Judging Freedom - Judge Andrew Napolitano - AMB. Chas Freeman : When Israel Attacks Iran.

All Episodes

Previous Next

Aug. 26, 2025 - Judging Freedom - Judge Andrew Napolitano

26:33

AMB. Chas Freeman : When Israel Attacks Iran.

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Hi, everyone.
	Judge Andrew Napolitano here for Judging Freedom.
	Today is Tuesday, August 26, 2025.
	Ambassador Chaz Freeman will be here with us in just a moment on is Israel getting ready to attack Iran again?
	And if it does, what will the United States do?
	But first this.
	My friends, if you care about your liberty and your right to control your own future, you need to hear about this.
	From October 10th to 12th, Mikel Thorpe, host of the Expat Money Show, is bringing together top experts from around the world for the Expat Money Online Summit, and it's completely free to attend.
	You'll learn how to legally protect your wealth, secure second residences and citizenships, reduce your tax burden, and own property abroad, all to safeguard your freedom.
	This year's focus is on Latin America, where opportunity is booming.
	Argentina is shifting to free markets.
	El Salvador is undergoing a dramatic transformation, and Panama and Paraguay are offering simple residency programs.
	A Plan B is no longer optional.
	It's essential.
	Reserve your free ticket at ExpatMoneysummit.com.
	And if you want VIP access with special perks including lifetime replay access and exclusive VIP panels use promo code judge for 20 off your upgrade that's expatmoneysummit.com promo code judge ambassador welcome here my dear friend thank you for accommodating my schedule I want to ask you In some detail,
	your views on what's happening with Israel and attacking journalists in Gaza and preparing for war with Iran.
	But before we do that, in the same week that President Trump wore a hat proclaiming that he is right about everything, he suggested that Ukraine should attack Russia.
	Then he authorized about 3,000 ERAM.
	You can tell us what those are from your years in the Defense Department.
	long-range missiles about 280 mile range to be manufactured and shipped to Ukraine.
	What do you think is going on?
	Well, it's pretty clear that it has no relationship to the expectations that President Trump raised during his campaign for office.
	These are warlike warmongering statements.
	They are not conducive to peace, which is, I think, what he wants to achieve.
	His formula for achieving peace appears to be preemptive attack on various parties.
	And there is, he's not alone in this.
	this hypocrisy of course.
	We have the Democratic Party, Democratic National Committee meeting I think a week from yesterday, Monday, and one of the things before them is a resolution proposing to sever certain relationships with Israel, stop backing it in the war.
	And the elders in the Democratic Party are busily trying to prevent any airing or passage of that resolution, even though only 8% of Democrats now approve of what Israel is doing in Gaza.
	So we have a complicity, a participation in genocide in Gaza.
	We are continuing to participate in the war in Ukraine.
	It has not changed its character.
	It is still a proxy war between the United States and Russia.
	And it looks like a great deal of the so-called effort to produce peace is really just a series How do you think the Russians view this, Ambassador?
	This is from the President of the United States late last week.
	It is very hard, if not impossible, to win a war without attacking an invader's country.
	It's like a great team in sports that has a fantastic defense, but it's not allowed to play offense.
	There's no chance of winning.
	It is like that with Ukraine and Russia.
	He then goes on to attack.
	Joe Biden, isn't this sort of an instigation suggested by him that Ukraine should attack inside of Russia?
	And if that is the case, where's the guy that showed up in Anchorage proclaiming peace?
	Good question.
	I think the major point of that statement is actually to blame Joe Biden for the war, which is fair enough.
	basically apparently told President Putin to bring it on and we'd crush Russia with sanctions.
	So the provocation was real.
	It came from us.
	And Joe Biden does bear responsibility for the war.
	But President Trump is no less responsible.
	He was the first person to provide Ukraine with offensive weapons in his first term as part of the NATO buildup of Ukraine to attack Russian separatists in the eastern provinces of Ukraine, the oblasts in Donbass.
	And since he's come into office.
	in a second term, he has not at all halted the flow of weapons to Ukraine.
	In fact, what he's done basically said to the Europeans, you want a war, you can have a war.
