All Episodes
Previous Next
May 17, 2023 - Just Informed Talk - Craig James
35:38
Did Russia DEFEAT/DESTROY Patriot Missile Defense Systems In Ukraine? | JustInformed News #333
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
- Hi, welcome to another episode of Just Informed News.
I'm your host, Craig.
Thanks for joining me.
We have a lot to cover here today.
Today, we're going to be talking about what's happening in Russia with Ukraine, or what's happening in Ukraine with Russia, however you want to look at that.
We're going to be talking about this Patriot missile defense system, and whether it succeeded or failed, and what that says more broadly about the U.S.
nuclear defense capabilities And how that is going to affect everything going into the future.
There is a major developing story there as it seems as though Russia is claiming that they took out the U.S.
Patriot missile defense system and the U.S.
is saying something quite different and Ukraine saying something even more different than that.
So we're going to get to the bottom of that story.
There's a lot to talk about and discuss there.
I hope you guys are ready for it.
Plus, we're going to get another update on the John Durham aftermath.
You guys know John Durham's report was released a couple days ago, and it outlined how the FBI worked with the DOJ and the Obama administration to frame Trump, and how now that we have all that evidence, well, nothing's happening.
No indictments are coming, it seems, and everything is just called a misstep or an accident or just, you know, some misfiled paperwork.
We're going to look at how insane this whole thing is.
We're going to look at some more takeaways from the Durham report.
I hope you guys are ready for that.
Plus, we're going to get into some other news stories, including an update on Tucker Carlson, the saga of Fox News, which is only getting more crazy by the minute.
What we have now is James O'Keefe at O'Keefe Media Group coming out and says that, or basically has undercover footage of a Fox News producer talking about how the settlement with Dominion had everything to do with why Tucker Carlson was removed from the airwaves.
And we're going to look at that briefly, plus we're going to look at a bunch of other news stories.
So I hope you guys are ready for us to get right into it.
With that being said, though, we got to thank the sponsor of this episode.
You guys know him.
It's Noble Gold.
And you know, There's no denying it.
Gold is hot right now.
Prices are soaring and experts are predicting even more to come.
Not so long ago, gold reached its all-time high of $2,069 an ounce, and now it's inching ever closer to that number again.
Bank of America, one of the largest banks in the world, is saying gold will rise further still to over $2,200 an ounce later this year.
So what, right?
Well, gold is already a safety net for your hard-earned money, and now, when the stock market's all over the place, and when the value of the dollar is uncertain, being safe really counts like never before.
Noble Gold's offering a 5-ounce America the Beautiful coin for any qualified IRA or old 401k rollover.
Terms apply.
A solid silver U.S.
Mint-issued coin, celebrating our national parks free with every qualifying precious metals IRA or 401k rollover.
You can't go wrong with Noble Gold Investments.
Call them today at 877- Six, four, six, five, three, four, seven, or visit noblegoldinvestments.com.
That's noblegoldinvestments.com.
Thanks to them for sponsoring this episode.
More information about Noble Gold Investments in the description below.
Go check that out.
But with that being said, let's get in the first story here.
Russia says it took out US-supplied Patriot missile system in a hypersonic strike on Kiev.
So, Russia's military may have taken out a US-supplied Patriot anti-air battery in Ukraine, which, if true, would be a very significant first, since the advanced Raytheon-made defense weapon was deployed there.
This came as Ukrainian officials have cited an exceptionally dense attack on Kiev overnight, Which included cruise missiles and drones and even allegedly Kinzhal hypersonic missiles.
Ukraine was hit by at least 18 missiles and nine drones were sent with media reports saying some six ballistic missiles including Kinzhal were launched but Ukrainians are claiming that most or all of them were intercepted.
So...
Now it comes to be, who do you believe?
Who do you who do you listen to?
Who do you trust?
Right?
And at this point, I'm not sure which side is more trustworthy or less trustworthy, I guess you could say.
But at this point, we hear now that what they're claiming is that the US missile defense system, the Patriot missile defense system took out these hypersonic missiles.
And if that's true, that's a game changer.
Because the hypersonic missiles are being touted as this incredibly hard to hit.
They go to speeds up to Mach 10.
These are insanely fast missiles that are very hard to hit.
