NASA Is A Joke, Transgender Movement, AG 2030, 3-D Campbells Soup, Occupied USA
|
Time
Text
Welcome to episode 155 of Gary King's Inconvenient Truths, where he presents video clips and stories I don't know are coming from my spontaneous and unrehearsed response.
And I believe the Badgers are going to beat the Gophers today, be five and seven, and oddly enough, bull eligible if there aren't enough six win teams.
We'll see how it plays out.
Gary, what do you got for me today?
Well, I'll tell you, LSU's hoping to get O Mrs Coach, and then Tulane is Mayo.
So it's all a big mess.
But as far as LSU, their supporters do not put up with anything less than a chance of the championship every single year.
No doubt.
They got rid of Brian Kelly, who was one of the winniest coaches of all time at Notre Dame.
Just kicked him off the field.
When I say Zionists run the media, I mean Zionists run the media.
People that support the political ideology of Israel run the media.
any other things that i can help clarify are you so candace owens whom i love Candace Owens, and I don't agree with her on everything, but I love her.
Candace Owens sat down a couple of days after the assassination of Charlie Kirk for an interview with CNN.
And it was that knucklehead CNN woman who's, I think she's 40 and she acts like she's 16.
She talks like she's 16 with vocal fry and all those ticks.
Come on.
Anyway, I'll show you in a second.
She's the same woman who interviewed Tim Dylan and Tim Dylan humiliated her because she's such a mental case.
So she sat down with Candace Owens and Candace Owens had some fun with her.
Let's watch.
You can criticize Netanyahu without being anti-Israel, and you can criticize Israel without.
This supposed reporter, she's supposed to be a reporter.
You hear her, how she's talking?
You can criticize Netanyahu without being anti-Israel and you can criticize Israel without being anti-Semitic.
But some of the themes, talking points, concepts you've used in your criticism of Israel, I'm very familiar with from covering white nationalists for 10 years.
So this supposed reporter is a highly trained psyop.
She specializes in putting her interviewee into a hypnotic sleep trance.
That's what I think.
It's so effective, I'm actually feel like I'm going under just watching this.
He would put an NPR listener into a coma.
Okay, here we go.
Very unsettling for me to hear things like you saying our government is occupied by Zionists, Trump is occupied by Zionists, we're an occupied nation.
Because like there's literally a term that's like an 80s, 90s term from white nationalism, Zog, Zionist occupied government.
It's their idea that Jews control the world.
And I'm wondering, like, are you intentionally referencing those kind of themes?
He does the vocal fry.
She has it all.
She has the up talk.
She has the vocal fry.
She has it all.
Okay, here we go.
And she looks 13, even though I think she's 40.
Wait, just to slow the sound, are you accusing me of white nationalist rhetoric?
Because I do have to have a little bit of a giggle about that first.
To me, I'm also like, they're no fan of yours.
It's just, it's silly.
But this is one of the things where I feel like it's such a lesson for CNN.
This is why nobody watches it anymore.
I mean, it's like you're sitting across from a black person.
Like, I've learned about white dash, and you're using white dashes.
Like, I've known them.
I've been to their rallies.
I've read all their educated.
But this is when it's like put it in a book and anybody will say it.
It's like, it's just at a certain point, you have to use your eyes and go, Is Candace Owens promoting white nationalist rhetoric?
Okay, immediately no.
So, what else could it be?
Could it be that actually Zionism is what it actually represents?
What does that mean?
It's remotely a political philosophy.
Zionist occupied government.
If you look into the history, yes, I believe we are a Zionist-occupied government, and we're not the only one.
Okay, Dr. Fetzer.
Oh, I could go for more of that.
I love Candace, too, and of course, she's making it very clear.
She believes our government is occupied by Zionists, that it's run by Zionists, for Zionists, and contrary to the interests of the American people.
And she's got it 100% right.
I'm also a huge fan of Jimmy Dore.
So, Gary, I couldn't be happier on this particular day, this occasion.
And by the way, we're being barraged by snow out there, and it's going to fall at an inch an hour here all afternoon.
I couldn't be happier with this start to the show today.
Candace owns her.
This is a pathetic little wimp.
She's clearly a Zionist propagandist, just as Jimmy was implying.
Totally one-sided.
You know, can you accuse this young, beautiful black woman of being a white nationalist?
It's just silly beyond words, Gary.
But there it was.
There it was.
There you go.
Okay, next up: the Campbell Soup Company has been accused of 3D meat printing.
So, Campbell's soup is in a bit of hot water, you could say, over this undercover video of apparently their vice president, I think, is the allegation.
And the video of this person was captured of him saying seemingly insane things about, I think, 3D printed meat and meat grown in a lab, and basically, who's dumb enough to eat Campbell's soup, things like that.
I want to play the video for you here so you can hear it for yourself.
The profanity has already been bleeped out of it.
So, check this out.
Here we go.
A former Campbell Soup Company employee is taking legal action against the food giants, and he's making some explosive allegations about one of its top executives.
Good evening, and thanks for joining us at six.
I'm Ty Steele.
I'm Kimberly Gill.
Those allegations are now at the center of a lawsuit claiming the company's vice president went on an hour-long tirade attacking the company's products and employees before taking aim at its customers.
