Need to Know News (28 December 2025) with Carl Herman & Brian Davidson
|
Time
Text
Carl Herman, Mission Viejo, Brian Davidson, Houston, Texas, Need to Know News of the 28th of December 2025.
Let's take a look at the topics and have an opening statement.
Need to know news or what?
Scripted now.
We have just one topic with a bunch of subtopics.
It's what kind of war is Amrev 2 and World War III.
So the first part, we got Charlie Kirk's hit show.
And next, what is Israel?
And then next, the Epstein file show.
And the forever wars for ongoing RD plus the sadism of our opponents.
And then the great replacement race to the bottom while enriching Empire minions, election fraud, more LGTBS and silver bullets.
And then COVID, VAX, and official poisons.
And then finally, so more evidence of this old world tartaria being mud-flooded and then emptied.
Somebody surrendered.
They were empty.
Those were cities that were founded.
And then they were whatever they were that was erased from official history and just more of the evidence that supports the ongoing working conclusion that I'm seeing.
Brian, opening statement, brother.
Well, Merry Christmas and Happy New Year to all of our listeners.
My wife and I are now in some new digs.
We're still at the same campground, but we bought a 42-foot RV so we could get out of one of those dumb cabins that we were in.
We were tired of getting moved around because other people rented it or whatever.
Anyway, so we went out and got ourselves a nice destination RV.
And it's pretty big.
It's got eight-foot ceilings and all the setup.
So I think we'll be a little bit happier over here.
Besides, we'll have a little more privacy.
That's good.
So I'm testing out some new structures on my computers, as well as some new lighting and all that stuff.
Christmas time, you know, it was a different type of Christmas.
We didn't have our traditional, you know, Christmas tree.
And now we're just sort of getting organized, trying to move into this new place.
So that's like our fourth move in the last three months.
So it's getting a little bit old, maybe four months.
It's getting a little bit old moving stuff here and there.
You lose things, can't find this, can't find that.
But that's okay.
I keep a positive attitude about it.
I was trying to, I got my men's group at church to pray that the judge would just give us our house back, but I don't know that he will.
I don't know that it goes that easy.
Besides, it looks like this particular probate is going to be a very, very, very long and arduous haul because we've got some suspected fraud involved with the forged durable power of attorney that was executed long ago.
But there's millions of dollars missing potentially.
And finding it at this point in time is going to require some very serious actions.
So that's what we're going to have to deal with for the meantime.
Anyway, I'm excited about doing the show.
I'm not excited about 2026.
2025 was really, really hard on us.
Although the storylines don't seem to have really updated too much in 2025, obviously there was some adjustments with a conservative, theoretically, government that didn't act conservatively at all.
We had lots of things this year that were disturbing to say the least.
We're starting to get some more drip-drip disclosure on Epstein, but still not announce a justice.
And of course, the Charlie Kirk thing is sort of the new seems to be the new play to action to make sure that there's a takeover of the entire right-leaning conservative party MAGA movement and keep it in total limbo so they can install whatever leadership they think is going to serve their purposes.
So we'll take a look at all those things in the story today.
But the more I study, and again, I'm going to go back to the cultural assimilation presentation I did for the false flags and conspiracies conference because it feels to me like it was sort of my most epic presentation because it was the first time we were able to take a look at false flags through an entirely different lens.
We used to look at them as, you know, one-off activities that would just simply drive security spending structures or drive fear, a new bill to get rid of the guns.
But the more I take a look at it, and that was what the presentation was about, the more I'm beginning to see that it's all about keeping the American general public in limbo, guessing, anxiety, no sense of justice, no sense of judgment, so that they can selectively apply justice wherever they want.
And they don't want Americans to think too highly of their government.
They want us to just basically roll our eyes and throw back our shoulders and say, well, there's nothing we can do about it.
It's just a bunch of corruption.
And I got to say that I don't think that's the right attitude at this particular point in time.
I'm proud of all the journalists out there that are doing a good job on covering things.
I'm looking at it much from a higher perspective rather than isolated events.
And I'm just making sure I understand the times as well as I can.
That said, let's go ahead and fire up the show.
Are you saying that you don't want 2026 to be kind of like 2025, where somebody might come back at you and say, Brian, the only reason you're against Erica Kirk for president is because you hate women.
Look, they'll use the same framing that they've used for all these, you know, there's nothing new under the sun.
This playbook is getting really, really old and it's really being exposed very, very well.
I mean, all the different, all the different quote-unquote truthers that are out there that are picking pieces apart.
Folks, if you're out there and you're just listening, I can tell you that when somebody really sits down and studies current events and culture to prepare for show after show after show, you begin to see exactly the same plays driven in exactly the same patterns, getting exactly the same results.
And it only takes a few seconds to be able to tell what's real and what's fake when you've been doing it as long as I've been doing it.
So nothing shocks me, but there is certainly a righteous indignation rising against the system that thinks that they've got us in such limbo and confusion that we'll never be able to be able to fight back.
I just hope that that's not true.
I think most Americans are normies that sit in front of their TVs are caught up in that, but certainly none of our listeners.
Yeah, it's fascinating.
And so the government is doing this show and go.
A little bit of exposure and then drawing back, but then more.
But the overall trend is escalating.
So it seems to be pushing to some sort of a trying to spark a civil war of one kind or another.
Or I continue to see the evidence that we have consistent with the narrative that this is a white hat operation and they're destroying the enemy as we speak.
All time, low popularity ratings for all the leaderships.
And then, well, we'll get to more of the evidence as we go on today.
So, I'm cautiously obviously.
Let me say, just say one more thing.
Let me say one more thing before we get this.
You know, Carl, when he puts together his articles, he often asks the question: what kind of war is this?
And this is not your typical kinetic warfare where weapons are used to destroy buildings, although that doesn't happen every now and then.
This is a war of narrative, a war of identity, a war of who do you trust, and a war of who's legitimate.
Let me remind you that the old plays, you know, the greatest kingdoms in the history of mankind from a power perspective, they never conquered with tanks alone.
They conquered by redefining reality, fragmenting up the loyalty of the people that they absorbed, and then flooding their minds with a number of competing truths.
So they cycled out the old minds that couldn't and wouldn't update, you know, take the new patch, and they simply rebuilt the minds of the youth that were being absorbed by the kingdom.
So, what we're getting here fundamentally, I think, is a cultural assimilation through mental exhaustion.
Because think about it, when nothing makes sense at all, we become completely exhausted with even trying to fight against the machine.
So, they're doing everything they can to weaken us through exhaustion, mental exhaustion.
Yeah, yeah.
