All Episodes
Previous Next
June 26, 2022 - Just Informed Talk - Craig James
37:45
What Happens When You Corner An Animal? | Q News #002
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Hi, and welcome to another episode of Just Informed Talk.
I'm your host, Craig, and we have more Q news to get into today.
The latest post we left off at 4956.
We're picking up at 4957, and there's a lot to go into here, actually a lot to break down.
And just to tell you guys where I'm at with all of this, it actually is a Saturday night.
It's pretty late.
And these came up just after the rally, which is exactly what I expected.
I even tweeted out, well, not tweeted, but I actually Truth Social posted out that I was pretty sure there'd be new Q post after the Trump rally.
And of course there was.
I watched the majority of the rally and it was pretty good.
Great speech.
You know, Trump did a good job.
But again, I'm going to be coming at this from a different angle.
A lot of you guys in the last video gave me these comments that wanted to paint me as a person who's just going to be following along blindly without questioning or challenging the narrative.
And that's not what I'm going to do at all.
The fact of the matter is that I have all intention of looking at this vigorously with a skeptical viewpoint that also will allow me to examine the evidence and to present it in its entirety for everybody to examine on their own.
I have no intention of just jumping on some bandwagon blindly without looking at the facts.
I think that's what this movement taught us, right?
A lot of you guys out there may think that...
Because Q went away for a while, it's like, well, why do we care about it coming back now?
Well, that's exactly why we should care about it, right?
We got to remind ourselves that we're looking at the information and the facts that are being presented.
It really doesn't matter who Q is.
I never cared for one second from day one...
Who Q was?
I've only cared about the information that's being shared.
Now, if you guys want to go and say it's this or that, PSYOP and everything else, yeah, I'll leave the realm of possibility open to anything.
But at this point, I will tell you that it's worth looking at the information and breaking it down.
So I think that's why we're here.
That's why we're looking at these things in the first place.
So, you know...
Take it with a grain of salt, is my opinion.
Don't dive deeply into this except to say, what we're doing is we're changing the whole world.
And imagine this, if there was some kind of operation that was going on, that was meant to save the whole country and do great things globally, do you think that we would be able to know every single detail of it?
Do you think that if we did, then maybe our enemies would know every single detail?
Or do you think that there are obviously parts of this that must be misleading, that must point us in one direction when we should be looking at another, and that maybe that's why this has come back?
I don't know.
The fact of the matter is, I'm just going to be a skeptical person for...
The sincere reason that I want to get to the information and the facts.
So, let's do it, you know?
That's my whole diatribe.
I mean, that's the whole thing.
I want to give you a preface to it, because I know a lot of you guys were trying to get on me in the comments before, and I'll tell you how I honestly feel, you know?
And that's how I feel at this point, so let's look at it.
Again, QPost4957, who was Jane Roe?
How do you control generations of a populace?
50 years of conditioning, 50 years of propaganda, 50 years of lies, peaceful protests, riots, summer of love, redux.
What happens when you corner an animal, midterms, Democrat power implosion, QPost.
And there's another one that's wrapped up in here saying establishing comms Q. So you've got to remember that what's going on in the boards is kind of beyond a lot of our technical understanding.
Now, I have a pretty good grasp on it all, but for the most part, people will look at this and go, what's happening here?
here?
Well, simply put, what Q has done is posted anonymously in the eight Kuhn boards and then gone on to confirm his own posts later.
So I think that's something to be looked at more closely.
But it is telling us that Q is trying to establish either a new trip code identity or he is posting under an old one and anonymously posting otherwise.
So I don't know what this will turn into, but it looks like he may be trying to establish a new trip code with maybe a more secure hash and password and all that stuff.
So that's something that goes in sync with everything we've known.
Now, Now, I'll give you guys an example of information I've been getting from my sources, which you guys know my sources are my sources.
A lot of them you've seen and a lot of them you may haven't, but it doesn't matter because from what I can tell, the people running the board have...
I would say a good alibi, at least, Jim Watkins was in Southern California, right near yours truly, oddly enough.
Yeah, nothing there, but yeah, it's interesting.
