Truth vs. NEW$. Inc. Part 2 (23 February 2026) with Don Grahn, Joachim Hagopian, and Brian Davidson
Don Grahn, Joachim Hagopian, and Brian Davidson dissect the February 23, 2026 presidential address amid conspiracy theories: Ghislaine Maxwell’s alleged Trump blackmail ties, Epstein’s unreleased files (98% hidden), and a 16-year-old victim’s diary exposing horrific abuse. They question DOJ transparency, Israel’s influence over U.S. narratives, and the Charlie Kirk shooting, citing police scanner reports of an SUV passenger dangling minutes after the incident. Fetzer’s banned research on JFK, 9/11, Sandy Hook, and more is framed as evidence of systemic deception, with Brian calling for defiance against suppression via platforms like BitShoot. The episode ties elite protection, media control, and "truth vs. narrative" into a broader pattern of hidden power. [Automatically generated summary]
The president is going to have his big annual talk tomorrow and we're pitching the war and all kinds of things are happening here on February the 23rd, 2026.
I'm Dolly Ron host here and Jim is reporting some hot stuff.
Go for the next story, Jim.
What we got about Julie McCarthy?
We got reports.
Well, the first one is our man who was shot by Secret Service after breaching Mar-a-Lago has been identified as a missing 21-year-old.
It's not real clear what his motive was, but he did have a shotgun.
It does look as though this was another legitimate assassination attempt, or shall we say, a legitimate assassination attempt, because others, such as in Pennsylvania, I regard as having been staged.
Meanwhile, DOJ delivered a report revealing that Maxwell helped potentially mail over Trump.
This is very interesting.
The FBI, it turns out, interviewed her four different times, but they only released one of them.
And this suggests to me the FBI does this all the time.
Multiple interviews and releasing what they want to release.
Wednesday, I, Roger Stolenberg, reported DOJ had removed from an Epstein file database a key document about a woman who told the FBI Trump sexually assaulted her when she was a child.
By Thursday evening, it was once again live.
It's unclear why it was deleted in the first place.
Here's proof it had been taken down.
It's also unclear why they put it back up, including a screenshot of relevant information, a link to an internet archive of the full record.
Info pertaining to the Trump accuser, whom DOJ identified as a victory of Epstein in the early to mid-80s, doesn't appear altered in any way.
However, the existence of this record, more specifically a public knowledge of it, carries significant implications when it comes to the president and his DOJ posture against co-conspirator Gheline Maxwell.
That's because this document shows the FBI conducted not just one, but four, four interviews with Trump's accuser.
And as I reported Wednesday, while the government gave all four to Maxwell's legal team, the government only gave one to the to us in the Epstein files.
In other words, it shows that in choosing to withhold three of the four interviews in the Epstein file, DOJ granted Maxwell potential blackmail on the sitting president of the United States.
Moreover, we have an Epstein diary reporting horrific assault.
One of the most disgusting and unsettling documents that were part of the latest Epstein-DOJ document dump have to do with a girl who was 16 years old at the time and what she wrote in her diary as she was allegedly abused by Epstein and his cronies.
Before I get to the details, Jen, your two cents.
Yeah, so we've heard a lot about the different girls who were abused, but focusing in on one story like this, I think, is going to give you a sense of the horrors that happened during this Epstein regime these years.
And think about all the people who helped support this as Anna tells you this heartbreaking story of what happened to this girl.
So if you search for it, you can find her actual diary and what she wrote in her diary as this abuse was happening to her.
And she names names.
She wrote in code.
I mean, it was really easy to decipher what she was saying, but I'm going to give you the screenshots from the FBI's interpretation of what she was writing in code.
Okay.
So first, here's what we know about the girl who is now much older, but at the time she was 16.
She has autism and Down syndrome.
She was born with Mosaic Down syndrome, which is apparently a rare condition, which gave her some of the features of typical Down syndrome, but did not affect her physical appearance at all.
In fact, in the diary, she actually writes about her autism.
We'll get to that in just a second.
She talks a little bit about how she doesn't like that people are always making fun of Spirit Airlines because Spirit happens to be the only airline company that's made accommodations for autistic people.
Yeah.
I just, oh, God, it's just evil exists, man.
It just does.
And I want to do something about it.
Yeah.
Go ahead.
So they liked her because they thought she was easier to take advantage of because of her condition.
And apparently she was really beautiful.
And they kept talking about her beautiful blonde hair and blue eyes and how she was like a porcelain doll.
And so they've, in the way that they targeted people they thought were easier to take advantage of is extra sickening.
Yep.
And wait till you get to what one of the most top finance people in the world might have done to her, which is just an extra lay.
We can't go into all the details.
She has turned into a baby factory.
Sometimes she'd be given abortions, at other times not.
Very, very touching.
Meanwhile, Joachim, the Epstein fallout continues.
Joachim has a new piece about it, and he's talking about how many fallouts are taking place.
