really did change.
Another example is Christian Piccolini.
Do you know who he is?
He was a white supremacist, KKK member, guy, who's been on Sam Harris' podcast, he's also done some TED Talks, who now speaks out against it and talks about how he's indoctrinated and talks about how lost he was and then he was brought into this ideology.
There's many people like that all over the world.
Majid Nawaz, another perfect example.
He was an Islamist.
I mean, he was trying to form a caliphate, was literally thinking about radical Islamic terrorism as being some sort of a solution.
Now he's the opposite.
Now he's trying to get people to leave, and he's trying to get people to be more reasonable and secular.
bill ottman
Did you see what happened to him?
joe rogan
Yeah, he got punched in the street.
Yeah, some guy called him a fucking Paki, I guess, and punched him in the head and fucked his head up.
And he's got this giant cut on his head from a ring and his face is swollen up.
But apparently they have the guy on video and they think they're going to be able to arrest the guy.
I've had Majid on the show.
He's a super nice guy.
bill ottman
The hard thing is that Yes, we see these transformations take place.
It makes us feel warm inside.
And yes, people can change.
But at the same time, should people have to go apologize to Twitter?
Oh, I'm sorry.
Can I come back?
Sometimes people are going to think completely differently than you, and you just have to deal with it.
And that should be okay.
We shouldn't force people to come in to our way of thinking in order to have discourse.
joe rogan
No, that's a good point.
That's a very good point.
And, like, who is to decide what this path to redemption is and whether or not you've completed it?
Right?
Who is to decide?
Like, maybe you are, like, a hyper-radical lefty, and maybe Jamie's points of view and yours are just never going to line up, so you're like, fuck him, he's banned for life, which a lot of people have been banned for life.
And when you look at some of the infractions they've been banned for, they're like, boy, I don't know about that one.
That doesn't really make sense.
bill ottman
Almost none of the high-profile banning cases make much sense.
joe rogan
No.
It's like a short-term solution that's creating a long-term problem.
bill ottman
Yeah.
joe rogan
That's really what it is.
bill ottman
So, I just think that we have to talk about it more.
I don't know.
It's like, why can't we just get everyone to talk about it?
joe rogan
Yeah.
bill ottman
Like, at the same time.
I mean, it's like, we're just wasting time here.
joe rogan
Well, sort of, but I also think we're figuring it out as we go along with a bunch of different competing ideologies.
You know, you have yours, which, like, you, dude, you look like a hacker on, like, House of Cards.
You look like a guy you call in to break into the mainframe server.
bill ottman
You're not that, honestly.
joe rogan
I believe you're not.
bill ottman
I hang out on GitLab and check out code, but I cannot code.
I cannot code.
unidentified
Listen, man.
bill ottman
I'm not claiming to be a developer.
No, these people are another level.
It is incredible.
joe rogan
I understand.
Right.
Yeah.
I get it.
Well, that's like if someone says to me, like, you're an MMA fighter.
I'm like, I'm definitely not.
And they are on another fucking level.
I know a little martial arts, but just settle the fuck down.
unidentified
Right?
joe rogan
Same kind of thing.
I think, though, that your ideology is going to be, your point of view and perspective is going to be very different than maybe someone who's like a radical Marxist.
You know, shouldn't they be allowed to post on the site too?
Someone who's like an extreme socialist.
Someone like AOC. Yeah.
You know, someone who thinks that we should give money to people who are unwilling to work.
Someone who thinks that we should try to engineer society and tax the top X percent, you know, 70-something percent of their income.
There's a lot of those different people, and we have to figure out how to make it so that, well...
We have to figure out a way to make it so all the ideas can compete in the marketplace of ideas.
All these different ideas can compete, and we can find out which one is better.
And we can find out which one is better.
You don't always find out which one is better, though, right?
You find out which one is most popular.
I mean, that's what happened with Hitler.
You don't really find out what's better.
You find out what's got more juice behind it.
bill ottman
It's just, it's too risky.
Even being in the position that I'm in, you know, I see these edge cases.
Like, we say, look, if it's legal, it can be there, but we still see edge cases where we have to make decisions.
joe rogan
Okay, what's like an edge case?
bill ottman
I mean...
Let's see.
I mean, there is...
I don't even want to go here, but I will.
unidentified
Uh-oh.
bill ottman
There is a type of animation.
joe rogan
Uh-oh.
Porn anime?
bill ottman
Yeah.
joe rogan
Yeah.
bill ottman
That is very sketchy.
Super.
You know, like, child porn, animated child porn.
And we've taken the stance that, look, it could fall under obscenity laws, so we're not cool.
unidentified
Yeah.
bill ottman
But, you know, that is a huge debate.
joe rogan
Right.
bill ottman
That has not been decided by the Supreme Court if animated, you know, kids, like, they will do the weirdest stuff.
And I just don't want to be telling people what is and what is not art.
joe rogan
Right.
So, like, some of that Japanese stuff with tentacles, like, some of that stuff is just like, what is happening here?
Right.
I got, like, octopuses banging chicks in every hole, and they're choking on it, and they've got one in their ass and one in their vagina, and it's all, like, very liquidy.
You know, there's a lot of splattering going on.
You're like, what the fuck is this, and is that okay?
Because it's just art, right?
I mean, if it was a person getting fucked left, right, and center by an octopus, he'd be like, yeah, I think we've crossed some lines here.
That's bestiality.
But if it's an image, and then the image is a girl with a schoolgirl costume on.
She's dressed like a Catholic schoolgirl with a little skirt, and she's getting banged by an octopus.
You're like, what do you do with that?
unidentified
Right?
bill ottman
Yeah.
What would you do?
joe rogan
It's a good question.
I'm glad I don't have a social media site where I have to make that decision.
Well, the real concern would be, is this something that is actually illegal?
bill ottman
That's the thing.
And we've tried to look at the case law, and we've seen that this type of stuff has been called obscenity before.
And so we're just not going to risk it.
But I still, you know, in a...
Alright, nipples.
joe rogan
Nipples?
bill ottman
Look.
joe rogan
Right.
bill ottman
Did you know that Free the Nipple started out with- On 4chan.
Well, everywhere.
It's a whole movement.
To be honest, Time Magazine just did a really interesting piece about a statue that got banned from Facebook.
It was a naked ancient statue that has a nipple.
Like, I'm sorry, that's not realistic.
That's not helping society, taking down a naked statue.
joe rogan
Well, we were talking about the other day, during the Super Bowl, that Adam Levine had his shirt off, and Brian Redman was like, hey, wasn't that what Janet Jackson got in trouble for?
Like, yeah.
Why is it okay if Adam Levine shows his nipples, and Janet Jackson's nipples are offensive because they're sexualized, because she's a woman?
bill ottman
Mm-hmm.
This is the weird fact.
Men had to gain the right to have their nipples shown in public back in the day.
joe rogan
When's the day?
bill ottman
If you go on the Free the Nipples site, there's this...
Go on their Instagram or something.
I think that's maybe where I saw it back when I used Instagram.
But...
You know, society is evolving.
We're going to get there.
We're going to be able to handle it, I think.
Or give people the controls so that they can only see the types of things that they want to see.
That's ultimately what it's about.
joe rogan
So, like, you should have, like, a filter.
Like, do I want 18 plus?
Do I want PG-13?
Like, what kind of distinction do I want?
bill ottman
Yeah.
joe rogan
Yeah.
And then when things come up, like one of the things that Instagram has been doing is like they say, I follow a lot of hunters and Instagram has things where they say, warning, this is sensitive content.
Nature is Metal gets popped on that a lot too because Nature is Metal is an Instagram site that's all like these crazy images and videos of animals eating other animals and attacking other animals.
And sometimes, some of them, they just decide, this one's too fucked up.
They just decide.
There's one of them where a lion is looking out of a wildebeest asshole from the inside.
There's this giant hole they've eaten through its stomach, and it's looking out its asshole.
And they're like, yeah!
This one, you're going to have to click on your own.
You have to double click.
What do you got, Jamie?
jamie vernon
Basically, from what I just looked up, Tarzan is the catalyst for why guys wanted to wear their shirts off.
Like in the 1920s, 1910s, they had to wear, in pools, they had to wear a top.
joe rogan
But look, this only covers one nipple.
jamie vernon
They're probably tired or sweaty.
bill ottman
That's the rebellion right there.
That's how they started doing it.
They're pulling down the strap.
joe rogan
Look what it says here.
Saucy lifeguards flash rebellious nipples.
unidentified
Ha!
It got overturned in 1937. That's hilarious.
joe rogan
So it was Tarzan, 1937, New York State's male shirtless ban.
That's when they overturned it.
The incident attracted press attention as Atlantic City and other waterfronts similarly mandated against man-nips.
With that legal domino tipped, along with the help of Hollywood hunks.
bill ottman
And you were talking about how Twitter has porn.
joe rogan
Yes.
bill ottman
A lot.
Yo, we got banned from Google Play for that.
Twitter has it.
They're up on Google Play.
joe rogan
Yeah, Twitter has a substantial amount of porn.
You know, you follow, like, some of them gals, and they just want you to see, look, here's one in my pussy.
Right there.
Take a look.
bill ottman
Like, full-blown.
jamie vernon
It's not offensive.
joe rogan
Well, it's not offensive if you follow them.
If you follow certain porn stars, you know what you're going to get.
bill ottman
I think it's against their own terms.
joe rogan
Oh, really?
bill ottman
But they're just allowing it because they know they want that traffic.
joe rogan
Oh, is that what it is?
bill ottman
You know they want that traffic.
unidentified
Oh, you know they want that traffic, bro.
joe rogan
Yeah, it's a problem if you hand your phone to your kid.
You know, they accidentally click on that link and they're like, Mommy, what's happening with her?
bill ottman
But Jonathan Haidt, Haidt or Haidt?
joe rogan
Height?
bill ottman
Height.
He was talking about an interesting thing where, you know, should there be an age where we really get into social media?
I don't know.
I mean, people should be free to do what they want to do, but, you know, the internet is the wilderness, right?
joe rogan
Well, his book, The Coddling of the American Mind, I'm in that right now.
I just finished his other one and I'm working on that one.
And a lot of it has to do with social media and a lot of it has to do with the impact that it has on young people.
You know, people are not really designed for this.
And you might be able to handle it if you're a 32-year-old man or a 35-year-old woman or whatever you are.
But if you're a 15-year-old girl...
It might be overwhelming.
I mean, and the angst and the anxiety and, you know...
bill ottman
That's what I was saying about the depression.
You know, they see if they're not at a party where their stuff's not getting liked.
That has an impact on them.
And ultimately, I think the networks need to be helping educate people...
How to, you know, whether it's disinfo, educate people how to research.
I did see that YouTube is starting to do, like, a you've been on this for too long type thing.
joe rogan
Really?
bill ottman
Yeah.
joe rogan
Like, get a life, you fuck.
bill ottman
Yeah.
joe rogan
They tell you that?
bill ottman
I want to build stuff like that.
