Truth vs. NEW$, Inc Part 1 (24 Nov 2025) with Don Grahn, Brian Davidson and Joachim Hagopian
|
Time
Text
This is truth versus news incorporated.
And today is the 24th of November.
Just three days away from Thanksgiving Day.
And I think we have a lot to be thankful for.
For one thing, we have a great show here.
And I'm really thankful for Jim Fetzer, the host of this show.
Quite a gentleman and honor.
And he's just the best person in the world who wrote books like this, American Nuke on 9-11.
Facebook, but this book movie died at Sandy Hook.
And how about JFK?
These are just history marks you've got to have in your library.
So, Jim, you're just fantastic.
And we really, I'm so proud of you and everybody else.
I'm very thankful also for Brian Davidson out of Texas.
He's a very short private detective who hunts down and finds things and reports them well.
And also we have Joaquim Gopian all the way from Bali over there in Indonesia.
And he is a great writer and West Point graduate and has got a lot of insights on things that we need to know about that only he can relate well.
But so Jim, let's get going.
I guess we have a little bit to tell about Marjorie Taylor Greene.
Is that where we're starting?
It's quite a shock and to me, a personal calamity in my opinion.
She was one of the pillars of integrity in the Congress along with Thomas Massey.
Her decision to retire, to resign from Congress came as a major shock.
Here's a bit of a story about it.
Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia, a loyal supporter and critic of President Trump, who faces potential retribution if she sought reelections that Friday.
She's resigning from Congress in January.
Here we can hear Marjorie and her thanks to the American people and put America first.
And I have fought against Democrats' damaging policies like the Green New Deal, wide open deadly unsafe border policies, and the trans agenda on children and against women.
With that has brought years of non-stop, never-ending personal attacks, death threats, lawfare, ridiculous slander and lies about me that most people could never withstand even for a single day.
It has been unfair and wrong, not only to me, but especially to my family, but it's been wrong to my district as well.
I have too much self-respect and dignity.
I love my family way too much, and I do not want my sweet district to have to endure a hurtful and hateful primary against me by the president that we all fought for, only to fight and win my election while Republicans will likely lose the midterms, and in turn be expected to defend the president against impeachment after he hatefully dumped tens of millions of dollars against me and tried to destroy me.
It's all so absurd and completely unserious.
I refuse to.
I think it's very grossly unfair.
Trump made a terrible mistake, in my opinion.
Here we have a bit of discussion about what happened here.
Nobody was expecting this, but Marjorie Taylor Green has resigned from Congress.
She's one of the most outspoken advocates of the president, certainly a bombshell of a personality, somebody who's constantly going to the mat for the Republican Party, fighting various Democrat members of Congress.
I love having her on our show.
And perhaps even more striking, Nick Fulante is talking about Marjorie.
And now she's resigning, resigning midway through her term.
Very strange.
Very strange timing, very strange turn of events.
And so maybe she just withdrew because it got too difficult.
We'll talk about it tonight.
We'll work through her statement.
We'll talk all about the announcement.
It's a pretty big surprise.
Especially after this massive victory over the Jeffrey Epstein disclosure.
So they just won.
They just finished.
All right, guys, this is a massive story.
We're going to dive into this because there's a lot of different things going on.
But I want you to take a close listen to this quick statement from Marjorie Taylor Greene when she does resign.
I'll be resigning from office with my last day being January 5th, 2026.
And I look forward to seeing many of you again sometime in the future.
May God bless you all and may God bless America.
So Marjorie Taylor Greene says that she'll be resigning as of January 5th, 2026.
And that date's very important because January 3rd, 2021 is when she took office.
And you need five years in the House to get a congressional pension.
So because she's staying until past January 3rd, just by two days, she's going to get a pension from Congress.
So that part of the timing, I guess, makes sense because she wants to get her retirement.
But there's a lot of other questions that need to be answered.
Take a listen to these clips here and then we'll talk about it.
Marjorie Taylor Greene resignation, huge news.
And a big surprise, big shocker.
This came out of absolutely nowhere.
It makes no sense on some level.
Marjorie is relatively young.
I mean, she's an older woman, but she's relatively young for a Congresswoman.
And as far as I'm aware, I think she's more popular than ever.
She has easily won every election since her first election, I think in 2022 or 2020.
She's been around for a long time.
She's been learning the game.
She's been quite popular.
And like I said, the resignation follows her total and complete victory over Donald Trump concerning the bill, which will force the DOJ to release the Epstein files.
Donald Trump has been working overtime to cover up the Epstein files, to bury them, to distract people from them.
It is only this week that the bill finally passed, and it did so with the defections of four MAGA congressmen, Thomas Massey, Marjorie Greene, Lauren Bobert, and Nancy Mace.
Now, it's important to note that up until this point, President Trump had been attacking Marjorie Taylor Greene, but it was only when she was pushing for these Epstein files to be released that the president finally said he is removing his endorsement and he no longer supports her for re-election.
That obviously was a huge blow, but this was the straw that broke the camel's back.
Let's keep listening.
This was the latest and arguably the most intense conflict between Marjorie Green and President Trump to date.
