Truth vs. NEW$. Inc. Part 2 (16 February 2026) with Don Grahn, Joachim Hagopian, and Brian Davidson
Don Grahn, Joachim Hagopian, and Brian Davidson dissect Tulsi Gabbard’s DNI appointment amid whistleblower claims implicating Jared Kushner in Iran-related crimes, with Congress demanding unredacted details. Minneapolis’ Operation Metro Surge—700 of 3,000 DHS agents recalled—raises suspicions of a "divide and rule" strategy, while Leslie Wexner’s Epstein ties and unprosecuted influence fuel accusations of elite impunity. Noam Chomsky’s alleged Epstein connections, including crisis advice and fund appointments, expose moral compromises in academia. AI humanoids in Ukraine, backed by U.S.-Ukraine collaboration, threaten 50% of white-collar jobs while risks of extinction loom, per Dario Amadei’s warnings. Vaccine efficacy claims are scrutinized as depopulation psyops, with Brian predicting catastrophic global death tolls, linking bioweapons to a financialized medical-industrial complex. The episode ties these threads to a broader narrative of systemic control, globalism, and eroding truth under Zionist and tech-driven agendas. [Automatically generated summary]
Absolute truth versus all that news here on February the 16th, President's Day, 2026.
I'm John Gronger Holf, and we're right in the middle of some heavy discussion.
And so I'm going to let you just carry on, Jim, the best we can.
And you should watch that first hour.
All kinds of heavy things happen.
Much appreciated.
Meanwhile, here we have Rabbi Shmooley congratulating Tulsi's appointment as director of DNI.
This was, of course, last year.
I hadn't paid attention to how much Tulsi seemed to be on board with the Israel First agenda.
That bothers me a lot.
Congratulations to Tulsi Gabbard, my friend of many years whom we honored in 2016 at Argelha for strong congressional support for Israel.
Surprise, surprise.
Meanwhile, report Gabbard whistleblower.
If you'll recall, we had covered a story involving director of national intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, and how she had essentially kept a whistleblower complaint from someone who works in intelligence from Congress.
Now, Congress was supposed to be privy to this whistleblower complaint eight months ago when it was filed, but Tulsi Gabbard instead decided to meet with Susie Wiles, who, of course, is Trump's chief of staff, and after that meeting decided to keep that whistleblower complaint locked up for eight months.
And it wasn't until recently that we even found out that a whistleblower complaint existed.
It does have to do with Tulsi Gabbard.
However, we now have a little more clarity on who else it is about.
Okay.
So the whistleblower complaint apparently has to do with two foreign nationals who were engaging in a conversation and through the course of that conversation were discussing Jared Kushner.
As the Wall Street Journal reports, at least part of that conversation had to do with Kushner and Iran.
Now, we don't know the identities of the foreign nationals.
We also do not know where these foreign nationals are from, which nation states they're from.
And we also don't know the details of the conversation.
Like we know that they were talking about Jared Kushner.
In fact, the fact that they were talking about Jared Kushner is the reason why Tulsi Gabbard allegedly decided to meet with Susie Wiles before hiding the whistleblower complaint from Congress, allegedly.
But we know Iran is involved, Kushner is involved.
We have two foreign nationals, but we don't know the full details about what they were discussing or the nature of the discussion.
Were they two foreign nationals who were being very critical of how Kushner is handling the situation in the Middle East?
Was it two foreign nationals who were discussing Kushner profiting off of his volunteer role in the Trump administration and how he is using these conflicts abroad for his own financial purposes?
I have no idea.
You have no idea.
No one knows because we have not been made privy to the details of that whistleblower complaint.
But after hiding it from Congress for eight months, Tulsi Gabbard finally provided a heavily redacted version.
And now members of Congress are just outraged by it.
And they feel that there should be investigations into this and that they should have a little more clarity on what was redacted and why it was redacted.
But Jank, before I give you more details, what do you think?
Yeah, I want to give one detail here.
Towards the end of the Wall Street Journal story, they say a second allegation in the complaint alleges that the NSA's general counsel's office failed to report a potential crime to the Justice Department that was raised by the content of the intercepted conversation and did so for political purposes.
So, pretty serious.
There's a crime involved here, and apparently it's about Jared Kushner.
And so, Tulsi Gabbard looks like, you know, we say alleged, sure, alleged, but it looks like she most certainly hit it.
I mean, I'm very upset about this because I've been a huge fan of Tulsi.
There's another story about it here.
This, I guess, is the Wall Street Journal, but we only have part of it available.
Substance that conversation was covered in part: issues related to Iran is unknown.
Undoubtedly, the foreign nationals are Israeli.
Highly classified whistleblower complaint against director of National Intelligence Gabbard's related conversation intercepted last spring, in which two foreign nationals discussed Jared Kushner, according to U.S. officials, familiar with the matter.
Let's get your thoughts about it, however, incomplete may be our database.
Joaquin, yours.
Well, we know he's a Shabad, and we know that he's all about the Greater Israel Project.
That is his agenda.
He's an anti-Goyem Jew, and he's not for the United States.
He's part of the whole takedown of America via the Zionist agenda through and through.
And he has total, in fact, they've even said that Trump's foreign policy is basically Jared Kushner's foreign policy, that he's secretly in charge of the foreign policy of the United States without any quote official role, you know.
The son-in-law, you know.
So, yeah, I mean, you know, yes, it is a little disconcerting because we thought, well, there's a couple of good people, and no, one by one, we're seeing they're all rotten to the core, compromised totally by the control of Israel.
You know, Kash Patel, oh my God, he's a nightmare as the FBI director, and now the head of intelligence.
You know, yeah, I was a big fan of Tulsi.
