Need to Know News (2 March 2026) with Carl Herman & Brian Davidson
Carl Herman and Brian Davidson dissect the Epstein file dump—17 White House visits, Clinton’s "shut that up" emails, and blackmail ties to Sarkozy—as a scripted "War Week" distraction from Iran, framing it as a scapegoat for U.S. aggression (30M+ deaths since WWII) while exposing elite pedophilia networks. They link CBDCs, vaccine mandates, and gender politics to authoritarian control, citing Epstein’s fractional-reserve banking claims and CHD’s OSHA fraud allegations, then pivot to Maui wildfires as directed-energy attacks and Newport mansions defying historical timelines. The episode culminates in a warning: official narratives mask systemic corruption, urging skepticism of "Operation Truth" while blending conspiracy theories with financial reform and biblical judgment. [Automatically generated summary]
Carl Herman, Mission Viejo, Brian Davidson, Houston, Texas.
Need to know news, March 2nd, 2026.
Let's take a look at those topics and have an opening statement.
Need to know news or what's scripted now?
The Epstein-class satanic pedivores.
Are we going to see those 3 million more files to finish the Clintons?
I hope so.
I think it's going to be scripted after War Week.
Wars and rumors of wars.
We'll have at least a week of War Week news, I'm sure, dominating.
Domestic and international facts and optics.
Is it the Emperor's New Clothes, Great Awakening, Great Tuesday, Breakthrough, or the Gangster, Bankster, Petivore, Business and Official?
His story, Mind Control as usual.
Then, a couple weeks ago, I showed you the Hotel Internacional in Barcelona, Spain.
It has its 54,000 square feet claimed to be completed in 53 days.
Now we're going to go to the U.S., Newport, Rhode Island.
These 1,800 so-called mansions, two of them with a one-year build time and two of them with two-year build times.
And some of you have seen them, some of you haven't.
They're as rich as any palace in Europe.
And so if it's not possible that these palaces were built in the official timeframes, then that story is wrong.
And somebody else built them, somebody who isn't here anymore.
And when you take a look at the impressive work, you ask the question, who were those people?
All right, Brian, opening statement.
Well, I always try to start out with just an overview because we're all people.
So I like to get inbound messaging from listeners.
I don't always have time to get to everything.
And right now I'm in a really intense period of development for a new project.
And yeah, I'm using artificial intelligence.
And it's still not easy.
You still have to learn all sorts of new things like Python and different types of applications.
So it's quite a learning curve for a guy that's been a private investigator for 20 years and a corporate analyst for another 20, 15, I should say.
So there's a lot of learning that takes place and a lot of typing, but I think that the amount of reading what I'm doing every day is probably at the very high point in my entire life.
And it's not all about cultural events and development of events.
So staying up on the news patterns as challenging.
But I do know that we have this Iran script that's beginning to roll out pretty intensely.
And I imagine that there's a lot of falsity within it.
I can say at this point in time, I do not know what's real and what's not.
And I don't know who's dead and who's not.
So we're going to try to deal with today's shows as if it's a pattern.
And we're going to treat the stories as signals and then just sort of try to answer the question of what are they training the public to accept, forget, or emotionally outsource right now.
So there's two battles running at the same time.
There's the battle on the ground and there's the battle over the meaning of what it all means.
The second one decides what the first one becomes in people's minds.
So it's going to be difficult to separate facts from claims or speculation.
And if it can't be confirmed, we're going to treat it as narrative warfare, not a settled truth, which is what we generally do.
So that said, let's get started with the first segment, which is obviously a continuation of the Epstein governance pattern that we've seen.
So let's go ahead and take a look at those and get started.
Well, your opening statement is so well said, brother.
Yeah, yeah, you can't take anything other than testimony from your background as a PI and for me as a historian, like we receive all this testimony eagerly and even ask follow-ups.
Like, anything else you want to tell us?
That's so helpful.
Because, man, that's the first step is to recognize that we're being lied to.
These are scripts that are rolled out by puppeticians and public serpents and not to take any of it as the truth.
And then to ask the bigger question, like, who's writing these scripts and where is it going?
Let's take a look at the Epstein part.
All right, so we got a whole bunch of these.
Let us begin.
All right, so first, we had the testimony last week of Les Wexner and then this lawyer, Michael Levy, in a hot mic moment that I think, of course, script had leaned over and said, I'm going to fucking kill you if you answer any question more than five words.
Well, who is this guy, an attorney?
I mean, you could say he's just playing around figuratively, you know, even though these people are killers and he's in the Epstein files.
So that might be a thread that's worth following a little bit.
All right, our pal James Corbett is pointing out that, you know, part of what we need to really take seriously is these black market babies.
And what are they doing with these black market?
They're eating them, of course, after they torture them and rape them.
And with the Epstein testimony this week of the Clintons and Hillary saying, yeah, you know, Ghislaine, we had charities together and just social contacts.
And I bet if she elaborated, I would prompt her to say how much she and Chelsea love the oceans and that because of Ghislaine's work to save the oceans from climate change.
And then Bill saying, yo, I would have turned Epstein in myself if I only knew.
Well, okay.
All right.
And but the testimony here on the emails, the emails that we received, minus the 3 million other files yet to come.
Yeah, yeah, I guess that she does that Hillary and Epstein knew each other pretty well or from the evidence.
And I just dumped one that had other information.
All right, so an intimate fundraising event with Hillary Clinton, 5.30 to 6.30 p.m.
There they are in the White House.
And then more talking about Hillary Clinton is much prettier in person.
Ooh, that's hard to believe that maybe if you were evil, you would really like that vibe better.
And the Daily Mail exclusive, Bill Clinton was Jeffrey Epstein's closest celebrity mate and a frequent guest at his New Mexico ranch with wife Hillary staying at the pedophile's cowboy-themed village, say, Estate Workers.
Well, that's certainly testimony worth following.
And then Jeffrey Epstein's access to the Clinton White House laid bare.
Visitor logs reveal the pedophile, Pedivore, visited the former president at least 17 times, including a dozen in 1994 and twice in one day and other occasions.
Yeah, this is good.
Hillary Clinton.
She says she only recalls meeting Epstein, Epstein, that one time when she murdered him.