Having been three full weeks now since DOJ released over 3 million piles to the public, despite the enormity of the task and challenge, sorting out so much material, enough time has lapsed to paint a far darker, more disturbing picture like ever before of Epstein's truly demonic, depraved world.
Despite over a year at Trump regime, nonstop, defiant evasion, refusing to release anything but thousands of such heavily redacted pages in order to cover up the truth by meticulously protecting the wealthy, powerful child rapists and murderers, blackening out all their names.
It showed DOJ's real aim was never to deliver justice to the literally thousands of Epstein victims.
This unprecedented largest data file drop had proven what many Americans have said, in fact, that for years now, all along, the Trump administrative top priority has been to delay toward and willfully obstruct justice in order to ensure that perverse diabolical criminals, like their White House boss, remain shielded from all prosecution and punishment.
This travesty of justice is the ultimate reality that, according to UK's Channel 4, just 2%, 2% of the total Epstein files have been released.
Joachim, your thoughts, my friend.
Yeah, and the article goes on to basically say that, yeah, now they arrested the ex-Prince of Britain under further investigation now for his wrongdoing.
And there's so much evidence of it.
So, I mean, actually, the thrust of the article is saying basically, one by one, if you're not American, but you abused underage minors with the Epstein operation, the other countries are going after the child molesters, except America.
You know, we have a Department of Justice, Pam Bondi, that's, you know, standing by her boss and, you know, and his friends that are all pedophiles.
And they're holding all that back.
But one by one, we're seeing the dominoes falling in other countries.
There are, well, we know also with Britain, we have the pedophile Peter Mandelson, who worked very heavily with the Prince, ex-Prince now.
They were actually part of the whole National Cruelty to Stop the Cruelty to Children organization, which is the biggest charity organization on the benefit of children in Britain.
And they work together.
They always have gatekeepers assigned to the positions, basically, that are pedophiles.
I mean, this is the way it works, or enablers.
But in this case, both the Prince and Mandelson, yeah, they've been pedophiled.
And so, yeah, and then we have, you know, other countries.
Apparently, Epstein was in very close to the princess that's the queen in waiting at this point.
And maybe she might not even become queen because of it, because of her intimate ties.
We have Kathy Lumer, who was the Goldman Sachs head attorney, and under Obama was his general counsel, the head attorney for Obama.
And she also very close for many years, and they were trading secrets the whole time.
And so she had to fall.
And, you know, there's a whole bunch, you know, I mean, the list goes on and on, you know, and I haven't gotten into all of them.
And they all need to actually have a court of law prosecute them for the evidence.
And we also know throughout the whole time, just like that one story you were saying, they have four interviews with Glene Maxwell, yet they only make public one, you know, and that's how they operate.
We're lucky to see anything come from the FBI.
They cover up everything.
That's the general rule.
They're always in protection of the powerful.
That's the way it is.
That's the way of the world.
I mean, you look at every single pedophile scandal in the whole world.
And because the government puppets that are pedophiles and enablers, they're not going to, you know, make themselves go to jail.
It doesn't happen nowhere.
And at the national level, there is yet to be a politician that's held accountable for their pedophilic crimes.
And yet, you know, I would venture to say there's probably at least a hundred of pedophiles that are in our Congress.
And then the rest of them are all basically blackmailed, extorted, and giving loads of money from AIPAC, you know, and that's how they are basically owned by Israel in the same way that Trump is.
You know, yes, he has a record of pedophilia.
He was the best buddy of Epstein for anywhere from 15 to maybe even up to 20 years.
It started probably in the mid-80s and goes all the way to 2005.
So, yeah, I mean, it's just the truth has come out.
And even though they pick and choose, you know, what has gone out there to the public, made available through these files, there's a whole lot out there that really is incriminating.
But you'll notice that, you know, there's nothing really that's going to make Trump go to jail.
They haven't put anything out.
They're very careful about that, of course.
But there is plenty of evidence that probably the biggest takeaway is that Epstein, here he was did time, you know, 13 months of sleepovers at the whole Palm Beach jailhouse wing they gave him.
And then he comes out in 2010 and he just, you know, it's like he basically resumes his whole operation.
His whole operation was intact after he was a convicted pedophile, child sex offender.
And yet, the whole world of, you know, from all walks of life, all these leaders, all these people at the top of their professions, very important people, they all befriended him.
Like he's, you know, it's like they totally didn't know.
Of course, everybody knew.
There was a lot of publicity when he was in the hot water that he was in from the investigation starting in 2005 to his getting out of jail into 2010.
And so from 2010 to 2019, basically, with quote his fake death, I think he's alive in Israel.
But anyway, that's a whole other show.
But anyway, so yeah, for a whole decade, the whole elite world embraced this guy as a known public pedophile.
Elites and Pedophilia Scandals00:06:51
And what does that say?
It says that the elites are pedophiles and pedophile lovers.
They're enablers and lovers of pedophiles or pedophiles themselves at that high level.
This is what they are.
And I have an even more recent article that I just finished yesterday.