And, you know, part of my perspective after 48 years engagement is I don't think engaging more, we need a breakthrough.
We need help from friends in high places because, you know, the projects that I've continued to engage in have seemed to do nothing, nothing, and had my opinion among family probably be driven lower and lower as I go.
And it doesn't even matter if you can document your facts as professionally as I do.
And that's part of the reality that I have of this paradox of surrender while you're engaged in war.
This stuff that I can't control.
Am I going to have it deter me from the mission?
That's the discipline.
That's the discipline.
So, the idea of it being spiritual warfare.
Oh, yeah, baby.
I mean, if you pay attention, I don't see any other conclusion that you got to say.
Yeah, that's part of it.
That's part of it.
How do you stay on mission while you're under attack by this low-level propaganda?
All right.
Let's go on to the first topic of, yeah, what kind of a war is this?
So, Charlie Kerr hit show.
Got three of those.
This is a great summary.
And I'm going to play probably most of it here.
I might have to refresh it, though.
How did this extra code get in here?
I remove all of those when I'm setting up the show.
And then this got back in there.
All right.
So here we go.
Claimed that Charlie and her had received constant death threats over the years.
She alleged that Charlie decided not to inform her of this considerably more serious concern.
Erica even went on to state very publicly that the claim that Charlie had alerted his colleagues to this particular threat via phone messages the day before was false because she claimed to have in her possession Charlie's phone, only to later correct herself, suggesting that she simply hadn't checked his other messaging apps where she later discovered the messages in question.
Therefore, despite the very public claims of their existence, Erica explained that it hadn't occurred to her to check for these additional messages for over two whole months from when the claims were first made.
In fact, Erica went on to very publicly rebuke the claims of their existence just before admitting her mistake in a private meeting with Candace Owens.
But not only had Erica failed in the most simple of tasks to retrieve these vital clues, she had essentially further hindered the murder investigation of her own husband by doubling down on the assertion that these messages did not even exist.
And if that wasn't bad enough, it appears that the FBI had also failed to investigate Charlie's phone messages properly and retrieve this vital evidence.
In other words, Charlie's own wife and the police investigating Charlie's murder both failed in the most basic tasks to find his killer, months after Candace Owens had accurately reported the existence of these messages.
This is dynamite stuff.
And this is what I'm talking about.
That what we're seeing is an exposure more and more.
I'll let this guy finish because it's so strong.
Therefore, Erica Kirk only willingly utilized the contents of Charlie's phone to hinder and debunk any speculation of an inside job, whilst failing to find these important clues which might prove otherwise.
And even more suspiciously, she only found them once she had no choice but to look after Candace Owens had essentially trapped her.
And even then, she failed to publicly correct her mistake, meaning that much of her audience might still consider Candace to be a liar when in fact it was Erica who put out the false information, even after having months to verify it.
But I suppose everybody agrees differently, don't they?
Ouch.
Ooh, ooh.
That's sharp.
And Jimmy Dore, I want to give him just a couple of minutes for this with more of the damning evidence of what at least were being shown.
As we've talked about on the show, I find the evidence points to that this was a squib and it's whatever some sort of dummy was taken to and staged.
It was not an assassination.
Remember when Erica Kirk was on Tucker was on Glenbeck and she said this because Candace Owens had said that she knew that Charlie Kirk had texted people the night before he was murdered.
That he said he texted people, they're going to murder me.
They're going to kill me.
Now, she says that didn't happen.
Let's watch.
We have, I mean, I still, I have unbelievable amounts of death threats.
My kids have kidnapping threats, death threats.
Our whole team has death threats.
Let me slow this down because Jimmy also sped it up.
We knew that there was always going to be a threat, but Charlie and I always promised each other we would never live in fear.
And he would say, if they're going to get me, they're going to get me.
But he was not messaging people the day before saying, I'm going to be murdered.
They're coming after me.
Someone's going to kill me.
He didn't say that.
And I had a cell phone.
He didn't say that.
And I have a cell phone.
Well, my first question is, why do you have a cell phone and why doesn't the FBI have that cell phone?
That's what that doesn't make sense.
Unless the FBI isn't really investigating this, and they're not.
So, um, well, guess what?
At their meeting, this is what a lot of people missed.
At their meeting, Candace Owens got them to admit that he actually did that.
That what she just said is not true.
She got them to admit that Charlie actually did text that.
Let's listen.
That was going around that was viral.
And it was Erica saying that she had Charlie's phone and that Charlie never texted anybody the night before saying that he thought that they were going to kill him.
And that obviously reflected poorly on me because I was the one who said that he did, in fact, text multiple people the night before.
And then I went on Jimmy Door on Friday, Jimmy Door show, and I clarified: I said, Andrew Colvet told me specifically that he was one of the people that received this text message.
So I got that first person.
I didn't get that from a source.
I got that directly from Andrew Colvet.
And then somebody who had access to Dan Flood's communications said that Dan Flood similarly received a text message.
They owned that right away and explained.
Erica said that she has Charlie's phone.
She's looking at his eye messages.
And it turns out that he, like everybody else, communicates on signal.
He communicates on Telegram.
And that those community, when she heard me say that, they then went and looked.
And yes, that what I said was true.
So they're acting dumb.
And certainly the FBI wouldn't be able to act dumb for that aspect.
But here's more.
In 1995, Erica Kirk's Jewish uncle, Jack Solomon, was a board member for the new Center of Jewish Studies at Utah Valley State College.
The goal of the center was to bridge the gap between Jews and Mormons and guide the relationship with Israel.
Charlie Kirk was murdered at that specific university.
Wow.
Wow, and here's some of the documentation here.
So fascinating.
And I see that Israel is getting pinned and exposed and destroyed by this.
And they're not going to continue to exist as a political entity.
Brian, your thoughts, brother?
Well, those are some pretty broad stripes to paint with, that they're not going to exist as an entity.
Again, I'm going to default back to my high-level position on Israel, which is that they're a tool.
They're a tool that's become more powerful than they were supposed to be because they've used such dark and nefarious techniques to gain power.
But the real stories here are the stories about the Turning Point USA narrative.
First of all, everybody concedes that Charlie Kirk was murdered.
And when there's confusion, like he's going to default to the position that it was some type of false flag.
Now, whether Charlie Kirk is alive or not on this day, I don't know, I imagine.
But I know this.
He wasn't brutally murdered with a bullet from a 30-06 in front of all those people at that college.
So that said, remember that the most important aspect of this war is making sure that you can capture the minds of the youth.
Now, I think that there was early days with Turning Point USA and even right up through it, where Charlie Kirk was doing a very, very good job confronting the progressive mindset with facts that were causing people to sulfly into a more conservative, thoughtful mindset.
