All Episodes
March 9, 2010 - The Joe Rogan Experience
02:38:12
JRE MMA Show #11 with John Danaher
Participants
Main voices
j
joe rogan
37:18
j
john danaher
01:53:40
Appearances
Clips
j
josh olin
00:02
| Copy link to current segment

Speaker Time Text
unidentified
And we're live.
joe rogan
John Donagher, thank you very much, sir.
Very nice to see you.
john danaher
It's my pleasure, Joe.
Thank you for having me here.
joe rogan
Nice to be with a fellow fanny pack proponent as well.
And now you have one of the beautiful Higher Primate leather bags.
I like that, huh?
john danaher
Joe Rogan has just given me one of the most beautiful fanny packs that I've ever seen in my life.
I wear a very cheap fanny pack and this is a thing of beauty.
I was just telling Joe about my student Gordon Ryan was recently given a Gucci fanny pack.
It's literally the most beautiful thing I've ever seen in my life.
When he wears it around me, I get insanely jealous.
joe rogan
But would you buy one of those?
It's like an $800 fanny pack?
john danaher
Just on principle, I can't buy an $800 fanny pack.
But I could definitely stab Gordon Ryan in the back with a knife and steal it from him and blame it on Nicky Ryan.
I could do that easily.
joe rogan
Blame it on his brother?
john danaher
Absolutely.
Great TV series.
joe rogan
The fanny pack is making a comeback.
It's a slow comeback that a lot of people are reluctant to join.
They're scared.
They worry about their position in the sexual food chain.
john danaher
With good reason, by the way.
joe rogan
I don't know why.
I feel like anybody that won't fuck you because you have a fanny pack, you don't want to fuck them.
They're too much work.
john danaher
Strong point.
Essentially, it's always a battle over appearance versus function.
Fanny Packs score very, very low on appearance but very high on function.
joe rogan
I feel like that one bucks the trend.
john danaher
I think you're right.
Between this and the Gucci, we've got something going on here.
joe rogan
There's a video that I put up the other day of my archery game, this techno hunt thing, which is this big, crazy, elaborate thing.
I got more comments on the fact that I was wearing a fanny pack in the video than anything.
john danaher
Were they positive or negative comments?
joe rogan
Mostly negative.
But that's just the internet.
john danaher
The internet is extremely angry.
That's the first thing you learn about the internet.
You could literally save a baby's life.
80% of the internet will call you an asshole for doing so.
It doesn't matter what you do.
The internet is very angry.
joe rogan
Well, what the internet is, is it shows what people are like when there's no social cues, when they're not in front of you, they don't have to deal with, like, looking you in the eye, and what weird little hidden demons of jealousy and anger and resentment.
john danaher
And it's a pretty sad story, isn't it?
If that's what we're really like, it's not looking good for the human race.
joe rogan
I just think it's the kind of people that comment in general.
john danaher
What it shows you is that 99% of what we call human goodness and politeness really comes out of fear of consequences.
joe rogan
There's a lot of that, for sure.
john danaher
Because there's no consequences when you talk online.
joe rogan
But I think it's the quality of the people that are making those kind of comments.
I would say, if you look at YouTube comments, Michael Jordan is not leaving YouTube comments.
The people that leave YouTube comments and bitch and complain about things, usually everything's not going so fantastic in their own life.
But they have this forum now where they feel like, you know, if there's a video that has 3 million downloads, they also are on that video.
They're there in the comments section.
You go to that.
They're a part of that.
unidentified
Unqualified.
joe rogan
No one asked him to be there.
Literally, all you have to do is make an account.
No one has to know anything about your education, the way your mind works, what you've done with your life, what mistakes you've made.
Doesn't matter.
You are oldfuck66, and that's your name.
And you can say whatever you want.
And your comments are right there with everything else.
john danaher
Yes.
It's fascinating to watch.
josh olin
It's very egalitarian.
joe rogan
But in a lot of ways, it's also, it's like, boy, I don't know if that's the best way to get your information.
john danaher
Yeah, I think there's a lot of truth to that.
joe rogan
Yeah.
So, John, you are one of the most fascinating characters in the world of jujitsu and the world of martial arts.
And for people who are not aware of your background...
You started out, correct me if I'm wrong, you started out a philosophy student.
john danaher
That's correct, yes.
joe rogan
And you were working as a bouncer.
And you were jacked, right?
You were a power lifter at the time?
john danaher
Yes.
joe rogan
And you wanted to figure out a way to defend yourself.
john danaher
It wasn't really a question of wanting to figure out.
It was a pretty simple desire that I had.
When I grew up in New Zealand, martial arts was almost entirely based around striking prowess.
You'll back me up on this, Joe.
We're similar age.
When we grew up, the...
It's no exaggeration to say that the study of martial arts in English-speaking countries, North America, Western Europe, etc., was absolutely dominated by the striking arts.
And if you ask the average person who was the best fighter in the world, they would typically say whoever was the best boxer in the world.
So in the 1980s, Mike Tyson wasn't just the best boxer in the world, he was the best fighter in the world.
People...
Always equated prowess in fighting with the ability to strike.
I grew up in that time period and so I grew up studying kickboxing as a teenager in New Zealand.
I came to the United States And for the first time, there's no wrestling culture in my country.
New Zealand has no wrestling culture.
It's one of the few countries where there's no indigenous wrestling culture.
There were, but it was kind of lost in the sands of time.
When I grew up, wrestling was something I saw once every four years at the Olympics on TV. And I didn't even associate it with fighting, to be honest with you.
I just saw it as this strange sport where two guys tackled each other.
And so I came to the United States and I was working as a bouncer.
America has much, much more of a wrestling culture in it.
In New Zealand, when I grew up, when you fought, you were expected to fight with fists and if it went to the ground, the two guys stood up and they resumed fighting.
You stood up and you fought like a man.
That was the idea.
And in the United States, when I was bouncing, I was Absolutely shocked and impressed by the prowess of judo players and wrestlers in street fighting, working as a bouncer.
I worked alongside them and I was massively impressed.
joe rogan
What year was this?
john danaher
This is in the early 1990s.
I arrived in the United States in 1991. So I started working late 1991 in New York City.
New York was a very, very different city back then.
It's almost like two different cities from what it used to be.
joe rogan
It is amazing how much it's changed, right?
john danaher
The transformation is amazing.
Night and day.
joe rogan
It's become like a giant TGI Fridays now.
john danaher
That's pretty much what New York City is.
To give you an example, I used to live on West End Avenue on the Upper West Side.
When I would come home from working in nightclubs at 5.30 in the morning to go to sleep, there would be large numbers of street-walking prostitutes on my block, my avenue.
If you saw even a single street-walking prostitute in that area today, it would be front-page news of the New York Times.
It would be so shocking, so completely out of people's minds.
It would literally just...
Yeah.
People's minds.
joe rogan
Times Square is the best example.
john danaher
Times Square is an extreme example.
joe rogan
Because Times Square used to be all seedy peep shows.
john danaher
It was nothing but seedy peep shows.
joe rogan
And now it's like Guy Fieri restaurants.
It's all weird television.
john danaher
So the transformation is huge.
So that was the New York that I went into.
And it was a violent New York.
1991, I believe, was the year with the highest murder rate in recorded history for New York City.
So it was a very, very different New York City.
It's not what you see today.
So I came into this environment and I saw these people were incredibly adept in fighting.
They were using grappling technique to do so.
This impressed me a lot.
Shortly after that time, as I was working, I started to hear talk about this show, this ultimate fighting show.
And there was this Brazilian guy who had beaten everyone.
He was wrestling people and strangling them and locking their arms, things like this.
Things that I'd never heard of.
So I'd heard this and...
One day I was teaching at Columbia University, and a close friend of mine, who was also on the PhD program, came into my office.
It was office hours.
And he said, John, you know, I know you work as a bouncer.
And I know you work at night.
And I started doing this martial art.
It's called Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu.
And it's mostly fought on the ground.
And I remember you said most of the fights you get into, people get put down on the ground and they wrestle.
And I was wondering if you would be interested in doing it.
And I was like, Brazilian Jiu Jitsu?
I never associated martial arts with Brazil.
For me, martial arts, Japan, Korea, Brazil.
What do they got?
Capoeira?
Who's this guy?
So I'm like, Brazilian Jiu Jitsu?
Isn't Jiu Jitsu like Japanese?
Isn't it like a contradiction of terms like Brazil Jiu Jitsu?
So at the time I was around 230 pounds and this guy couldn't have been more than 140 and he'd only been training two weeks.
So he goes to me, we go on the ground and we wrestle on the ground.
And I was like, okay, let me put you in a headlock and let's see what you can do.
So I shut the door of the office.
I cleared out the furniture.
This poor kid on the ground.
Now, the only thing I knew how to do on the ground in those days was headlock people.
I was a strong guy.
I had a pretty nasty headlock.
So I grabbed my poor little friend and throttled him with basically a Kezika Tamay type headlock.
And to my shock and horror, he started slipping around behind me.
And I started holding harder and harder.
And about two minutes went going, and I really had no real control over him.
And he was starting to get around behind me.
Now, I didn't know back attacks were.
I had complete naivety on the ground, but I could feel something bad was happening.
Someone getting behind you is never a good thing in a fight.
And I was getting tired.
My arms were getting tired.
I had no control over the guy.
And finally, he slipped out, and I had to stand up and run away.
Are you kidding me?
I'm twice your size.
You've been training two goddamn weeks.
And if this was a real fight, he would have got away from it.
I'm tired.
That's not good.
And I was going to say, if he did this in two weeks, What could you do with some training?
So I was fascinated.
I went down, got completely destroyed on my first day.
It was hilarious.
Who was there on his first day?
Matt Serra.
He was a blue guard at the time.
So even on that first day, you met people that would become very important in your life later on.
And I vowed to the moon and the stars that I would at least become competent.
I couldn't live with the idea that I was incompetent at an important element of fighting.
I didn't want to be a world champ.
I just wanted to be competent.
And I believed it would make my bouncing work significantly easier.
That was absolutely true.
Within a very, very short period of time, bouncing got massively easier for me.
You always hear this cliché, jiu-jitsu saved my life.
How many people say that all the time?
Well, I can think of, without any question, there are four times in my life that jiu-jitsu actually did save my life.
I can say that with complete honesty.
It's a cliché for most people.
For me, it did happen.
So it made a massive difference, but I still saw it as something that was interesting and something I just wanted to gain competence in.
That fundamentally changed because really at that point I wanted to finish my PhD and become a professor.
That was my original goal when I came to the United States.
But things started to change when the three senior students at the Henzo Gracie Academy, Hikato Almeida, Matt Serra, and Rodrigo Gracie all went their separate ways.
They had to go out and start their own schools.
And Henzo was busy fighting professionally in Japan, so he couldn't be at the academy all the time.
And he came to me and he said, John, you're going to have to be a teacher.
Like, there's no one else.
joe rogan
And how long have you been training?
john danaher
I believe if I go through the...
It was around four years.
I believe I was a purple ball when I first started teaching at Hanzo's.
Don't quote me on that, but I'll have to go back and check.
But I believe that's...
joe rogan
And why did he come to you?
john danaher
Probably because he felt sorry for me.
I don't know.
I was there a lot, and I think maybe he saw some...
Enthusiasm.
joe rogan
Well, you were obsessed, right?
You were there daily.
john danaher
Yeah.
That became much more so when I became a teacher.
I saw that, okay, I'm filling big shoes here.
You must remember all three of those names that I just mentioned, all three were world champions.
These were good, good people.
And for that time, they were killers.
And here I am, a PhD student.
Now I've got to fill in these shoes.
So I was like, I've got to get serious about this.
So I made a commitment to becoming the best possible teacher I could.
Now, you must remember, I went in as a teacher.
That was my first assignment.
And so I decided my primary focus in Juditsu would be upon teaching.
And fortunately, I came from an academic background.
I had many brilliant, brilliant professors coming through the philosophy programs, both in New Zealand and the United States.
Columbia University had a fantastic PhD program.
So I was very experienced in the art of teaching, but in an academic context.
And I thought, maybe this has given me, fate has given me this angle where I can use an academic approach to teaching in a sports environment.
And that has really become one of the patterns of my approach to teaching a jiu-jitsu.
joe rogan
So this is in the 90s and you are a purple belt at the time.
When did you develop this leg lock system that has become so legendary?
So for people, for the uninitiated that have never heard of you or understand what we're talking about here, For the longest time, jujitsu was primarily attacks on the arms and the neck.
That was pretty much it.
And there were known attacks on the legs, but they were frowned upon.
Yes.
Something happened.
You got to see some of those techniques in MMA. You got to see some heel hooks, occasionally foot locks.
There's a few guys.
Orlovsky pulled off a foot lock in the UFC against Tim Sylvia.
There's a few guys that were pulling these off.
This is pre-Husamar Palhares.
But you all of a sudden came along with this very effective system that there was rumblings many years ago about this where a lot of people were talking about it.
And a lot of people were saying that, you know, John Donaher has this insane leg lock system, and then you started developing all these...
For people who don't know, the top grapplers in the world...
There's a lot of top grapplers in the world.
Jiu-Jitsu is incredibly competitive, but...
You're recognized as being one of the premier coaches of the most promising young people, like Gordon Ryan, who you're talking about before, who's an Abu Dhabi champion, Gary Tonin, Nicky Ryan, Eddie Cummings.
You have an incredible crew of world-class strangle artists who are also known to be some of the very best leg lockers in the world.
So what happened?
How did that all take place?
john danaher
Let's go through...
joe rogan
We should talk about the history of taboo...
john danaher
You've actually asked about six different questions.
unidentified
Yeah, I'm sorry.
john danaher
No, no, no, it's good.
We can answer them in turn.
So let's go...
The first question, your first question was a historical question.
How did it happen?
Yeah.
First off...
There was nothing in my early learnings of jiu-jitsu which suggested leg locks, nothing.
Henzo would teach.
By the way, I should say my sensei throughout my entire career has been Henzo Gracie.
I never left Henzo.
He taught me from white belt to black belt and I never left his academy.
I'm the only one of his students who stayed with him from white belt to black belt and never left.
So Henze would teach leg locks, but it was taught in always the same fashion that everyone else did.
Here's a move, here's a figure four toe hole, here's a heel hook, here's an Achilles lock.
So the moves themselves were known.
They were in existence.
It wasn't like I invented heel hooks or something like that.
That's not the idea.
But they weren't emphasized.
A very, very talented and influential figure in my life was a guy that I only knew for three days.
Now that sounds crazy, right?
How can you learn something from someone in three days?
Well, actually, the influence he had occurred in three minutes.
I'm a big believer in the idea that someone can come into your life for a very short period of time and have a massive influence.
I truly believe that.
In my case, it was a great American grappler called Dean Lister.
Dean Lister was invited by Matt Serra to come to the Henzo Gracie Academy.
I believe, don't quote me on this, but I believe Dean was a brown butt at the time.
I'm pretty sure Matt was a brown butt at the time, too.
And he brought him in for around three days and he trained mostly with Matt Serra in preparation for a grappling tournament, if I remember correctly.
Now Dean was known mostly in those days for his Achilles lock.
Later on he would become a heel hook specialist, but in those days it was mostly an Achilles lock.
And he came to the academy, he rolled with some people, and he was doing Achilles locks and getting some success.
You know, it went both ways.
I remember he couldn't really get his stuff to work on Matt Serra, and Matt Serra could get his stuff to work on him.
But he was doing something which was unusual.
And so I talked with him just briefly after class, and I said, you know, it's interesting what you're doing with these Achilles locks, because I don't really do that at all.
It's not something I do.
And he said...
One sentence which completely changed my outlook.
Why would you ignore 50% of the human body?
One sentence.
Why would you ignore 50% of the human body?
unidentified
And I looked and I was like, I don't know.
john danaher
Why would you?
Makes no sense.
And we never talked again.
And then he went back to California.