And that basically addresses the continuity of the ones that were in control from ancient times to the present with their what they do to children, with the blood sacrifice, with the occult rituals.
They've been around for many, many centuries, many even millennia.
And basically, the elites from way back when that colonized the earth, you know, thousands upon thousands of years ago, are the same bloodlines that are now still in control, still doing these horrible things to children.
And I will be adding a little bit more to that article regarding the scientific evidence that the ones that came to the earth to colonize the earth are the same bloodlines that are doing in power, that are doing these things still to children and making wars and all the rest.
That is part of their genetic DNA structure, to war and be brutal toward other people because they have the power.
They always have.
We're still enslaved.
Brian.
You know, in light of the Jeffrey Epstein mess, I think what is happening here is that we're beginning to realize that we have some very serious cracks in our foundation.
A justice system isn't just about crime and punishment.
It's about predictability, equality under the law, impartial adjudication, and frankly, public trust.
And if the public believes that law only protects the powerful and gets weaponized politically and it conceals the truth for elites, then the justice system has stopped functioning as an authority and started functioning as a force to be used against the people.
And that's a very, very dangerous shift because it signals to the public that elite crimes are shielded and transparency completely depends on political usefulness.
So that drives a big psychological shift for the American people where our participation in our own government is replaced with sort of a cynical attitude.
Why vote?
Why pay taxes?
Why trust the courts?
It's all rigged.
Are they right?
Yeah.
It certainly drives the conspiracy thinking, which, of course, that's what we do.
We try to speculate about conspiracy, but we don't go overboard with it.
But how can you not be a conspiracy theorist when these institutions hide all this information from us, which is what the article is about?
You know, you have to start filling in the vacuum with some speculation here and there about blackmail systems and blackmail chains.
And I don't think it's even speculation anymore.
I think it's sort of a conclusion ever since we've had it.
So you kind of have to start looking at America in terms of it's not, our institutions aren't doing our job.
And if and if the courts don't do justice, somebody else will.
Now, that's going to erode our nation very, very quickly.
And think about like the late Roman Republic.
And as their elite corruption grew, all prosecutions became political weapons.
All the Senate's credibility collapsed.
And frankly, all legal outcomes just simply depended on the political factions.
And that meant that populist strong men began to emerge and legitimacy transferred from Senate to military leaders, which normalized civil war.
And so If the institutions became partisan, people had to take the power and they had to do it at the end of a gun.
Now, the same thing happened in Weimer, Germany.
Unequal enforcement, leniency, political violence on one side.
That delegitimatized the entire Weimar Republic.
Take a look at what's going on down in Latin America.
Politically elites and cartels evoid prosecution.
Corruption cases simply disappear.
Heads roll in the streets and they riot and they go completely out of control when somebody strikes one of the power structures.
So when justice collapses, you're going to get a new breed of informal power that fills the void.
And that's a very, very dangerous thing.
By the way, the same thing in the Soviet Union.
That was, you know, under Stalin and other later Soviet Union setups.
Party elites were untruthable.
Take a look at China.
I mean, their government is absolutely feared and despised by their people.
So that legitimacy is gone and the state becomes brittle.
And then they have to rule by force instead of by reason.
And that's going to cause a collapse, but it's not going to be an instant collapse.
It's more going to be an internal rot.
And so, you know, the Epstein case touches all of it.
And I guess that's what the story was about.
Some files are released.
Others are hidden depending on what they implicate.
And, you know, the most dangerous outcome for America isn't, at this point, riots.
It's total apathy because the citizens are concluding that the institutions are just there to protect themselves.
And that's going to, that's, that's going to, that's going to cause the inevitable collapse of this society.
Teeth Analysis Revealed00:04:42
And I probably mean a collapse into a totally controlled state with a totally controlled population that uses surveillance systems and social engineering and social credit systems and cameras to build sort of an Orwellian control grid.
I think it's already happening.
I think you're exactly right.
Meanwhile, an AI is going to be critical.
Did they swap out Ghelane Maxwell?
Who is this person?
So we all know that prison can change one's appearance, right?
Obviously.
Especially if you're a billionaire heiress who's had the best of the best her entire life.
Your diet changes drastically.
You're not getting as much exercise.
You can't get your fancy procedures done anymore.
You're going to look and feel differently.
Now, this is Ghelane Maxwell shortly after she entered prison.
This is her mug shot.
And this is Ghelane as of recently.
Just last week, she had to sit down for a deposition.
Now, listen, I know a lot of us citizens can be gullible, but who the fuck is he?
Does prison change your entire nose shape?
The shape of your eyes?
Your chin?
I mean, did they swap out her brother for her?
Y'all, this is where I lean on you for my sanity.
Is this just Ghelane with a few extra pounds?
Or are these motherfuckers punking us?
So we all know that.
There's not much doubt about it.
Meanwhile, they found her in Canada.
I believe someone just found Ghillain Maxwell.
Ghilin?
Do I know you?
