All Episodes
Previous Next
Sept. 21, 2025 - Jim Fetzer
01:01:12
Israel moves to Ukraine, Digital ID, Kirk Psyop, Stable Coins, Troops in NOLA, 50 States - 1 Israel
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome to episode 145 of Gary King's Inconvenient Truths.
Where Gary presents video clips and stories I don't know are coming from my spontaneous and unrearse response.
Gary.
So much going on in the world today.
What do you got for me now?
Oh man.
Well, I can say one thing.
We get a lot of clips from 153 news.
And I'd like you to go there and help support us.
We barely make it every month.
And we could really appreciate your help.
All right.
We're going to start off with Judge Napolitano.
I'm still horribly disturbed at what's going on in Gaza.
The United Nations issued a very detailed report, which our friend and colleague Jeff Sachs has read the entire report.
It's about 100 pages long.
It details with excruciating and unassailable detail.
It recounts excruciating non-assailable detail.
The barbaric acts being committed by the IDF and the use of starvation as a uh means of repressing the uh populace.
Doesn't history teach that some force at some point in time will come in to put a stop to a Holocaust of this magnitude.
Well, I think what you're saying is that justice can be delayed, but justice eventually finds its way.
I think that's probably true.
The problem that we have right now is that we're giving a lot of evidence for the old observation that there is nothing more reliable than a person that can be got bought for cold hard cash.
And I'm afraid that's what the Israel lobby has discovered about us.
Uh we have been purchased, our government has been purchased.
There's no moral justification for any of this.
There's no strategic justification for it.
You know, this recent attack uh on Qatar was something that we knew about.
We we uh helped to enable it, frankly.
The British provided air refueling assets.
All of this is part of the same uh lobby and same power in in the United States and in the West right now.
Will this continue?
It's it I guess it will.
At some point, the money may run out.
Uh, we don't know under what circumstances our economies are fragile.
If you look at the bond market, which the British call Gilts in London, it's only a matter of days, maybe weeks before the entire British economy implodes.
Financially, the rest of Europe is not in much better shape, and of course, we're not far behind.
So I guess when these things happen, there will be an epiphany, and we will simply walk away because we can't afford to stay and do what we're doing.
But at the moment, that's the best we can do.
It would be wonderful if President Trump simply picked up the phone and said, Look, I've gone as far as I can with you on this, and I can't in good conscience as the president of the United States continue.
I see no evidence that that will happen.
Does Trump control Netanyahu or does Netanyahu control Trump?
I think that's self-evident.
It's Mr. Netanyahu, who is the de facto president when it comes to matters in U.S. foreign and defense policy.
I don't think there's any question of that at all.
I mean, right now, you and I were talking off-camera before this began.
Uh, friends inside the Department of Defense who are very knowledgeable and involved right now in the inventories of missiles and rockets.
Right, right, right.
Please go to this.
I forgot about it, please.
Yeah, well, they contacted me and they said uh they used an acronym that you found interesting.
Uh it's essentially an informed estimate that says right now, if we continue on the current path, it we're seven to eight years behind the Russians and probably the Chinese in terms of our inventories.
Now we could improve that with both legacy and new technology to about three to four years.
And they said this is not absolutely hard facts.
They said this is our informed estimate, and they use the acronym SWAG, which we frequently do, which is a uh uh wild-ass uh wild ass guess, but it's it's based on their experience and and the times for manufacturing this equipment.
And we have no surge capacity, as we've discussed before.
The point is that if we were to go to war with any major power, we would run through our existing arsenal very, very quickly.
So if we were really concerned about our own security, which I think we should be, we would be much less provocative than we are.
Now, obviously, Venezuela is very weak, and Venezuela would not tax us greatly if we decided to destroy it.
That's not a vote in favor of doing so.
I think it's a dumb idea and unnecessary.
But if we find ourselves in a on a collision course with the Russians, whether it happens in Eastern Europe or it happens in the Middle East, or God forbid the Chinese, their capacities to produce are far greater than ours.
Their inventories are far greater than ours.
And we can't make up for the last 10, 15 years in the space of uh six months or 12 months.
We'll simply run out and then we'll be naked in the face of overwhelming military power.
Colonel, thank you very much.
A gloomy picture indeed.
Okay, Dr. Pazir.
Well, Colonel McGregor is the single best geopolitical analyst in the world today, I affirm.
I admire him beyond words.
He's absolutely right.
Let me just add, beginning with a trivia, attacking Venezuela, he suggested would be a stupid idea and unnecessary idea.
It would also be sadistic and cruel.
What has become of the United States?
And it becomes a monster indulging in barbaric acts like the Israelis, where he perfectly properly observes that Benjamin Nanya who is our acting president.
This has become the United States of Israel or the United States of America.
Our Congress is Israeli occupied territory.
The only gleam of light I see here as we speak now is that the Charlie Kirk shooting event has made the whole world believe that Israel is out to assassinate anyone who's remotely critical of Israel, and the world is rising up in revolt against it.
