All Episodes
Previous Next
Sept. 2, 2025 - Judging Freedom - Judge Andrew Napolitano
22:57
Ray McGovern : What Ukraine Can Learn From the Finns
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Hi, everyone.
Judge Andrew Napolitano here for Judging Freedom.
Today is Tuesday, September 2, 2025.
The summer's over.
It seems like a Monday here in the US, but today is a Tuesday.
Rey McGovern will be with us in just a minute on the significance of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization and this interesting comparison.
What can Ukraine learn from the experience of the Finnish government?
But first this.
My friends, if you care about your liberty and your right to control your own future, you need to hear about this.
From October 10 to 12, Mikel Thorpe, host of the Expat Money Show, is bringing together top experts from around the world for the Expat Money Online Summit and it's completely free to attend.
You'll learn how to legally protect your wealth, secure second residences and citizenships, reduce your tax burden, and own property abroad, all to safeguard your freedom.
This year's focus is on Latin America, where opportunity is booming.
Argentina is shifting to free markets.
El Salvador is undergoing a dramatic transformation, and Panama and Paraguay are offering simple residency programs.
A Plan B is no longer optional, it's essential.
Reserve your free ticket at expatmoneysummit.com.
And if you want VIP access with special perks including lifetime replay access and exclusive VIP panels, use promo code judge for 20% off your upgrade.
That's expatmoneysummit.com promo code judge.
Ray McGovern, welcome here, my dear friend.
Before we get to Ukraine and the Finns, and before we get to your interesting observations on the shanghai cooperation agreement i want you to take a look uh at this this is the beginning of the armada making its way to gaza and the tens of thousands of people that turned out to send them off this armada has 50 ships in it including
a lot of um media embeds and a lot of Americans.
One would think the United States Navy would protect these peace-lovingitable, generous people who just want to deliver food and medical supplies to the Gazans.
But I guess we shouldn't bet on it.
No, we shouldn't.
As you may recall, I was on one of those flotillas in 2011, and it was made clear to me by sources, not only in the NSC, the National Security Council, but also in the State Department, that Obama would just as soon see the Israelis have their way with us.
And if we came home in coffins, well, that would be all right with them because that would help them.
in the next election.
APAC would really be very, very much friendly to them if that happened.
This I had from two sources.
So no, the US Navy's got to do anything about this.
The US Navy will probably want interference for the Israelis if they're called to do that.
I mean, do the Israelis, I'm going to guess they do.
I never heard much about it.
Do the Israelis have a navy?
I mean, will they send ships to prevent these generous people?
Or will they have a navy?
Will they send ships to block them from landing?
Yes, that's what they do.
And they take them to this little port of Ashtod.
and then they put them on trial and they send them home.
The only good thing about this is if you want, you can get sent home free of charge.
The Israelis will pay for your return flight.
Well, what happened with you, with the one you were on?
Did they, did they stop it?
Were you arrested?
Were you prosecuted?
This was the year after the Mavi Marmara, with the Turkish cargo and Turkish people, was blown almost out of the water.
Several people killed by Israeli commandoes.
This time, we registered our boat in the United States.
Otherwise, it was American flagship okay we rebuilt it and there were about forty of us including people like Alice Walker and other people feel really strongly about Gaza well we were told that okay you can sail but we have to inspect you they inspected us we were ready to sail all of a sudden they say no no there's something wrong with your air conditioner air conditioner my god you should see this boat anyhow they sold us those a sail well we got our our captain to agree to sail anyway
and we went out the next morning we got nine miles out of Piraeus and then the the ninja turtles on the coast guard of Athens there in Greece turned us back.
There was a standoff for an hour.
They were terribly apologetic.
They said, look, we're just under orders.
What happened was Obama prevailed over Papua New Guinea, said, look, you want an IMF loan.
You want to bail out your economy.
Don't let that ship out into the Mediterranean.
And so we were prevented.