No, sorry.
No?
Oh, I used to order the hell of pizza off of her.
Shall we delivered, yeah?
Now I'll give her some credit.
She did a good job at hiding her British accent.
But you can't hide those chompers or that nose.
Look at the dip in the nose, the flare in the nostrils, the damn teeth, the way they sit.
How about that upper lip?
Come on now.
They'll call you a psycho for suggesting that this could be Ghelane.
But then they'll try to sell us this, whatever this is.
It's not her.
Just notice how her left eye sits slightly lower than her right eye in both of these images.
And this is a consistent feature in multiple images.
Something fishy is definitely going on.
But I'd love to know your opinion in the comments below.
No doubt about it.
Indeed, they've actually got her with her brother.
This fellow's, I don't know, tad on the crude side, perhaps.
He didn't think this shampoo would work.
And rough hair, especially after 35.
So he made a shampoo that stopped.
Do you suck eggs at the range?
Try this out.
This is the immediate turn.
So I know that some of you guys are probably still hella skeptical.
Here is somebody who ran a teeth analysis on the two.
And I mean, it definitely looks like it could very well be.
It looks like that one tooth is chipped.
And mayhaps it wasn't before, but the tooth analysis looks pretty conclusive.
So they've run that tooth analysis.
It says there's an equal drop from the canine, equal spacing, and triangular shape next to the lateral incisor.
Two, the lateral, left lateral incisor is equally recessed and slightly angled, having an equal length to central incisor.
And why is it important?
Why are we going over teeth here?
We're going over teeth because teeth is one of the ways that they can actually identify your body.
I mean, there's a little more to it.
He's got the brother is with him.
Her own brother is with him.
Here's another.
I find this kind of odd.
Mike Men says Trump has once in a generation chance to put the deep sand on the defense post-Epstein files.
What does he mean?
Well, he suggests there are a whole bunch of other files that could be released.
Ben said Trump's base is looking for something transformative in these four years rather than something that's purely economic.
Those include everything from major transparency drives around USAID, the State Department, CIFI, things like continued Russian gate disclosure, things like Fast and Furious, the male feasants of the John Brennan CIA, Bill Burns, CIA, referring to Intel Agency directives under former President Barack Obama and Joe Biden, respectively.
I don't think we're going to get anything like that, but that's what he's suggesting could happen.
Sheriffs Warn on ICE Enforcement00:02:26
Meanwhile, we got a Muslim crowd in Times Square declaring we're taking over New York City and going out Ola Akbar, Ola Akbar.
How odd is that?
Give me that, but yo, make some noise on the mother mortar right now, baby.
Bashawa, yeah.
Buki!
Oh, whatever!
Oh, don't scare them, brothers.
Relax.
They're over here on purpose to be like, oh my God, who's seen those videos where they're like, oh my God, the Muslims are taking over New York City?
You seen those?
You seen those?
Let them know that we are taking over New York City.
The fee!
Oh, my God.
So they're taking over New York City.
Meanwhile, Madame just told New York what he's trading 5,000 New York cops for.
He had the money for 5,000 new New York cops.
But what's he doing?
He's going to spend it on a commission for gender equity.
5.6 for the Office of Racial Equity, 4.6 for the Commission on Racial Equity, 835,000 for the Commission on January, six-figure diversity officer salaries, Frank Ross Fire Department, Department of Education.
I think the guy is failing New York.
Meanwhile, Maryland sheriffs defy the governor's new state ban on partnering with ICE.
They've declared they're going to continue to support ICE.
These are sheriffs in nine Maryland.
The abolition of the 287G program is not the abolishment of ICE.
They're going nowhere.
In fact, they're going to intensify their efforts.
We warned them this was going to happen, and it's going to happen.
A warning on Wednesday issued by sheriffs from the nine Maryland counties forced to end active partnerships with ICE under a new state law.
They're not going to do it.
Joaquim, your thoughts, all of the above.
Yeah, there are plenty of law enforcement officers out there that are actually in support of ridding the illegal aliens from our nation, especially if they have gang records and records of criminal activities in the past or present.
Two-Tier Justice System00:07:21
So, you know, not too many people would be against that.
And there are, you know, enough law enforcement officers that are of that mindset.
So they're not going to go along, even though they may live in blue states and blue cities and sanctioned cities and all these kind of crap.
They won't go along with it, which is a good thing.
But, you know, it's just another reflection of, you know, the two sides here, the divided and rule, the blue, the red.
You know, on and on we go with Democrat versus Republican and all of this shit.
You know, and I get tired of that because even though there's legitimate points, you know, Obama, they're all pedo-criminals of the past.
Every president, you know, for a long, long time has been very guilty of a lot of bad shit.
But they play both sides.
The controllers play both sides.
They play the Republicans versus Democrats, left versus right, and divided rule.
That's their MO for maintaining their power and increasing it.
And they've used that MO forever.
You know, so I don't like to get caught up into the partisan politics aspect because I see the bigger picture and the controllers behind everything we see.
