Need to Know News (12 April 2026) with Carl Herman & Brian Davidson
Carl Herman and Brian Davidson dissect AI limitations in human augmentation, then pivot to geopolitical rumors linking Melania Trump to Epstein conspiracies and Iran's war failures. They challenge NASA's moon landing authenticity via CGI evidence, reject heliocentrism for biblical creationism, and condemn theologians like Ravi Zacharias for hypocrisy amidst fraud allegations ranging from $500 billion in federal losses to hospice shutdowns. Ultimately, the hosts argue that true stability requires obedience over intellectual assent while urging listeners to resist a fear-mongering security industrial complex before the U.S. 250th birthday. [Automatically generated summary]
Transcriber: CohereLabs/cohere-transcribe-03-2026, sat-12l-sm, and large-v3-turbo
|
Time
Text
Replicating Systems vs Human Logic00:09:22
Carl Herman, Mission Viejo, Brian Davidson, Houston, Texas.
Need to know news, April the 12th, 2026.
Let's take a look at those topics and have an opening statement.
Need to know news or what's scripted now?
Another episode of What Kind of War is Amrev 2 and World War III?
Wars and Rumors of Wars.
Moonies, Domestic and International Facts and Optics.
Is it the Emperor's New Clothes, Great Awakening, Great Choosing, Breakthrough, or the Gangster, Bankster, Pedivore, Business and Official History, Mind Control as usual?
Brian, opening statement.
Well, I did actually take some time to read a bunch of articles to try to figure out what is really going on in Iran today.
I'm not sure if it's going to help me with my commentary because all the information seems to be twisted and bent one way or another, and it's really hard to tell what's going on and what's not.
To give you guys an update, I didn't do too much this week.
I worked in front of the computer all week building an operating system.
Which is no small endeavor.
It's much harder than I thought.
And of course, what I'm trying to do is basically get human augmentation off the ground.
And I figured out how to get an application to self replicate a while ago.
But the problem I'm learning is that the reason it can self replicate is because it fills in the blanks with the unknowns and it just works towards its success conditions.
And so I guess one of the things that we all have to learn the hard way is that AI looks very impressive on the outside.
But when you get down to the nuts and bolts of it, getting it to build on proper columns on top of a proper definition foundation.
On top of an architectural plan instead of just shooting from the hip.
The first runs that I had, really, I was able to replicate from one shack to another shack.
So think about you know, you just go tell AI to make a picture of a house and everyone comes out looking completely different, but you start to constrain it really well.
And pretty soon all the houses sort of start looking the same, but they're built differently.
And so the reason I had to develop an operating system.
Was because I had to figure out how to make it replicate using the same structural techniques from floor to floor to floor.
Like, think of it like this I was able to replicate a bunch of houses on a meandering street in a neighborhood, and they'll all fall down when the wind and the waves come.
But getting from there to let's go ahead and build a skyscraper, and we'll start out with some architectural plans for each floor, and then we'll stage all of the Components that we need, and then we'll invoke the codex crane to lift those components into place, and then we'll make sure that every component is set down on the right column at the right place so that the structural integrity remains there.
That's a whole different ballgame than just telling AI to build a shack and build another shack.
So, I guess what I'm learning through the process is that there's a lot of talk that can make you feel like you're really smart if you're using AI, but when you get down to the nuts and bolts of it, it really doesn't do much.
In terms of it, it makes you feel smart because you skip a bunch of steps, but it doesn't make you actually smart because all it's doing is fabricating variables to get to its success conditions.
And so it might look impressive when it comes down to reading an article or writing an article or doing this or doing that, but getting it to work consistently from one chat to the next is incredibly challenging because.
AI has a certain memory.
And once that memory expires, you got to seed another chat.
And so you got to make them boot consistently and work off the same consistent structure all the time.
And so here I thought I was going to be able to build something nice and big and do it pretty fast.
And I thought I'd be able to sort of change the face of this.
But the good news is the more I work with it, the more I see opportunity.
It's just a matter of trying to constrain that opportunity.
To the point that it's actually functional.
I say that because fundamentally, what I'm doing here is I'm, you know, how like if an airplane flies over at 10,000 square feet, think of that like Google.
Google is going to fly over.
If you Google, I want to go on a lodging vacation at this particular place.
AI flies over like an airplane and says, oh, well, this has a big signal and that has a big signal.
So this is what's going on in this particular area.
And if you look through the lens of it, you'll see a bunch of, again, neighborhoods with meandering streets.
That's what Google does.
It was back in 99.
The idea was for it to get to a point where it could capture these variables and make a decision for you in terms of what was best.
It's never been able to get there.
The internet really is more just a hodgepodge of who's got the strongest signal.
So, what I'm trying to do is build layers over zones around.
Lakes and docks, so that when Google looks down from 30,000 feet, they see an intelligence structure that says, Call this number and you'll get the best decision.
Instead of, you know, so like they see an intelligence layer floating down there at 1,000 or 2,000 feet instead of a bunch of spotty vendors floating around in the area.
So it's a great idea and concept because what it does is it creates an entirely new, completely cheap.
Layer of digital real estate that's free to buy, but which means for pennies on the dollars, you can own a zone for nothing if you do it right, which is kind of what I'm going after.
So I'm trying to build a model that creates a new layer of digital real estate that floats just above five mile radius zones of a lake.
So not easy to do, but if it's done right and I can get the system to replicate.
On top of the foundation properly, then I'll be able to replicate Lake, And, you know, like I said, I'm going after VRBO and Airbnb because they're just fragmented directories that don't really tell you much.
They don't have any decision making capability inside of them.
Mine does, which means that the future artificial intelligence search engines will see my intelligence layer before they start seeing all the different vendors below, which means that I should be able to capture all that inbound.
Traffic.
It's a new model.
Maybe I'm crazy.
Maybe I'm smart.
Maybe I'm not.
But again, it goes back to the fundamental issue.
AI looks impressive because it speaks a human language that speaks very impressive, but human language has semantic drift all over.
You substitute synonyms, you substitute to make a sentence sound right, but it doesn't mean it's architecturally right.
So you have to flip the switch into machine language so that you can get architecturally aligned and then flip it back into human so it makes sense.
That's kind of what I'm learning.
This might sound stupid for a private investigator out of Houston, but I'm I'm telling you, there's something there.
There's something there because you can buy, everybody's investing in multi million dollar lakefront properties, but nobody's investing in buying the digital air above them.
