Jim Fetzer - The Raw Deal (19 Sept. 2025) Charlie Kirk Killing 100% FAKE! - with Danny Cirrus & Monique Lukens

All Episodes

Previous Next

Sept. 19, 2025 - Jim Fetzer

01:57:28

The Raw Deal (19 Sept. 2025) Charlie Kirk Killing 100% FAKE! - with Danny Cirrus & Monique Lukens

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	I need someone to be audience.
	step
	And that do we should feel well?
	This is Jim Fetzer, your host on the raw deal right here on Revolution Radio Studio B this 19th day of September 2025.
	A return engagement from Danny Cyrus, law enforcement, 25 years plus, really brilliant guy and analyzing these false flag events.
	And Monique Lucas, who has screen actor guild credit, very perceptive about what's going on here.
	We have uh a number of issues that remain unresolved from our last show on Monday.
	So I've invited Danny and Monique back.
	Uh Danny has sent me a number of links.
	Uh Danny, shall we begin with the very first you have the before its news conspiracy theories?
	Why not?
	I'm pulling it up.
	Danny, join the conversation.
	Yeah, good morning, sir.
	Can you hear me okay today?
	Very clearly, yes, Danny.
	Good.
	Yeah, we have you know, there's a few do new developments from our last show, and we could probably go over some of the uh some of the other stuff.
	But the show goes on, and uh, you know, my position is still the same.
	You know, of course, if I saw new evidence that changed my mind, I would be open, but there's nothing even close.
	We just have more evidence to show concluded on Monday, sir.
	Yeah, very good, Danny.
	Well, I pulled up on the before it's news piece.
	Can someone please explain these anomalies in the Charlie Kirk shooting real or false flag?
	And of course, uh a false flag could involve real deaths.
	Look at 9-11.
	It was a false flag because it was attributed to a source other than the actual responsible party.
	Uh they were playing up the idea of 19 Islamic terrorists led by Osama bin Laden again, gave off an Afghanistan as being responsible when in fact it was an Israeli op with the compliments of the CIA, the neocons, and the DOD and the Mossad, where Dick Cheney was uh on ground executive directors.
	Michael Rubin established his magisterial book crossing the rubric on based on publicly available sources, so we can have false flags where people die here when they mean is it a false flag, they really mean was it a staged event, and of course, attributed to other because they're claiming this so-called now, I guess he being portrayed as some kind of uh tranny progressive leftists.
	I mean, it's it's silly beyond belief, but that is what they staked out for themselves here in terms of the official narrative.
	Danny, I'm on.
	We're looking at the image where we have the moving spot.
	I think maybe it's supposed to be a bullet hole, but it moves all around.
	First, it's sort of below his collar to the right, then it's closer toward the throat, then it moves upward, then it's actually eventually on the throat, I mean, how ridiculous is this, Danny.
	Well, yes, sir.
	I'm glad that you're pointing that out.
	And just for our listeners today, I want to point out this was nothing but a CGI false flag.
	It was done with AI or CGI video, was shot ahead of time.
	And just to put it in everybody's mind, what what they did is they made video of what they wanted us to see ahead of time, like they do when they make a movie or a TV show.
	They put it on video and then they released it uh during the Charlie Kirk advanced.
	So, you know, what people saw that were there in the audience uh were probably a lot different or slightly different than what we saw that everybody else saw around the world that looked at the CGI video.
	And all week I've been listening to people that are just still under the trance, they don't understand they're looking at CGI video.
	There are quite a few people that have cut on, and that's good, but there's a lot of people still under the trance.
	And basically what happened is what he just uh Dr. Fetzer just described was we're gonna go over today again, he's gonna show where a bullet hole comes in on the right side, not on the left side where he was shot, but on the right, and it hits him in the chest area, then the bullet actually disappears.
	So you'll see it appear in the shirt, then it disappears, then it moves over a little bit more to the center, it'll appear again and then disappear, and then it keeps moving over to the left until it moves up to his neck, and of course, there was one shot fired, there's no magic bullet that can do anything like that, and just the mere presence of CGI shows everybody that this was a fake event.
	They had to use CGI video to full it, and we're gonna, you know, we're gonna go over further evidence today, and I'm looking forward to it, sir.
	Yeah, interject something really quickly because I'd like to change my background.
	This is from a beautiful mine from years ago.
	That was me right there.
	Wait, how can it do this?
	Ah, right there in the gray, some years ago, many years ago.
	And um, as you're talking about the false flag, some of you might be saying, Well, how is it that there are people screaming in the back but not in the front?
	Uh so false flags could actually have some real people and then some people that are planted.
	So it seems from your colleague Dr. Fetzer, the people looking at him in the front, they were in on it, but the people in the back, they weren't because they start running around.
	And uh and apparently audio was mixed in with it too.
	But I'll let you get going.
	I just wanted to point that out.
	Um, so I could put a more neutral screen on.
	Thank you.
	Let me add a perfect example in Los Vegas.
	They brought in hundreds of crisis actors uh through a Los Angeles outfit called Crowds on Demand, who were acting as though there were real shots being fired that they were scared and so forth when actually it was uh pre-recorded soundtrack being played through the amplification system from the stage,
	and where they had special coordinated visual effects in the center of the Mandalay Bay, on like the uh fourth floor, flashing lights to simulate a machine gun firing.
	But there you had a mix of about 500 uh crisis actors with 19,000 legit who were there as spectators, and and it exemplified perfectly what you're describing, where the spectators who were in on it were turning over to the FBI, what they'd recorded on their cell phones and their laptops, and the FBI was wiping them clean.
	Danny Daddy, it's so embarrassing.
	I mean, you know, we think that it's supposed to be the world's greatest investigative agency, it's just a cleanup crew for offenses committed by our own government.
	I mean, it's just outrageous and disgusting beyond belief, Danny.
	Well, yeah, sir, that was crazy.
	They had that booth set up where people were showing up with their they were announcing everybody turn in your cell phone because we want to see if you have any footage that caught it.
	And you know, people got in line and did that.
	They were turning on their cell phone, but when they got them back, they found out the FBI was wiping everything off their phone and deleting all of their video and giving them back the phone with nothing on it.
	Can you imagine?
	You know, if you had something, they wanted it what it what they were doing is if you had any evidence, they were going on there deleting your evidence so you couldn't show it to anybody.
	That's exactly what they were doing.
	And there's actually some talk of that now.
	There that I saw a caption of the FBI said if anybody was there, they had cell phone here at Charlie Kirk uh to turn it in to us.
	And I I saw that the other day.
	I don't know if that's Actually happening or not.
	I haven't talked to anybody that has done that.
	But that's a tactic that they will do.
	This is a crime against humanity.
	Uh is there anything that could be done?
	We're not just here for our house and to twiddle our thumbs.
	We need to stop we need to stop incidents like this.
	Of course.
	Well, the only way the only way we're gonna stop it is if uh, you know, I heard one gentleman the other day say they need to bring back the Smith Month Act.
	And the Smith Month Act said that the government's not allowed to do this kind of thing.
	They're not allowed to use propaganda against the US uh the American people and Obama kind of uh abolished the Smith Monk Act.
	And as soon as they took that out, you know, the the false flags just went wild.
	We had, you know, for a while when Obama was president, we we were getting one a week for a while.
	I mean, they were getting to be comical, they were so bad.
	It was just one after another after another, and it was getting to be a joke, actually, and they were they were horrible false flags that were just blown apart, but it was like no it was a nonstop for a while, as soon as they got rid of the Smith Monday.
	So I would love to see Trump bring that back.
	Uh that would be great, but you know, I'm not in charge and uh I don't know him.
	So if they ever brought that act back, we could maybe stop some of this stuff.
	How's he gonna bring it back when it seems like he probably knows what's going on?
	When he made the announcement, it looked like CGI to me.
	Uh this has been pointed out.
	So I mean, thank you, Officer Dan, but I don't see how it's gonna be done under his administration.
	But Monique, we're talking about measures that could be taken under a proper administration, and of course, restoring the Smith Mutt Act of 1948 would be among them, Ms. Danny was describing.
	Right, it precluded the use of the same techniques of propaganda and disinformation that were being uh deployed abroad.
	These are staged events, paid riots, all that sort of thing within the the United States.
	We're not being allowed, but and by the Smith Mutt modernization act of 2012, just in time to bring a sandy hook.
	It was nullified and the propaganda flood was allowed.
	I mean, Danny's exactly right.
	This Obama guy turns out to have done massive damage to the United States again and again and again.
	He's a creature of the CIA.
	He wasn't qualified to be president, and there he was.
	I remember, I mean, I voted for the guy twice.
	I that was a great moment in American history when we elected our first black president, but he was a fraud.
	My question again, what about the CGI applied to Donald Trump's speech about Charlie Kirk?
	I mean, nothing has been said about that.
	I'll give you that piece of footage if you're unfamiliar.
	His hands are going like that.
	There are skin, there's color patches that are off with the rest of his um his splash colors.
	Monique back up and tell us.
	You're saying when Trump gave a talk about Charlie Kirk, it was actually CGI.
	Just go ahead and tell us.
	I wasn't aware of it.
	A video shows what a million words, so let me call that up.
	In the meantime, Officer Dan could share what he's sharing.
	Let me get that.
	It's in my substack.
	I'm just asking you to describe in words.
	We can pull it up.
	I did last time.
	There was like a skin patch color that was off around here, and it kind of looked like his hands were like that.
	So you'll have to see that with your own eyes.
	It is again in my substack.
	Let me call it up.
	Yeah.
	I I can say I'm not familiar with that, sir.
	Uh, I'm not familiar with that.
	And yeah, I I don't expect Trump at this point to to add the Smith Month Act, or at least right now, but maybe at a l later time.
	I don't know.
	But I would love to see back to your comments, sir.
	I would love to see that Smith Month Act put back in because I think the people of the United States had enough of this emotion tugging back and forth with these, you know, these super events that clog up the news cycle.
	You know what I mean?
	We need to focus on real life.
	There's enough things happening in the world.
	We don't need to be doing these false flags that you know terrorize the American people anymore.
	Yeah, yeah.
	Keep talking.
	I'm I'm getting back to Did you want to play that Charlie Kirk video, sir, and go over the fake bullet holes again.
	Do you want to play that video?
	I do, Danny.
	He's got the link now, Officer Dan.
	He has the time code too.
	And you could go right there and see what I'm talking about.
	Okay.
	But Monique, if Monique, if you'd like you just call me Danny.
	You don't have to put the officer in there.
	I'm retired.
	So just call me Danny would be fine.
	Thank you.
	Okay, Danny.
	Thank you.
	Great, great, great.
	Danny, I'm having a bullet back up again.
	Yeah.
	I'm looking at it on the screen, sir.
	You have it.
	You had it up or whatever the the Charlie Kirk right there video on uh that link I gave you.
	And and how about mine?
	Are you pulling that up before we forget about it?
	I had a technical problem here.
	I got a timer on the show, so I got bounced off and have to come back in, so I got to re-find it, but I will do that.
	You guys are doing fabulous, your part.
	The screenshot still shows the image, sir, of the video, so the audience is looking at the screenshot on your computer.
	It's still there.
	I'm not sure what you're looking at, but we can all see the screenshot.
