All Episodes
Previous Next
April 27, 2022 - Just Informed Talk - Craig James
01:01:05
Chemical Attacks Planned For Ukraine: US False Flag Or Russian Last Resort? | JustInformed News #097
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
The storm is getting closer.
We are the digital soldiers.
It's time they run together.
We are the digital soldiers.
We will bring the light to this field of fight.
Hi and welcome to another episode of Just Informed News.
I'm your host Craig.
Thanks for joining me.
We have a big show today.
We're going to get into some major stories as usual.
The stuff you're never going to see on the fake news.
But we're actually going to cover the fake news for a little bit too and how they're reacting to Twitter being taken over by Elon Musk.
They're all very, very worried about democracy, whatever that means to them.
We're also going to talk about a major story from Russia.
They're making very bold proclamations and this war seems to be getting worse and worse as we have another food processing plant that's gone up in flames.
I'm going to talk about that and I'm going to get into some of your comments on what you guys thought was going on down there.
I read through them, yes, and...
We'll get into some interesting topics there.
Plus, we're going to cover a bunch of other news stories, including more breaking information from the Durham investigation that seems to point to more criminal corruption inside the DNC and the Clinton campaign, which we already knew about.
But thankfully, we're going to hopefully get some answers further on that, and hopefully people will start going to jail.
But with that being said, we have a lot to cover, so let's just jump into the first story here.
Here it is.
Russian official claims the U.S. preparing WMD false flag to justify direct intervention into Ukraine war.
Now, this is not a far-fetched claim to be made, and the Russians have been making it over and over and over again, but it's only most likely because they are reading the tea leaves at this point and seeing what's coming.
It would only make sense after yesterday's video where we talked about how There may have been a connection between a major oil facility going up, oil refinery going up in flames in Russia, right as the Secretary of State and Defense Secretary were arriving in Ukraine to have a meeting with the Prime Minister or President Zelensky, I should say.
So it's no surprise that they are saying that this is coming down the pipe, but here, let's read what they say.
It says here, the top spokesperson for Russian Foreign Ministry claimed shockingly over the weekend that the U.S. government was preparing to stage a false flag attack using a weapon of mass destruction, likely a chemical munition, in order to justify sending American forces directly into Ukraine's meat grinder.
The claim was made by FM spokeswoman Maria Zakharova, who said that the Biden regime would use the false flag to blame Moscow for deployed banned weapons of war as a sort of plan B after the U.S. and the West sanctions have failed to deter Moscow from who said that the Biden regime would use the false flag to blame Moscow for Quote, the reason is clear.
The shocking details of the illegal cooperation between the United States and the current Ukrainian authorities in the field of creating bacteriological weapons have been revealed to the world.
And the understanding of the inevitability of the detection of their criminal activities was so obvious that Washington began to prepare in advance.
That's what she wrote in her post on Telegram.
It says, as well as fears that those facilities could fall into the hands of invading Russian troops adding that the Biden regime has spun its agenda adding that Americans should be prepared for a terrible provocation by Russia that could include its troops as well as Ukrainian civilians She also cited a March 25th article in Foreign Affairs
magazine titled Preparing for the Unthinkable in Ukraine as an effort to shape U.S. public opinion ahead of the planned false flag, claiming it was likely there could be Russian biological or chemical attacks in Ukraine.
And of course, contractors in Western-controlled organizations were found which can be tasked with investigating the circumstances of the use of such weapons.
I will name, too, the Chemical Forensics International Technical Working Group, which proved itself during chemical weapons provocations in Syria, and the Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research, which specializes in poisons of the Novichok type.
In the past, both structures have shown their reliability and diligence in dealing with their American masters, the spokeswoman wrote.
She also said that the U.S. is working alongside international organizations, including the Red Cross and the organization for the prohibition of chemical weapons, in the expectation that Moscow will pull off a Syrian-style scenario in Ukraine, which would then serve as the impetus to boot Russia from the organization, and that wouldn't really be a good thing, would it?
The Americans and their partners in Europe completely ignore the fact that Russia has not had any chemical weapons for about five years now, since 27 September 2017.
With this fact verified by the OPCW, the spokeswoman added, according to Sputnik, which said that reality would be handled by planting chemical weapons where Russian troops are currently stationed.
So, look, I take everything Russia says with a grain of salt, just like I do with our own government, because we know the corruption exists in both places.
And especially in that statement at the end where it said, oh, we all know that Russia hasn't had chemical weapons for over five years.
Yeah, right.
We know Russia has chemical weapons.
They would never give those up.
For the simple fact of being able to have parity against any other countries that have chemical weapons, like the United States, and all the biological labs that are in Ukraine that are being uncovered.
And it would also stand to reason that through the invasion of Ukraine, Russia could have taken possession of a number of biological weapons if they were able to get to the facilities before the actual content of the facilities were destroyed.
So, my whole reason for starting here with this story is to kind of go over what I talked about yesterday and tie a few things back together.
Now, some of you, not a lot of you, some of you, first asked, who am I being paid by?
Well, sadly, no one's paying me to do anything and I'm not working for either government and I don't have any skin in this game.
So, you can go ahead and stop with that, but, you know, feel free.
It's a free country.
You can go ahead and say whatever you want down in the comments.
But after that...
A lot of you were saying that it's obvious that it's the US and we're the ones who are destroying our own food processing plants because we're the ones trying to start a crisis in our own country.
And I'm not saying that's impossible.
And it's sad that I have that in the back of my mind as being a possibility because considering the fact that our own government was responsible for things like falsifying intelligence to try to frame a president and try to illegally remove him from office when he didn't comply with their globalist agenda...
Yeah, that makes me really suspicious of anything our government does, especially at this point in time.
And if you ask me, just as a regular citizen of the United States, what do I think is actually happening here in Russia?
I think it's a mixed bag.
But I think ultimately we have to be prepared for all outcomes and all possibilities.
Yes, is it possible Russia could be planting a story like this with the intent of using chemical weapons in the future as a last-ditch effort to try to maintain control of a situation that's getting out of hand?