So, and it costs virtually nothing to do it.
I think it's a great idea.
And you're finding out the only way that you can find out by jumping in.
Yeah.
Yeah.
I didn't, I thought it would be easier.
It's not.
You have to learn, you have to learn to code.
I mean, bottom line.
Bottom line is AI is helpful, but again, its success conditions just make it fulfill a requirement.
It doesn't make it constrain the shape.
Same problem with the commentary.
The commentary was drifting all over the place.
I had to, I mean, I had hundreds of pages of constraining documents that were designed to get it under control so that it didn't lie or embellish or fill in with some bullshit.
It still turned out very readable because that's what it does.
It fills in the blanks on human language and makes it very readable.
But how accurate is it?
Power Brokers and Moral Compasses00:13:18
It's still got a bunch of groupthink in it.
It's still got a bunch of old legacy systematic theology.
It's still pretty weak.
I'd like to make it stronger.
Well, good luck.
Yeah, yeah, it always takes a lot longer than you think to get anything done.
All righty.
Let's go on to this episode of What Kind of War is Amrev 2 in World War III.
First, an appreciation of all of our partners.
I don't care if you call yourself a digital soldier, keyboard warrior, anon, or an independent journalist.
I don't care how many followers you have or how many views you get.
I don't care if you create content or just share others.
I don't care if you believe Q or if you think it's fake.
If you're a patriot pushing truth, we're on the same team.
Together, we're making history.
All right, and what kind of a war is this?
This is Bohemian Grove, and this circle on the left is going to be future President Ronald Reagan, and the circle on the right is going to be Richard Nixon.
I don't remember offhand when this was, I think that's before he was president as well.
And Bohemian Grove, just north of San Francisco, is one of the party places for the elite with a lot of testimony of child sacrifice.
What kind of a war is it?
Going into the Epstein saga, the Epstein class.
Valhalla VFT, the Melania Trump scandal just exploded.
I want to give him a couple of minutes to give context and then go over what I understand is happening and what might be a big deal tomorrow.
Welcome back to the channel, everybody.
Now, yesterday we covered that absolutely bizarre press conference where Melania Trump decided to come out seemingly for no reason and let everybody know that she never knew Jeffrey Epstein or Maxwell.
Right.
Yeah.
Obviously, nobody believes that.
We've all seen the dozens of photos of them together.
We all know the connections there, but we did.
Know how deep the connections really go between her and Big E.
And a lot of people were wondering, like, what exactly was this?
Does she just hate her husband so much that she wanted to drudge this back up?
Is this all just a big psy hop distraction from the failure of the Iran war?
Well, no, it turns out that this is all because of this story, which is 10 times crazier than anything we could have possibly thought.
And that is Melania Trump's best friend, Amanda Ngaro, who's been friends with Melania for over 20 years, going all the way back to the time with Big E hanging around.
And she's now vowed to literally expose Melania and Donald Trump for.
Everything regarding their relationships with Christine.
And the reason why she's doing it might be the most insane part of the whole story.
So that's what we're going to talk about in today's video.
Don't forget to like, comment, subscribe.
It helps the channel.
Follow us on Patreon.
So here's the story Melania was friends with another model.
And this model had a boyfriend.
And the model invited Melania to a party.
And that's where she met Donald Trump in 1998 or 1999.
Now, she ended up marrying.
The other model ended up marrying the boyfriend.
They had a kid, and now they're divorced.
And he wants custody of the child.
And when she was in the United States, she was deported through the request of her ex husband through to President Trump.
And now she is vowing to go on, and she'll be on television, CNN tomorrow.
First, to congratulate him back.
To tell the story and the background.
And it is alleging that it is because of Trump being a pedophile and Melania covering it up.
So we shall see what goes down with that tomorrow.
Jimmy Dore, Melania blindsides the White House with Epstein press conference.
And the drama here is that Trump claimed that he had no knowledge of this information.
And I want to give an opening to this, too, to put this into context.
Congress to provide the women.
Who have been victimized by Epstein with a public hearing specifically centered around the survivors.
Give these victims their opportunity to testify under oath in front of Congress with the power of sworn testimony.
Remember when Donald Trump was saying this, Kurt?
Are you still talking about Jeffrey Epstein?
I mean, I can't believe you're asking a question on Epstein.
That is unbelievable.
Yeah, yeah, unbelievable.
The whole world is watching.
And remember, Type of war that we're in, whatever it is, as Epstein says Goyim were born only to serve us.
Without that, they have no place in the world, only to serve the people of Israel.
And for me, that harkens back to Epstein is semi aware of his position as a servant to Satan, and that this may go all the way back to the Elohim and the GMOing of.
Human beings to work in their gardens and their image, but unable to tell the difference between good and evil.
Jimmy Doerr again.
This is Ben Swan.
Here's proof that Epstein and Pizzagate are the same thing.
I do recommend this entire interview to be clued into the code, but I want to introduce this as well.
Why?
Why would a guy who owns a pizza joint in a strip mall on the outskirts of D.C. be considered one of the 50 most powerful people in a city where you have the President and the administration, and senators, and members of Congress, and lobbyists.
And this guy is named as one of the 50 most powerful people.
Yeah, that's because the pedophile blackmail is one of the most important elements to run the empire.
Folks, we have special guests with us Ben Swan, two time Emmy winning journalist who has worked for various TV stations, including KDBC and El Paso.
And Swan got canceled despite his success.
Many of us can relate to that.
Now, what kind of a war is it?
Well, it's a war where you get handlers.
And you get assassinations for people who step out of line.
We've gone over the Charlie Kirk thing, and that seems like a stage psyop that nobody was harmed, but that was a show in order to frame Israeli linked or Israel linked security to the hit.
And that the idea that Erica might be a lesbian and going and a child trafficker and going back with whatever manipulation happens to mess with people's sexuality.
Whatever is going on, there's sufficient documentation, and I'm happy to walk you through it.
That what we're looking at is prima facie crimes against children that require arrests in the present.
So, this is a kind of war that involves all of those aspects.
And we haven't even gotten into the usual interpretation of war.
Brian, your thoughts.
Well, I'd hate to be the guy that contributes on a surface level to.
Such a serious conversation, but let's face it, if you start reading through the comments on all these videos and going through the actual contents of it, there's nothing here that's new.
The Melania thing is new ish in terms of its development, but I think a lot of people knew that she was a plug in replacement that Trump chose from the harem of available girls at the Epstein parties.