That's really important.
Yeah.
Helping people get off.
joe rogan
Yeah.
I haven't seen that.
I haven't done enough time on YouTube where they're kicking me off.
bill ottman
I have.
unidentified
Yeah.
joe rogan
It's easy.
You know, I sent Eddie Bravo this thing from The Guardian about the upsurge in people that believe in the flat earth and all of it because of YouTube videos and that apparently now YouTube is, they want to censor those.
They want to, they feel like Flat Earth videos and I think another one, check this if I'm wrong about this, but I think they also want to lean on those anti-vaccination videos.
I think there's a concern with those.
I think they're worried about a bunch of different things along those lines.
They feel like there's disinformation and outright lies that are being spread.
How do we combat it?
We own this platform.
What do we do?
They feel like they have a responsibility.
bill ottman
I think there is responsibility.
joe rogan
Okay, but what is a responsibility if there's a debate?
bill ottman
I think it's more to educate people how to research as opposed to saying this is or is not true because who's deciding that?
joe rogan
Well, I believe the earth is round.
But, uh, um, I also believe it's such a stupid conspiracy that you should have it.
You should be allowed and it should be something you should show your friends.
Like, dude, I need you to go look at this.
this has 37,000 thumbs up and they really believe that the fucking earth is flat they really believe there's an ice ball outside Antarctica they really believe that the sky doesn't move that it's that the you know that we're in some sort of a i think it's like projected images or something like there's a bunch of like really really wacky theories like i think those are okay yeah Of course.
bill ottman
But I think freedom of information sort of transcends a lot of these little debates.
So if there was more freedom of information, so we actually knew everything the government knew about all of the different conspiracies and black projects, the black budget.
joe rogan
Yeah.
bill ottman
More information is going to give both sides the ability to understand what is happening.
joe rogan
That's true.
bill ottman
The reality is that we don't know what's happening, and there is lots of secret stuff.
joe rogan
The problem with that, though, is then you're dealing with foreign governments that are way better at keeping secrets than we are, and if they have access to our secrets.
One of the things that's been kind of disturbing is seeing the actual influence that these Russian troll farms have had on not just our political process, But sowing seeds of dissent amongst people and starting conflict amongst people and how people are buying into it.
You know, like this podcast I've been talking about a lot with Sam Harris and Renee DiResta, that's her name, right?
Where they talked about how these Russian troll farms set up a conflict by having a pro-Muslim rally across the street from a pro-Texas Pride rally.
And they just set it all up and had it there and then a skirmish broke out.
Because these people are across the street from each other.
And that they do this with – they were having these African-American groups that were saying anyone but Hillary, and they were really trying to get people to vote for Jill Stein, really trying to get people to even consider Trump anyone but Hillary.
And then they were also having ones that were against them.
They're trying to make debate.
They're trying to make anger.
bill ottman
I don't think you can stop that.
joe rogan
But it's a fascinating thing, isn't it, that this is like a concerted effort?
How do you feel about that?
When you're in a position where you have a fairly small network, but it's influential, right?
And then so you're watching Zuckerberg and the Facebook shit on TV, and they're talking to these congresspeople and senators, and they're talking to all these politicians about what's going on and how to stop it and what they're trying to do, and you feel like, oh God, this is an arena that I'm getting into.
What would you do?
bill ottman
I mean, I think more conversation needs to happen, not less.
joe rogan
Yeah, I think you're right.
bill ottman
I want more information from the government, from the corporations.
joe rogan
From the trolls?
bill ottman
From the trolls.
I mean, I feel like I have a pretty good ability to discern what is and is not troll behavior.
I think help people understand how...
How to absorb information.
Just banning an account that has an agenda Everyone has an agenda.
It's a propaganda back and forth between everybody.
Just because somebody posts a Jill Stein meme, okay, what's your point?
I'm not saying that regime change behavior is...
Positive or negative.
I don't know how we sort of switched gears.
joe rogan
No, we did, but let me step in here.
When you're saying a Jill Stein meme, there's absolutely nothing wrong with you posting a Jill Stein meme.
Like, say, if you have a joke about Jill Stein, you wanted to post it in a meme.
There's nothing wrong with that.
What's weird for people is that people are being hired to make these memes, and these memes may not have anything to do with their own personal ideology.
They might just decide, hey, I'm going to collect this check And they make, apparently according to Renee in this podcast she did with Sam Harris, they make really hilarious memes.
Like some of them are really funny.
bill ottman
I listened to that podcast, yeah.
joe rogan
It was great, right?
bill ottman
She said that she started laughing a couple times.
unidentified
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
joe rogan
And she had to go through thousands and thousands of them.
bill ottman
That's weird, right?
There's this idea of a web of trust, which is interesting.
Sort of like a peer-to-peer.
It's not like a Chinese social score.
But it's like, the people that you're connected with...
Show a certain account to be untrustworthy because you trust your little network.
So it's sort of like a peer-to-peer score.
We're looking at different ideas.
I think that transparency and understanding what's going on with different accounts and if it's the real person, that's all important stuff.
We don't want frauds.
We don't want disinfo.
We just have to really step back and think about how we're doing it rather than letting AI and algorithms run the show.
joe rogan
Right.
I see what you're saying.
Do you think that there's a, I don't want to say there's a market, is there a demand for this?
Like are a lot of people responding in a positive way to the way you guys are approaching the game?
bill ottman
Yeah, for sure.
Every time there's a big scandal, every time, whether it's data manipulation or our first big growth spurt was during the Snowden days when he released all the information.
People are really upset with what's happening.
It's just...
What are they supposed to do?
This is what they're using for their communication.
It's not easy to just achieve a multi-billion person network overnight so that everybody's there.
And so we're stuck.
But again, I think that supplementing, just installing these alternative apps, not just us, like the whole open source market.
I'm not even here trying to just talk about what we're doing.
It's like, if you don't have those apps on your phone and you don't use those browsers, I'm sorry, you just, you're not helping.
And people just want to vote with their energy, I think, and vote with their time.
So it's more of an education thing.
People just don't know that this matters and that this can help change the whole internet simply by logging into an app once in a while.
It's like organic food.
I mean, we want to put things into it.
We want to support things that have integrity.
So when you click something, you are supporting that thing.
When you're sitting on an app all day, you are feeding that app.
That's how the apps get all the money.
That's where they get all their funding.
That's where it's all based, is in user retention and energy.
joe rogan
And do you think that most people are even aware of this, or do you think they're just using it because it's convenient?
bill ottman
The biggest charade going on right now, and most people don't know that Facebook owns Instagram.
They think Instagram is cool because it's not Facebook.
joe rogan
Right, it's one giant umbrella.
What is the difference between the two?
Obviously, with Instagram, it's just pictures mostly and then whatever the post is below the pictures.
But with Facebook, it's a lot more commentary and long, verbose statements on shit and then people arguing in the comments about it.
bill ottman
Yeah.
All the Instagram founders left, abandoned ship.
The WhatsApp founders abandoned ship.
The Oculus founder abandoned ship.
All because of the privacy stuff.
unidentified
Really?
bill ottman
They're like, you took this good thing.
Well, it was proprietary, so I would argue if it was ever actually a fully good thing.
But at least it wasn't completely corrupted by Facebook.
But all of the founders of those companies left because they hate what's going on.
The WhatsApp guy joined Signal, which is a really cool open source, end-to-end encrypted messaging app.
So, you know, these people know...
joe rogan
So what happened with WhatsApp?
It's not the same anymore?
bill ottman
WhatsApp is owned by Facebook.
joe rogan
I don't know this.
bill ottman
Oh, sorry.
joe rogan
Come on, bro.
bill ottman
Get in the jungle, man.
joe rogan
Well, you're deep into this, man.
That's why I want to talk to you about it.
unidentified
Yeah, and they're all buying up companies and using these same sort of ideas.
bill ottman
Yeah, and now they're talking about integrating the messages between WhatsApp, Instagram, and Facebook, so it's all one system.
joe rogan
Ooh.
bill ottman
Yeah.
joe rogan
Yeah.
Centralization.
unidentified
Yeah.
joe rogan
It has happened?
jamie vernon
It hasn't been turned on yet, but I believe it's happening.
Like if you want to message your DMs on Instagram, you're going to have to download the Facebook Messenger.
joe rogan
So what are the challenges for something like Mines when you're trying to take off?
Like there was a social media Instagram type thing that was around a little while ago.
Remember I used it like once and I posted about it and What was that called?
Vero?
Is that what it was?
But then a lot of people were saying it was bullshit.
bill ottman
They're proprietary.
It's closed source.
No idea of what's going on behind the scenes.
joe rogan
Same as the other ones.
bill ottman
A lot of apps try to say that they're alternatives and that they support X, Y, Z privacy or free speech or whatnot.
I don't think it's any new paradigm if they're not showing their source code so that people can see the algorithms.
The people who care, you know, obviously most people aren't going to go and inspect the code.
joe rogan
Right.
bill ottman
But just the principle that the experts could, because they will.
You know, there's all kinds of think tanks and whatnot that would love to dive into the source code to understand how these companies were actually behaving.
So, you know, waving the privacy flag without being open source or...
This is getting a little bit into the weeds, but a lot of this comes down to licensing of content or code.
So the license that we use for our code is called the general public license, the AGPL v3, which means that anyone can take our code and do whatever they want with it.
They can sell it.
They can do anything.
But if they make changes, they have to show them with everybody else.
So it's sort of like the Creative Commons share-alike license, which essentially says the same thing.
Take my video, photo, remix it, do whatever you want, but you have to share the result with everybody else.
Open source basically means you can do whatever you want with it.
You can take it, make it your own, keep your own little secret sauce if it makes you feel good.
They get conflated because free software sounds like Free as in free beer, not free as in freedom.
So, you know, licensing is really what this all coalesces into.
But it's been proven that you can make a lot of money with free and open source software.
I mean, look at WordPress.
It's a hugely successful technology corporation, multi-billion dollars.
People share the code.
It created a network effect because they did that.
It's like the Grateful Dead would let everybody record their music and that's how it spread.
So it's actually a good marketing tactic and it also gives transparency so people can see what the hell is going on.
joe rogan
Right.
Now, when you started this, what was your objective?
And were you thinking about it as a potential large-scale source of revenue?
Or were you just thinking, this is something that I would like to do and do correctly because I don't think anybody's doing it this way?
Open source, pro-freedom of speech, anti-censorship, and to just do the bare minimum amount of managing content.
unidentified
Right.
bill ottman
I think everyone should be able to make money.
I don't think it should have to be mutually exclusive like you do something for free for everybody and you also can't make money.
That's a big misconception.
We're trying to give people the tools to make money.
We have a monthly recurring subscription system, sort of like a crypto Patreon-type tool, so you can subscribe to people.