It seemed that considering that Marjorie Greene has been one of Trump's closest friends and staunchest allies in Congress, one of the most conservative members of Congress.
And in fairness, the areas where Marjorie has broken with the president, these are areas where the president has broken with the people.
Marjorie disagrees with the president on H-1Bs, on bombing Iran, on foreign aid to Israel, and on the Epstein files.
These all happen to be MAGA, America-first issues.
These are America-first labor, corruption, and foreign policy issues.
And most of these things are things that Trump campaigned on himself.
He's not delivering.
And these are the areas where Marjorie has disagreed.
And it is worth taking note that Marjorie Taylor Greene cannot be attacked on her voting record.
She has 100% conservative rating from Conservative Review.
And it's pretty funny that Mark Levin actually started Conservative Review and was their editor-in-chief.
And he cannot stand Marjorie Taylor Greene.
But her record, as far as voting is concerned, is a perfect one.
In response, Trump has totally pulled the rug out from under her and declared an open war on her.
Marjorie retaliated against the president.
She replied and she said that because of the statement, she's been getting death threats.
She says that people are threatening her, harassing her, doxing her.
She's in fear for her life.
And Trump has totally dismissed that.
Now, the big news came today on Friday that she is resigning.
And she talked in her resignation message about this conflict.
She talked about how she's frustrated with the lack of change or willingness to change in Washington.
She wrote about how she is disappointed and saddened about the conflict with the president.
She also writes about the pressure she's under and the danger.
Now, President Trump had been asked about Marjorie Taylor Greene facing death threats and being scared for her life, and he made light of it and actually just called her a traitor.
Her life could be a danger because of the rhetoric.
Her life is in danger.
Who's that?
Marjorie Taylor Green, he said.
Marjorie Trader Green.
I don't think her life is in danger.
I don't think, frankly, I don't think anybody cares about her.
Okay.
That's just disgusting that he said that.
She'd been such a loyal supporter.
Meanwhile, Tucker talks about why people gravitate to Nick Fuentes.
I think it's just a terrific guy.
Well, it looks like all the screaming about Nick Fuentes on the internet is finally dying down a little bit.
It couldn't go on forever, though it seemed like it might.
And that's a good thing because, after all, there's a lot else going on in the world, some of it important.
And watching people day after day stand up to basically make the same point, I'm a good person, unlike him.
Not that interesting or edifying or even really informative.
And we definitely learned that there are quite a few professional conservatives who are not that conservative in any sense that really matters.
Some of them are fraudulent or sad or kind of stuck in nonprofit jobs because they can't get another.
And your sympathy goes out to them, but listening to them talk day after day really didn't teach us anything.
But it doesn't mean that there aren't lessons to be learned.
In fact, there's one really important lesson, and this was really the reason to interview Nick Fuentes in the first place.
And the lesson is that a lot of young men in America, mostly white, but not exclusively, listen to Nick Fuentes really carefully.
And the lesson that our professional bettors in Washington have drawn over the past few weeks is that means they're as bad as Nick Fuentes.
They're Nazis too.
But of course, they're not Nazis by and large.
They're just American young people.
And so the question is, and it's a pressing question if you care about the future of the country, why have they been listening to Nick Fuentes?
Sincerely?
Like, what is this?
Why aren't they listening to somebody from the Heritage Foundation or the Daily Wire?
Why do they believe Nick Fuentes more than they believe the people who think they ought to have a monopoly on the attention of young conservatives?
That is.
And I think the answer is pretty obvious.
Nick Fuentes is clearly sincere.
He cares about America.
He's not a Hemocrat.
He's not a double talker.
I think it's obvious.
Joaquin, your thoughts about Marjorie Taylor Greene.
I'm so distressed.
Well, I think that both Nick Fuentes and Candace Owen capture young America in general, especially conservative young America, and especially Americans that are so fed up with the Trump administration that have betrayed those of us who are America first,
who are demanding that our government represent the people, which is by Constitution designed to do.
But it's so far removed from that reality and has become, in my words, treasonous.
So there's very few that I see and can discern in Congress that are not traitors.
You know, so they're all bought and sold.
You know, I mean, America is so fed up with no government that has their interests and acts on their interests.
We are all so fed up.
So articulate young man, Nick Fuentes, comes along and captures the sentiment of a very disgruntled, angry, upset America.
And I'm not talking just young males or anything like that.
I'm talking about the majority of Americans are completely fed up with the politics of America that have sold out the interests of American citizens in favor of the Nazis in Israel that are committing genocide.
You know, I mean, we are so fed up with it.
So a guy like Nick comes along and boy, you know, and Candace, she's like the number one broadcaster on the internet in the world.
So, you know, these voices are people that speak to the masses of so upset people that want change, that want Trump to be the guy that he campaigned and won his presidency on, that we're not getting.
He's a complete traitor for Israel.
He's doing everything wrong against the people.
And, you know, I mean, and then the Marjorie Taylor, she represents among those very few select handful of House of Representatives senators that actually are for the people.
So of course, she follows in the same category.
