Need to Know News (8 February 2026) with Carl Herman & Brian Davidson
Carl Herman and Brian Davidson expose the "favor bank"—a shadow system where elites trade access, silence, and immunity (e.g., Trump’s ignored Epstein files, figureheads like Kash Patel) to avoid accountability. Epstein’s leaked ties to Israeli officials (Netanyahu, Mossad), Russian assets, and alleged "honeypot" operations clash with media narratives, while his AI-driven island parties mocked Western hypocrisy. Minnesota’s $400M autism fraud, Omar’s $5M winery money-laundering claims, and the Ford Foundation’s $51M anti-Trump funding reveal systemic corruption. Directed-energy wildfires (Tubbs, Paradise) and debt-fueled economic collapse highlight elite resistance to reform, mirroring WWII’s unresolved grievances—suggesting moral decay, not just greed, underpins civilization’s fragility. [Automatically generated summary]
Carl Herman, Mission Viejo, Brian Davidson, Houston, Texas.
Need to know news, February 8th, 2026.
Let's take a look at those topics and have an opening statement.
Need to know news or what's scripted now?
First question: How many leaders are captured under satanic pedavoric blackmail?
And how far back does this go?
Epstein Satanism and Empire Control.
And then domestic and international facts and optics.
Is it the Emperor's New Clothes, Great Awakening, Great Tuesday, Breakthrough, or the Gangster, Bankster, Pedivore Business and Official His Story, Mind Control as Usual?
Opening Statement, brother.
Well, I have been looking forward to beginning to address this Epstein stuff from a little more reasonable perspective.
And I think that I finally got part of it figured out with great thanks to one of the many videos that I happened to watch in the middle of the night while I was half awake, half asleep.
And I turned on, I think it was Benny Johnson's page where Mike Benz was rolling out an idea called the favor bank.
And I hadn't thought of Epstein in this light yet, but the more I thought about what he was saying, the more I thought it had a great deal of credibility.
Now, tracking it and getting to the bottom of it, obviously, is hard.
And Benz just gave like a 10,000-foot overview, but I want to introduce the concept prior to doing this show because I think it helps make a lot more sense of all these Epstein files if you look at it through a framework of everything fits inside of a favor bank.
And it also makes it a lot more expansive.
The problem with framing everything as everybody is a satanic conspiracy, child eating, jerky eating baby is that you sometimes miss the forest through the trees and you oversimplify a very, very complex institutional corruption.
So before we open the show today, I want to kind of introduce the idea, the concept of the favor bank is power doesn't move through laws or ideology.
It moves through favors that are done.
Public language, you know, we as citizens talk about values and policy, but private systems all run based on access, protection, silence, and reward.
So it's better to look at these things instead of through the great conspiracy eyes where everybody is darkly, everybody's all stages of their life are put through a framework of, you know, this dark conspiracy.
Think of it, like, think of power like a bank concept where you deposit favors and discretion, loyalty, non-disclosure, and then you withdraw protection, opportunity, and immunity later.
So as you work your way up the food chain inside the institutions, it's a series of non-monetary deposits and withdrawals that help you get what you want and work through the systems.
So with that concept, you really don't need everyone compromised.
You really just need enough people who can't really afford to be exposed.
And as long as you isolate these guys and move them to the tops of these institutions, there's not going to be any exposure because everybody's working off the same favor bank.
So, this exposure of the Epstein files really becomes a bit of a stress test of how the system works.
And the question at this point in time isn't, you know, was something revealed?
It's did it change anything at all afterwards?
And I don't believe it will.
I don't believe it did because I think the institutions are going to continue to run on this favor bank concept.
And just to sort of walk you through the career of somebody, let's just do it like it would really work in practicality.
So let's take the kid who comes out of college, comes from a good family, has a daddy that can be trusted, that's a part of an institution.
He graduates from a respectable university, has good grades, good social skills, no red flags, maybe a decent golf game.
He believes in process, merit, and institutional legitimacy when he comes out of school.
And at that stage, he hasn't yet been asked to do anything wrong at all.
They're just simply these people that are part of the favor bank are just watching how he behaves.
And so they keep note, keep tabs on him.
His reliability is noted.
His discretion is noticed.
He's trained.
They make sure that he's not too ambitious and make sure that he's not too reckless and they reward him.
So just take a look at the pattern.
And then early on, you know, maybe the ambition starts to get there.
And they come to him and say, look, you're a sharp young man.
You're professional.
If you play ball and work with the big boys, you know, you'll get that recommendation.
You might get a fellowship or a junior analyst or a staff role.
And that'll be great because you'll have access to all these meetings that others don't get.
And, you know, what they're really doing, what's happening behind the scenes is they're testing him.
Do you talk too much?
Do you moralize too much?
Are you going to embarrass your superiors?
Do you walk around with a chip on your shoulder like you're leaking out frustration?
And so that's not a competence test at all.
That's a discretion test.
So they're calibrating him, tuning him, pressing him.
And then they put him into the low-level bureaucracy inside the paper world.
And so now he's inside some regulatory agency or a legislative office, maybe a compliance department.
And at that point in time, young Joey is growing up and he's beginning to notice that rules are applied unevenly.
Decisions are made before meetings or outside the context based on structure.
He's observing, observing, observing.
And this is where most people either leave quietly or just simply adapt to the system.
The system doesn't really come out and just explain everything to him.
It waits to see if you're going to try to rationalize it and play along.
So there's a certain amount of compromise that comes with just being there.
And then, of course, everything reaches a head where there's a confrontation.
And so they get that sort of that's odd cognitive dissonance that starts to set in.
And maybe they encounter a crime that goes nowhere or a complaint that gets buried, a violation that gets quietly reclassified or buried.
Or maybe just a superior that says, we're not going to pursue this.
And you can think of this as a government agency or an institution, or think of it as a journalist working his way through the ranks, you know, a smart young man or woman that, you know, wants to go write the big story.
And then they run into the let's not pursue this, but they need the job.
Maybe they have a baby, maybe they're married, whatever.
But that person's going to begin to realize that these institutions don't run on rules alone and they're going to find themselves caught up in a bit of a moral fog, not full corruption at this point in time.
And then once they think they can, once the superiors think they can be trusted, they're going to get a soft, friendly, innocent approach.
You know, you don't need to worry about this.
Let's handle this carefully.
There are bigger priorities, you know.
And so the favor that they're asked to do is framed as restraint.
And so the ask might frame itself in as delay, reroute, be quiet.
And it starts small.
And then, of course, you know, that person, because they're in a moral fog, they're going to run into the internal negotiation.
You know, I'm not the decision maker here.
I should just play along.