Yeah, it's totally possible.
And I don't push that out of the realm of possibility.
But if we're talking about probability...
It would make sense that what they're claiming is a tactic that we have and are going to adopt in the future.
We all saw what happened in Syria.
The understanding there was, oh, it was definitely Syria using chemical weapons on its own people, so now we have to go bomb them.
And that was just another proxy war against Russia because we all know this is about getting pipelines into Europe.
It's about gas.
It's about the petrodollar.
It's about the world reserve currency.
It's about a challenge to the globalist new world order that Russia has put forth that...
The globalists hate, and the globalists want to destroy Russia now.
Now, will they use our country as the, you know, the frontline defense to go in there?
And is our country using NATO as the even more frontline defense to go after Russia?
Yeah, it seems.
So I don't know exactly how this is all going to play out.
I pray that there is less, there is not as much suffering and death as they're projecting already.
And there already has been enough suffering and death that I would hope that this conflict can come to an end soon.
But it seems as though Russia is making all of the moves based on the fact that they're taking on the globalist new world order.
Who is the enemy of the United States?
At least the part of the United States that hasn't been infiltrated by the Klaus Schwab's penetrating the cabinets with the young global leaders.
So I think it this way.
The enemy of my enemy is my friend.
And in this case, it seems Russia is the enemy of the enemy of the American people.
So I don't know.
It's hard-pressed for me to say that they're going to be the bad guys when this is all said and done.
But, again, I don't push that out of the realm of possibility.
We're talking about probabilities here, though.
That's what really matters.
Now, here's another one that makes me really worried, talking about what we discussed yesterday following a rash of fires.
The FBI warns that food plants will be targeted with cyberattacks.
Hmm.
So first of all, you need to be suspicious since the FBI is getting involved here.
Obviously, we know the FBI has been involved in every major false flag that has happened in our country for the last who knows how many years.
You can go practically back to, you know, Oklahoma City bombing to 9-11 to, you know, more recently, the Whitmer kidnapping plot on January 6th to know that the FBI has had its hands in these things for a very long time.
time, you know, the seventh floor of the FBI, the shadow government, deep state puppets who work for this perpetual bureaucracy that never leaves Washington, D.C.
that's 100 percent beholden to the globalist overlords who run the banking cartels and own most of the major corporations in the world.
Yeah, those guys.
It seems to me when the FBI gets involved, we know that they're not telling us if but when, right?
So let's read through a little bit of the story.
It says the American deep state is letting everyone know that more attacks on the domestic food supply are soon to come following a wave of arson that saw numerous food processing plants in the United States burn to the ground or get crashed into by planes all at roughly the same time.
The FBI's cyber division published a notice explaining that the next phase of this engineered takedown involves cyber attacks.
Ransomware actors may be more likely to attack agricultural cooperatives during critical planting and harvest seasons, disrupting operations, causing financial loss, and negatively impacting the food supply chain.
The FBI announced suggesting more false flag operations are on the way.
The FBI added that 2021 and early 2022 have already seen ransomware attacks on farming cooperatives and that these attacks could affect the current planting season by disrupting the supply of seeds and fertilizer.
A significant disruption of grain production could impact the entire food chain since grain is not only consumed by humans but also used for animal feed.
The notice further reads, in addition, a significant disruption of grain and corn production could impact commodities trading.
So again, they're telling us, they're basically calling their shot at this point, and I can only look at it one way, and that is that what we're seeing is a manufactured crisis and you have to remember, this is all part of the plan.
We don't have to go very far back to learn that there were tactics being employed by the communists, which today the communists have changed.
It's a less communist Russia today and a far more communist United States deep state today.
So you have to go back, though, and look at people like G. Edward Griffin, who, you know, some things he said that I agree with, some I disagree with, especially more modernly.
But...
He did have a lot of good points, especially going back to when he was first coming out with a lot of this information.
Here's one example where he talks about basically how they're going to take down the United States when the communists make their final push.
And it sounds a lot like what we're going through today.
Let's watch this.
Minority Revolution.
Any all-out minority revolution must create a state of crisis wherein almost all of the male population would be forced to remain in their homes to protect their property and families.
The middle class is very large, but it is not accustomed to deprivation and terror.
Because of its affluence, it has waxed soft.
It has no stomach for massive fire, blood, and violence.
The motive force behind its life drive is its endless pursuit of prestige, conspicuous consumption, and sensual pleasure.
A few years of violent, sporadic and highly destructive uprisings will set the stage for the grand finale.
After the stage is properly set through protracted struggle, America could be brought to her knees in 90 days of highly organized, fierce fighting, sabotage and massive firestorm.
Well, does that sound familiar to anyone out there?
I mean, it sounds very familiar to me saying America could be brought to her knees in 90 days of highly organized, fierce fighting, sabotage, and massive firestorm following a few years of violence, sporadic, and highly destructive uprisings that set the final stage for the grand finale.
So if that doesn't sound like where we're at today, I don't know what does.
And this is back in, I think, the 1960s or 50s when he gave this recording.
So they knew that there was a communist plan to destroy America and they knew how to exploit it to destroy America.
I mean, there's been dozens, hundreds, maybe thousands of books written on this exact topic and this subject and giving us exact detailed explanations for how they would do it.
Think about what's happened over the last few years, right?
Talking about sporadic and highly destructive uprisings and violence, talk about Black Lives Matter and Antifa.
We've had years of that, right?
They've been going out and committing open and outright violence against the public at large.
And it talks about the middle class being so affluent and obsessed with their creature comforts that if you do something that makes it so that they all have to stay at home, Out of fear, well then that means it'll only take, after all that's said and done, 90 days of highly organized fighting, sabotage, and massive firestorm to overthrow this country.
So perhaps that's what they have planned for us.
Perhaps we're in the midst of that plan unfolding as we speak.
It would stand to reason that when you look at the way it's explained here, I mean, what was COVID? Years of people being locked inside their homes, not being able to leave.
