Sasha Latypova argues vaccines cause 98% of chronic illnesses, citing a study showing 400-500% increases in autoimmune and neurodevelopmental issues among vaccinated individuals. She claims the vitamin K shot and fetal cell-derived vaccines drive this crisis, while alleging the pharmaceutical industry operates as a mafia shielded by laws like the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Act. Latypova asserts that avoiding these interventions reduces risk to 2%, noting the Amish thrive due to non-vaccination, and predicts a future where younger generations reject shots to reverse current hospital overcrowding and early die-offs caused by forced immunization policies. [Automatically generated summary]
Transcriber: CohereLabs/cohere-transcribe-03-2026, WAV2VEC2_ASR_BASE_960H, sat-12l-sm, script v26.04.01, and large-v3-turbo
Time
Text
The Forgotten COVID Era00:12:27
From the time when you and I first spoke during the COVID era to now, a lot has changed.
Yeah.
Firstly, people have forgotten that there was this whole COVID era.
Have you noticed?
It's as though it never existed.
I find that baffling.
Yeah.
Yeah.
A lot of people, well, I mean, I understand, you know, like a lot of people want to, the ones who fell for it and, Probably on the bubble, and they know that they were fooled.
They want to forget because it's embarrassing, it's humiliating, it's also scary because they're what have we done?
What have we done to our children?
But they don't want to face it head on.
And so the next most common thing is you escape it, you try to pretend it didn't happen, you live in denial.
Would you go back to 2019?
Knowing what you know now, no, no, no, and and and my life was very charmed at that time.
Very, you know, I can say I was absolutely happy, I was doing what I loved, I had no worries in my life, and it was blissful, frankly.
Um, but I don't want to go back there, I much prefer knowing the truth.
Well, I mean, me too.
I mean, if it weren't for the covert era.
My child would be vaccinated and he isn't.
And that's such a blessing.
I am so delighted for your child.
I'm so delighted.
It's beyond words.
Yeah.
It's amazing because that gives me hope.
Certainly, you know, people like you who are having children now and are well aware, it makes it all worthwhile.
I'm going to play a video clip.
I think this will.
Set the tone for the conversation.
And over the next decade, as more and more patients chose not to vaccinate, I got to see the difference.
But I wanted to see could I prove it?
So we got all the data from my practice.
We looked at every baby born into my practice and published it in an international journal of public health.
What we found, and that study was peer reviewed, it was robust, we found massive increases.
I mean, we're talking four to five hundred percent more allergies, autoimmune conditions.
Neurodevelopmental issues, and then we had infections of all kinds.
Massively increased in the vaccinated compared to the unvaccinated.
What happened when I published that study?
Within days of it being available online, I get a call from my attorney.
Don't go see any patients, don't write any prescriptions, don't go into the office.
Your license has been emergently suspended.
You are a threat to public health.
What's today?
Today is the last time I will be doing clinical medicine in Oregon.
Knowing that you guys are keeping it going, the heart of this place lives on.
My currently very well researched and backed up theory, and this is a working theory that I have, and I invite anyone to try to overcome it, is that vaccines are by far the number one driver of all chronic illness at all age.
So starting from babies into the late 80s, the number one driver.
Is vaccines, vaccinations, and other injections such as, for example, vitamin K shot that they push on the babies at birth.
And I can discuss it in more detail, but basically, people always fight me because there is this propaganda narrative that you have gazillion different causes of chronic illness.
It could be lurking just about anywhere.
So the narrative goes like this First, if you ask them what causes chronic illness, you will have a response such as, We're baffled.
We just don't know what caused cancer in this 25 year old.
We're baffled.
Next, next.
Layer is it's everything, it's absolutely everything.
You know, look at the you know, on the in California, there's a so called Proposition 65, and they will put stickers everywhere saying this, you know, this is known to cause cancer.
And it will be stickers will be on Starbucks cups, I found them on a package of walnuts.
You will find them on cabinetry saying this, this is known to cause cancer.
You will find them on gas stations, you'll find them everywhere.
So, the message is cancer is lurking everywhere.
And then, but it's definitely not vaccines, like this person who published a really good study from the video from CHD that you showed.
It's definitely not vaccines.
And if you publish solid scientific data contradicting this narrative, you immediately get kicked out of your profession and persecuted.
And then they have other layers of defense.
But the data is that.
The vaccines cause 98% of all chronic illness.
The 98% of risk that you personally face of getting any chronic illness, especially serious chronic illness like cardiovascular cancer, neurodegenerative, autoimmune, 98% of that risk is given to you by vaccines.
And only 2% risk is everything else.
Everything you can think of, glyphosate, trace glyphosate.
I'm not saying, you know, if you.
All of a sudden, like sprayed in glyphosate, that's safe.
No.
But trace glyphosate that you might encounter in cereals, or even the cam sprain, the EMF radiation that has some legitimately health risks, all of this combined, all of those other things that you think about, all of it combined only contributes 2% to the total risk of chronic illness.
You know, and I welcome anyone to disprove it.
And every time I get in an argument and people are saying, oh, it's just toxic food that Americans eat.
Seriously?
Did you see what we ate in the Soviet Union?
And, you know, all that stuff.
Oh, it's just how toxic food supply RFP Jr. is fighting for us.
And, you know, all of those things.
Every time I encounter somebody like that, I'm like, okay, fine.
You just bring me a study that shows that.
You can induce cancer by feeding somebody something.
Okay, if you feed them like carbohydrates and sugar, show me that you can induce cancer.