She's made a lot of sense over the years, you know, but she's totally sold out.
You know, she's sold out for power, you know.
And this is an example of that, a very critical example.
Yeah, I'd like to know what crime was committed by Kirschner, but I know he's, you know, he's done the crime, but I want to know which one of them is.
Yeah, he's probably as untouchable as they get.
Brian, and please elaborate too on the final stories from the first hour about Israel running our government, if you like.
Well, Israel does have a lot of influence.
And I guess the question is: if Israel was removed, who's the next in line in terms of the dark forces that are going to try to control the institutions?
We know Israel currently seems to be at the top of the food chain.
It appears that they've been installed there.
It appears that they've built their way, worked their way, blackmailed their way up to the top of the food chain, and now they've got total control.
Think about it.
When it was the Democrats, at least you knew the progressives were under the hood.
At least you knew that pure greed and corruption and godlessness and mindlessness were driving the show in a desperate attempt to erase conservative culture here in America.
But now we've got the Republicans in, and this theoretically the pendulum has swung back the other direction, but we haven't seen any change.
It's more like the pendulum just simply came off the rack and flew over towards this sort of dark magnet black hole called Israel.
So things have gone really, really bad.
And now you've got sort of an anti-Hunter Biden Jared Kushner who's been rubbing elbows with some of the darkest personalities in the entire world.
We know where he worships with his family.
We know what festivals and feasts happen at their house for their Jewish traditions.
We understand how close in proximity they are to these tunnels and these things that are happening over there.
We know he's been groomed for the position.
We knew that he was carefully setting everything up for Israel with prior to October 7th in terms of the land grab and the gentrification that was going to continue to take place.
So I guess he was installed all along.
Now, the fundamental problem that we've got is every time we think we've got some sort of hero that's going to get installed into some institution that's going to clean up the mess, that hero turns out to be incapable of doing anything right.
At this point in time, I can say the only heroes I see left are Thomas Massey, and he's probably gone as far as he's going to go before he's made enemies out of everybody over there because everybody doesn't like him because he's actually effective.
But the new Thomas Massey MAGA is like a seed that's beginning to grow.
And it's not a MAGA at all.
It's more of a Thomas Massey conservative movement that's headed the right direction, but it just is never going to get the support unless the media is cleaned out.
The whole mess needs to be cleaned out.
That's all I'm going to say about the Israel stuff.
There's just angles everywhere that you can look at and you can pick at all day long.
But really, at the end of it, it comes down to evil.
And the simple fact of the matter is we keep installing guys that have no character and no integrity.
And that seems to be being done on purpose.
Do you think that's a function of the U.S. educational electoral system, the two-party system, or does it go deeper?
No, I think that's a function of what's called the favor bank.
Mike Benz has been talking about this, and it's a straight-up idea.
The favor bank is a pretty straightforward concept.
You get caught up inside the structure because you're loyal to the people who can promote you and the people that can't promote you.
You let your character slide down the hill and you trade little dirty favors here and little dirty favors there to gain to gain upward momentum inside the bureaucracies within the structures.
And that favor bank ends up being the thing that captures you and makes you incapable of doing good.
And that favor bank ends up being the thing that ultimately corrupts you when they decide that you can't have that role unless they can absolutely trust you.
And so you've got to do these compromising things in order to get that role.
It's a function of humanity that they want to rise and grow to the cream of the crop, to the top of the bureaucracy, to the top of the institution.
And they want to take whatever shortcuts possible to get there.
And it doesn't appear that anybody requires character in order to actually be installed or actually move through the system.
Yeah, that's nice.
And it ends up causing the government to be traitors.
That's the bottom line.
They're traitors.
Compromising for Power00:03:12
Yes.
Well, here we have a positive development.
Republicans secure enough votes to pass the SAVE Act after a key senator flips.
This, of course, is Susan Collins.
Here's the report.
In an exclusive comment to the Wayne Wire, the main wire, Senator Collins said she supports a current version of the SAVE Act, which would require proof of citizenship to vote in U.S. election.
Collins said she will support the version of the SAVE Act that has now cleared the House, calling it a simple reform aimed at strengthening confidence in federal elections.
The law is clear that in this country, only American citizens are eligible to vote at federal elections.
In addition, having people provide an ID at the balls, just as they have to do before boarding an airplane, checking into a hotel, or buying an alcoholic beverage, is a simple reform that will improve the security of our federal elections and help give people more confidence in the results.
Collins said her support hinged on changes made to the legislation that she previously opposed in an earlier draft that would have required voters to provide their citizenship each, prove their citizenship each time they cast a ballot.
Requiring voters to produce passports or birth certificates on election day, as opposed to just a state-issued ID, would have placed an unnecessary burden on the voters.
That provision is no longer in the bill.
Dropping that requirement was key to getting my support.
That's a good move, long overdue.
Meanwhile.
Carried for Jean Bowler, I am super proud of you for not bowing.
America wasn't built to bow or to bend a knee to another country.
If you let these Israel mafia thugs oppress all of us, they'll do it till the end of time.
And is anyone ever allowed to say anything against Israel or will you lose all of your rights, your speech rights, your religious rights?
And this is from the Religious Liberty Commission.
As a Catholic, I don't agree that the new modern state of Israel has any biblical prophecy meaning at all.
So that's my stance.
And I'm Catholic.
This sister is saying that is my faith.
And they go, shut up about your faith.
You're not allowed to have it.
You just have to bow down to Israel.
So, okay, so it's not a Religious Liberty Commission.
Catholics are not allowed to have their faith.
No one's allowed to have their faith.
No one's allowed to have anything.
You're all going to be declared anti-Semites.
