All Episodes
Previous Next
Jan. 12, 2022 - Just Informed Talk - Craig James
40:15
Is Ray Epps A Spook? FBI Won't DENY Agents Played Part in Jan. 6 "Riot" | JustInformed News #023
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Hi and welcome to another episode of JustInformed News.
I'm your host Craig.
Today we are going to get into a lot of major news, but before we do that, quick reminder, we start here at JustInformedNews.com, which has a little bit of a different look.
I don't know if you guys noticed.
I've changed up the site.
I've also changed up a few of the graphics and other things here.
Access to different websites.
You can go to Locals.com directly there or here if you want to get signed up on that page.
But Yeah, go check it out.
Make sure you can still get subscribed to get email notifications as soon as these videos are posted.
But you know, this is the new format show, so we jump right into the news.
Then we talk about scripture, and that's it.
So, that being said, jumping right into it, here we are.
Gateway Pundit reporting.
Fireworks GOP senator and medical doctor confronts Dr.
Fauci over Project Veritas' expose.
Fauci has a meltdown.
Now, you can watch the video for yourself, and I'd like to begin this video by saying I don't think we should all be dogpiling on Anthony Fauci.
Man is human after all, and we as humans are all flawed.
We're all sinful, and that's just our nature.
And he, though, takes it to another level with his lies and ambiguity and misuse of his power and authority to do things that he shouldn't do and constitutionally really legally should not be allowed to do.
So with that being said, again, prefacing this by saying we're not here to just dogpile on Fauci because it took a lot more people to pull off what happened in that pandemic with everything from the actual virus itself to You can say it exists or doesn't exist.
It doesn't matter.
They replaced the flu with COVID and then everything became COVID for a year at least before they finally realized that people were catching on to that.
But that being said, it took a lot more people than Anthony Fauci to get this going.
It took governors.
It took people inside the Trump administration, people inside of the CDC, the NIH. It took people across the board in different federal judge positions and political politicians.
And it is a little bit seemingly unfair right now to dogpile on him.
But that being said, if you look at the information that's coming out from Project Veritas, it is very, very seemingly incriminating if you understand what the implications of it are.
With that being said, let's look at the story.
Military documents about gain-of-function contradict Fauci testimony under oath.
As much as I dislike Anthony Fauci's I really do believe that he has been made the face of this so that people can...
This is how our society works at large.
They want to blame everything on one person.
It's kind of a...
I guess it's a group dynamic.
It's a cultural thing that we have in our society.
And it's a psychological thing that they've used in psychological warfare, I think.
And in this case, in the art of deception, the art of war.
Is to put a guy like Anthony Fauci out there and say everything is his fault.
He was responsible for everything that happened and that everyone else who was involved was just basically following orders.
If they ever get caught, that's going to be their way they play it off.
Because remember, that's exactly what happened.
I know I'm digressing to a tangent here, but I think this is important to draw this analogy.
It's exactly what happened with the Russia collusion thing.
All the FBI and DOJ officials who were involved with manufacturing, helping manufacture the steel dossier, then using the steel dossier that they knew was fabricated to go after Trump, and then further going after Trump by spying on him illegally and doing other things to other sitting members of Congress and others.
It was the exact same progression.
They said, oh, we were just following orders.
Oh, it was, you know, first it was Peter Strzok and Lisa Page.
Then it was, oh, well, it was Andrew McCabe.
And then it was, no, but it was Jim Comey.
And then it was, oh, but it was, you know, Rod Rosenstein.
And as you saw, what they did is they just kept passing the buck from one person to the next.
And still to this day, nobody's really faced any consequences for what they did.
And that may be very well the case here with Anthony Fauci, but these documents are fascinating when you look at them in their totality and what they uncover.
So, let's start by going here and reading this article.
Military documents state that EcoHealth Alliance approached DARPA in March 2018 seeking funding to conduct gain-of-function research of bat-borne coronaviruses.
The proposal, named Project Diffuse, was rejected by DARPA over safety concerns and the notion that it violates the gain-of-function research moratorium.
Now that's one of the most critical statements in this whole paper, but we'll look at some of the other implications as well.
The main report regarding the EcoHealth Alliance proposal leaked on the Internet a couple of months ago.
It has remained unverified until now.