Those don't exist.
But I can show you numerous ways of inducing cancer by injections.
And so, anyway, so this is like, this is what I'm saying.
You have to keep in mind vaccines contribute over 90% of the total risk of the chronic disease for the entire population, entire lifespan.
And everything else, Is about 2%.
So that's why we need to focus.
And the propaganda narrative wants us to focus on anything but vaccines, including on both sides of freedom now, including our brave HHS leadership.
And this is a constant battle, and this is what we need to bring people's attention to.
You mentioned vitamin K.
Now, most people don't even know what that is.
Yeah, that's the next level of research I'm going to be doing actually into vitamin K.
But yeah, it's another giant.
Scam, really, and a very dangerous one.
Well, as it happens, I looked into it before my kid was born and I told them not to give him vitamin K. In many states across the US, you cannot say no to vitamin K.
Yeah, correct.
So, today, the hospitals in many states, there are some states that are worse than others, but it's horrific what's happening around pregnancy, delivery, and neonatal.
Because they're extremely militant.
They push the injections, especially like any injections, and vitamin K by itself.
So, first of all, babies don't need vitamin K.
But I will write more about this in detail.
They don't need vitamin K.
But the vitamin K shot is not just the vitamin K, it contains all the adjuvants that vaccines contain.
It contains aluminum, it contains all those other toxic things that are injected with vaccines for the same reason because they want immune response.
And the data that I've Presented and shared and published on this control group project, they actually specifically looked into the difference between totally unvaccinated people and totally unvaccinated people who also avoided vitamin K and whose mother wasn't vaccinated in pregnancy.
So, purely unvaccinated and unjabbed with any things.
And so, the mother's vaccination and vitamin K contribute.
So, the risk goes like without it, the risk is 2% of chronic illness.
With it, with maternal vaccination and vitamin K, the risk is already 13%.
So the risk dramatically jumps up just with the vitamin K shot.
And so it's not anything benign, it's just as dangerous.
And yes, they are extremely militant in some states.
They will call CPS and the Child Protective Services on you, they will remove your parental rights, they do enormously evil things to force people to inject babies with this.
And they fear monger and they tell, oh, your baby's going to have a brain bleed and all that.
That's nonsense.
That's nonsense.
That's actually based, again, I'm going to write more extensive analysis of this.
They claim that babies have too thin blood.
Their blood is way too thin.
And we need to coagulate it.
It's the most ridiculous statement I've ever heard.
Babies have the highest percentage of water per body weight than any other.
At any other point in time, we progressively lose water as we grow, our body mass grows, but the percentage of water declines.
And then when we age, we actually lose body mass and water.
And like older people visibly shrink because they're literally smaller now.
And so, and the percentage of water in the baby is something like 85%, and in the old person is something like 55%.
All this is is babies just have more water content than older people.
Sasha, but I think there's something else that they don't tell you.
You're supposed to actually wait for all the blood and nutrients and whatever else from the mother to get transferred through the umbilical cord.
They don't wait, they cut it quickly.
Yeah, exactly.
So that's an additional point that you need to wait all those factors.
God created us perfect.
Babies come out completely perfect.
Nothing needs to be done to them.
Nowhere it says, well, which other animal species do we have, you know, comes with a bag of prescription meds and injections.
It's nuts, okay?
And so, based on that harebrained theory, they force this very dangerous injection with aluminum into every newborn, right when they're born.
Autism and Mental Illness Links00:12:57
It just defies any logic.
Andy Wakefield was on my podcast, and he, I think, was one of the first to.
Have the pharmaceutical industry attack him for finding.
He didn't even find a link.
He found a very loose correlation and they totally destroyed him.
Yeah, and he said something really mild, like, you know, maybe this should be considered.
And yeah, there was a total destruction of his reputation, career, everything.
You can never, in vaccines and approval of vaccines, they never do placebo control, true placebo control studies.
Ever.
And actually, you know, and that applies to the entire field of virology.
They never use actual scientific method.
So it's another one that I've been, you know, in frequent debates about with people who spend their life in virology or molecular biology or some related field.
And they, you know, they may be even well intended, you know, intentioned people, but we get into debates and I'm saying, look, you know, you can't show me a single study from virology, you know, for the past hundred years.
You can't find a single study, single paper published where there is actual true control involved.
And the scientific method requires testing the null hypothesis with proper controls, the placebo controls or well designed positive and negative controls.
And they never do it.
So it means that they never use the scientific method ever.
And they just make these claims, these grandiose claims, and then they inject people with poison based on those claims, and then they compare poison and poison so that they never show.
Any like true difference, true outcomes.
And it becomes ridiculous because the population gets progressively more poisoned and then they do more comparisons on already poisoned population.
So, I mean, so what's happening here is that they can't really do a true, what did you call it, double blind study because what, 99% of America is already vaccinated.
Well, yeah, depends for what.
But right, so they can't really even compare now with the truly unvaccinated.
So, this study I'm referring to, the control group project, they found about 100,000 unvaccinated people, but the completely unvaccinated, or like somewhat unvaccinated, I would say.
But then out of that, they found about 1,500 completely, completely unvaccinated people.
And so that's what you need to understand this whole impact.
And so that's why this study is so valuable because it actually does look into that issue.
And it also kind of, they did, you know, they divided the risk by, you know, you have maternal vaccination, the vitamin K shot, and then how many vaccines afterwards did you receive to really study how the risk of chronic disease changes with increase in vaccination.
