Steve Volk, author of Fringeology, challenges skepticism with Rupert Sheldrake’s telepathy study (32% success rate) and the Ganzfeld test, while Joe Rogan—despite dismissing most psychic claims as "bullshit"—acknowledges anomalies like Sorrels’ 2008 Stephenville UFO sighting, later harassed by military forces. They explore lucid dreaming’s emotional benefits, from LaBerge’s nightmare therapy to Volk’s Kindle-priced book ($1.99), and critique materialist science’s rejection of free will, citing experiments where belief in determinism increased cheating. Psychedelics like DMT and McKenna’s "stoned ape theory" reshape perspectives on consciousness, even for figures like Dawkins, while fringe research—from Dean Radin to Sheldrake—demands open-mindedness beyond Randi’s dogmatic debunking. Science’s blind spots may hold answers to humanity’s deepest mysteries. [Automatically generated summary]
Well, expect one of those shows, ladies and gentlemen.
Expect possibly a few O'Brien moments.
This podcast is brought to you by Kerosene Games.
We're brought to you by a bunch of things, but everything we're brought to you by we believe in.
That is our 100% pledge.
We're never going to sell you dog shit.
We're never going to sell you something that's not good.
We've been offered a lot of different things that we didn't agree with, that neither Brian nor I thought were Interesting or just, you know, stuff that it just didn't seem like it was something that we should be endorsing.
So that's what we're trying to do.
We're trying to only endorse shit we would use and stuff we believe in.
And this Kerosene Games is a brand new startup and they have games that they're developing specifically for iPads.
And for iPhones and high-end Android devices starting in February.
And what it is, is a lot of the games, especially like really high-end, big, beautiful games, a lot of them, they start out making them for consoles or they start out making them for a PC. And then they port it over to an iPad.
That's not what these guys do.
What these guys do is they make badass games right out of the box for iPads and touch screen devices.
All, you know, the various Intuitive controls that they've put into these games.
They've put in and designed for use with an iPad, so it doesn't feel clunky at all.
The graphics are fucking awesome.
It's a really cool game, and I've gotten nothing but positive feedback from people that went out and bought it.
In Vegas, this chick was telling me that they took the real technology from that bracelet and they incorporated it into their own, but that bracelet was ripping people off, but this shit works.
I go, you got a hologram.
I go, what is that?
Is that a hologram?
Like, what's it called?
What are you calling it?
What are you calling it?
You got a piece of plastic on your wrist.
If you believe it, it makes you feel better.
A lot of how you feel is affected by your attitude.
A lot!
And if you truly feel like you've been gifted with this fucking rubber band around your wrist that makes you move better, you're gonna start thinking like a person who moves better.
Because that's a big part of what's fucked up about you, alright?
Get it together, bitches!
So in that vein, I would be very sensitive to anything that I thought was a placebo.
The science behind AlphaBrain is all rock solid.
You can look it up.
You can look up all the different various ingredients and the history of human use of these ingredients, including things like memory tests.
There's a lot of shit that people have learned about the efficacy of nootropics.
And the weight of evidence clearly sides on the idea that Vitamins and nutrients we know affect human performance.
We know they affect your body's ability to recover, your body's ability to be nourished in a way that allows it to move and function and operate at its optimum levels.
I'm a big fan of supplementation.
I'm also a big fan of eating right.
I think that's one of the most important and underlooked things.
People just don't get enough fucking vegetables in their diets.
And one of the reasons we started selling these Blendtec blenders at Onnit.com is for that very reason, to try to encourage people.
If you want to really be healthy, go to the supermarket as often as you can.
Go three, four times a week if you can.
Get kale and cucumbers and celery and garlic and get some sort of fruit like an apple so it doesn't taste like death.
Throw it in there with some coconut oil and rock that shit every morning.
You'll be a new human being.
You're just getting this big wave of nutrients first thing in the morning and then go about your day.
Take some multivitamins.
Take some protein supplements and get some fucking workouts in.
You can go get some kettlebells at Onnit.com, and we even have a DVD you can follow.
Try to follow it, you'll fucking puke.
It's the Extreme Kettlebell Cardio Workout.
It's brutal.
It's a brutal DVD. I can't get through it with a 35-pounder.
I know dudes who can do it.
It's a crazy workout, man.
And we sell that.
We sell everything to make you man the fuck up and get your shit together.
And if you use the code name Rogan, You will save 10% off any and all supplements.
As for my t-shirt, higherprimate.com, those t-shirts, they're selling out faster than I can make them.
I'm sorry.
I appreciate that everybody's trying to buy them.
There's nothing I can do.
We put it in order, and I made a much bigger order this time.
So thank you for all the people that are buying them, though.
It's higher-primate.com and I think most things are out of stock right now.
Sorry, you fucks.
Look, we got Steve Volk here.
He is an author about all things freaky and we're gonna get down to business.
We're gonna start this party.
As soon as Brian knows how to press that button, there's an issue here.
unidentified
The Joe Rogan Experience.
Train by day, Joe Rogan Podcast by night, all day.
Fringeology is your book, and dude, when Matt Staggs, our publicist, requested you or suggested you, I was so all over this, because this is so right in my wheelhouse of shit that I enjoy.
Bullshit and stuff that might not be bullshit, you know?
But there's a lot of people that almost immediately discount anything fringe, whether it's psychics or whether it's, you know, I've gotten angry people over the last couple of weeks, like angry emails and angry tweets, because I suggested that something might be going on when because I suggested that something might be going on when you think about someone and the phone calls, the phone rings and it's them.
And people are like, oh, you're attaching that to it.
This is a person you think about all day.
Sam Harris had some very logical points.
And I agree with him, absolutely, for the most part.
But there are specific isolated instances where you feel something and then something happens, where you know someone's looking at you.
Yeah, and I have to tell you, the chapter on telepathy in particular scared the hell out of me because I had gotten so used to hearing the skeptical line, there's no evidence, there's no evidence, there's no evidence, that I really expected to find no evidence.
I thought I'd be ostracized within the profession of journalism, you know, for saying this.
But the fact is there's a really high level debate going on between really smart people about the proper way to slice and dice these studies in terms of analyzing the statistics that are generated.
And we can't at this point really be sure whether or not psi, as they put it, that's the whole field of telepathy, whether or not psi exists.
But there's a lot of really strong evidence that would suggest it does.
And I mention this in my book.
A couple of the leading skeptics, Chris French, Richard Wiseman, have both allowed that by the standards of any ordinary science, telepathy is proven, right?
So if they were just judging kind of a pharmaceutical and looking at the same sorts of numbers that these guys are generating, they would say, okay, something's happening here, right?
There's an effect.
But because it's a, quote, extraordinary claim, we don't understand the physics of this, what the mechanism would be that would allow for telepathy, we need greater evidence.
Well, again, this is Wiseman in French who I'm quoting, but they would say that, like, say something like the Gansfield test, if you're familiar with that.
They'll have, there's many different ways to set it up, right?
But one of the ways to set it up is you've got a person who is the, one of the test subjects has halved ping pong balls put over their eyes, right?
They have white noise being pumped into their ears, and they're put into a very comfortable chair where they're just sort of kind of suspended.
So there's very, very little input into the system at that point.
And they're the receiver, right?
And they're in a soundproof room, so they're getting no normal input whatsoever, but they're supposed to just kind of go within, right?
Listen to themselves, what thoughts occur to them, and start reporting back on what it is that they're seeing in their mind's eye, hearing in their mind, that kind of thing.
And in another room, The sender is actually, they're in a soundproof room too, locked away from the receiver.
They're looking at some sort of stimulus.
They're looking at an image on a computer, perhaps, or photos in front of them.
And they are trying to send that image to the person in the other room, who they may or may not know, depending on the study.
And then there are four target images that are then presented usually in the best studies that an impartial judge will look at a transcript of what the receiver said, right?
And then they'll have four images in front of them, one of which was the target that the sender was actually trying to mentally send to the receiver.
And you would expect that if the person with, you know, the ping pong balls over their eyes got absolutely nothing, then the judge would select the correct image one out of four times.
But instead, you do enough trials and the meta-analyses on these when they crunch all the numbers from all the studies together shows more like a 32% effect.
Instead of being right one out of four times, they're right 32% of the time.
And this, Wiseman in French would allow that these studies are generally well controlled enough that if this was an ordinary claim that was being presented, this is fine and we would accept this as evidence that something's up here, some kind of information transfer.
The problem is, because we don't understand the physics of how this would work, they say we need greater evidence than this.