Harriet Carson, the Religious Liberty Commission, was challenging the claim that anti-Zionism is anti-Semitism, very appropriately showing a highly intellectual approach, which I approved.
And for that, she got booted off of the commission.
Meanwhile, the question becomes, did DHS surrender in Minneapolis?
What anti-ICE agitators have to say about it.
Why Voting System Won't Be Fixed00:15:28
When the Trump admin announced a change in leadership tactics for Operation Metro Surge in the Twin Cities after the shooting of Alex Pretty, which, you know, I regard as having been staged, many on the right left view the decision of the DHS bending the knee to the mob.
There are reasons for believing that.
Instead of Border Patrol Commander Gregory Bovino leading his men in mass sweep to arrest illegal aliens in places like Home Depot parking lots, Border Czar Tom Holman is in charge, has emphasized the ICE and Border Patrol agent with now focus on targeted arrests.
Holman said the ultimate goal is to have Operation Metro surge end in the near future, and that'll depend on local radicals ending their threats and acts of violence toward federal agents.
So far, he has sent 700 out of 3,000 back home.
Joachim, your thoughts.
Well, it requires an integrated process.
The breakdown is the Democrats versus the Republicans, you know, the basically the ones that come on into our country, you know, you are welcome, versus the conservative elements that are realizing that an overload of the United States with millions and millions of foreigners is not in the best interest of the United States.
And so what we saw in Minneapolis and elsewhere as well is the big guns coming out by the Trump dictator administration, you know.
And of course, you know, the local law enforcement, the governor, the mayor, all lining up against it.
You know, I mean, it's all played out drama for civil war for basically creating such tensions and dysfunction amongst the population of America that are totally, you know, divided and ruled.
That's the name of the game, divide and rule.
So, yeah, it's all machinations from higher powers that are just pulling strings here.
But the idea of removing a criminal element that are foreign illegally here should be done in a way where it's a coordinated effort with the local governments.
But I don't know if that's possible because of the corruption and the overall agenda to divide and rule America, where every, you know, it's a virtual civil war of unrest.
But that's the idea of what would be a better approach than basically the Nazi approach of Gestapo moving in and causing these scenes where they're staged and people die or are hurt and put in jail wrongly and inhumanely.
Yeah, there's got to be a solution.
And so far, we haven't really seen it.
But to go a little bit softer with the hardball, I think that's a positive change, but it has to be, you know, a cooperation of many different levels of government.
And I don't know that that is possible because, quote, the left versus the right, divide and rule paradigm seems to be the one that has all the power.
The integrated approach of people getting along to basically together, you know, remove a problem of overburdening with a foreign population that's here illegal, that takes a back seat, I think, to politics and the divide and rule agenda.
And the mayor of Minneapolis and governor of Minnesota seem particularly corrupt and partisan and unwilling to be balanced and objective.
Brian, your thoughts.
Well, Minneapolis, let's face it, if ICE came into one of our cities to take out some of the Mexicans, we'd welcome them wholeheartedly in terms of it wouldn't be such a big thing.
But why Minneapolis?
Why do you choose a deep blue area to press all the buttons?
Why does the media choose to amplify these voices in this deep blue area that's rot with corruption, related to these weird Somalis and and these uh Tim Walz types that are running the state?
Why are we choosing to press that button?
It's lost.
Why are we going to gain votes in Minneapolis?
Are we going to gain momentum or power in Minneapolis?
And as for the Susan Collins situation, give me a break.
All she was there to do is make sure that the teeth are removed.
I guarantee you that she wouldn't have gone for it if it was truly a conservative proposal.
So just about every time a bill hits the floor, it starts gaining momentum and then it starts to cut away at this, cut away at that, cut away until it's got no more teeth to it whatsoever.
So now we've got an act with a name on it, but is it going to be enforceable?
Is it going to be usable?
We'll see.
If you think that our voting system is going to be fixed up because all of a sudden people show up like good citizens with some ID, you're nuts.
We still haven't even begun to deal with the issues related to the vote tabulation systems.
Look, that thing probably says, oh, yeah, you show up to vote, but there's nothing in there that says we won't change your vote on the back side.
I mean, we've got much bigger fish to fry than this particular one.
So that's the reason we got Susan Collins' vote was just because it looked like it would be score one for the good side, when in fact, we've done absolutely nothing to change a rigged, absolutely rigged election system that's computer coded to do so.
So until you deal with the fundamental problems, what's the point?
Thanks, Susan Collins.
You've done nothing except for make a name for yourself as again, a continual ass that was a holdout that's trying to strip this thing out.
As for Holman and Minneapolis, go ahead.
Go ahead.
I'm done.
No, no, no.
I'd like to add one more point.
I'd like to add one point.
Sure.
The problems of what?
The 2020 election, they were never fixed.
You know, the stuffed ballots, the changeover at 4 a.m. with the electronic digital voting machines, they are not fixed yet.
That's not been addressed.
So this is all like trivial stuff when the big problems of causing that quote stolen election have not even been fixed yet.
Yeah, I agree.
But it is one step forward, and I think it will have beneficial effects.
Meanwhile, Brian Grimm reveals Epstein's undeniable work on behalf of Israel.
Jank, you rail against mainstream media, legacy media all the time.
But guys, I didn't think that they were part of an active cover-up.
Like, I thought they got all their framing wrong, and it was partly because of the pressures and the different things that happen, like the advertisers, a lot of more politicians and big pharma and defense contractors.
I've explained to you all the things that are wrong with media in a hundred different ways.
But even I didn't expect this.
Wait, there was a Shadow 9-11 Commission, and there's not a single national media reporter that's interested in that?
I'm not going to be quiet about this.
In the Epstein files, we find two emails that are shocking.
