All Episodes
Previous Next
July 1, 2025 - Jim Fetzer
41:58
Truth vs. NEW$, Inc Part 2 (30 June 2025) with Jim Fetzer, Don Grahn and Joachim Hagopian
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Versus News Incorporated and we're contemplating a pact that all the news is not the truth these days and it should be this one and the same but it's it's so far apart now and it's really something here as we get ready to celebrate July 4th here on Friday.
This is even the 30th.
Half a year has gone and all kinds of things have been happening and more to hold on to your hat as we head into the next half of the year.
And Jim, what kind of news do we have to sum up this half?
What good news do you have?
The right idea, Don.
Let me just comment on that last story.
Sure.
Can you think of anything more immoral and evil than having these people that you're starving come to get scraps of food and then you order your military to shoot these children and poor, desperate people?
That's the bottom.
You're violating international law by starving them and then you're killing them with bullets.
as they come and get boots.
You can't think of anything more evil except maybe what they're doing to children around the world, which I've of course written about.
But you know that's all you need to know about Israel and America because America is funding this.
America, as that last story alluded to, America is financing, quote, this humanitarian one that brings in the sharpshooters and wiping out the poor starving children.
You can't, an ethical person cannot even dream up such evil.
Well, that's what we're up against.
America and Israel governments are this evil.
Get it in your head.
Oh, no.
Walk it out.
Sorry to say you got it exactly right, Joaquin.
Meanwhile, Target BB, Kevin Barrett, talking about this monster of the Middle East.
My friend Gordon Duff, a Marine Corps CI black ops pet and master gunsmith with an amazing firearms collection once told me, I don't mind killing people.
I just got tired of killing the wrong people.
The always quotable Gordon with his darkly humorous hyperbole was making a serious point.
If you work for the American National Security State, your job mostly entails threatening and killing relatively good people on behalf of seriously bad ones.
Donald Trump, a pathetic slave of global Israeli gangsters, has taken that irony to the next level with his hilariously insane threats against Sayyad Ali Khamenei, the supreme leader of Iran.
Even the ultra-Zionist Daily Beast, inured, as we all are, to Trump's ever-escalating lunacy, found Trump's rabbit slobbering a wee bit over the top.
Trump demands thanks for saving Iran leader from ignominious death in Bonker's rant.
Here's a screenshot of his rabbit rant, demanding that Ayatollah Khomeini thank him for saving him from a very ugly and ignominious death.
Meanwhile, Trump says he's not going to stand for Israel prosecuting Bibi Netanyahu.
He's not going to stand for it.
They are virtually joined at the hip.
President Donald Trump said Saturday the United States was not going to stand for the continued prosecution of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on corruption charges.
By the way, it's not because they are true.
It's not because they aren't supported by evidence.
It's not because they're not violations of the law.
He's just not going to stand for it.
It is insanity doing what the out-of-control prosecutors are doing to bleed me Netanyahu, he said, on a truth social pose.
Adding the judicial process was going to interfere with Netanyahu's ability to conduct talks with Palestinian group Hamas and Iran.
Right, of course.
Trump's second point over the course of a few days defending Netanyahu and going for the cancellation of Travis a step further to Israel's legal action to U.S. aid.
The United States of America spends billions a year, far more than any other nation, protecting and supporting Israel.
We're not going to stand for this, Trump said.
Netanyahu, right now, was in the process of negotiating a deal with Hamas, Trump said, without giving further details on Friday.
The Republican president told reporters he believed a ceasefire is close.
More.
Trump threatens to cut off aid to Israel if they don't drop the prosecution of Netanyahu.
I'm reminded of a few years ago when Joe Biden threatened to cut off a billion dollars in foreign aid to Ukraine if they didn't stop their special prosecutor from investigating Barisma, where Son Hunter sat on the board.
This is a form of blackmail or extortion.
It was then by Biden.
It is now by Trump.
President Trump is threatening to cut off aid to Israel if they don't drop their prosecution of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and charges of bribery, fraud, and breach of trust.
Again, I say, it's not because they aren't valid charges.
It's not because they're not supported by evidence.
It's not because they aren't violations of Israeli law.
He just doesn't like it.
The United States of America spends billions a year on Israel.