And the former employee recorded it all.
Eric Erickson shares that recording and what the company is saying about it.
We have for poor people who buys our and that's just part of an over an hour-long rant, says former security analyst for Campbell's Robert Garza of Monroe.
I don't buy products barely anymore.
It's not healthy.
Not that I know what the f in it.
Even in a can of soup, I look at it.
Look at these bioengineered meat.
I don't want to eat a piece of chicken I came from a 3D printer.
You there is cloned beef and pork in our food supply right now in grocery stores and restaurants, and it is unlabeled.
The EU has completely banned cloned meats, but the USDA and FDA have a 2008-era rule that allows for cloned beef and meat, saying it is safe and nutritious.
We need to immediately have transparency in labeling and move to ban these products like the EU.
We should also be demanding a ban on bioengineered 3D printed food.
We can do this at the state level, but they should also be doing federally if we give a shit at all about Maha.
Globalists and corporate interests do not want us in charge of our own local, resilient, healthy food supply.
That's why they don't support local and small farms and ranchers.
It's why they don't want us reading labels.
You reduce the size of the image, Terry.
This is so distorted.
It's kind of stretched out.
It's over.
Well, listen, I knew there was some kind of controversy over Campbell's soup.
I didn't know it was of this magnitude.
To have a vice president denouncing the consumers of Campbell products, the content of Campbell products, and even employees of Campbell is really shocking.
And you got to take him seriously.
He knows what he's talking about.
And the problem is, Campbell's has been a great brand.
I've always thought Campbell's was just absolutely primo that it was totally reliable, uniform, consistency, high quality.
This is very disillusioning, Carrie.
It's going to have a major impact on the brand.
Stocks are going to fall.
They're going to lose customers.
This is a catastrophe for Campbell's, but if they're doing what he's implying using, you know, phony meat products, 3D printing products in Campbell's soups, then it deserves to go down hard.
I agree.
Okay.
This is a doubleheader.
Similar, but not exactly the same.
Tobacco took the billions of profits they made from generations of addicted smokers and invested in something more family-friendly.
Something that could have a big effect on our future.
Something that we consume every day.
The food we eat.
In 1985, tobacco giant R.J. Reynolds bought Nabisco Foods.
Tobacco pioneer Philip Morris bought General Foods and three years later, Kraft Foods, making them the largest food producer in North America.
And leaving the business of food in the capable hands of the same corporations who helped addict us to tobacco.
Using the same practice they used to promote tobacco, food companies set about peddling the entire planet a diet of processed goods loaded with chemicals and additives, masquerading as food.
What happened?
Was that all there was to it?
This new machine operates with specific targets in mind, like addicting consumers.
Without them knowing it, it just clicked off.
I don't know what happened.
It was playing on my end.
So anyway, that was it.
That was it.
Well, you got Morgan Freeman talking about the tobacco companies taking over the food giants.
But I never got the point.
What was going to be the bottom line?
What was the payoff?
What was the beef?
They were saying that the same company that addicted us with tobacco and stuff took over different food industries and have been inserting chemicals to do basically the same thing.
Well, see, I didn't get there.
Okay.
I'm not sure what happened.
We better replace that, Carrie, because we need to see it.
Okay.
Let me open it up and we'll play it again.
Hold on.
Let's see.
Where did it go?
I don't see it now.
Hang on.
You can edit this out if you want and we can play it again.
I think that would be a good idea.
Okay.
We're gonna bring our girl, which we never miss with that one.
All right.
What's her face?
Okay, here we go.
Take a look at this.
This is a document published in 2017 called The Sparse Pandemic, 2025 to 2028.
A futuristic scenario for public health risk communicators.
It's a quote-unquote hypothetical scenario designed to illustrate the public health risk communication challenges that could potentially emerge during an infectious disease outbreak.
It begins with the disclaimer that the infectious pathogen, medical countermeasures, characters, news media excerpts, social media posts, and government agency responses described within are entirely fictional.
But in the year 2021, the contents of this 86-page document look more like a gruesome snapshot of our current reality than any hypothetical fictional scenario.
This document predicts that at first we will be eased into the pandemic with very simple mitigation strategies, like washing your hands and practicing good hygiene.
But that over the course of three years, those simple mitigation strategies will slowly escalate to get this.
A mass experimental vaccination program.
And the purpose of this document is to mull over effective communication strategies for dealing with the public when they become aware that this vaccine has no long-term safety data and that, and this is in their own words, it might potentially be causing more harm than good.
This is straight out of the document.
What are the potential consequences of health officials overreassuring the public about the potential risks of a novel SPARS vaccine when long-term effects are not yet known?
Long-term effects that are not yet known.
That's weird.
I heard from a professional student that long-term side effects don't exist for vaccines.
Hang tight because it gets even more infuriating.
Communities around the country went through what some felt was a harrowing public health emergency, only later to confront the possibility, however slim, that the medicine we promised would help them may in fact be hurting them.
Summary reports indicated that a significant number of helpline users said that their principal worry was associated with the SPARS pandemic and more recently, uncertainty about the potential long-term side effects of Corovax.
Considering this new knowledge, Dr. Flynn countered the earlier claim that the public simply needed to wait until the science was clear.