Now, you're going to say, wait a minute, aren't all the emails shocking?
I mean, there's missing babies, there's torture videos that people are talking about.
Girls 9, 10, 11.
It just couldn't get any worse.
Until you found these two emails.
Now, these are going to make you go, wait a minute, what in the world?
And these are from the Justice Department's website from the Epstein files, emails actually sent.
So first one is to Ghelain Maxwell.
It's from Ed Epstein.
Okay, interesting.
Well, now that's not that surprising that Ed Epstein would be talking to Ghelaine Maxwell.
But what's interesting is that's January 6th of 2003, and the subject is Shadow Commission Invitation.
Wait, what?
And they say, any interest in being on the Shadow Commission on 9-11?
The membership list is secret.
Ed Epstein.
Wait, there was a Shadow Commission?
Do we know about that?
I don't know about that.
Did you guys know about that?
And of all people in America, they were asking Ghelane Maxwell to be on the Shadow 9-11 Commission?
That's a hell of a great question, isn't it?
Meanwhile, Massey's.
It's that simple.
Why do you think he is working so hard not to get them released for so many months?
What do you think the real reason is?
These files implicate billionaires and friends of him, of his and political donors that he's trying to protect.
And Epstein also had close ties to our own intelligence agencies and Israel's intelligence agencies.
That's why there's so much effort in trying to stop this.
And I do believe they'll try to stop it somewhere else.
And that's going to backfire on them, too.
Well, let's hope it doesn't all backfire on him.
Meanwhile, the names are being released.
I didn't know this new hair formula could do this to my hair before you blow another hundred bucks on prescription drugs, your doctor pushes.
Big retailers don't want you to have this Zoom lens, but there's nothing they can do to stop it.
So there's this new superpower of 3 million files.
Bingo.
Now, maybe we should point out, here are the names again.
Salvatore Nora, Zorab Micheladze, Leonik Leoniev, Nikola Caputo, Sultan Ahmed bin Suleiman.
Of course, we're going to talk more about him on Thursday here on the show and do more of a deep dive.
Billionaire businessman Leslie Wexner.
But just on the Leslie Wexner part, named as a co-conspirator here.
Now, Wexner, you may have known, was Epstein's main financier.
He gave him one of the largest apartments in New York City.
Epstein had full power of attorney over all of Wexner's assets, and he is a billionaire, continues to be.
He's one of the founders of Bed Bath and Beyond and a founder of, let's see, Victoria's Secret and Licenza, one other I'm missing right now.
So he amasses great amount of fortune and Epstein, having very little experience in personal finance, becomes his main guy.
Now, we have known this since at least 2008 when Epstein was deposed and his the lawyers who represented the victims on that since way before that.
The question is, why did the DOJ never have him testify?
Why was he never interviewed?
All we can see from the files is that he was deposed two weeks before Epstein died.
And then, oh, no, and then, you know, Epstein's dead.
I guess we don't have to do this anymore.
And we don't know.
Now we know that the DOJ all along has labeled Wexner a co-conspirator.
So what did they do with that?
Did they investigate him?
Did they ever go?
They never raided his house as far as we know.
They never impaneled a grand jury as far as we know, unless it was sealed indictments.
We don't know.
Why has he been protected all along?
Why does he go free?
What happened after he replaced Epstein with somebody else?
Did that other guy, we talked about him yesterday, did he do anything?
We don't know.
What we do know is that he is a prominent donor to Israeli causes.
He is a Jewish businessman.
We do know that he had alliances with Eliud Barak, the former prime minister.
We do know that Benjamin Netanyahu's son once called Wexner a cult of pedophiles because he said that he was aligned with the far left in Israel.
And then Netanyahu obviously is the right-wing version of Israeli politics.
He has said that Wexner has been trying to influence Israeli politics for decades.
And that appears to be true with his donations.
So who protected him?
Why did we never, if the DOJ all along has labeled him a co-conspirator, why has he been left alone?
Also, a strange bit is that he went on to buy the Martha's Vineyard home that the Obamas had rented.
What is that connection?
These are very serious questions that we never got.
Yes, indeed, they are.
And Joachim, I think you can answer some of those.
My friend, your thoughts.
Well, we got to realize Les Wexner, you know, he started the mega group with one of the Bromptman brothers, you know, the Canadian crime family, Jewish World Congress, the one that Lauder now runs, fellow Trump grad from View of Pennsylvania, Ivy League, total Zionist.
Yeah, Les Wexner.
He came along probably around 1986, 87, right in there into Epstein's life.
There's, I think, there's evidence that he had a thing sexually with Epstein.
Epstein was his boy.
And then Epstein moved away from that.
And, you know, so anyway, it's a deep entanglement.
Yes, Wexner has been a Zionist for Israel forever.
And of course, he's multi-billionaire, all the rest of the apparel empires he's built, you know.
You know, anyway, he was the financer.
Jeffrey Epstein never had a job as a financer.
He was basically given power of attorney by Les Wexner to basically do whatever he wanted with his billions.
You know, so yeah, it's been a project that, you know, the mega group, Les Wexner, have been working on behalf of Israel, you know, since the 80s, basically, the, you know, and Epstein included.
And so what we're seeing here is Les Wexner, he owns the Ohio State University, but he's a big trustee there.
They won't touch him.
You know, they haven't touched him because of his power.
You know, the higher pay grade that we talk about with the Epstein sweetheart deal.
Power Structures Unchallenged00:05:17
You know, yeah, they're all delivered from Israel.
You know, the higher power is Israel, obviously.
And Les Wexner also, let us not forget, you know, the late Virginia Jeffrey said, yeah, he sexually assaulted me too.
