All Episodes
Previous Next
March 13, 2023 - Just Informed Talk - Craig James
36:42
Are GLOBALISTS Starting The FINANCIAL COLLAPSE To Hide TRUTH Of J6 & C19? | JustInformed News #311
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
We have an army of digital soldiers.
We have been blinded by the library.
We have been living to survive.
They will still make you pay when we walk away.
They want you dead before you die.
They want you watching while you die.
Just live to find another day.
It's time to walk away.
Hi, welcome to another episode of Just Informed News.
I'm your host, Craig.
Hope you guys had a great weekend.
We're back, and the financial collapse is happening as we speak.
Or it may be, or it may not be.
Who knows?
We're going to get into it.
We're going to talk about the details of this SVB, Silicon Valley Bank's implosion that has led to a contagion effect, which has taken down several more banks.
And that don't worry, Joe Biden, the supposed President of the United States, has come out to tell us everything is fine, which means you can bet your bottom dollar that everything is not fine and that this is definitely going to get worse.
We're going to talk about that.
Plus, we're going to look at the contagion effect, other banks going down as we speak.
We're going to look at what it all means and what it could be related to.
You know, it's interesting that right as we start getting into the deep, nitty-gritty details, exposing these criminals like Fauci and the COVID pandemic hoax and January 6th and how that was all a hoax, that all of a sudden, magically, banks start collapsing.
Well, guess what?
If they can't get your attention with their fake news liars and they can't get your attention with the politicians that endlessly lie and gaslight, well, they surely can get your attention once they take all the money out of your bank account and they start running these bail-ins which are going to be very devastating to the average person who has money in the bank.
So...
We're going to try to cover it all.
We're going to look at all the different possibilities.
We're going to get through some interesting stories surrounding it all, and then that's pretty much going to be the show.
So I really, really, really hope that you guys are ready to get into this today.
It's going to be looked at as a big day in the history books, I think.
But it may just be the beginning, and that is going to be the scariest part of all.
With that being said, though, we've got to thank our sponsor.
And, you know, today's sponsor of this episode...
It's actually really connected to the whole financially.
You know, if you see the financial contagion on the horizon, well, maybe you should go check out different ways to diversify your investments.
Now, it's not financial advice, but I want to thank the sponsor of today's episode truly.
That is Noble Gold Investments.
You guys know them.
But remember, we are at war and we are in recession.
These are two things the government doesn't want you to know.
But it's only a matter of time until cracks start to show.
And do you know who will get hurt the most?
Well, it's you.
That's why you need to protect yourself and your family because things will get worse.
Fortunately, Noble Gold Investments is here to help you.
You've worked too hard to build up your savings and investments to see it all crushed to bits in the financial fallout from the wars, the trade tariffs, and the sanctions that are bound to happen.
Gold and silver from Noble Gold Investments are real possessions in times like these.
Knowing that you're outside the system when it all goes wrong is a great feeling.
And surefire way to keep your money safe for your retirement is a precious metals IRA.
Noble Gold Investments has been helping people like you to keep their money safe for years with these.
And this month, they're giving away a beautiful gold eagle bullion coin.
With every qualifying IRA of $50,000 or higher, make sure you don't get trampled.
Visit NobleGoldInvestments.com.
That's NobleGoldInvestments.com.
And thank you to them for sponsoring this episode.
And you guys, I don't give financial advice here.
This is a commentary show, but if I were a betting man, I would say it's probably safer to have your money in things like hard assets than to have them in these banks right now because they are collapsing.
And how do we know that?
Well, here we are.
We start with this story from over here on Natural news.
Big banks starting to collapse as financial experts warn more fallout is coming.
Global financial system has been teetering on the brink collapse for the last couple of years thanks to the stupidity of lockdowns and business closures during the COVID-19 pandemic.
But now the system is really in trouble as the other factors like war inflation and ongoing supply chain issues put even more pressure on already weak financial institutions.
Wednesday afternoon, the holding company of Silvergate Bank, a significant player in the world of cryptocurrencies, announced its plans to wind down operations and liquidate.
This is one of many that have come as contagion with everything else that's happening in the world today.
We also know about the SVB banks, but there's other banks, right?