Let Bibi go.
He's got a big job, a job to do.
This is unbelievably insulting.
But guess what?
Court cancels Israeli PM Netanyahu's trial hearings this week.
Reuters.
The Jerusalem District Court canceled this week's hearing in Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's long-running corruption trial, accepting a request the Israeli leader made, citing classified diplomatic and security grounds.
Yeah, since they're classified, you can't actually reveal what they are or even prove that they exist, where I suspect they do not even exist.
It was unclear whether social media blows by U.S. President Donald Trump influenced the court's decision.
Trump suggested that Trump could interfere with Nether's ability to join negotiations with the Palestinian militant group, Hamas, and with Iran.
But face it, he's really just trying to get Bibi off the hook, no matter what, regardless of Merritt, interfering in the sovereign judicial processes of a different state.
Outrageous, Joachim, your thoughts.
Well, I would say that probably Netanyahu is the most hated national leader of a country in this whole world.
I bet.
The world knows this man is a war criminal, a genocidal murderer, and yet who defends him?
Trump.
So that lumps them both in together.
They're both war criminal, genocidal murderers, and two Ps in the same evil satanic pod.
And there's no if, ands, or buts about this.
This is proof, basically.
And it comes right after the preceding story about what they're doing to the starving children that show up for scraps of food to survive.
And they're killing them with sharpshooters, killing them, picking them off.
It's like, you know, there's nothing further from the light and the darkness.
The darkness is Netanyahu and Trump, and the light is the children that are, unfortunately, the darkness is murdering them.
So you can't get any more of a contrast, you know, between good and evil.
You know, you just can't do it.
I also suspect, and if you try and pay attention to when they stand up for photos about the hype and about, you know, we know about them switching with masks and all kinds of disguises and deception with Biden, you know, well, the same applies to Trump.
I have a feeling that because based on a, when they did a photo op of all the people there at the NATO summit, Trump was a lot shorter than he really is.
He has gone as a six foot three person and the photo in that group photo of NATO, he's shorter than like the Queen of Holland.
And so there's these discrepancies that make us become aware that they have clones or they have mask wearing, you know, masquerading people behind it, actors.
And the way that it seems like the Trump presidency is now being supposedly personified by this person that's one shorter and two, just falling off the cliff of morality in everything he does and says now.
And it makes me wonder whether the true Trump, the one that was supposedly, you know, sheltered away under Cheyenne Mountain at the North American defense, it makes me wonder, where is he now?
Where is this guy?
I think the true Trump might even be missing in action now.
That's what I'm thinking.
Yeah.
Joaquin, let me add to that.
I've identified at least three different Trumps.
There's one, the original has gold hair.
There's a sub-body double who has silver hair.
And then I recently noticed a Trump with perfect teeth compared to a Trump who had bad lower teeth.
I think there are at least three.
So I'm on board with your conjecture.
And I wonder if the peacekeeping Trump, the guy we voted for, has not been replaced by a warmongering Trump who's completely subject to Israeli control.
It would appear to me.
We're confronting that reality.
Whether it's the same guy or not, the transition in attitude, policy, and so forth is so stunning.
It might as well be two different people.
Yeah.
Yeah.
I'm convinced of that at this point.
I wonder, is Trump controlled by the United States people in a law here or by Israel?
I mean, and who's puppeting it?
Isn't that a serious question, Don?
Better see it.
The evidence is already in.
Our Congress is Israeli-controlled occupied territory, Don.
Yahoo, 100% controlled.
Absolutely.
Did CIA Director Radcliffe push bogus Mossad Intel to go Trump into Iran strikes?
Let me just add this is from InfoWars.
Alex Jones is breaking a lot of very important stories.
I suspect he has inside sources, or he's being provided with intel to keep his popularity current.
President Trump was duped into launching a feudal strike on Iran's nuclear facilities as part of a sinister plot organized by Israel's most Saad, according to Max Blumenthal, investigative journalist and editor-in-chief of the Gray Zone.
Dubbed Operation Midnight Hammer by the White House, Indack was sold to Americans as a top gun-style triumph.