	I'll sell you the weapons that you can give to the Ukrainians and we won't be responsible for what happens in Ukraine.
	You will be.
	Well, that's because he knows Ukraine is losing the war and he wants to escape accountability for that.
	It's not to help Ukraine particularly.
	And attacking deep into Russia from Ukraine really does nothing except invite counterattacks from Russia, which are occurring.
	The Russians have been quite careful to attack.
	The Ukrainians are attacking energy infrastructure for the most part in Russia in an effort to drive up prices at the pump and achieve opposition to President Putin from Russians.
	But the main effect of their attacks is simply to cause Russians to rally around a flag.
	And finally, to make an important point, which seems to be overlooked, and that is Russia attacked Ukraine in 2022 because it claimed, it asserted, it felt that the presence of Western weapons, long-range weaponry in a hostile Ukrainian state would be a threat to Russia.
	Well, every time the Ukrainians bomb something distant target in Russia, whether they do it in Operation Spider-Mebb with converted trucks and with drones in them, or whether they do it with missiles, they prove the Russian point.
	And that is that their current posture is a threat to the russian federation that russia has to deal with so this is really all a great mess makes no sense at all.
	And it's very disappointing to anyone who hoped that President Trump would not just talk about peace, but actually produce it.
	You know, right after the Anchorage meeting in which Trump and Putin were very cordial and friendly and over the top embracing each other.
	The neocons seem to be distressed.
	Now they seem to be resurging again.
	Is General Kellogg in or out?
	Does he still whisper it into Trump's ears.
	I hope he's out, but I don't know.
	There's no peace going to be produced by the creation of a demilitarized zone like the one in Korea in Ukraine, which was basically General Kellogg's idea.
	That is a proposal that would perpetuate, sustain the confrontation and war between Ukraine and Russia, between Europe.
	the rest of Europe and Russia.
	It would not produce a peace.
	It has not done so in Korea.
	There's a constant danger of war breaking out.
	And in fact, the existence of the tensions in Korea has finally, combined with U.S. policies of maximum pressure, similar to those that we've placed against Iran, has driven the North Koreans to develop an effective nuclear-armed ICBM that can hit the United States, virtually any part of the United States.
	So we've ended up creating a menace to our own country that didn't exist.
	by failing to deal with the promise in the Korean armistice that we would negotiate a peace.
	We didn't try.
	So I think that kind of recommendation is frankly boneheaded.
	And that's why I say I hope he has appeared to be the case at Anchorage.
	Sideline.
	Moscow destroyed the TARS long-range missiles that Germany delivered in parts to be reassembled and fired in Ukraine over the weekend.
	Destroyed nearly all of them.
	What did Chancellor Mertz think the Russians would do?
	Sit back and wait for the Ukrainians to fire these things?
	They were destroyed before they were used?
	Well, I think he, you know, the Germans have confronted the problem that the Russians basically said that if you provide the Taurus missile to the Ukrainians, that German-manufactured missile, we will destroy the plant in Germany that manufactures the missiles.
	So they tried a trick.
	They let the Ukrainians assemble the missiles in a factory in Ukraine and the Russians have now made good on their threat, which ought to teach us something that we don't have the ability to control Russian behavior.
	Russian threats need to be taken seriously and they mean business.
	So I hope President, sorry Chancellor Mertz has taken this aboard.
	There are many parties in Germany that are not happy with this war.
	He's the head of one that is.
	Ambassador, the Western security services continue to leak to the press that Russia is losing.
	This is really absurd.
	Do you think they honestly believe that?
	It's very hard to believe that they would honestly believe it.
	Surely they have better sources of information and more accurate information.
	I note that the other day there was a hack of the Ukrainian Ministry of Defense by the Russians, which produced an apparent listing of all of the people who've been killed or was seriously wounded or defected or disordered.
	deserted in the ukrainian army over the last three and a half years and the total was 1.7 million and my first reaction in looking at this was that that wasn't very believable But when you do the mass and you look at the history, it is believable.