He went on to become two-time ADCC champion, mostly with leg longs.
But what Dean gave me was not technique, didn't show me a single technique.
But he gave me a point of view.
If you give a man a point of view, you can change him.
He can work from there.
That was the influence.
And my sensei, Henso Gracie, was an extremely liberal-minded professor of jiu-jitsu.
He would let us do whatever we wanted.
He wasn't one of those guys who said, no, no one in my academy is studying leg longs.
He was never like that.
He would allow his students to go in any direction they wanted, provided they could prove it was effective.
So I started studying leg locks, and that's where I'm going to come to the second question, which you asked, which is why did leg locks have such a bad reputation in jiu-jitsu?
It's curious, right?
We don't talk about this way about arm locks.
I'm going to run through the main criticisms, and you'll be my witness on this, Joe.
I'm sure you heard the same criticisms a thousand times.
You would always hear people refer to leg locks in the following way.
The first criticism, they were too dangerous.
If you allowed people to do leg locks, everyone would be injured in a week and jiu-jitsu would be impossible.
So that was the first criticism you would always hear.
The second great criticism is they didn't work.
You might be able to tap out a white belt with a heel hook, but if you have a world championship level, you're never going to tap anybody.
They didn't work at high levels.
By itself, those two criticisms seem to go in opposite directions.
If they're really that dangerous, But they don't work.
How do those two gel?
They're either incredibly dangerous to the point where they can't be practiced or they don't work.
The two arguments contradict each other.
Then you hear other arguments that they were positionally unsound.
That if you were in top position and you went for a leg lock, you would lose position and that was a disaster.
That's a criticism with no merit because that same criticism applies to guillotines, arm bars, etc.
You can be mounted on someone.
Go for an arm lock and lose position and end up on bottom.
But no one criticizes armbars.
So as I went through the reasons why people criticized leg logging, none of them really made sense.
So I started asking myself, well, often the reasons people give, as opposed to what the real reasons are, are very different.
And the more I thought about it, the more I thought the real reason people don't like leg logs runs much deeper than that.
Let's understand Jiu Jitsu for what it is.
Jiu Jitsu is a systems-based approach to fighting.
What is the system of Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu?
Well, it can be described in a few different ways.
I'm going to give you one rendition, which is pretty simple and will resonate with most of your listeners.
Jiu-Jitsu is a system based around four distinct steps.
You can add steps, you can subtract steps, but the rendition I'm going to give you now is probably the most widely known.
Okay, let's say a friend of yours asks for advice on fighting.
He knows you're a Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu expert.
You're a black belt in Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu.
And he's saying to me, Joe Rogan, tell me, I don't know anything.
I want to fight someone else using your Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu.
What are the steps of Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu?
What is the system that it espouses?
You're going to see always that step number one is take your opponent to the ground.
Okay.
Why?
Why do you think the ground is so special?
Why did Brazilian Jiu Jitsu choose the ground as step number one of its system?
Why do you think?
joe rogan
Well, it all came out of Judo, right?
So Brazilian Jiu Jitsu took the effective submission techniques of Judo and then just refined them.
john danaher
That's the historical reason, but what's the mechanical or physical reason?
joe rogan
Because you can control someone on the ground far better, right?
john danaher
Yeah, you can control people.
Lomachenko controls people in the standing position with angle and distance.
There's different ways to control people.
joe rogan
Yes, in boxing, if you only are boxing.
john danaher
But why the ground?
Why did they choose the ground?
What's the mechanical reason?
What happens when you take a human being to the ground?
joe rogan
Well, there's a whole barrier behind them that you can press them against.
john danaher
What about if you're in bottom position?
joe rogan
Well, you could use that barrier as leverage.
john danaher
True.
But there's something that occurs when someone goes down to the ground.
There's something big that you may be missing here.
joe rogan
What am I missing?
john danaher
What's the most explosive event in the Olympic Games?
The event that probably requires more Transfer of energy and development of kinetic energy than any other.
There's a bunch you could name, but one of them for me is always going to be the javelin throw.
The javelin throw involves a full powered sprint, a jump, a massive explosive turning of both hips and shoulders, and a throw.
All the quintessential explosive elements of the human body are involved in the javelin throw, probably to a greater degree than any other Olympic event.
And as a result, people can throw a javelin 80, 90 meters.
What would happen if you took those same javelin throwers and made them perform the same event on their knees?
joe rogan
Wouldn't be so good.
john danaher
They probably couldn't throw up more than 10 meters.
Okay, and what's changed?
The closer they get to the ground, the less they can employ explosive force.
What's the first thing cowboys do when they go to Brandeis Deer?
joe rogan
Take it down.
john danaher
Yeah.
They lock up its legs and they put it down on the ground.
Nobody tries to brand a standing steer.
You're gonna get killed.
Because it can employ explosive dynamic movement to hurt you.
You put them on the ground, dynamic explosive movement is massively curtailed.
It takes away the single riskiest element of fighting, which is quick dynamic movement that can generate kinetic energy.
So step number one of Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu is get it to the ground.
It's inherently safer.
Less things can go catastrophically wrong on the ground than in the standing position.
What's step number two?
joe rogan
Secure dominant position.
Control.
john danaher
Control?
Too vague.
There's many ways to control people.
There's a definite step.
You've just taken the guy down.
What's your first thing in Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu?
joe rogan
Well, the first thing I would try to do is get to a dominant position.
john danaher
What do you mean by that?
Be more precise.
joe rogan
Okay, pass to side control, try to mount.
john danaher
Good, good, good, good.
You just answered it right there.
Get past his legs.
joe rogan
Past his legs.
john danaher
Why?
joe rogan
His legs are strong.
They carry you around.
You can hold a person in position.
They're very good defensively.
john danaher
They're dangerous.
joe rogan
They're dangerous.
john danaher
Okay, if I end up inside your legs, if you're a skilled judici player, you can arm lock me, you can leg lock me, you can strangle me.
Even if you were an untrained fighter, you could up kick me.
Many a man has been knocked out by an up kick.
Even an untutored guy can form an up kick.
Legs are dangerous.
So step number two is get past those dangerous legs.
What's step number three?
joe rogan
Go for submission.
No?
unidentified
He must be a tenth planner Black Belt.
john danaher
Sorry, I had to throw that in somewhere, Joe.
I'm an asshole.
Step number three, Joe, you're failing.
joe rogan
Okay, I passed the legs.
Well, I'm going to try to control.
I'm going to try to either mount or, like I said, side control.
john danaher
You're on the right track.
You're going to work your way through a hierarchy of positions.
You're going to go knee on belly.
You're going to go side control.
You're going to transition to mount.
You're going to transition to rear mount.
joe rogan
Depending upon my game.
john danaher
There's a sequence of pins once you get past your opponent's legs, and Jiu Jitsu encourages you to go through those various pins.
If you look at the sport of Jiu Jitsu, the pins score different amounts of points.
Neon Ballet scores a certain amount.
Mounted position scores more.
Rear mount scores more.
Why?
Ever wondered about that?
Why do we score the pins of Jiu Jitsu differently?
joe rogan
Well, there's more available from rear mount, of course.
Of course, you can attack the neck.
You can also attack the arms.
You have a positional advantage where you can't be attacked.
You're behind them.
So it's one of the most superior positions to achieve.
john danaher
Very good.
joe rogan
What about the mount?
Mount, when the striking involved, is phenomenal.
john danaher
You just put your finger on it right there, Joe.
Every one of the pins of Jiu-Jitsu, the value of it is measured by your potential to strike your opponent on the ground.
That's why they score more.
Neon Valley scores more than side control, because from distance of Neon Valley you can strike with more power.
It's inherently unstable, however, so it scores less than mount, which is inherently more stable, and offers the same punching platform.
Step number three of Jiu Jitsu is to work your way through a hierarchy of pins where the pins are graded in value according to your ability to strike with effect on the ground.
So far we've got three elements in this system of Jiu Jitsu.
Step number one, get the fight down to the ground where explosive kinetic energy is less likely to be developed by a dangerous opponent.
Step number two, get past his dangerous legs.
Step number three, work your way through this hierarchy of pins where the pins are understood in terms of the potential to harm your opponent with strikes on the floor.
What's step number four?
joe rogan
Step number four is try to secure a position where you can submit them.
john danaher
You've already got the position.
So what's step number four?
joe rogan
Attack with a submission.
john danaher
Correct.
So we've just described Brazilian Jiu Jitsu as a four-step system.
It's beautiful, it's elegant, and it's deadly effective.
Step number one, take the fight to the ground.
Take away the danger of explosive kinetic energy.
Step number two, get past his dangerous legs.
Step number three, work your way through a hierarchy of pins.
Each one graded upon your ability to harm your opponent with strikes on the ground and set up.
Step number four, submissions.
And now the question that needs to be asked.
Where do leg locks fit into that system?
joe rogan
And where do they fit in?
john danaher
They don't.
joe rogan
Well now, they don't.
They don't.
Traditionally.
john danaher
Leg locks fit into the system in only one way.
When the system has failed.
When the system's not working and you can't take your opponent down, you can't pass as guard, you can't maintain a dominant position, and you can't get the regular submissions to work, fuck it.
Try a leg lock.
joe rogan
Yeah, that's what you used to have.
Yeah.
john danaher
Leg locks were seen for generations as a signal of failure.
When you couldn't get the system to work, you had to resort to leg locks.
It meant you were a bad jujitsu player.
You couldn't impose the fundamental system of jujitsu, and so you chickened out and you went to leg locks.
That's why they were despised.
That was the real reason why, for generations, leg locks were dismissed.
joe rogan
You don't think it was because so many people were injured by them?
john danaher
No, absolutely not.
People get injured.
The worst injuries in Jiu-Jitsu don't come from submission holds.
The worst injuries in Jiu-Jitsu come from falling body weight.
When people jump guard, when people accidentally, when poorly performed takedowns, that's where you see catastrophic injuries in Jiu-Jitsu.
That's where you see career injuries.
The joint lock submissions, you're out for a week, two weeks, you know, catastrophic injuries.
As I said, go on YouTube and put in, God, Paul, gone wrong.
You'll see catastrophic injuries.
You'll see career-ending injuries there.
You're not going to see it from arm bars, heel hogs, etc.
You'll see people getting hurt, but it's a contact sport.
You expect that, okay?
No.
There's a very simple, elegant system, Brazilian Jiu Jitsu.
We just saw one rendition of it, the four-step approach.
And you clearly see leg locks don't fit comfortably into that system.
What I did is I tried to find an avenue where they could come in.
And the results were surprising.
The first thing is our four-step rendition of Jiu Jitsu I looked at Jiu Jitsu from top position, where we took our opponent down to the ground and we were on top of them.
But my study of Jiu Jitsu didn't start from top position.
It started from bottom position.
If you look at my students in competition, you will notice that around 80% of their entries into leg locks come from bottom position or with their opponent behind them.
In other words, from what are supposedly inferior positions.
So for me, it was never a question of losing position when I went for leg locks because I was already underneath my opponent.
I started underneath.
How can I end up on bottom by going for a leg?
I'm already on bottom.
So most of my early work in leg locks was how to get into leg locks from disadvantageous positions, from underneath or when someone is behind me.
So I never felt this problem of, okay, I'm going to lose position if I go for leg locks.
I could still play a conventional jiu-jitsu game and have a very, very strong leg lock injury.
That was the first avenue of leg locking.
But things became more interesting when I got further into the leg lock game and I started to realize that as you add leg locks into the game, you change the very nature of the sport.
If you look at Jiu Jitsu as it's ordinarily practiced, it's a single direction game.
If someone is in front of me and I'm standing over them, Jiu Jitsu is all about movement from the legs towards the head.
I'm supposed to pass their guard, work my way up to chest-to-chest contact, and get my head next to their head, either in front of them or behind them, either mounted or rear-mounted.
So Jiu-Jitsu always goes in one direction.
If you ever get stopped or you lose position, you just start the process over again.
It's a mono-directional sport.
It always goes from the legs to the head.
Once you start adding leg locks into the game, jiu-jitsu becomes a two-directional sport where you can go from the head down to the legs.
You can go in both directions.
So if I'm passing someone's guard and I simply can't do it, I can fall back and go back into the legs.
If I'm side control on someone and they start to recompose their guard, I can fall back into the legs.
I'm going from their upper body down to their lower body.
Traditional Jiu-Jitsu always goes from the lower body, directionally, up to the upper body.
So you end up head-to-head with your opponent.
But once you start adding leg locks, Jiu-Jitsu for the first time becomes a two-directional sport instead of a one-directional sport.
And you can play your opponent's reactions between the threat of lower body and upper body in ways that opens up submissions so much more easily than the traditional game.
joe rogan
So if I take you back to the moment where Dean Lister says to you, why would you ignore 50% of the human body?
You go back and think about this, and what is your next step?
Do you just start looking at students and looking at what you're teaching and analyzing positions?
And you're still rolling at the time.
john danaher
Yes, correct.
The first thing that I started to look at is, okay, who out there is doing a good job of leg locking?
And the honest answer was there weren't a lot of people.
What you would see is random success with leg locks.
You'd see a guy wins a match here, a guy wins a match there.
Most of the eminent leg lockers of that generation were actually coming out of Japan.
You'd have people like Romina Sato who had a decent heel hook for that time.
Iminari.
That was a little bit pre-Iminari.
Iminari came slightly after Romina Sato.
They fought each other in grappling matches.
One was younger than the other.
But, you know, they had some success.
I believe even Sakuraba finished Newton with a knee bar.
So, you know, the knowledge was there.
But there was nothing systematic about it.
There weren't people who were coming out and just systematically finishing people with one move.
So there wasn't much in terms of people to study.
So the first thing I started to ask is what is the nature of leg-locking?
It seems to have some problems associated with it.
It's not as controlling as the traditional methods.
That was really the key word there, control.
Why do people favor things like rear naked strangles so much?
Because it's such a controlling position.
Rear mount is an incredibly controlling position.
Why do people favor things like karagatame, the arm triangle?
Because this too is a very inherently controlling position.
All the most high percentage Finishing holds in jiu-jitsu all have control as their dominant feature.
It's hard for people to work.
And as a result, one person can continue to use the same move with a large degree of success over time against a wide array of opponents.
So every question I asked ultimately always came back to control.
And the one thing you would see with regards to the use of leg locks in the late 1990s and early 2000s was a lack of control.
So all of my studies immediately went to the notion of control.
Now, there are many forms of leg lock, but the ones that interest me the most always come out of what the Japanese call ashigurami.
Ashigurami is a generic term.
It just means tangled legs.
There are many different forms of ashigurami.
Ashigurami is a mechanism by which I can use two of my legs to control my opponent's legs and hips.
What I started to do was make a deep study of this notion of Ashigurami.
How am I going to use my legs to control the real estate between my opponent's knee and his hips, preferably on both sides?
Probably the single biggest cliché that you'll hear about Jiu Jitsu is that it's position before submission.
At the time, I was primarily interested in the idea of control before submission.
Control is a much deeper and wider concept than the basic point structure-based position before submission model of Jiu Jitsu.
There's many ways to control people.
They have very little to do with position.
For example, Ashigurami itself scores nothing in Jiu-Jitsu, but done well, it can control an opponent just as well as rare mount can.
So I started to see that there are many forms of control that went outside of the traditional, basic, positional hierarchy of Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu.
Ashigurami was one of them.
Probably the single greatest key in the development of my leg lock system again came from a simple realization that the greatest mistake that people had made in leg lock work prior to the arrival of the squad was that they made no distinction between the mechanism of braking and the mechanism of control.
Ashigurami was the mechanism of control.
The lock itself, whether it be a heel hook, an Achilles lock, a figure four toe hold, that was the mechanism of breaking.
If you watch 99% of the people out there who claim to be experts in leg locking, they don't distinguish between the two.
They see, for example, heel hooking as a single skill.
There's the lock on the legs, the ashigurami or whatever term they use for it, and the lock itself.
They're not distinguished.
They're taught as a single skill.
