Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

March 5, 2024 - Just Informed Talk - Craig James

01:30:53

Will Globalists CRASH OUR ECONOMY After Supreme Court Blocks Their Election Rigging Plans?

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	This show is brought to you by shop.allamericangold.com.
	Visit their website or call 800-951-0592 for the best deals on high-quality physical gold and silver right now.
	Can you hear the silence?
	Can you see the dark?
	Can you fix the broken?
	Can you feel the...
	Can you feel the...
	Can you fix the broken?
	Can you feel?
	Can you hear the silence?
	Can you see the dark?
	Can you fix the broken?
	Can you feel it?
	Well, I'm begging on my knees!
	Can you save my bastard soul?
	Will you wait for me?
	I'm sorry, brother!
	So sorry, lover!
	Forgive me, father!
	I love you, mother!
	Can you hear the silence?
	Can you see the dark?
	Can you see the dark?
	Can you fix a broken?
	Can you feel my heart?
	Can you feel the power?
	Can you hear the silence?
	We need to go outside.
	Welcome to another Just Informed Talk Radio Show.
	I'm your host, Craig James, joined by my co-host and consigliere, Nick Ngo.
	We have a lot for you guys today.
	I hope you're having a great day.
	We're back.
	It is Monday.
	Yes, a lot happening over the weekend.
	We're going to try to give you the short version of it all, but of course, this being talk radio, it may turn into a longer version, but that's okay.
	Okay, we have a lot of big stories as usual.
	That is something that is consistent here.
	Never a shortage of information to get out to the public.
	And I hope you guys are ready.
	We're going to give you the breakdown and the takes that you're certainly not going to hear in any fake news syndicate, corporate media.
	Propaganda outlet.
	So we're going to get into it today.
	We have a lot to cover.
	I hope you guys are ready.
	First of all, though, thank you to everybody listening.
	If you're listening here in 1360 a.m.
	in the front range of Colorado Rockies from Colorado up into Wyoming over Nebraska.
	Welcome and thank you to everybody else listening anywhere else, whether it's on the live stream at Rumble or YouTube or at Twitter slash X.
	We welcome you as well.
	Make sure you leave your thoughts in the comments or the live chat.
	We want to hear from you.
	And if you want to join us on the show here, you can call or text.
	The number is 877-536-1360.
	That's 877-536-1360.
	If you want to chime in, but a lot happening over the weekend.
	A couple more races were called.
	We had the Missouri primary caucus called and Washington D.C.
	swamp GOP primary took place.
	So we'll get to the results of that here in just a minute.
	But There are other stories we're going to get to here today as well, including a series of mysterious incidents that are just coincidentally happening right as we're going into World War III, with trains continuing to derail.
	And a mysterious death of the sister-in-law of Mitch McConnell is now being investigated further as a not a typical accident.
	We'll talk about that, plus deadly wildfires sweeping across Texas, taking out over a million acres of land, and much more.
	With that being said, I know we have some information here on the primary races.
	Let's get to it.
	We have President Trump winning the Missouri Republican Caucus by a margin of 100% to zero.
	Now, of course, this is a caucus, and in a caucus, only a certain amount of people end up voting.
	In this case, Trump polled, it looks like 100% of The caucus.
	This is the most updated story I have, so we'll go ahead and wait on it, but it looks like he's the clear winner of the state, and Missouri awarded him 51 of its 54 delegates through its months-long process called a caucus convention system.
	So there you go on that.
	And on top of that, you have Nikki Haley winning a participation trophy out there in Washington, D.C., as she was able to take away the victory in the GOP primary in Washington, D.C., which it shouldn't surprise anyone that the majority of her voters are actually Biden voters.
	It's something rather incredible.
	But, Nick, I'll bring you on.
	Results coming in in the voting this weekend, and we have Super Tuesday coming up tomorrow.
	It's going to be a huge primary sweep for Trump across the board.
	What are your thoughts on what happened in the races over the weekend?
	Well, man, I can't believe Nikki Haley's still in it, and it's a, what a joke.
	You know, the only people that voted for her were the attorneys that are after Trump.
	You know?
	Yeah, yeah, about 1200 of them.
	So, you know, that's to be expected.
	It looks like with the race in DC too, by the way, you're looking at Well, it looks like around 2,000 votes in the Republican primary out there, so... You know, they're running with it, though.
	The algorithms really love Nikki Haley.
	I can only imagine why.
	Everything I see on there is like, this is a big momentum boost for her going into Super Tuesday!
	She actually won a state!
	You're like...
	When she gets eviscerated on Tuesday, which she will in every one of the primary races that will be held that day, it's going to be interesting to see how she reacts.
	Although there is more to this story than we know that just came out.
	Nikki Haley over the weekend basically rescinding her pledge to endorse Trump if the race was called for him as far as the primary goes.
	She has come out and said that she will not honor the agreement that she signed to get on the debate stage for the original primary debates where all the candidates had to sign a pledge to back the eventual nominee.
	She's come out and said essentially that She's not going to do it.
	So we shouldn't be surprised about that.
	However, let's just listen to her in her own words, explain how she's not going to be bound by pledges.
	Listen to this.
	Let me try it this way.
	You did sign a pledge, an RNC pledge, to support the eventual nominee.
	Do you still feel bound by that pledge?
	I have always said that I have serious concerns about Donald Trump.
	I have even more concerns about Joe Biden.
	So is that a no?
	Are you bound by the RNC pledge?
	The RNC pledge, I mean, at the time of the debate, we had to take it to where, would you support the nominee?
	And you had to, in order to get on that debate stage, you said yes.
	The RNC is now not the same RNC.
	Now it's Trump's daughter-in-law.
	So you're no longer bound by that pledge?
	No, I think I'll make what decision I want to make, but that's not something I'm thinking about.
	And I think that while y'all think about that, I'm looking at the fact That we had thousands of people in Virginia.
	We're headed to North Carolina.
	We're going to continue to go to Vermont and Maine and all these states to go and show people that there is a path forward.
	And so I don't look at what is.
	I look at how do we continue the conversation.
	Am I the only one who is just very annoyed by this woman?
	She won't go away.
	She's really becoming quite a nuisance, and it's really becoming obvious what she's trying to do, who is behind her, who's supporting her.
	It's not the America First, you know, patriots that love this country, the conservative base, obviously.
	you know, neoliberal factions in these, you know, ultra progressive areas that want to basically stick it to Trump.
	That's really all it is.
	And that's her support.
	That's her base.
	So, you know, Nick, is this just meant to antagonize us?
	Is this trying to elicit a response?
	I feel like it's getting to that point where she's doing this intentionally to not only drive a division and wedge in the GOP and the conservative side of the aisle, but she's also doing it to antagonize and provoke a response, right?
	Yeah, absolutely.
	Well, she could just be a crazy ex-girlfriend, you know.
	I mean, seriously, that's what she looks like.
	I mean, you know, guys are crazy exes too, but yeah, she sounds like that crazy ex-girlfriend that won't stop calling, leaving stuff on your porch.
	You know, you see her walking by acting like she's walking the dog when really she's just trying to come by your house.
	That sounds like you've had some personal experience.
	Shoot, that was personal.
	Yeah, but that's exactly what she looks like.
	No one takes her seriously.
	I don't think she even takes herself seriously.
	So what about your pledge to back the nominee?
	So if she can't keep that pledge, what about the pledge to the Constitution and the American people that would vote for her?
	Obviously, they wouldn't vote for her.
	You know, what happens when you get in?
	Oh no, that pledge didn't mean anything.
	I'm gonna go to one.
	Like every rhino neocon out there, just say whatever they have to to get elected and then completely backstab you when the moment counts.
	Stay tuned, we're gonna be back.
	You're listening to Just Forum Talk Radio.
	Welcome back to Just Form Talk Radio with your hosts, Craig James and Nick No.
	Nick, you know, before the break, we're talking about Neocon Nikki Haley and her victory in Washington, D.C.
	I mean, what an accomplishment.
	What a feat.
	She's so brave and beautiful, right?
	Stunning and brave.
	Yes, stunning and brave.
	Stunning and brave.
	You know, you've got to give her credit where it's due, at least.
	She's a resilient one.
	And, you know, it's like, These swamp creatures are backing her with the intention of, you know, creating this division, obviously.
	I think they're still trying to extort a VP selection out of Donald Trump, although I think he's calling their bluffs and saying no, he's not going to have another Mike Pence traitor all around him at the White House, right, Nick?
	Yeah.
	Look at it this way.
	What if they shut out?
	What if they, the real intelligence has been shut out from Joe Biden because they know he's a bad guy and he's not the real guy.
	And, um, what if this, you know, this is just a scenario I see playing out and Nikki Haley is their only way to get any real intel on what's happening.
	Because when you run for president, you get the presidential briefings, you get, uh, you know, brought in on stuff later on down the road.
	Um, and so she, you know, maybe they think that they can get a heads up to what's going to happen if Nikki Haley, uh, gets briefed on that stuff and she would share it with them.
	And also don't forget if she's a criminal that's done some really bad stuff, if she's running for president, uh, then she basically has immunity until the election is over.
	Um, and that's what she could be after too.
	Yeah, except that that doesn't... You know what's crazy, Nick, is that that is how it should work principally, but it doesn't seem to be the case for Donald Trump, right?
