Alex Jones and Eddie Bravo join Joe Rogan to dissect media collapse, with Infowars’ 40–85M weekly listeners eclipsing CNN’s 1M. They debate pedophile networks tied to Democrats—like Anthony Weiner’s NYPD-investigated child exploitation claims—while Rogan cites Hastert’s conviction and Podesta’s brother’s 2007 Washington Post article. Jones links U.S. occupation to Afghanistan’s opium surge (3% pre-2001 to 93% by 2015) and geoengineering programs like SAI, citing $5B DOE budgets and John Brennan’s alleged admissions. Trump’s tax reforms and inauguration protests—including burka-clad women—are framed as elite backlash against dismantling globalist control. Ultimately, the episode suggests a hidden power struggle reshaping media, politics, and even human evolution, with Rogan’s platform as a key battleground for truth. [Automatically generated summary]
Really, it's just that we're covering the resurgence of America, what made the country great, lower taxes, empowering the people, bringing people together.
The opposite of what MSM... What's happening is mainstream media is literally almost dead.
It's collapsing.
I mean, look at you.
I mean, I remember having dinner with you like six, seven years ago, and you're like, yeah, we got a million downloads a week.
Now it's 90 million or whatever it is a month and 20 million on YouTube.
And for Infowars, it's similar numbers.
A good week's 40 million.
We've had as many as 85 million people listen on radio and tune into videos in one week.
That was election week, but our normal's 40-something million.
It's just crazy.
How can they compete with that?
They're still delusional.
The average CNN show has like a million viewers.
Fox thinks it's the big swinging dick.
It's got three, four million.
It's all, I'm sorry, people transmitting and broadcasting to geriatric homes.
It seems like those shows where you have to tune in from 8 to 9, and you have to sit through the commercials, that's kind of all gone away because of DVRs, because now people just have to wait a few minutes so you can DVR through all the commercials, or you record things after the fact.
Like, tigers sometimes will, like, adopt another little animal, like a wild dog or something, like be licking on it, being nice to it, and, like, won't the other ones eat it?
Remember, the only way you could see this before is with those animal attack videos.
Remember those?
They always started the same way.
They start off with a dog attack, a dog attacking a mailman, an iguana's out, attacked your leg, and then it slowly ends up with drunk Mexicans at a rodeo on a wild bull with a rope.
And those bulls are smart as hell and they drag them, these drunk Mexicans, and they drag their heads along the rails and just crush these dudes in between the railing like some serious...
Yeah, you were arrested early on in the Bush administration.
I remember when we first became friends in 1999, we were running around the White House or the state capitol lawn with George Bush Jr. and senior masks on, and you were always against the Bush administration.
That's why I supported Trump is the entire power structure, the media.
I mean, the Vatican, the Communist Chinese, the Saudi Arabians all put money in and said, stop him, stop him, and then lied and said the Russians were giving him money with no proof.
And so the issue is he's simply trying to actually be president and not have special interest in there running him, and that's why the whole power structure is against Trump.
So, and he was asking before we went live, well, how is it you're this outside guy against the establishment, but now you're for it?
No, Trump's trying to create a beachhead, just to explain it, to try to take the country back and actually devolve power back to the states and back to the people.
Doesn't mean he's perfect, but notice the stock market went up $1 trillion, $200 billion just in the last month or so because a lot of institutional investors and others understand with Trump he's trying to create real prosperity, not a bunch of social engineering.
And I'm not here to pitch Trump to people.
The issue is that there were major intelligence agencies and patriots in the government who were sick of what was happening and were sick of Hillary and Obama backing jihadist groups and other things.
And so they're rolling those groups up right now.
They really are strong.
And so there's been a counter coup through the electoral process in our country.
And that's what WikiLeaks was.
That wasn't the Russians.
That was U.S. intelligence agencies.
I said two months ago.
That Anthony Weiner in New York, Uma Abedin's husband, the former congressman that was working for Hillary, I said that he's under investigation for child porn.
And then now it came out yesterday that they're looking at indicting him for child porn.
Well, I had that from the NYPD. That came out yesterday?