You can't differentiate the ashigurami and the lock.
And you'll see people teaching in this manner.
What I did was to strongly distinguish between the two so that my students could all hold an ashigurami position and switch from one ashigurami to another and hold people for extended periods of time and inhibit movement.
If I can inhibit movement for long periods of time, I can break you at will.
I can take my time when I come to break you.
Because the control is there, the control is prime, the break is second.
For most people it's just throw on the ashigurami and immediately go for the lock.
The ashigurami is described as part of the heel hook.
They don't distinguish between the two.
Once I made that realization in the early 2000s, that's when the ball started rolling.
That's when a significant amount of progress was made.
I would say that your question was an interesting one.
Okay, you had the insight.
Lister gave you the insight.
What started you going?
It was making first a critical distinction between control and submission, and in the case of leg logging, between the mechanism of control, ashigurami, and the mechanism of braking, which is the lock itself.
In my case, the heel hog.
joe rogan
A really good example of this is how effective it's been implemented by your students against real world class Brazilian Jiu Jitsu competitors who don't use these methods.
Like a good one is Gordon Ryan versus Cyborg.
Cyborg who is a fucking beast of a man and just a physical specimen, a real freak.
And is known for his tornado guard, is no stranger to leg locks.
He's no stranger to any of the positions of no gi or gi jujitsu.
But when I watched Gordon wrap him up and control him, and before he got the submission, you could see Cyborg look completely befuddled.
john danaher
Yeah, the match was over roughly 30 seconds before the submission was applied.
joe rogan
Yeah, he was just trying to figure out a way out of it and just...
john danaher
There's nowhere to go.
joe rogan
It was a terrifying position to be in for...
A real world-class brazilian jiu-jitsu black belt like cyborg when you watch that that match I was like this is stunning because gordon is what 21 years Which is amazing and cyborgs in his 30s, right?
john danaher
I think cyborg has been a black belt Many many years longer than gordon has even been doing jiu-jitsu.
unidentified
Yeah.
joe rogan
Yeah, he's one of the best guys in the world And when you look at how well Gordon dismantled him on the ground using the strategy that you just described, it just...
See if we can find that, actually.
See if you can find Gordon Ryan versus...
His actual name is, I believe you pronounce it, Abru.
How do you...
Ricardo Abru?
john danaher
Ricardo Cyborg Abru.
joe rogan
Yeah.
There's a lot of cyborgs in the jiu-jitsu world.
There's a male cyborg in MMA. There's a female cyborg.
Here we go.
john danaher
I think cyborg and pitbull are two most commonly seen.
joe rogan
So we're watching it here now, and you see cyborg who is this...
Fucking tank of a man and Gordon Ryan is quite a physical specimen himself, but much younger guy Hasn't how long has don't Gordon been doing jujitsu?
john danaher
I believe it's between six and a half and seven years total now.
joe rogan
That's fucking crazy and immediately he dives under Gets low Using butterfly guard And so what he's trying to do, Gordon is trying to do what with Cyborg's legs?
john danaher
The first thing that Gordon Ryan needs to do is establish inside position with his feet.
Probably the single biggest starting point for any kind of Ashigarami-based game, if you want to remember anything about this, Joe, remember this.
Whenever you go into leg locks, the person whose feet dominate the inside position will always dominate the Ashigurami game.
That's the heuristic that I teach all of my students.
Gordon Ryan has just established inside position.
joe rogan
Well, Cyborg just pulled him in, which is interesting.
Cyborg literally pulled him in with his feet inside.
john danaher
Yeah, but Gordon's feet were positioned in a way where they could only end up in the inside position.
So that's the first thing.
He's got to establish inside position with the feet.
He knows damn well.
If his feet occupy the inside position, wherever they go, he's going to get to the ashigurami, and his opponent won't be able to stop.
Now, can we freeze it there?
joe rogan
Yeah.
Pause.
john danaher
Okay.
Actually, can you go back a little bit?
We've overshot just a little.
Okay, right about here, okay?
Initially, there's a battle going on here for inside foot position.
Cyborg is an extremely well-trained and knowledgeable opponent, and he's doing a good job of trying to backstep with his left leg.
He knows that if he keeps both of his feet on the left-hand side of Gordon Ryan's body, he will be able to prevent his opponent getting inside position.
So he's doing the right thing.
He's doing a good job here.
Cyborg's not naive.
As you said before, he's a multi-time world champion.
He's very, very good.
He's not leg-locking someone who doesn't understand what's going on.
He knows what Gordon Ryan wants.
There's a battle here for inside foot position.
Cyborg is doing the right thing.
He's going into a back step.
He's going to post his right hand on the floor and try and back step out.
Let's go just a little further forward into the video.
Good.
Freeze.
Go back just a fraction.
Just a little more.
Okay.
What does Gordon's right foot have?
joe rogan
His right foot, it looks like, it's hard to see here, but it looks like he's got...
john danaher
He's got inside position with one foot.
He's got inside position with one foot.
The whole question is, what's going to happen with Cyborg's left leg?
Now we've got a battle between Gordon Ryan's left leg and Cyborg's left leg.
How the battle goes from here will come down to one thing.
Who wins that battle?
Go forward just a little more.
Hook.
joe rogan
Stop.
unidentified
Right away.
john danaher
Okay, Gordon Ryan just won the battle.
Essentially, at this point, the fight is over.
The only question is, how long is it going to take?
Why am I so confident?
Am I an asshole?
Am I saying this because I'm an asshole?
No, I'm saying this because I know what's happening.
I gave you one of the keynotes of the leg locking game already.
I'll say it again because it's so important.
The man whose feet dominate the inside position will always dominate the Ashigarami game.
Now, the second.
Whenever you go to attack someone's leg, 90% of the resistance on the leg you're attacking comes from the other leg.
That's so important I'm going to say it to you again.
Whenever I go to attack my opponent's right leg, 90% of the resistance is going to come from his left leg.
We talked about control.
The foundational principle of control in leg locking is a principle I refer to as double trouble.
Double trouble is a simple idea that if I control both of my opponent's legs, he no longer has the opportunity to use his second leg to defend the first.
So the amount of trouble that you've put him in is literally doubled in a matter of seconds.
Gordon Ryan has a hold of Cyborg's right leg with his left arm.
And he has a hold of Cyborg's left leg with his legs.
Why was I so confident that the match is over at this point?
Because both of Cyborg's legs are now controlled by Gordon Ryan.
He has just attained double trouble.
Now, let's slowly advance the video.
Do you see how cyborg's legs are in a straight line?
He's having a very, very hard time holding his base.
Stop.
Can you go back just a fraction?
Right about here.
Freeze.
Okay.
Our whole approach to Jiu-Jitsu is based around the idea of putting wedges around our opponent's body so that we can inhibit movement.
A wedge functions just as a door stopper stops a door from moving in a breeze.
The only thing better than a wedge is a reinforced wedge.
That's where the wedge is locked in place by another part of your body.
Gordon Ryan currently has inside position with the right leg.
He has control of Cyborg's other leg with his arm, so both legs have some degree of control.
But he's about to massively reinforce that control by locking a triangle or a senkaku around his opponent's leg.
In order for that to happen, he's going to have to lift his hips slightly off the floor so that he can elevate over Cyborg's left knee.
Watch the video.
There's the elevation.
There's the lock.
Freeze.
Freeze.
Now he's got Cyborg's two legs in a straight line.
That means Cyborg's only mechanism of posting or saving his balance is his left arm.
That's all he's got left.
At this point, the fight is done.
Cyborg's right leg is controlled by Gordon Ryan's left arm.
Cyborg's left leg is controlled by a reinforced wedge, the strength of both Gordon Ryan's legs locked up in a triangle.
Cyborg's actually a weight division heavier, I believe, than Gordon, but it doesn't matter.
At this point, both hips are controlled.
This is a full state of double trouble.
Both legs are controlled and a braking mechanism in place.
There's an ashigurami on the leg.
You can brake someone from there.
Cyborg knows his only method of not being finished is to keep his hips over Gordon Ryan's hips.
So the next battle is, how is Gordon Ryan going to put Cyborg's hips on the ground?
What's saving Cyborg is his left hand.
Let's see how the battle goes.
The battle just got lost.
The hips went down.
Why was it so easy?
Stop.
Why was it so easy?
joe rogan
I don't know.
Tell me.
john danaher
Do you see that right knee?
joe rogan
Yes.
john danaher
That's what pushed him over.
The right knee went into the pocket of Cyborg's left hip.
That meant the directionality of force was slightly away from the one base of support that Cyborg had left, which was his left hand.
So he got sat on his hips.
Now, go forward just a little.
And freeze.
What do you see, Joe?
joe rogan
What do you want me to look at?
Well, I see both legs wrapped up.
john danaher
Good.
Be more precise.
joe rogan
Well, he has incredible control with his right leg, the way he's got his right leg and his left leg triangled.
He's got the cyborg's right foot tucked deep under his arm, and he also has the left foot there as well.
So he's completely wrapped up with his legs and his arms.
john danaher
Very good.
Okay, let's bring in a few points here.
First, if you want to immobilize a human being and prevent them from moving, what are the best things you can ever do?
It's locked their legs together.
You get a dangerous prisoner, what's the first thing you do?
Handcuff his feet together and handcuff his hands together.
He's no longer dangerous.
Here, Cyborg is one of the most dangerous Jutsu players in the world, but with two of his feet locked together, he's effectively neutralized.
Perhaps most importantly, we've got a very interesting distinction here between what we call a primary and a secondary leg.
Which leg is the ashigurami locked up on?
joe rogan
Well, he's got the left leg is what's triangle.
john danaher
You just answered it.
Good.
That's the ashigurami leg.
We call that the primary leg.
The ashigurami is locked on Cyborg's left leg.
That's the primary leg.
The other leg, remember our principle before, 90% of all resistance comes from the second leg.
The arm controls the secondary leg, and the legs control the primary leg.
joe rogan
So the resistance from the secondary leg is pushing off and trying to separate the lock?
john danaher
There's numerous things.
He could pommel the foot.
He could put his foot on the floor and turn.
He could invert his body.
There's a thousand things he could do.
But he's not doing any of them if you control that leg.
That's the important theme.
So, Gordon Ryan's upper body, his left arm, controls the secondary leg.
And his lower body, the ashigurami, controls the primary leg.
As a result, what do you think of Cyborg's ability to move?
joe rogan
He's fucked.
john danaher
He's completely nullified.
Okay, let's go a little further.
Freeze.
Now, Cyborg is doing all he can do.
Movement has been taken away from him, so his only option is to fight the hands.
Gordon Ryan understands that he has control of the secondary leg, but he needs to make a transition to the primary leg in order to break Cyborg.
He's going to have to release the secondary leg.
Now that's a scary thing.
If you release the secondary leg, then your opponent can start defending himself again.
So he's got to measure how he releases the secondary leg.
So there's a battle for angle here.
Cyborg is battling for the hands, but Gordon Ryan hasn't even started the hand fight yet.
He's still in a control fight.
His only interest is in holding the position.
Go a little further.
unidentified
Freeze.
john danaher
Why did Gordon switch his right hand to the knee?
joe rogan
Well, that's the leg that can control the secondary leg, which can defend.
I would imagine he's distracting him.
unidentified
Mm-hmm.
john danaher
Why is Gordon Ryan's head leaning to the right-hand side?
unidentified
I don't know.
Why?
john danaher
Because that's the side he needs to take Cyborg.
If Cyborg turns his head to the other side, when Gordon Ryan releases the secondary leg, there's going to be a problem.
There's a battle for angle now that no one sees.
Gordon Ryan's head tells the whole story here.
Let's go a little further.
unidentified
Freeze.
john danaher
Gordon Ryan is already beginning to transition to the primary leg.
joe rogan
The way he's got it locked up is just so horrific too.
john danaher
Yes.
joe rogan
The two of them crossed over each other.
john danaher
Now, at some point, he's got to uncross the legs to get to the primary leg.
unidentified
Let's go a little further.
john danaher
Cyborg's still engaged in the hand fight.
Now Gordon is about to make his transition to the hand fight.
unidentified
Freeze.
Yes.
john danaher
Gordon Ryan's made the critical release of the secondary leg.
This is where things start to get interesting.
Cyborg has perhaps tragically sat on his right hip, which means he has no ability to use his secondary leg to escape.
And because he's holding Gordon Ryan's arm, he has no ability now to invert his body and go into a turning escape.
Now, Gordon Ryan just needs to release the right arm.
Let's go further.
unidentified
Freeze.
Freeze.
john danaher
Go back just to here.
Okay.
Gordon Ryan is about to release the secondary leg.
Freeze right there.
Now, very slowly take it forward.
Watch Gordon Ryan's left elbow.
Freeze.
Why did he put the elbow there?
joe rogan
I don't know.
john danaher
It's a wedge.
It's immobilizing the leg he really wants to attack.
He's switched his arm position from controlling the secondary leg, which he hasn't yet fully released, but he's put his elbow in front of the toes of the primary leg.
joe rogan
To keep that primary leg from extending.
john danaher
Correct.
And to be able to transition effortlessly into the lock.
All he needs now is to release the right arm.
Cyborg knows if he loses the right arm, the fight is lost.
continue Gordon goes back to elbow position Freeze.
Freeze.
Go back just to here.
Why did Gordon Ryan win the hand fight battle?
Freeze.
Cyborg is one of the strongest people in Jiu-Jitsu.
He's got two hands on a guy in a weight division lower than him.
Why can't he hold?
Why did he lose the arm?
joe rogan
Why?
john danaher
Watch Gordon Ryan's right elbow.
unidentified
What did you see?
Amen.
Thank you.
joe rogan
Let me see that again.
He's just lifting it up and pulling it away.
What is he doing?
john danaher
He changed the angle through the elbow.
There's a grip over and a grip under.
If you just pull, you'll never release the arm.
He changed the elbow position so that one grip was lost and then a push-pull with the elbow and a slip.
Once, continue forward now.
He's got the left arm set as soon as the hands touch.
joe rogan
And Cyborg just taps before he even gets a chance to extend it because he knows the game's lost.
john danaher
He knew the game was lost long before then.
joe rogan
That's pretty goddamn impressive.
john danaher
Yes.
And you'll see this with almost all of my students.
joe rogan
I have seen that with almost all your students, which is so bizarre.
Now, how many people are recognizing this system and trying to mimic it or trying to find out some sort of a counterattack to it?
john danaher
That's an interesting question.
I'm told there's actually kind of like an industry of people who try to break what we do down and mimic it.
I know there's people putting out numerous instructionals.
They watch what the squad does and tries to break it down.
That's good and it's natural.
I'd be doing the same thing.
If someone else was coming out and wrecking people with a given rule, I'd be studying what they're doing too.
So yeah, there does seem to be an industry of that.
The question is how successful are they?
Do you see any other groups of people coming out and just exclusively finishing people with the same moves time and time again for years at a time at all levels of competition?
joe rogan
No.
You're seeing more Tenth Planet guys do that now.
Tenth Planet guys have given you all the credit in the world, by the way, that they've started transitioning to a lot more leg lock attacks, leg lock defense.
Concentrating on that.
john danaher
Yeah.
What we find is that most people definitely struggle with defending it.
And, you know, this has been around for quite a while now.
It's been five years since the squad really started pushing this publicly.
And it seems like there's still going to be some...
Eventually people will figure things out.
It's just the way progress works.
But I think at this point it's pretty clear that people have changed their minds about leg locks.
People, I think, are recognizing that there's something different going on here, that this is a control-based approach to leg locks rather than, you know, a speed and power-based approach to leg locks.
And the evidence for its success really comes from the nature of the squad itself.
If you look at the three founding members of the squad, Eddie Cummings, Gordon Ryan and Gary Tonin, All three have very, very different body types.
All three have very, very different personalities.
And yet all three use a very similar game.
Two of those three athletes came from nowhere.
They had no competition record before they started training with me at the Henzo Gracie Academy.