Trading was halted today, actually, as far as 30 banks go as market opened.
The New York Stock Exchange halted trading at Charles Schwab.
So we're talking about massive financial contagion.
Over 30 banks, their trading was halted because of massive losses because people are panicking.
And this is how they're going to bring in the global central bank digital currency, of course.
We've talked about this ad nauseum.
They're going to start with the bail-ins, and then they're going to say, this is why we need central bank digital currencies.
And then they're going to get rid of the currency as we know it, and they're going to replace it with digital tokens that can be programmed so that if you don't follow the restrictions of the party in charge, the communists running it, social communists, or whatever they call themselves these days, then you will be restricted social communists, or whatever they call themselves these days, then you will be restricted in what you can So this is where it's going to get really interesting.
But here's a report on it.
It talks about how the...
Let's look at this right here.
It's to gauge the panic-like activity of bank investors in the wake of the recent failures of SVP, Silicon Valley Bank, Financial Group's SIVB, Silicon Valley Bank, and Signature Bank are down 22.8%.
Investors can check out Nasdaq's current trading halts page.
Multiple banks have had their stocks halted for volatility.
So...
You know, when we talk about the free market, it's not a free market.
You guys understand this, and if you don't know, if you're not very...
I'm not an economic expert by any means, but an economist, if you will.
But I can tell you right now, what has been broadly known for a while now is that they have these automatic halts put into the stock market.
Ever since, I believe, it was 2008 when they started this system of...
And it may have been before that as well, but if a stock loses more than 5% in a day, well, guess what?
It's not allowed to crash.
The trading just stops.
The number just stays where it's at, and you can't trade anymore.
So in that system that we are living in, the fixed market, not a free market, a fixed market, the banks are essentially all in free fall, and as they're collapsing, they're being halted, right?
As they're seeing huge shares collapse, it's pretty interesting to see it happen in real time.
Now, this is not to say that banks cannot fall below the 5% marker, but they have basically put in a safety net so that things can't collapse at a certain rate.
And that is what is most terrifying about this, is because we're actually seeing it happen.
But somebody explained SVP on a Twitter thread fairly well, telling essentially why it's not like 2008.
It's a different kind of financial crisis.
And I believe this thread puts together very well So let's go ahead and we'll read this thread over on Twitter that I found and thought interesting enough to share.
It says, when banks accept deposits from clients, they owe the client the money.
So deposits are liabilities to the bank.
Liabilities cost money.
Costs both to serve the clients, branches, tellers, apps, and any interest the bank pays you on your checking account, And it says to pay for the cost of those liabilities, banks turn them into assets, lending deposits, small business loans, mortgages, credit, etc.
If a bank can't lend deposits responsibly, it often uses excess to buy loans or securities like U.S. Treasuries and mortgage-backed securities.
As mentioned above, from 2019-21 deposits, SIVB tripled.
That's a good but tough problem.
Banks need deposits, but they cost banks money.
Banks need to lend deposits to cover the costs.
Silicon Valley Bank needed to take these funds and acquire assets to pay its costs.
So SVB, Silicon Valley Bank, knew it couldn't lend those responsibly.
It was too much, too fast.
Much of the money was from venture capital backed for companies that needed a place or needed a place to deposit the money they raised.
Those are big deposits.
Keep in mind, FDIC is only insuring individual customers up to $250,000 per bank.
Deposits were pouring in too fast to lend responsibly.
So SIVB recognized that rather than make dumb loans, they bought assets guaranteed by the U S government treasury bonds.
Those are big deposits.
It says, but it bought long duration, often 10-year bonds.
That was a big mistake.
When rates rise, fixed income prices fall.
As general rule of thumb is for every one year of duration, each 1% interest rate move impacts the price of the bond by 1%, 1% times duration.
It says a 1% move on a 9-year duration bond is give or take 9% plus or minus on the bond price, but banks are levered.
Remember, banks generally acquire assets by using deposits, liabilities as the capital source, and banks like SIVB are levered 10 to 1 or more, owing $10 plus for every $1 of shareholder equity.
If you're levered 10x, a 10% loss on assets is a 100% wipeout.
Hmm.