	And it underscores the point that we've been the victims, we in the West have been the victims of an incredible disinformation campaign mounted by our own governments to create a false reality.
	And we've fallen victim to it.
	I can't say that the people who are producing this propaganda.
	don't actually believe it.
	They may.
	They may have inhaled it and gone nuts.
	Israel preparing.
	to wage another war against Iran?
	They say they are.
	I think they are.
	The only question, there's no question about their intent at all because they've been quite open about that.
	Their intent is to do to Iran what they did to Syria.
	That is, for many years, they pursued a policy that successfully divided Syrians against themselves.
	Iran is a complex society with many minorities.
	In fact, I don't think the Persian element in Iran is actually the majority of Iranians.
	There are Kurds, there are other Bakhtiaris, there are Arabs, there are all kinds of people.
	And so Israel hopes to reduce Iran to the sort of rubble that Syria now consists of.
	And it has no way of doing that other than by force.
	It's probably lost a great number.
	of the intelligence operatives that it had in place or which it or that it infiltrated over the border from Azerbaijan when it attacked Iran in the so-called 12-day war.
	But let's remember how that war ended.
	That war ended with Israel running out of interception capability against increasingly effective Iranian missile attack.
	And I think the Israelis should bear in mind that Iran basically slow-rolled its response to all three Israeli attacks on it.
	And yet at the end of the 12-day war, Iran was clearly in a position to devastate Israel, which is one reason the Israelis agreed to President Trump's proposal of a ceasefire.
	They wanted a ceasefire.
	If they attack Iran again, I don't think the Iranians will slow roll the counterattack.
	I think they'll go for broke and they'll do what Israel has done, which is attack civilian targets as well as military targets.
	They didn't do that in the first three rounds of this conflict.
	So this is very dangerous, particularly to Israel.
	And we know that the government of Israel, headed by Prime Minister Netanyahu, favors war in large measure because that is a guarantee against court proceedings and a jail sentence for corruption for Mr. Netanyahu.
	It's his ticket to surviving politically.
	Here's an MSNBC report from late last week on the Israeli intentional attack on journalists in a hospital, bearing in mind that the Israeli attacks are guided by American-made AI and identify their targets.
	This is a little gut wrenching, but I'd like your thoughts on it.
	Chris cut number ten.
	So it happened around 10 a.m. this morning.
	And for context to give our audience a lay of the land, Nasser Hospital is the largest, the only functioning hospital in the south, and the part of Nasser Hospital that was hit, you guys, is really important.
	You can see it in the videos.
	It was a staircase.
	And the reason this staircase was targeted very clearly is that this is where journalists since the early days of the war have gathered to get Wi-Fi signal.
	We have seen videos they've posted on social media.
	Our team, which used to work right close to that staircase, would share videos videos of them holding their phones to the sky, kind of huddled over laptops in the wee hours of the night.
	But journalists since the beginning of this war, you guys, since they have been personally displaced, have flowed to hospitals to use resources like Wi-Fi, to use power, to use water.
	So this staircase journalists were on the staircase this morning when it was struck around 10 a.m.
	And as Jonathan just laid out minutes later, as first responders were racing up to that area, as other journalists in the area were going to cover the strike, another drone strike hit that same exact spot.
	Mika, we actually have updates from the numbers that you just read.
	As Jonathan says, this is a very fast moving story.
	It has now at least twenty people killed, including five journalists, as you mentioned.
	AP, Reuters, and Al Jazeera have all said that at least three of those journalists were working for them, excuse me.
	And this brings the total number of journalists killed in Gaza since October 7 to 245 journalists, media workers.
	These are our colleagues, our peers, who have been killed in the last 22 months, guys.
	Correct myself.
	This was not last week.
	This was yesterday.
	Right.
	Ambassador.
	Can anyone believe the Israeli denunciations when it is pointed out that they have murdered 245 journalists?