One of them had a competition record.
I believe Gary Tottenham was a brown belt competitor in the Gi, but he had no leg lock game.
He was a guy who was essentially known for scrambling from bottom half guard and using rear naked strangles out of scrambles.
Strangles out of scrambles, my God, that was a tongue twister.
So Gary Tom was a particularly interesting case because he came to me as an already developed athlete.
He's trained under a very good friend of mine, Tom DeBless, and completely changed his game.
So that showed something very interesting.
That showed that someone could already have a developed game and then take on this and change their game.
So that was a particularly interesting case.
With the case of Eddie Cummings and Gordon Ryan, they came to me early in their development, so they took it on wholesale, as it were.
joe rogan
I think this style and approach and one of the things that's so fascinating about it is it really requires someone like you to systematically break it down the way you have described it.
I've done jujitsu for 20 years.
But I never stopped and thought of all the positions in the system, all the steps in the system, take the fight to the ground, get past the dangerous legs, achieve some sort of a dominant position, go for the submission.
I didn't do that.
I knew what I was doing.
john danaher
What I find with most Jiu-Jitsu players is that they know what they're doing on an unconscious level.
My job as a coach is to make it conscious.
Now, for me, the most interesting thing, when I first started thinking about jiu-jitsu as a system, I did that when I wrote a book for my sensei, Henzo Gracie.
He asked me to write a book, and I started thinking deeply about, you know, what is this thing that I study?
I spend all day on the mantle.
What am I doing exactly?
And when you start consciously thinking about, okay, breaking it down into steps, you see Brazilian jiu-jitsu as a step-by-step system.
My question was, can I go further than that?
If jiu-jitsu was a simple single system, what about if you divided jiu-jitsu up into niche areas and instead of having one overall system you had an overall system with many subsystems within it.
So you had a leg system, a back system, a front headlock system, a kimura system.
My approach to jiu-jitsu is that I had recognized that much of the success of early Brazilian Jiu Jitsu came from its systematic nature.
The fact that it was a systems-based approach to Jiu Jitsu and I took various niche areas and created systems within systems.
Then things started getting interesting when I started integrating the system so that one subsystem failed you could transfer to another.
That meant that my students could put Opponents who had trained much, much longer than they had into a niche area which my students had so much knowledge of, so much training in that isolated niche domain that they could take someone who had trained three, four times longer than themselves and have more knowledge in that one domain than their much more experienced opponent did.
And so what you saw with the squad was incredibly speedy progress where they were getting wins against people who trained two, three times longer than they had.
And this idea of what I call integrated subsystems, instead of having Jiu Jitsu as just one simple single system, you keep the overall system of Jiu Jitsu, but you have subsystems within it, each one integrated with the other, so that when one system fails, you can pass off to another and go back and forth until you get the win.
That was my approach to Jiu Jitsu.
That's what I want to do.
If I can innovate Jiu Jitsu in any given direction, that's probably the one I would push the most.
joe rogan
Now, throughout this time, you're dealing with some pretty significant injuries and physical limitations that you've had.
Tell me about those, what those were, and how those hindered you.
john danaher
When I was in my early teens, I was involved in a rugby injury where my knee was massively injured.
Over the next six years I would dislocate my knee.
The ligaments appeared to be severely compromised.
Every six months or so I'd get a fresh injury which would be severe and I'd be on crutches.
I spent a significant amount of my teenage years on crutches.
Around the age of 19 I had one last injury and my knee just seemed to have no power in it.
Things like I walked with a limp and you must remember this is in the 1980s in New Zealand and this is pre-MRIs, pre-arthroscopic surgery.
The doctors said well we can do an operation where we shorten the ligaments so there's less looseness in there and hopefully your knee will be strong again.
An operation was performed and unfortunately the ligaments were cut too short and as a result my leg never straightened again.
I developed a severe case of atherofibrosis where my knee actually became deformed and doesn't straighten.
Simple actions like walking, kneeling are extremely painful for me and have been my whole life.
joe rogan
Just walking around is painful?
john danaher
Just walking is painful.
Kneeling is extremely painful.
And, you know, it's not easy to do jiu-jitsu where there's a lot of kneeling.
unidentified
Yeah.
john danaher
Also, there were other kind of structural problems as I got older.
Because I walk with a limp and one leg significantly bent and one straight, I tend to be completely out of balance, out of sync with my body.
So I soon developed considerable hip and back pain.
So this is something I carried with me my whole life.
And when I started jiu-jitsu at the age of 28, there was a concern, you know, am I going to be able to do this?
Well, fortunately, ground grappling as a rule is generally easier on your body than standing martial arts.
I don't think, for example, with my leg I could even become moderately effective at Muay Thai or Taekwondo or something where you have to be able to jump and land.
I just couldn't do it.
Whereas jiu-jitsu, because it's on the ground, you can become pretty good.
So I battled through that and I developed a satisfactory degree of competence.
I got a black belt from Henzo Gracie and I became one of his main teachers.
joe rogan
How did you train with such a compromised knee?
john danaher
You just figure out a way around it.
You know, what are you going to do?
unidentified
Sit down and die.
joe rogan
But you never thought, well, boy, I fucked my knee up.
I don't want to fuck my other knee up, too.
john danaher
You know, I think at that point, you just got to go forward.
And you got a choice.
You got to sit down and feel sorry for yourself or you're going to do the best you can with what you've got.
joe rogan
And how limited was your game because of your knee?
I mean, were you able to do things?
john danaher
Standing position was difficult for me.
joe rogan
Were you able to do triangles and all sorts of different things?
john danaher
Every week or so I would tweak it and I would be in pain for a day.
I developed a strong need for ibuprofen throughout my life.
And other problems started to emerge, especially the lower back.
The lower back is a big issue and gave me problems my whole adult life.
joe rogan
Does it still bother you now?
john danaher
Less so now.
joe rogan
I have a machine I have to show you.
john danaher
Okay.
joe rogan
It's called the Reverse Hyper.
Have you ever heard of it?
john danaher
Oh, yes.
I believe they were used by a guy called Louis Simmons.
joe rogan
Yeah.
It's a life changer.
john danaher
Yeah.
I can't use one now because they have a hip replacement.
And when you go up, it puts extreme shearing force on a hip replacement.
So I can do it with body weight, but I can't do it with a weight.
So I'm aware of what they are.
I know many people speak very highly of them.
unidentified
Yeah.
john danaher
So yeah, I had this problem and things didn't really become critical until my mid to early 40s when as a result of walking my whole life with a limp, my left hip started to become completely bone on bone.
So then the problems doubled because now I had a Completely screwed up knee and a hip, but I couldn't get any kind of operations because George St-Pierre was fighting, Chris Weidman was fighting.
They both had great goals and so I delayed the hip operation as long as I could until George had his first retirement and Chris Weidman became a world champion and then moved further away to Long Island.
He wasn't training with me so much.
At that time I started training the squad and my first active competitive grappling student was Eddie Cummings and I was able to work effectively with him as best I could with my hip problems and of course the original leg problem and then at some point I got to a point where I literally If I walked down a New York City block,
I would have to stop several times and just stand on the side of the road and wait for my hip to stop hurting so I could walk and it just became impossible to work with and I ended up getting a full hip replacement.
joe rogan
So that's when they shear off the top of your hip, they screw a bolt down in there with a new hip?
john danaher
That's correct.
joe rogan
And how does it feel now?
john danaher
It's pain-free, which is a wonderful thing for me.
Like any fake hip, it's never going to be as strong as your real hip.
There's limitations on what I can do there.
The only problem was that shortly after the hip replacement went in, then my knee finally collapsed after 30 years of problems.
And so I'm going to have to get a knee replacement on the same leg.
joe rogan
And how do they do that one?
john danaher
Knee replacement's a little bit more tricky because you don't have as much bone mass to work with.
And generally the longevity of knee replacements is not as...
Because there's much more movement in the knee than there is in the hip.
There's much greater range of motion.
There's less bone to affects too.
They generally don't have the longevity of a hip replacement.
I'm 50 years old, so ideally you would want a replacement that outlived you, but I would probably have to get a second knee replacement when I get older to replace the first, which is not ideal, but I'm probably going to have to do it.
joe rogan
Well, who knows what kind of crazy technology they'll have down the line.
john danaher
I hope so.
I hope they give me some kind of superhero leg that turns things around for me.
joe rogan
Yeah, well, you never know.
I mean, it's just the nature of the hip replacement is so...
It's so brutally invasive.
The shearing off the top of the hip and then the rod that's inserted deep into the bone of the hip and then all that jazz.
john danaher
Yeah.
joe rogan
It's a lot.
It's a lot going on there.
john danaher
So, to answer your question, in the early days it was an impediment that I worked around.
But as I got older, I had to do a first operation and now a second.
Believe it or not, Joe, I was actually scheduled to get my knee replacement tomorrow.
But I didn't do it because Gary Tonin is going to be fighting his first MMA fight in March 26. Now, is he fighting for 1FC? 1FC. Ah, interesting.
So if I got the knee replacement now, I would not be able to help him get ready for his first MMA fight, which I thought would be – that's not fair on my part.
joe rogan
Right.
john danaher
And so I delayed it until after that fight.
unidentified
Why did he decide on 1FC? That's an interesting question.
john danaher
You'd have to ask Gary Tonin to be certain.
But I think one of his main fears was that if he went through the amateur route and then worked his way towards the UFC, there would be problems because he's already an established name in grappling.
And I think he was concerned that it would be difficult for him to get people to fight amateur.
And then eventually make his way to the UFC. Whereas 1FC is a fairly well-known organization and they were pretty open.
He did a grappling match for them and they loved it.
They were like, you know, are you interested in MMA? So he could, as it were, go into a fairly high level of MMA right from the start as opposed to do a long, circuitous amateur route and then battle his way into the UFC. I believe, don't quote me on this, but I believe that was the logic behind it.
joe rogan
Now, are you able, so when you're demonstrating techniques, are you demonstrating them verbally?
john danaher
After the hip replacement, I could only do it verbally and I had to trust in my students, Eddie Cummings, Gary Tonn, Gordon Ryan and others, Brian Glick, no one knows him, but he's one of my great students.
I would point with a stick and they would do the moves for me.
Since then I've gotten a little better and I like to demonstrate as best I can.
There's days when I can barely walk and on those days I'll have the students go through.
Sometimes there's certain standing techniques that are a little risky for me to do and I'll have students demonstrate those.
But I do what I can on the days that I teach.
joe rogan
It is quite fascinating that a guy who has catastrophic injuries of his leg is one who is known for being an innovator and crushing people's legs.
john danaher
There is something kind of strange about that.
joe rogan
Yeah, you were joking around about it being revenge.
john danaher
Yeah, this is my revenge against the world.
If God took away my leg, I'm taking away everybody else's.
So, yeah, there is something ironic about that.
joe rogan
Now, when you're teaching this system and you're showing all the guys in the squad, the Donaher death squad, do you have it worked out to the point where it's like you have a curriculum?
john danaher
I never like the word curriculum because that kind of implies that it's all worked out in advance and it's done step by step.
I come in on a given day and I'm there seven days a week.
I watch all of my athletes every single day.
They don't do anything without me watching them do it.
So I know at the end of every day what they need to work on tomorrow because I'm there.
unidentified
Wow.
john danaher
So it's not like a set curriculum where, you know, I know that on April 13, I'm going to do this.
It's not like that.
unidentified
Right.
john danaher
It's like, I saw you train yesterday.
I saw where you fucked up and I saw where you were good.
So tomorrow we're working this.
joe rogan
What an amazing resource for those guys to have someone like you standing over them, watching them and analyzing their positions and techniques and progress.
john danaher
That's generous of you to say, but I always feel that my students are more of a resource to me than I am to them.
I've been blessed through my entire coaching career to have some truly remarkable students.
Some of whom are famous and known to you and many others who aren't.
And whatever debt they owe to me, I feel I owe at least as much to them.
My students literally give me everything.
I'm a notoriously difficult person to get along with.
I'm demanding.
I'm a perfectionist.
I can be downright unpleasant when my body's in pain, I'm short-tempered.
And yet, they're like angels.
They stick in there and they tough it out and they give so much time, so much effort, so much thought.
And as I said, whatever resource I am to them, they give it right back.
They're a resource to me.
joe rogan
Well, that attitude is why you're such a fantastic coach in the first place.
I remember one of the first times I started talking to you was when you were working with George.
Now, what's interesting is you had a very interesting approach and even the way you described things.
You would talk about shootboxing.
unidentified
Mm-hmm.
joe rogan
Describe that because you you didn't talk when like I remember I think one of our first long conversations with that some weird Denny's or something somewhere and one of those weird road shows Like we're just sat down.
john danaher
You're absolutely right.
That was the first time we met.
joe rogan
Yeah, we had a long conversation and You were talking about the principles of shoot boxing.
Please explain.
john danaher
One of the strange things about the sport of mixed martial arts is so young that there's still so much to be done.
Even the way people understand mixed martial arts to me is interesting.
99% of people who look at mixed martial arts see mixed martial arts as an eclectic sport.
In other words, it's a conglomeration of different martial arts kind of banded together and then you've got mixed martial arts.
It's a mix of martial arts and there you have it.
You get two guys in a cage and you've got mixed martial arts.
I never saw mixed martial arts as an eclectic sport.
I see it as a transcendent sport.
What I mean by that is there are four distinct skill areas of mixed martial arts.
Any one of those skill areas always goes beyond the component martial arts that make it up.
In other words, the skill area transcends the various martial arts that make it up and create something bigger and different from the core components that originally built it.
When you look at the sport of mixed martial arts, you see there are four dominant skill areas.
The first occurs when they first come out and the two athletes have no connection with each other and they're dancing around the cage.
This is the so-called shoot boxing phase which involves skills drawn from Western boxing, Muay Thai, Karate, freestyle wrestling and various other martial arts.
Where the two athletes are jockeying for position and typically they're trying to determine the direction of the fight.
Will it go down or will it stay up?
That's one skill area.
The second skill area is the skill area of the clinch, where the two athletes are both still standing, but now they've got a hold on each other.
They're no longer moving around at will.
This has its key components drawn from Muay Thai, Greco-Roman wrestling, freestyle wrestling, judo, etc., etc.
Then there's a third key skill area.
The area of fence fighting, fence boxing, where the two athletes are in a clinch, but they're locked on the fence, which dramatically changes the skills required for success than if you're in the open.
And then you have a fourth skill area, which is the ground.
And of course, that's divided into top and bottom position.
So there are four skill areas of mixed martial arts.
You could add more or less.
For example, you could add in the idea of the geography of the cage, you can add in new areas.
But let's stick with that fundamental four for now.
If you show me any one of those skill areas, yes, you can derive skills from those component martial arts, from Muay Thai, from Judo, whatever you choose.
But that skill area is going to have other elements that are not part of those original martial arts, that is something different, something unique, and something above the various component martial arts that made it up.
When you're fighting on the ground, a lot of what you do is derive from Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu and modern mixed martial arts.
Most of the athletes come from a Jiu-Jitsu background.
When they work ground skills, they work in a kind of a Jiu-Jitsu framework.
But many of the things going on down there are a mix of things that are far outside of your daily training in Brazilian Jiu Jitsu.
You can bring in things from Muay Thai.
You're throwing Muay Thai elbows on the ground, but on the ground the elbows have a very different feel from the standing position.
The mechanics behind them are significantly different.
You're throwing hooks on the ground, but the mechanics of throwing hooks on the ground are very, very different from the mechanics of throwing hooks in the standing position.
So yeah, you're bringing skills in from boxing, but you're adapting them too.
So the way to look at the sport of mixed martial arts is not just like, okay, I'm going to rope together some wrestling, some boxing, and see what happens.
Rather, you're developing skills in four distinct areas, a minimum of four, And the skills you ultimately develop go beyond and are significantly different from the core components that you started with.