Now we have an entire population, pretty much half of the population, let's say, maybe less than half, to be fair, are terrified to leave their homes still.
I know people that still won't go to church or won't go out in public and they won't go outside without a face mask and they won't, you know, do anything with with people who they think might be possibly infected with without with covid.
I mean, so the way that you destroy a country seems to be exactly how everything's going here in America right now.
So if I were to make a guess, I would say that the illegal coup that took place where the criminal regime of Biden took control was the state, the precursor, for where we're heading toward today, which is the destruction and downfall of America from sabotage within.
Now, when it says fierce fighting, we've seen that in the streets, organized, fierce fighting, sabotage.
We're seeing that with these food plants burning down.
But massive firestorm, we haven't seen that yet.
And maybe that's what they have planned for us next.
I pray not.
I truly pray not.
But it's very dangerous when you start looking at what's happening as we have another, another General Mills facility catches fire.
And no, this isn't connected to the other 21 that we were reporting on yesterday.
This is a new one.
Look at this.
American people are noticing that many fires are happening at food processing plants, and the timing of these fires exposes that there is no way that this is all just a coincidence.
Some conservative media are awake to the fact as well, but the lapdog media is ignoring the entire timeline of unfolding danger.
Recently, as many as 20-plus U.S. food processing plants that are headquarters of food processing companies have been damaged or destroyed, but that isn't anything our government is concerning themselves with at this time.
A General Mills facility was recently hit by a plane in Georgia, and a plant in Idaho appeared to be in the crosshairs as well.
New reports indicate that yet another General Mills facility has been damaged in some way, this time by fire.
This brings the grand total to 22 food processing plants or headquarters that we know of, which have been destroyed or damaged in some way over the course of just one week, and the odds of that happening organically are making people everywhere wonder if we are watching the managed decline of the United States of America.
The suspicion is growing among citizen analysts because, remember, Democrat Joe Biden has been forecasting that we will experience food shortages.
Here he is.
America.
God bless you all.
Well, that was just a clip of him.
Thank you.
Anyway, the point is, you guys have seen it for yourself.
Now we have another fire at a General Mills facility.
So there's two theories I've heard.
The one theory is what I've kind of put forth that it's some sort of, you know, sabotage from our enemies that are trying to weaken us and cause food crisis, and that creates riots, that creates social disorder.
Social disorder causes social mistrust in the government, which leads to a lack of support for the government to go into a war with Russia, let's just say.
That's one theory.
The other theory you guys have been telling me in the comments is that there's a group of white hats that have been going around destroying food processing facilities because they're putting things in our food that make us sick and they have to stop that to keep us from getting sick.
So I've seen less evidence for the latter and more for the former, but that doesn't mean that that's the truth.
The fact of the matter is you guys are going to have to make this decision up for yourself as far as what the evidence shows, but To me, when I look at something like this, I'm reminded of things like Agenda 21.
You guys remember that?
Which I think is now Agenda 2030 because it was supposed to be Agenda 2021.
But anyway, it's the globalist plan to destroy the world.
Now again, here is G. Edward Griffin, but this one's a little bit later.
Him is an older man, telling us all about Agenda 21 and how that's going to work here in America and what it's going to look like globally.
So tell me if this doesn't sound familiar to where we're heading today.
Agenda 21 is kind of a code name for a master plan originated at the United Nations to change the political and economic system of the world to one of total collectivism.
And in order to do that, people must not be allowed to have independence.
They must be dependent on the state for everything.
Otherwise, they won't be easily controlled by the state.
That means they can't have private property, mostly.
They cannot have land of their own.
They have to live in, preferably, high-rise apartments that are provided to them by the state as a benefit, so to speak.
Oh, good, we've got a free apartment.
But these people at the top want all humans to be dependent on the largesse of the state.
That means that they don't want anybody living out in the boonies.
Anybody that's got a couple of acres of land and his own water supply and can grow his own food and that kind of thing, or have some sheep or some chickens, these people are a threat to the collectivist society because they aren't going to go to the politicians and say, please feed me, please clothe me, please give me shelter.
They tend to be independent.
That's the secret behind Agenda 21.
They want people out of the country.
They want corporations out there growing all the food and that kind of thing, but they don't want anybody living out there because that way they cannot be controlled.
In order to control mankind, we have to get them all into the big cities.
We have to rack them up and stack them up, get them dependent on the state for their food, their shelter, their electrical power, their water, everything.
That's the dirty secret behind Agenda 21.
Yeah, I mean, it sounds pretty familiar, right?
Looks like a lot like what we're going through today.
We may have already reached it and gone in even further now into Agenda 2030.
But the fact of the matter is, you know, when you put all this stuff together, it looks very, you know, very bad for us all.
And we just have to keep exposing it and fighting against it at every step of the way.
Do not let them overthrow this nation.
We cannot and must not let that happen.
Now, you guys know we started justinformednews.com.
If you guys haven't come here, please...
Sign up, get subscribed, that way you'll get an email notification as soon as these videos are posted.
Just put your email address in right here and hit subscribe.
Also, don't forget the majority of the news we're going to go over here today came from here, informednews.com, the official news website for Just Informed News and Talk.
It's a 24-7 breaking news, news aggregating site.
Go check it out.
It's easy.
Just go to informednews.com and check that out today.
Today's God's Grace is Greater segment, we're going to be looking at this piece of scripture.
I told you we're going to do the whole...
Psalm 119 in segments because it is the longest chapter in the Bible.
And today we're doing the second part of the chapter of Psalm 119.
And here's the quote from the scripture that we're going to be looking at today.
It says...
How can a young man keep his way pure?
By keeping your word.
I have sought you with all my heart.
Don't let me wander from your commands.
We're going to read the whole little section there.
It's the second one.
I hope you guys stick around for it because we're going to keep doing these God's Grace is Greater segments every single show.
They're powerful because...
As much bad news as we cover here in this show, we always finish with the good news, the good news of the gospel, because there is hope.
As dark as it seems, as bad as things seem to be getting every single day, there is hope.