This isn't my fight.
I'm just an employee.
I need to work my way up the ladder.
Someone else probably knows more.
And, or even, yeah, I was idealistic, but I'll do some good later when I have more power.
And there you go.
There's the deposit.
The favor bank doesn't coerce them into it.
It waits for consent.
And then, you know, once you give them the consent to go ahead with something immoral, you're inside the system.
Now the favor's been done.
You're part of the bank.
Promotions start to come easier.
Mistakes are forgiven.
Invitations expand.
Big parties.
And the lesson is learned basically that my loyalty to the system is rewarded and my disruption is punished.
So don't look at it as bribery.
Look at it as sort of a career gravity.
And then, you know, you get to mid-career, selective enforcement, asymmetrical accountability.
Something's just not quite right.
But at this stage, you know, they're not going to leave.
It would cost their reputation.
And speaking out would destroy their credibility and the upward momentum that they're getting when they're young.
And they get locked in.
The higher they go, the more expensive honesty becomes.
Next thing you know, you're jacked up through the system until you're senior leadership.
And then if you really want to get to the top of the institution, that's when you get the invite.
And the invite is something compromising or some drug at some party, and you feel like you're doing what you need to do to get that career advancement and you justify it, even though it's evil as hell, whatever you're into.
And then now you're part of the system.
You've made deposits and you've taken withdrawals.
You've worked your way up.
You're earning $250,000 a year.
You're part of the institution.
And how far does it go?
Well, the more responsibility they want to give you, the more they think they can trust you, the more your path and your decisions and your ability to maintain confidence helps your momentum.
And the more your deviation from their system pushes you out.
Of course, you see the guys driving the big expensive cars, living in the lakefront houses, and you justify it.
That's what success looks like.
And now you're part of the favor bank.
So I bring all that up and I have that opening monologue with you because I want you to think through how an entire institution tacks itself up at the uppermost levels with these people.
Because Epstein is a symptom, a symptom where the virus has attacked a particular immune response.
Epstein is a small part of a much larger transactional system.
And if you look at it, there's no taxes on favors.
There's risk, but risk is protected as long as you play along.
And it's a currency system that operates on loyalty.
And the more I see it like that, the more I realize that whether you're a financial advisor or whether you're a government bureaucrat or whether you're a journalist or whether you're, you know, whatever, if you've got ambition, these are the framework that you've got to work inside of.
Anyway, that's the concept of the favor bank.
And Ben's brought it up.
He didn't go through it that way, but I did because I think it makes a lot of sense when you look at everything through a lens like that.
And that also gives us a better understanding of Pizzagate being the full-blown AIDS in terms of how advanced it's gotten and developed.
And you got to ask yourself, really, where's the corruption begin?
Does it begin at small levels?
I mean, because they're not going to take a kid straight out of the frat house and bring him to the pizza party unless he's skull and bones or something like that.
You know, his blood has gotten him through the door.
You know, they're just not going to introduce that stuff unless they really recognize that this kid is something that somebody that you can trust.
Anyway, just an idea to open up the show's monologue and sort of give you a framing structure as we start to go through the Epstein files.
Very helpful.
Thank you, brother.
Yes.
Pay to play and play to get paid.
That's part of the empire.
And we noticed, I told the story a lot in results.org as a key volunteer lobbyist for ending poverty through U.S. domestic and foreign policy, that the good news was about 90% of the members of Congress that I interacted with in our organization interacted with upon presentation of the facts of how easy it would be to end poverty and save lives, reduce population, and terrorism.
These people were on board and they'd prove it with their votes.
Podesta Brothers Reversal00:12:32
But what we needed is the chairs of the committees and especially for the funding.
And when we got to that level, then we would be bullshitted and ghosted.
And it would be a completely different environment.
And, you know, I've said it before, is that you would feel it immediately, the bullshit, the sicky sweetness, the obfuscations, the refusal to answer questions, and basically the antagonism where they had no empathy.
They had no interest.
They had no intellect to solving these problems.
But they had a script, and they would stick to their script.
They wouldn't believe the script, and you could tell.
And when they couldn't find any other bullshit to say, they would have to exit the conversation.
And that capture of the top, the people who would be appointed to the chairs of the committees in Congress would be the ones who would go on the Sunday talk shows on television and pimp the narrative of the empire.
Almost always it would be talking for a war that the empire wanted.
Yeah, every system, every agency, apparently has been controlled, and they have to, because it would just take somebody in authority pointing to the facts, to the data, to the law.
That person would be a problem.
Let me throw one more thing out there on top of that, okay?
Yep.
I remember clearly Donald John Trump's first term.
And of course, he had largely bought his way into the office.
And of course, his competition was pretty weak.
Pizzagate was on the table.
There were high expectations that he was going to be the big econoclast that was going to be able to go in and bust up the systems and expose it.
But you got to remember, Donald John Trump had gotten himself into that position by operating as part of the favor bank system.
Now, obviously, at higher power levels in terms of it.
But once he got into office, he couldn't get any of the appointments that he wanted.
All the high-level quality people that he was looking to get appointed had all of a sudden been buried inside of a closet someplace.
Guys like Sebastian Gorka and some of the other guys out there that he was looking for that had different departments, good conservative names that we had at least liked or as a conservative community had mildly relied upon.
And he couldn't get these appointments.
And so he was fighting an institutional system that was preventing him from getting anything that could cause institutional change.
And a lot of people, I think, overestimated how far a guy like Trump could go in a structure like that.
He had high hopes that he could say, you're fired.
But the problem is the next five layers of the bureaucracy were all part of the favor bank.
And the real power brokers were the ones who were making sure that everybody that was in one of those jobs up or near the top was reliable to be part of the structure.
And so Trump's first presidency went through with largely no impact at all on the things that we as a conservative community were interested in.
But then the second time around, it looks like he just simply chooses to work with the structure.
And instead of trying to kick against it and do nothing, he works with the structure, gets himself absorbed back into it, lets these institutional corruption people learn that they can trust him.
And then think about guys like Kash Patel and Dan Bongino.
You know, they were at one point considered to be patriots.
They were at one point considered to be parts of the team.
You know, I don't think anybody held a lot of hope for Pam Bondi, but you know, we had hoped that these guys were real patriots and could expose it.
But once they got inside, they realized that they were just installed as figureheads in an institution that was so hopelessly corrupt and loaded up with bureaucracy and loaded up with ambitious young favor bank members that they couldn't justify just simply terminating everybody at the top of the institution or the institution would collapse completely.
So that said, let's take a look at the stories, but I wanted to frame it that way so you guys can understand the failures and the challenges of what these guys might have been up to.