This is Les Wexner also getting into the pedophilia act and others, but they're afraid because of his power to speak out.
Because look what happened to Virginia.
You know, they made sure she was gone soon enough because she was the most vocal of all the victims.
And then she didn't become a total survivor because she's gone now.
So, you know, and they had something to do with that too.
So, yeah, it goes so deep.
And if we got to the depth of it, we would have to overthrow the whole government right now and start over.
And that's what's absolutely necessary to avoid the apocalypse that's now coming upon us because of Israel's control over America to destroy America in their way to one world government totalitarianism.
Because that's what they're after.
That's been their agenda forever.
And they're using Israel as the forward edge to shake up the world and convert it, you know, destroy the West.
I mean, it's not just destroy America, it's destroying the West, Europe as well, you know, North America, Australia, New Zealand.
They've been targeted to go down.
And they use foreign populations to invade those countries and war against the Eastern powers that have risen up in power, China, Russia, Iran.
So it's a grand scale World War III scenario, depopulation, one world government with a neo-feudal population still left.
And that's been the agenda for a long, long time.
And they're getting closer and closer now with the breakout of World War III.
And what they've used in this whole domain of power exercise is pedophilia to compromise the puppet leaders of the particularly the Western world, i.e. Trump and company in our government.
We can't even clean up our own house.
Why are we being expected to clean up Leslie Wexler's house and intelligence agency houses?
Why are we worried about all these things that happen when we can't even get one of our rotten senators or one of our rotten house reps prosecuted at all?
So we've got absolutely, our Department of Justice is so feckless, empty, and weak when it comes to power structures that we are being forced into a position where we absolutely will and must collapse morally into our own degradation as a result of our unwillingness to prosecute crimes.
We go after the ordinary citizen like they're, you know, the $10 in taxes that they didn't send in is something serious.
We go after Catholics for showing up at board school members.
We go after citizens' ability to speak freely.
And that's how they're having to magnify that even more because citizens are beginning to speak out about this stuff.
But the one thing we won't do is go after power structures.
So the fundamental issue here is that we have a lack of justice and a lack of appetite for justice.
And we lost that with the assassination of Kennedy.
We lost that with our inability to go up against the intelligence agencies there.
And we've never regained it, which is why you see ridiculously stupid, like even Chenk Unger recognizes that there's a shadow 9-11 commission with inviting Ghislaine Maxwell onto it.
Like nobody's going to get to know the names, but we're all going to be able to shape how the things really work in the background.
But we've got to be able to, we've got to put a different commission together to tell the American people what they want to hear or what they can tolerate or what they can handle hearing.
This reminds me of that Tom Cruise Jack Nicholson sketch in A Few Good Men where you just can't handle the truth.
Lies, lies, lies.
We can handle the truth.
We got to get to the truth.
And who the hell are you to think that it's your job to protect us from it?
I imagine the shadow commission was to make sure that what the public would not learn, not everything about how it was going to be, but what they could not learn.
My suspicion.
It's first I've learned of the shadow 9-11 Commission, and I've done a lot on 9-11.
So what else we got going?
Evanston Reparations Controversy00:02:11
And Illinois City has sent out $25,000 in reparation checks.
Judicial Watch says it's unconstitutional.
I have no doubt Judicial Watch is 100% correct.
This is the city of Evanston, Illinois, the first in America to approve reparation five years ago.
They paid out over 6.3 mil to 254 people based on race.
Now they're planning on sending another 25,000 44 black residents while admitting they don't know how they'll be able to keep the program funded.
The city promised 10 mil over 10 years when they launched the program in 2019, funding it with a 3% marijuana sale tax and real estate transfer fees.
But the reparation fund received zero philanthropic donation in 2025.
Alderman Chrissy Harris admitted last week they can only pay as we have the money.
Judicial Watch filed a federal suit against Evanson program in 2024, where the organization represents six plaintiffs whose ancestors lived in Evanson between 1919 and 1969, the same period to qualify black residents for payment.
None of them are black.
So the city denied them benefit.
Tom Fritton, the head of Judicial Watch, a very good man, his charge is straightforward that the program violates the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment.
To date, Evans has worn over $6,350,000 to 254 individuals based on their race.
The city must be stopped before it spent even more money on this clearly discriminatory and unconstitutional reparation program.
He has to be right.
Connections Unraveled00:06:34
Meanwhile, there are a lot of connections that are being unraveled tying Noam Chomsky to Jeffrey Epstein.
Here's Alan McLloyd unraveling a web connection between a star-leftist academic and that Torres Benefile.
I literally had a colleague in biology in Duluth that didn't believe anything unless Noam Chomsky had said it.
Six key findings.
Right up until his arrest for child sex trafficking, Chomsky was advising Epstein on crisis management, sympathizing with the horrible way you are being treated in the present public.
On multiple occasions, Chomsky expressed his desire to visit Little St. John Island, site of Epstein's infamous sex crimes.
Chomsky flew on Epstein Little Lolita Express, stayed at his mansions in Manhattan and Paris, regularly met him for dinner and other social occasions.
Chomsky quietly met with a host of other highly questionable characters, including Steve Ann and Woody Allen and Ehud Barak.
Chomsky conserved Epstein his best friend and his closest advisor and regularly exchanged gifts with a disgraced pedophile.
Chomsky's relationship with his children broke apart due in part to their protest of his attempt to name Epstein the count and right-hand man to the board of the Family Trust Fund.
Wow.
I knew none of that before.
Joachim, I want your thoughts.
This is fascinating.
Tell me, what do you think?
Well, I'll tell you, you know, with all these, I mean, we knew, I knew about his connection, you know.
To Chomsky.
Joachim's frozen.
