Jim Fetzer - Truth vs. NEW$, Inc Part 2 (1 December 2025) with Don Grahn, Joachim Hagopian, and Brian Davidson

Dec. 2, 2025 - Jim Fetzer

01:04:47

Truth vs. NEW$, Inc Part 2 (1 December 2025) with Don Grahn, Joachim Hagopian, and Brian Davidson

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Welcome back to Truth versus News, Incorporated on the 1st of December.
	Let's start off a holiday fusion with some heavy news today on our show.
	And Jim, this is the second hour, and I guess we've got things cooking here.
	Are we going to get into the Epstein now?
	Yes, Don.
	We're turning to Jeffrey Epstein.
	It turns out, aided Alan Dershowitz. in attacking this absolutely historic book on the Israeli lobby.
	In ours, this is about as bad as it gets, in my opinion.
	This completely discredits Alan Dershowitz as a man of integrity who cares about America.
	He's another Zionist shell.
	In March 2006, the Harvard Kennedy School published a working paper, The Israeli Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy, by influential political scientists John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt.
	The paper, which ran in the London Review of Books and became the basis for a book published the following year, was an unflinching analysis of the impact of pro-Israel advocacy and lobbying groups on the U.S. political system and the role of organizations like APAC in shaping U.S. foreign policy toward the Middle East.
	It was a profound analysis and made a lot of waves.
	Mearsheimer and Walt described a loose coalition of philanthropists, think tanks, advocacy groups, and Christian Zionist organizations that routinely pulled U.S. policy toward the Middle East away from America's national interest as the U.S. was being drawn into a military quagmire in Iraq.
	Other special interest groups have made a skew U.S. foreign policy in direction they favored.
	Walt and Mearsheimer wrote, but no lobby has made to divert U.S. foreign policy as far from what the American national interest would otherwise suggest while simultaneously convincing Americans that U.S. and Israeli interests are essentially identical.
	Even before the Kennedy School posted the paper online, the project had already spooked editors at the Atlantic, who originally commissioned the essay in the early 2000s.
	In an interview with Tucker earlier this year, Mearsheimer revealed the editor of the Atlantic had offered them a $10,000 kill fee if the publication didn't print the article.
	Mersheimer said, that's the fastest $10,000 we ever made.
	The paper was written by two highly esteemed scholars of international relations.
	Walt had been serving since 2002 as academic dean at Harvard's Kennedy School, as prestigious an appointment as exists in the field and Mersheimer taught at University of Chicago.
	But the backlash against it was swift, intense, and unusually public in the world of academia.
	A wave of news articles described the authors as anti-Semites.
	The anti-defamation league weighed in to denounce what they called an anti-Jewish screen.
	The pressure became so intense, the Kennedy School removed its logo from the paper and added a disclaimer, distancing the institution from its arguments.
	Rather like University of Minnesota Duluth dissociating itself from the conspiracy theory views of its distinguished McKnight professor emeritus, Jim Fetzer.
	Meanwhile, X revealed a massive effort, foreign policy media targeting Israel and Ukraine.
	Depending on how you read this, it may be complete propaganda.
	X's new geolocation to us exposing waves of social media influencing unknown foreign powers, influencing by media influencing by unknown foreign powers.
	Last week, X released a geolocation of major and influential accounts and discovered fake postings from sites claiming to be U.S.-based.
	Notably, many were so-called MABA accounts that appeared to support Donald Trump and his policies, but often posted critically of Israel and Ukraine.
	Well, they're criticizing Israel and Ukraine.
	They're certainly on the right side.
	I've long sighed, said foreign actors are using social media to poison our politics and divide America.
	Former UN Ambassador Nikki Haley posted.
	The location feature on X is a huge win for transparency and American security, except that Israel and Ukraine deserve criticism.
	Meanwhile, saving Candace, the hit contract, motivates an opportunity.
	George Webb.
	I made this video and others from the La Quinta Orum parking lot, where Candace now says potential assassins from the Egyptian military goal tomed Jet State on September 4th through the 13th.
	Good morning, beautiful people.
	George Webb here.
	Day two of the Candace Owen assassination investigation.
	I just stayed at the same La Quinta in Orem, Utah, as the assassination team that probably killed Charlie Kirk.
	Same room, same parking lot, same Wi-Fi password, same bullet, same breakfast bar, except Charlie Kirk wasn't killed.
	That was a fraud.
	That was a stage event.
	Meanwhile, more negative on Candace, his revelation from Lauren Wetzka.
	We need to blackmail Candace faster.
	Project Veritas broke a huge story revealing A.G. Bill Barr's daughter was trying to set up and blackmail Candace when she was a senior DOJ official.
	Mary Bardaly also is trying to set up someone with an underage girl to blackmail him.
	Also, it appears they're running cover for former Baltimore candidate Kimberly Classic.
	If so, explains why Classic has been on a huge rampage against Candice since she questioned her campaign finance spending, calling her crazy, smearing her as insane.
	I don't think Americans understand how deeply corrupt our government truly is.
	This is just one text message.
	Imagine how many other people they have set up and blackmailed.