Now I believe there are subtleties about this that suggests the event was actually staged.
But real or staged, no matter the genie is out of the bottle, the public has been hit like a bullet between the eyes, with a realization that Israel is completely out of control.
Slaughtering everyone, practicing assassination right and left.
Remember the Hezbollah, the pagers remember now, taking out the Iranian uh leaders, uh, remember assassinating the Houthi leadership.
Now they've gone into Qatar.
This is completely insane.
I believe BB not yeah, who is no longer in his right mind.
My only fear is whether that's also true of our own president, who's been slavishly obediently following his orders and no not that long ago describing as the greatest man in the world.
When he's in fact one of the true whore figures on the world stage of all time.
I agree.
All right.
Speaking of.
I don't know who specifically came out and said that BB killed Charlie Kirk, but now that he's for the second time denying that he is, people are going, what's actually going on here?
Joseph Goebbels, the Nazi propaganda minister, said that the bigger the lie, the faster it will spread.
Well, somebody has fabricated a monstrous big lie that Israel had something to do with Charlie Kirk's horrific murder.
This is insane.
It is false.
It is outrageous.
Charlie Kirk was a giant, a once in a century talent who defended freedom, defended America, defended our common Judeo Christian civilization.
Charlie loved Israel.
He loved the Jewish people.
He told me so in a letter that he sent me just a few months ago.
One of my greatest joys as a Christian, he said, is advocating for Israel and forming alliances with Jews to protect Judeo-Christian civilization.
He encouraged me to make the case directly to the American people about how vital Israel is to U.S. national security.
He told me the holy land is so important to my life, it pains me to see support for Israel slip away.
Now, if Charlie disagreed with a policy of mine or decision here and there, not only did I not mind, I welcomed it.
This is the essence of Charlie.
This is the essence of a free country.
It's exactly what Charlie stood for.
And I knew that his suggestions always came from the heart, from his love for Israel, and from his love for the Jewish people.
A few weeks before his death, I spoke to Charlie.
I invited him to visit Israel again.
And sadly, that won't happen.
Now some are peddling these disgusting rumors.
Perhaps out of obsession, perhaps with Qatari funding.
What I do know is this.
Charlie Kirk was a great man, and a great man deserves honor, not lies.
Rest in peace, Charlie Kirk.
May your memory be a blessing.
I don't know, guys.
That Israeli propaganda just ain't hitting the same.
You're not making people feel comfortable with the fact that you keep coming out to have to deny something that certainly wasn't asserted by me on this program.
And you're doubling down on your lie.
I told you to publish the full letter that Charlie wrote to you, not lines of it.
Okay.
It's a lie by omission and to stop mentioning the fact that you invited him to Israel just two weeks ago without mentioning the fact that he declined to go.
Am I lying?
Can anybody actually work and assert that I am lying?
You can say my name.
Candace Owens lie.
Charlie said, I'd love to go to Israel.
Charlie said, I'd love to have you have my on my uh radio show.
They have sent the hounds out, but they're unable to actually dispute the words that are coming out of my mouth.
Okay, Dr. Tatcher.
Oh, Candace is so wonderful.
Charlie had been undergoing an agonizing reappraisal of his attitude toward Israel, even uh about Judeo-Christian values.
He was critical of the genocide.
He thought it had been unwise for the United States to bomb Iran.
He uh was very, very troubled about expanding the definition of anti-Semitism.
He told Cantus.
He told Tucker, he told Clayton that he was worried that the Mossad might take him out.
And I believe that was totally legitimate and bona fide.
Candace, of course, is making a very telling point that Bebe is overdoing it.
He's displaying consciousness of guilt by repeatedly denying what the whole world thinks, and thereby actually confirming that was the plan Gary now.
I believe that in fact Charlie flipped the switch by staging his assassination before they had the chance to pull it off.
It's very complicated to explain.
But either way, and frankly, no matter how much evidence I could adduce that it actually had been a stage event, practically no one's going to buy into it because the motive, the means, the opportunity was so obviously possessed by Israel.
Charlie had a $40 million war chest for turning point.
Offered him an additional 150 million.
He turned it down.
He confronted the choice between silver or lead.
And designed away out to fake his death.
There's a whole lot to it.
I'm not going to pursue here and now, but I'll just say it doesn't really matter.
Whether you believe it or not, because the whole world is outraged with Israel.
They've overdone it again and again and again.
This has turned out to be a turning point in US Israeli relations.
And BB is so stressed.
He's so distraught.
That he's acting very, very stupid.
I believe among what the outcomes that could emerge is a requirement that APAC be registered as a foreign agent.
That dual citizens not be allowed in policy shaping or decision-making positions in the American government.
Those two steps alone would be a form of emancipation from the yoke that Israel has imposed upon us, Gary, and I say the vow to be wished.
Let it be.
Yes, sir.
Okay, we'll get we've got two clips that I put together.
So this is a double clip of Catherine Otto.
Catherine, what did you think about the Charlie Cook assassination?
We haven't spoken about that.
