Truth vs. NEW$. Inc. Part 1 (16 February 2026) with Don Grahn, Joachim Hagopian, and Brian Davidson
Don Grahn, Joachim Hagopian, and Brian Davidson expose a U.S.-Israel conspiracy to destabilize Iran, citing China’s Beidou-linked YLC-8B radar (700km stealth detection) and fabricated 30,000 death tolls from orchestrated January 2026 riots. Treasury Secretary Scott Besant admitted sanctions triggered bank collapses and inflation, while Jared Kushner and Steve Witkoff stall talks to push for regime collapse. Iran’s hypersonic missiles (5-second strike time) mirror Libya’s Gaddafi fate, with Israel pressuring the U.S. to act—despite no nuclear threat—using $33B in taxpayer funds since October 7th. The episode implicates figures like Yehuda Kaplun and Marco Rubio in suppressing dissent while advancing a "Greater Israel" agenda tied to financial elites and global cyber control. [Automatically generated summary]
So folks, the truth versus news incorporated here on the 16th of June, President's Day here in Greenwald, USA, and 2026.
Wow, what a year it's been so far.
What a week we've had.
And we have the best people to cover that right now.
Of course, we've got Jim Petzer, who's an author of many books I show you every week.
Like this, we hear about JFK.
That's vital history that you need in American Loops on 9-11, 9-11.
These are things that you need to see and have here, Sandy.
Look, well, he's got 40 more books or more.
And he's still writing and doing wonderful things and hosting shows like this where the deal misses Buyer is totally awesome.
Plus, we have all the way from Bali.
We have Joaquim, who's also a very prolific and outstanding critical writer.
Boy, he lays it on the line as to what's really going on behind the scenes in the world.
You ought to see I try to pass those on to you.
And then we also have Brian Davidson, the private investigator who investigates just about everything you need to see and exposes it all like nobody else.
So I think we got what a heck of a show today.
And it looks like we're going to start off talking about Iran has a game-changing defense and things are changing over there.
Are they for the better?
You're absolutely right, Don.
And these changes are very significant.
We have a report from Malastair Kroc that the Chinese have provided Iran with a radar system that automatically alters the targets in real time for the missiles to have constant updating.
It's fabulous.
Chinese are putting up that to say, you know, waiting that that is not included in the deal.
We'd like to maintain freedom of action against that emerging threat.
He specifically says, if you get a deal, but it doesn't include the missiles, we want to reserve freedom of action.
That's exactly what I'm saying to you, is that Netneo puts it in more blunt language to Trump.
And he did that at Mar-a-Lago.
And he said, if you won't do this, then we will force it on you.
If you come up with a nuclear agreement, which has shortcomings, it doesn't include, if you like, weapons and other things, then we will go alone and you will have no choice but to back it.
And we will criticize you.
We'll go against you if you don't back us.
And you know that we can carry big support in Washington in those things.
So you say Trump is hesitant.
I think he's very hesitant because he's been searching around asking all his team desperately, find a quick attack on Iran that I can do.
Can I do a, you know, like a Maduro in Venezuela, I want in, boom, out.
I want a quick one.
It's got to be clean.
We know that, you know, the head of CENTCOM, when he was talking with the Israelis, said this specifically.
Look, our instructions are he wants a clean, quick operation that doesn't involve any longer-term entanglements within Iran.
The problem is that he keeps getting told both by the Israelis and his own team, we're very sorry, but there isn't such a thing.
And what he, I think, is coming to face now is that, you know, if he doesn't get an agreement with Iran, and I think that's highly unlikely that he will, then he faces a long, complicated entanglement in Iran.
It won't be a short war.
It will be a longer war.
America likes short wars, but Iran understands that, and they will play it because they know that in about within two weeks, the American military operation will probably have been exhausted in terms of its air defenses and its capabilities.
And what I was going to say to you is: you know, Iran has got, why it's feeling very confident, it has got help.
And what is so striking about it is the help they're getting is unseen.
You won't see even signs of this, and it's a game changer.
What have they done?
The Chinese have given already to Iran their long-range radar systems.
I think it's a YLC-8B radars.
And these can detect stealth planes at a distance of 700 kilometers.
And as you know, I mean, that excludes all F-35s either by Israel or America.
These are the eyes and years, but they've done more than that.
Iran in this last period has switched completely away towards from the old GPS system of targeting, and they've moved over to the Baidou system.
And in the partnership agreement with China, this is one of the most significant elements.
It's not about air defense missiles, but what they gave them was effectively the high-grade military data linking on Baidu, which is very difficult for the West.
This is rather like what the Pakistanis had and it's called Link 17, which is a complete network from radar to command missile control centers of a data system and the ability to communicate in this way.
And it is so they would be able, if you like, to create for them from Chinese satellite structures a whole battlescape which can be fed directly,
real time, into the missile centers of Iran, giving them accurate, if you like, targeting data to within two meters accuracy and feed that automatically into the, if you like, the missile centers for targeting either American ships or others.