	I'll do a refresh, Danny.
	Monique why why he's doing that why don't you go ahead and describe a little bit more where you've where you saw that CGI didn't you pick it up live razor uh hang on a second you're probably hearing a commercial because I am pulling it up myself because I am concerned about that little Fetzer's tech issue here.
	I I could I could quite easily share this with you if you let me have share screen but the last time you did share screen for me it wasn't showing all the way on the recording for some reason.
	I know I know ready to go I'm ready I know I know I know look let me get let me get back here to Danny is it now it looks like the screen is frozen sir but you you're frozen on the Charlie Kirk video that's the video people talk about with the CGI.
	I'm frozen on that Charlie Kirk, but that's where I want to be.
	That's where you want to be.
	Yeah.
	Yeah.
	Just for our audience, the video that he's going to queue up for everybody, it definitely shows the video where the, the bullet comes in on the right hand side and then it comes in and it disappears and then it appears and it disappears.
	And I've heard, what's really interesting about this video, sir, is it has gone around to a lot of different hosts and different people.
	Different people that cover, you know, the real news.
	And I heard, you know, Michael Jaco and some different people revert to this video.
	They didn't go over it in detail like you did, but they've referred to this video as the video that pushed them over the edge that got him to really start dialing in and noticing.
	And of course you were, you know, on the scene a lot quicker than most people, sir.
	But you know, since that Monday show, I've seen it on the web where people have referred to even our show or referred to what you did and then now they're looking at the video and they can clearly see that there was CGI.
	You know there's so much cognitive dissonance out there in the world and especially in the United States that people are still waking up they have a hard time believing that they would put out a fake video and stage a fake event like that.
	They believe what they're told on Fox News, CNN, all the other TV shows.
	And I'd just like to say, you know, I'm grateful, sir, every day that you're doing these radio shows.
	And you're out there telling the truth because, you know, your audience is smart.
	They tune in for a reason.
	And you bring on all hosts of different experts to point all this kind of stuff out.
	And I just think it's great.
	I'm glad you're around.
	and I'm glad that you're showing this kind of stuff because the American people need to understand that we
	are being propagandized there's no doubt about it danny he also spoke at a school district school board meeting several times he's waiting to get a full presentation given to him and he spoke on the sandy hook the incident because the school district has partnered with sandy hook promise which we believe is fraudulent so he's trying to do that too he's put himself on the line speaking to everyone which it goes on a pbs station out in
	los angeles so i hope that he gets that that special spot he's already done the um the the public speaking and got in two minutes each time so do I I mean that that would be great I mean it we really need it you know speaking of spit Sandy Hook promise, you know, that organization has rented TV spots or ad video ad spots, and they're running them randomly on YouTube.
	So there's different yeah, there's different families coming on going, hey, this is so and so, and my son was shot at Sandy Hook, you know, and I just hit the skip button and keep going.
	But it's amazing they're out there spending money and they're still trying to spread that, even at this date with all the information that's out, especially the information that Dr. Fetzer has put out.
	And they're still trying to spread that stuff all over the web.
	It's amazing to see that on YouTube.
	I I just can't get over it.
	I can't either.
	Um and I'm so sorry that people still get triggered if they don't know if they're still in that trance and they get so angry at you.
	They're children, you know.
	We're glad that they're alive.
	Everyone, we are glad, allegedly.
	I gotta protect myself.
	Okay.
	Yeah, of all the issues I address, Paul is dead, and Sandy Hook evoked the strongest emotional response, but now I'm getting a two on Charlie Kirk.
	So I mean, these are well-designed, very crafty events intended to have maximal emotional impact.
	I mean, with Paul, who died in 1966 and was replaced by a person I regard as an even better musician.
	The guy's four inches taller.
	Why do you think they stopped touring?
	Because it would have been so obvious to fans this wasn't the original James Paul McCartney, but a replacement, Billy Shears.
	They even introduced him by name in the Sgt. album, William Shepard, known as a man of a thousand voices because he could imitate anybody.
	In regard to Sandy Hook promise, my friends in the Sandy Hook community were three years ago, two of the participants in the event, the girl was cast as the little blonde-eyed, blue-eyed Emily Parker, and the woman who was cast as the teacher uh Victoria Soto,
	who supposedly heroically gave her life saving her kids, thought I was being abused in the court system, reached out to me to extend emotional support, most of which was via a mutual friend of theirs with whom I had innumerable conversations, send me additional information where I already had the FEMA manual for the event,
	which I included in the book, Nobody Died at Sandy Hook, as a pending say, where I brought together 13 experts, including six PhDs, and we established the school had been closed by 2008.
	They corrected me, it was actually 2006.
	It wasn't even an elementary school.
	They corrected me, it was a special needs school, and that there were no teachers or students there.
	Indeed, there were not because it had been long closed, and that it had been a FEMA drill to promote gun control.
	One of my contributors, Paul Preston from California, rather well known as a school administrator and supervised active shooter drills, and was so disturbed by what he saw being broadcast from Newtown that day that he reached out to his contacts in the Obama Department of Education, all of whom confirmed to him that it had been a drill, that no students had been harmed and it was done to promote gun control.
	Now that's as close as you're gonna get to a confession.
	But it's just outrageous.
	The Sandy Hook Promise is still raking in a million bucks a month from gullible Americans who think it was a real event.
	They're buying those ads because they find it cost effective.
	It's very inexpensive for the ads and brings in lots of money from suckers and saps.
	I mean, it's that bad.
	Daddy, how embarrassing.
	You know, it's all I I put out the book and Mammoth bans and I release it as a PDF and it's downloaded millions of times, and then they bring a rigged lawsuit against me where the judge won't even allow my evidence to be admitted, even though I have massive evidence,
	including they they sent me my friends in Sandy Hook the uh uh scan of the Connecticut FEMA headquarters showing the exercise L366 for a new town right on the schedule and a map.
	They showed how to get from Bridgeport, Connecticut to Dickinson Drive.
	Daddy, it's absurd.
	There's so much evidence.
	But Americans, they're just careless.
	They they take impressions, they want to believe in their government.
	I do think, however, this Sandy Hook of that, I mean, this Charlie Kirk event is perfect because it's a small event, one victim, one shot.
	Everyone has opinions about it.
	And practically the whole world has concluded it was Mossad, a Mossad hit.
	Even if they never wrap their minds around the fact that it was actually a staged event by Charlie Kirk to avoid a Mossad hit.
	The world will never catch up.
	The world's gonna continue to believe it was a Mossad hit, and they're turning on Israel like mad.
	It's opening a lot of minds.
	Monique, yes, Monique.
	I don't know what to say about that.
	It sounds legitimate to me.
	I've read what you're you're saying.
	I'm not here to make an opinion on what that is.
	Um, but I did want to make mention with that Amazon uh mention that you had for your book.
	Um, of course, we know that there was not everyone knows there was a book put out uh the day that it happened for Charlie Kirk.
	I think it was called the shooting of Charlie Kirk.
	No, no, no, no, no, Monique the day before.
	The book of no so let me say Charlie Cook on the 9th when the shooting only took place on the 10th.
	I mean, most people would think that's rather peculiar in the major tell.
	Let me let me clarify.
	It says published on September the 9th.
	So we all think, oh, it came out on the 9th, even though the incident happened on the 10th, but there are articles, which is are in my substack now that state that Amazon is saying that it was a technical flaw and that it could have been changed by the the person put it out there, but there's one of them.
	I think it's the ebook that can't be changed, or the audio, maybe that can't be changed.
	One of them, but the fact is that Amazon is saying it's a technical flaw.
	So of course it's a technical flaw.
	Let me go back to Danny.
	Danny, your thoughts about all of the above.
	Well, sure, whether it was on the ninth or the tenth, who writes a book in one day or on the same day.
	I mean, that's that's gotta be obvious.
	It takes a long time.
	You've written, I don't even know.
	I lost track how many books you've written, Dr. Fetzer.
	And I know it took you a long time to write every book, and I know you didn't write any of them in one day.
	You might have thought about them one day, but you certainly didn't put all the words on paper and get everything all organized and then publish a book in a day.
	I mean, every anybody would know that.
	There's so many mistakes that are being made.
	And again, I'm so grateful that you're you're putting the time into your show, sir, to show the people what is going on.
	And I'm I'm just so glad to be just a you know, one of the little gears of the cogs to be able to bring my piece to this.
	But it just it really needs to be shown to the American people the best we can to show that we're being propagandized, at least on you know, each event we cover, and when we see it, we're showing it, and we're going over the evidence, which I think is what counts.
	You show the evidence, you know.
	Of course, we give our opinions to to the evidence, but we're actually showing the evidence, showing the CGI, showing the fakery, showing all the stuff.
	We have quite a bit of stuff, uh, including some very interesting uh photographs that have popped up this week, and I can't wait to get to those as well.
	Danny, let me see if you if you could we're gonna play this little video glasses or contact.
	Everywhere almost over folks, something big is about to happen to this nation.
	This has nothing to do with wearing screen.
	Okay, guys.
	Yeah, the screen seems to be frozen, sir.
	I don't know on my end.
	We we're getting a frozen.
	Like being right above this is before the shot.
	Do you see that little red spot above his uh freedom to the left?
	Uh sorry, uh right, right shoulder, his right shoulder, right below, right above his right pectoral muscle.
	Watch that, watch that speck turn into a bullet hole, but it moves across his shirt without leaving any trace that it was there, and then pops up onto his neck.
	Tell me how stage.
	Then there's a bit of a that's possible.
	You see it pop up onto his neck.
	Watch, it's over here.
	It's over here on his shoulder.
	Okay, play it up without the sound.
	During the we're still we still have frozen screen, maybe after the break we can get to it.
	Oh, okay.
	okay canning Revolution radio at freedom flips.com.
	We'll be right back.
	Thank you.
	Management would like the listeners and posts for all their support that's just made Revolution Radio one of the biggest platforms for free speech in an ever growing dark world of censorship.
	Unfortunately, this platform free speech has never been free.
	We need the support of the people.
	It is the people like you.
	Yes, you that keeps the station in the front lines of the battle against tyranny and oppression.
	Please help support Revolution Radio.
	So free speech will not be silenced in a world that seems to be going deaf to the real truth.
	With your support, we will be able to become an even bigger pillar of light.com, the number one listener supported radio station on the planet.
	Join Revolution Radio every Wednesday, 8 p.m. Eastern time on Studio B for Momentary Zen with host Zed Garcia at Freedomslips.com.
	the people station The opinions expressed on this radio station, its programs and its website by the hosts, guests, and calling listeners or chatters are solely the opinions of the original source who expressed them.
	They do not necessarily represent the opinions of Revolution Radio and Freedom Slips.com.
	It's staff or affiliates.
	You're listening to Revolution Radio, Freedom Slips.com.
	100% listeners supported radio.
	And now we return you to your host.
	Okay.
	Danny, I may have unfrozen the screen.
	Did I succeed or not?
	Yeah, you did, sir.
	I'd like to point out on the bottom of that little image there.
	There's a little square you can click on and it'll go full screen right there off that page if you'd like.
	Yeah, no.
	Hang on a sec.
	It'll get here.
	No, I know.
	Yeah.
	This is a critical video.
	There you go.