There's no doubt that that was a big deal.
They've tried to make her sort of conservatives have tried to make her sort of a Jackie O mindset.
And I have no doubt that she's got a brain and is also pretty.
There's quite a few women out there that have a brain and they're also pretty.
But Trump to snag her during a time when he was making a transition doesn't surprise me.
Younger, smarter, prettier, sort of exactly what a warlord would want to have for a trophy wife, and certainly one that he could afford.
It doesn't diminish her value in this, but her friend Amanda, you know, look, if I had an insurable interest, I'd be taken out of life insurance policy on her in a heartbeat, given that she's the powers that she's besting with.
And you think about.
You know what's been going on there.
If you look at Melania in terms of being in the center of this, you might be able to put some pieces together on Bondi, although she was worthless, but she was valuable to some people because they could obviously control her.
We had the Bongino firing and that whole absolute dark mess that went around with it.
We've had Kash Patel covering for this Epstein thing and for Ben Swan to really focus on the Epstein.
Pizzagate connection is great.
I'm glad to see people are doing it because it's the same network recycled, regurgitated, and vomited back up.
It's just different names in different places.
James Alafontis becomes Jeffrey Epstein, but the playbook remains the same Mossad playbook.
Let's go ahead and entice people into these troubled territories.
Let's go ahead and obtain what we can.
Let's release them and reward them for their silence.
And then let's call the card when it's time to.
When it's time to leverage the favors that we need out of them for this particular role that we're going to graduate them to because we can trust them to stay silent.
This isn't new.
This is an old game.
It's been around for a long time.
I mean, from my perspective, there's a fundamental difference between people who will rise in ambition at any cost and people who actually have a moral.
A moral compass that's telling them where to go.
And that fundamental difference is why you have great men scattered all over the United States that won't touch the political football.
And you've got a bunch of dirty, rotten scoundrels that are interested in ascending the ladder at whatever price, and they'll pay whatever price to do so.
That's the Bohemian Grove concept.
Yes, Reagan, Nixon, they were all part of it.
Yes, Bushes were all part of it.
Yes, they have their.
Rituals that they perform to buy in.
Yes, they invoke dark powers to magnify their power, but that's when you combine that, you got to ask yourself which side of the coin am I going to look at because it's the same coin.
Either you look at it from an institutional coin, it's which these guys have the power to help me rise up the ladder, or you look at it through the spiritual coin, which is these guys are empowered by a darker force.
And if I can gather some of that power for my own benefit, then I'm going to go ahead and And do that, whatever the price.
So it explains a lot about the way Hollywood works.
It explains a lot about the way power brokers work.
It explains a lot about how banksters and cartel members work.
And we see the themes always intertwining.
I guess the question comes down to the guy that's on the street that's a realist.
He's going to say it's an institutional corruption, but the guy who's involved in the spiritual realm is going to see a much darker agenda at play.
So, which one is it?
Both and, both and.
There are certainly spiritual forces of evil that are at work.
And these people are more susceptible because they have appetites that will make them more susceptible.
And they really don't care about the moral misgivings that come along with the territory.
And if it's all about this world, why not?
Why not sell yourself out?
But, you know, I was reading Proverbs this morning.
I did like seven chapters of it.
And I, Realize something.
It's not a book for, I hate to say it, it's not a book for a 50 plus year old man.
That's a book for a 20 year old man so that he can learn how to walk in the right ways and learn what's important to stay away from and what's important to stay with.
Once you get to be so old that you can't really change your ways, those little pithy moral groundings don't seem to have the same sort of impact because you rush over them.
But when you're young, they're important.
Judging Intentions Amidst Pressure00:15:37
So I guess what I'm fundamentally saying is, We should be building a better generation in the next.
We should be always working to build a better generation, a stronger generation, one that would parallel and rival our forefathers in terms of their moral constraints.
And I'm not saying they were all great people, but they were certainly smarter.
Certainly smarter.
Yeah, yeah, we're all doing our best to try to empower the next generation.
All right, let's go on to wars and rumors of wars.
Just three updates with that, but I'm going to play a couple videos.
Merrill Nass devastation rains down on Lebanon, and some say a hundred high rise apartments were bombed in central Beirut.
Israel has warned residents to leave.
Where is Netanyahu?
Who really gives the orders?
Okay, so we're being told that there was a truce, a ceasefire, and people would think that means that you're ceasing firing.
But that isn't the case here.
Israel is saying and Trump is saying, no, no, no, Israel can go ahead and continue to bomb Lebanon.
Of course, it's Orwellian illegal.
Jake GTV, you try watching Iran escalate, but the anchors keep noticing this is 10 minutes.
I like the whole 10 minutes.
I'm just going to play you a couple.
Welcome back to Jake GTV News.
Is Satan dead or not?
Well, apparently he was taken to Germany.
Dude's in a coma.
What?
Ching Chong, break it down for us.
Chloe and Michael, good morning.
We're here in Berlin outside.
Satan's plane, the Wing of Zion, aka the Flying Hospital, where flight trackers caught it circling the Mediterranean while putting him in a medically induced coma.
Allegedly, of course.
Shut it down, Ching Chong.
He's alive.
Haven't you seen his proof of life videos?
The six finger thing was debunked by the Times of Israel.
Same with the coffee cup.
Back to the goy slup.
Jeez.
All right, producer Berg, we'll play the videos.
Yeah, don't want to end up like Jackie.
Good call.
Here's proof that Satan is still alive.
Was that AI or was he absolutely bricked?
Dude's packing a meat hammer.
Yeah, that was the wrong video.
Play the AI video.
Okay, so here he has his ring on.
Okay, there it goes.
Just like a magical jujitsu.
How about the coffee cup video?
All right, so this one isn't obvious for the normies, but that cup should have sparked.
They literally can't get the proportions right, I swear.
Yeah, let's go to the investigation team to break this down.
Okay, so besides the overfilled cappuccino, look at the dude's head.
Just look at the shape of his nose and ears.
Either that's a decoy or they think we're retarded.
Just because you retarded Goyam, notice a couple AI anomalies, doesn't mean our sugar daddy is dead.
And it goes on.
It's great work, and this is great work.
Iran releases another Lego animation mocking Trump as information war continues.
Hey, orange pig.
America first.
Oops.
Oh boy, that was the slogan you stole.
But Bibi's pulling strings and your vote is getting cold.