	Well, 245 dead journalists is more journalists killed on the battlefield than in every war since the US Civil War.
	There's no question of that this is a deliberate campaign designed to cover up what's happening in Gaza and thereby facilitate the various lies that Israel has been propagating about that.
	For example, there's no starvation in Gaza.
	Israel is providing massive aid to people in Gaza of a humanitarian nature and so forth.
	These are the words of Prime Minister Netanyahu and really raises the question, who are you going to believe, Prime Minister Netanyahu or your lying eyes?
	Well, the lying eyes are being put out by the Israelis and deliberately.
	And I think a particularly heinous aspect of this is the double tap.
	That is, first you kill a bunch of people, then you kill the first responders and the journalists trying to cover the murder of the first group.
	And that is exactly what the Israelis did and it's typical of what they have been doing.
	So the reporters without fr Without Borders has tried to move this issue before the UN Security Council with no success because the United States blocks it.
	We're supposed to be dedicated to freedom of speech, the First Amendment, the protection of honest journalists, but we're behaving in exactly the opposite way under both the Biden and the administrations.
	Watch this.
	Ambassador, this is the UN High Commissioner for Humanitarian Relief speaking to the UN, it's likely that either this resolution condemning Israel won't be voted on or will be vetoed by the U.S. This is gut-wrenching, but extremely articulate, moving, and well-documented.
	Cut number eight.
	It is a famine.
	The Gaza famine.
	It is a famine that we could have prevented if we had been allowed.
	Yet food stacks up at borders because of systematic obstruction by Israel.
	It is a famine within a few hundred metres of food in a fertile land that forces a parent to choose which child to feed that forces people to risk their lives to seek food.
	It is a famine that we repeatedly warned of but that the international media has not been allowed in to cover, to bear witness.
	It is a famine in 2025, a 21st century famine, watched over by drones and the most advanced military technology in history.
	It is a famine openly promoted by some Israeli leaders as a weapon of war.
	Everyone owns this.
	The Gaza famine is the world's famine.
	It is a famine that asks, but what did you do?
	A famine caused by cruelty, justified by revenge, enabled by indifference and sustained by complicity.
	It is a famine that there therefore also asks, and what now will you do to Prime Minister Netanyahu and anyone who can reach him?
	Enough.
	Ceasefire.
	Open the crossings, north and south, all of them.
	Let us get food and other supplies in, unimpeded.
	End the retribution.
	It is too late for far too many, but not for everyone in Gaza.
	Enough.
	For humanity's sake, let us in.
	Who or what can stop this other than a phone call from Donald Trump or an enormous retaliatory response by the Iranians when Israel attacks again?
	Probably no one.
	That was a very eloquent statement of reality.
	and I'm glad you aired it.
	People need to know what's happening despite all the I'd make two comments.
	Some of the food that's sitting at the border is sitting there because Israeli settlers, not the Israeli government, ordinary Israelis take joy in denying food to the Palestinians and they rip it off the trucks.
	that are parked to go into Gaza and not allowed to buy Israel.
	And second, we are told by the humanitarian groups who are trying to remediate the situation there without success because of Israeli obstruction that for many in Gaza, even if food is now supplied, it will be too late because starvation has proceeded to the point where medical attention is required for survival.
	And we saw an example of that when one woman evacuated to Italy, who had been subject to severe malnutrition, died despite the medical attention she received there.
	So we're also told that there are 130,000 children in imminent danger of death.
	And yet the United States will veto a condemnation of this.
	Unbelievable.
	You're as eloquent and articulate as the Undersecretary of State for Humanitarian Affairs.
	Ambassador, thank you.
	I know it's a vacation week for a lot of people in the U.S. leading up to Labor Day.
	Thank you very much for coming on.
	Thank you for accommodating my schedule.
	No matter what we talk about, it is always instructive to hear your analysis, my dear friend.
	I look forward to seeing you next week.
	Thank you very much.
	Thank you.
	Coming up later today at 11 this morning, Kyle Anzalone and at 1 this afternoon, Max Blumenthal.
	Full days for you coming on Wednesday and Thursday this week.

▲