	Yeah, that's now we're cooking.
	Yep.
	That's me to turn on the sound.
	Yeah, they put on the sound, and I don't know.
	Is this still a TV ad?
	I don't recognize.
	That's all it matters to me.
	And I kind of like that.
	Um we're seeing this the the apocalyptic meltdown breakdown happening.
	Wow, we're just kind of chilling and and this isn't the this isn't the video, so I'm not sure what what happened.
	Always stayed in early.
	Let me right.
	Industry right now, the game industry can do it's boom boom boom.
	You know, it's but that we're we're on year 10 champs.
	So we're not here for a day for the daily uh, you know, boom, we're going sky high.
	We've taken a you yeah, pause.
	Can I share what I wanted to show while you're trying to figure that out?
	If you could give me the sharing privilege, so I can uh the sharing isn't working, Monique.
	It's not recording.
	Now I you got the link to me.
	I can do that.
	I can play it here.
	I can play it.
	Okay, but can't play it.
	So I got it, got it.
	Okay, thank you for let me see what I can do, however, with uh getting rid of this thing here that we didn't want.
	Danny, keep talking.
	Keep talking about it.
	Yeah, I'm not I'm not sure what that is why you work on that, but you know, uh maybe throwing it back at Monique.
	Um, did you happen to see uh any of the photos that came out this week?
	I want to talk about those.
	Maybe we could just talk about them for now until we bring them up.
	I guess you go.
	You got it, Dr. Fetzer.
	You got it.
	There it is.
	I got it.
	Yeah, I play it.
	Let's go.
	That's it.
	That's the main video.
	Okay, yeah.
	Yeah.
	And I do know how many matches.
	There we go.
	Over the last 10 years.
	Councillor gang violence.
	Great.
	Did you see the guy with the in the white, and he was gone like that, Danny?
	We're weird about Catholic, and then of course we need to keep changing for some reason.
	I'm not sure why it keeps changing videos.
	Uh I'm not sure what's going on.
	That guy has gone like that.
	He's shooting him, but not really.
	Did you stand in there?
	Just that poke everyone in the eye, like we're mama's boys.
	But I don't think he saw that, but there's a guy in white.
	But he holds up something that looks like a cell phone and he shoots him.
	I've seen him now twice, unless it's like going like I had my eyes.
	He does it at different times in different videos, but he goes like that.
	But also, oh god.
	Oh uh as far as Christianity goes, which I'm not sure what's on what's playing on the uh speakers.
	I was gonna read this from the North Carolina Constitution.
	It says no person who shall deny the being of God of the Protestant religion.
	And I I have no doubt capable of holding any office or place of trust or profit.
	Who is that?
	Somebody there we go.
	There we go.
	I I don't think I've seen that, Monique.
	I know the guy in the baseball hat.
	I know the other guy in the black shirt that gave the signals.
	I do know there was one guy standing in white, kind of up against the fence.
	Uh, you know, there were even some people that said that he had a gun under his arm or something like that, and that he should be Charlie Kirk from the side, and I thought that's ridiculous.
	That's that didn't happen.
	Are you talking about the left screen?
	I'm I'm unclear.
	It might be the same person, but he's not near a fence.
	Well, it's like a it's a guardrail or something.
	There's the one guy that's leaning against the rail just outside the tent.
	That guy.
	He's outside the tent, but I don't believe he's leaning against anything.
	He holds up at the end.
	He's right up on the rail.
	He's right up on the rail, Monique.
	He's in brown shirt.
	No, not brown.
	This is a guy in white.
	I could point it out to you.
	Monique.
	I'm talking about the guy who set off the squib.
	He's in a brown shirt.
	He scratches his arm.
	He's actually setting off the squib.
	We'll get there.
	Okay, great.
	And I'm talking about somebody different.
	So we'll see.
	You want to know why?
	Nobody believed me at first, but now I guess we're we're just having technical dishes issues today.
	What did you say?
	That's okay.
	If you could fix it, sir.
	So many back.
	I have a lot of clips to play.
	We can kill the sound so we could talk because somehow the sound is coming over or coming over our broadcast.
	Uh, and we're having some issues.
	You know, um, I'd just like to point out that some additional photos why why he's working on that that came out this week.
	You got it, you can see it now, right?
	Can't you, Danny?
	We're having we have a black screen now, sir.
	I'm not sure what's going on.
	You got a black black screen on our end.
	Yeah.
	There we go.
	Now we can see you.
	No computer, no, no video.
	You see, you don't see now we Got it.
	Yeah, now we got we got some video now.
	This first clip right here.
	This black dot, if you can see he's talking about the movie black dot, Danny.
	You want me to turn up raise his sound or no?
	Yeah, you could, but you might want to start at the beginning of that of that uh GI video.
	I saw the guy in the white.
	Uh only Kirk's tent right here.
	So these people are in this this glass booth, this glass enclosed booth, like box seats.
	But check this out.
	We're gonna play it all the way through, and then I'm gonna play it back in slow motion.
	You can see the guy running to what would be our left and his right.
	Yeah, but that's just about to run or we know that true.
	And let me just kind of zoom in on it and I'll just go frame by frame as we go.
	Danny, we don't need we don't need that.
	Yeah, if you could jump forward, sir, and get to the CGI part.
	There you go.
	There you go.
	And Danny, didn't you say last time if it was somebody that high up, he wouldn't have even been able to have seen Charlie's like upper body?
	You said that, correct?
	Yeah, if you look at even where their hats are in relation to the tent border, everybody's standing there.
	There's only, you know, it's not very much room, even in that side shot.
	And the higher you go, you know, the more their head projects underneath the tent.
	And Charlie is in the back of the tent.
	He's not in the middle of the tent, he's not in the front of the tent, he's towards the back of the tent by the wall.
	So, you know, uh, even the people in the elevated audience in front of him, as you get towards the back, a lot of them can't even see his hair, or they they could barely see his forehead and maybe his eyebrows because he's sitting for back, and every time you go up another 10 feet, you know, he appears smaller because the roof line of the tent uh obscures your view of him.
	Well, if you go up, you know, 50 feet, 75 feet, way up, and you go back, you know, what they're telling us 200 yards or whatever, 150 to 200 yards.
	I mean, all you would see is literally the lettering on the top of his tent and the border.
	You would not be able to see down into the tent where he's located.
	You know, you would probably see somebody if they were standing in the front of the tent, you could see them.
	But Charlie is way back in the tent, and the view the or the line of sight for the supposed shooter where they're telling us the shooter was, right?
	On that roof, he would his view would have been down into the tent, and there's no way he could have made that shot and got a lucky shot down through the tent and got Charlie, he had no line of sight.
	And you know, no, I haven't really heard anybody talk about that yet.
	You know, they're just focusing on the CGI and some of the other stuff.
	But you know, if we didn't have CGI, we would you know there'd be an impossible problem there to solve, and that would be what how did he get line of sight from that rooftop, which would be impossible.
	We'd have to have an open roof, or he'd be have to be standing on a stage with no roof.
	Then you could maybe make some sort of argument.
	But when he's underneath an obscure tent like that that has a roof and a border, right, and you're looking down on it.
	If everybody can imagine that, and we'll probably get to some of those photos.
	There's no line of sight, and there's no way that he could have made a shot like that.
	I don't care who you are, you could have been a mess best marksman in the world.
	You're not gonna be able to shoot a target inside of a tent when you can't see him.
	I mean, that's just ridiculous and absurd on its face.
	I don't know if you want to weigh in on that, Dr. Bensor, but uh, I just don't see that happening anytime soon.
	Of course, Danny, of course, you're absolutely right.
	And to jump 12 feet down, which is what Dr. Fetzer listed last time, that's nearly impossible unless you are trained to do that, which I doubt he was.
	It is like Spider-Man, and I was a background actor in Spider-Man, so I I think I have some expertise in that.
	Thank you.
	Well, he didn't uh go ahead, Danny.
	Well, I was gonna say shooting a shooting a rifle.
	I mean, at that distance, sir, takes extreme focus.
	I mean, you really have to concentrate on your breathing.
	I mean, just to point out at a hundred yards where a lot of people will uh sight in their scope at a shooting range, right?
	Most people will sight it in a hundred yards before they go out.
	That's a really good distance.
	And even at a hundred yards, if anybody that's a football field long, when you when you zoom in on a target through through an optic on A on a rifle, you know, you have your spider web or your red dot or your different types, but you got to put that crosshair uh right on the target.
	And it is super easy to be twitchy on the trigger, super easy.
	And if you miss that thing by less than the thickness of a hair, and you're off the target, by the time the by the time the bullet gets to the target, you can be completely off the paper.
	I mean, people don't understand, and that's even at a hundred yards.
	You got to be right on to get your target.
	If you twitch, jump, move, have any movement at all, you could easily miss.
	And that gets magnified the farther out you go.
	So you go 200 yards, 300 yards.
	That shot gets to be very, very difficult.
	And we're talking about, you know, a spot.
	Charlie would have been just an at less than an ant spot at 200 yards uh up on that rooftop, even if he had a line of sight with them.
	And the way the kid was, you know, running around the whole thing about how he had this rifle that you know does not come apart, and somehow the kid figured out how to take apart, you know, this hunting rifle, which you know, it's got a welded barrel on there or loctited on there.
	Uh, you know, you'd have to only a uh an experienced gunsmith has the tools in the most cases, and a vice and a heat gun or a blowtorch to do that sort of uh mechanical work to a rifle like that, you know, and then reassemble is even more important because there's some timing on the barrel that needs to go on there.
	The gunsmith has to do it and get it just right.
	If you it's not like you just screw the barrel on and you're done, it's got to be put on an exact certain way to get the the accuracy uh right on the money.
	And you know, the whole the it just really didn't make any sense.
	If they wanted to come up, sir, with something, you know, there are rifles, backpack rifles that do are designed to break and break down.
	Uh, you know, you can buy them at sporting goods stores, and they would have come up with something like that, at least made it plausible so they could say, hey, look what we found in this backpack.
	You know what I mean?
	But for them to come out with a full-size rifle that looks sort of like a savage model or Remington 700 that we all know, anybody that's ever been around guns ever knows that that rifle doesn't come apart uh whatsoever, and then try to say that he had the rifle, and then give us a video that looks CGI, and at least have have the CGI video have a rifle on the guy's hand or something when he's on the roof or a you know, something to try and make their story plausible.
	You know, well, what they really need, sir, technically, is they need someone like you, uh, not you, but someone like you that has some expertise to help them make these videos and proofread their mistakes and just be like, hey, this is wrong.
	This is comical.
	You know, you you know, you can't you can't do that.
	You got to show the rifle, you gotta have a rifle that breaks down, all these technical things you'd think it's almost like they rushed it.
	You know, I'm not sure how they can make so many mistakes, but then again, they're using cognitive dissonance and they're putting this out with the media, using you know, all the major media to put it out, and maybe they just think the average person won't drill down and ask for any details.
	You know, this week I talked to several people that didn't even know that this thing was fake until they saw some of the evidence.
	Then all of a sudden they're like, oh my god, they after they look at the evidence, they're like, oh my god, they faked it.
	Man, I I didn't know that.
	You know, they just went by the pure emotion by being conned by the mainstream media, and it's really a shame.
	You're absolutely correct.