I think it's a psyop, and I think it's a complete waste of our time.
What you want to focus on, you know, forget what might have happened or not happened.
What you want to focus on is this is being used as an excuse by the attorney general.
Um we're hearing it from the president to get tyrannical clothes at uh uh laws and to rip up the constitution.
Don't let it happen.
So, you know, don't let free speech be interfered with.
Don't let any of your due process rights be destroyed.
So lawlessness is not okay.
And we're seeing, you know, if you look at our our our collection on the control grid, this administration is moving to build a control grid.
We can't let it happen.
It's one of the reasons we want Kennedy to remain in there.
He's one of the things slowing it down and trying to stop it.
And and the reality is you cannot let a vague standard like hate crime um be used because who's whose hate crime?
Um, and we've also seen an attack on due process with the attack on the Venezuelan boats, you know.
But but you're watching a concerted effort to shred the constitution, and I hate to say it, Charlie Kirk assassination was the Reichstag fire.
Uh-huh.
So I I just, you know, my attitude is your time is busy.
Don't waste time on this.
What you need to understand is a group of people are trying to use this to take away all of your rights.
Don't let it happen.
Don't buy it, don't believe it, and push back against them because you know, it's only gonna take a little bit of pushback to send a signal, this is not gonna work.
You know, and if if you want one action to take politically that is the proper pushback, help Congressman Massey get the 218th vote to release the Epstein files.
Because one of the things this is pointing out is the push to get the Epstein files, and every effort is being made to stop the Epstein files from coming out.
Meantime, we have many people in the Epstein files over, you know, having dinner with Prince Charles and uh our I should call him King Charles now.
Um, you know, and and the Anglo-American Alliance celebrating.
But, you know, I keep saying this is the mega rich against every everyone else, and we can't, you know, we cannot let the mega rich tear up the fundamental legal principles that are the bedrock of this country.
So, you know, don't don't don't let this distract you and don't let them get away from it.
Uh uh, yeah, all it takes is a little bit of pushback Against people like Pam Bondy and what they're saying to make this go the other way.
This is a theater where you're making it up as you go, and as you see how the audience reacts, you change the story, and you evolve the story and you create the story.
This is a this is a theater production.
But the important thing to understand about that theater is that in this case, I'm seeing something I've never seen before.
And that is when they do this kind of theater, you and and when I say they, I mean the intelligence agencies.
When they engineer a theater like this, they always, you know, they like to mock the crowd.
I have never seen the mockery this extreme.
This is different.
This is new.
It's a joke.
It's a joke that you would say, we have a manifesto, but it disappeared, but we know it existed, and we think we might be able to get it.
It's like, what are you talking about?
I mean, no experienced enforcement person would say that could possibly say that with a straight face.
I mean, it's a mockery, but but then you know, it turns out the roommate, he's got a roommate, the roommate is trans, the they were lovers, but he told his lover, you know, before this, and he did it on this, and he, you know, and so they keep adding pieces to the story of who the alleged assassin is that make it more and more ridiculous and more and more ridiculous.
And every time, and and it's a way of mocking at the audience that they can get them to buy this.
Okay.
Well, Catherine Austin Fitz is a very wise woman, and she's reading the tea leaves right, and I think her concern with how this is gonna be utilized to bring in more surveillance, completely appropriate, or other advisories about not getting wound up in it.
Well, it depends who you are, you know.
I mean, given my history and exposing false flag in the stage events, I have an obligation to expose this one.
Very detailed, very clever, and it's going to turn out to be among the most important in the history of the United States, Gary.
I'll tell you flat out.
This is uh seemingly so simple.
One man killed by a single shot.
Everyone has an opinion about it, and the opinions are being very strongly held.
And even if I offer superior information, they're not budging, they're not being affected.
There's an irrational grip that is seized their minds.
But I don't, it doesn't bother me.
It's okay because the effect of believing it was real, and Israel actually took him out because he was turning against Israel is devastating to the Zionist agenda.
And of course, a story about the Patsy is silly beyond belief.
There's so many fantasy elements running across a roof with no gun and change of clothes, taking apart the gun, reassembling the gun, jumping down 12 feet with a barrel in his trousers.
This claw stuff is colossally stupid.
You jump down 12 feet with a barrel of a gun in your trouser, you're gonna rip your intestine, maybe penetrate your heart, you're gonna be dead on the spot.
It's just so stupid.
And yeah, the wobbler could be disassembled, but it required a special wrench and a lot of torque.
This wimpy little kid couldn't have done it.
He's supposed to have disassembled it, then reassembled it to be found in the woods.
I mean, what a parson she was talking about.
He had a roommate who was male, but was transitioning, and they were dating, and he's got a manifesto, but now he doesn't have a manifesto, now he can't find it, but he knows he had it.
She's absolutely right.
This is mocking us.
This is insulting us to our face, and I hope none of our followers are gonna let themselves be played.
Again, I re reiterate a wise woman.
Listen to her every word.
Yes, I agree.
Okay, now uh instead of sending troops to Gaza to maybe help out there.