We had the ability for creators to accept fiat dollars, but we took it out because it's Stripe, and Stripe is a closed-source...
Which we just didn't have long-term faith in.
joe rogan
So Stripe was some sort of an extension to your site?
bill ottman
Yeah, we were using their API to facilitate peer-to-peer payments.
This is why Patreon most likely banned Carl because the payment processors went to them and were like, look.
You know, Stripe has very strict terms.
And we didn't want to be, you know...
We don't want to be subject to overlords in our company decisions.
joe rogan
Do you think that's what happened with Carl?
bill ottman
That is most likely what happened.
joe rogan
So they stepped in and said, hey, we don't want this guy to be a part of the site.
bill ottman
Yeah, and I think that Stripe probably stepped in with a lot of explicit content, controversial content.
I mean, it's in their policy that you can't facilitate payments dealing with that type of content.
And now we're seeing banks actually go after people.
joe rogan
Well, the thing about Carl, though, was that his content, that it was questionable, wasn't even related to Patreon.
It had nothing to do with it.
It was on another person's podcast.
It was from six months prior, and that other person's podcast was on YouTube.
It had nothing to do with Patreon, and they had specifically said that they were not going to act on content that was outside of their network.
They were only going to react to things that were on Patreon.
bill ottman
Right.
joe rogan
Because you can make little blogs and stuff on Patreon, right?
bill ottman
They do have some content.
joe rogan
Yeah.
bill ottman
Yeah.
But that's not what Patreon said.
Obviously, the processors...
I don't want to...
joe rogan
Who knows?
bill ottman
Yeah.
I don't want to act like I know.
I also don't want it to seem like I have an ideology that I'm trying to push right now.
Like, I'm very open to moving in the direction that makes the most sense for the community.
I'm not attached to what I'm thinking.
unidentified
Mm-hmm.
joe rogan
Good.
I like that.
unidentified
I wish more people would do that.
joe rogan
I mean, I try to do that.
I'm really getting way better at it.
But that's something I actively work on.
Like, these ideas that I have, I'm not fucking married to them.
Don't argue them.
Look at them.
If someone says something different, go, huh.
Don't go, no man, that ain't right, bro.
Because that natural instinct to argue and to claim some sort of a personal identity with your ideas, that's part of the problem that we have.
I think it's a main conflict issue with social media.
One of the things that I see a lot of that, look, I used to do it way back in the day.
If you go back to the early days of Twitter, I used to argue with people.
I used to argue with people on social media.
Then I realized some long time ago, like, there is no good that comes out of that.
I might correct someone if someone said something that's incorrect, but I'm not going to argue and I'm not going to insult.
I'm just not.
bill ottman
It doesn't even work.
joe rogan
It doesn't work.
It just makes people argue back and insult you back, and nothing ever gets accomplished.
Occasionally, you dunk on people, and it's fun.
But in reality, especially me, I kind of dunk on people for a living, so I'm just going to...
I'm not going to engage.
And I don't...
This is going to sound corny as fuck.
I don't want to hurt anybody's feelings.
I really don't.
I don't want to be in some argument where someone is looking at their phone like, fucking fuck you!
unidentified
Fuck you!
joe rogan
I don't want that.
I don't want that.
I get that.
I know what it is.
I know what it is.
But it's...
In this flat medium, okay?
This two-dimensional medium of typing text and then sending text and you type text and send text...
The conflict that arises through that is never beneficial, in my opinion.
I don't get anything out of it.
So, if I'm expressing something, almost always I try to express something about shit I like.
Like, oh, I love this new show.
Oh, this movie was great.
Oh, this is amazing.
Like, check out this picture.
bill ottman
Yeah, you might want to check this out.
It's tone.
Honestly, same with me.
I was much more...
Trying to convince people about what I thought was right.
Coming out of college, you think you're all high and mighty.
It doesn't work.
People just are allergic to it.
I'm allergic to it.
I cannot handle it.
No one wants to talk like that.
It's one thing if you're having a good time and trying to show someone up.
You can have fun with it.
It's more comedic.
But when you're actually taking yourself seriously, it's not going to work.
joe rogan
No, it's not going to work.
And it actually has the exact opposite effect.
It's like the expression...
How's the expression?
Jealousy is like a poison that...
How does it go?
Jealousy is like a poison that you take yourself because you don't like what someone else is accomplishing.
I forget that terrible job of paraphrasing that.
That might be my worst paraphrasing of all time.
Mumble mouth motherfucker that I am.
But the idea is that it has the exact opposite effect.
Like if you're jealous about someone, it actually makes you feel bad instead of them feel bad.
bill ottman
It also makes them not want to hang out with you.
unidentified
Oh.
joe rogan
Well, you know, they probably don't want to hang out with you anyway, let's be honest.
But what you're doing by back and forth, and I know people who do engage in it, and sometimes they have these anxiety moments where they don't sleep for days because they're involved in these Twitter feuds.
I mean, I know people that have done this, where they've gotten involved in Twitter feuds, and they'll wake up at 3 o'clock in the morning, they check their Twitter feed, and like, oh, Christ, man.
Like, you gotta go on a yoga retreat or something.
You can't do this.
You can't live your life like this.
bill ottman
I think there may be some value to the debate.
It should be there.
It should be there.
joe rogan
Debate.
bill ottman
And it's like, okay, I'm not going to spend my time doing it that way.
Some people want to spend their time doing it that way.
And if there's cool mechanisms for the most voted content to be seen, I mean, okay, that's interesting to check out sometimes to look at feedback.
Yeah.
It's not nearly as an effective way of communicating your ideas as making something more personal.
Even video is more effective than that because people actually have a chance to look at you or obviously in person would be even better.
joe rogan
Yeah, well, in-person is obviously the best.
And I think my concern, really, about the future is...
I'm holding back a sneeze right now.
Sorry.
Trying to keep it together.
bill ottman
Do it.
joe rogan
I don't think I can.
It's one of those borderline ones.
What are you supposed to do?
Are you supposed to stare at the light?
bill ottman
Are you trying to resist it?
joe rogan
No, I'm trying to get...
Okay, we're good.
We're out of the woods.
I lost my train of thought.
What were we just saying?
bill ottman
AI something?
joe rogan
No.
jamie vernon
Jealousy quote?
You're talking...
joe rogan
We went way past that, Jamie.
jamie vernon
I know, but you guys are back and forth.
joe rogan
You've been asleep for days.
unidentified
I was looking for it, and then I was...
joe rogan
I lost it.
I lost it in my holding back a sneeze.
Oh, that's what I was worried about.
AI. Not AI. Augmented reality.
That's what I'm really worried about.
Not artificial, but augmented.
And my concern is that what we're experiencing right now in this flat form of two-dimensional text is something that is very overwhelming to a lot of people's time.
I mean, you're looking at some kids that are online, social media, eight, ten hours a day just staring at their phones.
I'm extremely concerned, and I have some jokes about it in my act, about the next wave, because I think that we're overwhelmed by this incredibly attractive medium where we're attracted to our phones, we're attracted to this style of engaging in information and receiving information and passing information and online arguments and debates and looking at pictures and this constant stream,
which, you know, Just looking at your phone, it's not that thrilling.
It's just like, hmm, it's not that thrilling.
It's like, okay, yeah, but it's still getting you all day long.
Like, there's nothing really crazy happening.
When my concern is if something really crazy does start to happen.
When you really can have experiences that are hyper-normal, like that are more powerful than anything you can experience in this regular carbon-based physical touch-and-feel world.
And once we start experiencing augmented reality, the integration between humans and technology, and then the ability to share augmented reality.
If you were at work and you have these fucking goggles on and your girlfriend is at work on the other side of town and you guys both have these similar video pets that are with you and dancing around and providing you with fucking advertisements and giving you things, there's next levels to this stuff that I'm trying to see the future, but I'm too fucking stupid and I don't really know anything about technology, but I know that they're going to get deeper into our lives.
I know that these technologies, not they like the government, but these technologies, they're going to get deeper into your life.
And that they got you by the balls and the clit with a fucking phone.
And it doesn't even do much.
Take some pictures, look at some pictures, look at some text, watch some videos.
That's all it does.
bill ottman
And access to most human knowledge.
joe rogan
That's true.
But how many people are using that?
Well, you know, they are for sure.
They definitely are.
There's a lot of Googling going on.
I'm sorry.
What is the other one?
DuckDuckGo.
DuckDuckGoing going on.
bill ottman
I'm holding out for another one.
We might start working on search more.
joe rogan
Bing is a goddamn ghost town, isn't it?
I bet if you go to Bing, you gotta blow fucking dust off your keyboard as soon as you open it up.
Like, no one's in there.
Who's in Bing?
bill ottman
Bing is just Microsoft.
joe rogan
I know.
But who's using that?
Oh, ladies?
jamie vernon
I think that YouTube is the number two search engine on the web.
YouTube?
YouTube, yeah.
joe rogan
Wow.
jamie vernon
Yeah.
unidentified
Really?
jamie vernon
That's why people can make so many videos about so many weird topics and it'll just pop up and you get...
bill ottman
I don't think we can stop it.
joe rogan
Holy shit.
bill ottman
But...
Look, it would be fun with the frequency that you go to an arcade.
I would go and do some crazy AR, VR stuff.
It would be fun as a rare entertainment thing to do.
I just want to make sure that even with the robots that we're carrying around now, Is it respecting my freedom?
Is this thing on my side?
It's not.
I don't think it is right now because I'm using Android as open source.
joe rogan
Are you an Android guy?
bill ottman
Of course you are.
unidentified
All those crypto guys, they're all Android people.
bill ottman
It's just more freedom.
Now, Google's version of Android is just as bad as iOS.
joe rogan
So whose version of Android do you use?
bill ottman
I am...
Yeah.
No, I'm not perfect, man.
unidentified
Are you not telling me?
bill ottman
No, I'm not perfect.
I'm on the Google Android right now, but there's a version called Replicant, which is a fully free version of Android that I'm probably...
Because I just cracked my phone like a day ago, so I might...
joe rogan
You have to get a new one?
What are you using?
What phone do you use?
bill ottman
S8. Oh, look at you.
Yeah.
joe rogan
You're kind of retro.
bill ottman
Is it?
joe rogan
I don't know.
It took a year ago.
bill ottman
There's this one called the Black Phone, which I'm looking into.
unidentified
What's that?
bill ottman
It's like a hyper-encrypted phone, but I don't know if it's fully free.
joe rogan
Wasn't there a blockchain-based phone that they were coming out with?
An Ethereum-based phone?
Isn't that?
bill ottman
I don't know.
joe rogan
Wasn't that something, Jamie?
jamie vernon
Yeah.
Sure, it definitely got announced, but I don't know that it's still in development.
bill ottman
You can't run everything on a blockchain.
unidentified
No.
bill ottman
Blockchains are pretty slow.
We use it even to publish to the Ethereum blockchain when you send each other payments on mines.