And there is hope that goes beyond anything we can ever imagine.
So I pray and hope that you guys stick around for this at the end as we do our segment, God's Grace is Greater.
So stick around for that.
And also don't forget, this video is sponsored by Victory Book.
And thank you to Victory Book for sponsoring this episode.
Victory Book's a personal goal-setting system.
It's for people 8 to 108 years of age.
You're never too young or too old to learn to dream bigger.
The audiobook and flipbook are free to download at VictoryBook.com.
Visit VictoryBook.com and download your free copy today.
Thank you, Victory Book.
And guys, it's free!
So go download it and try it out.
It's going to help you have a system for personal goal setting that can give you a better look at how you're going to achieve the things you want to achieve in your life.
So thanks to Victory Book for sponsoring this episode.
Go try them out today.
Alright, next story here.
MSNBC hacks suddenly worried about Twitter censorship influencing the elections.
What?
Are you kidding me?
Twitter's censorship's going to influence the elections?
You've got to watch this.
It's hilarious, but it also is disturbing the lack of self-awareness, or I guess he's fully self-aware, because he's tacitly admitting that Twitter was used to censor conservatives, and that's what swayed the election.
So now he is visibly scared, this MSNBC anchor, visibly scared that Twitter...
Without censorship, it's going to sway the election away from the communists and the socialists and the criminal regime that did the coup with the deep state to take over our country with the globalists.
They're really scared about this.
Here, watch the video.
Let's watch it real quick.
Twitter or Facebook or what have you.
You own all of Twitter or Facebook or what have you.
You don't have to explain yourself.
You don't even have to be transparent.
You could secretly ban one party's candidate or all of its candidates, all of its nominees, or you could just secretly turn down the reach of their stuff and turn up the reach of something else, and the rest of us might not even find out about it until after the election.
Elon Musk says this is all to help people because he is just a free speech You know what's hilarious is you watch these people and you're like, okay.
Like, first you're like, oh, they have no self-awareness.
This guy's an idiot.
He doesn't know what he's talking about.
Then you're like, man, no, it's more nefarious and insidious than that.
He is basically, as I said before, he's tacitly admitting that exactly what they did to conservatives is what will happen to them, and that's terrifying.
Well, guess what?
We lived through it, and yeah, it is terrifying, and it is wrong, and it is corrupt, and it is exactly everything that these people stand for.
They are the corrupt, vacuous class of degenerates who are fully okay with censoring and silencing the dissent to their opinion and their narrative and their agenda.
But even the thought of all those things that he talked about, oh, they could secretly turn you down without you even noticing.
Yeah, like they did to every conservative for who knows how long on every social media platform, YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, etc.
It's like...
They're terrified that we're going to do to them what they did to us.
Maybe rightfully so.
I mean, I think it would only be fair, but I don't think it's fair if we go and censor them as they did us.
Because, first of all, the reason they had to censor us, which is hilarious, is that our ideas were actually good and were better than theirs, and we could beat them in any debate at any time.
I will debate any of these idiots any day of the week because they have nothing behind their arguments.
They're just full of empty-headed talking points and a bunch of corporate scripts that mean nothing to the real people of this country.
That people will have the freedom to speak on these platforms is something that they just like, it's like they're like, well, what are we going to do?
It's like, just get better ideas.
Maybe stop shilling for the corporate deep state, corporately backed deep state, the globalist cartel that wants to destroy this country.
How about that?
Oh, I see, but then he'd have to give up his little schtick in his show on MSNBC where he probably gets paid an exorbitant amount of money to spew lies all day.
See, these people are easily bought, and that's the problem, too, is that these corporations find the most mentally weak among us, offer them a huge sum of money.
These are people that get meaningless degrees at big universities that don't really amount to much of anything other than, oh, I'm a journalist now.
It's like, oh, great.
Another one of these idiot journalists with their degrees who's going to go on MSNBC and read off a teleprompter, words that weren't even written by them, except I think Joy Reid writes a lot of her own stuff.
That's how dumb it sounds when she spits it out.
But the fact of the matter is that they're terrified of us being able to have the ability to call out their lies and expose them.
I mean, here's what's happening on Twitter right now.
Twitter goes on internal lockdown to prevent woke employees taking revenge for Elon Musk takeover.
It says, yes, Twitter's gone on internal lockdown in order to prevent woke employees from taking revenge in response to Elon Musk takeover the company.
Yes, really.
After Musk completed his $44 billion purchase social network, leftists responded with their usual brand of hysterical moral grandstanding and empty threats to leave the platform altogether.
However, the company is also concerned about the internal reaction with concerns that angry, woke employees would stage performative hissy fits harm the platform in response to Musk's purchase.
Twitter has locked down all changes apart from business-critical updates in a bid to halt collateral damage.
So I already told you this is what they would do.
Everything I said that would happen if Elon Musk bought Twitter is happening.
The first thing I said is they would sink their own ship, and they're going to try to sink their own ship.
Apparently they're trying to stop them from being able to sink their own ship.
But I have a feeling if they had made this move to lock down the source code that there could have been some major internal attacks on the algorithm itself and on how the entire platform functions, trying to crash it, trying to make it unsalvageable so that it could never be used again.
Again, it's the equivalent of, you know, You're behind enemy lines, and this is their perspective.
You're behind enemy lines, and your plane goes down, or your helicopter goes down, and the rescue mission comes in to pick up the soldiers from the helicopter, and they blow up the helicopter that they can't bring out because it's got technology in it, and it's got things they don't want falling into their enemy's hands, so they have to destroy it.
I guarantee you that's how they see Twitter.
Twitter is a weapon of the left that has been used against the right unashamedly, and they don't want it falling into the hands of a person like Elon Musk.
Now, I've already said all my...
Questions and concerns about Elon Musk and what his true motives are behind him taking over Twitter.
I don't believe it's some altruistic, oh, I'm going to save free speech.
As much as it is, I have a technology that puts a computer in your brain, basically taking your smartphone out of your hand and putting it in your brain.