	Your critique of the shooter scenario is spot on, Danny.
	It's the original amateur hour.
	Now, the more tricky part is how they fake the actual shooting.
	And here a colleague of mine, Vivian Lee, posted this comment on 153 news.net uh outlining here, expanding on them.
	She, I think, has nailed how it was done.
	And I want to go through and explain her position, and then we can look at the videos and see how they confirm it.
	So, how do they do this thing?
	A hand signs.
	Remember all those hand signs of the guys right behind Charlie.
	Triggered the remote activation of the squib, a squib being a previously positioned blood packet that's gonna be set up by explosives.
	Sometimes they can do minor injury to the actor wearing the scrib.
	In this case, of course, it's Charlie Kirk.
	They had the squib activated on signal and then break and produce a fake wound with some blood.
	Many have observed, by the way, the blood looks too dark.
	If it were etirial, it ought to be bright red, but it's gushing out.
	It almost looks like uh Hershey's syrup to me.
	These were people taking cell phone footage in the immediate proximity.
	But no one outside the operation was allowed to get that close.
	Then they sent their cell phone footage to the AI guys who added more blood and accidentally moved his ring to his little finger.
	We know, of course, it was at one point on his ring finger, then it's on his little pinky.
	They didn't notice the ring problem.
	And then the doctored footage was sent to the news networks who made sure the whole world saw it.
	That way, anyone in the crowd would have seen the phase one skim squib event so as to think it was real.
	And the phase two AI doctored footage was broadcast fine wide.
	Definitely a Hollywood Mossad type operation, I believe.
	This was in fact not Mossad, but it was what Charlie Kirk put together with his friends because he was worried Moussad was in fact going to hit him and wanted a way out.
	The commotion and arrest of George Zinn character, the George Zinn character was part of the operation.
	It was done to direct our attention away from the shooting and toward the fake suspect to give the AI guys time to doctor the footage.
	So I could be sent out to the media for wide distribution.
	And Danny here, she's disagreeing slightly with you because you're suggesting it was done in advance.
	I think she's more likely to be right because they need to have footage that corresponded to the exact details on the stage.
	So using Zinn as a distraction while they do their alteration and then put it out, I think would probably be the right sequence to give the AI guys time to doctor the footage, so I could be sent out to the media for wide distribution.
	Once the doctored footage was ready to go, the news no longer focused on the fake suspect.
	All attention moved to the fake shooting footage.
	Now, here, here's her breakdown.
	The hand signs.
	First, Charlie touched his nose to indicate he was ready to start.
	Then the guy in white, this is one Monique has been talking about, Frank Turek, touched the bill of his hat and then his top lip.
	Then the guy in black put his right arm and then touched it above his elbow with his left hand.
	This was assigned to a guy in a brown shirt in the front row of the audience to activate the squib.
	Right after the guy in black made his arm hand sign, the guy in brown put out his left arm and touched above the elbow with his right hand.
	The remote was in the left sleeve of the guy in brown.
	And when he touched his arm, he activated the squib.
	Then he ducked down a little, focused his attention on Charlie.
	When he saw the mission had been accomplished, he gave a smile of satisfaction and then took off.
	Then they grabbed Charlie, carried him off to a waiting SUV.
	No putting him on the ground, no towel or fabric, pressed on the wound to stop the bleeding, no EMTs, no ambulance, no medical equipment, no stretcher, and no blood.
	As a guy's carried Charlie to the van by his arms and laid no blood anywhere.
	Fake.
	And as you pointed out before, Danny, if he'd been shot, there should have been blood all over the place, including behind him.
	When they're carrying him out, his sneakers are glistening white.
	They're pure white, no spots of blood at all, Danny.
	I think she's nailed it.
	Your thoughts, Danny.
	Well, sir, she's pretty close.
	I mean, I sent you a video uh also that shows them in slow motion, shows them carrying different angles, shows them carrying uh Charlie out to the SUV.
	And when a video slows down, I don't know if we can show that, but what we'll see is there's no blood in anybody's shoes.
	There's no blood on Charlie at all, really.
	There's a little bit uh on a shirt on one side, But there's no, there should be blood dripping all over the ground.
	I mean, you know, just going back to it, if he was really shot with a rifle round, especially through the neck, you know, it's a lot of soft tissue right there.
	And you know, for anybody that's ever hunted, they would understand this.
	If somebody doesn't really understand bullets and you know, ballistics at all, it might be a little more difficult.
	But a the bullet, supposedly by the CGI, came in and hit him in the neck in the soft tissue.
	There's no bone there.
	Hit him in the soft tissue.
	That bullet is not gonna stop.
	That would be kind of like a knife through butter.
	It would just go right through and come out uh and exit out of the back of his neck.
	And what we would have seen is a big giant, well, not a big hole, but we would have saw a bullet hole in the back of the tent.
	And as the bullet traveled through his neck, I'm sorry I'm being a little bit gory, but you know, the exit wound is huge.
	The interior wound when a bullet comes in is a smaller hole, but the exit wound is quite huge.
	It almost looks like a reverse funnel on the backside, and tissue blows out the back, and you know, it goes all over the place, even if you shoot a deer or hog and you go retrieve your uh you retrieve your animal.
	You can see the blood of the you see the blood and the matter uh on the ground.
	And what we would have saw, sir, is we would have seen a big splat on the back of that tent.
	It would have been huge, and we would have sent an initial splat on the front of Charlie's shirt as well.
	It would have been a completely different scene.
	There had been blood all over the place, and then when the blood flowed, what I'd like to point out is it came out of his uh out of a squid vest, we're calling it here, special effects vest.
	It came out almost like um he had a CO2 cartridge or some kind of compressed air in the vest that pushed it out, and it came out one steady flow, and that's really not what it looks like.
	When somebody gets shot like that, what happens is you see a little bit of blood and then it stops, and you see a little bit of blood.
	And what happens is every time the heart pumps, the blood flows a little bit out of the area.
	We would have seen kind of a heart pumping flow.
	But instead, what we saw in the CGI was this steady pressurized fountain that came up and then came down, and then further through slow motion, we were able to find out that even a lot of that was uh fake CGI because a lot of the blood when it was coming down his shirt, it was actually running off his shirt and not sticking.
	He had no blood on the front of his shirt whatsoever.
	He had a little bit on the side arm, but it was flowing down, and as the blood flowed down, it wasn't sticking to anything.
	There wasn't filling and getting on anything, and it was disappearing.
	The bottom of the blood, the blood would disappear into thin air and stop.
	You can actually see the CGI with the blood flow, which kind of reminded me of the Christchurch shooting with the disappearing casings when they came out of the gun.
	The blood would just stop in midair and then disappear into thin air.
	And when you see that in slow motion, sir, you can't unse it.
	You can see the CGI.
	It was everywhere.
	They made so many mistakes in this thing.
	And it's not only what you see, it's what you don't see.
	And once you take a close look at this, sir, like you're showing today.
	I mean, there's just so many mistakes they made.
	And once you have, I said it at the closing of last show.
	Once you have the presence of CGI video, this trickery video in any event, whether it's this event, a plane crash, whatever, once you see CGI, you know there's sleight of hand at play.
	You know you're dealing with an event that they're trying to create a narrative, they're trying to make you think something, you know you're dealing with a false event.
	You basically can throw the whole event out as soon as you see CGI.
	Excuse me, Officer Danny, there could be somebody else who's doing that.
	So we can't always say that.
	It might be the media who's putting the the real stuff out, and then somebody who wants to trick everybody, putting that over it.
	So it's not always the original creators that are trying to um you know deceive people.
	I just wanted to put that out there.
	And also the blood is actually going up and down, going up and down for that CGI.
	And by the way, Dr. Fetzer, when you talked about the person in the white, I know who you're talking about.
	That's not whom I'm talking about.
	So I really hope we're gonna get into the video so I could have the gun.
	We'll get there.
	I have to go in six minutes, that's why.
	Thank you.
	Oh, you gotta go.
	I forgot, Monique, you gotta go.
	That's right.
	You can only be here for the for the first hour.
	Uh which video then you you you want would you like me to see if I can pull up for you.
	Oh, you it's all right.
	You could stay where you're at at this point.
	Let's go over those hand signals, and I want to share with you who I see in the audience doing a shot.
	I'm not saying he really is, but he is, you know.
	So I think that that he was part of it, and they switched it to the guy on the roof.
	In other words, they had somebody there just in case to shoot.
	I know here we go.
	I'm starting to smell.
	Let me see what we got here.
	All right.
	I mean, it boy, it really got let's see what we got here.
	Oh, so we got sound, sir, but we got a black screen just to let you know.
	So I don't know what's going on with the software today.
	We're having some issues showing our showing our video audience what's going on.
	But you know, maybe Monique makes a pretty good point there.
	I mean, they probably had some backups in place or whatever, but uh in case the CGI failed, or I don't know what all their backup plans were.
	I'm what I'd like to point out is this was probably rehearsed.
	I'm sure the same group of guys that put this on probably did this in a building or something.
	They all practice their cues and stuff.
	This wasn't done, you know, live with just one take on that day.
	I mean, there was obviously some rehearsal that took place before they did this event out out in Utah in front of all these people.
	And uh, you know, like it like actors would practice a rehearsal to shoot a television show or something.
	They practiced it, you know, and they again they probably had a few other scenarios ready to go, including some of the people in the audience that were cued uh and ready to go, and they're crisis actors and all this stuff.
	They put a lot of effort into this.
	They knew it was going to be a big event for the public, and they had several facets to this.
	And what we're doing is just trying to point out the most critical, the CGI, the I CGI items to show just how fake and how phony this video is.
	I mean, there's there's guys all over the web that run all kinds of different news shows that's this week that I listened to, and so many of them were commenting on the CGI video from the the ring finger that was moving, you know, from one finger to another.
	Uh just it just went on and on and talking about the the bullet, the magic bullet, some people referred to as uh, you know, that was going in and out.
	I mean, there's just so many mistakes they made.
	They made it really, really obvious for people that are in the know.
	And it's amazing how many people through sheer cognitive dissonance that uh just believe what the news media told them, and they really didn't look very close at any of the stuff.
	Monique, I'm so glad you could join the first hour.
	We'll we'll pick up, we'll get your guy in the white shirt.
	Believe me, by and by, and thank you for being here today.
	Much appreciated.
	We'll be right back with Danny Syrus.
	Hate wearing glasses or contacts.
	But who's here for laser?
	Try drinking warm water before bed when we were my site almost over revolutionary three new slides.
	Lots of strange things happening in the was it a conspiracy.
	Did you know that the police in Boston were broadcasting this is a drill, this is a drill on bullhords during the marathon.
	Boston Globe was tweeting that a demonstration bomb would be set off during the marathon for the benefit of bomb squad activities, and but one would be set off in one minute in front of the library, which happened as the globe had announced.
	Peering through the smoke, you could see bodies with missing arms and legs, but there was no blood.
	The blood only showed up later and came out of a tube.
	They used amputee actors and a studio quality smoke machine.
	Don't let yourself be played.
	Check out and nobody died in Boston either.
	Available at MoonrockBooks.com.
	That's moonrockbooks.com.
	Amen.
	Amen.
	Thank you.