It's like, basically, it's like shooting a bullet with another bullet out of the air.
That's essentially what would have happened if you have hypersonic missiles actually being taken out by the Patriot defense system.
Now, that's not to say that conventional missiles aren't difficult to take out of the air.
But when you have a hypersonic missile and the guidance systems that are on those, They're almost impossible to stop, which is why everybody's so afraid of that new hypersonic technology.
Because essentially, when you launch it, you can almost be guaranteed it's going to hit at its destination.
But let's see what the propagandists are saying.
Over here on Reuters, we have this story coming up.
Patriot missile defense system in Ukraine likely damaged according to US officials.
So that's kind of the official report from yesterday about this missile defense system.
Apparently, U.S. officials are saying now that the system may have been damaged, which means that Russia may be telling the truth that they took out the missile defense system.
But wait, it gets more interesting because CNN now has come out with U.S. officials.
officials saying that the damage to the Patriot's missile defense system was minimal following Russian attack near Kiev.
Well, if it's just minimal, then that leads us to several different conclusions.
The main one being that the hypersonic missiles can penetrate the U.S.
Patriot missile defense system, and that in and of itself Basically sparks a whole new conversation about the US nuclear defense capabilities, because we know that Russia is using these hypersonic missiles in their nuclear missile fleet.
And if the missile defense system, the Patriot system can't stop these hypersonic missiles, as it seems is the case, then that is going to lead to a whole nother game, a whole nother Ball game here, if you could say, to use terms as such.
There is going to be a change in the dynamic here, which is why you're seeing things like the US coming out and voluntarily trying to push for this transparency with our nuclear arsenal, when we know that not too long ago, Russia had basically gotten rid of this open and transparent system where they were sharing information about their nuclear Weapons as a part of a treaty that was standing between the United States and Russia.
They actually withdrew from that treaty.
And now we don't know essentially, they're not publicly sharing at least where their strategic nuclear arms are.
Now, of course, the United States probably has spies, which we're going to talk about in this episode two in Russia, which the CIA is actively recruiting Russian spies on YouTube.
We're going to get into that story later.
And they probably have systems like very advanced satellite systems that can detect radiological weapons on the entire planet.
I mean, I'm actually pretty sure that most nuclear weapons, unless they're in some kind of bunker where it's shielded, are very easily detected via satellite systems that exist.
So there is not necessarily this concept of You know, we don't know where they all are, but there is the idea that the realization that our most advanced weapons, as far as missile defense, can't stop the hypersonic missiles, it actually is going to lead to much more dangerous provocations and a dangerous scenario going in the future.
But here's an interesting story.
How's Ukraine responding?
Well, Ukraine denies Russia destroyed Patriot missile defense system.
Well, of course they did.
They basically have come out and said that, nope, They didn't destroy the missile defense system.
All the Patriot missiles were intercepted, or all the hypersonic missiles and other missiles were intercepted and everything's fine.
Okay, well, you know, take that with a grain of salt.
But it wasn't too long ago.
It was actually only a few days ago, where they had this huge mushroom blast in, I'm not going to try to pronounce that, but it's somewhere in Ukraine, where they basically it said the Russians took out a depleted uranium munitions depot.
Now think about this.
We've talked about here on the channel before.
What Russia said previously was that the act of the United States with the EU giving Ukraine depleted uranium shells to use against Russians was tantamount to declaring nuclear war against Russia because essentially it is a nuclear war when you have radiological weapons being used against Russian soldiers.
So that happened when the United States and the EU, I believe, or the NATO came together and said that they were going to be giving Depleted uranium shells to the Ukrainians to use against Russia.
Now, what's come from that is that it looks like Russia decided to target one of those depots.
And here's a video of it, which you probably saw at the beginning of this episode.
But watch this.
This is what they say.
is a targeted strike that was from drones shot from Russia that ended up hitting in Ukraine and destroying a weapon, a munitions depot that held the actual depleted uranium shells.
That's just what they're saying.
this was but watch this video *crash* *crash* *crash* *crash*
F**k!
F**k!
- - - - - So you get the gist of it, and you can hear the actual, the rest of the munitions going off in the background,
That's what it would sound like when you hit a munitions depot because you have the initial blast that takes out a large portion of what's there.