Now, I'm not saying Bongino's a hero or Kash Patel or any of them at all.
I'm saying that anybody who has a family, who has a wife, who has a house and two and a half children has certain defense mechanisms that are going to kick in personally because there's always something to lose.
And there's a lot of people out there with favor bank shotguns that are that are gunning for you.
Dangerous world.
Dangerous world.
And make such good points, I got to add to him.
So for Trump, my take on Trump, when he announced he was running for the presidency in 2015, I jumped on that.
And John Hankey, friend and colleague, he pointed to the WrestleMania, the Battle of the Billionaires.
And I just wrote on that and made the observations of, look, so this is a guy, Trump, who on his spare time likes violent cosplay with the Battle of the Billionaires, where he pretends to beat up another billionaire and then shaves the head of the loser.
And of course, Trump won that Battle of the Billionaires.
And he was a darling of Oprah, a darling.
He had media appearances.
And he had beauty pageants where he would go into the dressing rooms.
And our friend and colleague, Joachim Hagopian, has abundant documentation that the prima fascia conclusion is that Trump is dirty.
And yet, we came into 2016 with high hopes and nothing really happened.
And I want to point out the executive power that was absent and is still there through Patel, the FBI director.
Now, he had to lie, of course, saying that I would have brought charges yesterday if there was anything actionable.
Anybody competent in law just barely would find out, oh, buddy, whoo, oh, you have just totally lied.
And then the script is ridiculous.
Anybody with the least bit of competence is seeing more and more of the corrupt empire.
It is crazy and it is dangerous.
And it is in the position of reversal.
Now, for Trump, I don't know anything, but it may be that he was dirty and was given a chance to turn.
It may be that he wasn't dirty and given a chance to play a role.
It may be that he was dirty and he's just acting out some script as the empire is playing with their food.
I don't know, but I do know that people are paying attention and something is going to break.
And it's going to break in a civil war.
And not just A, it's going to break in civil wars because the NATO and the Five Eyes countries, their populations are receiving the same shit show, variations of the same themes.
But yeah, let's take a look and go through it and see how it is playing out.
It is fascinating.
And something is going to break soon.
All right.
How many leaders are captured under this?
Well, first, let's meet Big Mike.
Yeah, that's a dick.
And that is film evidence.
That isn't the only one.
And the Prima Fascia conclusion, which is the legal basis for action, is that on its face, that looks like a man.
And for all these leaders, we got a former PM of Norway on the list.
And Normal Island News, I appreciate this woman's British sense of humor and pointing out that Keir Starmer, if you think about elevating in the U.S., Joe Biden as the president, and Kamala Harris, and Harris is still yapping about 2028, is that these were the absolute worst choices that you could make for public approval.
And it was demonstrated through the public's lack of approval.
And the same thing with Kier Starmer and the PM.
Peter Mandelson, another Epstein star, was the UK ambassador choice to the U.S.
And of course, Starmer is hanging in there, but his approval rating is at record lows.
And the UK is another place where civil war is a real consideration, a real option from the frustration of the destruction of the country primarily through the illegal migrants.
Now, there's another aspect of it.
Let's talk about the king.
Did you see the portrait of King Charles III?
It's a big red portrait which currently hangs in Buckingham Castle.
Oh, I have seen that.
It's crazy.
If you take a quarter of it, invert it, flip it, it looks like a goat devil.
That's 100% a goat.
It's on purpose.
Just the photo by itself.
What the fuck are you doing?
Did you see the portrait of King Charles III?
It's a big red portrait which currently.
What the fuck are you doing?
See, again, 18 years of paying attention to the optics that are so important for the political leadership.
I see this stuff, and I am with Q 100% that this is scripted and this is a self-destruct script.
This is going to produce a civil war in which these people will be dragged out and hanged and beat and destroyed.
They will not survive this politically.
It may be that our opponents want the civil war.
I don't know.
All right, so Podesta Brothers.
I want to point out, Tony Podesta, if you have any intuitive feel at all of John too, just looking into their faces and what kind of a feel do you get?
Now, the drawings at the bottom are from the police getting facial recognition for the disappearance of a young girl who was abducted and disappeared.
And that certainly does look like the Podesta brothers.
We've gone over again and again the depth of the Podesta brothers and their art and their language for crimes against children.
All right, here we got chair of Sweden for the UNHCR.
That's the illegal refugee movement.
There is so much.
I'm going to have much more on the show on Tuesday.
But the question is: how many of these leaders are captured?
Mental Assent to Christ's Kingship00:08:44
And to what extent and to what extent is this baphomet transgender stuff going on?
And at least sufficient for the control of the empire up to now, anyway.
Your thoughts, brother.
You know, we're right on the borderline of value questions that tie to judgment.
And, you know, it's funny, I've done a lot of work on that particular issue lately because I've written the commentary.
And by the way, I've broken through to the New Testament on that.
So I finished up the entire Old Testament.
It's still out there.
Well, one of the things I run into in the book of Lamentations, which I hadn't expected, but it hit me like a ton of bricks.
It came out of Jeremiah 19:9, and it was an indicator, basically a prophet, Jeremiah, that was prophesying something terrible coming on Israel.
I swear I have a point.
It's a good point.
And he said that when judgment reaches its full peak, you will eat your children.
And then you go to Lamentations 4.
That's Jeremiah 19:9, by the way.
And then you go to Lamentations 4:10, and you have a city under siege, and a cup of water is like five bucks, and there's no food to eat.
And what it says basically is that otherwise good mothers that would have been good under normal circumstances during that time killed and ate their children.
So you have this cannibalistic imagery that is sort of the low point of judgment.
It's like it doesn't get any worse than this because after that, those northern 10 tribes were absorbed into Assyria and they never ever returned again.
All that you had left was the southern kingdom.
And I thought about that.
And as I was thinking about it and writing about it, it dawned upon me, you know, that's cannibalistic language right there in the Bible.
And this is the lowest point of judgment.
You'll eat your future, you'll eat your children instead of caring for your future and building your future.
And when you think about it, you kind of flash forward to the New Testament and you're like, wait a second, what was Jesus saying when he said, eat my flesh and drink my blood?
I mean, that offended everybody.
All the disciples were like, this is heavy stuff, man.
I'm out of here.
That's pretty ugly imagery, cannibalistic type imagery related to communion, you know, the Last Supper.
And obviously, everybody couldn't understand it, but to a Jew of the day, it would have reminded them about the very, very low point of the Old Testament that you'll eat your children under the highest form of judgment.
And so I got to thinking about it.
And of course, this week with Epstein files and all of this jerky talk and all of this stuff that's developing, I see this even more.
And so you bring up Q as if justice is coming.
