All Episodes
Previous Next
Sept. 4, 2025 - Jim Fetzer
01:31:38
Richard Gage on 9/11 (2 September 2025)
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Oh, you can hear me.
Dean says hi.
Oh, tell him I said hi.
Did you find the DM with the, it's the real Dean.
Yeah.
Thank you.
He was having an affair with his guy, he even admitted to the operator that he was a friend.
He was having an affair with his wife, he was having an affair with his wife, he was having an affair with his wife.
He was having an affair with his wife, he was having an affair with his wife.
Good evening, ladies and gentlemen.
Wherever you find yourself, this is nine eleven debate night one.
Night one here, uh, of a huge week we have planned for you here at Real Deal Media with some of the legends and the most courageous truth tellers that are speaking truth about that dreadful day in history that uh we're gonna learn a lot of things about.
Uh now, because presentations like these usually uh in a debate to go with it, uh would would take a an astronomical amount of time.
Uh we have decided to give you it up throughout the week.
And and that's why Richard Gage here is he's here tonight.
And uh you're gonna hear from him in his entire presentation within a very very abundant amount of time.
Now you're gonna see Jim Fetzer, his opponent join us here on the stage this coming Thursday, but ultimately the big debate night uh you don't want to miss that you want to mark your calendars for is this coming Saturday.
So you're gonna see the presentations and the proof that they have and what they think in their thesis and then ultimately Saturday, these two legends will go toe-to-toe.
And I'll be the moderator slash the referee for that uh but uh let's welcome to the stage a legend himself, the one the only leader and founder of the architects and engineers for November and Truth, Richard Gage.
Richard, thank you for joining us here tonight.
Thank you, Dean.
Awesome to be here with you.
I'm the former CEO of Architects and Engineers for Nine Eleven Truth.
And now Gail and I are on our own.
And we are having a fantastic time reaching the public, millions of people.
It's a very exciting time in the last three years at Richard Gage Nine Eleven dot org.
And thank you for correcting the matter because you know, there's so much misinformation uh all over the place.
And we're gonna set the record straight here tonight.
And uh you can you know mark your calendars for Saturday?
And Richard, you know, I'm glad we're doing this because there's a lot, there's a whole new generation that is learning about that day.
Uh, you know, two decades ago now.
How important is it that we continue to carry the torch for truth, whether it's in the format of debate or discussion or presentation, just how critical are is it right now?
And then we'll get started.
We're gonna be living in a full-on totalitarian police state.
If we don't expose the false flag operation uh known as 9-11, uh, we're gonna be getting many more of them if we don't alert the public to how manipulated we all are, how we're being dragged into wars, uh, particularly in the Middle East, and the media drumming up the march to war and our government lying to us about these events like 9-11.
We're gonna expose those lies tonight.
Well, isn't that something?
Okay, so let's get started.
I'm gonna get out of the way.
And we are broadcasting live now over there on Dean Ryan TV, the incredibly uh shadow banned YouTube channel over there, as well as we are on the real Dean Ryan over there on X, and uh Richard Gage is sharing our uh little broadcast here on his uh big big stage.
And hello to uh everybody, and also yeah, hello, hi mom.
And then we're also on uh Rumble as well.
You don't want to miss that.
Okay, uh Richard, I'm gonna give you the floor, and uh I'm going to uh uh probably learn a lot of things here tonight.
Uh let's get started, showing.
Yeah, me too.
Uh, we got a lot of new information.
In fact, um you're you're all the we're all the way off of the screen.
If that's what you want, that's fine.
Um sorry, Richard.
Uh I have Tourette's.
I have Tourette's, it happens.
Okay, so yeah, here it is.
I thought you might want to do it that way, but your choice and um variety.
This takes courage to to face these facts because they turn over uh for me uh 19 years ago, turn over my world upside down, and it can do that to you.
So I'm just giving you uh fair warning.
And tonight, this is part of a debate.
So what I've done is taken my regular 90-minute presentation and inserted responses to the uh improbability in my mind that there were nuclear weapons involved in the destruction of the towers.
The improbability that no planes hit the towers, meaning I believe planes hit the towers.
We're gonna be addressing all of that today, and we're gonna squeeze it in.
We're also going to be addressing the directed energy weapons theory promoted by uh Dr. Judy Wood and others, and so uh all of that is going to be the reason we're racing through a very tailored presentation tonight.
But I wanted you to know that we do have this series, 9-11 crime scene to courtroom.
Uh that we've we have 12 episodes.
We've already produced four of them.
They're out, they're on the website at Richard Gage911.org at 911c2c.org.
And I wanted to encourage everybody not only to watch uh that uh episode, which you'll learn much more about uh NIST and their deceptions.
NIST is the National Institute of Standards and Technology, who was tasked by Congress to explain these collapses to the American people, and they lied big time.
We're exposing those lies, and we're hosting a conference in Washington, DC, physically.
300 people will be there.
The conference will be led and keynoted by Senator Ron Johnson.
Oh wow.
Yeah, the chair of the Committee on Investigations.
He has subpoena power.
He's used it.
Uh, and he'll use be using it for 9-11.
He's gonna be telling us how that's gonna be happening.
Very exciting.
John Kiriaku, CIA whistleblower, other uh whistleblowers from the veterans of intelligence.
Uh vips what that B stands for.
Anyway, uh firefighters, family members, architects, engineers.
Uh, we're all gonna be there.
Uh former representative Kurt Weldon and Dennis Kucinich are going to be there.
A very exciting time.
And yes, it will be live streamed.
And yes, it will be live streamed on Clayton Morris's redacted platform all three days at this conference.
Uh, September 10, 11, and 12 in the evening on September 10 and 11, all day on the Pentagon, September 12th, with the experts uh speaking there.
So learn more at Richard Gage911.org.
So we're gonna dive right into building seven.
This is the third worst structural failure in modern history, and most architects know nothing about it.
It wasn't hit by a plane.
It's this be the tallest buildings in most of our states, yet it's dwarfed next to the tallest buildings in the world at the time they were built, the twin towers.
So we're talking about about a hundred part of the World Trade Center Complex, about 100 yards north of the North Tower.
This building is, and it did sustain some damage, but that damage was not a significant factor in the building's collapse.
And so what was well?
Let's look at that collapse.
Um, the most of this smoke is from building five, which was a raging fire on the other side of the World Trade Center, uh, building seven.
And after witnesses here explosions, it drops straight down all of a sudden, uniformly, symmetrically into its footprint in under seven seconds.
The East Penn House, as you can see, comes down first.
Six in the upper left, six seconds later, again, the whole building drops in the exact manner of a classic controlled demolition.
No difference.
So uh the official cause of this building's collapse.
What we found was that uncontrolled building fires have caused an extraordinary event.
The collapse of World Trade Center 7 was primarily due to fire.
Fires.
Okay, well, let's look at those fires.
These are those fires.
They are few, they are small, and they are scattered throughout the building, and they have never in history brought down a steel frame fire protected structure, like much hotter, larger, and longer lasting buildings have never even longer lasting fires in these buildings.