And they keep asking for greater and greater levels of scientific controls to be put on the studies, and they keep finding ways to reject the result.
But what's interested in that 7%, I mean, if it's really statistically real, if the study hasn't been fucked with, The idea is that it's just a little bit.
The idea is that there's this weak signal that we're not normally picking up on, especially look at the way we live now, where we're constantly being bombarded by information and input and just stimulus.
But when you shut all that out, And you close your eyes, and you don't have any sound that distracts you, what's there?
Are you receiving any kind of accurate information?
And I found the research really tantalizing, and I also, like I said, I found it scary, because I thought, well, here I am now, I'm going to write that, you know what, when they tell you there's no evidence, that's kind of bullshit, right?
In fact, there is some evidence, and the question is whether or not it's risen to the level yet where we have to accept it.
Back in the day, when we were, you mentioned before, the sense of being stared at.
There's been some really good research on this.
Again, one of the skeptics I mentioned, Richard Wiseman, did a study with a woman named Marilyn Schlitz, where they collaborated.
And they did three separate studies trying to figure out whether or not somebody could sense that someone was staring at the back of their head.
And they had real nice controls on it.
Wiseman was part of the experiment.
Two out of the three times they did it, they got, again, a statistically significant effect where people were right far more often than chance would have suggested.
And if you think of it in an evolutionary sense, which I do in the book, right, is that Back in the day when we were being hunted all the time, when we didn't have the kinds of fortifications we have now against the angry packs of wolves that are out there, we would have needed to have this ability to know that we're being stared at.
And so the people who are best at finding these hidden explosive devices just can tell that something's It just feels off in this area, and then they start focusing in on what...
I've actually done a lot of police reporting in my past, as well as, you know, this book.
I mean, it's kind of generally, I read about cops, crime, courts, politics, that kind of thing.
And I've spent a lot of time with cops.
And there's one homicide detective I know who absolutely And he's actually a religious guy, which is sort of interesting.
He hates psychics.
They have led him on so many, or tried to lead him on so many wild goose chases.
They screw with him when he's in the middle of a tough homicide investigation.
He's getting phone calls.
Sometimes one of his higher-ups will be, maybe you ought to listen, maybe you ought to hear this out.
You know, he cannot stand them.
But I recently met, and I've really, I've got to follow up with this guy.
And I haven't yet.
But I met a retired homicide detective who told me he wanted to talk to me because he has worked with a psychic who gave him good, actionable information on multiple occasions.
You know what, Joe, there's a couple of cases that are still sort of tantalizing out there that maybe something happened, maybe they did get actual information, but for the most part, if you've watched the Psychic Investigators show, what's really sort of funny about it is that even when they're saying that this information was so valuable, usually if you're really paying attention, it's not actually the information that broke the case.
It's information that after the fact seemed to fit.
And so I'm still, you know, I'm still, well, I'm still skeptical of everything, but I'm skeptical of the psychics helping detectives.
But I'm really open to it because, again, if there is this sort of weak signal out there, you know, that occasionally we pick up on, well then maybe sometimes it provides actionable information.
I think when you smoke pot, you get a little more psychic.
There you go.
Make that a quote.
Go ahead.
Use that to discredit me.
Take it in context, though.
I think you become super sensitive.
You become very aware if people are creepy.
Very aware of people who are angry.
Very aware of weird tension.
It makes you really sensitive.
It makes you really aware of bad acting too.
It's tough to get high and watch some bad acting.
You're like, whoa, you're fucking faking it.
And that is sort of like what acting really is.
The best actors...
Can lock into a role so deeply that they almost must believe it in themselves because they're convincing you, even though you know it's Daniel Day-Lewis.
You know he's not really an Irish boxer.
You believe it because he's tricked you.
He's bypassed all of your psychic energy.
But when you're high and you watch someone faking the funk, you're like, oh, what are you doing up there?
So I grew up with a ghost story, a ghost that was supposedly in my house.
This stuff happened when I was five or six years old, so I have very fragmented memories of it, but it was a...
It really sort of starts with the cliché.
It was a thing that went bump in the night.
Only it bumped, it thudded, it boomed.
It happened only at night.
It would go on for tens of minutes at a time.
It sounded like it was coming from somewhere upstairs.
So my parents on the first floor thought it was on the roof of the house.
My brother and I on one side of the house thought it was on the roof over our heads.
My sisters in their room who did not share an adjoining wall with us thought it was on the roof and or in there up high in the walls and at first that's what it was.
It was this noise but it was so loud it would wake everybody up and it would go on for a while and my parents hunted for Uh, prosaic explanations, um, didn't fit with like a water hammer or anything with the plumbing, didn't fit with the house settling because of how long it went on.
And, um, my sister started reporting stranger things.
It's really movie shit, right?
They started reporting that, um, their bed frames would shake in the middle of the night and wake them up.
They claimed that they saw a woman walk right through the room, um, you know, literally a ghost, right?
My parents, and I find this really important, my parents set that aside and discounted it for a couple of reasons.
It was coming from kids, and who would want to believe that that's true?
I mean, I think one of the things the skeptics always do is say, you know, it's sort of wishful thinking and superstition, that people hear a noise, And they leap to ghosts, but my family didn't.
And so they spent nine months or a year trying to recreate the noise in various ways, trying to figure out what it was.
And when my sisters would tell these crazy stories, they were just kind of like, number one, they didn't want to believe it.
Who wants to believe your daughters are being terrorized at night, right?
But finally, and I was raised Catholic, and we hadn't fallen out of the church yet.
That was still coming.
But my dad went to the family priest.
And he told him what was going on because he had run out of other answers.
And the priest said, you know, usually in cases like this, which I always find that language interesting as well because it implies he does this on a fairly regular basis, usually in cases like this I come over and I bless the house.
So he came over and I remember this vividly because to have Father Crowley come into the house with the vestments on and swinging Like, the incense around and praying in Latin was intense, right, as a kid.
I was like six, he was God himself, you know, standing up on that pulpit.
And he comes into our house, he's swinging the incense around, and he leaves and he says to my dad, so long, Jerry, I'm sure everything will be fine.
But that night, actually, things got worse.
The booming went on longer and louder than ever before, and for the first time, it seemed to locate in a specific spot.
So instead of coming from this sort of amorphous area somewhere up on the roof, it hits at the top of the stairs, the landing, and then it came downstairs, like one step at a time.
My father said it sounded like a kid throwing a tantrum.
And when it hit the bottom floor, they could feel the floor shake under their feet, my parents, and we never heard it again.
And so I grow up with this story, and I think of it as, you know, for a long time, all the way through adolescence, it was just sort of a, I don't know, man, an article of faith.
Like, I didn't even question it.
It just was.
But, you know, you get into college then, and you start meeting other people, and you start getting familiar with critical thinking, and you're like, what the hell was that?
And so whatever memories I have it are very fragmentary.
But I gotta tell you, Joe, when I asked my parents about it for the book, and I actually interviewed them, I knew someday I was gonna write about this, right?
I interviewed them many years before I really settled on this is the book I'm gonna write.
And I actually sat them down and I recorded it.
And I will never forget, when they were describing that last night when it came down the stairs, They turned white.
They held hands across the table.
They were still frightened just by the memory of it.
So for them, whatever it was, was tremendously real.
And I wanted to explore that and see, well, could there have been anything strange there?
Could they have possibly somehow, and my brothers and sisters too, could we all have somehow imagined all this?
And so that was part of my inspiration for the book.
In 1975, we weren't walking around with these HD cameras.
unidentified
I get courtroom sketch artists and just put them on every corner of the house Courtroom schedule is the dumbest thing ever that they still have to use someone to sketch what's happening.
It's like we're not supposed to be able to see inside the sacred courtroom where the decisions are being rendered and So instead, here's an artist's depiction of the action.
It'd be even weirder if someone's fucking staring at you and drawing you.
That's even weirder, man.
Imagine, you know, you're talking about your experience and trying to tell the truth, the whole truth, and some fucking weirdo's eyeballing you and drawing your face.
So as the years went on and I would share that story, I stopped sharing it because I was starting to run into more and more people who were totally adamantly opposed.
Not only opposed to the idea of ghosts.
I'm pretty suspicious about the idea of ghosts.
They were adamantly opposed to the idea that there was even a mystery there.
And so that's kind of what I hold out for in the book, that sometimes we just need to be able to admit – just say the words I don't know what happened.
People want to rush to some kind of conclusion whether they have enough evidence or data or not.
