Jim Fetzer - The Raw Deal (28 July 2025) with co-host Joe Olsen and special guest, Danny Cirrus

All Episodes

Previous Next

July 29, 2025 - Jim Fetzer

01:57:00

The Raw Deal (28 July 2025) with co-host Joe Olsen and special guest, Danny Cirrus

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	I need somebody, not just anybody.
	You know, I need someone, so much younger than today.
	helping anyway Help me get beaten now.
	Help me get my feet around.
	Help me get my feet back on the ground.
	Won't you please help me?
	This is Jim Fetzer, your host on The Rod Deal, right here on Revolution Radio Studio B this 28th day of July 2025, joined by co-host Joe Olson and special featured guest Danny Searas.
	The first hour we'll be discussing the latest news, the second hour, this very bizarre Idaho tranny shooting event, which looks like and has the characteristics of a false flag.
	We begin with a rather stunning report.
	Hal Turner on top of the issue, as he is so many others.
	Catastrophic data breach.
	French nuclear submarine source code stolen.
	Unreal.
	Just days after announcing support for Gaza, actually for a Palestinian state, France's largest defense shipbuilder, Naval Group, got hacked.
	Criminal hackers claim responsibility for the attack.
	I guarantee you 100% this was a Mossad operation.
	The hackers have allegedly given Naval Group 72 hours to pay a ransom, or all the data will be leaked online free.
	The hacker alleged possession of approximately a terabyte of internal data, including classified CMS source code, deployment guides for submarines and frigates, network data,
	technical documents marked with classifications like restricted distribution and special France, developer virtual machines with naval simulators, and intercepted internal communications via HCL.
	A 13 gigabyte sample of the leaked data has reportedly been shared to prove the hackers have the actual information, which I concede would be unlikely to have been most sawed.
	A research team reviewed portions of this sample and concluded it appeared to contain legitimate naval group materials.
	How about how Turner's snap analysis?
	France has nuclear ballistic missile submarines.
	I don't think anyone had this in doubt.
	The hack, if true, would provide the hackers access to the combat control systems of those submarines.
	They could remotely fire those missiles.
	Just think about that for a minute.
	There are other immediate risks.
	Reverse engineering of French naval technology for the sovereign-class submarine stealth systems.
	Exploitation of vulnerabilities in NATO ally systems.
	Strategic advantages to adversaries in Mediterranean or Black Sea theaters.
	NATO cyber rapid response team has already been alerted.
	Here's an update confirmed.
	This is a verified catastrophic data breach targeting Naval Group, a French military industrial giant specializing in submarines and advanced naval platforms.
	The leak package posted openly on a dark forum by a user named SACSX, Negropito, contains what I have described above.
	France's entire naval adherence doctrine possibly mirrored by adversaries.
	This is a cybernetic kill shot.
	Joe, your thoughts about this?
	Well, it most certainly would have been most odd.
	They had the method, means, and motive, number one.
	And number two, you couldn't trust buying blackmail from somebody that's got that much data because they're still going to have the data and they can share it with whoever they want and they can do those actual fake launches and use Fault 7 and blame it on somebody else.
	So bottom line is they better just make everything in their nuclear fleet manual operated only so that they don't have any automatic launch codes.
	Good, good, good.
	Danny, would you like to comment on this story?
	Well, sir, I would say the same thing.
	I mean, I would, you know, of course they should lock down their submarine and try to go in there and figure out how they did it and how they can lock it down.
	And of course, the first thing I would think of is secure the weapons to make sure that they can't be launched in any way without some sort of a secondary trigger or code being entered in to make sure that nobody externally can fire them.
	I mean, it's always been my understanding that the captain has to put in some sort of a special code, you know, before any of the weapons can be fired in the first place.
	So let's hope that's the case and they can't actually remote fire them from another location.
	Very good comments from you both.
	Meanwhile, Larry Johnson interviewed with Judge Napolitano, continues to do brilliant work here with first-class interviewers and important information on the latest about how Ukraine is losing the war.
	Let's pull it up here with Larry.
	July 28th, 2025.
	It's good to be back here at work again, and it's a delight to be here with my longtime friend and collaborator, Larry Johnson.
	Larry, a pleasure, my dear friend.
	Thank you.
	Man, you can't believe it today.
	You can't believe it.
	You can't believe the emails I was getting saying, where's the judge?
	Is he okay?
	I did.
	No, he's fine.
	He's doing the vacation.
	I was approached by a lady in a hotel in Berlin who said, Judge Napolitano, nice to see you.
	Please give my regards to Larry Johnson.
	So regards from this unnamed fan.
	Before we get to Ukraine, there are so many other things we have to talk about, not the least of which are the Tulsi Gabbard revelations and the latest international recognition, I think, of the depravity of the behavior of the Israeli government vis-a-vis Gaza.
	But let's start with Gabbard.
	You were, and having advised me, I was, but you were ahead of your time when we revealed back in 2017 that GCHQ was doing, that the British domestic spying apparatus was doing dirty work for the CIA so that American fingerprints wouldn't be on it.
	But we didn't really know, did we, that one of those fingerprints would belong to Barack Obama himself?
	Not back then.
	I mean, again, my source at the time, it wasn't so much being directed by Barack Obama.
	Really, it was more from Hillary's side.
	But Obama was providing support.
	What Tulsi has revealed is, let's call it, it's phase three of Russia Gate.
	Phase one was in the initial leadup when they hadn't actually designated presidential candidate.
	CIA, FBI were involved with targeting all of the presidential aspiring presidential candidates, except for Hillary.
	And that started in the summer of 2015.
	Once Trump was identified as he's he's the man, the whole operation to tie Trump to Russia and make him sort of the puppet of Putin, at least in the public's mind, that kicked off 1st of May in 2016.
	And then with Trump's election, and now that he was coming into power, that kicked in phase three.
	And that's really where Obama started really exercising his influence, putting his thumb on the scale.
	Interesting.
	The allegations that some of this was criminal, of course, will really grossly exaggerate, but Harrim will fall on dead on deaf ears because of the statute of limitations.
	Well, I think, you know, number one, it was ill-advised for Tulsi to make any judgment about what kind of legal charges should be brought.
	That is up to Department of Justice.
	I think the two most compelling lines of, if you will, judicial attack would be one, a RICO, because you can definitely establish that this was a conspiracy and it wasn't confined just domestically.
	It involved the cooperation of the FBI, the CIA, and foreign governments.
	The other would be an action based upon defrauding the United States government.
	And that doesn't mean you had to actually cost it money, although it did.
	So the perjury stuff, yeah, they lied.
	And that's been, you know, people do that routinely in Washington and usually get away with it.
	Right.
	No accountability.
	Particularly people in those levels of government.
	Some of the statements under oath may actually be less than five years ago, meaning the statute of limitations has not expired.
	Is there a developing consensus in Israel that the government has gone too far, that the concept of ghettos, the concept of concentration camps, the concept of collective punishments of the known innocent because they're children and babies is the hallmark of a Nazi regime.
	Well, it appears at least there's a strong minority.
	I'm not sure yet it's a majority view, but Alistair's wife, Asleen, puts together a terrific summary.
	They go in and read the Hebrew press.
	And the Hebrew press is different from the English press in Israel.
	The English press tends to clean things up and not be as blunt or direct, whereas the Hebrew press sort of pulls the veil back and it's like what the Zionists are really saying to each other.
	And what's remarkable about her latest contribution is that it highlights how many senior, important people across Israel are now speaking up in horror and liking what's happening.
	I know I have made the comparison in the past.
	Others have of tying it to the Holocaust in what the Nazis did to Jews during World War II.
	But now you've got a number of prominent Jews making that same comparison and accusing their own government of engaging in the kind of behavior that was sanctioned, approved by Adolf Hitler.
	I mean, I read.
	Yeah, the fact of the matter is Holocaust, the avision narrative of six million being put to death in gas chambers using Zykon B, we know to be an historical illusion.
	It's not historical fact, but playing it off against common beliefs or popular conceptions in relation to what's going on in Gaza, which is a bona fide genocide by any standard, I think works in terms of political discourse.
	And while I hadn't intended to go there yet, we do have a whole lot more on the Epstein Piles.
	I'll add a little bit about it and then get your comments.
	Henry Macau, who is of course himself a Jewish, but he's been an outspoken critic of Israel, Zionism, and the like, has now published Epstein Piles document Trump's Child Sex Trafficking.
	Senator Ron Wyden says Epstein received $1.5 billion in 4,700 wild transfers linked to sex trafficking of Eastern European girls to wealthy businessmen.
	Trump, who ran a modeling agency, was his partner in crime.
	Will Trump pardon Ghuslaine Maxwell to buy her silence and will it work?
	David Packman.
	Trump's Epstein fiasco takes a dark turn.
	Ghuslaine Maxwell lawyers say she discussed about 100 different people with the DOJ.
	Here's his image that Henry has.
	They're not meeting with the victims.
	They're meeting with a trafficker.
	That tells you everything you need to know.
	Complicit, corrupt, disgusting.
	Meanwhile, Paul Craig Roberts, a wise man, discusses the Epstein saga and what it's really about.
	And I think this is extremely important.
	We have to decide whether the Epstein story is a child rape or mossad black male.
	If child is defined as underage, the statutory age of female sexual consent in the U.S., depending on the state, a child is a female under 16 years of age, under 17 or under 18.
	In New York, the age of female consent is 17.
	In Hawaii, 16.
	Hawaii has a close-in age exception that allows 14-year-olds to consent with those up to 21 years of age.
	In Hawaii, the goal seems to be not to prevent underage females from sexual intercourse, but to prevent overage males over 21 from sex with females declared underage for them, but not for younger men.
	There's an element here of age discrimination.