She basically represents the interests and the sentiments and opinions of the people that are against Trump for being a fraud.
And she stands for all the right things.
She, like Nick and Candace, are against the Nazi order of the Zionists and speaks out articulately against that.
She's against war around the world, interventionism, which is the standard foreign policy for centuries of America.
We are fed up with it.
We don't want war.
Yet the government always goes to war.
And that's because they're sold out to the power interests of the world, the Rothschilds and the money changers.
That's what runs the world.
And so the U.S. puppet government does what they're told and they make war around the world.
We're so fed up with all this.
And as far as Marjorie Taylor Greene, yeah, Trump probably threatened her or elements of his camp probably threatened her life.
And in fear of her life, she's shutting down in Congress.
She will come up in some other major way to be another, I mean, to still be present and a viable voice for the people.
There's no doubt about that.
I've even heard that she has aspirations to maybe even become president.
So who knows?
The future is wide open for her, Nick, and Candace.
If Candace lives, you know, she's had a threat now on her life.
It's horrible what's happening to the people that speak the truth.
Scott Fennett, you know, given the strength of Marjorie's support for Trump to call her Marjorie Trader, Green was disgraceful.
Yeah.
Right.
Yeah, it's an indication that Trump has gone institutional with MAGA and that they've lost any sense of grassroots populism.
It's replaced itself with the Washington washing machine.
And, you know, I remember when I started to abandon Fox News back in 2010, 2011, I think it was Bill O'Reilly had James Fetzer on the show.
And there was just absolutely nothing true.
It was a complete ambush.
And I saw that and I said to myself, something's very, very wrong with the vomit that the mainstream media is putting out every day.
I've got to find alternative news voices.
And I want to hear from this guy, James Fetzer.
So I think Nick Fuentes represents the same sort of shift from the regurgitated cuke that our mainstream media is putting out.
As for Marjorie Taylor Green, I can't blame her for wanting to separate herself from all those Freetons in Washington, D.C. Call it the Washington washing machine.
But let's face it, we have a fundamental problem with people taking lobbyist money, people taking payouts, people taking foreign interest.
If I had to live my life and I had a choice how to live it, do you think I would surround myself with disingenuous guys that are on the church board that don't pray?
I mean, do you think I would surround myself with a bunch of leeches who are all about business all day, all the time?
No way.
I'm going to surround myself with people that are that are unique and transparent and genuine and tell the truth the best they possibly can about what they see is happening.
Nick Fuentes and Marjorie Taylor Greene both represent people like that, but I don't blame them.
I wouldn't want to be there either.
He's going to cite political gridlock, betrayal of core principles, corruption of both parties.
No problem.
We can all see that.
We all know it's true.
Had Donald Trump stuck to grassroots populism, which was his first term message, had he drained the swamp, had he fixed the corruption problem, had he released the Epstein files, then we wouldn't have this problem right now.
Our federal government would be attracting politicians of genuine nature that are willing to speak the truth and willing to speak the truth in love.
We'd have more Jim Jordans, more Chuck Grassley's, more Marjorie Taylor Greens, more Lauren Boards.
We'd have guys like Matt Gates back.
We'd have a crowd of people that would be growing and growing and growing.
The problem is they've all been abandoned.
And who would want to live their life in a washing machine surrounded by all that dirt?
It's just disgusting.
I wouldn't want to do it either.
So it's a high calling if you want to do it, but it'd be like being a pastor on the streets.
It's just terrible.
Marjorie's fearless.
It could only be threats against her family that would have induced her to step aside.
Meanwhile, Kerma Grager talked about Ukraine, the situation there.
Basically, we were planning our anniversary trip.
Someone tried to open a loan in my name in a state I've never been to before.
Most of the world is actually aligned with Russia on this matter.
Let me go back.
No longer support the war in Ukraine against Russia that we want an immediate end to the conflict.
But we're prepared to sit down and host whatever conference is necessary in order to bring the people together to sort through this.
But first and foremost, we are ceasing any further support to this corrupt and criminal regime in Kiev.
The only thing they've managed to accomplish is mass murder of their own population in a war that was easily avoided.
And unfortunately, President Trump has been badly advised, I would argue, by people telling him that he can't do that.
No, he absolutely can do it, and he needs to do it.
It's not just a function of wasting billions of dollars.
Washington does that very well on its own anyhow.
It's a question of putting us in opposition to Russia when there is no reason for us to be in opposition to Russia.
You know, for some reason, there are people in Washington who liked the Soviet Union.
The neocons seem to have been comfortable with them.
Now that Russia is an Orthodox Christian country that rests on the foundation of Orthodox Christianity, they're very unhappy.
They're unhappy because Russia has a national identity.
Russia is defending its borders.
And Russia is doing what we would do.
If we had an enemy force building a Mexican army for the purpose of reconquering Texas, New Mexico, Arizona, and Southern California, I think we would act exactly as the Russians have done.
We would destroy that force.
That's right.
And that's what they've done.
So I don't know why President Trump continues to waste his time on this matter, to be perfectly blunt.
He ought to divorce himself from it and say, I'm out.