So now I need a social media platform to entice people by saying, you can be on Twitter with your brain.
It'll be great.
And then I'll just steal all the data out of your brain and use it to manipulate you into an easily moldable zombie that can go and do the bidding of Tesla and buy more Tesla electric cars because you think you're saving the environment or something.
Now, I'm not saying that that's true or not.
I just don't have much faith in Elon Musk and what he actually pretends to be, which is something that I don't think he actually is.
That aside, though...
Another thing that makes me weary about Elon Musk and his agenda is something like this.
Jack Dorsey coming out and thanking Elon Musk for taking Twitter back from Wall Street.
He also said that he's the only person he thinks can take this company in the right direction.
So either Jack Dorsey's just coming off that DMT trip and he's feeling really, really happy and thankful, or, and he's been talking to the interdimensional aliens like Alex Jones would say, or...
You've got to look at this a little bit more critically to understand that these Jack Dorsey, Elon Musk, these guys are the transhumanists.
These guys are the Silicon Valley, DMT-tripping, hippie, out-there people who have talked openly about spiritualism.
They never talk about Jesus.
They never talk about God.
They never talk about the religion in that sense.
They always talk about spiritualism.
Right?
Well, spiritualism, in my opinion, a lot of it is of the devil, is demonic in its nature.
Now, you can be spiritual toward God, and you can have a spiritual connection with the Holy Spirit and with Jesus Christ.
I'm not saying that spiritualism is necessarily of the devil.
I don't think it is at all.
But I would say that the spiritualism these guys are talking about is like, I trip on drugs and talk to imaginary aliens, and we're going to put computer chips in your brain so that we're going to basically destroy the creation that God made and try to augment and amplify it into some AI-driven human-AI fusion.
Of transhuman people that will live forever and they will usher in an age of peace in this world.
This is the idea they have.
Which I think this idea that they have for the most part is just as dangerous as what you saw with communism through the 19th and 20th century.
They were promising a utopia.
If we all just got together, and we were all exactly equal, everything would be okay, and we would live in utopia, and it'd be paradise.
But what actually happened?
Millions, tens of millions of people died because of starvation, because of internment, because of wrongthink, and everything else you can imagine, because they weren't willing to get on board with the communist revolution.
Just look at Russia and China as examples.
Now, we have our transhumanist movement coming out of Silicon Valley from the ilk of these same communists, really.
A lot of the Silicon Valley people are all like the children of the hippie communists of the Haight-Ashbury district in the Woodstock 70s.
And they're going to create a new utopia, except this time it's not communism, guys.
This time you're plugged into a machine through your brain and you're all in a collective universe that doesn't really exist where you're augmented with this AI that's basically sentient at this point because it's not even being programmed by humans.
It's actually programming itself and developing itself into something more than what it is.
And that's what they want to join with.
Because they worship these AI gods, which are of this world, which means they're fallen, which means they're demonic in nature.
So, I don't, you know, I just don't have a lot of faith in the way this is all going.
And here it's like, here are some good questions.
Here's one example.
The UK is demanding Elon Musk keeps Twitter responsible, quote-unquote, by censoring content.
A spokesman for UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson has demanded that Elon Musk keeps Twitter responsible through content censorship.
Authorities in the UK are demanding that Twitter follows the country's censorship laws when it comes under the control of its new owner, Elon Musk.
Musk, who has identified himself as a free speech absolutist, has said that his aims are to increase the transparency of the platform he acquired for around $44 billion, noting that free speech is the bedrock of a functioning democracy.
Well, first of all, we're a republic.
I don't want to make that very clear.
Everybody keeps saying democracy, democracy, democracy.
We're an actual constitutional republic.
So the idea that we're a democracy...
This is untrue.
We're a republic that uses democratic institutions to do elections and things like that, but ultimately, at the end of the day, we're a federal republic, a constitutional republic.
So the idea that we're going to be saving democracy is like, wait, what?
Wait, we're not even a democracy.
But that being said, you have to remember that the censorship laws in the EU and in Great Britain and other places are far beyond anything we've ever seen in the United States of America.
And for those of you watching in the UK and in Europe and in other places like Australia, you know this in Canada.
You know this for a fact.
Free speech really is not a thing in your country.
In your countries, I should say.
Now, you can argue it is to a degree, but it isn't to the degree that it is here in the United States.
And I would point to several examples.
I mean, tell me that it's not happening in the UK, where if you make posts online about Muslims doing crimes, you might get a visit from your local police.
And they may say, you need to pull down that tweet or face penalties.
Whereas in America, as far as I last saw, the free speech that we've been given and enshrined in the Constitution of the Bill of Rights says that we have the right to say anything we want that is legally protected by the First Amendment, meaning the only things we can't say are a direct threat of violence, Meaning I'm going to hurt X person.
I'm going to do something to them and hurt them.
You can't make those kind of threats.
And you really can't, you know, yell fire in a movie theater, which actually you can, but it's like a gray area because you, if there was a fire, obviously you could.
And if you thought there was a fire, you could.
But if you're doing it with the intent of, you know, causing chaos and disorder and getting people hurt, it gets into the gray area.
So I would just say this, that you can make whatever argument you want that, you know, Twitter is going to save democracy as we know it.
But the fact of the matter is, is that it's not going to save free speech globally because free speech was already lost globally a long time ago.
and we may be lucky enough to save an ounce or a fraction of free speech on the Internet here in America, but I don't even know if that's going to happen because when Elon Musk makes statements like, I want 10% on both sides to be equally angry at me, well, does that mean that he intends to censor 10% of both sides, the people does that mean that he intends to censor 10% of both sides, the people that have been People like myself, for instance, who have been labeled with all these crazy things that aren't true.
They call me a conspiracy theorist, which I guess I am kind of, so that one I'll take that, but there's nothing illegal about conspiracy theories and asking questions.
I just am a conspiracy questioner, really, but ultimately they're going to take the fringe and they're going to shut them down.
Well, that's not free speech absolutism.