While these posts came out, he says he doesn't even have his official SSH, I guess, laptop or whatever it is.
To check the hashes and to do all the actual background interrogation of it all.
That he's been away from the mainframes and that this has just popped up anonymously.
So, you know, it may have all the hallmarks of the original Q group getting involved.
And if that's the case, then that's something to be looked at more closely.
Again, I would reiterate to everybody out there that...
And I know we'll get into the Q post in a second here because I know that's what you're here for.
We're going to dive into them in a second, but just remember this, guys.
When you look at this in its entirety, imagine this.
Imagine we're at war with the entire world, right?
Joe Biden steals the election.
Great.
Doesn't matter.
Military doesn't recognize him.
Therefore, he doesn't get the nuclear football.
Therefore, COG kicks in.
Continuity of government kicks in.
Therefore, he doesn't really have any control or power except to pretend to be in the executive branch and get things passed through legislative orders and executive orders.
But even then, it's limiting to what he can actually do.
Because Trump, when he came into power, empowered a lot of people inside of our military to establish an order that would ultimately effectively become a wartime stance that we could take against this globalist agenda to destroy our country from within, which we know they've done through infiltration.
And I'm going to get into that in this episode going back over older Q posts that correlate with where we're at today to understand how that may have come together now.
Some of you may say, Q is all a psyop from the CIA and we're just meant to, it's Operation Trust and we should just sit on our hands and not do anything when we should be angry and upset.
Yeah, no, be angry, be upset, make your voice heard, go out and counter-protest all of these criminals, these Antifa thugs and BLM terrorists.
Please, by all means, I'm not telling you to not do any of that, and I'm not doing this as a service to hindering our movement as a whole.
I'm actually thinking that what Q is, in my opinion, and I've said this before, Is a military intelligence operation.
Now, of course, over time, it's easy when the whole world's burning to look at this and say, oh, yeah, I mean, like, how in the world could this be what I think it is?
But I've always held hope.
And, you know, at this point, I think we have to hold hope in our country because if this isn't what it seems to be, then we're screwed, if that makes sense.
I mean, I don't mean that as a sense of a...
negative proclamation against our nation.
But I would say that we have to hope still that there are those in positions of power who have every intention of saving this nation.
And I'm not saying that to say, Oh, we need to sit around and wait for a white horse to come in and save us all.
How about this?
How about these guys are working their butts off to try to help save this nation, which means we have to get active.
We have to get politically active.
We have to get socially active and, We have to be protesting.
We have to be confronting these people.
We have to be what the left is against us and then some.
Because if they've weaponized these people to go out in the streets and commit terrorism against us...
Then all we have to do is expose it.
All we have to do is shine a light on it.
All we have to do is hold a mirror up so that people can see what they're doing and hopefully we can change this to get back on the course we were previously, which is toward a more cohesive and united America.
So, that's my whole diatribe.
I'm going to go into the post now because there's a lot to cover, but...
I want to make that clear because I think that there were some valid questions in the post previously and that's how I feel at this point.
So you've got how I feel at this point.
Now I'm going to do what I've always done and cover these posts as objectively as I can to look at the information for what it is and share it with you guys so that we can essentially have a chance at solving this.
So who was Jane Roe?
That's a good question.
Let's go look.
New York Post article.
Who is the Roe v. Wade plaintiff, Jane Roe?
I'm going to read it because I think it's interesting.
The Jane Roe who pursued the landmark Roe v. Wade case that legalized abortion in the 1970s was an unmarried 22-year-old woman named Norma McCorvey who would go on to be one of the procedure's greatest supporters and opponents.
With her courtroom alias forever linked to the 1973 case, McCorvey spent part of the next two decades as a leader in the abortion rights movement but then switched sides in the 1990s becoming an outspoken pro-life figure.
Finally, months before she died in 2017, McCorvey made a deathbed confession claiming that she'd made the change only after being paid to do so and that she was a man.
In the wake of the Supreme Court's decision to overturn Roe v.
Wade Friday, here's what we know about Jane Roe.