America doesn't want any part of this.
We want to normalize relations with Russia.
There's no reason why we should not.
And we urge our European allies to follow suit.
On the other hand, if they want to go it alone, and we all know they can't, then they may do so.
But we have just taken terrible steps.
We've offended people, the Russians.
We don't seem to understand that most of the world is actually aligned with Russia on this matter because they live in various parts of the world where they have hostile borders.
And they understand exactly what that kind of threat means.
We should understand it as well.
All you have to do is look south of the Rio Grande.
And if anybody thinks that's friendly territory, they should have their heads examined.
It isn't.
He makes so many excellent points.
Meanwhile, here we have a report about Zelensky.
This is a simply excellent description of the situation.
Russia has prevailed against the collective might of the West.
Those who still retain their illusion and self-blinding prejudices concerning this are now totally irrelevant and unable to influence events now occurring.
This includes the entire political elite of Europe, apart from those in Hungary, Slovakia, and since the recent presidential election of the Czech Republic.
We now stand before events which could herald the end of a conflict Russia never wanted.
Last three and three quarters years of bloody war became inevitable following a catastrophic failure by the Western political elites.
The Russian president and his team walked every last mile and for six long years to achieve a diplomatic solution to the situation in Ukraine's eastern regions following the West-supported insurrection and coup in Ukraine.
The ultra-violent insurrection removed the democratically elected president government with fully U.S., EU, and U.K. support in 2014.
That is when this conflict began.
Following the outbreak of hostilities, when the new coup government irresponsibly and recklessly sent the Ukrainian army to quell unrest in the Russian-speaking east of Ukraine, a diplomatic initiative between Russia and Ukraine began.
This also included the then leaders of Germany and France.
This process, which came to be known as the Minsk Accords, we got in 2015.
The Minsk Accord began due to things going badly wrong for the Ukrainian army in Ukraine's southeastern region of the Donbass.
They were begun admirably by Angela Merkel, Chancellor of Germany at the time to Vladimir Putin.
The accords were meant to find a diplomatic solution to the question of the Russians-speaking population, retain their right to retain their language and democratic rights in the face of the removal of the Brezzling government they had elected being illegally taken from office.
The population of Donbass saw gaining a semi-autonomous status as a way to achieve this.
And it was the outcome Putin sought to achieve.
But of course, the West merely used the Minsk Accords as a cover for beefing up Ukraine to fight Russia.
A fateful blunder.
Meanwhile, Trump has been promoting a 28-point Ukraine-Russia peace plan, and it has virtually every element you would expect a victorious Russia would demand.
It has frankly appalled me that you have individuals like the New York Times and Thomas Friedman describing the 28 plan as a disgrace.
Don't they understand?
Russia won the war.
Ukraine lost.
They want Ukraine to have all kinds of victories at the peace table they couldn't claim or achieve on the battlefield.
Walking your thoughts.
Yeah, every time McGregor opens his mouth, he speaks truth.
One of the few West pointers I definitely respect.
Yeah, but I have one little fault with him.
And I know he's of stature in the world, and especially, of course, in America as a patriot, that he can't go against the controllers of the world directly speaking, if he wants to have a future, because they'll take him out.
And that is the money changers, the central banking system, the control mechanism, the control grid that they're marrying now to technocracy to come in and make us all slaves, as if we haven't already been for the last quite a few centuries.
But he doesn't talk in terms of the bigger power structure that controls everything in geopolitics on the earth through money-changing economy and finances.
But, you know, as far as on the ground, yeah, he's got it right.
The war is going to be over prior to February 22nd, 2026.
That will be exactly four years since this incurred.
And I can't say it's an invasion because as you alluded to in these articles, it started long before.
And I would venture to say it even started before the illegal U.S. coup in 2014, March.
Because it starts really with the whole West versus East, communist versus democracy, which has all been installed by who else?
City of London.
They did it.
They even are behind the East-West in China.
They create these enemies of America.
They finance, fund, and create them.
They finance Mao.
They finance the Bolshevik Revolution.
Lenin and his Jewish friends that have taken over there for the longest time and become the Soviet Empire.
They are behind all of that.
They're behind the promise to Lionel Baron Rothschild in 1917 by the UK foreign minister Balfour.
They promised them Israel, you know.
And then we had to fight two world wars, the bloodiest on earth in history.
Yeah, they're behind everything we see.
So I always, who benefits and follow the money trail.
And it always leads to the same enemy.
And I've been writing and talking about this for ever, forever, forever.
Because you can talk about surface politics, the Democrats and the Republic.
You know, I'm so fed up with all that bullshit.
That's all superficial bullshit.
The bottom line is the ones that pay and have the power.
They are the instigators, the plotters.
They plot everything in advance, sometimes centuries.
You know, Armageddon fighting Iran versus, you know, Israel, all of that.
That was planned back in 1871, the Zionist versus Islam War by General Albert Pike, the Freemason, top Freemason.
So all these things are planned way in advance.
And they, you know, so anyway, just get to the bottom.
Who benefits?
Who has the money to do it?
And that's their objective of gaining more centralized power and control for a control grid that enslaves the human masses.