Yeah, we didn't talk much.
He just kept struggling.
You know how it is.
I didn't need that set.
All right, and then here's like, if you say that you don't know what somebody is up to and yet you're cozy enough to be dressing up and matching shiny shirts.
And then the redaction here was somebody who the explanation was that this was a naked woman here.
That's why they redacted it according to the file.
And Bill saying that he just didn't know anything.
Bill's explanation and Hillary's explanation is: oh, you know, since Bill was president, all he does is charity work.
And he coordinated flights with Epstein for his charity work.
And here's Clinton taking a break from his testimony with usage of a meme.
And then Jimmy Dore, Bill Clinton's biggest lies he told to the Epstein committee.
And I just want to play this golden oldie.
That I remember witnessing when it happened.
I just want to remind you how Bill tells the truth about this kind of thing.
I'm going to say this again.
I did not have sexual relations with that woman, Ms. Lewinsky.
I never told anybody to lie, not a single time.
Never.
These allegations are false.
And I need to go back to work for the American people.
Thank you.
Oh, and people applaud.
Well, here he is.
So here he is on the that's that looks like that's isn't that the thing he built at his island or put that's Epstein.
Yeah.
So it looks like I don't know.
I know he built a replica.
So this is a real thing in Israel and then he built a replica of it.
So maybe they're at the real thing in Israel together or maybe they're on his island.
I don't know.
But there they are together.
I think that Bill Clinton was probably just there for the pizza and the jerky and the grape soda.
He's a foodie.
He's a real foodie.
Bill Clinton.
Yeah, it doesn't look good for this.
It doesn't.
I do want to put this set back again because there were some more here that I zipped away.
So this is an email from somebody who shouldn't have been redacted by law.
All this stuff should have been out in December without redaction, except for victims.
Then an explanation for each and every redaction.
But we got redactions all over the place and not all the files.
And then this is to Epstein and somebody is saying, hey, I know you are close with Hillary.
Hmm.
Hmm.
And then organizing a discreet meeting between Sarko and Hillary Clinton in New York, talking about shutting that up.
That was all that I wanted to show for that.
And then we have more testimony to honor Bill Clinton's testimony under oath today.
Let me recount some of Bill's sexual predation.
He's guilty as fuck.
When I was the Air Force military aide to President Clinton, I traveled with him everywhere.
And then he goes over his testimony of Clinton assaulting a female member of that Air Force team and then eliciting that this commanding officer had to elicit an apology from Clinton.
And that's as far as that went.
And his testimony was, is that it was a half-ass apology of somebody who wasn't apologizing for shit.
And then James O'Keefe is giving this testimony of a senior Department of Justice investigator confirming that there is footage of Clinton, Bill Clinton, and Jeffrey Epstein having sex with girls raping girls on his plane.
Huh.
Well, that should be followed up.
And then a reminder that Epstein's IT manager who installed the Pedo Island recording devices, he's a tech guy for the U.S. government.
Probably talk to him would be a good idea.
But again, this is all a script.
This is just being slow rolled out.
And all we've seen so far is in all these areas, though, is the show and go.
But with the net political result of the Great Awakening, the public seeing more than ever before, and it keeps going.
Friend and colleague Fred BurksWantono.info, former State Department interpreter who worked at the highest levels of U.S. political leadership as a translator.
Child sex trafficking documentary Imperium.
If you would like more of the documentation and the supporting documentation for this, Fred Burks has the best alternative news site of any in my assessment as a professional historian.
Now, I'm not going to watch Imperium.
I've seen enough.
But as a professional historian writing both now and for the people watching and learning in the future, that's just another one piling on the evidence.
And then this one I did watch.
It's only 12 minutes.
Gates Epstein access in 12 minutes.
They plan the whole thing.
Sure looks like it.
And in terms of planning the whole thing, this is going to be a coordination with the culling event of the so-called COVID pandemic as well.
Brian, your thoughts, brother.
Well, look, when it comes to Epstein, you can take your time and dig into the salacious details and go as deep as you want.
And I think that the pattern that you want to, that the government wants us to do is you'll get lost in analysis, paralysis, and you'll get lost in all these things that don't really matter.
What really does matter, at least to me, from a big picture, is the model.
And that's what disturbs me the most from the big picture.
There are three questions that really matter when it comes to the entire Epstein machine.
Who gets in the room and who arranges it?
What leverage gets collected by whom?
And where does it route to?
And what decisions become unexplainable unless that leverage exists.
So we generally think in a set of as a set of rules that the decisions that get made have a purpose or an agenda.
I think the bigger purpose and agenda is who are these people that are applying the leverage for what goal?
Who Controls the Page?00:15:43
Is it limited to Mossad or is it a part of a much larger architecture?
Where else does the architecture exist?
I mean, it's not like this is the first revealing of a big secret.
This has been occulted knowledge, I'm guessing, for centuries in terms of how to control states using blackmail.
I mean, Epstein didn't invent that.
That's been around since the beginning of time.
So you have all these claims.
And again, like I said, you can get lost in the jargon.
You can get lost on the different threads and the different rabbit trails.
But what I haven't seen yet as a result of these redactions is who are these people in the network in large and what are their motivations to be a part of this structure?
Is it all just to get rich?
Because I can tell you one thing about these pedo murder Satanists is that they have all the money in the world.
Money isn't always the motive.
As a matter of fact, they'll trade in humanity because it's more fun.
And I wouldn't put it beyond these guys to be the types of people that literally have human hunts on islands, like has been, you know, portrayed in different types of movies and such.
But I would suspect that the tentacles to this system are everywhere.
And more importantly, I would probably ask the question right now with the Iran situation: okay, we understand the leverage systems.
How does that change the propaganda and the leverage economy?
So I'm not treating any statements as provable on air.
I'm going to treat blackmail architecture as the issue.
And I'm going to ask the question, how is that shaping policy and enforcement?
Because it's certainly not the American voter that is.
Or maybe we represent a 4% swing on the pendulum, but it's obvious that this leverage structure is much larger than the voting bloc of America.
So we have to get to the bottom of this and try to restore some sense of institutional faith in our government, or in my opinion, it needs to be destroyed.