I'm on record months ago saying that that's the case because I had those sources.
And so the government, good elements of the government know what's really going on.
So the media then misrepresented and said, oh, look at 4chan.
They're talking about a thing called Pizzagate and some pizza place in D.C. And the media looks at it and says, oh, Alex Jones is claiming all this bad stuff is happening at this pizza place.
I'm like, what is this?
So they divert some probably innocent pizza place to distract off of all the emails that the New York police have and the FBI have that's just this monstrous reported pedophile network.
So to discredit that, they go create a fake story hoping we jump on it to then divert over to that story.
And then once we're on that, it diverts everybody off from Anthony Weiner.
Sure, but then what happened is he goes on C-SPAN on the House floor and says, if you continue to investigate this, I'm going to expose half of you that are involved in this in this room.
And the investigation got shut down.
So the reason this is important is for shadow government, you need something so bad that everybody who's involved in it ever comes out will be destroyed.
What's crazy is this is, we're talking about two very specific cases, two very different cases, but what's crazy is they're both real.
It's both real.
100% Sandusky, who was a very respected man in the community, did a lot of charity work with young, disenfranchised children, and was molesting them at the same time.
It says, we plan to heat the pool, so possibly Bonnie will be Uber serviced to transport Ruby Emerson and Maeve Lozado, 11-9 and almost 7, so you'll have some further entertainment, and they will be in that pool for sure.
Not just of kids out on the Internet, but kids he's communicating with, and their parents are basically letting them communicate with him.
So I'm told this by NYPD detectives.
I mean, the Secret Service gave me information about how Hillary was collapsing all the time.
Remember, we reported that, and then it got caught on tape.
So all this stuff goes on and on and on.
And so I'm not saying half the people or 90% of them, you know, are guilty or innocent in all this.
All I know is we start covering it, start asking questions.
They then divert off into somebody on a 4chan forum pointing out there was some email about a meeting at some pizza place in D.C. where top Democrats go.
They then turn the whole thing into, I'm blaming some pizza place.
I'm sending shooters in to shoot people at a pizza place.
Make up all this crazy-ass crap when I never even said any of that.
And then, you go back to me two months ago, three months ago, I said, the police have told me they're investigating Wiener for pedophilia and child porn when it was not in the news.
So six grown-ups with two toddlers and two infants spread throughout the house, and sure enough, one of the toddlers was rubbing my nose at 545. What the fuck does that mean?
And then you've got Podesta's brother who's big in Washington.
In an article in 2007 in the Washington Post, I'm going to try to give you the exact headline, which was something like radical art or something, and it's like naked photos of the neighborhood kids in their house, and then they're showing it.
Throwing it in your face.
It's just crazy, but that's not even stuff I get into.
So she comes on my show, the story's on Infowars.com, and she says, we've got evidence, and then I had the hacking experts on, and I had the industry whistleblowers on, and I had the county officials on.
At every level, we have the fraud proven that Democrat-connected groups were already loading code onto machines all over the country.
But it's different companies, but about, I think it was 18% of the machines in the country, to be able to remotely break in and flip votes.
So, because they were aware of that, a bunch of states were waiting and watching, and Homeland Security broke in live into six states and kept trying to flip the results, and they even have screenshots and videos of them in the computers in there clicking and doing it all.
There's major investigations going on.
You hear the news going, Trump's crazy.
He claims illegals voted to make it about illegals.
That was one statement in a larger election fraud deal of actual computers.
So Trump knows about all this.
So she comes on and says, they're planning this fraud.
Then she comes on after the election and she says, yes, it's clear.
Here's where precincts closed.
Here's where all this happened, where 100% went for Hillary.
Or right after it closed, all the votes that then came in were 100% for Hillary.
They didn't even care.
But the landslide was so big for Trump, they couldn't steal it.
She successfully stole five states.
She tried to break into six others.
Or her controllers did, and got blocked.
The tsunami for Trump was so huge, with the real polling we can break down later, that they still weren't able to steal it, and now patriots inside U.S. intelligence agencies are preparing to roll up the pedophile networks nationwide.