And if you want to see the sort of emphasis of that, look at these satellite photographs that are coming out that the Chinese are putting up there to say, you know, wake up the United States because look, they've been putting out pictures of Diego Garcia and the Thad missiles there and also pictures of Aludaid missile base from their satellite systems.
And, you know, it is, you know, this is it.
People have been saying, well, keep saying to me, well, are the Chinese going to intervene?
Well, they're not about to put troops on the ground or sort of fire missiles from China into.
No, it's an unseen deterrence that has been taking place in a complete, if you like, I think you call it, and I'm not a military person, a sort of a kill system that gives absolute data.
You can provide data to the centers.
You don't need to have your aircraft, they don't need to have the radar on.
The data comes on, gives you the targeting of the missile or the airplane you want to go to.
This is what, if you like, the Pakistanis used against India.
Same, a Chinese system, but it was a slightly different one.
But this is the latest Beidou system, quite removed from anything of the GPS system that the West use.
They will find it very hard to jam Beidou.
It's a high-standard military data link.
As I say, it's a combination of early warnings.
We certainly have to do this because we start losing aircraft.
What if the strikes hit the ships at sea?
Now listen to McGregor, of course, elaborate even further.
People want to sink a ship.
You don't need to sink these ships in order to make them irrelevant.
You put a big enough hole in the flight deck on an aircraft carrier, the aircraft carrier is finished.
You don't have to sink these things.
So we've got to start thinking in terms of how much damage can they do to the fleet.
We don't know.
And now I think the Navy has responded by sailing 1,400 kilometers away from the Persian Gulf.
Smart move.
The problem is that limits your effectiveness.
We need to take that into consideration.
And we saw that during the Kosovo air campaign when the Navy discovered that there were two diesel subs, two diesel subs.
We summoned a British and an American nuclear attack submarine, two of these submarines that sat right outside the location where the two diesel subs were in harbor.
And they watched that the entire time.
But that was not enough.
The carrier battle group and surface action groups sailed far, far away from the coast of Yugoslavia or the coast of, no, you can't say Serbia, so we'll just say Yugoslavia.
The Navy's not stupid.
They're aware of this, and they understand that if they could hit one of these ships, particularly an aircraft carrier, people are going to say, well, geez, these are really vulnerable.
Oh, yes, they are.
And during the Kosovo air campaign, it was at one point, I think it was General Short who suggested it.
Could have been General Jumper.
General Clark certainly went along with it and said, let's make things easier.
Let's just bring all the aircraft from the aircraft carrier that has to sit down somewhere near Greece and Crete and bring them ashore in Italy and put them on airstrips.
Well, the Navy almost came unglued at that point because they said, if we do that, we're admitting there are limitations to what the carrier can do and how vulnerable it is.
Absolutely not.
All our aircraft have to stay at sea.
So these kinds of things undoubtedly are being discussed and considered.
And we haven't even talked about the missiles that have to be reloaded and how most of the ships have to go back to port to reload.
But you know, I mean, you say that surely those things are being discussed.
And maybe they are behind the scenes.
But in front of the scenes, in front of the cameras, you have these who had just been almost beside themselves of pleading with President Trump to not do any negotiations, no diplomacy, but to do the military option.
Jack Keene, I think it was yesterday, went out and said, hey, our best option is the military one.
The military option, the one that the president is in the planning and preparation stage of, is a preferred option here because it sets the conditions for regime collapse.
And it would likely be a combined operation with Israel and the United States.
And what we're seeing now, the pacing for this operation is being driven by being able to move resources into the region to do two things.
One, to help us defend, as well as the Israelis against Iranian's retaliation attack, but also to make certain that this operation would likely not be a limited operation in terms of a one-night operation or two nights.
This would be a comprehensive campaign combined with the stated purpose to set the conditions for a regime collapse.
So at least he's saying, you know, this is not going to be a one-off deal.
This is not just going to be like it was with Operation Biden Hammer about a two-hour operation.
At least he's saying it's a campaign.
But what he didn't talk anything about, and what I would like you to address, is what is the expected Iranian reaction?
And how are our defenses against that?
Well, two things.
First of all, the Iranian action has been stated very clearly.
If they are attacked at all, they will not exercise restraint as they have in the past.
In other words, they will respond with whatever they have that can reach the targets that are within range.
That means they will use their ballistic missile arsenal and they will attack bases where our aircraft are located, where we have radars, where we have air and missile defense.
They will look for command and control hubs, presumably in Qatar and other places in the Gulf.
They will attack ships if they think they can strike them.
They will do enormous damage, obviously, to Israel, which they see as the principal culprit, and justifiably so in organizing the entire operation.
If it were not for Israel, would any of this happen?
I think the answer is certainly not.
So I think we know what the Iranians will do and how long can they do it?
I think that we'll run out of missiles long before they do.
So what are we going to do at the beginning?
You're going to have a massive, massive assault in the first 24 hours.
It's going to be unlike anything that we've seen, certainly since 1990 or 91, rather.
So that's what we're going to see on our side.
And they'll respond as best they can with whatever they have.
So I think it's short of the use of a nuclear weapon, everything is on the table and everything will be used.
Now, I did want to pause for a second and point out a couple of things.
