All Episodes
Previous Next
May 18, 2023 - Just Informed Talk - Craig James
50:55
Whistleblowers EXPOSE The CORRUPT CRIMINALS Running The FBI & DOJ? | JustInformed News #334
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Hi, welcome to another episode of Just Informed News.
I'm your host, Craig.
We have a lot to cover here today.
We're going to be starting with going through a lot of what took place today on the House Weaponization Committee hearings, where we're going to look at the FBI whistleblowers who had come forward to expose the corrupt criminals who are running the DOJ and the FBI, how they have been targeted themselves after coming forward with this information, and how the FBI has been weaponized against the American people.
We're going to look at some excerpts from today's hearings that you need to hear.
I'm not even going to do a lot of talking today, honestly, for the first part of the show, because we're just going to be watching a lot of excerpts from this hearing, because this information is vitally important.
The fake news is never going to talk about it.
They're only going to put little, you know, two minute segments in their broadcast to the public at large, because they're going to try to hide the information that's being uncovered in this And we're also going to look at the deranged leftist lunatic Democrats and how they're attacking the hero, in my opinion, heroic whistleblowers who have come forward to expose this corruption.
And it just shows you everything about our system that is broken in one hearing.
We're going to look at that.
Plus, we're going to talk about some other big stories.
Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene bringing articles of impeachment against Joe Biden for his dereliction of duty and treason against this nation.
We're also going to look at a bunch of other news stories across the board.
We're going to get a little bit of an update on the Trump-Russia collusion that's been exposed, the scam that it was, the hoax that's been exposed by the Durham report.
A little bit of an update there as John Bolton's come out now.
And said that accused Donald Trump of treason for wanting to pardon the January 6 protesters.
Yes, that's something we're going to look at today.
Plus, a brief update on the Ukraine-Russia conflict, the war that's going on there.
That's essentially a proxy war between the United States and Russia, which we're going to get a better insight into with Colonel Douglas McGregor giving some insight.
And others giving insight on what this conflict is and how it's really about the world, liberal world order that they're trying to impose on us all.
So we have a lot to put in this show.
So I hope you guys are ready.
We're gonna get through all the news.
Before we do that, though, I gotta thank the sponsor.
You guys know him.
It's Noble Gold.
There's no denying it.
Gold is hot right now.
Prices are soaring and experts are predicting even more to come.
Not so long ago, gold reached its all-time high of $2,069 an ounce.
And now it's inching ever closer to that number again.
Bank of America, one of the largest banks in the world, is saying gold will rise further still to over $2,200 an ounce later this year.
So what, right?
Well, gold is already a safety net for your hard-earned money.
And now, when the stock market's all over the place and the value of the dollar is uncertain, being safe really counts like never before.
Noble Gold is offering a five ounce America the Beautiful coin for any qualified IRA or old 401k rollover.
Terms apply.
A solid silver U.S.
mint issued silver coin celebrating our national parks free with every qualifying precious metals IRA or 401k rollover.
You can't go wrong with Noble Gold Investments.
Give them a call today at 877-646-5347.
Or visit noblegoldinvestments.com.
That's noblegoldinvestments.com.
And thanks to them for sponsoring this episode.
There's links to their more information on them in the description below.
Let's get into the first story though.
Live streaming today.
We had this committee hearing this morning.
FBI whistleblowers testifying at the Weaponization Committee hearings.
Democrats interrupt, smear witnesses, and run cover for the FBI.
And there is a plethora of videos that we're going to go through here in this episode.
And I'm not going to talk too much in the beginning here because I want to play as much of this in the show today as I can.
I watched it all morning so that you guys could get the highlights.
And this isn't everything, but I'm giving you what I thought were some of the most important segments from this, you know, revelatory hearing this morning.
We had four heroic FBI whistleblowers come forward to expose the criminal corruption at the FBI and how the top brass have weaponized that federal law enforcement agency to the point where not only are they targeting innocent Americans across the board for political reasons, but they're also targeting their own agents who are coming forward who have a federally protected whistleblower status.
They're targeting them with retaliatory actions.
And we're going to outline what some of those actions were that were taken against the employees, the FBI agents who've come forward today.
It is disgusting.
It's sick.
And I'll just say this, that These people at the FBI and in the DOJ should be held to the highest standard.
And these are the people who should be arrested and put on trial for the crimes that they're committing against this country as we speak.
The treason, the seditious conspiracy you want to accuse some of these protesters of, it's times a thousand with the people running the FBI and the DOJ.
And I'll just kind of, I'll be quiet because You know, another headline kind of puts it well, whistleblower sounding alarm on being targeted by FBI and weaponized agencies role in January 6th, because that's exactly what this was.
Let's start here with Representative Hagman from, I believe, Montana or Wyoming, with these remarks that I thought would kind of set the tone for what we're about to watch here.
Watch this.
What I think we can say is that as the DOJ and FBI have become more political, They have amassed more power.
And as they have amassed more power, they have become more political.
This is a vicious cycle that must be stopped.
To be blunt, the leadership of the FBI and the DOJ are corrupt.
I will name names.
Christopher Wray and Mary Garland are corrupt.
They know it.
We know it.
And the American people know it.
Yeah, I think that that was a great starting point because that statement in and of itself categorically stating that the Christopher Wray, the head of the FBI, and Merrick Garland, the head of DOJ, are criminally corrupt.