So SIVB bought high-quality assets, but it bought tons of them with long duration at low interest rates.
When the Fed raised rates, those assets declined in value, 1x times duration.
Those losses multiplied through the leverage at SIVB, causing a big problem.
SIVB now is a mark-to-market hole in its balance sheet, but it's not taking loan losses like subprime defaults.
It's just mark to market as long as its liabilities are sticky.
IE depositors leave their money at SIVB.
It will ultimately be fine, but that's a big if.
Technically, if all the depositors ask for their money back at once, SIVB needs to sell the bonds at the market to market value, crystallizing what could have been a temporary loss.
And if those losses are big enough, SIVB may not have enough money to pay out all depositors.
But the situation rarely happens.
FDIC and FHLBs exist to limit this.
However, once it starts, Game Theory kicks in.
Nobody wants to be the last part of the bank.
And then you can imagine what happens.
Which brings us to SIVB today.
Large, has large depositors.
Large depositors aren't fully insured by the FDIC. They have an incentive to find highly sound banks.
Once a whiff of an issue pops up, large depositors run.
One might say they bank run.
As the bank's deposits go in reverse, it has to sell assets.
The bank raises money, the FHLB. Steps in to help turn its less liquid assets into more liquid, reassuring the utterance is made, but is it enough?
And that was the end.
So, you get a kind of idea of what happened with SVB, right?
They got over-levered, and then they bought all these 10-year bonds to try to have guaranteed bonds that they knew would be worth something, but then rates started to go up really fast and really high, and that actually basically undercut their ability to cover what has now become the contagion of the bank run that is hitting them.
So the big investors have tried to get their money out as quick as they can, and they don't have the money to cover it at the moment.
And they have to take huge losses that are now solidified as huge losses.
And this is not just happening at SVB. It's happening at multiple banks across the board as we speak, which brings us to Joe Biden today coming out and telling us that, you know, essentially the banks are fine, which means you can almost bet your bottom dollar it's the exact opposite.
So, let's go ahead and take a step back now.
Let's look at who they're going to blame.
Well, you know, the fake news is already blaming Trump.
Of course, because it's his fault.
SVP, Silicon Valley Bank, failure is Sparks' blame game over Trump-era regulatory rule.
Isn't it fascinating?
It's already Trump's fault.
Because what they're essentially saying...
Is that Trump's rolling back of certain regulations that were put in place after the 2008 financial crisis led to banks being able to be in a position to fail, so therefore it's his fault that the banks did fail, not the fault of Joe Biden, Janet Yellen, the Fed, It's interest rates being raised rapidly.
Jerome Powell, it's none of their fault.
Not the people in charge of things right now.
It's not the bank's fault.
It's not the head of SVB Bank.
It's not the people making decisions, the diversity, equity, and inclusion directors who, instead of focusing on running a bank, we're focusing on running a gay pride parade at their bank facility 24 hours a day.
No, it's not their fault.
It's Trump's fault because...
He took laws, rolled back laws off the books that protected banks from failing?
Because he was trying to work for a free market as opposed to a fixed market?
Which is what the Democrats and the banksters all want.
They want the fixed market where they're guaranteed against our debt.
They tell us it's not going to be taxpayer money because the FDIC has got money to cover all the insurers.
Well, what's the liquidity in the FDIC right now?
I think it's, what, about $100 billion?
That's like 10 checks to Zelensky in Ukraine.
That's not that much money, folks.
Let's just be honest here.
And If you think about it, what are they saying now about SVB Bank?
Well, because they want this contagion to spread, I believe, because they want a collapse and a catastrophic one at that, they're doing a few things.
First, they're trying to politicize it, right?
They're trying to convince us that it's a Democrat-Republican thing because that way you'll have half the people rooting for the bank to fail itself.
Because Silicon Valley Bank...
It is what it sounds like.
It is a bank in Silicon Valley, which is in California, which is where all the tech companies are, which is where all the woke leftist communists live.
And they even say it publicly on Meet the Press on Sunday that it's essentially the Democrats' bank.
Listen to this.
I want to start very quickly with banking crisis.
Maria Theresa, you were just saying you were surprised you haven't seen Powell or Yellen out more forcefully already.