And I ran into people over the years who would insist it had to be a water hammer even though it doesn't fit the story at all.
Yeah, sudden flow of water stops, and then you get that sound because the energy of the water built up is converted to acoustic energy because it's got to go somewhere.
Yeah, and it doesn't last that long, and it doesn't make that kind of noise, and it doesn't sound like it's coming from your roof or last tens of minutes, and it certainly never locates on the steps.
Yeah, so in the end you kind of have to trust, or not, right?
That's the question you're left with.
Do I trust my mother and father's account, my sister's account, my brother's account?
And, you know, on some level I do, but can I really buy into the idea that there are ghosts?
I mean, so one of the things I explored, and I found this really interesting, I mean, there are people out there working with sort of other technologies to determine if maybe there's an abundance of electromagnetic energy in the air in certain areas, then it fucks with your temporal lobe, then you have...
And a guy working with infrasound, a guy named Vic Tandy did research on infrasound.
It's a level of sound beneath even the range of human hearing.
But it actually has an effect.
It can create a sense of pressure and an easiness in your chest.
It actually can even impact sort of the eyeball, the actual vibration in the air, and cause you to see cloudy shapes when there aren't any.
I don't think any of those can necessarily explain Whatever happened in my house either, but what I like about it is at least here somebody's thinking creatively and not thinking so poorly of their fellow human that they just, yeah, you heard a creaking floorboard and you jumped to a fucking ghost because you're that stupid and that's superstitious.
These sorts of explanations, I think, grant people the proper dignity to be, that they're reporting things at least somewhat accurately, right?
Something really unusual was happening It's a very unfortunate reality that we live in that I can't trust anybody to tell me what really happened.
So when a legitimate event, if a legitimate event occurs, it's immediately dismissed.
If you really looked at how many strange things exist both in the natural world and in the world of space, just the world of dark matter and supernovas and All those things are way crazier than ghosts.
The idea that life exists at all, that you can see with eyeballs.
That is just as freaky as something that Used to live, but its essence in some form stays for some reason.
I think the idea that this dimension that we live in is super concrete and, you know, just because you can hit it with a fucking bald fist and push it into a street and watch a car slam into it.
You're dealing with real solid objects, and that's all there is here.
I don't necessarily buy that.
I don't believe in most of what I hear in terms of psychics and psychic readings and ghost stories.
I think most of it's bullshit.
But I think it's very possible that something remains of you and that you're not just skin tissue and bone tissue and blood.
There might be something going on and that something might leave your body and exist in some other state in almost an inaccessible Environment that parallels us.
And that's not outside the realm of possibility.
It sounds so woo-woo, but it's not.
It's not because life itself, the whole idea that your body is just this big chemical reaction and electromagnetic impulses and all that's crazy.
Neuroscientists can't yet answer the basic question of how consciousness is produced.
Right.
So how we get from the physical stuff of the brain To non-physical, subjective experience is a complete and total mystery, and yet it is the thing that really defines our lives, our internal experience of the world, and there's no explanation for it.
I actually looked at this a little bit in the book.
Doctors will assess How severe a person's injury was by coming up with a degree of memory loss, like asking them, what's the last thing you remember before the injury?
What's the first thing you remember after the injury?
And the longer the blank period, the more hurt you are.
I looked at near-death experiences in the book, and so that's one of the things that drew me in there, because what's weird about these guys is that, and girls, is they oftentimes come back with a totally flowing memory of an event that should have knocked Their memory producing capabilities offline for a certain amount of time, and yet somehow didn't seem to.
And I'm okay with saying, like, with the near-death experience, I take a lot of flack, really, from both sides, because believers will contact me and say they're upset that I won't come out and say that, you know, the near-death experience is smoking gun evidence that there's an afterlife.
You know, I don't think it is smoking gun evidence that there's an afterlife, but I also don't think it's yet been explained.
And again, we end up back in this place where Everybody wants to act like they know everything.
Everybody wants to push everything to a conclusion.
I think the most rational thing to say is we don't fully understand that experience yet, you know?
Let me tell you, I'm just going to cut straight to the chase, the best evidence that the NDE has to provide.
This is the best.
Janice Miner Holden, a researcher, did a study where she went through all the medical literature and all the research that's been done on NDEs so far.
And she tabulated veridical perceptions, so accurate and true perceptions that people got while, quote, out of body.
And what she came up with is that out of 38 cases in the medical literature where people were able to recount what was going on in the room when they were flat-lined.
Like seeing themselves above the table, like that kind of stuff.
Yeah, all that stuff, right.
When they were in this sort of severe physical distress, 35 of them were accurate in every detail they reported.
Two of them had minor errors, the sort of errors I'd have, you know, if I was trying to describe what I had for breakfast today.
Now the skeptical response to this is that the researchers themselves, Would have suppressed information that wasn't accurate because they were so blown away by what they were hearing that they went ahead and only recorded sort of the positive responses because the negative ones weren't making any impact with them, weren't landing with them.
And the other thing they'll propose is that, well, maybe...
We'd have to go back through every last study to figure out what research materials they had in every case.
But that's just one objection they lodged.
The other objection they lodged is that, well, maybe they had some sort of anesthesia awareness.
If the person was on anesthesia, sometimes you're still aware of what's going on in the room.
So they'll lob that one in there, too.
Or they'll say that, they'll call it perfusion, Of blood to the brain.
Maybe they were getting cardiac massage.
And that does supply a certain amount of blood to your brain.
So maybe some part of the brain was still operating and able to retain a certain amount of information.
But it just, these are possibilities.
These are ideas that maybe explain it, but 35 out of 38?
It's remarkable.
And it's enough to push it into that area where you have to say, you know, Maybe something is going on here.
I mean, do you ever feel in a psychedelic experience that you get accurate information, not just stuff that your mind is coming up with, but some sort of signal or contact with something that's, quote, real?
Absolutely believe that they're in contact with entities and there's other people that believe that you're just accessing the imagination and the mind is interfacing with distortion of its visual abilities in massive form and you're putting context to that and trying to make like rational understanding of it.
One of my favorite stories in the book When I was researching the near-death experience, I looked pretty deeply into the story of Elizabeth Kubler-Ross, who wrote the book on death and dying, which kind of galvanized the whole hospice movement and made end-of-life care in this country and really around the world a lot more humane.
And she is one of the first people ever to encounter the near-death experience.
And she did it before that phrase was even coined.
I mean, Raymond Mooney wrote the book in 1975. She, in the 60s, Was running across patients in the hospital wards, she was a psychologist, who were telling these same kinds of stories.
And what I find really, there's a couple layers to this I'm going to get to, but what's really fascinating is she wanted to reject this stuff at first, completely.
Her research partner, the Reverend Walamu Amara, who's a really terrific dude, I loved interviewing this guy, he's still around.
He was a reverend and he had been appointed to sort of go along on the hospital wards with her What she was doing was very controversial.
Nobody talked to the terminally ill at that point.
They were sort of shunted off to the side.
And so the fact that she was doing this was really angering a lot of the hospital staff.
So the administration put this reverend with her as a way of saying, Kind of giving her their blessing as a way of saying, it's not her alone, right?
There's somebody with her.
And I would imagine Amara was pretty formidable, so nobody wanted to fuck with Amara.
But anyway, because I met the guy, he's awesome.
But anyway, one of the early stories they encountered before they started even researching this experience, because they'd hear these stories and kind of blow them off, because they didn't know what to do with them.
Finally, he's out near the elevators one day, a woman goes into cardiac arrest, She's resuscitated right there in the hall.
They went to work on her.
They resuscitated her.
He goes to see her later, and she starts describing the scene of what happened exactly.
And she even describes that she was able, and this stuff sounds ridiculous, right?
But she was able to float in at one point behind a resident who was taking notes.
Because one of the things they did with, if you've got an inexperienced doctor on the scene like that, and there's an emergency thing going on, They generally just tell them, just take notes on what's going on.
It's a way of giving them something to do and keeping them out of the way, the people who really know what he's done right now.
And she was able to describe what he had previously doodled On the notepad that he was now taking notes on her resuscitation on.
Now Reverend Amara completely rejects this, right?
He hears this and he thinks, I'm going to prove you wrong, because this doesn't fit his dogma.
This is not what's supposed to happen when somebody dies.
So he goes and he finds the med student and he looks at the page of doodles, you know, or the page of notes and it has some doodles on it, and the doodles match with what she described.
He asked the student if he'd ever interfaced with this patient at all, they hadn't, and he'd asked the patient if they'd ever interfaced with the student, she hadn't.