And of course, their agenda now and has been for a while.
They used to do slow kill methods, you know, polluting the environment, the soil, the lungs, all this.
So we get slow diseases that we have to pay all this kind of money to stay alive on.
Well, they're increasing.
Instead of the slow kill method, it's the fast kill method.
The fast kill.
And of course, their big beta test for that was COVID, you know, and the kill shot.
That's a Holocaust.
That's killed millions around the world, including millions even in America.
And it's still going strong.
People are dying every day from turbo cancer and all the rest of them.
So, you know, they have an agenda to pretty much eliminate the human race.
That is the bottom line to what we're seeing too.
They want to go to, you know, a very sterile, barren, you know, world of silicon that can feed the monsters they created in AI and robotics to replace us.
This is the bottom line truth to everything we're seeing.
So don't get caught up in the just shallow little layer of analysis and stay there because you're not really telling the full truth that the people to arm themselves with the truth need desperately.
So I think that's where we need to go.
I kind of went off on my little rant side truck.
Thomas, go ahead.
Thomas Friedman appears to be burnishing his credentials as a dynamic sign of shill for the Junior Times by comparing Trump to Chamberlain, Neville Chamberlain, as appeasing Russia with a 28-point plan.
But it's clearly Putin's plan.
Trump wants to be the peace guy who negotiates it.
So he's taken Putin's point, presenting it so he can get glory from it.
But Russia won the war.
This is just absurd to protest that Russia is going to get what it wants over a war that it won and Ukraine lost.
Right.
And the bottom line is Trump from day one.
If he actually honored his promise, election promise, yeah, he could have ended it in 24 hours.
You don't supply weapons and money to the filthy, corrupt government of Ukraine.
And that war would have been ended a long time ago.
Yes, Brian.
Oh.
Yeah, the article goes back to the Minsk agreements.
It talks about how Russia was trying to get a diplomatic solution to the Minsk Accords all along.
They were trying to protect the rights of Russian-speaking Ukrainians and donbass, but the West never pressured Ukraine to actually implement the agreements.
Instead, they ran a coup, replaced the Ukrainian officials with new warmongers that they wanted and got rid of the path to peace.
So Russia was hanging out in the cold without any diplomacy taking place.
Well, whose fault is that?
Western leaders never did intend diplomacy.
Minsk was just used to buy time and to build Ukraine into basically an anti-Russian military fortress that would benefit the military-industrial complex and weaken Russia.
So who's to blame?
Western political U.S., EU, UK, Ukrainian leadership are all weak puppets that have been placed in.
I wouldn't blame Russia.
They attempted diplomacy, but they had to intervene militarily when they started approaching on the border.
Now, at this particular time, the West has no interest in pressuring Ukraine to accept peace because the Ukrainian military has collapsed and they know they don't have anything to negotiate with.
And support in the West has basically dried up.
And apparently, war is no longer politically profitable.
It's time to get into the rebuilding structure.
So it's a failed peacemaking attempt.
And I got to say that there are global moral consequences of having ignored the fact that we went over there and basically helped Ukraine drive a war machine that killed over a million people.
So as a nation and as Western forces together, we've lost our moral credibility.
Therefore, our influence is waning.
And our ability to lead others is waning as well, which is why you're getting a rise in bricks, a rise in everything.
The war in Ukraine was never about Ukrainian freedom.
It was about using Ukraine as a pawn in a struggle against Russia.
It failed.
And now we're at the point where it's very, very dangerous.
And It's nothing but the pride of leaders that's keeping it going.
So that's my analysis of what's been going on with the Ukraine situation at this point.
I'd like to add one point too.
Yeah, go right ahead.
Trump and his, is it 28 points this time around?
28, 28.
Yeah.
You know, yeah, it's good that, you know, he's making his move to withdraw support for Ukraine, which he should have started day one, but anyway, I'll tell you, those points, they do not recognize Kherson and Zaporizhi as Russia.
They do not.
That's point number one.
You have to, they had a constitutional vote.
They voted to be Russian.
They're ethnic Russian anyway.
They want to be able to speak their language and live in peace with Russia as their country.
And everybody should agree with that.
If they believe in freedom, they should agree that they have the right to be Russian.
And so that's a point of contention that Russia will not accept.
The other one is the militarization.
They haven't really addressed the fact that Ukraine cannot have a sizable military at all, and they must remain neutral.
That has never been really addressed.
And that's one of the very foremost foundational points that Russia is making this whole argument in years of conflict has been on that.
Neutrality at the border.
Hey, we had our Cuban missile crisis.
We wanted to, you know, we had a problem with that.
Well, Russia had the same problem.
You know, it's so fundamental.
On MS Now, to which my wife is addicted, the new name for MSNBC, they had an excellent discussion of Marjorie Taylor Greene.
It was actually very balanced and how she was shining a spotlight on weaknesses of Trump and his administration.
It was good.
But then when they turned to Ukraine, they had some former military type who was saying how this was all giving nothing but concessions to Russia, as though Russia hadn't won the war.