	In the Philippines, the age of female consent is 12.
	In Germany, the requirement is for a female to be 14 years old in order for a sexual relationship with a male over 18 to be legal.
	There's more.
	However, what's most important here, what I've reported are facts, not a brief or pedophilia.
	Use the facts to decide whether the Epstein saga is one of child sex trafficking or one of Mossad honey trap for blackmail purposes to ensure U.S. policy in the Middle East conforms to Israel.
	Sex trafficking of children in the U.S. is far more extensive than Epstein's operation, principally the sex trafficking of illegal alien children.
	Many were separated from their parents.
	And if reports are correct, tens of thousands or even hundreds of thousands have been lost.
	U.S. authorities don't know where they are.
	Another source was this seizure of children by child protective services, many of whom allegedly ended up in child prostitution.
	As far as I know, nothing has been done to find and rescue these children.
	As a final suggestion, consider whether the purpose of the hullabaloo of Repstein's sex trafficking is to focus attention off the Israeli spy operation that has succeeded in destroying an independent American Middle East policy in five Muslim countries regarded as obstacles to greater Israel.
	Joe, I think Paul Craig Roberts is making a wonderful point here.
	Your thoughts.
	This stuff is really embedded.
	A news article last Friday, CBS News, Alexander Brothers charged with sex trafficking 60 different females.
	And this is Oren, Tal, and Elon Alexander, who are business partners with Prince Cushy.
	So there you go.
	It goes really deep in that particular group.
	I want to mention something.
	Got a video this morning by Greg Reese on trauma-based mind control and how they've been using orphans to create armies for the banker elite for the last several centuries.
	And he goes on and on about how they used to have orphan auctions at county fairs.
	They just ship orphans around and sell them to whoever the willing local oligarchs were.
	And they could have their own slaves for sex or work or whatever.
	So bottom line is we've had a really nasty underlying to the whole United States myth.
	And I think the whole thing is going to collapse in one giant heap in a real short period of time.
	Danny, your thoughts?
	You know, sir, this is such a disgusting subject to me.
	It really kind of turns my stomach that this is going on in the United States in the first place.
	I mean, the fact that they're not doing everything they can, the authorities, to stop this from happening, especially in our country, is just, to me, is just over the top.
	You know, on X, I sent you a couple of videos.
	One with the gentleman releasing what he shows are names on a log that actually went to Epstein's Island.
	And there's a bunch of Hollywood elites and stuff on there, has the dates and whatnot.
	And then I sent you another short video clip with some pictures of Clinton with underage girls.
	You can see there's a few celebrities on that video clip that's rolling around X. And it's just when you see some of these photos of some of these, you know, Hollywood elites with these kids, it's really disgusting.
	And I just, I can only wonder, why are the authorities not raiding these people?
	Why don't we see them let off to jail and handcuffs, you know, things of that nature?
	And, you know, there's some entity way up above that just wants this to continue and wants to allow it to allow it to continue.
	And it's just disgusting.
	And I'm just tired of it.
	And I'd love to see something done.
	And I believe that something is going to happen pretty soon.
	I don't know what's going to happen with this Jisane and this these names that she named and all that kind of stuff.
	But, you know, I really would like to see finally see some people get prosecuted and go to jail over this and mainly put a stop.
	So we can end this.
	We don't need this in the United States.
	That's for sure.
	The whole country agrees with you.
	Here's a piece of Alaska Cook.
	Is the Trump mystique broken?
	But first this.
	We all know how devastating war is.
	Lives lost.
	No one is going to protect as we speak in the middle of the summer 2025.
	How broken is the Israeli society?
	Completely broken.
	I mean, I'm not trying to say something that is exaggerated.
	But if you look, recently we just put out a report from the, all drawn from the Hebrew and Israeli press.
	What they're saying basically is that, you know, this is not a place that they want to be in any longer.
	This is not a moral society, not a democratic society.
	They describe in lurid terms what's happening in Gaza to be a replay of the Holocaust.
	I mean, they are, and so me saying this, this is what is written in the Hebrew and the Israeli press, where they are saying very much that, you know, this thing of, you know, what are we doing in Gaza?
	We're going to try, we call it a humanitarian zone.
	It's a ghetto.
	And we all know what happened after the ghetto.
	What happened with the gas chambers?
	And they said, is this where we're heading?
	This is unacceptable.
	So Netanyahu is in deep trouble.
	There are divisions.
	Israel is overextended and all these conflicts he got involved with.
	Again, it is now at war in Syria against Turkey.
	And so it's a very complicated situation.
	At the same time, there's deep, deep problems about the legal situation, about the way ahead.
	Once again, I've had Fred Lochner participate in two of my Vault Flag and conspiracy conferences where Fred was the leading experts on gas chambers in the world and was sent off to Germany to inspect the camps and the facilities.
	He came back to report during the trial of a great German political figure who was a Holocaust denier that there were no gas chambers.
	I would have thought that that would have put an end to it, but it has not.
	We have nevertheless a persistence of the comparison, which is not unreasonable in relation to popular belief.
	But let me just say now, State of the Nation has published a very, to many, stunning report that the Donald Trump in the White House now is not physically the same person as the Donald Trump of the past.
	And it's on my blog at jameshvetzer.org.
	They have looked at a whole lot of videos going back and forth and they're finding stunning differences.
	And I've just supplemented it with additional photographs coming from a reader where we have the Trump in the past, in the 1980s, had attached earlobes, for example.
	But the Trump in 2004 had hanging or pendulum earlobes.
	The shape and size of their skull is this that their physical height even appears to be different.
	There are many, many features.
	And now it's been supplemented by photographs of Trump with his first wife, Ivana, with his second wife, Marla Maqules, and now with Melania.
	And the Trump married to the first two.
	And I do have one reader, by the way, who thinks they're all three of them are different.
	But the first two appear to be the same and the third different.
	Joe, you may not have been confronted with this.
	I welcome your thoughts about it.
	And by the way, I went back and watched an interview with David Letterman, and the Trump who came on was not only taller, as tall as Letterman, they're both about 6'3, but he had a very gracious, subdued manner.
	He was very low-key.
	He was very articulate, and he was modest.
	Joe, your thoughts?
	Yeah, well, body doubles seem to be another standard of the deep state fake reality we're living with.
	One thing that Trump definitely has a problem with is that his first wife, mother of his three oldest children, Avana, I mean, excuse me, Ivanka, Eric, and Don Jr., was BFF with Ghislaine, and they used to drive around in limos in New York City and in Miami, passing in modeling cards to teenage girls standing on street corners.
	So he's a little bit of a dynasty problem.
	Y'all hold that thought.
	We'll be right back after this break.
	�� listen to Revolution Radio at freedomslips.com.
	We'll be right back.
	Management would like to take a moment to thank the listeners and hosts for all their support that has made Revolution Radio one of the biggest platforms for free speech in an ever-growing dark world of censorship.
	Unfortunately, this platform for free speech has never been free.
	We need the support of the people.
	It is the people like you, yes, you, that keeps the station in the front lines of the battle against tyranny and oppression.
	Please help support Revolution Radio so free speech will not be silenced in a world that seems to be going deaf to the real truth.
	With your support, we will be able to become an even bigger pillar of light in a dark world.
	RevolutionRadioFreedomSlooks.com, the number one listener-supported radio station on the planet.
	Revolution.
	Oumu naji, oumu naji, yo yo yo, oumu naji, chana o naji.
	WELL, IT'S BEING YOUNG MAIN:
	Join Revolution Radio every Wednesday, 8 p.m. Eastern Time on Studio B for Momentary Zen with host Zen Garcia at freedomstick.com, the People Station.
	The opinions expressed on this radio station, its programs, and its website by the hosts, guests, and call-in listeners or chatters are solely the opinions of the original source who expressed them.
	They do not necessarily represent the opinions of Revolution Radio and FreedomSlips.com, its staff or affiliates.
	You're listening to Revolution Radio, FreedomFlips.com, 100% listener-supported radio.
	And now we return you to your host.
	you you You know, Joe, one of the fascinating aspects, if indeed Trump died, and I'm unclear at the point as to how that would have happened, though I've heard there could have been a helicopter accident and assassination that took him out.
	One of the reasons the guy in the Oval Office today protests against these sex allegations, him being personally involved, is because he, the president incarnation of Donald Trump, wasn't personally involved.
	That was earlier, the original Donald Trump, who was involved.
	So I think this has a psychological dimension that has heretofore remained unexplored.
	Your further thoughts?
	Well, it's going to be really hard to decide who all the different buddy doubles are because we know for sure there was several for Biden and several for Reptillary.
	So who knows?
	Yeah, sure.
	I thoroughly documented the Biden for four years.
	We had an imposter in the White House.
	I went back to earlier footage of the real Joe, like from around 2007, as I recall.
	And he was very articulate, very expressive, used his hands in gestures, yes, as do I, compared to the guy in the Oblaw office who is virtually like a mummy, no affect, no articulation, no expression.
	And that's over and beyond the physical differences, which are definitive, at different shape and size of skull, different handwriting, different signatures, different interaction with Jill.
	Danny, your thoughts about all the above?
	Yes, sir.
	Well, the Biden, for sure, there was multiple, multiple dummies or doppelgangers or doubles, whatever you want to call them.
	You know, we've seen lots of photo analysis of four or five different characters.
	You know, I've seen the videos of Biden going back to the 2000s and before.
	It's definitely not him.
	There's a video still online with him racing an older Corvette in the 60s, like a convertible with Colin Powell, who's driving a more modern, newer Corvette.
	And they're sort of doing a spoof where they're drag racing each other in some sort of a parking lot or like that.
	And I think it's hosted by Jay Delano, I believe, back when he had the show.
	And you can definitely see it's a different Biden by the mannerisms, the voice.