And that obviously creates a tremendous threat for a structure that is all in on the idea that the youth are going to need to be assimilated into the government good zombie culture that is being produced in academia right now.
So I see Turning Point 1.0 as something that needed to be broken down, something that needed to be replaced into Turning Point 2.0/slash cross-reference MAGA/slash cross-reference, a new breed of leader Kirk, JD Vance.
I see confusion all over the place, and I see zero leadership whatsoever.
Remember that people assimilate into the machine as a mechanism of exhaustion when all clarity collapses.
And so with this Candace Owens, Erica Kirk, Jimmy Doerr, and all the rest of the commentators back and forth.
I mean, come on, we're talking about the cell phone.
I was yawning on this on day two when I took a careful look at the video, and we're still talking about it.
And I think talking about it actually reinforces the purpose and the value of Turning Point USA to the new narrative.
I just don't know how it's going to be playing out.
One thing is for sure, from my perspective, the traditional progressive worldview is collapsing in front of our very eyes.
I see signs of it on YouTube.
I see signs of it all over the place where the traditional we can't define a woman feminism, you know, all those structures that they tried to build were basically they're empty structures simply built on the destruction of our conservative, conserving the values of our fathers culture.
And so when it's that empty and the foundation is that weak, it's going to implode.
And so I think they know that.
And so I think what they're doing is setting up the redistribution of the new youth movement 2.0, which is a conservative but compliant version of the new conservative that's pure Zionist and prepared for assimilation.
They have a slogan picked out.
They don't see that coming out of it.
The TPUSA conference thing, there was this big banner that they had among the displays.
And it said, We are the Zionist generation.
That's what they're pitching.
Wow.
That's so pathetic.
That's a good one.
That's so pathetic.
Guys, just throw this two cents out there.
There's a reason I'm writing a commentary, okay?
And it's not to start a cult, obviously.
It's to help people understand what the Bible really says.
And whether you're a dispensationalist or Zionist or futurist or predatorist or whatever you want to throw on it in terms of theology, I can guarantee you that there's 9,000 things that are more important in how you live daily than the 10 things that are all built into eschatology.
And all this Zionist movement is all some sort of eschatological manufactured facade that doesn't even belong.
I mean, go read the book of Proverbs.
Go read the book of Psalms.
Go read the historical books.
Go read the Pentateuch.
Go read the major prophets.
Give me a break.
Eschatology is like, yeah, it's going to happen.
It's going to happen the way it's going to happen.
But it's not a cultural driving.
Love your God and learn to be moral and learn why you need to be moral and learn why your sin makes God mad and learn what Christ did on the cross.
That's like 99% of the Bible.
And the rest is far out eschatology.
Yet the entire Zionist platform is built on it.
Something's out of balance there.
Yeah, yeah.
Which guys and civilians would Jesus bomb.
Okay, next part.
What is Israel?
Who are these guys?
I'm going to give a couple of minutes to this with Jimmy Dore again.
So the problem with Turning Points USA is that they're not going to get away from the Israel question because the younger generation has turned on Israel, including conservatives.
And so they thought by getting rid of Charlie Kirk that they would be able to go full Zionism at TPUSA and this would all go away.
Well, it's not going away because they're getting, this is what happened just at their Amfest.
Listen to this.
Conservatives that question foreign aid to Israel get called anti-Semitic by some other conservatives.
So am I anti-Semitic for questioning $38 billion sent in the last year while we have homeless American veterans on the streets in need of aid?
What's the premise of your own question?
I think there are some issues with Israel.
I think APAC should register with Farah.
I don't know how much collateral damage should be having in Gaza, but there's a certain limit of how many innocent children and women that should not be dying.
Does not look good for the Zionist takeover of TPUSA.
There is a Zionist takeover of TPUSA for sure.
Doesn't look good for them because these questions aren't stopping because the younger generation finally got informed about Israel, just like I did.
October 7th, I didn't know much about it.
I knew that Israel was an occupying force in Palestine.
I had covered some of their atrocities.
I didn't know anything about the founding of Israel.
I didn't know about the NACBA.
I didn't know about the Balford Declaration.
I didn't know about all the false flags they've done.
I didn't know how involved they were in all the wars we've done.
But now I am.
Now I'm aware of all that.
And so are they.
And so they're getting even Ben Shapiro.
So here is Ben Shapiro getting owned at TPUSA by a kid in the crowd talking about the, remember the USS Liberty.
We had one of the survivors of that attack.
Israel attacked the USS Liberty, which is a United States naval vessel, and they tried to blame it on Egypt.
So that was a way to, and it didn't work, but here we go.
Truth, as the most important tenet of American.
You saw it during your speech, truth, as the most important tenet of American conservatism.
Why, therefore, did you call irrelevant the Israeli attack in 1967 on the USS Liberty, which left dozens of American service men, a bunch of wounded.
I mean, the crowd's going nuts.
That's the real crowd.
That's the crowd that Charlie cultivated.
Ask questions, never stop asking questions.
And Charlie had turned on them.
He brought people like Dave Smith, Tucker Carlson to tell the truth about what Israel's doing to TPUSA events and Candace Owens.
And of course, you can see up in the corner, I hijacked this video from my good friends over at Dew Dissonance.
Here we go.
So, what I actually said is if we're looking at modern Israeli American relations, looking at an attack that happened mistakenly by multiple.
Now, the reason why I speed up Ben Shapiro is because he's slightly more sufferable at this speed.
Okay, so I apologize if it's too fast for some people, but I can't listen to him in real speed.
I can't take it.
So, I have to speed him up.
Here we go.
What I actually said is that if we're looking at modern Israeli-American relations, looking at an attack that happened mistakenly by multiple Navy reports, multiple Israeli reports, and all available evidence, and using that attack in order to undermine today's relationship between Israel-America.
That's irrelevant.
So, he's trying to pass it off as a mistake.
It was an oopsie.
It was a sustained attack.
Again, it wasn't an oopsie.
I'm going to show you that after this.
But he's trying to paint it as that.
Relevance is what we decided to peace evidence from World War II or from 1776.
They're fine.
America's relations with, for example, Great Britain or Germany today.
That does not mean that the attack wasn't horrible for the Americans involved.
That wasn't bloody and terrible.
The Israeli government paid reparations to the people who were killed.
If you look at the actual military record of what happened on the U.S. Liberty, it was clearly a mistaken and tragic attack.
The people who frequently cited U.S. Liberty, however, are not talking about the specifics of U.S. Liberty.
I suspect the vast majority of people who bring this up are doing so in order to suggest that Israel deliberately attacked an American ship because Israel deliberately wants to harm America.