Then you have subsequent blasts of other munitions that hadn't been fully destroyed or basically exploded, exploding after the fact.
So this is what they say we're seeing, right?
We're seeing this massive attack and it's been happening time and time again in Ukraine with Russia.
But you gotta remember as well, Think of the money that we're putting into this.
We're sending them U.S.
Patriot missile defense systems getting destroyed, or at least minimally damaged, according to U.S.
officials.
You have hundreds of millions, if not billions of dollars in munitions being destroyed that are being sent from NATO in the U.S.
to Ukraine, which aren't even lasting, you know, in some cases aren't even lasting more than a few days before they are just found, targeted, and destroyed.
And everybody keeps telling us, well, this is a war of attrition against Russia.
Well, if it's a war of attrition against Russia, it doesn't seem to be working too well.
Russia seems to be getting arguably stronger as time is going on through this conflict.
But there's a great write up here on this particular blast, talking about did Russia vaporize depleted uranium shells.
And this is a write up from Larry Johnson over on Gateway Pundit.
If you guys want to read through it, it's an interesting read.
But It talks about some of the videos and it talks about what they indicate and what they show.
Finally, it says, it's not clear whether or not depleted uranium shells were vaporized.
What is certain is that Ukraine lost an enormous quantity of munitions of various types that cannot be easily or quickly replaced.
It also is noteworthy that Russia has been carrying out these kinds of strikes, not all with the same level of success at multiple sites throughout Ukraine for the last eight days.
Whatever small advances Ukraine has managed on the flanks of Bakhmut, they don't They do not compensate for the massive loss incurred at Kiev.
This is a graphic reminder to the Ukrainians west of Kiev that they are at war and that Ukrainian military facilities are not safe.
That write-up kind of summarizes it right there.
We don't even know if it's the shells or not, but they've had this massive onslaught for the last eight days, where they're taking out huge quantities of these munitions and these military facilities that are housing them.
So that only leads me to believe more that this conflict is continuing to escalate, and what's even more worrisome about that Is that nobody's focusing on it?
You know, what are we focused on?
We're focused on the Durham report here.
But what is, you know, and people go, well, you know, it's a war between Ukraine and Russia, you know, we're just trying to support, we're just trying to support the Ukrainians so that they don't, you know, keep dying.
Well, tell that to the CIA, who's releasing videos on YouTube urging Russians to spy on their own country.
This is the video itself.
It's in Russia, or it's in Russian.
And basically what you can take away from it is, in the video published to the CIA's official YouTube channel and Telegram messaging app, popular in Russia, a male voice reflects on the meaning of heroism and endurance as lone individuals are seen weighing their decisions.
A man trudging through snow, a woman staring through a window.
We are easily swayed by lies, quote.
But we do, but we do know what our reality is, the reality we live in and the reality we talk about in whispers.
The voice says at the end of the video, a man and a woman are shown in separate scenes with their fingers hovering over mobile phones, as you can see here in this picture, with the screens, having a link that says contact CIA, saying, quote, this is my Russia, this will always be my Russia, I will endure, my family will endure, we will live with dignity because of my actions.
I mean, look, great, good, fine.
CIA, go ahead.
Recruit Russians to spy on Russia.
I don't even know what to say to that.
Other than to say that what we know about the CIA so far, as far as the leadership and the intelligence officials who signed that letter that said the Hunter Biden laptop was Russian disinformation, is that the CIA is essentially been, you know, effectively working toward ends that I don't think beat with the ends that are for the American people.
They're for themselves at this point, kind of what you would call a radical, radical spinoff, you know, splinter cell agency that's just completely gone rogue.
And at this point, That the fact that they're on YouTube, making these propaganda videos to be released in Russia, so that they can recruit Russians to spy on Russia for them.
I'm pretty sure that's a high indication that we are at war with Russia right now.
I mean, I'm not a genius.
I'm not a military tactician.
I'm not like, I'm not really this is, you know, whatever it is.
But I can tell you right now, they probably wouldn't be doing this if we weren't fighting a proxy war through Ukraine with NATO against Russia.
So I mean, that's just my simple takeaway.
And we're already seeing Americans dying in this battle, as Wagner Chief says that American was killed fighting in Bakhmut.