	Even when you look at the video now, you see the ears are different.
	There's so many things that are different, you know, and the way he talks, subjects.
	The one video where he talks about the importance of locking down the border and not allowing people to come over here, not being vetted, that's a powerful one.
	You know, there's ones where masks are peeling off of his neck.
	You can see that it's definitely some sort of a character in the mask in the later Bidens.
	The one that really gets me, sir, is how the signature is different and how after the last election, the guy supposedly in the White House now all of a sudden is left-handed.
	And, you know, Joe Biden has been right-handed his whole life.
	And there's many documents that have been in Congress with his signature on it.
	He's been involved in government in multiple ways, we all know, and signed many documents over the years.
	And then all of a sudden, he shows up after the 2020 election, and he is left-handed.
	And he writes with his left hand now.
	And there's nothing wrong with his right hand.
	It's not in a cast or anything, but he's writing left-handed and his signature has changed.
	And I, you know, I don't know how a denier could say, well, it's common for somebody to reach their upper 70s and into their 80s and just start writing with their left hand all of a sudden and stop using their right hand.
	That's not the case at all.
	And I know none of my parents ever switched writing with their hands or any of my relatives for that matter.
	They've, you know, stayed whatever they were their whole life.
	And the fact that his signature changed and you can clearly see in the photos that he's signing with his left hand, the executive orders, is a dead giveaway.
	The other thing that's really troubling is in a lot of those videos and pictures, the scenery outside of the White House window has changed.
	You know, it's always looked the same with the trees.
	We have videos of Barack Obama.
	There's a spoof of Barack Obama with Jerry Seinfeld coming to the Oval Office and he comes in through the back door.
	It's kind of funny.
	And you can see Jerry looking through the window and he comes in.
	And, you know, they set it up, of course, with Barack ahead of time.
	And then he interviewed him, you know, around the White House and around the grounds.
	And they ended up driving a car around and whatnot.
	But you can see clearly how the grounds look in the window and how things are in the scenery.
	And then when Obama was in, I mean, not Obama, excuse me, when Joe Biden was in office, the scenery out the window changed.
	There's a building sitting out there, several buildings that you can see.
	And those buildings are not there.
	They're simply not outside of the real Oval Office window.
	They've never been there.
	But all of a sudden, they're there with this Joe Biden who signs with his left hand.
	Then all of a sudden, for comparison, when Trump gets back in office, the scenery out the Oval Office has changed back.
	And now the scenery looks like it did when Obama was in office.
	It looks normal.
	Yeah, Danny.
	It's well known.
	They constructed a phony Oval Office in the West Wing.
	I mean, that's what you're talking about.
	All the reporters knew they were in the audience.
	They had a jumbo-side telepomper so Biden could read.
	So that and the scenery change and all that is actually well known and documented, but you're absolutely right about it.
	Everything was different.
	We had a total imposter for four years, and virtually everyone in Washington had to know.
	It's very, very strange.
	Every now and then, Trump would drop a line like it's as though he were a completely different guy, but it was never made an issue when, in my judgment, it ought to have been.
	And now the question becomes, what about this Trump thing?
	Now, most importantly, I believe Paul Craig Roberts has it right that all the focus on child sex trafficking, as horrific as it is, and we all agree, Danny, is it disgusting beyond belief, is being used as a distraction from the fact that this was an Israeli Mossad spying blackmailing operation to gain Israeli control over the American government.
	I think that Paul Craig Roberts got it right.
	That's the bigger story.
	Your thoughts?
	Well, you know, Robert David Steele, before he passed away, said that they broke him out.
	He said they broke him out of the jail and moved him back to Israel was his opinion.
	And, you know, he's always been really credible and pretty on target with everything that he talks about.
	And he said, this is an operation.
	They moved him out, you know, and the operation came to an end.
	There's some people that say even that Ghislaine isn't actually even in jail.
	She's gone too.
	And they just an illusion of her being in the jail.
	I think that's not right.
	She has herself said Jeffrey's alive and is in Israel and continuing to blackmail American politicians.
	Right, right.
	And that could very well be.
	I would love to go to the jail and verify it myself, but they're not going to allow me.
	And I just wanted to touch on the body doubles with Trump.
	There's definitely been body doubles with Trump.
	I mean, one noted one that was one of the bad ones is there was a rocket launch not too long ago with Elon, you know, a few months back.
	And Trump was in Florida wearing a red hat, you know, the red hat.
	And he was hanging out with Elon on the like the launch platform or the observer platform, if you will.
	And he was with, you know, some of the members of his cabinet were around.
	But you can definitely tell that the guy wearing the hat and he was wearing it down low.
	You could tell it was not Trump, you know, and he was out in public.
	So, I mean, he definitely uses body doubles.
	You can see him from time to time where it's not Trump.
	But as far as them switching him out for the original one, and we have a doppelganger in there to the like we had with Biden, I don't believe that.
	I haven't seen that.
	To me, it looks like the real Trump when it counts, when we see the videos or you see him in the Oval Office to me, but I definitely have seen the use of the body doubles, you know, at different events.
	There's no doubt that they're using body doubles for Trump.
	I mean, that's just probably done for security.
	Excellent, Danny.
	I'm glad to get your alternative opinion on the table.
	Let me encourage everyone, see if you can dig into research and figure out when the switch was made.
	I personally am convinced these are two different people.
	I don't have any doubt about it.
	It is true he may be using body doubles for security, but these are photographs of him dancing with Ivana, with Marion Marla Maples, and with Melania.
	And they're not the same person.
	There's a whole lot of other evidence here on the blog.
	So I'm inviting everyone in our audience right here at Revolution Radio to do some research of your own home sleuthing, as it were, to figure out when the switch was made and how it occurred.
	As I say, I've heard a report that it had to do with a helicopter accident that was actually an assassination.
	But I'd love to get confirmation.
	Meanwhile, now returning to Eastern Europe, satellite images reveal a massive expansion of a Russian kamikaze drone operation, military watch reports.
	Satellite images published by CNN have revealed significant efforts to expand Russia's primary production facility for single-use attack drones in Alaboga.
	The images indicate the construction of dozens of buildings is underway, not only production workshops, but also dorms for the workforce of up to 40,000 expected to live on site.
	The Russian defense sector's capacity to produce single-use attack drones has been expanded tremendously since 2022, with The Economist reporting in May the output of their Geron 2, the primary drone class produced at the factory, had increased more than tenfold from 300 a month to over 100 per day.
	Industry was reported at the time to be on track to be able to produce 500 drones daily, which would allow for 15,000 attacks to be launched every month.
	Staggering.
	Plus, we have the Russians commissioning a new ballistic submarine that will carry 160 nukes.
	160 nukes.
	The Russian Navy has inducted a new Borai-A-class nuclear-powered ballistic missile submarine into service with a flag raising ceremony having been attended by President Vladimir Putin at a time of increased focus on the service's modernization.
	The warship, Kenyaz Polzarsky, is the eighth Barai-class ship to have been built and the fifth in the improved Barai-A-class.
	It reportedly benefits from significant incremental upgrades that have improved its stealth and survivability over preceding ships in the class.
	As the world's largest operational submarine class, the massive 24,000-ton vessels each carry 16 RSM-56 intercontinental range ballistic missile ICBMs, each of which can deliver up to 10 nuclear warheads against separate targets using multiple independent re-entry vehicles.
	Joe, your thoughts about these developments reflecting the evolution of modern warfare?
	Well, that's the end of old-fashioned warfare.
	That's for sure.
	And then another thing on Epstein.
	Yeah.
	He had 4,725 wire transfers for over $1.1 billion.
	In 1994, he was introduced to Slick Willie by Slick Willie's Treasury Secretary Rubin.
	And at that point, it was the start of the $21 trillion that's missing from the DOD, UD, and HHS.
	And that's burned by Kathleen Pitts.
	And she's the secret that he was the one that was in charge of doing the money laundering for all the money that was being stolen out of our different federal government divisions.
	Okay.
	What then about the Russian military developments with regard to drones and submarines?
	Or do you want to pass?
	No.
	It's not just that.
	It's their whole entire missile program and their fighter jets.
	I mean, they surpass America in absolutely every category of air dominance and certainly in air defense.
	Yes, yes.
	Danny, would you like to comment?
	Well, it's disturbing, sir.
	You know, the missiles that they're developing and the capabilities that they keep growing, you know, they're showing the world what they have.
	And I don't know if it's peace through strength or, you know, if they're saber rattling, you could call it.
	I don't know.
	But it's very disturbing.
	And, you know, the more we see this, there's the more of a chance that eventually someday they can be pointed at us.
	And nobody wants to have a gun pointed at them.
	And, you know, it's very disturbing.
	And what's even more disturbing is the way that they keep kind of antagonizing Russia, you know, with the sanctions and all the different things.
	And, you know, down the road, you can see a conflict happening.
	And I certainly don't ever want to be drawn into a conflict with Russia and be involved with that.
	I think there's ways to get out of that.
	And this constant antagonizing with Putin, I think, is very poor judgment.
	And I'd like to see a way out of that in a friendship or at least some kind of working relationship and not always going down the path.
	We have so many senators that are always threatening Putin and coming out, you know, saying that they want war or they want to do this or they want to do that.
	And this whole thing that we're backing Ukraine and been giving them weapons and giving them stuff like that, you know, as a proxy, it's dangerous.
	It's dangerous.
	And Putin is constantly showing us what he has.
	And I just think it's very, very irresponsible.
	And it's dangerous on the United States' behalf.
	And I'm kind of tired of it, actually.
	Well, Danny, you're understating the situation.
	It's an horrific threat to the entire world.
	And the fact that Ukraine won't give up, that the European leaders want to fight it out, and that Trump so far has done nothing to bring it to an end is all outrageous.