And that's extremely important.
And of course, the CDC and all the public health officials all over the world, they don't want this.
This is their kryptonite.
I mean, they can't.
They can't allow this to be publicly known.
So, for clarity, all vaccines?
Yes, all vaccines, all vaccines.
So, there's also variation as far as what kind of damage and what kind of, like, typically what kind of illnesses you will see.
And there are, of course, differences how the traditional vaccines were made, let's say 50, 60 years ago, or how then the recombinant protein vaccines started being made.
And now, the final, final next generation is this mRNA monstrosity.
And that's a whole different ball of wax.
So, like, they progressively, the technology itself becomes progressively more toxic.
And the traditional vaccines are not safe.
I mean, they're very dangerous, too.
And once you know what vaccine injury looks like, even mentally going back now, I know in the Soviet Union, I know this person, this person, this person.
Even in myself, I recognize signs of vaccine injury now.
Based on those childhood vaccines that I received.
But they pale in comparison and what is going on, like with the recombinant ones, they started this.
So, recombinant ones, for example, added on this whole, you know, like the transgender stuff.
It's a lot of it is propaganda and bullying and pressure on young teenagers and children.
But also, a lot of it is in induction, initial induction of.
Let's say gender confusion, which is part of sort of mental illness, which is driven off of psychiatric effects of these shots.
And we know that, let's say, recombinant vaccines, they contain a lot of synthetic DNA and plasmids, and they have a lot of features that are very similar to the mRNA shots.
And you can kind of trace it.
So, like, the development of this psychiatric condition comes as a wave after the The recombinant technologies were more widely introduced.
That's an example.
And now with mRNA, we have yet new types of things like turbo cancer, the heart attacks and strokes in babies, a lot of ocular nerve damage, immediate blindness, microstrokes, microclotting, those white abnormal clots, and stuff like that.
And that's a feature of.
This new platform.
So, like every time they have some sort of a new platform, you see a different wave of different effects.
Wait, so you're suggesting that there could actually be a connection between certain vaccines and mental illness and, for example, the whole LGBTQ thing?
Oh, yeah.
Oh, yeah.
So, you know, I'm not saying that, you know, the condition of being gay is because of vaccines.
I.
I don't have a very good link to that.
I doubt it.
And certainly, gay lifestyle precedes vaccination by thousands of years.
So we can safely say that maybe just the gay lifestyle is its own thing.
But the whole issue with transgenderism and.
Which is new.
I mean, it's only been around, what, 20 years, not even?
Right, 20 years, exactly.
And the recombinant protein vaccines actually coincide with that pretty well.
But the ones that are carrying.
Now, I'm saying DNA loosely, I mean synthetic DNA, it's just a chemical compound, okay?
But the way they make them, the way that they can then transfect the cells, so get.
Be inside cellular membranes is carrying much more damage.
And if that happens, let's say in the brain, or even like we don't really have a good theory of mind, it's not even clear that our mind is in our brains.
And so, wherever it gets into the system that affects psychiatric conditions, it could be also based on the gut flora, you know, killing off gut flora and it gets replaced with different species because the gut produces a lot of neurotransmitters.
And so The gut could drive the psychiatric health.
And we know that, for example, in autism recovery or improvement of the symptoms, it's important to focus on the gut flora.
Why?
Because of the same thing.
Because neurotransmitters are made by your gut bacteria.
And if, for example, they get killed off by these plasmids that are floating around, which is the E. coli cells will pick up plasmids.
That's how they do it in biomanufacturing.
So you have E. coli cells in your gut.
This plasmid comes in with some foreign toxic material, the E. coli will pick it up and start reproducing that instead of making your normal neurotransmitters.
Well, and that affects, of course, your psychiatric state.
It can result in ADHD, anxiety, and anxiety is like it's a very broad, you know, you have anxiety.
If you have chronic anxiety, it can manifest in a variety of ways.
You can become depressed, you can become suicidal, or you can.
Start having because you're depressed and suicidal, you start having transgender ideologies because you feel like you never feel okay in your body.
And so, and here comes your teacher and says, Oh, let's go into the secret room where your parents can't access these files, and let me talk to you about becoming a boy, or if you're a girl, or a girl if you're a boy.
You know, this is what, and this is what's going on in California.
In California, for example, after a child is 12 or 13, I have a nephew here, and this is an issue right now.
Not the transgenderism, but the access to data for parents.
After the child is 13, the parents cannot see their medical records.
So the doctors can start transitioning him in the school secretly.
And you, as a parent, you won't see the records.
So that's how this whole That's how they feed off of this poisoning of children.
It's multifaceted, but they have created this whole entire system where they want to take away the children, poison them, and then in a variety of ways.
And then, based on the results of the poisoning, they'll harvest this into their own financial interests, whatever those are the gender transitioning or just having them dependent.
Autistic children are very profitable.
It's a huge industry.
It's a multi billion dollar industry of all these, you know, autistic care and autistic research and autistic, and it depends on the supply of autistic children.
And the supply of autistic children depends on vaccination.
So there we go.
And everybody's on the spectrum these days, have you noticed?
Yeah.
Yeah.
Yeah, again, in California, it's one in 12 boys officially diagnosed with autism.
This is a catastrophe.
And California continues the most draconian ways of prosecuting parents, forcing children to vaccinate.
It's incredible what's going on.
And it's not the only state that, and it's California, New York, Illinois, West Virginia, Connecticut.
I mean, they're all incredibly awful.