So if Americans are over there dying in this battle, and they're going to keep telling us, oh, well, we're not at war with Russia, but we are at war with Russia, then how long before all of this goes nuclear, in my opinion, or gets elevated to the status of an official war?
I'm not sure, but I can tell you right now what's happening inside of our own country seems to be an indication of what these intelligence organizations and agencies, what their real goals are.
Let's look at this.
We had a better breakdown of the Durham report that's just been come out.
We have eight conclusions from the Durham report and the Trump-Russia investigation.
Let's read what some of them are.
One, there was no valid predicate for the investigation and the FBI knew it.
Okay, well that's interesting.
Two, There's nothing to this, but we have to run it to the ground.
That was put out by Peter Strzok when he was talking about this investigation.
Another quote from the report says, it's thin, there's nothing to this.
This is a text message exchange between the attache and the supervisor agent, showing that the Americans were skeptical just as much as the British.
4.
The Trump campaign investigation was premised on raw, unanalyzed, and uncorroborated intelligence, and U.S.
intelligence agencies possessed no actual evidence of collusion when the probe began.
5.
Sensational stories published in the New York Times in February and March 2017 claiming Trump associates were in contact with Russian intelligence agents were false.
6.
FBI Director James Comey pushed heavily for an investigation of Carter Page starting in April 2016, when Page was a government witness in an espionage investigation of Russian diplomats in New York.
7.
At the direction of the FBI, confidential human source Stephen Halper recorded lengthy conversations with Carter Page and George Papadopoulos in which each denied the campaign entity involvement with Russian officials.
And finally, eight here Durham was highly critical of the FBI's startling and inexplicable failure to investigate the so called Clinton intelligence plan.
Now, you put all this together, right?
You put it all together.
And what do you get?
You get this conclusion that's almost as plain and as clear as daylight here.
That the individuals running the FBI and the intelligence services were operating this sham hoax, trying to frame President Trump for crimes he never committed, and trying to associate him with individuals that they themselves were paying to investigate Russian criminals And so they knowingly knew that they were trying to associate Trump with people that were already on their payroll, who were informants against Russian assets.
So this is like, as damning as evidence as you could see, but guess what, they've already decided that it was just a misstep.
I mean, you can't make this up.
I'll pull up the tweet here.
Let me just pull this up real quick because it's almost unbelievable to see this in real time.
But here's the official response from the FBI.
Now, I'm going to read this to you.
Watch this.
This is the official response on the special counsel, John Durham, what he did.
This is what the FBI said on Twitter.
Listen to this.
The conduct in 2016 and 17 that Special Counsel Durham examined was the reason that current FBI leadership already implemented dozens of corrective actions, which have now been in place for some time.
Had those reforms been in place in 2016, the missteps identified in the report could have been prevented.
This report reinforces the importance of ensuring the FBI continues to do its work with the rigor, objectivity, and professionalism the American people deserve and rightly expect.
And I don't know if you noticed there, I responded to them.
So by missteps, of course, you're referring to all the crimes that you committed, correct?
Because that's essentially what they're saying.
They're just saying, Oh, you know, missteps, miscalculations, just a few clerical errors, nothing to see here.
Well, no, actually, you and several individuals within your organization committed severe, seditious crimes against this country that could be basically said to be treason by some who are paying attention.
So imagine that, you have the FBI coming out and saying that they've had missteps, and that John Durham, it's good that he outlines them, but don't worry, it's never going to happen again, because we've corrected that issue.
Wait, you mean you corrected the issue as in you helped try to steal the 2016 election, then you did everything you could to undermine Trump's administration, then you helped facilitate the actual steal and the coup in 2020 to remove Trump from office and install the traitor Joe Biden, who you won't, as the FBI, investigate, even though we have ample evidence of his crimes and his corruption and his crimes against his own family members, with his family members.
And we're just supposed to sit here and say, the FBI is continuing to work with rigor and objectivity and professionalism for the American people.
Well, no!
That's BS, man.
I call BS.
This is all a big scam.
These people are scammers, and you know what they do?
I heard this somewhere, and I thought it was very apt.
When somebody scams you, they don't say, oh, well, you caught me in the scam.
No, they just go to the next scam, which is exactly what they're doing with Trump right now.