That's not even close to it.
You're still censoring 10% of both sides.
You're censoring 20% of the population at that point.
So I don't know what he means when he says things like that, but I do know that it's fair to say that...
The way our society is heading, as I showed you in the beginning, where G. Edward Griffin was talking about different scenarios in which the communists take over and win, one of the biggest pushes the communists always have to do in order to affect their goal is racism.
And what you see is a society that's openly hostile toward white, straight men.
It's just one of those things where it makes no sense to me when I think about it, except that these people have been indoctrinated and demoralized and programmed to the point where they've been desensitized to the idea that they can be racist.
Right?
I mean, societally, it seems like that's where we're at.
Here's a great example.
And I always bring up The View, not because I'm a big fan of Joy Behar and all these other morons that run this show, right?
The coven of witches, if you will, that appear daily on this show called The View.
But it is the fact that this is where a large portion of the population gets its view from.
Right?
See, the reason, I mean, think about it.
We've talked about this before, but television, television, programming.
Why is it called programming?
It's programming your mind.
Why do they call a television show The View?
Because it's your view.
They're imprinting their view onto you, and then you take their view, and then you spouse that out into the world.
That's what this show is.
It's basically a place where uninformed, uninterested parties go to get their political viewpoints from a bunch of babbling witches who have no idea what they're talking about because they've been given their viewpoints from the fake news, corporate media, globalist press and this is what you get.
This is the byproduct you receive here.
Let's watch Sonny Hostin on The View.
Tell us about what really the problem is here and what's going to happen at Twitter.
Watch this.
In fact, on Twitter, it is predominantly straight white men.
So when Elon Musk says, wow, this is about free speech, it seems to me that it's about free speech of straight white.
White men.
And so let them have it.
Let them just go at it.
I enjoyed the block button on Twitter.
I think it has a real outsized influence in our world because politicians and celebrities are on it.
See, what they do is they have to relegate everything down to race.
Because by relegating it down to race, that gives us more cultural division.
We cannot unify on an idea like, say, the idea that we're all Americans and we're all in this together and that we should want our countries to succeed.
We have the best country in the world.
We're an exceptional nation with exceptional values that were given and enshrined through the Constitution.
But moreoverly, that was an enshrinement of the rights given to us by our God, our Creator, These people want to further the division because they're so stupid.
I feel bad sometimes for these people because their IQs are so low that if you could get past the cognitive dissonance which exists in their minds where they have trouble taking two competing theories, if they have a theory or a fact that competes with their fact that they believe, they can't accept that fact so they just ignore it altogether.
If you could get past that, I think these people would see how dumb they've been and how ridiculous their arguments are.
To say that, oh, it's straight white men and they're the ones on Twitter.
That's why Elon Musk is doing this.
It's like, well, wait.
Why shouldn't straight white men have an ability to speak freely?
Why is it that straight white men should have less constitutional protection and they shouldn't be protected by the First Amendment?
What have we done to this person?
And then they'll say, oh, you own slaves.
I didn't own any slaves.
Did you?
I can tell you right now that I don't have any slaves running around my house right now.
But I know that this lady, Sunny Hostin, probably has a whole lot of servants running around her house right now, cleaning things up, maids and butlers and all types of stuff.
So it just goes to show you that these people come and it's their guilt, I guess.
It's this guilt that they have ingrained in them because they have all this money and success, which is artificial because it's just been given to them because they're useful idiots.
And then they turn around and go, well, it must be those evil white people.
It's like, no, no, no, no, no, no.
We see what you're doing.
You're too dumb to see what you're doing.
So, you know, it's almost like You know, it's like, you gotta try your best to live as a Christian and say, forgive them for they know not what they do, except I think in a lot of cases they do know exactly what they're doing, which is, that makes it evil and wrong.
But, you know, here we go.
The next story, Jeff Bezos is suggesting that Elon Musk gives China leverage over Twitter.
Could you imagine a more out-of-touch person saying something so stupid?
Jeff Bezos, this is his post.
So somebody posted here, apropos of something, Tesla's second biggest market in 2021 was China after the U.S. China battery makers are major suppliers for Tesla's electric vehicles.
After 2009, when China banned Twitter, the government there had almost no leverage over the platform.
That may have just changed.
So Jeff Bezos reposts this and says, Interesting question.
Did the Chinese government just gain a bit of leverage over the town square?
Says the hundred plus billionaire who's made probably 99% of that money off of China and selling cheap Chinese crap on his crappy website.
This guy, did China just get leverage in Twitter with Elon Musk?
Maybe.
I wouldn't put it past Elon Musk that he's in bed with the Chinese.
They'd be a great partner for his transhumanist vision of the world.
They're willing to torture and kill their citizens without any reason all the time, for any reason.
But just the fact that he tweeted this is so stupid.
And then he goes out because it was so bad he had to go and answer his own question.
He says, my own answer to this question is probably not.
The more likely outcome in this regard is complexity in China for Tesla rather than censorship at Twitter.
But we'll see.
Musk is extremely good at navigating this kind of complexity.
Yeah, and then some of the replies are pretty hilarious here, saying, how much leverage does China have over the Washington Post, given the percentage of goods sold on Amazon that are dependent on that country for supply?
The way Washington Post disses India, I'd say a lot, but it could be an entirely independent prejudice.
Here's another one.
Somebody posted a Financial Times headline, or the Times headline, saying, Amazon agreed to allow only five-star reviews for Xi's book in China.
Here's another one.
It says, replying to...
It says, did the CIA previously gain leverage with DC local discussion via WAPO? And then it gives examples of the article.
Special report Amazon partnered with China's propaganda arm.
Oh...
And then again, here's somebody, Amazon, to ban the word union on its new worker chat app.
Per internal company, documents leaked to me.
Other banned terms include living wage and slave labor harassment and restrooms.
Yeah, and then they keep going.
They get pretty funny.
But the fact of the matter is that the lack of self-awareness in that one is fairly clear and obvious.