But Blumenthal calls it Operation Midnight Scammer, alleging that Mozad, with CIA Director John Radcliffe as its stenographer, in other words, taking notes of the talking points from Mossad, fed Trump fabricated intel drag the U.S. into Israel's war agenda.
Mozada operatives, including Director David Barneya, directly briefed Trump in the Oval Office.
Think about it.
Director of Mossad, David Barneya, directly briefed Trump in the White House.
He doesn't pay attention to his own director of National Intelligence, but he allows the director of the Mossad to brief him directly.
Meanwhile, Blumenthal told Judge Napolitano on judging freedom on June 25th, they allegedly peddled wild claims, such as Iran being weeks away from a nuclear weapon, and even planned to hand a nuclear warhead to Yemeni's Houthis within a week.
A notion Blumenthal source, a Trump official, called absolutely laughable.
The goal to manipulate Trump into authorizing strikes on Iran's Fordo facility, which Blumenthal said were symbolic at best, hitting empty tunnels after RAN had already moved its enriched uranium stockpile.
Meanwhile, the neocons and the never-Trumpers were wrong about Iran.
Now, this actually was written from a point of view of the Zionist perspective.
I'm 35, old enough to remember when the Democrats were supposed to be the party of anti-war, but these days, if Trump says peace, they say war.
But of course, you'll see how dated this is because Trump isn't saying peace at all.
While Trump and the media battle over whether RAND's nuclear sites were annihilated, the focus on a battle damage assessment is missing the forest for the trees first off.
Every American should be thrilled that while on the precipice, we were able to avoid falling into yet another powdered vacuum used to justify yet another regime change forever war in the Middle East.
So far, so good.
Did Iran's uranium enrichment centrifuges get obliterated into bitty smithereens?
Probably.
Is Iran's nuclear program delayed by months or even years?
Yes.
Did we avoid putting boots on the ground?
Yes.
Did Iran and Israel cease bombing each other?
Yes.
These three affirmatives are what matter the most, except that it hasn't played out the way he has presumed.
Meanwhile, Iran says it foiled an Israeli plot to stage a false flag attack on U.S. soil.
By the way, I think that's the greatest threat we confront today.
Iranian Intel claimed it thwarted an Israeli false flag terror plot targeting American citizens on U.S. soil designed to spark a full-scale war between Washington and Tehran.
Well, if that one was defeated, the next one may succeed.
According to Tehran Times, the blot involved detonating an explosive inside the United States and framing Iran through planted evidence with a goal of manipulating American public opinion and dragging the U.S. military into another Middle East conflict on Israel's behalf.
Iranian officials say they were tipped off by a friendly nation and immediately alerted U.S. authorities.
The warning, they claim, helped stop the attack before it could happen.
The explosion was prevented, one source stated, and Tehran's intel services relayed urgent messages directly to high-level American contacts.
But bear in mind, not every American high-level contact is going to be wanting to defeat these fabricated attacks.
There are many, I suspect, who would like to see them succeed.
Joaquin.
Well, in the same way that they listen to false information regarding their justification of actually attacking Iran, the same applies to suddenly, and I've noticed this too, that all of a sudden we're hearing,
oh yes, all those sleeper cells, you got to watch those Persians in those sleeping cells, they're going to activate and they're going to go after Americans and they're going to go after the infrastructure, the water facilities, you know, the grid, you know.
Here we go again, you know, it's all this warmongering, let's go to war against the bad guy, Iran.
You know, it's the same old shit of lies every damn time.
They use it over and over, and they almost every war that America has ever fought has been preceded by a false flag.
And so, yeah, it's all being set up right now as we speak, That there will be a false flag this summer, and we will be going into a hot war versus the Eastern powers that will militarily, if conventional means are used, kick America's ass.
There are a lot of rumors floating something big is going to happen on the 4th of July.
Do not, if whatever happened is blamed on, guess who?
Iran.
Surprise.
Meanwhile, Obama dropped over 26,000 bombs with our congressional approval as Armstrong Economics Report.
Check this out.
A little video clip about what's been going on.
If I'm the president, we will attack Iran.
Whatever stage of development they might be in their nuclear weapons program in the next 10 years during which they might foolishly consider launching an attack on Israel, we would be able to totally obliterate them.
That's a terrible thing to say, but those people who run Iran need to understand that.