Whether that destruction is going to come from an implosion as a necessary consequence to the degraded moral values and the degraded trust in the institutions,
or whether that collapse is going to come from some sort of engineered series of events that lead to a military industrial complex running an Orwellian security structure along with a social credit system to enforce the behaviors that they want to achieve.
I don't know.
I don't know what's going to come first in terms of that.
But I can tell you this.
What Epstein has revealed is that the model itself has been corrupted completely.
And we cannot return to constitutional dynamics unless we recognize that as a society.
Yeah, you talk about getting to the bottom of it, maybe getting to the top of that pyramid.
And just a historical context, as a volunteer political lobbyist with results.org working for U.S. Domestic and Foreign Policy to End Poverty, we discovered that it was all of the heads of the government of all of the so-called developed nations.
They were all captured.
None of them would do anything to help the poorest of the poor except Virtue Signal.
And then we thought, okay, there's like 200 nations in the UN.
Let's just get the developing countries all to go for it.
And we found out that they wouldn't do it either.
Some of them were puppets, and the ones who seemed honest wouldn't risk their lives.
And then later for the economic hitman, John Perkins' explanation of that it's silver or lead for these leaders.
So something is coordinating an earthwide empire.
And what is driving the show?
I mean, Brian and I have chatted about this.
It seems to be something deeply evil.
And if you wanted to call that satanic, that matches with me.
And the idea of the crimes against children and explaining that.
I think it's something that is demonic to the level of attempting to deconstruct God's closest vibrational frequency connection, children.
And to see where God's power of creation is.
I think that they literally want to rip that out of kids and then use it against the Creator.
And at the same time, causing the maximum pain to the Creator because these guys are sadists.
Let's take a look at wars and rumors of wars.
And again, I'm with Brian.
I said, yeah, we'll take a look at these signals and see.
All right, so we got Trump tweeting, but truth and out, is that he's claiming that Khmeni is dead.
And maybe we got 40 of the leadership.
Maybe all of the fire is all against evil targets.
Maybe this is the show.
Maybe who knows?
Meryl Nass providing some historical context to Patriot last time I checked.
Iran hasn't stolen any of my freedoms.
They didn't run up $38 trillion in national debt.
I think this might be a two days old, so maybe it's 39 or 40 now.
And destroy our standard of living.
Didn't pass the Patriot Act.
Didn't pass the income tax.
The income tax after World War I started out as 1%.
They promised, oh, yeah, yeah, we'll roll it back.
Iran didn't hand over the full control of the U.S. monetary policy to a private banking cartel.
Didn't force the NIH to fund gain of function research in Wuhan, China.
Didn't lock down American cities, businesses, and schools.
Didn't pass experimental and deadly mandates for being shot.
Didn't print $7 trillion during the COVID pandemic and destroy the American economy.
Didn't host drag queen story hours in the elementary schools and libraries.
Where again, you get the leaderships giggling about, oh, who doesn't like drag queen story hour?
Where you get men who aren't going to be these gay men who aren't going to reproduce but have to recruit wanting to read stories to kiddies, huh?
While dressed in sexually provocative clothes that you would associate with sexual pleasure with children and putting their books in those libraries.
Iran isn't promoting destructive, life-altering transgender surgeries, surgical mutilation, and surgical or medical castration.
Iran isn't flooding American airwaves with pharmakea.
Iran isn't trying to block out the sun or spraying harmful chemicals all over our skies.
They're not spraying our crops with cancer-causing pesticides.
They didn't give glyphosate manufacturers immunity.
They didn't accuse the Supreme Court Justice nominee of being a gang rapist.
Yeah, but they're all dirty and keeps going on and on and on.
That the real enemy is centered in Washington, D.C.
That would be one of the main conclusions, Caitlin Johnstone.
Fuck everyone who made this war possible.
That's a good historical context with Caitlin, because that's all that the empire does is war, war, war, war murder.
And as a professional historian, I've done my best, published research via the Claremont Colleges, that the wars are Orwellian illegal, and including with the lies for Iran.
Got a 40-page white paper leveraged by Congressman Kucinich for the attempted impeachment of W and Vice President Cheney.
Two one-page briefs for Robert David Steele to brief Trump.
The two central lies for war in Iran that we kept on hearing is Iran threatened to wipe Israel off the map and their nuclear program.
Maybe I'll tell you those stories, but the documentation is all here that we know for sure is that the official his story is a lie.
Mike King, the anti-New York Times, you know, he's saying that this is just a show, this is all scripted, don't take it personally.
And his conclusion is that this is a white hat production.
And I'm in agreement.
And I'm in agreement because what we're seeing with this show and go with all these areas is the unprecedented awakening of the American public.
And that it's in position for this reversal.
Hasn't happened yet.
And we shall see.
And then this is an interesting summary.
No U.S. military casualties have been reported.
Well, that was as of the other day.
All while killing 40 top Iranian officials.
This is not a war.
This was a deletion.
Yeah.
Okay.
I think that's it for that section.
And I do want to tell you the two principal lies that we heard for well over a decade that Israel, and that's all in the documentation, that Israel wants to wipe or Iran wants to wipe Israel off of the map.
All right, this was a 2005 speech by the Iranian president.
And what he said, and you can read the speech for yourself, it just takes like two minutes.
And I provide the speech, and you can check it for yourself.
The Iranian president was saying, Look, in our own country of Iran, the leadership of the Shah was taken out because of its intense corruption, erased from the page of time.
Same thing for Saddam.
So evil.
His government fell, erased from the page of time.
Same thing with the Soviet Union.
Erased from the page of time.
And the same thing will happen to Israel with their treatment of the Palestinians, this ongoing war on them.
The Israeli government will be erased from the page of time.
And the line that has been going on forever is: Iran threatened to wipe Israel off the map.
No, no, no, no.
And then the weapons of mass destruction is that for all of the follow-up of the international IAEA, the International Atomic Energy Commission, they have 24-7 monitors on the production of nuclear material.
And it's the U.S. and the NATO countries, they're in violation because the deal of the non-proliferation treaty is you give up nuclear weapons.
And in exchange, we help you have nuclear energy and nuclear medicine.
And the production, the refinement of materials in Iran is 24-7 monitored.