Trump wants to send troops to New Orleans.
Breaking news on WDSU.
But we begin with breaking news out of our nation's capital.
As President Trump says he is thinking about sending National Guard troops to New Orleans, possibly even bypassing Chicago to do it.
The president punctuating crime in the Crescent City, even though murder rates are at historic lows right now.
So for the latest on this and the implications, let's get to White House correspondent Christopher Salas and uh Christopher, they're sending shockwaves throughout Southeast Louisiana right now.
I can imagine, Randy, this is the first time, in fact, that the president has mentioned sending troops to the Crescent City, arguing that New Orleans has a crime problem.
Take a listen.
Do we go to Chicago or we do we go to a place like New Orleans where we have a great governor, Jeff Landry, who wants us to come in and straighten out a very nice section of this country that's become quite, you know, quite tough, quite bad.
So we're gonna be going to uh maybe Louisiana, and you have New Orleans, which has a crime problem.
We'll straighten that out in about two weeks.
It'll take us two weeks, easier than D.C. But we could straighten out Chicago.
All they have to do is ask us.
Governor Landry is one of several Republicans who have sent National Guard troops to Washington, D.C. as part of President Trump's so-called crime crackdown.
The administration has touted the efforts, making at least 1,700 arrests so far and seizing 195 illegal guns.
That's according to Attorney General Pam Bondi.
But the president has also faced fierce pushback from Democratic governors and mayors, where the president is now promising to send the National Guard.
He said so yesterday.
We're going in.
We're not gonna tell them when some of those cities include Chicago and Baltimore.
Back to you.
Christopher, thank you so much for that live report at all.
Okay.
Well, it's loopy.
What the hell is going on here?
It does seem to be having a desired effect in Washington, D.C., I gather the crime rate has dropped at very, very low.
Not zero, of course, but very, very low.
Some governors, like Pritzker of Illinois, who has aspiration to become president, is taking a firm stand.
Doesn't want him in Chicago.
And yet Chicago is probably our most crime-laden city in America.
So we'll see how this pays out.
If the governor of Louisiana wants the troops to come to New Orleans, Gary, I don't know quite how all this has been justified given the Possi Comitatus Act of like what, 1878 that precluded the use of military forces to perform police functions, but it's happening.
He must have found a loophole in the law that makes it legal, because otherwise it's unconstitutional on its face.
But it may have good benefits.
Some have speculated, by the way, he wants the police forces in the major Democrat cities for when he cracks down on leading Democrat political figures like Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama, if he arrests them.
it might create riots so to preempt their occurrence.
He has the troops in these major cities where it's most likely to occur now.
I'm not declaring that to be the fact, I'm simply observing It would be a way to quell all kinds of rioting and so forth.
Worry to take those actions, and I guarantee you they are more than warranted.
The offenses committed by Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton against his nation are horrendous.
Barack Obama, especially.
Even though in the past we've called for locker up, blocker up about Hillary.
That fate is far more deserved by Barack Obama, who, among other things, nullified the Smith Mutt Act in 1948 with a Smith Modernization Act of 2012, which thereby legalized staged events, fake shootings, paid riots, and all that sort of thing, just in time to bring a Sandy Hook.
And we've had a succession of one of these phony events after another Boston bombing Orlando, Dallas, Charlottesville, Parkland, Las Vegas, Buffalo, Nashville, Uvalde.
It's seemingly endless, Gary.
And that was all the doing a Barack Obama.
We must restore the Smith Mutt Act and end this nonsense, which is doing a tremendous amount of damage.
Anytime they want an event to bolster some legal issue, they just manufacture it, and the public gets played.
I'm against that 100%.
All four restoring Smith Mutt to its original form for the benefit of the nation.
I agree.
All right.
Half time we'll go into the second half of our show.
All right.
Here is our congressman taking a little vacation.
The largest ever U.S. delegation to Israel just took place.
250 state legislators from all 50 states arrived Monday for an event called 50 states, one Israel.
They planted 50 trees at a site of the October 7th attacks and met with Israeli leaders.
Netanyahu's office called it the biggest bipartisan visit of American lawmakers to Israel.
Foreign Minister Gideon Tsar urged them to push anti-BDS laws in their states, which are meant to discourage boycotts of Israel.
So far, 38 states have already adopted such measures.
Tsar described BDS as part of a coordinated global effort against Israel, saying the best response has been anti-BDS legislation.
But the trip's timing sparked controversy.
The very next day, the UN ruled for the first time that Israel is committing genocide in Gaza, while Israel relaunched its ground invasion of Gaza City.
And despite its scale and timing, this massive visit has barely been covered by international media.
Only local Israeli outlets reported on it, leaving many to question why such a major event went largely unnoticed.
And of course, that's because it's grotesque.
These are just bribes.
These are public bribes.
I thought they'd all come from the Congress.
Thank God for that.
But they're patsies, they're suckers, they're saps.
And the fact that the UN made the announcement of finding of genocide was sensational while they were there supporting genocide Gary.