That's why you've seen arrests in Pennsylvania, arrests in L.A. I haven't seen these arrests.
But how insane is it that this is still happening, right?
So all the people that thought that this idea that, you know, whether they tried to make it ridiculous by calling it Pizzagate or connecting it to a pizza place, everybody that thought that was ridiculous, it is not ridiculous that there could potentially be some sort of a pedophile ring.
They go pick some pizza place, probably have their people go on and make comments on some message board, CNN, New York Times, Washington Post, the same day come out and say, All the emails are discredited from New York and California and Hawaii.
Because there's this innocent pizza place over here that some of the Democrats go to, and they're all saying that's where the pedophiles are at.
So then the Internet all goes and looks at that and starts trying to prove, to disprove MSM, that, oh, there must be something going on there.
So then that turns that all into the big quagmire as a smokescreen from all the admitted stuff that's happening.
Because, again, I was told by my NYPD high-level sources that they've got all this stuff on Wiener's computer that just got scooped up.
During the whole hacking story and the whole story about Hillary and the unsecure servers.
And that as soon as Trump got in, they would go back after Weiner.
Then I was told by a former section chief from the CIA that indeed this was an operation they were running against him to start leaking all this.
And so what you're beginning to see is the beginning of all the pedophilia coming out as they roll up the procurers that grab your kids out of backyards or that go out as social workers and get the kids or whatever.
They're rolling all those up right now to get to Renfields.
Renfield brings the people to Dracula.
That's the allegory.
I'm not saying a real vampire.
And so they're going to now roll it up into the higher level groups.
Well, here's what's going on with a lot of this stuff.
You have to be real careful in how you describe these things and how you talk about these things because people are looking for any little tiny thing to discredit it.
And one of the reasons why they're looking at it, they're doing it for personal reasons because it seems...
No one wants to be ridiculous.
No one wants to be a fool.
And no one wants to be someone who's talking about conspiracies that aren't real.
So people are very hesitant to talk about something that's unproven, but horrific.
Just like Sandusky ran an abused children's shelter and group and then would take the kids out, sometimes overnight at rich people's houses to make them feel better.
And no one wants to believe that the assistant coach and that all these powerful people, but when he finally got caught, he was raping eight-year-olds in the showers at noon on a Saturday at the field house.
But the point is that all this happens and he comes out in the news...
Okay, through the White House organ, Breitbart, that's basically from Trump's mouth, and says, yes, we've confirmed high-level pedophilia rings in the Clinton operation.
And then he was also flying to this Middle Eastern country with this sheik that's admitted pedophile with multi-million dollar checks and Bill Clinton on the plane.
And Bill Clinton's a known sexual predator.
Okay, so all this stuff's going on.
So they start bringing up lawsuits against Donald Trump with Jane Doe's, claiming he'd been with Epstein, even though there's no proof in the law, because they make you log even on private jets.
And then they had me on the news and also Swan going, They said these people were killing kids in a basement.
They say, okay, Megyn Kelly went on and took a clip where I was talking about Hillary funding jihadis and Obama back in the Arab Spring that killed tens of thousands of people, hundreds of thousands of people, thousands of children, and how Al-Qaeda was putting kids, which is ISIS, into sex slavery.
They edited that out and then cut it together on Fox News with me saying, Hillary Clinton rapes and kills children in a basement at Ping Pong Pizza.
On October 30th, days after the FBI announced they'd be reopening an investigation into Hillary Clinton's emails, someone on Twitter, whose name remains unverified but has several thousand followers, posted that new emails found on Anthony Weiner's computer confirmed that Hillary posted that new emails found on Anthony Weiner's computer confirmed that Hillary Clinton was involved in a
The Twitter post included information from a Facebook user who stated, quote, my NYPD source said it's much more vile and serious than classified material on Weiner's device.
We're talking an international child enslavement and sex ring.
The next day, the bogus claim was picked up by a website called yournewswire.com, message boards like 4chan and Reddit, right-wing blogs, and several pro-Trump websites.