You know, what we're left with now is we can say that Reverend Waluamara is lying, and I will never fucking say that, because he wasn't, right?
You know, intriguingly, Kubler-Ross herself wrote about it.
Not, I don't think, in as great a detail as I ended up doing it through Amara.
So what happens is, they have this event happen.
They're really shaken by it.
But they also are noticing that the patients who are reporting these experiences are changing.
They are no longer afraid to die.
I mean, you've got to imagine the anxiety That you would confront a terminal diagnosis with.
These people start losing that anxiety and start wanting to talk to her about, you know what, I want to clean up my relationships before I go.
They start talking about living hard in the time they have left rather than trembling at the fact that they're going to pass on.
It's a huge dramatic effect.
And that's when they decided to start taking notes.
Like, this whole idea that the near-death experience is merely wishful thinking is bullshit.
And it's at least bullshit in her experience and Amara's experience of it.
They rejected it until they really couldn't reject it anymore because here they are researching what happens when you're terminally ill, and one of the things that was coming up in dozens of cases were people who were losing their fear because of this event, and that's how they ended up justifying doing any research on it at all.
So when she wrote her book, she had a lot of different stories to tell.
I don't think she hit that story as hard as she should have.
The near-death experience being created or being facilitated, maybe is a better word, by a psychedelic experience, by the brain producing chemicals, it doesn't mean that there isn't something still going on.
There's a researcher, are you familiar with, I remember their last piece, Carhart Harris?
No.
He did a study on mushrooms, the active ingredient in mushrooms, with psilocybin.
And he found that it seemed to suppress brain activity.
The brain actually seemed less active, particularly the parts of the brain responsible for Making connections and relaying information from one spot to another.
What he thought was really interesting about that, and I would tend to agree with him, is that you would think at moments of heightened experience and heightened perception that we would see an excitement in the brain, right?
Greater activity.
Well, here he was seeing diminished activity, less activity.
And it calls me back anyway to the idea that a lot of what the brain does is filter our experience.
A lot of our processing is unconscious.
Information we're picking up from the environment all the time That doesn't rise into our awareness.
Our brain's making the decision for us as to whether or not we need to be, you know, worried about that little noise behind us or the creaking the chair is making or whatever, you know?
We don't even register it necessarily consciously.
And so the question becomes, when you take this chemical, which I may or may not be interested in taking myself...
The thing about the mushroom experience is that the mushroom experience actually mirrors normal human neurochemistry.
Part of what makes up a mushroom is dimethyltryptamine, the same stuff that your brain produces, or your lungs and your liver.
They know that the human body produces it, and it's been thought that the pineal gland, a lot of people get very angry if you're not very specific about this, because it's just anecdotal evidence that the pineal gland, which is the third eye of Eastern mysticism, produces this.
Whatever produces it, whatever they find, one day ultimately, they believe it's the pineal gland, but you've got to cut people's brains open within like, A certain amount of time while they're dead and then extract it to see if it's like...
But the most important thing is it's unquestionably produced in the body.
So the body is unquestionably...
Producing this incredibly potent human neurotransmitter, which is part of the ingredients of mushrooms.
Like psilocybin mushroom is something like 4-foxoriloxay and dimethyltryptamine.
And I know I fucked up the first part, the way you say it, but It's NN-dimethyltryptamine with something tagged on and my point is that people that take mushrooms have the exact same sort of feeling when it comes to without the near-death sort of connotation to it that they will die But they have the feeling like they have to clean up relationships.
They have the feeling like they want to live, like right now, with joy and happiness.
It's a very religious experience for a lot of people, and a lot of scholars actually believe it's the origin of religious experiences.
That's, yeah, the Terence McKenna stoned ape theory is a fascinating, fascinating idea.
You know, it's really one of those who the fuck knows things.
It's tough to go back and try to figure out what the hell happened that turned us from, you know, some sort of monkey-type creature, an ape, a lower ape, to however it became a human being.
I might have started with the telepathy, but the other thing was meeting Ricky Sorrels in Stephenville, Texas.
He was one of the witnesses to what became known in UFO circles as the Stephenville Lights, this January 8th, I think, 2008 sighting.
And Sorrell's, so on January 8th, dozens of people, I like to say, they had the misfortune of looking up because they faced a lot of heat after they reported what they saw.
But it was some kind of series of lights in the sky that moved with such unity that it seemed to be one craft.
It would have been very, very big.
At one point it was actually trailed by F-16s that couldn't catch up to it.
And these were the sorts of reports you were getting out of Stephenville at the time.
And Ricky came forward to the newspaper and said that he had seen something many weeks before.
I think it was shortly after Thanksgiving.
And it was a solo daytime sighting.
And it was the wildest story of all the stories anyone ever told me, right?
In relation to the book, this was probably the wildest.
And part of it had to do with Ricky himself.
He didn't want to tell me the story.
I had to go through an intermediary who talked him into ultimately speaking to me.
As far as I'm aware, he has not done another interview since.
And we're now looking at three and a half years since I spoke to him.
He made not a dime on this.
If anything, he just faced a lot of ridicule locally in Stephenville at first.
Except, of course, from the people who'd seen it or had a loved one see it.
And so he has this sighting.
He's out hunting.
And this is one of the things that people use to sort of subtly undermine him.
In the same way that Monica Lewinsky was sort of framed for all of America by the fact that the dress that ended up with a semen stain came from the gap, right?
So now we know where she shops, like she's this low-rent little girl, right?
That's how people did her in.
With Ricky, one of the things people like to report, sort of demean him, is that we call him a deer hunter, right?
He's a father, he's a machinist, he's had his job for 15, 20 years.
I mean, he's a lot more than a deer hunter, but he was out hunting deer when this happened.
He's in Stephenville, Texas, which is literally a cow town.
You were talking before about the cowboy with kerosene games.
These are cowboys.
These are people who are raising cattle, right?
And the cliche of UFO sightings is that it's, quote, it's hicks who see them, right?
One of the cliches of it.
Anyway, Ricky's out deer hunting, and he trips over a branch, and he doesn't fall down, but he has to sort of steady himself, and he glances up, and he notices overhead now something.
He ended up saying it was 300 feet over his head.
He gauged this by the fact that there's a water tower in the community that is 300 feet high, and it seemed about the same height.
He cannot see an edge to whatever it is that's floating above him.
And it's not making any sound, but it is hanging over the trees.
And in it, there are this series of sort of inverted cones, which he intuitively suspected must be part of, like, the propulsion system.
So the narrow part is up further into the craft, and then it widens as it telescopes down, right?
And so there's these series of inverted cones, and his first instinct, and I think people use this to sort of His first instinct was to put his gun on it.
Put his sight on it, right?
Just instinct.
What the fuck is that?
You know, he points the gun at it and then quickly, within a second or two, realizes, you know, I'm not gonna shoot at this thing.
Whatever it is, I'm not gonna shoot at it.
And so he lowers his gun, and I remember him telling me about this, that he just told himself, calm down.
Remember as much of this as you can.
Just look at it.
Take it in.
And then, boom.
I forget exactly how long he was looking at it, but for a little while, it just shot off.
And it went so fast, he said, there's no word for this kind of speed.
There's no word that can describe this kind of speed.
It went from blocking my entire field of vision because it was so big to just shooting up into the air like a lightning flash.
That's what's so interesting to me about a story like that.
What we're left with is the idea that what we have to say is, well, he must be crazy.
Something must be off with him.
What was it people saw several weeks later?
I mean, one of the things that interests me about that story is they were very near a military base.
And again, this is all in the book, but one of the things that happened to him after he reported his sighting is he started getting calls from somebody who was identifying themselves as a member of the military who was advising him not to talk about this anymore and saying they wanted to meet with him.
And actually, you know, the funny part about this, one of the witnesses, a constable, that's what they call their sheriff there, Leroy Gaten, right, had a camera nearby when he had his sighting.
It was in his car and he was 10 feet from his car.
And he had to make a choice.
Do I take my eyes off this unbelievable sight and miss it, or do I go grab the camera?
And his choice was to stay rooted to the spot.
And I think that that's another thing where I just sort of caution the skeptics.
I mean, at the end of the day, you know, what they saw in Stephenville is an unidentified flying object.
And we end up with believers who hear that and say, we don't know what it was, therefore aliens.
Right.
Ridiculous, right?
But we also end up with skeptics who want to explain in a way as flares.
I totally met people who are so invested in this idea that they're being...
That they've been abducted or that they're visited by aliens.