And this is to protect them that it's not being widely reported.
They don't want their constituents to know that they've sold out to Israel.
They've sold out to genocide.
They sold out to mass murder.
They've sold out human rights.
They've sold out international law.
They've sold out the Geneva Convention.
All 250 deserve to be removed from their positions in government.
Get them the hell out.
Find out.
Campaign against them.
And replace them with Americans.
People who are going to stand up for this nation, which I'm sad to say is why we need a new president, too, because this guy is Israel first.
He sold us a bill of goods, Gary.
And I can't begin to tell you how many Like myself who voted for the guy three times, are experiencing buyer's remorse.
Now it would have been inconceivable to have an airhead, a complete nitwit like Kamala Harris in office.
So in many ways Trump benefited from those he was running against.
The idea the Democrats couldn't do better.
And a person who's completely out of her depth in any intellectual exchange was itself embarrassing.
That's the best the Democrat Party can do.
At least Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton were smart and clever and shrewd.
They just had the wrong intent because they were out to do damage to the country and to benefit themselves.
Kamala, she has no idea which end is up.
She can't put A together with B. She's a moron.
Dumbest figure in American political life, with a possible exhibition of the phony Joe Biden we had to endure for the last four years.
Was a real Joe was actually a smart guy, very articulate, very expressive.
Use his hands in gestures alike.
He was impressive in many ways.
But the imposter for four years who was kind of a mummified version, no.
Ridiculous.
Different shape and size of head, different sandwiching, totally different style, no cognitive function.
It was business by auto pan.
The American people are starting to wake up, Gary.
I'm telling you, this is a very distressing situation to have 250 state legislators.
They had to be profoundly embarrassed by the UN declaration.
They deserve it.
And to be removed from office at the earliest opportunity.
Let it be done.
Yes, indeed.
All right, I wanted to play this clip earlier.
This is might explain a little bit more about the Ukraine situation.
Isn't there an argument to be made that the end result is now certain?
Why should another fill in the blank?
You can tell me better than I can give you, thousands Ukrainian young men die before the inevitable happens.
I think that's all that's ongoing.
Although, you know, we've seen that 13,000 Ukrainian men between the ages of 18 and 25, just a little over a week ago were suddenly released and allowed to cross the border from Ukraine into Poland, which was a rather strange development.
But now we're also seeing settlements in southern Ukraine emerge, uh, places where the population has been either denuded or is very, very thin, and we're seeing large numbers of Jews establish themselves in new communities.
In fact, we have a something on the internet uh that talks about the appearance of police around a community in southern Ukraine wearing American-like police uniforms who are stopping anyone from going into the area who is not Jewish.
And the people that wanted to go in there were Americans, but obviously they were Christians, they were halted, turned around and sent away.
We've always been hearing about this uh desire to create uh another greater Israel uh in parts of Ukraine, where at one point you had large numbers of Jews before the Second World War that were concentrated in places like Ukraine and part of Poland and southern Belarussia.
This is very odd.
Uh, is this part of the larger plan that's bankrupt by people like Larry Fink and others to create this?
Is this uh an extension of uh Israel as it is today?
I have no idea, but needless to say, I thought it was very odd to find a police force that looked like they were the New Jersey uh state police and insisting that if you weren't a Jew, you couldn't go into the area.
I thought that was very odd.
I don't know what's going on, but clearly the numbers of Ukrainian men are at an all-time low.
Well, of course, it's fascinating.
Yes, yes, I heard him make those observations before.
Even Zelensky has claimed that he wanted Ukraine to be the new Israel.
This is the largest community of Jews outside of Israel in the world today, as I understand it.
They wanted to return to their homeland.
The Ashkenazis have no connection to the tribe of Judah.
They have no Palestinian blood, they aren't Semites.
They're from Cazaria, modern day Ukraine.
DNA studies have confirmed it.
Which means that since the Palestinians actually are Semites.
But the Israelis are prosecuting them.
Israel is the greatest practitioner of anti-Semitism in the world today.
Just one ironic aspect of the situation.
I don't believe Israel or Ukraine are going to survive.
Russia is dominating the region, but I am very, very profoundly concerned that the West, out of greed, avarice, a desire to mismember Russia and loot its natural resources, is going to commit some colossal blunder that's going to trigger a nuclear war and Berlin.
Brussels, Paris, New York City, London are going to disappear in the blink of an eye, Gary.
Because the West wants a war.
It's not prepared to wage.
Which Russia wants to avoid, but is positioned to win.
next up Greg Reese music music music music music music music music music music While Charlie Kirk's death is being used by political agents to attack freedom of speech and to further divide an already divided nation, many are wondering what happens next.
And most financial analysts these days will tell you what's next.
Radical change in the U.S. economy is coming.
The U.S. government is facing a criminally irresponsible debt crisis.
The world is losing faith in the dollar and growing more and more disgusted with the crimes against humanity that the USD money printing machines are funding every day.
Cutting spending didn't work.
And the next attempt to try and save the U.S. debt-based system can be found in the recent Genius Act.