And Iran has been in compliance throughout all time.
So what we know for sure is that the U.S. is lying about the wars as they always lie about the wars.
And it is the U.S. is the biggest war murderer, 30 million plus since World War II.
So we shouldn't take their testimony as anything other than Epstein-class war criminal pedivors to know what's going on and to not believe anything from the leadership of those criminals.
Brian, your thoughts.
Holy cow, the thoughts run deep in a segment like that.
First of all, I can see the patriotic side of supporting a war with Iran in the sense that, you know, here we are helping free up these people.
We're going to put a mall on every corner, just like we did in Iraq back in, you know, under George Bush.
You know, what was that, 1990, 1991?
We're going to help free the citizens from the corrupt and powerful Ayatollah Khomeini.
While we're at it, why don't we just go ahead and rid the whole world of all their despots and try to replace it with the new constitution?
Foolishness, pure foolishness.
Look at what America actually is, not what our constitution says it ought to be.
Right now, what we are is, I hate to say it, but Israel, the secret societies, the global banking cartel, we are their enforcement mechanism.
Team America World Police is not a crusading avenger trying to rid the world of some dark evil, unless what you say is true.
And this is a white hat operation.
But if that's true, wouldn't it be a global initiative of some group of good guys who are going to actually rid the structure of this corruption influence?
I would say that since Trump took office again, I've seen almost every decision he has made lean more towards the corrupt oligarchy in terms of political positioning than lean back towards the people in terms of what we want.
If the people were to really think about it, the idea of, you know, oh, we're going to get rid of all the people that come draining in when the border was wide open.
So we're going to send in ICE.
There's a distraction.
Oh, we're going to release the Epstein files, but we're not going to actually do any justice.
There's a distraction.
Oh, we've got this war.
Well, that war is narrative in Ukraine.
That's all played out.
So we're going to go ahead and move over to Venezuela and that's going to try to distract them for a little while.
Now we're going to move to Mexico and that's going to try to distract them a little while.
And we had the JFK and the MLK and the RFK files showing nothing.
Operation Truth's Illusion00:15:25
But yo, though, they show and go with those too.
I think my point is: if this is Team America World Police, don't be deceived.
We are not out to create independent countries under independent leaders who make decisions that are in the best interest of their country.
We are out to make servants of an industrial complex.
Now, is that better than what Khomeini offered?
I mean, as a street-grade American, I guess I can say, well, they don't have much internet over there.
There is a lot of censorship.
I mean, it was much better back in the 70s when women were wearing bikinis at the beach before, you know, the new religious revolution came on in and replaced that permissive society with a much more structured religious theocracy style with an ayatollah.
I mean, what's better, I don't even know that we have the moral ground to even make that assessment anymore because of what we've allowed ourselves to become.
So, what you have to realize about this Iran thing is that this thing hasn't, and the very first segment you ran with Iran didn't, you know, throw up our Supreme Court, Iran did, tells us, you know, this thing's not being sold to the American public on facts.
It's being sold to the American public on permission.
And so, right now, we've got a mainstream narrative architecture that is quietly growing in appetite and strength that manufactures permission through fear, inevitability, moral panic, as if it's, oh, you don't really have a choice.
And by the way, you're helpless and useful anyway.
So, I mean, just take a look at how the narrative is advancing.
Ask yourself these questions when you see media headlines.
When they absolutely minimize one side of the story and maximize the other side's losses, you're watching narrative control, which is producing confidence and compliance and trying to undergird faith in institutions.
But what's really going on is that look, whenever a regime wants to expand control, you will see a sort of reality management campaign that's running in parallel to it.
And we have to ask ourselves at this point the question: What is really happening with the expansion of control?
Is this an expansion of control in the Middle East for the sake of Israel's Greater Israel project?
Which I suspect it is.
Or is this an expansion of control in terms of United Nations, Team America, World Police?
We must continue with the Kissinger doctrine of Global hegemony through force, and anyone who threatens it must be downgraded, eliminated, or replaced.
And so that would be kind of my conclusion on the system.
That I have a crying dog here.
I don't know if you can hear him in the background.
Can't hear him.
She's getting blind, and she's having a hard time right now.
Yeah, that's kind of how I'm going to finish the segment.
You have to look at it in terms of what are they trying to accomplish.
They're trying to accomplish consensus and control for whatever action.
And the problem that we have right now is that there's a tremendous amount of cloud and darkness and smoke in the air related to what are the real motives here.
My instinct is if you could let the winds blow and clear it all out, you'd see Israel's expansion campaign with America's tail wagging the dog position.
We are the tail that's being wagged by the Israel dog.
That's my instinct.
And if that's true, if that's really true, you would think that our military industrial complex white hat leaders would see it.
And that would support the idea that there is some sort of super secret structure and architecture in place that's going to rid the world of this evil.
But I would ask the question: by what mechanism?
I mean, what executive order is there?
What international consensus is there that the power system must be taken down?
I don't see any.
I see a bunch of American-Israeli bitches out there with the exception of Russia, China, Iran, and some of the other South American countries.
I can't really see anything else.
The rest of them are compromised to the point where we just simply control.
Yeah, well stated, brother.
Well, in terms of the history, as I emphasize, we can be clear and we can be rational that until the history of these lie-started Orwellian illegal wars of aggression is accounted for.
Certainly, you shouldn't believe anything coming out of the leadership from these war criminals.
And then the idea of that, well, how could this actually turn out for the good?
We would need friends in high places.
And in terms of the applicability of psyops and for the professional military, of not wanting you to see them ever.
Never.
And I agree with you that it feels like we're in a big psyop right now.
This does feel like the, I mean, it feels like a horror movie.
It is, except for the outcome.
It's me too.
I mean, I keep on saying best of times, worst of times.
And what you're seeing isn't going to make you happy.
What you're seeing is all of the evil of the empire.
And yet, at the same time, it's show and go, and we're still talking.
We haven't been taken out.
We haven't been cold.
We haven't been put into work camps and truth camps and health camps because we're a danger to public health and we're insane.
None of that has happened.
And the political effect has been the destruction of the assets of the enemy, which is the belief in the leadership and in the media.
So, you know, I don't know anything, but I am pointing to the political outcome.