They are corrupt criminals.
And there's no other way to put it.
And that's how you know our system has fallen and broken.
Because we have corrupted political criminals who are actually running the top federal law enforcement agency in the country and the top judicial organization in the country, the Department of Justice.
So this is To me, just the tip of the iceberg because we have so much more to uncover here.
Here is a statement, opening statement, part of an opening statement from Jim Jordan where he warns the whistleblowers of the dirty smear tactics that the Democrats are going to employ against these whistleblowers for coming forward with this information against the FBI because the FBI has gone so rogue and is so criminally corrupt that the
Democrats have to run cover for them at every step of the way and how they will target these whistleblowers and try to destroy their lives.
Jim Jordan explains it very well in this clip.
Let's watch.
We've talked to over two dozen whistleblowers.
People have come to us.
We've interviewed several of those and today three of them.
Three of those brave whistleblowers and a lawyer who represents them will tell us their story.
They will tell us what happened, what they saw, and then what happened to them because they were courageous enough to report it to Congress.
And I just want to tell you guys, get ready.
Get ready, because these guys are going to come after you.
You know they are.
Last hearing we had, last hearing we had, we had two journalists, Democrats, two Democrat journalists sat right where you guys did, and these guys tried to get them to divulge their sources.
Someone needs to tell them how the First Amendment works.
And oh, while Mr. Taibbi, one of those award-winning journalists sitting right where you're sitting, was testifying, guess what else was happening?
The IRS was knocking on his door.
So get ready.
But I know you're up to the task.
Because you came forward in the first place.
Thank you for your commitment to the Constitution, the First Amendment, the rule of law, and for your willingness to come forward and tell Congress what you've seen, what you've witnessed.
Thank you for doing that.
So, okay, just a correction here.
I think I said four whistleblowers at the beginning.
It was three with their lawyer, but either way, it still remains the same.
These are heroic individuals coming forward and exposing it.
And just like Jim Jordan just outlined there, he said in no uncertain terms, The Democrats are going to come after you, and they're going to smear you, and they're going to try to basically destroy your lives.
Why?
Because you've come out against their weaponized organization, the paramilitary wing.
If the paramilitary wing of the DNC is Antifa and BLM, then the FBI are essentially their Gestapo, or their brown shirts.
So if you want to look at it from that perspective, then you can see very clearly what this is, right?
What we're going to get into in detailing some of these clips from the hearing today are how the tactics being used that were being exposed by whistleblowers the FBI was using against parents at PTA meetings, or Catholics at churches who were protesting abortion, Or against patriots who didn't commit any crime on January 6th but were being targeted nonetheless.
And that's just the tip of the iceberg.
This is only going to get worse and only going to become bigger from here.
But we have the individuals, the ranking member from the Democrat side.
What is her opening statement about?
Well, Stacey Plaskett, the Democrat ranking member on this committee, defends the FBI for targeting white Christian males and for threatening violence at whistleblower hearing.
Let's hear what she said in her opening statement.
This, to me, exemplifies exactly what we've said is happening, and they keep telling us we're conspiracy theorists for believing, which is that these people hate, they're racists, and they hate God.
They're anti-Christ Racist.
I don't know how to put it any differently.
Anti-Christian racist?
That's what you have here.
Listen to this.
Because, listen to the false paradigm she puts out there.
She basically says that Jim Jordan and all the Republicans are racist and that it's good that they're targeting Christian males.
Watch this.
We are about to see the real question, the real thing that Americans need to be focused on is why.
My Republican colleagues would like me and others to believe that they've suddenly found religion when it comes to misconduct in law enforcement.
Give me a break.
When the FBI is rifling through personal correspondence of people of color, When law enforcement tries to push policies to limit the freedom of people practicing a different religion, or unjustly pursuing people in cars who look like Philando Castile or my children, or who are just going about their business, or breaking down the doors of people's homes like Breonna Taylor, do you think my Republican colleagues care about that?
Well, see, that's just, I mean, I have to stop there.
That's a false paradigm and it's all insanity.
She says protecting religions of other people.
Oh, you mean the Satanists who want to murder babies?
Oh, okay, we're not going to stand up for that.
No, sorry.
Not into that at all.
Then she starts calling them racist because that's the only thing they have.
They don't have anything.
They don't have any merit to what they argue.
All they can do is yell racist as loud as they can, and they expect us to just cower and say, oh, no, we're not racist.
I'm not a racist.
Well, you know what?
Screw you, Stacey, you moron.
You can't see what's happening in front of your eyes because you are so partisan and blinded by your own hatred that you can't even see what's happening here.
What's happening is quite simple.
The FBI has been weaponized.
You think that we don't care about black people being targeted as much as we care about white people being targeted?
That's insane!
That's just a leftist talking point that they throw out there because they, you know what they need?
They need you and I, or you and whoever your neighbor is, to fight each other so we don't look at the FBI.
Because like I said, The FBI is essentially the Democrats' Gestapo, and they need them to be their political jackboot thugs to go and politically prosecute and persecute anybody who stands in the way on their march toward power.
And that's all Plaskett cares about, because she is the embodiment of corruption and immorality.
And she embodies it so well that when she speaks, she is ignorant to her own immoral Ineptitude.
So I'll stop there.