Just fighting for Iran, hear this clear Your people reached out to us Yeah, we got the DMs here If one nation's gon' stand against the Epstein regime's fear It's us to the last breath, we've been doing it for years We're standing here for everyone, your system ever wrong They've known all along The enemy was always you The real threat warrior Sloot and sung a patriotic song While selling their own citizens and calling it strong Stealing from your own people, making them bleed Taking tax dollars just to fund your own greed They waking up to the lies,
the illusions are burst You screamed America first, now you'll put loosers first Israel great again.
Your government is run by pedophiles.
They ordered you to die for Israel.
They ordered you to die for Israel.
They lied to you all.
Saw the files, man, the planner would shake from the level of filth and the crimes in your wake.
No wonder Jeff called you the worst, you degenerate snake.
Um, you claimed you never set foot, you went 40 plus times.
You sick bastard, you cook.
We stepping up to the plate, Epstein regime gotta fall.
You fake Christian elite sacrificing the ball.
Demon, you talk real big for a man with tiny hands.
Tiny hands, tiny things, tiny everything.
We saw everything, and word got out, the smallness kinda expands.
No wonder all those rage tweets, all those desperate rants.
Overcompensating bully, always causing the scene you said you love.
Losers, well, look at your team.
Your government is run by your government is run by pedophiles.
They ordered you to die for Israel.
They ordered you to die for Israel.
They lied to you.
Hey, Orange Pig, that's sharp stuff.
So, what we're being shown and what people are getting awake to is that the U.S. has always been a lying.
Looting, Orwellian, illegal, rogue state empire.
At least going back through the history of the United States.
Brian, your thoughts.
Well, I think the game has become more sophisticated as information has started to travel much faster.
I appreciate Iran's efforts to propagandize, but I don't really put them in a completely different class than the one that we're in in terms of what we've allowed into our own nation.
So who are the good guys?
Who are the bad guys?
You know, I'm going to say, I'm going to, it's going to come down to people, not necessarily the structures that or the institutions that drive whatever seems to be happening out there.
It's going to come down to people.
You got to judge people by the intentions that they're involved with.
I do believe that when Donald Trump got started in this, his intentions were right.
But I think that the appetite for power did corrupt.
And he began to realize that if he was going to be fighting the media for his entire second term, then it probably wasn't going to turn out very well.
The problem we've got now is that it seems that he's not handling the pressure as well as he should.
And I'm beginning to see threads of draft documentation that has been floating around gain a lot of new attention because it's becoming so difficult to recruit young people into the military.
So, I mean, I know that there are new things that have been floated around DC in terms of, hey, we've got to reinstitute this because we don't have anybody that wants to play the game.
And of course, nobody wants to play the game because there's too much to lose and not enough to gain in this particular.
And right now, it appears that the institutions that are in charge of America are willing to sacrifice our citizens just as quickly as they're willing to sacrifice any others.
Think of Israel.
They're willing to sacrifice their citizens.
They propagandize them at a very young age inside their central schools.
They bring them into the military and prepare them and they brainwash them just like anybody else.
And they teach them that these people are nothing but cattle that ought to be crushed, used, destroyed.
Epstein was.
No different, and all the elites are no different in terms of how they view the little people.
So, I don't think our audience is going to be shocked or surprised by any of the claims in any of this, and I don't think that.
Iran's propaganda is any better than America's propaganda, even if they do knock off Eminem to put it out there in Legos because, yeah, it's creative and it's neat and it's true.
It rings true, but is it the whole truth?
Again, discernment comes down to the ability to not just to tell truth from lies, but to be able to dig underneath that which is appetizing and get to that which is that which is true.
That's the same thing I've been struggling along with in artificial intelligence.
What I have found.
Believe it or not, is that if you don't have truth at the foundation and all you've got is drifty synonyms that sound good, you end up with nothing but garbage.
And that's exactly what's happening.
I hate to say it, but we're forging our own reality here where something becomes true if the group thinks it's true, if Wikipedia says it's true, if Tucker Carlson says it's true, if enough people.
Produce it, but really, what it comes down to is who's got the ability to decide what's really true.
And I'll bring back the prophet Amos, he used to run around with a plum bow.
This is true, you're either on the left or you're right, but this is true, and there's nothing you can do about it.
It's the truth.
And so, you know, finding the right center is being able to look underneath the hood and identify that which is true and throw out that which is partially true, but not the whole truth.
It is crazy, and part of my ongoing analysis is my favorite etymology of the word war is from German, means confusion.
We're not going to be able to see very much, but what we can see, I document in that one article that I shared in the previous Epstein section, is my best written work.
It's a 10 part series, and it goes through all of the major areas of AMREV 2 and World War III.
And what we can say for sure is that the recent wars I can personally document.
That the reasons to go to war were known to be false as they were told, proven by our own government agencies and their most authoritative documents within those most authoritative agencies.
So we can tell that the official history is a lie.
But as to what's true, as to what Trump is and how many Trumps there are, definitely that fatter dude that plays golf so well, as a different dude, the real Trump were told a 6'3, and the idea that there are actors and scripts and It's a show.
It is a psyop.
And again, to remind our viewers, is that you do not appreciate the role of psychological warfare in a war.
We are in the fog of war.
So who knows what's going on?
But we can.
Yeah, let me.
Yeah.
Look, I'm a reasonable man, and I'm going to try to lay my feet on something that is foundational.
There is some truth out there.
I'm not the guy that's going to come along and say everybody's a body double or everything is a Satan behind every rock and under every tree.
I'm not the guy that's going to do that.
I spend too much time reading to find myself falling into that trap of allowing the assimilation program to just simply shape the new truth.
Think about that's what progressives do.
They go off to college.
The assimilation program teaches them fundamentally to throw out all things that our culture and our forefathers had believed is true, replace it with a new truth, and now boys can be girls and trans can be this, and everybody.
The progressive idea is to throw out the old truth and bring in the new truth, which is your individual truth.
The conservatives are we want to conserve the ways of our fathers because our fathers were solid in this.
Endeavor and that they thought reasonably to try to establish that which is true.
And I'll say this for the upcoming segment.
You know, we're going to deal with some cosmology here today.
And I just want to remind you that I don't know the shape of the earth, I don't know the height of the firmament.
I don't know.
I know some things are true and some things are not.
But Whether Netanyahu is alive, I don't know.
My instincts are he's dead.
My instincts are the hardliners have taken over, which is what I feared, as if they weren't hard enough lying already.