But let me play devil's advocate for a second.
Could it also not be argued that, I mean, autism isn't a thing?
You can't just look at it under a microscope.
Could it be possible also that they're just completely over diagnosing and just calling everything autism?
Well, it's certainly a spectrum.
So there are more functioning people and far less functioning people.
But by any metric you look at it, it skyrocketed so high that, and also the prevalence of severe and nonverbal autism.
Skyrockets in the same proportion.
So you can't say, you can exclude the lower, you know, you can say, well, maybe we can cut the data and exclude the more functioning people and call it something else, Asperger, I don't know.
But we still have this humongously increasing incidence of severe nonverbal autism, children that need to be institutionalized, children that can't care for themselves for the rest of their lives.
It's an incredible human tragedy.
And it is.
Driven by vaccines.
Also, in the same in control group study, the incidence of autism was less than 1% in the unvaccinated group, but that less than 1% was contributed solely by those whose mothers were vaccinated and who received a K shot.
The people who did not have those, it was zero autism.
Polio Virus Claims Exposed00:07:17
And overall, in the unvaccinated group, we had zero incidence of cancer, zero.
For entire lifespan, from children.
To 80 year olds and zero incidence of cardiovascular disease, and that's the number one killer today.
So, again, when we talk about vaccines, Sasha, what exactly are you referring to?
Is it just injectables or also the ones that you put on the tongue?
Yeah, I would stay away from those as well.
So, the ones they the oral ones, I think it's only polio today, and I'm not aware of.
I mean, there's like flu mists, those are the mists.
Also, I would avoid that.
But the oral polio vaccine, and that's a horrendous thing.
I've actually written an extensive review, and together with my colleague, Debbie Lerman, we started looking in detail into this polio situation.
And I'm kind of perplexed that nobody in the space, in the people who are writing about polio, have ever mentioned this.
Because until I didn't know, I've read other people's work on this, and until I myself went looking, I was like, why didn't anybody mention this?
But basically, poliovirus so they claim there are multiple strains of poliovirus, right?
And there's poliovirus 1, poliovirus 2, and poliovirus 3.
And they have sub strains, but in general, it's these categories.
The main strains are these 1, 2, and 3.
Poliovirus 1 was Allegedly isolated in 1941.
If you go look on search, they will say, oh, it was isolated in 1941 by Francis and Mack.
Walter Mack was one of the key people in this.
And I went looking for them.
I was like, okay, I would like to see that paper of isolation and read it.
And I found that paper and I published it on my Substack.
So that isolation magic was from three children who were killed by tensilectomy surgery.
Actually, not even from those three children.
It's even funnier than that.
Not funny.
It's a tragedy.
So there was a family in Ohio that had five children, or they have six children, five of them.
Had tensilectomy on one day, and after this tensilectomy, three of them died, and two of them were severely injured.
And a team of CDC warriors immediately descended to help the hospital avoid liability for botched tensilectomies by claiming it was polio.
But it wasn't.
There was no polio in that community.
So after these children died, they come in and they start contact tracing all the, you know, Children's playmates and cousins and stuff like that, and they collected 54 stool samples from everyone who was never exposed to polio, never had polio, there was no polio in the community.
And then they said, Oh, and from these other three children who had nothing to do with anything, they were completely healthy, but they somehow were friends with the deceased children, we've isolated polio virus one, and that was the basis of the SOC vaccine.
That's your polio virus.
It never existed.
And then the polio virus 2 and polio virus 3 are completely secret.
There are no isolation papers.
They're saying they were taken from people who had polio, but you can't find any source material.
And frankly, it never existed.
Maybe somebody just in the military said so.
And now, from then on, these strains, where they came from, no trace, no information.
But they are the ones that are responsible today for any polio case in the world, those.
Vaccines.
They said polio, wild virus, is eradicated.
The only source of polio today in the world are those polio virus vaccines, and the oral polio vaccine is based on those strains two and three.
And polio was a pesticide?
Well, they started calling polio anything under the sun.
It's just like Lyme disease.
It's a collection of things that generally somebody has some form of paralysis.
Today, for example, Guillaume Barre.
That's polio.
That's what they were diagnosing as polio.
But now they're saying it's Guillain Barre because it's usually a flu vaccine injury and also it's common with mRNA vaccines.
But we can't call it polio, and so we have to call it Guillain Barre.
But in the 50s and 60s, the same exact saying was called polio.
So any sort of event where there is like a partial paralysis, numbness, some sort of a central nervous system involvement, partial or complete paralysis.
With or without recovery, or maybe just high fever and diarrhea, and they would say, Oh, yeah, it's polio.
So, but that can be induced, yes, by pesticides, by insecticides, by botched tensilectomies, botched dental surgeries, botched, you know, other surgeries, you know, anywhere you can produce this effect.
And then they will say, Well, no, it's not the hospital's fault, it's polio virus.
It's a scary thing that just attacked us, you know?
But what's actually going on here is that as Your work shows if vaccines are creating these illnesses, they're not taking them away.
Yeah, vaccines are creating these illnesses.
So, for example, another thing that even today the Chad GPT will admit, you can make it admitted, that, for example, Franklin Delano Roosevelt, the US president in the 40s, who famously had polio, right?
So he was in a wheelchair because of polio.
Well, turns out that wasn't polio, it was Guillaume Barre.
And Chad GPT will also say, well, yeah, it wasn't classical polio because.
Classical polio is like one side, and he had both sides simultaneously.