Project Veritas has obtained a separate report to the Inspector General of the Department of Defense, written by U.S. Marine Corporal Corps General, Excuse me, U.S. Marine Corps Major Joseph Murphy, a former DARPA fellow, the proposal, quote, does not mention or assess potential risks of gain-of-function research, unquote, a direct quote from the DARPA research rejection letter.
Project Veritas reached out to DARPA for comment regarding the hidden documents and spoke with the chief communications, Jared Adams, who said, it doesn't sound normal to me when asked about the way the documents were buried.
Okay, so let's just break this down very quickly.
What's happened here is that Congress is now questioning Dr.
Fauci on this revelation from Project Veritas, which seems to show that the research that he later signed off on was originally denied by DARPA for basically facilitating because of the which seems to show that the research that he later signed off on was originally denied by DARPA for basically facilitating because of the perception that it would be And if you weaponize a virus and it escapes, then you could cause a lot of damage and kill a lot of people.
And it's very reckless and dangerous.
So here we are.
This is something that's just been uncovered and verified by Project Veritas and it was on Capitol Hill today.
There's a two-minute video here and I guess we have time.
I'll show this to you very quickly and this is just kind of a little look into what they uncovered over at Project Veritas.
Project Veritas has obtained never-before-seen military documents regarding the origins of COVID-19, gain-of-function research, vaccines, potential treatments which have been suppressed, and the government's effort to conceal all of this.
Dr.
Anthony Fauci has testified many times before Congress stating that the U.S. government was never involved in gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
They gained in lethality.
It's a new virus.
That's not gain of function?
According to the definition that is currently operable.
We're not going to get anywhere close to trying to prevent another lab leak of this dangerous sort of experiment.
You won't admit that it's dangerous.
And for that lack of judgment, I think it's time that you resign.
That assertion is based on the NIH's definition of gain of function.
However, the documents we've obtained refute that.
The documents in question stem from a report of the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, better known as DARPA, which were hidden in a top-secret share drive.
But what is DARPA? They are an agency under the U.S. Department of Defense, which facilitates research and technology with potential military applications.
Project Veritas has obtained a separate report to the Inspector General of the Department of Defense, written by the U.S. Marine Corps Major Joseph Murphy, a former DARPA Fellow.
Major Murphy makes claims in his report to the Inspector General that, if true, could be damning to the official narrative that has been played out to the world over the past two years.
Major Murphy's report states that EcoHealth Alliance approached DARPA in March 2018 seeking funding to conduct gain-of-function research of bat-borne coronaviruses.
DARPA rejected the proposal because the work was too dangerous and could violate the gain-of-function moratorium despite EcoHealth's position that it would not.
According to the documents, the NIAID, under the direction of Dr.
Fauci, did not reject the proposal.
They went ahead with the research at Wuhan and several sites across the U.S. So here's the question.
If the Department of Defense, the same people who make our nuclear arsenal, felt this research was too dangerous to proceed with, why in the world did the NIH, NIAID, and EcoHealth Alliance recklessly disregard the risks involved?
So there's a lot of great questions that need to be answered now with the information that's been uncovered inside of these documents.
As it said in the video there, you saw briefly, but it talked about how there was an active effort on the part of, seemingly, the U.S. government to withhold information about We're good to go.
If you see the actual information inside of this report, there's some very breakthrough stuff here.
Ivermectin works throughout all phases of COVID according to a leaked military document.
This is the same document that we were just referencing here.
But let's understand what this is saying.
It's actually saying that ivermectin, identified as curative in April 2020, works throughout all phases of illness because it both inhibits viral replication and modulates the immune response.
Let me ask you this, right?
This is what Eric Weinstein is saying, which I agree with here.
Help me understand DARPA. What am I looking at at 423 about ivermectin?
I don't have the context.
Can you authenticate?
May I see this whole report?
Thank you.
So...
You've got to understand, he's saying that this is misleading.
You DARPA need to know that this is being served at, and he's giving them a link to the information.
So, here's the thing.
Everybody is saying, is this accurate or is this not?
Is this true or is this false?
Did the military know, or were there parts of the government that knew that Ivermectin and other things were working, and they just decided to tell people they couldn't have it and wouldn't give it to them?
I don't know.
But there's a lot more unanswered questions than there are answered questions at this very moment.