It costs, like, you know, there's a gas fee.
So the way that the network is powered is that, you know, the miners get paid with gas, with a little bit of ether.
So it costs like a buck to do a post.
Like, there's fully decentralized social networks.
There's one called PPeth, which you have to pay for everything you do on it.
And so this is why it's a cool experiment, but it's really not scalable.
So, you know, it's going to be a combination of decentralized technology.
Like, Not just blockchain.
People like to say that blockchain is going to solve all the problems, and it's going to solve a lot of problems.
It's an incredible tool.
joe rogan
What is this, Jamie?
Is this it?
The Finny?
jamie vernon
It's one that's out now.
Yeah, it just went on sale like a month ago or something.
joe rogan
It's pretty.
jamie vernon
Siren OS, which I'm not exactly sure.
joe rogan
What is that, Jazz?
Good luck getting a fucking app with that.
And some of those Android apps, they're sneaky, right?
Don't they steal Bitcoin?
There was an Android app that got in trouble for stealing cryptocurrency.
It was stealing it in the background while you had your app open.
And it was on the Google Play Store.
See if that's true.
I might have made something up.
I can get sued.
I don't think I did, though.
jamie vernon
It might have been mining.
joe rogan
And I think it was stealing.
jamie vernon
It says steals, yeah.
joe rogan
Yeah, pull that up so we can see it.
I have an Android phone as well.
I have a Note 9. I really like it.
It's giant.
Huge screen.
Great battery life.
Beautiful.
bill ottman
So you use both?
joe rogan
Yes.
Bitcoin scam warning over fake Android app that steals cryptocurrency from your phone.
Yeah, I use both.
Android's very good now.
It's very good.
I was an early adopter and it was like clunky and shitty and then I would go to my iPhone and I was like, oh my god, this is so much better.
What iPhone is great with is integration with like Apple TV, integration with a laptop, but I also have a Windows laptop that I use a lot.
I really like...
I have a Lenovo ThinkPad for writing.
The keyboard's better.
In fact, I actually bought an older MacBook just for the keyboard.
Because as a writer, you want tactile feedback as you're writing.
It just helps.
It makes it easier for you to recognize where the keys are.
And Apple has decided to go so far towards design and just for aesthetic beauty that they've ruined the tactile feedback of their keyboards.
bill ottman
Do you remember that, though, when the old smartphones, they still had the keyboard?
I thought I would never leave that because it was tactile, but then I ultimately left.
joe rogan
That's true, but that's a different experience.
That's just thumbs.
I can do that with my thumbs and I kind of know where everything is and I'm not writing a novel.
You know, when I'm writing material or essays or something like that, I need a fucking keyboard.
bill ottman
You don't think that the holographic screen that's just here, you don't think if it just like autocorrects everything you do and you can just like...
joe rogan
Maybe, but there's a...
bill ottman
I like the tactile, too.
joe rogan
There's a feeling.
I like mechanical keyboards, in fact.
There's a feeling of knowing.
bill ottman
Did you test out that FaceTime bug?
Did you hear about that?
joe rogan
FaceTime bug?
bill ottman
Yeah, there was a FaceTime bug where...
What was it?
jamie vernon
You didn't see that?
joe rogan
I heard about it, but I didn't look into it at all.
jamie vernon
Yeah, we didn't test it out and play with it.
bill ottman
Basically, you could call someone and hear them without them picking up.
Yeah.
joe rogan
Without them picking up?
bill ottman
Without them picking up, yeah.
joe rogan
So, the thing is ringing on FaceTime, and they don't even have to pick up, and then you're on the other end talking shit about them.
bill ottman
Yeah, you can basically surveil anybody.
joe rogan
Fuck Bill and fuck minds.
That guy's full of shit.
As soon as the big companies come to him, he's gonna stick his ass in the air, just like all of them.
jamie vernon
He said the camera could be turned on, too.
unidentified
Yeah.
joe rogan
Makes sense.
I was thinking about that when I'm beating off.
Don't you?
You should.
bill ottman
Apple acts like it cares about privacy, which maybe it doesn't turn CERN over things to the FBI. I don't know exactly what's...
But we don't know what the Apple phones are doing.
joe rogan
Right.
bill ottman
Apple is all locked down, closed source.
And additionally, there was a creepy speech that Tim Cook just gave.
joe rogan
Creepy?
bill ottman
Did you see it?
unidentified
No.
joe rogan
Let's listen to it.
bill ottman
Yeah, let's listen to it.
joe rogan
Should we play spooky music in the background?
bill ottman
Do the ADL speech.
joe rogan
Do you have any spooky music you can play in the background while he's doing the speech?
We might get in trouble for that.
bill ottman
So, again, it's good intentions.
Like, people who want less hate speech, we all want less hate speech, realistically.
joe rogan
Of course.
We want people to get along better.
unidentified
Yeah.
joe rogan
Right.
bill ottman
But this idea that, I don't want to give too much away, but, you know, he's acting as if they are going to be the moral authority about the types of content that can exist on the App Store.
Yeah.
So, I just don't know how that's scalable.
joe rogan
Yeah, what does that mean?
Let's hear what he says.
jamie vernon
I was just hoping this is the right one.
Is this it?
joe rogan
It says, CEO Tim Cook banning hate division is the right thing to do 12-3-2018.
Is that it?
December?
unidentified
That's it.
joe rogan
Okay, let's hear it.
Hello, Tim.
Volume, please.
unidentified
Our devices connected to the humanity that makes us, us.
We do that in many ways.
One of the most important is how we honor a teaching that can be found in Judaism, but is shared across all faiths and traditions.
It's a lesson that was carried forward by the late Elie Wiesel.
May his memory be a blessing.
It's a lesson put into practice by America's Muslim community who raised thousands for the victims of the Tree of Life killings.
Do not be indifferent to the bloodshed of your fellow man.
Do not be indifferent.
This mandate moves us to speak up for immigrants and for those who seek opportunity in the United States.
We do it not only because their individual dignity, creativity, and ingenuity have the power to make this country an even better place, but because our own humanity commands us to welcome those who need welcome.
It moves us to speak up for the LGBTQ community, for those whose differences can make them a target for violence and scorn.
We do so not only because these unique and uncommon perspectives can open our eyes to new ways of thinking, but because our own dignity moves us to see the dignity in others.
Perhaps most importantly, it drives us not to be bystanders as hate tries to make its headquarters in the digital world.
At Apple, we believe that technology needs to have a clear point of view on this challenge.
There is no time to get tied up in knots.
That's why we only have one message for those who seek to push hate, division, and violence.
You have no place on our platforms.
You have no home here.
From the earliest days of iTunes to Apple Music today, we have always prohibited music with a message of white supremacy.
joe rogan
Hold on a second.
What do you think they're signaling here?
Like, are they signaling that they're about to start censoring things?
They already are.
They already are.
Okay, I agree that you probably shouldn't put white supremacy music on, but there's a lot of really violent stuff that you can get on iTunes, right?
I mean, if you go back to the old NWA albums, that's available, right?
jamie vernon
Oh.
I'm assuming, yeah.
I don't know that it is for sure, but yeah.
joe rogan
Like, Straight Outta Compton?
That is some violent shit.
And then how about the films that they have?
How about the films that you can get on the iTunes store?
There's a lot of very, very, very violent films.
Like, extremely violent.
There's a lot of films that, like...
Is it that they're making the distinction between something that's fiction, that although it may be disturbing, you understand that this is a movie and this is something someone wrote versus someone...
bill ottman
Art versus...
joe rogan
Yeah, versus someone with commentary, their commentary.
And then here's the other thing.
He was saying hate...
And division.
They won't promote division.
But that's a weird one.
bill ottman
Yeah, that means...
joe rogan
Like, what does that mean?
bill ottman
People who disagree with you.
joe rogan
Yeah, what is division?
bill ottman
He has good intentions.
You can sort of feel it.
That's the problem with this.
joe rogan
Right.
bill ottman
That it's...
He's not allowing the conversation to take place.
So this is in direct conflict with the Daryl Davises with confronting these issues.
Right.
unidentified
So...
joe rogan
But we can kill it.
But I think...
When he's saying, you have no place on our platform, they probably feel like you can go somewhere else.
bill ottman
He's building a wall.
joe rogan
Yeah.
I mean, but this is what I'm saying.
Everybody kind of feels like you can go somewhere else.
bill ottman
That's what happens, though, and that's how things get more radicalized.
joe rogan
And everybody goes to Gab.
bill ottman
So, I don't know.
Look, the conversation needs to take place.
People on the left, he's acting like he's speaking for all LGBTQ people.
He's not.
There's lots of people on the left, and LGBTQ people aren't always on the left.
And not all of them want that.
joe rogan
Well, not only that, there's division in LBGT and Q. There's a big issue right now with Martina Navratilova that was going on about her discussing the reality of trans women competing against biological women and that she opposes it and she thinks there's some fundamental advantages which is leading to a lot of weightlifting world records being broken by trans women and she's like, this is fucking preposterous.
Including trans women with penises.
Now they're attacking her for being transphobic.
So there's not even a united opinion in the LBGTQ community.
bill ottman
For sure.
And that's why that Megan Murphy, I think?
Yes.
I go to this restaurant in Bridgeport, Connecticut called Bloodroot, which is like sort of an old-school feminist-like vegetarian vegan spot.
joe rogan
In Bridgeport?
bill ottman
In Bridgeport.
unidentified
Really?
bill ottman
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
joe rogan
Bridgeport's kind of, no offense.
bill ottman
I know.
joe rogan
It's kind of a dumb...
bill ottman
It's a pretty wild place, yeah.
We would have a...
Gathering in the Vibes Music Festival is cool.
I helped organize that.
joe rogan
I used to do stand-up in Bridgeport.
There's a place called the Joker's Wild.
It was a comedy club.
I saw the owner beat a guy with a shoe there.
Beat a guy in the face with a shoe.
Pulled a shoe off and smacked him in the face.
I was 24. I didn't know what the fuck was going on.
bill ottman
So anyway, that restaurant, they get called, what is it, Turf?
Yeah, trans, exclusionary, radical, feminist.
And so, again, they're the old school ones.
And they're saying, look, we're not against your battle.
We're not against trans rights.
Who would be against trans?
But they're just saying that's not our thing.
So, again, there's diversity.
They're trying to clump everyone together in the whole intersectional world.
Look, people want to band together.
The oppressed groups want to band together.
They should.
But it's not that simple.
joe rogan
Well, there's always going to be differing opinions, and especially when you have something like...
Trans women competing against biological women and you know you have someone like Martina Davratilova that made her her life's work and her career competing as a biological woman.
She's gonna have some opposition to that and then the idea that everyone's supposed to be lumped in together with some mandate that no one is really openly discussed you're supposed to agree and it fluctuates and moves like the tide you know like what is and is and moves like the tide It just changes.
It's like this court of public opinion.
It's constantly rendering new verdicts.