	They're having to go all the way to the Supreme Court to even get a ruling on this presidential immunity, and that's dealing with crimes that have been alleged to have occurred in the past.
	I don't know if Nikki Haley's a criminal or she's just representing a dark criminal faction, and she's a willing, you know, willing participant in the plot and conspiracy to overthrow the Constitutional Republic, which I guess should be a crime in and of itself, right, Nick?
	Yeah, and think about it.
	If that was the case, then she would have to be enticed to run, even though it's dismal.
	I mean, she's already been a laughingstock, so imagine it that way.
	She must be getting offers of lots of money.
	Yeah, but at this level of humiliation, Nick, that she's enduring, can only be the product of, in my opinion, her being compelled by blackmail.
	Or the promise of a very lucrative bribe at the end of all this.
	There is no way somebody would subject themselves, any normal human being would subject themselves to this kind of complete and utter humiliation outside of that.
	Unless she's a masochist who just enjoys it, that's the only way I could see it.
	I mean, she is the definition of a sociopath, if that's the case, right?
	Well, she certainly seems like it when you look at her eyes.
	If you look at You know, what is that guy's name out there that got those people to kill people in California?
	The celebrity guy?
	Oh yeah, she looks like Charles Manson.
	That's a good comparison.
	Now, I'm not saying comparable in level of criminality, because we don't have any proof of that, but I will say, yeah, she's got the craziness.
	You know, I have a good perception of people, good read on people, and that is something that I tell people often.
	I can pretty much tell when I meet somebody, almost at the first glance, whether they have that capability in them.
	She definitely strikes me as the kind of person who has that.
	What's the strategy here?
	What could possibly be, possibly be the plan, especially when you look around and you see RFK Jr.
	still in the race and he's been shut out by the Democrats.
	So he's, I think, going to be drawing more off the Democrat vote.
	So maybe, maybe a part of their strategy is they need a Nikki Haley to draw off the Republican vote because they think that'll help them somehow.
	Her going on national television though, and saying that she's not going to honor the pledge that she made.
	I mean, In a society of decent and honorable people, that should be the nail in her coffin right there.
	That she has completely rescinded and changed away from her word.
	But again, this is politics and that's how they all are, right Nick?
	Yeah, it's a typical, you know, bait and switch that they do.
	Yes, we're going to do so.
	We're going to do all these great things for you.
	The only, the only politician I've, well, politician, president that I've ever seen that actually followed through with what they promised is President Donald J. Trump.
	He's the only person that actually delivered on his promises.
	Not just a little bit.
	I think, I don't think there was a promise that he didn't fulfill except for putting Hillary behind bars.
	Well, let's read some texts.
	We got the audience chiming in.
	I think it's awesome.
	You guys, 877-536-1360 is the number.
	If you want to chime in, we'd love to read your thoughts here on air.
	You can text that number directly.
	Somebody from the 970 texted in and said, I apologize for not being 100% on this, but isn't DC a foreign corporation?
	Nick, do you want to answer that?
	I know you have some thoughts on that.
	Yes, that's true.
	Um, so I, I'm really, I don't know what to think about that.
	I don't think they have any delegates, do they?
	Or is it just as a ritual thing?
	But then again, uh, I could be wrong.
	Um, yeah, they have, they have delegates, but it's, they only have, uh, what do they have?
	19 delegates, I think.
	Yeah.
	19.
	Yeah.
	That's not going to help with the landslide.
	No, I mean, the numbers say that Trump's going to win because he's going to take the delegate vote by a huge margin regardless of what happens.
	I mean, Trump needs 1,215 delegates to win the nomination.
	So far, he has 247.
	And Super Tuesday, which is tomorrow, is going to be a big chunk of that that he will be receiving.
	And, you know, even if Nikki Haley squeezes out a couple of these, you know, blue state victories in the smaller blue states with not strong Republican bases, she's still going to get completely smoked in the overall race.
	So it doesn't make sense why she's staying in.
	She just keeps talking about there's a path forward, there's a path forward, but there is no realistic path forward.
	She's just playing the game of, well, let's wait and see what the results are when every one of the polls have been correct in predicting the outcomes of these races up to this point.
	And Trump's been winning every single race.
	Yes, she took Washington, D.C., but you've got to remember, Washington, D.C., since its inception as a part of the electoral process back in like the 60s, has never once voted for a Republican scab.
	So, that's like, you know, that's like walking into the FBI and winning the popularity vote on the 7th floor, Nick.
	I mean, it's like, it just is indicative of exactly who she is, right?
	Yeah, and it makes you wonder, what does she believe is going to happen?
	Who's informing her of that information?
	Who's giving that to her?
	You know, so the expectation is that for some reason he's not going to be able to run.
	Who's telling her that?
	So, you know, the people telling her that are plotting something.
	You know, and that's election interference in and of itself, and she's aware of it, which is an accessory to treason.
	Therefore, this misprision of treason, if she does not Go to a governor, go to the president, there's several different outlets she could go to, to report this treason.
	Because if they're doing election interference, then she's culpable.
	I agree.
	For context, I want to give the listeners out here this interesting factoid.
	The electoral votes in Washington, D.C.
	have never gone to the GOP candidate.
	The district has consistently voted for the Democrat candidate in every presidential election since it was granted electoral votes in 1961.
	The GOP candidate has not won the popular vote in DC in any of the past 10 years, and the closest the GOP came to winning DC's electoral votes was in 1972, when Richard Nixon received 21% of the vote.
	Now for context, remember that in that race, Trump actually did better Did better than Richard Nixon, who did the best of anyone ever in this primary vote.
	Trump received what, 33% of that vote?
	Now again, Nikki Haley won 62%.
	But Nikki Haley's a Democrat, so it's like, we can't, we're not...
	This is what drives me crazy.
	You put an R next to somebody's name, it does not make them a conservative.
	It does not make them a Republican.
	And we all know what Nikki Haley is.
	So pulling 60% in DC, it's just like, okay, you know, and Trump actually had a response about this, which I thought was worth sharing.
	Here's what Trump said over on his Truth Social page, and this is ahead of Super Tuesday.
	he put out this statement saying, We're in the middle of an election.
	We have Super Tuesday coming up very shortly.
	According to Justice Department guidelines, they shouldn't be prosecuting me.
	Quote, Federal prosecutors and agents may never select the timing of any action, including investigative steps, criminal charges, or statements, for the purpose of effecting any election, or for the purpose of giving an advantage or disadvantage to any candidate or political party.
	End quote.
	Trump goes on and says, this is election interference and should be stopped in the courts.
	So how have we gotten here, Nick?
	How have we gotten to a place where our DOJ is so weaponized, our law enforcement agencies are so corrupt, that they can flagrantly get away with election interference, and there's practically nothing we can do about it at this point, it seems.
	What do you think?
	You know, it's all the more reason for a military intervention.
	We have every branch of government is incapacitated at this point.
	And then not to mention, uh, it's completely corrupted.
	So, you know, uh, for them to interfere in these elections, they do, they did it by silencing people.
	They, you know, which is completely illegal deprivation of, uh, of rights under color of law.
	They've been doing this for some time.
	And, and, you know, it's ever since president Trump.
	Came out there with the military behind him and said, we're giving the power back to you to the people.
	They have done everything in their power to stop that.
	Now, every attack on him is an attack on us.
	Well, they keep telling us he's going to be a dictator and that he's this fascist terrorist, but the reality is that they see all of us as terror threats, and they've made that all but too clear.
	I mean, here's Alex Jones explaining how they look at Trump supporters, and they openly say this stuff, so I want to play this clip real quick.
	Sure, it's one thing when Alex Jones goes, hey, it's in this document they're going to declare us all terrorists.
	It's in there!
	And I get people wouldn't go look it up, they thought I made it up.
	Now it's all over the news.
	Oh, you're a terrorist.
	Screw you!
	You're the globalist terrorist.
	You're the Nazis, Socialists, Commies, Authoritarians, whatever you want to call it, telling me, an American, that I'm not essential, and that another lockdown's coming.
	Alright, I was going to play that whole clip, but I just remembered right as I hit play that he drops a few F-bombs strategically in that clip, which is a great clip.
	Again, all this stuff's available on my Twitter page, slash X, whatever you want to call it.
	I use it for informational purposes only, and you can go over there and get all of the receipts on everything that we talk about here pretty much at justinformed1 on Twitter slash X. That's at justinformed1.
	So, if you want to watch that clip, feel free to go check it out.
	But, you know, the sentiment is the truth.
	It's like, screw you, you call me a terrorist, and then you call him a terrorist, and then you're the ones out there, you know, allowing our country to be invaded.
	You're the ones out there rigging elections.
	You're the ones out there, you know, framing innocent patriots for this January 6th quote-unquote insurrection and torturing them in Washington, D.C.
	at the Gulag there.
	You know, Nick, I have to be careful what I say because it's very tempting to call for actions that would seek to counter this obvious, you know, Complete and total destruction of our Constitutional Republic.
	And that's why we have to see this as a thing.
	They can go on, you know, out in the streets and call for violent overthrows and destroying, you know, this Constitutional Republic.
	They can do all that and nothing happens to them.
	But if we even utter anything, we'll be on trial in no time, right?
	Yeah, that's the rules for radicals.
	Saul Alinsky is to use that against your opponent.
	If they follow the rules, don't follow the rules.
	That's just part of the deal.
	That's why they've got Catherine Herridge.