Let's listen to what else she has to say.
Let's give her the rest of her time.
They don't bat an eye.
But when the FBI investigates conservative Christian white men who are actually threatening violence, suddenly my Republican colleagues are rushing to defund the police.
See?
I gotta stop there.
And it's probably going to be a long video if I keep doing this, but she just said, first off, that, oh, when they target white Christian men, then they get all, then they want to defund the police.
Do you see this inversion of reality?
Do you see the word games that they play?
They don't play by the same, they play by the rules for radicals, the Saul Alinsky tactics.
These are communists.
These are the literal definition of subversives who have infiltrated government and have been elevated to power because they are so good at inverting reality and lying to the public.
Like Stacey Plaskett is doing here, this dishonorable member of Congress who has done nothing but lie from the time she started speaking here in this video.
So, you see how they invert reality?
Everyone's a racist, and we're only worried about Christians.
Well, guess what?
In this country, we try to worry about everybody, but you're the one who wants to say that there's a two-tier justice and it's okay that people commit crimes like Hunter Biden and Joe Biden.
They can get away with murder if they want, but, you know, if a Catholic goes to pray outside an abortion clinic, he needs to be thrown in jail and have the FBI ruin his life and have a SWAT team kick down his door at 4 a.m.
and drag him out of his house in front of his family.
That is okay, Stacey Plaskett, But if you have a hearing to look at how corrupt the FBI is, well essentially it's like racist.
We're basically back to Jim Crow South.
So let's let her finish.
I would give her time back.
Sorry.
The reason we're here today is because Chairman Jordan wants to make America Trump again.
My Republican colleagues aren't here representing their constituents, not my constituents.
They're representing Donald Trump.
So now we see how low IQ she really is, because she has nothing.
All she did is say, racist, racist, Trump.
Racist, racist, Trump.
It's like that's all they have.
They don't have any merit to any argument that they make.
All they say is, racist, racist, Trump.
Racist, racist, Trump.
Let's let her finish.
Their acting has his defense attorney, his campaign operative, and everything in between.
This committee, this select committee, is a clearinghouse for testing conspiracy theories for Donald Trump to use in his 2024 presidential campaign.
What's clear from these hearings is that Donald Trump knows just as well as I do that the danger to him and his MAGA movement is the rule of law.
I love how, and I just have to stop here, I love how The Democrats talk about politicization as if it's a bad thing.
They're like, we can't politicize this, we can't politicize that.
And then all they do is politicize it.
Everything that we're hearing from the opposite side of the aisle here, from the conservative GOP, is essentially saying the FBI is going outside of its bounds, politicizing itself, and that's bad.
What did she just say?
Stacey Plaskett, this low IQ moron, who's the ranking member on this committee, she has come out, but she's been put there because she's a moron.
That's why, obviously, because she's so stupid.
She'll say whatever she has to to, you know, get her racist talking points out.
But she sits there and says, it's Trump's clearinghouse for conspiracies.
Wait, what?
You mean exposing the partisan nature of the FBI and the politicization of the FBI is somehow... Oh yes, Trump's gonna say that?
Well, this is the whole gaslighting in how it all works.
And Stacey Plaskett, she deserves no respect.
She's a complete and total moron, a racist moron at that.
And these people, how do they get into positions of power in this country?
Well, it's because our country is broke and failing.
It's the fall of the empire, if you will.
And this is what happens when empires collapse.
We get people like Stacey Plaskett.
Let's let her finish her statement.
That's why this committee is working so hard to undermine the rule of law.
That's why Donald Trump asked Jordan and others on this committee to waste our time and taxpayer money, asked the Speaker of the House to attack the Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg for having the audacity Okay, so there you go.
That was just basically the first two minutes of her racist tirade that she went on.
So that's kind of like the gist of it.
But let's see what the FBI is doing.
The FBI has been caught secretly infiltrating online chat rooms for workers who oppose COVID jab mandates.
And we're going to get into some other details about what the FBI has been doing.
I want to show you this Matt Gaetz, his time that he gave on the committee.
This is his statement and question time with the whistleblowers.
And tell me if this doesn't sound like weaponization and politicization of the FBI.
Watch this.
So, which Americans were being targeted?
Now, August 22nd, 2022, a media organization attained a copy of a document which whistleblowers subsequently authenticated to the committee that is styled the FBI's Domestic Terrorism Symbols Guide on Militia Violent Extremists.
Mr. Roy, are you generally familiar with that guide?
Yes.
And that guide identified certain things that made people more likely to be deemed a threat or terrorists, didn't it?
Yes.
And wasn't one of those things just the number 2 and the letter A next to each other?
Yes, it was.
And in your experience as a law enforcement official, does putting the letter 2 and A next to each other make someone more likely to be violent or law-breaking?
No.
And if someone signified that they support the right to bear arms, was that also something in the symbol guide?
Yes.
And how about this one really got me.
The Betsy Ross flag.
Was the Betsy Ross flag in the terrorism symbol guide?
It was.
And what about the Betsy Ross flag makes someone more likely to be a violent extremist?
I wish there was a reasonable explanation for that question.
There isn't!
And people blew the whistle and said this stuff is crazy.
Americans are being targeted.
Mr. Friend, you ever been to a school board meeting?
Yes, I have.
FBI ever sent you to the parking lot of a school board meeting?