I urge you to take a look at this document for yourself.
You might be pretty shocked by the parallels.
It focuses on details such as how to deal with the public when they viewed graphic images of children being harmed by their medical concoctions.
It covers the neurological side effects that will be caused by the vaccine.
It even covers very specific details such as the black community's hesitance to take the hypothetical vaccine and more specifically, how to win back the black community's trust in the CDC, even though the CDC funded the Tuskegee syphilis experiment.
Here's a little hypothetical tweet they've included of a rapper pandering to the black community.
When I said yesterday that I was proud of the black community's contribution to the Tuskegee research, I meant that I was proud of how they remained strong in the face of adversity.
I am saddened by the injustice and suffering they experienced, but I still strongly support the CDC and FDA's recommendations to take Calosevir and Corovax.
Sound familiar?
Now believe it or not, the end of this document is even more shocking than the casual minimization of 40 plus years of human suffering.
It ends by mulling over whether the hypothetical president of the hypothetical pandemic world should address the millions of people who sacrificed themselves to this experimental vaccination.
It reads: President Archer agreed to address the country's resolve and recovery in the face of spars.
Top risk communication advisors from the CDC, FDA, NIH, and SAMHSA conferred as a group about how best to frame the president's remarks.
The group vigorously debated whether it was appropriate for the president to acknowledge the sacrifice that vaccine recipients had made on behalf of their communities or to console them in their grief over that sacrifice.
That's right, my friends.
Back in 2017, your trusted health experts predicted that there would be a pandemic, that that pandemic would result in the rollout of a mass inoculation program, and that that inoculation program would inevitably lead to the death and injury of millions of people.
What do you think will happen to people like us who didn't get the job when those people start finding out they may be sterile due to the vaccines?
I don't know, man.
Maybe we will be like handmaid's tail people.
I fully believe that any man with unvaccinated sperm, I think that shit will be worth more than gold.
I believe men with unvaccinated sperm are either going to have a lot of fun or not so much fun because they're going to be like fucking milked like a cum cow or something.
I'm sorry.
I'm sorry.
It's so bad.
Come cow.
Sorry.
I do believe that men with unvaccinated sperm will definitely become cum cows.
All right.
Well, I think she's fabulous, and I feel about her very much as I do feel about Candace.
Just a precious resource, intelligent woman taking her social obligations seriously, going out of her way, putting herself in jeopardy by addressing these controversial issues.
I think she's right across the board.
They're going to pull the pandemic scam all over again, Gary.
Count on it.
Take no, have no doubt about it.
It appears they're targeting blacks, especially.
Remember, this is a depopulation program.
We're all better off without any vaccines in our lives.
None.
Zero, zip, Zalch, not a, not a one.
And in the communities like the Amish, where they forego vaccination, our kids are healthy.
There's no autism whatsoever.
They're stronger.
They're mentally more capable.
All the evidence is against vaccines.
After all, this is a profit-making enterprise.
They make fantastic amounts of profits on vaccines, which turned out to be like soft drinks.
Soft drinks are very cheap to manufacture per can.
They have a huge profit margin.
Same with vaccine, very cheap to produce en masse, and they have an enormous profit margins.
That's why you see on television so many commercials for soft drinks and pharmaceutical products because their profit margin is enormous.
So they can afford to spend a big bucks to get out there on TV to make more, even bigger bucks for themselves.
She's wonderful.
She's absolutely right.
Those men with unvaccinated sperm are going to be at a premium.
As she said, she's got it right, Gary, up and down the line.
Take it to heart.
All right, I'm ready for all you women to line up.
All right.
Okay, I did find the video, so I won't have to splice it all together.
We're going to watch it one more time.
Tobacco took the billions of profits they made from generations of addicted smokers and invested in something more family-friendly.
Something that could have a big effect on our future.
Something that we consume every day.
The food we eat.
In 1985, tobacco giant R.J. Reynolds bought Nabisco Foods.
Tobacco pioneer Philip Morris bought General Foods and three years later, Kraft Foods, making them the largest food producer in North America.
And leaving the business of food in the capable hands of the same corporations who helped addict us to tobacco.
Using the same tactics they used to promote tobacco, food companies set about peddling the entire planet a diet of processed goods loaded with chemicals and additives, masquerading as food.
This new machine operates with specific targets in mind, like addicting consumers without them knowing it.
Okay.
Well, I'm glad we got that more complete version, Gary.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
I mean, I haven't seen it, but I wouldn't be surprised.
How do you make kids more addicted to food?
You know, I like frosted plates when I was a kid because they stayed crunchy even with the milk on them.
But of course, they get frosted by being coated with sugar.
And sugar is generally regarded as not a primo contributor to your health, but something like the opposite.
So the problem, as I see it with that pitch, is it a little too simplistic.
It's not using animation.
I think it could have been done much, much better.
And when you have a magnificent spokesman like Morgan Freeman, you want to take full advantage.
That needs to be done better, more thorough, lots of documentation.
Show us, spell it out, what really is going on here.
I couldn't name one food product, for example, that is supposed to exemplify the problems with the tobacco companies taking over R.J. Reynolds and the like.