And he just like suddenly got paralyzed when he was on vacation in his compound somewhere in Nova Scotia.
And well, I'm thinking he was vaccinated and he got paralyzed.
And even today, they admit it's Guillaume Barre wasn't polio.
But he is the face of polio, you know.
What is it about a vaccine that does this?
I mean, it sounds like a very broad question because.
Supposedly, vaccines are all different.
I'm guessing the mechanisms are all the same.
So, what is it then that causes this illness?
They're not all the same.
That's the problem.
So, I mean, there are, I would say there are categories of mechanisms that are in many of those shots.
But the problem with number one with vaccines is they are never made to any particular specification.
Vaccine Anaphylaxis Mechanisms00:03:40
So, they're always variable.
They're always a concoction of things that are.
Well, traditional ones were based more on the organic matter, but it was always like any organic matter that you take out of the organism immediately starts dying and decaying.
And so they have this dying, decaying matter monkey cells, aborted fetal cells, they throw in some bovine serum and it's just an incredible amount of absolute garbage and sewage that they brew and filter and then it's all decaying.
In decomposing, so you can never make it consistent and reproducible.
And so they just, and they never regulated them as pharmaceutical drugs.
It was always like, initially it was made just by CDC without any regulations.
Eventually it was brought into the FDA, but with a whole bunch of legal ways of avoiding regulation.
And today that's the case, like they avoid all regulation.
And they just brew this decomposing stuff.
And then you have to guess what, and then they add metals to it as adjuvants, and they add a lot of food products as adjuvants, and they call them generally regarded as safe because they're food, but food is absolutely not safe to inject.
And so that kind of composition, rough approximation, also varies batch to batch, vial to vial.
And so what individual person gets is a mystery.
And then how individual body reacts to it is also a mystery, but there are different known mechanisms.
Population studies and other research, we can figure out that there are multiple mechanisms.
So, for example, the injection of food proteins will result in the effect of anaphylaxis, which was described by Charles Richet in 1913 and he received the Nobel Prize for it.
So, anaphylaxis is generally speaking going to be produced in a small percent of the population, but pretty significant, something on the order of 5 to 10 percent will develop it with each injection.
And if you, for example, if you were injected with peanut oil as adjuvant, which was Merck's adjuvant for a long time, you will have a peanut allergy.
If you injected with albumin adjuvant from cereals, corn, soy, rice, you will have allergy to gluten, corn, soy, rice.
If gelatin was there, you will have alpha gal or shellfish gelatin from fish gelatin, or various other.
Ah, and the famous one is.
Linoleic acids, which is oils and proteins from like canola and those seed oils, right?
So it's not that the seed oils are dangerous.
It's when you inject it with them as part of vaccines, you will develop anaphylaxis to them.
So at the next encounter with seed oils, when you start eating them, you're going to have allergy, gut reaction, and eventually insulin sensitivity.
And in some cases, you will develop diabetes and obesity.
So that's how, you know, that's the effect of anaphylaxis.
Then injection with metals will have another pathway of damage, and that's primarily caused by stripping what's called zeta potential from blood flow and other colloidal fluid flows in your body.
Stopping Harmful Injections Now00:13:52
And, you know, blood flow has all the components of the blood, such as cells, red blood cells, white blood cells, you know, different lipids and proteins.
That are in it are all separated from each other by negative charge on the surface of the cell.
It's called Zeta potential.
And because of that negative charge, they're kept separate and they're all flowing.
And if that charge starts diminishing for whatever reason, then there will be pileups.
And if it's quickly diminished, you will see that the fact that they were showing with fresh blood and then pouring vaccines under the microscope and looking at the microscope, what happens?
With the fresh blood.
And we saw immediate clumping and immediate these rouleau patterns forming, right?
So the red blood cells stuck together like coins.
So that's the effect of stripping zeta potential.
Why?
Because lipid nanoparticles are hugely what's called cationic.
They have high positive charge.
And aluminum is a very, very known high triple cation.
So it has triple positive charge on its surface.
And when it enters the blood flow, So, positive with negative charge immediately cancel each other out.
So, now you have stripping of the negative charge and you start having these clumping and pile ups and blood clots and all these processes.
The same can happen with lymphatic flow, any interstitial fluid flow, and you're going to have various types of fallout like crystals, urea crystals, kidney stones, gallbladder stones, plaques, lipid plaques.
Cataracts, the same protein deposits on the lens.
And so that's, you can, I can go forever describing all these things, but you can appreciate the variety of mechanisms of damage that are built into the shots, the variability that drives this very, very hard to pin exactly these effects, and a lot of opportunity for gaslighting and pointing in different other directions, right?
So it's a perfect setup here.
But people need to start understanding that, again, as I said, coming back to.
Again, to control the project, 90% of your risk of chronic disease comes from vaccines.
Everything else is almost irrelevant.
So that's how we need to look at it.
That's very interesting.
So, what sort of timelines or timeframes are we looking at?
Because this can, you said earlier, you can have an immediate effect or it can take years.
Yeah.
It's also very hard to study and very hard to research.
And I can't give you a very definitive answer.
It depends on individuals, it depends what they were injected with, where it went in the body, which is random, how it got carried, which cells got affected, which cells were transfected.
Traditional vaccines, at least, did not transfect the cells.
Unless very, very rare, bizarre instances, but they were not known as a transfectant.
So the body had an easier time getting rid of them.
Now, more newer platforms like recombinant and mRNA, well, they are transfectants, and recombinant largely transfects the biome, but mRNA transfects mammalian cells.