And make no mistake, a nuclear-armed Iran is not a challenge that can be contained.
It would threaten the elimination of Israel, the security of Gulf nations, and the stability of the global economy.
It risks triggering a nuclear arms race in the region and the unraveling of the Nonproliferation Treaty.
That's why a coalition of countries is holding the Iranian government accountable.
And that's why the United States will do what we must to prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon.
As long as I'm President of the United States, Iran will not get a nuclear weapon.
I made that clear when I came into office.
And look, I mean, Iran has American blood on their hands.
And what we saw in terms of just this attack on Israel, 200 ballistic missiles, what we need to do to ensure that Iran never achieves the ability to be a nuclear power, that is one of my highest priorities.
So if you have the hell is the anxiety about Iran having nuclear weapons?
Why shouldn't Iran have nuclear weapons?
Plenty of countries have nuclear weapons.
It was because the United States and the Soviet Union both had nuclear weapons that we were in that era of mutually assured destruction known as the Cold War, which introduced worldwide stability.
If Iran had nuclear weapons, Israel wouldn't be trying to push it around, bully it, and destroy it because it would know it itself might suffer comparable destruction.
So I believe if Iran had nukes, actually, there'd be much more stability in the Middle East.
Second of all, well, let's go ahead with comments on that, Joachim.
That's such a fascinating subject.
Look how many presidents have made this claim.
Iran cannot have nuclear weapons.
Why the hell not?
Right.
More indoctrination over and over, decade after decade, same old shit.
In the meantime, what?
Since the early 60s, Israel's had weapons.
Has anybody called them out on it?
No.
Mum's the word.
Oh, that's just a taboo topic to talk about the illegality of not even be participating in the non-proliferation treaty because they're immune from all accountability.
Israel can have nuclear weapons.
Oh, they must defend themselves.
And then, you know, yeah, it's all slanted.
It's all upside down.
And, you know, how many times have we heard this, you know, from Net Yahoo and from every puppet president in America, the same bullshit, you know?
So, yeah, all of this aggressive action has forced basically Iran to get nuclear weapons.
And Russia is helping them out now.
You know, it's called parity.
It means that, you know, the mutually assured destruction is going to be prevented because you don't want to die.
So it's worked between Russia and America for a long time.
So yeah.
And even when there's a skirmish once in a while between India and Pakistan, two nuclear powers, they don't go all the way because they both have nuclear weapons.
So it's only right.
The evil terrorist state Israel should not have nuclear weapons.
But for Iran to have nuclear weapons, yeah, that will keep peace in the world.
And so, yeah, they're moving forward with it.
They did not destroy their ability to upgrade the uranium.
So it's going full speed ahead right now.
Iran's going to have nuclear weapons.
Like it or not, Israel and America.
And they were forced to do it.
This was not by choice.
Right.
They were coerced.
They were pressured into defending themselves against these two countries that are seeking to destroy them and have no doubt about it.
America and Israel have made it clear they want to obliterate Iran.
Just listen to Joe Biden, Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, Kamala Harris.
They're all talking about obliterating Iran.
I think there's a point at which you get the message.
If you're told enough by other powers, they want to obliterate you.
There's a point at which you believe them.
I think we have reached that point.
Meanwhile, we have a report.
New York Times editorial on anti-Semitism is just pro-Israel ad.
Look at see.
Nothing would surprise me less.
On June 14th, New York Times published a long editorial denouncing anti-Semitism, focusing part of its attention on the political left.
Not surprisingly, it was badly flawed.
If at times it stuck with real examples of anti-Semitism from both left and right, their editorial could have been a valuable contribution.
But unfortunately, quite predictably, they include criticism of Zionism and of Israel as part of the problem.
To be sure, they condescendingly allow that anti-Zionism and anti-Semitism are not the same and inform us that they too have condemned mass killings in Gaza.
But with that out of the way, they begin explaining how there have to be limits on just how you can criticize an apartheid state in the midst of committing genocide.
The nation that one could criticize, the notion that one could criticize Israel too harshly under these circumstances is difficult to understand.
And the New York Times fails to show that it's happening.
Here's some excerpts from the editorial.