In short-term investing, the volatility of Bitcoin can allow a person to profit immensely, but only if they have a stable coin to convert to when the market corrects itself.
This is the foundational purpose of a stable coin to maintain a stable value so that one's investment can be temporarily secured.
The plan outlined in the Genius Act is to create an increased demand for U.S. debt by requiring stable coin companies to be backed by U.S. debt, thereby using stable coins as a way to funnel global money into U.S. government debt.
President Putin's advisor, Anton Kobukov says that the U.S. is planning a worldwide crypto rug pull to erase its massive debt by creating a U.S. debt-based stable coin system and then devalue it, robbing the people of their money to pay off its debt.
Right now, America is trying to change the rules in the gold and cryptocurrency markets.
Remember how much debt they have.
35 trillion dollars.
The US, just as it did in the 1930s and 1970s, will solve its financial problems at the expense of the entire world, driving everyone where into the cryptocurrency cloud.
Over time, when part of the U.S. national debt is placed in stable coins, the US will devalue that debt.
Once again, in simple terms, right now they have a 35 trillion dollar currency debt.
They move it into crypto into the cloud, devalue it, and start from scratch.
Of course, this is all just money out of thin air.
A desperate monetary sleight of hand that doesn't create new wealth and only shows that the system has failed.
To show that Russia and other countries will not go along with this.
He also said that the world will split up into zones.
The world isn't just moving to a new type of financial system.
The world is moving away from fiat money and dividing into zones.
This is referring to a multipolar world where different sets of rules are applied to different zones and signals the strong possibility that BRICS will not be buying U.S. debt in the near future.
It is important to remember that the term and the idea of BRICS was conceived in 2001 by an economist at Goldman Sachs.
U.S. regulations on stable coins will likely push the market offshore, where stable coin issuers will turn to real-world assets over U.S. debt.
The U.S. will then have to manage the debt crisis by taxing the American people, most likely with a carbon tax system.
Stable coins have been predominantly used for investing, but they also have the ability to freeze and seize your money, which should please Trump supporters who have been giddy schoolgirls over canceling people who offend them online.
The future of technocratic banking control is already being deployed in Vietnam, who recently implemented a nationwide digital ID system that requires both citizens and foreign residents to permit the government to store their biometric data in a centralized database.
Participation is not optional, and all accounts without biometric data will be closed.
The Vietnamese government has already erased and or frozen eighty-six million bank accounts.
And Vietnam is just the beta test.
This is soon going worldwide.
Greg Reese reporting.
It can't happen here.
Okay, Dr. Petcher.
Well, you know, uh Greg Reese puts out so many simply brilliant videos like this one.
That I elevate him to the category of a genius.
I think Greg Reese is a political genius.
I think his creativity, his ability to marshal arguments and present them in compact fashion in these videos is unparalleled.
This is tremendously important.
And it's telling us exactly where the world is heading.
The scam the US is gonna try to pull off to eliminate 35 trillion in debt.
My hat is off to you, Greg Reese.
You have done it again, hit it right out of the park.
I'm very impressed, Gary, as I am with the other clips you've had today.
This had been a sensational sequence, my friend.
Sensational.
Okay, we'll try to keep it going.
This I think the Ukraine, I mean the UK has lost their mind.
Okay, what we what was it?
Sorry, I don't like the camera.
You can have a body cam.
I can exhibit that to you.
I just don't like the camera really.
Okay, well, I'm doing this because this is my own house, and I am telling you why I'm saying so.
I just need to know why why why would she?
She's basically viewed a post, which is not an arrestable offense.
Yeah, okay.
The only thing is, we need to seize the phone at this corporate moment.
Yeah, the phone needs to get seized from us, otherwise we will escalate this further.
With a voluntary interview.
So have you seized anyone else?
Is she the only child you're picking?
Uh yeah, have you spoken to anyone else?
Let's go.
No, we'll come we'll come to the station now.
Do you want to let you know finish her sentence before we do have to get further Space Unfortunately?
That's fine.
We'll come to the stage now.
The phone isn't seized right now, and we're not able to basically get the phone.
We have to escalate this further.
Yeah.
Which means you'll get arrested.
For what?
No, absolutely not.
I'm sorry.
That's fine.
I would like you to leave now.
I should like you to leave.
This is why you're Okay.
I have nothing more to say to you.
A social media post.
I've got nothing more to say.
I'd like you to leave.
You've harassed the child.
Enough.
I'd like you to leave.
Lisa, that's no worries.
Uh Okay.
Wow.
Gary, did I understand correctly?
Yeah, two cops.
These young women who were there to the house over a social media post that this woman's daughter had put up.
Is that what I'm saying?
No, she just she only viewed the post.
Not that she put it up.
She viewed the post the post.
Yeah.
Sorry.
And what the hell did the post say?
Do we have any idea?
No.
It was just um the title was A Child Has Your Phone Sees over viewing a social media post that they disagreed with.
And that's where we're at.
They actually took her phone.
