All Episodes
Previous Next
Nov. 22, 2025 - Jim Fetzer
01:06:27
The Raw Deal (21 November 2025) with co-host Paul from CA.
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
This is Jim Fetzer, your host on The Rod Deal, right here on Revolution Radio Studio B this 21st day of November 2025, the day before the 63rd observance of the assassination of JFK.
More on that later.
Meanwhile, Truth Seeker reports, Pistorius warns of the risk of a Russian attack on NATO by 2029.
This is frankly, in my opinion, absurd, but it shows the extent to which the European Union is going to try to muster some kind of antagonism against Russia and even provoke World War III.
Russia may restore its military forces to attack a NATO member state sooner than expected.
German defense minister Boris Pistoris noted the initial forecast, the initial forecast was for 2029.
But now the Alliance are preparing for the attack that occur even before that date.
He said this in an interview with a Frankfurt Al Jamain Zeitung newspaper, where I dare say this guy sounds like a Zionist hack.
During the interview, the defense minister was reminded that strengthening Germany's defense takes time.
Vladimir Putin is rapidly building up his arsenal.
The minister confirmed Russia could attack NATO countries earlier than the projected 2029.
And Germany may not have enough time to make systematic changes.
But the whole idea is ridiculous.
Russia has no interest in attacking Europe.
Russia only intervened in Ukraine because of the threat to the Russian-friendly Russian ethnic Russian-speaking population of the Donpass, as Kiev was anticipating a mass slaughter that would have rivaled that of the Israelis against the Palestinians in Gaza.
Meanwhile, more EU-UK leaders paving the road to the hell of a new country.
The European Union leaders are now the biggest obstacle to peace in the world.
They are the biggest threat of World War III in the world.
They are working their puppets on the Baltic coast, Lithuania, Estonia, Latvia, Finland, to mount ever more serious provocations, any one of which could lead to the outbreak of World War III.
Just the other night, Kaliningrad, don't forget that name.
It's a part of Russia.
It's what you call an exclave.
It is surrounded by hostile NATO member states.
The Swalkie Gap is the one, is the tripwire where World War III might break out.
The European Union is openly threatening to blockade hundreds of thousands of Russian citizens in Kaliningrad.
And not just citizens, but tens of thousands of Russian armed forces, including Russian nuclear forces.
Kaliningrad is a vital interest for Russia.
As vital as Moscow, as vital as St. Petersburg.
Russia will not allow its people and its assets there to be threatened by these yapping dogs who surround it.
So never forget the word Kaliningrad.
It might just be the last word on your lips, in your ears.
Let's pray not.
The guy's brilliant, absolutely brilliant.
Paul Cole from California, your thoughts.
It seems to me the Europeans are eager for a war.
They would be destined to lose your thoughts.
So that was George Galloway, correct?
Yes.
Yes.
I remember some of the debates he used to engage in.
He's been around a long time.
You know, when you say the Europeans, I mean, who are we talking about?
I mean, the average person in Europe probably has, just like we do in many ways, zero idea of the motives of the people behind the scenes.
Yes.
I mean, we're doing our best to guess who exactly is running the show and what is their medium-term goal, long-term goal, etc.
I think he probably keeps up with this a whole lot more than I do.
And we can only scratch our heads as to what it is they're attempting to do, except for what they always do, which is try to make a lot of money and get a lot of people killed because that's in their nature, apparently.
Yes, yes.
Meanwhile, Danny Dannon on an exhibition of children's drawings on world peace at the UN, which has no mention of host.
At the main entrance of the United Nations, where thousands of people are passing every day, the UN decided to put an exhibition about world peace.
Look at the drawings of children from all around the world.
Nothing about Israel.
Nothing about our hostages.
Look what they have.
They don't recognize Israel.
They promote hate in those drawings.
That is shameful.
This is part of the hypocrisy of the United Nations.
I demand that the UN will remove this exhibit immediately and will stop with the hypocrisy against Israel.
I like that.
He's talking about, you know, basically giving a cover a paper over the atrocities being committed by Israel against the Palestinians.
Here are a few stories.
At least 13 killed, many wounded as Israel attacked Palestinian refugee camp in southern Lebanon from antiwar.com.
UN has committed 10,000 violations in Lebanon in one year of ceasefire.
That's from truthout.org.
Israel tries al Qasa Iman Hakima Sabri over alleged incitement, Middle East I, The ongoing offenses being committed against human rights by Israel are simply staggering and overwhelming.
Some say with allies like these, like Israel, who needs enemies?
The Israelis are obsessed with the idea that we're not giving them everything, right?
And we give them pretty much everything, but they want to make sure they're getting everything, literally everything.
For example, when the F-35 came out, they were the first ones to say, we want the F-35.
And so we said, okay, we'll give you the F-35.
So we just barely degraded the avionics.
Okay.
And we called it the F-35I for Israel.