Massive Assault Ahead00:02:05
First of all, there were people in Washington urging Eisenhower to consider not simply building up a larger army in Korea for the purpose of destroying the Chinese forces that were in front of us, but also to invade China and ultimately execute regime change in Beijing.
There were some who actually said we should consider the use of nuclear weapons.
Eisenhower rejected all of it.
And I think we can be grateful that he did.
He said, first of all, we don't want to be involved in another long war whose outcome is hard to measure, hard to control.
We may think we can destroy them, but we may discover that we can't.
He knew enough about China and its expanse to understand that the Chinese have strategic depth, have a large population.
They can fall back.
They can take the casualties.
They can wait you out to some extent.
And obviously, he worried about the inclusion of the Soviet Union in that equation.
Then you have Kennedy in 1962, who is confronted by the Joint Chiefs.
And frankly, the large consensus inside the Joint Chiefs was, let's go invade Cuba.
Let's bomb it into the Stone Age, and then we'll invade the place.
And of course, that's something that Kennedy considered.
And he decided, well, if we go to Cuba, we've been there before.
We're going to have to stay for some period of time.
It's going to cost us a lot of money.
We're going to end up killing large numbers of people that we probably don't want to kill.
We really don't want that.
We don't want a war in the Western Hemisphere if we can avoid it.
And so the rest is history.
So what I'm trying to get you to understand is that other presidents have been confronted with the kinds of arguments that General Keene is offering.
And they said, thanks, but no thanks.
I'm not going to go there.
Now, right now, I don't know what the I haven't polled the people in the White House.
I don't know what they're suggesting.
I don't know what kind of operational review any of the plans for this coming campaign have been subjected to in the National Security Council staff and who's weighed in.
The Trap That Trump Faces00:15:52
What we do know is that Israel first is the preeminent concern and that this is considered to be a unique opportunity, not in the history of the United States, but in the history of Israel, to essentially annihilate its most serious competition, strategic competition, and strategic opponent.
That's number one.
This is unique.
And right now, Mr. Netanyahu has absolute control over what we do, which is why you're going to see this air campaign commence in a few days.
So if you're an Israeli or if you are an Israeli firster inside the White House or in Congress, you've got to go.
You absolutely have to do this because this condition for Israel may not last and Israel's position in the world could change.
In other words, they have to consider the terrible possibility that the American people say, we're not going to do this in the future.
So now is the time to do it.
If you're ever going to do it, get it done now.
And I think that's really what's behind all of this.
Well, and Douglas.
One more story before I get your man.
Alistair Krip, there's going to be a very sad planes.
Those are those huge ones, those huge aircraft that are filled with all kinds of military gear, missiles and other military gear to its CENTCOM's area of responsibility over the past month.
U.S. fighter jets have already been repositioned to regional countries.
The USS Abraham Lincoln Carrier Group Strike Group remains in the Arabian Sea.
And now the USS Gerald R. Ford will deploy immediately to the Mediterranean.
Best I can calculate from what we have looked in there, what we have available is that there is somewhere around the first week of March is when that thing could be on site.
Now, I want to read something to you because there was some news that came out, I guess, a couple of days ago that said that the George H.W. Bush, the aircraft carrier, had been put on a prepared to deploy orders.
And then now all of a sudden, instead, it comes to the Gerald R. Ford.
That raised some concern for what happened to the Bush.
Well, it turns out that there may be a reason.
This from Larry Johnson sent to me from his, he had a naval source just an hour ago.
He says, I'm hearing that the Ford CSG, that's the carrier strike group, is on the table for a second CSG in the conflict.
Something must be seriously wrong with the Bush that is classified.
The narrative that they can accomplish this en route, I don't think they can.
I know this because it's been done in the past.
This tells me that the USS Bush problem is something that can't be fixed fast enough and is classified.
In my opinion, the Ford has been at sea too long to surge in my opinion as a last resort.
This is the key part.
Lots of data already exist.
It shows it is not a good idea.
Anything over eight months at sea destroys families, impacts retention morale, prone to accidents, mishaps, extends shipyard availability, and has a ripple effect across the fleet.
Aviation mishaps are the most likely of the bad things to happen.
Something is not right here.
What does that tell you?
Because I mean, just the fact that we've added another aircraft carrier after the Trump and Netanyahu meeting on Wednesday, which apparently ended with no agreement between the two.
And in fact, they didn't even have this press conference afterwards, which they normally do, which implied, especially with Trump's true social saying that there's not going to be, I'm going to continue on with negotiations.
So he didn't give any kind of authorization for firepower, but now here comes Gerald R. Ford.
What do you make of it?
Well, I don't agree there was no agreement.
I mean, I think there was an agreement to differ between the two sides.
And really, the circumstances in which we went into this are still there.
Trump, Netanyahu, is laying a trap for Trump.
And that is quite obvious.
Now, we don't know exactly when we don't know what went on in this last talks Tuesday, but what we do know is from the Mar-a-Lago talks, because that's been well covered in the Hebrew press in Israel.
And Netanyahu was plain that he was going to tell Trump, as he did at the end of December, the nuclear issue is not of concern to us.