Infowars' Alex Jones, a far-right web host, posted a YouTube video seen almost 500,000 times.
unidentified
When I think about all the children Hillary Clinton has personally murdered and chopped up...
The rumor spread, inspiring some newfound internet sleuths to start digging around in John Podesta's hacked emails, searching for proof and location of the so-called sex ring.
unidentified
What they found were numerous references to pizza.
Am I talking about the devil worship story with her chief of staff or campaign chairman?
Looking at the menu of blood and semen and body parts at the Aleister Crowley event?
The private event?
Oh no, I'm not talking about that.
I mean 200,000 plus dead Christians with her operation with Syria.
And our operation in Libya and not letting the Christians get out and directing Al-Qaeda and ISIS who target and murder children and put them through sex slavery and throw Catholic priests off cliffs and kill people en masse and murder gays and everything else you can imagine because they don't like peaceful people.
And they con everybody.
They're for open society and they love everybody.
Anything they do is for degradation.
unidentified
And someone could have been killed inside of your restaurant for no good reason other than people like Alex Jones fanned a conspiracy theory that even the D.C. police say has no basis in fact.
...to drive across four state lines with an assault rifle and enter a family-friendly...
Restaurant at 3 o'clock in the afternoon on a Sunday.
I know Reddit has banned this topic on its website.
I mean, slowly but surely those who help ban it are trying to dial it back out of the safety, you know, out of concerns for the safety of those who have been endangered by it.
You were making a very provocative statement, and you made a very provocative statement by saying something kind of crazy at first, and then backing it up.
And so what they decided to do was just edit a chunk of that.
And so they didn't really have to edit it and chop it up, but they did take it as bizarre as it seems to take it out of context.
The spirit-cooking Aleister Crowley stuff where the lady has written, it's real for her.
And they go, and they take little kids to these parties, and they have vats of blood.
That's one thing if you were an adult and wanted to do that, you know, issue some art project.
This is real.
And so I was talking about the menu where they're in the email saying, you know, we're going to have plenty of blood, plenty of semen for you, and other delicious things on the menu.
And he's like, what are the juicies on the menu?
And they go, well, we're going to have cheese pizza.
We're going to have the nut sauce.
And we're going to have the pasta.
And we're going to have, you know, succulent hot sauce.
We love hot dogs.
We know you love succulent hot dogs.
What the fuck?
And they go, oh God, I want to go back to that place in Hawaii that had the best hot dogs.
You know, it's like, yes, we've got hot dogs.
And Obama wants $65,000.
Will the hot dogs deliver to the party?
Will the hot dogs be there?
And then it's in Stratford and CIA emails that got leaked by WikiLeaks that now people have cross-referenced where the CIA is like watching going, aha, look at Obama in Chicago, another hot dog party.
We're about five days into this, and the news hadn't even picked it up, and all my crew is doing is all day reading thousands of emails.
I mean, there's thousands that are just related to food and hot dog and kids and hot tubs and kid deliveries and, oh, the spirit cooking and, oh, Aleister Crowley and, oh, there'll be semen and blood.
I told my crew, I said, it's probably true.
No one's going to believe it.
Stop obsessing on it and stop reading these emails because I want to focus on the election and everything else that's happening.
So then sites start accusing me of...
I'm covering up the Podesta stuff before it's called Pizzagate, and then I get blamed for being behind Pizzagate, and I'm not even bitching.
I'm explaining what it's like to really be trying to get at the truth, and then people take the fact that it's complex.
She'd be better at this than me, Joe, because you know how to put stuff out clear and parse it.
People won't listen to me, because I've got too much data!
Can you imagine what this is like?
I mean, it's just, I'm sick of it.
I don't know everything that's going on, but I know this.
I have good CIA people and FBI and Secret Service, okay, telling me yes.
Yes, Alex, it's worse than you know.
Keep getting them.
It's going to come out.
And it's starting to come out and saying, watch, when we start arresting the pedophile networks, we're going to roll up the Democrats and the Republicans that are involved.
That's why Trump said in his speeches at the inaugural, this is not about parties.