I met a guy who claimed to have an implant in his leg and he didn't want it removed because the times that he's thought about it he began to feel nauseous.
And this made him think that the, you know, the aliens don't want him to have it removed and just this whole trip into lava wind because there's a lump under his skin, right?
And that could be glass that's been working its way up, you know what I mean, for decades or who knows what the fuck it is, right?
Like some kind of growth.
So I definitely met people like that.
I think that's one of the things that impressed me so much about Ricky.
He didn't want to give the interview.
He hasn't done another interview since.
There's no profit in it for him.
If anything, he just faced embarrassment over this.
Well, I wish a story was enough for me, but I still have an open mind.
I still have an open mind because even though I know that most people are full of shit, I still know that we can send a rover to Mars.
If we can send a rover to Mars, if there was a Some sort of a civilization out there that wasn't just a thousand years advanced, but millions of years advanced.
And perhaps they live in a solar system that doesn't get pelted by asteroids every couple hundred million years and wipes out everything on the planet.
And who knows what level of achievement they've had technologically.
One of the guys I write about in the book, Dr. Edgar Mitchell, NASA astronaut, his family In a hundred years, if you sort of trace the bloodline, they moved west in horse-drawn wagons, and then he was on the moon a hundred years later.
That, that's technology advancing, from horse-drawn wagons to the moon.
He maintains that he saw nothing in terms of UFOs when he was in space.
He does believe in UFOs.
He says he's talked to members of the military since who've assured him that they're That UFOs should be identified as alien craft in some cases, right?
That we are being visited.
But what happened in space was completely different.
It was a religious or a spiritual, I'll say, spiritual experience.
He had an epiphany where he had the same sort of experience that people report in meditation when they hit this kind of bliss Or sometimes on psychedelics where it was like everything dropped away and he felt himself being at one with the entire universe.
That everything was connected.
Everything was one thing.
And it was a feeling that he had all the way back, you know, over a period of a day or two.
He would have this experience every, you know, regularly.
Feel this sense of wonder and this sense that he was, you know, he rejected his parents' religion.
He'd gone completely down the science path.
And it completely altered his perspective and made him think that there's some way of uniting spirituality and science.
He landed and started the Institute of Noetic Sciences to try and find some sort of connection between spiritual experiences and some scientific basis for them.
Yeah, what Edgar Mitchell's deal is with aliens, rather, is that he has talked to quite a few people that were high-knowing people in Joint Chiefs of Staff, Intelligence Committee-type characters, and they told him there was a UFO crash, that there was an alien spacecraft at Roswell, and that...
It's pretty fascinating stuff.
Listening to him, I'm reading this thing, and he had something to do with the Disclosure Project with Dr. Stephen Greer, who one day we would like to get him on this podcast as well, because he's another very highly credible person, and his Disclosure Project included a lot of very high I think it's high time that we start being honest about what these people in high levels of the military have already experienced,
know about it and the fact that there's probably a high level of probability That we are consistently visited by some freaky dudes from another part of the world or another dimension, but they just can slip in and out like that, and we don't really know what the fuck is going on.
One of the arguments you'll get from the Skeptics is that our planet is one among so many.
How would they find us?
What kind of propulsion system could possibly carry them here?
And they're basing this all off on what we know right now with our technology and our understanding at the moment.
But as you said, if you've got a civilization that's been around for thousands or potentially even a million or more years, who knows what they could have?
It's a silly sort of argument to me because it's based so much on this idea that this is as advanced as we're ever going to get.
The people they send up into space are changed by the experience of seeing the Earth from space.
It has a profound impact on them.
They feel...
And for Mitchell, it becomes a spiritual experience.
For other people, it got them more involved in politics.
They recognize how arbitrary the lines between countries are and the lines we draw culturally.
But they see just how fragile our little Planet is hanging out there in space, and it changes them, and I think most of us would agree it's changing them for the better.
They end up coming home and doing sort of more altruistic things with their lives, and now we're going to have civilians being sent up into space, mostly wealthy civilians initially, because how much that ride's going to cost, right?
Bigelow Aerospace or Virgin.
We're talking about $100,000, $150,000.
I can't remember the price at this point, but I had researched it.
And we're going to have general civilians getting shot up into space and having an experience of seeing the Earth from there.
And it's going to begin to slowly change the culture, I would think, because if you look at how dramatically it changed the lives of all the people who've gone into space, it's going to change these people too, to some degree.
Yeah, Edgar Mitchell's take on it is very trippy, man.
It's very trippy.
When he was in the spacecraft coming home, this is his word, suddenly I realized that the molecules in my body were created in an ancient generation of stars, and suddenly that became personal and visceral, not intellectual, and I had never had this experience.
It was accompanied by bliss and ecstasy I had never experienced.
The Keck Observatory in Hawaii is on the Big Island, and there's one island in Hawaii that's so big, you get so high on the Big Island, that you go through the clouds.
The Keck Observatory is, I think it's on the Mauna Loa volcano, whatever one it is, the biggest one.
And it's at, there's like a visitor station that's down at like 9,000 plus feet, and then you go even higher, they have the telescopes there.
But you get out of the car, and you're through the clouds, and the way the Big Island is set up, they have these diffused lights so that they don't create light pollution because of the observatory.
So, the fucking Milky Way was so stunning!
It was so, that to this day, All I think about when we talk about going on vacation is, like, we've got to get back to that.
I've got to see that again.
I've just got to look up and see that again.
Because it really did feel like you were flying through an impossibly filled galaxy.
Whereas, like, usually you see, like, a few stars, like, here and there, you know, up there with that.
High altitude and the really zero light pollution and clear skies.
Yeah, the thing that's weird about camping is that when you're away from, like, electricity and a house and all that shit for long enough, you kind of, like, get this, like, real humble feeling.
Like, oh, okay, I get this.
Like, we're just, like, another animal who just figured out some way to separate ourselves so we can do our work.
We separate ourselves in our houses and in there we create these computers and electrically hook things together and As long as we separate ourselves from the nature, because we're out there in the nature, you might get eaten, or you gotta go find some food.
Shit can go wrong.
Put that Purell on your hands, bitch, and go back to work.
So you get in your house and you hide from the connection with the outside world.
But when you're camping, it's inescapable.
It's a weird feeling.
When you're out there for, I did it recently, five days with no cell phones in it, no electricity, no heat, no nothing.
And we had to start a fire if we wanted to stay warm, and it was in Montana, it was freezing cold.
But doing that, you really have a different sort of feeling and appreciation for what nature actually is.
We're disconnected from one of the fucking coolest things ever for a human to experience.
We're completely disconnected from it.
There's a lot of people who live their whole lives in cities and in suburbs and they drive back and forth from work and they never get out there in the woods.
I'll never forget a guy in college who went on this big, long tirade, and I thought he might be mentally unbalanced, because he went on this big, long tirade.
It was in philosophy class, actually, too.
unidentified
I'm so sick of people talking about the outdoors and how the outdoors are so great.
I have to tell you, that's one of the biggest pushbacks I've gotten from that sort of crowd on the book.
The whole idea that I was going to go study lucid dreaming and learn to meditate and do all these things, you know, like, why?
Why would you put that kind of effort...
I don't know, I guess they feel so great in their skinny jeans that the idea of doing something to improve themselves further, you know what I mean, just seems like an admission of defeat, right?
I'm not going to be able to quote him exactly, but it was Martin Sheen.
And that guy went through the shit, right?
I mean, look at the whole Apocalypse Now filming and that whole story, the whole arc he went through.
The basic fact we need to understand about life is that it's terrifying.
We are cauldrons of anxiety.
We have a part of our brain, the amygdala, that whenever we're confronted by ambiguous information is immediately going to be like, check for danger, check for danger.
And it sort of prohibits us from learning, growing, trying to find out new things if we give in to that.
What other information or what other pieces of evidence about aliens have ever led you to believe conclusively one way or another that That there is something out there.
You know, that's another one where I conclusively believe that UFOs are unidentified flying objects, right?
And there are times when we just need to kind of, there are people who want to honor sort of like materialist science, and there are people who want to honor some sort of dogmatic religion.
I want to honor that like gap in our knowledge to some degree, right?
And just acknowledge that it's there.
And that's what we're working through.
You know, we need more information, more data, not less.
So the UFO question, I mean, have we been visited?
I'm not entirely sure.
I mean, even that Stephenville Siding, I didn't get a chance to get into this, but that Stephenville Siding, there's a military base nearby.
This guy claimed that he was harassed for weeks afterward by a member of the military.