One explanation is that anti-Semitism has become conflated with the divisive politics of the current Israeli-Hamas war.
It is certainly true that criticism of the Israeli government is not the same thing as anti-Semitism.
This editorial board has long defended Israel's right to exist, also criticizing the government for its treatment of Palestinians.
Since the current war began, we have abhorred the mass killing of civilians and the destruction of Gaza.
Israel's reflective defenders are wrong, and they hurt their own cause when they equip all such arguments with anti-Semitism.
But some Americans have gone too far in the other direction.
They have engaged in what aboutism regarding anti-Jewish hate.
They have failed to denounce anti-Semitism in the unequivocal ways that they properly denounce other bigotry.
Nathan Sharansky, the former Soviet dissident, has suggested a 3D test for when criticism of Israel crosses into anti-Semitism, with the Ds being delegitimization, demonization, and double standards, demonization, and double standards.
Progressive rhetoric has regularly failed that test in recent years.
Americans generally have greater ability to identify Jew hatred when it comes from the hard right and less ability, and comfort to call it Jew hatred when it comes from the hard left or radical Islamism, said Rachel Fish, an advisor to Brandeis University Presidential Initiative on Anti-Semitism.
Consider the double standard that leads to a fixation on Israel's human rights record and little campus activism about the records of China, Russia, Sudan, Venezuela, or almost any other country.
Consider how often left-leaning groups suggest that the world's one Jewish state should not exist and express admiration for Hamas, Hezbollah, and the Houthis, Iran-backed terrorist groups that brag about murdering Jews.
Considering how often people use Zionists as a slur, an echo of Soviet propaganda from the Cold War, and called for the exclusion of Zionists from public spaces, the definition of a Zionist is somebody who supports the existence of Israel.
Joachim, this is really embarrassing.
It's very bad.
It's very shallow.
Zionists are not just those that support the existence of Israel.
They're those who advocate Jewish supremacy, Jewish entitlement, including that all other races only exist to serve the Jews.
So here you have the New York Times debasing itself with frivolous claims that a sophisticated fifth grader could identify and reject your thoughts.
Yeah.
The idea of Zionism is incorporated with this whole concept of Jewish supremacism, that we are the chosen ones, and that as chosen ones by God,
which is a total misnomer in and of itself, they are entitled to wipe out other ethnic groups, expand their territory to cover all of the Middle East, usurping the autonomy and sovereignty of a number of Arab nations, just like Palestine has shrunk into a little thing called Gaza and the West Bank.
And it used to be a country of its own.
And they are the true Semites, by the way, not the Ashkenazi Khazarians that have moved in and pushed their belligerent ways onto the rest of the world.
So yeah, it's a total, again, everything in the news, it seems, can be analyzed from the point of view of everything is inverse.
You know, the New York Times is just a total propaganda voice of what's wrong with the world, basically.
They twist things around.
They do a little nuance of saying, Well, if you're critical of Israel, okay, you're not necessarily anti-Semitic.
But if you go past this and start saying anything about Hamas as a resistance force defending itself from the true terrorists, the Israelis, oh, you're anti-Semitic.
They've been moving in this direction.
You know, I mentioned Palantir earlier.
They have the AI thing going.
They're doing all the data harvesting on every American now.
And so, yeah, if you are critical of Israel, if you're critical of Trump, yep, you're on a list, a shit list to be disposed of, either imprisoned somewhere or perhaps even genocided against.
Anybody against this whole criminal regime that's taken over the world.
Yeah, exactly.
I mean, here the New York Times could have played a role in clarifying, illuminating, and leading the world to a better understanding.
And they've done precisely the opposite, promoting Israeli Zionist propaganda.
Embarrassing.
Meanwhile, our final story for today.
Constitutional crisis.
Analysis suggests Biden's auto pen signatures are not his, likely Jill's, meaning all of those AutoPen signed documents are forgeries.
On February 20th, 2021, a Missouri pharmacist reached out to the Gateway Bonet and shared his observation on Biden's signature to date.
This pharmacist noted, I am a pharmacist in Missouri.
I read a few days ago that none of Biden's executive orders have been posted to the Federal Register.
So I looked then a few days ago.
Those executive orders are showing up.
However, I believe I have accidentally discovered the signature may be a forgery.