Jay Powell, Federal Reserve Chair.
If you actually look at which bank this is, this is the Silicon Valley bank.
This is the startup bank.
This is also oftentimes the Democratic ATM bank of all those investors.
And so the fact that you don't have these individuals, the investors that invest.
So the fact that you don't have someone actually talking from the administration and being so forceful, I do think that what we're going to see are Republicans saying, oh, you shouldn't bail this one out.
And it's going to be, I think, very much along political lines.
So they're already trying to frame it in this political scope.
Like, if you don't, if the Republicans don't back bailing out SVP or SVB, Silicon Valley Bank, then it's because they realize that it's a Democrat bank and that the Democrats, that's how they're going to fund these election fraud scams.
And so they're politicizing it, right?
Why are they politicizing it?
It's a good question, right?
I mean, they politicize everything, so there's that.
But There's probably a more insidious nature to what they're doing if they're doing it so publicly and so openly and brazenly.
And I believe it has a lot to do, and this is just me speculating out loud, and if you think different, let me know in the comments or in the live chat.
I want to hear your thoughts.
But if you think, if you understand how this is all going to work, they want these clops to happen, right?
So they essentially want the Republicans to try to push against the bailout.
They don't want these companies to be bailed because they want to do bail-ins.
What's a bail-in, right?
So you have bankruptcy, bank run, and bail-in.
So these are kind of like how it works, right?
You start with a bankruptcy, like what we saw with SBB. Silicon Valley Bank becomes basically insolvent, unable to pay the debt to the people who own assets.
They can't cover the assets that are in the bank.
No bank really can.
If everybody went to their bank tomorrow, everybody, and tried to take their money out, Banks are over-leveraged to, what is it, 10 to 1 in the Silicon Valley Bank, where they don't have that cash.
And the cash in reserve is not, there's only like, I think you only have to have 10 or 20% of the reserve current, the amount of money that's being held in your bank.
That's the amount of money.
You only need 10% in cash.
So it's like, they don't have that money to pay in the first place.
So they basically are put into this bankruptcy.
Then you have the bankrupts, right?
Which exacerbates the contagion effect of a singular bank basically going into a kind of bankruptcy, right?
These are just simple terms to keep it simple.
Then, a bankruptcy essentially, when everybody goes to the bank and says, give me my money, right?
But then...
That's because they want to bring in these bail-ins.
Now, what's a bail-in?
A bail-in is a novel concept that has been introduced lately, and it's kind of the inverse of a bailout, as it probably obviously sounds like.
Because in 2008, when the financial markets collapsed and the insurance companies were about to go under, and Frannie Mae and Freddie Mac and all of that happened with Goldman Sachs, and it was Bear Stearns, which doesn't even exist, I don't think, anymore, and it was all of those major companies started tumbling like dominoes.
Well, what happened?
They launched this massive initiative to give billions and billions and billions of dollars, which I think probably summed in the trillions, to these banks to keep them from collapsing.
Well, now that these banks, that was called a bailout.
They were bailing out the banks using taxpayer dollars because they said they were too big to fail, right?
Well, the inverse of that with this bail-in is going to be where...
They don't bail out the banks.
What they do is, just like they've done with SVB, they're going to seize the bank, but they're going to seize it and say, we guarantee all of your assets.
Well, what does that sound like?
That sounds like what we heard today from Joe Biden.
And they haven't announced the bail-in yet, but that's what comes next.
They've seized Silicon Valley Bank.
They've said the FDIC will guarantee all the assets, which means that's beyond the $250,000 cap that the FDIC normally offers to all investors, which is what there's an insurance that these banks pay into in the FDIC to cover anybody up to $250,000.
Right?
So they've come in and they've said, we're going to seize the bank, we're going to guarantee all the assets, and now what we're going to do...
In the bail-in scenario, right, when this becomes true contagion and it wildfire across the board, and like in 2008 where it was one after the other after the other, when these things start happening, what they'll say is, well, we don't have enough money to ensure that everybody gets their money back.
But what we can do is seize the bank, Guarantee your money up to a certain percent.