And the reason why we did that is because we don't want anybody to have exactly the avionics that we have in case, you know, what happens if one of these crashes in Russian territory and the Russians reverse engineer it.
Now they have the F-35.
They said, no, we want your F-35, the same F-35 that you have.
And we're like, no, we're not giving it to you.
Well, they're trying to steal the avionics for the F-35 because we went and turned it over.
It's very typical of what the Israelis do.
And then, you know, at the same time, they smile and they thank you.
And our friendship is forever.
The Israelis are obsessed with the idea that we're not giving them everything.
Former CIA official speaking the truth.
Meanwhile, we have two.
Are the Epstein piles a proxy for our connection to Israel?
If you've been injured in an accident, put a powerful law firm on your side.
Call UBN Abraham.
And I can't help but think you mentioned the obvious connection between Jeffrey Epstein and Israel and probably our deep state agencies and probably other governments that we shouldn't be protecting.
I can't help but think that this is really a proxy fight about our involvement with Israel and the way that we're funneling weapons that Israel is using in Gaza.
Do you think that's true?
I think the universe of people involved is small enough that there's a lot of overlap.
So for instance, and this gets to the three billionaires who are trying to take me out of Congress, one of them is Miriam Adelson.
And she's the widow of Sheldon Adelson, who's a casino mogul in Las Vegas.
She, I believe, was born in Israel and was in the IDF.
And she's a dual citizen now.
So she is legally allowed to advocate and spend millions of dollars getting me beat.
But Donald Trump recently said in a speech that he once asked her, which does she love more, the United States or Israel?
And she wouldn't answer him.
And he said he thinks that could mean maybe she loves Israel more than the United States.
By the way, he said that in front of the Israeli parliament, which was probably even sweeter.
So, and by the way, if I were to say that, I would immediately, APAC would call me anti-Semitic for invoking some kind of dual loyalty trope.
Right.
But he just did it.
He's the president.
He gets away with it.
It's also what he got away with was candor.
It's the truth.
Yeah.
He does that sometimes.
And to put a point on it, she refused to say that she was America first.
Correct.
Yes.
And she could say it today.
Yeah.
But she won't because she's got a loyalty to Israel.
And so the two other billionaires are Paul Singer, who interestingly has basically kept the Washington Free Beacon.
It's a newspaper, if I'm being charitable.
It's a newspaper, but it's really just his mouthpiece.
He's put all the money in it to keep it going.
And I don't think it was always considered a newspaper.
I don't know.
It may have been something else, but it's considered a newspaper now.
So it probably has certain privileges and immunities of the press.
But he recently came out with a hit piece.
So I'm pointing out that three billionaires who've given millions of dollars to smear my name, what their motivations are.
And they went through 13,000 of my donors and found one guy who's given $500 to me, who's a member of some organization that I didn't even know existed.
By the way, he gave me the $500.
This is ironic, at an event hosted by the founder of Muslims for Trump.
So literally, there's a whole Muslim organization to help Trump in purple states like Michigan, okay, or Pennsylvania.
This was actually in Pennsylvania, which was a swing state.
And so this was part of Trump's coalition that got him elected, right?
So I'm thinking, okay, it should be safe enough to go to an event hosted by the guy that started Muslims for Trump.
But some guy who's given to Democrat causes as well and founded an organization, I don't even know the name of it.
They're using that $500 donation to write a hit piece in the Washington Free Beacon that is controlled by the billionaire who's actually, I mean, this is another, I guess, trope that could get me in trouble that this guy controls the media.
But he basically owns the newspaper that's writing the hit piece to find this $500 donor.
This was the best they could do out of 13,000 grassroots donors.
And by the way, I'm not sending the money back.
The guy gave me $500 because I'm opposed to a war against a senseless war where tens of thousands of civilians have been slaughtered with bombs.
Okay.
That's why the guy gave me $500.
I don't have to agree with him on everything.
I think Thomas Massey is so admirable.
He's shown such integrity.
He and Marjorie Taylor Greene are being the most outspoken.
Paul, your thoughts about Massey, Marjorie Epstein, go ahead.
Well, interesting enough, I was listening to your show yesterday on RBN, the call-in section, which I probably don't listen to frequently enough, but on occasion I get the itch to do so.
And there were some very interesting comments made about Marjorie Taylor Greene by one of your callers, a caller that I don't particularly enjoy all the time.
So, but anyway, as far as Thomas Massey goes, what's not to like about the guy?
I mean, he has an air of sincerity and authenticity that is hard to duplicate because, well, most of the politicians don't have it.
In fact, they have the opposite.
I mean, how many politicians have you heard and I've heard where you just want to wipe the slime off you after they speak about something because they're transparent shills.
So I hope and pray for his continued safety.
I would think that would be the number one thing we got to keep in mind, right?
Yes, yes, yes.