	Here's a development in the Middle East.
	Actually, I had supposed Russia had provided Iran with S-400s long ago, but it's only happening now.
	Iran received Russian S-400 air defenses for testing.
	Iran missile outlet, media outlets have reported that a Russian S-400 long-range air defense system was deployed in the country for testing under operational conditions, which took place near the city of Isfahan.
	The tests reportedly included a 91N6E acquisition radar, 92N6E engagement radar, a command and control unit, and multiple mobile surfaced air missile launchers.
	Should these reports be confirmed, it remains uncertain whether this would signal that Iran has ordered the system or whether the Russian Aerospace Forces have made a deployment to the country to advertise the system's capabilities.
	Iranian officials previously indicated lack of interest in the S-400, asserting that the indigenous Bavar 373 system could provide a comparable capability.
	Iran's much more limited experience developing long-range air defense systems and its much smaller technological base have nevertheless brought such claims into question.
	I've also heard, however, Chinese have provided Iran with new sophisticated anti-missile missile systems and that the Mossad has already hacked into the Russian S-400, which might compromise its ability to function in actual combat situations.
	Joe, your thoughts?
	Yeah, the Russian Orensnik missile has a velocity, I believe, of like Mach 7 or 8.
	And just the kinetic energy, when you square the velocity in feet per second, you're going to get foot pounds of energy.
	And when you're squaring something that has a 5,000 feet per second velocity, you end up with a really huge number regardless of what the warhead is.
	And the warhead is one half of the mass.
	So the kinetic energy equation is one half mass times velocity squared, which is why a .22350 grain bullet out of an M16 has as much energy as a 230-grain bullet out of a .45 caliber pistol, up to about 100 yards.
	It's absolutely ridiculous.
	And the Kinskan-H missile that the Iranians developed has a speed of like Mach 12, excuse me, I think it's Mach 16, which is 12,000 miles per hour.
	And when they hit in the 12-day war, they didn't use but a half dozen of those, and they only used them on the last day because they wanted to reduce their old stock of missile inventory and wear down the iron dome.
	And what they did is when those missiles hit, they completely destroyed the initial target, but they had a blast radius of over a mile that stripped the fascias off of all of the skyscrapers.
	So one-third of the buildings in Tel Aviv were severely damaged by a half dozen of the Iranian super missiles.
	And that's what we're looking at now.
	They don't even need nuclear weapons.
	If they had continued the war for another two days and fired another dozen of those, there would be no Tel Aviv.
	Yes, yes, yes.
	Here we have a report from wired 53news.net that the October 7th AMOS attack footage was done using AI generated footage.
	up.
	Thank you.
	Hi, folks.
	As I mentioned to you, I have what I consider to be a very important interview that I wish to share with you.
	And as you know, I don't interview too many people.
	It's very rare for me to actually have anybody on this show.
	But I've got a message from someone.
	I actually came across his sub stack and I featured some of his stuff on an earlier report.
	You know, when you look at the Middle East today, everything that's happening there, everything that's happening in Gaza, everything that's happening in Lebanon, Syria, now moving into Jordan, Yemen, the whole place has erupted, all due basically to the October 7th attack on Israel by Hamas.
	But was it all really what we are told that it was?
	I mean, I've been questioning this for quite a while because it seems incongruous that Hamas Could have got away with what they did, and also the level of damage that we saw with the cars burned and the houses burnt, and so many people killed in the kibbutz.
	I've showed you previously, I've showed you footage of helicopters firing, scraping the crowd as they're trying to run away from the festival.
	I've showed you videos of tanks, Israeli tanks literally shelling homes in the kibbutz.
	And we've spoken extensively about the Hannibal Directive, which is an Israeli directive designed to basically kill the hostages.
	You know, if any people have been kidnapped or being held as hostages, it's Israeli policy to kill them along with the perpetrators because they simply don't want them to be kidnapped and used as bargaining chips.
	And there's so much to the October 7th attack that doesn't make sense.
	Even the burnt cars, the damage that was done to the vehicles, Hamas simply doesn't possess these type of weapons, let alone how they got the equipment to build hang gliders and just sail over the wall the way we're told.
	Oh, valuable points.
	IDF former members, the day of the event, were saying there's something wrong here because the sensitivity of the fence is so delicate.
	And if a bird craps on the fence, the IDF knows about it.
	Meanwhile, Trump continues to show strong support for Israel as Palestinians in Gaza starve to death.
	And a top famine expert reports, Gaza will take generations to heal from Israel's webinarized starvation.
	Frankly, I think it's so far advanced that the trace minerals necessary to sustain human life are gone and that a very large number, hundreds of thousands minimally of Gazans are already past the point where now their death from starvation is inevitable.
	Joe, your thoughts?
	Yeah, well, they have two different doctrines in Israel that are really disturbing.
	The Hannibal doctrine, where they kill their own Israeli citizens to avoid being forced into a prisoner exchange.
	And then the other one is the Samson option, where they've got up to 400 nuclear warheads, and they'll just nuke everybody on the planet.
	And supposedly, they've carried those to their consulates in Western countries and have planted nuclear bombs in different locations in their, quote, ally states to keep them on board.
	And we know for a fact that it was Israeli-provided nuclear weapons that brought down four buildings and World Trade Center buildings.
	So now, one of the people I saw in the blog had a really funny comment.
	They need to exercise the Samsonite option.
	Put all your damn shit in a suitcase and lead the Middle East.
	Samsonite, yes.
	Danny, your thoughts?
	Well, you know, sir, we covered so many times extensively about the October 7th and the fakery video.
	You know, there was CGI, fake bullets in the guns.
	You know, it just, there was so much fakery going on.
	And you figure when one side is putting out fake propaganda video to make you try to believe a narrative, you know, obviously they're putting up a front that didn't happen.
	And, you know, we've gone through the bomb footage, the fake video they threw in there that happened in Beirut and other places, the non-ordinance and the firecrackers that went off in the buildings, the fake soldiers, the fake blanks and the guns.
	And there was several IDF soldiers that have come out on X and other places where they're describing they worked at one time around the wall.
	That was their assignment, the security around the wall.
	And they said there's no way to get through that wall like described because there were too many sensors and other devices in the wall that they would know about it basically in seconds.
	And, you know, it just couldn't happen the way they said it happened.
	Danny, you're so absolutely right.
	When we return, we're going to turn to the Idaho Tranny shooting.
	And we'll tell us in what really has to happen.
	the right back You're listening to Revolution Radio at FreedomSlips.com.
	We'll be right back after this message.
	We'll be right back.
	Was it a conspiracy?
	Did you know that the police in Boston were broadcasting, This is a drill, this is a drill, on bullhoards during the marathon?
	That the Boston Globe was tweeting that a demonstration bomb would be set off during the marathon for the benefit of bomb squad activities.
	And that one would be set off in one minute in front of the library, which happened as the Globe had announced.
	Peering through the smoke, you could see bodies with missing arms and legs.
	But there was no blood.
	The blood only showed up later and came out of a tube.
	They used amputee actors and a studio-quality smoke machine.
	Don't let yourself be played.
	Check out And Nobody Died in Boston Either.
	Available at MoonrockBooks.com.
	That's moonrockbooks.com.
	If you think for one second that the Capitol will ever treat us fairly, you are lying to yourselves.
	Because we know who they are and what they do.
	This is what they do.
	And we must fight back!
	You can torture us and bomb us.
	Fire is catching.
	And if we burn, you burn with us.
	Good evening.
	Good evening.
	Are you awake yet?
	I hope.
	We've tried and we've tried for years and years to use passive resistance and loud voices to make a change.
	The time is over.
	Your governments around the world have no other goal than to decimate your entire existence at the hands of the bankers and the elites.
	The war is coming.
	And it's your choice to decide if you want to be a warrior or a victim.
	Denial is not a choice anymore.
	Revolution Radio, FreedomSlips.com, the number one listener-supported radio station on the planet.
	Not giving up.
	Revolution Radio.
	It is no secret that the so-called mainstream media is best described as controlled propaganda.
	Countless news stories are either totally ignored or spun with half-truths, and because of this, essential facts and vital information are often compromised.
	Join Dr. Ott every Friday night on Studio B at 10 p.m. Eastern and learn why the story behind the story was nominated for a Peabody Award in its second year of producing unparalleled broadcasting excellence in 1997.
	That is, if you really care about learning the truth.
	The opinions expressed on this radio station, its programs, and its website by the hosts, guests, and call-in listeners or chatters are solely the opinions of the original source who expressed them.
	They do not necessarily represent the opinions of Revolution Radio and FreedomSlips.com, its staff or affiliates.
	You're listening to Revolution Radio, FreedomSlips.com, 100% listener-supported radio.
	And now we return you to your host.
	you Well, it's a pleasure to have Danny Sears here today to discuss the Iowa shooting, the Idaho shooting case.
	As most of you are aware, false flags continue to this day, often in different venues than you might have anticipated, where I have pioneered the study of collaborative research of these events by bringing together the best expert to sort out what really happened,
	who was responsible, and why, beginning with JFK back in 1992, 9-11, the Paul Wellstone assassination, Sandy Hook, Boston bombing, and more.
	Well, we have a peculiar event in Idaho.
	The pattern is clear according to one report, and it means trouble.
	Let's take a look at an early report.
	This is from Before It's News.
	Idaho shooter.
	All flags.
	Video, however, not found.
	I think that it had too much truth.
	Danny, I looked for it before I was hoping it would show up.
	Tell us about this video, which is so explosive.
	They've taken it down.
	Well, sir, what happened was it was a review of basically some of the things that I told you about, about the anomalies, some of the anomalies that are happening.
	It seems like nobody really covered this Idaho thing.
	You know, there's always different channels covering the false flags, you know, the different ones that we've covered over time.