There's a story in the book about somebody showing up on his property and in the middle of the night making his dogs bark and just staring into his door and clearly wearing camo gear.
And this was during the same period when he was getting these threatening phone calls from a guy who was identifying himself as a member of the military.
So is it possible that people are encountering at times some sort of advanced military technology?
To me, no coincidence that people started reporting triangle-shaped UFOs shortly before the stealth bomber was ultimately revealed.
So sometimes that's the explanation.
But, you know, for me, simply the vastness of the universe, its age, the chances that we're the only, only planet that's evolved life like this seem so small.
That surely somebody out there has developed the kind of technology it would take to find us and get here.
That's the kind of thinking that really opens me up to the possibility.
And there are enough of these cases where You know, like Greer's people, the military people who come forward and say that something happened or whatever.
Enough of these people are credible and it's left in an unidentified category that you start to think, well, you know, maybe at some point, some of these...
But so many people are full of shit and so many people have told lies that if you have...
Any thoughts in your head that you're going to be able to tell people that you believe in UFOs and not have them ridicule you?
Good fucking luck.
Good luck being a serious person and being taken seriously.
If we had Obama, if Obama was on TV and he started talking about UFOs, And his experience and what he believes they are and that he believes that we're being visited by intelligent beings from some other dimension or planet.
He had written, or I'm sorry, Shirley MacLaine, who I guess is like a great aunt or something to him, or a godmother.
I can't remember the relationship.
She had written a book.
Red flag!
She had written a book in which she claimed that he had seen a UFO. And Tim Russert asked him about it during a debate, and people immediately, and this is, again, the language was UFO, not an alien craft, but a UFO. People immediately burst into laughter, and you can hear it, you know, on the video.
I write about this in the book, too.
People immediately start laughing, and he starts saying, well, look, you know, UFO, it's unidentified.
And people are still sort of, now you hear people kind of gasping, because instead of rejecting it out of hand, he's sort of trying to stick up for this.
I was drawn to the idea that where the whole title of Fringology came from is these are subjects we push to the fringe, but if you look at near-death experiences, ghosts, UFOs, They speak to the big existential questions that really plague us, the ones we don't have answers to.
What happens when we die?
Are we alone in the universe?
What's it mean to be human?
These sorts of questions.
Bigfoot doesn't really get into that field.
He's not something that's going to make me question The idea that there might be some undiscovered ape does not affect what happens when I die or whether or not we're alone in the universe.
And then when he had, like, a quote, hot case, I would go.
There was one case I went out on, like, three, four nights in a couple-week time span.
And look, there were times when the people didn't want to think anything was going on in their house and brought him in hopefully to debunk it, but there were a lot of times that people brought him in hoping.
That they had a ghost.
Excited about it.
Showing pictures of dust motes in the air and saying, look at these orbs.
It's just a video artifact of certain cameras that when they put a super high-speed camera on it, it didn't happen.
They got the exact same area photographed.
They lit a fire and bugs would fly around the fire.
And when the bugs would fly around the fire on one camera, they would come out like these rods because the camera couldn't compete with it or couldn't rather pick up the image when it was moving too fast, too close to it.
It didn't know it was focusing on the front and the back.
You know, digital imagery is kind of funky.
But on the high-speed camera, they got it loud and clear.
Yeah, I was trying to look for things that would help me answer the big questions, if only for myself.
I got tired of, like, you know, I don't want to listen to some right-wing, dogmatic, religious person tell me how it is.
I got tired of listening to Richard Dawkins telling me that I'm just meat.
And I just thought, you know what, if it's knowable, if it's observable that there's more to me than that, I should be able to find a way to experience this directly for myself and learn about it directly for myself.
So I started looking into meditation and lucid dreaming and trying to find some way, Of experiencing myself, in a sense, disconnected from the meat, right?
I love the idea that he's standing up for science and he's standing up against religious ideology and brainwashing.
But he's doing it in such an arrogant, sort of aggressive way that it makes you go, like, you're kind of a bad spokesperson for the thing.
But I'm sure from the scientific community, like, the encouragement is, like, so strong and profound and almost hero-like that it sort of encourages him to be this aggressive force of reason.
And that's sort of the worst insult, I mean, that you can level out an atheist because they are so, you know, they're reacting to fundamentalism in their view.
You know, if you adopt a point of view to that degree with that passion, if it walks like a fundamentalist and talks like a fundamentalist and quacks like a fundamentalist, that's what it is.
I guarantee you that if you could get Richard Dawkins to take place in at least one mushroom trip, if not several, I think one to find out what the fuck it is and then reset and revisit, go back in and sort of analyze what the fuck is happening, I bet he will have a completely different opinion as to the possibilities.
But the thing is, the atheist community, that sort of fundamentalist, materialist community, came out and said this is an explanation for God and religious experience.
But people have all sorts of strange experiences when they put that helmet on.
And when they screened him before he put it on, because he wanted to take part in this, when they screened him and put him through the questionnaire they put him through, and I have not seen it, so I'm not going to be able to describe this in great detail, but Persinger related this much of it to me.
When they screened him, his temporal lobe was really, really in It's not a normally active sort of temporal lobe, which is what they were trying to stimulate.
So when he didn't have an experience, Persinger dismissed it as saying, well, this guy isn't built like the rest of us.
And it's an intriguing thing to think that is that part of what created his worldview, his atheistic worldview.
The degree to which we feel, if you pray or if you meditate and you feel like you're contacting something sort of outside yourself, this is the part of the brain that processes that information.
Well, if you're never using that part of the brain, if you're never stimulating it, It will become less active.
If you completely reject any idea of woo-woo whatsoever, the woo-woo part of your brain.
You know, there's a big issue that I have with people that will say that an experience, whether it's an experience like Edgar Mitchell had or whether it's a psychedelic experience, They'll say, especially in terms of psychedelic experience, they'll say that it's not real.
Like you had a hallucination.
But the same effect It has the same effect, rather, on you as a real experience.
Like, even if it's a hallucination.
Let's define a hallucination as you're seeing something that's not there.
Even if it's that.
From that, you benefit greatly.
And you have a real thing is going on in your imagination or wherever it is.
You really are receiving information.
You really are looking at yourself and the world in a totally different way.
It's actually happening.
So this event, this experience, whatever it is, I mean, we want to compartmentalize it because you're taking in some sort of a substance alien to the body that tricks the body into having this state and achieving this state and having this experience.
It's still an experience that you actually really have.
I heard you mention that you were interested in it.
Maybe the most gratifying thing that's happened to me in writing the book is whenever I do a public appearance or a podcast with a big enough audience, I end up getting notes from people afterward that they had a lucid dream.
Either, you know, after the interview or after they went and then read the book or whatever it is.
Before they came along, I was having a lucid dream every two or three weeks without even trying.
I mean, just spontaneously because I'd...
Trained at it long enough, hard enough, that I was having them every two or three weeks.
Since they were born, I actually recently, because they're starting to sleep a little bit now, I actually had a couple, just in the last couple of weeks, or three weeks, I had two.
And it's like, oh great, it's coming back online.
This function of Steve Volk is returning now that he's getting proper rest, you know?
And it's pretty terrific.
And one of the great things about it is that it changes your waking life as well as your...
Dreaming life.
I mean, it honestly wouldn't be worth the effort if you were only doing it to experience a change in your consciousness when you're dreaming.
So lucid dreaming, for those that don't know, is the act of being aware you're dreaming while you're dreaming and then choosing accordingly, right?
So think of it this way.
One great way of introducing people to the idea is that...
One of the ways of introducing people to lucid dreaming to understand what it really is, and usually I'm asking this if like a crowded book reading or something, but I'll ask you guys here.
Have any of you ever woken yourself up from a nightmare?
You were this close to having a lucid dream because you were aware you were dreaming while you were dreaming.
You were like, shit, this is a nightmare, right?
I'm gonna wake myself up.
And you chose to wake yourself up.
But the fact is, since whatever was chasing you or whatever was happening that made it qualify as a nightmare, If you had no external reality, you could have just walked away from it in your dream.
You could have, because the laws of physics don't apply, flown away from it.
You could have gone up to it and said, yo, what the fuck's up?
And it's a vacation that tapped me into a whole new wing of my life.
It's the act of being where you're dreaming, while you're dreaming, and choosing accordingly.
And I realized, once I read that, that I had woken myself up from nightmares for years.
And so it's like, okay, I have an opportunity to do something different here.
So there's different ways you can train for it.
One of them is you take the time to remember, for instance, a recurring dream or the dream you had last night, right?