If you look at what's happening in Australia, you'll understand very quickly what will happen to our country if we continue down this crazy road that Joe Biden decides to take us down on a regular basis here.
But you see they have empty shelves, which we're already seeing here in America.
But this seems to be in response to a vaccine mandate on truck drivers.
And this is something that could be very dangerous.
But Apparently now, U.S. truck drivers must show proof of vaccine to enter Canada.
And, of course, the Biden regime's vaccine mandate will mean around 30,000 cross-border truckers will be forced to shut down.
We're already seeing it happen in Canada here.
This is where that picture is from.
And you may soon start seeing it on a wider scale here in America.
So stock up, like I say.
Make sure you go and get everything you need to be ready for anything that could happen.
I really think that's important.
COVID survival rate for under-20s is 99.9987%, a Stanford epidemiology professor study shows.
So, yeah.
Look, this is Stanford epidemiology.
Everybody's like, listen to the science.
Trust the science.
Listen to the scientists.
Why are we making kids wear masks?
You have a better chance.
I'm pretty sure the odds are better of you getting in a car accident on the way to school and dying than actually getting COVID and dying.
But I'm not sure.
I'd have to look up the statistics on that.
But I would see more via...
More accurate, I should say.
So...
But, you know, it's anecdotal.
I do not want to have a vaccination.
The science isn't strong enough.
Brave doctor challenges the UK Health Secretary and tells he will not get the jab.
Now, this video I wanted to highlight and show because it is very much worth watching.
I'm going to show it to you, and it is worth every second of this video.
So watch this video and watch the interaction, and watch what they do in the United Kingdom.
This is the same in Canada and Australia and other authoritarian countries.
Look at how the people react when they're asked a question on camera.
They can't give a real response.
And there's only one person that seems like he's a doctor, seems like he's well aware of the science behind it all, who is not afraid to stand up and say, hey, this is what I think we should do, what I think will work for me, for us as a country, right?
So, here we are.
Let's go down.
Let's watch the video.
It's worth it.
I mean, I'm just going to show the whole thing.
Do you think of the new rule to require vaccination of all NHS stuff?
I'm not happy about that.
You're not happy about that?
Tell me.
So I've had COVID at some point.
I've got antibodies.
I've been working on COVID ITU since the beginning.
I have not had a vaccination.
I do not want to have a vaccination.
The vaccine's reducing transmission only for about eight weeks with Delta.
With Omicron it's probably less.
And for that I would be dismissed if I don't have a vaccine.
The science isn't strong enough.
That's your view.
And your views?
Do you have any view on that?
I respect that, but there's also many different views.
And there's another colleague who's also in the same position.
I understand that.
And obviously we have to weigh all that up for both health and social care.
And there will always be a debate about it.
Maybe there's an opportunity to reconsider with Omicron and the changing picture, or at least to nuance it and allow doctors who've had antibody exposure, who've got antibodies, who haven't had the vaccination, to not have it.
Because the protection I've got from transmission is probably the equivalent to someone who's vaccinated.
Yeah, but at some point that will wane as well.
But if you want to provide protection with a booster, you'd have to inject everybody every month.
If it's worn off by two months, yeah?
If the protection's worn off the transmission after two months, then after a month you've still got a bit of protection.
So if you want to maintain protection, you're going to need to boost all staff members every single month, which you're not going to do.
We take advice on how much you made.
But it's not going to achieve a practical benefit.
Well, we take the very best advice that we can.
From the people that are vaccine experts.
Let me explain to you why that conversation was so important and why capturing it is the biggest fear of the establishment at large.
The person who was there, who was talking to the individual, the person who was wearing the mask, who had the bald, shaved head, that was the health secretary in Great Britain, Sajid Javid, right?
This guy is standing here with an actual doctor in a hospital who's explaining to him why he doesn't want the vaccine, why he hasn't taken the vaccine, why he doesn't think that having a vaccine makes sense.
What you notice in that interaction is two things stood out just blatantly to me very quickly is that The first thing that he did was when he acknowledged this individual who came forward and said what he said about vaccines and how he didn't want to take it, he turned to the women, the nurses there, or other doctors.
I'm not making any presumptions.
And he said, do you guys have anything to say about that?
He didn't ask them if they agreed with it because he just was asking...
Do you have anything to say about it?