And you have to keep up and catch up.
Things that were acceptable just a few years ago are totally unacceptable.
I mean...
bill ottman
Comedy is the key area, too.
unidentified
Yeah.
bill ottman
It is not...
What's happening on social media now is not sustainable for comedy.
joe rogan
It's fine.
bill ottman
Oh, really?
joe rogan
Yeah.
It is.
It is.
bill ottman
How?
joe rogan
Because it creates outrage.
And then comedy relieves that pressure.
Like, believe me...
There's a lot of blowback, and believe me, there's a lot of debate and discussion, but also, believe me, when someone does do some politically incorrect, really good stand-up, people go fucking bonkers.
They love it.
It's one of the best times ever right now to do stand-up.
People go fucking apeshit.
bill ottman
Oh, yeah, no, it's incredible material, but I'm just saying, for comics that are running into issues with getting banned or whatnot, I mean...
joe rogan
Well, who's running into issues with getting banned?
bill ottman
I mean, I think you know one.
joe rogan
Owen?
bill ottman
Yeah.
joe rogan
Yeah, Owen's had some issues.
Yeah.
And, you know, you can make some arguments that Owen's not doing so well right now.
But he's also developing his following because of the fact there's people that don't agree with him being banned.
He's a very specific example.
Other people that are being banned...
Do you know what other stand-up comedians can you think of?
bill ottman
Maybe they haven't been fully banned from social media, but they've had their performances shut down.
Who's that one guy?
joe rogan
Oh, Namesh Patel.
But that was at a college.
bill ottman
It's the same thing.
joe rogan
Yes.
But universities have been bad for that for a long time.
They're the most sensitive of all audiences.
And they're the ones who are the most...
They believe the most that they're going to change the world and that their ideals are...
Their ideals are rock solid and they have to push back against anything that opposes them.
jamie vernon
Ari was temporarily banned.
joe rogan
That was an accident.
The Ari thing was he was joking around and they thought he was making a legitimate death threat.
He was joking around with a good friend of ours.
bill ottman
The algorithms and the moderators are just not...
We can't just be having this happen all the time and then they just keep saying, oh sorry, oh sorry.
There has to be a new approach completely.
It can't just be, oh, let them back on and just keep doing what they're doing.
We need to completely re-approach how moderation is happening, the whole policy situation, the transparency situation.
It's not just a matter of...
overlords and saying, can I please come back?
That's not suitable for the communication structure of the planet Earth.
joe rogan
Well, I think what's not suitable is that commerce should not dictate how human beings are allowed to openly communicate with each other.
And one of the things that Jack said that's kind of contrary to his company's actions was that he believes that the ability to communicate is a fundamental right, like the ability to Like, if you're in the KKK, you can still order electricity.
So, should you be able to just distribute information?
If people say no, then you have to say, okay, well, who's to decide what can and cannot be distributed, and then who's to decide if they can go somewhere else?
And then what happens if you tell a person they can't go anywhere?
Then things get really weird.
bill ottman
We're looking at more of a community moderation structure so that we've even been considering like a juror system so that if we make a bad decision and someone appeals it, then the community can potentially make the decisions as opposed to us.
Or – but then when you go far enough into the decentralization world, it just becomes impossible.
So we sort of have to decide.
I think that's where it's going to go.
I don't know.
That's the uncensorable internet.
And this idea that we can do things and then...
Just delete them.
In the GDPR, the European privacy laws have this whole idea of the right to be forgotten online, which is very difficult because deleting things from any database, especially a blockchain, is not easy.
So the idea that you can go on the internet, do crazy shit, and then just have it taken away, it's a paradox because privacy means control, but It doesn't jive with the way that technology works to just be able to delete things.
You're writing to a database.
That's not even how the universe probably really works.
You can't just say, oh, I just went and punched that guy in the face in the bar and I just want to delete that from having happened.
unidentified
Right.
joe rogan
Yeah.
Yeah.
And again...
I think that what we're dealing with now is like you have to interface with it, right?
You have to interface with your computer, you have to interface with your phone to access all this stuff.
My real concern is that that's just a temporary step.
And that we're going to just consistently and constantly be interfaced with all of each other.
You know, Elon brought something up when he was on the podcast called Neural Link.
And he didn't want to fully describe it because he said he couldn't, but he said it's going to be live within a matter of X amount of months.
And he was talking about it increasing the bandwidth between human beings and information in a radical way that's going to change society.
That is what I'm talking about.
bill ottman
Yeah, he's talking about an injection.
You're basically doing like your throat and it's a neural lace and it just threads around your brain.
joe rogan
What?
bill ottman
And yeah.
joe rogan
Are you serious?
bill ottman
Yeah, that's what he's talking about?
Yeah, yeah.
joe rogan
He's a damn alien.
Trying to turn us into robots.
bill ottman
So, but the question is, what's the nature of those robots?
Robots are going to exist.
They exist.
joe rogan
Right, but should you shoot them into your brain?
bill ottman
If you're dying of cancer, would you?
joe rogan
Go for it.
Yeah.
I'd want to see God and see what's up.
bill ottman
So, like, do the nanobots, you know, that Kurzweil talks about, like, do we have control as a community over those robots?
What's the code running those?
joe rogan
And are they infallible?
I mean, what if they crash?
I mean, our fucking TriCaster crashes every other podcast.
bill ottman
Yeah, whether it's open source or free or not makes no difference to whether it can fuck up your brain.
joe rogan
Right, what if somebody puts that shit in and then, for whatever reason, they have a blown fuse and they stomp on the gas and drive right into a tree?
bill ottman
It depends on the level of risk you're willing to take.
I mean, you see some of those videos, like, I've cried at those videos where, like, the woman, like, hears for the first time, you're like, oh, Yeah, yeah, yeah.
joe rogan
And people seeing color for the first time, putting on certain glasses that allow them to see color.
Yeah, all this stuff is amazing.
I mean, all that stuff is very cool.
And in talking to David Sinclair, and he was talking about emerging technologies with reversing aging and age-related diseases.
I mean, we're entering into an incredibly strange time for the...
The influence of technology and innovation on human beings, on our bodies, on our brains.
And we're going to have to decide how far you want to go on this ride.
Next stop, Far Rockaway.
When are you getting out?
bill ottman
I lived there.
joe rogan
Did you?
bill ottman
Yeah.
I lived on the beach there.
I'm going.
No, I don't know.
joe rogan
But you know what I'm saying.
It's like one of those things like, where do you get off?
Where do you go?
Okay, that's enough.
You know, like with you, you're deleting Facebook, you delete Instagram, and you're just going to be on Mines, and that's enough.
bill ottman
I'll go in other places.
I mean, there are alternatives that are getting very big.
joe rogan
Yes, like what?
bill ottman
And together...
joe rogan
Like what?
bill ottman
Like, Signal has tens of millions of users.
joe rogan
I don't know what that is.
I've never heard of it.
bill ottman
That's like the encrypted messaging app that...
joe rogan
Do you know it?
bill ottman
It's open source.
joe rogan
What is it?
bill ottman
Snowden is on their advisory board or whatnot.
joe rogan
What is Signal?
bill ottman
It's just a messaging app.
joe rogan
So a messaging app, like a WhatsApp or like a Twitter?
Yeah, like WhatsApp.
So you have to know the person and then contact them through it?
bill ottman
Yeah, but we're considering using the Signal protocol for our messaging system because our messaging system needs an upgrade.
All of us together are going to be able to create a group of apps that are a more open, freedom-supporting privacy alternative.
We're not going to solve it by ourselves.
It would be way easier if one of these big companies would just switch gears and start doing things the right way.
Eight years building this.
If one of the big companies, Google, Facebook, had just been free and open source, we would have spent the last seven years building on top of them.
joe rogan
Right.
bill ottman
Because, you know, they already did something cool that they're sharing with everybody.
unidentified
Right.
bill ottman
So it's actually closed source projects stifle innovation.
Because if you think, we had to reinvent the wheel.
We went and built an alternative with much of the similar functionality.
Think about how much further the world would be if everyone was building on top of more common projects.
joe rogan
Okay, but you're looking at it in terms of your own personal benefit.
You're looking at it in terms of mine's personal benefit.
I mean, you created this thing.
It's not just pure for altruistic reasons.
It's a business, right?
So if they had established this open source network that was Facebook and you just came along and built yours, well, yeah, that would be great for you.
But why would that be great for them?
I mean, they're obviously in a business.
Now, the problem with the business is this business is the business of distributing information.
And then we have to decide, okay, at what point in time do we allow these, air quotes, overlords to dictate what can and cannot be distributed.
And how did this happen?
Because in the beginning, I bet it didn't happen.
I bet in the beginning, you could just put on whatever the fuck you wanted.
And then they had to deal with that.
And then they had to figure out after a while, okay, maybe we shouldn't have this on.
If we're going to sell advertising, we really should maximize the amount of clicks.
Okay, how do we do that?
Well, we put things in people's feeds that they want to see.
We put things that people want to debate about and argue about and political things, all sorts of different things that excite them and get them to be engaged with the platform.
That's their business.
Their business is...
I mean, it's no different in a lot of ways than Amazon or than any other business that wants to grow.
How do they grow?
Well, they grow by maximizing their profits and by maximizing the amount of eyes that get to their advertising so they get more clicks and more people get engaged.
That's what their business is.
You're deciding.
By saying, if they were open source, look how much further along the world would be.
bill ottman
They would be further along, too.
joe rogan
I don't know if they would agree with that.
I think they're worth fucking kajillions of dollars, so they've figured it out.
bill ottman
Well, it just depends on whether or not you think that people have a right to know what is going on.
I mean, it's like food transparency.
I will talk about that until the end of time.
We're interfacing with this, and it's affecting us.
joe rogan
I agree.
I fully agree with what you're saying.
I'm playing devil's advocate by saying that in their position, they have a business, and their business is to make money.
bill ottman
And they're going to lose because of what they're doing.
Because it's not sustainable.
joe rogan
But their business is up.
bill ottman
They're losing active users.
joe rogan
Are they?
bill ottman
Yeah.
joe rogan
But I thought their business went up after the hearings.
bill ottman
Probably.
joe rogan
Did it?
bill ottman
But it's not going to last.
Why do you say that?
It's just the game's over.
It's going to take a long time for us to build it up as all of these different organizations and companies working together.
But Linux, for instance, is the operating system that most banks – it is the most popular operating system in the world.
It's open source.
Yeah, it's open source.
It's in your phone.
It's in everywhere.
It got there because of that.
Because everyone used it and incorporated it into their product.
Facebook, they are all using free and open source software in their stacks.
They're just not sharing their product with everybody else.
So they're benefiting from it but not giving back.