Well, many believe his wife was deliberately taken out to punish him for opposing Israel and send a message.
I find the guy heroic.
I'm 100% with Massey.
Now we all know Israel.
Go ahead.
Go ahead, Paul.
I did not know about his wife.
You want to briefly fill in the details?
That sounds terrible.
Oh.
This is about a year and a half ago.
She died.
I think it was an automobile accident.
That's easy to arrange, especially now because cars are controlled by computers.
So it's easy to take remote control of a car and bring about an accident.
But there are many of us who believe that's what happened.
And the fact that he's now remarried, and I celebrate his remarriage has become, made him another target of criticism for apparently not grieving and mourning long enough, since it's a year and a half after.
As far as I'm concerned, I wish him well.
Meanwhile, the whole victim card played by Israel so many times over the Holocaust has not only worn out its welcome when we see the genocide Israel is perpetrating against the Palestinians,
but Alexis Jonas, who is the editor, senior editor of Veterans Today, has done two interviews with Nick Kohlerstrom, who is in fact the author of the most important book, Debunking the Holocaust Myth, Breaking the Spell, for which I was flattered to be invited to write the introduction.
So I just want to mention that in Ounz.com, which I continue to regard as the best public journal out there today, we have initially Astronomer and Historian as Science Examines the Holocaust Industry, interview with Nicholas Kollerstrom by Alexis Jonas on November 9th.
And then we have an addition selling the Holocaust, interview with Nicholas Kollerstrom, Bart II, November 17th.
I highly recommend.
Nick's a terrific guy.
He may be the person I most admire in the world today.
And I published it separately my introduction under the title, The Holocaust Narrative, Politics, Trump Science.
And you can find that on my blog at jameshvetzer.org.
It's also published on the government rag, the Holocaust narrative, politics, trump science, which gives you a summary overview of how we know that the stories we've been told about the Holocaust are total fabrications.
And I mentioned in relation to my sixth annual false flag and conspiracies conference, which will be held on the 13th and the 14th of December this year.
And boy, do I have a full plate.
I have 13 speakers on Saturday, 13 more on Sunday, wide range of subjects.
It's all free and available by way of Zoom.
I'll be announcing more about it on future shows prior to the event.
You might want to mark your calendar.
I've featured in the past.
Yeah.
I featured in the past a man who actually went to Germany and visited the camps and came back.
His name is Fred Luchter.
He's a leading expert on gas chambers in the world with the Lucha report in relation to the trial in Canada in 1988, where he complained there was nothing at any of those camps that could have remotely served as a gas chamber.
There's a whole thing was nonsense from beginning to end.
Meanwhile, this is rather interesting.
Swastika nooses are no longer regarded as hate symbols by the United States Coast Guard.
Yeah, I mean, I think that's a very welcome loosening of.
We know that nooses have been overplayed.
We've had in my 2020 presentation, Deception Galore, I exposed hate crimes and more that were being faked, including the Jesse Smollett alleged attack in Chicago, the George Floyd fabricated attack, and then the Wallace thing at NASCAR,
where a normal rope for a pull down for the Grosdor was amplified as though it represented a noose for a hanging.
Some of these events are just ridiculous beyond belief, Paul, how they've gone out of their way to fabricate hate crimes.
Your thoughts?
Well, I was just commenting to a friend of mine the other day because we were watching one of those shows from the 60s.
You remember Route 66?
Yeah.
Route 66.
This good old retro TV.
But they were starting back then to work on us.
I think that was from the early 60s, if I'm not mistaken.
But you can tell I now watch a lot of older shows, including some of the old Westerns, with a, on occasion, a jaundiced eye, because you can see that that was the beginning of them working on us with our notions of, well, first of all, Jewish victimhood, but also as well, the whole idea of being a racist, right?
And that they made it so distasteful.
And of course, in my opinion, so-called racism, which is just affinity for your own, and anthropologically, this has been proven to be innate.
In other words, enmity for outsiders and affinity for your own in-group is absolutely totally natural.
And they're breaking that down.
Yes, yes, yes.
Here's an interesting beast from the gray zone.
The intel scandal behind Prince Andrew's twisted Epstein exploits.
But I'm being denied access.
I love what we get from the gray zone, really terrific stuff.
Can you hear me, Paul?
Can you hear me?
Yeah, now I lost you for a little bit.
Yeah, yeah.
Well, I had some kind of cut off with regard to the internet.
And wow.
Anyway, I think I think I got, I think I said everything I need to say on that.
I stopped, and then right after I stopped talking, I lost you.
Yeah, yeah.
Well, there was a cutout of the internet.
Let me see what else I can pull up now, retrieving where we were.
I can send you an audio fan of the recent Kevin Alfred Strom dissonant voices from National Vanguard, which is excellent talking about the Epstein files.
So, if we need any content.
Oh, good, good, good.
Welcome.
Let's see what we have here about.
I mean, there's so much going on.