Yes, they have.
And in the parking lot of a school board meeting, where the FBI sent you, you were taking down information regarding people's license plates.
That's correct.
Now, it wasn't the first time you'd been to a school board meeting, was it?
No, I went on my own as a private citizen.
As a parent!
Yes.
And so, there you were.
It must have been quite an interesting perspective.
There you were, taking down the information of people, parents, attending school board meetings on behest of the FBI, and you had been one of those parents at a school board meeting.
How did that feel?
Well, after I attended privately, my colleagues teased me that they were probably going to start investigating me.
You used to go after the worst of the worst, didn't you?
Yes, I believe so.
You went after people who looked at child porn, Yes.
People who were sexually exploiting children?
Yes.
And then, you were in the parking lot of a school board meeting, taking down the information of parents.
What happened to the cases that you were working to protect our communities from the worst predators that exist?
I was told they were not to be resourced, and then after I was suspended, they were handed off to local law enforcement.
Wow, so the FBI just decided it was more important to have you in that parking lot of that school board meeting than getting the worst of the worst away from people that they could harm.
That's correct.
But you deserve the consequences you are getting according to the ranking member.
Mr. O'Boyle, the ranking member said that when people break the law, they deserve the consequences they get.
It doesn't matter that they served in the military.
So what law did you break before the FBI packed up all your stuff and moved it across the country to Virginia?
No true law.
The only thing I broke was not toeing the line for the FBI.
Like I said when I opened, my oath is to the Constitution, not to the FBI.
And our laws provide you avenues to talk to Congress, to talk to your supervisors about those concerns, right?
Correct.
And so you didn't deviate from that, did you?
No.
You didn't go to the media first, did you?
No.
You used what the law provided.
And your family has paid an exquisite price for that, haven't they?
They have.
How old were your children when they moved you across the country?
Six.
Five.
Three.
In two weeks.
A two-week-old baby.
Could you get your stuff?
Six weeks later.
Oh, so for six weeks, almost every possession to your name the FBI had and wouldn't give back to you.
How did you... What time of year was it?
Was it winter, summer?
When I reported, it was in September.
So when we were traveling, it was summertime, essentially.
So we had basically summer clothes, but then we were basically stranded in Wisconsin, which is where we're from.
It gets cold there pretty quick.
I'll take your word for it.
I'm a Florida man.
But what was it like when you had to go and explain to your wife that you didn't have coats for your children because the FBI wouldn't give them back to you?
It was horrible.
I mean, we were Asking family for clothes and... Excuse me.
It was a difficult time.
Yeah.
You became a charity case, didn't you?
I did.
And now I get derided for that.
I never thought I'd have to accept charity in my life.
I thought it would be able to take care of my family, but I'm grateful for everyone who has provided charity to me.
That even includes a former colleague's church.
I would name the church to give them recognition, but I'm too worried that the FBI would send informants to infiltrate that church as well.
Yeah, well, they've already done that with the Catholics.
I yield back.
I don't even know what to say.
You hear that story from that Agent Boyle and it makes your blood boil.
Not to use a pun, but it's true.
The FBI takes the clothes away from his children and leaves them stranded in Wisconsin in winter.
He doesn't want to talk.
Can you imagine this?
We have an FBI agent who's coming forward and saying he doesn't even want to mention the church that provided support for his family for fear that the FBI would send informants to try to infiltrate the church that provided clothing so his family wouldn't freeze to death.
And food and support.
If that doesn't tell you we live in a banana republic run by a bunch of corrupt, crazy, treasonous criminals, I don't know what does.
And the Democrats just, you know, all they can say is, you know, this is, this is terrible, this is evil, this is that or that.
You know, O'Boyle, or O'Boyle, Agent O'Boyle, he's come forward now and he doesn't, he wouldn't even recommend that anybody do this.
And we're going to watch a clip of that in a second here, but watch this other clip of him giving his testimony and statement here.
Watch this.
I've sworn to defend this country from enemies, both foreign and domestic, even if that means sacrificing my life.
I've lived that oath out since first enlisting in the Army, consistently saying, here am I, send me.
My oath, however, did not include sacrificing the hopes, dreams, and livelihood of my family, my strong, beautiful, and courageous wife, and our four sweet and beautiful daughters who have endured this process along with me.
In weaponized fashion, the FBI allowed me to accept orders to a new position halfway across the country.
They allowed us to sell my family's home.
They ordered me to report to the new unit when our youngest daughter was two weeks old.
Then, on my first day on the new assignment, they suspended me, rendering my family homeless.
They refused to release our goods, including our clothes, for weeks.
All I wanted to do was serve my country by stopping bad guys and protecting the innocent.
To my chagrin, bad guys have begun running parts of the government, making it difficult to continue to serve this nation and protect the innocent.
But I, for one, will never stop trying.
And I'll never forget my oath.
So God bless this man.
We should be praying for all these people because they're facing something that is unimaginable.
But here he is telling one of the other representatives, Armstrong, here that he wouldn't recommend anybody do this because, well, I'll let him give you the reason.
Watch this.
All of the hardships you've gone through.
If one of your really good friends, your former colleagues, came to you and said, I have this thing that is being covered up and I think the American people need to know about it.
What advice would you give them?
I would tell them first to pray about it, long and hard.