So if you have a million dollars in the bank, right, and you know that you're not covered under the general FDIC and your bank's going under, well, the government's going to come in, seize the bank, and again, fact check me on this if I'm missing something.
I'm not an economist, so this is just my elementary understanding of it all.
They're going to seize the bank, right, and And then they're going to say, okay, well, you can have, and this already happened in places like Greece, by the way.
This already happened when that financial collapse took place.
So they've talked about this, and they've kind of trained on this.
They're going to take it and say, well, we can't guarantee all your money, but you can get at least 50% of your money back.
And I'm just using random numbers here now.
This is not exactly what they're going to do.
I don't know how much money you're going to get back of that million dollars.
But say you have a million dollars in the bank.
The bank collapses.
The government takes it.
And then the government says, I can't give you a million dollars, but here's 50.
Here's 500,000.
Well, what happened to that other 500,000?
Eh.
I don't know.
I don't know where your money went.
It's just disappeared.
It's just disappeared.
And...
That's what's going to happen, and Trump now has come out and said that he thinks this is going to be even worse, saying, with what is happening to our economy, and with the proposals being made on the largest and dumbest tax increase in the history of the USA, times five, Joe Biden will go down as the Herbert Hoover of the modern age.
We'll have a Great Depression far bigger and more powerful than that of 1929 as proof the banks are already starting to collapse.
Well, that's reassuring, and And look, Trump is just as in bed with a lot of these banking people as the other side is.
It is a uniparty at the end of the day, but as I've said in many, many different videos in my explanation of my defense of Trump, I defend him to the point of saying that there is not a better solution or alternative at this point.
If there is a better alternative that comes along, I will gladly look at that option.
But he is the best of what we got, and this is what he's already saying, is that the banks are going to collapse.
Okay, great.
Well, who is telling us, what is the supposed president telling us now?
Oh, the supposed president of the United States, Joe Biden, who is a criminal and a very degenerate criminal at that, is insisting that the banking system is safe.
Well, I'd imagine that's exactly what you tell people right before it all collapses.
Taking advice from, if he tells us the banking system is safe, what does that tell you about the banking system?
It tells you that's probably not safe.
So they've taken immediate action.
They've basically seized Silicon Valley Bank.
They've decided to cover a few different, I believe at least one or two other banks.
They've decided to guarantee all the assets in those banks.
Which, again, if you think about what Silicon Valley Bank is, that calls into question some interesting things as well.
Because think about this.
Being a conspiratorial conspiracy theorist, as they like to call us, imagine a scenario where you are coming into an election cycle where you know the economy is going to be collapsing.
You know these banks are going to start defaulting because of the interest rates and inflation and the market volatility and everything that's happening.
In a way, the first bank to collapse is actually getting that money.
Like, imagine this, right?
If all the banks collapse tomorrow, there wouldn't be enough money to cover them, right?
There just wouldn't.
The FDIC doesn't have that kind of cash.
It just is impossible.
Right?
So if Silicon Valley Bank, the bank of big tech, who we know helps steal the election for Joe Biden, who we know is censoring Americans for the deep state, who we know is in bed with the intelligence services that are driving us through these endless wars, who we know is bought, owned, is a wholly owned subsidiary of the globalist is a wholly owned subsidiary of the globalist cartel at large.
We know that's what Silicon Valley, that they are, right?
Their bank is the first one to declare financial insolvency.
So it's the first one to be bailed out.
And then Joe Biden just goes on stage today and says, we're going to not only pay the $250,000 per customer FDIC guarantee, But we're going to dip into that $100 billion fund, or whatever it is at this point, that is at the FDIC, and we're going to cover all of the SVB investors.
Everybody!
Well, what does that do?
Well, that ensures that in the 2024 cycle, you got big tech with all their money, FDIC insured, even beyond $250,000, who knows, in the millions and millions, maybe billions, right?
And they're going to have the money to do things.
They're going to have the money to support candidates.
They're going to have the money to rig elections.
They're going to have the money to make investments in new products that can make the people more subservient at large.
So if you think about the concept here, it's almost like the first to the trough, the first pig to the feeding trough here.
And that's what this is.
So you can take that and tell me what you think about it.
But they've been talking about this for quite some time.