I really recommend doing it with a recurring dream.
You remember it, particularly a nightmare, because those are so vivid.
You remember it, it's like a meditation.
You meditate on it and you choose the point in the dream where you wish you had become lucid, where you wish you had gained control.
And so the dream in the book that I had worked with was a dream where this creepy fucking dude shows up outside my house and he's peeking in through the window and eventually I end up getting angry that he's trying to terrorize me and I open the door and we would fight, we would clash.
And I would wake up literally at times punching the air, just Because I'm going after this guy.
So I decided to meditate on that dream and look for the spot within that dream where I could get lucid.
And gosh, I'm not sure how long I, at this point in the book, but it was probably a couple of weeks of work where maybe 10 minutes one day, 5 minutes the next, maybe 15 minutes before I fell asleep one night.
And finally the dream happened.
And when the guy showed up in my window, I realized, shit, this is the dream.
I'm dreaming.
And to feel yourself, like, to feel this, you don't realize it until you've had a lucid dream, but there's a sense of disconnect between you and the dream, right?
Until you lucid dream and suddenly find yourself in this dream body, you're no longer watching it like a movie.
You are in it.
And it's like the fucking Matrix.
You get to be Neo.
Suddenly, as I said before, the laws of physics play no part.
And most people find when they really begin, when they first have a lucid dream, there's this exhilarating sort of feeling flying and dream sex.
Like, those are the first things that people usually do.
How could the neurons, this three-pound gelatinous mass, Secreting and emitting chemicals and electrical firings create this.
And the truth of this is that we don't fucking know.
And yet we're inundated with people telling us what we should consider important.
And telling us at this point, too, just drilling us with this kind of materialist paradigm that we are meat computers, that we have no free will, all this sort of...
To me, you know, just sort of...
I don't buy that, the no free will thing.
And I think if...
If they don't know how to explain it, how we have free will, it's because we don't know yet enough about the brain and consciousness.
And I love Sam Harris.
Sam Harris really turned me on to meditation through reading his book.
And I consider him like sort of among the new atheists.
He is a breed apart.
I love the interview you did with him because he admits that the paranormal's been unfairly stigmatized and all this sort of stuff.
But he's one of the guys out there trumpeting that we have no free will.
And I'm really happy for the opportunity to talk about this because, you know, and he says rightly that dogmatic religion has an unhealthy effect on the psyche.
And it certainly does for a lot of people, right?
A healthy effect on people and society because they're fearful and they're judgmental of other people and all this sort of stuff.
But when you tell people they have no free will, they are more likely to cheat.
And this has been researched, right?
When you expose people to the idea that they have no free will and then you give them an opportunity to cheat at something, they'll do it.
And the control group who was not exposed to that information didn't cheat as much as the people who – anywhere near as much as the people who had been exposed to the idea that we have no free will.
And when you say that Sam Harris believes that we have no free will, We should kind of – it's a very comprehensive sort of a take on things that has to do with not just natural selection, but the human organism itself and all the reward systems that are put in place to motivate behavior.
It's not like he believes that there's an architect that's guiding your life.
Theoretically, if this is a completely naturalistic material universe, if we could measure all the variables from the Big Bang until now, we could predict everything you're going to do your entire life, every choice you're going to make, because it's all the result of the conditions that led up to it.
Yeah, I had a crazy idea once of taking a computer that's so powerful that you could input in all of the data of everything in the state that it exists right now in the world, everything that exists in the world, In the state that it exists right now, and from that you could extrapolate and go back through time and get a full detailed depiction of every single event that took place.
It sounds completely ridiculous right now, but I don't think that's ridiculous in the future.
I think we're going to be able to get data from, I'm like, whoever thought like a million years ago you'd be able to get ice samples?
And that was going to tell you climate change from thousands and thousands of years.
And that's how we know what the fuck was going on 6,000 years ago.
You drill a gigantic chunk of ice and go, well, shit was different here.
And looking at it a foot higher, it's different here.
And this is the part that really gets beneficial for your daily life.
The part that was most powerful for me in that sense.
The other way you can train yourself to have a lucid dream, first of all, you have to ask yourself the question, how do you know when you're awake or when you're dreaming?
How do you know?
What's different?
And what LaBerge found and what everybody else subsequently has found Is that there's this kind of state test you can do to see which state you're in.
And the idea is to start doing it when you're awake.
Do it all the time.
It should probably come from some cue in the environment.
If something odd happens where you just think, oh, that's strange, lock into that, right?
And here's how you would do a state test.
Print changes in a dream.
If you look at it, something printed, and then look away, and then look back, sometimes you have to do it a couple times, it will change.
And the reason is because that print doesn't have any external reality.
It's something that your mind is producing for you.
I had print at one point.
Usually I've just been able to figure out, I just kind of lock into it and get, okay, this is a dream.
And so you check print, and you see if the print changed.
And I had print change into just...
Like symbols at one point.
A book just changed into a series of incomprehensible symbols.
Digital clocks will really malfunction and machinery in general will malfunction because, you know, you flick that light switch over there and it's actually connected to the light bulbs.
But in a dream, it's not connected to anything, right?
So you flip the light switch and maybe the light goes on the first time and then when you turn it off, it doesn't go off because it's not actually connected to anything.
And you'll find that initially when you first start trying to do state tests when you're awake, maybe the first day it feels really awkward.
Because now I'm having a conversation with you, but I'm also looking at the print on your shirt.
I'm looking down and then up and down and then up to see that it stays the same.
But after you get used to doing that, and for me it only took a day, day and a half, you know, something like that, of doing a state test maybe eight or ten times a day, I found that my state tests were actually making me more aware and more mindful of everything that was going on around me all the time.
And it seemed to have that effect of slowing my life down, making me more considerate of what's happening, making me more present to the person that I'm with.
And suddenly I realized, right, when Sam or somebody says we have no free will, you know, a lot of times we are just on autopilot.
We're just reacting.
How often do you eat a meal and don't really taste it because you were busy and you were thinking about something else?
When I started practicing lucid dreaming, it was really, it's a mindfulness practice.
I mean, it harkens back to the Buddhist practice of mindfulness.
You're just more aware of what's going on all the time.
So I climbed up into this building and I gained lucidity.
And there was this woman in the room.
And I said to her, and this happens a lot of times with dream characters.
I said, I'm having a lucid dream.
I'm dreaming.
She said, no, you're not.
And they will, dream characters will invariably tell you, if you say to them, this is not a dream, they will invariably say to you, no it's not.
And this is one of the weirdest, coolest parts of lucid dreaming, because even LaBerge, right, eminent sort of scientist, just kind of shrugs his shoulders, like somehow the dream world wants to maintain its It's status as real for you, right?
So the dream characters will say, this is not a dream.
Yeah.
And so I said to her, no, I'll prove it to you.
It's a dream.
And so I turned, and it was like, you know what you were talking before about when you have a subjective experience...
You still had the experience, right?
So I know totally what it's like to be fucking X-Man because I said, I'm going to prove it to you.
And I turned and there were these big double doors, like, you know, 30 feet away or something.
And I just went like this with a wave in my hand and the doors, I said, I'm going to close these doors from here.
I went like this with a wave in my hand and the door slammed shut.
And I was like, holy shit, it worked.
Cause it was like one of my first lucid dreams.
It was awesome.
And then I turned to her and I was like, so now I'm going to have you, right?
And so I grabbed her, and I went to kiss her, and then I remembered, because at that point I was engaged to my wife, right?
And I was like, oh, but, you know, I'm engaged, and it felt so real.
Again, her skin, the smell of her, her, it just, I was really...
I've got to get my wife's back on this, because when I told her about it later, she's like, you could have Oh, did you immediately just fucking take some choline and go right back in?
Everywhere he goes outside, he gets tackled and raped by big, giant women that look like they're in R. Crumb comic books.
You've never thought- Big giant thighs and giant asses, they just hold him down and they just- Or women like those chicks from Boston and the fighter.
Shove his face into their big meaty snatch, big fucking roast beef snatch, big gigantic rump roast, big bullet wound snatch, and they just shove it in his face and then- So he doesn't leave the house much in his dreams.
Right?
Isn't that what you told me?
unidentified
Yeah, sure.
I have sex with a lot of ex-girlfriends in my dreams, I notice.
This is one of the sad parts of Stephen LaBerge's story, is that he discovered this thing that you can really use to defeat nightmares.
If you're one of those people who has night terrors, where you wake up and suffer from sleep paralysis, Or you have recurring nightmares or anxiety around an event, right?