We're taking these people on.
We're bringing God back in.
Even somebody that wasn't very religious like Trump has gotten religion learning about this.
Because let me tell you something, Trump's not a devil worshiper, and he loves God, and he's been briefed on all this, and he's going to roll their ass up.
And then when he stole the election from Gore, who I didn't even really like, I still came out and exposed it, and it's now been certified in Congress, and they've documented it.
And one of the things that really opened my eyes, this is a really important video that you did, 9-11 Road to Tyranny, where you talked about the World Trade Organization protests, and how they had sent in these...
People in government uniforms, with government-issued boots, and these anarchists that were dressed in black, and that this is an actual tactic that they'll use to break up peaceful protests.
Well, they'll send in soldiers or policemen or whoever the hell they're hiring, no one knows, and they send these people and they smash everything up, they turn into a violent protest, they light things on fire, and then they all hold up in a building.
And they negotiated their release, and none of them were ever arrested.
And when you showed this, clip by clip, from these various news organizations, and you focused on the kind of clothing they're wearing and the difference in their behavior versus the behavior of all the peaceful protests, and then showed the result of it, which had these people that were walking to work with a WTO sticker that had a line through it, and police stopped them and said, you can't have that sticker on that book bag.
We like to think, just like you don't like to think that pedophiles are real, you don't like to think that...
Anyone in the government would ever organize some kind of an attack or some sort of a fake event where a bunch of people that you hire to start smashing things to make a peaceful protest look bad.
We don't want to think that that's possible, but it is possible.
It turns out that this is actually a documented tactic.
Again, that's what's frustrating is a lot of the fake liberals, because I see myself as a real liberal, but a lot of the fake liberals just go, oh, that's a lie, this is a lie.
No, you can search engine.
Opium production in Afghanistan pre-2001, and then look at the latest years that's come out, like 2014-15.
It went from 3% of world supply to 7% to 30%, and after 10 years of occupation, it went to 93% of global supply.
That is a major deep state government program funded by Soros mainly, and they found the most effective way is anti-Israel bashing.
And so, this came out in the WikiLeaks last year, the U.S. Intelligence leaked, not the Russians, that he's in there saying, we're going to overthrow Israel, we've got to deal with Saudi Arabia, and we've got to, like, up the ante with anti-Israel rhetoric.
I'm somebody that was neutral in Israel, never been there, have nothing to do with it.
Israel has liberals, conservatives.
I'm not anti-Israel.
It's a tiny little place.
I know it does some things that are bad compared to what we've done.
It's nothing.
So I just don't have some giant hard-on for Israel, you know, wanting to hurt them.
And I'm not against the Palestinians or anybody else.
Everybody knows that.
So when they kill Israelis for no reason, I say it's wrong.
When they white phosphorus bomb Palestinians, I say it's wrong.
So I'm sitting there covering all that, and...
Then they just put out that I'm this Israeli agent all day long, or I'm this CIA agent.
By Soros and others, who's a real-life Nazi collaborator, like true Dr. Evil.
The latest James Bond was based on his real company.
It's even named after his company.
The bad guy in the movie is actually Soros.
He tried to crash the pound, bring down England.
He's really bad news.
So MI6 hates him.
But long story short about George Soros, he's funding this attack on me and any independent media.
How do you attack independent media when the public's awake to deep state and government and stuff?
You say Alex Jones is the government.
And then they always ignore real facts I talk about, where I admit some of my family and stuff that's worked for the government, and they said the government was corrupt and out of control.
If it's Fox News, if it's CNN, if it's anybody that's distributing news, you're in direct competition with someone who has an independent news organization.
They operate it themselves, and they do it online.
Sure, I think I put it on the web right after that.
Exactly.
I put it out on, like, DVD or something right before that.
But you just hit it, Joe.
So let me try to actually think and codify this then.
Because my problem is, I don't script what I say, and then it's kind of all over the map, which is a good thing and also a bad thing.
You just hit the nail on the head.
You ask your question, why do they call me fake news?
We just saw Megyn Kelly.