So they finally got to the holy grail that they wanted.
They wanted to transfect the mammalian cells, and those are really, really hard.
And so, there we go.
So, you can have what type, where did it go, did it transfect your cells, if it did, which ones, biome or mammalian or both.
And then it depends.
It just depends how your body is going to deal with it, how you're going to deal with it.
But, number one thing is to stop vaccinating.
And if you stop vaccinating, you have, and you maybe, you know, you have maybe some side effects or some illness, but over time, you can.
You can recover.
I've seen it happening.
My own daughter was severely, severely injured by childhood vaccine, probably by Merck HPV.
And I honestly thought she was going to die.
It was so bad.
But we managed to, over time, make her feel better.
And she is functioning now.
She's well functioning now.
She has her own job.
And she, you know, she's totally, at least it wasn't mental, thank God.
It was all physical.
Pots, but it's manageable.
And again, your body has a self healing mechanism.
You just need to try to help it.
And over time, you can become better.
Okay, I'm not saying completely recovered, cured.
Maybe, you know, some people might be.
But at least you will be better.
The key is to stop these injections.
If you continue injections, it's, you know, it's not recoverable.
And Obviously, stay away from multiple injections and vaccines and don't get boosters and all that kind of thing.
Does that make it worse?
Yes, it makes it worse.
Absolutely makes it worse.
It's like a Russian roulette.
So, as I said, it's such a huge variability of components and how individuals get affected that you think of it as a Russian roulette.
And, well, if you play it 90 times or whatever CDC wants to inject every child with, were you guaranteed to have a dead or disabled child?
Guaranteed, you're guaranteed to win that game, and so that's what I tell people just don't do it, just stop.
Sasha, I wonder if, in many ways, COVID was a blessing.
Um, because more people than I can remember have a critical view of vaccines now.
Yeah, there was a recent poll by Politico, which is a hugely pro-establishment organization.
And it was funny because I think they needed to hide the real answer.
And they, as typical, they split it by the party, you know, affiliation, Democrat or Republican, which just ignore.
But there was a total column, and it was something like, and they also phrased the questions in a very skirmish way, you know, like you know that they're trying to kind of massage the message.
And so, but the question was like something along the lines of are vaccines trustworthy or not?
And they got like 46% of the people said no, which is.
Huge, and then 30 some percent said yes, trustworthy, and then there was this category of 15 percent they said other, and I guarantee you it was like absolutely effing, no way.
Which means the vast majority of the population will not get vaccinated.
You'll be criticized.
This is just correlation, Sasha.
You haven't got any causation here.
Well, yeah, we have a causation in the uh, that we actually do have a causation so.
In my research, I also wanted to, like, that's my point to anyone who wants to debate me on vaccines and say that, no, for example, it's not vaccines, it's the food.
So, you know, the food drives all the chronic disease epidemic, and we just need to fix food, like RFK propaganda now tells us.
And so my response is well, why don't you show me a study where you can induce whatever you want?
Diabetes, for example, by that.
Just induce diabetes in a mouse or a rat by food, and then let's see how that what you did in that diet and how that translates to humans, whether it's realistic or not.
And there's another, I also asked the same question about cancer.
Well, can you show me how you can induce cancer?
And not in a human, of course, that's unethical, but in an animal model.
And you know, the people send me the study which was recently circulated, a very well.
Conducted study in about 1,000 rats, they fed them glyphosate at 10x and 100x of regulatory limit every day of their life in water.
So imagine if you were drinking glyphosate at 100x of regulatory norm with coffee every morning for the rest of, like from the beginning when you were a baby to, you know, for the rest of your life.
Your total risk of developing cancer, if it's a translatable study, your total risk of developing cancer in this scenario is 4%.
So, yes, you can cause cancer by glyphosate, but it's very difficult.
It's very difficult, and it's entirely unrealistic that exposure that you need for any normal encounter with glyphosate, even for people who actually routinely work with it.
And so that's my point.
And so, and another thing, I started looking for these kinds of examples.
So, do you know how we make mice for?
Or ask for preclinical research that, and we need these animals that reliably develop cancer at early age.
And so, what do we do with them?
We have a mouse vaccination schedule.
We don't make them smoke.
We don't feed them sugar.
We don't, you know, we don't feed them carbs.
We don't even feed them glyphosate because, as I've demonstrated, it's pretty difficult.
By the time you induce cancer, the animal is too old to do any research with it.
So, you need cancer early and reliably.
That's when you do the mouse vaccination schedule.
And that gives you early, reliable, commercially successful animal models that will develop cancer on a consistent schedule.
And we can also develop particular types of cancers depending on how we vaccinate them, when we vaccinate them, with what, and then what we feed them subsequently.
So, the food is used as a secondary vector.
You can make things faster, better, and in different locations of the body, how you need it for your commercial mouse strains.
But the primary thing is vaccination.
There's no other way to induce cancer reliably.
So that's what I'm saying.
You can try to argue with my theory, but so far, and I'm very open minded.
That's why I invite people, please send me papers that prove otherwise or prove something else, and I will very happily review and adjust my view if I find something.
But so far, I haven't seen it.
You do know, though, that you're going to get some angry responses about the animal testing, the animal testing part.
Well, I mean, so would you like to do it on humans?
No.
So we do, you know, I'm not against animal testing, by the way.
Actually, there are a few humans I think we could send off to an island somewhere.
I know, I know.