	But this one was very, very strange in the fact that the way that it appeared, and just as quickly, it disappeared.
	There was, you know, it just like dropped off the map really, really fast, and there wasn't a lot of talk about it.
	But basically, the gist of the report was, you know, all the anomalies that were going on.
	And you have a photo there in the right corner.
	And I saw you had a link there with the Gateway Pundit.
	And they show that link is really good.
	It has a good photo.
	And this thing starts off with a 20-year-old that is a transsexual.
	This is the story that they tell.
	And Gateway Pundit shows that, if you want to click on the photo there, they show the kid that's, there he is right there.
	They show some pictures of him.
	And he's a, you know, the story is that he's a troubled kid.
	He doesn't really have a lot of bad, nasty background, though, as far as criminal convictions, just a couple of police contacts, according to the sheriff.
	Of course, we've got to remember in these false flags, all we have is a story that they project.
	We don't have anything else, any other sources.
	And just to start off, you know, I looked at the national databases for this kid, which I usually do, and I found, you know, a few people in the United States, I believe, you know, half a dozen or more, to confirm the name.
	And everybody I could find was 40 years old and above.
	There was definitely nobody in their 20s even close with this name ever being shown being born in the United States.
	So that was very troubling.
	But the fact that this transsexual kid did what he did, and he crossed the state line, went into a beautiful part of Idaho that's heavily trafficked with recreational vehicles and people on motorcycles and ATVs and that sort of thing.
	That he went to this remote area and why he would pick this remote area, like he threw a dart on a dartboard and said, hey, I'm going to pick this place to supposedly light a fire, you know, a forest fire, which didn't turn out to be a really big fire.
	If you look at the videos, you see some smoke and stuff, but it's not, I've seen way worse than this.
	It doesn't look like a really big fire.
	And then when the story is that when the fireman showed up, that he shot the fireman, a few of the firemen that he'd shot and killed them.
	But the troubling part of this story was...
	Here's from the Gateway Pont.
	Pictured Idaho sniper Wes Rowley, who set fire before fatally gunning down two firefighters in cold-blooded ambush.
	A 20-year-old man has been named as a suspect in a chilling ambush that left two firefighters dead and one injured on Canfield Mountain.
	The Gateway Bunnet reported earlier, the suspect is identified as 20-year-old Wes Broly, accused of intentionally setting a brush fire on Sunday on Canfield Mountain near Court d'Alene, Idaho, to lure firefighters into an ambush.
	Upon arrival around 2 p.m., crews took refuge between their fire trucks as gunfire erupted from a sniper's position deep in the woods.
	Two firefighters, one from the Coordaine Fire Department, one from Kuteriel County Fire and Rescue, were killed instantly.
	A third critically wounded.
	We do believe that the suspect started the fire, and we do believe it was an ambush and that it was intentional.
	The county sheriff, Bob Norris, said during a Sunday night news conference, the firefighters did not have a chance.
	He went on to say the gunman was apparently hiding in the rugged terrain using a high-powered rifle.
	He noted that he instructed deputies, he instructed deputies to fire back.
	Over 300 officers, along with FBI agents and helicopter sharpshooters, swarmed the area.
	A shelter and police order was issued as authorities deployed tactical assets.
	Rowley was later found dead near his weapon after law enforcement officials say he acted alone.
	But whether he died by suicide or police action remains unclear.
	Photos of the suspect are now circulating, and those are the photos with which we began.
	Danny, continue now.
	Well, sir, that's where this really gets weird.
	This is one of those potential false flags where the entire story was dictated out of the media and particularly by the sheriff.
	We get all of our information from him, even the background on this kid, which was very minimal to the situation.
	And he did a series of press conferences the sheriff did.
	And I want to point out to start off that the sheriff is from Los Angeles.
	So he's not originally from the area.
	He kind of retired from L.A. and then came north and did different things in his retirement and then actually ran for sheriff and won and became the sheriff.
	And he actually has been doing, from what I can tell, a very good job.
	The locals have liked him and he's been, you know, he's been keeping the place safe and doing a really good job, which is very puzzling that this would happen all of a sudden, this particular event.
	But to draw down on this kid, the way that he picked this area.
	The sheriff in the first press conference, sir, to start off, said that he didn't use the word AR-15 because he said, well, somebody asked him about the gun he was using.
	And this is when an active shooting was in place.
	So he's doing the press conference while he's saying there's an active shooting and they're engaged.
	His deputies and other law enforcement are up on the hill engaging this kid in a firefight.
	This is the first press conference.
	I got it up.
	We can listen to parts of it.
	Then you can comment.
	Here we go.
	Cooney County Coroner's Office, Coroner Duke Johnson there, has been identified as Wes Val Rowley.
	Date of birth of May 1st, 2005.
	As of right now, and this is all very, very preliminary.
	We've had a lot of resources at the crime scene.
	We've been working through the night, so many of these facts are subject to change.
	We believe that Rowley has prior residence in California, Arizona, and Idaho.
	We believe he was born in California.
	The Kootenai County Sheriff's Office and Coordinate Police Department, we've had five interactions with Rowley, and of those five interactions, we've had three.
	Quarterlane Police had two.
	They're very, very minor in nature.
	They had to do with more trespassing.
	He was trespassing at a location.
	He was asked to leave and he cooperated.
	We had some welfare checks on Rowley and very, very minor.
	We don't show any criminal history for Roley.
	We do have some social media presence for Rowley.
	I find it disgusting to call him a Mr., but we don't have any much to go on.
	Here's some of his social media postings that were recently removed from social media.
	I believe this one was Instagram.
	And we have some copies of this that Lieutenant Mark Ellis will distribute.
	Where would you like me to go with this?
	It's 30 minutes long.
	We don't want to play it all.
	Yeah, we don't have to play it, sir.
	I was hoping you catch the clip where in the first conference, the important facts to drill down are the way that he changed the details.
	And he did say they're subject to change.
	But during the firefight, he says that they were using a modern sporting rifle when somebody in the press corps there asked him what kind of gun was going to be used.
	And I thought, okay, here it comes.
	You know, it's always an AR-15, right?
	So the most popular firearm in the United States that they're always demonizing.
	And he didn't say that.
	He said it was a modern sporting rifle was his term.
	And he said it was rapid, a very rapid shooting modern sporting rifle that they were taking gunfire from.
	Okay.
	So everybody kind of knows what that means.
	You know, obviously some sort of a magazine-fed gun.
	And it was a very fluid situation.
	And, you know, they were dealing with it.
	Right.
	And they were returning fire.
	But then he went into this bizarre rant about how the kid had tree climbing experience because in his family, he had arborists and that the kid was in a tree at one point shooting at them.
	In the second conference, to move forward, he dropped the modern rifle and he moved to that the kid had a shotgun.
	He didn't give a model or the type of shotgun.
	Well, shotguns are not rapid fire shooting like a modern sporting rifle.
	You know, a modern sporting rifle has a distinct sound when the round goes off, the hypersonic round goes off.
	It makes a loud crack sound.
	You can hear it.
	And of course, they would know that.
	And then he changed it to a shotgun, which is very distinctive and sounds completely different than a rifle or an AR-15 going off.
	The shotgun shell has a completely different sound than a rifle.
	And he changed it to a shotgun.
	And he didn't say what kind of shotgun.
	He kind of dropped the narrative that it was a fast-shooting modern sporting rifle.
	And then he changed, which I thought was very bizarre, because if you think about a shotgun, most people, and I sent you some photos of some shotgun shells to show people, if people want to, I don't know if you want to put the picture up of the shotgun shells.
	There's four of them there to compare.
	I sent you, but there it is there on the top.
	If you look at a shotgun shell, what it looks like, that's a 12-gauge shotgun shell.
	And it has different kinds of shot in it.
	And this is, you know what, I don't want to go on too long with this, but it's really important to get the details.
	This is sort of how we unwind these false flags.
	You know, they go over people's heads and they don't pay attention.
	A lot of people don't even really understand the difference between a shotgun and a rifle.
	And I run into people like that all the time.
	But the shell is completely different.
	It's not a bullet.
	And it's a bunch of BBs inside of a plastic shell that come out of a barrel.
	And when they come out, they spread in a wide pattern.
	So you're basically shooting a whole blast of BBs and different size BBs, you know, from little baby BBs that they use to shoot birds because they don't want to tear the bird up to large, large caliber balls, which the police and, you know, law enforcement use, double-odd buck.
	And it's deadly at close range.
	It's not a long-range weapon.
	It's a close-range weapon.
	So to think that this kid put all this together and was going to go up into this forest and shoot these firemen, you wouldn't use double-odd buck.
	It wouldn't be effective in a wooded area at all.
	The BBs would bounce off the trees.
	It would not be effective.
	So then the sheriff comes out with this bizarre thing saying, well, the kid had specialized, that was his word, he had specialized hunting slug ammunition.
	Okay.
	And that's the same shotgun shell, but inside of the shell is a big giant bullet or projectile.
	And you can see a picture of one on the right-hand side there.
	It's a three-quarters of an ounce to a one-ounce huge giant bullet.
	And it has rifling on it, so it spins and it's accurate.
	And there's a couple shotguns.
	There's a smooth bore, and then they also have a specific hunting shotgun that has rifling in it, like a rifle, for specific ammo, because it's accurate.
	And these rounds are quite deadly.
	They have a lot of, lot of power.
	They'll go through car doors, you know, through hardened steel doors in many cases.
	There's all kinds.
	There's literally thousands of different kinds of shotgun shells.
	But what gets me is, how did this kid get a hold of a rapid-firing shotgun?
	And there's basically two types of shotguns, maybe three.
	There's the pump action that everybody knows, which you have to cycle the gun and caulk it with a grip and cycle it to eject the shell and then put the new shell in or whatnot.