It is not our prime interest any longer.
And he said, then, you know, the new missiles, the missiles that are in hand in Iran are so sophisticated that actually it makes nuclear weapons obsolete and makes them much less important.
Wow.
It's the missiles.
It's the missiles, Trump, that you have to take out.
And you do that first.
And what's more, excuse me, if you try and come up with a phony nuclear agreement, which is rather like that, if you like the 2018 agreement that you subsequently renounced, then I will go against you.
You won't be able to maintain the fiction of an agreement if I don't give it a kosher certificate.
That's their language.
They use that.
Netanyahu said, I won't give it a kosher certificate.
And then how are you going to maintain it if we don't support your position?
Or worse still, if we go against your position?
And because we don't have a veto, supposedly, but we represent what Republican hardliners believe.
Without Israel, it would be impossible.
Well, and that to bolster your argument there, if Netanyahu is actually saying, hey, you either go with what I'm saying here, which is it's the missile program and the proxies in the region, even more than the nuclear, because allegedly that was destroyed last June.
But so that seems to be their ticket.
And if that's Netanyahu's threat, it would seem to be made true because on Fox News yesterday, you had Jack Keene, who goes on, it sounds an awful lot like the Netanyahu position you just laid out.
I cannot fathom him putting together a deal that would not give us complete assurances, not only on nuclear weapons, but also on ballistic missiles, restrictions in numbers and range.
and also denying Iran support of the proxies.
In other words, a total fundamental change in Iran's behavior to include no longer killing in such a barbaric fashion their own people.
I don't believe that Trump would ever put together a lousy deal.
So I don't believe this is Jack Keene on Fox News, which Trump, almost like his Bible, he listens to every day.
Here they're saying no, no bad, because that would be a bad deal.
I can't believe he would do that.
And there has been, let's see, Mike Pompeo and Lindsey Graham, two others very close to Trump, have been playing the Obama card.
You can't be weak like Obama and that bad deal that you got out of before.
It seems like a lot of pressure on the inside of the administration for Netanyahu's position.
Netanyahu is very clear.
And he said, listen, and he threatened.
And this is what happened in December.
And I'm sure this was repeated in this last, at least I think it's very likely that it was repeated.
And he said, if you don't attack Iran, we will.
And you try and stay out of it.
Do you think you're going to be able to, if you force us in, we give you a time few negotiations, but a little while.
But if you don't succeed in your negotiations or you have a bad deal, which is just a nuclear deal and doesn't deal with the missiles and doesn't deal with Iranians' allies like Hezbollah and Hamas and others, then we will do it ourselves and you will have no choice but to be brought into it.
So, I mean, this is the trap that Trump has.
Now, you know, it's very unlikely that he will be able to.
This is indeed the trap confronting Trump.
I have no doubt about it.
And he's forcing Trump to do what I think in his heart of hearts Trump does not want to do.
Your thoughts?
What we're seeing here is a highly compromised pedophile president that's been placed there basically as an automaton for Israel.
He must do what Israel says.
And if he balks and continues to hesitate, Israel will do a false flag and force America's entry into a war against Iran.
That is the scenario that is now in process.
I think the carrier group is going to come in within the next couple of few weeks, maybe two weeks probably.
And then we have a whole, basically a whole situation where war will be launched.
And yeah, Trump doesn't want to do it because obviously he knows the American people are totally against it, along with the whole world other than Israel.
You know, and maybe some fanatics in Britain too.
But beyond that, there will be no support for this war.
And then, of course, Trump wants it to be fast.
It's not going to be fast.
What we're looking at is a whole change in the technological delivery of war today.
I mean, with China invested so much along with Russia in the defense of Iran, their ally, strategic ally, and the sophisticated technology that they bring to the table that Iran last June did not have, they are at an advantage now to wait this war out of attrition because America will,
yes, run out of its missile supply.
Israel will not have an air defense system.
They will be obliterated.
The thousands of troops, American troops in the Middle East are also targeted, of course.
And the command control centers, all of this.
It's all going to go down.
There's going to be a huge loss of life of American soldiers.
It's all in the works now.
And because Netanyahu has Trump by his pedal balls, it's going to happen.
And, you know, it's like Trump knows that it's a defeat for him and he doesn't want to do it, but he's a pedophile and he's being forced to.
And this is the world we're living in.
It's not going to happen, but it's going to happen super fast.
It's going to be like Pearl Harbor.
It's going to be a calamity.
Ships sunk, bases destroyed, Israel obliterated in the first 24 hours.
Brian, your thoughts?
Well, I don't want to simplify it to straight Israel, but kind of when you break it down, it does go there.
Just look at all the different pressure sources that push for a war.
You've got, number one, obviously, the quote-unquote alliance commitments that we have with Israel because they're our ally in the Middle East.
And so, in theory, you've got intelligence sharing, which ties into all of this joint defense posture that Israel is sort of forcing us to take, and a political expectation of support.
But that's just alliance architecture.
That's not straight-up coercion.
So, alliances sort of couple it up.