And so ultimately the skills of a mixed martial artist at the highest levels transcend the various core martial arts that made the sport up.
You're going further.
When you fight in a mixed martial arts fight, you're a jiu-jitsu fighter, you use it a lot more than just jiu-jitsu and the various other boxing styles, etc., etc., that you use.
In the case of shoot boxing in George St. Pierre, everyone always talks about George's wrestling.
Now, George is a very good wrestler.
He's wrestled a long time with very good people.
But 90% of the success of his ability to take people down It goes far beyond wrestling.
It has to do with the precursors to the shot.
What wrestling teaches you to do in mixed martial arts is how to finish a shot.
It gives you the body mechanics to finish the shot.
But the setups are Completely different from wrestling.
I can show you endless examples of good wrestlers who went into mixed martial arts competition with no background in mixed martial arts and couldn't take anybody down.
The distance is different.
The stance is different.
The motion is different.
The setups are completely different.
The context is different.
You're being punched instead of grappling.
George In my opinion, throughout his career, had a level of skill and technical insight in the art of boxing, kickboxing into takedowns that no one else has even come close to.
Much of what he did in that area came from himself.
Did he have good wrestling coaches?
Absolutely.
Did he have good boxing coaches?
Absolutely.
Great Muay Thai coaches?
100%.
But the skills he was exhibiting went beyond any one of those teachers or even them as a whole.
The act of tying together all of those disparate skills came from him.
The integration of skills And so you have someone who had a wrestling background, had a boxing background, had a Muay Thai background, but ultimately what he was doing was something bigger than all of those put together.
There's a synergistic effect here where the sum was somehow greater than the components that individually made it up.
And that's what I mean when I talk about a transcendent sport.
George St. Pierre was largely responsible through individual experimentation, starting in his late teens and going through his entire career in the development of Shootbox.
joe rogan
Now, when you work as a coach for George, you weren't just working as a jiu-jitsu coach.
You were working in almost like a mastermind sort of a position.
I mean, I saw some conversations that you had with him where you discussed various things.
In fact, one of the things you came to me about was you asked me if I knew anyone who was proficient at the spinning back kick.
And that's how I got to working with George.
Your coaching with him was not just simply like, these are the principles of jiu-jitsu, this is what I want you to work on, when the fight goes to the ground.
You were working on a lot of different aspects.
You were a guy that sort of put it together.
Now, when you don't have a background in striking and you're looking at all of these various disciplines and trying to formulate a strategy for a guy who's such a supreme athlete like George, how did you formulate that?
Did you do it based on the individual, based on their physical strengths and limitations and sort of formulate what you think would be the best approach?
Did you work it out with him in conjunction?
john danaher
When George comes to train with me, there's a bunch of considerations.
First of all, George lives in Montreal.
I live in New York.
So time is always an issue.
joe rogan
Well, he does go down there.
john danaher
He goes down there quite often.
But it's not like a squat.
The squat's there like seven days a week, three times a day.
George was never like that.
So in the time available, we'll work on what we can.
So everything's always done with George.
How much time is available?
And what is the scenario that's coming up?
For George, almost always, it was an upcoming mixed martial arts fight.
So a lot of people often ask me, say, you know, how come he didn't teach George St. Peter leg locks?
Why wasn't he leg locking everyone in MMA? Well, that's a good question.
First off, leg locking, as you saw from the Gordon Ryan clip, requires...
If it's not done well, leg locking is one of those things where if it's done well, it's amazing.
But if it's done badly, it's the worst looking thing in the world.
It's a disaster.
Secondly, George's game, because his takedowns are so strong, is almost always done from top position on the ground.
It's rare for George to be in bottom position on the ground.
And in a fight situation, if you're already on top of someone and you've got the striking prowess of George St-Pierre, I was happy to coach him more in what we call grapple boxing, the skill of grappling to punching on the ground.
It just made more sense for him.
He's competent in leg-locking, but he's not like Gary Tonner, Eddie Cummings, or Gordon Ryan.
Could he finish most black belts?
Yeah, absolutely.
But why would you stake a fight where literally millions of dollars are being fought?
There's a legacy on the line.
Why would you take that risk when you could just stay on time and punch him out like he did with, say, John Fitch, for example?
So it didn't really make sense to push that hard on George.
Your question, though, was, okay, what about these other skills?
What about standing position?
Well, I'm fascinated not just by Jiu-Jitsu, but by martial arts in general.
And I've always believed all the various sport martial arts in the world have areas where they are particularly strong.
For example, people make fun of Taekwondo.
No one does Taekwondo or MMA. You'll back me up on this joke.
There are some Taekwondo players out there at Olympic level who can kick with a skill level that most people can't even imagine.
I've seen people like Herb Perez do kicking demonstrations where You're looking at it.
This is one of the most impressive things I've ever seen in my life.
And this is a guy who, if he hits you, he's going to take your head off.
It's impressive.
joe rogan
I was there when Herb Perez was in his prime.
I watched him KO quite a few people.
I watched him KO one of the U.S. national champions with an axe kick.
john danaher
Some of the worst KOs I've ever seen in my life came from Taekwondo.
They tend to involve jump-spinning kicks where there's just huge amounts of kinetic energy being developed.
You see the same thing in point-fighting karate.
You see some terrible knockouts in point-fighting karate.
People make fun of these sports.
joe rogan
Well, on their own is the issue.
john danaher
That's the issue.
On their own, they've got problems.
But if you can integrate that into a well-developed Complete skill set, they could be incredibly effective and I always saw tremendous potential for Taekwondo's jump spinning back kick.
No one does spinning back kicks better than Taekwondo.
That's one of their main things and they do it incredibly well.
The setups are fantastic, the application, the mechanics, everything's super impressive.
So I always thought that would be a, you know, George had a good spinning back kick, but I thought that would be a nice addition.
You always want to be Building new skills into a pun.
You don't want to be that predictable guy where everyone knows what you're doing.
And I know you came from Taekwondo backgrounds, and so I thought that would be an interesting thing for you to work on with him.
joe rogan
Well, it was a funny conversation because that was my specialty.
john danaher
Yes.
joe rogan
And so when you brought in, I always wanted to talk to you.
I always found you a fascinating guy.
So when you came up to me and you said, do you know anyone?
It's almost like a trick question.
It was a trick question.
john danaher
Do you know anyone besides Joe?
joe rogan
What I said, I was like, I was hesitant.
I was like, okay, you're not going to believe this.
john danaher
The truth is, I knew you had a good jump swinging back kick.
I was trying to subtly push you.
unidentified
Did you know?
john danaher
Yeah.
joe rogan
How did you know?
john danaher
Word gets around this guy.
joe rogan
Oh, okay.
I thought you were just fucking with me.
I mean, but I felt like when I was telling you, I was like, man, I don't even want it.
I wish I knew someone who did it as well as me.
john danaher
You were too modest.
You should have just been like, yeah, I've got the best jump spinning back kick in the fucking world.
joe rogan
Not really.
I did jump spinning back kick quite a bit, but I prefer a regular spinning back kick.
I want my foot on the ground.
Because I push off that foot.
There's a significant amount of force in that left leg pushing off that back.
john danaher
Interestingly, you're seeing some guys out there now having good success in MMA spinning back.
I remember seeing Michael Page had a beautiful one.
joe rogan
He's got everything.
That guy can do everything.
He's another guy who came from that point fighting background.
You see Raymond Daniels and him and a lot of these guys from that background.
john danaher
Raymond Daniels worked with George for his last two fights.
Very, very impressive guy.
joe rogan
Phenomenal.
Again, he had just the point fighting skills and now he's developing real boxing skills.
You've seen him in Bellator kickboxing.
john danaher
You see the integration of the two.
joe rogan
Phenomenal.
He could just do things physically that most kickboxers just really don't know what he's doing.
He'll jump up and do what's called a touch spinning back kick.
Like he'll jump up and touch you with the front leg and spin.
john danaher
I saw that.
He hit it in a glorified, I believe.
Yes.
joe rogan
Beautiful.
Yeah, he's phenomenal.
He's phenomenal.
When you see that, it's like those things by themselves, you're just gonna get taken to the ground and smashed and most people, unless you land one of those catastrophic spinning back kicks right away, the odds are you need all those other things as well in order to be particularly effective, which is why George was such a unique case.
john danaher
George can get away with that kind of thing, yeah.
joe rogan
But that was a fun moment.
It was interesting.
It was like, I've always wanted to show somebody this.
Because it's a weird little thing that I know how to do.
john danaher
Going back to your original question, the idea of George in Shootbox, you'll see that George's entire methodology in The Standing Musician is built around the concept of a dilemma.
The dilemma is always between his jab and his takedown.
People always talk about proactive and reactive takedowns.
Okay, this guy's a reactive, this guy's a proactive takedown guy.
The thing about George is he would use his jab proactively, but he would use his takedowns reactively.
Now that's interesting because George would literally provoke people into the takedown.
joe rogan
I just want to point this out, past tense.
You're saying this like you know something I don't know.
john danaher
No, no, no.
joe rogan
Because George just won the middleweight title, relinquished the title, and then the great speculation is, will George fight again?
john danaher
The truth is that no one knows because it comes down to medical problems.
George has a, he's got a problem on his stomach.
joe rogan
It's like colitis, is that what it is?
john danaher
Yeah.
joe rogan
What is that exactly?
john danaher
I'm not going to claim to be a medical expert, but it's one of the most frustrating things that George has had to deal with, where there are certain parts of the human body that are just out of your control, and the stomach is one of them.
Just things happening in your stomach, you can't control it.
Things like stress seem to make it worse.
And the truth is that no one really knows at this point.
So wherever there's doubt, my Instinct is to think well, do you really want to come back George?
joe rogan
You've done all this and What a great way to cap off a career too.
john danaher
It was amazing.
It was impressive.
joe rogan
And I gotta tell you when he came back This is what was really interesting about that fight George had said I'm better.
I'm a better martial artist than I was before and he looked better I mean, he definitely looked like he was a little out of competition Like there was a moment.
john danaher
After four years he should.
How many fighters do you know came back after a four-year layoff?
joe rogan
Very few.
But, skill-wise, he looked phenomenal.
I mean, his striking looked incredibly smooth.
And I think you could see it in Bisping's face, like, pretty early on.
Like, this guy is...
This is not a rusty George St. Pierre.
He's not a small welterweight who's making his way in the middleweight.
He looked huge.
He looked phenomenal.
His technique, the way he was landing leg kicks and his sharp jab, and then ultimately that left hand that he used to stun Bisping and get him on the ground.
I mean, he looked sensational.
john danaher
Yes.
You were there the night George went into his first retirement, and you'll recall the whole retirement thing was kind of, the speech was vague, it wasn't clear, it was confusing, because in truth he didn't know if he wanted to retire.
The whole thing was actually contrived in the octagon, right there in front of you.
It would have been a hard fight.
The training camp hadn't been the best camp.
The fight for Hendrix was...
George was unclear if he wanted to fight at all.
There were all kinds of controversies involved in the fight.
And then when the fight was over, it was a very close fight.
And he wasn't sure what he wanted to do.
There was some language miscommunication.
And ultimately, essentially he walked away from the game.
And he walked away for four years.
That's a long time to be out of a sport that's as young as MMA, which is evolving all the time.
Every year the sport changes and the belts tend to change hands very, very quickly.
So when George started talking to me about the idea of, okay, I want to come back.
I think I've still got to come back.
I want to come back.
There's a desire, a passion.
And My point to him was, first off, you sure you really want to do this?
Like, you know, the last two fight camps was tough.
He didn't seem to have the same kind of drive as he used to have.
You sure you want to do this?
Is this like a middle-aged fantasy going through here?
And he said, no, no, I feel this.
I want to come back.
So my question to him was, If you're going to come back, are you just going to do the same thing?
Are you just going to come back to welterweight and do what you always did, which is come out and beat the best welterweights and just hold the title?
Are you just going to be doing the same thing?
I thought, if you're going to come back, let's do something significant, something you haven't done before.
And so the way I put it to him was, what are the three most persistent criticisms you always hear about George St. Pierre?
You never fought up a weight class.
You never went up.
Number two, you fought so tactically sound, with such an emphasis on strategy and techniques or what have you, that matches could become dull.
The average fan was like, well, yeah, he's winning easily and it's dominant, but doesn't do it for him.
It's not exciting.
There's no drama in the fights.
Okay?
So we had this idea that on the one hand he was very technically sound, strategically deep but the fights weren't as exciting as they ought to be.
The idea that he'd never gone up a weight category and the third most persistent charisma he didn't finish fights.
He was a very skilled fighter but he wasn't finishing fights.
So my point is, okay, if you're going to come back, let's do it in a way where you address those three things.
Okay?
George is always concerned about his legacy as a fighter.
And if there were three persistent criticisms of George NPS legacy, it was those three things.
You're not finishing fights, you never went up a weight class, and you're too tactical.
Okay?
You're not providing the drama that a fight should.
So I said, let's change things.
In that four years, previous to that, whenever I was training George, I was training him for a fight.
He was fighting Nick Diaz, he was fighting Carlos Condor, he was fighting whoever.
And it was always getting him ready for a fight.
You're fighting Matt Hughes in two months, let's get ready.
Now you're retired, I'm not going to train you to fight some dude.
I'm going to train you in jiu-jitsu.
Freddie Roach is going to train you in boxing.
In this sense, we had the time now to start working on finishing skills.
A significant change occurred where my primary emphasis in training George in that four-year layoff was in submissions.
Now, happily, that happened at what time?
The time the squad was coming out.
So I had a group of some of the best submission peoples in the world for George to work with.
So his submissions started getting better.
Suddenly George said, Pierre, if he got on your back, it was a problem.
He's submitting people in the gym.
I could run off some names.
I won't do it because it's not the thing to do, but I could run off some names of people he submitted in the gym that would shock you, like well-known jiu-jitsu people.
And for the first time, our primary emphasis wasn't on grapple boxing, it was submission.
Freddie Roach was working on the mechanics of punching.
George always had good in-out movement.
He always had that karate movement, the ability.
He always had a strong jab.
But now he's teaching him how to sit on a punch.
Suddenly George had a left hook.
A guy who can integrate left hand between jab and left hook, that's a dangerous man.
Everyone was worried.
There's so much overreaction to George's jab that suddenly left hook opportunities were opening up.
And now he was sitting on that left hook and people were getting hurt.
So now for the first time you've got a guy who's got submissions and he's hitting with genuine power.
As he came back, there was a question of who's going to be the opponent.
And the next thing I said is, well, you never went up a weight division.
joe rogan
Go up to 85. Now, was any consideration about going up to 85 because of the fact that Bisping was the champion?
john danaher
No, because that decision was made before Bisping was the champion.
joe rogan
Really?
john danaher
Yeah.
joe rogan
How far in advance was the decision made?
Because Bisping had defended against Henderson, he'd won against Rockhold.
john danaher
Remember, this was a four-year project.
Okay?
joe rogan
So, during these four years...
john danaher
Initially, I couldn't make that decision because another student of mine, Chris Weidman, was a 185-pound champion.
And Chris and George would never fight each other.
But once that was no longer an issue, then it was like, hey, this could work.
This could be interesting.
joe rogan
So during the entire four years, he was talking about eventually coming back?
john danaher
Not the entire four years.
No.
joe rogan
Okay.
john danaher
But he was training the whole time.
And I was pushing him like, you're not fighting anymore.
Let's do some submission grappling.
joe rogan
Right.
john danaher
Okay.
He stuck with Freddie Roach.
He loves working with Freddie Roach.
And so the training was going in different directions.
joe rogan
And who is this Muay Thai coach?
john danaher
Mostly, he works with Firas Zahabi in Tri-Star, but that's more integrated.
Firas is a black belt of mine, so he often does jiu-jitsu with Firas, where I teach Firas, and Firas does a good job there.
But Firas ties things together.
That's his principal function.
joe rogan
And I know he trained with Phil Nurse for a while as well?
john danaher
Yes.