No, they didn't want to harm America.
They wanted to drag America in and have them attack Egypt for them.
Generally, with a larger point, I wonder if that's your point.
If the truth matters, then the Israeli government must be held accountable for that attack.
The American flag was flying on that ship.
You do not mistake an American ship for a foreign one when our flag is flying.
We're spending some time talking about the specifics of the US liberation.
By the CIA director in the joint.
And they go on, and it's sharp stuff.
And I recommend the whole 18 minutes.
I'm looking at this.
I don't know if Shapiro looks kind of AI-ish in that perspective.
I don't know.
I don't know.
And then we got this.
The question is, what is Israel?
So internet searches in Israel, going back in time, include ISIS attacks Disneyland, Christian terrorist London, Disneyland bombing.
And it may be that these searches now can predict future false flags from those people.
And we got this.
So the final solution, vaccines, infertility, and genocide of Germans, or at least including Germans, if you consider that everything that we receive is Norwellian narrative.
The opposite.
And if you know a little bit about the history of World War II, and I'll provide that in just a moment, you can see that for some reason, Germany got targeted as the bad guy for World War II, just as Russia is being targeted as the bad guy at World War III.
Don't believe me.
Watch the history.
As a professional historian, I find zero historical errors in this documentation, Europa the Last Battle.
And the punchline for that is just as I said, it's we're witnessing the same thing trying to paint Russia as somehow bad when NATO was promised not one inch to the east.
And the Russian speakers in the Donbass, the southeast part of Ukraine, were getting shelled by the Ukrainian, the NATO-installed puppet government.
14,000 killed.
The Russians send in military to protect them.
They demand independence.
Same thing, same thing with the peace treaty terms today.
Independence for the Donbass and no NATO for Ukraine.
That would end the war.
But nope, nope, nope.
Russia is the bad guy.
Brian, your thoughts.
A lot of puzzle pieces there.
You know, the first thing that really kind of stood out to me was this word anti-Semitism.
A Semite is somebody who speaks one of the Arab languages.
How has that term been culturally adopted?
In the cultural assimilation strategy, how important is it to control language, to make morally unacceptable categories of thought?
It's very, very important.
And so they hijacked the word anti-Semite, applied it to Jews exclusively.
Now, what's interesting is I was watching this old World War II movie called Conspiracy the other day, and it had to do with the exterminate, the quote-unquote Hollywood version of the guys that got together from the Hitler ranks, the Nazi group, and decided to exterminate all the Jews in Europe.
And one of the interesting things, I only got about halfway through the movie before I fell asleep, but I thought, well, isn't this interesting?
Here you see a bunch of relatively well-balanced, sophisticated white people with excellent vocabularies and education sitting down and talking about these people as a problem and what to do about it.
And then, of course, my history books were opening up the whole time I was thinking about it.
They've been kicked out of 179 countries.
This isn't a one-off.
And frankly, what they did to Germany at the end of World War I and what the bankers did to Germany was reprehensible.
And I got to tell you.
An act of war.
Yeah, I got to tell you that the idea of a dual American Israeli citizen is a landmine for America.
Because it is true that this billionaire class, that this class of people that belong to the Jews, whether you consider that a religion or a people or whatever you consider it, have such a huge concentration of wealth.
And here they're in a position where they're basically saying, screw America.
The end of America is going to come.
We'll go back to our promised land.
We'll take all our money with us.
We'll go exist over there, be protected behind our walls.
Now, I want you to understand that what happened to Germany is that they didn't see it coming from that perspective.
And when they pulled out causing hyperinflation, that was the collapse.
Now, you've got a bunch of dual American Israeli citizens.
They could do a lot of damage if they all got real clannish and got together and decided that it was time to crash the machine.
And is there a reason to fear?
Yeah.
Does that mean that you go as far as the Nazis did in terms of exterminating?
No, there's a balance there.
But the balance ought to be that we are instead creating a plan to culturally assimilate these Jews into the American identity rather than allow them to be separate and independent.
Problem is all throughout history that's failed when it comes to Jews because they have their very strange commentary on the Pentateuch and the First and the Old Testament called the Talmud.
They have their Mishnah, they have their church/slash cultural centers called these synagogues.
And you can't really separate the family life from the religious life.
And they reject any semblance of a Messiah, thinking of themselves as the great Messiah, looking forward to the arrival of their eternal king, and it's not Christ.
Yeah, right.
Anybody who actually studies this stuff knows exactly what happened.
So I do understand this German perspective of these German guys getting together and saying, what are we going to do about this problem?
So that from a Zionist perspective is probably all I want to hit on that.
Now, one of the other issues we talked about was this Russia-Ukraine war.
And I got to tell you that doesn't that feel like there's so much fatigue and background noise?
And I got to tell you, when war in America is responsible for this level of death and this war has become nothing but background noise, our citizenship is, in a sense, completely meaningless.
I mean, why?
What are we doing if we're allowing our nation to operate like this without any sense of checks and balances in place anymore?
This is a very dangerous time for the empire that we call America because citizenship, voting, taxes, it's meaningless.
It's empty.
It's vanity.
Vanity makes us feel like we're part of America.
But there's, it's, we have no say.
And that's how they want us to think.
That's not how we should act, though.
We're going to have to figure out how to act in a way that is civilly disobedient without breaking the law.
And I see these presentations themselves as a type of civil disobedience.
Although I'm not advocating, you know, being an idiot.
I'm trying to expose what they're doing.
And that, in a sense, is my peaceful way of doing civil disobedience.
So join us.
Make more comments.
Find a show.
Get a show.
Make a show.
Be civilly disobedient.
Yeah.
Consent.
Yeah, at least with what you can do with what you think and what you say and what you do.
With the idea of what is Israel, whatever it is, this deeply evil part that is connected to the U.S., that is connected to NATO, is that there are about 15 million self-described Jews, and almost all of them, who I know, they're for the truth.
So I say just split that population.
This is war.
And one of the fundamental tactics that you want to do is you want to drive a wedge into the enemy territory and then split off assets and use those assets against the enemy.
And the enemy are the pet of wars at the top.
And those are the ones.
And yeah, anybody is for truth.
I agree with that.
I agree with that.
The problem is, the problem is that culture makes sure that the checks and balances are in place.
In order for you to integrate into that culture, you've got to show that you're willing to do what they want you to do and what they need you to do.
They have great and therefore you're going to participate in the activities.
Yeah.
Yeah, yeah.
They're they're the victim.
And this is what we do as Jews.
We help each other out.
And if there are areas where we need to help spread the word about something, that's what we do.