	She's now in contempt of court for refusing to divulge her source for a series of Fox News stories about Chinese-American scientists who was investigated by the FBI but never charged.
	Um, you know, they're harassing her.
	And then this judge has slapped a fine on her, $800 per day until, uh, Heritage reveals her source.
	So, okay.
	So that judge right there is, uh, you know, tampering with an election too, because you know, those are, that's related to the Department of Justice and also the FBI, which are political appointees.
	So right now, they are messing with her.
	She's telling a story about the FBI not doing their job.
	Typical.
	And now they're going after her, which is against the rules we just talked about.
	Well, we have some texters who are texting in some pretty funny things that I'll read when we get back, but you guys stay tuned.
	When we come back, I got big updates on Lauren Boebert of the 4th Congressional District out here in Colorado as she's running for the race.
	A big story broke over the weekend with her.
	We're going to talk about that and much more.
	You're going to want to stay tuned.
	You're listening to Just Forum Talk Radio.
	We'll be back after the break.
	Welcome back to Just Form Talk Radio.
	I'm your host Craig James with Nick Doe.
	And Nick, before the break, I told everybody we got big news about Lauren Boebert and here it is.
	Lauren Boebert has officially received the endorsement that everyone seeks after so much.
	It is Donald Trump giving his endorsement to Lauren Boebert.
	He says in a post on True Social, quote, Congresswoman Lauren Boebert is a proven conservative and effective leader who delivers for Colorado and our America First agenda.
	She has led the fight to impeach Joe Biden, stop illegal immigration, defend the Second Amendment, protect our wonderful ranchers and farmers, support our military and veterans, secure our natural resources to pursue energy dominance, and stand up to the radical Democrats who want to destroy our beautiful country.
	Congresswoman Lauren Boebert is a trusted America First fighter and has my complete and total endorsement for Colorado's 4th Congressional District.
	You know, Nick, I gotta be honest.
	I guess that kind of seals the deal, right?
	It's not really worth going into her personal life or going into anything to do with her family and all this package or this baggage that she's bringing with her.
	She's been endorsed by Trump now, so I don't think anybody's going to be able to do much to stop that from going through, right?
	Yeah.
	Yeah.
	And you know, this is a war and he's, he, she is on board with the Patriots to take back the country.
	And if President Trump endorses her, that's good enough for me personally.
	I trust his judgment.
	He makes a lot of good calls and I trust this one.
	Yeah, I mean, at this point, I've pointed out my reservations and I've made it clear my feelings toward Lauren Bovert.
	Personally, I don't care for her as an individual.
	I think that her family needs her right now and that if she wants to pursue this path and, you know, go down that route, you know, God bless her.
	I'm not going to stand in her way.
	I don't have anything to say that's nice.
	And, you know, my mom taught me when I was a kid, if you don't have anything nice to say, don't say anything at all.
	So I'll just leave it there.
	If you all want to go vote for her, though, feel free.
	You know, like Nick said, it's a war and she's much better than Ken Buck, so I'm not going to stand in her way and I'm not going to stand against Trump on this one.
	I'll pick a different hill to die on with regard to that.
	I think, you know, the one thing that people accuse us of often is living in this cult where we worship Donald Trump.
	The truth is, though, that I take, you know, I've I've been open about my disagreements with Donald Trump on a number of issues, including his views on abortion, including his views on some other things that I don't want to get into, because then it'll just start a whole other side rant tangent.
	But I do support Trump, 100%.
	You guys know that.
	And I've made the argument for Trump repeatedly, saying that we can convince him to change his views or his, you know, perceptions on things.
	You know, if we're persuasive enough like you told me Nick one time, you know, Trump's one of those people where if you sit down in front of him and you're organized and you have a good articulate argument for why you believe something is or should be a certain way.
	He will listen and he could change his mind and make a decision right there.
	He's a good decision maker.
	And I think the calculation with Lauren Bover and the endorsement is one that Trump always makes.
	And I've said this before.
	Trump's endorsements work like this.
	He looks at the numbers.
	He understands if a district is going to go one way or another.
	He then makes a decision, you know, basically, like you said, Nick, he makes very quick, pragmatic decisions.
	His quick, pragmatic decision here is support Lauren Bovert because she's got the name recognition.
	She's obviously going to be able to win a lot of people over.
	She maybe lost people like myself in the Christian conservative camp because of her behavior and what I think is, you know, my own opinion about her.
	issues that I don't want to talk about here.
	But, yeah, I guess that's where we're at, Nick.
	So it is what it is.
	Yeah, I look at him as, you know, the people's leader here.
	You know, this guy has taken so much, you know, His family is in jeopardy.
	His livelihood is in jeopardy.
	His freedom is in jeopardy.
	He's pushing all the way to the end.
	He's risking it all.
	I think if a guy is risking it all, and he's fighting this deep state that's trying to take over the country, and quite frankly they will if they're able to You know, disrupt the election or whatever.
	That's their plan, is perpetual bootstamping on our faces.
	And he's the only person standing in the way.
	So, you know, I got to support him 100%.
	And I look at him like he's a military general, because that's really what he is.
	He's out there making, calling the shots with those decisions, too.
	Getting, say, Imani and all those people.
	And, you know, ever since he came out with the military behind him and said he's giving the power back to you, the people, I looked at him like he's a military general and they are supporting him, you know?
	Absolutely.
	Absolutely.
	So we have a bunch of texters texting in.
	Let's go ahead and check out what we got here.
	Let's see.
	505 texted in and said, Nikki Haley is not a woman of her word.
	Proof is in the pudding.
	Yeah, that's very clear and obvious and on display.
	Another person texted in and said, uh, DOJ, Department of Jankum?
	Question mark?
	Most people who have listened to the show long enough know that I've made that reference several times to, uh, you know, people making these wild statements, especially in the fake news.
	I always question whether or not they are inhaling their own jankum, which is, A very vicious concoction where you use your own bodily waste products to create a vapor which you inhale and then causes you to hallucinate.
	Very dangerous.
	What?
	I said good gracious.
	Well, you know, you gotta call these people out for who they are, right?
	They're huffing their own fumes very hard, let's just say, and sometimes I wonder if it's common practice amongst these people.
	But, yeah, thank you for the text.
	877-536-1360 is the number if you want to call or text.
	So, Nick, I know you had a couple stories you wanted to get to.
	We have a couple minutes for the break.
	If you want to start going into them, that'd probably be a good place to go from.
	Okay, so a couple of things have happened recently.
	I don't know if a lot of people have heard about this, but there is a group of people that went in and have served the Arizona with Maricopa County Board of Supervisors.
	They ran out of a public meeting when they were served the following.
	I'm going to read this to you.
	Um, so this is what I said.
	My name is Michelle Klan.
	I'm here today to put you on public notice and inform you that you are not our elected officials.
	None of you ever signed an oath to the Republic of Arizona.
	Instead, you have signed an oath of office to foreign corporation, which means that this is an insurrection.
	And you do not have the proper bond-carrying security for your actions to We The People.
	Due to your voter fraud, you've never been formally voted in.
	Acting as if you were an authority over the people is a direct act of treason.
	Today, by the body sovereign, we're presenting you each with a liability of notice and an opportunity to cure.
	The fine is $1.75 million per claim, and there are 12 signatures, which means you are personally liable.
	And this is actually true.
	They have to have a bond and all these things.
	Uh, and personally liable for 21 million.
	And if you do not resign in the next three days, we will, uh, present, uh, be presented with a writ quo warranto and a favor of tort.
	If you do not rebuke these truths, you and your maiden office, we'll be notifying the military and your act of treason will be grounds for an immediate military tribunal.
	Yeah, man, I'm ready for the military to jump in here.
	I'm getting to the point where I see clearly what we're facing and people are saying, you know, you don't want that because it is, you know, the ultimate point of no return.
	But at this point, The direction we're heading is so disastrous and destructive that I wouldn't be surprised if, you know, there was already a de facto military, you know, control apparatus working clandestinely behind the scenes and that everything we see is merely an illusion.
	We're going to get into that much more, though, when we come back.
	Stay tuned.
	You're listening to Just Informed Talk Radio.
	I'm your host, Craig James, with Nick Ngo.
	We'll be back after the break.
	Welcome back to Just Informed Talk Radio with your host, Craig James and Nick Ngo.
	Nick, before the break, you were talking about some members of a council in Arizona getting served some paperwork.
	Do you want to continue to elaborate on that?
	Oh yeah, sure.
	And so when they are facing these people, by the way, they vacated their post, which means they left and ran out of their room.
	And I'm pretty sure that's a legal vacation of their post.
	You know, they just left.
	You can't, you can't just do that.
	If there's, you have to, same with nonprofits, you have to have an open meeting to the public and you must be there and, and it's requirement, you know, and if they vacate and they run away, That's no different than just leaving their job in general, you know, dereliction of duty.
	So so here.
	So they find them one point seven five million per claim and their 12 signatures.
	So they said, you know, basically a few days to respond.
	And they said, also, today I hand you this jump drive, which contains a 5000 page document notifying you of all the dangers of the COVID vaccine and the poison in the water, to name a few.
	And these are high crimes and acts against humanity.
	If you cover up high crimes, you'll be held guilty for committing acts against humanity.
	Therefore, I hereby command you to send a public broadcast to every resident in Maricopa County, notifying them of these dangers within the next three days, or you'll be in direct violation and derelict of your supposed duty.