It's almost like when it's, could you imagine the feeling there?
Because it, and I know a lot of you are there who are maybe watching the show, but it may almost feel like that moment where you're in like the Mafia movie, and the Don walks in, and he goes, and you know, you say something that Don doesn't like, and he turns to his friends, he goes, oh, oh, you guys agree with this guy?
Right?
That was the feeling that you had in that interaction.
This person, doctor, nurse, whatever he is, is brave enough to stand up and keep going and say, look, not only is it crazy, but you'll have to vaccine us every month.
And the guy doesn't Deny it.
That's the thing.
You'd think that the minister would be like, oh no, we're not going to vax you guys every month.
We'll figure out something that'll work.
We'll have a system.
But he just says, well, we listen to people who know what they're talking about.
And there's this awkward pause for a second.
And he realizes that it could be interpreted that he's saying that this person, this doctor or nurse who's talking to him, knows what he's talking about.
His name is actually Dr.
Steve James.
And so he makes this statement to him and he's basically, oh, we trust the vaccine experts.
He says that very clearly.
He catches himself.
We trust the vaccine experts, not you.
Not you little doctors in these hospitals who see patients every day who understand your own immune system probably better than this supposed health minister ever could.
And maybe I'm wrong about that.
I'm making a presumption there.
But I'll say this.
It's just fascinating the society that they've created in these countries where now it's like it's mafia rule.
It's like Oh, and the other people, the women and the other nurses there, didn't seem to want to chime in anything on that.
They knew that that was a radioactive subject that could get them in big trouble if they commented on it.
And I'm sure, I mean, you know how this all works.
This guy's going to probably suffer major repercussions for questioning authority so openly.
As New Yorkers raise hell over COVID segregation in Nike store and Whole Foods saying this is the same thing they did to Nazi Germany.
Everyone was just doing their job until the Holocaust happened.
And I think there's a lot to be understood in this statement, and I believe that all these individuals who did this, I support them 100%.
I don't think that these businesses should be engaging in this medical segregation.
I mean, what's next?
Are we going to start separating everyone from everyone else?
If you have a cold, if you have the sniffles, you can't leave your house.
I mean, that's what they're doing in a lot of these other countries.
That's what they want to bring here.
It's just another form of control.
It's another way to create this fear that's used to then brainwash the masses and then gin them up in what Dr.
Robert Malone described as social mass psychosis, which they've obviously got us to here today.
But if you go to NIH's actual website, just for reference here, you can actually pull up a copy from the National Institute of Health of the Nuremberg Code.
And if you read through it, you know, It actually paints exactly why what they're doing to us is wrong.
Because they tell us the vaccine's not experimental.
Of course it's experimental.
You've been changing it every four months and making a new one.
You were experimenting on us.
And this outlines how experimentation on humans should be done and what's the ethical way.
And there's two things that stood out to me.
Number one is the first and foremost thing.
The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential.
They're obviously already violating the Nuremberg Code because are we giving consent to them mandating vaccines on us and forcibly trying to inject us?
No.
Right?
They haven't crossed that line yet, but in other countries they are.
In some countries they hold people down and shoot them up with a vaccine, like China.
So is that a war crime?
You tell me.
And also here is section number six.
The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.
So...
Are we doing more harm than good?
And I would argue yes.
They're doing a lot more harm than good.
Societally, culturally, economically.
And it's for what?
The flu?
So these people have obviously violated the Norberg codes.
They're criminals.
Crime against humanity.
And this is what we get here.
Watch this.
So go to Rand Paul website and you see fire Dr.
Fauci with a little box that says contribute here.
You can do $5, $10, $20, $100.
Yeah, so this is what we have societally now.
But did Dr.
Fauci interfere in the 2020 election?
The special counsel says it's a close call.
This is from the Federalist over here talking about how Dr.
Fauci disregarded its best practices around the Hatch Act and enabled his official position to be used to make a political point.
So in June, the government, a transparency nonprofit protected or protect the public's trust, filed a complaint against Fauci over an October 2020 interview with The Washington Post.
Published days before the election, the White House medical advisor branded then-candidate Joe Biden as taking the novel Wuhan coronavirus more seriously.
In the article headlined, A Whole Lot of Hurt, Fauci warns of COVID-19 surge, offers blunt assessment of Trump's response.