And I'm telling you that it either is or it has, it almost has sort of an already not yet feel to it in terms of the prophecy of the evil.
So you're either going to consume of good and consume of Christ and consume of the cross, or you're going to consume of your children, the future, and human flesh.
When you take the imagery that far, it really is kind of mind-bending in terms of what was really being said and what was really being developed.
And I, anyway, just something I noticed in the context of all this with Epstein and the eating of the children and the killing of people, it feels more to me like a judgment than it does.
that look Paul said of the homosexuals he said you will receive in yourselves the due penalty for your perversion And he meant up their ass.
Sometimes judgment doesn't look like what we think it looks like.
I think that's my point.
Yeah, well, good points and good catches and passes.
And part of, you know, as a professional historian reading the Bible, part of my take on that is that, so this book has been in the hands of the enemy.
And there are internal inconsistencies.
For example, for when Jesus died, was it the Saturday on noon?
Was it the day after that?
When was that?
And part of my conversation with myself and with other Christians who can tolerate conversations with me, those are few, is that dealing with this paradox is that part of me is any of that doesn't, it doesn't matter.
It doesn't matter.
Because the fundamental question is, are you aligned with the Creator?
Do you accept the Creator?
If you do, and you conclude that the Creator is beneficent, then what do you have to worry about?
We're his children.
Well, let me address that real quick because there are a lot of people that make a mental assent to the idea that Christ is king.
And I can assure you that even the most evil of people were willing to make the mental assent that Christ was who he claimed to be.
The difference between somebody making a mental assent to that particular fact and somebody that's willing to restrict their boundaries of behavior in daily life is completely different.
If you are willing to restrict Your daily boundaries so that you don't sin and you align yourself with what's right, then you are a child of the covenant in a sense.
But if you are unwilling and pay lip service instead, only willing to basically taking the Lord's name in vain by your actions and the asymmetry of your actions versus your voice, then you are eating and drinking that judgment onto yourself.
And so God had plenty of things to say about all their festivals and all their sacrifices and all their empty activities that took place because the simple fact of the matter is they might go up to the altar and make a big show of weeping and mourning over their sin or over the judgment.
But the simple fact of the matter is they had an orgy scheduled that night anyway, and they weren't going to change that for nothing.
And that's that was the fundamental problem.
That's what made God sick was that they were unwilling to repent in terms of their setting different boundaries for their behavior while making a mental assent, which was a fake, false, a fake, false display of religious moral superiority.
Yeah, virtue signaling.
Virtue signaling.
Yeah.
And another part of it, I love this conversation.
I just don't get to talk about the seriousness of the importance, the centrality of who we really are.
And that, you know, as a historian, going back to, all right, so the book has been in the hands of the enemy.
And, you know, I've been to the Pope's crib.
Temple of Dagon.
It's one of the richest museums in the world.
And the, oh, the evil that you feel in there and the history, that's subjective.
But for me, so, okay, so the book has been in the hands of the enemy.
And yet I do conclude that there was, Jesus was a messenger and that there's enough there to bank on.
And how you treat the least, what you do to the least of my brothers, you do unto me.
End Story Redacted00:07:02
All right.
We're all brothers and sisters.
Okay.
Was there one thing that Jesus said that you had to do?
Did he give one command?
He did.
I mean, if you talk about 10, that's a lot for a little human brain to manage.
But one commandment, love as your brothers and sisters.
And, you know, my conclusion and my feeling and my intuition is that in that story, it's like, all right, so what, whatever Jesus was with the information, the quality of the information that we got, I'm on that team.
And yeah, and end of story.
End of story.
And then to move forward in good faith effort.
All right.
So Epstein, Satanism, and Empire Control.
Here we go.
All right.
The Epstein files contained admissions of murder and other serious crimes.
So why no arrests?
And Joe and I hammered this point on Friday that for Bondi and Patel to not take action on this and to violate the letter, the crystal clear letter and intent of the law, only redactions for victims.
And if you redact anything, you got to explain it.
Well, they redacted everything.
Not everything, but they redacted a lot in violation of the law and without explanation.
And it looks really bad.
And this is actionable.
And again, as we're talking about, anybody with competence in the law, anybody who can read, could see that, oh, this is this fresh, firm, and creamy stuff is actionable.
All right, I want to give this gentleman an opportunity to present this point.
Who, if anyone, did Epstein traffic these young women to besides himself?
Himself.
There is no credible information.
None.
If there were, I would bring the favor back yesterday that he trafficked to other individuals.
And the information we have, again, is limited.
So the answer is no one for the information that we have.
In the files.
In the case file.
For the information we have, Epstein didn't traffic, didn't traffic anyone.
Yet now that these files are coming out, I'm sure you guys saw them as well.
Not only do we see videos, but we're seeing photos, videos of men on top of young individuals, on top of young girls with their faces, you know, blacked out and just hidden.
And we're seeing these images clearly.
He's with other people.
Other things are going on.
This guy blatantly lied to the face of the American people.
How?
Why?
Why?
For what reason?
You have to question, for what reason?
Is it because of the fact that it implicates the president of the United States?
And that's a good point.
And the idea that it's not going to be safe for Patel to walk the streets.
And Brian made a point that I want to, you talked about jerky a couple of times, and it looks like that.
That is code word for human flesh.
And I'll have that documentation on the show on Tuesday for these pedivors.
All right, update eight.
Epstein file horror show.
More proof Epstein's still alive.
Yeah.
Yeah.
It looks like a match for the facial recognition that he's in Israel hiding out in pedoparadise.
The most powerful woman in DC is tied to Pizzagate.
And that was the chief legal counsel.
And we hit her on Friday as well for Obama.
Birth babies for black market use and warning.
And this is only like there are, there's another few million files to go here.
And I forget which show it was, but somebody made the point of, so what is it that was released and what may still be yet to come?
And the idea of what may yet to become is what was released were former political leaders and what is yet to come is going to be the current ones.
But we'll see.
I don't know anything except we can demonstrate again and again and again that the official, his story are lies.
And this documentation is great.
And I do recommend it.
And we have gone over bits and pieces of it over the years.
But I do appreciate, what a graphic here for pizza.
And that was a pizza party for raising money for Hillary, I believe, or at least for the Dems.
Dark.
Well, it's an excellent article.
Ep date number nine will be on Tuesday.
If Epstein was a Russian asset, why were three Israeli leaders meeting him and corporate media spinning it that this is another Russia, Russia, Russia?
It's funny.
And it is damning.
And this here, this should have been a photo of Netanyahu along with Epstein or something.
Maybe he's eating a baby.
I don't know.
All right.
So here's the proof that Epstein was a Russian asset.