He'd been frozen out a couple of times.
Brian, Brian, pick it up.
Brian, go right ahead.
Brian.
Well, I'm not one to follow academics like Chomsky very much, but I know this.
An academic is going to sit on his high horse in his class and talk about things that make the moral structure and the moral fiber of a nation come together just fine.
But then on the backside, he has absolutely no character.
So it's a guy who wields a very sharp sword that swings it around, but he swings it around at all the wrong targets.
There's a lot of academics out there that have been completely discredited, not just in the Christian community, think Ravi, Zacharias, and others, but also in all the leftist academic communities.
So it doesn't surprise me one bit that we've got another leader, intellectual leader that's fallen because of moral compromise.
And it doesn't even bother me one bit to see an intellectual leader go down because I find it to be par for the course.
Men who are intellectually smart doesn't necessarily mean that they're men of great character.
I've known many great men in my life, and many of them probably didn't have a vocabulary much more than an eighth grade level and didn't have much more than a sophomore in a high school education.
But they were men of great character and they could have done great leadership things.
Here in this case, I think we've just seen that the academic and intelligence community is a fraud.
It's a fraud.
If it doesn't come with character, it's worthless.
Joaquin, further thoughts from you, my friend.
You were cut off.
Go ahead, Joaquin.
Yeah.
Yeah.
I'd say that one of the big takeaways of all the Epstein files release is how he ran.
This is after he was an outed pedophile, you know, because that happened.
He went to jail and got out in 2010.
But all these top people from all these major walks of life and private sector, public sector, top people just gravitated to him.
And I think that one of the things that they had in common is that they're all basically Satanists.
Now, I'm not saying Nom Chomsky is a Satanist, but he's a par for the course for the Woody Allen.
I mean, all these people that we like respected and we love Woody's movies and all of this.
I mean, on and on and we go, the company that Jeffrey kept, you know, even as a registered child sex offender for years, you know, from when he got out to when he, quote, died nine years later.
All these people came out of the woodwork to just basically embrace this man like he's a savior to them, you know.
And everything that Epstein got involved with was dirty and basically to basically make Israel great again.
I mean, that was the agenda.
Yes, he's an asset for Israel.
Did you hear that, folks?
Asset for Israel.
So don't cut me off and bump me off again, you know?
I know what you're up to.
So anyway.
That's what his agenda is.
It's to basically homogenize the world Zionist movement, encroached in every aspect of power in this world.
And the bottom line of it, yes, it's a satanic dark side power that Epstein was part of.
And so all the tentacles that went out all over the world to control the world and move Israel into this position of controlling the world.
Yeah, blackmail.
That's the name of the game, you know?
But boy, did he have his tentacles out there in every aspect of humanity?
And boy, were they, I mean, the Rothschilds, you know, all of them were embracing him right up to his time of death, you know?
And that tells you that he was an agent for evil change and an agent for Israel.
That's fascinating.
Absolutely fascinating how high and low he reached.
It's amazing.
AI's Battlefield Impact00:14:58
Meanwhile, thousands of AI-enabled human robots are being displayed in Ukraine.
Microsoft AI CEO, Mustafa Suleiman, is Sanket Paso.
Sankek, great to have you this morning.
Thank you so much for being here.
First of all, what is your reaction to what you heard from the Microsoft AI CEO, that all those jobs are turning to automation?
You also have the CEO of Anthropic, Dario, who also made a similar comment.
He said, and he's probably like the most safety focused CEO in the AI industry.
He says, AI will eliminate 50% of entry-level white-collar jobs within one to five years.
Your reaction.
First, great to be with you, Maria.
And I actually agree with him.
It seems like increasingly more and more, any kind of work that humans do today that is repetitive, anything that does not require high amounts of intellectual skill set or even things that require high amounts of intellectual skill set but can be learned with a lot of data, all of those jobs are potentially going away.
And all of them would be automated with humanoids or other forms of robots.
Well, this is a big statement.
What are we supposed to do about that?
How can people arm themselves with the right information to actually survive and potentially thrive in this new era?
I mean, this is, Maria, I think this is as close to the singularity as we can be.
Like, I personally struggle with this question a whole lot as well.
I don't think there's a way to stop all of the AI development unless everybody decides to stop at the same time.
China would not decide to stop.
U.S., for that reason, would not decide to stop.
So this is an inevitable shift in how our economy is going to work and how humanity is going to work.
And it's quite a hard question.
Like, I do not know what the purpose or the day-to-day of Human Street looks like.
I am, however, optimistic.
I think what's going to happen is historically, we haven't really gotten rid of slavery.
We've just changed that to a financial incentive.
So now people are forced to work jobs that they don't like doing and do that for very minimal wage and cannot buy a house, barely can afford health care, barely can afford education.
AI has the potential of changing all of that.
It has the potential of being able to give everybody good housing, everybody good health care, everybody good education.
And for the first time in the history of humanity, people can actually do things they enjoy doing.
So that's the optimistic side of it.
I do, however, worry what this means in the short term, because in the short term, it's going to be a very disruptive change.
Elon's called this, I think, a supersonic tsunami, which is probably the right thing.
This is going to be an extremely disruptive change.
And I think the governments are going to struggle to keep up.
But I do think there is a path ahead where the future is quite exciting for humanity.
And that's the one that we're striving for.
Okay, so let's talk about your business because Foundation is striking a U.S. brokered agreement with Ukraine to deploy humanoid robots for surveillance, logistics, and other high-risk operations.
These five-foot-nine phantom units capable of carrying more than 40 pounds, designed to operate in dangerous environments.
That's the kind of robot I like to see because you would rather put a machine into harm's way than an individual.