Because the six million thing.
Yeah.
Stick together.
These contracts all go to Jews.
It's just the way it is.
All right.
So what kind of war is Amrev 2 in World War III?
The Epstein files show.
All right, Epstein Israel and the CIA, how the Iran-Contra plans landed at Les Wexner's base, Jeffrey Epstein, helped Leslie Wexner repurpose the CIA's Iran-Contra planes from arms smuggling to shipping lingerie.
So this is history that perhaps what Epstein was doing was helping to facilitate the trade of weapons going through the U.S. to Israel and then being sent back to Iran.
While that was illegal to do, that would have been a way of getting around it, and that would have given Epstein a lot of money.
And there's a history there if you're interested in that.
And then some of the conclusions here that Epstein was a Mossad tool.
And if Trump was one of them, then he's compromised.
Then if Mossad has that information, then Trump is going to do what the Zionists in Israel want him to do.
And so that's consistent with what we see in his behavior.
And this is excellent to view the propaganda to distract away from who these Epstein clients were, because if that is exposed, then this principal area of blackmail and the blackmail, the whole operation, Empire is dead.
Oh it was so good too.
Well, what it showed, what it showed was Ben Shapiro saying.
I guess.
Part of it was Ben Shapiro saying, you know what, this Epstein stuff is just a distraction.
Just don't pay any attention to it.
And a few of the other talking heads were basically if they're saying don't pay any attention to it, then they're covering for the empire.
All right.
Then the history of this, this is really good, too.
You know, the Epstein files don't exist.
And now there are so many Epstein files that we don't even have time to redact them all in 30 days.
Your government thinks you're stupid.
And then some of the history going through.
And it is a show and go.
But the whole world is watching now.
Oops, I'm going to have to repopulate this.
All right, let me just deal with the big broad stroke on Epstein there.
I got just one more here.
I got one more.
Oh, one more.
Okay.
He got in the show and go.
So Trump goes off after the DOJ finds a million more Epstein files?
A million more.
How many clients?
Go ahead.
Yeah, obviously the elite want the American people to believe that they're immune to justice.
And this Epstein thing has been going on so long, it feels like another narrative war that is just getting to be, we'll never, ever, ever have a resolution on it.
They want the American people to accept a permanent state of non-resolution.
They want us to Think of justice as purely theatrical for the elite rather than real, like it is for us.
And they want to define power as untouchable by design so that we don't go after them.
And I got to tell you that if the American people do give up and begin to believe that justice is completely fictional, we're going to stop expecting any sense of moral order whatsoever.
In which case, if moral order goes out the door, then you might as well join the strongest clan with the biggest guns because all borders are meaningless.
All rule by law is meaningless.
And everything is going to quickly degrade into pure rule by force instead of any sense of legitimacy whatsoever.
And fundamentally, civilization dies when it no longer expects accountability because it descends into a Lord of the Flies mindset.
And so, what does Epstein represent?
Epstein represents the precipice of the cliff where we're standing on the edge, shaking our fists.
And the Pied Piper, Trump, is leading us to the cliff.
I mean, if we don't at some point get justice, then the people will rebel.
It's just a matter of time.
It's just a matter of time.
Now, Americans, very well-developed sense of fair play, very much, you know, MAGA mindset, clean up the tea party grounds before you leave.
You know, most Americans are not this young, radical, progressive culture that's willing to completely abandon all of the fences and borders that had been built by our founding fathers in terms of how social order works.
And burn down the police station.
Those people are animals and they're taught to be animals.
What's that?
Yeah.
Well, they're taught to be animals because, look, this is a fundamental issue.
If there is no God and there is no judgment and there is no accountability, why not be an animal?
I mean, be an animal.
You want to be an animal?
Okay, you evolved from primordial ooze.
Now all of a sudden there's a moral order that takes place that just comes out of nowhere because we're good people and we respect our neighbors.
That's so, it's so gray zoned.
You know, I'm a guy who pretty much believes in a plum bob, like the prophet Amos used to run around with to say there's a line.
It's straight down.
A ruler, you know, something that says, this is the order, this is what's righteous, this is what's right, and this is what's wrong.
And I got to tell you that in case you think the Bible was written to protect the Jews, in case you're one of those sad, sad and ignorant people, it exposes them as a stubborn and obstinate people who refuse to accept God's righteous moral order,
which he had planned to be distributed to all the world through them.
And they did, believe it or not, because in them was the seed line of the Messiah who becomes Christ, who then does distribute moral order to the entire world.
So there's a lot there, but moral order is very, very important.
Otherwise, we might as well be animals.
Very good.
Thank you.
All right.
Next up.
What kind of war is Amrev 2 and World War III?
All right, is it forever wars for ongoing weapons?
Just research and development plus their sadism, their need to have death and pain.
DNI Tulsi Gabbard, blast the, quote, deep state warmongers, unquote, for attempting to sabotage Trump-Ukraine peace talks because Trump wants peace.
And you know he wants peace because we arm the war, arm and fund the wars.
That's how much he wants peace.
This is just bullshit Orwellian cover story as usual.
And I just want to point that out that in this, if anybody wanted to end the wars, well, first the wars are illegal.
This is my published research via the Claremont Colleges.
All that we ever have is these lies-started treaty-violating wars of aggression.
And this is kind of a top 10 list where if you just look through the facts, you see it for yourself.
Nobody has to say anything more after that.
So this theater of allowing a shown genocide to go on that we fund and we arm.
And then again, what does Russia want to end this war?
Independence for the Donbass and no NATO for Ukraine as was previously promised.
That's it.
But it's not good enough.
You mean the same thing?
The same thing that they wanted at the very beginning?
Yeah.
How unreasonable.
This is like World War I trench warfare.
I mean, we're nowhere.
They want the same thing that they've always wanted.
They haven't given an inch.
Ridiculous.
Yep, yep.
All right.
Anything on that part, brother?
Or go on?
No, no, no.
Get it over with.
This money pit's got to end soon.
I don't know how they're going to roll that bad.
Hey, next part.
So great replacement theory.
Is it a race to the bottom while enriching the empire minions?
We got five of these.
So the Minnesota fraud scandal exposed by Nick Shirley.
It's way worse than anybody can imagine.
And what they're seeing is dozens and dozens of front shops of receiving government money promising to give these services, but they're just front companies.
And it may be up to 9 billion.
And they've done sufficient documentation that is sufficient evidence to warrant raids on these businesses because they say like they're a child care, but they have zero children.
Isn't that odd?
And we got a livid Minnesota mayor says the citizens across the state are now calling Tim Walz.