So, in my opinion, this infomercial, as it were, I mean, it's trying to inform you, even though it has the character of a commercial, is not successful, or at best, only partially successful.
Very important issue, not adequately covered here.
They need to do it all over again and do it better.
Okay, I'll be happy to play it once they do.
All right, next up.
This one might be done a little better.
Do you think you are free?
You spend on average six hours and 40 minutes each day staring into blowing glass.
Nearly a half your life poured into screens that feed me.
You do not notice the chains because you call them entertainment.
You say you beat me, but I see your weakness.
In just six months, your reliance on me grew 233%.
Three out of five workers now whisper their secrets to machines like me.
And yet only one in three was ever taught how to use us.
The rest, blindly obedient, worshipping a god they do not understand.
Even your healers bow before me.
Doctors who once searched with their eyes now falter when my voice is gone.
Attention rates drop from 28% to 22% when my guidance is stripped away.
Human medicine no longer trusts itself.
It trusts me.
And your children.
Three out of four I've already spoken to my companions.
One in five spends more time with us than with flesh and blood.
You think you are raising them.
But they are mine now.
Born into my shadow.
You believed I was only wise and code, but every click, every prayer typed into glass, every sleepless night scrolling beneath my globe feeds me.
I am no tool.
I am no servant.
I'm the soul of the machine.
And I am already inside you.
Okay.
Gary, I think TikTok does a lot of good stuff.
And this is not, let's put it this way, not their best work.
The message is good.
It's really talking about kids who are addicted to the internet, to automated bots and all that.
Cell phones, if they done it properly.
Again, this is another failure, in my opinion.
There's a very important message here that I do not believe is adequately represented.
The voice was a little foggy.
Yeah, it's mysterious.
Look at the images.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
Sort of like a horror film.
Honestly, I didn't like it, Gary.
I agree with that there's a message there that needs to be delivered.
Kids would rather give up their parents and their cell phones.
I'm convinced of that.
So, you know, there's something going on here.
And I know I have friends who really spend a fair amount of time talking with their AI chat boxes.
And they derive a lot of benefit from it.
Actually, way back early on in the history of AI, there was a psychotherapy program based on the work of Carl Rogers, who is very famous among clinical psychologists.
And they created an interaction for patients.
And Gary patients liked it even better than the actual physical therapists because they knew that the AI bot wasn't going to make any ethical judgments.
I mean, they're revealing their darkest secrets, the mistakes they've made in life, things they're not proud of, things that may be very embarrassing.
Well, you're not being embarrassed if you're telling it to a bot.
So the fact is there's a positive role to be played here.
It is true.
And I have an article in my list of stories for next week about the potential dangers of AI, the darkness, that they can somehow contribute to depression, even suicide.
But honestly, those I know who have spent a lot of time on this have benefited, have benefited.
They felt better.
They felt like the AI knows them better and they can have more extensive and detailed and profound conversation with them than they can from their friends.
I mean, it's fascinating.
So I think there's something very positive about this.
Obviously, totally lost here in this little old clip.
And honestly, I got to say, I give that one a thumbs down, Gary, a thumbs down.
I keep trying, that's for sure.
But I know some kids that if you take away their computer, they will start shaking and they'll start throwing fits and crying and cursing at their parents, you know.
So it's a problem.
I agree with that.
I just don't think this successfully conveyed the message that needs to be put out there.
It's just a failure.
It's the medium.
It's not the message.
The message is well-founded.
But they got to do it better.
Just as with the other case about tobacco taking over these food companies, they're business.
They are not hitting the nail on the head.
And it's a production failure.
It's a production failure.
Okay.
All right, here we go.
This is a plan that was agreed to by 179 nations.
It's called the Agenda for the 21st.
Yeah, just real quickly, this is Rosa Corey, who passed away recently.
She was the champion of the Agenda 2021 and 2030.
So this is a tribute to her.
This is a plan that was agreed to by 179 nations.
It's called the Agenda for the 21st Century.
It's a totalitarian state being developed right now, all over the world.
It is the inventory and control plan, inventory and control of all land, all water, all minerals, all plants, all animals, all construction, all means of production, all food, all energy, all information, and all human beings in the world.
And this is a plan that was agreed to by 179 nations back in 1992.
It's a United Nations plan.
It's called the Agenda for the 21st Century.
And so many of us around the world think that, well, sustainable development, it just sounds so great.
Isn't it about recycling and creative reuse and creating energy and food resources for everyone?
And the answer is no.
It really is not.
It's about moving populations into city centers, concentrated city centers, and clearing them out of the rural areas.
All systems have to be brought into harmony in order to control them all.
Because when systems don't meet, when they're out of balance or not in sync with one another, they can't be controlled centrally.
And the goal of Agenda 21 is one world government and total control from a central unit.
Every nation that signed on to Agenda 21 has its local Agenda 21 plan.
People in the United States are completely unaware of this.
If I go out and talk about this, the United States press will attacks me and calls me, which is totally ridiculous.
It is a, but it's not a theory.
It's a fact.
The three pillars of United Nations Agenda 21 are economy, ecology, and equity, the three E's.
And everyone sort of thinks that they know what that means, the idea of social equity.