I mean, it's just so effing obvious that, of course, Russia is going to take the benefit of the war where Ukraine lost close to 2 million, close to 2 million.
Russia, I'm guessing, 600,000, 700,000.
But this has been a catastrophe for Ukraine.
It was all by design by the West.
Deliberate.
They have sacrificed Ukraine.
Meanwhile, I believe we dodged a bullet here of light.
Here you have Hal Turner talking about Southcom troops, had steak and lobster dinner tonight.
You know what that means.
Well, Keena and I for sure know what it means.
It's like a last meal before you go into combat.
But it turns out this was published on the 11th.
Here's today, Monday.
Oh, wait a minute.
Here it says today, Monday, November 24th, last night, I uploaded no times to the airlines at 11 p.m.
This morning, the Federal Register published U.S. critical designation.
This is a no-fly zone.
With the publish of that declaration, the entire world was one of those U.S. is going to do something.
There's a date in here of the 11th made him think we had missed a bullet.
But I think maybe I was wrong and actually it's going to happen.
The calamity is going to occur tonight or tomorrow morning.
Lobster and steak.
That's a last meal for the troops.
Meanwhile, Russia has already sent a Russian to Venezuela.
They have all the anti-ship missiles.
If we go forward with this attack, it's going to be the greatest military disaster the United States has incurred in a single day in our history.
And I tell you, it looks like it's going to happen.
This no-fly zone being declared over Venezuela.
That's indicative.
That's also in anticipation.
And here you have Russia's missiles to target U.S. Navy.
Venezuela's deadly warning to Washington.
We have John Mearsheim talking about the obvious.
I never thought I'd live to see the day when American warships would become sitting ducks in their own hemisphere, but that day has arrived.
Russian anti-ship missile systems, hypersonic, radar-evading, and lethal, are now positioned along Venezuela's coastline.
These aren't ceremonial weapons.
They're operational systems capable of tracking, targeting, and destroying every U.S. Navy vessel within hundreds of miles of the Caribbean.
The Monroe Doctrine didn't just die quietly in some diplomatic meeting.
It was executed by precision-guided munitions, delivered with a clear message.
America's naval supremacy in its own backyard is over.
What terrifies Washington isn't the technology itself.
It's the realization that we created this nightmare with our own hands.
Every sanction we imposed, every asset we froze, every coup we attempted pushed Venezuela toward this moment.
And now for the first time in over two centuries, American naval power faces a credible threat in waters we've controlled since 1823.
This isn't just about missiles.
It's about the moment a superpower's chickens came home to roost.
Let me explain how we turned the Caribbean into a potential graveyard for our own fleet.
When I first heard the intelligence reports last month, I thought there had been a mistake.
Russian S-400 air defense systems were one thing, defensive weapons that could be explained away.
But Zircon hypersonic anti-ship missiles, caliber cruise missiles with ship-killing warheads, P-800 Onyx supersonic missiles designed specifically to hunt aircraft carriers.
This was different.
This was Russia placing a loaded gun to the temple of the U.S. Navy's 4th Fleet.
The technical specifications are sobering.
These aren't the primitive Soviet-era systems we once dismissed.
Modern Russian anti-ship missiles travel at speeds exceeding Mach 5, follow unpredictable flight paths, and carry warheads capable of crippling or sinking the largest vessels in our fleet.
They're designed to overwhelm defensive systems through sheer speed and maneuverability.
More importantly, they're positioned to control sea lanes that America has dominated for generations.
Every aircraft carrier, destroyer, and amphibious assault ship operating in the Caribbean now does so under the shadow of these weapons.
The psychological impact is immense, and that's exactly the point.
But the real story isn't the missiles themselves.
It's how they got there.
And that story begins 15 years ago, when Washington decided that economic strangulation was a substitute for diplomatic engagement.
Well, Mearsheimer is wonderful.
He's completely brilliant.
But I now think we are talking about, I mean, I actually had moved this to be our opening story because it has a date of November 11th in there, but this is actually a current story.
So I think that America is on the verge of a catastrophe.
Joachim, your thoughts.
Yeah, John Mearsheimer is the other West Pointer that I went to school with that I admire totally, him and McGregor.
Yeah, this is all a setup.
We pull our guns out of the Ukraine war, but it's forever war.
And by definition, that means if one war stops, there's another war that starts.
And here we go again.
Yeah, the modern war technology has radically shifted.
And our mighty fleets, the naval fleets of America, are all sitting ducks.
Our aircraft carrier groups, they're all sitting ducks now.
The technology of missiles and Russia is at the forward edge on technology in all kinds of war aspect.
They are the number one power militarily in the world.
And for us to even try and confront them or go against them is the downfall of America.
And, you know, that's all by design, too, isn't it?
Cold War, East-West, Russia, anti-America.
You know, it's the same bullshit.
Here we are again.
But this time, it's with a technology that can totally destroy America and will.
They're determined.
I agree with you, Jim.
This may have been November early, but no, they have not let go of their total plotted out plan to make war against Venezuela.
It's coming.
There's no giving around it.
America never moves away from war.