There's these like throwaway comments about, oh, we should test it on prisoners, which is like, oh my God, like, did you know that Nazis did this, right?
But also, there, oh well, let's test it on Fauci.
Even in the case of Fauci, I don't want to do that because I don't want to go on that same level with him.
That's what people like him do.
And I'm not on the same level with him.
I'm a human being, I'm not a Satanist.
And so that's what I'm saying let's not go there.
The animal research is legitimate.
You have to have animal studies if you want to develop.
Drugs, new drugs, or new products, medical devices.
You do need to have animal studies, and they are supposed to be also regulated by animal institutional research bodies and protocols and ethical guidelines.
We're not supposed to be just cruel and torturing them like what Fauci did with those beagles.
That's just pointless torture.
Or JD Vance, for example, our vice president, does in his Amplify Bio.
Horrific experiments on monkeys sawing their skulls off and injecting them directly into the brain with toxic, complete toxic matter for no reason whatsoever.
So that's called pointless and cruel handling of animals and wasting animals' lives for these psychopathic objectives.
No ethical animal research is supposed to be done in the most humane manner and for the sole reason of reducing the risk to humans.
So, we need to de risk a whole bunch of things about new substances or new devices or something.
And before we can give it to a human, we need to make sure that we're not doing something majorly bad.
And that's the only purpose of the animal research.
Vaccination vs Smoking Risks00:13:41
And so, that's my position on it.
All right.
So, conversely, somebody who is completely unvaccinated is likely to live a very healthy life.
Yes.
Assuming.
Assuming they don't go down the road of smoking and drugs and all that kind of stuff.
Yeah, so destructive lifestyles, of course, and smoking, excessive drinking, other risky activities, drug use, of course, those can certainly contribute to the chronic disease burden.
But even things like smoking, I'm kind of revisiting now.
And I've never smoked, and I don't like smoking, and I don't want to be around smokers.
But even that, I'm revisiting now and being more, let's say, rational about it.
When you look at the data, it's nowhere nearly as dangerous as vaccination.
Nowhere nearly.
I mean, it is dangerous, but not like if I had a choice, it'd be smoking than taking vaccines.
Everybody knows an old person who lived to 95, smoked their whole life, and died of a heart attack.
Right, exactly.
Well, there was the famous lady, so I think she is to date the longest lived human recorded, a French lady who lived to be 127 years old.
And she smoked all her life and drank every day.
Like, literally.
There's something in that.
There's something in that.
And we also know that, you know, smoking has been around for thousands of years, right?
So, and all those diseases that are, you know, and cancer was extremely rare.
And actually, you know, many people state, I don't know, I don't have the data, I don't have the research, but if you read, there's like, References from the 1800s and 1700s where people saying, I've never seen cancer in my life.
Well, certainly the cancer in children does not exist without vaccines.
I can absolutely guarantee you that.
So, in children, cancer is only induced by vaccines.
If we go to people over 50, maybe there are other, maybe it's a smoker and then there's other contributing factors.
But in a child, there's nothing else that can induce cancer.
It's only vaccines.
Based on what you're saying, is it Then, true to conclude that people a thousand years ago were healthier than what we are today on average?
Yeah, on average, possibly yes, because, and I think it just depends on where in the world, obviously.
Like the Vikings.
The Vikings.
Well, I mean, yeah, so, you know, based on the records that exist, so the Native American population, for example, was in the record, like one.
In the initial encounters, or let's say the encounters before they became a war, right?
They were like trading and normal interactions with people who came from Europe or other places.
And they all universally said how very strong, how vibrant they were, how tall they were, healthy, you know.
And yeah, we have those accounts of people living long lives, living healthy, not having all these.
Insane illnesses, insane societal burden of chronic illness at all.
And now we're being told that they were all dying at the age of 20, which is ridiculous.
It does seem ridiculous.
That's ridiculous.
It's not true.
Of course, they twist the life expectancy statistics to suit their public health propaganda.
And I've seen those presentations.
I know exactly how they do it.
So they give you average.
Statistic which includes, well, that you know, there were a lot of wars, a lot of accidents, and there was high childhood mortality.
There was a high birth rate, and due to shortage of food and cramped conditions and neglect and so forth, a lot of children would die in childhood.
But that's a different issue.
It's not because of the infectious diseases, it was nutrition, conditions of living, sanitation, and neglect.
Some parents just didn't care.
There were too many of them anyway, and the attitudes were different to that.
That's and then they say, well, you know, because of this high childhood mortality, now your average is something like 47 years old, but that's not true.
The average person would survive into their 70s and 80s, just as they are today, you know.
If so many people today are vaccinated, Sasha, what does it mean for the near future?
Well, we're going to have.
A pretty significant early die off, and not only just that.
Well, we're already having a very significant impact of chronic disease burden.
It's skyrocketed.
And we all know that the hospitals are now full.
So they were not full during COVID, they were empty.
But they are now packed.
It's very hard to get any medical appointments.
You have to wait.
The hospitals are consistently running out of capacity of all the people who are arriving, you know, with the consistent.
Episodes of whatever they have in cancer or cardiovascular or neurodegenerative.
And that is just going to generate a reduced lifespan for those people.
And once, but also I see that a lot, you know, as we've discussed the political poll, for example, a lot of people are now beginning to understand the real reason for this.
And so we also see a positive trend of.
Youthful people having children and refusing all vaccines, and people in whatever age just stopping vaccination.
And that is a positive trend.
And if that continues, then okay, well, this wave will die off eventually, but we now will have a healthier, really healthier generation.