You're going to have a total of 26 speakers, 13 on Saturday, 13 on Sunday.
Yeah, is that amazing?
Wow.
It's going to be jam-packed.
You can lick and choose.
Here's a story I started to report: the intel scandal behind Prince Andrew's twisted Epstein exploits.
In an interview with a gray zone, author Andrew Lowning detailed shocking findings of his research into Prince Andrew's relationship with Jeffrey Epstein, describing Andrew as his Super Bowl trophy.
Epstein user prints for Intel, which he passed a foreign spy agency.
Lowdy says further revelation threaten to bury the royal family.
We'll be right back after this break with Paul from California on Revolution
Radio Freedomslips.com, and we'll be right back.
Management would like to take a moment to thank the listeners and posts for all their support that has made Revolution Radio one of the biggest platforms for free speech in an ever-growing dark world of censorship.
Unfortunately, this platform for free speech has never been free.
We need to support the people.
It is the people like you, yes, you, that keeps the station in the front lines of the battle against tyranny and oppression.
Please help support Revolution Radio so free speech will not be silenced in a world that seems to be going deaf to the real truth.
With your support, we will be able to become an even bigger pillar of light.
Dark world.
RevolutionRadio, freedomslips.com, the number one listener-supported radio station on the planet.
revolution.
Revolution Radio, every Wednesday, 8 p.m. Eastern Time, on Studio B for Momentary Zen, with host Zen Garcia at freedomslips.com.
the people station the opinions expressed on this radio station, its programs and its website by the hosts, guests, and call-in listeners or chatters are solely the opinions of the original source who expressed them.
They do not necessarily represent the opinions of Revolution Radio and FreedomSlips.com, its staff or affiliates.
You're listening to Revolution Radio, FreedomSlips.com.
100% listeners supported radio.
now we return you to your host our host will return shortly
I think we're all sort of used to seeing him, well, for those who watch it later, seeing him slide back in that chair and pick up the microphone.
So, figure a speech there, picking up the microphone.
So, Jim, yeah, break it over.
Thank you, Paul.
There's been a rather interesting development that is well worth discussing about Democrats suggesting military shouldn't follow illegal orders coming from Donald Trump, to which he's reacted very forcefully.
Let's pick up the story.
Hey, y'all, and welcome to Politibral.
My name is Brian, and Martha McCallum does not hold back when she calls out Jason Crow.
And you will not believe what he's actually standing up to defend here.
This story is insane.
Let's dive in.
What law are you talking about that's being broken?
And then you said that he's implying that he might do something that they wouldn't want to uphold or follow through with in the future.
What are you talking about specifically?
Yeah.
Yeah, I appreciate you asking.
Well, number one, the protests at Lafayette Square in the first Trump administration where he said, Can't you just shoot them?
Can't you just shoot them in the legs or something?
That's a direct quote.
And of course, the then chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.
That's not a military order.
That was a comment.
That's it was a request.
And that's coming from the President of the United States to your command to your generals.
Don't you think that's a request?
I'm asking specifically right now what you're talking about.
Yeah, number two, he's also threatened to send the military into Chicago and other cities to go to war with those cities.
That is a very, very disturbing thing.
Number three, he's also alluded to sending troops to polling stations, which is actually a violation of U.S. law.
U.S. criminal law prohibits troops from going to polling stations.
And he's alluded to that.
So those are just one of many examples of allegiance.
You're not talking about actual policy.
You're not talking about things that our members of our service members who we revere and respect are actually being asked to do.
So when you see this video on all over the place, when you see this video on social media, I think a lot of people scratch their heads and they say, What exactly are they talking about?
Are they talking about not allowing gunboats to make it to the United States carrying drugs?
I mean, is that what you're talking about?
Martha, here's a novel idea.
How about we actually prevent things from happening before they become a problem?
I think that's what they're trying to do.
No, what you're saying, what you're saying is we have to wait until there's a problem to respond to that problem.
No, I'm not.
Right.
As a military officer, what I think is important is we train people, we give them information, we prepare people for challenges coming down the pike.
Let me just elaborate on this.
There are six members of Congress who are former Army or Intel officers and others.
They know what they're talking about, suggesting the military and Intel agencies should not follow illegal orders from Trump.
It's actually part of the uniform code of military justice.
I taught this to recruits in San Diego at the recruit depot from 64 to 66.
The first year there, I served as a series commander with 15 DIs and 300 recruits under my command.
And we had instruction for the recruits on military justice.
And it's a principle of military justice that you must refuse illegal orders.
Now, non-commissioned officers getting an order from a superior are going to treat it as legitimate, even if they have questions about it.
The consequences could be severe.
But we know, you know, lots of actions committed by the military are illegal.
I think in this case, what may have inspired it is taking out these boats down off of Venezuela.
Now, Martha McCollum is begging the question by assuming they were transporting drugs, but it was not proven.