And I almost feel like I shouldn't even be saying that they should just pivot because that's their only chance to survive.
joe rogan
So this is based on your estimations of the future.
bill ottman
Yeah, it just seems like things are becoming more open.
joe rogan
Is that possible because you engage with a lot of other super nerds and you guys all have these similar ideas?
bill ottman
Look at what's happening with Bitcoin.
joe rogan
I don't know what's happening with Bitcoin.
bill ottman
Bitcoin and Ethereum and lots of other blockchains are growing really fast.
Maybe the price is separate.
The development energy, the number of people who are building apps on top of Bitcoin and Ethereum is growing massively.
It's a whole new infrastructure that's like a common protocol that people can build on.
So that is growing rapidly.
The price is secondary.
That's not even what Bitcoin and Ethereum are really about.
It's a decentralized database.
So, this is just where the internet is meant to be decentralized.
It sort of started out that way.
And then we moved into this, like, Web2 silo system with, like, just these massive companies that are controlling everything.
But it's going to keep waving.
joe rogan
Okay, again, to play devil's advocate, the vast amount of users are not using those platforms.
The vast amount of users are using these controlled platforms like Facebook and Instagram and Twitter.
Like, if you're talking about, I'm just guessing, but if you're talking about the gross number of human beings that are interacting with each other on social media, they're mostly uncontrolled networks.
You're saying that this is not going to last.
But there's no evidence that it isn't going to last.
bill ottman
There's tons of evidence.
joe rogan
What is the evidence?
bill ottman
Wikipedia.
What happened in Carta?
Remember that disk you put in your computer that was your encyclopedia?
Where is that?
No one uses it.
joe rogan
Okay, that's different.
This is not a social media network.
The social media networks that people are using are almost all controlled, right?
bill ottman
Yeah.
No, it's going to take a very, very long time.
unidentified
How long?
bill ottman
I would say 10 years.
joe rogan
And what do you think is going to be the catalyst?
Like what's going to cause these people to make this radical shift to open source?
bill ottman
I think we have to be – we have responsibility to be competitive functionally.
joe rogan
Mines does.
bill ottman
Yeah, we do.
We're moving there fast.
Like we just hired a ton of new developers and – It's going to take time.
We're not there yet.
joe rogan
Right.
bill ottman
But once we have functionally competitive products that you wouldn't even know the difference and there's enough people there, then it's basically the decision of, you know, am I going to choose the one that respects my privacy and freedom or the one that doesn't?
And people are – kids don't like Facebook.
Everyone is sick of it.
We're just drug addicts.
unidentified
Right.
joe rogan
Is that what it is?
They're just sucked into this thing where you constantly want to check and see who's writing what?
bill ottman
Yeah, and there's monopolies, arguably.
joe rogan
Yeah.
Yeah, right?
Especially when Facebook owns Instagram, right?
What if they bought Twitter as well?
bill ottman
They almost did.
I think Google almost did.
joe rogan
What if Google steps in and buys everything?
Then you're like, oh no.
They probably could, right?
bill ottman
Yeah.
joe rogan
They easily could.
They could probably buy everything.
jamie vernon
Apple could with cash.
unidentified
Yeah.
joe rogan
Yeah.
Tim Cook could come in with a big purple pimp suit on, just slap down a briefcase.
unidentified
Bitch!
bill ottman
I just wonder, and like, look, all these executives...
Jack seems like a cool person.
He's a very nice guy.
I just sense so much inconsistency.
He's talking about Bitcoin like it's this important new internet money.
He knows the infrastructure is open, but then his platforms are the opposite.
Why is he so inconsistent?
It's just hypocritical to the maximum.
joe rogan
I think it's partly because it's a giant business.
And I think when you have an obligation to your shareholders and to maximize profits...
And when you're trying to maximize profits, too, and there's this universal growth model where every year it just has to get a little bit bigger, otherwise you're fucking up as a CEO. You don't have to experience that with Mines.
You're one of the co-founders.
How many people are involved...
bill ottman
It's like 15 of us now.
joe rogan
And do you have like a board where you sit around where you make critical decisions?
Is that stressful as fuck?
bill ottman
Yeah.
Luckily, we've started off from the point where we're saying, okay, we're embedding principles into how we're doing things.
So we're not in a position where we would ever change that.
For us to do that would just be a total waste of time.
joe rogan
Right.
bill ottman
So we're making it harder for ourselves to make money in the beginning.
We're making it harder for ourselves to grow because we are not going to compromise people's privacy in order to do those things.
And so we're just going to build up slowly, steadily, and just get there when we get there.
joe rogan
How much time a day is this?
How much of an obligation is this for you?
bill ottman
Same as any job.
It sucks because, you know, my wife Allie would say, like, it's too blurred, my life.
Because it's like, what is pleasure?
I mean, it probably happens with you, too.
Like, when you're on...
Your phone.
Like, your family doesn't know if you're working or if you're doing something for fun.
unidentified
Yeah.
bill ottman
Because, like, your work is sort of in the digital realm, partially.
joe rogan
A lot of it is.
unidentified
Yeah.
bill ottman
So it's like, I just need to put it down, like, no phones in bed, these kinds of things.
Like, strict lines.
joe rogan
Yeah.
That is huge.
Strict lines are huge.
Yeah.
Yeah, putting your phone in a physical place and pushing it away.
It's huge.
It's just the compulsion to look and check Instagram feeds to see if there's any cool pictures.
Like, what the fuck am I doing?
Why am I compelled to do this?
There's no benefit.
Occasionally, if I'm bored, like I'm in the dentist's office, you have 10 minutes, all right, let's see what the fuck's going on in the news.
Like, maybe.
Occasionally.
But there's so much of your time that's dedicated to that.
So much of it.
It's so taxing, and it's so involved, and so many people are doing it.
I mean, I went to a restaurant the other day, and I was looking around, and fucking everyone was sitting at a table looking at their phone.
It's weird.
bill ottman
You ever do the stack game?
joe rogan
What's that?
bill ottman
Just like, if you're out to dinner with a bunch of people, just everyone's put their phone in a stack in the middle.
joe rogan
Well, you could do that or just...
bill ottman
And if you touch it, then you pay.
joe rogan
Oh.
I'd rather just...
bill ottman
Just not?
joe rogan
Not.
Yeah.
People wipe their butts and don't fucking wash their hands and touch their phone.
And, you know, your phone is filled with all kinds of dirty shit.
They've, like, done these swab tests of phones.
They're covered with E. coli.
And people are gross.
bill ottman
I'm a little germaphobe.
joe rogan
Keep my fucking hands clean, bro.
I'm not, but I know your phone probably has your butt all over it.
bill ottman
True.
joe rogan
Just be honest.
bill ottman
True.
joe rogan
But I know what you're saying.
It's a good idea.
You know, the guys who run Joe Beef in Montreal, it's this amazing restaurant, Fred and Dave, and they were talking about it, that when they go to dinner, they shut their phone off.
I'm a good guest, a good table guest.
I shut my phone off.
I don't engage.
I don't check it.
It's a similar thing to podcasting, in a way, in that one of the good benefits of podcasting is that for three hours or two hours, whatever the fuck you're doing, you're going to sit down, and you're just going to engage with the person.
Just you and I. Me and Bill.
We're just talking, right?
And that we're not checking our phone.
We're not looking at the television.
We're not looking at the laptop.
There's no distractions.
And that is one of the rare moments in life where you get to talk to someone for several hours.
And over the last, you know, nine years that I've been doing this podcast, it's benefited me tremendously just in having real conversations with people.
We're just sitting across from somebody for hours just talking to them.
Getting better at understanding how people think, getting better at understanding how I think, getting way better at communicating and knowing when to talk and when not to talk and what questions to ask and try to understand the thought process that another person has.
And you walk out of that with some lessons, like real, legit, tangible lessons.
Those fucking don't happen when you're staring at your phone while you're talking to people.
It, like, cuts all that off.
The conversation stays shallow.
You miss important points.
Like, oh, I'm sorry, what?
What were you saying?
You do that kind of shit.
And, like, then the other person knows you're not engaged.
It's just...
It's weird.
bill ottman
Yeah, it's all shades of gray.
I mean, it's done incredible things for, like, democratizing the ability to share information so it's not just these...
joe rogan
Yeah.
bill ottman
Juggernaut media companies are the only places that can share information.
So it's incredible.
It's crucial.
We need everyone to have the ability to share and so that you can check because maybe you're more likely to get the reality of what's going on in the world from your newsfeed than the big companies.
joe rogan
We need management skills.
Personal management skills.
Yeah.
And I think we need to look at them the same way we look at alcohol consumption and even poor food choices.
You can have a cheat day and eat a bunch of pizza and some ice cream like The Rock does.
No one's going to get hurt, right?
But most of the time you should probably take care of your meat vehicle.
I think the same thing can be said of your mind.
I have a day, a week, where I will fucking plop down on the couch and I don't give a fuck.
I just watch bullshit on TV and just relax because I know that I'm redlining it six days a week.
And I'm doing three different things at a time.
I have three different jobs.
I'm working out.
I'm trying to take care of my family.
I'm writing comedy material.
And then, oh, let me see some documentary on some wacky fucking cult or whatever the hell I'm going to watch.
And I don't feel guilty when I do that because I know that I've kind of, air quotes, earned it.
But I think that that's mental management.
And I think we certainly need personal management when it comes to the use of electronic devices.
bill ottman
Yeah, personal challenges.
joe rogan
Yeah.
bill ottman
Challenge psychology is really fucking interesting to me.
Like, you guys do the October thing?
unidentified
Mm-hmm.
joe rogan
We're thinking about doing it twice a year now.
bill ottman
I did this one with some of my friends.
joe rogan
Jamie's just going to watch shit.
bill ottman
Are you in it too?
joe rogan
No, no.
Jamie doesn't get in.
bill ottman
We did one called the 100 Burpee Challenge.
100 burpees a day?
I haven't done burpees in...
I did them today because I was coming out.
I was like, I'm going to fucking do burpees today.
Nice.
But 100 for time.
Every day for 100 days straight.
And you are drenched after going for time 100 burpees.
joe rogan
Oh, yeah.
bill ottman
Ridiculous.
joe rogan
Yeah, it's hard work.
bill ottman
And that was the best, most discipline I've ever been working out.
It was like me and five friends.
My friend's mom did it, too.
And it changed my life.
unidentified
Really?
bill ottman
It was ridiculous.
joe rogan
How did it change your life?
bill ottman
I felt better than I have ever felt by far.
And that was like a year ago, and I've trailed off.
But not just physical challenges, like digital ones too.
And like with the ice bucket thing.
That was crazy shit.
joe rogan
I didn't get involved in that.
bill ottman
I didn't do it either.
But just watching it happen was just really powerful.
joe rogan
I'm like, I'm not throwing water in my head during a fucking drought.
Stop.
Everybody stop.
This is not fixing anything.
How about I just write a check?
I'll give you some money.
bill ottman
Yeah, film yourself writing the check.
joe rogan
Yeah, stop.
Yeah, throw a glass of water in my face when I'm done with the check.