	I think that's right.
	And Candace has been on a hit list for criticizing the McCran's McCrons.
	I think they've been especially offended by your outing Bridget as a man.
	Anyone who sees her in a swimsuit can tell that she, like Michelle Obama, has a package most women do not have.
	Joaquin.
	Yeah, there's that expression.
	You know, you really find out where the power is with who you cannot criticize.
	And that is Israel.
	That is basically Zionism that controls to a great extent the earth, or at least a lot of the events on this earth are controlled by Israel and the Zionist cult, death cult at that.
	So yeah, I mean, in every case, you know, whether it's Walt and Mearsheimer, I always plug Mearsheimer and McGregor because I went to school with them at West Point and they are two heavyweights in telling the truth.
	But yeah, they came out with this article a long time ago, but boy, you know, the Anti-Defamation League and all the Zionists moved in to squelch that one real quick.
	And that's just, you know, an example of how it's been throughout the history of America in the modern day, you know, where you cannot criticize without a lot of flack and opposition from the wrong people, the evil ones, you know, the so-called chosen ones.
	Yeah, all right.
	Chosen to go to hell.
	But anyway, yeah, and it goes right up to Candace Owens.
	You know, they're after her.
	They're after Tucker.
	You know, they're after, you know, Fuentes.
	They're after anybody that's critical that has some reach, that is, you know, we can get away with it.
	I don't think we're going to get much flack.
	But if you get up high enough and you're criticizing Israel, yeah, you're going to pay the price.
	You know, that's the reality.
	And every one of these stories that you just presented, that's the story.
	You know, you cannot criticize Israel if you reach a certain level without being in their crosshairs for getting rid of you, destroying you, killing you even.
	But because they will resort to anything just to make sure the truth doesn't get out there.
	They know it's a war that can't be won as far as public opinion all over the earth.
	Israel's done.
	It's not going to last.
	And they're pushing it because they know that.
	They're pushing the war thing all the way where, yep, there's going to be a war where Israel will no longer be a country.
	That is coming and it probably will be coming soon.
	How much damage happens to America because America is completely owned and controlled by Israel?
	We don't know.
	We hope that America is salvaged somehow, but it's also going to suffer much damage because it doesn't, because the people haven't awakened yet.
	They're in the process now, but it's too late.
	They have not awakened to the fact that Israel was never our ally.
	It was never our friend.
	It has always been a liability.
	It has turned on American soldier USS Liberty and on and on we go with how it steals the uranium, steals the secrets, develops the nuclear weapons, kills John F. Kennedy, kills Robert F. Kennedy, on and on and on and on.
	They are not our friends.
	Netanyahu, he basically predicted 9-1-1.
	That's because Israel did it along with a bunch of neocon dual citizens that weren't loyal, obviously, to America.
	You know, on and on and on.
	The evidence is overwhelming now that Israel is the evil of the earth, it seems.
	As far as a country, yeah, an American government's right there with it, and it's as evil because it's allowed America and its interests and the people to completely suffer at the hands of protecting Israel.
	I'm so sick of it.
	Well, and my friend, Brian.
	Well, I think with what we've been seeing lately, even in the mainstream media, it answers the question that I think the normie continues to have out there, which was: you know, was Jeffrey Epstein just a private criminal or was he a state contractor who was using compromised individuals as attack dogs?
	Well, using the Dershowitz article shows that he was, in fact, a state contractor working with a state-sponsored compromise system and intelligence agencies to drive to drive a system which could be used to protect Israel's strategic narrative and continue to silence the academics that continue to talk out about it.
	Epstein represents complete moral rot within every layer of our government.
	The leaked pro-Israel lobbying emails is classic foreign lobbying infiltration, something that we need to re-engineer our Foreign Agents Registration Act to fix.
	And I got to ask myself the question: how many governments out there effectively state-sponsored subcontracted lobby groups for the Israeli lobby?
	As a result of all of it, we get down to Kansas Owens, who's been calling out some of the blackmail threats that have been taking care of her.
	They're trying to do everything they can to continue with damage control against any whistleblowers or dissenters that exist inside conservative circles.
	And think about the pattern here: character assassination leads to legal pressure, which leads to erase the narrative.
	This is not just an internal civil war within the right.
	This is an external infiltration of the right that's being controlled by artificial intelligence, social media, and a number of other systems that they're using to try to manufacture consent to protect Israel and Jeffrey Epstein.
	If both parties, Republicans and Democrats, are compromised, then who actually is running the system?
	Well, obviously, the people who are doing the compromising.
	So that means Israel.
	And American people are going to start to come to that conclusion here, even the normies.
	And my dad's a normie for the most part.
	And he's like, we went out the other day and we started talking about Epstein.
	He's like, well, what's the big deal?
	Wasn't the guy just a sleazebag?
	This is what he's getting from Fox News and the mainstream media.
	It has nothing to do with state-sponsored control mechanisms.
	Once I explained it to him, he began to understand it.
	But I'm telling you, the normies out there just see the guy as a morally corrupt academics and business operator.
	Whereas those of us that are on the inside that have been studying this for years know exactly what it is.