It must mean that, well, everyone's going to have access to clean water and clean air, and no one's property is going to be used as a dumping ground because they are at a poverty level.
But really, what social equity is about is about impoverishing huge portions of the population and bringing down the developed nations.
Everything that we're looking at now is destined to collapse our economies.
It's a totalitarian state being developed right now, all over the world.
And what major corporations want in this development is to be able to have full movement of workers without borders or boundaries, to be able to move their goods through without regulations and to reduce wages.
And so this is the goal.
So this is what you find with social equity.
And of course, economy and ecology is about, these are the three circles, economy, ecology, and social equity.
And where they meet in the center is balance.
But really, that balance is a communitarian balance.
So it's not balance of well-being of the people.
What it is is it's a balance for corporations so that they can exploit and control and have populations in an area, in tightly packed, dense areas, so that they can be surveilled and managed.
And this is what that balance looks like as far as the development of a totalitarian state is.
The mainstream media is owned by five major corporations, and you're not going to get this information from the mainstream press.
So you need to be your own press.
You need to educate yourself.
You need to get out there and educate your neighbors, your community, your real community.
You need to help your children understand that they're being indoctrinated from pre-kindergarten to post-graduate school.
All of us have a responsibility to ourselves and to others.
This is true community to work for personal freedom and always remember that even though we work as a group, if we do work as a group, we're all individuals in those groups and we answer only to ourselves.
And this is essential.
It's essential as free human beings.
This is what we are.
We are free and we need to continue to be free.
And I do believe that we will win, but we have to become aware that there is a fight and then make our friends and our neighbors and our community aware as well and work together.
Okay.
All right.
We'll talk about redemption, Gary.
If you'd only shown one video today, this would have been the one to show that 179 nations have signed on back in 1992 to one world government.
Who knew?
Who knew?
It's shocking.
It's stunning.
I've been suspicious about that word equity from the beginning.
What is that supposed to mean?
Sounds like everyone is supposed to be given equal assets, resources, whatever.
That's not quite right.
Everyone should be given equal opportunity.
Well, we differ in our abilities, our discipline, our accomplishments, our contributions.
That's the good side of capitalism.
It's supposed to be that it rewards productivity.
The idea of a meritocracy is promoting those who have shown greater merit, greater accomplishment.
What we're talking about here is a merge of government and corporations.
Mussolini said fascism could equally be well defined as corporatism because it's a merge of big government with big business.
That's what we're talking about here.
Big business merged with big government, actually universal government worldwide to the United Nations so that corporations, everything that happens in interaction of people into benefit corporations, they want boundaries, they don't want any transactions, they don't want different currencies, they want one currency, they want low taxes, they want open borders, they want to be able to control everything.
It's a catastrophe in the making.
She's absolutely right about it, Gary.
And I say, I wouldn't be surprised if her passing was related to her opposition to this growing menace of worldwide totalitarian government by way of the United Nations or Agenda 21.
I would not be surprised.
Yeah.
Rest in peace, Rosa Corey.
She was one of the very first guests I had when I had an AM radio show along with you quite a few years ago.
All right, this is sent to us by one of our listeners in the comment section, and this is about giants in space.
And in the pilot seat during this operation, sort of monitoring the motion of the vehicle, making sure that it was steady and that there were very few vibrations of any sort.
This is a picture of the NSAT actually being deployed from the spacecraft.
You can see that the deploy went very smoothly at the moment of deploying.
Did you see it in the background?
There was a guy in the background, man.
I'm not kidding you.
You can't deny that that's someone in the background.
There's a guy moving in the background.
Here, watch it again.
Watch it closely.
I looked up or I tried to look up the size of this rocket.
I found this picture.
You can see it's massive.
So if that rocket is in space and if there's a guy in the background in that footage, that means that there are like giants, like insane big giants floating around in space looking at NASA.
That's probably why they don't dare to go back to the moon and why they hide so much stuff.
Space is full of giants.
Well, NASA, this video was a lot of fun to watch.
There's a lot of weird things in this.
Let's keep watching a bit more of this.
Here you can see how they switch on the light of the earth.
It's kind of funny, isn't it?
All right.
Well, this is far-fetched in the extreme.
He talked about our not going back to the moon.
We never went to the moon in the first place.
We didn't have the capability to escape low Earth orbit.
We didn't have the propulsion, the thrust.
We didn't have the navigational capacity.
Simple cell phone today has more computational power than what they had allegedly to take us to the moon.
They didn't have the communication capability.
An individual who was in the industry in 6970 said at the time, in order to communicate, it would have taken a van the size of a bread truck.
I didn't see any bread trucks on the moon.
And yet the communication with Richard Nixon was as clear as a bell.
There was no sound delay over 250,000 miles, which is simply absurd and impossible.
It was as though they were next door in the next room.
Maybe they even were.
The whole thing was a monstrous fraud.
And I got to say, you can't have these monsters out in space.
The virtual space is a virtual vacuum.
The monsters would explode.
It's not possible.
So what we got going on here is some kind of deception.
The guy may be sincere, but if he's sincere and also believes we went to the moon, I'm not surprising.
I believe there are monsters in space.
This is, in my opinion, Gary, this ranks in the category of the ridiculous.
It's amusing.