	Uh, making you even more accountable for your actions.
	Uh, notice to agent is notice to principal.
	You have been formally served on record.
	And that is true.
	That's why they ran away.
	So they could say they weren't served initially is exactly why they, they thought that they could get away with it.
	No, they vacated their post.
	Um, and also, like I was saying, everybody, every politician, even, you know, local ones have to get a surety, but they have to get a bond.
	Um, and that costs like a lot of money.
	Actually, you got to put money up in a bond.
	And in case you get sued and and for damages and then they're in that position right now so what they've said is basically they weren't they weren't Elected legally, which is true.
	And they did not sign the documents that they're supposed to, pledging their allegiance, as Nikki Haley would say, that isn't necessary to the state constitution.
	Um, and, uh, you know, uh, they didn't do that.
	And that is actually a legal defense.
	Like they literally are not legally representing them if they do not do that.
	And they did not.
	Um, so then on top of that, that would also erase their, their liability protections that they would have for, uh, you know, not notifying the public of, of what, what's going on with the vaccines.
	And they, they were handed that stuff.
	So it's their responsibility, uh, you know, to hand that out.
	And if they don't, um, you know, you know, they're, they're culpable for damages, you know, everything from the deaths to the, uh, the, the medical bills.
	Well, it seems as though we have rather tough times ahead.
	You know, I don't see this ending well for anybody.
	I'm starting to understand, Nick, why all these billionaires and millionaires are, you know, buying and building bunkers so they can go hide when all of the stuff hits the fan.
	I just saw a crazy story this morning.
	You know that popular drag queen named RuPaul?
	Uh, apparently that person, whatever it is, I don't know if it's a girl or a guy actually, I assume that it's a guy, right?
	Okay, uh, they are building a fortified compound in Wyoming to prepare for civil war.
	So, you know, I think most people who are, you know, remotely in the know understand this is not going to end well for everyone involved, right Nick?
	Yeah, yeah, this is great.
	I'm glad you bring this up.
	So I actually have seen that there's something like close to 30 different billionaires that are doing this all right now.
	And, you know, some of them already had bunkers, whatever.
	As soon as they saw Mark Zuckerberg and how he is making a bunker that essentially I mean, this isn't an exaggeration.
	It has like a moat that's a fire.
	You know, once you, if you got through the first level, then you get to this next spot, you have to walk through this literally a moat of fire around it to get inside.
	And then, you know, ultimately what, you know, this dummy thinks that he can escape with a submarine exit and entrance that is deep in his base.
	Let me play the video.
	I have a video that talks about all of this.
	Listen to this right here.
	Billionaires are prepping luxury doomsday bunkers with moats that set on fire.
	The newest trend for the uber-rich is building underground shelters complete with $50,000 trapdoors, parking spaces for submarines, water cannons, and a moat that literally sets on fire in case of intruders.
	Here's a literal rendering of how it would work in case of an external attack.
	According to builders of these luxury bunkers, the buying frenzy began after Meta founder Mark Zuckerberg announced that he was constructing a $100 million bunker in Hawaii.
	It got really busy, and it seems like the phone hasn't stopped ringing.
	World War III seems to be coming, Ron Hubbard, CEO of Atlas Survival Shelters, told The Hollywood Reporter.
	Renderings show a state-of-the-art medical room, complete with an MRI machine and top-of-the-line equipment.
	Of course, a state-of-the-art escape tunnel is a must, and so are bulletproof trapdoors leading to secret passageways.
	With the pandemic top of mind, builders have also thought of decontamination rooms.
	If the bunker somehow fails in Apocalypse, parking spaces for extraction devices like superyachts, helicopters, and submarines can also be thoughtfully implemented into the space.
	There you go, Nick.
	Kind of explaining exactly what you just said, right?
	Yeah, and their strategy's not really to keep people out.
	That's not what it is.
	Their strategy is if they see the Deep State loses, they'll run into their bunkers, they're going underground.
	They have the escape routes that nobody knows about, and whether it's a submarine like a Zuckerberg, Big ol' boy Zuck out there thinking he's gonna get away.
	It's not gonna happen.
	Then you got the other guys that have the tunnels too that think they're gonna get away.
	You know, maybe they'll have some land about 10 miles away and they think, oh, I can just walk through the tunnel to get to safety.
	Uh-uh.
	Nope.
	No, they're doomed.
	There's no way out.
	They think they can have a bunker and just live it out in there.
	Nope.
	I'd imagine also that a lot of these bunkers, people like Mark Zuckerberg who have enough money, you know, leaking the fact that he built that one maybe was intentional so that people think he's there when he's somewhere else, you know?
	That might be a part of a strategy, and who doesn't want an underground supervillain lair in Hawaii with a submarine escape route?
	I mean, sign me up!
	I'm not a villain, but that sounds pretty cool to me, right Nick?
	Yeah, and it sounds like they understand that there's going to be a full power and might of an entire state, which means essentially a country, is going to go after them.
	What country?
	Maybe their own.
	Who knows, but they want to make sure they're fortified and they can escape from one that has the power to get into their bunker.
	You know, so that's who we're dealing with.
	If they thought they could play God, Their hubris was their downfall, but we'll see how it all plays out.
	We all know, in the end, God wins.
	When we come back, we're going to get into some more stories.
	I've got a bunch of other stuff to talk about here.
	I hope you guys are ready.
	We're going to jump around, hit a few big ones, and we may even be having a special guest on later, but no promises.
	Everybody stay tuned.
	You're listening to Just Informed Talk Radio.
	We'll be back after the break.
	Welcome back to Justformed Talk Radio with your hosts Craig James and Nick Ngo.
	Nick, a lot going on.
	We're going to get into some bigger stories here.
	We're kind of wrapping up the first hour.
	Like you were saying, these people think they're going to escape to their bunkers, right?
	That's why they're building them, obviously.
	I don't think they're trying to avoid natural disasters.
	Maybe that's an ancillary thing to what they're doing.
	The primary reason and motivation, it seems, will be because they fear Retribution, legally and lawfully, legally and lawfully, for what they've done to us.
	You know, they've played God, they've manipulated society, they've convinced people to do things that are completely counterintuitive and definitely detrimental to their mental and physical health.
	We all know this.
	We all are aware of it, yet these people continuously get away with it because nothing's being done, or is it?
	That's really the question, and I think it's foolish to assume that our military is so incapable that they're just going to keep promoting all the trannies until they get to general, and that we're going to just change the flag to the rainbow flag at the military.
	I think that's pretty unlikely.
	What do you think, Nick?
	Yeah, it's all going down the path.
	They see the writing on the wall.
	That's why they're building the bunkers.
	It reminds me of when Nancy Pelosi, if everybody, you can Google this, or you can not Google another search engine, but you can look up how Nancy Pelosi's laptop was taken out of the Capitol building and many people's laptops were taken out of the Capitol building on January 6th.
	She's never gotten it back.
	And there were some special forces guys that went in there and took all of the laptops that were involved with the coup that they had planned.
	And that's why she was so frantic looking for her laptop.
	And they lost their minds about it.
	And she actually tried to escape out of the country.
	I heard this from a pretty good source.
	And they actually worked for the government and like legit, you know, had.
	As that would have whatever need to know about this that she tried to escape a couple of times and it reminds me of Zuckerberg thinking he's gonna get away with the submarine she tried the same thing she tried to go out into international waters and the Coast Guard stopped her but she was gonna try and board a submarine at that point because she'd been caught Then they brought her back and told her, be good, Nancy.
	And then she set up a fishing, a deep sea fishing, um, trip in South Carolina to try and get out to international waters again.
	And it didn't work.
	They caught her.
	Um, you know, so there's a lot going on in the background.
	I could just, like, I don't know why this entertains me so much, but just imagine Nancy Pelosi trying to, like, escape the country.
	It must be the most, you know, completely insufferable thing ever.
	Like, her yelling at her servants, like, get the boats ready, we're going!
	And then the military's like, Nancy, Nancy, Nancy.
	Oh, go back there.
	Keep calling Trump a Russian agent.
	Go back to what you do best.
	Because here's the thing, right, Nick?
	It's like, if all that's happening, we can't know about it.
	So it's, to me, mere conjecture.
	You know, it wouldn't make sense.
	This is the thing, I refuse to believe that our military is this incompetent.
	You know what I mean?
	Like, I feel like if our military is so incompetent that they've allowed our country to be overrun and been invaded and done all this stuff and just have sat back on their laurels and been like, oh, this is good, let's promote the trainees to general!
	You know, it's like...
	Mentally ill people running brigades in the military.
	I just refuse to believe it.
	Maybe I'm the one who's being naive, but I don't know.
	What do you think, Nick?
	I think they just might be really, really good at PsyOps now.
	Yeah, yeah.
	Everything is not as it seems.
	The world's a stage.
	Stay tuned.
	We're gonna come back with much more after the break.
	Welcome back to Justiform Talk Radio.
	I'm your host, Craig James with Nick Ngo.
	It is hour two of the Justiform Talk Radio Show and wouldn't you know it, we have one of the biggest breaking news stories landing right here on top of us like a proverbial nuclear bomb.
	It just went off.
	The Supreme Court has made a ruling in the case of Donald J. Trump being removed from the ballot.
	Here in the state of Colorado, everybody Buckle up.
	This is a big one, Nick.
	It just broke about 30 seconds ago while we were at break.