And as for America, why are we in the war?
I would think that there's going to be layer upon layer upon layer of motivation involved in this.
Everything from military industrial complex money to the preservation of the petrodollar to control of the Straits of Hormuz to long term strategic partnerships.
And there's layers and layers and layers.
So to label it as if the motive is something that can be isolated independently of all the other layers that need to be considered is a lie.
Because it omits other things that are important variables in the equation.
So, that said, I'm okay with a little bit of wind and waves when it comes to the truth.
As long as I understand up and down, again, back to the prophet Amos with his plumbbog, then I can always sort of measure what are the factors that I think are most closest to true.
And I'm probably going to fall into the same boat.
As you are, as most of the viewers are, in terms of what we're willing to accept as true.
Look, I didn't buy into the false flags.
I saw it.
I woke up to it.
I grew into it.
That changed everything for me.
I wouldn't be the man I am today if it had.
But sometimes you need a shocking event like that to get you to reevaluate everything you thought was true.
And that's exactly what happened to me.
And, you know, There's a lot of people out there that are waking up to the fact, and maybe there are listeners that are here today that are waking up to the fact that everything that you once considered to be a foundational truth needs to be reconsidered and reevaluated.
That said, going into the next segment, let's just go ahead and take a close look at what they're trying to put on us and ask yourself does it ring true?
And if it does for you, maybe you're a simpleton and it's okay.
But if it doesn't, then I guess the next question is well, if it isn't, then what is?
And with the shaking of all that people think that they know or is true, I want to provide a foundation.
Again, part of what Brian and I discussed, and I appreciate Brian's commitment and where he's looked and where he stood, is that fundamentally, if you align yourself with the Creator, then again, what are you worried about if you're saying that the Creator is a beneficent being and that if you want to go the Christian route and have Jesus as a representative?
Exposing Fake Moon Mission Images00:07:23
And Jesus pointing the way forward, which I think is the truth is going to be simple.
Dude only gave one commandment.
And if you follow that, you're not going to be a good person.
You're going to be a great person.
I'll give a little anecdotal evidence, just provide some foundation of where people are going to stand if you're standing with that trust the plan, trust God's plan, because that's all we have.
And we really don't see very much.
So I was working out, I was at the gym and played tennis, went to the gym and Stretching in the sauna, and these four guys walked in and they're chatting.
They know each other, and one of them calls over to me and says, Hey, brother, how are you doing?
I was the only other one in there, and I said, I'm doing good, brother.
And so, where do you guys know each other from?
He said, We work out together and we go to church together.
And we had a conversation, and I think they were trying to recruit me to their church, but we began talking about the spirituality and the Christian precepts.
And that you do have a place to stand with each other.
And the idea is that we're brothers and sisters and to treat each other that way.
And we talked for, that went on for the remaining 15 minutes for me being in the dry sauna.
And I think that we're close to something breaking through, but I tend to always think that.
And maybe it is breaking through.
I don't know how to evaluate it.
Certainly, we're seeing an unprecedented awareness of the public.
All right, let's go to the moon, so called.
Things that make you go, hmm, is we've shown this before, is that the background scenery for the so called moon lander.
And again, any close inspection of this stagecraft.
This is not a lunar lander.
This is not an engineered product.
This is a stage craft.
Eric Dubay.
I recommend all 10 minutes of this.
I'm just going to give a couple of minutes to point out some of the evidence that this is a fake mission, of course.
Continues to release new images and videos from their latest moon mission, exposing themselves more with each one.
Meanwhile, backpedaling space fantasy fanboys are working overtime, making excuses for all the anomalies and inconsistencies.
Just making sure that you catch this is that the Earth is spilling over.
It's a CGI error with that frame.
Let's start with a quick slideshow of some of the new Earth and moon images being given to the public.
Claimed to be real handheld photographs taken by astronauts through windows in a rocket flying at speeds between three thousand and twenty two thousand miles per hour.
Most things filmed outside through your car window going just sixty five miles per hour, are a blur.
Yet NASA never seems to have this problem, even at the incredible speeds they claim to attain.
To a discerning eye, the colors, lighting and textures in these pictures are all very synthetic and unrealistic, looking much more like cgi than actual photography.
Here is actual video of the moon taken from earth by a Nikon P Nine hundred super zoom camera.
We can see the moon's color, lighting and textures from earth in amazing detail With just an 83 times zoom camera, which first of all suggests the moon isn't 240,000 miles away, as claimed, but also shows how unnatural and unrealistic the new Artemis images actually are.
Even AI bots that are trained to detect and differentiate real photographs from CGI are claiming the new NASA images are fake.
In 2026, with the level of realism that CGI, AI, and deepfake technologies have achieved, to see these images and not be at least a little suspicious if they could possibly be fake is frankly disingenuous and gullible beyond belief.
Let's look at this image called a setting Earth.
Notice how clear the craters, shadows, and subtle textures appear.
It looks like the camera is only a few dozen or at most a few hundred miles away from the moon's surface.
Being generous, Asa claims however, that at its nearest, Artemis Too was never any closer than four thousand miles away from the moon.
Now let's compare that with the following Apollo Eleven image from nineteen sixty nine, where the astronauts were supposedly only sixty miles away from the lunar surface.
Look at the difference in detail between sixty miles away and four thousand miles away.
Why does everything look far more textured and detailed from four thousand miles away than it does from sixty?
Could it be because photo fakery has come a long way since the sixties and it actually has nothing to do with their supposed distance from the moon?
Notice how much more detailed the lighting shadows, textures and contrast are on the Artemis moon images.
Also, as a quick aside, if all of these moon craters were supposedly created by meteor impacts hitting the surface, how is it even remotely possible that every single meteor arrives at a straight ninety degrees above the surface zenith?
Every crater is a perfect circle.
None of them are oblong or elongated, as they would have to be if meteors were actually striking from all angles.
Now let's look at this image called a distant crescent of home notice.
First of all, the wonky shape and how both the tiny earth and the moon appear to be smushed from top to bottom.
This is similar to the effect seen during the live stream.
And he then goes through the geometry and the mathematics of the proportions of the Earth to the Moon, and that the sizes are just wrong in all those pictures.
They're just wrong.
I do recommend the full 10 minutes.
All right, then this is the alleged preparation.
And this guy here, this NASA employee, is going to have a big Baphomet tattoo on his left hand.
Is that a coincidence or is that a signal?