And it does and the history that we're in a SIAP.
Of course, we're in a SIAP.
It's all a SIAP.
It's all scripted.
Let me point this out.
The idea of an Operation Truth creates a very, very nice platform for a bait and switch that ends up imprisoning us in an Orwellian government control structure because of the fact that we don't have transparency and we don't have any sort of authoritative basis.
And so the idea that there is some sort of delivery team, let's call it a deliverance team without any verifiable structural confirmation leaves the door wide open for this concept being used in a bait and switch mechanism that says,
we've gone ahead and acquired all of the resources of all these bad oligarchs and global elite and we've taken it away and we're going to give it back to the people.
By the way, in the meantime, we just need you to go ahead and sign off on this temporary military presence in all your towns so that we can keep the order while the transition takes place.
I mean, it feels so scripted.
It feels so scripted.
Yeah.
I don't want to be fooled when the day comes, but I can tell you that that day of deception, I mean, even from a biblical perspective, it's coming.
It's coming.
It's coming.
How do you recognize in such a foggy environment who's good and who's bad?
Who's got who's going to double-cross who and what's a setup and what's not?
It's too foggy.
And who do I trust to make the decisions about what risks to take to make a transition like that if I can't trust our leaders or our military?
Which obviously, look, if the media statements are true, we certainly can't trust the military.
Where is this?
I would prepare for the worst rather than hope for the best in these situations.
Yeah, you gotta be much more towards prepare.
You gotta plan for all contingencies.
And this certainly, it could be an Operation Truth.
And I just have to tip my hat to them.
But, you know, if I was a black hat advisor, there is no need for all of this work.
I mean, they had wrapped up over a decade ago of the people who they would need to take out.
And we even saw documentation of things like marking mailboxes and stuff like that.
And they were building the camps.
And they would have rolled it out and crushed us.
I conclude.
But I don't know anything.
I don't know anything.
And well, they need to continue manufacturing consent until we get to that point of have we walked off the cliff?
You know, until we get to the actual turning point where they turn off physical currency and replace it with a government-controlled cryptocurrency or what is it called?
Decentralized digital, centralized banking, digital currency.
You know, that's it.
That's the only obstacle threshold that needs to be crossed is to basically convince the public that it's in the best interest to go ahead and switch over to a CBDC.
Yeah.
What else is left?
Well, then you have to take the chip so that the stores can register your purchases and we can make sure that you're up to date on your vaccines.
Yeah, and then you pay your taxes and we can make sure that you have exercised your right to vote and make sure that you're being a nice compliant citizen who's filing for all of your opportunities to go protest and who you still have freedom of speech.
It's just that it's not so much free anymore.
You know, those are obstacles that will be crossed.
They're positioning us in terms of manufacturing the consent to take that level.
What do you think all this gender crap is all about?
It's about saying, well, we can't go this direction with speech.
We can't go this direction with old societal constraints.
We've got to go that direction in terms of now we're a new breed of progressive, enlightened citizens who recognize that the very small minority of cultural outcasts that have blue hair and progressive mindsets must be protected from the bad, you know, white conservative Christian male who obviously has a gun and obviously cares about the Constitution and freedom.
I mean, that's the whole purpose is to try to create a protected class to protect them from us.
But I would say, if I'm the leader of this movement, I don't care about the progressive that's emerging from the academic structure at all.
I care about the corrupt politician.
I don't, I don't much, I would rather see these people change their minds through experience as they grow older.
And it never fails that they'll all, the older they get, the more conservative they'll become.
I mean, that's a fact.
I would rather see these people change their mind through that than through some sort of culture war or civil war.
But the real enemy is not the progressive lie.
The real enemy is the people driving the progressive lie in order to achieve a, like I said, manufactured consent.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
All right.
Well, let's take a look at more of the news.
And the biggest question always is, who is in control?
Because the scripts could go either way.
And we try to have a little bit of fun thinking about those scripts.
All right, domestic and international facts and optics and the ongoing contextual question of who is in charge.
Now, Epstein says there would be runs on the bank if the public knew how the banking system works.
Damn right.
If you have $1, you can lend out nine.
That's the way our system works.
People on the street would find it impossible, possible to believe.
And I'll give Epstein a moment himself to talk about this.
Which is called fractionalized banking.
And fractionalized banking is something that finance people understand.
And the people on the street, and when I say people on the street, that's where I was when I started on Wall Street, would find it impossible to believe.
Impossible.
Why?
Bang and Bank.
I give you $1, just one single dollar.
In our system of banking, I would say, okay, Steve, I gave you a dollar.
How much can you lend out to your friends?
And your natural reaction would be, probably something less than a dollar because I want to keep something in my pocket.
The way our system works is if you as a bank are holding my dollar, you can lend out an additional eight or nine dollars.
As if they play by the rules.
The big boys don't, but the Fed regulators make sure that the small bitch banks follow those rules and they're regulated for that.
Banking Practices Explained00:02:29
And that, of course, is going to create an unprecedented inflation.
Yeah.
And creating everything that we use for money as debt is going to cause this near exponential growth of total debt.
Yeah.
And the good news is that this Orwellian system has superior mechanics ready to go.
Monetary reform and public banking.
And again, published research via the Claremont Colleges that pretty much all, each and every one of our economic problems is near instantly, near instantly solved with just these two changes.
And this is backed up by 10.
I had different published research paper with Claremont Colleges of 10 of our brightest American historical minds pointing that out.
And it's obvious.
All right, Iowa candidate Zach Lon says big agricultural giants, including Chinese, owned Syngenta, are causing the skyrocketing cancer rates and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in the United States.
And they're spraying us with poison, as we keep on talking about.
We're being dued and redacted with their millions of people for the Maui massacre.
I just want to point out the contextual questions here that are important for all of us.
In Maui, after the wildfires, how much of that land was sold off to investors on the mainland?
And that's an ongoing process, is that it is the burnout and then the buyout, and then keeping them in distress to predictably force more sales.
What about the directed energy weapons used to cause the fires or start the fires?
What is the official line from the government and why we should all just look the other way?
The official line from the government is that's a crazy conspiracy theory and they don't have that technology.
So many households still not rebuilt and living in temporary housing.