Well, they went down to the station, and um, I mean, I'm not exactly sure, but just the idea that they're at her home saying that your daughter viewed a social media post.
And we have and if you don't give us your phone, we're gonna arrest her.
This is completely nutty girl.
You're absolutely right.
The UK has lost its way, and we are not far behind.
Look for a cops coming up to your dome for watching online to something they don't approve of.
Outrageous, stunning, stupid, really bad.
Awful, just awful.
Yeah.
I can assure you, they don't approve of inconvenient truth.
That's for sure.
All right, next up, we've got someone that I believe is just up there with Greg Reese, one of the smartest, nerdiest looking people, Whitney Webb.
Uh yeah, I mean, I think they absolutely do.
And I think that's part of um uh you know the manipulate manipulations that that target the public or to make us think that we're powerless and we have no power.
And these people have invested so much money on uh finding every excuse they can to try and get us for in the case in the case of digital ID, get us to voluntarily want to adopt it.
And we have to focus on the fact that if digital ID does not succeed and people do not comply, it will fail.
I mean, it is a it is the cornerstone of like the entire UN agenda 2030.
Um without it, the the programmable surveillable money won't work.
Um, a lot of their designs for what they want to do in the online virtual world will not work.
And so much of it will not work if we do not uh comply with digital ID and they're trying to force it on us as a voluntary thing.
Uh sort of in the same way that vaccine passports were voluntary, which is why I encourage people, you know, if you want to change um the direction the world is going, you need to figure out how you are going to set up your life so you don't have to comply with digital ID the same way.
Um, you know, maybe if you were forced to comply with vaccine mandates and vaccine passports, how will you get around those type of restrictions when they try and impose you know digital ID on people for various reasons?
As I said earlier, you know, before it was about um you know the vaccine and all of that.
Now in the US, uh conservatives mainly are being pitched as this is a solution to illegal migration, this is a solution to voter fraud and all of this stuff.
There's efforts to frame uh biometric digital ideas essential to solving cybercrime and hacking and cyberbullying and any other normal of uh any, I mean, essentially any ill of society, they're just going to say digital ID is going to be the solution to that,
and um their sales pitches, but ultimately if we you know the digital ID is the is uh essential to the whole idea of the social credit score and any of these other um you know Orwellian uh designs that you know at least enough people I hope know by now um uh is part and parcel um of this agenda, and I think again it comes up to people having to make a choice.
And the way they do this is is through you know, they try and get us uh to comply with this is through convenience.
It's convenience to opt in.
It's convenient to have a digital ID.
Um, it's convenient to have you know money on on your phone and have your whole life be based on your smartphone and uh and all of this.
It's convenient to vote once every four years for one one of the two lesser evils in all of this.
Uh but really it's the convenience that they're using to enslave us, and it's inconvenient to find ways to opt out of these systems and and change uh your life so that you're more resilient and your your life is actually sustainable for you and your family and your community.
It's perhaps inconvenient to get out off of the couch and off of the chair and and go meet your neighbors physically and stop being on the online world so much, and making real human connections and real human solutions uh to the problems we're facing because I mean again that's why during COVID the lockdowns, I think, were a big part of it to keep people isolated to keep people from connecting and force people to feel like they could only connect with others through this virtual world that these people control.
Because they control the infrastructure, the software, and the platforms.
So I think, you know, people need to uh consider that this convenience is really the carrot.
Uh maybe there will be a stick at some point, but they seem to be focused a lot on the carrot and the idea of having us voluntarily adopt these things because it's easy uh the way they're setting things up, or it will be easy, um, or they'll frame it that way at least, but I think it's very important for people to uh realize that they have the power, otherwise they wouldn't be investing all this money to manipulate us and and and pitch us on this.
And uh, you know, I think it's important for people to think critically about what's being done, and I think you know, there's a lot of efforts to manipulate uh prominent voices in alternative media for the purpose of uh getting people who have realized these agendas during COVID, at least, or maybe before, uh, to come back sort of into the fold and trust certain people that are selling these particular solutions under different metrics.
Well, it's amazing how many brains are packed into that head.
Yeah.
She is so smart, Gary.
I agree with you.
Whitney Webb is a genius in her own right, without any doubt.
And we need to pay attention to those who are speaking the truth so clearly, with such articulation, and know what they're talking about.
Greg Reese on the one hand, Whitney Webb on the other.
These are sensational sources.
And I think she's right.
We can resist that digital ID and the seductive argument of its convenience.
We may be able to advete a whole lot of other bad things that have the ultimate goal of enslaving us.
She's got it a hundred percent right.
Everyone listen to what Whitney Webb is saying.
She's right over the target, she's got it exactly right.
She's spot on.
Yes, sir.
All right, now, actors again.
Okay, so let's.
I'm not gonna say too much.
I just want to show you some things, and you let me know what you think.
This is the woman that was unalived in Sandy Hook.
This would be the teacher who was unalived in the Texas incident.
This is the preschool teacher that supposedly brought a pew-poo with her to school to protect the children.