And then we got here we have if you think this piece of shit door just stood 10 to the negative 11th power of vacuum, then you're not very smart.
This warped little door.
The amount of money since 1958 is about $1.9 trillion in 2025 dollars.
That's about $20,000 per average U.S. household.
And then we have here, we have this who took this selfie.
And then why is the top of this thing black?
It was all white, but now it's black.
Why is that?
A lot of good questions.
And then NASA, not a space agency and never a straight answer.
Show the NASA official, an astronaut, saying, I'd go to the moon in a nanosecond, but NASA destroyed.
All the technology, the graphic artist who creates those fake images of Earth, is he admits that it's photoshopped and it has to be.
And the idea that they can't get through the Van Allen belts and Elon Musk you can tell it's real because it looks so fake and just it's a ridiculous story, not credible.
All right, Brian, your thoughts, brother.
Well.
Look, I don't want to burst anybody's bubble here, but I don't know that anybody in our audience is swayed by these lies anymore.
Synchronizing Biblical Text Translations00:07:08
If you're going to accept the heliocentric bottle, then you've got to ask why the sky is black in all their photos.
Why there's no stars.
And they give contradictory evidence or testimony saying, oh, yeah, the stars are really bright.
And others say, stars, no stars.
Are there stars?
Are there not stars?
You know, obviously, none of this adds up when you sit down and begin to take a critical look at it.
But, you know, like I said, the problem that people have is this idea of cognitive dissonance.
If everything I've believed and everything I've said in my entire life is now thrown into question, then I must re inspect my entire knowledge base and I must ask.
And I tell the story occasionally.
You know, when I was in college, I think it was around my junior year, I was in Bible college.
And The Genesis professor, I think it was Genesis 301 or something, stood up at the podium and he stepped to the right of the podium and he said, I'm going to argue for the world's perspective of the world over here.
And then he moved to the left of the podium and he said, I'm going to argue for the biblical perspective here.
And so he steps to the right and he says, There was a big bang, and out of the primordial whose comes, you know, the first signs of life, and out of that first signs of life, Mutations began to take place and the evolution kicks in, and you know, you multiply that evolution by billions of years and then take the Jurassic Park concept of life just finds a way to survive, even though you know you've got to live with this thing called the second law of thermodynamics,
where things move from a state of order to disorder.
You know, he steps to the right, and this is what I was taught in my first year of college at Central Washington University and all through high school and all through junior high is this model of the world where we're.
A cosmic accident floating around a third rock from the sun, whipping through outer space at a bazillion miles an hour in an uncontrolled spiral.
We're all alone, except for the visitors who have taken the time to come on in and share some truth with us or seed mankind with their Prometheus concept or whatever it happens to be.
And when you begin to realize that that doesn't add up, the next thing is, well, what does?
And this is when he steps to the left of the podium and says, okay, well, the Bible says this, the Bible says that.
Well, here I am, third year of Bible college, and I don't know what to believe.
And the problem was everybody was trying to synchronize the concepts at the time.
Well, do we have the first seven days of creation ages?
Well, no, the text doesn't allow for that.
Maybe there's the gap theory.
Well, the text doesn't allow that.
What about human footprints on top of dinosaur footprints in the mud?
You know, you start to run into these anomalies that get you okay.
Well, something's true, but I'm not sure what it is.
And maybe I don't want to go full Bible, but maybe I also aren't necessarily buying the world.
So I try to synchronize it, and that causes a crash because the concepts will not come together.
They're opposites, they're like magnets pushing, pushing, pushing.
And if you try to position yourself into the middle there, you're going to find yourself in a spot.
Where you're just simply going crazy.
Everything you say, half of it's true, half of it's fake, half of it.
So, how do you?
So, you try to reconcile it, you try to synchronize it.
It doesn't work.
It causes a shipwreck because the next thing you know, well, if this is true and that is true, nothing's true.
And the older I've gotten, the more I've realized the wisdom of this man stepping to the left of the podium.
And the more I've seen archaeological dig results, and the more I've studied old texts, and the more I've put the pieces together, I realize that there are people at all sorts of levels.
That are deceived on all sorts of issues.
I haven't necessarily come up with all the truth all the time, everywhere.
I'm okay with that because, like you said, there is a standard out there.
And if you really do bypass that, all those questions, and say, Well, I believe Jesus knew exactly what he was talking about, you'll find yourself in a very peaceful spot.
And, you know, that's where I found myself.
So I don't have to struggle and fight and kick to make all these things work.
I found a much more peaceful way to live my life that adds up, makes sense, and works.
And that's simply because Jesus Christ came and he quoted from Genesis.
He quoted all the way through Malachi.
He talked about from Abel to Zechariah and he validated that old original Septuagint Greek translation of those proto Hebrew books, even though there are things in there that are difficult to reconcile.
And I don't say the Bible is.
Perfect in the sense that every word is perfectly understood or perfectly colored with perfect depth.
I'm okay with English language translations.
I'm okay with textual criticism flaws.
I'm okay with, you know, John chapter 7, verse 53 through 8, 12 not being in the earliest, most reliable manuscripts.
I'm okay with majority text translations that were done with the King James version of the Bible.
And I'm okay with the newer, later.
Texts that are translated in a much more critical fashion, tied to the earliest, most reliable manuscripts.
I'm okay with all of the confusion because I think the centralized principle is strong enough for me to say, I don't have to know everything all the time to make it all make sense.
I can stick to the foundation, find myself laying my feet on something solid, and then building out from there.
Like I said, I'm okay with it.
I have peace with it.
Now, when I first came around and started realizing that we weren't third rock from the sun, that was.
That was mind boggling to me.
It was so mind boggling.
I found myself pulling my car over on the side of the road, looking up the sky, going, What is this place?
You know, just like this massive confusion.
Yeah.
What is this place?
Who are we?
What's going on?
Yeah.
Yeah.
Well, as a professional scholar, one of the points that is strong for me is just to recognize we've been lied to and our education system has been a system.
The Downside of Blind Obedience00:04:21
To reduce us into servile sheeple for an Epstein class.
So there's going to be a lot of confusion.
And again, the etymology of the word war for confusion.
And yet, there is a place to stand.
In the sauna, one of the guys was talking to me and he was saying, he was a young man, he's probably about 30.
He was saying, The life I had before I met Christ, you wouldn't want to know me.
And he didn't go through the details, but he said, It was really bad.
And the Lord touched my heart.
And everything changed.