Then you've got another pressure point, which is this regional power balance idea that from a U.S. strategic perspective, you know, Iran challenges U.S. dominance in the area.
They threaten our Gulf shipping routes.
They arm their networks and they expand their missile capacity while they're deepening their ties with the supposed enemy of Russia and China.
So, even if Israel didn't exist, we'd still be caught up into this pressure area.
So, the motive isn't totally zero without Israel.
It just sort of looks different.
But what you still haven't even calculated into this is the military-industrial complex momentum.
Now, if you want to say that the military-industrial complex is the tail being wagged by the Israeli dog, then I guess Israel is in charge of everything, including our military-industrial complex, and it's inevitable.
But the simple fact of the matter is that there's a lot of momentum for any long-term sustained military action that takes place.
And of course, it makes the budget boys lick their chops because of the idea of all this equipment being sent over there and restocked, and all these different bases being built out.
And on top of the military-industrial complex, you still have to think about the political incentives.
Look, Trump doesn't seem to really worry about the people of the United States of America.
But if he wants to try to keep American hegemony, he's got to worry about all these weakness narratives.
And he's got to worry about mid-term pressures.
And he's got to worry about all these donors like the Adelsons that give him money.
So there's just a lot of pressure there.
You know, the defense industry incentives, in my opinion, are the ones that end up kicking the dog across the fence line.
So Israel's position isn't the only one that's driving this.
There's a lot of different driving actions that take place.
Driving Forces Behind Conflict00:11:04
So I don't think the question is as simple as: is Israel wagging the dog?
I think the question is: who's controlling whom?
And are all these overlapping incentives creating pressures on Trump that are so big that he's going to escalate this thing and build the momentum up at the cost of what the American people want?
Because all this alliance institutional bias and military-industrial complex stuff, they're all pressures as well that could play into this.
So I just don't think it's as simple as it looks.
I wish we weren't there.
Without the Israeli alliance, none of this would be taking place, except the military-industrial complex would still be licking their chops to get after it because we can't get the resources that we want out of the Middle East without being threatened.
But I think the threatening is only taking place because Israel's driving the force.
So, anyway, that's my take on it after 20 minutes of video.
And I'd like to add one more thing.
You know, I mentioned that this is the new warfare that's coming out technologically.
And I didn't mention, you know, that was part of this whole segment.
China has given its most sophisticated radar detection system out there.
It's state of the art.
It reaches out 700 miles basically, okay, kilometers.
And, you know, any kind of air action, you know, the whole COP decapitation agenda is going to be read well in advance, unlike last June, of course.
And it's integrated.
It's an integrated system with basically their ballistic missile launches.
So they're going to be targets, not to mention the sitting target of the carrier groups that are there.
So, you know, it's not a good situation strategically on the battlefield in the new war, the new technological war that America is being forced into right now.
Not a good situation.
Yes, I agree.
And Brian would be right if this were a kind of standard war exchange scenario, but it's not.
If we attack, we are so unprepared.
We're so incapable of dealing with our defenses.
We're going to lose six or seven ships, 10 to 20,000 troops, and Israel is going to be obliterated in the first 24 hours.
They aren't going to be happy about it.
The American people are going to be repulsed.
Trump's going to be defeated massively in the midterms.
He's going to lose any political clout he has had heretofore.
It's really for all the marbles.
Meanwhile, we have to ask: is there going to be another Israeli false flag?
State of the Nation does a wonderful job in this article of summarizing the situation we are in.
Listen to this.
Nothing is working.
Israel has failed to get up to attack Iran despite all the leaks regarding his ties to Epstein, which itself seemed to be a modest false flag promoting that fell short.
Some form of the Samson option is on the way.
It's almost guaranteed with no one buying Trump's claim of innocence other than Alex Jones, who at least admits Israel is complicit in much wrongdoing.
But as everyone can see, after decades of brutal wars and furtherance of the Greater Israel Project, Beebe and his gang of thugs are all in on behalf of the chosen ones as they do everything they can to hasten his coming.
Chuck Baldwin is exactly right.
It's bad news for us all, including the mega Mason Trump himself.
Epstein found proved that for decades, the state of Israel via Mossad has covertly taken over complete control of the U.S. government, that the federal government is but a public entity of Israel, and that presidents from both parties have been and are being blackmailed by the Zionist stake for the unspeakable crimes they have committed, and which Israel, the Epstein's massive pedophile network, has the evidence thereof.
Our government is totally corrupt, an illegitimate distortion of the Constitutional Republic founded 250 years ago, with both parties complicit in massive criminality, as many have claimed for decades.
Restraint is extremely unlikely in the coming days, with war against Iran, a virtual certainty to simultaneously provide the wag-the-dog distraction Trump so desperately need and to fulfill the final part of the Wesley Clark, seven nations in five years, post-9-11 Pentagon scenario.
All that's missing is the excuse, the false flag trigger to provide maniacs like Lindsey Graham and his delusional ilt retext to launch an attack that Judge Naptim, a foreign policy expert, assure us will fail spectacularly.
As good a summary as we're liable to get.
Meanwhile, Max Blumenthal on all the cards.