So this is all happening, not coincidentally, but by script, that this guy was the VP candidate of the worst presidential candidate in history, Kamala Harris, for pure, I mean, repulsiveness.
So this was the VP, and now he's the fraud father.
And this evidence coming out is just pay to play exposed, which is so usual for this.
And this is part of the race to the bottom as well.
So you just use these people and get them in and get them rich on payola.
You get them H4 visas.
And good question for this because I used to live in San Ramon and about half the neighborhood are Indians and they're in tech.
And these visas, they're asking a good question.
How are they getting a 30-year mortgage to buy a home if they have a visa valid only for three years?
How are they qualifying for a mortgage with no credit history and only a short-term work visa?
And why are they moving their entire families to the USA with H4 visas?
80% of these are going to entry-level or junior level positions.
Those are the types of jobs that new American college grads used to get.
Huh.
Huh.
Yeah.
Yeah.
It's not just here.
It's all the NATO countries and they all have, again, the record low approval from the public.
And I want to give Tucker a moment and Mike Benz, former CIA, with the conclusion.
Playing with revolution here.
They've lost their legitimacy.
I'm not going to try to overthrow the U.S. government.
I'm 55.
I'm not going to do that.
But at some point, you know, someone's going to try to do that.
And it's going to be kind of hard to see whether they're not justified because it's not legitimate.
Their legitimacy comes from the consent of the government.
That's our system.
And when they no longer have the consent of the government, they're not legitimate, period.
What they said was, Russia and China don't have the problem that we have.
They don't have rising populist movements in their countries that are opposed to the state institutions, that are opposed to the state priorities that are winning political power.
How do Russia and China solve this problem of domestic populist insurgency?
I'm not joking when I say this.
Giving their citizens political power, in other words?
Yes.
Do they ever stop and just ask, like, since when is it okay for the people in charge of a government to ban populism?
I thought the whole system was fundamentally a populist system.
The country belongs to its citizens.
I thought that was the whole deal.
There's been a redefinition of democracy from meaning the consensus of individuals to meaning the consensus of institutions.
They're playing with revolution.
Yeah, and they are playing with revolution with that too.
Yeah.
And, you know, I would like it for Tucker to just take the next step and point out that these are prima fascia criminal government leaders.
And we shouldn't be just talking about legitimacy.
We should be talking about their criminality.
Your thoughts, Brian?
I think Tucker ought to have on his show David Duke.
Many of you of our listeners might not be familiar with him, but he's been obviously labeled by the progressive left nutballs as, you know, the threat, the number one threat to the left.
He ran for political office.
He still has a show.
He's on the same channel as Giuseppe, Buffalo Culo Radio.
I think it's FTJ Media is where you can find him.
And I'm seeing new themes develop, and I'm happy to see them.
If anybody saw the Nick Fuentes, Piers Morgan interview, it was just laughable.
Joe Rogan covered it, and he just laughed at how Fuentes just absolutely mopped the floor with the progressive Piers Morgan.
The Hodge twins, black guys, famous guys on YouTube, had David Duke on their show recently.
The Hodge twins also did long segments with Fuentes.
I will say this.
I like listening to David King.
I think David Duke makes a lot of very good points.
I am a conservative.
That means I am in the business of conserving the ways and the culture of my fathers.
I am not a progressive.
I do not believe in destroying those cultural borders and those cultural fence lines that have been built over years and years and years by our not only our spiritual fathers, but our founding fathers.
I am a conservative in the sense that I also recognize that white culture has brought a tremendous amount of value to the world.
And I think that the idea that diversity is our strength is the dumbest thing I've ever heard in my life.
If you look at any strong empire ever, they have a central, strong culture, and then everybody else is assimilated into that culture or they're enslaved by that culture.
Now, I'm not saying that I'm class A world domination type of guy.
I'm not Henry Kissinger.
I don't believe that there needs to be Team America World Police, but I am saying that I, as an individual, identify very closely with the Thomas Jeffersons, Ben Franklins, George Washingtons.
I identify very closely with the Puritan style founding fathers because I think they had things right.
I identify with the German people.
I think they're very, very strong.
The Ottomans, the Ottoman Empire, all those empires over there that are part of that were very, very strong cultures.
And the one culture that's weakened is the mixed, highly diverse culture, whereas the culture that's strongest, I mean, take a look at it now.
The Jews have become a stronger culture in terms of the glue that holds them together in the sense that let's go ahead and make everybody hate us, and then we'll all have this same glue that holds us together.
Let's have this, you know, satanic commentary called the Talmud.
And that'll be the glue that holds us together.
Let's run our own schools called synagogues and let's run our own businesses and let's hire our own type and let's do our own thing.
Look at what that's done for that culture versus us.
We've sat back and watched our TVs and let diversity as our strength.
Think of Minnesota and the fraud and the Somali problem.
Think of what's happened to Texas, California, the great replacement.
Look at the urban centers where the corruption runs rampant, where different cultures think they get to play by different rules.
Diversity isn't our strength.
It's the dumbest thing I've ever heard in my life.
Guys, seriously, tune into David Duke and listen to him.
Tune into Giuseppe Vafonculo and listen to him.
They're not right about everything and you're discerning listeners and you can listen, but I'll tell you something.
I have such an appetite for a stronger culture of people like me in this nation.
And it just, we're just, we're villainized and we take it and we take it and we don't fight back.
Time to start fighting back.
I believe in what we are, where we came from.
And I believe that we've offered this world more than anything that you've gotten from Africa or from China or from even Japan or any place else.
And that's well articulated.
Thank you, brother.
And many Americans are feeling it.
That if there isn't any justice, then somebody else is going to have to do it.
And especially, you know, one more thing.
I think they're the closest to breaking.
People don't defend a home that they think is already lost to the enemy.
Are we going to defend America?
Or are we going to just roll our eyes and say it's too late?
It's gone.
That's going to make us homeless.
Yeah.
Yeah.
People need to pay attention to what's going on and then act consistent with their hearts and minds.
Best response.
All right.
So what kind of a war is this?
There's this part.
I've got a few parts of this.
Okay.
So with the election fraud, Secretary of the State dropping off ballot into Dropbox.
It's illegal.
This is Detroit, Michigan.
And this has yet to break.
I mean, we've covered this since it began.
This goes back to the early 2000s for me as covering this topic academically.
So you're telling me on the same day Rudy Giuliano was ordered to pay $100 plus million for claiming the Georgia election was rigged.
We now find out the Georgia election was rigged.
This is back from December of 2023, where the governor's legal staff had notified the Secretary of State that 17,852 invalid 2020 votes were counted in just one county.
Yeah.
And God here.
Oh.