And Fauci told The Post, you could not possibly be positioned more poorly to confront the pandemic and emphasize the United States needed an abrupt change.
you I mean, you decide for yourself, but I believe that the writing's on the wall, and the fact is that Dr.
Fauci is as political as the day is long, and everything he's done has been political from day one.
It's been to set up this fraud election that was stolen with the mail-in votes that came from COVID. So prove me wrong.
That's what I would say.
Justice Department establishing a new unit on domestic terrorism?
Well, of course they are.
Because domestic terrorism is the number one threat facing the corrupt and criminal Justice Department and FBI. I mean, I say that in jest.
It's half-joking.
I mean, it is fascinating, though, you see these organizations, which, again, I'll be very clear.
There are plenty of people inside these organizations who do good work.
There are a lot of people who have jobs that are so hard and difficult that you couldn't even imagine.
We couldn't imagine.
To those people I say thank you and I say I respect you and I appreciate what you do.
I know a lot of them are saving children.
They're rescuing people from sex trafficking.
They're taking drugs off the streets.
They're stopping violent crimes.
They're doing a lot of great things.
The problem is that there has been this corruption that's seeped in and that corruption has caused a level of malfeasance and blatant, arrogant, just brazenness that you can see for yourself that these people aren't scared of any repercussion for their actions, right?
So, according to Human Events, the Department of Justice is establishing a new unit on domestic terrorism.
The Department's top national security official announced Tuesday, Matthew Olson, the Assistant Attorney General for National Security, made the announcement to lawmakers, noting that the number of domestic terror investigations launched by the FBI more than doubled since March of 2020, per the Hill, I mean.
Huh.
It was right around the time they were setting up, the FBI was setting up Whitmer guys, right?
They were helping to create that whole fiasco.
Yeah, I don't trust it, not for one second.
But now the January 6th committee is claiming they interviewed Ray Epps in November and that he was not a federal informant.
Well, obviously, we should just take them at their word because they're honorable people of integrity.
No, I can't even say that with a straight face.
Obviously, we're dealing with corrupt liars, so when they say something, you can pretty much bet your bottom dollar the opposite is true.
They're probably very scared after this exchange between Ted Cruz and the representative from the FBI today about RAPS, to which the FBI did not answer any of the questions in the affirmative.
Or really at all.
So I'll put this to you.
You can watch the video and you can make your mind up for yourself here.
How many FBI agents or confidential informants actively participated in the events of January 6th?
Sir, I'm sure you can appreciate that I can't go into the specifics of sources and methods.
Did any FBI agents or confidential informants actively participate in the events of January 6th, yes or no?
Sir, I can't answer that.
Did any FBI agents or confidential informants commit crimes of violence on January 6th?
I can't answer that, sir.
Did any FBI agents or FBI informants actively encourage and incite crimes of violence on January 6th?
Sir, I can't answer that.
Ms.
Sadburn, who is Ray Epps?
I'm aware of the individual, sir.
I don't have the specific background to him.
Well, there are a lot of people who are understandably very concerned about Mr.
Epps.
On the night of January 5th, 2021, Epps wandered around the crowd that had gathered, and there's video out there of him chanting, tomorrow we need to get into the Capitol, into the Capitol.
This was strange behavior, so strange that the crowd began chanting, fed, fed, fed, fed, fed, fed.
Ms.
Sandburn, was Ray Epps a fed?
Sir, I cannot answer that question.
The next day, on January 6th, Mr.
Epps is seen whispering to a person and five seconds later, five seconds after he's whispering to a person, that same person begins to forcibly tear down the barricades.
Did Mr.
Mr. Epps, urge them to tear down the barricades.
Sir, similar to the other answers, I cannot answer that.
Shortly thereafter, the FBI put out a public post seeking information on individuals connected with violent crimes on January 6th.
Among those individuals, in the bottom there, is Mr.
Epps.
The FBI publicly asked for information.
Identifying, offering cash rewards for information leading to the arrest.
This was posted and then, sometime later, magically, Mr.
Epps disappeared from the public posting.
According to public records, Mr.
Epps has not been charged with anything.
No one's explained why a person videoed urging people to go to the Capitol, a person whose conduct was so suspect the crowd believed he was a Fed, would magically disappear from the list of people the FBI was looking at.