Her children and how her life played out in the public realm...
And then it says, I
am Rowe.
McCorvey said her adoption attorney connected her with Texas lawyers Linda Coffey and Sarah Weddington, who were seeking a woman to represent in a bid to challenge Texas' anti-abortion law.
The Roe lawsuit was filed in May 1970 against Henry Wade, the district attorney in Dallas County whose job it was to enforce the state law banning abortion.
While the case was still pending, McCorvey gave birth to Roe Baby later that year and put the child up for adoption.
The Supreme Court took up the Roe v.
Wade case in 1971 and handed down its ruling establishing the right to an abortion two years later.
After the Supreme Court ruling was handed down, McCorvey lived a quiet life before making her identity known in the 1980s.
She spent the next few decades in a lesbian relationship and working in a Dallas abortion clinic.
McCorvey started monetizing her newfound celebrity by doing TV interviews and writing books as she continued to be an ardent supporter of abortion rights.
her newfound celebrity by doing TV interviews and writing books as she continued to be an ardent supporter of abortion rights.
But in the mid-90s, McCorvey suddenly switched sides and became a face of the pro-life movement.
But in the mid-90s, McCorvey suddenly switched sides and became a face of the pro-life movement.
Maybe realizing that death is at hand, right?
In 1995, she quit her job at the abortion clinic and joined Operation Rescue, an anti-abortion group that had moved in next door.
McCorvey went on to be baptized in front of TV cameras by Operation Rescue's leader, the Reverend Philip Benham.
A religious conversion resulted in McCorvey ending her lesbian relationship because she believed homosexuality was wrong once becoming a Christian.
She ended up founding her own anti-abortion group, Roe No More Ministry, in 1997 and traveling the In 2005, McCorvey tried to challenge her 1973 Row ruling, but it was rejected by the Supreme Court.
In the months before she died, McCorvey told a documentary crew that she had been paid to switch her support on abortion.
Wow.
And you can read more of this story if you want to, but imagine that.
Why is Q pointing us to this, saying, who was Jane Rowe?
Well, because there are some very important truths in that story, aren't there?
What are those truths?
Well, the truth is that Jane Rowe...
Was just like a lot of these kids you see right now.
A lot of those kids you see holding up signs, screaming, blowing whistles, repeating chants mindlessly, marching down the street.
These are broken children who've been brainwashed, who've been propagandized, who have had their whole lives basically manipulated to a point where they think killing babies so they can have promiscuous sex is a good thing.
Jane Roe.
A.K.A. Miss McCorvey, ended up changing her life because she had the intention of going back toward God.
And I think, how could you not look at that and think to yourself, wow, that's exactly what we should be thinking of in this time.
We have to save these people.
They're all lost.
And I think that's why the whole operation's been so delicate up to this point.
I mean, look at the last few posts we looked at, saying it had to be done this way and saying, you know, Everything that we've gone through has been for a purpose.
Think about it.
And somebody brought this up in a social media post I saw today.
They were saying if Trump was the president and Roe v.
Wade was overturned and all this other stuff happened that has been good for us, at least in some part, under Trump, we may be at an actual hot civil war right now.
So the fact that Biden, this bumbling idiot who we know is compromised, who we've embarrassed internationally and shown that he's a fraud and a puppet, and he doesn't even get to carry the nuclear football with him because he doesn't represent this country and he's an illegitimate president, perhaps, perhaps, let me just say, that it is all part of an international shaming that we're allowing to happen at this point to show our enemies that we mean business.
When we say we're cleaning house, we're cleaning house.
And I hope that's the case, because I can't tell you that that is exactly the case, but I can tell you that, look, I mean, understand in the context of what we're seeing here, right?
It says 50 years of conditioning, 50 years of propaganda.
How do you control generations of a populace?
50 years of lies.
We generationally have been conditioned into accepting this evil that has been thrust upon us through the infiltration of our government, which there are people inside our government who recognize.
Now, we're trying to break it apart, but it's going to take time.
Imagine that if it took 50 years for all this to happen, it's probably going to take 50 years or more for it to be undone.