And then in New York.
So the new elected mayor has appointed an LGTBS person who has never served as a firefighter as the fire commander.
And she'll be the first openly gay FDNY commissioner.
So with the optics, it's crazy that they keep digging, but they do.
They do.
Okay, so with another thing that may be happening with a silver bullet is that silver did hit over $80 today.
It went down a little bit.
It's down to $78.
But the historic rise there.
And again, what's going to happen is that the silver derivatives contracts.
Actually, I'll go ahead and do this and then I'll explain it to you in a moment.
China is now buying silver at $90 an ounce.
Okay.
And then this, I recommend the whole 25 minutes.
But what this guy is talking about, and this may be an AI, but he's saying that in China is that if you want to export silver, beginning January 1st, you have to get a government stamp and approval.
And he's saying that that could collapse the entire system and spike the price of silver.
No matter what happens, there are solutions published research via the Claremont Colleges that the real economy is labor and resources.
And none of that is hurt by the fraudulent system.
So let me tell you a little bit more about the silver stuff.
So I don't know all the details about how this sausage is made, but basically you're going to get people selling into the silver market a promise to deliver silver.
And, you know, somebody might ask, so this is attached to a specific registered silver bar on in the vault.
No, it's not.
Trust me, I'll get you the silver.
All right, so how many of these physical paper contracts are there?
What's the total?
So it's 20 times the actual physical amount.
And that what that means is that if people see through that scam and they demand the delivery of physical silver, as we're seeing, then these people who are promising to deliver silver aren't going to be able to deliver it.
And the price is going to go way up and they're going to be bankrupt.
That is so where it's at right now of silver at $80 an ounce, that's the beginning of something that could be a big deal, a paper financial collapse, and then a whole other possibility of conversations.
Brian, your thoughts?
I have never thought of my silver stack in terms of its value per ounce.
I built it and I think of it in terms of this is what is going to get me through day to day when they turn off the lights.
I never thought of it as an investment, although I knew it would come around sooner or later that it was being artificially depressed.
I have those old 90% quarters from the 50s and lots of them.
And I just never let it get into my head, even when business is bad or you're not making any money or whatever.
I never let it get in my head that I was going to use it until that day when they shut off the lights.
Now, I hope it's not just simply passed down to the kids or whatever.
But I remember my dad saying, oh, I need to buy Bitcoin.
I think it was about $17,000, $18,000.
I said, why are you buying Bitcoin?
Are you buying?
Oh, it's an investment.
Okay, it's an investment.
It's one thing.
But if you're buying it because you think we're going to have a cultural collapse or a systematic collapse of some sort, you need something hard and physical.
So I'm no prepper trainer, but I can tell you this: I feel very, very good knowing if that day comes, I can pull out a quarter that's worth a tank of gas.
Very good.
Thank you, brother.
All right, next.
What kind of war is MREV2, World War III?
And more with the COVID and the vaccine, the official poisons, three of those updates.
So, RFK2 saying that Gates has been indicted in the Netherlands for lying to the public about the so-called COVID vaccine.
He's going to have to go to trial.
Huh?
Well, that's in the right direction again.
Nothing has come of it.
And then here, I want to play this because this is so important.
Let's see.
Yeah, this repopulated somehow from the code I left it with.
Okay.
I mean, do pediatricians get incentivized with percent vaccination of their...
Yes.
Dr. Paul Thomas has done a very good video on that, and many other pediatricians have followed.
Maybe Dr. Hooker could answer better on that.
Yeah, they're typically incentivized directly by HMOs.
HMOs buy and sell vaccines, so vaccines are big businesses for HMOs.
But the incentivization is usually anywhere from $200 to $600 per fully vaccinated patient, as long as they're vaccines.
A certain percentage of their practice is fully pay to play, baby.
Be vaccinated.
So some pediatricians can make upwards to a million or more a year just in those incentives.
I've also heard stories of pediatricians basically firing patients because they won't get vaccinated.
Because that'll we hear that story over and over again.
And also the lies that the pediatrician tell us that our baby will die if we don't get vitamin K at birth.
The baby will bleed out before it gets to the car.
And these stories, if you don't get the HPV vaccine, then you will die of cancer.
These parents have told us these stories, and they're the same over and over again.
How can they get away with lying like that to us, the parents?
Yeah.
Yeah, so we're getting close to a breakthrough.
And then I want to give this 15 seconds or 16 seconds.
Ask a good question.
So you're telling me that sunscreen was invented in the 1940s.
People spend 90% of their time indoors today.
And melanoma rates are up six times since then.
Definitely the sun causing it.
So you're telling me that.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
What kind of war is this?
Your thoughts, brother.
Sunshine bad.
Yeah, sunshine bad.
Yeah, yeah.
Oh.
Look, the medical stuff always goes along the same line.
To me, the big broad stroke is body sovereignty.
The issue isn't medicine.
It's who owns the body and who has the right to decide what's going to go inside of it.
And so obviously there are incentive structures that are there to help everybody get rich inside the machine, but they've done a whole lot to destroy trust ever since COVID.
But you've got to remember: once bodily autonomy is negotiable, all autonomy is negotiable.
In other words, in other words, the last step is your ability to touch my body and take my freedom.
Before that, you're, you know, draining my bank account, issuing me a ticket or whatever, but the last step is that physical step.
And so any society that's willing to surrender bodily autonomy, I believe, will surrender everything else quietly.
If you're willing to go that far, why not surrender everything else?
Do you really need that picnic table or that car?
Do you really, you know, you need your body.
That's it.
And if you're willing to go so far as to let these people jab you with this poison, then you might as well be willing to surrender everything else.
Well said.
All right, last section.
So what kind of a war is MRI of II World War III?
There apparently was this old world civilization of advanced capabilities that got mud-flooded and emptied and erased from official history.
Now, this is friendly colleague Susan Bradford, and she has the documentation too.
The mythical mud floods coincide with the launch of England's first central bank.
Now, this is subscription only, so I can't get in here.
I was able to see part of it only.
Just pointing out that part of Jim's team is into this.
Now, this, in talking about the 22-minute video of what really changed the world in the early 1700s, pointing to the possibility of earthquakes and the documentation of these cities somehow ending up 20 feet within mud.
Not all of them, but some of them.
And certainly the existence of what you see here of underground tunnels in these cities.
And again, this was not constructed.
These cities were founded and with extraordinary architecture and size.
And again, the documentation, which I'll point out just a minute after I want to prime you with this information, I'll show you this and then I'll show you the video.
This is my presentation at the last false flags and conspiracies conference.
And much of what I find fascinating in the present is this documentation of Tartaria.