	And then you fire the shotgun again.
	And then they have the automatic shotgun and it has a tube on it, holds up to six to eight different shells, depending on what kind you put in there.
	And it'll fire one after the other semi-automatic till the tube runs dry.
	And then you have to reload it.
	So this guy, the sheriff went on to elaborate that this kid was in a tree, right?
	This 20-year-old with no criminal record, sir.
	That's very important to understand that.
	He had no criminal record, certainly no violence in his record.
	And all of a sudden, that this transsexual got a hold of a very rather expensive, you know, those automatic shotguns run up to $2,000.
	They're not super inexpensive.
	And that he got a hold of a fast shooting shotgun, never giving a model, with some very expensive and exclusive slug hunting type of slugs, right?
	Which are a lot more expensive than the buckshot, I'd like to add.
	And that he was using those to shoot at the firemen and shoot, you know, shoot at the police with this sophisticated shotgun from a tree, sir.
	That's what really gets me is when he went into the tirade of him being in a tree.
	Well, if you're up in a tree that's heavily leaved, like in that area, you know, you're not going to be able to have a clear line of sight on targets all around you because there's trees everywhere.
	It's a place with trees and trails and stuff.
	You're not going to be able to shoot very far.
	But that he was holding off this SWAT team with this shotgun and that he was fast acting and shooting a lot of rounds at them.
	Well, to think that a 20-year-old, sir, with no experience, no military experience at all, keep in mind he's a transvestite.
	He's a trouble kid.
	He has no criminal record whatsoever, according to the sheriff.
	A couple of trespassing calls.
	You know, a lot of kids get talked to by the police for not being somewhere where they're supposed to and get trespassing.
	That doesn't make anybody a bad person, you know, especially when you're young like that.
	And that he has no violent tendencies at all.
	He didn't give a school record that he was a bully or got in fights at school or any of that sort of stuff.
	He kind of keeps it kind of open and very blague when it comes to that.
	And then when you're in a tree, sir, you have to reload the shotgun.
	So how was he carrying his ammo?
	Did he have like a shotgun bandolier around his neck, you know, with a bunch of shells in it?
	How is he carrying the weight, sir, of a lot of shells, it would be a very substantial weight you'd have to carry.
	You could only fit a few of these shells in your pockets, maybe, you know, it's not like you could carry, you'd have to have some kind of an apparatus to carry these shells, these slug shells.
	And to be able to load a shotgun, sir, in a tree, right?
	And that's very important, in a tree as a 20-year-old transvestite, and be able to turn the shotgun in the right position to load the shells.
	You know, loading the shells into the tube takes practice.
	It's not super easy when you're sitting there in a chair or standing on the ground.
	You have to turn the shotgun upside down.
	There's a particular move that you use with your thumbs to push the shells into the tube.
	You know, an inexperienced person is really going to be funky loading a shotgun.
	I've given instruction to people loading shotguns.
	You know, it takes a little practice to push the rounds into the tube.
	And under stress, it's even harder.
	So this kid somehow is combat loading an automatic shotgun in a tree and effectively loading it quickly so he can keep engaging the police with a specialized shotgun and these slug slugs.
	And then I'd also like to point out he put out another dynamic, sir, and it was all during a forest fire.
	So this kid has smoke all around him.
	The forest is burning and he's up in a tree engaging police with this combat style shotgun with this very specific slug ammo.
	And he's effectively holding down the police.
	The narrative just got more comical and more comical as it got.
	He could have left out these details and just kind of been more blue with it.
	But he just kept going into these weird details about this firefight.
	And then finally, at the end, he says that they caught up and they made their way into the area where he was and they found him dead.
	So he definitely said it appears that he had committed suicide.
	All right.
	Suicide with a shotgun, especially with slugs, sir, would be awful, terrible.
	I sent you some photos of how nasty these wounds can be from these.
	There's a good picture you just passed of a close-up of the slug.
	And they're nasty, sir, these photos.
	And they leave huge, huge gaping wounds.
	They're just, you know, they blow body parts off.
	I mean, they're really, really bad, these slugs.
	They leave a terrible, terrible wound.
	And you can see some of them right there in some of the photos.
	There are some of them that have a slug plus a few BBs on there as well.
	So they shoot at a blast of BBs and then one slug down the middle.
	They're just horrific rounds.
	They're good self-defense rounds.
	I mean, they would definitely put any kind of a bad guy down.
	There's no doubt about it, you know, at a closer range.
	But the point being, during a forest fire, the kid had the whereforall to go up this tree and engage in police in a wooded area while this forest fire is going on.
	And when they found the guy, this is the sheriff, they found the guy.
	They said that the shotgun was nearby.
	Didn't say it was in his hands.
	It was nearby.
	So I hate to be too graphic, but if somebody wanted to commit suicide with a shotgun, they would have to point it at themselves in some way.
	You know, a shotgun is 18 inches long or could be at least 18 inches long.
	So it's kind of long.
	And you would have to point it at yourself.
	And the fact that this kid with no violent tendencies in his life would all of a sudden come out with this horrific crime that he would get this expensive shotgun with these slugs and engage in a fight from a tree during a forest fire, effectively against the police.
	Then imagine he climbs down from the tree and he says, well, I guess they're going to catch me.
	I don't want to go to jail.
	I'm not going to keep shooting.
	Maybe he ran out of shells.
	I don't know how many rounds he had on him or how he could have carried them.
	I mean, the sheriff didn't go into, did he have a bandolier of shells?
	How many rounds was he carrying?
	He didn't give any details like that, which I was kind of surprised.
	And then they said they found the weapon nearby him.
	Well, nearby, if he shot himself with the shotgun, sure, the shotgun would basically be laying like right on in his hands or in his body.
	And it would definitely be a completely horrendous scene.
	I mean, if you can imagine point blank with a shotgun and a shotgun slug, you know, obviously he would be dead.
	It would be, you know, if he shot himself into the chin or however he did it, you know what I mean?
	There'd be a big, huge mess from the shit.
	I just don't see a 20-year-old kid shooting himself with a shotgun slug with a specialized shotgun in that matter.
	I mean, this kid couldn't have been that mature at 20 years old.
	He was already troubled as it was.
	And this was all going on during a forest fire.
	Then the last detail was the sheriff comes up and says, well, when they made way, the fire had approached the scene.
	It was very close, he said, within, you know, feet or a few yards of where they found this body and the shotgun nearby, not on him, nearby, he said.
	And then he commented that they had to scoop up the body, use the word scoop, if I remember correctly.
	And they had to scoop up the body and move him because the fire was coming and was going to contaminate and did contaminate the scene.
	So he said, as far as evidence goes, we really don't have any.
	And he went out to say that, like, tell everybody, sorry, guys, the fire burned the scene down and we don't have any photographs or anything to show you of the scene.
	And that was the end of it.
	And if you think about it, sir, if they did scoop up the body, there should have been empty shotgun shells all over the place.
	And the fact that not anybody, you know, he's describing several people on the team that were up there dealing with him, from firemen to police.
	The fact that there were no pictures on the ground of any of the shotgun shells or anything like that, it's just, it's over the top, sir.
	It just could not have happened the way that he said.
	Penny will continue our conversation right after this break.
	Thank you.
	listen to Revolution Radio at freedomslips.com.
	We'll be right back after this message.
	Management would like to take a moment to thank the listeners and hosts for all their support that has made Revolution Radio one of the biggest platforms for free speech in an ever-growing dark world of censorship.
	Unfortunately, this platform for free speech has never been free.
	We need the support of the people.
	It is the people like you, yes, you, that keeps the station in the front lines of the battle against tyranny and oppression.
	Please help support Revolution Radio so free speech will not be silenced in a world that seems to be going deaf to the real truth.
	With your support, we will be able to become an even bigger pillar of light in a dark world.
	Revolution RadioFreedomSlipsy.com, the number one listener-supported radio station on the planet.
	Revolution.
	The
	Join Revolution Radio every Wednesday, 8 p.m. Eastern Time on Studio B for Momentary Zen with host Zed Garcia at freedomsearch.com, the people station.
	Even the government admits that 9-11 was a conspiracy.
	But did you know that it was an inside job?
	That Osaba had nothing to do with it.
	That the twin towers were blown apart by a sophisticated arrangement of mini or micro nukes.
	That Building 7 collapsed seven hours later because of explosives planted in the building.
	Barry Jennings was there.
	He heard them go off and felt himself stepping over dead people.
	The U.S. Geological Survey conducted studies of dust gathered from 35 locations in Lower Manhattan and found elements that would not have been there had this not been a nuclear event.
	Ironically, that means the government's own evidence contradicts the government's official position.
	9-11 was brought to us compliments of the CIA, the neocons of the Department of Defense, and the Mossad.
	Don't let yourself be played.
	Read America Nuked on 9-11.
	Available at MoonrockBooks.com.
	That's MoonrockBooks.com.
	The opinions expressed on this radio station, its programs, and its website by the hosts, guests, and call-in listeners or chatters are solely the opinions of the original source who expressed them.
	They do not necessarily represent the opinions of Revolution Radio and FreedomSlips.com, its staff or affiliates.
	You're listening to Revolution Radio, FreedomSlips.com, 100% listener-supported radio.
	And now we return you to your host.
	I must say, Danny, the situation is a manifest absurdity on at least three grounds.
	Number one, the Suspect.
	This tranny who's only had trespassing suddenly turns into a violent felon on a murderous rampage.
	Ridiculous.
	Second, the weapon.
	How these two deputies could have been killed and died instantly had he been using a rifle that could be rapid-loading, AR-15 or otherwise, that might make sense.
	But switching to a shotgun makes it ridiculous beyond belief, especially when third, you had the circumstance he's supposed to be firing from a tree.