Just stop.
bill ottman
But getting communities to sort of pressure each other into doing things.
joe rogan
In a positive way.
bill ottman
In a positive way.
Yeah.
joe rogan
Well, that was what the Sober October thing kind of turned out to be about.
And there's a lot of lessons in learning that, too.
You know, you learn lessons about your reliance on either substances or things.
And one of the things that I learned from the Sober October Challenge, the last one, was that when you engage in really rigorous physical activity six and seven days a week, you don't give a fuck.
Like, you don't give a fuck.
Like, all the chatter, the internal chatter just goes away.
All the negative chatter, like, it's like taking a pill.
Like, I don't give a fuck pill.
It's amazing.
It's really amazing because I think a lot of personal anxiety that people carry around with them is a physical energy that's not being expressed because I think the body has certain demands and certain potential and in order to have this certain potential like your potential for athletic output You have to have this energy source, right?
And this body energy source when not expressed.
And when you're sitting in a cubicle all day, day after day after day, it builds this internal anxious feeling and tension.
And that becomes your normal, the normal line, the normal frequency in which you operate.
You operate under this intense sort of anxious state and you feel like, well, this is life.
God damn it, I'm depressed or God damn it, I'm anxious.
I got anxiety.
I got to see it shrink.
I got this.
If you just blow that shit out every day...
Every day.
You burn off 2,000 calories and you fucking run for five miles and you do kettlebells and chin-ups and fucking hit the bag for five rounds.
Dude, that shit goes away.
You don't give a fuck.
And then you get to look at things with real clarity.
So there was a lesson learned in that.
And that lesson was only learned because we decided to challenge each other and push ourselves.
bill ottman
Do you think it would be too draconian to have a company 100 burpee a day policy?
joe rogan
Yeah, you know why, man?
I just don't think you should tell people what to do.
Their job is the job, and then everything else is like a cult.
You know?
It's like, no, we're only going to wear white robes.
We don't need anything about white robes.
Okay.
When do you start fucking everybody and taking their money?
Because that always comes next.
bill ottman
Yeah, because it's in vain.
joe rogan
Yeah.
bill ottman
You can't force people.
It's like being convinced.
joe rogan
But it wouldn't be a bad...
Well, the problem is if you were...
You could have some sort of a company-wide challenge where you invite people.
No, because that's what I'm saying.
You would shame them into doing it, or you would somehow or another make it seem like they would advance in the company more if they played along.
It could be...
bill ottman
Yeah.
I'm not going to do it.
joe rogan
Were you thinking about doing it?
bill ottman
I just did, maybe.
Because it feels so good!
joe rogan
Yes, yes.
Well, you should encourage it.
But I almost feel like...
Yeah.
But you don't want to shame people.
There's some brilliant people that don't work out at all.
They're brilliant.
But for whatever reason, that's their choice.
It should be your choice to go out like Christopher Hitchens and just fucking drink every day and smoke cigarettes and one day you get cancer.
And you're like, well...
You know, I mean, this is like...
I mean, the way he described it, like burning the candle at both ends, it gave a beautiful, brilliant light.
bill ottman
Yeah, he wouldn't have had those ideas if he had done it another way.
joe rogan
It's very possible that's true.
And most of the madness that we see in brilliant artists, it's very possible that that madness would not be expressed if they had their shit together.
bill ottman
There was something that Sam Harris was saying the other day, On your show just about the free will stuff.
And I think that connects to this information theory kind of thing.
So if we're just sort of a conglomerate of these actions and we're like flowing the actions through our body in unique ways...
I mean, do you accept his theory on free will?
joe rogan
Well, it's not his theory.
It's a conventional theory of determinism that a lot of people are embracing, and I think there's definitely some merit to it.
However, you and I both know that you choose whether or not you decide to do something, right?
You choose whether or not you...
Someone says something to you that's kind of shitty and you choose whether you decide to email them back something shitty.
Like you have that initial impulse.
Like, well, hey man, fuck you.
You have that initial impulse.
You think on it.
You sleep on it.
But why are you thinking on it and sleeping on it?
Are you doing that because of determinism?
Are you doing that because you're trying to be a better person?
And are you trying to be a better person because of all the factors that played out in your life?
Like...
Environment, genes, life experience, all those things.
It's a really good discussion.
bill ottman
So do you own the words that you're saying right now?
joe rogan
That's a good question.
bill ottman
Larry Lessig, who was on here the other day, you guys didn't even talk about this, but he basically is one of the founders of Creative Commons and this whole licensing structure for content.
Like what we're saying right now, this is going to be licensed.
I don't know how.
joe rogan
How's it going to be licensed?
bill ottman
You and I? Some form right here.
joe rogan
This discussion is going to be licensed?
bill ottman
Yeah.
I think you're licensing it in a certain way.
joe rogan
Okay.
bill ottman
So you have the ability to license it however you want.
You could say, hey, anyone can take this and cut it up and remix it.
Or you could say, no, it's locked down.
But he helped create this whole licensing array of like six different licenses.
One says, you can do absolutely anything you want with this.
Another says, you can share it, but you can't make money off it.
There's a handful.
And so...
The free will stuff is connected to how we're dealing with information.
And, like, if you...
Because if you think...
Realistically, we don't own what we're saying.
We're a part of it.
We're a conduit.
We're a unique conduit.
So I don't think it aligns with how the universe works to really be locking down information.
I think that it makes sense probably in certain short-term business ways.
But, you know, I think we have to open it up to what's really going on.
joe rogan
What do you mean by, like, locking down information?
bill ottman
Like source code.
Like classified files.
Like our content.
Like music.
Like video.
joe rogan
And now how does this connect to determinism and whether or not you have free will?
bill ottman
Because it's...
Are you the creator of your information?
Mm-hmm.
joe rogan
Well, you are certainly if you put in the work.
Like, let's say you decide to write a book.
I mean, you put hundreds and hundreds of hours into this book and edit this book and then you release the book and someone says, no, you didn't create that.
you're you're a product of determination and I'm gonna just steal your book that's intellectual theft intellectual theft is real it's it's certainly real in terms of a creation of content right if you are a stand-up comedian and someone takes your countless hours of work and steals it that's intellectual theft for sure and then they try to pawn it off as their own through their own selfish needs selfish means That's intellectual theft.
bill ottman
That's why attribution is the key part of the Creative Commons licensing structure.
Always saying, if you come up with a joke, you know, it came from here.
joe rogan
But, what if it's a profit?
Like, say if you wrote a book, and I say, hey, this is a great book written by Bill Ottman.
Give me five bucks for it.
I'm putting it up on my site.
Do it.
Fuck that.
bill ottman
I mean, here's the thing.
joe rogan
I... What if somebody makes all the money off of your book because they have a better platform to sell your book and they don't give it to you at all and you wrote the book.
You spent all the time.
You did all the work.
bill ottman
I would, for certain content that I create, completely give it away.
joe rogan
That sounds like a guy who's never written a book.
bill ottman
I've written a book.
joe rogan
Did you?
bill ottman
I mean, I've written a lot of content, yeah.
But have you written a book?
I give away – I've not published, but yeah.
joe rogan
But a book that you – like if you were an author.
bill ottman
But say if you were – I'm not saying people should be forced to do this.
I'm just saying that this, I think, is how creativity happens.
And I just don't – People deserve to make money on their content.
joe rogan
Right.
bill ottman
And you deserve to own your stuff.
But I don't think that that's actually how the universe works.
And I don't think it's acceptable to say, oh, free will doesn't exist.
I own your content.
joe rogan
Yeah, that's why I'm struggling to see how they're connected.
bill ottman
Because if you're not the originator, then you're not the owner.
joe rogan
That's a weird argument because you are the originator.
Stephen King wrote all Stephen King books.
unidentified
You are.
bill ottman
You're the unique conduit.
You are the originator of that specific configuration of information.
And you deserve to be able to do everything you're saying with it.
I'm just saying that...
I don't know.
It's complex.
joe rogan
Well, it is complex if you're saying that all human beings, essentially, all of your actions have been determined by a lot of factors that are outside of your control.
Whether it's genetics, again, life experience, education, all the different factors.
Your environment.
Is that what's causing you to put out A fucking brilliant record.
bill ottman
It's part of it.
Maybe you have 50%.
Maybe you have 50%.
Everything else has 50%.
I don't know what the percentage is.
joe rogan
But if you're a musician...
And someone like Spotify comes along and says, boot, you didn't even make that, dude.
So we're just going to put it on Spotify and make millions and give you pennies.
bill ottman
That's not what I'm advocating.
I'm saying Led Zeppelin uses the blues.
joe rogan
Well, more than that.
bill ottman
More than that.
There's real plagiarism.
But that doesn't mean that those aren't great records, obviously.
joe rogan
It's true.
It is true.
Yeah, I mean, Led Zeppelin is a legit gray area.
You know, I found out this...
Bill Burr called me up and left this really disturbed message.
He was, like, really bummed out when he watched...
And Bill's a musician.
He's a drummer.
And when he saw videos of Led Zeppelin music played and the band that used to open for Led Zeppelin, we played it on the podcast.
We were like, holy shit.
Like, they just stole stuff.
They just stole giant chunks and riffs and, you know, and...
I mean, they made it better.
I guess.
But yeah, but that's a different thing than Stephen King's book.
bill ottman
Why?
joe rogan
Because Stephen King had to spend countless hours in front of his laptop trying to go over each and every sentence and each and every paragraph and suck you in and rope you in and all this work.
No, they stole stuff, dude.
bill ottman
They sold certain phrases, but you think he didn't use a single phrase.
Anywhere in any of his books that he didn't pull from somewhere?
joe rogan
No, he certainly has.
Yeah, he certainly has.
I don't think it's the same, though.
bill ottman
I think it's similar.
jamie vernon
Led Zeppelin, they also had to spend countless hours recording that performance to get it to the level of awesomeness that we heard.
That wasn't easy to do.
joe rogan
They just did a bitch-ass move and they didn't pay those people.
bill ottman
Yeah, no matter what, you should be attributing.
If you're taking ideas, put it in the footnotes.
Why does it hurt?
It doesn't make your art worse.
joe rogan
Because then they'd have to admit they stole the riff for Stairway to Heaven from their opening band, and then people would go, what?
And then they would see it, and then they would look at Led Zeppelin differently.
But, you know, human beings are fucking severely flawed.
I don't know if I buy that with this idea that you're saying, in terms of authors creating content.
bill ottman
I'm not trying to sell something.
joe rogan
No, I know.
But if they are, I don't think someone should be able to copy their stuff and sell it.
bill ottman
I don't think they should either.
But what do you think they should be able to do it?
I think you should be able to decide.
joe rogan
Okay, you should be able to decide.
So if you're the content creator, you should...
Okay, I agree with that.
Yeah, it is, I mean, obviously I play devil's advocate a lot, but that's how you get to the bottom of these conversations.