And so I don't fall for that very easily.
You know, as far as Ghelane Maxwell, yeah, you know, it's, I think they caught her.
And I think that's great because it needs, you know, we need to know that basically Jeffrey Epstein is more than likely in Israel safely with a couple of facial structural kind of changes cosmetically to, you know, make him fit in there and not be noticed as Jeffrey Epstein.
And then now we got Ghelene Maxwell in Canada.
So, I mean, you know, it's a two-tier justice system as the main thrust of this hour has been.
And, you know, the regular citizens, the 99% citizens, you know, oh, we go to hell, you know, to pay for anything that we do wrong illegally.
But of course, the ones that have been in power and have all the control and the money and all the rest, they get away with everything.
And, you know, here it is again.
So, yeah, there's nothing new in that.
Oh, yeah, Donnie.
Oh, my God.
He's a nightmare like we figured he would be.
You know, of course, DEI all the way, you know, it's disgraceful.
You know, I hope enough New York people object to him and his policies, but who knows?
It's a very liberal leftist city.
But there's a lot of people that I think are not.
These people that are so big on DEI and the whole LGBT, all that crap, it is not the popular sentiment of the majority of Americans.
Never has been.
And it's even more so not the case now.
We're moving in a conservative direction, popular-wise.
The city could have used 5,000 more cops for sure.
Brian, your thoughts?
Well, take a look at the difference between a Rudy Giuliani and a Mamdani.
Look, I blame the academic institutions for driving this.
They've taken so much money from the DEI NGOs that they now are in a position where they're stuck with a losing position.
This is pretty simple.
The conservative view of crime and punishment is that order must be maintained and that precedes justice, that enforcement deters crime, and that visible authority stabilizes neighborhoods.
And that people are generally bad when let completely loose and they require restraint and consequence, or the behavior goes completely off the rails.
But the progressive view is: oh, crime stems from systematic inequality and policing overemphasizes punishment, investment in equality, you know, is going to reduce the root cause of crime.
And so therefore, state enforcement ought to be minimized.
And so that disagreement is a profound philosophical divide that I don't believe is supportable for long.
But let's take a look at some historical reality in New York.
Let's go back to Judy Giuliani in the 90s.
What happened?
He increased the police presence and crime dropped dramatically.
So, you know, it worked.
And now you've got a guy who's agreeing with this progressive mindset to get rid of the law enforcement and let people just go and be good.
Well, haven't we seen this before?
San Francisco, 2020, Seattle, Minneapolis, George Floyd.
And so that policy, that policy shift, I should say that policy shit has led to an absolutely, you know, dumpster fire of a community.
And so, you know, when you start taking a look at what happens when civilization abandons our inherited moral boundaries and replaces them with these new untested ideological frameworks centered on mankind instead of there's a God, there's going to be justice, There's moral laws that need to be adhered to.
You end up with this sort of identity-based framework where you don't have to punish that person for crime because they have the wrong color skin or they had a tough life, or you know, it's okay to kill your kid because you grew up in the ghetto.
You know, it's ridiculous.
It's a totally destabilization, progressive platform that's designed to dissolve boundaries and lead to civil destruction.
Police morale collapses, enforcement is uneven, there's a middle-class fight that breaks loose, and there's this reactionary backlash that's absolutely going to come.
I'm an old biblical guy, so I'm absolutely going to be on the justice restraint order necessary.
And I think our founding fathers were the same way.
Red Liquid Flowing00:02:48
And I think just about every indicator we're seeing is that this manufactured progressive platform that's being pushed by our quote-unquote academic institutions is nothing but toxic poison designed to erode and destroy our community and our nation.
It already appears to me Bondami is going to be a failure.
I just don't see any way he can succeed.
Meanwhile, Monique Lucins calls out the Charlie Kirk show.
She has a background in acting, and her point is that this was a theatrical event.
Here are some of the points she makes right off the bat.
The world went into shock September 10th.
When we be lived, we had witnessed Charlie being shot.
A closer look shows something seemed off.
There was a black spot on Charlie's t-shirt gliding to his neck, then disappearing from his shirt.
The letter F and freedom on Charlie's shirt disappeared, then reappeared.
The microphone in Charlie's hand did not immediately drop.
Red liquid flowed down, but it also flowed up.
No red liquid absorbed into Charlie's shirt.
It vanished.
Charlie's ring jumps from finger to finger.
Wardrobe?
Others interviewed on Fox News 13 grinned, saying he'd been shot directly in the heart.
Good morning, America.
Showed about a third of the audience leaving with an empty tent.
But wait, weren't people in and around the tent after the accident?
Yes.
Could this have been a rehearsal?
Indeed, it was.
Meanwhile, Bernard M. Smith gives a summary of an old book by Arthur Bots entitled The Hoax of the 20th Century: Debunking the Holocaust.
Very thoughtful, very good, excellent article.
I made a comment myself about it.
Here, let me turn to the comment I added, which is very similar.