There was no due process.
Those who were aborted, and I take it there are now 15 of these instances where Trump has had the military take out those what may have been mere fishing boats without any due process, without any investigation, without apprehending the suspect before they were terminated.
I don't have any doubt that's a violation of international law, none whatsoever.
And given the background of the UCMJ, I think what they were saying was actually accurate and appropriate.
Paul, go ahead.
Well, there's a lot going on here.
I think we can assume that whatever is being done is nefarious at best.
I think I first heard the phrase back in the 80s where someone said it's not a war on drugs, it's a war on the competition.
And of course, there's various types of wars being waged under the name of the war on terror or the war on drugs.
So I trust whatever comes out of our government and our military has currently constituted.
I trusted zero pretty much.
And I mean, why Venezuela, in other words, no other country sends us drugs, right?
I mean, in other words, how many different countries are drugs coming here from, for example, you know, Colombia, Bolivia, Mexico?
I mean, we know all kinds of drugs come from China as well.
So it seems to be very selective.
And I really would like to know what's going on.
And I don't believe I've heard a plausible explanation.
Certainly taking out drug votes to me is not plausible.
As far as your comments about refusing unlawful or illegal or immoral military orders, this is a higher concept that a lot of people are not going to be able to buy into.
So for example, if you don't have a very well-developed moral consciousness to begin with, then you're going to be much more susceptible to do what it is you think they want you to do or they tell you directly to do.
Paul, I'm liking your comments, but they're a little hard to hear.
If you've been on the speakerphone, could you switch it off?
Because usually your voice is very clear.
Now it's kind of foggy.
So I will do so.
It's going to be difficult though because my speakers are not working very well on my phone.
I've been using a remote speaker.
So okay, okay.
Well, look, I mean, a perfect example is in Israel.
Those are grossly illegal orders to abuse the prisoners, the slaughter of the civilians.
This is all violation of international law.
And if they had a uniform code of military justice as soldiers, the idea of carrying out these atrocities would be in violation thereof.
Now, in Israel, they don't give a shit about the law or morality.
They only care about power and control.
They want the Palestinians out.
The only good Palestinian is a dead Palestinian, as we used to hear the joke about Indians.
The only good Indian is a dead Indian.
Well, that was atrocious then, and it's atrocious now.
Only the slaughter of the Indians is in the relatively distant past.
The slaughter of the Palestinians continues unabated to this day.
Paul, more thoughts of yours.
Yeah, I'm not sure there's any equivalency between the Indian wars, which we had to fight here, versus the Israelis and the Palestinians.
I think there's a whole world of difference, even though your point is well taken.
The only other thing I was going to say about the military and so forth, there's a really good article on Russ Winter's site.
You may have seen it about the quality today of some of the military candidates and listees.
And it's not good.
And we can be sure that it's not just a physical quality, but a mental and emotional quality as well, because the world that a lot of these kids are growing up in is completely different than the world that you and I grew up in.
So I don't have high hope for a sense of morality coming from the average American soldier.
However, the ones with the higher consciousness and the higher intelligence would like to think they would refuse their experience.
Well, Trump's gone so far as to suggest they ought to be executed, which is outrageous that they've committed seditious treason for simply observing what's in the U uniform code of military justice.
I mean, Trump makes himself look very, very foolish here.
Meanwhile, of course, he signed a bill to release the Epstein piles.
We could still limit what comes out.
I have no doubt that's going to happen.
There's going to be an effort here.
Among the speculations, Paul, I have heard are worries about the cultural impact if it turns out that very well-known religious leaders revered worldwide, sports figures, immortalized actors on the A-list that everyone admires.
If, if, if it were to turn out that the Pope, for example, had visited Little St. James Island, that Michael Jordan, that Tom Hanks, that George Clooney had all been involved in this kind of sexual abuse.
What do you think would be the impact for the public to learn these things, Paul?
I believe in the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, but I'm assessing your thoughts about the cultural impact.
Well, you know, that's hard to say.
I think a lot of people already suspect it and believe it.
If you read the comments on many of the videos online on several different channels, including, you know, YouTube, for example, I mean, there's, I think that there's a huge segment of the population that already suspects it or believes it.
So that's as far as the cultural impact, you know, again, this is something that I don't believe they will allow to happen.
I sent you an audio file.
We can play some of it if you want, but Kevin Alfred Strong makes the point that they switched the language now with a lot of people not noticing.
They're now calling it the Epstein case file.
And what he feels they're going to do is to release very limited amounts of information, not much more than what was actually in the case against Epstein from 20 plus years ago, where they prosecuted them for, you know, sex trafficking.
And they are definitely never going to release the videos, even though he makes the point that we have the technology that we can blur out the faces of the victims, the minors, and we can actually clearly see the faces of the politicians and the actors and celebrities and other people.
We could do that.
But essentially, so that way we know exactly who it was that was participating.