Two weeks before the election, say, in a whole hour-long show special against fake news, we've played a few minutes of it, Alex Jones is the king of fake news.
He just said Hillary is chopping up children inside a basement at a pizza place.
Now, granted, I was saying it in satire about her in the Middle East, so it begged for them to take it out of context, but they clearly did that to deceive their viewers.
She's branding herself, I'm real, you can trust me, look at this poor victim, Alex Jones almost got him killed, when none of it was true.
When none of it was based in reality, and what I was getting was from the NYPD, okay, and the FBI, who are good people, at least those agents.
So there's an example of them branding.
Take CNN. They'll take something real I've said, or they've taken videos where I'm acting stupid.
You know, with like 5X or 6X underwear that they're giving the illegals or whatever, and they'll show me with underwear on my head and say, look, this guy's crazy.
And I get it.
I cover serious topics so they can take it out of context.
But when I'm being serious, which is 90% of the time, I tell people.
But when Joe comes in and we've got, you know, Joey Diaz talking about, you know, kidnapping people, I start, you know, laughing or whatever.
But I'd like to, some today, really get into the big picture and what I believe is really going on, because I figured out the basis of what's happening.
And I'm going to let you, I mean, if you want to hear some far out stuff today, I think because what you experienced, I mean, I'll go through it.
What the mainstream media has said yes, but it's also he makes it easy for them by saying crazy shit like Hillary Clinton chops up babies and all that stuff And I know he's doing it for dramatic effect It's one of the reasons why a show is so popular because he does a lot of things like that It makes it easy for people to dismiss him and then you get into this thing.
Well, okay Let's before you dismiss them.
Let's look at what he said What has he said that's true?
And look at what he said.
Everything he said today, so far, we've been able to corroborate.
That's a thing, though, when you wind up doing a lot of podcasts, especially doing these radio shows like Alex does by himself, where he just rants and rants and rants for long periods of time, they develop a certain muscle.
There's a lot of guys who do their own podcasts.
Bill Burr is a perfect example.
He does his own podcast by himself all the time.
And he's got this ability to just rant from one subject to the next subject and keep going.
And when you have him on a podcast, you've just kind of got to get out of his way.
So with Alex, he just kind of...
I've got to feed him some subjects, get out of his way.
But every now and then, he does so many subjects in a row, I've got to bring him back.
Seeing Alex like this is going to help people have...
A chance to look at this whole picture of, just forget about where your loyalties lie, whether you enjoy CNN or Fox News or whatever it is.
Just sit outside of it right now and look at what it really is.
Because what it really is is, why does anyone want to give you the news?
Are they giving you the news because they love you?
Are they giving you the news because it's a program and they're trying to make money?
And do they have access to certain people because they're willing to play certain games?
Most likely, when you're looking at something that's on a major league television show, whether it's Fox News or NBC or CBS or whatever the fuck it is, you've had to go through some serious channels to get there.
If you're a guy with a suit and a tie, good evening America, and you're doing that guy on any of those major networks, you've had to go through some fucking serious hoops and ladders and checks and balances.
Represent something in order to be the person who reads the news, but what is that news for?
Is it a fucking show or is it really the news?
Are they really trying to help you?
What are they trying to do?
Why are they doing the news?
Are they doing it because they love you and care for you and they want you to be informed?
Or are they doing it because they're clearly biased and they've got an agenda?
Well, if you watch Fox News and then CNN, just go back and forth whenever there's something going on.
I did it after the election.
I was like, Fox News, CNN. Fox News, CNN. Who the fuck is telling the truth?
Someone's got to be lying.
One of you fucks is lying.
One of you fucks is lying.
Because there's one story over here and there's a totally different story over here.
All you need to know, just looking at that, just forget about what you are, whether you're a progressive liberal, whether you're a conservative Republican, just look at that and understand that you're getting all of your information.
From these sources that have a vested interest in relaying their particular version of the truth.
You know, actually, Q... I think you might be with the CIA. Every now and then, don't you want to be on that side and just have full access to the CIA? Don't hold that whiskey hostage.