Have never brought down a steel frame fire protected structure, not even after 9-11, where we have these fully engulfed buildings.
So you can see right off the bat that NIST is standing out there naked, uh trying to gaslight uh architects, engineers, the entire American public.
Uh let's see what it might look like if it couldn't have been brought down by fires.
Oh, uh, yeah, a series of known control demolitions on the right on the left.
Uh building seven on the right.
So, yeah, we've got some problems, and we're gonna look at the typical features of controlled demolition, see if building seven has any of these.
Beginning with, is there a sudden onset?
Let's listen to Dan Rather describe this for us.
And what you're seeing are high shots.
Now, here we're gonna show you a videotape of the collapse itself.
Describe that now.
to go to videotape the collapse of this building It's amazing.
Amazing, incredible pick you were for the third time today.
Too much on television before when a building was deliberately destroyed, destroyed by well-placed dynamite to knock it down.
What was that?
Dan deliberately destroyed by well-placed dynamite to knock it down.
He's using his intuition.
We have a frame of reference for this type of collapse.
Twin Towers are very different, but this is a typical controlled demolition.
One of the tallest in the world, uh, other than the Twin Towers, the tallest.
Is there a straight down symmetrical progression?
Let's look from West Street.
Uh, pretty straight down, pretty symmetrical.
How do you do that?
You have to take out all of the core columns within a fraction of a second of each other, followed about a second later by the perimeter columns within a fraction of a second of each other.
And then you have to repeat that floor by floor.
Now directed energy weapons cannot do this.
A nuclear weapon cannot do this either.
And it would be much more obvious.
So they don't, the proponents of these theories don't provide us that minor detail, not minor at all.
These fires don't do it either, by the way.
We all agree on that.
Uh they're few, they're small, they're scattered, they're not going to provide that symmetric symmetrical progression.
If if you don't get the control demolition charges going off just right, you get all kinds of problems like that and like this.
Somebody has to go up back into that building and set those charges and fix them.
Uh buildings that are damaged on one side, like building seven in the northeast corner, according to the official narrative, should have fallen to the northeast, or if it was damaged uh from the north tower that hit it in the southwest corner of building seven, it should have fallen that way, but not straight down symmetrical, and certainly not at free fall.
Now, Richard, just real quick, because uh this is kind of new for some people that uh may not have heard of a building seven.
A lot of people are kind of reawakening to this.
What exactly was Building Seven?
Um, because you know the Twin Towers took such precedence of the focus on the this is a financial institution building.
Uh more than half of it was occupied by Solomon Smith Barney.
Uh many other floors were uh divvied up to three-letter agencies like the CIA, the DIA, the um DOD, uh the SEC Securities and Exchange Commission, which lost thousands of files related to hundreds of cases that it was actively pursuing against Wall Street companies like Enron and WorldCom.
This was developed by this building by Larry Silverstein in 1986, and he then purchased the rest of the seven six buildings in the World Trade Center, and just six weeks prior to 9-11, uh, which is very interesting.
Uh poor guy.
His whole he came away with 5.6 billion dollars.
Okay, not poor guy.
That's what the asbestos abatement would have cost him alone.
Wow.
Which was quite geez.
He was required by the New York State uh the city of New York to comply with federal laws.
The the port authority was so it went into private hands, and he didn't have to do that because he had his free asbestos abatement uh coming at the expense of the people who are dying of cancer today.
Larry Silverstein is still in New York, he's a real estate mogul, doing very well.
Um, how fast is this building coming down?
Well, it's coming down at free fall.
That's as fast as a bowling ball falling out of the sky.
The bowling ball has no resistance.
This building had 40,000 tons of structural steel in it, it shouldn't have come down that fast at all.
NIST finally acknowledges that it came down at free fall for a third of its seven-second fall.
How do you do that?
You have to take out all 82 columns in this building.
Uh you missed one of them, and the building doesn't come down in free fall because those columns will give resistance.
This means that not one of these 82 columns gave any resistance.
How is a nuclear weapon going to take out all the columns in this building floor by floor?
Uh, such that uh there's no tilting and it comes down at free fall.
How is directed energy weapons going to achieve any kind of accuracy like that?
The most advanced example of the use of energy to affect steel is the Hutchinson effect, which is only been uh experimented on uh by Hutchinson in small tabletop exercises.
This is this is ludicrous To imagine that all these columns could be targeted independently to be taken out all at once and on each floor, subsequently synchronized floor by floor.
And these fires certainly couldn't do that.
We all agree on that.
Feature number five.
How is this building coming down?
Well, this was a 47-story moment resisting steel frame structure which falls into a pile just six stories tall, like a house of cards.
What we know from looking at the destruction is that the concrete has been pulverized.
We're going to talk about how that can happen by thermite.
We're going to talk about that's each individual floor.
And so we it falls like a house of cards.
Buildings that fall naturally, like these in earthquakes, they fall over to the path of least resistance.
The columns are being not severed one from another.
Go ahead, D. It's small question at thermite.
Is thermite often used like in Vegas when they took down the uh the star?
Is that no?
It's it's not common at all.
Um, but it has been used for demolition on rare occasions.
Okay, and um and we'll get to the thermite.
Yeah, but uh uh wanted to mention that.
Um are these fires going to bring uh this building down all of a sudden uh severing all the columns?
No.
Uh so what can well explosions can, and guess what?
We have witnesses of explosions, starting with the deputy director of New York's Office of Emergency Management, Richard Rotans.
Then he had to go into that building to assess it.
You can hear the building creak above us, you can hear things fall, you could hear the fire burning, you can see columns just hanging from the upper floors, gaping holes in the floors up above us.
There was an elevator car that was blown out of its shaft and it was down the hall.
What an elevator car blown out of its shaft that was down the hall.
Now, a nuclear weapon is not going to be blowing one elevator car out of its shaft and have it be down the hall on the north side above uh this core.
Directed energy weapons are not going to blow an elevator car up and out of its shaft, being down the hall.
So, what can do that?
Well, explosions like our that are heard by Mayor Giuliani's attorney Michael Hess and Barry Jennings who were going into this building.
They were late, they didn't realize the building had been evacuated, uh, but they're being called to the emergency uh office of emergency management, OEM, and they get up there and they're told, get out of there.
We've evacuated that building for a reason.
Um, and here is their experience on the way down.
Well, we got to the eighth floor.
I started walking to one side of the building.
The first explosion I heard when I was on the stairwell landing when we made it down to the sixth floor, then we made it back to the eighth floor.
I heard some more explosions.
Like a boom, like an explosion.
So he's hearing explosions that are blowing him from the sixth floor back up into the eighth floor as he describes it.
Explosions that are localized in the building affecting their lives.
This is not directed energy weapon.
This is a witness of two witnesses of explosions, and this is not a nuclear weapon going off.
These are isolated explosions.
Uh, we have foreknowledge of this building's collapse.
If we allowed it to burn, could we anticipate a collapse?