And I would tell them I could take it to Congress for them, or I could put them in touch with Congress, but I would advise them not to do it.
So you would legitimately try to protect one of your colleagues from doing what you have done?
Absolutely.
And how do you think that solves being able to shine light on corruption, weaponization, any kind of misconduct that exists with the American people?
It doesn't solve it.
But the FBI will crush you.
This government will crush you.
Can you imagine?
He's not lying.
if you try to expose the truth about things that they are doing that are wrong.
And we are all examples of that.
I can't think of a more sobering way to end a hearing.
I yield back all of the hard...
Can you imagine?
He's not lying.
He says, look, I would do what I could to help, but I would tell them probably not to do it.
Why?
Because the government will crush you.
The FBI will crush you.
For what?
For saying the truth.
Just like they've done to all of us.
I mean, think about it.
How many of you out there watching have lost your social media?
Have lost your ability to speak freely online?
I know myself.
You've seen what happened to me.
I lost an entire career overnight.
For what?
For reporting on things that the powerful elite didn't want us to talk about?
Didn't want the American people to see the truth about things that they told us were conspiracy theories then, but then three years later told us, oh, our bad.
It was all true.
And this is the same thing for these whistleblowers.
They've lost everything.
They've lost entire careers overnight.
And I know how that feels.
So I know what these guys are going through, and I know what it means to sacrifice and put everything on the line and say, you know what, I'm going to tell the truth, whether they like it or not.
And damn be the consequences, because I know that the only thing I'm fighting for is for God and Jesus and bringing the truth to light in this nation to help save as many people as we can.
So this is truly The embodiment of how we've gotten here, and I'll play a few more clips here of Jim Jordan.
And this might be a longer episode today, so just bear with me, but I'm going to play all these clips because they're worth it and they're important.
Here's Jim Jordan in his exchange with Agent O'Boyle.
Watch this.
Mr. O'Boyle, why do you think they came down on you so darn hard?
Deep down, what do you think their motivation is?
I think the agency as a whole wants to get rid of people who simply just don't hold the line that they want.
They don't want critical thinkers.
They don't want people who raise valid questions to their chain of command.
They want to send a message, don't they?
Absolutely.
They want to make you an example, don't they?
Yes.
And they don't care.
They want to send that message so hard, so strong.
They don't care that you served six years in the Army.
Remember, the 101st Airborne took enemy fire, was selected for a special new unit they were putting in Quantico.
They wanted to send such a message that they said, if we can get this guy, we can get this guy to be quiet, we can get everybody to be quiet.
That's what they were doing, wasn't it?
Yes, sir.
Especially since I just had...
Just to put the emphasis on it, they said, we're going to do it the day he arrives.
The day we've worked with him, we've selected him, he's done a great job in the FBI, he's served our country, took an oath to the Constitution, took an oath to defend this country, he's going to move, we're going to send all his stuff in this van to this moving, we're going to do that when the day he arrives, we're going to suspend him.
We're not going to let his family get their belongings.
We're not going to let him get his clothes for his kids, his winter coats for his children.
We're going to send a message.
And they did.
They suspended you.
They took your pay.
They don't let you get health insurance.
They made life miserable for you to send a message.
Because you know what?
You reported on the first big screw-up they had in this administration.
The first big one.
You reported to us, as a whistleblower, about the school board's issue.
The Biden administration, they thought this was going to be a win for them politically.
They thought it was going to make Terry McAuliffe governor of Virginia.
Backfired on him.
And you reported.
Would it surprise you, Mr. O'Boyle, to know that the FBI told us they looked at 25 parents who were reported on this snitch line that was set up with this memorandum from the Attorney General.
They looked at 25 parents.
How many of you think of them were actually ever investigated and prosecuted?
How many think were prosecuted, Mr. O'Boyle?
And to guess, I'd say zero.
Zero.
Zero.
And you came to us because you say this is wrong.
This is wrong to set up some federal snitch line, some neighbor calling in because they don't like their neighbor's politics, reporting to the FBI, go investigate these parents.
They said, we got to get this guy.
We got to get Garrett O'Boyle because you had the courage to step forward.
And it's not just with this issue.
Because we have the memorandum from the Richmond field office about Catholics.
Right?
If you're pro-life, pro-family, and you're Catholic, look out.
The FBI wanted to put people inside the church, inside the parish, to spy on fellow citizens.
Does that surprise you, Mr. O'Blood?
Did that actually happen in the Richmond Field Office?
It doesn't.
Not anymore.
Scary.
And you know that memorandum, by the way?
It was signed off by five people in that office.
One of them was the Chief Division Counsel.
A lawyer.
A lawyer who supposedly went to law school and probably had a course on the Constitution signed off on that memorandum.
Scary stuff.
Scary stuff.
Mr. Allen, you served 20 years.
You had a security clearance for 20 years.
You served our country as well, right?
Yes, sir.
Honorably discharged.
Yes, sir.
Won medals from the Marine Corps.
Yes, sir.
They came after you too, didn't they?
And you simply did.
Mr. Goldman just asked you a few questions.
You were simply doing your job.
Your job as an analyst is to compile information, open source information, present that to your colleagues so they're fully informed about the case.
Is that right?
Yes, sir.
And you did that job, didn't you?
Yes, sir.
You followed your oath, right?
Yes, sir.
You adhered to the rule of law.