Look at there was videotaping in all the different rooms in his different mansions.
And that's what they supposedly have.
They have a lot of that.
And you can bet we're never going to see it.
And they're never going to expose the people that we want to see exposed.
So again, it's going to be to use one of your phrases, a very limited hangout, so to speak.
Paul, I like what you've said here, the Epstein files versus the Epstein case files.
There's another great deception happening right now.
Have you noticed the very careful language some administration officials and congressmen and media figures are using lately with regard to the Epstein files?
Faced with an overwhelming public demand to release a Voltro file seized from Jewish sex abuser and apparently sought intel operative Jeffrey Epstein.
We're seeing a very carefully orchestrated act, a dance between Democrats and Republicans to make hay out of each other's failure to release the files and to pretend to be transparent and release a few things here and there to make the other side look as bad as possible while at the same time protecting the guilty on their team.
That's where the new deception, the new language comes in.
At first, everyone is saying the Epstein files mean everything that's been seized from the billionaire Jewish user and abuser of white girls and women.
Then Trump, while simultaneously claiming there are no Epstein files, find the whole issue of the Epstein hoax, decided it would make him look good and quiet all the talk among his bays toward the release of the very limited grand jury files used to indict Epstein in the prostitution of minors case from almost 20 years ago,
which, since the grand jury testimony is sealed, they were pretty sure could never happen.
And it didn't.
Even if it had, it would have only been documentations of Depstein trafficking a very small subset of his victims and contain zero information about his recording and blackmailing the high and mighty among his many clients, friends, and associates.
The issue was never raised in that case.
We have the audio here, Paul.
Shall I play part of it?
If you like, but yeah, you just read the pertinent parts.
And isn't that a nice little piece of analysis there?
Yes, yes, yes.
Very disturbing, Paul.
Very disturbing.
And I think you're right.
They're going to make a distinction between the Epstein case files and the Epstein files.
And they're going to release only a tiny subset of what they have in order to protect themselves.
I think you got it exactly right.
More thoughts?
I was going to say, this is the same site where I read a great analysis and article quite a while ago about the absurdity of this so-called case where, if you recall, they made the non-prosecution agreement, which is such an amazing play on words, if you will.
I mean, no such thing really exists as a non-prosecution agreement, but that's the deal that they cut back then with Alex Acosta, the Jewish, you know, United States attorney.
And it's just, again, you know, it's just a complete what I call parade of absurdities when it comes to justice for these people as opposed to the rest of us.
Yes.
Get this.
X, supposed to be a bastion of freedom of speech, shuts down Hebrew translations to hide hateful tirade, uncommon sense tweet.
This is from Winter Watch.
X literally disabled Hebrew translation because Jews were celebrating killing people too much.
It's inaccurate that they disable it to protect us, though they did it to protect them.
Is Hebrew the only language translation on X and why is it disabled?
Is this an AI request?
Yes.
Hebrew appears to be the only language for which post translations have been specifically disabled on X formerly Twitter.
This change was made because translation from Hebrew often amplifies inflammatory art policy violating content that just calls for violence.
Translation for other languages, including Arabic, remain available.
I think that's exactly right.
They were celebrating the slaughter of the Palestinians.
Here's an image from Satan.
I do something evil, but you're guilty because you found out and that makes you anti-Semitic.
Paul, I think that's pretty close to the mark.
Your thoughts.
Well, nowadays, anti-Semitic is a pretty broad brush.
And I think it's through the little saying, I guess it's cliché that I saw a long time ago, probably now at least, well, 13 years ago, where it said anti-Semitism is a form of awareness.
Ever heard that?
Anti-Semitism in the form of awareness.
Yes, yes, yes, I get it.
So again, it's, you know, we live in a world like you have covered, and I have mentioned on your shows before, but in so many ways, it's like a bad science fiction movie in many aspects, not just the one that you've been recently covering with the nanotechnology and all the vaccines, and then probably many, many other things as well.
It's just a very, very strange world.
One that the average person is not prepared to comprehend, in my opinion.
I keep finding that over and over again.
Out and about, sometimes I'm roaming around.
I encounter a liberal in the wild, if you will, you know, based upon just a brief exchange of conversation or ideas.
And it really is true.
A lot of these people that I've bumped into are quite unhinged.
And when you talk about things that are quite factful and well understood, it really makes them short circuit.
You know, they can't handle, well, just like Jeff Nicholson said, can't handle the truth.
Here's a report worth tossing into the mix.
Americans should be enraged reports exposed unprecedented corruption at Trump DOJ.
I wouldn't even call it the Justice Department anymore.
It's become Trump's personal law firm.
And somewhere between Kash Patel and Pam Bondi, I think that's completely correct.
Dozens of former U.S. DOJ attorneys have now gone on record to describe the unprecedented corruption of federal law enforcement taking place during President Donald Trump's second term.