Then he trained with a lot of guys who came out of Thailand itself, from Tiger Muay Thai.
Yod, that's a shortening of his actual name.
They all have very long names, but Yod was one of his trainers.
They trained him prior to Condit and Diaz.
Did a fine job.
So there's never been a shortage of coaches in his life, but there are certain things that seem to gel with him more than others.
Interestingly, during that four-year period, George had a strong rebirth into karate and worked with a lot of specialized karate people, including Raymond Daniels and others.
They came mostly from the European point-fighting karate circuit, and he was working with them a lot.
And so they crossed a certain period of time where you're dealing with a different athlete now.
This is a guy who's had four years off and the training had gone in different directions.
His finishing skills in both fisticuffs and grappling had gotten considerably better.
He was toying with the idea of going up to 85 and experimenting with diet, etc.
to get his body weight up.
That's never an easy thing to do.
And tactically, he was working more on the idea of being an exciting fighter through movement and pushing harder for the finish.
And I thought those were three very, very healthy directions to go in.
And this would, as it were, if he did come back, this would offer a genuine opportunity to address the three most persistent criticisms of his career.
Initially, there was a lot of persistence from the UFC. I don't think they were fond of the idea at all.
They wanted him to go to 170 and do what he had done.
But George pushed hard for the fight at 85, and ultimately it happened in a rather strange way.
Tyrone Woodley had a fight at 170, which wasn't the most crowd-pleasing fight, and George St-Pierre was supposed to fight Tyrone Woodley, and then the U.S. said, you know what?
Fight Brisbane, it's on.
So we chose the Madison Square Garden.
That's one of the great fight capitals of the world and that's how it happened.
joe rogan
So there was consideration in fighting 170?
unidentified
Yes.
joe rogan
And so this was the UFC's idea, but what about your plan for...
john danaher
I thought...
First of all, I'm not the matchmaker.
I'm not the main policymaker.
I don't want to say that I was the guy that suggested those ideas.
And George seemed to like the idea.
He said, if I'm going to come back, if I'm going to take the risk of a four-year layoff and come back, it's a big risk.
I mean, Muhammad Ali came back after three years and had two warm-up fights and still lost his title fight.
joe rogan
Yeah, but Muhammad Ali really wasn't working out.
That was when the Vietnam War thing had happened.
john danaher
Yeah, he was mostly doing tours of college campuses.
joe rogan
Yeah, he wasn't really working out.
john danaher
George is working out the whole time and improving.
joe rogan
You could see the difference in Muhammad Ali's body when he came back.
john danaher
But still, there's many other examples.
Sugar Ray Leonard came back after layoffs.
He had one successful and one very unsuccessful comeback, and he was working hard the whole time.
unidentified
So, coming back is a tricky, tricky thing.
john danaher
On many levels, too.
Not just physical, but also psychological.
joe rogan
So now this Kaleidos thing is throwing a monkey wrench into the gears.
john danaher
Yeah, actually it threw a monkey wrench during the camp.
joe rogan
Really?
john danaher
Yeah, I could tell you some stories about that.
That camp was, as good as the four years was, the camp itself, I can say it now because it's over, was a disaster.
It was probably the worst camp I've ever been involved in.
joe rogan
Really?
john danaher
I was coaching, of course, the squad for ADCC. So ADCC, I believe, was around six weeks before George's fight.
unidentified
Yeah.
john danaher
So I was in Finland and communicating with George and he's like feeling good.
The moment I get back, I was going to go on a plane from Finland to Montreal and start the camp.
George sent me out, I've got stomach issues.
And I was like, what do you mean, stomach issues?
What does that even mean?
Now, about two weeks into the camp, the issues got so bad that George literally could not...
Now, this is a six-week fight camp.
It's a very short camp.
Back in the day, we used to do eight to twelve weeks.
But George thought a shorter camp would be better.
As he was getting older, he wanted a shorter camp.
The first two weeks were okay, but I was in the aftermath of the Finland expedition.
And when I first went up, George said, I've got to cancel.
I can't train.
unidentified
My fight's four weeks away.
john danaher
And George took two weeks off.
There was a critical moment on a Friday evening where I said to Farah Sahabi, this is the second time I've had to say this to Farah Sahabi, the other was the Carlos Condit camp.
I said, if George isn't training by Monday, we're going to pull the plug.
There's no other way.
I mean, we're talking about a four-year layoff.
And this camp is lost.
It's dead in the water.
joe rogan
So four weeks out, he takes two weeks off.
john danaher
I believe it might have been five.
I'll check the dates later.
unidentified
But close.
john danaher
Somewhere in the neighborhood.
We're talking very close.
It was a critical two-week period.
joe rogan
And during that two weeks, what is he able to do?
john danaher
Essentially nothing.
joe rogan
Nothing.
john danaher
Just light drilling, some movement, and it occurred at the worst possible time.
It wasn't at the start of the camp, it was in the middle of the camp.
So the first two weeks were lost because...
Then we had two weeks of inactivity.
Then there's two weeks left.
And I remember the first time I went up, I brought Jake Shields, Gary Toner, and Gordon Ryan with me.
We came up and we went through some drills on the ground.
And I was happy.
You know, George looked okay on the ground.
He did fine against the squad guys.
And we worked on some specialized grappling stuff.
And then the next day he went to do a shoot box workout.
Now, I could sit here all day and tell you adventures of George St. Pierre doing shoebox training with people.
I've seen him spar everybody.
I'm not going to mention names, but I've seen George St. Pierre take down effortlessly some of the biggest names in mixed martial arts, in weight divisions far above his own, So many times per round, you just lose count.
I'm afraid to even tell you the stories because people wouldn't believe me.
I'm used to seeing George St. Pierre shoot boxing, bang, bang, down.
I've seen that since the start of his career.
I watched George St. Pierre do a shoot box workout where he couldn't score a takedown.
This is a fight two weeks away.
I'm just looking and going like, holy heck, what is this?
He's getting hit.
He's getting frustrated.
He's getting tired.
And I said to Faraz, you know, this is a crisis.
This is one of the biggest UFCs of the year.
It's Madison Square Garden.
He's the headline.
The UFC had to pull some big things to get this fight to happen.
They originally didn't want it.
If we pull out now, it's going to look like a disaster.
It's going to let George let the UFC down.
And to his everlasting credit, George said, I'll be back on Monday and I'll be better.
We went up and he dug in deep.
What can I tell you?
He's a trooper.
He trained every day those last two weeks.
As each day went by there was significant improvement and I remember there was a distinct moment about five days before the end of the camp I saw him do a shoot box workout and he looked like the old George I was okay.
I believe in this kid again.
You can do it.
joe rogan
Jamie will you please google colitis?
I don't know enough.
I believe you should google ulcerative colitis Yeah, I don't know it's so it's something to do with stomach ulcers I'm not going to claim to be an expert, but yeah.
john danaher
I can tell you what the symptoms were.
It was extreme stomach pain and inability to eat.
It screwed up his entire diet.
joe rogan
And when did it start?
john danaher
It started early in the camp and got progressively worse.
joe rogan
So before the camp there was no issues?
john danaher
Not none that he mentioned.
joe rogan
Ulcerative colitis is usually only an innermost lining of the large intestine, colon, and rectum.
Forms range from mild to severe.
Having ulcerative colitis puts a patient at increased risk of developing colon cancer.
Symptoms including rectal bleeding, bloody diarrhea, abdominal cramps, and pain.
Sounds like a party.
john danaher
Yeah.
Can you bring it back?
Read the first four.
joe rogan
Treatment can help, but this condition cannot be cured.
Requires a medical diagnosis, lab tests, or imaging always required.
Chronic can last for years or be lifelong.
john danaher
It's incredibly frustrating for him to deal with.
joe rogan
It says treatments include medications and surgery.
john danaher
Yeah.
So, it's a problem.
But it appeared to back off a little bit in the last two weeks.
He came back.
This is the kind of person George St. Pierre is.
The morning of the fight, Saturday morning, we're in New York City in the hotel room.
Farah Sahabi, Freddie Roach, and myself are at the breakfast table.
George comes down for breakfast.
He's weighed in.
He looks at his breakfast.
Originally the plan, because it was a fight at 185, was to have George come in at a higher body weight.
But he ended up weighing 191 pounds, which is exactly the same as he used to fight at welterweight, the same body weight.
So that was kind of a disappointment, you know.
And he quietly excused himself and went to the bathroom.
Everyone else went away to do their things and I sat there and I realized he's in the bathroom for an hour.
He came out and I was like, George, you okay?
And he looked at me and he said, I'm fine.
But I knew he wasn't.
And then he went out and fought.
And then afterwards he told me, dude, I was in so much pain.
And he was afraid to tell me because he would worry that if I cornered him and I thought he was compromised, I wouldn't corner him the way I normally would.
That I would doubt him.
So he kept it all inside, didn't say a word.
And he's a good kid.
You know, you can't help but admire a kid like that.
unidentified
Wow.
joe rogan
Well, that's what makes him a champion.
It's one of the things.
It's less than perfect conditions.
He could still rise to the occasion.
john danaher
Less than perfect.
It was very far from perfect.
joe rogan
Now, you said that during the Johnny Hendricks fight, during the camp for that fight, when...
He decided to impromptu retire inside the octagon.
There was talk during the camp that he didn't want to fight.
What was that about?
john danaher
Really, it centered around two things.
One, I cannot discuss because it involves a personal life of George St. Pierre.
There were some things going on in his personal life.
That deeply affected him, and he was deeply unhappy with some circumstances in his personal life, and it's not appropriate for me to talk about those.
And the second was the whole idea that it had become an obsession with George at that time, which was the use of anabolic steroids in mixed martial arts.
And he was deeply unhappy with what he perceived as the prevalence of the use of anabolic steroids in mixed martial arts as a whole and among his opponents in particular.
And he wanted a testing program to be brought in for that fight.
There was talk about it but nothing came of it and it became like this psychological obsession during the camp.
Between those two issues, there was a lot of unhappiness.
He came in, he did his training.
He's a professional athlete.
It's not like he missed workouts or anything crazy.
There wasn't going out at night or anything foolish.
But there was a degree of unhappiness where I'm looking and thinking, how much longer can this go on?
joe rogan
Now There was some talk about the Tyron Woodley fight and then Tyron had this bad performance, but if George did get healthy and was confident enough in his health that he could get through an actual training camp, would he be interested in considering a fight with Tyron Woodley?
john danaher
Absolutely.
I think Tyrone Wood is a great champion.
I know he gets a lot of stick, a lot of flack.
That kid is talented.
joe rogan
Very talented.
john danaher
He's very, very good.
joe rogan
He doesn't think George wants to fight him.
He was on the podcast the other day.
john danaher
I think people say that for reasons so that they can motivate someone to fight them.
There's a political aspect to it.
I think that both athletes have a deep respect for each other.
Tyrone Willie's a very, very difficult opponent to beat.
People criticize his style, but people don't understand the difference between regular fighting and championship fighting.
Championship fighting is about winning and losing, and you've got to do what you've got to do to win.
That's the first consideration.
It's nice to impress the crowd, it's nice to do this or that, but ultimately it's about what are you going to do to win?
What are you going to do to beat the second best guy in the world?
That's a difficult, difficult thing.
joe rogan
And it has to be done correctly.
This idea of fighting to entertain.
This is a very complex thing and you talked about it with George addressing that or attempting to address that in his comeback and trying to finish and be more energetic and aggressive.
The reality is, that's not always the best way to engage.
There's a right way to fight a person with a particular skill set.
Especially in the Woodley vs.
Stephen Wonderboy Thompson fights.
I was like, this is the only way to fight that guy.
Unless you are what he is, which is a very skillful, traditional martial artist.
That has this very unique ability to bend at the waist like a snake and slide in with techniques and does a lot off the front leg, dangerous stuff off the front leg.
Unless you can do that too, you really shouldn't be on the outside striking with him.
It's just too weird.
That style's too weird.
So he kind of had to lay back.
Again, if you look at the results of the fight, the times in the fight where someone was hurt, it was Tyron Woodley putting the hurt on Wonderboy Thompson.
Those were the only times in the fight where it was really exciting.
Other than that, it was Wonderboy trying to pick at him from the outside.
unidentified
It's a very difficult fight to look good at.
john danaher
You know, the whole idea of mixed martial arts fans, there's always three kinds of people that watch mixed martial arts.
There's fans of drama, there's fans of violence, and there's fans of strategy and technique.
Guys like us, when we watch MMA, we fall under the technique and strategy crowd.
To me, I can watch Woodley fight Wonderboy, and I'm fascinated by it.
To me, that's just like, wow, it's magic.
I can watch it all day.
Many of the fans want to see violence.
That's what they're attracted to.
And it's a significant portion.
Others like the idea of drama.
And athletes, in a sense, have to brand themselves according to one of those three choices.
George always branded himself as the technique and strategy guy.
Tyrone Woodley's struggling with that now himself.
He's doing the same thing.
Kale Sonnen is the quintessential drama fighter.
He didn't really have an exciting fighting style, and he was never really a technique and strategy guy.
So he went with drama.
It's mostly done vocally.
You'll get a violence-based fighter, someone like Husumar Pau Yarris.
That's his appeal.
joe rogan
Rumble Johnson.
john danaher
Yeah, Rumble Johnson.
It's a violence, okay?
He's not into drama.
He's not going to talk anything.
He's not known.
It's like a strategy and technique guy.
He's going to come out and do the same thing every fight.
And it's going to be a violent finish.
So every fighter has to, as it were, identify what's his area.
What's he going to do?
What's going to be his appeal and work within that?
And, you know, Tyron is Learning is not an easy thing to do.
You get criticism from certain aspects of the other two elements of the mixed martial arts audience.
joe rogan
That seems like the big fight.
It's certainly the big fight for Tyron, but it seems like the big fight for George as well.
john danaher
My only reservation when you say, is this the big fight?
Essentially, it's the same fight that George did for a decade.
It's George against another very, very tough welterweight, which he did for 10 years of his life.
joe rogan
Yeah, but Tyron is...
He's especially dangerous.
I mean, he's...
I think he's more dangerous than Hendrix.
I think he's more dangerous than any of those guys.
I think his ability to put you away with one shot is top of the food chain.
john danaher
But you could say Hendrix was putting people away with one shot for three years.
joe rogan
Yeah, he was.
Hendrix is a fascinating case, and we should probably talk about that once the camera stops.
He was a fascinating case, and I can understand why he was so successful.
But, you know, there's a lot to maintaining that.
There's a lot to...
It's one thing to get to a position where you are a world-class fighter.
It's like, how long can you keep that up for?
And one of the most impressive aspects of George's career was the fact that George was able to keep that up for so long.
john danaher
People don't understand this.
It's incredibly tough to become a UFC champion, but however tough that is, it's ten times tougher to stay there.
And on so many different levels, too.
It's not just the physical.
The moment you become a champion, you become the most studied fighter in the world.
Everyone knows every little weakness.
They see every little strength, and they can negate it.
Psychologically, it's tough too.
Every time the other guy fights, it's the biggest fight of his life.
Whereas every time you fight, it's just another fight.
This is your tenth title defense.
For you, it's just another fight.
For the other guy across the ring, this is the biggest moment of his life.
He's coming at you with everything he's got.
This is his moment of glory.
This is literally going to change his life if he becomes a UFC champion.
For you, it's just the next fight.
joe rogan
That's the question.
Is it possible for a champion to maintain a challenger's intensity through a 10 title fight defense?
Or do you just have to accept the fact that you're dealing with a completely different mind space?
john danaher
I think ultimately you have to drop the whole pretense that it's about intensity.
Because no, I don't believe anyone can hold the same amount of intensity over 10 years of preparation.
You have to start Thinking in terms of, I'm going to defend my title with technique and strategy.
Because if you go with intensity, you can only hold intensity so long.
It's going to diminish in time.