	This was just put out by the U.S.
	Supreme Court of the United States, or the Supreme Court of the United States.
	They have ruled in favor of Donald J. Trump and against the state of Colorado.
	All thanks be to God, Nick.
	This ruling just came down.
	This is gonna be huge.
	This is a major It's a goal for us here.
	We take the W where we can get it.
	Nick, I want to read what this ruling... This is just coming out, so I have a little... I'm still putting it all together.
	I was trying to put it together over the break.
	Supreme Court has rejected the effort to remove Trump from the ballot in the state of Colorado, thereby setting a president that he cannot be removed from the ballot in any other state in the United States of America.
	This is huge.
	Congress, not the states, is, quote, responsible for enforcing Section 3 against federal office holders and candidates.
	I'm getting this from TechnoFog, a very prominent account on social media who has been following these things as they break.
	The Supreme Court of the United States, in the case that was being heard where Donald Trump was the petitioner, has come out and said that because the Constitution makes Because the Constitution makes Congress, rather than the United States, or the states, excuse me, responsible for enforcing Section 3 against federal officeholders and candidates, we reverse.
	Nick, this is huge.
	And it's a huge win for us here in Colorado.
	What do you think?
	Just initial thoughts, Nick.
	Right now, wherever Nikki Haley is, she's hissing like a vampire would, wouldn't there?
	Hit with direct sunlight.
	Oh, poor Nikki.
	Yeah, this is really the death knell for her campaign because obviously I think she was depending on states removing Trump from the ballot to create the illusion that she was winning, when in reality they were just going to rig it for her to win a few states so that she could stay in.
	Now that's not going to happen.
	And let's give glory to God and thanks to Him.
	You know, that's the first and foremost thing, because this is a good thing.
	The state of Colorado is the one who was just rejected and had their decision reversed by the Supreme Court of the United States.
	Now, I'm not going to speculate, but I will speculate slightly enough to say how long until we hear the screeching of the media propagandist regime puppets telling us to, you know, that the
	The Supreme Court has invalidated its legitimacy with this ruling, and they're going to be sending their Brownshirt Brigade Rainbow Guard to go intimidate the Supreme Court justices and threaten their lives and possibly try to commit assassinations, which I'm not calling for that.
	I'm saying that's what they're going to do, because that's what they've done historically time and time again, right, Nick?
	Yes, even as of recently.
	You know, the Department of Justice knew that they were going to try and go after the Supreme Court justices and they did not protect them, as everybody saw those news stories when someone tried to attempt on one of them.
	This is going to cause a false flag.
	I imagine there's probably going to be two or three false flags that are going to happen in this month now.
	I wouldn't be surprised, but we, you know what?
	Screw them.
	Screw all these people who tell us that we were wrong.
	The Supreme Court has just basically told us what we already knew, which is that what was happening here in Colorado was a complete affront to the democratic institutions that are some of the foundational structures of our constitutional republic.
	In a 9-0 unanimous decision, the Supreme Court rules that Colorado cannot unilaterally disqualify Trump from the ballot.
	The judgment of the Colorado Supreme Court therefore cannot stand as all nine members of the court have agreed with the result and outcome to reverse that decision.
	Trump has won that case, which is huge.
	Now, a couple things I would be thinking in the back of my mind now is, have they ruled 9-0 on this to basically offset their upcoming ruling on the decision as to whether Trump can be or is allowed to keep his privileged have they ruled 9-0 on this to basically offset their upcoming ruling on the This is the other case that's going to the Supreme Court.
	Jack Smith tried to fast track it in to try to have them make a ruling on Trump's immunity as president.
	So I hate to do it because sometimes it's better to just take a breath and enjoy the victory.
	But I already see ahead, Nick, where, you know, is this one of those situations where they're trying to put out because, you know, it's all about balance.
	That's what these judges are all obsessed with.
	It's not necessarily always about what's right.
	It's about balancing the perception of the court.
	So, is this indicating that they may come out and rule against, you know, the executive privilege that Donald Trump has enjoyed or that he has contended in his case with Jack Smith that he is privileged to?
	That would result in him not being able to be prosecuted.
	I don't know.
	But I do know that the Supreme Court and all of the liberals in Denver, I can hear them screaming right now in terror and rage.
	Right, Nick?
	Yeah, you should take off your headphones and see if you can hear them screeching in the distance.
	Oh, I can see them.
	I can see them running through the streets right now.
	It's rather glorious.
	This is huge, though.
	What's up?
	I think you're right.
	Look, the Supreme Court, they ruled 9-0.
	That's surprising, honestly, to hear that.
	9-0.
	Okay, okay.
	So, when they come back, as you said, and they make this decision, Trump wins, President Trump wins, either way.
	If they say he doesn't have immunity, okay, no problem.
	And then guess what?
	Then Barack Obama, there's no statute of limitations on homicides, so Barack Obama can be charged for killing a U.S.
	citizen, Anwar al-Awlaki.
	He was a young guy, he was 16 years old, a United States citizen, that he killed with a drone strike that he personally was involved in.
	And, uh, you know, um, I think that, uh, you know, he would definitely be subject to, uh, murder at that point.
	He, he didn't give him a fair trial or anything like that.
	So, uh, definitely, uh, extra judicial and he'd be held accountable.
	So then, then Obama's out the picture and then you've got, uh, you know, uh, big Mike will not be eligible to run.
	I mean, there'd be too much, uh, going on with that.
	So either way, president Trump wins in this victory here.
	Alright, well, it looks like we have people who are excited to chime in.
	We have people on the call line.
	You want to bring on a caller real quick?
	Actually, you know what?
	Caller, you're going to have to hold on.
	We're hitting a break.
	So, if you stay on the line, we'll bring you on when we come back.
	Everybody, you're going to want to stay tuned.
	This is huge, huge, huge.
	As Trump would say, this is huge.
	Trump posted just recently, big win for America.
	That is his message to the people after this ruling has come down.
	And yes, it is.
	Yes, it is.
	But let's take a second and enjoy it, but also be aware that, you know, there's much more coming on the pipeline.
	I love your take, Nick, that Either way, that the SCOTUS rules in the next case with Trump, he wins, right?
	Because they're either going to legally say he's immune and can't be prosecuted, or they're going to say we're establishing a president that former presidents of the United States can't be charged for crimes, therefore we can go after Obama and the rest of them.
	I don't know, man.
	I can't take all this winning, Nick.
	It actually feels a little bit too much for me right now.
	Anyway, we'll be back.
	This is a big story.
	We have more big stories to come.
	You're listening to Just Form Talk Radio.
	We'll be back after the break.
	Welcome back to Just Form Talk Radio.
	I'm your host Craig James with Nick Ngo.
	And Nick, we are joined by a very special guest right now.
	I want to let you go ahead and introduce our guest and we're going to bring her on.
	But this is something I told the audience out there.
	We may have a guest coming on and it looks like she's been able to join us.
	Right, Nick?
	That's right.
	We're going to have Anne VanderSteel, a reporter that is a muckraker journalist.
	She digs and finds the dirt.
	She's very good at what she does, and she's always ahead of the curve.
	So I'm glad to have her on.
	She's going to let us know about what's about to happen with our financial system and what you need to know to prepare.
	Yeah, maybe we can get our opinion on the latest SCOTUS ruling that just came down.
	So, without further ado, I want to welcome to the show Information War Correspondent, Anne VanderSteel.
	Welcome to the show, Anne.
	Thank you so much for joining us.
	Hey guys, it's great to be here.
	Thanks for having me on, and it's been a busy morning, that is for sure.
	Right?
	I mean, this is huge news that just came out of the Supreme Court of the United States, but that's not even what we wanted to bring you on here to talk about.
	I know Nick has been talking to you about this big story that we want to get out to the public, get to the people here.
	So I guess, Nick, I'm going to let you kind of take over from here, and let's kind of get into it with Ann.
	Okay, so Anne, you know, as you know, in our list, we've covered a little bit.
	We got Bezos selling his billions of stock.
	We got Jamie Dimon, JP Morgan Chase sold 150 million stock last week.
	Leon Black, co-founder of Apollo Management, $172 million in stock.
	Zuckerberg, $638 million.
	Everybody's panicking.
	Even the Walton family has sold $1.5 billion in their stock, which is a sign of the times.
	So what is about to happen that they foresee?
	Well, you know, let's just be clear.
	The table has been set, and it was set a long time ago, and they've always told us what they're doing.
	The problem is, Americans find reading press releases by the Federal Reserve, or the Department of Justice, or Customs and Border Protection, or whatever government agency, they find it utterly boring and dry and stale.
	And they're really good at also using very complex language, especially the legal fiction that they like to write in their rules, codes, and statutes, which really don't apply to people on the Constitution and the law of the land.
	But very simply, if you go back and you look at what happened under Dodd-Frank, right, in 2010, that's kind of where they really set the table.
	And, you know, interestingly enough, that is what really sort of pulled the rug out of everybody, out from underneath everybody, because under Dodd-Frank, which was their Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, it allowed the bank to confiscate assets.
	And it also provided a bail-in relief, meaning if you have your deposits in a bank, just because you put it into the accounts in your name, you actually don't really have that money until you take it back out.
	You're giving it to the bank, and they're holding it.
	They're going to use it.
	They're going to loan it out, and they may pay you an interest rate.
	They may not.
	But it's really not even your money.