And how many people have now died as a result of this entire process?
Michelle Melendez is the author of Great Maui Land Grab.
What caused the Maui fire and is your home next?
And that's the principal questions is your home could be next.
Just 50 miles north of me, both in Pasadena and in Pacific Palisades.
They were dued.
Satellites and Sky Weapons00:04:02
And here's a picture of what one of the weapons just might look like for that.
As we covered during the time, is that Maui burst for Mountain Dew dew with a blast of pineapple and mountain dew pitch black.
And that might be the exact type of weapon that we're looking at.
I'm glad, let me hold you up on that one quick.
I'm glad you showed that picture.
And I'm going to transition over to the space guys in the audience.
We are told that there are satellites floating around in the endless vast expanses of outer space that are held to a particular layer of the atmosphere by gravitational forces as orbitation takes place around the gravitational center of planet Earth.
And that we are one of many planets in an infinite universe of solar systems where every star that you can see visibly in the sky represents hundreds and trillions and billions and millions of light years of travel combined with celestial architectural laws that are observable in any astronomy.
We are told that space weapons in the mainstream media are the new frontier.
We've been told that since Ronald Reagan, let me ask you a question: Is there something wrong with the structure when you see a picture of an airplane like that that obviously is equipped to project or read?
I don't know if that big object on the front of the plane is scanning, projecting, outputting, or inputting.
I don't know.
But I can tell you this: the idea that there is a space weapon floating around that somehow has enough power to transfer to the surface of the Earth from far above and also, you know, take signals and receive signals from the other side of the earth, bounced off other satellites.
It's a very tall order for me to believe.
What is easier for me to believe is that we have weapons that are built into planes.
Satellites are balloons.
And that the GPS positioning system may be some sort of satellite-based or fixture-based firmament assembly rather than a ground-based rather than a ground-based satellite system.
I can tell you that the Skynet, Elon Musk, what is it?
It's not Skynet, whatever the Elon, Starlink.
Doesn't make sense.
It doesn't make sense as they present it to us that here we see these lights floating around in the sky and this is how we get our internet.
Which just doesn't make sense.
It's just not.
Now, the last story that I have will provide some resources for people to see that the objects that are completely visible on the horizon are inconsistent and refute the official his story of the size and shape of Earth being a sphere.
By all appearances, it's flat.
All right, more of these stories of domestic and international facts and optics.
Turbo cancer makes the cover of Time magazine.
Prima Fascia Evidence Refuted00:02:20
And they're just asking the question, the race to explain why more young adults are getting cancer.
So they're forced to get ahead of the story.
But the prima fascia evidence is that this is crimes against humanity.
And we were injected with this stuff.
And as I keep on sharing, this is my documentation with two years of battle experience with Hayward Unified School District, that the prima fascia explanation is that this is crimes against humanity.
And that every aspect of the official his story of so-called COVID and their so-called health, so-called orders is laughably false, tragic, comically false.
But until we have this breakthrough, we'll have to just keep on talking about it.
Exclusive, CHD calls for federal criminal investigation of OSHA over COVID vaccine injury reporting.
Children's Health Defense is calling for a criminal investigation into OSHA over their 2021 directive, suggesting healthcare employers not report workers' adverse reactions to mandated COVID-19 vaccines.
And they had to have all the infrastructure and education.
They had to have the school districts, the departments of education, both at the state level and at the federal level, as well as the teachers' union.
Minnesota fraud investigation, only six of 500 autism centers applied for a license.
Whoa, that would make sense.
And again, the conclusion, prima fascia money laundering, and that this is one of the huge potential empire-ending show-and-go's that have begun.
Like this, RFK Jr. blows the whistle on 400 million autism fraud scheme in Minnesota.
And that the data, of course, would have to be rejected.
It's so ridiculous, but it still goes on, and we don't have the breakthrough.
And from Jim's channel, Hal Exek, the way forward for consciousness, health, and freedom with Mike Adams, is that it's a 24-minute video.
I recommended it.
I watched it with some of the stepping forward for alternatives to recognize that if you want to be healthy, then your food, of course, has to be healthy.
Turn to Speculation00:07:11
And you need to align yourself with energetic principles that are not part of the food pyramid.
And then in terms of healing ourselves, I like this woman's contribution and want to play it.
Yeah, even the official his story, white people didn't invent slavery, they helped end it.
Yeah, you would have to do that.
That's true.
That is true.
That is true.
And then, in terms of flipping the script as well, you got the actor playing Biden.
Remember when I said poor people are just as smart as white people?
And then the actor playing Newsom wasn't as good as me saying, I'm as dumb as black people, though, was it?
And then, of course, taking the inversion and trying to.
Part of the demonics that they always do is they want to grab you and pull you down into the slime with them.
And I would say that one of the principles for those who are spiritual, religious, philosophical, or just simply Christian, is that we were both offering the main main deal is that we offer and defend a kingdom.
It's not here, not here in this kind of near this kind of hell, but we're protecting and we're attempting to uplift people.
We're not going over the truth in anything other than presenting the truth.
And we're not hiding any of the facts.
But the biggest deal is that you have an opportunity to enter into a kingdom if that's of interest to you.
But the demons aren't going to do anything of that.
They're going to project through evil and they just want you to fight in the mud with them.
Your thoughts, brother.
Okay, so yeah, that is a segment that has a lot of sort of off-the-ground etheristic type of components.
So let's take a look at it.
And just remember, There's a lot of confusion floating around in the gap between science and the religious view of what humanity really is.
And this modern system doesn't need you to believe the official story.
It only needs you to feel that you can't know anything for sure.
And therefore, you should stop acting or just simply act in a way that seems reasonable based on the limited information that you have.
So there's a lot of credibility laundering taking place.
We've got some real signs of fraud, regulatory failure, and conflicts of interest.
But then when we bundle that up with speculative claims, the whole system becomes dismissible.
So mixing provable misconduct with unprovable speculation is a classic way to sort of bury the provable part because then you can throw the baby out with the bathwater.
So what we really need to do is sort of build a two-column worldview.
In the left column, it's what we can prove.
And in the right column, it's what we're monitoring.
And so that would clear things up a lot more.