Uh, says uh uh Chief Hayden to this anonymous engineer who we're told had put a transit on the building and they're monitoring a bulge.
Well, he says he's pretty much right on the money in his cute current state.
You have about five hours.
Wait a minute.
You never before in history has a steel frame fire protected structure ever come down due to fire, and now they're telling not only is this one gonna come down for the first time ever, but it's gonna come down in about five hours, and it does.
They won't release the name of this engineer.
It could prediction could only have been made with foreknowledge.
So um, we also have uh one of the top uh European controlled demolition experts.
Danny Joenko is the expert on this in Europe.
What did he say?
This controlled emolition.
Take away to Nasko.
Is it open?
They have a team of Alpha Next.
Interesting.
A team of experts did this.
Okay, so he knows what he's looking at.
He's an expert in bringing buildings down.
Well, there are three dozen structural engineers who agree.
Uh signed on to the petition demanding a new investigation.
A localized failure in a steel frame building like World Trade Center 7 cannot cause a catastrophic collapse like a house of cards without a simultaneous and patterned loss of several of its columns at key locations within the building.
Are directed energy weapons capable of targeting those uh 82 columns on each of 47 floors?
How about nuclear weapons?
No.
This caught the attention of Professor Leeroy Hulsey, who did a five four-year analysis of this building.
What was his conclusion?
That in order to take out bring this building on the left in their computer model, the dynamic analysis, uh, and have it look like the video of the collapse in the center, they had to take all the columns out.
Uh their essential findings, fire didn't cause a collapse of this building.
The temperatures were not high enough to cause the weakening of the steel framing.
Thermal expansion did not result in a loss of support for the beams and girders.
When he says the temperature was not high enough to cause the weakening of the steel framing, he's talking about the NIST theory.
Those fires were not hot enough.
But as we'll see, there's plenty of heat, which is unaccountable for from directed energy weapons, uh, because that's a cool event according to its proponents, which we'll get to.
The collapse of World Trade Center was a global failure involving what the near-simultaneous failure of every column in the building, not a progressive collapse, as claimed by NIST.
Well, we have to look and see what could have brought this building down in the way that it was.
Well, we have evidence of extreme heat produced by none other than FEMA in the building performance assessment team report in May of 2002 in this metallurgical examination of the steel at World Trade Center 7,
where they document never before observed intergranular melting, melting steel takes 3,000 degrees Fahrenheit, which is capable of turning a solid steel girder into Swiss cheese, like you see in this piece of World Trade Center 7 steel.
Watching Richard Gaze.
This is not eroded by the Hutchinson effect.
This is typical thermite erosion degradation of steel by melting at high temperatures, which thermite causes producing silver dollar size holes in here, rapid oxidation and sulfidation, neither of which is an effect by the Hutchinson uh uh effect.
Uh liquid iron, that's molten iron, that's 3,000 degree Fahrenheit iron temperatures which are denied by the directed energy weapons proponents.
Uh sulfur formed during this hot corrosion attack on the steel.
So sulfur is a key component here.
Interesting, we'll come back to that.
The New York Times says it's probably the deepest mystery uncovered in the investigation.
Yet NIST, when they took over this investigation, they threw out uh most of this report and and hid it because it's not consistent with their reality.
Steel members in the debris pile appear to have been partly evaporated in extraordinarily high temperatures, says the author of that report, one of them, Richard, excuse me.
Uh this is Jonathan Barnett, fire protection engineer.
Guess what it takes to evaporate steel, Dean?
4,000 degrees.
Where is this heat coming from?
It's denied by the directed energy weapons proponents.
Maybe it's coming from nuclear weapons.
We'll see.
But wow.
Let me ask real quick too.
Um, now this is on the heels, too.
I should give some current updates.
Uh Rudy Giuliani, who had a big role in what you know, the the days to months and years following 9-11, but even the day of uh he was just hit in a uh near fatal car accident, I believe, just in the past 48 hours.
I gotta I gotta keep rolling, Dean, or I'm gonna I just wanted to say um that the melted uh steel now how do we know how long that was um uh melting poor and how long was it keep uh heat three months the steel was uh that's what I mean.
The fires were burning for that long.
This is incredible, and this is uh used as evidence in the nuclear weapons theory.
It's denied altogether by the directed energy weapons theory.
Um, but thermite uh has its own source of oxygen that can burn under water, uh, which is um incredible and uh its survivability for that long is uh especially in uh nanothermite with these unburned ships that we're gonna be looking at.
Okay, we'll keep going and I'll just uh I'll write down my questions.
Go ahead.
This this structural engineer, because I know we have a hard stop in 90 minutes.
Well, now an hour, so I'm rushing.
I saw a melting of girders in the World Trade Center.
Uh how do we get melting of girders?
We we we have 3,000 degree Fahrenheit temperatures, says this structural engineer.
He says, Well, uh, it must have melted uh underneath uh in the pile, which is ludicrous because um it what well it it what's happening is these incredible temperatures are going on during the collapse of this building, as we'll show you.
We can tell the temperature of molten steel and iron by its color, it's emissivity.
We know this is exceeding 2500 degrees with bright yellow, and even hotter than that because it's white hot below.
Well, how do we get 2500 degree temperatures?
There's nothing in the official narrative, there's nothing in the directed energy weapons theory to account for this.
Jet fuel doesn't account for this, it burns only 600 degrees Fahrenheit in open air, and jet fuel isn't even a factor in building seven.
But now we're talking about this evidence of extreme heat, which applies to the twin towers as well, and there's several sources of this 600 degree maximum temperature of burning jet fuel in open air.
So some say it's twice that.
Okay, so what they're still missing two to three times the temperatures required to melt steel, 3,000 degrees.
Office fires only get at their absolute worst, 1830 degrees.
Most of them are only 500 to a thousand degrees, so none of this evidence, uh none of the theories put forth by the government, certainly by the directed energy weapons folks can account for this.
Thermite can account for it.
What is thermite anyway?
An incendiary used by the military.
Thermite is a compound of iron oxide and aluminum, which when ignited sustains an extreme heat reaction, creating molten iron in just two seconds.
Thermite can reach temperatures over 4500 degrees Fahrenheit, quite enough to liquefy steel.
We know that open air fires cannot burn hot enough to melt steel, but metal had melted at the base of the towers.
Appendix C of the FEMA report describes sulfur residues on the World Trade Center's steel.
The New York Times called this the deepest mystery of all sulfur slightly lowers the melting point of iron and iron oxide and iron sulfide had formed on the surface of the structural steel.
Sulfur used with thermite is called thermate, producing even faster results.
Maybe we're getting somewhere here because if thermite were used, it would explain the presence of sulfur.
There is no other explanation for it in the DEW or mini nukes theories.
It would explain the presence of 4,000 degree temperatures, which is denied by the DEW folks.
And it would explain the presence of molten iron, which we're gonna be looking at right now, which is permeated throughout all the World Trade Center dust examined by the U.S. Geological Survey in their 2005 particle atlas of the World Trade Center dust.
What do they find?