Jared Kushner and Steve Witkoff, who hold no formal position in the Trump administration, are negotiating through Oman's foreign ministry in Oman with Abbas Aragchi, the foreign minister of Iran, down the hallway.
I think Kushner shook hands with Aragchi in a sort of breach of protocol, but they are exchanging notes through the Omani foreign ministry as they negotiate over Iran's nuclear file, apparently over Iran's ballistic missiles.
Here's some photos of Kushner and Steve Witkoff with the Omani foreign minister, you know, raising a lot of questions.
And the whole reason this is happening is because Donald Trump has decided to threaten Iran with war because he's being nudged by Israel, by Netanyahu and by his largest donors, Miriam Adelson, Ron Lauder,
a figure who's named constantly in the Epstein files as an associate of Epstein, who was part of Netanyahu's mega group of millionaires and billionaires that would support his political fortunes from within the U.S. while pushing pro-Israel institutional activism across the West.
This is only happening because Israel is demanding that the U.S. attack Iran, which poses no threat to U.S. national security.
This is only happening because the U.S. instrumentalized protests to foment riots alongside Israeli intelligence and I would assume British intelligence, which left thousands dead.
Two days of rioting from January 8th to January 9th.
And as Wyatt Reed and I detailed in an article at the Gray Zone, the number, the death toll has been fabricated and concocted by sources close to the clown Prince Reza Pahlavi, who incited those riots, calling for Iranians to kill government workers and kill government media workers and take over institutions.
Trump called for Iranians to take over institutions.
The sources, monarchist sources are pushing this phony death toll of 30,000.
U.S. media started reporting it in Time magazine.
Then The Guardian began reporting it to sort of legitimize it through the voice of the left liberal London intelligentsia.
And then EU ministers followed by designating the IRGC as a terrorist organization to give European a European green light to a U.S. attack on Iran on behalf of Israel.
And it's being stalled through negotiations in Oman.
The idea that Iran would give up its ballistic missiles.
Wait a minute, actually, let me make one quick point about those protests.
Scott Besant, the U.S. Treasury Secretary for the second time, after saying something similar in Davos, has taken credit for the protests, which mutated into very violent, deadly riots in Iran through the instrumentalization of sanctions or financial terrorism against the Iranian economy.
And this is his most blatant confession yet.
The Treasury, and what we have done is created a dollar shortage in the country.
At a speech at the Economic Club of New York in March, I outlined the strategy.
It came to a swift and, I would say, grand culmination in December when one of the largest banks in Iran went under.
There was a run of the bank.
The central bank had to print money.
The Iranian currency went into free fall.
Inflation exploded.
Watch the woman nodding behind him over here.
Currency went into free fall, inflation exploded.
And hence we have seen the Iranian people out on the street.
We will continue monitoring all the partners, all the Iranian partners.
The good news, Senator, is that we have seen, and we can see it with our fence in the Treasury.
So, I mean, he admits it again that sanctions are designed to destabilize Iran and drive riots.
And he's taking credit for the riots.
These were not peaceful protests.
This was a bridge between the 12-day war and the coming assault on Iran.
And in many ways, the riots themselves were a more devastating act of war on Iran than Israeli assault, an Israeli assault last June, 2025, because it pits Iranians against one another.
It pits neighbor against neighbor through economic warfare, through desperation.
And that's what many Iranians are telling me, is that this was much more psychologically damaging because it's coming from within their own society.
Reminds me a lot of what took place in Nicaragua in 2018, which the Nicaraguan government defeated.
But these negotiations are ongoing.
Jared Kushner's Role00:03:56
Steve Witkoff, whose family is very close to the Zionist movement, Steve Witkoff, who praised the former director of the Mossad at a fundraiser for United Hatzalah, the Israeli pseudo-rescue group, which hyped up a lot of the October 7th hoaxes, is there with Jared Kushner, the presidential son-in-law, who's overseeing the Board of Peace to transform Gaza into a series of high-tech,
biometrically enforced concentration camps and data centers.
Jared Kushner literally was in bed with Netanyahu, or almost when he was a boy, his father, Charles Kushner, fraudster who was pardoned by Trump, is now the ambassador to France.
His father used to host Netanyahu when Netanyahu was in town in New York, and he was the opposition leader.
And Jared would be asked to give up his bed so Netanyahu could stay over in his bedroom.
And I guess Jared would like sleep on the couch or somewhere else.
So that's how close Jared Kushner is to Israel.
And these are the two figures negotiating on behalf of the U.S. with Iran.
What is Iran being asked to do?
They were being asked to give up some of their ballistic missiles, especially their long-range ballistic missiles, at a time when they're introducing a new hypersonic missile, which can reach targets in Israel in less than five seconds.
They're being asked to give up their deterrence, just as Gaddafi gave up his deterrence and was met with bayonets in his backside by NATO-backed death squads, literally backed by NATO.
The Libyan Islamic Fighting Group was under NATO air cover when they beheaded Qaddafi's guards and sodomized him with a bayonet.
That was Qaddafi's, the price he paid for normalizing and giving up his deterrence.
You can imagine that's what they'd like to do at Netanyahu.