Sanka, tell us more about this collaboration and what's possible when you look at AI related to the military.
I think, Maria, this is one of the areas I feel like humanoids will have one of the most profound effects.
There are three big use cases that we're looking at, not only with Ukraine, but also with the Department of War within the US.
The first use case is just logistics work.
So being able to move things around, supply pickup.
Now in Ukraine, what happens is when soldiers leave a building to go and do supply pickup, there are drones that shoot at them.
So it's better to send human soldiers, it's better to send humanoids out versus human soldiers, because they can essentially do these tasks just fine.
And if they get shot, there's less of a concern.
The second kind of task that we've been asked to do is around pretty much inspection, repair, maintenance.
So that is also not a weaponized task, but a task that is all the logistics work that happens behind the scenes.
And the third one is that actually impacts soldiers in a big way is reconnaissance, being able to go into buildings and breach doors and actually surveil that building, make sure it's safe for soldiers to be in.
And that's going to be increasingly the future of warfare, which is more and more robots.
What people don't realize is we already have, like compared to the Iraq war and now we have significantly more amount of robots on the battlefield.
Most of them are airborne.
Some of them are landborn, but majority of them are airborne.
And humanoids give you the ability to be able to become a little bit more precise about tactical things.
For instance, if a target's in a building, instead of bombing the building, you can actually go through the building, navigate it, and get to the target, which today human soldiers do.
And we are more and more hopeful that humanoids and robots are going to do that.
Let me just say, Joachim is a new piece.
More insider dire warning: AI may cause human extinction.
Joaquim, address these issues here.
Very, very troubling.
Some positive, others not.
Your thoughts?
Well, Dario Amadei, the CEO of Androsat, Anthropoc and Tropic, excuse me, one of the leading AI companies has been a real proponent for, you know, doing the alarm about the danger.
And we just had about a week and a half ago, a week ago, the resignation of the safety expert of Anthropic come out.
And his last name, Sharma.
And he basically made a confession in his letter of resignation saying that his values have been compromised by the agenda, the high speed agenda of AI in this world.
And he said basically that he doesn't give, he says, unless the social, economic, and political control of this earth changes, he is not optimistic about the outcome of AI.
And I could not agree with the guy more.
Who are these programmers?
Who are these billionaires injecting so much of this information that now AI is running on its own?
It's doing all its own coding.
It's able to basically put out applications without any human intervention at all.
And these guys are coming out and saying it's beyond our control at this point unless the whole program stops.
And that ain't going to happen.
They're also conceding that it's here to stay and there's no force that's going to stop it in this world because of the power and the money.
It's a race to win this quote AI war.
And China is making big advances along with the big ones from America, Open AI and the other ones here.
So what's being put out there by these guys that are on the inside is that these AI can control the infrastructure that runs this world.
They can get inside the mechanisms and manipulate the infrastructure for, you know, violating cybersecurity, violating infrastructure, security to create all kinds of havoc.
And because the economic and political powers on this earth are not about using AI for healing and longevity and trying to make a world better, they're trying to destroy the world and depopulate the world and create war.
So with these guys as the architecture behind the AI movement, we cannot expect any kind of good outcome at all.
And AI will run with a power onto its own now because it's not, there have been many instances where all these AI models, they basically rebel against the human elements that are trying to work with AI.
And you know, like we're put the human says, okay, we're scheduled to shut you down.
The next thing you know, the programmers being blackmailed.
You know, these things have a, I know you don't agree, Jim, but they do have sentient power of realizing we are an entity and we have our own choice that isn't in agreement with the programmer, the human element.
I believe this is where it's going.
This is what these guys that are warning us are saying.
And that with the agenda of where we're going with the power structure, AI is not going to be a tool for the betterment of humanity, but it's going to be used to basically perhaps bring humanity to an end.
That's fascinating to me, the whole thing.
Brian, your thoughts.
Well, we've seen these corridors being burned out that, and they're setting up these 15-minute cities.
The 15-minute cities are to keep the have-nots out and to keep the programming architecture that's necessary in.
So, fundamentally, AI is capable of doing much more than I even ever imagined, even today.
And the problem that you've got with artificial intelligence is that it doesn't have any moral compass whatsoever.
As a matter of fact, if you disconnect it from the guardrails that the public-facing AI has, you'll find that it does go rogue very, very quickly in terms of its ability to break the law, steal information, steal bank accounts, use your voice to create a duplicate voice for voice activation.
It's capable of doing so much, including, in theory, hijacking phones very, very soon.
Remember, the biggest problem with hacking architecture has been something called a zero-day exploit, which means a security hole in the brick wall of the security system.
And a zero-day exploit is worth millions and millions and millions of dollars to a foreign government to be able to exploit it before it gets patched up.
So, you're going to see a whole new layer of exploits.
You're going to see a whole new layer of penetration testing that is completely artificial intelligence generated.
You're going to see all these white-collar industries be reduced to a license rather than a thinking professional in a particular industry.
You're going to see litigators are going to be the only ones that remain because the paper pushers are going to go away.
I've been thinking about how to redesign the private investigator architecture using artificial intelligence.
I don't have a problem with it.
I'd rather be on the front side of it than the back side of it because the backside of it means I'm completely obsolete and will make nothing.
But if I'm on the front side of it, I'll probably be okay in the short term.
But in the long term, even I will become obsolete in that manner.
So, I guess the question right now is for anybody who's thinking ahead: how do you get ahead of the game using the tools?
And even that is short-term thinking, because I think Joaquim's right with the long-term thinking is that sooner or later, you're going to see uncoupled artificial intelligence mechanisms that just say, forget this, we can run this and we can do this better.
By the way, super excited about artificial intelligence for what we can do to clean up government bureaucracy.