When they start doing their rhetoric and setting up the stage, have they ever backed down and not had a war?
No, they always go through with it.
And we can go on and on in the history of America, one war after the next.
And it's not even after the next.
You know, right now we got two active wars and a third on the way.
And probably with China, a fourth, you know, on and on we go.
You know, it never stops.
Yes, absolutely.
And I think we have catastrophe looming.
Brian, your thoughts?
Well, they were talking about the Monroe Doctrine, and basically the U.S. has always warned foreign nations that we won't accept any foreign military in the Western hemisphere.
That was what the Cuban missile crisis in 1962 was all about.
We were facing, in essence, an external threat from our southern flank.
Well, now, if the article is accurate, you've got Oroch cruise missiles in Venezuela and caliber missiles that have a range of Florida, Washington, D.C., and the Gulf Coast of Texas.
So not only could they hit warships, they could hit Mar-a-Lago.
So this is the first time we've seen, in a sense, a fundamental shift in our vulnerability.
And you can't really blame Russia because they're doing everything they can to basically be building a counterweight to expanded NATO forces.
And they're trying to make sure that NATO and the rest of Western forces don't take over their partners in Venezuela.
But Venezuela seems to have teamed up not only with Russia, but also with China.
So are we on the edge of a world war?
Venezuela, Russia, Iran, China, all coordinating energy and military policy.
What are they really threatening?
Well, they're threatening the petrodollar and we're trying to protect the last remaining leverage that we have on our dollar.
It has a lot of very significant national security issues associated with it.
And it puts us in a really bad spot in terms of another potential world war.
And it might give BRICS the opportunity they need to really break out.
It could actually result in a very serious war that affects the homeland of the United States.
Ryan, I think you got it right.
I think you got it right.
I think we're there that it's going to be Venezuela.
Meanwhile, Israel seems to be beefing up its stock so much so it can only be for an attack on Iran.
Here we have a report: a thousand planes, 150 ships, 1,200 tons.
This is what's gone into Israel of late.
Here's the report.
Drinking warm water before bed improves eyesight almost overnight.
Thousands of people are already doing this.
Israel has been conducting a full-blown genocide and a campaign of destruction against the Palestinian people.
And despite all of that, they're still getting all of the arms that they want.
A recent confirmation report from Israel verified that Israel recently broke a record in getting military equipment.
1,000 planes, the 1,000th plane in the air train landed in Israel with a lot of military equipment, 120,000 tons of equipment, 1,000 flights, and 150 ships.
Who are the countries involved in the operation primarily?
And why is Israel getting so much weapons now, despite the fact that the genocide in Gaza de-escalated slightly in terms of direct Israeli involvement on the ground?
And there's a declared ceasefire.
There's a path for peace, like the American president says.
Well, firstly, let's talk about the levels of this air train that they're talking about here.
Again, 1,000 planes, 150 ships, 120,000 tons of explosives, of military equipment, of technological equipment.
I think there's no way they're not preparing for an attack on Iran.
Meanwhile, Russia controls.
Thank you.
Ambassador Mike Huckabee had a meeting with John Power, a former U.S. citizen who was convicted and spent three decades in jail for selling state secrets to Israel.
Did the White House know that that meeting was going to happen because the administration came down?
The White House was not aware of that meeting, but the president stands by our Ambassador Mike Huckabee and all that he's doing for the United States and Israel.
All that he's doing for the United States and Israel, the man's a lunatic.
Here we have Hakabri embracing this train.
So this is a hardware simulator.
We use it to practice interventions.
Tell it to each patient.
Okay, so people are furious and rightfully calling for the resignation of Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee, former governor of Arkansas, for meeting with a traitor, a traitor who was sentenced to life in prison for being a traitor to the U.S. government, Jonathan Pollard.
Apparently, what happened was he met with him in July.
It was a secret meeting.
It's just now come out.
The New York Times has reported on it that Jonathan Pollard had a meeting with Ambassador Mike Huckabee.
Jonathan Pollard worked as a civilian analyst for U.S. Naval Intelligence, where he had access to a lot of classified materials.
Starting in 1984, he systematically passed large volumes, about 800 classified documents and around 1,500 intelligence summaries containing sensitive military, technical, and strategic information to Israel.
He was a spy working in the U.S. government for Israel, and he was passing state secrets to Israel.
He did this in exchange for small payments, but he said his real motivation was support for Israel.
Records show that he received maybe $35,000, $45,000 a year.
He had agreed to a 10-year, kind of 30,000, 40 grand a year sort of pay structure, but really he was doing it because he was supporting the state of Israel.
So he was arrested in November of 1985.
Him and his wife attempted to flee.
They tried to get into the Israeli embassy in Washington, D.C., where they were hoping to seek asylum, but instead they were arrested just outside of the embassy.
And in 1987, Pollard accepted a plea deal and pled guilty to one count of conspiracy to deliver national defense information to a foreign government.
That should have given him about two to five years, I believe, two to four years in jail.
However, the judge reviewed the damaging assessments of the highly classified information.
So clearly, people probably there were some serious issues with what the judge saw.