Correct, sir.
You were consistent with the Constitution, just like the oath you took when you served our country in the military and at the FBI.
Yes, sir.
And you did the same thing, didn't you, Mr. Friend?
Yes, sir.
And yet you felt the full weight of the federal government come down on you guys.
And of course they timed it perfectly.
They sent a letter to us yesterday.
We knew they would.
We knew it was going to happen that way.
And as Mr. Boyle said earlier, he's getting his hearing tomorrow, right Mr. Boyle?
That's when they tried to schedule it.
We have not heard back.
Yeah, thank you.
Thank you for your service to the country.
Mr. Bishop was right.
The poise.
The way you've handled yourself, the gentleman way you've handled yourself here, the way you've served our country, it does not go unnoticed.
The American people appreciate what you've done for our country and what you are doing for our country.
God bless you.
Yeah, I agree 100%.
I mean, Jim Jordan hits the nail on the head there and it gets even crazier as you have Debbie Wasserman Schultz here trying to argue that these people aren't even whistleblowers.
Watch this exchange as the Democrats, since they have nothing and they have no merit to anything that they argue, they have to try to filibuster to waste time in the hearing.
So that they can basically just continue to peddle their lies and falsehoods.
Watch this exchange between the Congresswoman from South Florida, Debbie Wasserman Schultz.
You know, remember the one?
She was the one that used to run the DNC, right?
Remember when Seth Rich got murdered, seemingly?
And everybody's talked about how she may have had something to do with that.
Well, watch this exchange between the Congresswoman who we may or may not have been involved with a Hit job against a political staffer from the DNC who exposed and leaked information kind of like what these whistleblowers are doing Exposed the emails of the DNC to the public before the 2016 election Watch what she has to say in this exchange between her and Jim Jordan very interesting I yield to the Chair.
Excuse me, Mr. Chair.
I think you were going to indulge the Congresswoman from Florida and her point of inquiry.
The gentlelady from Florida is recognized.
Thank you.
Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
It's my understanding that— What's your—what are you—are you making a point of order?
No, I'm asking you a question.
Okay.
A point of inquiry.
Okay.
It's my understanding that the minority in this committee, under the rules, is entitled to the same testimony, information, documents that the majority is entitled to.
So, I mean, I'm not aware that you're able to withhold information from the minority that we would need to use to prepare for... When it comes to whistleblowers, you're not.
And I would just remind the committee, remind everyone, look, when it comes to whistleblowers, you are not.
That's not right.
It's shocking that the gentleman from New York would state that when you were part of an investigation with an anonymous whistleblower.
Mr. Chairman, these individuals haven't been declared whistleblowers.
I can't hear five people at once.
Can we have regular order?
I'm inquiring, and I was not going to be inquiring.
That when it comes to whistleblowers, you are not entitled to it.
That's at the discretion of Mr. Allen.
Mr. Chairman, these individuals have been determined not to be whistleblowers.
These are not whistleblowers.
They've been determined by the agency not to be whistleblowers.
Are you deciding that they're whistleblowers?
Yes, the law decides.
Did you not listen to Mr. Leavitt's testimony?
Did you not read the law?
The law decides that they are whistleblowers.
The chair recognizes the gentlelady from New York.
The law has not determined that they are whistleblowers.
The gentlelady from New York has been recognized.
The law has not determined they are whistleblowers.
His attorney is just asserting that.
Order!
Gentlelady from New York.
Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
I have lost my voice.
I'm yielding to Mr. Gates.
So what you saw there was not only the filibustering, but just the complete lies and deception tactics they're using there.
They're saying that they're not whistleblowers, and Jim Jordan's pointing out, he's like, you guys were the one not too long ago who were using anonymous whistleblowers and not giving us any information about what they were doing or what they were saying or any information in their background.
Now, the Democrats are demanding that they are entitled to information that is withheld from them about these whistleblowers.
So, the whole thing is a complete farce.
The whole thing is a joke.
These people are criminals.
Everybody, from Congress to the FBI, these people represent the worst in our society and it is just, it's only going to get worse from here.
I mean, if you want to look at how Unmeritorious, or if that's even a word, the low IQ individuals that are here in the tactics they're using, these gaslighting tactics, you have an idiot Democrat making a fool of herself by accusing Whistleblower of running a Twitter account, but it's not even his.
Watch this exchange and tell me if you can spot what's wrong with it.
Watch this.
Thank you.
Mr. Allen, have you ever used Twitter?
Yes or no?
I have utilized Twitter, yes.
Okay, and is your account at MarcusA97050645?
That is absolutely not my account.
Okay, that's not your account.
Well, on December 5th, 2022, an account under the name Marcus Allen retweeted a tweet that said... That is not my account, ma'am.
You haven't let me finish the question, sir.
Might have been the football player.
You haven't let me finish the question.
And the time is mine.
On December 5th, 2022, an account under the name of Marcus Allen retweeted a tweet that said, quote, Nancy Pelosi staged January 6th Retweet if you agree, end quote.
Do you agree with that statement?
Yes or no?
That, that is, I don't, no ma'am.
That's not my account at all.
I have no idea.
I'm asking whether you agree with that statement.
Yes or no?
Can you please rephrase the statement?
Yeah.
Do you think that maybe Pelosi staged January 6th?
I just want him to answer this last question.
He'll answer.