Billions of previously molten, that's 3,000 degrees.
Iron, not steel, not dustified steel.
There's no steel dust found in the dust by the US Geological Survey or RJ Lee, who's also studied the dust, as you'll see.
So no, these this is melted iron.
How do they get spherical?
Well, uh, aerosolized liquids form themselves into spheres.
In the case of molten iron, they cool, they fall with all of the dust as uh, and that could be what's toasting the tops of the cars around the World Trade Center, liquid falling molten iron droplets as small as uh a sixteenth of an inch and smaller.
The the EPA says we don't know what this stuff is or where it came from, but it's a signature component, it's used to distinguish common office dust from World Trade Center dust.
In other words, it's not even World Trade Center dust unless it has all of these previously molten iron microspheres in it.
They account for up to six percent of these samples.
The official narrative denies these completely.
Up to four tons altogether by extrapolation throughout all the World Trade Center dust.
RJ Lee Group, an environmental consulting firm, says they're formed during the event, not before the welders putting the building together, not afterward by the iron workers taking the building apart, but during the event.
They're very clear what happened.
Well, you know what, Dean, we can do an experiment.
Experiment is the arbiter of competing hypotheses.
This was not done in the book, where did the towers go?
What we see when we burn thermite is molten iron microspheres that are that cool and fall in the pan as such.
And yes, if that were falling on cars, could it toast them?
You bet.
What else could toast cars?
Melted molybdenum, a metal which was found by the U.S. Geological Survey in this periodical table of the elements.
It melts at 4,753 degrees.
They have found and documented heat proving through all of these examples of evidence.
But the highest one is this one, 4700 degrees Fahrenheit.
This is completely denied, not dealt with, ignored by the directed energy weapons people.
It might be found created by nuclear weapons, but we'll get to that.
Lead evaporated.
Lead doesn't evaporate until 3200 degrees.
This is documented, and they say the presence of lead oxide on the surface of the mineral wool indicates the existence of extremely high temperatures during the collapse, which caused metallic lead to volatilize, oxidize, and finally condense on the surface of the mineral wool.
All of these temperatures are systematically denied by the DEW people.
And they suggest somehow that the toasting of these tops of these cars is done by an exotic weapon.
Well, just look at them.
Cooling, falling, liquid molten iron droplets.
Speaking of heat, the dust cloud hits us, and it gets real hot.
It felt like it was going to light up almost.
These are witnesses of hot clouds running from the hot clouds, a wave, a hot solid black wave of heat through me down the block.
None of these quotes are in where do the towers go.
When I was running, some hot stuff went down my back because I didn't have time to put my coat on.
And I had some, well, I guess between first and second degree burns on my back.
And then we're engulfed in the smoke, which was horrendous.
One thing I remember it was hot.
The smoke was hot.
And that scared me.
I remember making it into the tunnel.
It was incredibly amount of wind, debris, heat.
All denied by D D DEW folks.
A huge, huge blast of hot wind gusting and smoke and dust and all kinds of debris hit me.
The super hot wind blew and just got dark as night.
You know, you couldn't breathe.
Well, all of that was a summary only of the evidence, which we have a whole hour of on extreme heat and witnesses thereof, including firefighters who are describing the hot molten iron, well, they call it molten steel flowing down the channel rails like lava from a volcano.
We have many witnesses of that.
I don't, I can't put them all in here because we're in such a rush.
But all of that was evidence of ignited thermite and can only be that.
Is there any evidence of unigned thermite?
Well, here's Niels Herrit from Copenhagen, chemistry professor, uh team of eight international scientists, uh, documents uh seven independently connected samples.
They find red gray chips, red on one side, gray on the other.
They're curious because they are attracted by a magnet, so they have a high iron content.
Well, interesting.
Well primer paint has iron in it, but not it's not attracted by a magnet.
They get real real uh curious.
They zoom in or analyze the red layer with XEDS, X-ray energy dispersive spectroscopy, and what do they find?
They find aluminum and oops, and uh iron, the ingredients of thermite.
What are the ingredients and manganese, ingredients of uh thermate?
What are the ingredients?
Magganese is added to thermite, and it helps it become thermate, much more effective at cutting through steel as a euctic mixture, which was found and documented by FEMA in their appendix C that we talked about.
Well, fascinating.
What is the ingredients of thermite doing in the red layer?
They get real curious.
They zoom in 50,000 times with an electron microscope, and they find nano-sized particles, particles of aluminum and iron oxide, the ingredients of thermite that are a thousand times smaller than the diameter of a human hair.
Interesting.
They're set in a matrix, a bed of oxygen, silica, carbon.
This is unmistakable.
They go, what is this stuff we've we've come across?
Oh, it's super thermite.
Lawrence Livermore lab developed this before 2001.
It's called superthermite.
We see when you get these particles so small, uh they the surface volume increases exponentially, and you've engineered an incendiary which works by means of heat, massive heat, 4,000, 5,000 degree heat, which is the only explanation for all the extreme heat that we have been looking at in this summary.
And they've engineered it to become more explosive.
Explosives work by knocking things over by expanding of gases, and that's what you have here: the expansion of or organic material in the silicon oxygen silica and carbon.
And that knocks things over.
It's very interesting stuff.
In the lab at Lawrence Livermore Lab, uh, they in a differential scanning calorimeter, they can actually ignite it and measure the resulting heat that comes off of it.
And guess what?
It's an exothermic reaction.
That's exactly what the samples from the Niels Harriet team did.
So they know that this is a thermitic response.
It's not paint.
Paint doesn't have these exotic properties.
And what do you think happens when it ignites?
It produces molten iron microspheres with the same chemical signature as the molten iron microspheres found and produced by USGS and RJ Lee in all of their studies.
This is not this is all ignored in the DEW theory in the book, Where Did the Towers Go.
In fact, the denial of thermite is on page 124.
The denial of heat in fire is on page 257.
The denial of these extreme temperatures, which we've been looking at irrefutable, overwhelming evidence for is denied on page 263 to 265 and 370.
The denial of the witnesses of molten metal on page 270, skewing their words, saying they don't know what they're talking about.
Denial of witnesses of a hot dust clouds occurring on page 299 and 480 of where did the towers go.
The denial of the heat source of the previously molten iron microspheres, which we just looked at, is denied on page 332, suggesting that this was uh somehow a cold event.
The denial of the heat-induced steel beam warping that can only be produced by four and five thousand degree temperatures in the building seven steel, and particularly the twin tower steel coming up denied on page 465.
So, as if we didn't know where those previously molten iron microspheres have come from, they are found attached to partially ignited red gray chips, as you see here and here.
So it's not a question where they came from.
The question is why are they located in the dust?
This is not made in a cave in Afghanistan.
This is made only in the most sophisticated advanced defense contracting laboratories.
Wow.
Wow, I've never heard that before.
That that is something uh we're gonna skip this network break and we're gonna continue on.
Uh, because now we're really getting into things uh I've never heard about uh with great detail before.
So um continue on, uh Richard.