And we have hope that more of us pushing back against this evil system will create a better world for us.
There must be areas in the world also with very low vaccination rates compared to, say, the US.
Oh, yes.
Still, they still exist.
Although WHO has become a real, like CDC, just enforcement mechanism, and they just use again the corruption, buying the government, putting the government in debt, replacing them, doing the regime changes if somebody pushes back and bringing Bill Gates and GOs, WHO, and push vaccinations again into those countries.
It remains to be seen, but yeah, there are places in the world that are with lower vaccination coverage.
And again, so that's another argument that people throw at me about food.
Oh, our toxic food.
And I'm like, well, have you been to India or any third world?
And have you seen the population there?
They're fit and healthy, and look at what they eat.
And their water is polluted, and the air is polluted, and they thrive.
The only difference is vaccination coverage.
That's all.
I think then the Amish.
Are ahead of the curve?
Oh, absolutely, yes.
They are definitely, as far as health, that's probably the healthiest population in the US.
And I mean, there are a couple of other groups that also, you know, avoid vaccinations, but Amish would be the healthiest group I could point to.
20 years ago, we were all mocking them.
Well, I wasn't, I mean, I thought, you know, I thought there was, you know, my perspective, I thought it was good that in the US you're allowed to do, to express your religious views the way, you know, If your religion says that you don't want it, well, then you don't want it.
And I thought it was fine.
I thought everybody had a choice.
I really didn't see this whole massive evil, you know, just coming at your throat with this, like as a parent, right?
I started seeing it maybe toward, you know, my children were already teenagers and toward the high school.
It started getting like more and more.
At the beginning, it wasn't like that.
And I could, you know, that's why, you know, nothing alerted me to even that when I was a young mother.
Because it was always presented as always totally your choice.
It's just as best.
It's best for you.
So I would just recommend.
And today they literally at your throat if you say no to one vaccination and repeatedly, repeatedly, on a continuous basis.
So I don't go to the conventional doctors anymore.
I have a private doctor and only go occasionally for sports testing.
But people that I, you know, my friends, my relatives that do have primary care, conventional doctors, The stuff that they tell me just like I want to tear my hair out, like what happens in those appointments.
What's the moral of the story?
Well, the moral of the story don't vaccinate, avoid all injections.
But, uh, especially for your children, like absolutely, do not do that.
As I said, if you do it enough, it's a Russian roulette, and you will win a disabled or even a dead child.
And nobody wants to do that.
And you don't want to live with the realization that you did it to your child for the rest of your life.
I guarantee you that's the thought that you do not want to have in your mind.
How does the pharmaceutical industry get away with it?
How do they get away with it?
Well, the government gives them all the protections.
It's a mafia.
It's called public private partnership.
And public private partnership is mafia and fascism also by definition.
It's corporatism, fascism.
And they have it now officially, legally in the US.
It's advertised as a great thing.
And so pharmaceutical companies would not have done any of this if the government didn't offer, didn't set up the whole system with the PrEP Act, with avoidance of any, well, initially with National Vaccine Injury Law 1986.
So they gave them the first layer of liability protection.
Now they have a complete layer of liability protection called PrEP Act.
And it actually took about 10 years for the government to convince pharma companies that this is a workable system.
So, they were training them for about 10 years.
I have PowerPoint presentations from FDA legal counsel explaining how pharmaceutical companies are absolved from all liability just to pacify them all and bring them on board into this collaborative public private partnership for pandemic preparedness and start producing these absolutely poisonous vaccines.
Because pharma companies know very well that they're poisonous.
It's not a secret to anyone.
They know very well it's poisonous.
Government says, Government says, I want you to produce a billion doses of this and ship it to me.
And pharma says, Well, I wasn't born yesterday because then you're going to make me liable, right?
And the government says, No, Look, look, we have this wonderful system.
And this went on for 10 years before they pulled the trigger in 2020.
Look, we have this whole new chapter in the Food and Drugs and Cosmetics Act called Chapter 564.
And it makes everything that you currently do, that currently is illegal by the Food and Drugs and Cosmetics Act, perfectly legal if we, the government, say it's an emergency.
And so they've done this for 10 years and finally convinced everyone that, oh, okay, yeah, we can do that.
And so then they went and they did the COVID pandemic.
Quote unquote.
Uh huh, yeah.
Yeah.
So, but otherwise, nobody's a fool.
They all know it's poison, and they all know that pharma know that as a private sector, they will be thrown under the bus and made the scapegoat and the bad guy.
Not that they're good guys, they're bad guys.
It's two parts of the mafia.
But the hierarchy is the government has the ultimate tool, which is called sovereign liability shield, that they can extend to their pharmaceutical co conspirators.
And as long as the pharmaceutical co conspirators are convinced and on board, then it all works out.
Sasha, how can I follow your work?
Well, I'm on Substack.
So, on Substack is my main source.
And you can find me, my publication is called Due Diligence and Art or SashaLotepava.Substack.com.
That art bit threw me off back in the day when I first discovered your Substack.
Following Due Diligence Art00:00:34
I'm thinking, like, this is just a Substack with art.
And then suddenly, mixed in between, were all these truth bombs.
Yeah.
Well, I wasn't even going to publish art, but one of my readers said, or like I said, several of my readers said, Oh, we also want you to publish your art.
And I thought, Well, they don't have anything to do with each other, but if you guys want it, sure.
And actually, people like it.
They think it's kind of like a relief from all the darkness.