Probably only get through about half of these, but it's funny to lay it all out.
And great journalism to lay it all out.
And again, my ongoing appreciation of these people doing the work that I used to do and now I don't do.
Consider myself an elder commenting from the stands.
So, Epstein was a Russian asset because his girlfriend was the daughter of a Mossad, and his best friends were Israel's lawyer.
Another of his best friends was a former Israeli PM.
And he met the current PM of Israel, and a senior Israel spy would stay at his house for weeks at a time.
His friends invited him to bring girls to Israel.
He fled to Israel when he was charged with sex crimes against a minor.
He was pictured wearing an IDF shirt and a Mossad sweatshirt.
Forgot that one.
He was funded by pro-Israel fanatics.
He worked for the Rothschilds, and he said that he represents the Rothschilds.
He donated to pro-Israel student groups.
He was responsible for the Wexner Group's pro-Israel philanthropy.
He supported Israeli settlement projects.
His friends were all Zionists.
He scathingly returned, referred to non-Jesus Goyam.
He was involved in Israel's diplomacy efforts.
He brokered security deals for Israel.
He aimed profit from regime changes in the Middle East.
Former Israeli intelligence officer said he ran a honeypot for Israel.
His business partner confirmed he ran a honeypot for Israel.
And one of his victims confirmed he ran a honeypot for Israel.
So obviously, Russia, Russia, Russia.
And then the idea that it is satanic or some sort of evil, something about the devil and demons, something like that.
This is some of the celebrities who endorse who are against Trump and for this in this show.
Pizza Place Conspiracy?00:15:21
And let's see, is this part of this?
We get this comedian.
I think that was the end of the segment.
Let's talk about it.
Let's talk about it.
I'll figure it out.
No, it wasn't, but we can talk about it.
Oh, okay.
Well, look, I introduced the idea of the favor bank, and you just saw a lot of the shocking stuff that we knew about back in 2016 and 2017, those of us inside the conspiracy community.
And of course, we were labeled conspiracy theorists and wacko-nut jobs, and the mainstream media tried to put us on the same board with, you know, this guy that this false flag of shooting up Comet Pizza and all that.
But I don't want to look at this through the shock and horror and vomit.
I want to look at this back through my cultural assimilation process.
Because if you'll notice, we have a major flaw here.
We have crimes after crimes after crimes that are being exposed.
But is the metadata on the documents?
Or is it just another Sandy hook release from the Department of Justice where Connecticut State Police just released all these worthless files that had had all this metadata stripped off them so they weren't useless in court?
And so I think instead of us sitting here and asking, you know, is this true and to what extent?
Obviously, we've seen the extremes of it.
We should be asking ourselves, how would a favor bank system behave if this were being exposed for some purpose?
So ask yourself, what does the public get trained to accept as normal if indeed all these files have come out?
And so what's happening here?
We've got all these name-heavy stories with all these proximity cues with Hillary Clinton and all world leaders all over the place.
But you've got to remember that the favorite bank system operates where the currency is shared reputational risk, mutual silence.
And basically, through your silence, that becomes a deposit that you're putting into the bank to be able to continue to play the game.
So you don't need everyone compromised.
You just need enough people who can't afford to have their retirement at risk or their, you know, whatever disruption comes out.
And so take a look at this in terms of the desensitization that's happening to the people of America right now.
We're seeing things at the outer extremities of acceptable behavior.
And they're being desensitized to these ideas to what purpose?
I mean, are we trying to create an army of resistance that will rise up and say off with their heads and do evil things as well?
Or are we just trying to simply desensitize the public to, hey, that's how power structures work?
And it's the Republicans as well as the Democrats.
And I'm just going to watch my Super Bowl and enjoy myself.
And so right now, this system has trained people to a certain extent to confuse awareness of an issue with accountability.
There is no accountability.
There's no arrests.
And in a favorite bank system, the absence of arrests is almost proof that they're using this as a cultural assimilation angle.
So the favor bank system has protection mechanisms in place that are legal, procedural, and painfully uncinematic.
And since nobody's going to get arrested, they're going to go ahead and let everybody know: hey, it's okay.
You're just going to have to go into hiding for a while.
You might have to deal with the divorce, but you don't have to worry about the Department of Justice.
And so you've got a sense where they're training the American people to sort of accept the futility of even addressing the issue.
Like we could be hung up on this for years from a conspiracy community perspective.
We have 3 million pages, every angle that you can find, all these neat things that you can hear.
And it's just like a sickness candy.
How much do we need to absorb of this rottenness knowing nothing's going to change?
And of course, nothing is going to change because they're not going to bring all these witnesses back from the dead.
They're not going to bring, they're not going to go out and try to find these bodies.
They're not going to go look for on the island.
I mean, I haven't seen a body team out there yet.
I haven't seen official information about the tunnel systems that we're all cemented in and what might be on the system.
Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.
So here we have a system that is not going to respond.
They're just simply going to let the chips fall where they may.
And at this point in time, it doesn't even appear that the system's going to hand us a single, a single prosecution, which is just there to train us that we're subjects, not citizens.
And so, you know, if this thing, I'll bet you at this point in time, they let this thing go as far as they possibly can and make it sound completely insane.
And they're not going to investigate anything.
So that's kind of my take on it: is that they're going to drive people into conspiracy, rage, paranoia, because they don't know how to keep everything in balance.
Now, those of us that have been watching it for years, we're not affected by it.
Or less so.
Except to the point that we're, well, to the point that we're angry.
I mean, I'm angry at the idea that they kept pregnant young girls in prison cells so that they could have their babies and eat their babies.
But I can tell you that there's nothing new under the sun in terms of wickedness.
This is the stuff that's been around since the beginning of time.
And all we're seeing is the exposure.
I'll tell you what, I'm more upset about the latest round of exposures related to the charismatic church.
Because here you have a church institution that's supposed to be leading people the right way, but that's rotten and corrupt at the same time.
So I would say that the judgment's even greater for the institutions that claim to be, you know, shepherds or religious guides rather than people that are just simply lost to the caverns of depravity and never even bother trying to get themselves out.
Those people are gone.
But I would say judgment will come down even harder on the people that are that call themselves shepherds that act like this.
Yeah.
You know, there's a lot of them.
Great points, brother.
Yeah, as a scholar attempting to get to some fact that I can be absolutely confident upon is that as Brian is talking about, you take a look at this and you come to the conclusion of, huh, no arrest.
So we can say for sure, and again, as I say, anybody competent in law can come to this assessment that on its face is that these are official lies and crimes.
This is an official cover-up.
And that at least what individuals can do is can stand with that legal foundation to be able to say that it's on its surface.