The conclusion of this report in the Bentham Open Chemical Physics Journal in 2009 states that the red layer is active, unreacted thermitic material, incorporating nanotechnology, it's a highly energetic pyrotechnic or explosive material.
This stands uncontested.
Nobody submitted their own peer-reviewed paper to contest these results, and they're not dealt with in where did the towers go.
So we've looked at the 10 key characteristic features of controlled demolition appearing in building seven.
Fire doesn't create any one of these, directed energy doesn't create any one of these.
Many nuclear weapons are not going to create any but the extreme heat, which we'll look at, with additional circumstantial evidence and corroborative testimony, and by the way, the fires and can't create any of these features, let alone all of them.
Uh, we find this to be proof of control demolition, a body of proof that's convinced 3,000 600 architects and engineers to sign on to the petition demanding a new investigation based on this evidence.
How many engineers have signed on to where did the towers go?
Or the many nuclear weapons.
So we got to look at the towers then, right?
Because if building seven was a controlled demolition, then the twin towers obviously are suspect by default.
Look at them upward, outward, arching streamers, a geometry of fireworks, freely flying structural steel sections weighing four and eight tons, laterally ejected at 80 miles an hour, clocked by physicists landing up to 600 feet in every direction.
All of that is not dealt with by the where and where did the towers go?
None of it is now maybe the mini nuclear weapons can say it looks like a nuclear weapon going off.
We're still coming to that.
But why are these structural steel sections trailing thick white smoke clouds?
Steel is not flammable in office fire conditions.
Well, we've proven that thermite is operative here.
Let's look at the other byproduct of thermite, in addition to molten iron, thick white smoke clouds.
So now we know why the twin towers look like an erupting volcanic event.
Let's look and see if it has any of the features of controlled demolition.
Beginning with, is there a sudden onset?
Well, yeah, the building is at rest, and all of a sudden it's in uniform downward motion, no jolt, no hesitation upon impact of the cold hard steel below.
Same with the South Tower.
It's at rest, and all of a sudden, it's in uniform downward smooth motion.
How are we going to make sense out of this?
We're told that the upper part drove the rest of the building down to the ground and then destroyed itself.
Let's see if that's happening.
It's not happening.
In fact, I'm going to make it easier for you.
Look at the lower red line, the point of plane impacts.
The upper part is not driving anything down to the ground, it's being destroyed in the first couple of seconds here.
Fascinating, huh?
What's destroying it?
We've been looking at some evidence of what that is, but if it were there and driving the rest of the building down, we'd see it in the photographs in the videos.
But it's not there.
None of them show an upper section driving the rest of the building down to the ground.
It's gone, as I mentioned, in the first couple of seconds.
If it were there, it would have destroyed these few remaining core columns standing 900 feet in the air for six seconds.
But no, something else is going on.
There's a destructive force blowing it out and away from these few remaining core columns, and they survive for about six seconds, and then they descend frame by frame.
You can see the top of this bill, this core column set through the concrete powder which has been shaken off of it by presumably another explosion.
Yes, there's a lot of concrete powder.
No, there is no steel dust.
No, this interior column is not turning to dust before your eyes, it is dropping straight down through the concrete powder that's been shaken off of it.
and we're tired of hearing magical fantasies that prop up theories that have no evidence to support them I'm referring to DEW there.
Look at it.
Which one's the volcano?
Which one's building I think that's a north tower.
Upward, outward, arching streamers, a geometry of fireworks, freely flying solid molten objects, trailing thick white smoke clouds of aluminum oxide.
Yeah, I'll make it easier for you.
The volcanic eruptions on the right, 2009 in the Tongan Sea.
So this is not what they told us.
It's not the upper part crushing the lower part and then crushing itself, which is put to us by Zedenic Bazan of Northwestern University in Chicago, a false theory, which is used today as the key theoretical basis for NIST's column failure theory.
No, thanks to John Cole, who's giving us a great theory.
What we're seeing is explosions, and we're going to hear the witnesses of those explosions, all of which, again, are denied by the DEW proponents.
Explosions blowing the building out and away from the core that remains for six seconds, 900 feet in the air.
Feature number two.
Do we have patterned explosions?
Well, yeah, we got to look and see what's really going on here.
There's 156 first responders of witnesses of explosions in the 12,000 pages of testimony that was hidden from us by the New York City until the New York Court State of Appeals forced them to release it.
And it's these are all on the website today.
Professor Graham McQueen read all 12,000 pages of the testimony.
He found 156 of them.
Witnesses of explosions.
I could read all of them to you, but I don't have time.
But you can read them all if you care to not cherry-pick your evidence in where did the towers go and deny the veracity of these witnesses.
Just listen to them.
We felt the ground shake.
You could see the tower sway, and then it just came down.
You can hear this order of events again and again.
They're seeing something, they're feeling something, they're hearing something about explosions.
Before the towers collapse, all of a sudden the ground just started shaking.
Felt like a train running under my feet.
The next thing we know, we look up and the tower is collapsing.
Shook my bones.
I remember feeling the ground shaking.
I heard a terrible noise, and then debris just started flying everywhere.
I saw flash, flash, flash at the lower level of the building.
You know, like when they demolish a building with each popping sound, initially in orange and then a red flash came out of the building, and then it would just go all the way around the building on both sides.
Saw a number of brief light sources being emitted from inside the building between floors 10 and 15.
You saw about six of these brief flashes accompanied by a crackling sound before the tower collapsed.
Now, they're not describing a nuclear explosion.
They're not describing the weakening of the steel by some proposed fantastical theory that somehow they scaled up the Hutchinson effect hundreds of thousands of times, and can target these specific floors in order to make this building come down fairly symmetrically.
I saw low-level flashes.
I saw flash, flash, flash, and then it looked like the building came down.
An explosion appeared at the very top simultaneously from all four sides.
Material shot out horizontally, and then there seemed to me be a momentary delay before you could see the beginning of the collapse.
None of these explosions are a part of the official narrative.
None of them are a part of the DEW narrative.
And we're still coming to the nuclear narrative.
When it hit about the fifth floor, I figure it was a bomb.
Because it looked like a synchronized, deliberate kind of thing, synchronized.
Nuclear weapons go off all at once.
And they're big booms.
And they're bright flashes.
Many times brighter than the sun.
And Jim and I are going to talk About this during the debate.
It seemed like on television, when they blow up these buildings, it seemed like it was going all the way around like a belt, all these explosions.
They're describing small series of explosions.
Building was blowing out on all four sides.
You actually heard the pops, you know?
You heard the pops of the building.
I thought the terrorists planted explosive somewhere in the building.
That's how loud it was.
A crackling explosive.
Another loud boom at the upper floors.
And then a series of smaller explosions.
How many nuclear weapons are being outfitted in this building?
And how how small are they?
Jim and I will talk about that.
Another loud earth-shattering blast with a large fireball that blew out more debris.
Numerous explosions by these witnesses.
The lower level of the building, you know, like when they demolish a building, that's what I thought I saw.
You see any flashes?
I said, Yeah, I thought it was just me.