And I jumped in and said, Whoa, brother, that's the key because once you've experienced for yourself this presence, then that's where to stand.
Go ahead, brother.
Yeah, I would put it like this once you submit to obedience, your life can come together very well.
The problem that we get a lot with so called Christians today is.
That they make an intellectual assent that it's true, and they think that gets them out of the hot water in terms of judgment, but then they don't submit themselves to obedience, and that puts them in a position where their life stinks of misalignment.
And that is one of the ugliest things in the world to have a Tammy Faye Baker style or Jim Baker style proclamation.
With a lifestyle.
I mean, even recently we saw the downfall of the moral downfall of Ravi Zacharias.
I mean, he was a very influential, very smart theologian that a lot of people respected and people listened to with great hope.
And he's still, I still, if I were to listen to him, would say a brilliantly wise man who brought a lot of the pieces together.
But his moral downfall was that he had for years had a mistress.
And we're starting to see this happen in churches all over where this is beginning to come to the surface.
That there are people who make the proclamation and maybe put on the clothes, but they never really do get to the point where they're truly obedient to the goal.
Now, I can say this I still make mistakes.
Am I obedient?
Yeah, I try to listen.
Yeah, I try to learn.
Yeah, I try to get aligned.
Yeah, I try to renew my mind.
Yeah, I try.
But I still have this human body that has these flaws.
And again, the aspiration to be obedient is really.
Look, I sat down and wrote, it took me months.
I sat down and wrote an entire commentary on the Bible.
Do you think I came out with better systematic theology or better understanding of nuanced eschatology or a better full blown development of?
My homardiology or soteriology, this is ridiculous.
I didn't.
I came out, frankly, more confused on one hand about the things the world has come up with, but more centralized in terms of the message.
You start on page one and you end on Revelation 22, and you'll realize one thing, one thing, one thing, one overriding issue.
Be obedient and things will come, things will fall into place.
Don't be obedient and you'll find yourself in a mess, no matter whether you proclaim Christ or not.
As simple as that obedience, it's all about obedience.
And that's not to say it's sort of a slavish obedience, it's more of a I'm glad I've been delivered from this mess.
And therefore, in response, I'm very thankful and I will choose to be obedient whether or not I can see the payoff in the short term.
Fraud Charges and Property Taxes00:10:48
Yeah, good faith effort.
All right, domestic and international facts and optics.
And what are people recognizing?
Dr. Oz stuns Brett Baer saying that they shut down over 220 hospices in 10 weeks in Los Angeles alone.
Alone.
And people are waking up to the degree of this.
And Gavin Newsom's former top aide, Dana Williamson.
Just got hit with 23 federal fraud charges.
Allegedly looted $125,000 from a campaign account and claimed $1.7 million in fake expenses to fund a lavish Mexico birthday bash.
Well, a lot of show, but no go.
LA Mayor Karen Bass announces another $360 million for NGOs to prevent homelessness after the massive fraud already exposed.
She's handing out even more taxpayer cash.
The NGOs get richer while homelessness explodes, and it is.
Bass and Newsom own this betrayal.
Okay.
And Treasury Secretary Scott Besant just told Nick Shirley that there may be $500 billion in yearly fraud.
$500 billion a year, roughly 10% of the federal budget.
$500 billion.
So we have 100 million taxpayer households in the U.S., approximately a little bit.
More than that.
So that would be about $5,000 per household, average household per year.
Nick Shirley tried to paint, responding to Governor Newsom, California is again leading the charge against large scale identity theft and hospice fraud.
Today we're taking decisive action against 14 providers who tried using stolen identities to bill Medi Cal for non existent hospice services.
Nick Shirley, You tried to paint me as a pervert for exposing fraud, and as a result, radical leftists started trying to dox me and send death threats, wanting to kill me.
Now, you are taking credit for leading the charge on the fraud?
Are you serious?
You are the fraud.
Very nice.
And then, whew, an accuser just blew the whistle on Eric Swalwell.
So, Swalwell is the next Democrat lined up to be governor of California.
And this woman is apparently there are in the double figures of women with these complaints.
None of it has officially dropped.
And here's a little video of a guy who looks like Swalwell and a sex worker in his home.
Okay.
And then Dem leaders are calling for Swalwell to resign.
Well, we'll see.
Here's a good point of it.
Eric Swalwell took an intern, 17 years his junior, out for drinks.
And this is the summary of the testimony she gave.
She woke up in a hotel room unable to remember the entire night with physical signs that she was raped.
Physical signs that a medical doctor then verified, called her a survivor.
She got tested for pregnancy and STDs.
It's likely he slipped a date rape drug in her drink.
This happened in September 2019.
Okay, well, we shall see.
And then this is an attorney who knows a lot of people on the Hill, and she's saying no less than a dozen people have come to me alleging that Swalwell had inappropriate relationships with young staffers going back years.
Okay, well, we'll see.
A lot of smoke, no fire yet.
On a different issue for property taxes, this guy makes a good point.
I'm being taxed on money I never made.
Let that sink in.
I bought my property outright for $60,000 in 2015.
Now, the county says it's worth $246,000.
Did I sell it?
No.
Did I make a profit?
No.
Did I get a check?
No.
But my taxes jumped like I did.
That's the problem.
This isn't income.
This isn't cash.
This is a number someone decided on paper, and now I'm being billed for it.
Hmm.
That's a good point.
Another show that hasn't gone yet.
Raw data showing massive internet traffic from China and Iran directly to U.S. election precincts and more the night of the 2020 election.
Should be zero foreign countries connecting to U.S. election precincts, obviously.
It's just another data point that keeps on pounding.
And I like this.
Play this little 15 second video of Pfizer and they're involved in pharmakia, which is witchcraft or sorcery, black magic.
Lucifer, huh?
Huh?
Wonder if that's a coincidence.
And then what we've been talking about is that you have to propagandize the people.
And it's best to start when they're young, of course.
So, two patriot Merrill Nass, a health professional, points out this study I didn't know existed.
The U.S. government spent $1.5 million to study how to psychologically indoctrinate five to ten year olds.
Uh huh.
And, uh, Five years old.
That's kindergarten.
So they're studying how to brainwash our children right in front of us.
Brian, your thoughts?
Yeah, lots of issues there.
500 billion.
What happened to Doge again?
I mean, didn't we have like the world's smartest people working on finding all this fraud and yet nothing changed?
Show and go, baby.