This is an official cover-up and to at least withdraw consent with what we think and what we say and what we do and to demand arrests of the leaders.
Now, who's going to do it when it's an official lie and crime?
That is a good question of who's going to do it.
And you do need the leaders and you do need people who are sufficiently sheepalized, who will sacrifice their brothers and sisters for a paycheck or to protect their family members.
They get blackmailed and threatened from the testimony and from what I could project of what evil would do is that if you had a Boy Scout who wasn't willing to lie, say, hey, pal, you know, it's up to you.
But, oh, you have such a nice family.
Be a shame if anything happened to them.
What a shame.
And the history of America is that this nation was founded upon.
Eventually, there were enough Americans standing up.
And that breaking point when the war went hot was when the government went after our own guns.
All right, let's go on.
Yeah, this is in the Pizzagate Exposed.
I mean, title was right there.
Here we go.
So we got like four other stories for this section.
Would you mind just giving a basic recap of what this oh, this is great.
This is two minutes now.
This is Tucker and tens of millions getting a briefing, an excellent briefing.
Pizza Gee theory was, these emails get dumped online full of everything.
Sorry, what is it?
Better late than never yeah yeah yeah better oh yeah yeah, I mean oh, so we're getting all this show and go.
It's like everything is circling around and coming back and this is a great briefing of UH, of the Foundation, a Foundation FOR.
Would you mind just giving a basic recap of what this Pizza Gee theory was?
These emails get dumped online full of everything that was in John Podesta's life, and John Podesta is a very powerful and connected man.
People on the internet then start to notice these chief of staff for Obama and for Hillary strange pizza messages, messages about forty thousand dollars worth of hot dogs being flown to Dc for parties and over.
For those of you who don't know, the chief of staff is the right hand person, is the number one assistant.
References to children.
These kids ages like seven, eight and nine will be in the pool and it'll be heated and they will be there for it's like wait.
What are we talking about?
This one pizza place in particular, comet ping pong, right in the heart of Dc.
The instagram of this pizza shop is full of very disturbing images of children, things like children taped to tables, things like commenters talking about rape and abuse, things like comments about kill rooms.
And so much disturbing imagery on a public instagram account for a public pizza place as the media is.
And the pizza place has a hidden area, a hidden website that you need special password in order to access.
For a pizza place running this big kind of smear campaign on these questions.
A guy conveniently walks into that pizza place with an ar and shoots the place up, doesn't hit anybody, but manages to shoot a bullet straight through the hard drive that's in the back room and gets arrested by police very publicly.
They have a big photo shoot, so then you can look at it and say, these conspiracy theories are dangerous, so we can censor them all off the internet because it's been debunked.
Don't pay attention to the fact that the guy that owns the pizza place is the boyfriend of the guy that runs Media Matters, who is one of the primary debunkers of these things.
Would you mind just giving?
Yeah, we can go hours and hours about that.
And that guy with the uh, that crisis actor who shot up Comet ping Pong.
He was killed by police.
All right oh Epstein, hired comedian for an island party.
This is sharp satire.
Here, using AI, this guy is uh, is standing tall in the field of comedy.
Let me take you to the place where mother Six smiling face with the stars, where i'm straight to take you by the, my leg here turns blonde.
the summer.
Faster, faster.
You like vanilla bean?
Yeah, have a little lick on the house.
Come on, school boys from Chile with sugar.
Corn pops on his way.
Did you get the vaccine or no?
We'll get you nicely vaccinated.
Start a joke.
Getting closer and closer.
Something to break.
Goyam Lives Matter.
There are a few of these here.
You are paying taxes to the Epstein client list.
If you haven't figured it out by now, our entire government is a huge mafia who launders our taxpayer money right back to themselves.
Foreign aid and endless wars, they all hate you and could care less if you suffer and die horrible deaths as long as they got rich and serve Satan.
Everyone who does evil hates the light and does not come into the light for that fear that his deeds will be exposed.
And the idea that Epstein is still alive.
That's a recent photo in Israel.
And just the AI facial analysis is that, yeah, is that on his face?
Same guy.
Same guy.
And yep, that's it for that section.
Anything else on the Epstein stuff, brother?
Yeah, I told you so.
I told you what the earliest and most reliable evidence was.
And I've been hanging on to that for years.
The earliest and most reliable evidence was that an internal prison employee said that he had been extracted and that that was more reliable than anything that came after the fact.
It is now confirmed that the authority structures that be went directly after that guy and had him within, I think it was 24 or 48 hours and made sure that he was disappeared from the public dialogue whatsoever.
That's on Epstein missing.
Conservative outrage tactics00:04:03
Now, obviously, at some point in time, there's going to be some sort of conservative outrage or moral crisis that's going to come about.
It is my prediction that they'll pick some third-rate network of third-rate sickos and they'll use that as the fall guys to show the public that they've done something about something.
And I suspect that they'll just be eliminating the competition.
And if you look at this like a drug war with the exchange rate being the favor bank, the currency structures and human currency, you're going to begin to understand that this currency is just as valuable as oil and gas, favor money, favor bank stuff,
and just as powerful as the potential drug industry or even the pharmaceutical industry.
You're going to realize that in a situation like this, there's going to be evil opportunistic people that are going to come up with plans to create false flags to make the public begin to believe that something legitimate has taken place and that there's been some sort of justice.
But really, it's just going to be an institutional trade to make sure that they can completely dominate and control the industry and conceal it, sending a message to all the favor bank participants that we will protect you if you're part of the big enough, heavy enough class involved in this.
So expect that there might be something, but you're probably going to get like, you know, some low-level sickos or some prison, you know, some Richard speck type or, you know, something like that.
So don't get your, don't get your hopes up on big heavies taking the fall.
They might resign.
They might disappear.
They might retire.
But I don't.
think that there's some white hat army unless that white hat army is Thomas Massey.
Marjorie, remember Marjorie Taylor Greene's out.
All that's really left is Massey.
Now, he did a good job.
He got something out there.
But I can tell you when sometimes when you pass a law, you might win the battle that makes it look like the law passed, but you never win the war that makes the law actually change how the institutions function.
You cannot get that passed because it would negatively affect too many lobbyists and too many stakeholders in any particular industry.
So you just get frosting on the cake in terms of a legal response or a law type response to the problem.
We'll see.
That certainly has been the history.
And again, it's just my paid attention and my revulsion to the failure of the usual fixers to be able to fix this stuff up because they've just made it worse.
And now with Massey, you're talking about Trump is going after him and going after Massey's wife because of this, but it's just drawn more attention to the pedophile situation.