	And the problem with Dodd-Frank is they've now said, well, we can take your money and we can use it to bail out the banks if they've overextended themselves.
	So now you fast forward to March of 2020, March 26 to be specific, the Federal Reserve Board, which banks always had to have reserves.
	So if you put $100 in, you know, they were supposed to keep a reserve limit.
	And they could, you know, extend, you know, 50%, 60%, but they took it to zero.
	So, meaning, if you put $100 in, they could take your $100 and loan all $100 of it out and keep no reserves.
	So, if you went back to the bank and said, hey, I want my $100, they'd have to take it from somebody else because yours was loaned.
	So they basically taken all the reserve limits back in March of 2020.
	And this is right when COVID was taking off.
	And so they were hyper inflating the money, the amount of money in all of the capital markets by using the bank money deposits.
	And of course, the Federal Reserve started printing like drunken sailors, and they're still printing like drunken sailors, right?
	So we have no limits, we have no reserve limits.
	And in fact, when Jamie Dimon and Bank of America and Wells Fargo CEOs lined up in front of Congress last year in November, Congress is saying, hey, we want to increase the reserve limit from zero to three percent.
	And Jamie Dimon was like, yeah, no, we can't do that.
	We don't have the ability to do that.
	So they were telling us, they were telegraphing.
	Satan will always tell you what he's going to do.
	And this is Babylon.
	This is, you know, Babylon is falling right now.
	And this is the corrupt international banking system.
	They have printed us into inflation.
	And frankly, inflation is a lot more than it is.
	Just look at what's going on with Saudi Arabia and oil, and they're going to continue to restrict the amount of oil they're pumping and so on and so forth.
	So our price of oil is already going up, which adds to the cost of all goods right around the country.
	Go to the supermarket.
	Everything has to be trucked in, so you're getting extra inflation through energy.
	So we're seeing just sort of this great reset happen right now.
	And again, the same group of people, the cabal behind the international banks are the same group of people that control trillions and trillions and trillions of dollars in companies, global assets around the world.
	And we know that to be BlackRock and Vanguard.
	And so while they are manipulating the stock market, because like the Dow is just 30 stocks, they can pick their winners and prop them up and keep the Dow index high while people are having to work two and three jobs in regular America because they can't make ends meet.
	It looks on the paper side of things that everything is great, but who are the people benefiting?
	The super wealthy.
	The middle Americans are getting squeezed at every level because the value of the dollar is going down by the more money they print.
	It's taking more money to buy stuff.
	The same stuff you paid $10 for last year costs $15 or $20 today.
	So, it's really a very dangerous situation that we're in, but the fact that the banks can't, you know, raise their reserve minimums to 3% is telling you all you need to know.
	And all of this stuff, again, is published.
	I'm sitting here looking at the press release right now, Nick, on the Federal Reserve System, and it's a one and a half page, you know, statement that's very clear on what they're doing.
	I'm sorry, six page statement, very clear on what they're doing, but they simply have reduced the reserves to zero, and they've never moved off of there.
	So there is no money in the bank to – if the people all decide to go get their money, they don't have the reserves to pay the people back the money they deposited.
	That's what, in fact, is happening.
	So we saw bank runs with – Silicon Valley and a few others last year, if you remember, right?
	It was in 2022, right, or 23, excuse me.
	We're going to see the same thing again.
	It's going to start to happen.
	I don't think we're going to see one day all the banks shut.
	I don't mean that at all, but we're going to see a similar cascade of events.
	The smaller regional banks are going to fail because people are going to – they're not going to be able to sustain what's going on, and they're shuffling the chess pieces around the board on the stock markets.
	They're picking their winners and losers.
	That's why consumer products companies like the Waltons, Walgreens, Walmart, of course they've sold a billion dollars in stock because the new winners coming in are all these AI companies, and that's who you're seeing propped up.
	So you're looking at the price of spot gold over $2,100 today.
	You're looking at crypto, you know, Bitcoin and everything is taking off, hitting all-time highs right now.
	Ethereum was at $3,500, $3,400.
	Bitcoin over $66,000.
	Gold over $2,100 an ounce.
	You know, this is a sign at the time that people are now moving into an asset-backed relationship with money.
	And the BRICS countries, which represent Brazil, Russia, India, China, South America, and so on and so forth, That represents 75% of the world's GDP, so these countries are all recognizing, hey, we're off the International Banking Federal Reserve System, we're not doing business with them, so we're going to get our currency backed by assets, whether it's oil or gold or what have you.
	They're moving in that direction, and still the United States has nothing backing the dollar.
	While all that's happening, people should be excited because 21 states have stepped up and said, we're going to create our own gold-backed currency.
	I live in Florida.
	Florida's out the gate, pretty much first to market.
	We will be signing that, I believe, in July of this summer, getting a gold-backed currency, and I believe we'll be using and sharing a depository in Texas.
	And it will be a one-to-one ratio.
	So for every gold-backed dollar, there will be the appropriate amount of gold.
	There will be no fractional reserve banking where if you put a dollar of gold in, they give 90% of it out and you only have 10% backing that dollar you put in.
	It will continue to remain a one-to-one ratio.
	That is part of the new system.
	So it's a transitional time where we've been warning people for years, Nick, about this, We've been telling them, hey, get into gold, get into silver, pay off your debts, put things into tangible hard assets, have six months of food around and some kind of backup energy supply, because it may come a day where your credit card, debit card isn't working.
	You can't put gas in your tank because you don't have cash or gold or silver to do it.
	So make sure you are prepared.
	And we're getting very close to that.
	And I think when you look at everything with what's going on with the work I'm doing with Michael Yan and Operation Burning Edge, the amount of, you know, we have 47 million that we know of illegals that have come into country since 2021.
	And that's Customs and Border Protection's own numbers.
	Forget all the ones that got away.
	We have a real problem.
	We have people that are getting minimally $2,200 a month just to get in the country, and in some cities they're getting paid $10,000 a month.
	Well, what happens when the banks get shut off?
	And these people can't access their EBT debit cards to pay for their families they smuggled in illegally and invaded our country.
	What happens then?
	So you know what you would do to feed your family.
	What are these illegals who don't care about our Constitution going to do when they need to feed their family?
	We're looking at very troubled times.
	That's what this is about.
	It's like, wake up people!
	We're there!
	Well, Ann, I know that on March 11th, there'll be no more money to loan out and the Fed right now has been injecting this cash.
	As you mentioned, they brought the deposits down to zero that they had to keep.
	So they've been just feeding them this cash and then they're like, oh, this is great.
	We can lend out all this money.
	This is great.
	And they over leveraged themselves, clearly.
	Now, it's like musical chairs in my mind, because everybody's going to be grabbing at this last bit of money.
	And then whoever doesn't have the money in the end, Their bank is going to essentially collapse and there's going to be a whole bunch of smaller banks and the regional ones are over leveraged too because they've lent out a whole bunch of money for commercial lending.
	Those commercial loans are no good because no one goes to the office anymore.
	A lot of people aren't renewing their leases.
	We're in a tight spot.
	This is serious.
	It's incredibly serious.
	You know, in 2018, I worked with a gentleman, Julio Gonzalez, to defeat Paul Ryan and Chairman Brady on the immediate... So remember when Trump passed the tax reform bill in 2018, got tax reform done?
	They wanted to put in a poison pill.
	So go back to the 1980s, and let's give some perspective to this.
	In the 1980s, Commercial real estate, the depreciation schedule was 39 years.
	So if you bought a million-dollar property, you could take 1 39th of that property's value every year and write it off your taxes, right?
	But they reduced that depreciation schedule from 39 years to 15 years.
	So now that depreciation became 1 15th of the property.
	It basically doubled almost, right?
	So you could actually double the depreciation every year on your taxes or thereabouts.
	I'm giving you rough numbers.
	But it made it more advantageous for people to have a bigger deduction on their tax return by reducing the depreciation schedule.
	What ended up happening, that became a tax shelter for people.
	So all these people are like, darn, if I buy a million dollar property, you know, in 15 years I can write the whole thing off and I can do it every year on my taxes.
	So I'm going to go and invest in commercial real estate.
	So a bunch of people went out and built and they bought and all this stuff.
	But guess what?
	There wasn't enough customers to rent the spaces in the commercial real estate, so now they're stuck with these empty buildings.
	And they went belly-up, which meant they defaulted on their loans, and the banks got stuck holding the bag with no one to buy these buildings, so that a lot of savings and loans went down in the 80s.
	That was like a big scandal, the S&L scandal.
	That's what precursed that, was the depreciation schedule reduction.
	So, what Chairman Brady and Paul Ryan were trying to do in 2018, and we got wind of it, so I was just a little citizen journalist, and I went to D.C.
	on my time and dime every single week.
	I met with lots of different chiefs of staff, members of Congress and Senate, and I said, hey guys, we went to the U.S.
	Commerce Department, all this stuff.
	And I explained to him what's going on, and I did broadcast after broadcast.
	I had a little tweet at the top of my Twitter profile pinned with instructions for people to call and a script for them to read, and we blew up Paul Ryan's phone, so much so that his phone system crashed.
	And we ended up, what he was trying to do was take the depreciation schedule to zero, meaning if you bought a million dollar property, you could immediately write a million dollars off your taxes that year, the whole thing.
	So that would have been a massive hyperbolic gift to the billionaires that had all this commercial real estate that could just dump it and get super high prices because everybody's like, oh, I'll pay whatever because I can write the whole thing off.