Like Nick Shirley to go out there in Minnesota and Start to uncover things and then he makes a name for himself and says, Hey, there's something here.
Let me just go sniff out some other areas, probably get some tips, heads down to California.
Next thing you know, there's more of it and more of it.
How does that relate to property taxes?
Why does that play in?
Well, obviously, it's simple.
Your local proximity wants to build all their schools and comply so that they can comply with the new false flag security structures and they can get up to date and they can.
Get more tax revenues and have nicer neighborhoods, and so they vote to spend more money on sports stadiums and this and that.
And they have to have more police forces because you know everybody's scared that there's going to be a shooting, and so we got to hire more officers.
Oh, somebody drove too fast through a school zone, so now we got to have even more cars.
Oh, by the way, there could be a threat of a guy with an AR 15, so now we need SWAT vehicles and military equipment and a SWAT training zone.
You know, it's this is a security industrial complex that's been growing out of control as a direct result of the false flag economy.
It was planned a long time ago.
It was first really, truly put to the test with Sandy Hook, which obviously Jim's written a book on and I've contributed to on a number of different issues.
They were fake.
What were they?
They were massive spending structures to design to obtain.
Manufactured consent from the populace for this security industrial complex apparatus upgrade.
And by the way, just look at the model of 9 11 and you'll see it very, very clearly.
Prior to 9 11 2001, the same agencies that became the Department of Homeland Security had a budget of $37 billion.
After 9 11, the Patriot Act came around.
Next thing you know, we're going to consolidate this.
This wasn't an act that was born overnight.
This was in the planning stages, excuse me, for years.
Next thing you know, in 2002, the new budget is $87 billion.
And now it's up to something like $870 billion as a result, again, directly correlated to security, which is related to the fear.
Components that soccer moms have because somebody's gonna, some strange man is gonna get out of their car at the grocery store or at the soccer fields and he's gonna look funny and he's gonna be driving an old car and he doesn't belong with us.
So we better call the police and we better, you know, it's a vicious cycle that preys on anybody that comes out of an academic institution because the academic institutions are really the ones that pound this fear mentality with their drills, their terrorism drills.
And so, what do you get?
You get these kids that come out of school, that come out of college, that become mommies and daddies.
And now it's don't talk to strange men.
Don't talk to, you know, and I'm not saying there's nothing to it, but I'm saying that this fear mentality and this has driven the security industrial complex spending.
As for Swalwell, man, I hope the guy repents.
He'd be a good example of a guy that turned around, but I, you know, I doubt that'll ever happen.
If that did ever happen and he became sort of a new.
Kirk Cameron, he wouldn't make it very far.
Look, he's California style, California boy, born and bred for these positions of authority, taught that he was superior.
Avoiding Cynicism to Find Truth00:05:01
And there's nothing new under the sun with these frat boys that gain power.
They cheat their way through life, they cheat their way through their wives, they cheat their way through Chinese spies.
This is nothing new here.
Again, when you abandon the moral compass and decide that you're going to take the institutional ladder to success, And that all that matters is this world.
You're going to find yourself in hotel rooms with prostitutes and strip clubs burning lobbyist money.
And that's going to lead to it, that's going to put it into a death spiral in terms of where you're headed.
Swallow just found out early enough to turn around.
We'll see whether he actually does.
I doubt it.
I'll bet he'll just take some other job as some political lobbyist or some lawyer and patch it up and go live in a million dollar house in a gated community.
That's what they all do.
They just hide behind the money.
Yeah, yeah, maybe he'll get a job with Pfizer.
It's one of their lawyers.
Who knows?
All right, we're going to find a way to.
I'm sure he'd make a great pharmaceutical wreck.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
The empire takes care of their own.
Well, they also sell STD drugs.
Yeah, yeah.
All right, for final thoughts, Patriots, this coming week, of course, the promise of Melania, the Epstein saga blowing up again.
We shall see.
We shall see.
I am, again, I keep on looking for hope.
This is America's 250th birthday.
And I hope between now and the 4th of July, we're going to get some sort of a breakthrough.
We are seeing for sure the escalation and the importance, the escalation of the importance and the quantity of these news stories.
I keep on saying as I look through the stories and my appreciation to all the content providers, everyone who does memes and stories and videos.
The topics seem to get more and more important, and there's more stories.
I could have twice the number of stories that I go through here easily.
So, till something breaks, stay strong.
And after something breaks, and your friends, your family, your colleagues are confused and they're not sure what's going on, I think that the people who have been paying attention are placed around in proportion to be able to point to the data.
And to help people into the truthful world that I hope is coming.
Brian, final thoughts.
Look, I might have sounded cynical today.
I didn't mean to.
I am a bit cynical, and being a conspiracy theorist, especially a halfway decent one, will make you into a cynic when it comes to the issues of the world.
But I got to tell you, on the inside, I'm really not.
It's just when I evaluate current events and make commentary on them.
Of course, I'm going to find myself in a cynical mode.
But the bottom line is, I've got a lot of hope.
I mean, there's a lot of life left to live.
There's a lot of people left out there to.
To win, there's a lot of souls to work with, and there's a lot of people that need help not just help from me, but help from others.
So don't let the cynicism drag you into the mud.
Don't find yourself with these people.
Elevate above it.
Find a way to achieve a balance that tells people the truth in the best way you can.
Be humble about it, and I think you'll be okay.
I don't let these things eat away at me, I don't let them tear me apart.
I don't let them.
Haunt me at night.
I worry about the things I need to worry about and I don't worry about the things that I can't change.
And that's just the way it is.
If I can change it, I might worry about it.
If I can't change it, I might comment on it.
I might make some contribution or say something pithy or come up with something that's profound, but it doesn't change anything except for what am I here for?
The whole reason I'm here is for you, the listener.
It's not because I really think I'm going to change America.
It's not because I'm going to change politics.
It's not because I have some personal ambition or some appetite to get rich or get famous or anything like that.
I'm just here for the listener.
Simple as that.
And so don't be afraid to email.
Don't be afraid to call.
I do my best.
I don't get back to everybody all the time, but it is nice to hear.
I'm easy to find, I'm not hiding.
And if you got some insight or want to just have a chat or talk some questions, find me.
I own Panoramic Investigations in Houston.
Pretty easy to find me.
I'm not hiding from anybody.
Pretty easy.
All right.
Well, thank you, Brian.
Thank you, audience members.
Joe and Chris and I will be back on Tuesday with more of the news that you need to know.