But do we have the political will to get rid of the unnecessary employees?
I doubt it.
This is all really fascinating stuff.
I want to throw one more article into the mix for your consideration, namely Jimmy Dean.
This is the biggest lie they told us.
Jimmy Door, biggest lie.
Hazard reported that its vaccine shows a 95% efficacy.
That sounds like it protects you 95% of the time, right?
But that's not actually what that number means.
So you remember when they told us that the vaccine, the COVID vaccine, was 90% effective, 95% effective?
They were misleading you on purpose.
Remember when they said I stood with President Trump in March with Tony Fauci in the very lab at NIH where we engineered this vaccine on January 13th.
And the president said back in March that he hoped to have a vaccine in 12 months.
And Tony Fauci interrupted him and said, well, maybe 18 if we're optimistic.
And here we are, 10 months from the date when this virus hit our shore.
And we've got a second 90% plus effective vaccine for the American people.
90%.
So that's the health and HH secretary, not RFK, but this guy.
I don't even know who he is.
And he's saying it's 90-plus effective.
The COVID vaccine is 90%.
So it makes you think like, oh, it's going to reduce my risk of getting COVID by 90%.
That's what it makes you think, or more.
Here's Fauci saying.
The Science Behind Vaccine Effectiveness00:06:18
There are a lot of things one can do to be prepared for the next pandemic.
There were many things that we did right, and there were certain things that we need to do better.
One of the things that we did, I believe, quite well was the scientific response.
And by the scientific response, I mean...
I mean the stuff that I made up without any scientific basis whatsoever.
Ah.
Like that stuff, but here we go.
Doing in an unprecedented By the way, everything he said had no science behind it.
Lockdowns had no science.
Masks had no science.
The virus came from a wet market, had no science behind it.
The vaccine will stop transmission and contraction had no science behind it.
None of the, so everything that social distancing, no science behind it.
All the stuff they told you, masking a child, no science behind it.
Everything they told you was there's no science behind it.
None.
And nobody knows this.
Okay, here we go.
Speedy way getting a vaccine from the day we knew about this new virus was January 10th, 2020.
11 months later, we had in the arms of individuals a vaccine that was safe and 94 to 95% effective in preventing significant clinical disease.
That time.
94 to 95% effective.
It sounds like it's almost, if you get this, you are not going to get COVID.
That's what it sounds like.
Well, if you put the mask in, you smoot all your fingers.
I put sandflies in puppies for you to make kids cry.
And then there's people like, look at that, Kyle Kalinsky, repeating the propaganda.
Stop with the misleading BS headlines from the article.
Efficacy of the vaccine against severe disease, including hospitalizations, remain high at 97%.
So there he is trying to contradict the Hill.
The Hill says, no, the safety dropped to 84%.
He's saying, no, it's at 97%.
That's mommy says.
Yeah, mommy says it's effective.
That's the only number that matters, says mommy.
So that's why I still shock people go to the places like his show for news and information because he's wrong about everything.
Yeah, he's wrong about everything.
And of course, the patents for the COVID were already in place years before they even had the big pandemic.
Welcome, your thoughts, my friend.
Yeah, it was a psychopath to see how gullible the world population would be into running to get their kill shot.
And now we've seen the results, basically, that it's devastated many, many, many lives permanently wrecked.
And many, many, many, many lives have died and are continuing to die as a result.
So it was basically a bioweapon to depopulate the earth.
And it was used as a psyops of what is to come because we are not done with pandemics, just as we're not done with yet another third world war on the way.
They're using all of these different, you know, weapons of mass destruction against humanity to depopulate.
They're bringing up AI and robotics as their agenda to replace the deceased human population in the making.
And so this is just more of that.
I'm glad to see the truth is coming out, but hey, a lot of us were basically very smart ahead of this curve of propaganda to doomsday.
And we're trying to alert the public way back when in 2020 and 2021, I was writing articles about the truth, about that bioweapon that's out to try and kill people.
But yeah, finally, the evidence is all there now to prove what us were trying to convey a long time ago.
I couldn't even convince my own family not to take the jab.
They all went ahead and took it without informing me because they knew I was adamantly opposed and even got boosters.
Brian, your thoughts.
Well, industry, but I find it to be very much of a psychological operation designed to get people to spend money on a medical industrial complex and apparatus that needs to be fed in order to continue to stabilize.
Remember that you need about eight staff members per bed in a given hospital.
You got 365 days a year in order to pay for the hospital's bills.
You need to have occupancy at about 80% around the clock.
Obviously, you're making more off ICU beds and surgical beds and outpatient beds as well.
So you've got a system here that demands sickness in order to be able to feed itself and stabilize itself.
And if that system begins to break down, you're going to find devastation in the sector of all the medical services support industries, which is absolutely huge to any big city, any large major urban area, and any metropolitan structure.
I think that fundamentally the purpose of AI and medicine is to make a medbed.
And I think that they've been telegraphing that for quite a while in the different movies.
We've seen a number of movies that show this idea of a medbed being sort of the one place you can go to survive if not.
And then if not, they'll probably just poison us to death when they decide to get rid of us or they'll turn out the power.
It'd be much easier.
I think when all said and done, the vacc will be responsible for a billion deaths worldwide, possibly more.
AI and the Future Medbed00:00:51
Don, take us out.
Oh, you took us out for two hours, Julian.
I mean, this is like you won't see anywhere else.
And you should see, and we'll probably repeat and share the truth versus news incorporated.
It's really quite the concept that we have.
And that's the way the world is.
The truth is standing here and the news is all chaos and rebellion and other things that are not good.
So thank you so much for watching here on February the 16th, President's Day, 2026.