So I would say that it makes sense that this is what Q is pointing to, saying that peaceful protests and riots are kind of like the summer of love that we saw in the 1960s, which is a complete affront to the moral superiority that the United States had up until that point,
at least as being a Christian majority country that was actually trying to do great things in this world, but had been subverted by this, whatever you want to call it, Then it says here, interestingly enough, what happens when you corner an animal?
Well, that's an interesting one.
Because we know that the animal posts have been few and far between, but there's been animal references a few times throughout the Q posts.
We can look at the latest one, but we can actually go start at the oldest one and get some context.
We're going back 2017.
Why are we going back 2017?
Because when you look at it in context, it gives you a better idea of what we're actually seeing happen right now as we speak.
What would that be?
Well, here's the first post and this gives you a very good idea of where we're at.
November 2017, November 14th.
How do you capture a very dangerous animal?
How do you attack it from the front?
Do you walk through the front door?
Do you signal ahead of time you will be attacking?
How do you distinguish between good and bad?
How do you trust to keep secrets?
Or who do you trust to keep secrets?
How do you prevent leaks?
Or who do you trust to complete the mission?
How do you prevent warnings from being sent?
Why is Admiral Rogers so important?
Why was the source code to a former NSA collection publicly released?
How do you blind the clowns in America?
What was Snowden's primary mission?
What was Snowden's real primary mission?
Was Snowden truly acting on his own?
Nothing is as it appears.
What show is being put on by AG Sessions since his confirmation?
What show is being put on by POTUS since AG Sessions' confirmation?
Why was AG Sessions' confirmation challenged heavily?
Why was RR's, Rod Rosenstein's, confirmation smooth and easy?
What...
Was the vote count for RR? Why did Session recuse himself?
Why is this relevant?
What group has vocally supported RM repeatedly?
How do you capture a very dangerous animal?
Again, who is best to conduct the attack?
What is the one force necessary to retain control?
Why does the U.S. military play such a vital role in the global game of risk?
What is money without power?
Why did POTUS depart Manila 30 minutes ahead of schedule?
Why is Air Force One landing?
Why does Air Force One have in-air refueling ability?
Nothing as it appears.
What was the D.C. vote breakdown between Trump and Clinton?
What is the nickname for D.C.? Why would sealed indictments be outside of D.C. jurisdiction?
What purpose would this serve?
Why are the judicial appointments being rapidly competed?
Who can you trust?
Have faith, Patriots, Q. So, I can answer a few of these questions over time that I've been, you know, helped find the answer to, and I found them on my own.
But, first of all, it's saying, how do you, like, this is saying, like, art of war.
This is the strategy of battle.
Do you just tell your opponent what you're going to do?
Like, hey, I'm going to, you know, essentially go after the deep state and rid it and, you know, gut our entire government over these people, or are you going to, like, do it stealthily?
I think it's more stealthily.
I think a stealth approach is what we're seeing.
I think a lot of people have said, oh, well, you didn't have the faith.
It was happening.
Well, guess what?
You know what?
Are you kidding me?
Have you seen our country?
I think we all had a very good right to be worried every single time this stuff got worse and worse and worse and if we weren't getting worried guys let me just say I would say that's a pretty good sign that you don't care about this country if you weren't getting worried when you saw the writing on the wall and things getting worse and worse and worse So, looking at this, though, and going through it, you can tell that's what the strategy was, right?
Then it goes on to say Admiral Rogers.
Well, I happen to know somebody who has been on my show a couple times in the last few weeks, who was a former NSA analyst who worked under Admiral Rogers, who has some interesting information to share about the NSA, but his theory, which I agree with, is that Edward Snowden...
And I've said this before, I'll say it again.
I mean, if you guys go back, the thing was, I was deleted off YouTube, so a lot of you guys are going to go, oh, you just realized this?
It's like, no, no, no.
I said this like two years ago, three years ago.
I said this very openly.
I was one of the, maybe one of the first people to have this theory, not saying I was the first, but I was maybe one of the first, to basically say that Edward Snowden was working for the CIA.
I mean, this was all through Q research, by the way.