	If you think for one second that the Capitol will ever treat us fairly, you are lying to yourself.
	Because we know who they are and what they do.
	That is what they do.
	and we must fight back.
	You can torture us and bomb a fire is catching.
	And if we burn, you burn with us.
	Good evening.
	Good evening.
	Are you awake yet?
	I open.
	We've tried and we've tried for years and years to use passive resistance and loud voices to make a change.
	The time is over.
	Your governments around the world have no other goal than to decimate your entire existence.
	the hands of the bankers and the elites.
	The war is coming.
	And it's your choice to decide if you want to be a warrior or a victim.
	Denial is not a choice anymore.
	Revolution Radio, Freedom Slips.com, the number one listener supported radio station on the planet.
	Not giving up.
	revolution radio
	it says no secret that the so-called mainstream media is best described as controlled propaganda Countless news stories are either totally ignored or spun with half-truths.
	And because of this, essential facts and vital information are often compromised.
	Join Dr. Ott every Friday night on Studio B at 10 p.m.
	Eastern and learn why the story behind the story was nominated for a Peabody Award in its second year of producing Unparalleled Broadcasting Excellence in 1997.
	That is, if you really care about learning the truth.
	The opinions expressed on this radio station, its programs, and its website by the hosts, guests, and call-in listeners or chatters are solely the opinions of the original source who expressed them.
	They do not necessarily represent the opinions of Revolution Radio and Freedomslips.com.
	It's staff or affiliates.
	You're listening to Revolution Radio, Freedom Slips.com.
	100% listeners supported radio.
	now we return you to your host Hey guys, welcome back.
	Uh Dr. Fetzer will be here shortly.
	Uh Stanny Sears.
	I'm just gonna go ahead and uh start with some of the developments that happened this week uh for everybody.
	And uh there were some definitely some interesting photographs that came out uh this this week uh that were really worth talking about and some of the photos uh that I'd like to talk about that hopefully we'll we'll get a chance to show our simulcast seems to not be working or video simulcast today.
	You can't see the screen now, Danny.
	No, we just got a black screen, sir, with a little white dot spinning in the circle.
	Because Monique wanted to talk, she's still here about Erica at the creepy coffin, and it is uh a completely absurd scene.
	Let me see if I can pull it back up.
	Here, do you see it now, Danny?
	Yeah, now well, now we're seeing the coffin.
	Yeah, you have the coffin video.
	Go ahead.
	Let me play it while Monique is still here because she wants to comment on it.
	And it's pretty obvious this is a rubber hand.
	They got a mannequin in the coffin.
	Here we go.
	Stage, and to me, it's unbelievable how people have such poor discernment and the inability to see through the obvious.
	And that first off gets into Erica Kirk's video that she posted online with Charlie Kirk, supposedly Charlie Kirk, as you see here with the golden looking hand.
	And also I'm gonna get into Donald Trump.
	And this is obviously AI.
	Here we go.
	That's it.
	Share it.
	Show it.
	And again in 2014 with Barack Obama, I already posted that video.
	You can see the video.
	I'm on my channel currently.
	But first off, let's get on topic with Erica Kirk.
	And again, the video that she posted online, which is very creepy, doesn't look natural in any which way visually, and her voice itself, it just doesn't pass a smell test.
	Let's get right to it.
	Notice we never see Charlie's face here.
	I love you.
	I love you.
	I love you.
	Look at the contrast of her hands.
	How would someone be filming over her shoulder?
	Besides the fact that she posted this online on social media.
	Why would someone be hovering over her shoulder filming this?
	This is just very, very bizarre.
	It's like a bad movie.
	Let's continue.
	Well, Danny, you wanted to comment.
	Go.
	Well, I'm just saying, sir, if you look at it, the guy that's narrating this, I know him well.
	His name's Russian Vid is his nickname.
	Been pointing out, you know, a uh CGI forever, plane crashes, who's very good, by the way.
	And you can see the rubber hands, sir.
	You pointed it out.
	That you know, I have some medical people in my family that looked at this and they they pointed out that it looked like a uh like a rubber dummy, like a resuscitation dummy or something like that.
	I mean, the hands don't look anywhere near to being a human hand, and he was just pointing out the angle.
	Why would somebody be at that angle over a shoulder like that?
	What you know, it's a very strange angle.
	They're obviously going out of the way not to show his face or not to show the mannequin's face and do this scene with the hands.
	It's just comical.
	I find it hard to believe that a director, whoever's running this, would be so comical to even try to pass this off.
	It's it's really bad.
	I agree.
	Can you believe that there's someone on YouTube that has gained about 1.5 million views?
	She has colorful hair.
	She's stating she's a mortician, and she's stating this is absolutely realistic.
	She's stating, how dare you be discussing that it's fake with a grieving wife.
	I I gotta wonder, is she a plant?
	Who is paying her?
	Yeah, I mean, it's disgraceful.
	Of course, she's a crisis actor just supporting that narrative.
	Yeah, she's a crisis actor, like Dr. Fitzer said.
	Of course, they're gonna do that.
	They have supporting people that are trying to push their narrative.
	They had people like that at Sandy Hook.
	They've had they've had people like that at every false flag that they do.
	But you know what?
	Unfortunately, we have eyes, we have discernment, right?
	And we can see that those hands are fake.
	That's not even real human hands, and they're trying to do some kind of an emotional soap opera play here by this.
	But this angle, like Russian Vid is pointing out here, this angle where they get the hammer camera this close to her the side of her face down on the hands like this, where they're in normal, the guy would at least be back a few feet, you know, and you'd see everything that's going on in the coffin, but they're almost like they're trying to zoom in on the hands and show us that it's fake.
	You know what I mean?
	It's just they're doing things that are so obvious to show that this fake.
	The only thing that's missing that I pointed out in the other show was the missed opportunity that he's not wearing a ring that says uh number 33 on it.
	I mean, that's basically all that's missing from this scene.
	Yeah, I do have to get going if there's Any way that we could get to the um the the hand signal so I could share with you the person and the audience that is going like that close up those close up actors knew what was going on but not the people on the back so far as I could see uh let me get it up otherwise okay let me see if I can pull that up for
	I don't know if it's in one of these videos, but it might be here.
	See that white T-shirt in the back on the left of the screen?
	There you go.
	This up here?
	Yes.
	And what about them?
	Look at his arms.
	They go up.
	Look, look, look.
	They just went up.
	See, there you go.
	He has like a cell phone gun.
	And what are you telling me about this cell phone gun?
	He, on the word here, let me do a play by play here.
	Let me play it.
	You're not now suggesting this was real, right?
	No, but he's planted there to make it look like he's shooting him.
	And then maybe later they replaced it with the narrative now with the guy on the roof, right?
	So they had one person, like Danny said, as backup.
	And then someone else later on.
	But let me read my notes.
	So there's this young male in a white T-shirt.
	He holds up what looks like a cell phone.
	I didn't see this.
	Someone else did.
	So I'm just transcribing.
	Then I saw it.
	When Charlie says the word counting, okay?
	He puts up the phone.
	When Charlie says the word violence, the young man shoots it.
	And his arms recoil.
	Although, in my opinion, it looks a little unnatural.
	So the cell phone is being used as a gun.
	It could have been one of those toys.
	It could have been for a video game.
	It could have been the real thing.
	I'm not getting what you're saying.
	Are you endorsing the idea this guy shot him with his cell phone gun?
	Look at the guy in the white.
	Are you endorsing the idea or is that just...
	Gang violence.
	Did you answer my question?
	I'm endorsing the fact that there is a young guy in white who's holding a cell phone gun and shoots at Charlie.
	Am I saying that he is the assassin?
	No.
	But he was put there in order to do...
	There he goes.
	And he does it on the cue.
	So he's either just pretending that he's doing the shooting or...
	And or...
	He's possibly signaling remotely whatever's on Charlie.
	I don't know the mechanics behind that.
	I don't know if it's possible.
	I do know that there are cell phone guns.
	There are real ones.
	There are toy ones.
	And there are ones for video games.
	All right?
	So I just want you to actually see...
	There's the guy in the brown shirt.
	There's the guy in the brown shirt.
	You've not been able to identify.
	Right there.
	Got it.
	As long as you saw what I was talking about.
	And so I'm...
	Thank you very much.
	Well, thank you so much for getting on again.
	All right.
	Bye-bye.
	You got it.
	Danny, I can go back and play this over.
	This is really important footage here.
	The whole scam.
	Yeah.
	The angle was wrong.
	They're calling him the official, a real assassin.
	But of course, he's actually not firing a palm pistol.
	I mean, this is another of those phony.
	He's triggering the squib.
	Danny, you want to comment about this?
	well what Malik was pointing out is I I see the movement but I don't I don't see the cell phone gun I've seen that Footage in and other takes with that gentleman in the white that's over there.
	And I'd like to point out, sir, that through looking at that, Charlie's body is halfway obscured from his view by the guy standing to his it'd be to his right.
	There's an older gentleman with gray hair and glasses standing to his right.
	And when Charlie leans forward slightly, he's really almost a hundred percent obscured from that guy.
	So there wouldn't well there wouldn't have really been a shot there.
	I mean, that would have been a very difficult.
	I don't know how I mean, it would have been very dangerous to even try to pull that off because he easily could have hit the guy that's standing next to Charlie, or he could have missed to the back side of Charlie, and the bullet would have traveled through and hit somebody in the crowd.
	I I think he was he had some kind of signaling going on as what was going on.
	But I I don't to me personally, I don't buy into the fact that he was had any kind of a gun or was going to try and use some sort of a pistol or a you know small cartridge to shoot Charlie from the side.
	I'm not sure exactly what that guy in white was doing uh with those motions, uh, but signaling.
	And I also agree that this guy in the gray, when he reaches up with his right hand on his left sleeve there, he's activating maybe he's got a remote control key fob or something in his sleeve, or it's another signal.
	I don't know.
	I don't know who had the key fob that set off the vest uh and uh set the thing in motion with the gunshot as well.
	But you know, there's no way to know that.
	But though all these people were definitely in on this, sir, because you see, it's all choreographed.
	You can see all their movements uh coming together at the same time when the shot went off.
	Yes, yes, yes.
	I do agree.
	I do agree, Danny.
	It's it's really kind of fascinating.
	And we had the FEI trying.
	Look, let's go back to this one once more because this is so good.
	In America, not over the last 10 years.
	Not the sound, but yeah, you can see the the view from that guy was sort of obscured to Charlie anyway.
	He would have been really to try and squeeze a bullet in there accurately would have been very difficult with his angle.
	I mean, I'd say almost impossible.
	Yeah.
	Love it, Danny.
	Charlie Charlie wasn't hit from the side at all at all, sir.
	Not even, I mean, it just wasn't that.
	He fell back.
	If he would have been shot in the side, he would have reacted completely different than moving back to the left where the CGI suggested he was shot in the throat.
	You can tell Charlie had practiced uh that particular movement, and he moved in the right direction.
	You know what I mean?
	So again, I don't know what's up with the white.
	I have to see more close-up video of the guy in the white.
	I have seen a few where you know he had his arms crossed and he had something under his armpit, and he had his hands crossed.
	Some people say he was hiding a pistol or something on his armpit.
	I've even heard that.
	But the important thing is, sir, there was no gunshot fired at all uh on this whole day.