	This is a structure that's designed to control both the left and the right and to use its power on those levels to control social media structures and shut down any dissenting voices.
	Well, tell your father, tell your father and the rest of the normies.
	Read my articles in books, and you'll find out about Epstein.
	Didn't take me more than five minutes to straighten him out, but just the fact that he was coming to that conclusion by watching Fox News shows how broken the system is.
	Good, good, good work.
	Meanwhile, the government is banning this $39 fast charger next month, and this is your last shot to get this battle is not over, and that a lot of this, as it has since its inception, is going to fall to you on House oversight to keep the drum beating.
	Tell me how you see this playing out first, just over the course of the next week or so, and then what you think the work of your committee is going to be on the back end to actually ensure, should this move through the House, should this move through the Senate, should it even get Donald Trump's signature, that you actually see those files released?
	Actually, of course, it did move through the House, which has 435 members by a vote of 427 to 1.
	It passed the House.
	Asow zipped it through.
	Trump has already signed it.
	I think the play is going to be by the Attorney General to claim their ongoing investigation so that there are lots of files they cannot release.
	Here's Clinton and Epstein.
	You've got some of the Trump family.
	Yeah, this is interesting.
	Here's the guy's actually got this.
	They've actually got.
	Bill Clinton worked aimlessly to keep his public facade innocent and naive over the years, much like many of the other presidents who have exemplified the role of being the top official in the United States.
	Bill Clinton, the 42nd president of America, served from 1993 to 2001, a prime time in what would be considered the second longest period of peacetime economic expansion in American history.
	Despite his public mishaps and humiliating public affair with White House intern Monica Lewinsky, Bill Clinton was well known for the booming stock market and economic recession that came with his presidency.
	With an approval rating in the low 60s, Clinton was fairly liked by the American public, but much of that changed as his exterior cracked throughout his two terms.
	One of the few presidents known to have been impeached during his time in office, Bill Clinton tended to get his hands tied up in the wrong places.
	But today, we're going to talk about a darker scandal surrounding Bill Clinton that you don't really see many people talking about.
	This is not conspiracy.
	This is not hypothesis.
	Today, we're going to be looking at the thoroughly documented friendship between Bill Clinton, an alleged predator himself, and Jeffrey Epstein, the most notorious on planet Earth.
	Now, keep in mind, the Justice Department in the United States, even though they have been covering up the Epstein thing from top to bottom, currently, as you're seeing play out with this administration, they did admit that Epstein had over 1,000 victims in his life.
	Now, we know Epstein did do that, but we also know that Epstein plenty of young girls to prominent men.
	But was Clinton involved in all of that?
	We know Clinton and Epstein were very good friends, but just how involved was he?
	Today, we're going to find out.
	Welcome to the Conspiracy Files.
	Now, before we get into the show, as always, if you want to see the resources that we use to construct today's episode, all the news articles, books, different resources, I always post a resources document in the description of the show so you can go read this information for yourself and interpret it how you would like to.
	All parties are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law, and I don't plan on going anywhere or doing anything to myself in the near future.
	In a quick recap, Epstein was an American finance guy, an advisor, and who was investigated for and for the of minors as early as in 2005.
	But Epstein's practices were estimated to have started in the 1980s at minimum.
	Epstein was prosecuted by Florida State for two crimes of procuring a child's report and for soliciting a as part of a very controversial plea deal.
	Obviously, we know the details of the sweetheart deal there, where Epstein was basically given a slap on the wrist.
	He signed the papers that were presented to him, which essentially stated that Epstein's going to go down for a little bit of this, but then the other co-conspirators will never be identified or charged.
	I find that a particularly disturbing facet of the sweetheart deal.
	But then everybody moved on.
	Epstein was a convicted, but his famous friends continued to bring him around.
	Then in 2019, Epstein again was arrested, this time for federal charges for the and he allegedly died by self-deletion a month later in prison.
	Obviously, we know that that's not true, but that's just the official story.
	Now, Jeffrey Epstein was known for his very high-profile clientele list, being a finance guy, and a list which consisted of many high-profile individuals in fields including finance, manufacturing, real estate, film, TV, politics, and more.
	Obviously, we've discussed Jeffrey Epstein's infamous little black book many times here on the channel.
	By the way, if you've never seen a video that I've done on Epstein, I recommend you start viewing from the very beginning of the series.
	I created a YouTube playlist so that you could start from the beginning, or you can listen on Spotify or Apple Podcasts.
	And yeah, I actually have this photocopy, or I don't know what you call it, an accurate duplicate of Epstein's black book right here.
	A good friend of mine was actually the first guy who had this thing published.
	His name's Nick Bryant.
	He was the one who got access to the book and sent it off to the press.
	So here's the black book.
	You can see it's a duplicate kind of of what it would look like.
	There's a lot.
	There's a lot of people in here that are interesting.
	I've always thought it's interesting.
	Alec Baldwin is in here, the actor.
	You don't ever really see him.
	I mean, I'm assuming that's the actor being in New York.
	You got lots of institutions in here.
	Obviously, you've got some of the Trump family: Ivana, Ivanka, Robert, Blaine.