	So they would have hyperinflated the commercial market.
	Billionaires that own all this stuff would have cashed out.
	And then, again, we would have had a collapse because, you know, we would have had all these people start building things, right, just like we did in the past.
	And it would have had not enough customers, and it would have bankrupted SNL.
	So this is sort of what they wanted to do prior to COVID.
	All right.
	Well, Ann, this is Craig James.
	Thank you so much.
	We're going to keep you on if you're willing to come back after the break.
	It sounds like what you're describing is a very elaborate Ponzi scheme that's about to collapse.
	I think they threw Bernie Madoff in jail for about 150 years for this.
	But, you know, I guess if you commit a crime, do it on a big enough scale and you might get away with it.
	Anyway, we'll be the ones holding the bag.
	Stay tuned.
	We'll be back after the break.
	Welcome back to Just Informed Talk Radio.
	I'm your host Craig James with Nick Ngo and we have our special guest Ann Vander Steele on with us.
	Ann, you know, we're talking about what's happening this upcoming, most likely it's going to be some kind of major financial collapse.
	It reminds me of What you talked about, you know, with SVB, you know, you referenced that with what happened there, the Silicon Valley Bank and that scare we had, where, you know, people were starting to realize that the FDIC just doesn't have the money that they think it does.
	And when these banks start collapsing, these smaller ones and then the regional ones, people are going to lose everything if they're not prepared, right?
	And I think that's the end, the ultimate Takeaway I got from what we talked about here, but you know, we're here with Nick Ngo and his guests and Vandersteel.
	So I want to let you guys keep going.
	That's just my simple understanding though.
	And I got a couple other questions here because you seem to know this forwards and backwards.
	Have you heard about how BlackRock is trying to get the same status from the Dodd-Frank Reform Consumer Protection Act that protects the banks that are too big to fail?
	They're trying to get that designation.
	Have you heard about that?
	Actually, no, I haven't.
	That's very interesting and kind of very telling, isn't it?
	If, in fact, that's true.
	I haven't heard that, so I'm going to look into that.
	Oh, no.
	Oh, goodness.
	Okay.
	And just showing the evidence of what you're saying, in California, there's a commercial property that was sold two or three years ago for like $110 million.
	and I don't know, it could be off on the numbers, $110 million.
	And it just sold for like $27 million, I think, because it got resold.
	It went bankrupt.
	And don't forget, all these regional banks that are going to get bailed in from our economy, we're going to print more money, are these regional banks that are holding onto these commercial loans.
	Yeah, but they're also going to get bailed in.
	You know, there's $27 trillion in IRA accounts sitting out there, right?
	And that is, you know, the IRA, meaning like when you are investing in an IRA, right, you're getting tax-free money.
	So if you make $100 a day and you put 5% and you're putting $5 a day into your IRA tax-free, so they can only tax you on 95.
	Twenty-seven trillion dollars in IRA accounts, retirement accounts, are sitting out there.
	And that's because they are, you know, that's a government operation, right?
	That's the first thing they're going to pilfer.
	Then they can go for savings accounts.
	Look, they were just talking about doing this in Europe, in the EU.
	I can't think of the guy's name.
	He's one of the, you know, members of, you know, European Parliament.
	He was on video.
	I posted it the other day.
	French guy.
	He was talking about 34 Trillion dollars in dormant savings and loan accounts in the EU that they wanted to use to fund Ukraine and climate change and all this garbage.
	Oh, yeah.
	No, no, no.
	And again... May I ask a question?
	Sure.
	I was just going to ask, you know, is it true that, you know, recently courts have ruled that essentially when you give your money to a bank, you're an uninsured lender and that's what the bail-in is, is where they just take your money and use it to cover whatever losses they have?
	I'm sorry, repeat that one more time, my phone keeps blowing up, people are just, I'm sorry, I heard half of what you said because my phone keeps blowing up.
	I was just saying, have the courts ruled recently that you're basically an uninsured lender with your bank, that your money is not your money, and that in the case of a bail-in, they can use your money to cover their losses?
	Oh yeah, that's exactly what it is.
	I mean, that's exactly what it is, and they established that in Dodd-Frank in 2010.
	They established that in Dodd-Frank in 2010.
	You need to go back and read Dodd-Frank in 2010.
	Actually, I think I quoted some of it in a tweet, I thought.
	What about the great taking?
	Have you heard about that?
	How all of the people that have these IRAs, because they're going through a third party, the third party says that, you know, basically... I said IRA.
	I meant 401Ks.
	401Ks.
	If I said IRA, I'm misspeaking.
	401Ks.
	Sorry.
	You know, I heard that they, that the people that are, you know, servicing that or providing the service to provide the stock for everybody, that they change the laws so that you don't actually own the stock.
	You're just a benefactor of them owning the stock.
	So whenever it comes time for them to pay their tab, they can sell off your stock and you get nothing.
	Is that correct?
	Have you heard about that one?
	Um, not specifically, but when you think about the language, when you're the beneficiary of, right, it means they're holding it in trust for you because it's a government It's a government-sanctioned program, right?
	Like I said, if you have $100 and you use either a 401 or an IRA, but you have an IRA.
	Let's say I buy a $100 property and I'm doing it through my self-directed IRA because I'm taking a $100 property and I'm taking $100 off my income to buy this property and I'm not taxed on it.
	It is a government program, which means the government You know, is in control, essentially, and they are using a surrogate, right, to control the purchase of your property or whatever asset it is.
	So, your stuff is still at risk, and that's exactly why this bail-in language and Dodd-Frank is so important for people to understand.
	But, you know, when we were going through the banking crisis, we'd just come out of 2000, 2007, and 2008, the big banking crisis, right?
	Garbage loans, you remember all that stuff?
	The smelly real estate loans, the liar's loans.
	So coming out of that, you know, they slipped this language in, which is like, well, you know, that was a massive scandal.
	But what has happened in 2020 with COVID was far worse than what even happened in 2007 and 2008.
	I mean, the amount of debt we've created right now far surpasses what happened in 2007 and 2008.
	Yeah, that's the big problem is what they did during COVID was, you know, they almost destroyed the economy and they're on the verge of finishing the job here.
	And we're going to hit a break here in a second.
	Can we get your initial reaction?
	Have you heard about the SCOTUS ruling that just came down and Donald Trump Being vindicated once again with the SCOTUS ruling that he cannot be removed from the ballot here in the state of Colorado, which is where this radio show is based out of.
	We're in Johnstown, Colorado.
	This is a big win for us.
	I want to get your first initial thoughts.
	Have you heard about it yet?
	I know it just broke not too long ago.
	Yeah, this is huge.
	It's absolutely massive because if they had been able to remove from from the ballot, it literally would end.
	You know, our country as we know it, right?
	We are a constitutional republic.
	We have a republican form of government, which is a representative form of government.
	And if the people can't make, can't have the opportunity to choose, and you know, if you can't, if he's removed off the ballot, which basically says, well, we have to write him in, and most people don't even realize they can do that, then we have now destroyed what we, what we as Americans have in terms of our legislative democracy to be able to vote and pick.
	We've remote, we've just destroyed it.
	We're no better than a third world banana republic, right?
	And so, you know, the Democrats have been trying to do this, you know, COVID was a big giant blanket smokescreen that visibly changed how we could vote, right?
	We had the masks, we had, you know, voting became problematic, we were able to do a lot more mail-in ballots, and that's how they cheated essentially, right?
	In addition to ignoring statutes like what we see happening in Arizona, that's a complete abomination out there.
	They're ignoring their own statutes on how to count ballots.
	They're making up the rules as they go.
	So if they had been able to, you know, get away with it, our country would have just literally dissolved into a banana republic, and it'd be like, what's the point of even voting at that point?
	I mean, yes, you vote, you always vote, but you know your vote's not counting, because they're telling you who the people are that you can even consider to vote for.
	And that puts Nikki Haley at the top.
	I mean, this lady couldn't even, you know what I mean?
	She can't even get out of the starting gate, let alone... Do you think Nikki Haley is gonna... This is the thing she was waiting on?
	Is this ruling?
	Or what do you think?
	Oh, I don't put past Nikki Haley to be waiting on a whole bunch of other things they're gonna try to do.
	I mean, look, they've been trying to arrest this man and throw him in prison for quite some time, so I don't think she's done.
	These people...
	Play to win.
	They know they're on their heels.
	We actually have the Deep State on the run.
	The people are rising.
	There's an incredible organization that I'm affiliated with called the People's Operation Restoration dot com.
	Check it out because this is the people taking back government.
	All right, well, if you're willing, and we can keep you on for one more second, but I understand if you're going to have to jump off.
	Either way, when we come back, we're going to keep breaking down these stories.
	Lots of information here.
	You're going to want to stay tuned.
	We'll be right back.
	Stay tuned.
	You're listening to Justice Forum Talk Radio.
	Welcome back to Just a Forum Talk Radio.
	I want to first of all say thank you to our guest Ann VanderSteel.
	She was not able to stay with us, but I want y'all to go check out her social media.
	She's on right now with Ann VanderSteel.
	which is on Rumble.
	You can find her at rumble.com slash Ann VanderSteel.
	And we want to give her a big shout-out and thanks for just joining us to go through all of that information that she was able to.
	She's a really great reporter who has been getting real good information, Nick.