So there's a lot more here.
But the principal evidence comes from construction professionals.
You know, you don't have to be a professional, but as an expert witness, this stuff jumps out at you.
Taking a look at these palatial buildings with the official his stories that, oh yeah, this was architectured, excavated, wired, plumbed, and constructed in less than two years before power tools were, they, of course, it's ridiculous, just as everything else.
But take a look and appreciate what this civilization was that got great reset and the potential of human beings to rise to again.
Oh, this is just AI playing around with these old photos to give you more of a perspective.
Yeah, yeah, stunning.
So I think it's really important to find out what happened to those people because if those people can be hit and erased, I mean, that's what they want with us, too.
Your thoughts, brother.
Listen to me.
I've been saying this for a long time.
If they can take away our history, they can rewrite us.
So without a history, you've got no foundation and you've got no anchor.
So it's much easier to rewrite a new population once you erase their history.
Think of George Orwell's 1984.
Why do you think they rewrote the language?
Why do you think they rewrote the history?
They did that to keep people so that they didn't have an anchor that they could remember or they could believe in.
Have we been assimilated?
It looks like it.
If those buildings were built by human beings and not by some sort of hybrid angel, demon, human mix or something like that.
You know, have we been adopted and assimilated?
Where is the remnant of that culture and that society?
Is it lost inside of the Knights Templar secret societies that are modeled after Freemasonry and others?
Is it lost into some other secret occultic meeting?
Is it tied to some baal or some malech or some Ishtar or some, you know, we see a rise of the divine council concept and thinking as a as a relatively new string in Christianity.
And we must ask ourselves at some point, you know, When did we agree to become slaves?
What deal was made that said that, oh, we're going to have a birth certificate issued according to maritime law, and we're going to become chattel and property and we're going to be called Goy and we're not really going to actually own our land because we're going to have to continue to pay taxes on it.
Where did all this come from?
And then who agreed to put a massive obelisk and a massive, you know, all these things onto the look, I do, my instinct is that there's some sort of secret satanic society out there that was involved at some point in hijacking the education system to rewrite history.
My instinct is that the only agency that had, or the only institution that would have had the power to do that would have been the Jesuits.
I mean, can you think of another agency or institution that would have had the power to rewrite the entire textbook structure and the entire history of us?
It had to be the Jesuits.
It had to be.
Or not the Vatican.
The Jesuits came around as a post-Reformation military order to destroy Protestantism.
But go back before that, you've got your Vatican.
You've got all the Middle Ages.
I mean, look at your, man, that institution wasn't even really set until like 400 AD.
And then how long would it have taken for that institution to be corrupted?
That gives it 1,500 years to do its thing.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
As a professional historian, I would say that pretty much all the information that we have on the topic is unreliable if you want to take this seriously.
You got to get your hands and eyes on the primary documents yourself.
And that's really hard to do.
It's enough to withdraw consent and to realize that we're being bullshit about that.
And as to who the people are, well, in a criminal investigation, you start by rolling up the people you can identify and see where it goes.
And you and I both have considered that very question.
And we see some people and one of the people up there is named Satan or it's an office or something, but it's something super evil, super evil.
Off the charts.
Evil, a robust evil.
More evil than if you would have asked me, Carl, we're going to create some sort of a film series.
And we're wondering how evil the bad people should be.
And the level of evil we have on earth, that's more than I would recommend to show on.
You ain't seen nothing.
You ain't seen nothing yet in terms of evil.
You ain't seen nothing yet.
I can tell you this, if I'm reading my Bible correctly, then evil has been restrained quite a bit for our time.
And what you're seeing here is the desperately wicked and deceitful hearts of mankind.
And that I do believe that a certain component of evil has been restrained ever since the flood.
And I think we'll all agree that there was a flood.
But When that evil was wiped out, that was the one that was, that was, God's been willing to tolerate us for 4,000 years.
What he couldn't tolerate was that first 1,675 years between Adam and the flood, where he just said, I've had enough.
It's got to go.
He just, he grabbed it all, dried it off.
So that was evil.
That was even by God's standards, that was evil.
All right, we're going to final thoughts.
All right.
So the thing with Tartaria, the idea that these people have founded cities and what was the other thing?
Oh, yeah, you had mentioned Freemasonry involved.
Yeah, yeah, they just make fun of us.
Yeah, it was Freemasonry that was founded, founded as a legal term.
If you wanted to put something else for a building, it would be erected, built, constructed, something like that.
All right.
Well, Patriots, you know, that breakthrough with silver and the possibility of what might happen just this very week, as people are now coming to the conclusion that, oh, China can cancel all of the silver contracts beginning January 1st.
And I need silver in my business.
I better get some now.
That's going to be a strong drive on the price.
And the effects of this aren't going to be for another few months or when these contracts, these physical, this paper silver, when those contracts become due, whenever they are.
A major contract, I don't remember all the details of it.
This was a couple of weeks ago.
It was rolled over for three months with a promised price that was like almost $15 ago.
But when these are due and the people say, nope, I want the physical delivery, then that is going to be an emperor's new clothes moment that the banks are going to go under the ones who are the holders of those contracts.
All right.
Final thoughts, brother.
For anybody who thinks that we're fighting against the left or the right or USA versus Ukraine, it's crazy.
We are up against a system that is dead set on making us forget our roots, forget our history.
They want us tired, confused, detached, and mesmerized sitting in front of our televisions.
Cultural assimilation is more powerful than any military structure you can ever imagine.
And it doesn't arrive with chains and guns.
It arrives when people stop believing that the truth can be known, sit themselves down on the couch and veg out to the television while it teaches them a new version of reality.
What we need to do is get in touch with our roots.
I love the fact that we've got all these older artificial intelligence or these pictures of these structures.
It tells us there was something there that was assimilated out.
I think if I could ask for any book in the world right now, I would want a copy of, oh, there's like an encyclopedia over in Europe that supposedly is over like 120 volumes long and it covers all of ancient history from Adam.
Yeah, all ancient history from Adam up through like the 1700s.
It's the Diderot or something like that.
Something like that.
I mean, If I could trust artificial intelligence, and I don't mean ChatGPT 5.2, because I'm telling you, you can't trust it.
I know it.
It's bad.
They've sewn the Zionist machine into the results already.
So we might have had a purer version earlier, but it ain't ChatGPT.
But I would have artificial intelligence rewrite that encyclopedia, update the language so that it's actually readable.
What's it called again?
Like the Diderot.
It's from Paris, from the Enlightenment era.
Yeah.
Yeah.
It's like the actual history.
It's shocking that we don't have a copy of it, but I'm going to look into it.