As you get paid more, as you get tired, as you get injured, as years go by, the intensity drops.
joe rogan
Now, when you analyze various fighters of today, who stands out to you?
john danaher
There's a lot.
There's some very, very impressive people.
A guy who impresses me enormously is Demetrius Johnson.
I'm extremely impressed by this guy.
joe rogan
I think he's the greatest of all time.
john danaher
It's hard to...
Grace of all time is such a tough thing to say.
It is.
With Demetrius, the open question is always going to be, what was the level of competition?
But that's not his fault.
You can only fight the guys that give you.
joe rogan
Well, it's like Roy Jones Jr. when Roy was in his prime.
It's the same sort of situation.
He was so much better than everybody else.
It's like, how good were these guys?
I mean, they were world-class guys, but against him, they just looked like they didn't belong in there.
john danaher
What you typically find is that when you come to assess who's the greatest of all time, it's always going to come down to criteria.
And each guy has his strong point, his claim to fame.
As far as, you know, I was the best guy of all time.
Let's stick with just UFC champions, otherwise the discussion would be too great.
If we go into pride, it's going to get out of control.
But Demetrius Johnson's claim to fame is the completeness with which he's winning fights.
He's using everything beautifully.
He's hitting people.
He's clinching people.
He's hitting clinch knockouts.
You don't see those often in the UFC. He's incredibly good on the ground.
A few times he gets in trouble.
He seems to navigate his way out without a problem.
There's a completeness in his skill set which is incredibly impressive.
He's integrating wrestling and striking in ways that are just deeply, deeply impressive.
You'll get someone like Jose Aldo.
Who's right up there in terms of, you know, is he one of the greatest of all time?
A sad thing about UFC is that, UFC fans I should say, is that people have very short memories.
A guy loses a couple of fights and suddenly he sucks.
It's like, dude, Jose Aldo was a killer.
A killer for 10 years.
And obviously very, very skilled.
He fought many tough opponents.
joe rogan
Do you feel like when you see a guy like Aldo, you're just seeing the Miles pile up?
Or do you think that Max Holloway is that good?
john danaher
He's not that old.
joe rogan
He's not that old.
john danaher
32. Yeah.
So I'm reluctant to say it's the Miles.
And also, Jose Aldo didn't really take a lot of damage in his career.
He's not like a guy that got knocked out five times and came back.
So in terms of the damage he took and his age, I don't think it's a question of miles.
joe rogan
Do you think it's a question of the game just passing him by?
New levels of the game?
john danaher
That's a great question.
joe rogan
Well, I feel like Max Holloway's style was almost like the perfect antidote.
john danaher
A lot of it comes out of styles.
And you're right.
Holloway's awkward distancing and things like that.
joe rogan
Very good distancing, but also phenomenal endurance.
Unbelievable mental toughness.
Extreme confidence in himself.
And he has the ability to break guys.
Just puts a pace on them.
Very Nick Diaz-like in that regard.
Just puts that pace on them.
And you saw it with Aldo.
You see Aldo start to wilt.
john danaher
Because it almost started strongly in both cases.
unidentified
Yes.
joe rogan
It starts very strong.
Well, that's his thing, though.
He's so explosive and he sprints, essentially.
But you really can't do that.
I mean, his style is highlighted by incredibly explosive, fast movement.
And Max is not.
Max is about avoiding and then accumulation of bombs, of techniques.
Keep it on you.
And also his well-roundedness, his ability to submit you, ability to absorb shots, maintain composure when being fired upon.
All those things, incredible strengths of his.
But particularly matched up against Aldo, his strengths really shined.
john danaher
He is.
Yeah, but that's a hallmark if you're going to call someone the greatest of all time is they have to be able to take on a wide array of opponents and still be successful.
joe rogan
Yeah, which is why Demetrius gets my vote.
I just feel like when you look at Benavidez, when you look at just many different people that he fought showed him a bunch of different looks, a bunch of different styles.
And he was able to overwhelm them all.
Wilson Hayes.
john danaher
What's your assessment of his fight against Dominick Cruz upperweight division?
joe rogan
See, I look at that as a learning experience, a different era, a different guy.
He had a full-time job back then.
He wasn't the same fighter.
john danaher
What do you think happens if he fights Dominick Cruz a second time?
joe rogan
I'm fascinated by that.
I want to see him fight TJ Dillashaw.
I think that's the big fight because TJ's willing to go down to 125. So instead of fighting Dominic at 135, TJ's like, I can make 125. And TJ feels like he'll be the guy to break the legacy.
He'll be far bigger, stronger.
He feels like he can match him speed for speed.
And he thinks he can make the weight comfortably.
I'm really fascinated by that fight.
Because also I think...
TJ is one of the few guys that's trained by, I think Matt Hume is one of the great unsung heroes of MMA. I agree with that, yeah.
He's a master.
john danaher
Fascinating guy.
joe rogan
Fascinating guy.
Incredibly intelligent, deep, deep knowledge of the sport, both stand-up and on the ground, and integrating those two things together.
john danaher
He's one of the few guys you can genuinely say has expertise across all areas of mixed martial arts and played a pivotal role in taking someone from being an unknown to a legitimate great world champion.
All the time I see people who...
People often don't make a distinction between recruiters and coaches.
There's many fight camps out there that are very good at recruiting people that were already good and helping them to manage them, etc., and make them slightly better.
The world's full of recruiters.
But there's not many coaches out there.
Matt Hume took a kid who no one had heard of and took him from obscurity to arguably one of the best of all time.
And he did it in a way where that kid went from being essentially a wrestler to a genuinely well-rounded mixed martial artist with a complete set of skills.
That's an impressive accomplishment.
joe rogan
Yeah.
And it's also the way he does it, the way he fights, how little damage he takes.
It's his movement, his ability to control.
Like, a good example is Dodson.
He fought John Dodson, who's unbelievably explosive and fast and dangerous, and just overwhelmed him.
john danaher
If Demetrius Johnson didn't exist, Dodson would have been a very good champion.
joe rogan
Oh, yeah.
john danaher
Highly regarded champion.
joe rogan
Yeah.
john danaher
People don't realize how good some of these opponents are.
You know, they say, oh, is there a level of opponent that good?
Well, Dodson's a very good opponent.
joe rogan
Dodson was especially a few years ago.
He was extremely dangerous.
He seems to be in a bit of a rut now, whether it's a psychological rut or a physical rut.
He's not quite the same guy that he used to be.
But, you know, it's hard when a guy bests you the way that Mighty Mouse bests you.
Because it seems like the level of talent is so far above where you're at that it's like you're left with a dilemma.
Like, how do I catch this guy?
Is it even possible for me to catch him?
Because they had two fights.
And the second fight, Mighty Mouse won handily.
The first fight was closer.
The first fight was more dangerous.
He got hit a few times.
But in the second fight, Mighty Mouse just showed leaps and bounds.
And it was just a route.
He just ran them over.
The other arguments are Anderson.
Anderson is prime.
It's a great argument for the greatest of all time.
Outside the UFC, it's Fedor.
I think those are really the only arguments for the greatest of all times.
And George.
George is in there, especially coming back and beating Bisping.
That puts him, you know, right back into the mix in terms of argument of one of the greatest of all time.
john danaher
Yeah, I think it was an important step for him because, as I said, there were three persistent criticisms and he answered all three in one night.
So that definitely helps his case.
joe rogan
What's your thought on Khabib Nurmagomedov?
john danaher
Extremely impressed.
This kid is deeply, deeply impressive.
He's come into the academy a couple of times before fights.
I've never actually seen him train.
After his fight in Madison Square Garden, he fought himself and a group of his friends, his training partners, came into the academy and trained in my Monday afternoon class.
Khabib didn't train, he just sat on the bench because he just fought on Saturday night, so of course he's not going to train.
But his My training partners came in and trained with the squad.
That was a fun afternoon.
They rolled with, I think, mostly Nicky Ryan.
It's hard for them, of course, because it's submission grappling.
That's not really what they do.
They do more the interface of grappling combined with striking.
So they had a hard time with it.
But he struck me as a very, very nice person.
He's shockingly big for his weight division.
Shockingly.
Like all the people coming out of the Caucasus regions of Russia, his wrestling is extremely good.
They have probably the best wrestling program in the world.
That whole area stretching from Ossetia through Dagestan, through Chechnya, all the way down to Iran, that that area is just the hotbed of wrestling in the world.
And it shows with all their fighters, they're all strong in wrestling.
And then they just add to that the various skills and you've got a tough, tough group of people.
joe rogan
Yeah, it was extremely...
I've been impressed with every single performance he's had in the Octagon.
I mean, he's undefeated, which is incredibly rare in and of itself, but in the 155-pound division, even more impressive.
But the way he mauled Barboza was just like, Jesus Christ.
john danaher
And you could see the fight was essentially over halfway through round one.
joe rogan
Yes, yeah.
You could see it in Barboza's face.
He was drained.
john danaher
Yeah, that was an incredibly impressive performance.
Obviously, you can't put him yet in the greatest of all time category.
joe rogan
He hasn't won a title.
He hasn't even challenged for it yet.
john danaher
But you definitely get the sense that if he had had a title fight by now, he probably would have been a champion by now.
joe rogan
Him vs.
Conor.
Jesus Christ.
That's what I want to say.
Him vs.
Conor in Russia or him vs.
Tony.
Tony Ferguson and him would be a very interesting fight.
john danaher
What's interesting about those two fights is you have basically polar opposites.
Khabib Nurmagomedov is a control-based fighter, whereas Tony Ferguson is a scramble-based fighter.
And just that clash in styles is going to be fascinating.
With regards to Conor McGregor and Khabib Nurmagomedov, the feeling one gets is that if they did fight, it would be a complete shutout in one of two directions.
It's either like a man beating up a child on the ground, or it's just a flush knockout.
A guy unable to cover distance properly and walking into a left hand and just being catastrophically KO'd.
You feel like there's potential for it to go in both directions.
That's a fight I don't think goes the distance.
It's one way or the other.
joe rogan
Yeah, I agree.
I feel like what Conor presents that's interesting in terms of danger is speed and one-shot knockout power with his hands.
john danaher
And Khabib has been hurt coming in.
joe rogan
By Michael Johnson.
It's really the only adversity he ever suffered inside the arc.
john danaher
And he dealt with it well.
That's a good sign for Khabib.
joe rogan
It's the sliver of hope that every opponent clings to.
They watch that one moment where Michael Johnson clipped him.
And he's like, look, look, he's human.
john danaher
He can be hurt.
joe rogan
It's like the scene in Terminator.
If it bleeds, I could kill him.
john danaher
I believe that was Predator.
joe rogan
Oh, yeah.
What did I say?
Terminator?
john danaher
Yeah.
You just fucked up your honor of reference.
unidentified
Sorry.
I'm sorry.
joe rogan
Yeah, I did fuck it up.
But I think that Conor has been overwhelmed on the ground, though.
And he's been overwhelmed by Nate Diaz, and he's been controlled on the ground by Chad Mendes.
john danaher
One gets the feeling that whatever amount of control they were able to impose on him would be nothing compared with what Khabib could impose.
joe rogan
Yeah, I know.
john danaher
Moreover, Khabib is a much more dangerous form of control.
Khabib has a program of hitting people on the ground which is substantially better than either of the two athletes you just mentioned.
And the big difference is when Khabib gets you on the ground, you're not getting up.
joe rogan
No.
You're getting mauled.
And it's almost like a spider.
Like he's injecting venom into you and slowly but surely weakening your body.
You see after the first round when Barboza gets up, it's like, okay, he's alive still, but this is a different person now.
And going into the second round, Barboza gave an admirable account of himself.
He showed himself to be a true warrior.
john danaher
He did try a couple of spinning back kicks, and some of them were relatively close.
joe rogan
Barbosa's kicking-heavy strategy, though, is very different than Conor's.
Conor's kicks are just the opposite.
His kicks are just probes.
He's sort of poking at you, poking at you, and putting things out in front of you, and he's just trying to ding!
He's just trying to drop that hard left hand on you.
john danaher
He's a fascinating guy to watch.
joe rogan
Fascinating guy to watch.
john danaher
I always undervalued him.
When he first came in the UFC, I said, oh, it's hype, it's hype.
But the more I studied, the more I saw.
joe rogan
Yeah.
john danaher
He's very, very skilled.
joe rogan
Well, he's also, he mindfucks people.
He mindfucks people in a way that, but I don't think he's mindfucking Khabib.
john danaher
I don't think that works on Khabib.
joe rogan
I don't think that's going to happen.
I just think that you're dealing with a totally different kind of human being.
Those people from Dagestan are just so hard.
It's just a hard part of the world.
They're made of hardier stuff.
You know what I mean?
It's just like they have to deal with way more.
Not that people in Ireland are soft.
They're fucking hard people, too.
I just think that with, I've always said the most important, if you have a pyramid of technique when it comes to mixed martial arts, the base of the pyramid, the most important thing is the ability to control the grappling, the ability to take a guy down.
If you can take a guy down and control him, you have a significant advantage.
You can choose where the fight takes place.
And if you're competent in the stand-up, which Khabib is definitely competent in the stand-up, so you are adequate in the stand-up but overwhelming when it gets to the ground, you can present problems with a guy standing up, in which case problems the guy has to deal with the striking aspects which open up the takedowns.
john danaher
I wholeheartedly agree with you, but I'll go a little further.
Whenever someone asks me, what are the programs, what do you look for when you see a guy dominating fights?
What makes someone go in the right directions with their training and their fighting itself?
I always say there's three things.
If you show me a fighter who can, one, dominate the setups, two, dominate the pace of the fight, and three, How can I phrase this?
Dominate the simple direction of the fight.
Three things.
Dominate the setups.
Dominate the pace.
Dominate the direction.
You show me a fighter who can do those three things and I'll show you a fighter who can win 95% of the fights he gets into.
Dominate the setups, dominate the pace, dominate the direction.
Think about someone like Khabib or anyone who comes from a strong wrestling or judo jiu-jitsu with takedowns based fighters.
They're always going to be able to dominate the direction.
They determine whether it goes down to the ground or whether it stays standing.
Khabib always dominates the pace of the fight.
Once you're on the ground, you're on top.
The other guy's just reacting to what you're doing, trying to get back up to his feet, etc., etc.
You're dominating pace.
If there's one weakness that Khabib has, it is he's not as strong at dominating the setups to get to those areas where he can dominate pace, etc., etc.
If he's going to lose a fight, it's going to be in that area.
And Connor, more than anything else, is a guy who dominates the setups.
You said it before.
The kicks are probed.
They're not kicks.
He's not trying to hurt you with the kicks.
He's probing.
He hurts you with this.
joe rogan
Yeah.
john danaher
Okay?
So Connor's skill He's a master of dominating setups, especially in the standing position.
But Khabib's mastery, out of those three critical areas for domination in all forms of fighting, is he's incredibly dominant in determining the direction of the fight and the pace of the fight.
That's why he never gets tired in his fights.
He's got a very high work rate, but he never gets tired.
You never see him just completely shattered, despite the fact he's working hard the whole time.
joe rogan
And despite the fact that he significantly weakens himself to make 155 pounds, which apparently he's done far better now.
He had a real nutritionist heading into this camp, and it was much easier for him to cut the weight.
john danaher
I'd be fascinated to see him fight at 170. Well, that's a plan.
joe rogan
Apparently, that was a plan, and Woodley was joking around about it, saying he'll send him nutritionists.
He'll say, keep his psycho ass down at 155. That's funny.
john danaher
That's funny.
joe rogan
That's his exact quote.
john danaher
But yeah, with regards to your point before, this core combat skill, the most important one that you as a commentator look for when you look at fighters, can you determine, you put grappling skill as the number one thing, whether it be wrestling, whether it be sambo, whether it be jiu-jitsu, or whatever.
I would go further and say, yeah, there's three things that I look for.
Who dominates the setups?
Who dominates the pace?