	A classic here is Donald Trump himself.
	There's a very substantial amount of numbers here for the Don.
	In his book, he had the name for the White House.
	We've talked about like Vera Wang, Les Wexner.
	There's an entire section for Israel, which is interesting.
	So, I use PayPal to buy this ticket.
	I'm paying it off over time.
	No fees, no interest.
	You know what else is meanwhile?
	We have Joachim Hegobian latest Trump the medophile is guilty as sin nearly eight years ago.
	I posted chapter seven of book four of my pedophilia and Empire 5 book series exposing America's pedo scandals entitled Jeffrey Epstein scandal, Anatomy of the Zionist Illuminati Sexual Blackmail System.
	The two and a half eighth chapter excerpt below covers plaintiff Katie Johnson's lawsuit filed in New York City Federal District Court just anna Trump's November 2016 election victory.
	Although this lawsuit is currently being recycled into today's headlines and videos as breaking news, essentially a Bruce Donald Trump pedophas cannot and will not be buried, scrubbed, or erased from history, regardless of how much the Donald tries.
	What's playing out today is that the title of my November 13th article, Pedro Trump's Days Are Numbers.
	There's a lot there to contemplate.
	I have heard Katie Johnson talk about her experience with Trump.
	It's very, very creepy.
	And I have every reason to believe she's speaking the truth.
	Meanwhile, is the pedophile in chief losing control?
	Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene.
	I don't worship or serve Donald Trump.
	I worship God.
	Jesus is my savior.
	Brian Shulhavey, editor of Health Impact News, writes: I'm beginning to hear whispers, unconfirmed, that the pedophile in chief, Donald Trump, is in danger of losing the presidency due to his actions in handling the Epstein-File political fallout.
	What is this powerful force that now threatens Trump presidency?
	Sexually abused women, many of whom were raped and sexually abused as children.
	Many of them have been listed as Jane Doe victims in previous court cases against Jeffrey Epstein and Ghelane Maxwell.
	But we are now coming, but are now coming forward to tell their stories.
	Two of them, Liz Stein and Jess Michaels, sat down for an interview with a new Arizona congresswoman, Alita Grasiava, who cast a final vote on the discharge petition to force a vote in the House to release the files about Epstein held by the FBI.
	Jes Michaels says, We also know that we are no longer just representing Epstein survivors, we are representing one in three women.
	We are representing survivors who never had a voice.
	There's much more there.
	In addition, 20,000 emails, 20,000 more emails from Epstein released by Congress, testified at Trump's participation in the Epstein child trafficking blackmail operation.
	Again, the same author, Brian Shulhavey, editor, Health Impact News.
	After the Democrats on the House Office Committee published three emails from the Jeffrey Epstein state yesterday, showing how President Trump was part of the Epstein child trafficking enterprise, Trump and his supporters called foul, claiming the Democrats had cherry-picked just a few emails to try and deceive the public.
	So the Republicans on the House were seeing to publish all 20,000 pages of emails from the Epstein estate.
	Perhaps this was the Democrats' plan all along, because these emails did nothing to exonerate Trump, but instead provided further evidence of Trump participation with Epstein and showed how unfavorable Epstein and others viewed the benophile Donald Trump.
	In one email between Trump and Larry Summers, Epstein said, I have met some very bad people, none as bad as Trump.
	Not one decent cell in his body.
	Ben Misseller says he's read them all and gives this report.
	More if we so desire.
	Meanwhile, Joachim, your thoughts.
	Yeah, those Epstein files ain't going away.
	Yeah, it's been a total cover-up by Trump somehow.
	And, You know, be very sure that this all happened prior to him becoming president.
	Okay, I would venture to say that every American president of the last near 50 years has been compromised through sexual blackmail with children.
	Okay, I think Nixon might be the last one that didn't, or maybe Carter, but the rest, all of them since, yep, they are compromised and they have engaged in pedophilic crimes.
	That's how they control them so that we always are at war everywhere in the world, so that every aspect of doing government for the elites is done rather than for the people.
	They use the children as the currency for control of this earth.
	That's what's been going on for a long time now.
	So, yeah, it's nice to see things heating up in Washington where there's more victims coming forth and they are being heard now more than ever before.
	But will there ever be indictments of those top people?
	That's a big question that remains to be seen.
	My view, no, there won't be.
	It will be, it will signify a major sea change on this earth if the top pedophiles end up in prison.
	It will majorly be an indicator we're turning it around.
	I don't see it because the evil still rules on this earth.
	So, you know, I have my doubts because nobody at the national level has ever been brought to justice for pedophilia crimes.
	Whether it's Britain, which is, you know, the epicenter of the pedophilia operation at the top level on this earth, two books out of five on them alone, or it's America or anywhere in Europe or anywhere, really.
	Nobody.
	It has yet to happen.
	That's why history, as long as, you know, nobody has been brought to justice, I have a doubt that anybody will.
	And then we have Thomas Massey, one of the best congressmen there is, if not the best.
	The recent releases of Epstein files, he's holding them up.
	It's all blacked out.
	All blacked out.
	You won't see any names.