Ms.
Sandburn, a lot of Americans are concerned that the federal government deliberately encouraged illegal and violent conduct On January 6th.
My question to you, and this is not an ordinary law enforcement question, this is a question of a public accountability.
Did federal agents or those in service of federal agent actively encourage violent and criminal conduct on January 6th?
Not to my knowledge, sir.
Thank you.
Senator Leahy?
Alright, so what you saw there was an exchange between Ted Cruz and an FBI official, and it was about what happened on January 6th.
And I cannot tell you anything that was positive about that exchange.
I can't find anything about it.
I mean, if anything, it makes the FBI look incredibly guilty.
And it makes them look really, really guilty when you consider the fact that there's videos of Ray Epps literally telling people, we're going to break into the Capitol.
We're going to do it.
Let's do it.
He's like telling people to break down fences.
He's like bullhorning people to keep moving in.
And this guy is still out there.
And that means he was obviously working with the feds or he has some sort of immunity or something.
Right?
Some sort of agreement where he was working on their behalf.
So they're basically, again, in another situation where they're orchestrating something they shouldn't have been orchestrating or they're covering up something they shouldn't be covering up.
And here we are as a society suffering the consequences for their actions, their misdeeds.
DOJ creates a specialized unit, and we just covered that story.
But also going further, former CIA director Gina Haspel now works with Trump enemies, Rod Rosenstein, Sally Yates, at an international law firm.
Are you surprised?
Look, these people are all in the same boat.
They're in the same club, and guess what?
We ain't in it.
So...
I did a story yesterday about Kazakhstan and a bioweapons lab that was reportedly, according to Russia, ransacked by rioters and possibly released some sort of pathogens that could be very deadly.
At the same time, you're hearing rumors of a hemorrhagic fever spreading through China.
And then this story comes out today.
China offering Kazakhstan assistance as President says Afghan militants infiltrated country.
So according to this story, it seems China's now offering assistance to Afghanistan to overcome this uprising that seemingly was spurred by a set of moves by the now ruling dictator in that country,
I guess you'd have to call him at this point, president, I should say, who has decided to Basically, he arrested his right-hand man who was a close associate of individuals that were associated with Hunter Biden.
He was even part of the Hunter Biden laptop scandal.
This person was directly involved with deals that seemed to paint Hunter Biden as the go-between for Joe Biden and this man, this individual, this former prime minister who was arrested and put on charges of high treason, which is what seems to have started this former prime minister who was arrested and put on charges of high treason, which is what seems to have started the riots in the
Now we're seeing China offering to help and Russia's already dispatched troops to this area.
So we're seeing something take off in the Middle East right now that should be kept with a close eye on.
And I think we, we know what Kazakhstan really is.
I've talked about this previously, but Kazakhstan is the capital of the New World Order, it seems.
A lot of their architecture and things pop up in their capital, and that seems to be where a lot of people have planted a lot of large fortunes and have sat just as a place where they can go.
When the world's going to get reordered.
There's a whole backstory and history to it.
I'll get into it in another episode.
I've done it before.
New footage from We the People Arizona Alliance shows Maricopa County election workers removing mail-in ballot envelopes from trash and shoving them in drawers.
Totally normal.
It takes stuff out of the trash all the time, right?
And finally here, if you guys aren't on Locals.com yet, please consider becoming a member.
JustInformedTalk, the community, is here.
You guys can go check it out.
You can get exclusive content.
You're not going to get anywhere else.
I only put my vlog, it's a weekly vlog, here on JustInformedTalk community here on Locals.com for only those who support my channel financially.
So look, you guys, when you support this channel, it makes a huge difference.
I really appreciate it.
So when you come here and become a member of my community after you sign up or sign in, make sure you go over here and manage your support and consider making a donation where you hit subscribe now.
And then you can enter your information and you can become a supporter of this channel.
I really appreciate it.
It makes all the difference in the world.
So that being said, a few more quick stories here.
LA Times colonists says mocking anti-vaxxers' deaths is necessary.
Not surprised.
When most of the public thinks of pedophilia, they assume it's synonymous with child sexual abuse.
A pedophile is an adult who is sexually attracted to children, but not all pedophiles abuse kids, and some people who sexually abuse kids are not pedophiles.