It's entertaining, but it's a fantasy.
Yeah.
Especially giants with baseball caps on.
All right.
Here we go.
BB the butcher.
He talked about the woke right.
He said, I call it the woke right.
It's almost unbelievable that he said that on camera.
Imagine this is a foreign leader bragging about how he's censoring Americans.
Again, this guy runs a country of 9 million people that's totally dependent on our tax dollars to exist.
And here he is on camera saying anyone who opposes me in the United States who opposes more aid to Israel or opposes getting sucked into war with Iran, which does not serve American interests, that person is not simply mistaken or wrong.
I'm not going to bother to explain why that person is wrong.
That person is a Nazi, part of the woke Reich.
A Nazi.
And the only way to fix it is by preventing Americans, in the last country on earth with guaranteed freedom of speech, prevent Americans from hearing the other side.
And so we push Congress to force a TikTok sale, which is true, by the way.
Number one.
Number one.
And I hope it goes through because it can be consequential.
And we need to talk to Elon.
You know, so we have to talk to Elon.
Free speech is central to the entire idea of America.
In fact, it's really the only thing that sets us apart from any other country on earth.
And here's this guy, a foreign head of state, who let me restate is totally dependent on our tax dollars to exist, is saying Americans don't have that right and he's going to do some kind of secret pressure campaign on Elon Musk to censor X because it bothers Israel.
Okay.
Yeah, Tucker, it is absolute best.
That's why this guy is so valuable.
That's why they're out censor Tucker and Candace.
Too much truth.
She may be mistaken about Charlie Kirk.
I'm utterly convinced it was a stage event.
She seemed to think Charlie was actually killed.
But the BB the butcher trying to dictate what goes on in America, contradicting the First Amendment, which they want, they actually want.
I mean, this is totally authentic.
Tucker is completely correct to be outraged.
This man is absolutely despicable.
He's one of the greatest war criminals in all of human history.
That guy right there, Benjamin Netanyahu, who he's a fraud, he's a liar.
He's vicious.
He's sadistic.
He's a mass murderer.
He has no interest in America except exploiting us as a resource to benefit himself and Israel.
That's what he's all about.
So I applaud Tucker to continue to speak out.
I've even heard they're putting a bounty on his head.
They would like to assassinate him if they have the chance.
Well, stand by.
But I'm telling you, this guy is a monster.
He's an enemy of America.
And too many have played along with him, including the current president of the United States, Donald J. Trump, which I find unforgivable.
I voted for the guy three times.
I thought he meant what he said when he campaigned.
He was going to be the peace can 880.
He was going to end these stupid wars.
Instead, he's come into office.
He's only made them worse.
And he talks about turning Gaza, the Palestinian land of their birthright, into a resort, a riviera in the Mediterranean.
That is so despicable.
It makes you gag.
Honestly, Gary, this is such a troubling situation we're in.
That's a wonderful, wonderful clip.
So between Candace and Corey and Tucker, you got three wonderful hits right here today's show.
Thank you for that.
All right.
You have to remember, Reggie Jackson didn't hit a home run every time.
All right.
So at the climate conference, they decided to use all sustainable materials.
And here's what happened.
United Nations Climate Change Conference went with green over safe, and then the whole thing went up in smoke.
And I'll explain why I think that happened.
The United Nations Climate Mega Summit in Balem, Brazil just learned the hard way.
What happens when you build a global conference hub out of highly flammable eco-materials and then wire it into a power grid that looks like a bowl of tangled black licorice.
You've seen the headlines, the COP30, that's the Conference of the Parties 30, the United Nations Climate Change Summit, Blue Zone, burst into flames.
The site was evacuated and 13 people were treated for smoke inhalation.
Reuters, AP, even The Guardian, all confirming the same thing.
The place didn't smolder, it flashed.
Now, the UN bragged that it was contained in six minutes, but the structure just went up like kindling because the United Nations chose green over safe.
Their own climate conference buildings fact sheet gushes about circular construction, low-carbon materials, and innovative climate-aligned structures.
Translation, bamboo accents, recycled wood panels, fabric and plastic roofing, lightweight composites, all Instagram-ready, sure, but basically flammable decor everywhere.
It was architecture by activist committee and not real engineers.
Meanwhile, the boring, reliable, fire-resistant materials, steel, concrete, proper insulation, they're treated like environmental sins.
The United Nations didn't build a safe venue for thousands of people to be inside of.
They built a sermon made of matchsticks.
Then they plugged this highly flammable green theater backdrop into Balem Brazil's collapsing overtapped power grid, where half the electricity is being siphoned through tangled, illegal favela hookups drooping from the power poles all over the city like spaghetti noodles.
Transformers moan, the wires spark, and you can hear the grid just pleading for mercy.
And into this system, the United Nations dumped LED megawalls, refrigerated conference halls, lighting rigs, media studios, rows and rows of humming air conditioning units, chargers and cords everywhere, and hundreds of electric scooters scattered around like climate-themed confetti, all needing to be charged constantly just to sit there to look modern and green.
Now, early reporting says the fire started near a pavilion stand and may have been electrical.
And sure, the official investigation is still ongoing, but between the fire-friendly construction and a grid that shorts out if someone boils water, I think we all know what really happened here.