	And what that guy's role was right there in the white, it's really hard to say.
	But I do acknowledge what Monique said.
	I could see the guy, he's definitely doing something with his hands simultaneously when everything else happens.
	Yeah, I just want to go back to uh Vivian Lee's account because I think she's got it right.
	The hand signs.
	First, Charlie touches his nose to indicate he's ready to start.
	Then the guy in white, Frank Turk, touched the bell, the bill of his hat, and then his top lip.
	Then the guy in black put out his right arm and then touched above the elbow with his left hand.
	That was a signal to the guy in the brown shirt in the front row of the audience to activate the squid.
	Right after the guy in black made his arm hand sign, the guy in the brown put out his left arm and touched above the elbow with his right hand.
	A remote was in the left sleeve of the guy in brown, and then when he touched his arm, he activated the squib.
	And he ducked down a little and focused his attention on Charlie when he saw that the mission had been accomplished.
	He gave a smile of satisfaction and took off.
	I think that's I think she's got a right, uh, Danny.
	Yeah, she's pretty she's pretty accurate, sir.
	There's no doubt about it.
	I mean, you know, whether he had a key fob or something in his sleeve, you know, or not, or it was some other kind of signal.
	I mean, I don't know where that happened.
	Thank you.
	Danny, I want to go to the other photos and so what you have.
	Yeah, that would that would be good, sir.
	That you know, I'd like to point out that the the guy standing next to Charlie on his right, the immediate right, and just behind him.
	Uh, that's a very important character because we're gonna we're gonna show him in another place when we get to the photos.
	But what he did is the guy in the white baseball hat.
	Okay, I want to let's just kind of talk about this.
	Basically, what if you're a baseball player, you play baseball, and I played baseball.
	You know, you have the first base coach and you have a third base coach.
	And basically, when a runner gets on base, he's watching the coaches.
	And the coaches are telling you when to steal a base or not, and they do it through signals.
	They tell you when it's time to go, when it when you want to get ready and when you're gonna steal the base, and they do it by you know, tugging on their ear.
	They do it by pulling on their hat, getting ready.
	And they also have another signal called the go signal where they'll take their hand and put it on the opposite shoulder, and then what'll happen is they slide their hand down from the shoulder, down the arm to the bicep, and that is the go sign.
	And that's exactly what the guy in black does to Charlie.
	He starts with his, he takes his right hand, he puts it on his left shoulder, his upper shoulder, and then right when he slides it down, boom, that's when we hear the shot, the squib goes off and everything.
	And I think that's exactly what that guy in the front had with the maybe the key fob in his sleeve or whatever.
	He saw that cue from the guy in the black, slide his arm down, and right when that he reached up to whatever was in his sleeve or whatever rolled up in his sleeve, and that's when we heard simultaneously, we heard the shot go off, and we heard the vest go off at the same time that Charlie was wearing.
	So there's definitely a correct corrugation or a coordination with everybody uh in that tent to all move at the same time as they rehearse.
	There's no doubt about it, sir.
	Danny, can you see I'm on the mail you sent me with a mail?
	We're on a black screen with a circle in it, sir.
	So why while you're working on that, I'd like to point out the importance of the man that's wearing uh black and the man in white.
	The man in black is very interesting because he has been at other events before.
	And we're gonna show a photo if you go down to the photos of my email.
	We're gonna show a photo where you can see that he was at the butler event with Trump.
	He was there it is right there.
	If we could just focus on that photo right there, I don't know if you could blow it up or not, but we can focus on that photo.
	And if you look at him on the picture on the left, you can see him standing in the tent.
	He's standing there with his hands together.
	He's wearing actually either black or like a dark navy blue, and he looks like he has some kind of Levi jeans on.
	And if you look at just to the right of that picture, you can see there's a man in sunglasses standing next to Trump.
	That is the same man.
	He's some sort of secret service or pretending to be Secret Service that day, and he's right there, and he was right all over Trump when Trump went down after he was shot or supposedly shot.
	He comes up and this guy's right in the shot.
	He has the sunglasses on.
	Trump then, after he goes down, comes back up, he has the blood squirted across his cheek there, which he didn't have when he went down out of our view.
	That only appeared after he came back up.
	I'd like to point out.
	And then if you go down on the bottom image, you can actually see him next to the man with the white baseball hat and Charlie in front of him.
	I think it's very interesting that he was involved in the butler and standing there kind of running the butler up, we'll call it now.
	And now we see him in the Charlie Kirk.
	And I also sent you video, sir, of further of watching him involved in other things with Charlie Kirk and that the uh casket.
	There's a there's a scene where the some people are loading uh just a closed casket in the back bag of a Hertz.
	Why they film this, I don't know.
	Maybe just to give legitimize to this whole operation.
	But you can see he's one of the guys, he's in plain clothes, the other ones are dressed nice, and he's actually there loading the casket in the back of the hearse.
	So it's obvious that this guy is really involved with this.
	He's some sort of a controller, Some sort of a supervisor.
	I don't know what his role is officially, but he's obviously there because he's in multiple scenes with this Charlie Kirk, even after the shooting, we see him.
	He's involved in everything.
	And to me, he just looks like a supervisor that's involved in all the different aspects of this, trying to put this thing on for the public.
	I don't I don't actually know who he is.
	I don't know what his name is or what his role is, but I'd sure like to know more about this guy.
	There's no doubt about it, sir.
	Well, Danny, uh look, I completely agree.
	I call uh what happened in Utah, Butler 2.0.
	He clearly was there at Butler, the original, which was another fake staged event for a certainty.
	I showed this very image to Bill Benny and Catherine Horton, whom I'm interviewing on a weekly basis, and Catherine suggests that it's not the same guy.
	She said the guy at Butler was left-handed, and the guy here in Utah is right.
	Can you address that?
	No, there's no there's no way to know that.
	I don't know where she's getting that from.
	To me, sir, it's exactly the same guy.
	Uh it's him.
	And I you if you look at him in the in the casket video that I'm referring to, you can see he's the exact same guy.
	That's very clear video, and you can see it's him again.
	So I I'm telling you, it's the same exact guy.
	There's no doubt about it in my mind, but I'm looking at it.
	He has the same chin, same lips, same ears.
	I you know, I looked at it as close as I could get.
	He looks like he's the exact same guy.
	And for our audience that doesn't understand uh on a lot of these events, what I do is I zoom in on the ears, uh, just to let everybody know.
	And the ears are really like a fingerprint.
	You know, people can do a lot of weird things with the face and the you know, different different aspects of the body, but it's very difficult to change the ears.
	Very difficult.
	And it's you know, we all have a different ear pattern with the cartilage in our middle or our ear.
	A big tail is the ear lobe on the bottom, you know, or or where you would pierce, I guess, to have an earring.
	Some people have more of an ear lobe, some people don't even have an ear lobe, and the ear just comes right down and goes right in to the side of somebody's uh face there.
	There's different aspects to the way people's ears are.
	And it's a big tell just by looking at the ears.
	You match the ear, you know you got the same person.
	If you focus on the ear and you don't have the ear, you're not going to be able to say, well, the ears are are not right, but maybe this is right.
	Nope, nope, it's over.
	Once the ears first, if you have the ear, you have the right person.
	If you don't have the ear, it's over.
	You don't have the right person.
	And it's that's that.
	Now, scrolling down.
	Yeah, show that image right there.
	I'd like to talk about that image, sir.
	Very good.
	If you could leave that there for a minute.
	Okay.
	This this is important, sir.
	Can I narrate this or do you want to talk about this?
	No, I want you.
	Okay.
	Here's what I like to talk about.
	So, right after this event happened originally, the FBI actually photo uh posted the photo on the top.
	And I will narrate for everybody.
	It's a it's a kid that looks like to be, you know, 20 years old, maybe 21 at best.
	He's wearing a black baseball hat.
	He has some motorcycle type sunglasses on or what have you.
	He's wearing a black shirt, he has a backpack on.
	And I we showed several images of this before.
	You could see him standing in a stairwell, okay.
	And I'm like, okay, what's so significant about this?
	Well, the FBI actually posted this, and that's what makes it significant that they put it out.
	Okay.
	We didn't just dig this up off the internet.
	This came from the FBI.
	They put this out to the public, okay?
	So that's what's really interesting about this guy.
	And they're saying, the FBI, their story, they're saying that this is their shooter.
	He does not have a weapon, he has a backpack, he doesn't even look like he has anything that's like a weapon.
	Who knows what's in his backpack?
	And why they're showing him at the bottom of a stairwell, I'm not sure.
	I guess they're trying to tell us that surveillance camera picked him up inside of the building where he did the shooting.
	That's sort of their story.
	And they're like, this is our shooter, this is who we're looking for.
	They put this out.
	Okay.
	So there he is.
	You can see him pretty clear.
	We have a lot of other steel shots of him.
	But then here's what's happening, sir.
	What we did on the show the other day when we showed that video, I said, You know what?
	This could be anybody.
	They do that quite often.
	They could have stole this image from somebody in the UK or Europe or Greece or France or for wherever.
	They stole an image off of the internet and they just put this up for public consumption.
	There's no proof that this guy is anybody or is anywhere near.
	I don't even understand that stairwell, any of the any of the back scenery of this picture.
	It doesn't prove anything.
	It could be anybody.
	Okay, they just posted this picture and said this is the guy, and with no reason to tell us why it's the guy.
	I mean, I could understand if they had a if he had a rifle in his hand or you know, something to suggest that he was the guy, but there's even other people around him uh in the in the image, you know, nothing suggestive really.
	But then what happened this week, sir, is this they made an arrest, supposedly.
	The story keeps going on television, right?
	Television is telling us, right?
	Television, they're telling us that they the authorities caught this guy.
	Okay, great.
	Now we're gonna get a look at the guy.
	But here's the problem, sir.
	They ended up showing us video, and that's a still of the video below of the guy in the baseball hat.
	And we can clearly see now there's the guy.
	I thought, oh, okay, so they got the guy.
	All right, let's see, let's see what's going on.
	But through and also, sir, and you can see the red circles there that we put around the nose, the ears, and the lips.
	And I always focus on the ears.
	And if you look, sir, it's a completely different ear.
	It's not even close to the guy in the baseball hat.
	I mean, it's not even close.
	It's at least they could have got someone that was closer.
	It's the ear, the ears aren't even the same.
	Look at uh one goes right into the side of the head, and the guy in the baseball hat actually has a dangling earlobe, right?
	I'm not a forensics guy.
	I don't know what you call that piece on the bottom of the ear.
	I call it an earlobe, but he has a dangling earlobe, and the guy that they're showing us right now, it doesn't have the same earlobe.
	Benny, take a deep breath.
	We'll be right back after this break.
	Revolution Radio at freedomslips.com.
	Thank you.
	Management would like to take a moment to thank the listeners and hosts for all their support that has made revolution radio one of the biggest platforms for free speech in an ever-growing dark world of censorship.
	Unfortunately, this platform free speech has never been free.
	We need the support of the people, it is the people like you.
	Yes, you that the front lines of the battle against tyranny and oppression.
	Please help support revolution radio.
	So free speech will not be silenced in a world that seems to be going dead to the real truth.
	With your support, we will be able to become an even bigger pillar of light.