Snowden was working for the CIA.
He infiltrated the NSA to leak all their secrets, to blind them from what the CIA was doing, which when you look at Brennan, the former CIA director, John Brennan, you understand very quickly that there was an, there was an actual, our enemies had literally there was an actual, our enemies had literally infiltrated our government to the point where they were in the intelligence agencies.
And it took our NSA true patriots to recognize that and then formulate a strategy, which we'll talk about here in a second, which is related directly back to this post.
But they formulated a strategy to try to expose this, but it's going to be one of the strategies that's evolving over time.
And I think that we should never be satisfied and we should always question it and we shouldn't just sit around and be like, yeah, they have a plan.
So why should we worry?
It's our country.
We have to worry, right?
But then it goes on to say that he blinded the clowns in America.
That was his whole primary mission.
That's what he did.
I believe it's true.
But you go on further, and it talks about the sessions and Trump, and why was everything happening in the way that it was?
It was because I think they may have been setting the long trap, which is what it looks like now, especially that Q's back giving us information.
And that totally undermines the actual validity of Biden, which is great, because the fact that Q's posting and that Biden can't do anything about it makes me believe that this is real all that much more.
What is it talking about, though?
It's talking about all these other things, dangerous animal attack, and what do you do, what's the best conduct of the attack, or who is best to conduct the attack?
Well, it goes into these global games of risk.
Well, what are we doing?
Talking about money, it says what is money without power, right?
So we have a fiat currency.
Yeah, it sucks.
It's terrible.
But how do we break it?
We know the people that run the Federal Reserve are the same people that have infiltrated our government, the same people that want to destroy America from within.
So consider this.
If we are in exactly where Q says we are, then we have to destroy our own currency to a degree in order to rebuild it, just like Russia just did.
It's funny how Russia is doing something that we may be doing similarly in the future, where they have broken ties with this petrodollar system.
They've removed all their currency.
They've backed it all with gold.
And now the people in our country are freaking out, which is why they want us to take more vaccines and everything else.
Then they go, Trump pushed the vaccine.
Well...
I'll say this.
I don't know that Trump pushed the vaccine even though he said in Operation Warp Speed he's going to put out a vaccine.
Maybe he wanted to put out a vaccine that wasn't this vaccine.
I mean, that's my consideration is that maybe the vaccine he wanted to put out is different than the one that has been put out and that he realizes now that if he says anything against it, I mean, because the way the whole scenario is set up, it'd be like political suicide.
But I hope he does.
Q, if you're out there listening, which I know you are, Q, please, for love of God, tell us about this vaccine.
Give us more clarity.
Because I don't appreciate for one second what Trump did with it.
And I pray that...
What I think happened is what actually happened, which is that the pharmaceutical companies jacked it up.
They went with the mRNA vaccine, which Trump never wanted to do, I'm hoping, and that that is why they are a part of the globalists.
They're the same people.
The pharmaceutical companies connected to the fiat currency in the globalist banking cartel.
So it's all one big syndicate that we're trying to rid ourselves of as a country that have embedded themselves so deeply.
It's like a tumor.
You have to remove it carefully.
You could kill the patient if you take out the tumor too abruptly.
And I think that's what people have to remind themselves of is because we get so lost in this idea of like, oh man, you know, we just got to get rid of it all at once.
Well, what if you kill the patient?
Metaphorically speaking, in the sense of our country.
So that's my whole point.
Anyway, that's the game of Risk we're playing, and that's why money is so important.
And what is it talking about with Manila and Hawaii and everything else?
I mean, remember this?
When the false missile threat was put out and people were hiding under, you know, they were hiding in the sewers because they thought they were about to get blasted into nuclear oblivion?
It was a scare tactic that was put on by our enemies to try to exhibit that they were ready to go to war.
And I'm not talking about our enemies abroad, moreoverly, I'm talking about our enemies within.
This was a false missile threat.
So you're talking about having people inside of our own military who hit the button to tell people that they were going to die.
Yeah, so we were under attack and we've been under attack.
But it goes back up to these couple posts that I want to look at.