	That's the agenda.
	You know, we knew this was coming.
	We were writing about it from the very beginning.
	That we're not going to see anything.
	There's not going to be any action toward Trump.
	I think there is going to be enough pressure on him where, yes, he'll claim, you know, health issues, and I don't think he's going to last the four years.
	But will he be seeing a day in jail?
	No, I don't believe it.
	I don't believe it.
	He will not go to jail, but he will go out and JD will take over another total, total robot for Israel.
	You know, and Peter Thiel is his mentor, you know, who's palantier, getting all the data files on every single American so they can put dissidents into prison or worse.
	So yeah, I'm pretty much a skeptic because I am a realist based on history.
	I don't see any kind of action of top guys like Trump going to prison for pedophilia.
	Ain't going to happen.
	Brian.
	Well, This is the most important political story that there is right now.
	And right now, cable news is running the narrative that Epstein was a billionaire pervert with a long and bad friend list.
	That narrative is no longer going to fit if the truth about both Clinton and Trump get out in this.
	Now, remember, the Clinton Democrats and Trump, what this does is shows that they're connected.
	They're connected, and the intelligence services are also entwined with it.
	And so are the media outlets such as Vanity Fair and all the others that have done everything they can to edit out the accusers' stories under pressure.
	So if both major brands, Clinton's Democrats and Trump's Republicans, are all entangled in the same blackmail ecosystem, then that could spell the end of the blue versus red illusions.
	Additionally, it could show that the presidency has been a compromised office for years, vulnerable to deliberate compromise.
	Well, what are intelligence agencies doing if they're not protecting our president and our top leaders from being compromised?
	Epstein was brought into the White House early in Clinton's presidency.
	Prime ministers and all sorts of top officials have done off-grid detail and travel without their security to Epstein-Link locations.
	There's been all sorts of off-color inside jokes and art and blue dresses and birthday letters.
	And the political implications are that policy, wars, trade, and intelligence agreements are all being influenced by the group that holds the blackmail, which obviously is going to be Epstein.
	So you've got built around this a protection mechanism that weaponizes silence and does everything they can to control the scandals.
	But what you don't see in the story is any sense of justice, any sense of accountability, any sense of we're going to repent as a nation from this despicable behavior.
	And if that's the case, you're going to find that judgment is coming very, very soon.
	The PR tactics aren't going to continue to work with the American people if the story gets out, which is why we had, what'd they say, 432 vote to let the story out?
	And that means that you know damn well that the only story they're going to let out is the is the washed down, uh Cable NEWS narrative ready story that that could go out there that says, oh, Jeffrey Epstein, god rest his soul, he's dead.
	He died in jail, was doing some bad things, but unfortunately there were no victims, especially not any victims inside the government.
	The American people aren't going to buy this any longer.
	It's just not going to last.
	This is a.
	This is a case of American institutional self-preservation over any actual semblance of justice whatsoever.
	Yes yes, yes.
	Meanwhile, more proof of WTC-7 on 9-11.
	This is a contrast with a building that burned for 24 hours in Hong Kong in 2025, but didn't collapse because no steel structure high-rise has ever collapsed due to fire before 9-11.
	after 9-11 or on 9-11.
	What we're witnessing here is a classic controlled demolition of Building 7, seven hours after the North Tower was itself destroyed.
	Very modest fires.
	There you can see there's practically nothing to it, no risk to any building, much less this massive, robust World Trade Center, building number seven.
	So what we're seeing is one conspiracy theory after another is being validated and proven to be correct.
	Meanwhile, we have the False Flag and Conspiracy Six Annual Conference to be held on the 12th, the 13th, and the 14th of December.
	There are 28 speakers, two and a half days of information, free on Zoom, to register to get your free ticket.
	Go to falseflags and conspiraciescon.com.
	FalseflagsandConspiraciesCon.com.
	Register now for your free ticket.
	And to give you the schedule, let me track down the latest version and review it with you here.
	Here we go Now, on Friday, we're going to have four presentations.
	We're going to have at 6 p.m., R. Olivier on Sandy Hook.
	At 7 p.m., David Mannock, MD, Ph.D., JFK was assassinated by consensus.
	At 8 p.m., Larry Rivera, JFK, the latest revelations, especially about Mexico City, where Larry's also done brilliant work on the limousine stop that was removed from the home movies because it was such a powerful indication of Secret Service complicity in setting him up for the hit.
	And then at 9 p.m., Jim Fetzer, finding consensus on JFK's assassination, where I'm going to suggest that a merger of David's work on the medical evidence, Larry's work on Mexico City and the limo stop, and mine on the shooters and their sponsors provides a framework for understanding what happened to JFK.
	Then on Saturday at 9 a.m., Alexander Baker, JD, gender-affirming care, the new lobotomy.
	10 a.m., John Coleman, hollowing out third spaces.
	11 a.m., Hope Girl from Morocco, How Technology Threatens Freedom.
	Noon, Miriam Henan, How the Sausage is Made.
	1 p.m., Stephanie Sledge, Infiltration of America to Eliminate Whites and Christians.
	Actually, this is not the latest.