	Revolution radio, freedom slips.com, the number one listener supported radio station on the planet.
	revolution you know
	joy
	revolution radio every Wednesday, 8 p.m. Eastern time on Studio B for momentary Zen with host Garcia at Freedomslips.com.
	the people station.
	Even the government admits that 9-11 was a conspiracy.
	But did you know that it was an inside job that Osama had nothing to do with it?
	The twin towers were blown apart by a sophisticated arrangement of mini or micro nukes.
	That building seven collapsed seven hours later because of explosives planted in the building.
	Barry Jennings was there.
	He heard them go up and felt himself stepping over dead people.
	The U.S. Geological Survey conducted studies of dust gathered from 35 locations in Lower Manhattan and found elements that would not have been there had this not been a nuclear event.
	Ironically, that means the government's own evidence contradicts the government's official position.
	9-11 was brought to us compliments of the CIA, the neocons of the Department of Defense and the Mason.
	Don't let yourself be played.
	Read American Newt on 9-11.
	Available at MoonrockBooks.com.
	That's MoonrockBooks.com.
	The opinions expressed on this radio station, its programs and its website by the hosts.
	Yes.
	And calling listeners or chatters are solely the opinions of the original source who expressed them.
	They do not necessarily represent the opinions of Revolution Radio and Freedomslips.com.
	It's staff or affiliates.
	You're listening to Revolution Radio, Freedom Flips.com.
	100% listeners supported radio.
	And now we return you to your host.
	Thank you.
	Well, Monique's back, and I'd like to get her agreement.
	Of course, you're absolutely right.
	Different ears, different nose, different mouth.
	Danny, this thing really was the original amateur hour.
	I don't think I've seen anything as flimsy.
	The Boston bombing is so easy to blow apart because the Boston Globe was even tweeting that a demonstration bomb was going to be set off for the benefit of bomb squad activities.
	A minute later in front of the library, there it went up, but it was a puff bomb.
	I can assure as a artillery, former artillery officer in the Marine Corps wasn't powerful enough to kill anyone unless perhaps you were sitting right on top of it.
	Monique, did you want to comment?
	Danny's been pointing out they got two different guys.
	The one they booked is not the one they got in the stairway.
	Oh, yeah, absolutely.
	And that guy on the bottom, it's it's possible that he is that guy in the white t-shirt that did that gun maneuver.
	I don't know.
	I didn't see his head, but we saw all saw his body movement and how he recoiled a bit.
	So I do suggest that you look at that uh video footage again.
	There are different people that have different images up, and you can see him clear on other um videos and the like the smaller close-up uh shot, literally Charlie.
	Monique, what I don't grasp about this is no real shots were fired there.
	You're acting as though this guy actually fired a real shot.
	Is that your boy?
	No, I'm not doing that at all.
	I'm saying that you could put audio in, you can mix it in after the fact, just like the CGI.
	But he did make the movement.
	It doesn't matter if he did it or he didn't do it, which I don't believe he did it, but he makes the maneuver.
	So there was a reason for him to be there and doing that.
	Thank you, Monique.
	You're welcome.
	Here you got something that's a killer.
	Tell me about this.
	What do we have?
	I just want to add to what Monique said.
	As far as his movement goes, he could have been reacting.
	Because even the guy in black that gave the arms signal and the guy in the baseball hat when the shot went off.
	The simulated shot, you could see they all jumped.
	The shot made a lot of people twitching their skin.
	No, Danny, it wasn't that he actually made it look like he was shooting.
	Gosh, I wish it could get that back up.
	The problem is, Monique, because I have too many firearm experiences.
	It doesn't look to me at all like he's shooting a gun.
	A gun recoils quite a bit more than what you're referring to.
	That's why he was acting more than likely that I didn't see the recoil that looked like a gun.
	I see him moving, but it to me, to me, and I'm giving my opinion now.
	To me, I've seen several videos of the guy that you're talking About I seen another guy that got a close-up on him, and he tried to suggest that the guy had a gun under his arms when he closed them.
	He goes, Look, there's a shot going off.
	You can see it.
	And I didn't see any recoil.
	I saw no muzzle flash.
	I saw nothing.
	He was leaving out all those kind of details off of it.
	You know what I mean?
	But he did twitch.
	I'll call it twitch.
	But it's not it's not a gunshot.
	But just getting back to the phone photo, sir.
	If I could comment on the photo of the guy, I mean, it is the details matter.
	And that's what I like about what you do.
	You focus on the details.
	Some people just don't see any details on these events, whatever.
	And we just showed everybody to recap that they showed us a picture.
	The FBI showed us a picture of a guy that they're telling us that did it.
	You know, somehow, someway he was in this mysterious building 200 yards away, and they're trying to suggest to us that it's him.
	But then when they actually catch the guy, you know, a few days later, whatever it was, two, three days later, they don't explain to us how they caught the guy.
	There's no details how they caught the guy.
	But then on television, they produce the guy on the bottom.
	And again, the nose, the ears, the lips, it's not even close to the same guy.
	It's comical.
	And they're trying to push it off like here's the guy that we caught.
	And again, you're pointing out, sir, and you're allowing me to explain that it's not the same guy.
	And I'm I'm I'm grateful to our audience that's watching this, and they can see the photos that they're putting another one on us.
	This reminds me of George Floyd where they changed out the actor Derek Chauvin, what four times, and they kept changing them and changing them.
	It was a different guy every single time.
	And who knows if this is the last guy, they might put another guy in in a week from now.
	But if we could move on to the girl now, the next photos, it's obviously we're establishing that they've changed the actors already, and now they have another guy, and that shows you that we're dealing with a fake situation.
	We're dealing with a fake phony false flag event when you see not only CGI, but the changing of actors.
	That's another key point that they've done before, and they're doing it again right in front of your eyes.
	And you know, I'm grateful for your show, sir, and that you're pointing this out because you're showing everybody that you know all this stuff, and you're showing all the details on why this is a fake phony false flag.
	So moving on now, here's what else came out.
	They actually switched out Charlie's wife.
	And I know that's weird, and that sounds strange, but again, sir, you were showing the evidence, okay?
	It's one thing to give your your opinion, you know, our radio listeners, maybe they can watch the simulcast later on, but it's one thing to give your opinion, and that's fine, right?
	Everybody has an opinion.
	But what I always admired about you, sir, is that when you do a show, not only do you give an opinion, but you show evidence, right?
	You show it and you go over it in detail, you explain the fine points.
	I mean, that's why I became a fan of yours way back in the day, way before I met you, listening to you, because you would show the evidence where a lot of people just talk about stuff, talk duck tuck talk.
	But you know, Dr. Fetzer would always show the evidence, and to me, that's what's impressive.
	I'm an evidence guy.
	When I look at these scenes, when I look at any situation, I follow the evidence.
	I don't follow the speculation, I don't follow anything else.
	I just want to see the evidence to get to the bottom of what's going on.
	And when you do that, when you focus in on the evidence, that's when you can really uncover what's going on.
	You can show the fake and the phony and all that kind of stuff.
	Of course, the other stuff is ancillary and it's important too.
	But if you focus on the evidence strictly, you really can get to the bottom of these events quickly.
	So now we're going on to Charlie Kirk's wife, and you can clearly see by looking at the images, sir, that on the top we have Charlie's wife on the right, and we see some kind of a uh an imposter or an actor, a body double, if you want to call it, on the left.
	It's not the same girl, sir.
	I don't know if you want to weigh in, but you even so would you say that's the same girl?
	I mean, I don't know if Monique has an opinion by looking at that photo, but uh to me, sir, it's not the same girl.
	The eyes are different, the nose is different.
	It's not the same girl.
	I mean, they're similar, like maybe they could be cousins or something.
	That that might be.
	I mean, you could argue something like that, but it is not Charlie's wife.
	And again, they're doing it again, sir.
	They're putting in somebody, and that would make sense in some of these scenes where she doesn't have any emotion.
	Maybe we're dealing with an actor, a body double now.
	Yeah, because they made a switch.
	I don't know.
	But if you scroll scroll down a little bit, you can see her eyes too.
	It's a different person.
	It's not the same girl, sir.
	Yeah, of course.
	Uh, Monique, go right ahead.
	Your thoughts.
	Yeah.
	Well, I actually saw another picture that may be one of these, but I'm not so sure.
	I didn't put on my substack because it's actually put on the alleged wife's high school's Facebook page, which is a Catholic school.
	And they were giving their sentiments.
	And I asked you to if you would like to call the school and state that this is a false flag, but you probably don't want to.
	But it it's right there on the Facebook page.
	They're giving honor to Charlie.
	And then they have her and they have two older women and an older man, and they're all standing together.
	And she looks like she is um just a little bit weightier.
	Not a bad thing, but um, and and he Charlie, he looks vastly different too.
	Of course, it's supposed to be a younger one of him, but his like hair is kind of poofed up and curly.
	He has more weight on him too.
	So I'm believing that there's a few different um Charlie Kirks as well.
	The one who's been up on the stage, you know, he's very handsome looking, and uh apparently in these false flags, as you're both pointing out, there are body doubles, and this is what happens in film.
	I've been a photo double, I've been a stand-in, stand-ins aren't put on the camera, but happens all the time.
	Danny, you got to be able to do it.
	If you scroll if you scroll, if you scroll down, yeah, look at the close-up of the eyes I put in there, sir.
	They're not even the eye colors wrong.
	Now, somebody might say okay, she has contacts on one and she don't.
	Well, you know what?
	The eye pattern is different, eyebrows different, the eyelashes are different, the the upper eyelid is different.
	I mean, how many anomalies, sir, do we need to show to show that this these are different people?
	You're trying to pull a fast one on us, sir.
	It's plain and simple.
	Well, it's obvious they had to use a body double so she could be with Charlie.
	And you know, the fact that we're sorting it out, the Mossad knows they didn't kill Charlie Kirk.
	The Mossad knows this was uh a rig thing for Charlie to make a getaway, that it was given a choice between silver and lead.
	BB tried to bribe him with 150 million more for a turning point.
	Charlie turned it down.
	He knew they were out to kill him.
	Tucker has said it, Candace has said it, Clayton is said it.
	They all said Charlie was worried he was gonna be hit.
	This was his way out.
	Now he didn't want to just go off and live by himself, he wanted to live with his wife and his kids.
	I understand.
	I got a report that he sold his mansion in February.
	This is like a 1.6 mil.
	It was a gorgeous spectacular, but he can't live there anymore if he's dead.
	Danny.
	Well, I totally agree with that, sir.
	I mean, you know, after the fact, as far as who put this on, uh, who exactly.
	I mean, you know, uh Derek Derek Johnson, who's really been outspoken on, you know, he a lot of this stuff.
	Uh his comment the other day, this is almost like a military operation, he said, you know, uh, that's working with Trump.
	It's is it it's that well organized.
	And he also suggested that they made a lot of these mistakes with the CGI, the blood, and all this stuff to let everybody know it's looking close to let us know that it's fake.
	And you know, the public needs to buy off on it so the operation can continue.
	But he's very he's got a great report on Rumble, Rattletrap 1776 is his name.
	If you go over to Rumble, and you can listen, he almost gives three hours on the whole operation and breaks a lot of stuff down behind the scenes.