I found a video over here that shows us about how a month and two months ago you had FDIC having a meeting and the globalist bankers having a meeting where they were essentially talking about how not only are the banks going to collapse, but that they were going to lie to us about it.
Really?
Yeah, here we go.
Watch the clip.
It's important that people understand they can be bailed in, but you don't want a huge run on the institution.
I mean, they're going to be.
And it could be an early warning signal to the FDIC and the primary regulators when these things happen.
And there may be some other prices, this is similar to what Jay was saying, in the market that...
You can tell whether people understand who's going to be protected, who isn't going to be protected.
It would be, I think, an interesting study to look at the evolution of market prices in a situation like March of 2020, for example, and see whether people understood what might happen.
Should be accessible when people need to know, but I don't think you have much hope of reaching a public that doesn't have a professional need to know.
I completely agree with that.
I almost think you'd scare the public if you put this out.
Why are they telling me this?
Should I be concerned about my bank?
My insurance company doesn't tell me what they're doing with my assets.
They just assume they're going to pay my claim.
I think you've got to think of the unintended consequences of taking a public that has more full faith and confidence in the banking system than maybe people in this room do.
We want them to have full faith and confidence in the banking system.
They know the FDIC insurance is there.
They know it works.
They put their money in.
They're going to get their money out.
So there's a select crowd of people that are in the institutional side.
And if they want to understand this, they're going to find a way to understand this.
There's a bunch of law firms representing this room.
There's a bunch of people that will charge them by the hour a lot of money to explain this all to them.
And it's fine.
I don't have a problem with that.
And they all have huge staffs.
But I would be careful about the unintended consequences of starting to blast too much of this out in the general public.
You figured it out, folks.
This isn't a game.
I'm not playing around.
We're at war.
Yeah, so that was a clip from the Alex Jones show today, I guess.
But it is true.
They've been talking about this.
This is not some new novel idea.
They've been saying, A, they're going to do the bail-ins, and B, that they can't tell us or else they'll scare us and they don't want us to know about it.
So that's something to be considered.
And then, on top of it, Tucker Carlson did this Full Send podcast over the weekend, which was telling and interesting.
Lots of crazy things and stories he's talked about.
But one of the things that stood out to me the most was this clip I found of him talking about how, essentially, he's made the realization that he's working for the media, which is...
Whose job is not to inform us, it's to propagandize us and lie to us.
And he's having, like, an existential crisis as he figures this out on the Full Send podcast.
Watch this here.
Like...
I've spent my whole life in the media.
My dad was in the media.
Like, that is a big part of the revelation that's changed my life is the media are part of the control apparatus.
Like, there's no...
Yeah, I know.
I know.
Because you're younger and smarter and you're like, yeah.
Yeah.
But what if you're me and you spent your whole life in that world?
And to look around and all of a sudden you're like, oh, wow.
Not only are they part of the problem, but I spent most of my life being part of the problem defending the Iraq War.
Like, I actually did that.
Can you imagine if you did that?
What is one of your biggest regrets in your career?
Oh, defending the Iraq War?
That is it?
Well, I've had a million regrets, not being more skeptical, calling people names when I should have listened to what they were saying.
Look, when someone makes a claim, there's only one question.
That's important at the very beginning, which is, is the claim true or not?
So I say, you know, you committed murder, or you rigged the last election, before you attack me as a crazy person for saying that, maybe you should explain whether you did it or not.
You know what I mean?
And for too long, I participated in the culture where I was like, anyone who thinks outside these pre-prescribed lanes is crazy, is a conspiracy theorist.
And I just really regret that.
I'm ashamed that I did that.
And partly it was age, partly it was the world that I grew up in.
So when you look at me and you're like, yeah, of course they're part of the means of control.
I'm like, that's obvious to you because you're 28, but I just didn't see it at all, at all.
And I'm ashamed of that.
Isn't that what the media tries to do though?
It's their only purpose.
Right.
They're not here to inform you.
Really?
Even on the big things that really matter, like the economy and war and COVID and like things that really matter that will affect you.
No, their job is not to inform you.
They are working for the small group of people who actually run the world.
They're their servants.
They're their Praetorian guard.