In a lengthy story published Sunday by the New York Times, the former DOJ attorney described rampant politicalization of prosecutions, directives to dig up evidence on Trump political foes and orders to drop investigation into potential terrorist plots and white-collar crimes.
Several attorneys told the paper that the corruption of the DOJ began on Trump's very first day in office when he issued a blanket pardon to everyone who had been convicted of rioting at the U.S. Capitol building in his belief on his behalf on January 6, 2021, in a last-ish effort to prevent the certification of former President Joe Biden's electoral victory.
Now, I take exception to all of that.
That was a contrived event.
Nancy Pelosi, the mayor of Washington, D.C., the Capitol police, the FBI, were involved in the fabrication that the American thinker published very shortly, a decisive expose that there was no incitement, there was no insurrection, no one was trying to overthrow the government.
I think that blanket pardon was completely appropriate, completely appropriate.
Meanwhile, it continues.
Gregory Rosen oversaw the unit at DOJ that prosecuted January 6 rioters, told the Times he felt numb, seeing the pardon of the rioters, but he nonetheless facilitated the pardon because he understood they were within the president's constitutional powers.
Mike Romano, a prosecutor who worked on January 6 cases, said he had to resign as soon as he saw the broad scope of the pardons, which included rioters who are guilty of assaulting police officers.
It's incredibly demoralizing to see something you worked on for four years wiped away by a lie.
And here he says, I mean the idea that prosecution of the rioters was a grave national injustice.
We had strong evidence against every person we prosecuted.
I don't believe that for a second.
But of course, assaults on police officers are serious offenses.
The mass pardon of the Capitol Rioters was only the beginning.
As prosecutors said, politicalization seemed swept over the entire department now.
This article is published by Common Dreams, which is a well-known left-wing website.
But if there's corruption at DOJ, I want it to be exposed.
I'm sure you share that sentiment, Paul.
Your thoughts?
Well, once again, there's a lot to unpack there.
You know, Lomano, okay, I don't know about the guy, but I think just by the last name, Rosen, we can pretty much know what's going on there.
And the notion that they make such a big deal out of this, yet in the aftermath of the George Floyd BLM so-called movement and riots, I mean, how much actual real damage was done by that whole thing and how many of those people were prosecuted with the vigor that they applied to the so-called January 6th riders insurrection, right?
So this is one of the many psychological operations that's taking place all the time.
I think a lot of people understand it in a subconscious way as well, perhaps consciously, but they will give us somebody like Donald Trump who says many of the things that we want to hear and is doing many of the things that we want to see done, while at the same time undermining him in every possible way.
And for example, as you have come around now, you see the very big flaws and hypocrisies, in many cases, the outright criminality of Donald Trump.
And at the same time, you also see that some of his policies and some of the things he's done are good.
So it's a mixed bag.
And they're going to do everything they can to keep this thing at a boiling point without it having to spill over.
This is kind of my, I don't know, it's a rough way of looking at it, but I sort of have come to this conclusion that this constant tension, you know, between all the various factions and groups and the media, the way the media portrays our leaders and our government is on purpose.
It's, you know, similar to the old TV show, Get Smart, Write, Chaos and Control.
They want both of these things going all the time because I believe, and I'm certain you've heard the term strategy of tension.
This is, in my opinion, part of the overall ongoing mechanism by which they believe they hold power over us.
Yes, yes, yes.
Well, there's much more going on here.
It's one of the very positive development.
The CDC has finally retracted a 30-year denial that vaccines cause autism after a McCullough Foundation landmark autism report.
This is most welcome.
In a development with both found scientific and public health implications, the CDC has quietly updated its long-standing position on vaccines and autism, acknowledging for the first time the long-repeated lie: vaccine do not cause autism, has never been an evidence-based statement.
We'll be right back, and we'll talk about the assassination of the 35th president of the United States.
We'll be right back.
Was it a conspiracy?
Did you know that the police in Boston were broadcasting this is a drill, this is a drill on bullhoards during the marathon?
That the Boston Globe was tweeting that a demonstration bomb would be set off during the marathon for the benefit of bomb squad activities, and that one would be set off in one minute in front of the library, which happened as the Globe had announced.
Peering through the smoke, you could see bodies with missing arms and legs, but there was no blood.
The blood only showed up later and came out of a tomb.
They used amputee actors and a studio-quality smoke machine.
Don't let yourself be played.
Check out And Nobody Died in Boston either.
Available at moonrockbooks.com.
That's moonrockbooks.com.
The second that the Capitol will ever treat us fairly, you are lying to yourself because we know who they are and what they do.
is what they do.
You can torture us and bomb us, fire is catching.
And if we burn, you burn.
Good evening.
Are you awake yet?
I hope we've tried and we've tried for years and years to use passive resistance and loud voices to make a change.
The time is over.
Your governments around the world have no other goal than to decimate your entire existence.