But it is a very complicated issue.
The complicated issue of who you are and why you are who you are and who you are at this moment versus who you are a decade ago or two decades ago.
It's all very weird, you know?
I mean, you go back and think about stuff from high school and you're like, Jesus, am I really even that person?
Yeah.
I've talked to my sister about stuff that happened when we were in high school.
Hey, you remember that guy?
Oh, he said to say hi.
Is that even me?
Do I even know that person?
Is that really me?
If I see them again, I'll be like, oh yeah.
Oh yeah, we had 10th grade science together.
unidentified
Oh yeah.
joe rogan
Huh.
Crazy.
I ran into a guy from my high school a couple of weeks ago.
It was weird.
It was so weird.
You know, he remembered some strange story from English class.
And I was like, wow, you remember that?
Like, how weird.
And while he was talking to me, I'm like, is that even really me?
Like, is he even really talking about me?
Because I don't have any connection to the stuff that he's saying.
And I understand that he has this vague, distant, ghost-like memory in his mind of some slide images that he's pieced together that he recognizes as a past interaction.
I mean, it's...
Fucking strange.
bill ottman
It's super strange too, like in, you know, 50 or 20, 45, whatever.
You know, if your body can be replaced one piece at a time, as time goes on, then your body literally, you could survive, but your body is going to be like almost completely different.
joe rogan
Exactly.
It's like the boat analogy.
Was it Graham Hancock that used that analogy?
Somebody used this analogy of certain boats that are like really ancient boats that are on display and every single piece of them from the original boat has been replaced because they rotted away.
And you're like, okay, what am I looking at?
What is this really?
Yeah.
And that's kind of us.
And once that becomes a physical thing.
I met the guy who got his arm and his leg bitten off by a shark.
You ever see that guy?
He's got carbon fiber arms and legs.
John Joseph brought him to the comedy store.
jamie vernon
I met him at the UFC when you gave him tickets.
unidentified
I shook his hand and I was like, oh shit, that was weird.
joe rogan
Super nice guy, but he's got this...
It's like a carbon fiber hand and forearm that moves around like a hand.
He shakes your hand and then he walks with no limp.
He's got this carbon fiber, I think from the knee down the shark bit his leg off.
It's fascinating.
You're like, okay, you're still a person.
You're still here.
There he is.
There's a gentleman right there.
jamie vernon
Paul DeGelder.
joe rogan
Paul DeGelder.
Super nice guy.
But that is a fake arm that he's got from his arm being chomped off by a fucking shark.
See where it is?
From his right thigh, like mid-thigh down, and his right elbow down, all that shit chewed off by a shark, and he's still jacked.
Look at him.
No excuses.
bill ottman
And that's going to keep becoming more biological.
jamie vernon
Right.
joe rogan
Well, the real concern is, remember Six Million Dollar Man?
Do you remember that television show?
No, you're younger than me.
There was a show called The Six Million Dollar Man.
And The Six Million Dollar Man, he had been in some sort of a pilot accident.
And the gentleman, we can rebuild him.
We can make him better than he was.
Better, stronger, faster.
And they give him these bionic parts.
They gave him a bionic arm, and they gave him bionic legs.
And he could run like 60 miles an hour, like...
He would run like crazy fast and he had these artificial arms and artificial legs.
Then they had a bionic woman, same shit, except she was hot.
And she had artificial legs and I think she could see things that other people couldn't see.
Like one day, I mean that was cool when you'd look at that.
You're like, wow, look what he could do.
Like he got in a fight with Bigfoot on the TV show.
It's really stupid.
But one day people are going to be given the option.
bill ottman
Maybe it's an option now.
joe rogan
Do you want to keep your legs or do you want to get these legs that allow you to jump over a building?
bill ottman
I'm curious if there's really like superhuman projects that are going on where people actually can have these abilities.
We know that with classified information, it's just we know that there's stuff we don't know that are extraordinary projects.
So, you know, this being in the future, I feel like there's a disconnect between the state of technology on the planet Earth right now with, like, what the public has access to, with what the, you know, black projects have access to.
And that is really not cool because it's not fair for humanity to not understand what is going on.
joe rogan
I think that's true, but I also think that most of the state-of-the-art stuff is peer-reviewed, right?
I mean, there's so many different people working on these different technologies, like CERN. They're working on the Large Hadron Collider or anything else.
There's so many different people working on it.
The people that are at the forefront of the technology, unless they're all gobbled up by the dark government, You know, the people at the head of the line kind of understand where the technology is at currently.
For sure, for you and I, we don't know what the fuck's going on.
But I think you're right.
I think there's probably some government programs where they scoop up the wisest and the brightest.
And, you know, they got Oppenheimer, you know, and got him to develop the Manhattan Project.
There's probably some shit going on right now.
What do you think's happening?
What do you know, Bill?
Tell me.
bill ottman
I want there to be huge Freedom of Information Act reform.
We know there are trillions going into the black budget.
So Trevor Paglin wrote a cool book called, I think it was him, called Blank Spots on the Map.
And it just talks a lot about the black budget.
So we know it exists.
We know...
I don't know.
But it's holding us back.
But maybe – I'm not saying everything should be shared because what if you have like a bioweapon?
joe rogan
Right, right.
bill ottman
So we need to understand.
I think that we need to push the threshold with what the public has access to.
Like we need to go way deeper.
joe rogan
It's complicated.
bill ottman
Yeah.
joe rogan
It really is, right?
You know, it really is.
I really appreciate your perspective, and I really appreciate your point of view, and I really appreciate your ethics and what you're working towards with minds, and that's one of the reasons why I wanted to talk to you.
I think it is important.
And as much as I fuck around and play devil's advocate, I do that to try to get to, you know, how you're thinking and whether or not you've had these arguments in your own mind.
But I think, ultimately, I've said this before, and I don't know if it makes sense, because again, I'm not that smart.
I really wonder if there's bottlenecks for progress that we're going to run into.
And I think, ultimately, information is one of the big ones.
And information also, in a lot of ways, is money.
You know, I mean...
When we think of money, we're thinking of ones and zeros that are being moved around on bank accounts.
It's data.
I mean, it's attributed to different people and you get to do more things because you have more of these numbers and more of these things.
But what is it really?
It's not gold-based anymore.
It's not a physical material object that you're coveting.
Now it's some weird thing.
And it's kind of like information on a database.
And what if we get to a certain point in time, and I sort of feel like in this weird, vague, abstract way, we're moving towards this.
It's one of the things that when I really step back and wonder about this trend towards socialism and social democratic thinking, I wonder what that is.
And I honestly think that we're moving towards this idea that, hey, we've got a lot of fucking problems that could be cured if you move some of that money around.
But should you be able to move some of that money around?
And what happens if that money becomes something different?
What if people start developing social currency instead of financial currency?
What if your ability to do things was based on how much you actually put in?
I mean, we're assuming, right?
We assume that the way we do things now, where if you want to buy a car, you have to have $35,000.
That's how much a Mustang costs, and you got to bring it to the bank, and this and that, and you can prove a loan.
But what if we get to a time in the future where it's not these pieces of paper that give you material objects, but rather your own actions and deeds?
Provide you with social currency that allows you to go on vacations, or allows you to eat at restaurants, or allows you to do things, and there's this running tally.
That's not outside of the realm of possibility.
bill ottman
No, I think reward systems within everything that we're using are gonna rise up.
I mean, that's what we're already kind of doing.
I mean, we reward tokens for activity.
joe rogan
We're gonna see But what I'm saying is if we're doing it in – if it's a social currency and that your own personal behavior allows you to access more freedoms or more goods or more things, it would encourage people.
Positive behavior and community-based behavior because that would be the only way to advance.
I mean, obviously this is a long time down the line, but when the first caveman, you know, traded the first fucking shiny rock for the first spearhead, you know, whatever it was that they did that started this whole inevitable trend towards money, This is not something that has to be this way forever.
And I wonder, when we're looking at the distribution of information, which is arguably, not arguably, it's never been like what we have today.
There's never been a time in human history where everyone had so much access to information that you used to have to pay for.
You used to have to go to schools.
You used to have to earn your way to the position where you could open the very books that had all this information in it.
Now you just get it off your phone.
It's instant.
And this is a whole different way of interfacing with information.
I think this is going to affect higher learning institutes.
I think it's going to affect a lot of different things.
But I wonder if this all can be applied ultimately someday, maybe not in our generation, but someday to money, that people start using social currency.
And that social currency is going to be almost like we have some sort of a database of social currency in this country.
bill ottman
A distributed database.
joe rogan
Yeah.
bill ottman
As long as the government can be running on open systems, I think the reason we struggle with trusting the government to distribute wealth is because it's so inefficient.
We want to be deciding where it goes.
joe rogan
Well, they're also corrupt as fuck.
I mean, there's no doubt about that.
I mean, at the end of the day, that's a giant problem, period.
If the people that are deciding what we can and can't do with information are also corrupt, which, I mean, there's laws that allow them to be corrupt, but it doesn't mean that they're not corrupt, right?
bill ottman
I feel like every politician, the only politicians that I would support at this point, I want to be pulling us in a direction that is making their own position irrelevant.
Basically, building open, secure voting systems that allow the planet or the country to decide and vote on what we're doing.
I mean, you know, I just think that we need more accurate representation of the consciousness of the communities.
And it shouldn't just be these singular people deciding for everybody.
We have the tech.
joe rogan
Right.
And by the time they get in there, they're so compromised by the special interest groups that are helping them out and all the different people that are contributing to their campaign fund.
Do you see anybody like that on the horizon?
bill ottman
I think that there are – not specifically right now.
I don't see anyone talking about open systems and secure voting and completely changing the way that we're making decisions.
But I think that's probably just because they don't know about it.
I think there would be a lot of politicians who would be okay with that.
Or want us to move in that direction.
But I think we need more technologists, scientists in these positions building the things that we're using.
joe rogan
Yeah, and with an ethic of freedom.
unidentified
Yeah.
joe rogan
Yeah.
All right.
Dude, great conversation, man.
I really appreciate it.
Tell people how they can get on Mines, how they can check it out.
And do you guys have an app as well as...
bill ottman
We have an app.
You go to Minds.com slash mobile to get the app.
We're not on Google Play.
We are still in the Apple Store.
joe rogan
Google Play won't let you in?
bill ottman
No.
joe rogan
How come?
bill ottman
They're scared.
joe rogan
They're scared.
bill ottman
Yeah, the nipple.
But find me at Minds.com slash opman.
Hopefully we'll get you on there.
joe rogan
Yeah, well, I'm on.
I just...
Yeah, I haven't posted anything.
bill ottman
All right.
joe rogan
But you sent me my account.
Yes, thank you.
Appreciate it.
bill ottman
Let's do it.
joe rogan
Thanks, buddy.
Thank you.
Thanks for coming on, man.
It was really fun.
I think we got a lot out of it.
Thanks.
Export Selection