But the problem is, right now, what we can prove is such a fuzzy, dark, foggy nightmare that there's no confidence in it.
So we have to turn to speculation to fill in the blanks, because otherwise, that cognitive dissonance inside of ourselves puts us in a position where we know nothing, we can do nothing, we're nobody.
I would debate this in a way that argues we are the result of a creator first, and that that creator has built in enough design elements for us to understand who we are.
I would then build the case that that designer has revealed himself to us and that there is a reliable authoritative structure as to what really is the nature of mankind from the way the creator has revealed us himself to us.
And I'm not just talking about general revelation in terms of what we can observe and experience.
I'm talking about a special revelation in terms of answering the question: did that creator actually leave instructions instead of just leave us to speculation and occultic sort of connections?
Meaning, we're trying to connect with this sort of spiritual realm that's tied to this creator to gain information, which is what's called divinity, I guess.
It's also sometimes it's done right and it becomes prophecy.
Other times it's done wrong and the wrong sources are relied upon and it's called magic.
So I'm going to argue from that direction.
So a lot of the new agey stuff to me gets discredited, not because it doesn't feel right, but because it doesn't have a foundation in my worldview constitution.
You see what I'm saying?
So, but in the end, this isn't about being awake in the sense that we have a spiritual awakening.
It's more about being responsible with the reality that we have and thinking through and coming to some firm conclusions based on that architecture.
Kind of, see what I'm saying?
Yeah, yeah.
Well, well said.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
You got to discern what is true from what is not.
All right.
Fort Adams' Gothic Room00:08:03
And speaking of, let's go on to this for those Newport, Rhode Island mansions.
And when we lived in Boston from 99 or 98 to 2000 in Framingham, Massachusetts, while I was getting my graduate degree from Harvard, we did go to Newport, Rhode Island.
I didn't see the mansions.
I didn't want to see them.
We went to the tennis, International Tennis Hall of Fame, which is just about a mile away from these.
All right.
So there's a group of mansions, and the official history is that these mansions were built.
This one, I forget which one this one is, but the official history for this is built in two years and it's five floors and it the underground floors too.
And like 54,000 square feet, two-year build time in the 1880s, before power tools, before trucks, before roads.
And I want to show you, most people are not aware of what these things really look like.
And this gentleman is one of the ones who is with us.
Just let him walk in here.
This is the entryway.
This is the main entryway.
All right, and that's about as intricate as you can possibly get for the details and the beauty.
And again, the impossibility of just a two-year build time in the 1800s in two of these buildings.
This room, I mean, all of them.
This beautiful.
It's an 88-minute video.
And I watched all of it.
For all this stone architecture and the details.
Stunning.
And it's in every room.
So there were human beings who did this.
And if we can throw out the official his story as impossible, then the question is: who were these human beings and what were they really about?
The ceiling work, the opulence, the beauty, and a lot of angels, a lot of cherubs in here.
I'll show you the staircase here.
There's no way every single...
Two years!
That's just one of the buildings.
going to another one just briefly show you one of the rooms here inside the dining room
And for my having been to the Vatican and to the royal palaces in England, this is just as stunning as any of those.
And then I think I want to show you, there's so much that I could show you, but I want to just show you.
I want to leave it to three.
Oh, but I got to show you this.
And then I want to show you.
It's by a star fort that was built in the 1700s.
This is called the Gothic Room.
Take a look at the ceiling there, the woodwork, all of the angels.
There's no way.
No way.
It's true.
I mean, the detail is just off the cuff.
It's like a six-inch door.
Yeah, a six-inch door.
And it goes on and on.
And I want to show you that this is all by a star fort.
Maybe I'll just kind of cheat and bounce like this so you can see some of the details for these buildings.
And it's all of Newport.
A very protected town of these old world buildings.
So this must have been where the elite were decided to live rather than to destroy it as they did in the world's fairs.
This is the exterior too.
That's their museum cafe.
Some of the statuary.
And I just want to get to this fort.
And I believe this is Fort Adams.
I'm just going to give you a little view of the inside of it so you can see.
Here out this walkway here.
Looks super worn.
official history built in 1791.
You could fit the Castle Island Fort in Boston inside.
This few lot of bricks.
And I guess two more.
This is a pagoda in Forest Park of St. Louis, Missouri.
And this was destroyed as part of the World Fair.
It was claimed to be a temporary building, despite the elaborate architecture.
Now, I went to Forest Park when I was six years old.
Went there with my two brothers to visit my grandparents.
As I've talked about, I would love to talk to grandma and papa again to see what they knew.
They were born in the 1890s about the 1904 St. Louis World's Fair.
And Forest Park, when I was six, it was huge.
Nothing in there.
One water feature that had a pipe sticking out of it with a strong blast of water, but nothing of the beauty that had been there.
Completely destroyed.
Wiped off.
And if you want more of the documentation of Tartaria, this is the presentation that I did for Jim's False Flag and Conspiracies Conference for Tartaria, including the St. Louis World's Fair, And including the documentation of what Brian was talking about, is that, by all appearances, we certainly don't live on a ball of the that's.
Guaranteeing Judgment Drip by Drip00:07:08
If you think that the earth is the official size and shape that is as easily as refuted as you know the wars saying that they're for democracy it's.
Or that the financial system creating this near exponential growth in debt is a monetary system, it is inverted, it is easily proven, and just be a little bit more flexible of once you know that you've been lied to, then it's probably everything important, and I don't know of anything that isn't important to these demons.
Brian, your thoughts, brother.
Well, that segment you know.
I I have shared sort of my theory and it trust me, it's a wild theory on the angelic potential construction of these buildings and I can still tell you, while they appear impressive by our human hand standards, don't forget that the bible says,
consider the lilies how they grow and they neither toil nor spin.
Yet I tell you, even Solomon in all his glory was not arrayed like one of these.
And I can tell you this, those buildings are very cool, It's like dream architecture for the finest of our glorious oligarchical, kingly, monarchical classes.
Kid stuff compared to what you'll discover in Revelation 21 and 22 after this corrupt world gets rolled back like a scroll and replaced with a newer, superior version that doesn't have corruption right down into the very dirt.
So it again, from this world's perspective, yeah, it's impressive.