They pounded the ship.
We never saw the ship again.
Well, we saw it again, but it was not released to us.
That was a lot of money.
We sunk into that thing.
We all had to go home, but we all learned a lesson, just as the sailors on the USS Liberty in 1968.
In their case, the Israelis learned that they could literally get away with murder.
In our case, we learned that the US government was not willing to protect us if the Israelis did what they did to the US Liberty crew.
So, you know, if you want proof positive that the Israelis believe that they could get away with murder to include US citizens, well, there are two cases, sisories.
One of the viewers in what we call the chat room writes in and says, judge, the Israelis do have a navy.
It's called the United States Navy, which will do whatever they need.
Funny way to put it, but obviously very sad.
The USS Liberty, of course, is one of the great tragedies in modern American history where the Israeli jets attacked the boat, killed 134 sailors, and LBJ and McNamara refused to allow a military response.
We've actually, Judge, there were 34 killed.
There were 134 injured.
Correct.
Correct.
You got it.
Correct.
Thank you for correcting me.
It was a terrible, terrible tragedy, terrible behavior by the President of the United States and the Secretary of Defense.
Again, before we get to the other topics, Alistair Crook argued just about an hour and a half ago that Zionism is now barbarism.
Do you agree?
Of course I agree.
And of course he knows ten times more than I do about the subject.
When you have Israeli leaders boastfully saying, "We're going to do more genocide, more starvation," and then you have most of the Israeli populace, my God, approving that, I mean, what So yeah, Alistair, I saw the segment.
Alistair was brilliant as usual.
And I think he's right on that score.
Tell me about intelligence officers.
How do intelligence officers with moral qualms about what their government is doing, how do they react?
How do they participate in it?
How would an intelligence officer like you or who thinks like you do possibly aid the Israeli slaughter?
well it's sort of a fixture i mean Now that's the reality.
We used to have folks that were pretty objective working on Israel.
They've long since passed on to working in a library or some other place like that.
It's really infectious, this kind of corruption.
But I will say that there are little signs of light.
There is that deputy national intelligence officer.
We don't know her name.
Now this is about as high as you can get.
Okay, it's a national sort of thing.
I happen to be one of those those in the 70s, if you can believe it, Deputy National Intelligence Officer.
She couldn't put up with what John Brennan and James Comey were doing and falsifying the information to make believe, make believe, out of whole cloth, no evidence that Putin preferred Trump over Hillary Clinton, the whole Russia Gate thing, okay?
Now she fought tooth and nail.
She went to inspector general after inspector general and she went to the Senate Intelligence Committee as well.
They wouldn't let her in the door.
Now the whole thing is on record.
There were email exchanges, very, very copious ones.
What became of her, what became of her career?
Well, this is not known.
Her name is being withheld for obvious reasons.
There are lots of people about to get her for telling the truth.
And I had a really strange encounter with Senator Mark Kelly.
He was down here in Raleigh over the weekend.
And I asked him, why did you not see this whistleblower to tell you that Vernon and Comey were lying through their teeth?
She had the evidence right there.
Why did you see her?
And he says, well, I what's her name?
And I said, oh, I don't know her name., Senator Kelly.
No, I don't know her name.
I said, You can get it.
Yeah, I can get it.
Is he on the Senate?
Is he on the Senate Intelligence Committee?
He is, yeah, that's what I mean.
Then he surely knows her name.
He's got a top secret, the National Security clearance.
Well, this is what he does.
He says, Well, mister McGovern, what do you want me to do?
You want me to pull out my cell phone and call her?
I said, That would be a good idea, Senator.
Well, I'm not going to do it now.
I'll do it in front of McGovern.
Ray, is there a video of your encounter with Senator Kelly?
There is.
It's six minutes.
I had a friend who who knew I was going to try to ask a question.
There were no questions from the floor except mine.
It happened to be the last one.
They shut it down after I asked.