The hands of the bankers and the elites.
The war is coming, and it's your choice to decide if you want to be a warrior Or a victim, denial is not a choice anymore.
Revolution RadiofreedomSlips.com, the number one listener-supported radio station on the planet.
not giving up revolution are you angered by the injustices inflicted upon the innocence of the world Do you have a message you'd like to share?
Any knowledge you'd like to impart to those willing to learn?
Have you ever listened to our shows and thought, hey, I could do this, but you just don't know how to kickstart your hosting ambitions?
Or are you an established professional host?
Awarded by censorship in other areas, seeking pastures new?
Contact us here at the world's number one free speech network, Revolution Radio.
We provide the platform, the training, and the airtime to any budding host wanting the chance to take those first talk show steps.
Established hosts can find a safe and secure home here where their message can ring out loud and clear, unencumbered, free from sponsorship overreach.
Drop us a line via our email, support at revolution.radio, or head into our Discord server to say hello.
We'll take everything from there.
Revolution Radio, where hosting dreams become actualized reality.
The opinions expressed on this radio station, its programs, and its website by the hosts, yes, and call-in listeners or chatters are solely the opinions of the original source who expressed them.
They do not necessarily represent the opinions of Revolution Radio and FreedomSlips.com, its staff or affiliates.
If you're listening to Revolution Radio, FreedomSlips.com, 100% listener-supported radio.
And now we return you to your host.
Well, back in June, I did an interview with Jeremy Neal of South Africa, a wonderful host who publishes under the heading of Germ Warfare about JFK, who is responsible and why.
It didn't appear for a good while, but now it's shown up under UK column, UK column, and the title Oswald Could Not Have Shot JFK.
That's totally appropriate because it turns out Lee was standing in the doorway of the book depository when the JFK motorcade passed by and therefore not only cannot have been the lone gunman, he cannot have been one of the multiple shooters of whom I have identified eight, seven by name, rank, and serial number.
Meanwhile, the day of the assassination, 22 November 1963, late in the evening, the Secret Service and the FBI reported their conclusion that there had been three and only three shots from above and behind.
That the first had hit Jack in the back, the second had hit Governor Conley in the back, and the third had hit Jack in the back of the head, killing him.
Now, those were all legitimate findings about gunshots.
The shot to the back, Jack, about five and a half inches below the collar, just to the right of the spinal column, shallow shot.
Only went in about as far as the second knuckle on your little finger that shot Conley.
Yes, he was hit in the back.
Back of the head, yes, Jack was hit in the back of the head.
Now, what that left off and must have been very puzzling to the American people is that, for example, when Malcolm Kiltoff, the acting press secretary, announced that JFK was dead, it was like 1 p.m. Dallas time.
He pointed to his right temple and said it was a simple matter of a bullet right through the head, attributing that finding to Admiral George Berkeley.
So on radio and television that afternoon, many of the most famous newsmen of their time, including, for example, Jeff Hutley on NBC, were talking about the shot that hit Jack in the right forehead and a second shot, which had been elaborated by Malcolm Perry MD to perform a simple tracheostomy incision through the wound,
a small puncture wound at the throat, which he described three times as a wound of entry.
So while you got the FBI and the Secret Service announcing these three shots from above and behind all day, the news in the afternoon had been reported these two other shots, both of which obviously had been fired from in front.
Thus, when the FBI and the Secret Service report began to trickle in, Frank McGee, who is nobody's fool, says, this is incongruous.
How can a man have been shot from behind, from in front, from behind?
Here they had all day been talking about these two shots, great authority, both fired from in front.
And in fact, if you put them all together, you got five shots having been fired, four hits on Jack, the back, the back of the head, the throat, the right temple.
Those were all bona fide legitimate hits.
You got the one to Conley, that's already five.
That's obviously a number greater than three.
It would turn out that David Mantic, the leading expert on the medical evidence, has now concluded there was yet a third shot to the head, which means five hits on JFK alone, one or more to Conley.
That's already six.
And these were fired by separate shooters from separate locations.
And then we have a man who was in a Dallas police uniform.
He was CIA, joined the force just a few weeks before, firing his shot that missed.
He pulled it because it would have hit Jackie.
And they were under strict instructions, she must be harmed.
And it wound up in the grass, where it was picked up by a Dallas police lieutenant.
So that's already seven, seven different shots fired by seven different shooters.
I mean, and then there were a couple more that missed.
The shot that hit him in the back of the head was fired from the Daltech, from the second floor, the window of a closet, a broom closet for a uranium mining company that was a CIA asset by an anti-Castro Cuban,
Nestor Tony Iscedro, who fired three shots with a mannicker carcano, not the weapon found in the book depository, but would be subbed in when all the evidence was unnecessarily and wrongfully taken to Washington so it could be filtered by the FBI to complete their framing of Lee Oswald.
▲
Export Selection