But going into the next story here, Durham drops bomb that lying Adam Schiff was involved in Russia collusion sham in 2016.
Well, we all knew that.
John Durham released some documents yesterday related to the Trump-Russia collusion sham created by the Hillary Clinton gang.
We reported on this earlier.
There's much in the latest release, but one item in particular is that Adam Schiff was involved in the lie from the beginning.
Durham also derides the claim that Fusion was hired for legal work calling that a novel way to cover up opposition research and the derogatory information that they then spread against Donald Trump and his team.
He says that despite efforts, the parties have failed to provide meaningful substantive explanations to support these continuing broad assertions of privilege and or work product protections.
A number of emails have been released in Durham's latest.
One email showed that Pencil Neck Adam Schiff was involved in the Russian collusion lies early as 2016.
It says, call Adam Schiff or DiFi, Dianne Feinstein.
For that matter, I bet they are concerned about this.
Schiff later released a report on Russia collusion that was all lies.
He received no penalties for doing so.
So we all know he was involved in it.
And it seems like everybody's going to get pulled into this investigation.
I just hope people get found guilty and thrown in prison.
That's what I hope.
Next story here, swamp rat Mitch McConnell said he was exhilarated on January 6th that President Trump had finally tarnished his reputation.
Yep, here it is.
According to the new book, This Will Not Pass by Jonathan Martin back on January 6th, McConnell wasn't concerned about the well-being of Trump supporters.
McConnell wasn't concerned about the well-being of the Capitol Police.
McConnell wasn't concerned about the well-being of President Trump or his family.
McConnell wasn't questioning who was behind the riots at the Capitol.
He was apparently sure or was sharing that he was sure that President Trump was behind the riots.
McConnell didn't question why Pelosi prevented the military from being stationed at the Capitol after President Trump requested that they be sent there days before his speech.
McConnell wasn't concerned about the four dead Trump supporters.
McConnell, to this day, isn't concerned about the men locked up in the D.C. Gulag for over a year for constitutionally protesting a stolen election.
McConnell doesn't care that the election was stolen.
This is from the book.
I feel exhilarated by the fact that this fellow finally totally discredited himself, McConnell told Jonathan Martin, a New York Times reporter who detailed the exchange in a new book.
He put a gun to his head and pulled the trigger, the Kentucky Republican reportedly told Martin at the U.S. Capitol in the early hours of January 7th.
Couldn't have happened at a better time.
So these opportunistic vultures, literal vultures like this idiot failure, Mitch McConnell, it tells you everything you need to know.
But here's another thing.
Look at this story.
McConnell is emblematic of Republicans' past and he is the least popular politician in America, but he has the most power.
Oh, how about that?
His approval ratings are through the floor.
His aggregate poll numbers are horrible.
24% of Americans view McConnell favorably.
59% who say otherwise for a net negative of 35%.
McConnell's Democratic counterpart in upper chain, Senator Chuck Schumer, enjoys a 32% favorability rating, while Nancy Pelosi stands at 34%, Kamala Harris at 40%, and Joe at 43%.
So, you know, these numbers mean nothing because I'm sure they're even lower than what they're reporting.
But the fact of the matter is, is that how does the man who is the least popular amongst all conservatives, the one with the most power amongst all conservatives?
Oh, that's right, because we don't actually have a say in what happens.
It's the globalist deep state that picks and chooses who has the ability to say what they want and have the freedom to control and run the party.
Here it is, though.
McCarthy's support among Republicans appears unaffected by leaked audio about Trump resigning.
Here it is.
A reporter finally confronting Kevin McCarthy on his, you know, leaked tape where he said he wanted Trump to resign.
And I'll play that in a second, but think about it.
What are we seeing here?
The two people who have the most power inside the Republican Party are the two people who are the most despised by Republicans at large.
So ask yourself for one second if we're really in this democracy, as they say, right?
How are these people remotely close to the positions of power that they hold?
Well, maybe it's because the whole thing is fixed.
We all know his comments where he said that he believed Trump should resign.
Let's watch the tape here.
And what do they have planned?
You have 160 different countries.
Republicans win.
And to that point, you know what's out there.
The New York Times has released audio of you where days after January 6th you're on a call with House Republican leadership and you're heard on that audio saying that you've, quote, had enough with President Trump and that you would tell him to his face it would be your belief that he should resign.
Do you still stand by those comments?
Look, I never told the President to resign.
It was a conversation that we had about scenarios going forward.
But...
That's not really what critical happened 15 months ago.
What's happening is what's happening on this border right now.
Our border is not secure.
160 different countries of people are coming across.
We now have enough fentanyl in America to kill every American seven times over, and it's actually doing it.
It's the number one cause of death to Americans between the ages of 18 and 45.
This is real life things happening today, and this is what we need to be focused on.
And regarding that audio tape, you had said the New York Times reporting on it was, quote, false and wrong.
Then the tape came out.
Did you lie?
No, because what was brought to me is said that I called the president to say that to resign.
I never called the president to say to resign.
He and I have a very good relationship as we go through.
But what really needs to happen here is we're watching what's happening in this country.
A border that's not secure.
Inflation continuing to rise every day.
Streets that are not safe.
Parents that are being attacked by the Attorney General saying that somehow they're terrorists because they want to go to school board meetings, that all changes where Republicans take the majority.
Does the fact that this audio was leaked in the first place mean that there are some Republicans out there who have some knives out for you?
I think it's probably a little more of the Democrat side as well.
I mean, Elizabeth Warren, Adam Schiff, and Swalwell, you know, those people won't be on Intel anymore, and that's okay.
You can judge me by my enemies.
I think I'll be in good judgment.
Final question on this topic.
Let's say Republicans win, and you're speaker again, or you seek to be speaker again.
Do you think this tape has any impact on that?
No, I don't think it has any impact at all.
What really has impact is what we're doing today.
To make sure Title 42 does not...
The point is that he keeps deflecting and saying, oh, well, it's the border.
It's the border and the fentanyl and all these other things.