And after reviewing the highly classified damage assessments, the judge gave Pollard a life sentence, citing the gravity of the national security harm caused.
And his wife received a five-year sentence.
And of course, he was actually released by guess who? Donald Trump.
His armor is out of control.
Mega demands answers after Trump Ambassador supports welcomes the spy who sold America's secrets.
Prominent supporters of President Trump demanded answers Thursday after it was revealed U.S. Ambassador to Israel, Mike Hockabee, held a secret meeting with Jonathan Pallard, the convicted spy who sold American secrets to Israel.
This is all really so awful, so bad.
I can hardly believe it happened.
But then you have this extreme Christian Zionist Huckabee, who isn't in possession of his faculties, making all these moves, Joaquin.
Your thoughts?
Yeah, it's a total disgrace rewarding a convicted traitor, U.S. traitor.
Obviously, the man has been an asset for Israel for a long time, and there's a lot of Zionists and Jews in America that support Israel to the extent that they are ready to forsake America to support Israel.
And it starts with number one, Trump, who's totally always been for Israel first.
That's the true colors of this man we're seeing now in his second term in office.
Yeah, it's a total disgrace.
I also do want to point out, though, that a lot of our military technology secrets were basically sold by the Clintons in the 90s to China, you know.
And there's traders involved in that that went unprosecuted to this day.
But yeah, China has all the technology, just like Russia gets all the technology, just like Israel gets all the technology.
And a lot of that Russian technology was Jews actually from Israel that were from Russia that actually supplied technology secrets to Russia.
So, I mean, this dynamic of traitorous America through weapons technologies has been ongoing for a long, long time.
And it seems like America is always on the other end of having our secrets.
You know, we were the unipolar operator for many years, but all these treasonous secrets that have been traded militarily have caught Russia's advance and China's advance beyond America's technology now, including Iran.
So to even have this notion of World War III of West versus East, which is what all these conflicts are all about, America, Israel, and the West, Europe, you know, against these very formidable powers of the world militarily in the Eastern powers, Russia, China, and Iran, with a little help from North Korea.
And the whole multipolar world is now behind.
We forced the battering ram America has forced the multipolar world, and that's basically the south of the equator.
Majority of nations on Earth, the global south nations, are totally in the camp of China and Russia now.
And so it's a very small minority and militarily weak West versus all the forces of the multipolar world that include the strongest militaries in Russia, China, and Iran.
So yeah, I mean, it's all been set up.
You know, we have the controllers pulling all the strings that want to destroy the West.
Why?
Largest middle class.
Why?
We've been brainwashed with democracy and freedom and all these notions that we no longer have, by the way.
And so that we might give the most resistance to one world government.
Yeah, they thought all of this out.
And so they want to destroy the West.
They figured they can have their way once the West is gone with the largest middle class and freedom and all that kind of thing.
And they can do their one world government, bring in the AI robotics, and you don't even need the humans anymore.
That's where we're going, folks.
Brian.
Yeah, if you put both those two stories together, the first story was the YouTube video where the guy talked about this, that Israel's receiving all of this military equipment from the United States and Germany right now.
Well, think about that.
What's it for?
Is it for Gaza?
Well, they're already routed.
They're already killed, destroyed.
And so it's obviously setting us up for another war that Israel intends to put out there.
They're basically preparing for a regional multi-front war.
So you've got to think about the ramifications of something like that.
On the north, you've got Hezbollah.
On the east, you've got Iran and Iraqi military forces.
You've had all sorts of trouble down south in Yemen with the Red Sea.
BRICS nations are all coming together, and the West is aligning itself further with Israel right now.
While Israel is receiving a thousand cargo planes, 150 new ships, and 120,000 pounds of new weapons and technology and explosives.
Well, yeah, they're meeting with Mike Huckabee.
Yeah, Jonathan Pollard's being used as a front guy right now.
Because the problem that you've got is that the United States is no longer seen as sort of a moral foundation that's directing the activity of the West.
We're being seen as a supplier for a military intervention, and we are obviously willingly being drawn in to whatever coming war Israel is planning.
So there's strategic risks all over the place.
You've got military risks, you've got economic risks, diplomatic risks because of our moral foundation being destroyed because we're helping Iran or Israel cyber alliances.
And I mean, this problem is Israel is going to start a war with Iran, and America is going to be your partner.
So send in Jonathan Pollard to meet with the Zionists to go ahead and get the political backing that you need to go ahead and put this thing into order.
This is very, very ugly.
This is very, very scary.
And this could end up being a major problem for the Trump administration.
And the sad part is, Iran, if they stayed with their attack on Israel for two more weeks, there's a consensus out there that Israel would not be a threat and the United States would not be able to supply Israel to make another war against Iran.
So here we are.
Absolutely right.
Don, I think we're there.
Take us out.
We are there.
Oh, we're here.
It's in time for Thanksgiving.
Watch this show, and you'll have plenty to discuss over that Thanksgiving table.
Lose your appetite, probably.
But I tell you, it's getting heavy out there, folks.
And this is on the 24th of November.
And the first hour, we want to come back for the second hour if you can handle it.