Here we have it for further substantiation of the hoax of the century.
Check out the Holocaust narrative, Politics, Trump, Science, with a link.
For visual and photographic, you haven't watched my presentation, The Official World War II Narrative, Historical Factor Mass Illusion.
Should Bernard read this, I'd like to feature him on my radio show, The Raw Deal.
Please contact me for more details with a photograph from Nick Collerstrom's Breaking the Spell for which he invited me to write the introduction.
Terrorist State's Failed Propaganda00:03:27
Illustration 28: British football team at Auschwitz.
What?
You didn't know?
There was a British soccer team at Auschwitz, and here's another by a fellow calling himself Mr. Crowley.
The World Almanac voids the entire Hola Locust tale.
The only evidence anyone really needs World Almanac, World Jew Population, 1940, 15,319,358, 41, 15,748,091, 42, 15,192,089, 47, 15,690,000.
So if the atrocity propaganda actually happened, the World Alban Act number 47 would elicit 9 million instead of 15.
The American Jewish community supplied the World Almanac with the figures.
So the Jews themselves proved no Holocaust occurred.
Joaquim, your thoughts, boyfriend.
Yeah, it's just one more lie they're caught in.
The Zionist, Israeli, you know, Jewish thing to make everybody feel guilty for saying anything negative about them killing Palestinian children and women and all this, you know.
And of course, you know, they made a lot of real effort now to get inside all the media corporations, all the internet platforms.
You know, I mean, they have made a lot of progress seizing control and trying to steer the narrative against the reality that everybody out there with half a brain sees that Israel is in the wrong from the get-go, from their birth as a nation to now.
They've been a terrorist state.
They have been a terrorist state upon not only, you know, so many Arabs and Muslims in that part of the world, but they're a terrorist state against the whole world.
They cause wars and on and on.
You know, we're on the brink of World War III now with Iran because of them and because of their control over our government and president in particular.
So, yeah, I mean, it's just a one-sided sideshow that everybody is not even paying attention to.
All their propaganda is not working.
It hasn't really been working very well for a long time.
But as hard as they try, they're failing because, you know, a vast percentage of the world knows Israel is in the wrong.
They're genocidal killers.
They need to be punished for all their war crimes and war crimes against humanity because that's what they've been waging.
They have a war against the Goyan population, you know.
And if you're Christian, you know, they hate Christians, you know.
Dead Man Hanging Out of Car00:14:33
I mean, on and on, you know, I so, yeah, I'm an advocate of the truth and let the chips fall where they may based on truth.
That's what I believe.
Brian, your thoughts.
Yeah, I don't want to.
I'm going to defer a little on my segment here, and I'm going to ask you to play that Jimmy Dore video that I just sent because I think that's more important in the context of Monique Lukan's article about the Charlie Kirk shit show.
I found this to be absolutely in line with what my research indicated.
So, Jim, why don't you play that and then let me make my comment?
Let me see if I can track it.
I just emailed it to you.
Yeah, yeah.
No, I'll just have to get there.
Hang on a second.
Let's see, here
we go.
There we go.
Let's take a look at this.
This is exactly.
Does your house feel more like a burden than a home between the upkeep costs and unused rooms?
It might be costing you.
And I think what they're describing in the police, at least a way to interpret it, what the police are describing on the way to the hospital is a guy fighting back.
A guy struggling is what it sounds like to me.
Here's what you uncovered, which I find fascinating.
You got a hold of the police scanner of their recordings, what they were saying.
And there was a cop car following Charlie Kirk's SUV as they were taking him to the hospital.
And here's what the cop said.
He says, 212, everybody get off the radio.
I've got a black SUV northbound on Wolverine Way, passenger doors open.
Someone trying to hang out of it.
212, everybody get off the radio.
I've got a black SUV northbound on Wolverine Way.
Passenger door is open.
Someone's trying to hang out of it.
That broadcast right there was less than four minutes after the Big Bang.
So they had already gotten Charlie Kirk from the scene of the incident into the SUV and were flying up the highway with someone hanging out of the car.
Here is a bit of confusion, our first little bit of confusion that enters.
This is where they think they have another victim because of someone else hanging out of the car.
I assume possibly another victim.
They've got one hanging out of the car.
So there was some confusion there.
Hey, maybe.
So we've never, no one's no, no, no one ever reported this.
You found this amazing investigative work you're doing, really.
Honestly, swear, this is amazing.
And that, and so now we have a cop, two cops saying that there's two different cop reports.
I don't know if it's two different cops, but it's two different reports from cops saying that there appears to be a second victim because it looks like a victim is hanging out of the car.
And why would he say that it looks like a victim unless it looked like somebody who was somehow shot or injured?
So what do you make of these two reports saying that there is a well, there's actually one more report.
Let me play that.
But we have yet another broadcast discussing someone hanging out of the car.
This is a third broadcast that someone's hanging out of the car.
Copy 2530 in a vehicle 50 South 1200 West in Orange.