He said, No, I saw them too.
Multiple flashes, not one big flash.
Everybody, I think at that point, still thought these things were blown up, so I was fully expecting anything else to blow up.
You were there when the planes hit.
No, I was there when the building exploded.
You mean when it fell down?
No, when it exploded.
He's damn sure what he saw, heard, and experienced.
As are the 36 reporters who focus their reports on explosions.
We have many of them for you to play.
Here they are.
But as I was looking up, I saw the entire explosion.
It looked exactly like the first two, but we certainly had the most perfect vantage point for that explosion.
It was unbelievable.
There has just been a huge explosion.
We can see uh a billowing smoke rising.
And I can't, I'll tell you that I can't see that second tower.
Towers, a huge explosion now.
We're not sure exactly what happened, but it was another explosion on the far side of one of the buildings from where we're standing.
The verb the reverberation and another explosion on the right hand side.
Watch the right side ripping the far side of the building.
There seemed to be another explosion, and also on the right hand side, there was also another explosion.
We're not sure if that was uh extra reverberation from what happened at the World Trade Center, or if that was an added explosion.
We heard a very loud explosion explosion.
We looked up, and the uh building literally began to collapse before us.
Uh again, there has been a second explosion uh here in uh Manhattan at the Trade Center.
We are, and uh believe it or not, there was another major explosion.
The build the building itself, literally atop of it came down, sending smoke and debris everywhere.
Do you know if it was an explosion or if it was a building collapse?
To me, it sounded like it's to me it sounded like an explosion, a huge explosion, a huge rumbling cloud.
We're taking photographs and securing this area just prior to that huge explosion that we all heard and felt.
But it literally exploded and came down as though it had been hit.
We heard an explosion.
That explosion happened was shooting pieces of the plane.
There are pieces of the plane on church street.
Ah, there's another explosion as we search.
Something either exploded or fell off the side of the one building that was attacked.
Then the entire top of the building just blew up.
Just seconds ago, there was a huge explosion, and it appears right now.
The second world trade tower has just collapsed.
Um, it was just a small explosion, and then rocks and debris and everything started pouring down, and we were about two blocks away when the second explosion hit, and all we heard was just this small explosion, and you saw a roar of an of an explosion, and uh all kinds of smoke coming bellowing out, debris falling down.
It's unbelievable because you you hear these explosions.
In fact, I just heard another one.
Uh, I don't know if it was like an after effect or whatnot, just while you were on the phone talking about the squirrel cruising.
I'm hearing another explosion.
Just saying now.
I'm hearing another rumble.
What you can feel when these hammock comes is that it literally comes up under your feet.
That's what it feels like.
I that's the best way not to describe it.
Certainly didn't imagine that there would be second or tertiary explosions until they parked some of their vehicles in those areas and many of those vehicles, people in those vehicles.
Interesting.
Some of these voices.
Well, we just heard another explosion go off a couple minutes ago.
Uh, we'll go on and look at the other witnesses of explosions uh before the towers came down.
We're talking about Pacific Palisades 20 miles north.
Uh, which uh FEMA and NIST reports relied on the Kalma Columbia University uh for their theory.
The official narrative tells us that uh, hey, we have we have um seismic events occurring at the time the planes actually hit the towers, and they attributed to the planes hitting the towers.
Uh, we have a point nine magnitude uh event at the north tower.
Uh, we have a.7 magnitude event at the South Tower.
When did they really occur?
Um we we have identical planes and identical buildings, uh, yet very different uh on an order of magnitude almost because of the logarithmic logarithmic scale of the seismic um data.
Uh so it doesn't make sense.
The same plane hitting the same building, producing quite different results.
So the seismic signals occurring uh before the plane impacts in the North Tower.
Uh, we have 846 and 26 seconds uh is when the seismic event begins, but the plane doesn't even impact for another 14 seconds.
So, how in the world can the seismic event be explained by the plane impact?
It can't.
Uh, and so NIST says, well, we did our own research and we found that um uh the the plane impacts uh 10 seconds uh before uh excuse me uh that we think the plane impacted uh four seconds after the seismic event started.
Well, you're still off by four seconds.
The NTSB radar is accurate to within one second.
Everybody knows that.
So what do they do?
They go to you Columbia University and move their data back for uh three seconds, and we don't get that report at all.
What about the South Tower?
We have the uh seismic event occurring at 9 02 in 54 seconds, but the plane doesn't even impact here till 17 seconds later.
NIST says, Oh no, we don't think we we don't we don't agree with the NTSB radar anymore.
Uh we we we looked at the videos we came up and we think that it happened uh 12 seconds earlier.
Well, you're still off by five seconds.
Well, again, they moved get Columbia University to move that data back.
Well, that's darn interesting.
What could have produced those seismic events so far ahead of the plane impact?
Well, we have basement explosions by witnesses denied again by the in the in uh where did the towers go.
Uh Mike Pacrow says the whole building seemed to shake.
There was a loud explosion.
The two arrived at the sea level, they found the machine shop gone, nothing there but rubble.
We're talking about a 50-ton hydraulic press gone.
The two made their way to the parking garage, but found that it too was gone somehow.
Uh steel and concrete fire door weighed 300 pounds, wrinkled up like a piece of aluminum foil and lying on the floor.
A bomb had gone off in the building before the planes hit the towers, and that's documented by the janitor supervisor Willie Rodriguez.
The lobby first, and then a plane hit the bottom.
The bomb hit the lobby first, and a couple of seconds in the first plane hit.
Interesting.
And uh, and of course, William Rodriguez is uh has many witnesses backing up his story that they're in the sea level of the basement, and down below they they heard a big explosion push them up, and then about seven seconds later, he hears bah from up above the plane that uh that then hit, and and there are people that are injured, his skin was torn off.
Uh one gentleman.
Uh so we have to go to experts who are willing to not lie to us, like Andre Rousseau applied geophysics expert, author of more than 50 peer-reviewed papers, who says the frequency of the Raleigh waves attributed by LDEO to the plane impacts were only on the order of one hertz.
Aircraft crash impacts produce much higher frequencies, 10 to 100 Hertz.
And these frequencies were even filtered out by the bandpass filters used by the station.
So Andre says the uh Rousseau says the range of the instruments can't even measure those frequencies.
The seismic equipment is designed to detect seismic events like earthquakes and explosions around one hertz.
Well, that's interesting.
So the seismic events are not from the planes.
He says the actual waves generated by the crash had to have been deadened even before hitting or working their way down to the ground.
This is the flagpole standing up.
It's not going to generate transfer all of that energy into the ground and 20 miles away.
So now we have to look at the seismic events that occurred near the time of the collapse, which of course NIST attributes to the collapse.
And we have a 2.1 magnitude event at the South Tower and a 2.3 magnitude event at the North Tower.
Again, very different magnitudes.
Let's look at them.
The surface waves come at 1028 and 31 seconds that morning.
The tower starts descending about nine seconds before that.
The first debris hits the ground about that time, but the heaviest debris doesn't hit the ground till about four seconds later.