Yeah, he'll answer.
I'm just telling you your time's up.
Do you believe that Nancy Pelosi, do you agree with the statement that this person tweeted that Nancy Pelosi staged January 6th?
Yes or no?
No.
Thank you.
All right, so, I mean, look at this lady.
I mean, that's who we're dealing with here.
Not the brightest among us.
Another pink-haired liberal lunatic.
Using... Are you Marcus15783245 on Twitter at Twitter.com?
And you're like, no, that's not my account.
And they're like, well, regardless, do you believe Nancy Pelosi?
Did you like a tweet about Nancy Pelosi, you know, staging January 6th?
Well, yeah, she did, but...
No, I mean, she didn't stage it, she just let it happen and she, you know, the FBI was probably more responsible with the criminal informants, undercover informants and everything else.
So, listening to these morons, it's kind of like, it's almost hilarious if it wasn't so treasonous and if it wasn't such a betrayal of our country, in some regard, for some people.
Some other people are just morons and you just look at it and you're like, alright, whatever, it is what it is.
But you see this over and over again and you're like, okay.
At least there was some good news though.
MTG, Marjorie Taylor Greene introduces articles of impeachment against Joe Biden.
Here is her statement on that.
Watch this.
Therefore, Joseph Robinette Biden is unfit to serve as the President of the United States and must be impeached.
Out in the real world, where American taxpayers live, employees are fired when they are corrupt or aren't adequately serving their employer.
Or purposely destroying a country, a company.
In this case, the employer is the American people because they pay the salaries.
They pay the salaries of everyone in the federal government.
The Constitution outlines a very simple process to fire the corrupt officials serving in the federal government.
Impeachment.
Matthew Graves, Christopher Wray, Merrick Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas, and Joe Biden are all corrupt and unfit to hold office, and they all must be impeached.
This concludes impeachment week.
Well, you know, it's good and bad in a way.
I mean, it's good because, yes, we want to see justice to these people.
Yes, Joe Biden should be impeached.
Mayorca should be impeached.
Garland should be impeached.
Wray should be impeached.
All these people should be impeached and removed from their positions because they're corrupt and they're criminals.
Whether you want to talk about Alejandro Mayorkas as the DHS Secretary allowing the full-scale invasion of our country, Christopher Wray as the FBI Director allowing the weaponization of the FBI, Merrick Garland as the head of the DOJ allowing the weaponization of the Department of Justice against innocent Americans, or Joe Biden doing all of the above, and then some,
And his treasonous betrayal of our nation with the corrupt business dealings with his son and bribes he's taken and the complete betrayal of his oath of office, whatever you want to call it.
All of those people should be impeached, but are they going to be impeached?
I mean, let's be honest.
We've seen this show before.
We know how it ends.
Nothing ever seems to happen.
However, I guess this is a useful political tool because if all of this comes to a head around election time, then I guess that's a benefit to the Republicans to the degree that it's the same tit-for-tat that the Democrats did in the last election against Trump.
Except who knows what kind of thing they're going to do.
Remember last time in 2020 when they launched a pandemic so they could get the lockdowns so they could bring in the mail-in voting because they knew they were going to need that to stuff the ballots and rig the election for Joe Biden.
I wonder what they have planned for 2024.
If you think that they're not going to do anything?
I'm sorry.
These are the same people who have walked us straight into the precipice of World War III at a nuclear Armageddon, and I don't think they're going to hesitate to do something probably worse than 9-11 in the way that these people operate to try to sway the election and try to change the outcomes politically here in this country.
But maybe I'm just a crazy conspiracy theorist, so take everything that I say with a grain of salt, because I'm just thinking out loud here.
But it stands to reason that if they've done all this stuff in the past, they probably will do it again in the future.
It's kind of like, if it walks like a duck, talks like a duck, quacks like a duck, it is a duck.
But don't let them fool you.
They're going to use these deceptive practices here where you have members of Congress threatening MTG already.
Jamal Bowman, this member of Congress, led a menacing mob against Marge Taylor Greene in New York City, screaming and cursing at her, telling her to get the hell out of here.
But now he's the victim, because now he's come out and said that Marge Taylor Greene has put a target on his back and compares himself to Emmett Till and Mike Brown.
I mean, I hate to laugh, because it's serious, it's very serious, but it's just so absurd.
At what point do you not sit back and go, do they have anything else?
It's the cry bully.
It's like they're punching you in the face as hard as they can, and they're crying, and they're telling everybody, look at how they're beating me up, look at how they're treating me so bad, they're saying mean things about me as they're just beating you into a pulp.
So that's what these people are.
They're a bunch of cry bullies.
But it gets worse because Comer, who's come forward with the House Oversight and Accountability Committee, has now been seemingly been intimidated by liberal groups who are calling for an investigation.
Apparently, what we're seeing here...
Is these liberal groups calling for investigations and James Comer who's come forward with all of the FBI whistleblowers and the other whistleblowers who are reporting on Joe Biden and his corrupt dealings that we're uncovering.
So this is like totally separate from what we're seeing today in the House oversight.
So you see this disparate reality where you have Everything coming to a head now.
You have so much.
And it reminds me of, you know, what happened in 2016.
You know, when the DNC and the WikiLeaks came out and they got caught blindsided by it.
And then when Hunter Biden's laptop came out in 2019, I believe, right before the election.