You know, you're going to be doing public speaking or something and maybe that's not your bag.
You can rehearse, right, in the dream.
So he's discovered...
And look, it's enriched my daily life.
I mean, today I was doing...
I was just trying to train it again because now I'm finally getting some sleep.
The boys are letting me sleep.
And so I'm starting to do state tests again and stuff.
And I just...
Look, man, it just locked me into my environment in such a cool way.
I could suddenly...
Really pick out the sound of the leaves blowing in the wind.
There's actually been really good research that what we dream tends to be stuff we've been thinking about a lot in the last 24 to 48 hours.
So the whole principle of state testing and asking that question, is this a dream, right?
Or, you know, the way I always present, am I awake or am I dreaming?
The whole point of that is that when you do that regularly, you're more likely to have that thought then arise while you are fucking dreaming, when you're really dreaming.
There's so little we know about what the fuck is really happening and what kind of weird imaginary world you're creating inside your mind.
I love when people try to say, well, this means that the dragon represents...
You don't know what the fuck is talking.
I am in the Lord of the Rings, and I'm fighting a dragon.
It doesn't represent shit.
It represents, I like watching wacky movies, so I got high and watched Game of Thrones, took five alpha brains, went to sleep, and had a fucking dragon war.
Well, I'm sure there's a lot of things that occur in a dream are things that you're fixated on and things that are constantly in your mind and that your imagination will turn them into a dragon or a witch or a demon or a vampire or a disease.
There's all sorts of things that you're terrified of in real life that you fixate on and much like the knocking on the door, they just follow you into your dreams.
If you approach something that's in a nightmare more like a friend, and that's weird to say, but LaBerge did this with this really ugly ogre that showed up in one of his dreams that he would always recoil from.
He decided to, well, confront it's the wrong word because it sounds adversarial, but he decided to approach it in a spirit of curiosity and compassion and figure out what's going on with it.
And I can't remember what exactly he said to it, but he accepted it.
He didn't recoil from it.
And it actually, if I remember correctly, it became a part of him.
I'm gonna have to write 90,000 words in 10 weeks, and it was right before I was supposed to go get married.
And so there was no fucking with that deadline, right?
I was gonna have to write this thing and have a full good working draft of it done in a 10 week period.
And I was having all sorts of anxiety over it.
And I ended up approaching a dream character in a store.
And I said to them, I need help.
And she's like, what do you need help with?
And I said, well, I'm writing a book.
And she said to me with like the utmost sort of compassion and sincerity, she said, the book is already written.
And I had, from that, the feeling of, you know, there's just not, well, you, you work on creative projects all the time.
There's nothing like having finished and knowing it's right and it's good.
And I had that feeling just sort of flood into me when she said this.
So real and so vividly that when I woke up, I started thinking about all the vagaries of how time works and all this sort of stuff.
And then, you know, in a sense, the book is already written.
I'm just going to live through the period of writing it.
And it just totally reframed the experience of writing that book for me.
And in a strange sort of way, I mean, to say that I wrote the book in an altered state is a big, powerful statement.
In a way, I did.
I never had less anxiety about writing anything in my life.
I would wake up 7, 7.30 in the morning.
I was completely on leave from work.
I would get a cup of coffee.
I'd be writing within 15 minutes of waking up.
Instead of producing what my goal was, which is around 1,500 words a day, I was regularly writing 3,000, 5,000, 8,000.
There were days I wrote over 10,000 words in one day.
I would finish at 2.30 or 3.00.
I would eclipse my fucking goal.
By miles.
I would finish at 2.30 or 3.00.
I would go out and buy fresh groceries and a bottle of wine.
And when my wife would get home, I'd be this joyful firefighter standing there making her this delicious dinner and totally enjoying my life, like rocking balls.
It was awesome.
And it was lucid dreaming that did that.
And it was that experience of having that anxiety taken away from me in this really vivid, real way.
I know this book is outselling from the time it was released.
It's way more electronic and more than the general industry.
So when this first came out a year and a half, two years ago or whatever it is, I think they told me the figure was low 50% higher for electronic books.
And I did it, I think, three days in a row where I think the first day I wanted to go 15 minutes and I just started feeling so silly after seven or eight that I stopped.
And then on day two, you know, I think I did three or four minutes.
And on day three, I'm like staring at the spoon for like 45 seconds and I was like, I can't do this.
And so I met some people like that who have never publicly spoken about it, but they're doing credible stuff in the world, and they claim that they were able to do it.
They were at a, quote, spoonbending party.
There's some people who throw spoonbending parties.
The people who are doing credible parapsychology don't fit in to the way the prize works.
So people like Dean Radin and Rupert Sheldrake, and I remember when Sam was on here, he talked about Rupert and said that there's something very fishy about not going after the million.
There's really not.
And I love Sam, but I just think that maybe he, again, we all come at this with a worldview, and he's probably a little more predisposed to be on the materialist side of things, right?
But Sheldrake or Dean Radin or any of these guys, Daryl Bem, they're going to construct a study that requires dozens, if not a hundred subjects.
That will take an hour and a half for each individual session, conducted over weeks, months, or a year, to get this Gansfeld effect at 32% versus 25% that we started this whole thing with.
And James Randi needs an event that will take place with a very small sample size, where you'll get 10 bites at the apple, basically, 10 chances to guess something, or 12, in an afternoon or an evening.
Apples to oranges.
It is completely inapplicable to what credible parapsychologists are doing.
So the idea that Rupert Sheldrake hasn't taken it up is not only not very fishy, it tells you that he has some fucking sense.
He doesn't specifically require a small sample size, but whenever you look at any of the studies they're doing, they're doing stuff that takes, again, an afternoon or an evening, and it's kind of a public event.
And again, there are some parapsychologists, I think his name is Dick Bierman, who said he approached him and couldn't work anything out.
Supergirtle approached him and couldn't work anything out.
Daryl Bem apparently thought about it and realized that within these parameters, the kind of research he's doing, the kind of effect size he's trying to get, the time it would take him to generate that, just doesn't really fit into what they're doing over there.
But I think that this sort of the professionals...
And look, there are professional skeptics like French and Wiseman, the guys I mentioned before, who will engage in a reasonable conversation about this.
But then there are skeptics, to me, like the J-Ref, the James Rene Educational Foundation, those guys who are just kind of rejecting it out of hand.
But there's really something...
There is something to look at here.
There's something to wonder about.
And I find that, you know...
Number one, a more fucking accurate way of looking at it, which is great, right?
That tiny percentage bump is really fascinating because it really makes you go, maybe it is an emerging skill or maybe it is an emerging sense or, as you said before, a declining one because we don't use it in the natural world anymore.
And look, you know, it's a figure, when you look at that, like the Ganzfeld effect, 32 versus 25, you know, whatever an individual study might show, right?
One of the things that's powerful about that figure, and it speaks to one of the things the skeptics do well, right, is they warn you away from those people who really are con artists.
I mean, the idea of the super psychic, John Edwards, Sylvia Brown, there is threadbare Evidence for that.
It's not something that I would put my name on and reputation on as saying there's something we really need to look at this, right?
But the Gansfeld effect, there's so many studies, dozens and dozens of studies that go into these, what they call these meta-analyses when they crunch all the numbers together.
That I will put my name on and say, you know, we should fucking look at that.
And so it's not that the skeptics are all wrong or all wet, right?
But they paint with far too broad a brush.
And I think at the end of the day, my own guess and their motivation is the fact that that mechanism would be unexplained, the fact that that mechanism would suggest there is more to us than meat.
is not something they want to acknowledge because when you really look at these people, when you look at Randy, he's also a dogmatic atheist.
The idea that we're more than meat starts to introduce the idea of a soul, right?
Something that will transcend this bodily death and the idea that we have to, you know, worry about that to some degree and govern our behavior based on what we're going to become later or what we're going to have to deal with later, potentially.
And so I think that they're kind of keeping the barn door shut, right?
They've taken on this tack in life that they are going to hold this shit down.
All the interviews I've done now, and I've done a ton of them, This was the biggest honor, and the reason is because I've been listening to this podcast for the last couple years now, like a year and a half or more.
And I find, and so it's funny, I'm not sure how many guests you've had on in this position, where this show has become part of the way I reinforce my own good habits.
Like, I find that it just keeps me motivated, it keeps me focused on, I think of this podcast ultimately, secretly, it's kind of a cloak and dagger enterprise to get people to live their best possible life.
And that's the function it performs for me.
And so being on your show, totally fucking jacked to be here.