So how can the heaviest debris create a seismic impact?
Well, NIST says, Well, we're going to talk to Columbia University and get them to move their data back again, three seconds.
No report, no countable for accounting to the public.
But they completely ignore the very well-defined primary wave and shear waves that are occurring even before the tower starts descending.
What can cause those waves, which are not background seismic activity four seconds before?
Oh, we're going to find out because explosions, which is consistent with the 156, are detected by cameras that are on the ground here at the South Tower and the North Tower, excuse me.
And you just saw the shake.
So that shake occurs.
The towers and come down yet.
No, it shakes about the time the witnesses heard explosions corroborating their testimony.
How about at the North Tower from a tripod mounted camera on top of a roof, looking at the building, and there is the shake.
And about 10 seconds later, this building comes down.
Just like the North Tower comes down.
There.
So fascinating.
What about the South Tower?
We have the event occurring at 959 and 04 seconds.
The tower starts collapsing five seconds before that.
But the first debris doesn't even hit the ground for another seven seconds.
What does NIST do with that?
They say, Well, we looked at the uh our videos, and we think the the debris uh we think that the seismic event occurred three seconds later.
Again, no report.
Well, what could have produced the event again with above normal above background seismic activity four seconds before three seconds before the start of the actual collapse of the building?
Well, this corrupted this would corroborate also the first responders.
Does anything corroborate?
Uh that the seismic data, yeah.
We have uh in the South Tower uh a tripod mounted camera that's shaking three seconds before, And it's very subtle.
That's it right there.
I didn't move the camera.
And three seconds later, this is publicly available for everybody.
The building comes down.
So corroborating the first responders.
The official narrative tells us, oh, this is due to debris hitting the ground, but we just saw that's impossible.
But in also also it's not hitting the ground.
These four and eight ton structural steel sections are peppering the ground one at a time.
It's ludicrous to compare the seismic activity from these towers, which are not crashing onto the ground, but blowing out with individual freely flying structural steel sections peppering not even the ground, but the diaphragm, the plaza deck, the concrete deck.
So and they hit over a period of 15 seconds.
They're not even going to even produce a seismic event.
And they're equally distributed over the entire superblock of the World Trade Center.
No, this is not the kingdom, which is very different, as we'll see.
And one of these is 1.6 times greater in energy than the other.
We're talking about a 2.1 versus a 2.3 on the logarithmic scale.
1.6 that makes no sense given the identical buildings and nearly identical collapses.
They could have such great energy differences, unless there were different quantities of explosives in the building for some reason.
And that's what Andre Rousseau comes up with in 2012.
So we then go to feature number three.
Is there a straight down symmetrical progression?
By the way, the Seattle Kingdom is a 25-ton concrete roof, which does fall to the ground and produce, I think it was over a two magnitude.
So that indeed is going to register on the Richter scale at that quality at that magnitude.
So we have a straight down symmetrical collapse.
Well, the South Tower begins to actually tip over.
It's tipping over at 22 degrees.
So we have asymmetrical loading on the structure below, asymmetrical damage from the building from the uh broken columns from the plane, asymmetrical damage from the fires.
How in the world then do we get complete symmetrical damage all the way around each face of the building, just like the firefighters described?
It makes no sense given the all the asymmetry up above.
What are we looking at?
Are we looking at directed energy weapons taking out each floor of columns a tenth of a second?
And then the next floor uh directed energy weapons uh removing the the weakness without explosions, which were heard by all of these first responders, or are we looking at a nuclear weapon which somehow ignited down below,
maybe in the basement if you go with the cala Dmitry Kalazov theory, or suitcase nukes up above?
No, this is floor by floor, individual precisely synchronized explosions.
Let's zoom in on the leading corner of these explosions in this looped video.
What do we see?
Individual explosions, which must have been pre-placed floor by floor.
You can see them, you can see the squibs or isolated explosive ejection occurring down below.
This is not a nuclear Weapon going off.
This is hundreds, if not thousands, of individual explosions that are as we'll as we've seen, uh thermite-based and most likely high-energy explosions at uh explosives, as you'll as you'll see.
Uh and many of them are mistimed, isolated explosive ejections called squibs in the control demolition industry.
Uh, here we see them occurring as far down as 20 stories below, 40 stories below the zone of destruction, they occur even as far down as 60 stories down below.
There's no accounting for these phenomena whatsoever in the directed energy weapons hypothesis, which is why they never talk about it.
That these are not nuclear weapons going off way down below here.
Uh, either they can only be pre-placed and probably mistimed explosions here on the left side of the South Tower as it begins to lean right, you see a dozen of these isolated explosive ejections uh uh ejecting out uh of the towers uh themselves,
and then we have the lateral ejection of those structural steel sections weighing four and eight tons, impaling themselves in buildings up to six hundred feet away.
This is incredible explosive force hurling these freely flying structural steel sections that far.
Directed energy weapon has no capability to do that, at least it hasn't been produced, it hasn't even been hypothesized by Dr. Judy Wood.
These structural steel sections have four bolt holes at the ends of them.
All the plane had to do was to push in those heavy structural steel sections.
The columns are three stories tall, welded uh together by the spandrel panels, and shear off all 12 bolts that we're looking at here.
Most of these columns were not sliced, and yes, they're ejected laterally, they are freely flying.
This is not a banana peeling as has been described in the Where Do the Towers Gook.
Look at this one.
It's about to hit building seven.
Let's go back to forward two.
That's freely flying.
What's the energy source that ejected that section that far and horizontally?
How does gravity work?
Down.
How would we expect this structure to come apart if it were indeed all the columns were targeted synchronistically timed by directed energy weapons down?
It would weaken the steel and it would just go down.
But what we see is out, and it is not a banana peeling.
It's about to hit building seven.
And what is it trailing?
Thick white smoke clouds.
Why?
Because the aluminum oxide ash, the other byproduct of thermite, in addition to molten iron, is on the ends of these structural steel sections, all of them.
There's enough energy here, by the way, to hurl a 200-pound cannonball three miles.
This is explosive force with a 1200 foot diameter, actually 1400 foot diameter, blowing these pieces well beyond the boundaries of ground zero.
And by the way, if a hundred thousand tons or most all of that steel is distributed outside the footprint, as we can see in this aerial photography of the site, the steel, the perimeter columns and core columns are ejected outside of the perimeter.
The North Tower there, the South Tower here.
It didn't disappear, it didn't turn to dust.
There's no steel dust found by anyone or documented in the where did the towers go book?
In the dust.
If the steel turned to dust, it would be in the dust.
No.
What they do find is previously molten iron microspheres, about four tons of them.
So what's driving this?
We just have about a few minutes.
I have to tell just informing we got about a good five minutes left, and uh, this is so compelling.
Uh we may have just uh we may have to uh go even just a little longer if we can, but uh this is so compelling.
But uh go ahead and finish your uh your thoughts.
Thank you for the heads up, Dean.
Appreciate that.
If a hundred thousand tons of steel framing is distributed outside the footprint, you have to ask yourself what's crushing the building.