Of course, they launched COVID.
That was how they basically shifted the narrative, censored everybody, made it acceptable to basically have this state partnership with the media to censor free speech in this country, which is insane.
And who knows?
I'm just saying, whatever they're going to roll out next, we better pray for this country because I can guarantee you it's going to be big.
A few other stories to get through here.
No effing way British intelligence agents mocked FBI's flimsy Russia collusion evidence against Donald Trump.
And here's John Bolton accusing Trump of treason on CNN.
Watch this.
I'll just ask you one other question before we go, which is another comment Trump made on, speaking of the rule of law last Wednesday night, is he left the door open to pardoning people who were charged with assaulting cops on January 6th.
The Proud Boys convicted of seditious conspiracy.
What did you make of him saying that he would consider pardoning most of them?
I think it's virtually treasonous for the President to say he would pardon people who are trying to disrupt the work of Congress.
It's another example why he's not fit to be President.
If anybody wants to know what a Trump administration would look like when he's pardoning the people who rioted on January the 6th, I think that's all you need to know.
So anyway, you know, you have the obvious biased lunatic leftist, Caitlin Collins, interviewing the deranged lunatic neocon, you know, Rhino, John Bolton, and they both have the, you know, when you're watching CNN, and you see a neocon on there with a deranged leftist, and they're agreeing on something, it's going to be something negative about Trump, and of course,
It's agreeing that Trump is a treasonous, is committing treason by pardoning individuals who were wrongly accused of crimes they never seem to have committed, like seditious conspiracy.
When, in fact, if there were anybody committing seditious conspiracies, it's probably John Bolton and his friends.
Or, if you want to talk about seditious conspiracy to overthrow government, how about fake news organizations running information that they know are lies to influence outcomes of elections here in this country?
And we're talking about willful intent.
We're not talking about, you know, accidentally saying something.
What about willfully with the intention of subverting our country?
I don't know.
Maybe that's something we should look into.
Maybe there's a crime that was committed there.
Maybe there's a seditious conspiracy to be seen in that.
However, there are other things happening in the world that we should probably be paying attention to while we get so inundated with the domestic issues of the day, as we see Russian train derailed in Crimea due to sabotage.
And this conflict is ongoing, and I only bring up this story so I can play these clips.
One is going to be from Douglas McGregor talking about this war with Ukraine.
He was on Donald Trump Jr.' 's podcast Triggered.
And here he is explaining what is actually happening with this conflict and what it means for the United States, Russia, and everyone else involved.
Watch this.
The whole world is not with us on this Ukraine business.
Most of the world is very much against us.
And everything is at risk.
Our economy is at risk.
The reserve status of the dollar is at risk.
We're facing terrible times ahead.
Things are not going to get better until we remove the principle metastasizing cancer from Washington, D.C.
And I'm not just talking about an election for president.
We need to make a clean sweep.
Yep.
That's, I couldn't have said it better myself, but here's a better insight from an individual who gives a kind of a direct insight into what Joe Biden and the Biden administration is doing with this.
You know, uh, polarization of the, the global liberal world order, trying to establish us hegemony, what it really looks like and what it is.
Watch this.
Oh, we need this international order, but he's not going back to the absorption phase of the Obama administration.
He's going back to square one where in order to justify this rules based international order, we have to have an enemy.
We have to have counterpart.
We're now recreating Russia and China as this counter-polarity.
We've all but ceded equal status to China.
It's funny that we have to cede it.
China's seized equal status.
And Russia is taking a second seat to nobody.
And I think the Biden administration recognizes this, but rather than dealing with them as equals, trying to say, okay, you know, the United States is no longer the sole remaining superpower.
We are a very powerful nation in a very complex world where there are other powerful nations.
Therefore, we need to work with each other to get along, to survive.
No, we want to retain hegemony.
We want to be the big dog, at least in our block.
And so we are trying to revive the post-World War II.
world where we demand that our allies subordinate themselves to us.
That's what the rules-based international order is all about.
It's about submission by the lesser powers to the greater power of the United States.
That's just not going to work.
It's doomed to fail because the world's not willing to submit.
There's no need for the world to submit.
The world wants to, you know, succeed on their own terms.
So this is why I call it fiction.
A very dangerous situation.
Because it's an artificial construct that has no chance of getting any leverage policy-wise, and yet the Biden administration is throwing all of its eggs into this basket.
And when you fail diplomatically, Remember, war is an extension of politics.
Diplomacy is the face of real politics.
When you fail there, what are you left with?
The military option.
And so I see Biden claiming that he wants to use diplomacy to pursue this rules-based international order, but it's going to fail.
And at the end of the day, the U.S.
military is going to be called upon So that's kind of one take on it.
I think it's kind of an accurate one, and I think it's worth us kind of looking at that more closely in another episode.
I'm sure we'll get to it later, but thanks for watching.
I hope you guys enjoyed it.
Make sure you like, share, subscribe.
There's links in the description if you want to support this channel.
Your financial support goes a long way in keeping this channel alive.
Thank you so much.
Leave your comments below.
I want to hear what you think about everything that we covered here today.
What do you think about this crazy system and all this corruption?
I hope that you guys let me know down below.
But thanks for watching.
We'll see you on the next one.
Until then, my name's Craig.
▲
Export Selection