They have one hanging out of the car.
We're not sure if they're a patient or if they're just trying to get out of the area.
So that's three reports from three different police reports broadcast saying, hey, there's someone hanging out of the car.
And so when I heard that, I thought to myself, was Charlie dead?
And it seemed to me like he might have been fighting for his life.
And that's why he's hanging out of the car.
He was trying to get the hell out of that car because the people in the car were trying to kill him.
That makes more sense than anything else.
What do you think?
I really don't know what to make of it, Jimmy.
It's such a bizarre radio transmission, especially in light of the fact that they didn't really publicize that it existed.
And there were several radio transmissions that we covered that night on that program that were new to me when we discovered them.
The news media just never covered them.
And a lot of the audience came to the same conclusion in the comments.
A lot of the audience that watched that broadcast that night came to the same conclusion that it sounds like to them the police are describing someone fighting back or somebody trying to escape or utterly fascinating.
Brian, give us your comments on this.
I'm really taken aback.
This is totally news to me.
Give us your thoughts.
Well, look, I know how these false flags work.
I've seen enough of them throughout the years.
I didn't think that Charlie Kirk was aware that this thing was coming down.
I think he was genuinely shocked and surprised.
And I use that word to indicate what I observed in his behavior after the quote-unquote gunshot.
He had appeared to me to be shocked.
He retracted like he was shocked.
I think that they had enough time in there to edit the video and make the quote unquote blood come down.
And I think so.
What they did was they just coordinated a sound effect with an artificially inserted, almost real-time type of event and then extracted him from the platform.
And so is he dead?
Was he dead?
You know, my take on it always has been no, he's not dead.
He was extracted either willingly because he was going into some sort of witness protection, which now seems less likely, or unwillingly because they needed to move him from the TPUSA center and get him out of the discussion in terms of he was too powerful in the way that he was affecting college campuses and the way he was, you know, running his rhetoric.
And it was too threatening to the systems that had been spending so much money to drive this progressive platform.
So I had always said I thought he was extracted.
I didn't know whether or not they killed him afterwards, but this would seem to indicate to me that this was a situation where he was unwillingly extracted.
He woke up before they were able to finish the wet work, realized what was going on, tried to make his escape.
And then, you know, that's the last we ever heard from Charlie Kirk.
The rest is just media history in terms of what happened.
But, you know, for all the people that come along, think about all the Candace Owens, Megan Kelly's, Tucker Carlson's, all the voices that have said you have to conclude he was dead.
And if you don't, you're an idiot.
Just remember, we said it right at the start, right from the beginning.
We always knew this is this, that was not what you saw happen was not live wet work.
Well, Game, would you like to add a thought?
Sure.
Yeah, he went off the reservation.
He started becoming very critical against Israel and what they're doing with the genocide.
And so he was talking out of turn, you know, because he was, you know, installed basically to be, you know, pro-Israel all the way like all the rest of those compromise influencers out there that are very well paid.
That's how he was brought on at a very early age.
So he basically was principled and began speaking too much truth for the system of Israel and its ownership of America to tolerate.
And so, yeah, there were insiders in TPUSA that were part of this whole thing with Israel, with Trump, and with the law enforcement and all the rest of the major players that were involved in that incident that day.
It was a planned operation.
And yeah, it's still a question mark.
This adds just one more angle of it, that he went and was not in favor of going along with this program.
It shows that he probably was, it was not according to the script in his mind of what was supposed to happen.
I think that's what we can learn from this new evidence.
And yes, maybe they did kill him.
I was of the mindset that he was still alive.
And he could be, but that kind of almost is pointing in the direction that they got rid of him because he was too much of a danger.
That's kind of the way it's looking now with this added piece.
Our final stories are some quick takes.
My JFK colleague Larry Rivera has now published a two-volume set here on JFK 21st Century Revelations, volumes one and two.
Larry's done brilliant work.
When they released the JFK files about Mexico City, because he was born in Puerto Rico and is bilingual, he was able to sort it all out.
Whole thing was a sham.
Lee was never in Mexico City.
There was an imposter there.
They had photos and audio.
Jay Edgar even wrote to his station chiefs, someone in Mexico City was impersonating Lee Oswald.
If that's all you knew, you'd understand the whole thing was to frame him.
Turns out that three of the CIA assets involved in the deception were presidents of Mexico.
And Larry even got a copy of Oswald's passport.
Remember, the story was the fact he'd gone to Mexico City to get a visa to travel to Cuba to make an escape to the Soviet Union proved he was a communist about to assassinate the president.
Turns out his passport wasn't even valid for travel to Cuba.
How bad is that?
Now, I mentioned Larry, too, in relation to Bad Bunny, because when it happened and the controversy was so great, Larry, being from Puerto Rico, knowing Spanish, he had watched the halftime show.
I called him up right away when there was so much controversy and asked if he'd come on my show.
And he explained the lyrics were perfectly fine.
They were clean.
They were wholesome.