My problem with it is that people want to use a real, you're a bigot, you're a this, you're a that.
They want to come up with a nice quick label and box you in.
It boxes you in and defines you and then you have to defend yourself.
I said it best at the beginning of this.
Donald Trump's not perfect.
He's a man, and he's also a super ambitious, super wealthy man that's constantly on the go, and those kind of dudes are type A, hyper-aggressive personalities, and he's definitely said some shit he shouldn't have said.
If Rihanna just talked about how she can fuck any guy she wants, just walks up to him, grabs him by the dick, we would be like, ah, that bitch is crazy!
Like, Eddie and I have talked shit so much to each other laughing, saying things we totally don't believe, we totally don't mean, but we're trying to make each other laugh.
This is one of the few things that I have really gotten wrong.
And I didn't go with my gut.
And so I was proven wrong.
And I did it for the wrong reason.
So now I'm going to actually confess.
I was on one radio station.
I've been on AXS TV for a few years.
I was on one radio station.
I already started a show out of my house that was on like 15 radio stations.
So I had that at least.
But I was on one big radio station.
Had the top show at night.
Stationed with Howard Stern.
Was a killer.
Was all over the newspaper.
Had huge ratings.
And I was bringing in like 20, 30 grand a month, which was just a huge amount for me.
Building a whole operation out of that at home.
And they come to the sales guys and they go, look, for a year you've not been behind Y2K. And you're not letting us have all these big sponsors, and you're going to basically be fired if you don't let us endorse these sponsors and have them on air and say you believe in Y2K. Hold on a second.
This is one of the few times in my life that I... I don't want to say I didn't have integrity.
I kind of let them convince me.
But I think back to the point in the conference room, I just kind of went, okay, okay, okay, sure, I get it.
And then I went, and then once I decided it was true, I really pushed it.
So it's almost like I lied to myself, because I'm being honest about this process.
So this is what happened.
For like a year and a half, I'm saying it's BS. It's a government hoax because they're like, the Navy says the chips are all bad and 54 cities will completely fall and it's all the death.
And I said, they just want to upgrade with all this new spy hubs.
They want a new global standardization for the U.S. It's the Telecommunications Act of 96. They want to force all the new chips because I had NSA sources then that I was having on, okay?
And I didn't realize how special it was that I had these sources.
They're telling me it's all BS. And people are like, don't argue with the Navy.
And Fox News had ads to get your food.
It was just everywhere.
So I went, okay, hell, okay, stuff's going to be real.
See when you start talking about the end of the world or doomsday coming people like that shit because it gives them something to think about But here's a lot of people Future I know I'm not doomsday.
It was a long time ago 17 years ago, right?
Why 2k 17 fucking years ago at least and 2012 didn't get you so I redeemed yourself.
Yeah, you can 17 think about 17 years ago.
This That's a long time ago.
Getting fired from that job, every great radio guy's gotten fired.
The point is, his name was Raymond Teague, and if you look at Mission Control, he was the main guy on Mission Control that controlled the cameras and everything.
And he...
I've been to his house.
He had national security letters from the president.
He'd run, like, secret operations in Cambodia and Laos.
You think Kennedy and the government and everybody and Nixon are going to have this giant thing about America's number one and not have a backup plan if the astronauts die?
I know he lives here in L.A., and one time I ran into him, but we'll just leave it at that.
And he said, I want to come on your show.
And I said, all right, well, come on.
And it's the only interview he said, and he goes, I'm going to tell you, Alex, and your audience alone, he said, there is an obelisk, just like 2001, it's on the moon of Mars, the sole moon, and it's sending a transmission, and it's all real, and it's all Egypt, and there's aliens and everything else.
He said, you know India is sending a probe to the moon, and they'll announce that when they crash the probe, they found the undersea frozen ice that covers the moon.
The moon has dust on it.
It's a big water ball.
It's gonna be the water we need to get off the planet, and we make our big jump.
So the whole point is, notice everything's laid out on the planet, just perfect for humanity.
I'm telling you, Buzz Aldrin told me in a year it's going to be on the news that they discovered water with a probe they're sending before they were even sending a probe in the news.