I remember a video where you were dragged out.
I hope that or I trust that didn't happen over the weekend.
Not this time.
Well, there were Raleigh policemen there, but they happened to be friends of mine.
All right.
You and I have emailed over the weekend and you have educated me on the Finnish experience, the experience that the Finns have had with the Russians, which went from bad to good to very good.
Now who knows where it is.
They're in NATO.
Give us your brief, briefly, your understanding of this and how this could be a model for Ukraine.
Well, this was raised in the Oval Office when the President of Finland said something about, hey, Finnish neutrality, and it's a pretty good thing.
And this was all in the context of Ukraine.
How could there be an outsgang, an exit for us in Ukraine.
And Jeffrey Roberts, my good friend, a historian, a historian emeritus at University College Cork, he wrote this wonderful article about instances where Finland was faced with the situation that Ukraine faces now, a no win, they couldn't win.
Okay, so what did they do?
They appeased.
They said, look, let's do a deal.
Okay, and in each case, Stalin, in both of these cases, said, okay, we'll do a deal.
You do reparations.
We won't invade you.
You're neutral.
You're neutral.
Got that?
I got that, you're going to be neutral.
Okay, well that held until just two years ago when Finland decided to visit NATO.
Now the Russians were pretty clever, even Stalin.
Now whatever you say about Stalin, it's pretty clever.
Here's a little thing that Jeff Roberts sent me about Stalin.
Where is it?
Here it is.
Yeah.
So the Finns were a little bit late in paying reparations after the war, okay?
And so Stalin said, all right, well, we'll postpone it for a year or two.
And the Finns said, look, that's very generous.
And get this, Stalin, it's not a calculation.
When we treat others well, they're nice to us.
Our generosity makes up for a policy of tsarist autocracy.
Its policy towards Finland, Romania, Bulgaria made their peoples enemies of Russia.
We want neighboring countries and peoples to have a good attitude towards us.
So it's not niceness, it's not generosity.
It's simply calculation.
So let's tell it.
Now, the point here is the Finns were on their back.
They had a chance to fight to the last Finn., right?
To lose another hundred thousand troops.
They fought bravely for a while, but anyhow, in their case, the Swedes and the US and Britain encouraged the Finns, look, please, just do neutral, be neutral, and this will be really good for us as well, the allies, okay?
In this case, with respect to Ukraine, the Ukrainians are not getting any help from the coalition of the Brain Dead, as they call them, from Stomer, from Mats, from Macron.
They don't seem to they're deliusionary if they think that they're doing the Ukrainians a favor by saying, Okay, no problem, we'll buy US arms with what money, I would ask, and what arms.
There are no arms available for sale, okay?
And then we'll give them to the Ukrainians, but the Ukrainians don't have any soldiers to man them.
Other than that, this is a really good solution to.
So it's a no good solution.
What Jeff Roberts is suggesting, and The Economist picked up on this in its most recent, The Economist magazine picked up on this in its most recent issue, and says pretty much the same same thing that Jeff Roberts says.
Look, look at the Finnish example.
It worked beautifully.
And what happened?
Finland kept its sovereignty, they kept their independence, and they prospered as few other countries in Western Europe prospered during those Cold War years.
So why not try it?
And I think it's a really good idea.
I hope it gets around in Washington circles.
Most people in Washington read The Economist.
I read it just when I can, when I have to.
I read it as well.
I love it.
There's no publication like it.
It's champacked every week.
But back to the Finnish experience, they were sovereign, they were independent, they were prosperous, they were happy, they were peaceful.
And then they joined NATO.
Why the hell did they join NATO?
Oh, I was afraid you're going to ask me that, judge.
I don't have a Kanye Anung, as the Germans say, I have no idea.
There's this craziness that has enveloped European leaders such as they are, bubbling up to the top.
So you got this Kaya Kalas, you got Ursula von der Leyen, you got Macronalam outs and these people.