Now, I don't know anything, but if I were to imagine this from the point of view of a white hat operation, anything that brings attention and the idea of the, we're talking about the battle of the billionaires with a WrestleMania script and getting people all riled up and paying attention to the show and the non-stop full court press of all these topics.
Judgment And Paradox00:02:22
And as we talk about, it's just been show and go, show and go, and nothing gets done.
Nobody gets arrested.
And the political optic, the result, as I said, is that we're near civil war in half dozen countries because of this.
Not in the U.S. yet, but certainly.
Let me throw one thing else out on that.
Okay.
Please do.
Yeah, y'all listen to me.
I tell you, I study the Bible.
I do.
I can tell you that for anybody who goes and reads the book of Daniel, you'll realize that God is sovereign over all nations.
And you'll realize that he allows nations to take corruption to a certain level.
And then once it becomes overwhelming and the stench, he can stand no longer, he raises up another nation, just sometimes just as evil, sometimes more evil, sometimes more rotten, but he'll raise up another nation to dethrone the prideful nation that's been engaging in the behavior.
And that's how judgment works.
The second nation rises up, destroys the first, and then the second falls and a new one comes in.
That's the pattern.
And you'll go find it in the book of Daniel.
You'll find it all over.
He is still sovereign.
Judgment may appear delayed, but I can guarantee you everything is going to face judgment sooner or later.
We might not see it on the side of death, but it will all square up at the right time in the right place.
Yep.
I conclude that that is true too.
Part of what resonates with me in the story of the New Testament is that you got to be like a child.
And again, the paradox is that not intentionally, I mean, we're doing our best here, good faith effort, but to recognize that so much of this is over our heads and to apply ourselves as virtuously as possible.
But again, paradoxically, is to do your best, but not to take yourself all that seriously.
Because so much is over our heads.
Americans Deserve Better Care00:03:38
All right, let's take a look and see what's going on in domestic and international facts and optics.
And, you know, we're human, so we'll talk about it about what does this mean?
And we'll all have an answer, whether we say it or not.
All right, so this is a good summary of the USA.
Elections are rigged, children are trafficked, plagues are planned, wars are manufactured, vaccines are poisoned, billionaires are vampires, clouds are fake, dinosaurs are fake, clones for real, astronauts are actors, politicians are prostitutes, puppeticians and satanic pedophiles are in charge.
Yeah, that's well state as good.
Yeah, but that, I mean, we chuckle at it because humor is just going to be contrast and compared to the ideals of the United States that we stand for.
Independent journalist makes a damning discovery as she visits the principal address linked to Representative Elon Omar's winery.
It's not there.
So we're seeing, and Omar is just being, she's in the spotlight.
And she said, oh, yeah, I got this winery, my husband and I, and we made $5 million.
Oh, yeah.
Well, where's that wine?
Where's the winery?
And there's an address, but it's a place where small grape growers grow to process and to make wine.
So it's prima fascia money laundering.
And we've taken a look at probably 100 examples now so far.
And here's 101, Dr. Roz, and I'll give him a moment here to talk about this.
See if I can get him to play.
Here we go.
Americans deserve.
Let's switch to Minnesota for a second.
Minnesota expected to spend $3 million for autism.
It's now $400 million.
Why?
Because everybody in the community signed their kids up as though they're autistic.
Why?
We're paying them.
These moms literally took bribes to lie that their kids had autism.
Rob, if one child in a neighborhood has autism, they get care.
They get support.
We can give them money.
If every kid in the neighborhood has autism, nobody has autism because you can't get to a provider.
And we have are stealing the care that Americans deserve.
So he's beginning to point to what people are recognizing.
And you can hear the escalation of the urgency.
Not just the Somalis Nigerian, honored by Gretchen Whitmer, one of the gold standard left governors, exposed as massive daycare fraudsters stole while trashing America's structural racism.
And these people come in and they trash America.
And what is being targeted by these people are the good Americans standing for limited government under the Constitution in support of the Declaration of Independence ideals of inalienable rights by God.
And this is a little stab in the back by Ford.
According to funding charts circulating, the Ford Foundation has shown, and I check this up, there are news reports about this too, routing tens of millions of dollars, as much as 51 million, into activists and protest-aligned networks that mobilized against President Trump.
And that's for the Black Lives Matter and for the election fraud and for the illegals.
And all of this is being funded.
There's the USAID-like funding, and then these corporations and all of our investments for retirement funds are given to these Wall Street fraudsters into their chosen corporations.
Infrastructure's Role in Change00:14:48
And then our own money is paying for this stuff.
Mark Atward, I like this gentleman, The Death of Freedom and What to Do About It.
He's having a conversation for an hour with Michelle Melendez, who lives in Hawaii, and she's been one of the principals to document the Maui massacre.
And you see in the background just here this blue Volkswagen bus that didn't get burned in the Maui massacre and the other blue items that missed the due weaponry that was outside of the frequency range to be fried by it.
But I do recommend this conversation if you want to have a conversation with a patriot and just organizing and documenting and taking political action.
This is all the stuff that I used to do.
And then here's the video to it along with the article.
And she just points out what we have done again and again and again, that the fires, these so-called wild so-called fires, are directed energy weapons.
And Michelle is very good at going over the evidence.
And she herself has interviewed one of the two fire captains who looked at the Tubbs and the Paradise Fire in 2018 and documented, of course, that these three and a professional arborist that we've shown on this news show, that basically the conclusion is from these experts, these expert witnesses, that what burns shouldn't and what doesn't burn should.
And that the only conclusion that you could make from the evidence is that this is a directed energy weapon.
It is not physically possible for the damage to be caused by any known fire.
And the two fire captains are and the professional arborist of 50 years are especially powerful.
All right, finishing up on the money, zero.
Today, the national debt hit $40 trillion almost.
In 1835, it was zero.
One president did that.
All right, this is the story of Andrew Jackson, who killed the central bank of the day.
And it was tumultuous to do so.
And after he killed the bank, there was an assassination attempt on him.
And he would have been killed, except the assassin who walked right on up to him with two loaded pistols, large caliber pistols.
Both those pistols misfired.
And so Jackson survived.
But that was the historical version to the extent any of that history is reliable.
And in contrast, what we could have, there is just two structural changes that would solve almost all the economic problems.
A public bank.
What is a public bank?
The power to create money?
Who do banks serve?
The North Dakota model.
This is just a six-minute video.
And if you would like to be briefed on public banking and monetary reform, the quantification of the benefits of just those two structural changes, if you have a, I'll just talk to you for just a moment.
Yet again, that's the documentation, published research via the Claremont Colleges.
Public bank means that you can create credit at cost, in-house.
One state has a public bank, North Dakota.