	She's kind of a last-minute guest, so that's why we weren't sure on the timing, how long she could stay, all that stuff.
	But thanks to her, go check out her work.
	She's also on Twitter, aka X at Ann Van Der Steele.
	V-A-N-D-E-R-S-T-E-E-L.
	A-N-N is her first name.
	So go check her work out.
	But Nick, that was a really informative two segments there, right?
	Oh, Craig, yes, and she was really calm with what she was saying, but I want the listeners to understand that this is a mathematical certainty.
	On March 11th, there will be no more money coming from the Fed for the cash that they lent out that they should not have.
	They tried to get them to go to a 3% reserve all the way up until COVID.
	They had to have a 10% reserve.
	And even then that was very risky to have a 10% of your deposits on hand as they had to have.
	That was still very risky to do if they did it that way.
	And they, everyone brought it to zero and JP Morgan told Congress they could not go from zero to 3%.
	That is a dead giveaway to what's about to happen.
	If you have JP Morgan unable to even get to 3% reserves on balance, they have leveraged and over leveraged all of the money I'm not trying to make everybody start a bank run.
	I'm not trying to do that.
	into things to protect themselves during the collapse and they'll get refunded and then they'll get to keep those assets that they had or whatever the case.
	Craig, this is a big deal.
	And I am personally going to take out my money from the bank today.
	I'm not trying to make everybody start a bank run, not trying to do that.
	I'm just telling you that I don't feel comfortable with what I see and what I know is a mathematical certainty at this point.
	I mean, it's something to consider everybody out there.
	I'm not going to advocate taking all your money out the bank at this exact moment, because I'm not 100% sure that everything's going to happen tonight.
	But I do know that what you're saying, Nick, is a concern that a lot of people share, and the fact that you're You know openly talking about the fact that you're taking action to Secure yourself against this outcome.
	It should be an indication in the audience out there listening how serious you believe this is.
	And I'm not saying that I don't take it seriously or believe it, but I know that historically what I've seen is they always have some trick up their sleeve that they'll pull out in the 11th hour or the 25th hour, and they'll say, you know, we're going to re-extend this, you know, program, or we're going to, you know, we're going to re-extend this, you know, program, or we're going to, you
	Because really prosperity for the Federal Reserve Bank is built with debt because debt generates interest, and that's all they care about specifically.
	So they don't have an interest in seeing the financial system collapse, at least not yet.
	That is surely what they have planned coming down the pipeline in the future.
	It's always about timing with these things.
	Historically, the people who benefit the most and end up doing the best through these difficult times are those who time things just right.
	And I would not be surprised if we do see something Very akin to what Anne Vandersteel described for us happening in the near future.
	I just don't know what the timing on that is.
	And that's the difficult part, right?
	I mean, that's obviously, you know, if you can predict the timing, then you're going to do just fine, right, Nick?
	Oh yeah, and we have a time.
	We have an exact date, March 11th of 2024.
	There'll be no more money in liquidity from the Federal Reserve given to the banks.
	It's gone.
	That money that they put out there, the JP Morgan put out there, they're supposed to keep 10% on reserve.
	That 10% is probably a tremendous amount of money, and it's going to be like musical chairs.
	There's only so much money left from this pool that's supposed to be helping with this, and there's not enough for all the banks to go around.
	And therefore, if you have any more than the federally insured amount, and remember when that one bank in California failed.
	They didn't even have enough money to pay those people back.
	They had deposits of up to $100,000.
	They didn't have enough money.
	And that's our federal government's little program to help in that situation.
	They couldn't even do it with one bank.
	You know, imagine the biggest banks in America all of a sudden having no money and no liquidity, and then they call the loans, you know, the Federal Reserve, they're going to call the loans, which means basically those loans that they gave to them have to be repaid.
	And therefore, they have to sell off all their assets, all the cash that they have on hand if they have any.
	is going to go to the Federal Reserve and your money is not your money anymore.
	It's going to be gone, a deleted digit out of your bank account.
	Well, I know two people have been talking about this for a while now.
	The next show coming up, Patriot Radio News Hour and the Half Cup of Joe with Joe Janquin and Jason Walker.
	They've been talking about this exact scenario now for quite some time and I'm not surprised that there is a date, though, that we're being able to add to it.
	Will that be something that is going to happen?
	I'm not sure.
	It seems like you're pretty convinced, Nick, so I would just say everybody needs to be cautious and aware.
	I mean, here's the thing.
	I'm not an economist by any means, but everything that we've discussed here in today's show is just, you know, easily observed facts, right?
	That there is a banking crisis that is coming.
	There is a financial crisis that is coming.
	It's not a matter of if, but when.
	Again, the timing is what's going to be the differentiating factor of it all.
	But what do you think, Nick?
	We've got a minute before the break.
	Craig, this has been the banking collapse that the Federal Reserve was always working towards.
	Eventually it was going to happen.
	It was accelerated and it's about to happen.
	And when they, when they bail in the banks and they print more money, the money that you have, maybe cut in half the value with how much money they might have to print.
	We have no idea, you know, 17 trillion.
	How much is it?
	It's, it's an actual number.
	It's 27 trillion is out there.
	There's a certain amount of trillions that they're going to have to print.
	It's 30.
	There's, I mean, you're talking about the national debt.
	It's 33 trillion right now, but they're about to slap on, you know, probably, you know, at least $10 trillion, I'm guessing.
	In my mind, I have no idea for sure, but my gut tells me it'll be something like that.
	And so, you know, that will devalue the currency by, what, another 25% or something like that, 30% overnight when they print that money to bail out these banks.
	That's happening on March 11th.
	If no action is taken at all, the collapse will happen.
	It'll be slower.
	Like Anne said, it'll be here and there, and then it'll start to pick up.
	But if they don't take any action, it's gonna happen.
	And if they do take action, the inflation hits.
	Well, looks like we're going to have a fun 2024.
	It's going to be a wild ride when we come back.
	We're going to leave you guys with some hope and encouragement because it's not all doom and gloom.
	There is hope.
	Stay tuned.
	You're listening to Just Form Talk Radio.
	We'll be back after the break.
	Welcome back to Just Form Talk Radio with your host Craig James and Nick Ngo.
	And Nick, you know, it's our final segment.
	We do our God's Grace is Greater segment where we leave people with a little bit of hope and encouragement to take with them.
	Today is no different.
	Before we do that, though, We always give you a chance, Nick, to give your final thoughts to the audience.
	And again, special thanks to Anne VanderSteel for joining us for a few segments there in the second hour.
	A lot of very good information she was able to provide for us, and context and understanding is what's most important.
	But Nick, what are your final thoughts for everyone out there?
	Well, you know, Craig, my final thoughts are that You know, essentially, it may seem like we're in the gutter.
	But, you know, keep your mind and your eyes up on the stars and know that things are going to be better.
	And this is just going to be a bumpy patch and a blip in our lives that, you know, before the prosperity comes.
	And don't forget to prepare mentally, physically, spiritually.
	Be prepared for what's ahead.
	And one of the ways you can do that is by going to God.
	And today is an amazing serendipitous thing, once again, where we've landed by coincidence or chance, but by God's plan, I believe, on Psalm 56.
	We're in the book of Psalms, again, going through them all.
	Today is a call for God's protection.
	I couldn't think of a more appropriate thing given what we've seen across the board, what we talked about with the SCOTUS ruling on Trump and how that's going to certainly probably spur off some kind of false flags or other things that they're going to use to distract us or intimidate us.
	And then on top of that, we have this banking crisis that's looming ahead.
	But what we do as Christians is we call on God for protection, and this psalm talks directly to that.
	So I'm going to share it.
	Psalm 56 says, Be gracious to me, God, for man tramples me.
	He fights and oppresses me all day long.
	My adversaries trample me all day, for many arrogantly fight against me.
	When I am afraid, I will trust in you.
	In God, whose word I praise, In God I trust, I will not fear.
	What can man do to me?
	They twist my words all day long.
	All their thoughts against me are evil.
	They stir up strife.
	They lurk.
	They watch my steps while they wait to take my life.
	Will they escape in spite of such sin?
	God bring down the nations in wrath you yourself have recorded my wanderings put my tears in your bottle and they not or are they not in your records then my enemies will retreat on the day when I call this I know God is for me In God, whose word I praise in the Lord, whose word I praise in God I trust, I will not fear.
	What can man do to me?
	I am obligated by vows to you, God.
	I will make my thank offerings to you, for you delivered me from death, even my feet from stumbling, to walk before God in the light of life.
	And I love those words, and I believe they're more true now than ever.
	And I do want everybody out there to remember this, that God is going to protect us, He's going to deliver us, and He's going to bring us through this battle.
	But we have to go to Him.
	No matter what happens, once you put your faith in God, rest assured that He will deliver you.
	And His plan, as long as you submit yourself to Him fully, will be done in your life.
	I don't know what that looks like, and I don't know what He has in store for you or me, but I do know that if we continue to put our faith in him, then we will be delivered through all of the trials and afflictions.
	So that's where I'm going to leave it.
	I want to say thank you to Nick Ngo and thank you to Ann VanderSteel for joining us today.
	Great, great commentary.
	Thank you to everybody out there texting.
	Sorry I didn't get to everybody's texts and messages and everything, but I'll tell you what.
	We will be getting back to it tomorrow, God willing.
	Until then, my name is Craig.

▲