I don't know, but they're delusional.
Now the hope is that when daddy, you will recall that the new head of NATO, Rute, at the last NATO summit, he's like, Oh, daddy's here.
Hi, daddy, come in.
It's Trump had just arrived, see?
Now what they have to realize and what cold reality will finally do on them is daddy is a dead beat, okay?
Daddy's not going to pay child support, okay?
He's not going to pay alimony.
Daddy's gone and his vice president.
Vice President Hessen said, quote, We're done with Ukraine.
We gave them all the money, we're not going to give them any more.
We're done with Ukraine.
So how long is it going to take to sink into this coalition of the brain dead?
I would think in weeks, but I'm not sure because they're meeting today in Paris and Zelensky will be there and they'll be slapping it.
Well, they'll be hugging him, they'll be, they're doing a lot of hugs now these days.
But my God, they're crazy because if they persuade Zelensky that they can help him, they're, they don't have any basis on which to promise that.
And Zelensky is quite capable and willing to fight until the last Ukrainian.
And it's going to come down to that within the next couple of months if not weeks because the Russians are moving inexorably to the west toward the Dnieper River.
Chris found something that you'll find very interesting.
Chris.
that the Russians are evil and verdict and that if Trump said let's go into Ukraine you probably would support him because you're very much my question is there wasn't there wasn't there wasn't there wasn't there wasn't there wasn't Okay,
the question is this.
There's a national intelligence officer.
I was a national intelligence officer.
It's about as high as you can get.
She tried to whistleblow and she came to your committee and these guys were lying through their teeth about Russian gate and you wouldn't see her and neither would anyone else.
You know the name.
I don't know the name, but you know the name.
Now you have the power to find the name.
I'm not.
And sir, hold on.
Find out, Post.
I just want to make a comment on what you said.
Sir, please sit down for a second.
So I do have the power to find out who that person is.
Why happened?
Why happened?
Well, I don't know what you're talking about.
So let me just say this on the whole.
Who's the that pushed you?
Well, he's the head of the Democrats in the Raleigh area.
Not a bad guy.
He's airborne, 82nd airborne, all the way.
But, you know, he's a political functionary and he was trying to protect the good senator.
And, you know, I have to say that two women came up and tried manfully.
Two women came up and tried manfully to protect him after because I went up to him and I said, Now, Senator Kelly, I also want to register my, my beef against your, your slandering my good friend, Professor Ted Postal, Emeritus of MIT.
Jesus, who's that?
Who's that?
I said, Well, go look at your footage at the Tulsi Gabbard hearing, you slandered him.
So I don't even know who he is.
Well, well, look it up, because you owe him an apology.
I told Ted that last night.
He said, Oh, really?
Well, that's good.
So anyhow, if you look that up, you'll see that, that, what's his name?
Senator Kelly was reading from a script that they gave him.
And the script required him to denigrate Professor Postel, whom we all know, in favor of some crackheads who were saying, crackheads who were saying, Look, yeah, Ashraf Lhasa did that chemical attack, even though he was didn't have that kind of say, well, yeah, he did it.
And so, Senator, you know, I have something that someone sent me.
Just this would just take one more second here if I could find it.
It has to do with a remark I got from someone who read the, who watched the thing that you just said.
Here it is.
Now, what he said was, look, John Kennedy in his Profiles of Courage talked about the Senate.
He knew where of he was talking.
He was a senator, are you?
And he said, look, you know, you have people there that are not real smart.
that are rich and that's how they get their position or they're held to the military industrial complex.
It's not a really good group to be with.
I'd rather be president.
So he sent me this thing.
He said, look, keep fighting on, McGovern, even though the odds are against you.
Keep fighting on, McGovern.
You always have a place here in which to do it.
Thank you very much, Ray.
I have a lot of other things to ask you about, but time marches on, and I'll hold them till we're together with Larry Johnson on Friday.
▲
Export Selection