First of all, this one, 150...
LDR, Linda Rothschild.
So it's all about the Rothschilds.
Never forget that.
Saying, distress call to others will do you, family, no good at this stage.
We know where you, the family, are at all times and can hear you breathe and cue.
So remind yourselves that this has always been a battle against the Rothschilds, but they have more power than we understand, especially in Europe.
Not just here, but especially in Europe, which is why you're seeing everything happen in NATO. We have to placate them, I believe, to a degree so that they think that we're still on board with them when we're not.
And...
You know, let them go to war with Russia, not us, right?
But then also, finally here, I wanted to point out this, where it talks about the New York Times Clowns in America article released in 2017, yes, 2017, right here, that talks about the Q Group.
Oh, you guys think this is all new?
No, no, this has been happening.
This is an article from 2017 November saying Jake Williams woke last April in an Orlando, Florida hotel where he was leading a training session checking Twitter.
Mr.
Williams, a cybersecurity expert, was dismayed to discover that he had been thrust into the middle of one of the worst security debacles ever to befall American intelligence.
Mr. Williams had written on his company blog about the shadow brokers, a mysterious group that had somehow obtained many of the hacking tools the United States used to spy on other countries.
Now, the group had replied in an angry screed on Twitter.
It identified him correctly as a former member of the National Security Agency's hacking group, Tailored Access Operations, or TOW, a job he had not publicly disclosed.
Then the shadow brokers astonished him by dropping technical details that made clear they knew highly or knew about highly classified hacking operations that he had conducted.
America's largest and most secretive intelligence agency had been deeply infiltrated.
They had operational insight that even most of my fellow operators at TOW did not have, said Mr. Williams.
Williams.
Now, with Rendition InfoSec, a cybersecurity firm he founded, I felt like I'd been kicked in the gut.
However, wrote this article, We're good to go.
See, the shadow broker's disclosures, which began in August 2016, have been catastrophic for the NSA, calling into question its ability to protect potent cyber weapons and its very value to national security.
The agency regarded as the world's leader in breaking into adversaries' computer networks failed to protect its own.
Well, here's where it's interesting.
Fast forward a little bit.
It says, 15 months into a wide-ranging investigation by the agency's counterintelligence arm, known as Q-Group, And the FBI officials still do not know whether the NSA is the victim of a brilliantly executed hack with Russia as the most likely perpetrator.
An insider's leak or both.
So let me tell you this guys.
I think that the whole Q thing comes from a counter to this.
Right?
They tried to say that the NSA is the enemy when the NSA is the one that was basically blowing the whistle.
Admiral Rogers is the one that had the meeting with Trump and Trump Tower to expose all this stuff from the get-go.
So it would stand to reason that when Edward Snowden tried to expose all their hacking tools to undermine their ability to surveil We're good to go.
I think there's something there.
There's more there.
I'll leave links to everything below, but that's pretty much it.
That's the whole thing.
Midterms, Democrat power implosion, Q, so I guess that's what's coming.
Q's establishing a new handle, but yeah.
So with that being said, let's read through a bit of scripture here, our God's Grace's Greater segment, which I think is going to give us a more...
Broad perspective on all of it.
We're reading in the book of 2 Corinthians 8, verse 1-15.
We want you to know, brothers, about the grace God granted to the churches of Macedonia.
During a severe testing by affliction, their abundance of joy and their deep poverty overflowed into the wealth of their generosity.
I testify that on their own, according to their ability and beyond their ability, they begged us insistently for the And not just as we had hoped, instead they gave themselves especially to the Lord, then to us by God's will.
So we urged Titus that just as he had begun, so he should also complete this grace to you now.
As you excel in everything, faith, speech, knowledge, and in all diligence, and in your love for us, excel also in this grace.
I'm not saying this as a command.
Rather, by means of diligence of others, I am testing the genuineness of your love.
For you know the grace of our Lord Jesus Christ.
Though he was rich, for your sake he became poor, so that by his poverty you may become rich.