You have the Ijan Karel sex abuse case in New York, which they're going to say now.
Well, even if Trump's not a Russian agent, he's a sex abuser, right?
Because he said mean things about a woman who accused him of rape, which he never did.
Okay, then you have the grand jury being impaneled in Georgia that's gonna say, oh well Trump called the Secretary of State in Georgia and told him to do his actual job and that's election interference.
Well how about the 51 intelligence officials who wrote a letter just before the election and leaked stories to the press about how the Hunter Biden laptop story was Russian disinformation when it turns out it wasn't Russian disinformation and everything in the laptop is real and ample evidence of Joe Biden and his family's corruption.
Hmm.
Maybe that was interference.
And then you have special counsel, uh, what is this, Bragg in New York and whatever he's doing with Trump, trying to go after him.
So you have all these different things happening.
And it's all coming together to be very clear what is going to be the end result of all this.
And the end result is going to be, unfortunately, unless we stand up to these people and do something, they are going to get away with this crime.
And I almost feel like that's kind of the message here.
The message, the reason that Durham didn't bring indictments, the reason it's all meant You know, Yuri Bezmenev talks about this in detail, you know, the late stages of a communist takeover in a country, and part of that includes things like, you know, demoralization, right?
And humiliation.
Why?
Because if you demoralize the population to the point where they're apathetic or they're essentially just willing to go along with whatever you say, even if you know it's untrue or you know it's wrong, then that's how they've basically broken you.
See, it's not bad enough that they committed the crimes in the first place, but the fact that they allowed John Durham to write this entire report and release it, and the only response we get from the DOJ, which is supposed to be the law enforcement agency in this country, is, well, and the FBI is, you know, we made a few mistakes.
We're not gonna do it again, though.
We're not gonna run a coup in this country again.
We just had, we just needed the one coup to get rid of Trump.
That was, you know, we promised.
That was the only coup we actually needed.
And you're like, Well, no, you've actually committed treason.
And those crimes are punishable by massive sentences that these people should be in jail for.
But you know, it was just a misstep.
You know, it's like, it's like when Joe Biden goes up a set of stairs, just a few missteps, just missed a few steps, you know, come on, what are you what are you trying to say these people treason?
I mean, that's the literal way that you could interpret this and read it because that's essentially what it is.
I I look at this and I think there's only so much we can take as a country, especially as, you know, like Judicial Watch has been doing a great job.
They're coming out now and saying that the Trump-Russia collusion hoax was made up by Hillary to keep herself out of jail.
Well, yeah!
No kidding!
We all knew that already!
We've known that since 2016!
But anyway, it turns out Bruce and Elior even had bigger roles in the dossier than known, according to the Durham Report.
You remember these two that we were told about several times over?
But remember, all of these things are stuff that we've been talking about since 2018, I think, at least.
I mean, at minimum, we've been talking about Nellie and Bruce Ohr since 18.
We've been talking about the FBI.
We've been talking about Comey.
We've been talking about McCabe.
We've been talking about Strzok.
We've been talking about Page.
We've been talking about Jim Baker and Jim Rebicki and all these other people all the way down the line.
And that Bruce Ohr and Nellie Ohr probably were working tandem for both the FBI and the CIA as, like, liaisons between the two organizations.
So we know the intelligence agency was just as involved in this setup as the FBI in the first place.
So, I don't know, I look at it all, and then I see the response from the White House.
Karine Jean-Pierre just walks out of the room when they ask her about the Durham report.
Yeah, that's the kind of transparency Joe Biden provides from his corrupt criminal administration.
When you ask him about the report that proves that he's a criminal liar, he just walks away, or they just walk away.
So you get the kind of response that you see what's happening here.
You see how this is all framed out.
And then on top of it all, House Chairman's now demanding IRS chief answer for alleged Hunter Biden probe shakeup.
What's happened now is that the entire team that was investigating the IRS violations by Hunter Biden's just been disbanded.
And what a whistleblower has come forward to say was a retaliatory attack against the people coming out saying that this investigation was being hindered from the inside to begin with.
So you have Hunter Biden and the Hunter Biden IRS thing, don't forget ever.
It's all a cover up in and of itself.