But from the next, I could take it or leave it.
That's a good point.
And that is going to be the fundamental contextual question once you take a look at it.
So who are we really?
What are we doing here?
Who is the creator?
And to align yourself with that.
All right, we're going to final thoughts.
Well, Patriots, another big week.
We're in March.
Two of the months of 2026 are now complete.
And I hope that what we're going to be seeing is we got another 3 million files for the Epstein files.
I hope that this cue thing of drip, drip, flood that we're seeing the flood stage, because certainly we have seen an increase in the progression and the importance of events doesn't mean anything.
And as Brian wisely admonishes us, is to be prepared for all contingencies.
And me as a historian, I would admonish you that history doesn't guarantee the future, but it's where to put your money.
And if you were to anticipate what is going to happen, then the first thing, and you do this with sports, you scout your team.
All right, so scout Earth, what has happened?
Oh, well, the human beings have been work animals and the toys of a relatively advantaged class of demons.
Then I would prepare for that.
I would prepare for just more attacks, and that that's the environment that we're in until it's proven otherwise.
And at the same time, do we have help from friends in high places?
I conclude that we do.
Brian, final thoughts, brother.
You are absolutely correct that there is a bank.
And I'm going to refer the audience to Romans chapter 2, verse 5.
That those people that have hard and unrepentant hearts are storing up wrath and accumulating divine judgment for themselves, which will be revealed in a future day.
Now, if you think of that as a bank, you are either storing up the rewards that come with obedience and good works, or you're storing up wrath.
If we were to live our lives every day as if the day's output was to put a credit in that storehouse rather than a debt, where would we be at the end of our lives, folks?
I would argue that you've got it all wrong if you're more worried about your Bank of America or your Chase bank account than you are about your resurrected life bank account.
Because I can guarantee you one thing: I 100% believe that death is not the end, that death we don't pass into oblivion, but instead every man is raised to judgment.
Every man is raised to judgment because there has to be a judgment.
The very fact that our antenna points to right and wrong and we morally know it and can feel it, although we can't necessarily map it out every day, indicates that we were built with a moral guidance block based into us.
If we were built that way, that implies that the creator built us that way.
And if the creator himself made us that way, then I can guarantee you we haven't seen judgment in this world.
But it's built into the creator's character.
So it is promised.
It is a guarantee.
And this was Immanuel Kant's moral argument for the existence of God.
Still, to me, my favorite and I think the strongest argument for the existence of God.
But more importantly, forget all the philosophical stuff.
Where's your bank account?
Good question.
Yeah.
And the pathway for the audience that we have now, those who have offered the truth to others, and the overwhelming reaction of ordinary human beings when you offer them some opportunity of truth is to, they don't respond very well to it.
Covenantal Obedience and Rewards00:06:17
About one in 50 are able to really be with these serious conversations.
And for me, having done this for 49 years, is that you get used to it and you make an offer and it doesn't resonate with them.
So you move on and eventually you figure out, you ask the question, like, so what am I really aligned with?
What am I really doing here?
Like, I can't surrender to the people who are okay with, for example, a million human beings dying in slow motion agony from preventable poverty and dying every month, a million a month.
I'm going to work in good faith effort for the good of humanity.
And in terms of looking for allies, I mean, they're limited on the human domain.
But then you read texts and one of the texts is the New Testament of the Bible.
And that, ooh, this Jesus guy.
All right, I'm on that team.
I've read enough.
I know that that book has been in the hands of the enemy, but there's enough there.
I'll be on that team.
And that there is a kingdom that I identify with associated with that.
And I'll just work in good faith effort.
And in terms of being judged, oh, baby, bring it.
I am ready.
Let me know how I did.
I've done the best I can.
I'm very curious.
I may have done well.
I don't know.
It may be that I haven't done very well.
It may be that I've been given so many advantages, like playing a card game.
How'd you play your cards?
I may have been given great cards and I may have missed how to play the hand entirely.
I'm entirely open to that.
And the part of what resonated with me in the New Testament, I mean, so much resonates with me in that is to approach it as a child, not irresponsibly, but I'm doing the best I can and to not be so upset about how much is over your heads.
All right, anything else, brother?
You know, I guess if I'm going to do a little philosophical reflection in response to what you just said, I'm going to say this.
I just finished assembling a full commentary on the entire Bible.
The purpose was largely so that I could refresh and abandon bad theology, bad doctrine, bad framing of how I understand the world to be so that I could replace my mind and refresh and renew my mind with a fresh new input and therefore a fresh new output.
I can tell you this that, and I'm going to get I'm going to take a lot of flack from those in the audience that actually know what they're talking about for saying this, but I'm going to tell you this.
I know what I'm talking about too.
And I can tell you that the apparatus of judgment goes through gates.
Think of it like Belshazzar and the handwriting on the wall.
The gate was: I know what you should have known.
This is what you knew.
This is what you should have known.
This is what you did.
This is how you failed.
Here's the sentence.
There is no, everybody thinks there's some sort of response in terms of like we get an advocate to argue our case before God.
God is not a liar.
He does not need to have a court and a jury to tell the truth.
So either you're protected by an advocate or you're not.
If that advocate, and I'm correct about that advocate, if that advocate indeed is Christ, you must be clothed with the righteousness of Christ.
That gets you through the gate.
I think that's solid systematic theology there, or that's solid biblical theology there.
The next question comes down to rewards.
And I would say that based on my fresh evaluation of it, covenantal obedience is the most important thing for storing up daily rewards in that bank account.
And literally, that's the word Paul used in Romans 2:5: bank account.
So we think of storehouses, storing up wrath, storing up grain, storing up fertilizer.
It's a bank account.
Covenant obedience is what deposits to the account.
Covenant disobedience does not deposit to the account and can result in a mixed account that stores up wrath as well as stores up good.
Now, I think that that wrath debt has been paid by Christ completely and fully.
And so all that's left is what's in the account.
And so, why do I say this word covenant obedience?
Does that mean that you're supposed to be some sort of Israelite, you know, Abraham, Genesis chapter 12, covenant identifier?
No, but if you identify with Christ, then you will be obedient to Christ.
And those that obedience results in the reward instead of the wrath, which is what he took at the cross.