	I mean, give me a break.
	This is about as dumb an account as I've ever heard.
	It's utterly incoherent, and it's remarkable.
	They don't even have photographs from the scene of the crime.
	I mean, this is violating the most elementary protocols of forensic science and police procedure.
	Joe, your thoughts before we return to Danny, yours, Joe.
	Yeah, well, it turns out every mass casualty event, every mass casualty event is another chapter in the Truman Show.
	We're living in a completely artificial reality.
	And a perfect example was the Harvest 91 massacre in Las Vegas, where a day after it happened, Robert Davis Seale discovered that of the nine members of Resort International Board of Directors, all of them had sold stock within 30 days of the event.
	And in August before the event, George Soros did put calls where he put in a million dollars and he got $40 million back from the drop in the stock value because of the shooting.
	So there's certainly people that are aware of what's going to happen before it happens.
	And just like the put and calls that were done on 911 to American and United Airlines, those were definitely people that knew something was going to happen because you don't put that large a bet on something that's improbably going to happen.
	You have to have a pretty definite reason to believe that it was going to happen.
	And then there was another thing.
	Lutnik, who is currently the Secretary of Treasury, I believe, under DJT, he was with Kandor Fitzgerald, and he was the executive officer.
	He was supposed to be in the tower on 9-1-1, but he wasn't there.
	And they sued American Airlines and got a $120 million settlement.
	And then he said, well, because of my high stake in the company, I should get $20 million of that dollars just for myself.
	So he lost 650 employees.
	But instead of giving the $20 million to the surviving families, he kept it himself because he was the CEO.
	Give me a freaking break.
	Yo, that's all fascinating stuff, but I'm focusing right now on the Idaho shooting.
	What is your take on Danny's dissection?
	It appears to me completely ridiculous.
	And the question that arises is, why in the world would they contrive such an incredible and unbelievable scenario like this?
	What could have been the propagandistic benefit?
	Joe, any thoughts at all?
	Well, it goes back to the same thing that they did with you and Sandy Hook, is that they want to have gun control.
	And the lady Susan Bernhardt did a good analysis of the current state of the Sandy Hook situation.
	And it turns out the judge who violated all of the court rules and ruled against you was elected.
	And he's spent six months in his new term.
	And he's resigning five and a half years early.
	Yes.
	Yes.
	Because it's not working.
	Well, I think he sees a handwriting on the wall that before he resigned, there was a final motion from the Posner attorneys to dismiss, which was denied.
	And I think he realized he might either be recused from the case or actually removed from the bench.
	And he took what was for him the preferred option of retiring five and a half years early.
	I interpret that as a very positive sign in relation to the four appeals I have now before the Wisconsin Court of Appeals District 4.
	Danny, I want to get back.
	What in your mind, I mean, you have made an absolute decisive dissection of the ridiculous, absolutely ludicrous aspects of this scenario as reported by the sheriff, who obviously he's running a clown show here.
	What could be the motive?
	What do you think is going on here, Danny?
	You know, sir, all I could think of is some sort of distraction.
	I'm not sure.
	You know, I was thinking there's going to be gun control out of this.
	I thought, for instance, this was just going to be a mantra of AR-15.
	But when he switched to the, I mean, everybody in Idaho owns an AR-15.
	It's very common.
	You know, it's a big hunting state.
	Youth are taught proper firearm use, even in high school.
	There's shooting ranges all over in the culture, safety everywhere.
	I mean, it's just, it's a culture there.
	And I thought for sure it was that.
	And I thought, get ready.
	And then when he switched to the shotgun, I thought, okay, maybe they're going to start trying to ban the shotguns now.
	But nothing really happened that we didn't see this big mantra of shotgun, you know, need to be banned.
	Or I thought, okay, they're going to try to ban the automatic or semi-automatic shotguns and, you know, maybe try to whittle it down to the pump action single or the single shot shotguns.
	Something like that, you know, was in my mind.
	And it just, this whole thing just Went away the next day like it never happened.
	There was no fallout.
	I couldn't really run down anything with the names of the people that were killed.
	It seemed like the names had changed.
	They didn't want to announce the names for a while, so they were keeping it very vague on what was going on.
	But if you could, sir, I don't know if you can go back, but if you read that third line in that synopsis I gave you about the 20-year-old right there, it starts off with a 20-year-old tranny.
	Could you read those few sentences and you'll kind of see how comical this whole thing is when you put it together?
	I don't know.
	Can you just read that line really quick?
	20-year-old tranny with no criminal record somehow.
	He'd pick the most conservative place in the U.S. to do all this.
	No one who lives in this area has ever seen a tranny before.
	I'm telling you, this would pay for a wild movie.
	Please be careful.
	If you see any young trannies walking around town, I'd add daring shotguns, make sure you run away quickly.
	Keep your doors locked.
	I was worried we might be attacked by Muslim jihadists with AK-47.
	Nope.
	We need to worry about these crazy tree-climbing arsonist shotgun killer trainees.
	Who would ever thought a guy like this would show up in CDA, Idaho?
	What are the odds?
	Yeah, Danny, I think you got it right.
	I mean, it's just ridiculous.
	It's one of the comical ones, sir.
	I mean, they could have come up with a much better storyline, even though they're going to tell us a story with some details that made sense.
	But this one was over the top.
	And I really think that they probably saw how comical this was.
	And that's maybe why it went away.
	I can't really surmise why it came up so fast.
	It clogged the news cycle for two days, and then it disappeared just as fast.
	And there you can see the shotgun shells.
	And I show a bunch of wound cavities from these shells.
	So the fact that a 20-year-old with no violent record at all decided that he was going to start a fire, shoot some firemen with this obscure shotgun, and then kill himself all of a sudden with no tendencies in his background by the sheriff's account.
	And then again, he doesn't even show up in the record.
	So something really strange went on, sir.
	I can't go there.
	I can't see some of these details.
	The other things that we saw is a lot of guys from different agencies standing around.
	I saw a lot of guys smiling, shaking hands.
	I didn't see any notable stress from anybody.
	It looked like a lot of guys standing around in a drill like we see a lot of these false flags.
	You know, hey, how's it going, Tom?
	Hey, how's it going?
	We're at another one.
	You know, they're all standing there with their gear, calm, cool, relaxed.
	And again, a lot of them were smiling.
	They had smiles on their face.
	There were no stressed looks on people's face, no senses of urgency in some of the B-roll.
	And when you see all this stuff brought together, it sure looked a lot like a drill, sir, with just a wild story put on it.
	And then they decided to put it on television for a couple of days.
	That's the most I get on it.
	But I think it needs to be talked about.
	I haven't heard anybody else talk about it but you.
	And now you put it out there.
	And, you know, I just think people have a right to look at this a little bit closer and understand that even in conservative Idaho, we had this event.
	Some of the locals are very suspicious of this event.
	And it's obscure.
	And the details are just wild.
	And, you know, I'm glad we talked about it.
	Oh, yeah.
	It was a little more of a sheriff talking about.
	So obviously a shotgun is not a sniper weapon.
	Correct.
	Do you know what kind of weapon that was?
	Well, we're still processing the scene, but let me kind of set the scene for everybody.
	When you're in a rural area and you're heavily treated, heavily brushed, and when you're taking fire, then it just adds a whole different dynamic to the situation.
	So what was reported by people on scene, by peace officers on scene, that they believed they were taking sniper fire, yes.
	And then that's where that is.
	Lady in the black.
	Hi.
	Were you a suspect before you found him, or did you not identify him until after you find the survey?
	Can you give me that first part again?
	Was you a suspect prior to finding the spot or were you not sure what until after the founding suspect?
	Well, we had information that we had an idea who that person might be, but we always defer to the coroner's office to make sure that we have a positive identification on the individual.
	People borrowed people's car.
	People used people's phones.
	Yeah, so.
	This whole thing is a joke, Danny.
	You've called it up very appropriately.
	Just about as absurd a false flag as I've ever encountered.
	I mean, totally amateurish.
	No substance whatsoever.
	An incoherent account supported by no evidence.
	I wonder if these two firemen even were real rather than fictional.
	Do you have any confirmation that anyone, anyone actually died during this elaborate fantasy scenario, Danny?
	I've tried to run it down, sir.
	I can't find the names on any kind of a roster.
	You know, I tried to find out some information that I could.
	I couldn't find them.
	The only thing I found was a who's who of supposedly somebody knew them.
	That was as close as we can get.
	I couldn't find anybody that actually knew them personally or had an account of them.
	I had some contacts in the area and they didn't know of them or know anything specific of them.
	And there was no way to get any information on them.
	It was just basically an elaborate story put over the air.
	But in the end, if you think about it, sir, he closed the sort of closed the press conference with saying, well, we had to scoop up the body because the fire hit.
	And of course, the whole crime scene, he said, was contaminated.
	Sorry.
	Basically, you know, the fire destroyed the whole scene.
	We can't see, we can't even see a burned up shotgun shell.
	You know, how about usually they show the gun.
	You know what I mean?
	Couldn't we see what the shotgun was?
	I mean, if I would have been a press corps, I'd said, Do you have a picture of the shotgun, sir?
	Can we see it?
	Do you have any spent casings or anything so we can show everybody what kind of these specific shotgun shells he was using to be so effective to shoot?
	You know, the sheriff even said it was a highly wooded area and they were taking sniper fire.
	Well, sir, there's no snipering from a shotgun.
	It's not a long-range, accurate gun whatsoever.
	And when you're shooting a slug, it's a little more accurate, you know, maybe 50 yards, maybe 75 yards, but it's not a long-range weapon at all, sir.
	It's just not.
	So, I mean, come on, where's the details?
	Give us some stuff.
	And he just dropped off the map and switching from the rifle to shotgun was unbelievable from a tree, no doubt, you know, during a fire.