The fact that they're investigating him is so that they can take all the evidence that they have that's incriminating about Hunter Biden and say it's a part of an ongoing investigation so they can't comment on it and they can't talk about it and they can't do anything about it because it's an ongoing investigation.
Which is exactly what they did to Trump, remember?
All the exculpatory evidence that existed about Trump and the Russia collusion thing that we're finding on the Durham report, that all existed and was being held not only by the FBI, but it was being held by the DOJ with Special Counsel Robert Mueller during his investigation.
And that whole investigation was, remember, it was essentially a way to hold information in an ongoing investigation so that they could pick and choose what they leaked to the press, To create a narrative which framed Donald Trump as a criminal when he wasn't.
Right?
To frame public perception in a way to weaponize the media, to weaponize the DOJ, to weaponize the government at large.
That's what we saw happen.
That's what we're seeing here.
So it's the same playbook every time.
They don't change up what they do.
Just like when they're guilty of something, they accuse you of that.
Thankfully, some members of Congress are trying to do something about it.
MTG filing articles of impeachment against Merrick Garland for his violation of justice.
I don't know, we're trying to, I think they're going to impeach Mayorkas too, the DHS head who's allowing our country to be invaded from the southern border.
But at the end of the day, you know, these impeachments, I don't see them leading anywhere either.
Hopefully they do.
Hopefully I'm wrong.
But at this point, you know, the inmates are running the asylum.
I mean, their inmates are running the prison at this point.
And these bureaucrats, these kleptocrats, who call themselves bureaucrats, who call themselves, you know, officials, they are the ones who are You know, allowing, facilitating the wholesale destruction of America from within.
Why?
Because we found them out.
We caught them.
We caught them red-handed.
We caught them a thousand times over red-handed.
Treason.
Seditious conspiracy.
You want to talk about some Proud Boys that walked through the Capitol on January 6th.
You know, they're being charged with seditious conspiracy.
And what did they do?
They wrote text messages back and forth talking about how they wanted to, you know, fix a rigged election, to stop a rigged election.
How about the people who Fabricated evidence to frame a sitting president to basically undermine his administration's legitimacy and then use that same intelligence apparatus to basically, fraudulently deceive the American public to steal an election in 2020.
Is that a seditious conspiracy?
Is that treason?
You guys tell me in the comments.
Maybe I'm way off, but the way I see it, people like Andrew McCabe and James Comey and the rest, they're the ones who are the most guilty, but watch how they respond.
Here's Andrew McCabe on CNN about Durham's report.
Watch this.
In the decision to open the investigation, John Durham says that you shouldn't have launched it.
What's your response?
John Durham is wrong.
I don't think this investigation was legitimate from its inception.
Why?
John Durham made clear from the very beginning, shortly after he was appointed, exactly what he was going to conclude.
He made public remarks indicating that he thought that we had possibly broken the law and inappropriately investigated the president, which is an odd thing for any then U.S.
attorney.
So listen to that.
Andrew McCabe goes on CNN and he says, the whole Durham, it's all invalid anyway.
And they go, well, why?
And he goes, well, because he said that he thought we might've committed a crime and that we might've tried to frame the president.
Well, first off, you did.
Both those things.
Second of all, well, no kidding.
No SH, you know what, Sherlock?
Because, literally, that's why he was investigating you, is because he thought you committed the crimes.
Like, this is the logic they sell to the low IQ, easily programmed NPCs that watch CNN and are so politically driven that they don't care about truth, facts, objectivity.
They care about one thing, power.
It's all they care about.
They want power.
And they'll do it by any means necessary, and they've made that very clear.
So, you look at this, and you have to think to yourself for a second, okay, So he just said that because Durham said that he thought they committed crimes, which is like, why you would investigate in the first place that that it makes the whole investigation invalid.
Okay, got it.
That makes perfect sense.
I mean, in what world does that not make sense?
Right, guys?
Am I right?
Speaking about the propaganda media, though, O'Keefe Media Group came out with this incredible expose.
They've come out and released an undercover video of a Fox News producer revealing that Tucker getting fired was part of it, speaking about the Dominion lawsuit settlement, the $700-plus million lawsuit settled by Fox News with Dominion voting, which we know was essentially, I believe, just another cover-up of everything that's going on.
But what he says in the video is that Part of that settlement was getting rid of Tucker Carlson.