	My mistake.
	Here we go.
	Let's review.
	Initial were right.
	Here there are some changes.
	Alexander Baker, gender affirming care, John Coleman, Hollowing Out Third Spaces, Hope Girl, Marion Hanane, Stephanie Sledge, and Susan Bradford, the Black Rock Bamboozle, Chris Weinheart, TBMC, Social Re-Engineering, where TBMC is trauma-based mind control.
	4 p.m., Donald Jeffries, subverting our founding fathers.
	5 p.m., Roger Stone, The Clinton's War on Women extended to Jeffrey Epstein, Dave Hodges, Charlie Kirk, John Hankey, 7 p.m. Prove Israel killed Charlie Kirk, which of course, I think, is not quite right, since he doesn't appear to have been killed at all.
	8 p.m., Monique Lukens, an actor, looks at Charlie and Erica.
	Holy Domaguard, 9 p.m. Was Charlie Kirk shot to make Erica vice president?
	Man, Sunday, 9 a.m., Carl Herman, American Revolution II, World War III, 2026 status in historical context.
	10 a.m., John Hanke, the World War II whole low cost.
	11 a.m., Nick Hollerstrom, Ph.D., Israel did.
	9-11.
	Noon, Russ Winter.
	Another look at October 7th.
	1 p.m., Joaquin at GoPM.
	Genocide, not theory, but fact.
	2 p.m., Laurent Guyneau.
	Does Israel have a future?
	3 p.m., Alex Scott, World War III.
	4 p.m., Monique Lukens, the LA fires.
	5 p.m., Brian Davidson, the great American reprogramming, how decades of cultural propaganda rewired a nation.
	6 p.m., Rima Labo, MD, Fighting the UN and the Oscreech Calling.
	7 p.m., Joe Olson, practicing engineer, alleopathic cult conspiracy, 8 p.m., Danny Searas, blood after mRNA vaccination, 9 p.m., Catherine Orton, PhD, how not to die trying.
	Fascinating stuff.
	Meanwhile, I'd welcome comments from one and all.
	Joaquin, begin with you.
	Yeah, you got a real solid lineup this year.
	I'll tell you, it's a heavyweights of the alt news world, really.
	So much information on so many topics, too.
	Yeah, I'm looking forward to it very much.
	And everyone needs to appreciate this is a Zoom conference.
	It's a free conference, and you can pick and choose and watch it from the comfort of your home.
	Brian.
	Well, two years ago during the False Flags and Conspiracies Conference, after days of research, I was able to tell people that within four years after 9-11 and the Patriot Act, the Homeland Security spending more than doubled from $21 billion to the mid-40s and then kept climbing to about $70 billion by 2011.
	The FBI's budget jumped over 30% in one year and the intelligence community's budget roughly doubled over the decade.
	Defense and Homeland Security together explain almost all of the shift.
	All of them shifted from budget surpluses to deep deficits very, very fast.
	In other words, from 2001, the Patriot Act was the largest spending structure America had ever seen.
	By consolidating the agencies, it took the budget from where it was, which was about 30 billion, up to 800 billion where it's at today.
	So the Patriot Act 9-11 was a massive, basically, the right way to put it is it was a manufactured consent operation that allowed the government to run totally out of control with the budgets for years and years and years.
	Last year, I did something on something a little more obscure, which was alternative technologies.
	And this year, I'm going to come back to you with some very interesting information about cultural assimilation, which is, in an essence, exactly what has been happening to us with the media over the last 30 and 40 years and with academics trying to get us to assimilate to a new government-controlled reality and how that's different from where it used to be.
	We're going to explore all that in this year's False Flags and Securities conference.
	I'm speaking on Sunday at 5 p.m.
	It'll probably take me about 40 to 45 minutes to go through the information I have.
	Which I mean, there's time for questions because everyone has a 55-minute segment.
	Excellent.
	Meanwhile, let me find an additional story I want to throw in.
	Okay.
	We got some hot stories today, Antela.
	We're sharing.
	Yes.
	Here it is.
	Can you get me hotter?
	Can you see it?
	Can you see this?
	Okay.
	Judge Jevly Sachs.
	If this doesn't control your glucose today, I will pay you $1 million live on my show.
	It may sound exaggerated.
	Just to invade Western Europe is an insanity.
	Why don't the Japanese get diabetes?
	While you're stabbing yourself with needles, they're using something you already have in your kitchen.
	End of the era is the end of the Western dominance over the world system.
	And this is a dominance that began with the European empires and then transferred to the U.S. Empire after World War II.
	But that dominance essentially lasted from around 1750 to around 2000.
	So around 250 years.
	You could add one more 250-year period, helpfully.
	Starting in 1500, European imperial expansion began.
	That's with the voyages of Columbus and Vasco da Gama.
	So the voyages both to the West and to the East from Europe led to the beginning of the European global expansion.
	But Europe had its rivals, especially in the old world.
	In the new world, people succumbed to the old world diseases mainly.
	But in the old world, Asia didn't simply succumb to Europe, but over a period of around 250 years, European powers gained their ascendancy.