According to U.S. Today Life, this was actually put out there, Donald Trump Jr.
went ballistic on Here you can see what he wrote saying the internet is forever a-holes.
Good try on the delete, though, because they deleted this tweet.
USA Today tries to understand pedophiles.
So you see what they're doing here.
They're trying to put this out there.
They're trying to normalize it.
That's what Donald Trump Jr.
points out, and that's exactly what societally they're doing.
This is a funny one.
Is your child a far-right extremist?
There are warning signs.
Aversion to drug, alcohol, and porn.
Interest in physical fitness and mental well-being, growing collection of classic literature, monogamy and a desire to marry and procreate, increased time spent outdoors or in nature, appreciation of nation history and culture, disdain for modernism, post-modernism.
Yeah, that's it.
And finally here, a little humor.
This is what's happening in the UK and Australia to a lot of people, and even here in the United States.
It's cognitive dissonance, and I thought this meme encapsulates what it really is right here.
He's showing them a chicken, but it says, he's saying to them, this is a goat, and they're all just repeating back, this is a goat.
That's where we're at, ladies and gentlemen.
Alright, and now let's do what we always do here at the end of the episode.
We do our segment, God's Grace is Greater.
We're going to look at some scripture here.
This scripture in particular we're looking at is out of the book of Job.
You guys kind of may know the book of Job.
You may understand the story in general.
If you've read it, you'll understand that Job's a very complex story and it has a lot to do with us understanding that God knows more than we do and that his judgment is going to be infinitely more precise and accurate for what is needed in the world than ours.
And even though we think things can be unfair at times, that if we just keep our faith in God, ultimately it will work out.
And it may not work out the way we want, but it will work out according to God's plan, and we have to be okay with that.
That's like a part of the humility you learn from submitting yourself to God and Christ, His Son.
The verse I want to share with you is out of the back end of the book here, chapter 31.
This is basically Job saying, what have I done?
It says, This is almost like Job's calling out and saying, look, I don't...
If I've done something wrong to deserve this, then judge me fairly based on that.
But if I haven't done anything to deserve this, then, you know...
What have I done wrong?
What am I not doing right here?
And this is a part of, I believe, Job's reconciliation with the idea that God just is all-knowing and all-powerful.
Job never gets a full answer.
I mean, he does have everything he lost kind of restored in a way.
That wasn't necessarily a test of Job's faith to say, oh, we'll take everything away, and then if you pass the test, we'll give it back.
It was more like God's going to make a decision.
He's going to make a decision.
You're better off just submitting yourself to His will and letting things work out how they work out.
Now, whatever God's will is for you, then as you turn yourself over to it and you trust that it is good and you believe that and that you know where you end up at the end of things, I think that's the moral of the story here.
So I just want us to remember that the life of faith trusts that God will reward people for what we have done.
And so we have to look at the long term.
We consider the impact of our actions.
Today's benefit, today's temporal benefit is It can also lead to tomorrow's curse.
Whatever we gain today by living disobediently, we have to remember we can't outrun the justice of God.
And His plan is going to take its course no matter what.
So the good news is this.
We also can't outrun God's mercy and His forgiveness.
So as we set out right our wrongs, remember this, that God will surely bless us even if we don't see that blessing today.
Even like with Job where he couldn't see it in the moment.
But when God came to him and showed him the vastness of his incredible universe and how he controls everything, I think Job finally understood that it's in God's hands.
It's not in my hands.
So questioning God, yelling at God, getting angry at God, it doesn't do any good.
The only thing that makes sense, the only thing that does you any good is calling out to God to come and be there with you, to have mercy on you, to show His grace upon you.
And look, We all are human.
We're going to be like Job at times.
We're going to question why this happened.
It's unfair.
But just remember, in your heart, and you know this, that God is only looking out for what's best for you, and he has the whole universe under his control, and you have to trust in his plan for you.
So, for that, here we're going to end it with a prayer.
Dear Lord, help us love your teachings and follow your ways.
Even if our obedience means greater challenges today.
And we thank you most of all, Lord, for our eternal salvation through Jesus Christ.
In Jesus' name.
Amen.
Alright, guys.
Thanks for watching this episode.
That's pretty much where I'm going to wrap it up.
We've been a little long today, but that's it for me.
Thanks for watching.
See you tomorrow.
▲
Export Selection