Well, that makes a whole lot of sense.
And I'll leave a link to that if you want to watch that video for yourself in its entirety and go support the O'Keefe Media Group if you can.
They're doing great work.
And if you are a whistleblower, or if you are working in one of the intelligence agencies or wherever, I don't know about the intelligence agencies, but one of these corrupt organizations, let's just say, Whatever it is, and you want to maybe expose what's going on in there, you can go contact O'Keefe Media Group, O-M-G for short, and they can set you up with all kinds of tools to make it possible for that to happen.
Just saying.
But guess who they're replacing with Tuck Carlson with?
Oh, Sean Hannity is replacing Tucker Carlson.
The one guy who I can't stand more than pretty much anyone else on Fox News, Sean Hannity.
Some people like him, a few like him, whatever.
I just think he's a bloviated blowhard who has no grasp on reality.
He's friends with Lindsey Graham, brings him up on stage, and you go, well Trump is too.
Yeah, and I don't respect that either.
Like, as I've said before, Trump's the best of what we got.
I don't think that he's perfect by any means.
And neither is Sean Hannity.
But Sean Hannity, to me, is, you know, a regime puppet.
Just as much as Anderson Cooper is a regime puppet, Sean Hannity is.
And people go, oh, but I thought you were conservative.
Well, yeah, I'm a real conservative.
I'm not like a Mitch McConnell conservative.
You know, go along, get along with Kevin McCarthy and the rest of the crew.
I'm a real conservative.
Not like these people.
Because these people will support things like this.
The next chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff wants white male officers to be a minority!
So he's even more woke than Millie.
Oh, perfect!
Let's bring a radical black racist into the Joint Chiefs of Staff so that we can effectively... But don't worry, because if you think that racial replacement theory is real, then you're a racist bigot, but...
The chairman of joint chiefs of staff wants white male officers to be a minority because that's normal.
What if he what if just you got to do the shoe on the other foot test because this is where it gets crazy.
What if a joint chief says I want black officers to be a minority?
I want a Latino.
I want, you know, whatever it is.
This is racism.
And these people are so, they have their heads so far shoved up their own rear end that they can't see what's actually happening or what they're actually doing.
Or they just don't care and they're evil.
It's one of the two.
But they come out and say things like, we want white males to be out of everywhere.
And it's like, how is that not racist?
Because if you say it, if you said the same thing you're saying about any other race, It would be categorically racist, right?
But it's not because it's white people.
Okay, I got it.
Because you can be racist against white people because that's just fine.
Finally, we talked about this briefly in the last episode, but Obama calls for Australia style gun compensation as CBS praises him.
Well, of course.
That's the whole point.
You know, they get their radical, woke communist generals and the Joint Chiefs of Staff wanting to relegate an entire part of the population based on race.
And then you have Obama, who basically racialized this country and is the, one of the biggest, one of the biggest cancers that ever happened in this country, in my opinion, was Obama and his presidency.
But he essentially now is coming out, oh, we need to take all their guns, too.
Because Australia did it!
And look how well that worked out for them!
Remember COVID in Australia?
Some of my friends out there watching from Australia?
Remember when they were throwing you guys in quarantine camps?
Remember when they were going door-to-door and telling you what you could and couldn't say and do?
And they were telling you you had to take a vaccine, even if you didn't want to?
And they were saying that if you didn't, you couldn't leave your house, or you couldn't go to the grocery, or you couldn't go to the store?
Remember all that?
And you go, well, yeah, they did that in America too.
Well, yeah!
But they didn't go as far as they did in other countries.
I know that.
I know in Australia they had the quarantine camps.
I know in China they not only had the quarantine camps, but they had even worse things happening.
So that's what happens when you take away the guns, folks.
If you want to live in that world, I feel sorry for you, but I'm not gonna and I don't wanna.
So I hope you guys enjoyed this episode.
Make sure you like, share, subscribe.
There's links in the description below if you want to support this channel.
Your support keeps this channel alive.
Please consider making a donation, but there's also links to everything we talked about.
Leave your comments below.
I want to hear what you guys think about everything that we covered here today.
Make sure you stay tuned.
We'll see you on the next one.
Until then, my name's Craig.
▲
Export Selection