	And Britain became the dominant of all of the European empires by the 19th century with the defeat of Napoleon.
	So we all grew up in the age when it was taken for granted that Europe and then after 1945, Europe and the U.S., quote, ran the world.
	And indeed, in 1950, if you looked at the global landscape, the vast wealth, the financial power, the technological power, the new atomic age, everything. was in this Western-led world plus the Soviet Union.
	But China, India, Africa, Latin America had no discernible role.
	Actually, quite interestingly, the Western world also reached a peak of its share of world population, not only power.
	But we should remember that Europe relative to Africa and the Middle East was much more populous then than today in relative terms.
	Europe was a larger population than Africa and its Middle East neighborhood.
	Now it's half the population of those two.
	So I was born in 1954 in a European-led world.
	There was a Cold War and a very dangerous one between the Soviet Union and the United States-led world.
	But there was absolutely no doubt that this was a Western-dominated world.
	The main point, I think we see it in a hundred different ways, is that that is over.
	And it ended actually probably a quarter century ago, but it wasn't noticed as such.
	After the demise of the Soviet Union, while a new multipolar world was actually emerging, especially with the rise of China, but not only the rise of China, also the economic growth of India and others, the United States was asserting something quite different, which is not only is it the Western-led world, the U.S. now is the only superpower in the world.
	It became the unipolar world.
	And this was a great delusion and a great arrogance and very badly mistimed because people in Washington are not very clever to begin with.
	I can absolutely assure you, it's not a snipe remark.
	They just absolutely don't know what they're doing.
	But in any event, they asserted their unipolarity at precisely the time that the Western-led world was coming to an end.
	And so we've been at a clash of reality and arrogance for a quarter century, where the United States and even vestigially Europe, and within Europe, I have to say Britain, which is the craziest of all in terms of the gap between reality and image or delusion, thought the West runs the world.
	We can tell Putin what to do.
	We can tell Xi Jinping what to do.
	We can tell Modi what to do.
	We can tell Lula what to do.
	We can tell anyone what to do because we are the West.
	We are the United States and the reality of a world in fundamental change.
	Two points about the fundamental change that I think are worth noting.
	First, and I find it stunning and counterintuitive because of the bubble that we live in in the West.
	But if you add the population of the United States, which is about 340 million people right now, the population of the European Union, the population of the UK, so that North Atlantic world, you come to something around 900 million people, slightly more than 10% of the world population.
	If you want, and I think it's wrong, but if you want to say that the U.S.-led world includes Japan and Korea, because I don't think that will be true for long, if you want to add Australia and New Zealand, and you can add Singapore if you want, and a very few other places, you get to around 12% of the world population.
	Well, this should tell us something to begin with.
	How could 12% of the world population in today's world in which technology is everywhere, in which the internet is everywhere, in which capacities, nuclear weapons have spread to nine countries in the world and on and on.
	How could it ever be that 12% of the world thinks that it runs the world anymore, that the others don't have a view, don't have power, don't have capacity to resist unilateral demands?
	This is the backdrop for me of everything that we're seeing, that we are in a delusion in our English language, Western media ignorant, politically ignorant world in which Washington, Brussels, London, Berlin, Paris think that this is the center of the world.
	And honestly, 100 years ago, it was, for good and for bad.
	But it ain't now, not even close.
	And so we have two major groupings.
	You discussed them at length yesterday beautifully.
	The BRICS, which is nearly half the world population and half the world GDP.
	And that is a grouping that includes the original five, Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa, but now includes Egypt and Ethiopia, Iran, the Emirates, Indonesia.
	And that's a worldwide group stretching from Brazil to China.
	So it includes South America, it includes Africa, it includes the Middle East, it includes Russia and Asia.
	And we have the Shanghai Cooperation Organization, which began very much as an Asian Eurasian group, but an East Eurasian group of China, India, Russia, and the four of the five countries of Central Asia, Kyrgyzstan, Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, and Tajikistan, and Belarus added, Indonesia, and a number of partners.
	But that's an Asian grouping.
	And as you said, these two are very closely related.
	They each have nearly half the world population, not exactly the same membership, but they have two overriding realities to them.
	One is they're the fast-growing part of the world economy, and that itself is worth saying something about.
	And second, they don't want to be told what to do by Donald Trump.
	And the best phrasing of that was by President Lula of Brazil, who said a few months ago, we don't need an emperor.
	And this is the basic point, which is they're not even anti-American, by the way.
	That is a basic fundamental misunderstanding.
	They'd actually like normal relations.
	The point I've been making to all of them for years is you can't trust the United States on this because the U.S., till today, in its delusion, is aiming for hegemony, clearly.
	It's not a propaganda.
	It's the stated policy of the United States to have what they call primacy or what the military calls full spectrum dominance.
	This is the idea.
	I'm trying to say in Washington for 20 years, you guys are crazy because you're the U.S. alone.
	Okay, you're 4.2% of the world.
	We are not in 1945 or 1950 or even 1990.
	China is bigger than the U.S. economy, properly measured.
	That's not a myth.
	That's a reality.
	China is far bigger in industrial capacity.