They let India, quote, find it.
Because the U.S. already found it.
It's already been on the moon God knows how many times.
The word is they've got military bases on the other side.
The moon impact probe, which crash-landed at a designated site on the lunar south pole on November 14, 2008, had picked up some clear signatures of water during its 25-minute descent.
I've been talking about this forever, and Joe, I'm not bashing you, but you had your TV show made jokes about it, which I get, because a lot of it's BS. There is an entire atmospheric, terraforming, geoengineering manipulation.
They don't call it chemtrails, and of course the CIA director admitted they have this huge program.
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation owns the major patents on it from Westinghouse and others.
They use these big antennas to manipulate the weather they can.
So the idea behind this was they wanted to do research on the Aurora, and didn't they want to see if they could communicate using it and send radio waves to bounce off the atmosphere?
Only a micronic amount, a small amount of what HAARP does is in the atmosphere.
It's bouncing off the aurora borealis and then resonating back through in a deep earth communication program to satellites and other things through the planet.
So it's something you can communicate to satellites, through the satellites down to the submarines.
The facility's transmitters send radio waves upward.
But hold on, let's just read it first.
Waves upwards into the ionosphere between 100 and 350 kilometers of altitude.
The resulting heating effect creates irregularities in the electron density there, which in turn allows communication signals as from satellites to be relayed off the ionosphere.
Ideas for barges to pump cold water from the depth of the ocean to create some sort of a roadblock for the hurricane.
Since hurricanes pull power from the water's warm temperatures, cooling the water could have theoretically lessened the impact to outright dismantle the hurricane.
They're coming out saying, hey, there's going to be some countries that aren't going to be for it, and we've got to figure out how we're going to deal with them.
My dad's farmhouse, when my dad was a kid in the 1950s, for three, four months out of the year, it was below zero or freezing, and you had to chop wood, and you'd freeze your ass off, and all houses had, even in the South, had...
You know, had all sorts of chimneys in them for fireplaces because it was freezing cold.
Let's play the video of this CIA guy talking about it, because what I inferred from it is that they're trying to come up with some sort of solutions if global warming becomes a giant issue.
No, their answer is, give George Soros and the U.N. total power for a $100 trillion per decade global tax to micromanage and surveil everything humans do.
Because if carbon's toxic, they've got to surveil it.
Thus, they have a jurisdiction to control our lives.
CIA director admits chemtrails, geoengineering, stratospheric, aerosol injections.
Guys, the Council of Foreign Relations wrote a white paper calling for it.
Hold on, hold on.
At the Council, admits geoengineering in the form of stratospheric aerosol injections, SAI, is taking place, i.e.
chemtrails.
And the rebuttal is, nowhere in his speech is there an admission that an SAI program has already taken place.
The part where Brennan mentions geoengineering is just one example out of several not-often-mentioned issues that the CIA monitors for potential That's totally possible.
All right, I'm going to go back, because we took Eddie's turn on chemtrails, but we did it to sidetrack from what you were saying about the moon.
And I want to go back to what you're saying.
Because you were saying that there was two completely different missions, and one of them was real, and that there was some sort of contact with aliens.
I was told by a top NASA individual, Raymond Teague, that indeed there was a breakaway program and that he heard and saw transmissions on some back channels.
Of real feeds and advanced ships that he'd never even seen that basically didn't even look like they were anything that he could imagine that was classified.
And he knew about some classified programs.
For every program you saw, there was at least 10 programs that were secret.
That's admitted about NASA. 90% secret or more.
And so he knew about a bunch of classified programs, and he was seeing...
Transmissions and things coming back and talk to people about a whole breakaway program they sent that was a lot safer, a lot bigger than the moon.
And they had guys up in orbit just basically so that even other foreign governments from the trajectory point would think they were getting transmissions back from the moon.
So they had people out, basically out outside the regular orbit where you just go around in circles, or is it geosynchronous where you're in one spot, transmitting back from a mathematical spot to look like transmissions to fool the Russians and everybody while the real mission was going on on the moon.