Now I am giving you an opinion on this because it is profitable for you, who a year ago began not only to do something but also to desire it, but now finished the task as well, that just as there was eagerness to desire it, so there may also be a completion from what you have. so there may also be a completion from what you For if the eagerness is there, it is acceptable according to what one has, not according to what he does not have.
It is not that there may be relief for others and hardship for you, but it is a question of equality.
At the present time, your surplus is available for their need, so their abundance may also become available for our need, so there may be equality.
As it has been written, the person who has gathered much did not have too much, and the person who gathered little did not have too little.
Why do I read that to you guys?
One of the things that stood out to me the most beside the power of it all is that it talks about how God tests us when we have nothing or little to nothing.
And if we show joy through it, then we will be rewarded.
But not rewarded in the way that you may think.
Not just so that we may become rich or wealthier or anything else, but so that we may understand how When we have so little, to others we may have a lot.
So that means that for all of you guys out there, think of it the way I'm thinking of it right now.
If you have too little and you look at yourself like, I don't have enough, I don't know why, I need more, but then you look at others who look at you and realize you have a lot, then what we're meant to do by God's grace is share what we have with them and that will help us Get more.
I know it sounds crazy.
I know it sounds counterintuitive, but that's how this works.
And I have struggled with it my whole life to think, oh, when I have great abundance, why would I look back and think of, you know, the smaller things?
But that's what we're meant to do.
The more we have, the more we're meant to look back on others and try to help them.
Because it's saying here that it's not a command.
It's just saying that the diligence of you testing your own diligence or genuineness of your love will help you to understand that when Christ was rich, he was the son of God.
He had everything.
He went back, became a man, became poor, and allowed himself to be sacrificed on the cross.
So, in the same way I think we're called, that the more we have, the more we're meant to sacrifice what we have, but not in a way that we may be able to understand at the moment.
As it says here, the person who gathered much did not have too much, and the person who gathered little did not have too little.
Meaning, we'll have what we need.
God will provide what we need to get by.
I know that because He's done it in my life.
He's given me what I need to get by in my life.
He can do it for you.
He will do it for you.
One of the other points in this that I really thought was important was it's about finishing the task, right?
Because it says very clearly here, it says, For me, I read this in a way that God's compelling me to understand that I started this QAnon research task a long time ago, and I should see it through.
But it's not about QAnon.
To me, it's about God.
It's about Jesus.
It's about the gospel, right?
That I'm working every day to take the task I've been given, which is to spread the gospel out in the world, and finish it.
And if it happens to coincide with talking about what's happening with QAnon, that's fine.
And I'm okay with that.
But this is my main focus, always.
And I want it to be your main focus, too, in your lives.
So remember, when we're given tasks, we're meant to finish them.
Because even if we have a surplus, it's a surplus that we've built up.
As long as we do it rightfully and righteously, we've built it up because we know that there'll come a time where we have to share it with others.
Because as it says, the person who gathered much did not have too much, and the person who gathered little did not have too little.
As long as we are together in Christ, we will share what we have, and we will overcome all.
And that's my message to all of you guys out there, so let's end it with a prayer.
Dear Lord and Heavenly Father, Help us remind ourselves every day to finish the task of sharing the gospel in this world.
To never give up.
To know that whether we have too much or too little, we'll always have enough as long as we put our lives towards you.
And that if we do have too much or too little, that you'll help us find ways to come together to share those things so that we can help one another and uplift each other towards you.
Lord, I give great thanks for all of the discernment and knowledge and wisdom you've given us.
And Lord, I pray that we'll do great things in your name always.
And I thank you most of all for our eternal salvation.
In Jesus' name we pray.
Amen.
All right, guys.
I hope you enjoyed that episode.
Make sure you come over here and follow me on social media at JustInformedTalk.
That's pretty much the best way you can follow me right now.
I'll give you a few more links where these shows can be found.
But other than that, I want to say thanks for watching this episode of JustInformedTalk.
Remember, like, share, and subscribe.
If you're watching on BitChuteRumble, like it, share it, subscribe, all that.
It's going to help me out big time.
Other than that, thanks for watching.
My name is Craig.
▲
Export Selection