Meanwhile, special envoy for anti-Semitism.
You might have seen this guy before.
He's a US special envoy to combat anti-Semitism.
Yehuda Kaplun.
And his role was recently created.
And after he's been installed into this role, his job objectives have very quickly become making sure the world doesn't stop supporting Israel.
Genuinely, this seems like what this man's exclusive role is.
Before I talk any further, it's going to be a great time now to show my disclaimer.
This is not intended to promote hate towards any group of people, but I'm going to have an honest conversation about you guys where anti-Semitism, his role, is being used as a cover to shield criticism of Israel.
This is exclusively what's going on now.
As a Palestinian, I should be allowed to talk about this when ultimately my family is kind of being affected by the policies this psychopath is trying to push.
So let's get right into it.
Here's the guy.
I showed you some of this clip before, but look where he was recently.
He was in Saudi Arabia.
Why is he in Saudi Arabia?
Why is he talking to Saudi officials, Saudi officials?
Saudi foreign minister met with Israeli-American Lubavitch rabbi and U.S. special envoy to monitor and combat anti-Semitism, Mr. Yehuda Kaplun.
Who is he?
Well, he met at the security conference in 2026 with the foreign affairs minister, Faisal bin Farkhan.
And, you know, there he is.
And here's the thing.
He is meeting with world leaders left and right.
And my issue with it is he brags.
He's bragging.
He gloats about the fact that his policies that he's pushing for have led to the elimination of the BDS movement in certain countries.
He's bragged about BDS boycott divestment and sanctions against Israel, which is a movement that was very, very effective, you know, basically sanctioning Israel.
BDS Movement Elimination00:04:32
Countries stop engaging with Israel to weaken their economy to ultimately force Israel to make concessions.
That's the foreign policy on behalf of the United States.
And obviously, Donald Trump could have put an end to it if he were so disposed.
But he obviously supports it.
Joaquim, your thoughts.
He has to support it.
He's also Shabaad, along with his daughter and son-in-law that are now negotiating with other countries to basically bring about the war against Iran.
It's all very, very clear.
And it was supposed to happen in early last month, early January, with the protests, quote, protests in Iran, manipulated totally from the outset, as our Treasury Secretary admits openly two times now.
That was the idea that they basically create unrest in Iran, softens the underbelly in order to then win over the people as they go for their decapitation strikes against the Iranian regime.
You know, and this is just the old story.
It goes back to Wesley Clark under Bush and ready to basically take out seven Middle Eastern countries in what, five years or some shit like that.
It's totally failed because Iran is still the holdout.
That's the only one on that list that hasn't gone down with a regime change.
So they are just, and obviously it is the most powerful nation in the Middle East, far more than Israel.
So obviously that's their agenda.
And it also, of course, the overall agenda is to take down first Iran and then China and Russia.
That's the whole idea.
The East-West divide, the divide and rule.
That's how the financial infrastructure of this world that controls all wars, both sides every time, Rothschilds.
This is the agenda.
It's been the agenda since the invention of Cold War.
So this is what we're up against.
It's a world war.
And the people, hey, people die.
It's called depopulation.
That's been their agenda for the last century now.
If you read between the lines in some of these visionaries in the New World Order, they've been talking about that basically since the late 1700s with the whole overpopulation and the earth doesn't sustain the growth of the population.
They've been using that agenda and the green agenda, all that as a Trojan horse basically to lead to where we're at now, which is on the brink of World War III depopulation.
That's been the agenda all along.
Nothing is organic.
Nothing just arises.
It's basically a plotted out thing.
And we know that this World War III was plotted, Zionist versus Islam, way back.
You know, it was alluded to in a letter by the leader of the Freemasons in America to Mazzini, the leader of Italy, Freemasons, in 1871.
You know, it's all been plotted out way in advance.
And here we are on the brink of it all.
Brian, your thoughts?
Yeah, this is the Greater Israel project continuing to expand its scope.
Remember, their territory and territorial ambitions were always much larger than just that little sliver of land that they got post-World War II as a result of the Balfour Declaration.
They want to make their footprint as big as they possibly can.
Iran's going to continue to be a problem in that.
The Gaza Strip was a big problem.
Billions For Greater Israel00:07:54
And it looked like Kushner was in bed with the developers prior to the October 8th false flag to make sure.
And what did I tell you?
I told you it was a gentrification project.
And that's exactly what it is.
They needed to knock it all down, drive those people out and build it up.
And they've got plans to expand even beyond that because their fundamental problem is that they can't defend themselves if they're a small sliver of territory.
So they want to expand those borders as much as possible.
They want the money and the resources to do it bigger and better.
And even their military runs around, the IDF runs around with shoulder patches that show Israel 50 times its current size, which means that somebody's got to give up land.
Yes.
Yes, indeed.
Somebody's got to give up land.
Meanwhile, is Marco Rubio controlled by Israel?
Dropsight News found emails of Larry Ellison talking to the Israeli ambassador.
And he says, I'm going to go vet Marco Rubio for Israel.
Then he goes and talks to him at a party and then reports back to the Israeli ambassador.