	I mean, it just kept getting worse and worse.
	And then the whole scene.
	Why did they even make that transition?
	Why'd they go from the sniper with a rifle, rabbit-loading, which at least is semi-plausible?
	If you got two dead sheriffs, whatever, to a shotgun, which is totally ridiculous in this situation and makes no sense at all.
	Why did they make that switch?
	There's no way of telling, sir.
	And just it wasn't sheriff deputies that were shot.
	It was two firemen.
	So the story goes when the fire started, some of the responders that showed up from the fire department, two different agencies, is the story that they were shot.
	And then, of course, the sheriff and the police and other agencies showed up.
	But there's no way to know that, sir.
	I don't understand why he even switched from that.
	And if you're going to switch from a rapid shoot, I mean, yeah, you know, if you're taking on fire from a rifle, you hear the rounds coming out, you hear the crack.
	And then to switch to a shotgun and then to move into slugs, how did he even know it was slugs during an active shooting?
	You would have had to take possession of the shotgun, see the slugs, or, you know, the injured firemen would have been, you know, they would have been killed.
	You'd know if they were hit with a slug because of the wound cavity would have been devastating.
	He would have known that early on as opposed to it being a rifle.
	So the timing there was wrong.
	When they were killed, he would have known quicker that it was not a rifle round.
	So there's some weird stuff in there.
	But the fact that he never showed us any shells, the fact that he never showed the gun, never showed even a picture of the gun.
	He could have even said, here's a picture of the kind of shotgun that he used.
	He could have done that.
	Here's a picture of the kind of shells he used.
	A slug, you know, like I showed you.
	It's very easy to show even some pictures of it.
	So people would understand what that is.
	He didn't do that at all.
	And then in the end, he just said the whole place was ravaged by fire.
	The crime scene was contaminated.
	And he said, I have nothing to show you.
	He basically said that.
	That's his own words.
	And it's like, sorry, folks.
	Shows over.
	That's all I got.
	You know what I mean?
	And it just, it fell, the story fell off the map, sir, and it just disappeared.
	So I'm really glad that we at least got to talk about it because I haven't heard anybody else.
	Everybody else, I just seem to accept it, I suppose.
	I don't know.
	Well, it disappeared because it was a fiasco.
	It didn't add up in any way, shape, or form.
	It was a stupid story.
	It was incredible on his face.
	So I don't know.
	I would get rid of this sheriff who turns out to be a pathetic crisis actor.
	He can't even get his story straight.
	Well, he's done by all account his first term.
	He did really well.
	He's famous for a phrase that he put out on the radio, don't come here on vacation and leave on probation.
	And what he was alluding to is so many people come over from the liberal Democrat state of Washington that's just adjacent.
	And it's probably 20 or 30 minutes to the border.
	It's not very far.
	And a lot of people come over for recreation and, you know, they have drugs or things they shouldn't have on them.
	And they get arrested.
	You know, so he said that hence the phrase, don't come here.
	And he said that several of his arrests, you know, a high percentage, 70 or 80 percent was coming over from liberal Washington where they're allowed to, you know, have drugs on them or whatever and all these things they get away with in the Democrat area.
	They come over the line and they get, you know, because they enforce the law.
	And that's always made him popular.
	He seemed to be doing a pretty good job.
	And I would agree.
	And most people liked him.
	But when he went off the wagon here with this crazy story, and some of the locals I talk to that pay attention to that, you know, they don't really like him.
	They don't like some of his politics, some of his things.
	But, you know, I kind of judge a sheriff by, does he keep the place safe?
	Does he make arrests?
	You know, does he keep the crime down?
	That's his job, right?
	That's his primary job.
	And he seems to be done a really good job.
	So I have nothing negative to say.
	And that, you know, the law enforcement in the area has been top-notch.
	They've been very good up there.
	And they do a wonderful job.
	And the place is known for a lot of law enforcement retiring up there, coming back to work part-time.
	And they, you know, it's a beautiful area.
	And they've done a wonderful job keeping the crime.
	It's very low crime there, very low violent crime.
	And they've done a really good job.
	But when he, that's what made it so obscure, the fact that he did such a good job, but then he came out with this wild story.
	It's like the last place in the world, sir, you would think that they would try to pull off this wild false flag with a 20-year-old transvestite and a specialized shotgun in a tree during a forest fire.
	You would think that would be somewhere in a liberal place, you know, Chicago or Illinois somewhere or, you know, New York or something like that, you know, but no.
	They go in the most conservative area in a beautiful rural high vacation area.
	And then they put this story and they drop it right into that area.
	And the way it appeared and it disappeared at the end and the whole, sorry, folks, shows over.
	The whole place was ravaged by fire.
	We don't have anything to show you.
	And it's all over with and the whole place burned down.
	that's the end of the show.
	Maybe next time.
	You know, and that was it, sir.
	It was over.
	Yeah, nothing to see here, folks.
	Just move along.
	But the fact is, so many in Idaho or hunters are familiar with weapons, they would know this is absurd on its face.
	I mean, that sheriff must have confronted a lot of questions, a lot of puzzled looks, a lot of raised eyebrows, a lot of skepticism because this is ridiculous.
	Well, just the facts are that you're saying that.
	I mean, you know, I'm glad it'd be interesting to hear your other co-host if he heard some of these details that we went through and maybe comment on that.
	I don't know what his interests are, especially in any of these facts would be.
	But I mean, just I think you could be a regular person and drill down and watch some of these press conferences and say, man, that's really a bizarre, odd comment he's making.
	You know, he seemed to be a little nervous in the press conference.
	You know what I mean?
	It almost looked like he knew he was putting on a wild story.
	You know, again, we can't go there.
	We can't, you know, there's no real facts in this case at all.
	It was all presented on the news.
	Everything came from him and was presented on the news.
	And then we have some B-roll that looks like a bunch of guys standing around shaking hands, smiling that don't look like they're under any stress.
	And as far as the fire goes, it's a little bit of smoke.
	It's not even that thick forest fire smoke that goes up for miles in the air that we see.
	We just see like the smoke is light, like a couple of barbecues going off.
	It doesn't look like a heavy smoke with a huge fire at all.
	It just almost, I don't know how to describe it, but you know, it just looked really light in the mountains where they were.
	And, you know, it has a beautiful view of the lake.
	It's a beautiful area.
	The place is amazing to go on vacation and do outdoor recreation type of stuff, no matter what kind of person you are.
	If you like to be outdoors, it's a beautiful area.
	And the fact they dropped this story into this area with these obscure stories like they did, sir, to me, it's going to go down for a long time.
	It's one of those ones that's so bizarre.
	They just thought maybe nobody will pay attention.
	We'll just throw this tranny shotgun shooter tree climbing guy out there and see if anybody calls us out on it.
	You know what I mean?
	And I just want to thank you, sir, for letting me talk about it and you covering it because, you know, it's one of those things that needs to be covered.
	People need to understand.
	And you're on top of these things.
	And at least we got to talk about it.
	And now some people, maybe they're more aware of how crazy this situation was.
	You're on top of it, Danny, and you made me aware.
	And now Joe's aware.
	Joe, do you have any further reflections on this manifest absurdity?
	Well, one of the investigative reporters I followed for a decade is George Webb.
	And he's done really good work.
	And he went up there immediately after it happened.
	And he started doing episodes about what a false flag it was.
	And all I had to do was watch about two of his episodes.
	And I went, well, if he's on it, then it's certainly a false flag.
	Number one.
	Number two, I don't have enough time to dedicate to jumping down every rabbit hole on the planet.
	So it's like, I'm going to take my tinfoil hat and go back to the other areas where I've got more expertise because this is just two casualties and a weird shooter in a narrative that makes no sense in a range of narratives that none of them make any sense.
	Yeah, yeah.
	Fair enough.
	Fair enough.
	Well, gentlemen, we're on the verge of concluding our conversation today.
	I'd appreciate your observation, especially, but Trump Epstein and what it all means for MEGA, it seemed to me MEGA is imploding that Trump promised transparency.
	He was going to drain the swamp.
	He's covering it up.
	He appears to have been complicit.
	We're not even sure this is the same guy as we've had in the past.
	And frankly, I'm confident it is not.
	He hasn't ended this stupid war.
	So the primary reason he was elected as well is to secure the border, where he's had a great deal more success.
	But he's still supporting Ukraine.
	He's still giving weapons to Israel for the genocide.
	The world is turning massively against Israel.
	And alas, the United States is going to be collateral damage for having been so supportive right up to this day.
	Danny, your thoughts about all of the above?
	Well, sir, you know, there's things that Trump has done that I like.
	There's no doubt about it.
	But I'm highly disappointed in the Ukraine thing.
	You know, I know that he appeared to try to settle it in the beginning when they had the Zelensky meeting and the fallout at the White House, that famous blowup we saw where he kicked Zelensky out of the White House with the vice president, told him you don't have the cards and all that, that episode.
	And it looked like he made a gallant effort to try to stop this thing and to stop giving the money to Ukraine and what have you.
	But the fact that we don't see an investigation more into where did the money go and why is Zelensky worth billions of dollars now?
	Why is the country of Monaco where all the rich elites of the world hang out with the supermodels?
	Why is the harbor full of yachts that are all Ukrainian now?
	So now they say the bulk of the harbor there is by these new Ukrainian yachts.
	So you have all these Ukrainian fishers over there.
	Yeah.
	And that's from U.S. taxpayer money sent to support the war that went directly into their pockets.
	Danny, wonderful.
	Joe, thank you so much for joining me.
	Everyone, spend as much time with your family and the people you love and care about, because we do not know how much time we have left.
	Use every precious moment wisely.
	And even though I'm an agnostic, I say, God willing, we'll be back on Wednesday.

▲