He just goes to all the Republican talking points to try to change the subject away from, oh, he betrayed the American people and he said that Trump should resign and blah, blah, blah.
It's like...
These people don't represent us.
They don't speak for us.
They're completely removed from us.
They're run by big corporations, special interests, and the deep state.
And when I see a guy like Kevin McCarthy speak, I have little to no respect for him.
He reminds me of Gavin Newsom.
He kind of talks the same way.
He's got the same little rat-type nasally...
I'm going to do all these things.
You're going to see it at the border.
It's like, no, no, no, no, no.
Dude, I don't take you seriously for one moment.
You're a liar.
You're going to say everything you need to say to try to get elected and try to get the Speaker of the House position.
And then when it comes time for you to do the right thing and stand up for the American people, you're going to do exactly what you've done every time.
You failed on purpose because you're a coward, you're a spineless loser, and you're weak.
That's what it is.
And Look, whether these people are compromised or afraid or whatever it is, they don't do the will of the American people.
They do the will of the deep state, of the globalists, of everyone but the American people.
Because we're just second class citizens.
We're just citizens.
We're just this surf class that are peasants and subjects.
Kevin McCarthy, the biggest thing in his district is farming, big agriculture.
He's standing on the border telling us a bold-faced lie.
Oh, we need to stop what's coming across the border.
No, not according to you.
Why haven't you done anything?
You had ample opportunity to do things many times in the past, but you didn't.
And then going even further, here we are where he's standing at the border.
They want the illegals coming in for the farms.
His biggest special interest donors, these big agricultural companies, the corporations that do the farming for most of America, they want the immigrants coming in.
That's their workforce.
That's the majority of their labor force.
So for him to stand there with the two-face on and tell us, oh, we need to stop the flow over the border, but then at the same time do nothing to stop the flow of the border, it just says everything you need to know.
But Donald Trump Jr.
had a good point.
He said the left is losing its grip on everything and they're freaking out.
Maybe we needed this dementia-riddled dolt as president to sign all the insanity the radicals put in front of him to show America what the Democratic Party is really all about.
When they can't rig the game, and when others have a chance to compete fairly, they lose their you-know-what, and it's glorious.
Well, yeah, I think that sums it up perfectly, and I think that goes back to what we were seeing with the Q drops, where Q was saying sometimes people have to be pushed to the limit, the precipice, to see what's wrong.
That's what that reminded me of, that statement there.
But here's another story.
The big guy...
Had $5 million in unexplained income.
Yes, this is true.
Apparently, you can see that when he says after he left office, Vice President Joe and his wife earned millions of dollars through companies they owned.
In addition to book deals and speaking engagements, they received some cash in the form or some in the cash in the form of cash.
The president reported almost seven million more income on his tax returns than he did on transparency reports filed with the government.
According to an analysis of his financial records by reporters, the first lady's salary and other amounts not required in his reports can account for some of the difference, but still these five point two million dollars earned by Joe's company that is not in his transparency reports.
So, I don't know, is that $5 million related to all these emails that you can see here in this article that talk about paying Hunter Biden's bills and paying for his lawyers to help structure his deals and everything else?
I don't know.
But it would stand to reason that that's very possible.
So, you know, keep that in mind.
But there you go.
That's where we're going to go ahead and leave it.
But before we go, we do our final segment, our God's Grace's Greater segment today.
We're looking at the book of Psalm, Psalm 119.
And we're going to read the second part.
This is Bet.
It's verse 9 through 16.
It says, I have treasured your word in my heart so that I may not sin against you.
Lord, may you be praised.
Teach me your statutes.
With my lips I proclaim the judgments from your mouth.
I rejoice in the way revealed by your decrees as much as in all riches.
I will meditate on your precepts and think about your ways.
I will delight in your statutes and I will not forget your word.
So look.
Kind of going into what we talked about yesterday, a lot of what we have to ask ourselves is, how can we stay pure in this world that's so fallen and so evil?
And it's very simple.
It says here, by keeping God's word, by keeping his commands, by keeping his precepts, but even further, to treasure those in our hearts more than we treasure the riches of this world, right?
Praising God and proclaiming his supremacy over all, That's what we have to focus on in our lives in order to make sure that we can live a life that will help us stay pure in a world that is so fallen.
And I fall short in that and I'm sure you do too sometimes.
But look, we have to keep picking ourselves up and reminding ourselves that we must live by the Word.
Stay in the Word.
Read your Bible every day.
Pick a chapter and just start reading.
It really doesn't matter.
You can start at the beginning or you can start in Proverbs or you can start wherever you want.
But read the Bible, understand what it's telling us and how it's telling us to live, and then use that in your life to give yourself comfort and knowledge that you are going to have your way kept pure by following that.
And it will help in those times, especially when no one's around, when it's so easy to fall into sin without really seeing any repercussion in the short term or even the long term.
We have to control ourselves and live by what God has taught us to live by.
In that way, we will ultimately be able to overcome this evil fallen world and someday be rejoined with Christ in heaven.
But until then, remember to keep his word and that is how we keep our ways pure.
So that's my message.
I hope you share it with your family, your friends, your loved ones, but let's end it with a little bit of prayer.
Dear Lord and Heavenly Father, thank you so much for this day.
Thank you for all of your many great precepts and commands that we are called to keep.
Lord, help us keep our way pure by looking to you in all ways and praising you above all things and making sure that we look to you with more admiration and more love and desire than we do all the riches in this world.
Because ultimately, everything that's of this world comes to nothing, but what is eternal is you.
And we hope to one day be able to live lives worthy of your amazing grace which you've given us, even though we know you gave freely to all through the sacrifice of your Son on the cross.
We thank you for this day and every day, and most of all, our eternal salvation.
In Jesus' name, amen.
Alright guys, that's it for me.
Thanks for watching this episode of Just Informed News.
Make sure you like, share, subscribe, and do all that stuff.
Helps me out big time.
But other than that, we'll see you tomorrow night.
Thanks for watching.
My name is Craig.
▲
Export Selection