Don't worry, he's on our side.
I'm giving him $5 million for his super PAC.
By the way, at that time, that's against Donald Trump.
So that's Larry Ellison saying, I'm basically buying Marco Rubio on behalf of Israel.
So that doesn't even go to Marco Rubio's AIPAC tracker.
On an APAC tracker, he's over a million dollars from the Israeli lobby, but they've got all this secret money in their super PACs.
And in that case, he's caught because we have his emails.
Don't tell me he's not working for the Israelis when we have emails showing he works for the Israelis.
And then what is the consequence of that?
Hey, look at that, Marco Rubio's Secretary of State.
And now we're going to war against Iran, maybe Venezuela.
We're doing everything that Israel wants.
What a coincidence.
What a coincidence, indeed.
We do have Marjorie Taylor Green Daley.
So many innocent people have been killed in Gaza.
And I find that horrifying.
And I find it horrifying that our American tax dollars paid for that.
And our government gave them weapons to kill people, even to the point of weapons that vaporized people.
Like, I think that's crimes against humanity.
And I think they should be held accountable for that.
I do want to hear him come forward and say how he's never going to fight Israel's wars for them because they are trying to control our government and trying to control our president and trying to run our military.
Like I'm personally tired of that.
You know, we're in the midst of a great awakening right now.
There's no denying it.
You know, the foreign policy issues, the foreign influence is part of it.
We're in the process of a major awakening.
And really, you're part of that process, Marjorie.
And I'm not going to ask the question.
I'm sure there's plenty of external pressure right now.
But if you do ever decide to, just know you're going to have the support of this great nation.
Oh, thank you, Owen.
I really appreciate it.
Love that, Marjorie.
Here's what they call the best anti-Israel ad yet.
Got to go in and we also apologize.
Okay.
All right, so let's watch this ad from ASAPAC.
Maybe we can learn a thing or two about how we should be doing this.
Seems to be everybody.
Anytime you want to make a comment in the group chat, go for it.
Thank you so much for the $4.99.
Thank you, Holla.
Being here.
All right, here we go.
The United States of America did not begin with a revolution against tyranny only to serve a foreign nation state.
But the fact is, our government acts like the servant of another country.
That other country is, of course, the state of Israel.
That's not policy.
That's a national disgrace.
I'm Michael Rechtenwald, founder of the Anti-Zionist America Political Action Committee for ASAPAC.
Let's cut to the chase, shall we?
The U.S. government has been hijacked by forces loyal to Israel.
Does Congress represent us?
No.
With rare exceptions, they work for Israel.
These aren't your elected reps.
They're puppets.
And their strings are pulled by donors loyal to the modern nation-state of Israel.
This isn't an alliance.
It's extortion.
While we're scraping by eggs at $6 a dozen, rent or mortgage devouring our paychecks, our leaders have funneled over $21 billion to Israel in two years, not counting the cost of U.S. engagements in the region at Israel's behest.
The total cost to U.S. taxpayers and service of Israel is an estimated $33 billion since October 7th, 2023.
That's on top of the $3.8 billion sent Israel every year.
Billions that could fix our roads, billions that could fund our schools, billions that could house our veterans, billions that could ease your burden.
But no, they fund endless Israeli aggression instead.
Israel, the largest recipient of U.S. aid in history.
Israel, the country that bombed the USS Liberty.
Israel, the country using our weapons to mass murder innocents.
20,000 children, to be exact.
No.
I dare say we ought to be including Israel as a nation that attacked the United States on 9-11.
Somehow that slipped through the cracks.
Very astute observations, but we need to get it all correct.
Joaquin, thoughts of your own.
And they had their part in the JFK assassination, too.
Let's not forget that, because he was coming down on them for developing nuclear power, which they are using against the world, too, with their Samsung option.
So, yeah, I mean, you know, we've never seen it in our face like right now how Israel basically controls the whole tempo of events in this whole world.
Well, that kind of goes back to the financial and banking infrastructure of the Rothgils, you know, et al.
It's not just that one family, of course, but that represents the control mechanism of all the political puppets of the world.
It's in the palm of their hand.
All of these actions that we're seeing about Greater Israel project are in the palm of the banking structure that owns the world's hand.
That's what we're seeing.
And so, yeah, it's like we're going from one problem to the next, and it's all been mapped out way in advance.
And the loser is America.
America is going down.
Israel wants America to be destroyed.
That's all part of the GOEM, you know, population reduction.
They're behind all of this.
And they've also taken over the infrastructure of cybersecurity.
They have the back door on all the military nations of the world.
And they're making new deals about the cybersecurity of the United States defense.
You know, so we've put the power of America completely into the hands of Zionists that are out to destroy America.
What's Happening Return Break00:00:39
And that's what's happening.
That's absolutely right.
And we'll have more about what's happening when we return from our break.
Don, take us out.
Yeah, okay.
What a place to take a break.
This is February the 16th, 2026, President's Day, and a lot of happening up on the top end of the U.S. government.
And it looks like it's not for the best.
So we got to stay tuned and hopefully we'll be able to pull it out in the next hour.