That's her right there, right?
This is the one that got popped.
Okay.
This is the one that got popped.
Let me show you another picture of her real quick.
Okay.
This is Charlie Kirk's wife.
Let me keep going for a minute.
This is old girl that got knocked on the train, right?
This is a medic who was unalived in Ukraine.
This is the boy that was rallying that was from the same school problem, right?
The Sandy Hook school issue.
That was apparently also in the Florida situation with the other school pew-pew problem.
This is the kid that was allegedly the one that took off Trump's ear, who was an actor for their commercials for their schooling system.
This is the security guard that was at the event.
That was also the security guard at this event.
Funny how he looks a little strange there.
Well a little different, right?
Am I missing something here?
Okay.
All right.
Well, he's got some of it right and some of it wrong.
I think that it would take a very amount of time to go through it and sort it all out.
I mean Victoria Soto and Eva Morales, I know we're one and the same person.
It doesn't look to me though that uh woman on the train was the same.
I certainly don't think Erica Kirk is one of these parties.
Some of them I think were pretty clearly wrong, but Gary, as I say.
It's worthwhile to con there are a lot of people.
You can find someone who looks like someone else to a high degree without them being the same person.
So some of it he's got a bright.
Some of it I think he has wrong, but it would belabor it with tax our audience to say a lot more about it.
I I think this is all worthwhile.
All worthwhile.
Okay, this is two different persons who have said to be the Charlie Cook shooter.
They're clearly different people.
So look for that.
And you know.
Because we're getting this right up to this day, right up to this day, Gary.
Right up to this day.
Alright, so this is our last two-minute clip.
This is going back to 1952.
And this is a bluegrass music video about communism.
Music We're living in a country that's the finest place on earth.
But some folks don't appreciate this land that gave them birth.
I hear that up in Washington they're having an awful fuss.
Communists and spies were making monkeys out of us.
The bureaus and departments have been busy night and day.
They're figuring out just how we gave our secrets all away.
And Congress has appointed a committee, so they said to find out who's an American and who's a low-down rep. They call them up to Washington to speak for Uncle Sam.
But when they ask 'em what they are, they shut up like a clam.
I wish they'd take and put me on the witness standing.
And yells aloud, old Stalin could hear me all the way.
I'm no communist, I'll tell you that right now.
I believe a man should own his own house and bar and cow.
I like this private ownership.
I want to be left alone.
Let the government run its business, and let me run my own.
Our government is bigger than it ever was today.
The more they hire to work for it, the more they have to pay.
Our public servants should be proud and honest, you would think.
The taxes keep on going up.
That there is no doubt.
But still they just can't take it in as fast as the dish it out.
Our national debt is a monster size and growing every day.
Our children's children still unborn are gonna have to pay.
Our dollar used to be the soundest money on this earth.
But now two bucks won't even buy a good old dollar's worth, unless we stop inflation and take care of what we got.
The communists may win the five and never fire a shot.
I'm no communist, I'll tell you that right now.
I believe man should own his own house and far and cow.
I like this private ownership.
I want to be left alone.
Let the government run its business, and let me run my own.
Let the government run its business, and let me run my own.
Alright, Dr. Fazer.
Well, it's quite charming.
I think uh the menace isn't really communism, it's Zionism, it's Bolshevikism, which was primarily a Jewish led political movement.
Slaughtering the Tsar's family, I believe every one of the assassins was a Jew.
And uh the communism Marx Engels, I believe, were both Jewish.
I think Marx had a lot of good ideas, but he also had bad.
Uh he was worried about conditions in the United Kingdom at the time he was writing.
We saw the capitalists exploiting the workers, and he thought there'd be increasing exploitation until it would reach a point where a revolution would take place, and then there'd be the dictatorship of the proletariat as a temporary stage.
But in fact, it would never go away.
So we're really talking about totalitarianism.
The problem is the greater the power of government, the closer we get toward that ideal.
And I'm saying that uh communism per se isn't really the threat to America, but Zion is um and the infiltration of all of our institutions by Israeli representatives and their allies, and it's all based on an absurd premise, Gary.
Christian Judeo-Christian values, there are no Judeo-Christian values.
It's a part of the Jewish conviction, the Talmudic principles to kill all the Christians.
We're supposed to murder all the Christians.
We had this uh rabbi who was thought to be the meshiach, the uh Jewish Messiah returned to Earth, and he was asked, was he the Mesiac?
And he said, No, no, he couldn't be the Meshiach as there are still Christians alive on earth.
Well, the knuckleheads like Huckabee, who's our ambassador to Israel, are too dumb to see the writing on the wall.
Believe me, B.B. Netanyahu, who knows what it's all about.
They want to use and abuse America to their own benefit and then toss it away like a rag.
Don't be deceived.
We have real enemies in the world, but their name is Zion.
Exactly.
All right, Dr. Petser.
I appreciate it so much.
This has been Inconvenient Truth with the incomparable James Fesser reacting.
We'll see you next week.
Thanks, Gary.
▲
Export Selection