And we should treat them with maximum contempt because they have earned it.
Like, yeah, I believe Tucker Carlson.
I don't know if he's just had some sort of epiphanal moment in his life where he's made this realization that we've all known for a while.
But it is kind of like getting through it.
And that's why I like Tucker.
At least he tells the truth when he can.
Or at least he tries to tell the truth, I would say.
And even if he makes mistakes, he's admitting them.
And in this podcast, you see it, though.
That's what we're dealing with here.
We're going up against a system that is built by people who are only working to try to convince us that they aren't doing anything or that they're doing everything to try to help us and nothing to try to take advantage of us.
That's exactly the opposite.
That's exactly what we're facing.
And if you want to know how they take advantage of us, it's by stuff like this.
Are you seeing any of this in the news today about Joe Biden lying about how he forgot to tell Americans that we are bailing out China's venture capital business with the Silicon Valley Bank Rescue?
I mean, this is the kind of stuff, ladies and gentlemen, you know, because, you know, China's venture capital is all over the Silicon Valley Bank industry because it's all over big tech.
It's all intermingled.
It's all intertwined.
It's all incestuously together.
And if you don't understand this, then the problem is that our media is failing.
And maybe they're not failing.
Maybe they're succeeding that most people don't understand this and don't see it.
Because if Tucker's right, then their whole job is not to tell you anything.
It's to keep you uninformed and unaware and unable to see what's actually happening.
Because if you did...
Things would probably start to collapse more quickly than anything you could ever imagine.
Finally, Greg Reese sums it all up here in this video over on Infowars, and we'll wrap it up with this.
So watch.
This week, Tucker Carlson exposed the masses to the January 6th hoax.
In the Proud Boys trial, leaked chat logs from FBI Special Agent Nicole Miller revealed that she was ordered by her boss to destroy 338 items of evidence.
Once this news broke days ago, the trial was halted.
The investigation into Twitter has revealed that moderators were instructed to censor true posts which could fuel hesitancy.
Former CDC head Robert Redfield has just testified that the NIH was conducting gain-of-function research at the Wuhan lab in China.
Politically, the tide is turning, and people all over the world are now rejecting the New World Order.
The Central Bank of Nigeria launched their CBDC a little over a year ago, but the people rejected it.
So early this year, the Nigerian banks emptied the ATM machines and closed their doors.
This resulted in angry protests.
The people attacked ATMs and blocked roads in multiple cities.
The Bank of Lebanon has crashed.
The Lebanese pound has fallen to an all-time low of 80,000 against the U.S. dollar.
The people have taken to the streets.
Banks have been set on fire.
The rise in Fed rates has officially killed America's biggest lender, Silicon Valley Bank.
The FDIC shutters Silicon Valley Bank.
$152 billion of uninsured deposits are destroyed.
The rise in Fed rates also killed Silvergate Capital.
Several regional bank stocks have plummeted as a result of the Silicon Valley Bank and the Federal Reserve's rate hikes.
The housing market is collapsing as well.
The majority of commercial real estate loans are lent by small banks.
Massive short bets are now happening in the commercial real estate market.
The Federal Reserve Bank is taking down the housing market along with all regional banks leaving only its vassals who will be distributing CBDCs as a solution.
The financial experts are now recommending that people have food, gold and silver, and cash in their possession.
Reporting for Infowars, this is Greg Reese.
Well, I'll tell you what, it wouldn't be a bad thing to have in your possession if you need it, but I'll tell you this, it does make perfect sense what he's saying about how the big banks are collapsing the smaller banks so that the only banks that are left are the ones who are going to make us take their central bank digital currency, which brings in the social credit system, which brings in the command control authoritarian regime that's going to be a thousand times worse than what we saw under COVID. Mark my words on that.
But hey, you know what?
It is what it is.
And you let me know down in the comments because I need to hear what you're thinking about all of this.
But with that being said, thanks for watching.
We'll see you on the next one.
Like, share, subscribe.
There's links in the description if you want to find me on social.
And if you want to support this channel with a donation, that helps out big time.
But thanks for watching.
We'll see you on the next one.
Until then, my name's Craig.
▲
Export Selection