Who dominates the direction?
joe rogan
Now, what are your thoughts about strength and conditioning for mixed martial arts fighters?
john danaher
That's a huge question.
joe rogan
But the question is, like, what takes precedent?
Does skill training take precedent?
Like, there's several schools of thought, and one of them would be, one of the more interesting ones is Nick Kurson and Marvin Marinovich, that camp, they believe that you already know how to fight.
And that what the camp really should be about is just radical strength and conditioning to the point where...
john danaher
That's a mixed question.
Are you talking about a fight camp?
Are you talking about fight training over the year?
joe rogan
Let's talk about a fight camp in specific.
john danaher
Okay.
Okay, average fight camp is around six to eight weeks, and the longest you'll ever hear is like a 10 to 12 weeks.
That's a very, very long fight camp.
How much physiological change can you affect in the body in six to eight weeks?
joe rogan
You could tighten everything up.
You can certainly increase your endurance, your threshold, your ability to work.
john danaher
How much could you increase your VO2 max in six weeks?
joe rogan
That's a good question.
A few percentage points, I believe.
john danaher
I think considerably less than that.
joe rogan
Really?
john danaher
Yeah.
unidentified
Hmm.
john danaher
I don't know.
How much could you increase your vertical jump in six weeks?
joe rogan
Not much.
john danaher
Not much at all.
I'm not a big believer in the idea that you're going to create big, significant, fight-changing physiological changes in six to eight weeks.
It's not really my experience.
But I can show someone a single technique which can have a direct impact on a fight.
I can show them that in five minutes.
I'm not going to claim to be a medical expert who has a deep understanding of these things, but my experience in coaching is that physiological changes take time, and you're not going to get it done in a fight camp.
Yes, you can make physiological changes over a year, two years, absolutely.
George went up a weight division, but it took quite a bit of preparation to do so.
It didn't happen in six weeks.
joe rogan
What kind of strength training was he doing to do that?
I know he's very involved in gymnastics.
He likes a lot of that.
john danaher
George's primary physical training outside is gymnastics.
He loves it.
He also for a time did Olympic weightlifting.
Less so now than before but there was a time that was a big part of it.
Recently, he started taking on training in water with various fins, et cetera, et cetera, to increase resistance.
joe rogan
Oh, okay.
john danaher
And he's quite a fan of that.
But the truth is George goes through cycles.
And, you know, boredom is a factor.
You get bored with a certain kind of physical activity and you want to try something new.
joe rogan
Right.
john danaher
And so he's gone through various cycles.
I can tell you this.
George's strength has not significantly changed despite the various changes in physiological training.
Like when he did Olympic lifting, he wasn't massively stronger than when he did regular weightlifting or when he did swim training.
I don't feel like, okay, one mate, I'm stronger than the other.
There's so many interesting questions in the one you just asked.
Do I believe that strength is important?
Absolutely.
Anyone who says that strength doesn't make a difference in a fight is just straight up ignoring the obvious facts.
There's a reason why men don't fight women, because there's massive strength differences.
There's a reason why there's weight categories, because there's big strength differences between heavyweight and lightweight.
Strength makes a difference.
The proof of that is simply easy to observe.
Why do people take anabolic steroids?
Because they know that strength makes a difference.
There's a reason why they're illegal, because they do change the outcome of fights.
So yes, strength is extremely important.
The question is, how are you going to build it?
And are you going to do it in camp?
Is your fight camp going to be based around strength?
That's a risky strategy.
Can you really get that much stronger in six weeks?
I've always believed that the whole idea of fight camp is to prepare an already well-trained athlete to get around the problem of one individual.
It's programming one individual to solve the complex problem that another individual presents.
It's kind of like preparation for an exam, so to speak.
And for me, the whole thing, every fight camp is motivated by two very simple questions.
How are you going to win this fight and how are you not going to lose this fight?
The entire structure of the camp is based around that.
And almost all of that has to do with tactics and techniques rather than changes in the physical body.
joe rogan
Now, when George is in off camp, when he's out of camp, is that when he would...
john danaher
That's a period of skill acquisition.
You're trying to acquire new skills.
joe rogan
So that's when he would...
I know he's notorious for taking trips to Brazil, to work at Jiu-Jitsu.
john danaher
That's when you do your experimentation.
You bring in different perspectives, a different person.
This is interesting.
This has potential.
This doesn't really have much potential.
And you start changing things up.
joe rogan
Now, do you have that same approach with all the fighters that you've worked with?
john danaher
It depends on the context.
Are they mixed martial artists?
Do they train with me full-time?
Are they part-timers?
It would depend on the context.
I can answer with regards to the squat.
joe rogan
Yeah, but what I was going to bring up is Weidman.
Like, Weidman's approach, you know, coming from that elite wrestling background and then developing a lot of significant mixed martial arts skills.
He is in an unusual situation right now, right?
Where does he stand in terms of future opponents?
john danaher
Where is he at right now?
That's a tough question to answer.
Chris, I think, had probably one of the most meteoric rises into world championship level.
He literally beat twice in a row.
The guy that at that time was considered by most people to be the greatest of all time.
His run up to that was incredible.
I'm sure you commentated many of those fights.
Sure.
joe rogan
It's an animal.
john danaher
The time frame with which he went from obscurity to world championship level is incredibly short.
joe rogan
And undefeated.
john danaher
Yeah.
It was insane what he was doing.
So there was this incredible meteoric rise, and then there was a short period after that where he appeared to be crushing great former champions like Liotta Mishida, Vita Belfort.
He wasn't just beating them, he was just incredibly impressive.
And then I think people were shocked by what appeared to be an unbeaten record, and then suddenly three losses in a row.
joe rogan
And catastrophic losses.
Getting smashed by Luke Rockhold, getting KO'd by a flying knee from Yoel Romero, and getting dominated by Gegard Mousasi, and then all the controversy that led to that stoppage.
john danaher
So it was three in a row on a guy who had never even experienced defeat.
And so you go from no defeats to three catastrophic defeats in a row.
That throws everything off.
joe rogan
But then he rebounded with Calvin Gaslam and finished one of the toughest guys in the division.
john danaher
You saw what Gastelum went on to do with Bisping.
That was a great win.
It was a nice comeback.
But the question is, where does it go from here?
And I don't have an answer for you.
I'm so sorry.
joe rogan
How often do you work with them?
john danaher
Not often.
Chris came to me as a student.
He was a student of Matt Serra, who's one of my great friends and training partners from the Henzo Gracie Academy.
And Matt was having some medical issues.
And he said, John, you know, can you take over this student of mine, Chris Whiteman?
This guy's incredibly talented.
And I'd heard of Chris because, you know, we're linked schools, fairly close by, and people were telling me about this amazing wrestler who's, you know, incredibly talented, picks techniques up.
And, you know, I always take these things with a grain of salt because people exaggerate and stuff.
So Chris started coming in.
And it was all true.
This kid, you can show him a technique on Monday and by Tuesday he's doing it better than you are.
And he has a gift for physical movement that you don't see very often in guys that big.
He's big, agile, highly intelligent, and had at that time A level of self-confidence that was deeply impressive.
I would show Chris a guillotine variation and then five minutes later he would be using it in the gym and then a month later be using it in an MMA fight.
He literally would see opportunities and immediately act upon them.
What I worry about with Chris is that in those three losses I'm not saying this has happened, but what I worry will happen is that fighters who are typically very dominant and were confidence fighters when they experienced defeat lose confidence.
And a big part of Chris's success was that ability to see opportunity and have the confidence to immediately act upon it.
So my concern, if I look at Chris, is will that still be there?
Will he still have the same confidence, which was such a big part of his rise to the top?
Will it be drastically altered by three losses?
And I'm very pleased to say that it didn't appear to be so in the fight with Gastelum.
He actually took a heavy hit at the end of the first round in that fight and came back.
It looked like he'd gone through those three losses and come back strong and everything was fine.
joe rogan
So I'm pretty confident Chris will go on to great success again at 185. Knowing how good Chris is on the ground, how shocked were you about the Luke Rockhold fight?
john danaher
It was a hard one for me to watch.
Chris stopped working with me after the second Anderson Silva fight.
We did most of that camp together and then he stopped working with me, moved further out into Long Island.
He opened up a gym with Ray Longo.
I went back to training with Matt Serra.
Those guys were incredible training camp.
They did a fine job getting them through the machida fights, etc.
I was at that UFC. It was in Las Vegas.
Conor McGregor was the main event and Chris was the co-main event.
The fight had an interesting beginning.
Chris was doing well with the takedowns, but Luke Rockhold was doing a great job of controlling Chris's head with fake guillotines to prevent any kind of damage on the ground.
They're doing a good job of standing back up to the feet, so there was no really significant damage.
Then they got into an interesting kickboxing battle, where it seemed to go in one direction, then switch directions, and then Chris seemed to be getting the better of it, and things looked good.
And then there was just one episode where everything just came unstuck in a second.
And I remember watching, and it was like watching a bad dream, you know?
Yeah, it was shocking.
joe rogan
Yeah, Chris threw an ill-advised wheel kick, which is slow and telegraphed, and Rockhold took him to the ground.
And what I was most shocked with was, and I've seen it time and time again, I saw it in the David Branch fight, and saw it in the Leo Machida fight, is Rockhold's top game is fucking terrifying.
john danaher
Deeply impressive.
joe rogan
Very impressive.
I attribute that not just to his skill, which I think is considerable, but also to training on a regular basis with Daniel Carmiere and Cain Velasquez.
His wrestling, his grappling, is severely underrated.
Maybe not so now, but his ability to control guys on the ground is just terrifying.
john danaher
Yeah.
No, he's done an amazing job.
He's also got very strong submission skills.
joe rogan
Yes.
john danaher
People, I don't think, talk about those at all.
And he's submitted good people.
joe rogan
Submitted Bisping with that one-arm guillotine.
john danaher
And some of his finishes are like highlight reel finishes.
They're beautiful.
You know, he's got tremendous skills.
He's big for the division.
You talk about a guy who dominates the pace and the direction.
No one can hold him down for any period of time.
He's great at getting back up to his feet.
He wrestles the fence very, very well, like all the AKA guys.
They're all good on the fence.
He's a very, very impressive fighter.
joe rogan
I'm impressed with him in a lot of ways, but his ability to control top-level guys.
My thought was when he got Chris down, like, okay, Chris is a world-class grappler.
He's going to be able to get out of this situation.
There'll be scrambles.
There's a lot happening, but there was none of that.
It was just total control and ground.
john danaher
And for a considerable period of time.
joe rogan
Yeah, it was rough.
It was rough to watch because it was one of those where you could easily make the argument for it being stopped sooner.
john danaher
Yeah, I think so, too.
joe rogan
Yeah, it was a rough one.
And now Rockhold's going to face Yoel Romero, which is very...
He's the freak of all freaks.
That's like...
That guy was made in a lab.
john danaher
Yeah.
Isn't Yoel Romero fighting David Brunch?
joe rogan
No.
john danaher
Did this happen recently?
joe rogan
Yes.
Robert Whitaker got injured.
john danaher
What happened?
The knee again?
joe rogan
Most likely, if I had to guess.
I don't think they released it, but there's been an injury.
Maybe it's a different injury.
john danaher
When did this happen?
joe rogan
A couple days ago.
unidentified
Wow.
john danaher
I've just flown to California.
I haven't been using the internet, so yeah.
joe rogan
So, Rock, good for you.
john danaher
It's only two days, Joe.
joe rogan
We should all say that.
But Rockhold and Yoel now are going to fight for the interim belt.
john danaher
That's a huge development.
joe rogan
Yeah, big development.
john danaher
Wow.
joe rogan
Yeah.
john danaher
That's a...
I mean, Yo Romero, that's...
unidentified
That's a different fight, my friend!
john danaher
Yo Romero is probably the most uncontrollable man in the universe.
He is a difficult, difficult person to control in any aspect of the fight.
He's a fighter.
Some parts of what he does make no sense.
He's one of the greatest wrestlers of his generation.
joe rogan
Yeah.
john danaher
And yet many people take him down.
joe rogan
Yeah.
john danaher
And he gets taken down all the time.
But they can't control him.
He just springs back up.
joe rogan
He's not worried about being taken down.
I think that's part of it.
john danaher
Yeah, because he comes so hard with the upper body, he leaves the lower body open.
And you're right, there's no consequence to it.
He can just get up whenever he feels like it.
He has a greater propensity to change direction at speed than anyone else I've ever seen in my life.
People always talk about speed.
They're always, you know, this guy's fast or that guy's fast.
To me, there's two kinds of speed that impress me in fighting.
One is the speed of decision-making.
If you can make decisions, good decisions, faster than your opponent, you're going to win a lot of fights.
And the other is your ability not to go in straight lines at speed, but to change direction.
Speed of directional change is the most important kind of physical speed in fighting.
There's plenty of people that weren't really that fast, but they can change direction quickly.
And that's the kind of speed that counts in fighting.
So the two kinds of speed that you needed to be a fighter is speed of decision-making and speed of directional change.
And you see lots of fast people.
Usain Bolt is fast, but he's not fast in directional change.
That's not his thing.
But the thing about Joel Romero is there's a certain twitchiness to his movement where it's so hard to read where he's going, where he's going to be in the next half second.
It's just a handful to deal with.
joe rogan
Yeah, that is a very good assessment of what's shocking about him.
His ability to go from 0 to 60 is just freakish.
john danaher
And this is him at 40. What was he like when he was 25?
joe rogan
He just doesn't look like a 40-year-old man.
Just everything's wrong.
He doesn't look like a normal person.
Like you look at his body his proportions everything looks like something from a movie.
unidentified
Yeah, it doesn't there is real Yeah, and that flying need that he hit Chris with was like Jesus Christ Yeah, no, he could feel it in the audience.
joe rogan
It was it was it was terrible It's just the the amount of force that he can generate is just stunning But he's also a guy that's carrying around a tremendous amount of muscle.
And I wonder what kind of pace he can keep up.
You know, and we saw that in the Whitaker fight.
He faded a bit in that fight, wound up losing that fight.
We've seen it in several of his fights.
The Tim Kennedy fight, he faded in that fight and eventually came back to win.
But he's got so much to feed.
There's so much tissue.
You know?
john danaher
Yeah, yeah.
He's a fascinating character.
joe rogan
Fascinating!
And again, boy, wouldn't you have loved to have seen him in the UFC at 26?
Yeah, I mean, when he was just dominating everyone in the wrestling scene.
john danaher
Yeah, no, he's as good as they get in wrestling.
joe rogan
Medaled in every single world-class competition he ever entered.
john danaher
And not only that, but the best wrestlers in his weight division at that time, he beat all of them.
joe rogan
Crazy.
john danaher
It's as good as he did.
joe rogan
Yeah.
Hard to imagine.
john danaher
Yeah.
joe rogan
Yeah.
All right, John, I think we've covered basically enough where it's, uh, we're three hours in here, man.
john danaher
Oh my God, I'm sorry.
It was awesome.
Longer than one of my Instagram posts.
joe rogan
Your Instagram posts are amazing, by the way.
I'm a huge fan.
john danaher
You're one of the few.
joe rogan
That's not true.
A lot of friends share them.
They send them to me in text messages occasionally.
unidentified
That's very interesting.
joe rogan
But your breakdowns of technique and strategy and what is actually happening, I think they're critical.
Your voice and what you're doing with the squad and what you're doing for jiu-jitsu as a whole and the way you're able to articulate that and break these things down.
It's really, really critical.
I think it's awesome.
john danaher
Thank you.
joe rogan
Very significant.
john danaher
Thank you.
joe rogan
I'm really glad we finally got a chance to do this.
john danaher
It's better than meeting at Denny's.
joe rogan
Yes.
Well, Denny's meeting was fun, too.
What is your Twitter for people?
Is it just John Donaher on Instagram, rather?
john danaher
On Instagram, I believe it's Danaher John.
joe rogan
Danaher John.
john danaher
Yeah.
joe rogan
Okay, beautiful.
Thank you, brother.
Export Selection