Comments.
Very interesting.
Could every document signed with the AutoPen now be called into question?
I think it's the case.
There are various comments about it.
Oh, whatever.
We've already had at least one stolen presidential election, and that was simply swept under the rug and ignored.
This will be to another.
Very interesting.
Let's hope this gets a proper fair court review.
And all of Joe's mumblings are deemed frauds and a race.
Three, I hear another storm coming on.
Fourth, did I miss why the Gateway Bundon didn't share this in 2021?
When they first received the information if true, this is wild.
In my opinion, it's highly probable that that is the fact of the matter, that none of those, with the exception of the Hunter pardon, were actually signed by Joe Biden.
But then again, it wasn't even the real Joe, who appears to have died in 2017, as I have proven again and again on my blog.
The guy in the White House and the guy from Delaware have different shape and size of skull.
They have different ears.
They have different signatures.
They have different social interaction with Joe.
The whole thing is a farce, a fraud.
And every politician in Washington has to know Joaquim.
Yeah.
Well, they pretended throughout the four years, it finally caught up to them, you know, that he does not have his faculties in order.
He has declined in his capacity to process and communicate and absorb information.
He is a vegetable.
I mean, that's, we saw it from the very beginning with the stolen election.
He was not the same person, you know.
Many of us got it a long time ago because the whole controversy of, you know, the being doubles and triples and all of this and him even dying back in 2017, I've heard 2019.
That was pretty much already established before he even became president that there was an imposter in there.
So yeah, all those auto pens, you know, and the ones that have been, you know, handwritten, Jill, the wife, we knew that he was not in charge.
We knew that unelected people were calling the shots.
We also knew that it doesn't matter who the president is, Republican, Democrat, it doesn't matter.
They're never in charge.
They're always puppets.
So, you know, we need to face the reality.
We have some very evil powers behind the throne called the, you know, the man that represents the free world, the American president.
You know, it's all bullshit.
Everything that we see in the way of the quote news from mainstream media is a show.
It's a stage act.
Everything is already plotted in advance.
Nothing comes out organic.
So yeah, nothing.
And that means that everything that's auto-penned needs to be negated.
Whatever laws, whatever actions were taken, that undoes all of them because it wasn't legal.
It wasn't a real president signing it.
So yeah, I think we need to go back and it's amazing because there's so many people out there that have skills with being able to analyze signatures.
I mean, they're experts.
And then it takes this guy wherever from, you know, some regular guy.
Oh, I don't think it matches.
And then to have them hold that information back to everything is staged and presented as a drama theater.
That's all it is, you know.
Yeah, and I will say that Biden, I think, well, I don't think he had the, won the election back in 2020.
They're saying that.
And so, and also, I understand that the White House in Washington, D.C. was not really occupied for the last four years, and everything else has just been a sham and the whole thing.
So Miracle was not a miracle for four years, and all the news and everything else is, I mean, it's outrageous.
You can't imagine it in real time that we could be so far bad.
And Trump, I think Trump is Israel's puppet.
And so anyway, this world, as we get ready to celebrate 250 years of America, what are we celebrating?
What have we done in the last so many years?
It's positive.
We had a fake election with a fake president with a fake signature.
That's what we've had to endure for four years, and we're paying a pretty penny for the price.
Take us out.
Take us out.
Okay, well, this is a little shortened version of the soul for today.
Well, it jampax the things that you need to know about a country called America.
It's been a target of a lot of power brokers who have essentially taken America apart, looks like.
And we're in the midst of a crisis as we get to our 250th year.
So I guess we are getting taken out of the country and everything else.
So thanks so much for watching.
Dream was a powerhouse.
Appreciate the cutting stories that you present so well.
And Joaquim, your intellect and analysis is just fantastic.
So thank you so much for watching.
And hopefully we'll be coming back on the other side of the 250th anniversary here with a great show next week.
Hopefully we'll see.
But this is the time for us to question what is America?
Where are we going?
Where have we been?
And it looks like we've got a lot of work to do to restore true American values to this landmass that we're living on.
So God bless.
Take care.
I want to see you next week.
Share this widely and repost it because if you don't do it, nobody else will.
▲
Export Selection