He thought it was wonderful.
Representative Puerto Rico even brought tears to his eyes.
Well, now the FCC has confirmed exactly what Larry said.
Bad Bunny's lyrics have been translated by Google.
There are no violations.
Though I must admit, Bad Bunny has very lewd lyrics to some of his songs.
It's simply that they weren't sung at the Super Bowl.
Just as that book on the Holocaust is forbidden reading, here's Maddie giving us her forbidden reading list.
Rather fascinating.
And last, I have established a give, send, go site on to support a documentary.
You're all read how it begins.
Casey Whelan, an experienced investigative journalist and videographer, is embarking on a journey from Idaho to Wisconsin, which is a documentary about Jim Fetzer.
Jim's story is unique.
He began as a professor of philosophy, dedicated his scientific reasoning and explanation and evolved into a researcher who has tackled some of the most complex and controversial events of our time.
From the JFK assassination and the moon landing to 9-11, Senator Paul Wellstone plane crash and Sandy Hook.
Jim has applied rigorous analysis and collaborative research to separate genuine evidence from fabrication.
His books, including assassination, science murder, and D-Lee Blaza and the great Subruder film hoax, have challenged official narratives and exposed hidden truths.
His investigations have not been without consequence.
Six of his books have been banned by Amazon.
He's currently involved in ongoing litigation related to his work on Sandy Hook.
Despite these challenges, Jim continues to fight for transparency and accountability.
Recently, appealing a lawsuit involving additional cases told the media responsible for defamation and abuse.
Joachim, your thoughts.
Pioneering Truth00:05:07
Yeah, I applaud your making progress.
It's been a rough, rough going for you as basically one of the pioneers of basically uncovering false flags in America.
You are a pioneer in that.
And the struggle goes on because obviously all we see is deception in the mainstream media and the government pulling all these false flag kind of incidents that are staged.
And we cannot believe any of the official narrative nowadays.
There's a complete lack of trust towards the government, towards the media, towards, you know, even a lot of the alt media now.
The controllers want to muddy the wires and confuse everybody so that they don't know what to believe.
But I would like to think that people like us who are trying to ferret out what is real, what is not, and put it out there, help people understand what is going on.
And you have been, like I say, a pioneer in this truth effort.
Well, you know, coming from academia where I'd edited many books, it was obvious if I was going to tackle these, I should bring together the best experts and publish our work.
So I pioneered collaborative research and it's made a huge difference.
And in more recent works, I benefited from brilliant students like Brian Davidson, who's just a genius at using the internet for research.
Brian, a few words of your own.
Well, Jim, first of all, I'd just like to take the moment to directly thank you.
You know, when I was going through the cognitive dissonance change, you know, coming out of Sean Hannity and the Drudge Report and moving into the that doesn't make any sense, Orlando False Flag Pulse Nightclub.
It was your documents and it was your work that was there that kept me grounded.
Because as I began to break through this, of course, all these different media voices are saying, you can trust me, you can trust me, you can trust me.
But I had to look at the evidence being the nature of what I do.
And of course, all the evidence said, no, I don't care what all the voices say.
I care what Jim Fetzer says, because he's actually the only one that's sticking to the evidence.
There were a few other guys that were doing some work here and there, but then, of course, the great purge of the Las Vegas shooting began to take place when they kicked everybody off YouTube and we became sort of an archaic, hard-to-find breed of cat on a little site called BitShoot or Rumble or wherever we happen to be.
I stuck through it and I said, if this guy, this guy was right, I don't care what all the voices said, this guy was right.
And that's why I'm still here today.
And that's why I'm contributing.
And that's why my skill set is available on these false flags.
I don't care about what happens to me.
Yeah, I've caught them in my computer.
Yeah, I've had to deal with consequences related to Uvalde and some of the other situations that I've gotten involved with with this.
But that's been kid stuff in comparison with the golden nugget of being able to stick to the truth.
It makes me sleep like a baby.
And I got to thank you that you've been a part of that, making sure that I could live my life with absolute, complete moral clarity.
I got to thank the two of you who have been just wonderful colleagues and contributors and just sensational in your own work.
And to Don for having a show like this, bringing us together to report on the latest news and keep the ball rolling because we're doing our very best to expose the truth to the public because they're entitled to know their own history.
Don, we thank you.
Oh, Jim, we thank you.
I'm just so elated and so overjoyed and just so proud to have an association with you for the last 25 years to improve versus News Incorporated.
That was our original title from then on, and we're still there.
And it looks like we've needed more than ever.
Boy, oh boy, the way that news is going and getting heavier.
And this week is going to be a really heavy time.
So I thank you so much for your inspiration and all your work and all these books and everything that you've done for the years.
You are an American hero of the highest caliber, and I salute you.
So with that, I was going to say, thank you so much, Ellie, for watching.
Please share this everywhere.
Put it on the internet.
Do all you can, because if you don't, nobody else will.
We all got to know Jim Petzer is the hero of the hero of the century.