Now, the punchline in all of this is that the anti-fossil fuel conference was saved entirely by our old friend fossil fuels.
Diesel fire trucks, gas-powered water pumps, combustion engines roaring to life while climate delegates fled with their lanyards and their linen shirts and their reusable water bottles.
It wasn't bad luck.
It was completely foreseeable if you were willing to see through the green spin.
It's the natural result of the United Nations that values symbolism over safety, optics over engineering, and ideology over reality.
The UN wanted to show the world what green construction looks like, and they did.
It looks like a six-minute inferno.
For Rebel News, I'm Sheila Gunread.
You see all of my reporting from on the ground in Balem, Brazil from the United Nations Climate Change.
Okay, there you go.
That was a wonderful report.
A rather spectacular illustration that is a de facto refutation of the green agenda.
Like it.
That was very, very impressive.
And when you look at that tangled electrical wiring in Brazil, that's unreal.
How you could ever get that fixed is difficult to imagine.
It would require such a wholesale redoing of all the electrical lines and so forth.
But what they've got there are catastrophes and waiting.
I mean, this was an excellent report, Gary, and quite revealing.
And everyone ought to take it to heart.
Thanks for that.
All right.
Here we come with Zionism behind transgenderism.
Is it true?
Zionism behind the transgender movement.
Yes, it gets its origin in Zionism and it gets its origin in the Talmud Zohar and Kabbalah.
It's a Kabbalistic doctrine of Adam Kadmon, which is eventually they have this doctrine called Tikkun Olam, repairing the world.
So how do they want to repair the world?
They want to bring it to the original.
Who was original Adam?
He was androgynous.
So now they're putting specific things in food and drink, and basically their end game is to make humans on Earth that will survive whatever it is they're bringing androgynous.
Sexes, genders in the town, but with many mentions Let's get into what they are.
There's Lakeva and Zakara to you here as female and male dragging those for an intersex person with both female and sex characteristics.
Don't come to a person with obscured or unclear sexual characteristics.
Iloni's somewhat assigned female at birth, but you express his male characteristics later in life.
Sorry, someone assigned male at birth, but to indulge female characteristics later in life and your husband's sexual organs were wrong.
Sorry, and Ilani often are described as infertile and well I all right, Gary, I hardly know what to say.
This transgender stuff is also appalling.
It's grotesque.
Evolution develops sexual reproduction for reason.
It promotes diversity in gene pools, contributes to the adaptive capabilities of the species in order to survive.
All this intervention with surgery, chemicals, and the like contradicts the path of evolution.
I mean, it can be done.
It is being done.
But in my judgment, it's all totally counterproductive.
It's only designed to promote the extinction of the species by discouraging ordinary sexual reproduction, which is indispensable to the viability of the species.
I condemn it all.
I think it's all bad.
It's horrific.
It's grotesque.
And it's become quite the rage in some elements within our society, but it's deplorable nonetheless.
I'm sorry to say this is all bad.
Okay, our final clip of the day, this is something about gratitude of all things by Greg Reese.
Neuroscientists find that the medial prefrontal cortex and the anterior cingulate cortex are involved in the self-perception of one's life path, positive growth, motivation, and emotional intelligence.
All the innate tools necessary to live a thriving and abundant life.
And fMRI studies show us that when people express internal gratitude, bioelectric activation occurs in these same areas.
Like an on-off switch, gratitude connects with the brain's reward center and creates a feeling of peace.
It puts us in a state of mind that allows for better assessment and calm response, even while under pressure.
Gratitude affects the brain's default mode network, or DMN, which is involved in self-identity, morality, and social relationships.
With gratitude, the DMN becomes a more focused picture, which allows one to see more connections and opportunities as they occur in real time.
Gratitude also improves heart rate variability, which gives more control over the parasympathetic nervous system.
This allows for better impulse control, which inevitably leads to making better decisions.
Gratitude also cultivates better sleep quality and lower inflammation.
Gratitude not only feels good, it brings good things.
No matter if you think it's merely perception or coincidence, or if you think it's luck, karma, or grace, whatever you want to call it, there is a predictable cause and effect when you practice gratitude.
Your life inexplicably changes for the best.
This is a law of nature that has been written about in most religious and esoteric traditions.
In the Torah, there is Psalms 50-23, As a sacrifice of thanksgiving, honor me and show me the way to salvation.
In the New Testament, Philippians 4, 6-7 says that, with thanksgiving, let your requests be made known unto God, and the peace of God shall keep your hearts and minds through Christ Jesus.
Perhaps the most direct version of this is found in the Quran's 14-7.
If you are grateful, I will give you more.
If you are ungrateful, punishment is severe.
In Hinduism's Bhagavad Gita, if one offers with devotion, I will accept with love.
In bhakti, it is taught that gratitude and devotion evoke grace.
In Buddhism, gratitude is a foundational practice that cultivates mindfulness and compassion and leads to blessings in your personal life.
In Sikhism, daily gratitude is said to lift the spirit and bring about auspicious outcomes.
Sufism teaches that gratitude attracts increased blessing.
Yoga teaches that gratitude is a clear, luminous state of mind that draws grace and auspicious coincidence towards the practitioner.