	And if you go to China, as I do several times a year, China is ahead of the United States on many technologies, not all, but many technologies, and notably technologies that the world really needs right now.
	It will dominate electric vehicles for 20 years to come.
	It will absolutely dominate solar power production, which it has essentially no rivals in the world.
	It will dominate zero emission ocean shipping, something of interest to Greece and interest to the world, because it makes the ships.
	The United States doesn't make the ships.
	Europe doesn't make the ships except in much, much smaller numbers.
	And you could go down a long list of technologies like this.
	Well, I think he may be wrong about the technologies because I do not think the future, there's a future for electric vehicles, for example.
	But his overarching point to wit, that the United States and the West are losing out to BRICS, and the Shanghai Cooperative Organization appears to be overwhelmingly correct.
	So in terms of world trends, I think Jeffrey Sachs has exactly right.
	And Washington is living in a bubble of delusion.
	Joachim, your thoughts.
	Yeah, I agree up to a point with Jeffrey Sachs.
	I believe that, yes, there is a delusional element to thinking, oh, we're so powerful and arrogantly powerful, a hegemon still that's controlling the world.
	Yeah, there's a certain amount of that.
	But I also look up higher and realize that the Washington and the leaders of the world, quote, leaders are mere puppets.
	And they follow City of London, Wall Street, the banking infrastructure that largely controls this world still.
	And I maintain that basically the bloodlines that have been in control a long time have realized that the West is going down, but they're part of the West going down.
	They saw the large middle class of the West as a big obstacle to one world government.
	Because, hey, we've had it pretty good as far as freedom goes.
	The rest of the world, the world that's been, quote, third world and controlled by imperialism, they figure they will adhere to our dictatorship, one world government dictatorship.
	The ones that are the troublemakers for us, this is the powerful, are the West, America, Europe.
	So, yeah, I see it like that.
	They're doing suicidal actions on the puppets to maintain that we're going down very, very quickly now.
	It's all by design to get rid of the biggest resistance to one world government.
	That's how I see it.
	Right.
	Rarely am I forced to think on this level, but I will tell you what I think.
	The U.S. has been a hegemon for a long, long time.
	The U.S. dollar has controlled buy, sell, and trade agreements between nations and for minerals and precious rights for a long, long time.
	The rest of the world is feeling exhaustion from Team America World Police, but Team America World Police has worked hard to build our position.
	Now, unfortunately, we built our position using intelligence agencies, backdoor payoffs, blackmail operations.
	We are not sitting on the moral high ground anymore.
	We're almost tied to Israel at the hip from here on out.
	So, either our team wins or our team is forced into some sort of major catastrophe that drives us back into a constitutional cocoon where we belong, where we should have been from the very, very beginning.
	We had all these aspirations to run the world, and we did a good job of it for a long, long time.
	The problem that the world has right now is that BRICS doesn't have a strong enough leader to gather all the nations together.
	So, what I expect and what I've been waiting for, based on prophecy, based on instincts, and based on the signs of the times that I've been doing current event analysis on for years,
	is that the next step here is to gather the governments together underneath one evil one-world partnership, and that's going to take a catastrophic threat to all the world's governments to get them to join together under a single structure and a single leader.
	Folks, that man will probably be the Antichrist or some version of the Antichrist.
	Now, once that happens, there'll be the centralized bank digital currencies.
	There'll be the social media structures that go into place that tell you what you have to adhere to.
	There'll probably be a combination of religion as well as government that's mixed into one.
	There'll probably be a new code of laws that's artificially generated related to artificial intelligence.
	There'll probably be new licensing statutes that require all of our media companies and all of our vendors to comply.
	I expect that the Vatican's been working on it for a long, long time, and the occultic secret societies that have been building these structures out for generations will finally have their opportunity to drive through Project Blue Beam or whatever it happens to be that's going to end up being that one world threat that's going to drive the opportunity for all the world's governments to combine and fight off this major threat.
	I expect the smaller players to be squeezed out very, very quickly.
	And I expect the intelligence agencies to continue to absolutely, utterly dominate with political blackmail as long as politicians are willing to take a check for power.
	That's going to take place.
	So I think it's going to descend into a deeper, darker evil than we've ever imagined.
	And I think the regular people are going to be squeezed out much, much more.
	But we need to be prepared, which is why we need to basically steal our minds, put them through the furnaces, make sure that we're prepared for whatever trouble's going to come and do everything we possibly can to help the poor, the weak, and the broken, and the mentally ill so that when this whole thing shakes out, we're not the ones that end up in the pit of hell.
	Wow.
	What a statement, Brian, for concluding truth versus news today.
	Don, take us out.
	Yeah, I didn't take it out.
	You guys took me out.
	This is this real expedition going here into the future.
	It's going to be something.
	It looks like it's going to be something we got to prepare for, prepare for the worst.
	So here we are.
	Truth versus news on the 1st of December with Christmas Stuart and everything else.
	But why golly, this world needs to be woken up.
	And hopefully we have done that today.
	So come on back next week if you can and share this widely in all kinds of media because this kind of message needs to get out and you can do it.
	We can't do it all by ourselves.
	God bless.

▲