They're the only state that has increasing budget surpluses because they don't have to go to the fraudsters on Wall Street and sell debt securities.
When governments sell debt securities to fund infrastructure, the nominal cost doubles over the life of the bond.
Like taking out a mortgage and you're paying twice the nominal money back that you borrowed.
But if you can create that credit yourself, then you've reduced your total nominal costs by 50%.
And the public banking institute that I helped found, they didn't want me on the board because I'm way too radical.
I don't want people looking up what I write about.
But this is a game changer.
And we have banking experts who say that this is a no-brainer.
Every state should do this.
But corporate media won't cover that at all.
Second reform, monetary reform, is if the real economy is going to be labor and resources.
If you have surplus labor, surplus resources, you can connect those two, create the money out of nothing, hook them up, and you get triple benefits.
You get the upgraded infrastructure.
You get up to full employment.
And to the degree that the infrastructure reduces the cost of doing business.
And that's why you invest in infrastructure.
You end up making more money than the cost of the investment.
Then the prices fall.
So this is miraculous stuff worth a million dollars per the average U.S. household, as best I can document.
And that documentation has been with the Public Banking Institute and published research, and nobody has been able to come up with a better figure.
And that this idea, that's the last point here, goes all the way back to Benjamin Franklin being so excited in colonial Pennsylvania, saying, Hey, if the government is the bank, then we make so much money, we don't have to charge any taxes.
And I took that and did an analysis in 2012 for the state of California.
If we had a state bank of California and they issued a 5% credit card and a 5% mortgage, that revenue stream alone would abundantly pay for all taxes in the state.
Every state could do that.
No income tax, no sales tax, no fucking property tax, no tax.
No, none, none.
A million dollars in benefit.
So there are solutions.
That is the good news.
And the bad news is that we haven't seen any of those yet.
Brian, your thoughts, brother.
Yeah, Carl, but the institutional corruption would have to go away, which means that half of the people that are currently rich would be replaced by the other half of the people that actually like to work for a living and actually have creative solutions to problems.
We can't have that because all these people have been in the favor bank.
And I can tell you right now that what you sounded like right there, Carl, was Adolf Hitler post-World War I.
I mean, we can't have that.
I mean, we can't have a nation waking up to the idea that a global cartel is driving us through the ground in debt that's blackmailing us and controlling us.
We can't have people beginning to realize that there's a structural problem that's so deep and so problematic that it needs to be eliminated from our boundaries and that it seems to be the best way to eliminate the problem is to take the problem out of the nation and then rebuild the nation from the inside out.
I mean, you're talking about like issuing currency in competition to our corrupt governmental institution.
Where did that happen last?
Oh, that was the Nazis.
That was such a terrible thing back then when they decided when those people built this great military that was designed to protect their borders.
Now, the problem that they had, the problem that they run into is that they become Just as wicked and just as corrupt as that which they were fighting in the beginning, and their appetite for power and destruction got completely out of control.
And I think that's a national identity issue.
They had, remember, they were a very proud people and they were knocked down to the very bottom overnight at the Treaty of Versailles.
And they were humiliated as their currency went into hyperinflation mode and a wheelbarrow full of money couldn't buy a loaf of bread.
And they were humiliated when the carpetbaggers from other nations come in and take over their land, saying, We get your personal land because you have a debt to pay as because you lost World War I.
And this proud people was brought low, which set the stage for the rise of a new leader who would speak loudly, who would say it straight out what the problem was, identify the problem, and solve the problem.
And he got the people together.
And then the next thing you know, they were building the Audubon and other infrastructure projects, even though they couldn't borrow money from the current banking cartel structures.
And next thing you know, the mark was born.
And then the mark became in demand internationally, and it was completing with the global structures.
And then it's okay.
Well, here it is.
This is what they were defending themselves from.
And now you've got World War II.
Now, I'll tell you something.
They had some humiliation, revenge problems that got a little out of hand, to say the least.
We are going to run into something probably very similar if we are ever able to rise up again.
And right now, we are Westerners.
We were born of the Western mindset that is very much fair play, right makes might, do good, tell the truth.
It's a very biblical, and I'm not going to say Judeo-Christian.
I think that's a travesty to say that word, but it's a Christian concept since 2000.
You know, basically for 2,000 years.
It was a Judeo-Christian concept in the sense that it was the original Jewish mindset.
But think about there's like 25 prophets in the Old Testament that spoke out against these guys for not having the right mindset and not adhering to a theocracy and not obeying the rules that had come along with the responsibility.
And they ended up under judgment just as much.
And there was a line that was preserved throughout the process.
My point is, we operate under a Western mindset of fair play.
Those in the Middle East, the Gypsies, the Khazarians, the others, don't have that same Western mindset.
If we want to preserve that, we're going to have to get back to like Puritan Christian roots.
We cannot build another society on the broken structure of progressive progressive foundation that forgets the history and forgets the past.
If we have to build another society, it's going to have to be built on conservative principles that have been proven over time.
So what is it all going to look like?
How is it all going to play out?
I suspect that we'll take a very dark pill before we take an awakening.
And I think that we're going to look, if this system was being threatened, we would see emergency reforms, asset seizures, structural change.
We don't see that at all.
This system feels stable.
These people feel stable.
And it's when you feel stable that judgment comes.
So I expect that something like this is going to change.
Very good.
Thank you, brother.
We'll go on to final thoughts.
Well, just hang in there, Patriots.
It's the same message that I've had: the news stories are more and more important.
Escalation.
And people are feeling it.
People are paying attention more and more.
And what's going to happen is something is going to break.
And the break is going to be a withdrawal of consent and a new playing field.
And it hasn't happened yet.
It hasn't happened in 2026.
It didn't happen in 2025.
Didn't happen in 2024, 23, 22, 21.
It hasn't happened.
We're just chatting.
And it may be that, as I keep on saying, is that our only power is what we think and what we say and what we do.
And just to be proud to align what we've been given by God for the most virtuous self-expression that we can imagine as a child in good faith effort.
And we'll see what happens.
I just, all I can do is just be a humble, simple servant.
And that might be it.
Doing my best.
Brian, final statement, brother.
The favor bank system that we introduced during the show today shows how the elites protect themselves and survive exposure.
And obviously, it's effective.
What I've been talking about from a cultural assimilation perspective explains how the public is able to survive taking the red pill and remaining in the matrix.
Jeffrey Epstein is not the headline right now.
Jeffrey Epstein is the stress test that the elites have exposed us to that determines whether they will be able to continue to operate under the same rules.
So right now, instead of asking who's evil, let's ask what kind of behavior the system rewards.
And how do we build a rewarding mechanism for the behavior that we want?