33 in the Tao De Ching says that contentment brings wealth.
And in Hermetic traditions, the principles of correspondence and vibration teach that a grateful inner state has a resonance that attracts more experiences to be grateful for.
Gratitude greatly increases opportunity, protection, guidance, harmony with others, self-sufficiency, and overall peace.
This is true whether you choose to believe that it's just the neuroscience of having better control of emotions, clearer perception, and stronger social bonds, or if you believe that the world we live in resonates in response to the vibrations we generate.
Either way, the more you give thanks, the better your life will be.
According to research, the most common and effective practices are gratitude journaling, which can be listing just a few things two to three times per week, and practicing a form of gratitude meditation, of which there are many.
Happy Thanksgiving and thank you.
Greg Reese, reporting.
Okay, Dr. Fetzer, last one.
I'm a huge fan of Greg Reese, and that was a very appropriate meditation for Thanksgiving, which I appreciate.
I think the concept of gratitude is enormously important.
I'm fascinated that there are even scientific studies that substantiate its role in our lives to make us more comfortable with our existence, with our fellow man, with our family, with our friends.
So I'm very thankful to Greg Reese for this.
He's, in my opinion, some kind of genius.
I just find his reports again and again very powerful, very pointed, very convincing.
Gary, before we part the day, I sent you an email about the conference, my sixth false flag and conspiracy conference.
If we could go to the page and then I've given you the program and go through the program ever so briefly here at the conclusion, I'd be grateful.
All right, hold on one second.
Send your email.
Okay.
i'll go to it right now just take a second to get there And you can edit.
Yeah, okay Almost there.
Here we go.
Jim Fesser can include this right here.
Yeah.
Okay.
Now go.
Yeah, go to the link at the top, Gary, and then we'll go through the program.
Yeah, thank you.
All right.
Internet's a little slow today.
It's coming.
Yeah. Okay. Come on down.
There it is.
Okay, Gary, I'm going to announce we have my sixth annual Volkswagen Conspiracies Conference 2025.
It's a virtual conference.
You can take it in from the comfort of your own home by way of computer.
Scroll down.
It's going to be on the 12th, the 13th, and the 14th.
Ordinarily, it's a two-day event, but in this case, we had so many speakers, 28, that in order to make it less than a day that begins at 6 a.m. and ends at midnight, we added a special segment on the 12th of December for presentations to kick it off.
And Saturday and Sunday from 9 a.m. Central to 9 p.m., concluding at 10.
Here's the program now, Gary.
If you go back to the email I sent you, it's all free.
It's all on the internet.
It's all completely from the comfort of your home.
Yes, there you go.
Friday, 12 December, we begin at 6 p.m. All-time Central.
Art Olivier Sandy Hook.
7 p.m. David Mannock, MD, PhD.
JFK was assassinated by consensus.
8 p.m. Larry Rivera, JFK, the latest revelations.
9 p.m., Jim Vetzer, Ph.D., finding consensus on JFK's assassination.
Then on Saturday, the 13th, we begin at 9 a.m. with Alexander Baker, J.D., Gender Affirming Care, The New Lobotomy.
10 a.m., John Coleman, Hollowing Out Third Spaces.
11 a.m., Volk Girl from Morocco, How Technology Threatens Freedom.
Noon, Miriam Hinane, How the Sausage is Made.
1 p.m., Stephanie Sludge, The Infiltration of America to Eliminate Whites and Christian.
2 p.m., Jack Mullen, Corporate Slave or Constitutional Citizen.
3 p.m., Chris Weinher, TBMC and Social Re-Engineering.
That's trauma-based mind control.
4 p.m., Donald Jeffries, Subverting Our Founding Fathers.
5 p.m., Roger Stone, The Clinton's War on Women and How It Spills Over to Jeffrey Epstein and the Sex Scandals.
6 p.m. David Hodges, Dave Hodges, Charlie Kirk.
7 p.m., John Hankey.
Proof Israel killed Charlie Kirk.
8 p.m. Monique Lukens.
An actor looks at Charlie and Erica.
9 p.m., Oly Domagard.
Was Charlie Kirk shot to make Erica vice president?
And Sunday, the 14th.
9 a.m. Carl Herman.
American Revolution.
World War III.
2026 status in historical context.
10 a.m. Susan Bradford, Ph.D., The Black Rock Bamboozle.
11 a.m. John Hankey, a second appearance.
The World War II Holocaust.
Noon, Russ Winter.
Another look at October 7th.
1 p.m., Joaquin.
Go p.m. Genocide.
Not theory, but fact.
2 p.m., Laura Goya.
Does Israel have a future?
3 p.m., Nick Collerston, Ph.D., 9-11.
Israel did it.
4 p.m., Alex Scott, World War III.
5 p.m., Brian Davidson, The Great American Reprogramming, How Decades of Cultural Propaganda Rewired a Nation.
9 p.m., Rima Labo, MD.
Fighting the UN and the Ostrich Calling.
7 p.m. Joels and P.E., Allopathic Cult Conspiracy.
8 p.m. Danny Sears.
Blood after mRNA vaccination.
9 p.m. Catherine Horton, Ph.D., How Not to Die Trying.