There's a missing component here, there's nothing left to crush the building.
That's important.
Maybe it's the concrete because we're missing 110 floors of concrete, they're not found at the bottom.
You don't see them.
Four and eight inch thick concrete poor on metal decking, poured on metal decking supported by lightweight steel trusses.
We're looking for pancakes here.
We don't see them.
So while I do agree with the directed energy weapons, um uh factoid that there's no pile, there's not enough steel here at the bottom.
We saw where the steel went, it went out, it didn't disappear in a real pancake and collapse.
We're looking for a pancakes.
This is a 33-story building destroyed by an earthquake.
Its pile is three, four times the size the height of the World Trade Center pile.
Where are the pancakes?
We're looking for pancakes.
This 33 story building compared to 110 story building, is 30, 40, 50 feet tall.
Look at the people on the lower right.
We're missing pancakes.
We're missing concrete.
Where'd the oh there's the concrete?
It's pulverized in midair.
What can pulverized 90,000 tons of concrete is the question?
Jim's gonna suggest that nuclear weapons can, and I don't doubt that.
But I'm gonna suggest that there are several sources for the American Society of Testing and Materials report C 856, which says that even at temperatures of only 1,500 degrees Fahrenheit, concrete turns to white powder and decomposed hydration products.
That's gravel, sand, cement paste.
This is documented by others as well.
Concrete specimens subjected to temperatures of 2200 degrees Fahrenheit were completely decomposed by what heat, not explosive detonation speeds, which Mark Hightower and Jim have criticized for nine uh over a dozen years,
uh the capability of nanothermite to do and for good reason, but now we know that it's the heat, not the detonation speed that's pulverizing the concrete.
That's important.
This is not the building turning to dust.
This is concrete powder that's been pulverized, and now we know why.
It's steel that's been distributed laterally.
By the way, if 90,000 tons of concrete in each building is pulverized and spread over three square miles, what's crushing the building?
It wasn't the steel.
That was a third of the weight of this building.
It's not the concrete.
That's another third of the weight of the building.
Two-thirds the weight of each building is not available to crush it.
So what how did they get these materials in here?
I'm just going to speculate based on the research by Kevin Ryan and dig within net that they weren't doing fireproofing upgrades in the months or years before 9/11 they were applying liquid applied nanothermite on the bottom of those concrete slabs which would then at four and five thousand degrees evaporate the metal decking evaporate the steel trusses and return the concrete to its a D original hydration products
dry How else did they have access?
Well, if they had access to the c to the elevators, they'd have access to the core columns and beams in the building.
There's a lot of gypsum boards surrounding these hoistways, so they'd have to make quite a mess.
And yes, there was a mess in the weeks before 9-11.
It was probably the week leading up to 9-11.
Every morning I'd come in around 7 a.m.
And the dust was incredible.
It was self-eyed.
It was like the clean is like cleaning.
Right where the windows were there was a sill which enclosed radiators.
I was sick to death of the dust which were appearing on the windowsill.
It was um dirty gray.
And very, very noticeable.
Very noticeable indeed.
Well, Ace Elevator had the contract.
They had 85 employees.
Uh, but they were called out to a meeting uh that day.
So they weren't available to help the firefighters.
They had uh a um union meeting.
So they're pulled out to discuss some business.
That's convenient.
180,000 tons of steel.
Where did it go?
Easily the largest and most perplexing structural failures in history.
400 truckloads a day.
Carted off to China before investigators could get their hands on it and do a proper forensic investigation.
This is the illegal destruction of evidence in a crime scene, causing many to cry out.
Crucial evidence could answer many questions, is on the slow boat to China, showing an astounding ignorance of government officials to the value of a thorough scientific investigation.
So we have all the key features of control demolition and twin towers, and some very uncharacteristic features as well, with additional circumstantial evidence and corroborative testimony.
None of these features, by the way, can be accounted for by directed energy weapons, not one of them.
Or NIST's official theory of fire, and most of them can't buy nuclear weapons either.
So when we have opportunity, Jim and I are going to talk about no planes.
And um, we're going to following sequence.
Isn't we're gonna talk about uh 53 separate recordings?
Yeah.
That that is uh that that's exciting.
And uh we unfortunately have to uh we have to uh pull the curtain just a little bit, but uh you can catch the main debate uh coming this Saturday.
But also don't want to miss uh Jim's rebuttal to Richard.
Uh as uh you can see here this coming Thursday, Jim Fetzer presents his case for nuclear and why Richard is wrong and he is right, and uh we can't wait for that.
Uh Richard, any kind of final maybe uh thoughts you want to share with this uh worldwide effective audience here at uh real deal meeting because uh everybody is uh just been so engaged, but really uh glued to their seat because a lot of this either people maybe forgot about or really have never heard before.
Final thoughts, Richard.
Yeah, I I just want to um encourage everyone to do your research thoroughly.
Don't believe something because it sounds futuristic or uh something you haven't thought of before.
Critically analyze all the evidence, not just that which is provided to you in fancy books that are an inch and a half thick that are full of fantasy.
Uh we've you've gotta think critically.
And uh I'm looking forward to thinking critically uh with Jim and going through the evidence uh on when we have the opportunity on Saturday at 9 p.m. Eastern uh on your station, Dean.
And I'm looking forward to seeing uh Jim's uh uh presentation Thursday.
Uh I'm um uh I'm I'm tickled pink uh to have uh this discussion.
But I'm curious how we can find time to present.
I think what we'll focus on today is what we did, and and when Jim and I get together, I'll walk through just the evidence of um of plane impacts, plane parts, uh picked up uh seen uh uh uh picked up by Captain Richard Patterson uh uh dozens and dozens and dozens of plane parts and and and talk about why what the evidence is
for planes definitely hitting the towers, even though it seems like they couldn't push these towers.
I'll try to represent the DEW, you know, and just to let people know what they're saying, you know, just and when we get to that uh segment.
But uh Richard Gage, everybody, how about a round of applause if you're out there because uh he's a busy man, he's one of the hardest working men uh out there, just still uh pushing the truth about this dreadful day in American history.
So Richard, thank you for being here, and I look forward to seeing you this coming Saturday for this Saturday main event.
It's gonna be awesome.
And thank you so very much, Dean.
Appreciate you sponsoring this debate.
You bet.
I wish I could do more.
Okay, well, there you have it, everybody.
Richard Gage.
Uh, I want to thank uh everybody who's new uh for uh finding us.
If you can see us through all of the censorship, and uh to thank all of our regulars uh for being here tonight, as this is a most monumental uh moment uh for real deal media, but for this new generation to learn the truth about what happened that day.
And I tell you, this really makes me upset because it brings me back because uh knowing what we all know now and who's behind it gets me angry.
So uh on that note, uh until next time, uh Fort Richard Gage and everyone else here at Real Deal Media, I'm Dean Renzi.
Thank you for sharing a bit of your night.
And always remember to stay tuned and stay awake.
See you tomorrow, everybody.
▲
Export Selection