	So I can't say, you know, who's putting this on and all that.
	I don't have, I could guess, but I don't have any evidence.
	I again, sir, and trying to focus, usually bring me on to point out what we should see, what we did see, or you know, what's missing, and I try to use my expertise and experience uh to say, hey, that's not real.
	That's this is what this would look like.
	I call it when I see it and I try to focus on the evidence.
	What these photos are, sir, is evidence.
	And they're clearly showing that they are changing out the actors in this play for body doubles.
	And you were nailing them to the wall with these two pictures, sir, as usual.
	And I'm sure that's why your audience tunes in.
	That's why I watched you way before I ever got the chance to meet you.
	And that's why I watched you and you're pointing it out.
	And these details matter if this was real if this was a real event and happen the way they're trying to tell the story we would not see the CGI.
	We'd not see the fake blood.
	We would not see the guys doing the baseball signals.
	And we certainly sir wouldn't see a bunch of actors being swapped out for one and then to another that just would not happen, sir, in real life if this was a real crime a real shooting or a real event.
	It just would not happen.
	We saw this in Vegas with the Vegas shooting with the security guard if you remember that we had one security guard that came on that was part of the thing that supposedly was up on the floor with the shooter when he knocked on the door or whatever.
	And then on the Ellen show he disappeared for like three weeks or four weeks.
	Everybody's all what happened to that guy then he appears on the Ellen show on a close set with no with no audience do you remember that sir?
	It was some kind of weird Ellen show with no audience and and just him and a handler asking questions and now his weight changed his face changed it was like a 40 pound difference and they felt the need to change the actor on the security guard.
	And it just the comment sir I can tell you why they did that because the first guy that they used before they switched to the heavy set guy was the same guy they used in the San Bernardino false flag shooting.
	And a lot of people noticed it was that same guy.
	So they thought oops the cat's out of the bag we better get rid of him and in the middle of the whole play they brought in a new security guard and introduced him on the Ellen show.
	So this is not the first time they did this kind of stuff sir they've done this before you have caught them you caught them then and you're just catching them now sir.
	Good for you and I'm glad you're showing it to everybody Danny you do so much great work.
	Let me just explain something here.
	Some people have wondered how, given all the work I've done about exposing JFK, bringing together the best experts, 9-11 again, Wellstone, Sandy Hook, Boston bombing, why they haven't taken me out.
	And I got a guy with a lot of knowledge here who tells me they love my work because it creates conflicting points of view.
	Everyone who believes the official story, which is predominantly, usually the majority by a long margin, and those who are looking more closely and realize it's fraudulent, it creates conflict.
	And the conflict is what they want.
	That cognitive dissonance, when you can't reconcile conflicting points of view, leads to uncertainty.
	And the point I've made on occasion, but perhaps not often enough, the objective of the disinformation campaign isn't to persuade you one way or another, but to create enough uncertainty that, everything is believable and nothing is knowable.
	Well that's that could be sir I mean cognitive dissonance I you know I've had a a doctor a psychologist explain that to me before cognitive dissonance is a very powerful thing.
	I never realized it when I was younger I didn't understand that I heard that phrase but you know there's several feelings that come out with cognitive dissonance when you hit people and I could use examples of my own family and I'll show them the proof on some of these events and I'll bring out a computer and I'll say okay it didn't happen and I show them the proof I've seen people family and not family sir they get really mad.
	I mean all of a sudden they get like really pissy and mad yeah yeah and it's really weird I've seen them at the table going why are you flexing tightening fists you're making a uh look at your face and the reason why it is sir is it brings on a feeling of shame it brings on a feeling of embarrassment.
	It brings on all these feelings because that person is starting to Realize that they were conned.
	They were conned by the media.
	And it starts to bring on an embarrassment, like you're smarter than them, and you're pointing out how easily they were fooled.
	And that's almost like you're calling them stupid.
	You're calling them dumb.
	And it brings on these feelings.
	And a lot of people, when you do that, sir, because of the embarrassment, the shame and the feelings of being conned, a lot of them will fight for the lie, sir.
	Yeah.
	Fight for the lie.
	And the reason why is they're trying to fight off the embarrassment or the shame of being conned.
	So it's better for them to go to bed and live with the lie than it is to learn the truth because they're embarrassed.
	And that's what happens with cognitive dissonance.
	And that's what you do, sir.
	You bring all this stuff out.
	You break the cognitive dissonance, which you've done with JFK, you've done it with 9 11, you've done it with Sandy Hook.
	I mean, you've done it with so many events by showing all these details.
	I mean, you are a PhD, sir.
	You have critical thinking skills.
	That's why people tune in to watch you, sir.
	Your IQ is much higher than the average person.
	I'm sorry, but it's just true.
	And I'm grateful, sir, all these years that you do these shows.
	You you you dedicated, you know, your life to doing this kind of stuff when you could be doing business, or you could be building rockets, or who knows what else you could be doing.
	You know, you could be doing a lot of stuff, right?
	Maybe you're a weapons designer, uh, a car designer, you could be doing a lot of things with that brain power.
	But what you've done in your retirement years is you've decided, sir, to focus that PhD brain power and that that discernment and all that focus and all that critical thinking skills, and you've you've you've become like an orchestra leader.
	You've brought people together and you organize this in such a way that you can show people what's going on.
	And that's why I always tune into your show.
	Yeah, I'm lucky I get to contribute once in a while.
	But when I'm not listening, when I'm not on your show, sir, I listen to your show.
	When an event breaks, I want to hear what Dr. Fetzer has to say, because now I know I'm going to hear either for him or I know he's going to bring a bunch of experts together, and they're gonna help me figure out what's going on here, and that's exactly what you're doing, sir.
	You have nailed this event 100% with me and other people that I've heard you bring on the show.
	You know what?
	Do we have it a hundred percent?
	I think we have it about 98%, but we've shown enough evidence in court.
	If me and you were in court and I was like an assistant and you were an attorney, and we were presenting this to a jury of 12 people, and you were up there arguing, and I'm handing you evidence, and I'm here to show this, sir, show that, and you're up there doing the arguing, right?
	You're gonna show that jury of 12 people, they're gonna come back and they're saying, Hey, this is fake.
	You know, Dr. Fetzer obviously showed we have all this fakery going on, and the other side would be doomed, sir.
	There's just no way out.
	You've done an excellent job.
	You're doing it again.
	And you know, I'm sure your audience is very appreciative.
	I know I'm very appreciative of it, but I you know, it's amazing.
	You're just pointing it out.
	This is another fake false flag that they're putting on to the public to make Charlie disappear.
	You've shown that 100%.
	If I was in the jury, I'd be voting, hey, this is fake, this isn't real.
	I don't know if Monique wants to weigh in on that.
	Yeah, I'm going to let me just add your your explanation of the resistance fighting for the lie to avoid embarrassment is so spot on.
	That was just brilliant, Danny.
	Mark Twain observed it's easier to fool a man than to convince him he's being fooled, and you outline the reasons why in a sensational fashion, Monique, your thoughts.
	Well, I'm thinking that it could also be people being afraid because they might be afraid for you, the person that's stating something different than the narrative.
	They might be afraid for themselves because we all know that people are being uh removed from jobs, they're being arrested.
	Is it right?
	Who's to say?
	But like what's his name?
	Um, Kimmel.
	Is he a part of this?
	Does he know that this is not real?
	Whatever the case is, he was taken off of his show indefinitely, and he didn't even say anything that bad, in my opinion.
	He just stated that the other side was using it to their advantage, and they are right.
	It doesn't matter what you feel about the other side, but they are using it, you know, the right, the right, right.
	That's what I'm saying.
	It wasn't even that.
	He was just showing the clip or report arrest Donald Trump.
	How do you feel about you know Charlie Cook's death?
	And Trump says, oh, roughly, I'm fine.
	Hey, by the way, we've got all this construction going on.
	You know, we got this new ballroom.
	It's going to be the world's greatest ballroom.
	Here's pointing out now.
	Trump's in the fourth state of grief.
	Construction.
	I mean, it was ridiculous.
	Trump's response was absolutely bizarre.
	Censoring comics, political commentary is like absolutely forbidden by the First Amendment.
	The First Amendment is a constraint on the government not to interfere with the exercise of free speech.
	This was outrageous.
	And my wife showed me an article from about the Nazis where Goebbels was censoring five comics because they're political commentary and satire, which can be so devastating to punctuate political pomposity.
	But what Jimmy Kimball did was 100% appropriate.
	Nothing even remotely disturbing or wrong about it.
	Danny.
	Well, the only thing that Jimmy Kimmel did say it that I thought he made a mistake on is when he said, obviously, this shooting was done by a MAGA, and that Trump is doing everything in his power to they're trying to cover it up and make it look uh different.
	I didn't agree with that.
	The FBI never came out and said this guy was a right wing Trump supporter.
	There was nothing even in the news to suggest that.
	So his comedy was just fine.
	That one statement about him trying to make this look like a mega person turned on him and did the shooting.
	That was wrong, sir.
	He had no evidence to say that.
	Everyone, everyone makes a stupid remark now and then.
	I mean, it was inexcusable to censor him.
	Do you know CBS is now been bought by a billionaire Zionists?
	We're gonna get Zio News 24-7 out of CBS.
	Monique, this is just shocking, unbelievably bad.
	Your thoughts.
	Right.
	So I was just summarizing what I had heard.
	I guess he said I don't remember him saying MAGA, but the fact of the matter is that they have they, whoever they is, the media has put in the trans uh girlfriend and whatnot.
	And so we know that the right has been um uh cons, shall we say, concerned with the trans movement.
	So he's right on that angle because they put this character, allegedly, who's trans, uh uh to make it seem like look, see, look, it it's your fault.
	So I really feel that he was commentating upon what he saw.
	He could have been a little bit more sensitive.
	Uh Danny, what you just said, I I didn't hear that part, but he could have been a little bit more sensitive, sensitive, but it's not like these alleged teachers who have um shared that you know he oh, he should have been shot, and you know, that the things that they've said, that's not right.
	If they did say it, how do we even know that these people aren't being planted?
	And then people are afraid.
	I don't know.
	Do you know, Danny?
	There was like a hundred teachers that were fired for saying inappropriate things about uh about Charlie Kirk.
	Did they really?
	Do we know?
	Is this being used to scare people?
	Look, nobody should be stating that there should be violence towards anyone, you know, not even on BitChute.
	I see things all the time.
	Oh, we're gonna take them out, blah, blah, blah.
	Just stop.
	Stop.
	Monique, Monique, it's called freedom of speech.
	This is all outrageous.
	Nobody ought to be fired.
	You're entitled to have a political opinion.
	If you can't criticize your government in the United States, it means nothing to be an American.
	Now they're making it.
	You can't even criticize a foreign nation when it's committing genocide.
	Outrageous.
	You and Danny have been wonderful today, Monique.
	I'm so pleased we had a sequel here.
	Danny, Monique, thank you.
	Maybe we even do it again.
	Meanwhile, everyone spend as much time with your family, your friends, or people you love and care about.
	We do not know how much time we have left.
	Use it wisely.
	Support Revolution Radio.
	Have a wonderful will w weekend.
	And as I'm now inclined to say, God willing, we'll be back Monday and we'll do it all over again.

▲